Skip to main content
The Journal of Reproduction and Development logoLink to The Journal of Reproduction and Development
editorial
. 2020 Nov 9;67(1):1–3. doi: 10.1262/jrd.2020-101

Clinical prospects proposing an increase in the luteolytic dose of prostaglandin F in dairy cattle

Fernando LÓPEZ-GATIUS 1,2
PMCID: PMC7902216  PMID: 33162429

Abstract

Over the past few decades, the luteolytic dose of prostaglandin F (PGF) and its analogs, used to synchronize estrus for fixed-time insemination in dairy cattle, have remained unchanged. Given the beneficial effects of PGF on a young corpus luteum and on multiple ovulations in a fixed-time insemination protocol, and its therapeutic abortive effects on multiple ovulations in pregnant cows, we propose the use of a double PGF dose or two PGF treatments 24 hours apart. Ultrasonography procedures serve to identify luteal structures and may therefore help to determine the best PGF dose to improve the fertility of high-producing dairy cows.

Keywords: Additional corpora lutea, Cloprostenol, Double ovulation, Fixed-time artificial insemination (FTAI), Twin pregnancy

Introduction

In the 1970s, there were extensive reports of prostaglandin F (PGF) and its analogues being luteolytic in cattle, with the degree of fertility of the induced estrus similar to that achieved in previous studies [1, 2] or higher than that of naturally occurring estrus [3]. Traditionally, the use of these substances was based on shortening the luteal phase. This meant that a treatment was only effective in the presence of a functional corpus luteum (CL), and if done within 5–16 days of a normal estrous cycle [4], which is approximately 60% of a population cycling at random. The dose-response effect for luteolytic agents synchronizing estrus was also established in the 1970s: PGF, 25 mg; cloprostenol, 500 µg; and fenprostalene, 1 mg [1, 2]. These luteolytic doses remained unchanged with the development of different estrus synchronization protocols within the last 50 years of dairy cattle rearing. This would appear to mean that the success of treatment with luteolytic products has reached a plateau. However, higher metabolic clearance rates of steroid hormones and alterations in reproductive endocrinology have been linked to the process of high milk production [5,6,7]. Consequently, exogenous prostaglandins are likely to be exposed to a rapid metabolism or a less significant response excluding increased milk production. In fact, although endogenous PGF entering the pulmonary circulation is enzymatically inactivated in the lungs [8], biliary excretion is a major route of elimination of cloprostenol [9]. The question therefore arises as to whether one should accept current levels of success or, alternately, introduce new findings leading to the modification of prostaglandin dose. Moreover, while an important body of literature shows that the recommended PGF dose is still sufficient, some clinical reflections based on our experimental studies and extensive field-scale experience are provided to: 1) emphasize the features of current synchronization protocols for fixed-time artificial insemination (FTAI), 2) highlight the challenge of multiple ovulations associated with high milk production, and 3) improve the control of pregnancies.

Breeding synchronization protocols in dairy herds

Increased herd size combined with intensive milking and feeding, poor detection of estrus, and increased post-partum anestrus, make individual animal monitoring very difficult. These are cogent reasons why breeding synchronization protocols for FTAI have become routine components of the reproductive management of dairy herds. For example, the PGF-based ovulation synchronization protocol, denoted “Ovsynch,” is extensively applied for FTAI of lactating dairy cows [10, 11]. The Ovsynch method consists of a gonadotrophin-releasing hormone (GnRH) treatment given at random stages of the estrous cycle (to synchronize a follicular wave), followed by PGF seven days later (to stimulate the luteolytic effect on a CL). A second dose of GnRH is administered 36–48 h after PGF treatment (in order to synchronize ovulation) and the cows are inseminated 16–20 h later without detection of estrus [10, 11]. However, about 60% of cows ovulate after the first GnRH treatment and form a new CL so that the CL age at PGF treatment is about 5–6 days [12]. This is why incomplete luteal regression after treatment, with a single dose of PGF, during an Ovsynch protocol decreases fertility. Another reason for the insufficient results of the Ovsynch protocol is that it should not begin at random stages of the estrous cycle. For example, Ovsynch applied in the last third of the estrous cycle is not sufficient to ensure synchronization of estrus and ovulation in each animal treated [13].

A meta-analytical assessment was recently performed with the objective of evaluating the effects of adding a second PGF treatment 24 h after the first, during the Ovsynch protocol, on luteal regression and reproductive performance in lactating dairy cows [14]. An additional PGF treatment yielded an increase of 11.6% on luteal regression and 4.6% on pregnancies per insemination [14]. The fact that 1.5 [15] or 2 [16] doses of d-cloprostenol favored luteolysis when administered to cows with a 5- to 6-day-old CL, reinforces these results. Furthermore, a double dose of PGF administered 3.5 days post-ovulation resulted in partial luteolysis in 78% of treated animals, and full luteolysis in the remaining 22% [17]. In the latter study, partial luteolysis occurred when the progesterone concentration decreased by 12 h of treatment and finally increased to values similar to that of untreated controls during the luteal phase. Whereas, full luteolysis occurred when the progesterone concentration decreased below 1 ng/ml within 48 h of treatment and remained < 1 ng/ml until a new ovulation cycle [17]. As noted above, the threshold age for a responsive CL was set at five days [4]. However, with regards to a repeated administration of PGF, the second dose may just overcome the time problem of a refractory CL instead of dose dependence.

Research continues on methods of synchronization, and opinions vary on the best method available. Five-day P4-based protocols with either two PGF treatments 24 hours apart [18,19,20,21], or a double dose of PGF [20], have provided results that compare favorably with those observed for longer protocols. Therefore, an increased dose of PGF, or a second treatment with PGF 24 h after the first, should be recommended in FTAI protocols.

Control of pregnancy

Therapeutic abortion may be required during normal pregnancies (accidental breeding of a very young heifer) or abnormal pregnancies (fetal mummification, hydramnios, or hydro-allantois). It should be noted here that there also exists the problem of multiple ovulations. The significance of the double ovulation effect in high producers at insemination may be over 20% [21,22,23,24,25]. Because double ovulation has been linked to higher fertility [22, 26]; once a cow is pregnant the percentage of cows with two or more CL should be higher. In effect, in a recent study on 2173 pregnant cows in their third lactation or more [27], 1119 (51.5%) had at least two CL: 422 (19.4%) carrying singletons and 697 (32.1%) carrying twins. Twin pregnancies are not desirable for the economy of dairy cattle. With an economic burden estimated up to $225 per pregnancy in the U.S.A., the use of PGF for inducing abortion may be a suitable option upon a diagnosis of twins [28].

The CL of pregnancy appears essential for maintaining pregnancy prior to 165 days of gestation [29] and a single PGF treatment consistently induces abortion until approximately 150 days of gestation, generally without complications [30]. However, a double PGF dose between days 40 and 120 of gestation resulted in abortion of all treated cows, in contrast to a single or lower dose, which were either less effective or totally ineffective [31]. In the latter study, only one single CL was present for each pregnancy, suggesting that a double dose is better than a single PGF dose for terminating pregnancy. It is likely that a double dose of PGF is sufficient to induce abortion in cows with two CL. However, future studies should assess this assertion or establish a dose-response protocol in double-ovulating pregnant cows. In pregnancies in which the number of CL exceeds the number of embryos, this additional CL has proven to be a very strong factor favoring pregnancy maintenance [32].

Concluding remarks

The decline in the reproductive performance of high-producing dairy cows has been observed in the last few decades. This decline has been partly related to the high metabolism of steroid hormones and subsequent alterations to reproductive endocrinology, which is linked to increased milk production. Under these circumstances, PGF-based FTAI protocols have become increasingly common. However, up to 60% of cows have a young CL while undergoing PGF treatment, thereby reducing fertility. Furthermore, the number of cows with two or more CLs that are beginning treatment according to FTAI protocols is increasing, as is the case for pregnant cows. Consequently, the impact of multiple CLs reinforces the idea of a growing need to increase the luteolytic dose. There are dose-dependent studies showing that a lower dose of PGF still works within FTAI protocols [15] or on pregnant cows [33]. However, we concur that the treatment of two PGF treatments administered 24 hours apart in the FTAI protocols, or a double dose of PGF given to cows with a young CL and to pregnant cows for therapeutic abortion, should be recommended. Furthermore, ultrasonography procedures may help in identifying luteal structures, thereby deciding the PGF dose and improving the results in high-producing dairy cows.

References

  • 1.Lauderdale JW. ASAS centennial paper: Contributions in the Journal of Animal Science to the development of protocols for breeding management of cattle through synchronization of estrus and ovulation. J Anim Sci 2009; 87: 801–812. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Odde KG. A review of synchronization of estrus in postpartum cattle. J Anim Sci 1990; 68: 817–830. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Macmillan KL, Day AM. Prostaglandin F() - A fertility drug in dairy cattle? Theriogenology 1982; 18: 245–253. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Beal WE, Milvae RA, Hansel W. Oestrous cycle length and plasma progesterone concentrations following administration of prostaglandin F-2 α early in the bovine oestrous cycle. J Reprod Fertil 1980; 59: 393–396. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Sangsritavong S, Combs DK, Sartori R, Armentano LE, Wiltbank MC. High feed intake increases liver blood flow and metabolism of progesterone and estradiol-17beta in dairy cattle. J Dairy Sci 2002; 85: 2831–2842. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Sartori R, Haughian JM, Shaver RD, Rosa GJ, Wiltbank MC. Comparison of ovarian function and circulating steroids in estrous cycles of Holstein heifers and lactating cows. J Dairy Sci 2004; 87: 905–920. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Wiltbank M, Lopez H, Sartori R, Sangsritavong S, Gümen A. Changes in reproductive physiology of lactating dairy cows due to elevated steroid metabolism. Theriogenology 2006; 65: 17–29. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Piper PJ, Vane JR, Wyllie JH. Inactivation of prostaglandins by the lungs. Nature 1970; 225: 600–604. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Reeves PR. Distribution, elimination, and residue studies in the cow with the synthetic prostaglandin estrumate. J Agric Food Chem 1978; 26: 152–155. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Rabiee AR, Lean IJ, Stevenson MA. Efficacy of Ovsynch program on reproductive performance in dairy cattle: a meta-analysis. J Dairy Sci 2005; 88: 2754–2770. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Carvalho PD, Santos VG, Giordano JO, Wiltbank MC, Fricke PM. Development of fertility programs to achieve high 21-day pregnancy rates in high-producing dairy cows. Theriogenology 2018; 114: 165–172. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Stevenson JS. Physiological predictors of ovulation and pregnancy risk in a fixed-time artificial insemination program. J Dairy Sci 2016; 99: 10077–10092. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Kanitz W, Bhojwani S, Becker F, Schneider F. Follicle dynamics and characteristics of ovulation in heifers after Ovsynch treatment in the last third of the estrous cycle. Berl Munch Tierarztl Wochenschr 2006; 119: 512–515 (in German). [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Borchardt S, Pohl A, Carvalho PD, Fricke PM, Heuwieser W. Short communication: Effect of adding a second prostaglandin F injection during the Ovsynch protocol on luteal regression and fertility in lactating dairy cows: A meta-analysis. J Dairy Sci 2018; 101: 8566–8571. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Valldecabres-Torres X, Larrosa-Morales P, Cuervo-Arango J. The effect of dose and type of cloprostenol on the luteolytic response of dairy cattle during the Ovsynch protocol under different oestrous cycle and physiological characteristics. Reprod Domest Anim 2013; 48: 874–880. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Valldecabres-Torres X, García-Roselló E, García-Muñoz A, Cuervo-Arango J. Effects of d-cloprostenol dose and corpus luteum age on ovulation, luteal function, and morphology in nonlactating dairy cows with early corpora lutea. J Dairy Sci 2012; 95: 4389–4395. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Cuervo-Arango J, García-Roselló E, García-Muñoz A, Valldecabres-Torres X, Martínez-Ros P, González-Bulnes A. The effect of a single high dose of PGF administered to dairy cattle 3.5 days after ovulation on luteal function, morphology, and follicular dynamics. Theriogenology 2011; 76: 1736–1743. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Rabaglino MB, Risco CA, Thatcher MJ, Lima F, Santos JEP, Thatcher WW. Use of a five-day progesterone-based timed AI protocol to determine if flunixin meglumine improves pregnancy per timed AI in dairy heifers. Theriogenology 2010; 73: 1311–1318. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Ribeiro ES, Monteiro APA, Lima FS, Ayres H, Bisinotto RS, Favoreto M, Greco LF, Marsola RS, Thatcher WW, Santos JEP. Effects of presynchronization and length of proestrus on fertility of grazing dairy cows subjected to a 5-day timed artificial insemination protocol. J Dairy Sci 2012; 95: 2513–2522. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Stevenson JS, Pulley SL, Hill SL. Short communication: Change in dose delivery of prostaglandin F2α in a 5-day timed artificial insemination program in lactating dairy cows. J Dairy Sci 2013; 96: 5769–5772. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Garcia-Ispierto I, López-Gatius F. Effects of different five-day progesterone-based fixed-time AI protocols on follicular/luteal dynamics and fertility in dairy cows. J Reprod Dev 2014; 60: 426–432. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Fricke PM, Wiltbank MC. Effect of milk production on the incidence of double ovulation in dairy cows. Theriogenology 1999; 52: 1133–1143. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.López-Gatius F, López-Béjar M, Fenech M, Hunter RHF. Ovulation failure and double ovulation in dairy cattle: risk factors and effects. Theriogenology 2005; 63: 1298–1307. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Lopez H, Caraviello DZ, Satter LD, Fricke PM, Wiltbank MC. Relationship between level of milk production and multiple ovulations in lactating dairy cows. J Dairy Sci 2005; 88: 2783–2793. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Kusaka H, Miura H, Kikuchi M, Sakaguchi M. Incidence of double ovulation during the early postpartum period in lactating dairy cows. Theriogenology 2017; 91: 98–103. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.López-Gatius F, Garcia-Ispierto I, Serrano-Pérez B, Hunter RHF. The presence of two ovulatory follicles at timed artificial insemination influences the ovulatory response to GnRH in high-producing dairy cows. Theriogenology 2018; 120: 91–97. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Garcia-Ispierto I, López-Gatius F. The effects of a single or double GnRH dose on pregnancy survival in high producing dairy cows carrying singletons or twins. J Reprod Dev 2018; 64: 523–527. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Mur-Novales R, López-Gatius F, Fricke PM, Cabrera VE. An economic evaluation of management strategies to mitigate the negative effect of twinning in dairy herds. J Dairy Sci 2018; 101: 8335–8349. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Estergreen VL, Jr, Frost OL, Gomes WR, Erb RE, Bullard JF. Effect of ovariectomy on pregnancy maintenance and parturition in dairy cows. J Dairy Sci 1967; 50: 1293–1295. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Wenzel JGW. A review of prostaglandin F products and their use in dairy reproductive herd health programs. Vet Bull 1991; 61: 433–447. [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Lauderdale JW. The use of prostaglandins in cattle. Ann Biol Anim Biochim Biophys 1975; 15: 419–425. [Google Scholar]
  • 32.López-Gatius F. Factors of a noninfectious nature affecting fertility after artificial insemination in lactating dairy cows. A review. Theriogenology 2012; 77: 1029–1041. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Copeland DD, Schultz RH, Kemtrup ME. Induction of abortion in feedlot heifers with cloprostenol (a synthetic analogue of prostaglandin F): a dose response study. Can Vet J 1978; 19: 29–32. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of Reproduction and Development are provided here courtesy of The Society for Reproduction and Development

RESOURCES