Skip to main content
Journal of Arthropod-Borne Diseases logoLink to Journal of Arthropod-Borne Diseases
. 2020 Sep 30;14(3):239–249. doi: 10.18502/jad.v14i3.4557

The Phylogenetic Analysis of Cimex hemipterus (Hemiptera: Cimicidae) Isolated from Different Regions of Iran Using Cytochrome Oxidase Subunit I Gene

Awat Samiei 1, Mousa Tavassoli 1,*, Karim Mardani 2
PMCID: PMC7903362  PMID: 33644237

Abstract

Background:

Bedbugs are blood feeding ectoparasites of humans and several domesticated animals. There are scarcity of information about the bed bugs population throughout Iran and only very limited and local studies are available. The aim of this study is to assess the phylogenetic relationships and nucleotide diversity using partial sequences of cytochrome oxidase I gene (COI) among the populations of tropical bed bugs inhabiting Iran.

Methods:

The bedbugs were collected from cities located in different geographical regions of Iran. After DNA extraction PCR was performed for COI gene using specific primers. Then DNA sequencing was performed on PCR products for the all 15 examined samples.

Results:

DNA sequencing analysis showed that the all C. hemipterus samples were similar, despite the minor nucleotide variations (within the range of 576 to 697bp) on average between 5 and 10 Single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs). Subsequently, the results were compared with the database in gene bank which revealed close similarity and sequence homology with other C. hemipterus from other parts of the world.

Conclusion:

In conclusion, this study has demonstrated the ability of the COI gene to differentiate between the C. hemipterus populations from a few different locations in Iran. The current research is the first report of phylogenetic and genetic species diversity analysis conducted on C. hemipterus in Iran. These results provided basic information for further studies of molecular epidemiology, public health and pest control operators in Iran.

Keywords: Bed bug, Cimex hemipterus, COI, Phylogenetic analysis, Iran

Introduction

“Bed bugs” is a term often applied to the approximately 90 species within the Cimicidae; of these, only Cimex lectularius, the common bed bug, and C. hemipterus, the tropical bed bug, show a strong host preference for humans (1). Cimex hemipterus, is considered as the common tropical bedbug whereas C. lectularius is common in temperate climates (2). It has been well documented that bed bugs harbor at least 40 human pathogens, but there is no tangible evidence regarding the ability of routine mechanical transmission any of them (1, 36). All the daytime, bed bugs disappear and hide in inaccessible places such as: cracks and crevices in beds, wooden furniture, floors, and walls and reappear at night to feed from their preferred host, humans (7).

Apart from the discomfort caused by the bite, bedbugs have been known to cause secondary infections and psychological disorders (4). Chronic infestation can cause nervousness, lethargy, pallor, diarrhea, and even iron deficiency (810). Bedbugs infest any kind of temporary accommodations, especially hotels, serviced apartments, and cause severe problems. A resurgence of bed bugs has been reported from the United States, Canada, Australia, Europe, and some Asian countries during the past 15 years (1116). The reasons for the explosion have not yet been clarified; however, several factors such as increased rate of international travel, reduced use of residual insecticides indoors, and insecticide resistance may play a role (17).

Few studies have been undertaken on these bugs in Iran. Dehghani et al. examined an outbreak of these bugs in 1998 in villages west of Kashan. Out of 495 houses in 10 villages there was 6.7% contamination1 (18). In that year, the National Association of Managing World Pests announced the contamination in New York at 6.7%. Shahraki et al. in 2000, examined an outbreak of bugs in university dormitories among 180 boys and 145 girls in Yasuj, western Iran. They reported 28.9% contamination which approximated the current study after taking into consideration that the numbers of individuals were not close to our study (19). Haghi et al. reported that in Bahman Amir, Mazandaran, Iran most bugs were found in bedrooms (56.54%), living rooms (31.25%), and kitchens (8.59%) (17). Also, from the 182 examined containers in Polour, Mazandaran Province, 164 (approximately 90.1%) had evidence of contamination by bed bugs (20).

Genetic analysis of medically important insect species is absolutely required, because it provides useful information about vector transmission, disease epidemiology and disease control (21). There is scarcity of information about the bed bug population throughout Iran and only very limited and local studies are available (17, 20). Taxonomic and morphologic identification of bed bugs require highly experienced person and appropriate samples. Nowadays, molecular techniques such as nucleotide sequence analysis and phylogenetic tree have been developed for taxonomic identification (22).

In recent years, the application of high-resolution molecular markers has provided important new insight into the population genetic structure and infestation dynamics of many insect pest species of public health concern (2325). New molecular tools now make it feasible to not only accurately identify the number of populations actively infesting a building (24, 26) but also to elucidate dynamics and characteristics essential for understanding infestation patterns and history, e.g., levels of genetic diversity (a measure often associated with population health (27), temporal stability of populations after pest control efforts (28), and the presence or absence of genetic mutations associated with insecticide resistance (29).

Population genetics studies on bed bugs have been completed using nuclear rRNA, mt DNA genes, and microsatellite loci as markers (25, 3034). The aim of the first of these studies (Szalanski et al. 2008) shed light on the dispersal patterns of bed bugs during their recent global resurgence. All of the studies on bed bugs thus far have found genetic diversity within human associated population to be low, resulting from a great deal of inbreeding (25, 3032). Despite the importance of bed bugs in Iran, genetic evaluation has not yet been studied. Therefore, we aimed at this shortcoming and analyzed DNA sequences of C. hemipterus gathered from different parts of Iran, using partial sequences of cytochrome oxidase I gene (COI) and evaluated the genetic relationship between them.

Materials and Methods

Sample collection

All procedures in this study were carried out in accordance with the guidelines of the Animal Ethics Committee of Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Urmia University (AECVU) and supervised by authority of Sample collection Urmia University Research Council (UURC).

Geographically, there are 4 different zones in Iran, known as region 1: Caspian Sea (temperature: 8–26 °C, annual rainfall: 400–1,500 mm), region 2: Mountainous area (temperature: −5–29 °C, annual rainfall: 200–500mm), region 3: Persian Gulf (temperature: 12.6–35 °C, annual rainfall: 200–300mm), and region 4: the Central Desert (temperature: −4–44 °C, rainfall: less than 100mm). The pattern of bed bug species distribution for the 4 different areas was determined according to the method of Skerman and Hillard (35). Considering 10% prevalence, 95% confidence level and 5% error rate, 138 bed bugs collected and were used in this study. That way, adult bed bugs were collected from various locations such as infested hotels, residential houses and industrial buildings during May 2016 to August 2017, with the help of pest control companies. The following cities were selected from each region: Region 1: Sari and Rasht, region 2: Tehran, Isfahan, Urmia, Tabriz, Shiraz, Saghez, Sanandaj, Kermanshah and Hamadan, region 3: Ahvaz and Bandar Abbas, and region 4: Semnan. These locations were mapped by collecting the locality data via Google Earth (Fig. 1).

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

Map of Iran showing study locations of Cimex hemipterus collected for the present study. Abbreviations are listed in Table 1

Individual samples were collected by using forceps then stored in a sample collection bottle and preserved in 95% alcohol and stored at −20 °C until analysis onset. The insects were transferred to the laboratory of parasitology division, faculty of veterinary medicine, Urmia University and identified under a stereo microscope (Olympus SZ61, Olympus Corporation, Tokyo, Japan), using morphological keys described by Usinger (1) and Walpole (36). The pronotum which is the most distinguishing feature used to identify the two bedbugs species. The pronotum of C. lectularius is wider than that of C. hemipterus because of an upturned lateral flange on the margin of the pronotum on the thorax of C. lectularius which is absent in C. hemipterus (1). The dorsal and ventral sides of the Bedbug pronotum were observed to get a distinct image of the pronotum because the projecting edge of some were not very clear dorsally.

DNA extraction

Genomic DNA from Individual tropical bed bug of each collection site was extracted using DNA isolation kit, MBST (Molecular and Biological system transfer, Tehran, Iran) following the manufacturer’s instructions. For this, samples were grinded by pestle and placed into 1.5ml micro centrifuge tube and total DNA was eluted in 100µl of elution buffer. DNA quality and concentration from each specimen was determined spectrophotometrically using the NanoDrop (Thermo Scientific 2000c, United States) and stored in −20 °C for further procedures. We control the contaminations by check the 260/230 ratio because a poor ratio may be the result of a contaminant absorbing at 230nm or less. Also we check the wavelength of the trough in the spectra; this should be at 230nm.

Amplification of the mitochondrial COI and sequencing

For PCR amplification of the COI, the 658bp amplicon, the forward and the reverse primers LEP-F (5′-ATT CAA CCA ATC ATA AAG ATA TNG G- 3′) and LEP-R (5′-TAW ACT TCW GGR TGTCCR AAR AAT CA-3′) were used (32). The PCR was conducted in 25µl total volume, each containing 2.5µl 10x PCR buffer, 2μL 50mM MgCl2, 0.5µl dNTPs, 3µl DNA template, 10 pico-mole forward and reverse primers (0.5µl for each), 0.5µl Taq DNA polymerase (Sinaclon, Iran) and 15.5µl ddH2O. The PCR cycling conditions set in the program were as follows: initial denaturation at 94 °C for 5min followed by 35 cycles of 94 °C for 30sec (denaturation), 42 °C for 30sec (annealing), 72 °C for 45sec (extension) and a final extension step of 72 °C for 2min. PCR products were analyzed by electrophoresis in 1.5% agarose gel to confirm that the samples contained a single band. Then, stained with safe DNA stain gel and visualized with UV-Transilluminator (BTS-20M, Japan). Finally, Purified PCR products were sent to SinaClon Company (Tehran, Iran) for sequencing.

Nucleotide Diversity and Phylogenetic Tree Construction

The nucleotide sequences of each species from various regions were aligned for variation positions. Sequences were uploaded on NCBI to search for the most similar reference sequences, and positions of the COI were determined with the help of BLAST, available at NCBI. A total of eleven COI sequences belong to C. hemipterus available in the Gene Bank were used to phylogenetic analysis, including 3, 3, 2, 1, 1 and 1 sequence related to Malaysia, Bangladesh, Thailand, Czech Republic, USA and Iran, respectively. The Triatoma dimidiata (Hemiptera: Reduviidae), accession number JQ575031, was used as an out group. The alignment was manually edited to remove any alignment errors using the aligning tool Clustal W (37) and exported as MEGA and FASTA format files. All the obtained nucleotide sequences were deposited in the GenBank with the assigned accession numbers (Table 1). Subsequently, phylogenetic relationship was examined and constructed by Maximum-likelihood method (ML) using the Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis (MEGA), version 6.0. The reliability of an inferred tree was tested by 1000 bootstrap. The DNA sequence polymorphism analyses for determining nucleotide diversity were estimated using BioEdit Version 7, 0, 1 and Blastn software (38).

Table 1.

Collection site, isolated code, collection date and accession number of each bed bug in this study

Isolated code Isolation source State Collection date Length/bp Longitude and Latitude Genbank Accession number
Hm Hamadan Hamedan 20 June 2016 585bp 34.7989° N, 48.5150° E MG739319
Az Ahvaz Khozestan 25 June 2016 577bp 31.3183° N, 48.6706° E MG739320
Tn Tehran north Tehran 15 May 2016 608bp 35.6892° N, 51.3890° E MG739321
Ra Rasht Gilan 28 June 2017 669bp 37.2682° N, 49.5891° E MG739322
Sr Sari Mazandaran 10 June 2017 706bp 36.5659° N, 53.0586° E MG739323
Ba Bandar abbas Hormozgan 23 July 2017 683bp 27.1832° N, 56.2666° E MG739324
Sm Semnan Semnan 20 July 2016 683bp 35.2256° N, 54.4342° E MG739325
Is Isfahan Isfahan 15 July 2017 734bp 32.6546° N, 51.6680° E MG739326
Kr Kermanshah Kermanshah 14 August 2016 669bp 34.3277° N, 47.0778° E MG770888
Sn Sanandaj Kordistan 10 August 2017 721bp 35.3219° N, 46.9862° E MG770889
Shz Shiraz Fars 23 May 2016 717bp 29.5918° N, 52.5837° E MG770890
Ur Urmia West Azerbaijan 22 May 2016 684bp 37.5498° N, 45.0786° E MG770891
Tb Tabriz East Azerbaijan 19 August 2017 722bp 38.0962° N, 46.2738° E MG770892
Ts Tehran south Tehran 17 May 2017 587bp 35.6892° N, 51.3890° E MG737714
Sz Saghez Kordistan 16 May 2017 705bp 36.2389° N, 46.2780° E MG696803

Results

The average size of COI fragment obtained from the amplified C. hemipterus was found to be 655bp which was at the expected PCR product size (approximate length 658 bp) for the all 15 examined samples, within the range of 576 to 697bp. The accepted COI sequences found in NCBI GenBank database showed that the percentage identity ranged from 97 to 100. Nucleotide sequences of COI obtained from this study were submitted to NCBI GenBank and then accession numbers of MG770888 to MG77089, MG739319 to MG 739326, MG737714 and MG696803 were assigned to them (Table 1).

After some processing, for example, deleting and aligning sequences using Mega 6 Molecular Software, 362bp of partial COI from 15 sequences of C. hemipterus were obtained successfully. Construction of phylogenetic tree is done based on mitochondrial COI sequencing by maximum likelihood (ML) method. The sequences obtained from the present study were compared with sequences of C. hemipterus and C. lectularius from different parts of the world. As the tree shows, the samples were classified in three major clusters which confirm the genetic variation among different species of Cimex. All our isolates and those of other parts of the world were placed in one clustered together (G1) showing no significant difference between various regions despite the minor nucleotide variations.

Consistently, they were far from C. lectularis and T. dimidiata clusters (G2 and G3, respectively). Our isolates were further clustered into three subgroups (Fig. 2). The first one (SG1) contained 9 isolates which are shown in the phylogenetic tree in Fig. 2. Sequences from this subgroup clustered together with the C. hemipterus reference sequences containing three nucleotide sequences from Bangladesh (MG552132, MG572242, MG 587917), three nucleotide sequences from Malaysia (KT851503 to KT851505), two nucleotide sequences from Thailand (JX 826469, JX826470), two nucleotide sequences from Czech Republic (KF018754, GU 985538), one nucleotide sequences from Iran (KY560443) and one nucleotide sequences from USA (JQ782821). The second one (SG2) contained two isolates collected from Kermanshah (MG770888) and Esfahan (MG 739326). These sequences showed a significant nucleotide similarity with each other and were distinct from the both subgroups SG1 and SG3, and there is no reference sequence in GenBank that corresponds to this subgroup. Our third subgroup (SG3) contained four isolates collected from Hamedan (MG739319), Bandar Abbas (MG739324), Tehran north (MG739321) and Semnan (MG739325). Analysis of these sequences showed a significant nucleotide similarity between Hamedan and Bandar Abbas and also between Tehran north and Semnan.

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

Maximum likelihood (ML) tree inferred from sequences of the mitochondrial COI gene for 15 Cimex hemipterus populations collected in Iran (*sign) and one outgroup (Triatoma dimidiata accession no. JQ575031.), Numbers at nodes indicate bootstrap values (%) of ML replicates, obtained by 1,000 replications

This phylogenetic tree is also supported by a mean pair-wise distance that is calculated at 0.005, suggesting that all of the C. hemipterus populations studied are clustered together, showing no significant variance between different regions despite minor nucleotide variations, on average between 5 and 10 Single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs).

Discussion

There is a paucity of data and analysis regarding phylogenetic relationships below infraorder Cimicomorpha (39, 40). The proposed evolutionary relationships of the taxa within superfamily Cimicoidea and the family Cimicidae are based on morphological characters, chromosome numbers, and host associations (1, 32). Previous studies have associated the Cimicidae with other families within the superfamily Cimicoidea using both morphological and molecular characters (39, 41). A total evidence analysis using 16S, 18S, 28S and COI DNA sequence data and 73 morphological characters (39) has determined 13 infraorder Cimicomorpha and superfamily Cimicoidea are both monophyletic. The same study reported that the families Cimicidae, Polyctenidae and Curaliidae form a monophyletic clade (39).

In this work, we studied the phylogeny of C. hemipterus populations come from different regions of Iran, using the mitochondrial COI gene sequences. The COI gene is a part of the mitochondrial DNA genes and has been used as a potent marker for molecular phylogenetic studies, because it is species specific and appropriate for analyses of intra specific variations. The rate of evolvement in the COI gene is also relatively rapid which allow distinction at the species level and the identification of obscure species (42, 43). Despite the vast outbreak of bedbug in various rural and urban regions of Iran, there are very limited and unsatisfactory reports about the prevalence (17, 20). Probably due to resurgence and propagation of bed bugs in other countries, the population also has increased in Iran (44, 45). Limited public awareness, increase in internal and international travels, increase in utilization of second-hand furniture and resistance to pesticides may contribute to this resurgence (46, 47). Therefore, the resurgence and subsequent problems inspired us to perform phylogenetic analysis, as well as study genetic diversity and population dynamics.

The perceived near extirpation of bed bugs from many areas around the world suggests a genetic bottleneck would have occurred, which would be reflected in low genetic diversity across current bed bug populations (25, 3034). However, all of the studies completed thus far have found a relatively high genetic diversity between populations in different locations. Such high diversity across populations is atypical for species that have undergone a recent and single founder event (30). Szalanski et al. (30) focused on genetic variation among various bed bug populations in USA, Canada and Australia. They examined a partial sequence of the mitochondrial (mt) 16S rRNA gene and nuclear rRNA ITS-1 region of 136 adult bed bugs sampled from 22 populations and found a relatively high genetic diversity in the 16S gene, and low diversity in the ITS-1 gene.

The current research is the first report of phylogenetic and genetic species diversity analysis conducted on C. hemipterus in Iran. Our analysis showed one main cluster in phylogenetic tree. Therefore, from the present study it can be concluded that C. hemipterus in Iran is an arthropod with low genetic diversity with a potentially high capability for raise the levels of inbreeding. The previous study, done by Booth et al. (25) regarding molecular markers of bed bug infestation dynamics within apartment buildings supported the same pattern of genetic diversity in C. lectularius as they reveal restricted genetic diversity. Similar researches also have conducted in other countries. Seri-Masran and Majid (45) studied genetic diversity of bed bugs in Malaysia. They considered 22 selected infested structures and consistent to our findings, they observed one main monophyletic clade. Another study was performed in Thailand and one main cluster of C. hemipterus was obtained when it was compared with C. lectularis isolates. Both of the aforementioned studies support our results.

Given that the current phylogenetic and taxonomic relationships within the family Cimicidae are based on host relationships and morphology, it is possible that the inclusion of molecular data could cause a restructuring of the systematic relationships (1, 32). In addition to COI genes, the DNA sequences of the entire mitochondrial genome of C. hemipterus may be useful for population genetics studies. There are several reports in the country using molecular methods for species identification of insects (4858).

Conclusion

These results provided basic information for further studies of molecular epidemiology and control of C. hemipterus infestation to the public, medical association, entomologists and pest control operators in Iran.

Acknowledgements

The authors gratefully thank Iranian Pest Control Companies from all states in collaboration in the bed bugs sample collection. We also grateful to Dr A Nazarizadeh and Dr M Soltani Eini for their fruitful assistance in manuscript writing and helpful advice.

References

  • 1. Usinger RL. (1966) Monograph of Cimicidae (Hemiptera, Heteroptera). Entomological Society of America, College Park, Maryland, p. 582. [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Karunaratne S, Damayanthi B, Fareena M, Fareena MHJ, Imbuldeniya V, Hemingway J. (2007) Insecticide resistance in the tropical bedbug Cimex hemipterus. Pest Biochem Physiol. 88 (1): 102– 107. [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Cooper R, Harlan H. (2004) Ectoparasites, part 3: bed bugs and kissing bug. Mallis’ handbook of pest control, Cleveland. 2004 (1): 494– 529. [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Goddard J, de-Shazo R. (2009) Bed bugs (Cimex lectularius) and clinical consequences of their bites. Jama. 301 (13): 1358– 1366. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Wang C, Tsai WT, Cooper R, White J. (2011) Effectiveness of bed bug monitors for detecting and trapping bed bugs in apartments. J Econ Entomol. 104 (1): 274– 278. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Doggett SL, Dwyer DE, Peñas PF, Russell RC. (2012) Bed bugs: clinical relevance and control options. Clin Microbiol Rev. 25 (1): 164– 192. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Elston D, Stockwell S. (2000) What’s eating you? Bedbugs. Cutis. 65 (5): 262– 264. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Paul J, Bates J. (2000) Is infestation with the common bedbug increasing? BMJ. 320 (7242): 1141. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Masetti M, Bruschi F. (2007) Bedbug infestations recorded in Central Italy. Parasitol Int. 56 (1): 81– 83. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Reinhardt K, Siva-Jothy MT. (2007) Biology of the bed bugs (Cimicidae). Annu Rev Entomol. 52 (1): 351– 374. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Hwang SW, Svoboda TJ, De-Jong IJ, Kabasele KJ, Gogosis E. (2005) Bed bug infestations in an urban environment. Emerg Infect Dis. 11 (4): 533– 538. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Cooper R. (2006) Bed bugs--still more questions than answers: A need for research and public awareness. Am Entomol. 52 (2): 111– 112. [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Romero A, Potter MF, Potter DA, Haynes KF. (2007) Insecticide resistance in the bed bug: a factor in the pest’s sudden resurgence? J Med Entomol. 44 (2): 175– 178. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Doggett SL, Russell RC. (2008) The resurgence of bed bugs, Cimex spp. (Hemiptera: Cimicidae) in Australia. Int Conf Urban Pests (ICUP). 6 (1): 407– 425. [Google Scholar]
  • 15. Kilpinen O, Jensen KMV, Kristensen M. (2008) Bed bug problems in Denmark, with a European perspective. Int Conf Urban Pests (ICUP). 1316 (1): 395– 399. [Google Scholar]
  • 16. Wang L, Xu Y, Zeng L. (2013) Resurgence of bed bugs (Hemiptera: Cimicidae) in mainland China. Fla Entomol. 96 (1): 131– 136. [Google Scholar]
  • 17. Haghi SFM, Behbodi M, Hajati H, Shafaroudi MM. (2014) Prevalence of bed bug (Cimex lectularius) in human settlement area of Bahnamir, Iran. Asian Pac J Trop Dis. 4 (2): 786– 789. [Google Scholar]
  • 18. Dehghani R, Asadi MA, Ahmadi M. (1998) prevalence survey of bed bug infestation in residential homes in the villages of western Kashan. Feyz Sci J. 14 (1): 71– 76 [Google Scholar]
  • 19. Shahraki GH, Rayegan A, Fararouei M. (2000) Prevalence of bed bug and its biting in student dormitories. J Yasuj Univers Med Sci. 5 (19): 25– 33 [Google Scholar]
  • 20. Dehghani R, Hashemi A, Takhtfiroozeh S, Chimehi E. (2015) Bed bug (Cimex lectularis) outbreak: A cross-sectional study in Polour, Iran. Iran J Dermatol. 19 (1): 16– 20. [Google Scholar]
  • 21. Tabachnick WJt, Black IW. (1995) Making a case for molecular population genetic studies of arthropod vectors. Parasitol Today. 11 (1): 27– 30. [Google Scholar]
  • 22. Kress WJ, Erickson DL. (2008) DNA barcodes: genes, genomics, and bioinformatics. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 105 (8): 2761– 2762. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23. Endersby NM, Hoffman AA, White VL, Lowenstein S, Ritchie S, Johnson EH, Rapley LP, Ryan PA, Nam VS, Yen NT, Kittiyapong P, Weeks AR. (2009) Genetic structure of Aedes aegypti in Australia and Vietnam revealed by microsatellite and exon primed intron crossing markers suggests feasibility of local control options. J Med Entomol. 46 (5): 1074– 1083. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24. Crissman JRW, Booth RG, Santangelo DM, Mukha EL, Vargo EL, Schal C. (2010) Population genetic structure of the German cockroach (Blattodea: Blattellidae) in apartment buildings. J Med Entomol. 47 (4): 553– 564. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25. Booth W, Saenz VL, Santangelo RG, Wang C, Schal C, Vargo EL. (2012) Molecular markers reveal infestation dynamics of the bed bug (Hemiptera: Cimicidae) within apartment buildings. J Med Entomol. 49 (3): 535– 546. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26. Pizarro JC, Gilligan LM, Stevens L. (2008) Microsatellites reveal a high population structure in Triatoma infestans from Chuquisaca, Bolivia. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2( 3): e202. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27. Paup C, Brengues C, Kamgang B, Herve JP, Fontenille D, Simard F. (2008) Gene ßow between domestic and sylvan populations of Aedes aegypti (Diptera: Culicidae) in North Cameroon. J Med Entomol. 45 (3): 391– 400. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28. Perez de Rosas AR, Segura EL, Garcia BA. (2007) Microsatellite analysis of genetic structure in natural Triatoma infestans (Hemiptera: Reduviidae) populations from Argentina: its implication in assessing the effectiveness of Chagas disease vector control programmes. Mol Ecol. 16 (7): 1401– 1412. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29. Yoon KS, Kwon DH, Strycharz JP, Hollingsworth CS, Lee SH, Clark JM. (2008) Biochemical and molecular analysis of deltamethrin resistance in the common bed bug (Hemiptera:Cimicidae). J Med Entomol. 45 (6): 1092– 1101. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30. Szalanski AL, Austin JW, McKern JA, Steelman CD, Gold RE. (2008) Mitochondrial and ribosomal internal transcribed spacer 1 diversity of Cimex lectularius (Hemiptera: Cimicidae). J Med Entomol. 45 (2): 229– 236. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31. Vargo EL, Booth W, Saenz V, Santangelo RG, Schal C. (2011) Genetic analysis of bed bug infestations and populations. Proceedings of the Seventh International Conference on Urban Pests. [Google Scholar]
  • 32. Balvín O, Munclinger P, Kratochvíl L, Vilímová J. (2012) Mitochondrial DNA and morphology show independent evolutionary histories of bedbug Cimex lectularius (Heteroptera: Cimicidae) on bats and humans. Parasitol Res. 111 (1): 457– 469. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33. Davies TGE, Field LM, Williamson MS. (2012) The re-emergence of the bed bug as a nuisance pest: implications of resistance to the pyrethroid insecticides. Med Vet Entomol. 26 (3): 241– 254. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34. Booth W, Balvin O, Vargo EL, Vilímová J, Schal C. (2015) Host association drives genetic divergence in the bed bug, Cimex lectularius. Mol Ecol. 24 (5): 980– 992. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35. Skerman K, Hillard J. (1967) A handbook for studies of helminth parasites of ruminants. FAO, Near East Anim Health Inst. 2 (1): 1– 3. [Google Scholar]
  • 36. Walpole D. (1987) External morphology of the legs of two species of bed bugs (Hemiptera: Cimicidae). J Entomol Soc South Afr. 50 (1): 193– 201. [Google Scholar]
  • 37. Thompson JD, Gibson TJ, Plewniak F, Jeanmougin F, Higgins DG. (1997) The CLUSTAL_X windows interface: flexible strategies for multiple sequence alignment aided by quality analysis tools. Nucleic Acids Res. 25 (24): 4876– 4882. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38. Hall TA. (1999) BioEdit: a user-friendly biological sequence alignment editor and analysis program for Windows 95/98/NT. Nucleic acids symposium series, [London]: Information Retrieval Ltd., c1979–c2000. 41 (1): 95– 98. [Google Scholar]
  • 39. Schuh RT, Weirauch C, Wheeler WC. (2009) Phylogenetic relationships within the Cimicomorpha (Hemiptera: Heteroptera): a total evidence analysis. Sys Entomol. 34 (1): 15– 48. [Google Scholar]
  • 40. Kocher A, Guilbert E, Lhuillier E, Murienne J. (2015) Sequencing of the mitochondrial genome of the avocado lace bug Pseudacysta perseae (Heteroptera, Tingidae) using a genome skimming approach. C R Biol. 338 (3): 149– 160. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41. Cui Y, Xie Q, Hua J, Dang K, Zhou J, Liu X, Wang G, Yu X, Bu W. (2013) Phylogenomics of Hemiptera (Insecta: Paraneoptera) based on mitochondrial genomes. Sys Entomol. 38 (1): 233– 245. [Google Scholar]
  • 42. Hebert PD, Penton EH, Burns JM, Janzen DH, Hallwachs W. (2004) Ten species in one: DNA barcoding reveals cryptic species in the neotropical skipper butterfly Astraptes fulgerator. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 101 (41): 14812– 14817. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43. Ballard JWO, Rand DM. (2005) The population biology of mitochondrial DNA and its phylogenetic implications. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst. 36 (1): 621– 642. [Google Scholar]
  • 44. Tawatsin A, Lorlertthum K, Phumee A, Thavara U, Boon-Long J, Boonserm R, Siriyasatien P. (2013) Discrimination between tropical bed bug Cimex hemipterus and common bed bug Cimex lectularius (Hemiptera: Cimicidae) by PCRRFLP. Thai J Vet Med. 43 (3): 421– 427. [Google Scholar]
  • 45. Seri Masran SNA, Ab-Majid AH. (2017) Genetic diversity and phylogenetic relationships of Cytochrome C Oxidase Subunit I in Cimex hemipterus (Hemiptera: Cimicidae) populations in Malaysia. J Med Entomol. 54 (4): 974– 979. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46. Delaunay P, Blanc V, Del Giudice P, Levy-Bencheton A, Chosidow O, Marty P, Brouqui P. (2011) Bedbugs and infectious diseases. Clin Infect Dis. 52 (2): 200– 210. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47. Ryan ET, Wilson ME, Kain KC. (2002) Illness after international travel. New Engl J Med. 347: 505– 516. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48. Naddaf SR, Oshaghi MA, Vatandoost H, Assmar M. (2003) Molecular characterization of Anopheles fluviatilis species complex in the Islamic Republic of Iran. East Mediterr Health J. 9 (3) : 257– 265. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49. Sedaghat MM, Vonne-marie Y, Nicolescuz G, Koliopoulos G, Athanassios K, Zounos K, Oshaghi MA, Vatandoost H, Harbach R. (2003) Morphological and molecular characterization of Anopheles (Anopheles) sacharovi Favre, a primary vector of malaria in the Middle East. Syst Entomol. 28: 241– 256. [Google Scholar]
  • 50. Barghamadi Z, Moosa-kazemi SH, Oshaghi MA, Vatandoost H, Shahraki G. (2016) species identification of the Anopheles fluviatilis complex using phylogenetic analysis PCR-sequencing in southwestern Iran. Acta Med Mediterr. 32: 2069. [Google Scholar]
  • 51. Sedaghat MM, Linton YM, Oshaghi MA, Vatandoost H, Harbach RE. (2003) The Anopheles maculipennis complex (Diptera: Culicidae) in Iran: molecular characterization and recognition of a new species. Bull Entomol Res. 93 (6): 527– 535. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52. Khoshdel-Nezamiha F, Vatandoost H, Oshaghi MA, Azari-Hamidian S, Mianroodi RA, Dabiri F. (2016) Molecular characterization of mosquitoes (Diptera: Culicidae) in Northwestern Iran by using rDNA-ITS2. Jpn J Infect Dis. 69 (4): 319– 322. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53. Oshaghi MA, Sedaghat MM, Vatandoost H. (2003) Molecular characterization of the Anopheles maculipennis complex in the Islamic Republic of Iran. East Mediterr Health J. 9 (4): 659– 566. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54. Karimian F, Ali Oshaghi MA, Sedaghat MM, Waterhouse ME, Vatandoost H, Hanafi-Bojd AA, Maleki Ravasan N, Chavshin AR. (2014) Phylogenetic analysis of the oriental-palearctic-afrotropical members of Anopheles (Culicidae: Diptera) Based on Nuclear rDNA and Mitochondrial DNA Characteristics. Jpn J Infect Dis. 67: 361– 367. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55. Oshaghi MA, Yaghoobi F, Vatandoost H, Abai MR, Akbarzadeh K. (2006) Anopheles stephensi biological forms: Geographical distribution and malaria transmission in malarious regions of Iran. Pak Bio Sci. 9 (2): 294– 298. [Google Scholar]
  • 56. Chavshin AR, Oshaghi MA, Vatandoost H, Hanafi-Bojd AA, Raeisi A, Nikpoor F. (2014) Molecular characterization, biological forms and sporozoite rate of Anopheles stephensi in southern Iran. Asian Pac J Trop Biomed. 4 (1): 47– 51. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57. Mehravaran A, Oshaghi MA, Vatandoost H, Abai MR, Ebrahimzadeh A, Moazeni Roodib A, Gorouhi A. (2011) First report on Anopheles fluviatilis U in southeastern Iran. Acta Trop. 117 (2): 76– 81. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58. Oshaghi MA, Shemshad KH, Yaghobi-Ershadi MR, Pedram M, Vatandoost H, Abai MR, Akbarzadeh K, Mohtarami F. (2007) Genetic structure of the malaria vector Anopheles superpictus in Iran using mitochondrial cytochrome oxidase (COI and COII) and morphologic markers: A new species complex? Acta Trop. 101 (3): 241– 248. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Arthropod-Borne Diseases are provided here courtesy of Tehran University of Medical Sciences

RESOURCES