Skip to main content
Breast Cancer Research : BCR logoLink to Breast Cancer Research : BCR
. 2021 Feb 24;23:28. doi: 10.1186/s13058-021-01405-y

Correction to: Molecular analyses of triple-negative breast cancer in the young and elderly

Mattias Aine 1, Ceren Boyaci 2, Johan Hartman 3, Jari Häkkinen 1, Shamik Mitra 4, Ana Bosch Campos 1, Emma Nimeus 1,5, Anna Ehinger 1,6, Johan Vallon-Christersson 1, Åke Borg 1, Johan Staaf 1,
PMCID: PMC7903710  PMID: 33627140

Correction to: Breast Cancer Res (2021) 23:20

https://doi.org/10.1186/s13058-021-01392-0

After publication of the original article [1], the authors identified an error in Fig. 4A. The correct figure is given below.

Fig. 4.

Fig. 4

Copy number alterations versus age at diagnosis in TNBC. a Copy number landscape of HRDetect-high patients < 50 years at diagnosis versus > 70 years at diagnosis. b Difference in amplification frequency of CCND1, CCNE1, EGFR, and MCL1 with age groups when analyzed in the total SCAN-B cohort. Two-sided p values calculated using chi-square test for trends in proportions. c Difference in mutation frequency of PIK3CA and TP53 with age groups when analyzed in the total SCAN-B cohort. Two-sided p values calculated using chi-square test for trends in proportions. d Proportions of amplified cases for CCND1, CCNE1, EGFR, and MCL1 according to HRDetect classification. e Proportions of mutated cases for PIK3CA and TP53 according to HRDetect (left), PAM50 (center), and TNBCtype (right) classifications. For age group definitions, “[” equals ≥, “)” equals <, and “]” equals ≤ for the value specified next to it

The original article has been corrected.

Reference

  • 1.Aine M, et al. Molecular analyses of triple-negative breast cancer in the young and elderly. Breast Cancer Res. 2021;23:20. doi: 10.1186/s13058-021-01392-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Breast Cancer Research : BCR are provided here courtesy of BMC

RESOURCES