Skip to main content
PLOS One logoLink to PLOS One
. 2021 Feb 23;16(2):e0245993. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0245993

Investigation and assessment of ecological water resources in the salt marsh area of a salt lake: A case study of West Taijinar Lake in the Qaidam Basin, China

Lu Zhao 1,#, Xiao Wang 1,*,#, Yujun Ma 1,, Shuya Li 1,, Liuzhi Wang 1,
Editor: Ali Kharrazi2
PMCID: PMC7901737  PMID: 33621225

Abstract

The water ecology of salt marshes plays a crucial role in climate regulation, industrial production, and flood control. Due to a poor understanding of water ecology and the extensive mining of salt resources, concerns are mounting about declining groundwater levels, shrinking salt marshes, and other problems associated with the simple yet extremely fragile water ecosystem of salt marshes in arid salt lake areas. This study assessed the ecological status of water resources in the downstream salt marsh area of West Taijinar Lake in the Qaidam Basin, China (2010–2018). Using data from a field investigation, the water ecosystem was divided into an ecological pressure subsystem, an environmental quality subsystem, and a socio-economic subsystem according to an analytic hierarchy process. Each subsystem was quantitatively assessed using the ecological footprint model, the single-factor index, and available data for the salt marsh area. The results showed that water resources were always in a surplus state during the study period, whose development and utilization had a safe status. Surface water had low plankton diversity with no evidence of eutrophication, but its Cl- and SO42- concentrations were too high for direct industrial water uses. Groundwater quality was classified into class V because of high salt concentrations, which could be considered for industrial use given the demand of industrial production. The socio-economic efficiency of water resources was high, as distinguished by decreased water consumption per 10,000 yuan GDP and excellent flood resistance. In conclusion, the ecological status of water resources was deemed good in the study area and this could help sustain regional development. However, since the water ecology in this area is mainly controlled by annual precipitation, it would be challenging to deal with the uneven distribution of precipitation and flood events and to make full use of them for groundwater recharge. This study provides insight into the impact of salt lake resource exploration on water ecology, and the results can be useful for the rational utilization of water resources in salt marshes in other arid areas.

1 Introduction

A salt marsh is a terrestrial ecosystem that is excessively wet or seasonally waterlogged, with saline soil and growing halophytes. Salt marshes are recognized worldwide for their various ecosystem services, including water quality improvement and carbon sequestration [1, 2]. They are present in a variety of environments, such as coasts, estuaries, arid or semi-arid steppes, salt lakes, and even deserts. For example, many salt marshes exist in the Bahía Blanca Estuary in South America [3]. Additionally, there are 28 salt marshes in the St. Lawrence River Estuary (including the Saguenay Fjord) in North America [4] and 757 salt marshes in the Parramatta River–Sydney Harbor in Australia [5]. In China, salt marshes are mainly distributed on the Inner Mongolia Plateau and in Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region in an arid or semi-arid climate, and on the Qinghai–Tibet Plateau in an alpine climate [6, 7]. In particular, the largest contiguous area of salt marshes is found in the Qaidam Basin in southwest China [8].

A salt marsh constitutes a type of ecological interface between water and land, one that provides a vital transitional ecotone for aquatic animals and plants. The salt marsh also functions as a buffer zone for natural flood control [9] and so it has beneficial effects on the local environment. In recent decades, the area of tidal and estuarine salt marshes has dramatically decreased and theirsalt marsh ecosystems have become severely degraded or destroyed due to multiple factors, such as sea level rise, agricultural runoff, and land development [10, 11]. Previous studies have mainly focused on the restoration of tidal or estuarine salt marsh ecosystems and the cultivation of salt-tolerant seedlings or on the structure and composition of biological communities [12]. Plankton communities in salt marshes are robust indicators of environmental quality, and analyzing their levels of diversity from a historical perspective could provide insight into large-scale environmental change [13, 14].

A salt marsh in arid areas differs from tidal and other types of salt marshes in terms of its higher salinity [15], which is mainly due to continuous drought, severe water shortage, and high evaporation in the arid environment. In the Qaidam Basin, the salt marsh areas of salt lakes are rich in salt resources [16], which co-exist in solid-liquid forms and are dominated by liquid ores. The industrial exploitation of these salt resources is mainly done using injection wells coupled with open-channel extraction [17] under drought and evaporation conditions. In this context, water ecology plays a key role in the exploitation of salt resources. In recent decades, ecological problems such as declining groundwater levels and the shrinking salt marshes have become increasingly prominent in the salt marsh areas of salt lakes because of an inadequate understanding of their water ecology and the extensive mining of their salt resources. This situation has shortened the service life of salt mines [18] and led to a waste of resources. Therefore, it is crucial to investigate the current status of water ecology in the salt marsh areas of salt lakes, since this could provide valuable and timely information for improving the rational use of water resources and to facilitate the development and utilization of salt lake resources.

Currently, the Qaidam Basin Salt Lake is one of the largest inland salt lakes in China and harbors much industrial value. It has the longest exploitation history and the most mature technology to extract salt lake resources in China. With the extensive exploitation of its resources, the Qaidam Basin Salt Lake is facing several increasingly prominent problems, namely a drop in groundwater levels, a reduction in salt marsh areas, and an increase in desertification. Generally, when local overexploitation and local surplus co-occur, this adversely affects the comprehensive utilization of salt lake resources and their regional coordinated development. However, if water resources in this salt marsh area could be reasonably utilized to supplement the brine in the pressure-bearing layer, the sustainable exploitation of salt lake could be effectively realized. A case in point is the West Taijinar Lake, a seasonal tail lake in the middle of the Qaidam Basin. An investigation and assessment of ecological water resources in the salt marsh area of that lake has provided insight into the impact on water ecology from exploitation of salt lake resources. Such findings could prove useful for strengthening the rational utilization of water resources in salt marshes of those lakes and in other arid areas.

When compared with other salt marsh ecosystems, the salt marshes of salt lakes are different in terms of water ecology because their water resources are mostly supplied to industrial production. Considering the influence on it from industrial mining alone, the water ecosystem of salt marshes in salt lakes is simple yet extremely fragile. Previous research in the West Taijinar Lake has focused on its salt resources [19], while assessments of water resources in the salt marsh area of this lake are less reported. It is especially necessary to establish an appropriate assessment indicator system based on the functioning of water resources in a given salt marsh area. The analytic hierarchical process (AHP) proposed by Saaty has been widely used for the assessment of water resources in lakes, rivers, and wetlands [20, 21]. This method can be used to reliably assess the current status of water ecology in salt marshes at three criterion levels: ecological pressure, environmental quality, and social economy.

The term ecological footprint refers to the area of productive land required for the resources of productive consumption and waste disposal for a certain population. It indicates the scale of the environmental impact of the regional population and the demand for sustainable living at the current technology and consumption level [22]. Ecological footprint analysis is mainly used to assess the ecological pressure of water resources by measuring their safety, bearing capacity, and sustainable utilization [2325]. Additionally, the single-factor index is commonly used for water quality assessment because of its simplicity and applicability [26, 27]. This method selects appropriate water quality indicators for comparison with standard values, and it evaluates water environmental quality by following the principle of ‘choosing better than worse’. The socio-economic assessment of water resources is often conducted according to the ecological background of the study area.

The objective of this study was to investigate and assess the ecological status of water resources in the downstream salt marsh area of a magnesium sulfate-subtype salt lake: the West Taijinar Lake, of the Qaidam Basin. The AHP was implemented to establish an assessment indicator system with three subsystems based on a field investigation, water sampling, and laboratory analysis. The ecological footprint model and single-factor index were then used to assess each subsystem qualitatively. This study can provide useful information on water ecology in a salt marsh area. Its results could contribute to a better understanding of the impact of resource exploitation on water ecology, and how to facilitate the rational utilization of water resources in salt marshes in other arid areas.

2 Materials and methods: http://dx.doi.org/10.17504/protocols.io.bq3vmyn6

2.1 Study area

The West Taijinar Lake is located in the central part of the Qaidam Basin (Fig 1), at ~2680 m above sea level (93°13’–93°34’ E, 37°33’–37°53’ N). This lake’s water is recharged by the Nalenggele River, whose tributaries run down from the northern slope of Kunlun Mountains [28]. Due to the influence of climate, the runoff of from the Nalenggele River mainly occurs in summer, marked by uneven distribution and dynamic change in any given year [29]. Ultimately, only a small volume of runoff flows into the downstream Taijinar River, which is divided into the East and West Taijinar Lakes. There is obvious seasonal variation in the runoff of surface rivers including the West Taijinar River and its tributary—the West Tai River that receive a mix of precipitation, surface runoff, and underground runoff. The groundwater in the salt marsh area can be divided into intercrystalline latent brine, pore latent brine, and intercrystalline pressure brine [30], and it is mainly recharged by surface water. Because rich mineral resources co-occur in solid-liquid forms [31, 32] and element contents vary at different levels, the surface water and groundwater have distinct colors ranging from colorless to light yellow.

Fig 1. Geographical location of the salt marsh area and spatial distribution of the sampling points in the West Taijinar Lake, Qaidam Basin.

Fig 1

a) reprinted from [CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY] under a CC BY license, with permission from [CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY], original copyright [2020]; b) the basemap reprinted from [ArcMap 10.2] under a CC BY license, with permission from [Esri Master License Agreement], original copyright [2019].

The West Taijinar Lake is a seasonal magnesium sulfate-subtype lake downstream of the Nalenggele River, whose surroundings can be divided into a perennial water area, a waterless area, and a salt marsh area. The salt marsh area (at least 1000 km2) is distributed west of National Road 315, including the area around the lake, the seasonal West Tai River, and the banks of other tributaries (Fig 1). There is almost no human activity or vegetation cover in this salt marsh area, leaving large areas of bare soil directly exposed to sunlight. Due to the influence of Late Pleistocene climate change [33], the average annual precipitation for the last three years is ~128.9 mm in the salt marsh area, while its average annual evaporation (~1200–3500 mm) is 9–28 times higher than precipitation under drought conditions [34]. The soil in the salt marsh area consists of silt, fine sand, sandy clay, and halite, mainly formed by lacustrine deposits [35]. Most of soil here is classified as desert saline soil, whose salt content is high. Severe salinization occurs in the upper soil layer, with precipitated white salt particles visible on the surface.

2.2 Sampling and data collection

Sampling in the study area did not require any permits because our research was supported by the institute and had been approved by Science and Technology of Qinghai Province, China. Both the sampling and field investigation were carried out in the downstream salt marsh area, within 50 km of the West Taijinar Lake, in April 2019. Random sampling of water was conducted at 5–10 km intervals in the accessible parts of the salt marsh area (Fig 1, Table 1). Thirteen surface water samples were collected from the downstream tributary of the West Taijinar River using polyethylene bottles (1000 mL), while seven underground water samples were obtained from existing boreholes using a simple water collector.

Table 1. Geographic coordinates and elevation for the data set.

Types Sampling points Latitude Longitude Elevation /m Sampling points Latitude Longitude Elevation /m
Surface water a# 37.84758611 93.26803889 2622 h# 37.51648917 93.51747139 2636
b# 37.80454889 93.30165194 2623 i# 37.42336111 93.48155556 2702
c# 37.74357222 93.43734722 2688 j# 37.41662222 93.34359722 2718
d# 37.68273333 93.52798333 2685 k# 37.39474722 93.47520556 2706
e# 37.59298500 93.45051194 2634 l# 37.36905556 93.46951111 2709
f# 37.59427500 9348080833 2692 m# 37.34522778 93.46905833 2712
g# 37.54386333 93.50039222 2696
Under-groundwater n# 37.60728806 93.31288917 2621 r# 37.58058333 93.45000806 2608
o# 37.58588194 93.35307083 2633 s# 37.59173028 93.45828222 2615
p# 37.58525139 93.39495083 2627 t# 37.62156583 93.52627694 2627
q# 37.57781500 93.39697778 2626

For the water quality analysis, polyethylene bottles were filled with no less than 1000 mL of water per sample. For the surface water, its pH was measured using a pH meter (FE20; METTLER TOLEDO, Zurich, Switzerland). Suspended solid (SS) was analyzed by the gravimetric method [36]. The nephelometric turbidity unit (NTU) was determined using a turbidity meter (2100Q; HACA, Loveland, USA). Total iron (Fe) was measured by inductively coupled plasma-atomic emission spectrometry (ICAP6300; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). Chloride (Cl-) and sulfate (SO42-) concentrations were respectively analyzed by silver nitrate titration [37] and volumetric method [38]. Chemical oxygen demand (CODcr) was quantified by the dichromate method [39], while ammonia nitrogen (NH3-N) concentration was determined by Nessler’s reagent spectrophotometry [40]. For the groundwater, its pH, NTU, Fe, Cl-, and SO42 levels were determined as described above. Additionally, total dissolved solid (TDS) was analyzed by the weighing method. Sodium ion (Na+), magnesium ion (Mg2+), calcium ion (Ca2+) and total boron (B) were all analyzed by inductively coupled plasma-atomic emission spectrometry.

For the plankton community analysis, 13 surface water samples (at least 500 mL) were collected with a simple water collector from the shallow (5–15 cm below the water surface), medium, or deep (5–15 cm above the river bed) depths in the downstream tributary of the West Taijinar River. Samples collected at the same point were mixed equably and concentrated randomly to give 10–20 mL per sample, followed by filtration with 25 # plankton filter and storage in sealed glass bottles with 1 mL of formol [41]. Qualitative and quantitative analyses of plankton communities were performed using an optical microscope (SAGA SG-300; Suzhou Shenying Optical Co., Ltd., Suzhou, China). The morphology of plankton was observed and identified at the genus level according to a previous study, then the number of individuals in each genuswas recorded [42]. The diversity of plankton was estimated by Shannon’s diversity index (Eqs 1 and 2) [43].

H=pi×lnpi (1)
pi=n/N (2)

where, H’ is the Shannon’s diversity index, N is the total number of individuals, and n is the number of individuals for species i.

Only herbs were collected from the salt marsh area lacking shrubs, trees, or other tall plants. Considering the extremely low density and uneven distribution of plants, the salt marsh area was divided into four units corresponding to the east, west, north, and south directions. Multi-point random sampling was conducted based on the field survey to record the number of plant species, plant height, and coverage area. Photographs were taken to identify plants at the genus level with reference to a site map [44].

The salt marsh area in the Qaidam Basin is at least 40,000 km2, accounting for 1/6 of that basin’s total area. Due to a lack of other data for this salt marsh area and considering its similarity to the Qaidam Basin in terms of water ecology [45], water yield and socio-economic data were obtained from the Qinghai Statistical Yearbook (Bureau of Statistics of Qinghai, 2011–2019) and the Qinghai Water Resources Bulletin (Qinghai Water Resources Bureau, 2010–2018). The total amount of water resources included precipitation, surface water, and groundwater, while water consumption included the water used for farmland irrigation, forestry, herding, fishery, livestock, industry, urban public, residential life, and the ecological environment in the Qaidam Basin during the period 2010–2018 (Table 2).

Table 2. Water yield and socio-economic data of water resources in the Qaidam Basin (2010–2018).

Year 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018
Total amount /108 m3 83.61 62.51 76.54 50.08 51.75 66.32 63.47 70.49 91.29
Total consumption /108 m3 8.1883 8.6142 6.8062 6.7894 5.9168 6.1886 6.1789 5.9478 6.3889
Industrial consumption /108 m3 3.0168 3.0864 0.8787 0.9406 0.6697 0.8981 0.8195 0.7984 0.9077
Ecological consumption /108 m3 0.4054 0.1339 0.0297 0.0303 0.1071 0.1268 0.3245 0.3807 0.4820
Resident life consumption /108 m3 0.1137 0.1311 0.0898 0.0943 0.0957 0.1017 0.1041 0.1208 0.1241
Animal husbandry consumption /108 m3 1.3519 1.6179 2.0529 2.1307 1.8928 2.6364 2.3212 2.3167 2.3855
Farmland consumption /108 m3 3.3005 3.6448 3.7551 3.5935 3.1515 2.4256 2.6096 2.3312 2.4916
Calculated area /102 hm2 257765 257765 257765 257765 257765 257765 257765 257765 257765
Population / p 385899 395888 403067 408200 412461 402069 404275 405658 404892

2.3 Assessment methods

2.3.1 Establishment and weight assignment of the assessment indicator system

The AHP was used to assess the ecological status of water resources in the salt marsh area. Briefly, the assessment indicator system for water resources divided them into a target layer, a criterion layer, and an indicator layer according to their characteristics such as simple water ecosystem, rich mineral resources, and primary industrial use (Fig 2).

Fig 2. The assessment indicator system of water resources based on analytical hierarchical process.

Fig 2

Based on the assessment results of the indicators (C1–C8), the measurement grades of the criteria (B1–B3) were ranked into excellent, good, ordinary, and poor on the Likert scale and respectively assigned integer values 4, 3, 2, and 1. Nine discrimination grades proposed by Saaty were used to quantify the criteria subjectively. Then, the weight values (W), eigenvector (λ), and maximum eigenvalue (λmax) of the criteria were calculated using Excel 2010 (Microsoft Corp., Redmond, WA, USA). The uniformity test was performed using Eqs 3 and 4 [46]:

CI=λmaxnn1 (3)
CR=CIRI (4)

where CI is the consistency indicator; n is the number of criteria (n = 3); CR is the consistency ratio; and RI is the uniform average index (n = 3, RI = 0.52). If CR < 0.10, the uniformity test passed and W was meaningful; otherwise, W had to be reassigned. The value of each criterion was multiplied with their W to obtain the final value of the target, which was then compared with the quantitative assessment of grading standards [47, 48].

2.3.2 Ecological pressure assessment

To assess the ecological pressure of water resources in the salt marsh area, the ecological deficit or surplus and an ecological pressure index of water resources [49] were obtained by comparing their ecological footprint and ecological carrying capacity, using the methodology described by Wackernagel et al. [50]. For a given region, the indicators of ecological pressure were calculated using Eqs 58 [51]:

EFW=N×efw=rw×(W/Pw) (5)
ECW=N×ecw=(160%)×ψw×rw×(Q/Pw) (6)
EZW=ECwEFw (7)
EQ=ECwEFw (8)

where, EFW is the ecological footprint of water resources(ghm2); ECW is the ecological carrying capacity of water resources (ghm2); EZW is the ecological deficit or surplus of water resources (ghm2); EQ is ecological pressure index of water resources; N is the human population(cap); efw is the per capita ecological footprint of water resources(ghm2/cap); ecw is the per capita ecological carrying capacity of water resources(ghm2/cap); rw is the global equilibrium factor for water resources (rw = 5.19, based on the calculations of WWF [52]); ψw is the regional yield factor of land for water resources, namely the ratio of per unit yield in the study area to global production capacity of water resources, (ψw = 0.08, based on data in Table 2); Pw is the global average production capacity of water resources (Pw = 3140 m3/ghm2 [53]); W is the water consumption(m3); and Q is the total amount of water resources(m3), of which (60% was required to maintain the ecological environment).

2.3.3 Environmental quality assessment

The single-factor index was used to assess the environmental quality of water resources in the salt marsh area, because the salt marsh area is rich in mineral resources and the water quality is pristine without man-made pollution [54, 55]. Currently, the water resources in this area are mainly used for industrial production processes, including cooling, washing, and supplying of products, and boiler. Here, eight representative indicators with high detection rates (Table 3) were chosen to assess the environmental quality of surface water, by following “The reuse of urban recycling water—water quality standards for industrial uses (GBT 19923–2005)”. Additionally, 10 representative indicators with high detection rates (Table 4) were used to assess the water quality of groundwater following the “Standard for groundwater quality (GBT 14848–2017)”.

Table 3. Water quality standards for industrial uses based on eight indicators.
Indicator pH SS (mg/L) NTU Fe (mg/L) Cl- (mg/L) SO42- (mg/L) CODcr (mg/L) NH3-N (mg/L)
Standard 6.5–9.0 ≤30 ≤5 ≤0.3 ≤250 ≤600 ≤60 ≤10

SS is suspended solid. NTU is nephelometric turbidity unit. CODcr is chemical oxygen demand.

Table 4. Standards for groundwater quality based on 10 indicators.
Indicator Water quality class
I II III IV V
pH 6.5≤pH≤8.5 55.5≤pH<6.5 8.5<pH≤9.0 pH<5.5 or pH>9.0
NTU ≤3 ≤10 >10
TDS (mg/L) ≤300 ≤500 ≤1000 ≤2000 >2000
Na+ (mg/L) ≤100 ≤150 ≤200 ≤400 >400
Mg2+ (mg/L) ≤10 ≤20 ≤50 ≤200 >200
Ca2+ (mg/L) ≤100 ≤200 ≤400 ≤800 >800
B (mg/L) ≤0.02 ≤0.10 ≤0.50 ≤2.00 >2.00
Fe (mg/L) ≤0.1 ≤0.2 ≤0.3 ≤2.0 >2.0
SO42- (mg/L) ≤50 ≤150 ≤250 ≤350 >350
Cl- (mg/L) ≤50 ≤150 ≤250 ≤350 >350

NTU is nephelometric turbidity unit. TDS is total dissolved solids.

2.3.4 Socio-economic assessment

As a decisions-making tool at economic level, socio-economic efficiency analysis uses productivity, economic and even certain social to explore the utilization efficiency of water resources [56]. The investigation and assessment of ecological water resources is a question of rationalizing the use of resources and, especially, of reducing the use of scarce and limited natural resources, or diminishing the use of other, potentially contaminating resources. In this sense, many studies have been dedicated to evaluating water use efficiency from a productive stance [57, 58], and different economic or socio-economic water use indices with agricultural, industrial, and ecosystem outputs have been proposed, such as water consumption per 10,000 yuan GDP or water consumption per capita [59]. In previous research, most evaluations of the socio-economic efficiency of water resources targeted the management of an agricultural irrigation water system. The socio-economic efficiency of a water resources system is mainly influenced by the latter’s water resource use patterns and adjustment measures, which are controlled by human activities and the development of society and the economy [60]. Therefore, the selection of indicators is context-dependent and should be tailored to the actual situation of a given study area.

In our study, industrial and ecosystem outputs mainly refer to the development and utilization of salt lakes resources. To explore the utilization efficiency of water resources, the socio-economic assessment done here was based on water consumption per 10,000 yuan GDP of industrial companies in the salt marsh area [61]. Additionally, as one of the large drainage areas in the Qaidam Basin, the West Taijinar Lake is an important flood storage and detention area, yet also threatened by extreme flooding, which has certain effects upon local industrial production. The lake’s flood resistance was comprehensively assessed based on data for its slope gradient, bank height, and soil type that were collected from the salt marsh area through a field investigation [62, 63].

3 Investigation of ecological water resources

The investigation of ecological water resources provides raw data for their qualitative assessment. The water ecosystem in the salt marsh area was divided into an ecological pressure subsystem, an environmental quality subsystem, and a socio-economic subsystem, which were interdependent and mutually restrictive (Fig 3). Investigating the background ecological status of water resources in each subsystem could facilitate the establishment of an assessment system and the selection of assessment indicators.

Fig 3. The water ecosystem comprising three subsystems in the study area.

Fig 3

3.1 Ecological pressure subsystem of water resources

The ecological pressure subsystem of water resources indicates whether the utilization of water resources is sustainable for a given area, which is mainly related to the human population density, total amount and consumption of water resources, and land use area. Generally, the ecological pressure subsystem of water resources in our study area is similar to that of the Qaidam Basin. The gross area of the basin is ~0.25 million km2, where the population size remains low (no more than 41 million by the end of 2018; Table 2). Only two industrial parks—Qinghai CITIC Guoan Lithium Development Co., Ltd. and Qinghai Hengxinrong Lithium Technology Co., Ltd.—are located within 50 km of the salt marsh area, where the total population is always never exceeds 1000 excluding residential zones.

The total amount of water resources in the subsystem includes three components: inflow, outflow, and internal exchange. There are two pathways of water inflow into the salt marsh area: natural runoff and precipitation, both featuring dramatic seasonal change. Natural runoff increases with the runoff of the Nalengele River and its tributaries during the wet season (April–September), when floods may occur occasionally [64]. Moreover, natural runoff increases with the melting of ice and snow due to the influence of global warming. Precipitation is the most important source of water in the Qaidam Basin, and it directly determines the amount of water resources and the level of groundwater in the salt marsh area. Based on available data through 2018, the average annual precipitation in the basin is 35.98 billion m3; but since 2013 and 2014 (both drought years), the annual precipitation has increased continuously and reached 48.68 billion m3 in 2018 (Fig 4).

Fig 4. Annual precipitation in the Qaidam Basin (2010–2018).

Fig 4

The water resources flowing out of the salt marsh area are mainly consumed for the production of salt lake resources, at a rate of ~6000 m3/d for the two companies during the manufacturing process. Currently, there is an increasing trend in the daily consumption of water with a continuous drop in the groundwater level and increasing difficulty of salt lake exploitation. Internal exchange consists of evaporation and infiltration. Because there is almost no vegetation coverage, fast evaporation occurs under strong sunlight in the salt marsh area.

3.2 Environmental quality subsystem of water resources

Both the ecological environment and industrial production conditions are affected by water quality. In the salt marsh area of the West Taijinar Lake, changes in water quality mainly arise from natural factors since domestic or industrial sewage is absent. The water quality is altered dynamically across years and seasons, as evinced by varied colors ranging from colorless to light yellow due to different salt ion contents. Based on our field investigation, the vegetation coverage in the study area is less than 0.1% and no animals could be found. Only small numbers of Kalidium plants grow downstream of the West Tai River (Fig 5), while trace amounts of algae are present in the low-lying area upstream of the river. Overall, there are no signs of eutrophication in the river water.

Fig 5. A photograph of halophytic plants (Kalidium) growing in the downstream of West Tai River (taken on 24 April, 2019 around i# sampling point).

Fig 5

3.3 Socio-economic subsystem of water resources

The socio-economic subsystem of water resources is highly dependent on the other two subsystems that provide water for industrial production and socio-economic benefits. Industrial production in the salt marsh area mainly relies on the production capacity of salt lake mineral resources. In 2018, Qinghai CITIC Guoan Lithium Industry Development Co., Ltd. had an annual output of 2.7 million tons of potassium sulfate and 4500 tons of lithium carbonate, with ~1.1 billion yuan of business income, while Qinghai Hengxinrong Lithium Technology Co., Ltd. produced 20 thousand tons of battery-grade lithium carbonate. According to the field investigation, a large amount of surface water is discharged into the salt marsh area during the wet season (April–September), causing floods in some cases. If no flood prevention measures get implemented, this excess water would flow into salt pans, negatively affecting the operation of the industrial area and reducing the economic production capacity.

4 Assessment of ecological water resources

4.1 Ecological pressure of water resources

The ecological footprint, carrying capacity, and surplus of water resources in the study area are shown in Figs 6 and 7. During the study period, the ecological footprint of water resources first decreased (2010–2013) and then leveled off (2014–2018). The highest ecological footprint was 1.4238 × 106 ghm2, in 2011, and the annual average was 1.1206 × 106 ghm2 for the years 2010–2018 (Fig 6, left). Water resources in the study area were mainly consumed by industry and the ecological environment. However, with proposal of “green development”, the local government has paid increasing attention to ecological protection and resource conservation in this area, and the rate of water recycling has increased [65]. Therefore, its proportion of the ecological water footprint increased gradually from 0.57% to 7.54%, while those of industrial water decreased with time. Over the years, the population density remained low in the study area (Table 2), so that the residential water footprint was generally stabled, accounting for ~1.5% of the ecological footprint (Fig 6, right).

Fig 6. Ecological footprint of water resources (left) and the proportion of different water consumption (right) in the study area.

Fig 6

Fig 7. Ecological carrying capacity (left) and surplus (right) of water resources in the study area.

Fig 7

Generally, the ecological carrying capacity of water resources initially decreased and then increased over the study period, except for an abnormal value in 2012 (Fig 7). The lowest value appeared in 2013 (2.8000 × 107 ghm2), likely related to the lowest annual precipitation in that year (Fig 4). After that, the ecological carrying capacity continuously increased, so that it was 82.3% higher in 2018. The ecological carrying capacity of water resources exhibited a trend similar to that of annual precipitation (Fig 4). This result suggests the ecological carrying capacity is positively controlled by annual precipitation in the study area. Because the distribution of annual precipitation is uneven in time and space, it nonetheless remains challenging to make good use of seasonal precipitation and flood resources in the salt marsh for groundwater recharge. The ecological carrying capacity of water resources exceeded the ecological footprint from 2010 to 2018, amounting to an ecological surplus of more than 1.6 × 106 ghm2 (Fig 7). This result indicates that the water resources in the study area are in a sustainable state. The trend in the ecological surplus of water resources was consistent with that of the ecological carrying capacity, suggesting that the overall utilization rate of water resources was sufficient to maintain regional development. The ecological pressure index of water resources remained at less than 0.5, varying between 0.0407 and 0.0207 during 2010–2018 (Table 5). This result indicated that the development and utilization of water resources in the study area is in a safe state relative to the index range [66] and that its ecological pressure subsystem is good (B1 = 3).

Table 5. The ecological pressure index of water resources.

Year 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018
index value 0.0290 0.0407 0.0263 0.0401 0.0338 0.0276 0.0288 0.0250 0.0207

4.2 Environmental quality of water resources

4.2.1 Surface water quality

The genus and quantities of plankton in 13 surface water samples are summarized in Table 6. Dinoflagellates and diatoms accounted for 35% and 31% of all phytoplankton, respectively, while copepods and rotifers accounted for 43% and 42% of zooplankton, respectively. Based on these results, the phytoplankton biodiversity index (H’1) and the zooplankton biodiversity index (H’2) were obtained:

H1=[0.35×ln(0.35)×ln(0.31)+0.21×ln(0.21)+0.13×ln(0.13)]=1.32
H2=[0.15×ln(0.15)+0.42)×ln(0.42)+0.43×ln(0.43)]=1.01
Table 6. Species and quantity of plankton in thirteen surface water samples from the salt marsh area.
Plankton Phytoplankton Zooplankton
Dinoflagellate Diatom Chlorella Cyanobacteria Total Protozoa Rotifer Copepod Total
Total number 393 349 237 151 1130 40 112 115 267
Average number per sample 30 27 18 12 87 3 9 9 21
Ratio 0.35 0.31 0.21 0.13 0.15 0.42 0.43

The biodiversity index values of phytoplankton and zooplankton were extremely low, at 1.32 and 1.01, respectively. This low plankton diversity in the salt marsh area might be related to the low temperature (~3.56°C annual mean temperature) and high salinity (~331.5 g/L) of its saline water [67].

To assess the surface water quality for industrial uses, the measured values of the eight quality indicators were compared with their standard values (Table 3). The over-standard rates of SS and Cl- were 100%, while those of SO42- and NTU respectively were 69.2% and 7.7%. The proportions of SS, Cl-, SO42-, and NTU in the over-standard indicators were 36.1%, 36.1%, 25.0%, and 2.8%, respectively (Table 7). These results suggest that the surface water in the study area could be directly used as industrial water. In summary, the surface water in the salt marsh area of the West Taijinar Lake exhibits a self-purification ability, with no eutrophication present; however, it fails to meet the industrial water standards due to its high levels of SS, Cl-, SO42-, and NTU, which could be related to salt migration driven by the interaction between surface water and saline soil precipitation events and runoff flow processes. Although the surface water is not suitable for direct industrial use, it could be considered for recharging the groundwater in the mining area.

Table 7. Environmental quality of 13 surface water samples from the salt marsh area for industrial uses.
Indicator pH SS NTU Fe Cl- SO42- CODcr NH3-N
Usable or not Yes 13 0 12 13 0 4 13 13
No 0 13 1 0 13 9 0 0

SSis suspended solid. NTU is nephelometric turbidity unit. CODcr is chemical oxygen demand.

4.2.2 Groundwater quality

Based on the 10 indicators of groundwater quality, their measured values were compared with the standard values (Table 4) to assess the water quality in the salt marsh area. The chemical evolution of groundwater is mainly controlled by water–rock interactions and the evaporation–crystallization process [68], and it exists in the form of saline water (TDS >2000 mg/L). Based on its pH, Fe, and NTU levels, the groundwater in the study area met the water quality standards for class I (Table 8). Specifically, the pH levels of all groundwater samples met the class I standard, while the Ca2+ concentrations in 28.6% of groundwater samples complied with the class III standard. For the class IV, the NTU, Ca2+, and Fe levels in 42.3%, 14.3%, and 25% of the samples met the standard, respectively. Generally, TDS, Na+, Mg2+, B, SO42-, and Cl- were the main factors for the deterioration of groundwater quality, which met the class V standard (100%). In summary, the groundwater in the salt marsh area of West Taijinar Lake was affected by salt deposits and classified into class V. Due to high salt contents, the groundwater is not suitable for use drinking water, but it ould be considered for industrial uses based on the industrial water demand. In short, the environmental quality of water resources was poor (B2 = 1).

Table 8. Environmental quality of seven groundwater samples from the salt marsh area.
Indicator Total number of data Number of samples at different water quality class
I II III IV V
pH 7 7 0 0 0 0
NTU 7 2 0 0 3 2
TDS 7 0 0 0 0 7
Na+ 7 0 0 0 0 7
Mg2+ 7 0 0 0 0 7
Ca2+ 7 0 0 2 1 4
B 7 0 0 0 0 7
Fe 7 6 0 0 2 0
SO42- 7 0 0 0 0 7
Cl- 7 0 0 0 0 7

NTU is nephelometric turbidity unit. TDS is total dissolved solids.

4.3 Social economy of water resources

From 2015 onward, the total industrial water consumption declined and total industrial output value rose yearly following the adjustments made to the production technology of Qinghai CITIC Guoan Lithium Development Co., Ltd. and Qinghai Hengxinrong Lithium Technology Co., Ltd. Consequently, the water consumption per 10,000 yuan GDP decreased on a yearly basis. This result is indicative of an increasing trend in the utilization efficiency of water resources over time, which is beneficial for the social economy of water resources in the salt marsh area. According to the “Code for design of embankment engineering (GB50286-2013)”, both industrial companies in the study area are large-scale enterprises, with a level-2 dam capacity for flood control, an extra height for safety at ≥0.8 m, a preliminary estimate of wave climbing at ~0.6–0.7 m, and a total superelevation of ≥1.4 m. The slope gradient of the study area ranged from 20° to 75°, and the bank height was 2–6 m. Based on the field investigation, the soil type was mainly clay soil mixed with magnesia (MgO)—a component of industrial wastes released the salt marsh area while sandy soil comprised less than 10% of the soil composition. Presently, the flood control dam is still expanding and being reinforced to provide excellent flood resistance. Based on our investigation results, the socio-economic status of water resources in the study area was in a good condition during the study period (B3 = 3).

4.4 Ecological status of water resources

Quantitative results of the AHP are summarized in Tables 9 and 10. The W was meaningful (0.05 < CR < 0.1) and the final value of the target was obtained:

A=3×0.524680631+1×0.141550483+3×0.333768887=2.716899

Table 9. Judgment matrix of the criteria for the assessment of water resources.

B B1 B2 B3
B1 1 3 1
B2 1/3 1 1/3
B3 1 3 1

Table 10. Quantitative results of the AHP for the assessment of water resources.

Criteria W λ λmax CI CR
B1 0.524680631 1.616869852 3.053749835 0.026874918 0.051682534
B2 0.141550483 0.427671707
B3 0.333768887 1.02076065

The result indicates that the ecological status of water resources was good in the downstream salt marsh area of the West Taijinar Lake (2.5 < A ≤ 3.5).

5 Conclusions

Based on field investigation, this study established an assessment indicator system for the ecologic status of water resources in the downstream salt marsh area of the West Taijinar Lake. The proposed system comprised one target layer, three criterion layers, and eight indicator layers. From 2010 to 2018, the water resources in the study area had a stable surplus and the overall utilization rate was not high. Generally, the development and utilization of water resources was in a safe state, with low ecological pressure. Despite low plankton diversity and no eutrophication, the surface water did not meet the standards for industrial water uses, while groundwater resources could be considered for industrial uses based on the demand of industrial production. Considering the social economy of water resources, the water consumption per 10,000 yuan GDP declined on a yearly basis and the flood resistance was excellent. In conclusion, the water resources in the salt marsh area were in a good ecological state, which could maintain sustainable development on a regional scale. However, the water ecology in the study area was mainly controlled by annual precipitation.

The findings of this study must take into account some limitations. Firstly, due to time constraints, the surface water and groundwater throughout the Qaidam Basin could not be explored. Secondly, the proposed assessment indicator system for the ecological status of water resources is suitable for salt marshes in arid areas only; however, the index of the target layer can be added or subtracted according to the actual situation of a study area. Finding a way to accommodate and harness the uneven distribution of precipitation and flood could enable their full use for groundwater recharge, but this would be a major challenge to overcome in resolving the problems associated with falling groundwater levels and shrinking salt marshes in arid areas. Based on the investigation and assessment of ecological water resources for the whole basin, it is imperative that future research avenues focus on the sustainable allocation of water resources, namely from rainfall and floods, in the Qaidam Basin.

Acknowledgments

We warmly thank Transcend Envirotech Consulting for the copyediting of the language usage, spelling, and grammar.

Data Availability

All relevant data are within the manuscript and its Supporting Information files.

Funding Statement

This research was financially supported by the Applied Basic Research Project of the Department of Science and Technology of Qinghai Province, China (Grant No.2019-ZJ-7043). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

References

  • 1.MacDonald GK, Noel PE, Chmura PGL. The legacy of agricultural reclamation on channel and pool networks of bay of fundy Salt Marshes. Estuaries and Coasts. 2010. 10.1007/s12237-009-9222-4 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Barbier EB, Hacker SD, Kennedy C, Koch EW, Stier AC, Silliman BR. The value of estuarine and coastal ecosystem services. Ecological Monographs. 2011; 81(2):169–193. [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Negrin VL, Pratolongo PD, Villalobos AED, Botté SE, Marcovecchio JE. Biomass, decomposition and nutrient cycling in a SW Atlantic Sarcocornia perennis marsh. Journal of Sea Research. 2015; 97: 50–55. [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Desroches MB, Lavoie M, Lavoie C. Establishing the value of a salt marsh as a potential benchmark: vegetation surveys and paleoecological analyses as assessment tools. Botany. 2013; 91 (11): 774–785. [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Williams RJ, Allen CB, Kelleway J. Saltmarsh of the Parramatta River-Sydney Harbour: determination of cover and species composition including comparison of API and pedestrian survey. Cunninghamia: a journal of plant ecology for eastern Australia. 2011; 12: 29–43. [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Wenying L, Runhong G, Qiuliang Z,Yuhai C, Xiaojun X, Zhaoyong B, et al. Diversity and evaluation of phytoplankton in salt marsh wetland of Ordos Plateau. Journal of Arid Land Resources and Environment. 2009; 23 (5): 143–148. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Weiying L, Aixia L, Niu T, Runhong G, Qiuliang Z. Study on ecological environment characteristics of desert salina wetland in Inner Mongolia. Guangdong Agricultural Sciences. 2013; 40(21): 158–162. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Liwei W. Study on plant eco-stoichiometry of Salt Marsh Zone in Salt Lake of Qaidam Basin. Beijing: China University of Geosciences; 2019. https://kns.cnki.net/kns8/defaultresult/index (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Dale P, Eslami-Andargoli L, Knight J. The impact of encroachment of mangroves into saltmarshes on saltwater mosquito habitats. Journal of Vector Ecology. 2013; 38 (2): 330–338. 10.1111/j.1948-7134.2013.12048.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Gardner G, Johnston RJ. What does it cost to ensure salt marsh migration? Using hedonic modeling to inform cost-effective conservation. Journal of Environmental Management. 2020; 262 10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.110262 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Campbell AD, Yeqiao W. Salt marsh monitoring along the mid-Atlantic coast by Google Earth Engine enabled time series. PlOS ONE. 2020;15 (2). 10.1371/journal.pone.0229605 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Haobing C, Zhenchang Z, Thorsten B, Liquan Z, Tjeerd JB. Effects of sediment disturbance regimes on Spartina seedling establishment: Implications for salt marsh creation and restoration. Limnology and Oceanography. 2018; 63 (2): 647–659. [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Jacob B, David J, Abigail MQG. A century of change in North Sea plankton communities explored through integrating historical datasets. Ices Journal of Marine Science. 2018; 1: 1–9. [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Virgin SDS, Beck AD, Boone LK, Dykstra AK, Ollerhead J, Barbeau MA, et al. A managed realignment in the upper Bay of Fundy: Community dynamics during salt marsh restoration over 8 years in a megatidal, ice-influenced environment. Ecological Engineering. 2020; 149 10.1016/j.ecoleng.2020.105713 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Wenying L, Qiuliang Z. Study on the Lowest Ecological Water Level of Inner Mongolia Desert Salt Marsh Wetland. Guangdong Agricultural Sciences. 2013; 40 (23): 150–152+166. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Hongbin T, Jun C, Wenbo R, Wenjie Z, Huifang Z. Geothermal constraints on enrichment of boron and lithium in salt lakes: An example from a river-salt lake system on the northern slope of the eastern Kunlun Mountains, China. Journal of Asian Earth Sciences. 2012; 51:21–29. [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Xiaowang W, Haili Z. Development process and industrialization status of West Taijinar Salt Lake. Guangdong Chemical Industry. 2012; 39(1):64+74. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Faman T, Anfu J, Chao Z, Yongxiao S, Cainian L, Shengpeng Z. Development status and countermeasures of brine resources in East and West Taijinar Salt Lake and Yiliping Salt Lake. Industrial Minerals & Processing. 2020; 49(2):48–51+56. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Peipei G. Evaluation of Salt Lake Resources Based on Hierarchical Entropy Model. Xining: Qinghai Institute of Salt Lakes, Chinese Academy of Science; 2014. https://kns.cnki.net/kns8/defaultresult/index (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Haoyang S, SufenW, Xinmei H. An improved analytic hierarchy process method for the evaluation of agricultural water management in irrigation districts of north China. Agricultural Water Management. 2017; 179: 324–337. [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Serbu R, Marza B, Borza S. A spatial analytic hierarchy process for identification of water pollution with GIS Software in an eco-economy environment. Sustainability. 2016; 8 (11). 10.3390/su8111208 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Voet EVD. Books: Our Ecological Footprint: Reducing Human Impact on the Earth. Journal of Industrial Ecology. 1999; 3(2–3): 185–187. [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Veettil AV, Mishra AK. Water security assessment using blue and green water footprint concepts. Journal of Hydrology. 2016; 542: 589–602. [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Pei Z, Mingjiang D, Aihua L, Xiaoya D, Hao W, Yang H, et al. Coupling analysis of social-economic water consumption and its effects on the arid environments in Xinjiang of China based on the water and ecological footprints. Journal of arid land. 2020; 12: 73–89. [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Ewing BR, Hawkins TR, Wiedmann TO, Galli A, Ercin AE, Weinzettel J, et al. Integrating ecological and water footprint accounting in a multi-regional input–output framework. Ecological Indicators. 2012; 23(4): 1–8. [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Xianbin L, Guofeng L, Zhanguang L, Weihua G, Naiyuan G. Water Pollution Characteristics and Assessment of Lower Reaches in Haihe River Basin. Procedia Environmental Sciences. 2010; 2(6): 199–206. [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Xiaoliang J, Dahlgren RA, Minghua Z. Comparison of seven water quality assessment methods for the characterization and management of highly impaired river systems. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment. 2016; 188(1):15 10.1007/s10661-015-5016-2 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Yalian S, Jicheng L. Study on the dynamic changes of brine in West Taijina. Ground water. 2014; (5): 102–103. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Jianjian Z, Yingbiao W, Chengying L, Yanjun W. Analysis on development and utilization of water resources in Nalingguole River of Qaidam Basin. Groundwater. 2014; 36 (6): 166–167. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Yalian S, Haizhou M, Donglin G, Jicheng L, Minggang Z. Isotope tracing method for determination of underground brine parameters of West Taijinar Lake in Qaidam Basin. Ground Water. 2007; (5): 16–18+28. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Haizhen W, Shaoyong J, Hongbing T, Wenjie Z, Binkai L, Tangli Y. Boron isotope geochemistry of salt sediments from the Dongtai salt lake in Qaidam Basin: Boron budget and sources. Chemical Geology. 2014; 380:74–83. [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Junqing Y, Chunliang G, Aiying C, Yong L, Lisa Z, XianHu H. Geomorphic, hydroclimatic and hydrothermal controls on the formation of lithium brine deposits in the Qaidam Basin, northern Tibetan Plateau, China. Ore Geology Reviews.2013; 50: 171–183. [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Fangming Z, Ping Z. Late Pleistocene environmental change in the Xitaijinair salt lake region,Qaidam Basin. Journal of earth environment. 2015; 6(4):201–207. [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Shenglin M. Study on ecological environment protection in Qinghai Lake region. Journal of Poyang Lake. 2010; (4): 68–77. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Yixuan W, Tianyuan C, Chan W, Zhongping L, Shoudong G, Lu C. A Chronological Study on the Sedimentation of the West Taijinar Lake in the Qaidam Basin. Rid Land Geography. 2019; 42(4):876–884. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  • 36.GB 11901–89. Water Quality-Determination of Suspended Substance-Gravimetric Method. Beijing: Standards Press of China; 1990. [Google Scholar]
  • 37.D512-12. Statard Test Methods for Chloride Ion In Water. 2012.
  • 38.GB/T 13025.8–2012. General test method in salt industry-Determination of sulfate. Beijing: Standards Press of China; 2012 [Google Scholar]
  • 39.HJ 828–2017. Water quality-Determination of the chemical oxygen demand-Dichromate Method. 2017.
  • 40.HJ535-2009. Water quality—Determination of ammonia nitrogen—Nessler’s reagent spectrophotometry. 2009.
  • 41.Pompei CS, Hagstrom G, Visser A, Andersen KH. Resource limitation determines temperature response of unicellular plankton communities. Limnology and Oceanography. 2019; 64(4):1–14. [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Si L, Guanpin Y, Baohua Z, Kehou P. Identification of Microplankton in South China Sea with Image-Matching Individual PCR. Journal of Ocean University of China. 2019; 18(1):219–226. [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Bitetti MSD. The Distribution of Grooming among Female Primates: Testing Hypotheses with the Shannon-Wiener Diversity Index. Behaviour. 2000; 137(11):1517–1540. [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Parviz BKL, Dokht NPNM, Dini M, Zad ZJ, Tash IJ. Identification and ecological investigation of aromatic plants for cultivation and domestication. Harvard theological review, 2009; 107(1):81–85. [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Ying Z. Discussion on the current situation of ecological environment in Qaidam Basin and Countermeasures for its protection and construction. Shaanxi Forest Science and Technology. 2014; (1):48–50+71. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Qiyuan J. Mathematical Model. Beijing: Higher Education Press; 2005; 225–231. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Yanzhi X, Jianhua L, Xiujuan Y, Lili Z. Fuzzy comprehensive evaluation of campus environment quality. Science & Technology Information. 2009; (2): 407+409. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Gong L, Chunling J. Fuzzy comprehensive evaluation for carrying capacity of regional water resources. Water Resources Management. 2009; 23(12):2505–2513. [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Dongjie G, Yin S, Wei S, Ruixi Q. Evaluation and prediction of water resources ecological footprint in Guizhou Province. Journal of Chongqing University. 2015; 38 (4): 112–120. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Wackernagel M, Monfreda C, Schulz NB, Erb KH, Haberl H, Krausmann F. Calculating national and global ecological footprint time series: Resolving conceptual challenges. Land Use Policy. 2004; 21 (3): 271–278. [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Rees WE. Ecological footprints and appropriated carrying capacity: What urban economics leaves out. Environment and Urbanization. 1992; 4(2):121–130. [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Ying Z, Shanshan L. The time-series study of Xiangjiang River water carrying capacity based on the ecological footprint of water resource—The ChangZhuTan Region, for example. Advanced Materials Research. 2012; 518–523: 4362–4370. [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Changhai W, Yilei Hou, Yongji X. Water resources carrying capacity of wetlands in Beijing: Analysis of policy optimization for urban wetland water resources management. Journal of Cleaner Production. 2017; 161: 1180–1191. [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Dongfang Y, Lin Z, Wenpeng S, Sentao C, Yinjiang Z. Evaluation indexes and methods for water quality in ocean dumping areas. Procedia Environmental Sciences. 2012; 16: 112–117. [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Yajie H. Application of comprehensive identification indexes in water environment wvaluation of Taihu Basin. Applied Mechanics and Materials. 2015; 730: 199–202. [Google Scholar]
  • 56.José GG, Fulgencio Contreras L, Usai D, Visani C. Economic Assesment and Socio-Economic Evaluation of Water Use Efficiency in Artichoke Cultivation. Open Journal of Accounting; 2013, 2(2): 45–52. [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Romero P, José García, Pablo Botía. Cost—benefit analysis of a regulated deficit-irrigated almond orchard under subsurface drip irrigation conditions in Southeastern Spain. Irrigation Science. 2005; 24(3):175–184. [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Dichio B, Xiloyannis C, Sofo A, Montanaro G. Effects of post-harvest regulated deficit irrigation on carbohydrate and nitrogen partitioning, yield quality and vegetative growth of peach trees. Plant & Soil. 2007; 290(1–2): 127–137. [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Alkhamisi S. A., Abdelrahman H. A., Ahmed M., Goosen M. F. A. Assessment of reclaimed water irrigation on growth, yield, and water-use efficiency of forage crops. Applied Water Science. 2011; 1(1): 57–65. [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Xinyi X, Mei L, Feng W. Health identification of water resources-ecological-socioeconomic system of Baiyangdian Wetland. Advanced Materials Research. 2011; 183–185: 2340–2345. [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Chongxun M, Desuo C, Qunchao D, Xinyi F. Study on the optimized computational model of carrying capacity of water resources based on water efficiency and welfare level. The 2nd International Conference on Information Science and Engineering. 2010. 10.1109/ICISE.2010.5688711. [DOI]
  • 62.Lóczy D, Kis É, Schweitzer F. Local flood hazards assessed from channel morphometry along the Tisza River in Hungary. Geomorphology. 2009; 113 (3–4): 200–209. [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Downs P, Thorne CR. Design principles and suitability testing for rehabilitation in a flood defence channel: the River Idle, Nottinghamshire, UK. Aquatic Conservation Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems. 2010; 8 (1): 17–38. [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Junyun W, Juan L, Mingqiang P. Flood control contingency scheme for tail area of Nalenggele River. YELLOW RIVER. 2018; 40 (11): 53–55. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Jiani D. Status Quo, Problems and countermeasures of water resources in Qaidam Basin. Science and Technology. 2013; (17): 263–263. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Darnault CJG. Sustainable development and integrated management of water resources. Overexploitation and Contamination of Shared Groundwater Resources. 2008; 309–324. [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Muqi X, Hong C, Qinxian J, Yurong G. Preliminary study of plankton community diversity of the Gahai Salt Lake in the Qaidam Basin of the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau. Chinese biodiversity. 2002; 10(1):38–43. [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Yong X, Jingli S, Yali C, Ge Z, Qiulan Z. Groundwater circulation and hydrogeochemical evolution in Nomhon of Qaidam Basin, northwest China. Journal of Earth System Science. 2017; 126(2):26. [Google Scholar]

Decision Letter 0

Ali Kharrazi

26 Nov 2020

PONE-D-20-31417

Investigation and assessment of ecological water resources in the salt marsh area of the salt lake—A case study of the West Taijinar Lake in Qaidam Basin, China

PLOS ONE

Dear Dr. Wang,

Thank you for submitting your manuscript to PLOS ONE. After careful consideration, we feel that it has merit but does not fully meet PLOS ONE’s publication criteria as it currently stands. Therefore, we invite you to submit a revised version of the manuscript that addresses the points raised during the review process.

Please submit your revised manuscript by Jan 10 2021 11:59PM. If you will need more time than this to complete your revisions, please reply to this message or contact the journal office at plosone@plos.org. When you're ready to submit your revision, log on to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/ and select the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder to locate your manuscript file.

Please include the following items when submitting your revised manuscript:

  • A rebuttal letter that responds to each point raised by the academic editor and reviewer(s). You should upload this letter as a separate file labeled 'Response to Reviewers'.

  • A marked-up copy of your manuscript that highlights changes made to the original version. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Revised Manuscript with Track Changes'.

  • An unmarked version of your revised paper without tracked changes. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Manuscript'.

If you would like to make changes to your financial disclosure, please include your updated statement in your cover letter. Guidelines for resubmitting your figure files are available below the reviewer comments at the end of this letter.

If applicable, we recommend that you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io to enhance the reproducibility of your results. Protocols.io assigns your protocol its own identifier (DOI) so that it can be cited independently in the future. For instructions see: http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submission-guidelines#loc-laboratory-protocols

We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript.

Kind regards,

Ali Kharrazi

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Journal Requirements:

When submitting your revision, we need you to address these additional requirements.

1. Please ensure that your manuscript meets PLOS ONE's style requirements, including those for file naming. The PLOS ONE style templates can be found at

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=wjVg/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_main_body.pdf and

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=ba62/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_title_authors_affiliations.pdf

2. In your Methods section, please provide additional location information of the sampling sites, including geographic coordinates for the data set if available.

3. In your Methods section, please provide additional information regarding the permits you obtained for the work. Please ensure you have included the full name of the authority that approved the sampling sites access and, if no permits were required, a brief statement explaining why.

4.We suggest you thoroughly copyedit your manuscript for language usage, spelling, and grammar. If you do not know anyone who can help you do this, you may wish to consider employing a professional scientific editing service.  

Whilst you may use any professional scientific editing service of your choice, PLOS has partnered with both American Journal Experts (AJE) and Editage to provide discounted services to PLOS authors. Both organizations have experience helping authors meet PLOS guidelines and can provide language editing, translation, manuscript formatting, and figure formatting to ensure your manuscript meets our submission guidelines. To take advantage of our partnership with AJE, visit the AJE website (http://learn.aje.com/plos/) for a 15% discount off AJE services. To take advantage of our partnership with Editage, visit the Editage website (www.editage.com) and enter referral code PLOSEDIT for a 15% discount off Editage services.  If the PLOS editorial team finds any language issues in text that either AJE or Editage has edited, the service provider will re-edit the text for free.

Upon resubmission, please provide the following:

  • The name of the colleague or the details of the professional service that edited your manuscript

  • A copy of your manuscript showing your changes by either highlighting them or using track changes (uploaded as a *supporting information* file)

  • A clean copy of the edited manuscript (uploaded as the new *manuscript* file)

5. We note that you have included the phrase “data not shown” in your manuscript. Unfortunately, this does not meet our data sharing requirements. PLOS does not permit references to inaccessible data. We require that authors provide all relevant data within the paper, Supporting Information files, or in an acceptable, public repository. Please add a citation to support this phrase or upload the data that corresponds with these findings to a stable repository (such as Figshare or Dryad) and provide and URLs, DOIs, or accession numbers that may be used to access these data. Or, if the data are not a core part of the research being presented in your study, we ask that you remove the phrase that refers to these data.

6. PLOS requires an ORCID iD for the corresponding author in Editorial Manager on papers submitted after December 6th, 2016. Please ensure that you have an ORCID iD and that it is validated in Editorial Manager. To do this, go to ‘Update my Information’ (in the upper left-hand corner of the main menu), and click on the Fetch/Validate link next to the ORCID field. This will take you to the ORCID site and allow you to create a new iD or authenticate a pre-existing iD in Editorial Manager. Please see the following video for instructions on linking an ORCID iD to your Editorial Manager account: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_xcclfuvtxQ

7. We note that [Figure(s) 1] in your submission contain map images which may be copyrighted. All PLOS content is published under the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0), which means that the manuscript, images, and Supporting Information files will be freely available online, and any third party is permitted to access, download, copy, distribute, and use these materials in any way, even commercially, with proper attribution. For these reasons, we cannot publish previously copyrighted maps or satellite images created using proprietary data, such as Google software (Google Maps, Street View, and Earth). For more information, see our copyright guidelines: http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/licenses-and-copyright.

We require you to either (1) present written permission from the copyright holder to publish these figures specifically under the CC BY 4.0 license, or (2) remove the figures from your submission:

1.    You may seek permission from the original copyright holder of Figure(s) [1] to publish the content specifically under the CC BY 4.0 license. 

We recommend that you contact the original copyright holder with the Content Permission Form (http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=7c09/content-permission-form.pdf) and the following text:

“I request permission for the open-access journal PLOS ONE to publish XXX under the Creative Commons Attribution License (CCAL) CC BY 4.0 (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Please be aware that this license allows unrestricted use and distribution, even commercially, by third parties. Please reply and provide explicit written permission to publish XXX under a CC BY license and complete the attached form.”

Please upload the completed Content Permission Form or other proof of granted permissions as an "Other" file with your submission.

In the figure caption of the copyrighted figure, please include the following text: “Reprinted from [ref] under a CC BY license, with permission from [name of publisher], original copyright [original copyright year].”

2.    If you are unable to obtain permission from the original copyright holder to publish these figures under the CC BY 4.0 license or if the copyright holder’s requirements are incompatible with the CC BY 4.0 license, please either i) remove the figure or ii) supply a replacement figure that complies with the CC BY 4.0 license. Please check copyright information on all replacement figures and update the figure caption with source information. If applicable, please specify in the figure caption text when a figure is similar but not identical to the original image and is therefore for illustrative purposes only.

The following resources for replacing copyrighted map figures may be helpful:

USGS National Map Viewer (public domain): http://viewer.nationalmap.gov/viewer/

The Gateway to Astronaut Photography of Earth (public domain): http://eol.jsc.nasa.gov/sseop/clickmap/

Maps at the CIA (public domain): https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/index.html and https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/cia-maps-publications/index.html

NASA Earth Observatory (public domain): http://earthobservatory.nasa.gov/

Landsat: http://landsat.visibleearth.nasa.gov/

USGS EROS (Earth Resources Observatory and Science (EROS) Center) (public domain): http://eros.usgs.gov/#

Natural Earth (public domain): http://www.naturalearthdata.com/

[Note: HTML markup is below. Please do not edit.]

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented.

Reviewer #1: Yes

**********

2. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #1: I Don't Know

**********

3. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #1: Yes

**********

4. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #1: Yes

**********

5. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #1: - the paper is well written and developed

- the concept of socio-economic efficiency is not very clear from the abstract, please explain

- socio-economic efficiency is not well discussed within the paper, please expand on this concept, what is being measured, what are the limitations of this concept and where has it been used before?

- the motivation for this study area is not clear, I recommend the authors to emphasize why did the authors decide to examine this study area

- I recommend authors to discuss the limitations found in the study

- I recommend authors to discuss future research avenues

- please improve the language and flow of the paper for minor errors and typos

**********

6. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: No

[NOTE: If reviewer comments were submitted as an attachment file, they will be attached to this email and accessible via the submission site. Please log into your account, locate the manuscript record, and check for the action link "View Attachments". If this link does not appear, there are no attachment files.]

While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com/. PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Registration is free. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email PLOS at figures@plos.org. Please note that Supporting Information files do not need this step.

PLoS One. 2021 Feb 23;16(2):e0245993. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0245993.r002

Author response to Decision Letter 0


8 Jan 2021

Ms. Ref. No.: PONE-D-20-31417

Title: Investigation and assessment of ecological water resources in the salt marsh area of the salt lake—A case study of the West Taijinar Lake in Qaidam Basin, China

Journal: PLOS ONE

Dear Editor:

We have carefully considered the comments from the reviewers, and have revised the manuscript accordingly. We appreciate the editor and reviewers for the positive and constructive comments and suggestions on our manuscript. The inclusion of reviewers’ comments has improved the quality of our work.

We have highlighted all changes in the text in red color in my manuscript labeled “Revised Manuscript with Track Changes”. A point-by-point response to the editor/reviewers’ comments is given below, including line and page numbers in the revised manuscript. The line and page numbers refer to the numbers in my manuscript labeled “Revised Manuscript with Track Changes”. Please feel free to contact us if you need any further information.

Sincerely yours,

Xiao Wang

Department: Chemical Engineering of Qinghai University

Address: Qinghai University No. 251 Ningda Road Chengbei District Xining City of Qinghai Province in China, 810016

Tel.: 86-15709781855; E-mail: wangxiao1969@163.com

Response to Comments

Journal Requirements:

1. If you would like to make changes to your financial disclosure, please include your updated statement in your cover letter. Guidelines for resubmitting your figure files are available below the reviewer comments at the end of this letter.

Response: We would not like to make changes to our financial disclosure.

2. If applicable, we recommend that you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io to enhance the reproducibility of your results. Protocols.io assigns your protocol its own identifier (DOI) so that it can be cited independently in the future. For instructions see: http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submission-guidelines#loc-laboratory-protocols

Response: We have deposited our laboratory protocols in protocols.io and have added DOI in materials and methods in page 6, line 143.

DOI is http://dx.doi.org/10.17504/protocols.io.bq3vmyn6

3. Please ensure that your manuscript meets PLOS ONE's style requirements, including those for file naming. The PLOS ONE style templates can be found at

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=wjVg/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_main_body.pdf and https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=ba62/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_title_authors_affiliations.pdf

Response: We have modified the manuscript with reference to PLOS ONE's style requirements, including those for file naming. Also, we have made all data underlying the findings in our manuscript fully available and the statistical analysis has been performed appropriately and rigorously. Our figures have verified using PACE.

Track Changes is as follows:

1. Title page

2. Figures and Tables

3. Language Usage, Spelling, and Grammar

4. References

5. Styles, including those for file naming

6. The contents proposed by the reviewer that needs to be revised

7. Acknowledgements

4. In your Methods section, please provide additional location information of the sampling sites, including geographic coordinates for the data set if available.

Response: Additional location information of the sampling sites, including geographic coordinates and elevation for the data set has been added in Table 1 in page 8, line 200.

Table 1. Geographic coordinates and elevation for the data set

Types Sampling points Latitude Longitude Elevation

/m Sampling points Latitude Longitude Elevation

/m

Surface water a# 37.84758611 93.26803889 2622 h# 37.51648917 93.51747139 2636

b# 37.80454889 93.30165194 2623 i# 37.42336111 93.48155556 2702

c# 37.74357222 93.43734722 2688 j# 37.41662222 93.34359722 2718

d# 37.68273333 93.52798333 2685 k# 37.39474722 93.47520556 2706

e# 37.59298500 93.45051194 2634 l# 37.36905556 93.46951111 2709

f# 37.59427500 9348080833 2692 m# 37.34522778 93.46905833 2712

g# 37.54386333 93.50039222 2696

Under-groundwater n# 37.60728806 93.31288917 2621 r# 37.58058333 93.45000806 2608

o# 37.58588194 93.35307083 2633 s# 37.59173028 93.45828222 2615

p# 37.58525139 93.39495083 2627 t# 37.62156583 93.52627694 2627

q# 37.57781500 93.39697778 2626

5. In your Methods section, please provide additional information regarding the permits you obtained for the work. Please ensure you have included the full name of the authority that approved the sampling sites access and, if no permits were required, a brief statement explaining why.

Response: Sampling does not need permits, because the research supported by the institute has been approved by Science and Technology of Qinghai Province, China. So a brief statement has been added in page 7, line 178-179.

The added statement is as follows:

“Sampling in the study area did not require any permits because our research was supported by the institute and had been approved by Science and Technology of Qinghai Province, China.”

6. We suggest you thoroughly copyedit your manuscript for language usage, spelling, and grammar. If you do not know anyone who can help you do this, you may wish to consider employing a professional scientific editing service.

Whilst you may use any professional scientific editing service of your choice, PLOS has partnered with both American Journal Experts (AJE) and Editage to provide discounted services to PLOS authors. Both organizations have experience helping authors meet PLOS guidelines and can provide language editing, translation, manuscript formatting, and figure formatting to ensure your manuscript meets our submission guidelines. To take advantage of our partnership with AJE, visit the AJE website (http://learn.aje.com/plos/) for a 15% discount off AJE services. To take advantage of our partnership with Editage, visit the Editage website (www.editage.com) and enter referral code PLOSEDIT for a 15% discount off Editage services. If the PLOS editorial team finds any language issues in text that either AJE or Editage has edited, the service provider will re-edit the text for free.

Upon resubmission, please provide the following:

� The name of the colleague or the details of the professional service that edited your manuscript

� A copy of your manuscript showing your changes by either highlighting them or using track changes (uploaded as a *supporting information* file)

� A clean copy of the edited manuscript (uploaded as the new *manuscript* file)

Response: We have thoroughly copyedited our manuscript for language usage, spelling, and grammar with the help of Transcend Envirotech Consulting. There is a proof in the supporting information named Editing Certificate.

7. We note that you have included the phrase “data not shown” in your manuscript. Unfortunately, this does not meet our data sharing requirements. PLOS does not permit references to inaccessible data. We require that authors provide all relevant data within the paper, Supporting Information files, or in an acceptable, public repository. Please add a citation to support this phrase or upload the data that corresponds with these findings to a stable repository (such as Figshare or Dryad) and provide and URLs, DOIs, or accession numbers that may be used to access these data. Or, if the data are not a core part of the research being presented in your study, we ask that you remove the phrase that refers to these data.

Response: In manuscript, “data not shown” are in page 17, line 409 and page 21, line 467.

For the first one, “data not shown” has been deleted and the ecological pressure index of water resources calculated according to Eq. 8 has been shown in Table 5.

Table 5 The ecological pressure index of water resources

Year 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018

index value 0.0290 0.0407 0.0263 0.0401 0.0338 0.0276 0.0288 0.0250 0.0207

For the latter, it does not matter for “data not shown” deletion and “data not shown” has been deleted. The trend of the water consumption per 10,000 yuan GDP of Qinghai CITIC Guoan Lithium Development Co., Ltd. and Qinghai Hengxinrong Lithium Technology Co., Ltd. were derived from the trend of total industrial water consumption and total industrial output value.

8. PLOS requires an ORCID iD for the corresponding author in Editorial Manager on papers submitted after December 6th, 2016. Please ensure that you have an ORCID iD and that it is validated in Editorial Manager. To do this, go to ‘Update my Information’ (in the upper left-hand corner of the main menu), and click on the Fetch/Validate link next to the ORCID field. This will take you to the ORCID site and allow you to create a new iD or authenticate a pre-existing iD in Editorial Manager. Please see the following video for instructions on linking an ORCID iD to your Editorial Manager account: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_xcclfuvtxQ

Response: An ORCID iD has been validated in Editorial Manager. The ORCID iD registered to my address wangxiao1969@163.com is https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7883-5409.

9. We note that [Figure(s) 1] in your submission contain map images which may be copyrighted. All PLOS content is published under the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0), which means that the manuscript, images, and Supporting Information files will be freely available online, and any third party is permitted to access, download, copy, distribute, and use these materials in any way, even commercially, with proper attribution. For these reasons, we cannot publish previously copyrighted maps or satellite images created using proprietary data, such as Google software (Google Maps, Street View, and Earth). For more information, see our copyright guidelines: http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/licenses-and-copyright.

We require you to either (1) present written permission from the copyright holder to publish these figures specifically under the CC BY 4.0 license, or (2) remove the figures from your submission:

1. You may seek permission from the original copyright holder of Figure(s) [1] to publish the content specifically under the CC BY 4.0 license.

We recommend that you contact the original copyright holder with the Content Permission Form (http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=7c09/content-permission-form.pdf) and the following text:

“I request permission for the open-access journal PLOS ONE to publish XXX under the Creative Commons Attribution License (CCAL) CC BY 4.0 (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Please be aware that this license allows unrestricted use and distribution, even commercially, by third parties. Please reply and provide explicit written permission to publish XXX under a CC BY license and complete the attached form.”

Please upload the completed Content Permission Form or other proof of granted permissions as an "Other" file with your submission.

In the figure caption of the copyrighted figure, please include the following text: “Reprinted from [ref] under a CC BY license, with permission from [name of publisher], original copyright [original copyright year].”

2. If you are unable to obtain permission from the original copyright holder to publish these figures under the CC BY 4.0 license or if the copyright holder’s requirements are incompatible with the CC BY 4.0 license, please either i) remove the figure or ii) supply a replacement figure that complies with the CC BY 4.0 license. Please check copyright information on all replacement figures and update the figure caption with source information. If applicable, please specify in the figure caption text when a figure is similar but not identical to the original image and is therefore for illustrative purposes only.

The following resources for replacing copyrighted map figures may be helpful:

USGS National Map Viewer (public domain): http://viewer.nationalmap.gov/viewer/

The Gateway to Astronaut Photography of Earth (public domain): http://eol.jsc.nasa.gov/sseop/clickmap/

Maps at the CIA (public domain): https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/index.html and https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/cia-maps-publications/index.html

NASA Earth Observatory (public domain): http://earthobservatory.nasa.gov/

Landsat: http://landsat.visibleearth.nasa.gov/

USGS EROS (Earth Resources Observatory and Science (EROS) Center) (public domain): http://eros.usgs.gov/#

Natural Earth (public domain): http://www.naturalearthdata.com/

Response: Figure 1 has been replaced and modified. The figure caption was changed to “Fig 1. Geographical location of the salt marsh area and spatial distribution of the sampling points in the West Taijinar Lake, Qaidam Basin, a) reprinted from [CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY] under a CC BY license, with permission from [CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY], original copyright [2020]; b) the basemap reprinted from [ArcMap 10.2] under a CC BY license, with permission from [Esri Master License Agreement], original copyright [2019]” in page 6-7, line 159-163.

The a) has been replaced with a map downloaded from Maps at the CIA (public domain) (https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/index.html).

The b) was completed with ArcGIS 10.2 software, and the basemap was directly added using the ArcGIS Online function in ArcMap 10.2. The latitude and longitude, sampling points, wind rose, scaleplate, and geographic names were all added and perfected by the authors. ArcGIS 10.2 software is licensed under the Esri Master License Agreement.

The introduction of the software includes “The map was developed by National Geographic and Esri and reflects the distinctive National Geographic cartographic style in a multi-scale reference map of the world. The map was authored using data from a variety of leading data providers, including Garmin, HERE, UNEP-WCMC, NASA, ESA, USGS, and others.” More detailed contents can be viewed through the website: https://www.arcgis.com/home/item.html?id=b9b1b422198944fbbd5250b3241691b6

Moreover, Esri/esri-loader is licensed under the Apache License 2.0. the Apache License 2.0 clearly stated that the information are freely available online, and any third party is permitted to access, download, copy, distribute, and use these materials in any way, even commercially, with proper attribution. More detailed contents can be viewed through the website:

https://github.com/Esri/esri-loader/blob/master/LICENSE

Based on the above information, we think Figure 1 can be published specifically under the CC BY 4.0 license.

Reviewer #1:

1. The paper is well written and developed

Response: Thank you for very much your positive comments. We appreciate your great input, which has helped us substantially improve the quality of our work. Please also see our point-by-point response to your comments.

2. The concept of socio-economic efficiency is not very clear from the abstract, please explain

Response: Investigation and assessment of ecological water resources is a question of rationalizing the use of resources and, especially, of reducing the use of scarce and limiting natural resources, or diminishing the use of other, potentially contaminating resources. In this sense, many studies have been dedicated to evaluating water use efficiency from a productive stance, and different economic or socio-economic water use indices with agricultural, industrial and ecosystem outputs have proposed such as water consumption per 10,000 yuan GDP or water consumption per capita. In this study, industrial and ecosystem outputs mainly refer to the development and utilization of the resources of salt lakes.

As a decisions-making tool at economic level, socio-economic efficiency means using indicators of productivity, economic and even social to explore the utilization efficiency of water resources.

The references of the above contents are as follows:

Romero P, José García, Pablo Botía. 2005. Cost–benefit analysis of a regulated deficit-irrigated almond orchard under subsurface drip irrigation conditions in Southeastern Spain. Irrigation Science, 24(3):175-184.

Dichio B, Xiloyannis C, Sofo A, et al. 2007. Effects of post-harvest regulated deficit irrigation on carbohydrate and nitrogen partitioning, yield quality and vegetative growth of peach trees. Plant & Soil, 290(1-2):127-137.

Alkhamisi S. A., Abdelrahman H. A., Ahmed M., et al. 2011. Assessment of reclaimed water irrigation on growth, yield, and water-use efficiency of forage crops. Applied Water Science, 1(1):57-65.

José G G, Fulgencio Contreras L, Usai D, et al. 2013. Economic Assesment and Socio-Economic Evaluation of Water Use Efficiency in Artichoke Cultivation. Open Journal of Accounting, 2013, 2(2):45-52.

3. Socio-economic efficiency is not well discussed within the paper, please expand on this concept, what is being measured, what are the limitations of this concept and where has it been used before?

Response: The concept and application of socio-economic efficiency and the selective basis of indicators were added in page 13-14, line 293-313. The references were added to the list of references in page 29. The contents are as follows:

“As a decisions-making tool at economic level, socio-economic efficiency analysis uses productivity, economic and even certain social to explore the utilization efficiency of water resources [56]. The investigation and assessment of ecological water resources is a question of rationalizing the use of resources and, especially, of reducing the use of scarce and limited natural resources, or diminishing the use of other, potentially contaminating resources. In this sense, many studies have been dedicated to evaluating water use efficiency from a productive stance [57,58], and different economic or socio-economic water use indices with agricultural, industrial, and ecosystem outputs have been proposed, such as water consumption per 10,000 yuan GDP or water consumption per capita [59]. In previous research, most evaluations of the socio-economic efficiency of water resources targeted the management of an agricultural irrigation water system. The socio-economic efficiency of a water resources system is mainly influenced by the latter’s water resource use patterns and adjustment measures, which are controlled by human activities and the development of society and the economy [60]. Therefore, the selection of indicators is context-dependent and should be tailored to the actual situation of a given study area.

In our study, industrial and ecosystem outputs mainly refer to the development and utilization of salt lakes resources.

Additionally, as one of the large drainage areas in the Qaidam Basin, the West Taijinar Lake is an important flood storage and detention area, yet also threatened by extreme flooding, which has certain effects upon local industrial production.”

At the same time, the discussion of the water consumption per 10,000 yuan GDP was enriched in page 21, line 463-467. The contents are as follows:

“From 2015 onward, the total industrial water consumption declined and total industrial output value rose yearly following the adjustments made to the production technology of Qinghai CITIC Guoan Lithium Development Co., Ltd. and Qinghai Hengxinrong Lithium Technology Co., Ltd. Consequently, the water consumption per 10,000 yuan GDP decreased on a yearly basis.”

The measurement of the flood control dam and socio-economic efficiency has been discussed in detail in page 21, line 469-475.

4. The motivation for this study area is not clear, I recommend the authors to emphasize why did the authors decide to examine this study area.

Response: In the abstract, I have explained the problems existing in the arid salt marsh area and the significance of this study in page 2, line 25-29 and line 47-49. At the same time, I elaborated the key role of water ecology in the exploitation of salt resources in the introduction in page 4, line 79-94. I also added the motivation for the study of West Taijinar Lake in page 4-5, line 95-108. The added contents are as follows:

“Currently, the Qaidam Basin Salt Lake is one of the largest inland salt lakes in China and harbors much industrial value. It has the longest exploitation history and the most mature technology to extract salt lake resources in China. With the extensive exploitation of its resources, the Qaidam Basin Salt Lake is facing several increasingly prominent problems, namely a drop in groundwater levels, a reduction in salt marsh areas, and an increase in desertification. Generally, when local overexploitation and local surplus co-occur, this adversely affects the comprehensive utilization of salt lake resources and their regional coordinated development. However, if water resources in this salt marsh area could be reasonably utilized to supplement the brine in the pressure-bearing layer, the sustainable exploitation of salt lake could be effectively realized. A case in point is the West Taijinar Lake, a seasonal tail lake in the middle of the Qaidam Basin. An investigation and assessment of ecological water resources in the salt marsh area of that lake has provided insight into the impact on water ecology from exploitation of salt lake resources. Such findings could prove useful for strengthening the rational utilization of water resources in salt marshes of those lakes and in other arid areas.”

5. I recommend authors to discuss the limitations found in the study.

Response: We have discussed the limitations found in the study in conclusion in page 22-23, line 500-504. The contents are as follows:

“The findings of this study must take into account some limitations. Firstly, due to time constraints, the surface water and groundwater throughout the Qaidam Basin could not be explored. Secondly, the proposed assessment indicator system for the ecological status of water resources is suitable for salt marshes in arid areas only; however, the index of the target layer can be added or subtracted according to the actual situation of a study area.”

6. I recommend authors to discuss future research avenues.

Response: The conclusion has raised the great challenges for the future of arid areas in page 23, line 504-507. The contents are as follows:

“Finding a way to accommodate and harness the uneven distribution of precipitation and flood could enable their full use for groundwater recharge, but this would be a major challenge to overcome in resolving the problems associated with falling groundwater levels and shrinking salt marshes in arid areas.”

Meanwhile, other future research avenues were discussed in conclusion in page 23, line 507-509:

“Based on the investigation and assessment of ecological water resources for the whole basin, it is imperative that future research avenues focus on the sustainable allocation of water resources, namely from rainfall and floods, in the Qaidam Basin.”

7. Please improve the language and flow of the paper for minor errors and typos.

Response: We have thoroughly copyedited our manuscript for language usage, spelling, and grammar with the help of Transcend Envirotech Consulting.

Attachment

Submitted filename: Response to Reviewers.docx

Decision Letter 1

Ali Kharrazi

12 Jan 2021

Investigation and assessment of ecological water resources in the salt marsh area of a salt lake: A case study of West Taijinar Lake in the Qaidam Basin, China

PONE-D-20-31417R1

Dear Dr. Wang,

We’re pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been judged scientifically suitable for publication and will be formally accepted for publication once it meets all outstanding technical requirements.

Within one week, you’ll receive an e-mail detailing the required amendments. When these have been addressed, you’ll receive a formal acceptance letter and your manuscript will be scheduled for publication.

An invoice for payment will follow shortly after the formal acceptance. To ensure an efficient process, please log into Editorial Manager at http://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/, click the 'Update My Information' link at the top of the page, and double check that your user information is up-to-date. If you have any billing related questions, please contact our Author Billing department directly at authorbilling@plos.org.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please notify them about your upcoming paper to help maximize its impact. If they’ll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team as soon as possible -- no later than 48 hours after receiving the formal acceptance. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information, please contact onepress@plos.org.

Kind regards,

Ali Kharrazi

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Additional Editor Comments (optional):

Reviewers' comments:

Acceptance letter

Ali Kharrazi

15 Jan 2021

PONE-D-20-31417R1

Investigation and assessment of ecological water resources in the salt marsh area of a salt lake: A case study of West Taijinar Lake in the Qaidam Basin, China

Dear Dr. Wang:

I'm pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been deemed suitable for publication in PLOS ONE. Congratulations! Your manuscript is now with our production department.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please let them know about your upcoming paper now to help maximize its impact. If they'll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team within the next 48 hours. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information please contact onepress@plos.org.

If we can help with anything else, please email us at plosone@plos.org.

Thank you for submitting your work to PLOS ONE and supporting open access.

Kind regards,

PLOS ONE Editorial Office Staff

on behalf of

Dr. Ali Kharrazi

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Associated Data

    This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

    Supplementary Materials

    Attachment

    Submitted filename: Response to Reviewers.docx

    Data Availability Statement

    All relevant data are within the manuscript and its Supporting Information files.


    Articles from PLoS ONE are provided here courtesy of PLOS

    RESOURCES