Skip to main content
PLOS One logoLink to PLOS One
. 2021 Feb 24;16(2):e0243305. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0243305

New sulphonamide pyrolidine carboxamide derivatives: Synthesis, molecular docking, antiplasmodial and antioxidant activities

Efeturi A Onoabedje 1,2,*, Akachukwu Ibezim 3,*, Uchechukwu C Okoro 1, Sanjay Batra 2
Editor: Mohammad Shahid4
PMCID: PMC7904193  PMID: 33626047

Abstract

Carboxamides bearing sulphonamide functionality have been shown to exhibit significant lethal effect on Plasmodium falciparum, the causative agent of human malaria. Here we report the synthesis of thirty-two new drug-like sulphonamide pyrolidine carboxamide derivatives and their antiplasmodial and antioxidant capabilities. In addition, molecular docking was used to check their binding affinities for homology modelled P. falciparum N-myristoyltransferase, a confirmed drug target in the pathogen. Results revealed that sixteen new derivatives killed the parasite at single-digit micromolar concentration (IC50 = 2.40–8.30 μM) and compounds 10b, 10c, 10d, 10j and 10o scavenged DPPH radicals at IC50s (6.48, 8.49, 3.02, 6.44 and 4.32 μg/mL respectively) comparable with 1.06 μg/mL for ascorbic acid. Compound 10o emerged as the most active of the derivatives to bind to the PfNMT with theoretical inhibition constant (Ki = 0.09 μM) comparable to the reference ligand pyrazole-sulphonamide (Ki = 0.01 μM). This study identifies compound 10o, and this series in general, as potential antimalarial candidate with antioxidant activity which requires further attention to optimise activity.

Introduction

Malaria is a human parasitic disease that is caused by some species of Plasmodium in which Plasmodium falciparum is the deadliest [1, 2]. In spite of extensive measures to combat the disease [3, 4], 214 million new cases and more than 400,000 deaths were reported in 2018 [5]. The emergence of drug-resistance strains of P. falciparum, which are no longer susceptible to even frontline drugs such as artemisinin, and cross-resistance, where resistance to one drug confers resistance to other chemically similar drugs or those that share mode of action, are blamed for the persistent devastation [6] and raises the dire need to discover new drugs to check the rate of malaria morbidity as well as mortality [7, 8]. Within red blood cells (RBCs), P. falciparum transforms from ring stage to trophozoite, then to schizont and finally to merozoites that egress and invade RBCs. The merozoite invasion of RBCs is driven by molecular motor complex which has been assembled by inner membrane complex (IMC). The human malaria parasite requires protein myristoylation for life stage progression. N-myristoltransferase (NMT) catalyses myristoylation process i.e. the co- and post-translational transfer of myristoyl group from the cofactor to the N-terminal glycine protein substrate. NMT inhibition induces loss of IMC activities and hence parasite viability [9]. Also, some proteins which are essential for parasite to attach to new RBCs are found missing when NMT is inhibited [10, 11]. The foregoing provides strong evidence that NMT inhibited P. falciparum is non-infectious and therefore NMT is a good drug target for antimalaria drug search. Likewise, malaria infection increases the amount of free radicals because the activities of Plasmodium stimulates the generation of free radicals which are essential in malaria physiopathogenesis [12, 13]. Similarly, Clark and coworkers [14] observed that antioxidant enzymes highly decrease in malaria patients. So, it is advantageous for compounds to possess both antiplasmodial and antioxidant properties and in fact researchers presently screen for both activities in a putative antimalarial agent.

Sulphonamides are group of sulfa drugs used in the treatment of infections since 1930s. They have been reported to possess anti-virial, antihypertensive, anticancer, antiprotozoal, antimicrobial, antioxidant and carbonic anhydrase inhibitory properties [15]. Similarly, numerous natural and synthetic carboxamides have demonstrated notable degree of inhibitory potency against P. falciparum. For instance, leukinnostatin A, efrapeptin, zeryamicin, and antinmoebin are few examples of linear carboxamides are found to be lethal to the pathogen at low micromolar concentration [1620]. While sulphonamides exert their antimalarial activity through disruption of the folate biosynthesis [21], carboxamides have been reported to inhibit haemoglobin degradation by plasmepsin and cysteine proteases in acidic food vacuole and both pathways are vital for the parasite survival [22, 23]. Consequently, carboxamides bearing sulphonamide functionality are hypothesised to show improved antimalarial effect through enhanced proteolytic stability and hydrogen-bonding and our past studies as well as other research reports have confirm that to be true [24, 25]. Therefore, search for antiplasmodial agents in sulphonamide-carboxamide hybrid is highly desirable.

In this present work, we continued our search for new antimalarial lead that possesses antioxidant effect in the sulphonamide-carboxamide series [26, 27] and in addition tested their capability to bind to P. falciparum NMT (PfNMT); a validated antimalarial drug target.

Material and methods

General information

Commercially available chemicals were purchased from Sigma-Adrich and Spectrochem Pvt Ltd (India) and used without further purification. Unless otherwise stated all reactions were performed in non-dry glassware under an air atmosphere and were monitored by analytical thin layer chromatography (TLC). TLC was performed on pre-coated silica gel plates. After elution, plate was visualized under UV illumination at 254 nm for UV active materials. The melting points were recorded on a hot stage apparatus and are uncorrected. IR spectra were recorded using Agilent Cary 630 FTIR spectrophotometer. 1H NMR and 13C NMR spectra were recorded on Bruker Av III HD 400 MHz NMR spectrometers with DMSO-d6 as solvent, using TMS as an internal standard (chemical shifts in δ). Peak multiplicities of 1H-NMR signals were designated as s (singlet), brs (broad singlet), d (doublet), dd (doublet of doublet), t (triplet), q (quartet), m (multiplet) etc. Coupling constants (J) are in Hz. The ESI-MS were recorded on Triple Quadrupole Mass spectrometer. Column chromatography was performed using silica gel (100–200 mesh). Analytical grade solvents for the column chromatography were used as received.

General procedures for the synthesis

To 2-(4-methylphenylsulfonamido)propanoic acid (1.0 equiv.), EDC.HCl (1.2 equiv) and HOBT (1.2 equiv) was added DCM (5.0 mL) and DIPEA (2.0 equiv.) and the reaction mixture stirred for 20 min at room temperature. Thereafter, 2-amino-N-substitutedphenylpropanamide (1.0 equiv.) was added and the entire reaction was allowed to stir at room temperature overnight. The reaction mixture was diluted with DCM (20mL), and subsequently washed with 5% bicarbonate, 1.0 M HCl and brine. The organic layer was dried over Na2SO4, filtered and evaporated under vacuum to provide the crude product, which was purified by column chromatography (10–70% EA/Hexane) to afford the desire product.

N-(1-oxo-1-(phenylamino)propan-2-yl)-1-tosylpyrrolidine-2-carboxamide (9a)

Yield: 68%; a white solid, mp 122–124°C; Rf = 0.48 (Hexane: EtOAc, 3:7, v/v). IR (CHCl3) νmax: 1216, 1341 (S = O), 1677 (C = O), 3369 (N-H) cm-1.1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6): δ = 1.35 (d, J = 7.1 Hz, 3H), 1.47–1.52 (m, 1H), 1.69–183 (m, 3H), 2.42 (s, 3H), 3.12–3.18(m, 1H), 3.37–3.45(m,1H), 4.14 (dd, J1 = 8.2 Hz; J2 = 3.57 Hz, 1H), 4.46 (p, J = 7.1 Hz, 1H), 7.06 (t, J = 7.4 Hz, 1H), 7.32 (t, J = 7.7 Hz, 2H), 7.45(d, J = 8.1 Hz, 2H), 7.62 (d, J = 7.8 Hz, 2H), 7.77 (d, J = 8.2 Hz, 2H), 8.29 (d, J = 7.4 Hz, 1H), 9.87 (s, 1H). 13C NMR (100 MHz, DMSO-d6): 18.7, 21.5, 24.6, 31.1, 49.4, 49.6, 61.5, 119.7, 123.9, 127.9, 129.2, 130.3, 134.3, 139.3, 144.1, 171.4, 171.5 (C = O). MS (ESI+): m/z = 416.2. ESI-HR-MS calculated for C21H25N3O4S (M++H): 416.1644, found: 416.1637.

N-(1-oxo-1-(p-tolylamino)propan-2-yl)-1-tosylpyrrolidine-2-carboxamide (9b)

Yield: 65% Yield: 67%; a white solid, mp 95–97°C; Rf = 0.47 (Hexane: EtOAc, 3:7, v/v). IR (CHCl3) νmax: 1217, 1341 (S = O), 1670 (C = O), 3365 (N-H) cm-1.1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6): δ = 1.33(d, J = 7.1 Hz, 3H), 1.46–1.51 (m, 1H), 1.68–182 (m, 3H), 2.25 (s, 3H),2.41 (s, 3H), 3.12–3.17 (m, 1H), 3.39–3.44(m, 1H), 4.12 (dd, J1 = 8.2 Hz; J2 = 3.7 Hz, 1H), 4.44 (p, J = 7.2 Hz, 1H), 7.11 (d, J = 8.3 Hz, 2H), 7.43–7.50 (m, 4H), 7.77 (d, J = 8.2 Hz, 2H), 8.26 (d, J = 7.5 Hz, 1H), 9.77 (s, 1H). 13C NMR (100 MHz, DMSO-d6): 18.7, 20.9, 21.5, 24.6, 31.1, 49.3, 49.6, 61.6, 119.7, 127.9,129.6, 130.3, 132.8, 134.3, 136.8, 144.1, 171.1, 171.4 (C = O). MS (ESI+): m/z = 430.4. ESI-HR-MS calculated for C22H27N3O4S (M++H): 430.1801, found: 430.1798.

N-(1-(4-methoxyphenylamino)-1-oxopropan-2-yl)-1-tosylpyrrolidine-2-carboxamide (9c)

Yield: 81%; a white solid, mp 79–81°C; Rf = 0.54 (Hexane: EtOAc, 3:7, v/v). IR (CHCl3) νmax: 1217, 1342 (S = O), 1674 (C = O), 3373 (N-H) cm-1.1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6): δ = 1.33(d, J = 5.9 Hz, 3H), 1.48 (s, 1H), 1.72–1.78 (m, 3H), 2.41 (s, 3H), 3.15 (d, J = 6.6 Hz, 1H), 3.42(s, 1H), 3.72 (s, 3H), 4.12 (t, J = 4.1 Hz, 1H), 4.45 (t, J = 6.3 Hz, 1H), 6.89 (d, J = 7.1 Hz, 2H), 7.45 (d, J = 7.7 Hz, 2H), 7.52 (d, J = 7.7 Hz, 2H), 7.77 (d, J = 6.9 Hz, 2H), 8.26 (d, J = 6.5 Hz, 1H), 9.72 (s, 1H). 13C NMR (100 MHz, DMSO-d6): 18.8, 21.5, 24.6, 31.1, 49.2, 49.6, 55.6, 61.6, 114.4, 121.2, 127.9, 130.3, 132.4, 134.3, 144.1, 155.8, 170.8, 171.4 (C = O). MS (ESI+): m/z = 446.3. ESI-HR-MS calculated for C22H27N3O4S (M++H): 446.1750, found: 446.1746.

N-(1-(4-isopropylphenylamino)-1-oxopropan-2-yl)-1-tosylpyrrolidine-2-carboxamide (9d)

Yield: 74%; a white solid, mp 121–123°C; Rf = 0.44 (Hexane: EtOAc, 3:7, v/v). IR (CHCl3) νmax: 1246, 1339 (S = O), 1667 (C = O), 3359 (N-H) cm-1.1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6): δ = 1.10(d, J = 6.9 Hz, 6H), 1.7(d, J = 6.9 Hz, 3H), 1.39–1.45 (m, 1H), 1.62–1.75 (m, 3H), 2.5 (s, 3H), 2.7–2.80(m, 1H), 3.04–3.10(m, 1H), 3.30–3.37(m, 1H), 4.06 (dd, J1 = 8.2 Hz; J2 = 3.8 Hz, 1H), 4.37 (p, J = 7.3 Hz, 1H), 7.11 (d, J = 8.6 Hz, 2H), 7.38 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 2H), 7.44 (d, J = 8.6 Hz, 2H), 7.70 (d, J = 8.2 Hz, 2H), 8.19 (d, J = 7.5 Hz, 1H), 9.71 (s, 1H). 13C NMR (100 MHz, DMSO-d6): 18.7, 21.5, 24.4, 24.6, 31.1, 33.2, 49.3, 49.6, 61.6, 119.8, 126.9, 127.9, 130.3, 134.4, 137.0, 144.0, 144.1, 171.1, 171.5 (C = O). ESI-HR-MS calculated for C24H31N3O4S (M++H): 458.2114, found: 458.2110.

N-(1-(4-chlorophenylamino)-1-oxopropan-2-yl)-1-tosylpyrrolidine-2-carboxamide (9e)

Yield: 71%; a white solid, mp 90–92°C; Rf = 0.41 (Hexane: EtOAc, 3:7, v/v). IR (CHCl3) νmax: 1158, 1339 (S = O), 1667 (C = O), 3355 (N-H) cm-1.1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6): δ = 1.35 (d, J = 7.1 Hz, 3H), 1.47–1.52 (m, 1H), 1.69–182 (m, 3H), 2.42 (s, 3H), 3.12–3.18(m, 1H), 3.38–3.44(m, 1H), 4.14 (dd, J1 = 8.2 Hz; J2 = 3.74 Hz, 1H), 4.44 (p, J = 7.2 Hz, 1H), 7.37–7.40 (m, 2H), 7.45 (D, J = 8.2 Hz, 2H), 7.62–7.66 (m, 2H), 7.77 (d, J = 8.2 Hz, 2H), 8.31 (d, J = 7.3 Hz, 1H), 10.03 (s, 1H). 13C NMR (100 MHz, DMSO-d6): 18.5, 21.5, 24.6, 31.3, 49.4, 49.6, 61.5, 121.2, 127.4, 127.7, 129.1, 130.3, 134.4, 138.2, 144.1, 177.5 (C = O). ESI-HR-MS calculated for C21H24ClN3O4S (M++H): 450.1254, found: 450.1250.

N-(1-(4-fluorophenylamino)-1-oxopropan-2-yl)-1-tosylpyrrolidine-2-carboxamide (9f)

Yield: 68%; a white solid, mp 110–112°C; Rf = 0.56 (Hexane: EtOAc, 3:7, v/v). IR (CHCl3) νmax: 1214, 1339 (S = O), 1666 (C = O), 3357 (N-H) cm-1.1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6): δ = 1.34(d, J = 6.7 Hz, 3H), 1.47 (s, 1H), 1.72–178 (m, 3H), 2.42 (s, 3H), 3.12–3.8(m, 1H), 3.37–3.45 (m, 1H), 4.14 (dd, J1 = 8.2 Hz; J2 = 3.57 Hz, 1H), 4.46 (q, J = 7.1 Hz, 1H), 7.06 (t, J = 7.4 Hz, 1H), 7.32 (t, J = 7.7 Hz, 2H), 7.45 (d, J = 8.1 Hz, 2H), 7.62 (d, J = 7.8 Hz, 2H), 7.77 (d, J = 8.2 Hz, 2H), 8.229 (d, J = 7.4 Hz, 1H), 9.87 (s, 1H). 13C NMR (100 MHz, DMSO-d6): 18.7, 21.5, 24.6, 31.1, 49.4, 49.6, 61.5, 119.7, 123.9, 127.9, 129.2, 130.3, 134.3, 139.3, 144.1, 171.4, 171.5 (C = O). MS (ESI+): m/z = 416.2. ESI-HR-MS calculated for C21H25N3O4S (M++H): 416.1644, found: 416.1637.

N-(1-(4-fluorophenylamino)-1-oxopropan-2-yl)-1-tosylpyrrolidine-2-carboxamide (9g)

Yield: 54%; a white solid, mp 81–83°C; Rf = 0.65 (Hexane: EtOAc, 3:7, v/v). IR (CHCl3) νmax: 1217, 1335 (S = O), 1679 (C = O), 3361 (N-H) cm-1.1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6): δ = 1.37(d, J = 7.0 Hz, 3H), 1.47–1.52 (m, 1H), 1.70–1.83 (m, 3H), 2.42(s, 3H), 3.13–3.18(m, 1H), 3.38–3.44 (m, 1H), 4.13–4.16 (m, 1H), 4.15 (dd, J1 = 8.1 Hz; J2 = 3.5 Hz, 1H), 4.41–4.48 (m, 1H), 7.44 (t, J = 8.3 Hz, 3H), 7.75 (t, J = 8.0 Hz, 1H), 7.78 (t, J = 11.1 Hz, 3H),8.11 (s, 1H), 8.33(d, J = 7.1 Hz, 1H), 10.25 (s, 1H). 13C NMR (100 MHz, DMSO-d6): 18.4, 21.5, 22.5, 24.6, 31.1, 31.4, 49.6, 61.4, 115.7, 120.2, 123.2, 127.7, 127.9, 129.8, 130.1, 130.3, 130.5, 134.4, 140.1, 144.1, 171.6, 172.0 (C = O). MS (ESI+): m/z = 484.4. ESI-HR-MS calculated for C21H25N3O4S (M++H): 484.1518, found: 484.1513.

N-(1-(4-chlorobenzylamino)-1-oxopropan-2-yl)-1-tosylpyrrolidine-2-carboxamide (9h)

Yield: 54%; a white solid, mp 68–70°C; Rf = 0.42 (Hexane: EtOAc, 3:7, v/v). IR (CHCl3) νmax: 1159, 1216, 1344 (S = O), 1671 (C = O), 3399 (N-H) cm-1.1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6): δ = 1.27 (d, J = 7.0 Hz, 3H), 1.45–1.48 (m, 1H), 1.67–1.78 (m, 4H), 2.41 (s, 3H), 3.11–3.16 (m, 1H), 4.07–4.09 (m, 1H), 4.23–4.33 (m, 3H), 7.27 (d, J = 8.2 Hz, 2H), 7.37 (d, J = 8.2 Hz, 2H), 7.44 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 2H), 7.74 (d, J = 8.1 Hz, 2H), 8.16 (d, J = 7.32 Hz, 1H), 8.36 (t, J = 5.5 Hz, 1H). 13C NMR (100 MHz, DMSO-d6): 18.6, 21.5, 24.6, 31.1, 41.8, 48.8, 49.6, 61.6, 127.9, 128.7, 129.4, 130.3, 131.8, 134.3, 138.8, 144.1, 171.4, 172.5 (C = O). MS (ESI+): m/z = 464.4. ESI-HR-MS calculated for C22H26ClN3O4S (M++H): 464.1411, found: 464.1408.

N-(1-(3,4-dichlorophenylamino)-1-oxopropan-2-yl)-1-tosylpyrrolidine-2-carboxamide (9i)

Yield: 61%; a white solid, mp 98–100°C; Rf = 0.50 (Hexane: EtOAc, 3:7, v/v). IR (CHCl3) νmax: 1341, 1383 (S = O), 1680 (C = O), 3361 (N-H) cm-1.1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6): δ = 1.28(d, J = 7.1 Hz, 3H), 1.40–1.45 (m, 1H), 1.63–1.75 (m, 3H), 2.35 (s, 3H), 3.05–3.11 (m, 1H), 3.31–3.35 (m, 1H), 4.07 (dd, J1 = 8.1 Hz; J2 = 3.7 Hz, 1H), 4.34 (p, J = 7.0 Hz, 1H), 7.38 (d, J = 8.1 Hz, 2H), 7.44(dd, J1 = 8.9 Hz; J2 = 2.4 Hz, 1H), 7.52 (d, J = 8.8 Hz, 1H), 7.70 (d, J = 8.3 Hz, 2H), 7.93 (d, J = 2.4 Hz, 1H), 8.26 (d, J = 7.2 Hz, 1H), 10.13 (s, 1H). 13C NMR (100 MHz, DMSO-d6): 18.3, 21.5, 24.6, 31.1, 49.6, 61.4, 119.7, 120.9, 125.4, 127.9, 130.3, 131.5, 134.4, 139.4, 144.1, 171.6, 172.0 (C = O). ESI-HR-MS calculated for C21H23Cl2N3O4S (M++H): 484.0865, found: 484.0869.

N-(1-(3-chloro-4-fluorophenylamino)-1-oxopropan-2-yl)-1-tosylpyrrolidine-2-carboxamide (9j)

Yield: 54%; a white solid, mp 153–155°C; Rf = 0.53 (Hexane: EtOAc, 3:7, v/v). IR (CHCl3) νmax: 1158, 1218, 1394 (S = O), 1670 (C = O), 3358 (N-H) cm-1.1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6): δ = 1.35 (d, J = 7.1 Hz, 3H), 1.47–1.52 (m, 1H), 1.72–1.82 (m, 3H), 2.42 (s, 3H), 3.12–3.18 (m, 1H), 3.38–3.45 (m, 1H), 4.14 (dd, J1 = 8.1 Hz; J2 = 3.8 Hz, 1H), 4.42 (p, J = 7.0 Hz, 1H), 7.37–7.48 (m, 4H), 7.77 (d, J = 8.3 Hz, 2H), 7.94 15 (dd, J1 = 6.9 Hz; J2 = 2.6 Hz, 1H), 8.33(d, J = 7.3 Hz, 1H), 10.13 (s, 1H). 13C NMR (100 MHz, DMSO-d6): 18.4, 21.5, 24.6, 31.1, 49.5, 49.6, 61.4, 119.5, 119.7, 119.9, 120.0, 121.0, 127.9, 130.3, 134.4, 136.6, 144.1, 152.4, 171.6, 171.7 (C = O). MS (ESI+): m/z = 468.4. ESI-HR-MS calculated for C21H23ClFN3O4S (M++H): 468.1160, found: 468.1164.

N-(1-(3,4-dimethoxyphenylamino)-1-oxopropan-2-yl)-1-tosylpyrrolidine-2-carboxamide (9k)

Yield: 77%; a brown solid, mp 122–124°C; Rf = 0.44 (Hexane: EtOAc, 1:9, v/v).IR (CHCl3) νmax: 1232, 1339 (S = O), 1667 (C = O), 3358 (N-H) cm-1.1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6): δ = 1.34(d, J = 6.4 Hz, 3H), 1.48 (s, 1H), 1.73–178 (m, 3H), 2.42 (s, 3H),3.13–3.18 (m, 1H), 3.40–3.44(m, 1H), 3.72 (s, 6H), 4.11–4.13(m, 1H),4.43 (t, J = 6.5 Hz, 1H), 6.90(d, J = 8.4 Hz, 1H), 7.13 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 1H), 7.32 (s, 1H), 7.45 (d, J = 7.5 Hz, 2H), 7.77 (d, J = 7.5 Hz, 2H), 8.26 (d, J = 6.7 Hz, 1H), 9.71 (s, 1H). 13C NMR (100 MHz, DMSO-d6): 18.7, 24.6, 31.1, 49.3, 49.6, 55.8, 56.2, 61.7, 104.8, 111.6, 112.6, 127.9, 130.3, 132.9, 134.2, 144.1, 145.4, 149.0, 170.8, 171.4 (C = O). ESI-HR-MS calculated for C23H29N3O4S (M++H): 444.1957, found: 444.1949.

N-(1-(3,5-dimethylphenylamino)-1-oxopropan-2-yl)-1-tosylpyrrolidine-2-carboxamide(9l)

Yield: 68%; a white solid, mp 122–124°C; Rf = 0.48 (Hexane: EtOAc, 3:7, v/v). IR (CHCl3) νmax: 1217, 1344 (S = O), 1672 (C = O), 3373 (N-H) cm-1.1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6): δ = 1.33(d, J = 6.9 Hz, 3H), 1.47–1.49 (m, 1H), 1.70–180 (m, 3H), 2.23 (s, 6H), 3.41(s, 3H), 3.12–3.18(m, 1H), 3.38–3.42(m, 1H), 4.13–4.15(m, 1H), 4.39–4.46 (m,1H),6.71 (s,1H), 7.23 (s,2H), 7.41–7.46 (m, 2H), 7.73–7.78 (m, 2H), 8.22 (d, J = 7.2 Hz, 1H), 9.74 (s, 1H). 13C NMR (100 MHz, DMSO-d6): 18.7, 21.5, 21.6, 24.6, 31.1, 49.4, 49.6, 61.5, 117.5, 125.4, 127.7, 127.9, 130.3, 134.4, 138.2, 139.1, 144.1, 171.2, 171.4 (C = O). ESI-HR-MS calculated for C23H29N3O4S (M++H): 444.1957, found: 444.1949.

N-(1-(5-methylthiazol-2-ylamino)-1-oxopropan-2-yl)-1-tosylpyrrolidine-2-carboxamide(9m)

Yield: 44%; a white solid, mp 234–236 oC; Rf = 0.47 (Hexane: EtOAc, 3:7, v/v). IR (CHCl3) νmax: 1217, 1345 (S = O), 1678 (C = O), 3395 (N-H) cm-1.1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6): δ = 1.33(d, J = 7.1 Hz, 3H), 1.45–1.52 (m, 1H), 1.66–181 (m, 3H), 2.34(d, J = 1.2 Hz, 3H), 2.41 (s, 3H), 3.11–3.17(m, 1H), 3.34–3.40 (m, 1H), 4.16 (dd, J1 = 8.3 Hz; J2 = 3.6 Hz, 1H), 4.50 (p, J = 7.1 Hz, 1H), 7.14 (d, J = 1.3 Hz, 1H), 7.44 (d, J = 8.1 Hz, 2H), 7.75 (d, J = 8.1 Hz, 2H), 8.30 (d, J = 7.0 Hz, 1H), 11.95 (s, 1H). 13C NMR (100 MHz, DMSO-d6): 11.5, 18.3, 21.5, 24.6, 31.1, 48.7, 49.5, 61.2, 126.9, 127.9, 130.3, 134.6, 135.2, 144.0, 156.4, 171.3, 171.6 (C = O). MS (ESI+): m/z = 437.4. ESI-HR-MS calculated for C19H24N4O4S2(M++H): 437.1317, found: 437.1314.

N-(1-(benzo[d]thiazol-2-ylamino)-1-oxopropan-2-yl)-1-tosylpyrrolidine-2-carboxamide (9n)

Yield: 63%; a white solid, mp 110–112°C; Rf = 0.64 (Hexane: EtOAc, 3:7, v/v). IR (CHCl3) νmax: 1267, 1344 (S = O), 1666 (C = O), 3293 (N-H) cm-1.1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6): δ = 1.39(d, J = 7.0 Hz, 3H), 1.48–1.55 (m, 1H), 1.69–183 (m, 4H), 2.42 (s, 3H), 3.12–3.18(m, 1H), 4.19 (dd, J1 = 8.2 Hz; J2 = 3.6 Hz, 1H), 4.57 (p, J = 7.0 Hz, 1H), 7.30–7.34 (m, 1H), 7.43–7.43 (m,3H), 7.75–7.78 (m, 3H), 7.98 (d, J = 7.4 Hz, 1H), 8.40 (d, J = 6.8 Hz, 1H), 12.41 (s, 1H). 13C NMR (100 MHz, DMSO-d6): 18.1, 21.5, 24.6, 31.1, 49.0, 49.5, 61.2, 121.1, 122.2, 124.1, 126.6, 127.9, 130.3, 131.9, 134.7, 144.0, 149.0, 171.7, 172.6 (C = O). MS (ESI+): m/z = 473.3. ESI-HR-MS calculated for C22H24N4O4S2(M++H): 473.1317, found: 473.1312.

N-(1-(3-adamantan-1-yl)-1-oxopropan-2-yl)-1-tosylpyrrolidine-2-carboxamide (9o)

Yield: 54%; a white solid, mp 69–71°C; Rf = 0.43 (Hexane: EtOAc, 3:7, v/v). IR (CHCl3) νmax: 1160, 1216, 1384 (S = O), 1664 (C = O), 3398 (N-H) cm-1.1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6): δ = 0.84–0.87 (m, 1H), 1.21 (d, J = 7.0 Hz, 3H), 1.45–1.49 (m, 1H), 1.62 (s, 6H), 1.72–1.79 (m, 2H), 1.93 (s, 6H), 2.01 (s, 3H), 2.42 2.01 (s, 3H), 3.10–3.16 (m, 1H), 3.37–3.45 (m, 1H), 4.07 (dd, J1 = 8.2 Hz; J2 = 3.7 Hz, 1H), 4.20–4.29 (m, 1H), 7.23 (s, 1H), 7.45 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 2H), 7.76 (d, J = 8.3 Hz, 2H), 8.00 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 1H). 13C NMR (100 MHz, DMSO-d6): 19.2, 21.5, 24.6, 29.3, 31.1, 31.2, 36.5, 41.4, 44.2, 48.8, 49.6, 50.2, 51.2, 61.9, 69.3, 128.0, 130.4, 134.1, 144.2, 171.0, 171.4 (C = O). MS (ESI+): m/z = 474.5. ESI-HR-MS calculated for C25H35N3O4S (M++H): 474.2427, found: 474.2430.

N-(1-(naphthalen-1-ylamino)-1-oxopropan-2-yl)-1-tosylpyrrolidine-2-carboxamide (9p)

Yield: 35%; a white solid, mp 168–170°C; Rf = 0.38 (Hexane: EtOAc, 3:7, v/v). IR (CHCl3) νmax: 1216, 1346 (S = O), 1676 (C = O), 3401 (N-H) cm-1.1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6): δ = 1.39–1.44 (m, 4H), 1.62–168 (m, 1H), 1.72–179 (m, 2H), 2.35 (s, 3H), 3.06–3.12(m, 1H), 3.30–3.41(m, 1H), 4.11 (dd, J1 = 8.4Hz; J2 = 3.6 Hz, 1H), 4.60 (p, J = 7.2 Hz, 1H), 7.37–7.50 (m, 5H), 7.58 (d, J = 7.0 Hz, 1H), 7.71 (t, J = 9.0 Hz, 3H), 7.87–7.89 (m, 1H), 7.98–8.00 (m, 1H), 8.29 (d, J = 7.3 Hz, 1H), 9.85 (s, 1H). 13C NMR (100 MHz, DMSO-d6): 18.7, 21.5, 24.6, 31.1, 49.4, 49.6, 61.6, 122.4, 123.2, 126.0, 126.1, 126.4, 126.6, 127.9, 129.2, 128.4, 128.6, 130.3, 133.6, 134.2, 134.4, 144.1, 171.7, 172.2 (C = O). ESI-HR-MS calculated for C25H27N3O4S (M++H): 466.1801, found: 466.1797.

1-(4-nitrophenylsulfonyl)-N-(1-oxo-1-(phenylamino)propan-2-yl)pyrrolidine-2-carboxamide (10a)

Yield: 73%; a white solid, mp 156–158°C; Rf = 0.44 (Hexane: EtOAc, 3:7, v/v). IR (CHCl3) νmax: 1245, 1351 (S = O), 1668 (C = O), 3368 (N-H) cm-1.1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6): δ = 1.34 (d, J = 7.0 Hz, 3H), 1.58–1.63 (m, 1H), 1.81–1.87 (m, 3H), 3.23–3.29 (m, 1H), 3.43–3.48 (m, 1H), 4.27 (dd, J1 = 7.1 Hz; J2 = 4.0 Hz, 1H), 4.43 (p, J = 7.2 Hz, 1H), 7.05 (t, J = 7.4 Hz, 1H), 7.31 (t, J = 7.5 Hz, 2H), 7.59 (d, J = 7.6 Hz, 2H), 8.12–8.14 (m, 2H), 8.36 (d, J = 7.5 Hz, 1H), 8.42–8.44 (m, 2H), 9.93 (s, 1H). 13C NMR (100 MHz, DMSO-d6): 18.7, 24.6, 31.3, 49.4, 49.6, 61.4, 119.6, 123.9, 125.0, 129.2, 129.3, 139.3, 143.2, 150.4, 171.1, 171.4 (C = O). MS (ESI+): m/z = 447.4. ESI-HR-MS calculated for C20H22N4O6S (M++H): 447.1338, found: 481.1335.

1-(4-nitrophenylsulfonyl)-N-(1-oxo-1-(p-tolylamino)propan-2-yl)pyrrolidine-2-carboxamide(10b)

Yield: 78%; a yellow solid, mp 140–142°C; Rf = 0.46 (Hexane: EtOAc, 3:7, v/v). IR (CHCl3) νmax: 1217, 1352 (S = O), 1672 (C = O), 3380 (N-H) cm-1.1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6): δ = 1.33 (d, J = 7.0 Hz, 3H), 1.58–1.63 (m, 1H), 1.81–1.87 (m, 3H), 2.24 (s, 3H), 3.23–3.27 (m, 1H), 3.43–3.48 (m, 1H), 4.24–4.27 (m,1H), 4.41 (p, J = 7.2 Hz, 1H), 7.11 (d, J = 8.3 Hz, 2H), 7.47 (d, J = 8.74 Hz, 2H), 8.12–8.14 (m, 2H), 8.34 (d, J = 7.4 Hz, 1H), 8.41–8.44 (m, 2H), 9.83 (s, 1H). 13C NMR (100 MHz, DMSO-d6): 18.7, 20.9, 24.6, 31.3, 49.3, 49.6, 61.4, 119.6, 125.0, 129.4, 129.6, 132.8, 136.8, 143.2, 150.4, 171.1 (C = O). MS (ESI+): m/z = 461.4. ESI-HR-MS calculated for C21H24N4O6S (M++H): 461.1495, found: 461.1498.

N-(1-(4-methoxyphenylamino)-1-oxopropan-2-yl)-1-(4-nitrophenylsulfonyl)pyrrolidine-2-carboxamide(10c)

Yield: 52%; a yellow solid, mp 131–133°C; Rf = 0.35 (Hexane: EtOAc, 3:7, v/v). IR (CHCl3) νmax: 1217, 1352 (S = O), 1671 (C = O), 3380 (N-H) cm-1.1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6): δ = 1.33 (d, J = 7.1 Hz, 3H), 1.57–1.63 (m, 1H), 1.81–1.88 (m, 3H), 3.25–3.29 (m, 1H), 3.43–3.49 (m, 1H), 3.72 (s, 3H), 4.26 (dd, J1 = 7.5 Hz; J2 = 4.1 Hz, 1H), 4.40 (p, J = 7.3 Hz, 1H), 6.86–6.90 (m, 2H), 7.48–7.52 (m, 2H), 8.11–8.15 (m, 2H), 8.33 (d, J = 7.5 Hz, 1H), 8.41–8.44 (m, 2H), 9.77 (s, 1H). 13C NMR (100 MHz, DMSO-d6): 18.8, 24.6, 31.3, 49.3, 49.6, 55.6, 61.5, 114.3, 121.2, 125.0, 129.4, 132.4, 143.2, 150.4, 155.8, 170.8, 171.1 (C = O). MS (ESI+): m/z = 477.4. ESI-HR-MS calculated for C21H24N4O7S (M++H): 477.1444, found: 477.1445.

N-(1-(4-isopropylphenylamino)-1-oxopropan-2-yl)-1-(4-nitrophenylsulfonyl)pyrrolidine-2-carboxamide (10d)

Yield: 68%; a brown solid, mp 86–88°C; Rf = 0.58 (Hexane: EtOAc, 3:7, v/v). IR (CHCl3) νmax: 1246, 1351 (S = O), 1660 (C = O), 3368 (N-H) cm-1.1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6): δ = 1.17 (d, J = 6.9 Hz, 6H), 1.33 (d, J = 6.9 Hz, 3H), 1.58–1.63 (m, 1H), 1.80–1.87 (m, 3H), 2.80–2.87 (m, 1H), 3.23–3.29 (m, 1H), 3.44–4.49 (m, 1H), 4.26 (dd, J1 = 7.3 Hz; J2 = 4.0 Hz, 1H), 4.41 (p, J = 7.2 Hz, 1H), 7.17 (d, J = 8.5 Hz, 2H), 7.49 (d, J = 8.6 Hz, 2H), 8.13 (d, J = 9.0 Hz, 2H), 8.34 (d, J = 7.4 Hz, 1H), 8.43 (d, J = 8.7 Hz, 2H), 9.84 (s, 1H). 13C NMR (100 MHz, DMSO-d6): 14.4, 18.7, 24.4, 24.6, 31.3, 49.3, 49.6, 61.4, 119.8, 125.0, 126.9, 137.0, 143.2, 143.9, 150.4, 171.1 (C = O). MS (ESI+): m/z = 489.4. ESI-HR-MS calculated for C23H28N4O6S (M++H): 489.1808, found: 489.1807.

N-(1-(4-chlorophenylamino)-1-oxopropan-2-yl)-1-(4-nitrophenylsulfonyl)pyrrolidine-2-carboxamide(10e)

Yield: 78%; a white solid, mp 145–147 oC; Rf = 0.44 (Hexane: EtOAc, 3:7, v/v). IR (CHCl3) νmax: 1216, 1352 (S = O), 1680 (C = O), 3380 (N-H) cm-1.1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6): δ = 1.27 (d, J = 7.0 Hz, 3H), 1.53 (t, J = 5.1 Hz, 1H), 1.75–1.79 (m, 3H), 3.17–3.21 (m, 1H), 3.36–3.41 (m, 1H), 4.18–4.21 (m, 1H), 4.34 (p, J = 7.0 Hz, 1H), 7.30 (d, J = 8.8 Hz, 2H), 7.56 (d, J = 8.7 Hz, 2H), 8.06 (d, J = 8.7 Hz, 2H), 8.32 (d, J = 7.3 Hz, 1H), 8.36 (d, J = 8.7 Hz, 2H), 10.02 (s, 1H). 13C NMR (100 MHz, DMSO-d6): 18.5, 24.6, 31.3, 49.4, 49.5, 61.3, 121.2, 125.0, 127.4, 129.1, 129.3, 131.5, 138.3, 143.3, 150.4, 171.2, 171.5 (C = O). ESI-HR-MS calculated for C20H21ClN4O6S (M++H): 481.0949, found: 481.0953.

N-(1-(4-fluorophenylamino)-1-oxopropan-2-yl)-1-(4-nitrophenylsulfonyl)pyrrolidine-2-carboxamide (10f)

Yield: 66%; a white solid, mp 156–158°C; Rf = 0.41 (Hexane: EtOAc, 3:7, v/v). IR (CHCl3) νmax: 1216, 1352 (S = O), 1676 (C = O), 3379 (N-H) cm-1.1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6): δ = 1.27 (d, J = 7.1 Hz, 3H), 1.53 (t, J = 5.1 Hz, 1H), 1.75–1.79 (m, 3H), 3.17–3.21 (m, 1H), 3.37–3.40 (m, 1H), 4.18–4.21 (m, 1H), 4.34 (p, J = 7.1 Hz, 1H), 7.08 (t, J = 8.8 Hz, 2H), 7.54 (q, J = 5.1 Hz, 2H), 8.06 (d, J = 8.8 Hz, 2H), 8.30 (d, J = 7.3 Hz, 1H), 8.36 (d, J = 8.6 Hz, 2H), 9.93 (s, 1H). 13C NMR (100 MHz, DMSO-d6): 18.6, 24.6, 31.3, 49.4, 49.6, 61.4, 115.7, 115.9, 121.3, 121.4, 125.0, 129.3, 135.7, 143.2, 150.4, 157.3, 159.7, 171.1, 171.3 (C = O). MS (ESI+): m/z = 465.3. ESI-HR-MS calculated for C20H22FN4O6S (M++H): 465.1244, found: 465.1244.

1-(4-Nitrophenylsulfonyl)-N-(1-oxo-1-(3-(trifluoromethyl)phenylamino)propan-2-yl)pyrrolidine-2-carboxamide (10g)

Yield: 67%; a white solid, mp 78–80°C; Rf = 0.60 (Hexane: EtOAc, 3:7, v/v). IR (CHCl3) νmax: 1163, 1341 (S = O), 1667 (C = O), 3364 (N-H) cm-1.1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6): δ = 1.37 (d, J = 7.0 Hz, 3H), 1.57–1.66 (m, 1H), 1.81–1.91 (m, 3H), 3.25–3.30 (m, 1H), 3.43–3.48 (m, 1H), 4.27 (dd, J1 = 7.6 Hz; J2 = 3.9 Hz, 1H), 4.41 (p, J = 7.1 Hz, 1H), 7.41 (d, J = 7.7 Hz, 1H), 7.56 (t, J = 8.1 Hz, 1H), 7.78 (d, J = 8.3 Hz, 1H), 8.09–8.15 (m, 3H), 8.40–8.45 (m, 3H), 10.02 (s, 1H). 13C NMR (100 MHz, DMSO-d6): 18.4, 24.6, 31.3, 49.6, 61.3, 115.6, 120.2, 123.2, 125.0, 125.9, 129.3, 129.8, 130.1, 130.5, 140.1, 143.3, 150.4, 171.2, 172.5 (C = O). MS (ESI+): m/z = 515.3. ESI-HR-MS calculated for C21H21F3N4O6S (M++H): 515.1212, found: 515.1209.

N-(1-(4-chlorobenzylamino)-1-oxopropan-2-yl)-1-(4-nitrophenylsulfonyl)pyrrolidine-2-carboxamide (10h)

Yield: 54%; a white solid, mp 127–129 oC; Rf = 0.30 (Hexane: EtOAc, 3:7, v/v). IR (CHCl3) νmax: 1165, 1216, 1353 (S = O), 1671 (C = O), 3403 (N-H) cm-1.1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6): δ = 1.27 (d, J = 7.0 Hz, 3H), 1.57–1.60 (m, 1H), 1.78–1.87 (m, 3H), 3.22–3.26 (m, 1H), 3.43–3.47 (m, 1H), 4.20–4.32 (m, 4H), 7.25 (d, J = 8.4 Hz, 2H), 7.36 (d, J = 8.5 Hz, 2H), 8.11 (d, J = 9.0 Hz, 2H), 8.25 (d, J = 7.4 Hz, 1H), 8.37–8.43 (m, 3H). 13C NMR (100 MHz, DMSO-d6): 18.7, 24.6, 31.2, 41.8, 48.8, 49.6, 61.5, 125.0, 128.7, 129.3, 131.8, 138.8, 143.2, 150.4, 171.0, 172.5 (C = O). MS (ESI+): m/z = 495.3. ESI-HR-MS calculated for C21H23ClN4O6S (M++H): 495.1105, found: 495.1100.

N-(1-(3,4-dichlorophenylamino)-1-oxopropan-2-yl)-1-(4-nitrophenylsulfonyl)pyrrolidine-2-carboxamide(10i)

Yield: 64%; a white solid, mp 120–122°C; Rf = 0.47 (Hexane: EtOAc, 3:7, v/v). IR (CHCl3) νmax: 1308, 1352 (S = O), 1677 (C = O), 3369 (N-H) cm-1.1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6): δ = 1.28(d, J = 7.1 Hz, 3H), 1.52-152(m,1H), 1.73–1.84 (m, 3H), 3.17–3.23 (m, 1H), 3.36–3.41 (m, 1H), 4.20(dd, J1 = 7.3 Hz; J2 = 3.7 Hz, 1H), 4.31 (p, J = 7.2 Hz, 1H), 7.42 (dd, J1 = 8.8 Hz; J2 = 2.3 Hz, 1H), 7.51 (d, J = 8.9 Hz, 1H), 7.92 (d, J = 2.4 Hz, 1H), 8.04–8.07 (m,2H), 8.33–8.37 (m,3H), 10.19 (s, 1H). 13C NMR (100 MHz, DMSO-d6): 18.3, 24.6, 31.3, 49.5, 61.3, 119.7, 120.8, 125.0, 125.3, 129.3, 131.2, 131.5, 139.4, 143.3, 150.4, 171.2, 171.9 (C = O). MS (ESI+): m/z = 515.2. ESI-HR-MS calculated for C20H21ClN4O6S (M++H): 515.0559, found: 481.0556.

N-(1-(3-chloro-4-fluorophenylamino)-1-oxopropan-2-yl)-1-(4-nitrophenylsulfonyl) pyrrolidine-2-carboxamide (10j)

Yield: 57%; a white solid, mp 83–85°C; Rf = 0.55 (Hexane: EtOAc, 3:7, v/v). IR (CHCl3) νmax: 1164, 1216, 1352 (S = O), 1677 (C = O), 3377 (N-H) cm-1.1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6): δ = 1.23–1.16 (m, 1H), 1.35 (d, J = 7.1 Hz, 3H), 1.59–1.62 (m, 1H), 1.82–1.88 (m, 3H), 4.04 (q, J = 7.1 Hz, 1H), 4.26 (dd, J1 = 7.5 Hz; J2 = 3.6 Hz, 1H), 4.38 (p, J = 7.2 Hz, 1H), 7.38 (d, J = 9.1 Hz, 1H), 7.46–7.49 (m, 1H), 7.92 (dd, J1 = 6.8 Hz; J2 = 2.5 Hz, 1H), 8.13 (d, J = 8.87 Hz, 2H), 8.39–7.44 (m, 3H), 10.18 (s, 1H). 13C NMR (100 MHz, DMSO-d6): 18.4, 24.6, 31.3, 49.5, 61.3, 117.4, 117.6, 119.9, 120.0, 121.0, 125.0, 129.3, 136.5, 143.3, 150.4, 171.2, 171.7 (C = O). MS (ESI+): m/z = 499.3. ESI-HR-MS calculated for C20H20ClFN4O6S (M++H): 499.0854, found: 499.0861.

N-(1-(3,4-dimethoxyphenylamino)-1-oxopropan-2-yl)-1-(4-nitrophenylsulfonyl)pyrrolidine-2-carboxamide(10k)

Yield: 78%; a brown solid, mp 129–131°C; Rf = 0.43 (Hexane: EtOAc, 1:9, v/v). IR (CHCl3) νmax: 1048, 1216 (S = O), 1674 (C = O), 3389 (N-H) cm-1.1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6): δ = 1.33 (d, J = 7.0 Hz, 3H), 1.58–1.63 (m,1H), 1.81–1.88 (m, 3H), 3.24–3.28 (m, 1H), 3.44–3.49 (m, 1H), 3.71 (d, J = 3.1 Hz, 6H), 4.25 (dd, J1 = 7.4 Hz; J2 = 3.1 Hz, 1H), 4.39 (p, J = 7.2 Hz, 1H), 6.89 (d, J = 8.8 Hz, 1H), 7.11 (dd, J1 = 8.7 Hz; J2 = 2.4 Hz, 1H), 7.29 (d, J = 2.3 Hz, 1H), 8.11–8.15 (m, 2H), 8.33 (d, J = 7.5 Hz, 1H), 8.41–8.44 (m, 2H), 9.77 (s, 1H). 13C NMR (100 MHz, DMSO-d6): 18.7, 21.6, 31.3, 49.3, 49.6, 55.8, 56.2, 61.5, 104.8, 111.6, 112.6, 125.0, 129.4, 132.9, 143.1, 145.4, 149.0, 150.4, 170.8, 171.0 (C = O). MS (ESI+): m/z = 507.4. ESI-HR-MS calculated for C22H26N4O8S (M++H): 507.1550, found: 507.1552.

N-(1-(3,5-dimethylphenylamino)-1-oxopropan-2-yl)-1-(4-nitrophenylsulfonyl)pyrrolidine-2-carboxamide(10l)

Yield: 78%; a yellow solid, mp 84–86°C; Rf = 0.58 (Hexane: EtOAc, 3:7, v/v). IR (CHCl3) νmax: 1217, 1352 (S = O), 1670 (C = O), 3374 (N-H) cm-1.1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6): δ = 1.32 (d, J = 7.1 Hz, 3H), 1.57–1.65 (m,1H), 1.81–1.88 (m, 3H), 2.23 (s, 6H), 3.23–3.29 (m, 1H), 3.43–3.48 (m, 1H), 4.25–4.28 (m, 1H), 4.39 (p, J = 7.2 Hz, 1H), 6.70 (s, 1H), 7.21 (s, 2H), 8.11–8.14 (m, 2H), 8.30 (d, J = 7.3 Hz, 1H), 8.41–8.44 (m, 2H), 9.77 (s, 1H). 13C NMR (100 MHz, DMSO-d6): 18.7, 21.6, 22.5, 24.6, 31.3, 49.4, 49.6, 61.4, 117.4, 125.0, 125.0, 125.4, 129.3, 138.2, 139.3, 143.2, 150.4, 171.1, 171.2 (C = O). MS (ESI+): m/z = 475.4. ESI-HR-MS calculated for C22H26N4O6S (M++H): 475.1651, found: 475.1653.

N-(1-(5-methylthiazol-2-ylamino)-1-oxopropan-2-yl)-1-(4-nitrophenylsulfonyl)pyrrolidine-2-carboxamide (10m)

Yield: 57%; a white solid, mp 232–234°C; Rf = 0.35 (Hexane: EtOAc, 3:7, v/v). IR (CHCl3) νmax: 1216, 1352 (S = O), 1672 (C = O), 3401 (N-H) cm-1.1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6): δ = 1.26 (d, J = 7.0 Hz, 3H), 1.53–1.60 (m, 1H), 1.73–1.84 (m, 3H), 2.27 (d, J = 1.0 Hz, 2H), 3.19–3.22 (m, 1H), 3.33–3.39 (m, 1H), 4.15 (dd, J1 = 7.7 Hz; J2 = 3.5 Hz, 1H), 4.39 (p, J = 6.9 Hz, 1H), 7.07 (d, J = 1.3 Hz, 1H), 8.03–8.06 (m, 2H), 8.33–8.37 (m, 3H), 11.91 (s, 1H). 13C NMR (100 MHz, DMSO-d6): 11.5, 18.2, 24.6, 31.2, 48.7, 49.5, 61.2, 125.0, 126.9, 129.3, 135.3, 143.4, 150.4, 156.4, 171.2 (C = O). MS (ESI+): m/z = 468.3. ESI-HR-MS calculated for C18H21N5O6S2 (M++H): 468.1011, found: 468.1011.

N-(1-(benzo[d]thiazol-2-ylamino)-1-oxopropan-2-yl)-1-(4-nitrophenylsulfonyl)pyrrolidine-2-carboxamide (10n)

Yield: 77%; a white solid, mp 144–146°C; Rf = 0.52 (Hexane: EtOAc, 3:7, v/v). IR (CHCl3) νmax: 1267, 1352 (S = O), 1669 (C = O), 3360 (N-H) cm-1.1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6): δ = 1.39 (d, J = 7.2 Hz, 3H), 1.60–1.66 (m, 1H), 1.81–1.93 (m, 3H), 3.25–3.31 (m, 1H), 3.39–3.46 (m, 1H), 4.30 (dd, J1 = 7.6 Hz; J2 = 3.6 Hz, 1H), 4.52 (p, J = 6.9 Hz, 1H), 7.29–7.33 (m, 1H), 7.42–7.47 (m, 1H), 7.76 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 1H), 7.98 (dd, J1 = 7.9 Hz; J2 = 0.5 Hz, 1H), 8.11 (t, J = 2.0 Hz, 1H), 8.13 (t, J = 2.4 Hz, 1H), 8.42 (t, J = 2.0 Hz, 1H), 8.44 (t, J = 2.4 Hz, 1H), 8.51 (d, J = 6.7 Hz, 1H), 12.46 (s, 1H). 13C NMR (100 MHz, DMSO-d6): 18.0, 24.6, 31.3, 49.0, 49.4, 61.1, 121.1, 122.2, 124.1, 125.0, 126.6, 129.3, 131.9, 143.5, 149.0, 150.4, 158.2, 171.3, 172.5 (C = O). ESI-HR-MS calculated for C21H21N5O6S2 (M++H): 504.1011, found: 504.1006.

N-(1-(3-adamantan-1-yl)-1-oxopropan-2-yl)-1-(4-nitrophenylsulfonyl) pyrrolidine-2-carboxamide (10o)

Yield: 50%; a white solid, mp 111–113 oC; Rf = 0.53 (Hexane: EtOAc, 3:7, v/v). IR (CHCl3) νmax: 1165, 1216, 1310 (S = O), 1658 (C = O), 3397 (N-H) cm-1.1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6): δ = 1.20 (d, J = 6.8 Hz, 3H), 1.59 (d, J = 12.4 Hz, 8H), 1.78–1.80 (m, 4H), 1.91 (s, 6H), 2.00 (s, 3H), 4.20–4.29 (m, 2H), 7.23 (s, 1H), 8.06 (d, J = 7.8 Hz, 1H), 8.13 (d, J = 8.6 Hz, 2H), 8.43 (d, J = 8.8 Hz, 2H). 13C NMR (100 MHz, DMSO-d6): 19.1, 24.6, 29.2, 31.2, 36.4, 41.4, 48.9, 49.6, 51.2, 61.8, 114.4, 125.1, 127.9, 129.4, 150.5, 170.8 (C = O). MS (ESI+): m/z = 505.4. ESI-HR-MS calculated for C24H32N4O6S (M++H): 505.2121, found: 505.2125.

N-(1-(naphthalen-1-ylamino)-1-oxopropan-2-yl)-1-(4-nitrophenylsulfonyl)pyrrolidine-2-carboxamide(10p)

Yield: 78%; a brown solid, mp 137–139°C??; Rf = 0.44 (Hexane: EtOAc, 3:7, v/v). IR (CHCl3) νmax: 1216, 1352 (S = O), 1678 (C = O), 3380 (N-H) cm-1.1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6): δ = 1.71 (d, J = 7.0 Hz, 3H), 1.60–1.62 (m, 1H), 1.85–1.91 (m, 3H), 3.24–3.29 (m, 1H), 3.47–3.51 (m, 1H), 4.30 (t, J = 5.7 Hz, 1H), 4.65 (p, J = 3.1 Hz, 1H), 7.48–7.57 (m, 3H), 7.64 (d, J = 7.2 Hz, 1H), 7.78 (d, J = 8.1 Hz, 1H), 7.94 (t, J = 5.2 Hz, 1H), 8.04 (t, J = 4.2 Hz, 1H), 8.13 (d, J = 8.7 Hz, 2H), 8.43 (d, J = 8.8 Hz, 3H), 10.02 (s, 1H). 13C NMR (100 MHz, DMSO-d6): 18.7, 24.6, 31.3, 49.3, 49.5, 61.4, 122.3, 123.2, 125.0, 126.0, 126.4, 126.5, 128.4, 128.6, 129.3, 133.6, 134.2, 143.2,150.4, 171.3, 172.1 (C = O). MS (ESI+): m/z = 497.4. ESI-HR-MS calculated for C24H24N4O6S (M++H): 497.1491, found: 497.1494.

In-vitro P. falciparum assay

The sample concentration that inhibits the growth of chloroquine sensitive strains of P. falciparum development by 50% (IC50) was measured and used to determine the antimalarial potencies of the new derivatives as thus: Sorbitol synchronized, 0.1% parasitemia, ring stage P. falciparum strain W2 parasites were cultured under the atmosphere of 3% O2, 6% CO2 and 91% N2 in RPMI-1640 medium supplemented with 10% human serum in the presence of inhibitors for 48 h without media change. Inhibitors were added from 1000 x DMSO stocks. After 48 h, the culture medium was removed and replaced with 1% formaldehyde in PBS pH 7.4 for an additional 48 h at room temperature to fix cells. Fixed parasites were transferred into 0.1% Triton-X-100 in PBS containing 1 nM YOYO-1 dye (Molecular Probes). Parasitemia was determined from dot plots (forward scatter vs. fluorescence) acquired on a FACS sort flow cytometer using Cell Quest software (Beckton Dickinson) [28].

DPPH radical scavenging assay

The ability of the new dicarboxamides to reduce the 2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH) radical was used to assess their antioxidant effect. Different test tubes containing solutions of each of the compounds in different concentrations (5, 10, 15, 20, and 25 μg/mL) were prepared in DMSO. 1 mL of freshly prepared DPPH solution (0.004% w/v) was added into each of these test tubes and shaken to mix properly. The test tubes were allowed to incubate in the dark room temperature for 30 mins. A blank solution containing everything else in the sample solution except the test compounds was also prepared and DPPH was used for the baseline correction. UV-Visible spectrometer (v. 6405 Jenway) was used to take record absorbance at 517 nm against the blank solution. Percentage inhibition (PI) of DPPH radical activity was used to measure the radical scavenging activities of the dicarboxamides [29].

DPPHradicalscavengingactivity(%)=[(ADPPHAsample)/ADPPH]*100

Where ADPPH = absorbance of control and Asample = absorbance of samples/ascorbic acid.

Homology modeling

A query sequence of NMT from P. falciparum (access code: AAF18461.1) and template of X-ray crystal structure of NMT from P. vivax complexed with its cofactor (myristoyl Co-enzyme A) and an inhibitor (a pyrazole sulphonamide) (pdb code: 2ynd) [30] were employed to construct PfNMT homology model using modeler (v. 9.21) [31]. The template suitability was evaluated through the computed sequence-identity and -similarity. Twenty protein models were built and the best selected based on the evaluation by the Modeller objective function and Discrete Optimized Protein Energy profile. The best PfNMT homology model was energy minimized using Gromos force field 53a6 in Gromacs (v. 5.1, 2019) [32]. Ramanchandran plot was used to assess the quality of the model.

Building 3-dimensional structures

The graphical user interface and MMFF94 forcefield packages in molecular operating environment (MOE: v. 2014.0901) software [33] were used to build the 3-dimensional chemical structures of the dicarboxamides and energy minimized them to an energy gradient of 0.001 kcal/mol while the QuSAR module in the same software was employed to compute the following molecular descriptors: lipophilicity (logP), molecular weight (MW), hydrogen bond acceptor/donor (HBA/HBD).

Docking

Docking the new derivatives into PfNMT homology model was performed using AutoDock 4.2 program [34]. A grid box of 40 x 40 x 40 points with 0.375 Å point spacing placed in the center of mass center -25.835, 14.762, -25.529 such that it covered the peptide-substrate binding site. AutoGrid package was employed to calculate the potential grid maps for the interaction of ligand while AutoDock package was set to perform 250 hybrid GA-LS runs, making a maximum of 2.5 M energy evaluations and 27 000 generations. Maximum number of rotatable bonds was set at 6 while root mean square deviation tolerance for cluster grouping was set at 2Å. All other parameters were left at default setting.

Results and discussion

Synthesis and characterization of new dipeptide derivatives

Pyrrolidine moiety was introduced into the sulphonamide dicarboxamides because it occurs frequently in synthetic and isolated natural peptides that have antimalarial activity [35, 36]. The new sulphonamide pyrolidine carboxamide compounds were synthesised as presented in Fig 1. First, proline reacted with either toluene sulfonyl chloride or para-nitrophenyl sulfonyl chloride to produce either compounds 4 and 5 which were separately coupled with compound 8 via EDC.HCl/HOBT activation to obtain compounds 9a-p and 10a-p respectively. Intermediate 8 was obtained by reaction of boc-alanine with phenylamines followed by subsequent deprotection. The target molecules were fully characterised by combine spectroscopic and MS data and these are presented in S1 File. The IR absorption peaks for S = O, C = O and N-H functionalities were found in the range of 1200–1400 cm-1, 1660–1680 cm-1 and 3300–3400 cm-1 respectively.

Fig 1. Scheme 1.

Fig 1

The methyl protons in toluenesulfonyl moiety integrated as singlet for three protons at about 2.40 ppm in the 1H NMR of compounds 9a-p. The methyl group that sandwich between the two amide groups appeared in the lowest field as doublet for all the compounds at around 1.35 ppm except for compound 9p. The two ortho OMe substituent of the anilino ring of compounds 9k and 10k integrated as 6 protons singlets at 3.71 and 3.72 ppms respectively. The aromatic protons absorption peaks appeared within 7.00–8.30 ppm while the N-H protons showed up at the highest frequencies with chemical shifts in the range of 8.30–10.00 ppm in the proton NMR spectra. In addition, the 13C NMR furnished the carbonyl carbons in all the synthesised compounds at the lowest field in all the spectra. Every other spectral data including MS are consistent with the molecular structures of the prepared compounds.

Drug-likeness of the new sulphonamide-carboxamides

Since many drug candidates with very high therapeutic potential failed to succeed as drug due to poor pharmacokinetic profile it has become customary to evaluate the property early in drug discovery program to avoid wasting resources on wrong candidates. Hence, four molecular descriptors used to assess oral bioavailability of molecules according to Lipinski’s rule of five (ro5) were computed for the new derivatives Table 1. The rule posits that molecules that have HBA ≤ 10, HBD ≤ 5, logP ≤ 5 and MW ≤ 500 Da or more than two of these criteria will likely be orally bioavailable [37]. All the newly synthesised compounds possess two HBD and logP in the range of 0.76–3.19. MW and HBA values also fall within the acceptable region except for five compounds with 503.56–515.37 Da and four compounds with 11–12 values respectively. However, following ro5 all the new compounds are likely druglike since none of them violated more than one of the criteria. Hence, they are worthy of further attention as drug candidates.

Table 1. Basic physicochemical features of the new dicarboxamides.

Compound codes HBA HBD logP(o/w) MW (Da)
9a 7 2 1.97 415.51
9b 7 2 2.27 429.54
9c 8 2 1.92 445.54
9d 7 2 3.11 457.59
9e 7 2 2.56 449.95
9f 7 2 2.12 433.5
9g 7 2 2.9 483.51
9h 7 2 2.69 463.98
9i 7 2 3.19 484.4
9j 7 2 2.75 467.94
9k 9 2 1.67 475.56
9l 7 2 2.6 443.56
9m 8 2 1.13 436.55
9n 8 2 2.6 472.59
9o 7 2 2.74 473.63
9p 7 2 3.19 465.57
10a 10 2 1.61 446.48
10b 10 2 1.9 460.51
10c 11 2 1.56 476.51
10d 10 2 2.75 488.56
10e 10 2 2.2 480.92
10f 10 2 1.76 464.47
10g 10 2 2.54 514.48
10h 10 2 2.33 494.95
10i 10 2 2.82 515.37
10j 11 2 0.76 467.52
10k 12 2 1.3 506.53
10l 10 2 2.24 474.53
10m 7 2 2.1 429.54
10n 11 2 2.23 503.56
10o 10 2 2.37 504.6
10p 10 2 2.83 496.54

Biological screening for antiplasmodial and antioxidant activities

Based on the fact that the pathophysiology mechanism through which plasmodia cause malaria results in cell oxidative stress, efforts are currently channelled to discovering agents with dual antiplasmodial and antioxidant activities [26, 27, 38]. The compounds were screened in vitro against chloroquine sensitive strains of P. falciparum malaria parasite at a maximum concentration of 20 μM and their IC50 determined while anti-oxidant activity was evaluated by checking for their ability to scavenge DPPH radical (Table 2). Although activity was not better than reference drug, chloroquine (IC50 = 0.06 μM), as expected of compounds bearing sulphonamide and carboxamide functionalities, it is worthy to note that sixteen of the sulphonamide-carboxamides killed the pathogen at single-digit values of half-maxima inhibitory concentration in micromolar (IC50 = 2.40–8.30 μM), nine showed IC50 between 10 and 20 μM concentration while only seven have IC50 > 20 μM and so were reported as having no activity (na). The close range of IC50s suggests there is no outstanding structure-activity relationship, however, it was observed that attaching thiazol (9m, 10m, 9n, and 10n) and adamantanyl (9o and 10o) substituent moieties at the N-terminal position of the parent-structure relatively led to an increased antiplasmodial activity. Similarly, para-nitrophenyl derivatives in general were found to exhibit higher activity than the ones bearing toluenesuphonamide. For example, 10m, 10n and 10o with para-nitrophenylsulphonamide attachment respectively have higher inhibitory potencies (IC50 = 2.80, 2.40 and 3.6 μM) than 9m, 9n and 9o (IC50 = 3.20, 2.80 and 5.00 μM). On the other hand, compounds 10b, 10c, 10d, 10j and 10o scavenged DPPH radicals at IC50s (6.48, 8.49, 3.02, 6.44 and 4.32 μg/mL respectively) comparable to ascorbic acid (1.06 μg/mL) while all the compounds reduced more than 50% oxidative property of the tested radicals. It appears compound 10j and 10o are most suitable for our interest since only the two possess both antiplasmodial and antioxidant activities at relatively low micromolar and microgram concentration respectively.

Table 2. In vitro antiplasmodial and antioxidant activities of compounds against chloroquine sensitive 3D7 strain of Plasmodium falciparum.

Compound codes Anti-P. falciparum activity IC50 (μM) Antioxidant activity IC50 of DPPH (μg/mL)
9a 16.4 12.51
9b 12.6 12.02
9c 16.8 12.95
9d 12.2 12.37
9e 6.2 12.59
9f 8.6 14.91
9g 6.6 12.43
9h 11.6 13.16
9i 6.4 14.95
9j 6.8 12.85
9k na 11.7
9l na 13.71
9m 3.2 12.34
9n 2.8 13.43
9o 5 11.75
9p na 13.22
10a 10.6 12.71
10b na 6.48
10c 18 8.49
10d 11 3.02
10e 6.4 12.36
10f 6.6 12.16
10g 4.4 12.71
10h 15 12.65
10i 5 12.75
10j 3.2 6.44
10k na 12.77
10l na 12.52
10m 2.8 12.28
10n 2.4 12.7
10o 3.6 4.32
10p na 12.42
Chloroquine phosphate 0.06 -
Ascorbic acid - 1.06

na = no activity

Homology modelling

The PfNMT homology model was constructed using modeller 9.21v with a PfNMT query sequence (accession code: AAF18461.1) and template X-ray crystal structure of NMT from P. vivax (PvNMT) in complex with an inhibitor, a pyrazole sulphonamide (accession code: 2ynd). There were sequence-identity and -similarity of 82% and 93% between the target and template which indicate the template sequence is suitable for the process. Moreover, there was only 0.350 Å root mean square deviation upon alignment of the homology modelled PfNMT and the template structure. In addition, the model possesses good stereochemical quality because more than 90% of its residues lie in the recommended region according to the Ramanchandran plot in Fig 2.

Fig 2. The Ramanchandran plot of PfNMT homology model.

Fig 2

Docking results

To check whether the new sulphonamide-carboxamide derivatives can bind to PfNMT, the default forcefield in AutoDock4.2v was used to dock and score compounds 9a9p and 10a10p toward the peptide-substrate binding site of the modelled protein. The co-crystallized ligand from PvNMT was used as reference in evaluating the performance of the dock-protocol. The retained dock protocol was through visual inspection based on the ability of the software to return ligand dock-pose comparable to X-ray crystallized pose within the rmsd tolerance of 2 Å for cluster grouping (Fig 3). The least theoretical binding energies of the derivatives (ΔG = -6.98 to -9.60 kcal/mol) retrieved from the highest populated clusters docking poses show they preferentially interacted with the protein (Table 3) and therefore are potential PfNMT binders. Though none of them has docking score as high as the reference ligand (ΔG = -10.91 kcal/mol, Ki = 10.11 nM, ligand efficiency = 0.33), their low computed inhibition constant (Ki = 0.09–1.18 μM), reasonable ligand efficiencies (0.23–0.28 kcal/mol) and interesting drug-like character make the new compounds a promising series deserving further investigation. Moreover, notice that compound 10o which had earlier shown interesting superior dual biological activities, also emerged as topscorer in molecular docking study thereby highlighting the importance of this derivative.

Fig 3.

Fig 3

The reference ligand i.e. the pyrazole sulphonamide (a) X-ray crystallography predicted binding pose in P. vivax NMT and (b) docked pose predicted by AutoDock in the PfNMT hoology model.

Table 3. Docking results for the new toluenesulphonamide dicarboxamides.

Compund codes ΔG (kcal/mol) Ki (μM) Ligand Efficiency
9a -7.89 1.64 0.27
9b -8.09 1.18 0.27
9c -8.31 0.81 0.27
9d -9.05 0.23 0.28
9e -7.99 1.38 0.27
9f -6.98 7.67 0.23
9g -8.55 0.54 0.26
9h -7.43 3.6 0.24
9i -8.41 0.68 0.27
9j -7.94 1.53 0.26
9k -8.43 0.66 0.26
9l -8.33 0.77 0.27
9m -8.09 1.18 0.28
9n -8.58 0.51 0.27
9o -8.61 0.48 0.26
9p -7.78 1.99 0.24
10a -7.52 3.05 0.24
10b -7.45 3.48 0.23
10c -7.68 2.36 0.23
10d -8.78 0.36 0.26
10e -7.89 1.65 0.25
10f -7.23 5.05 0.23
10g -8.19 0.98 0.23
10h -7.6 2.7 0.23
10i -8.47 0.62 0.26
10j -7.58 2.8 0.24
10k -8.21 0.96 0.23
10l -8.22 0.94 0.25
10m -7.67 2.4 0.26
10n -8.26 0.87 0.24
10o -9.6 0.09 0.27
10p -9.17 0.18 0.26
rl -10.91 0.01 0.33

NB: rl means reference ligand i.e. pyrazole-sulphonamide cocrystallised with PvNMT (pdb code: 2ynd)

Conclusion

It is increasing becoming necessary for antimalaria agents to possess antioxidant property as well because of the oxidative stress which accompanies malaria pathophysiological mechanism and the search for such agents within compounds bearing both sulphonamide and carboxamide moieties is common due to proven pharmacological efficiencies of both functionalities. In this study, we presented the synthesis and full characterization of 32 new druglike sulphonamide-carboxamide derivatives and explored their antimalaria and antioxidant properties. The results show that some of the derivatives are able to kill P. falciparum at single-digit micromolar concentration and scavenge DPPH radicals at comparable degree to ascorbic acid. In addition, through molecular docking and scoring, we calculated the theoretical binding affinities of the compounds for PfNMT homology model and observed that 15 of them favourably bound to the target at submicromolar Ki values. Particularly compound 10o, with relatively significant dual pharmacological effect and topscorer towards PfNMT homology model, will be focused in our further studies to optimize activity. We hope that the results of this study will facilitate effort to design and discover new antimalaria candidate with antioxidant activity from carboxamides bearing sulphonamide moiety.

Supporting information

S1 File. Detail spectral data used to characterise and describe the new sulphonamide pyrolidine carboxamide.

(DOCX)

Data Availability

All relevant data are within the manuscript and its Supporting Information files.

Funding Statement

EAO received funding from CSIR-TWAS in the form of postdoctoral stay in a lab. in India. AI received funding from AGNES through Junior Researchers Grant (JRG). Computational resources were provided by Dr. F. Ntie-Kang.

References

  • 1.Gamo FJ, Sanzi LM, Vidal J, Cozar CD, Alvarez E, Lavandera JL, et al. Thousands of chemicals starting points for antimalarial lead identification. Nature. 2010; 465: 305 10.1038/nature09107 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Burrows JN, Duparc S, Guiteridge WE, Huijsduijnen RH, Kaszubska W, Macintyre F, et al. New developments in antimalarial target candidate and product profiles. Malaria J. 2017; 16: 1–29. 10.1186/s12936-016-1675-x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Ashley EA, Phyo AP, Drugs in development for malaria. Drugs. 2018; 78: 861–879. 10.1007/s40265-018-0911-9 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Tse EG, Korsik M, Todd MH, The past, present and future of antimalarial medicines. Malaria J. 2019; 18: 1–21. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.WHO Media Center. Fact Sheet on malaria, 2020, https://www.who.int/en/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/malaria (accessed April 4, 2020).
  • 6.Ramakrishnan G, Chandra N, Srinivasan N, Exploring antimalarial potential of FDA approved drugs: an in silico approach. Malaria J. 2017; 16: 2 10.1186/s12936-017-1937-2 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Wells TNC, Burrows JN, Baird JK, Targeting the hypnozoite reservoir of Plasmodium vivax: the hidden obstacle to malaria elimination. Trends Parasitol. 2010; 26: 145–151. 10.1016/j.pt.2009.12.005 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Luth MR, Gupta P, Ottilie S, Winzeler EA, Using in vitro evaluation and whole gernome analysis to discover next generation targets for antimalarial drug discovery. ACS infect Dis. 2018; 4: 301–314. 10.1021/acsinfecdis.7b00276 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Wright MHB, Clough MD, Rackham K, Ranganchari JA, Brannigan M, Grainger DK, et al. Validation of N-myristoyltransferase as an antimalaria drug target using an integrated chemical biology approach. Nat Chem. 2014; 6: 112–121. 10.1038/nchem.1830 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Moskes C, Burghaus PA, Wernli B, Sauder U, Durrenberger M, Kappes B, Automated Export of Plasmodium falciparum calcium-dependent protein kinase 1 to the parasitophorous vacuole is dependent on three N-terminal membrane anchor motifs. Mol Microbiol. 2004; 54: 676–691. 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2004.04313.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Rees-Channer RR, Martin SR, Green JL, Bowyer PW, Grainger M, Molloy JE, Dual acylation of the 45 kDa gliding-associated protein (GAP45) in Plasmodium falciparum merozoites. Mol Biochem Parasitol. 2006; 149: 113–116. 10.1016/j.molbiopara.2006.04.008 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Tarkang PA, Atchan APN, Kuiate J, Okalebo FA, Guantai AN, Agbor GA, Antioxidant potential of a polyherbal antimalarial as an indicator of its theratpeutic values. Adv Pharmacol Sci. 2013; 678458 10.1155/2013/678458 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Iribhogbe OI, Agbaje EO, Oreagba IA, Ain OO, Ota AD, Oxidant versus antioxidant activity in malaria: role of nutritional therapy. J Med Sci. 2012; 12: 229–233. [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Clark IA, Hunt NH, Evidence for reactive oxygen intermediates causing hemolysis and parasite death in malaria. Evidence for reactive oxygen intermediates causing hemolysis and parasite death in malaria. Inf Immunity. 1983; 39: 1–6. 10.1128/IAI.39.1.1-6.1983 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Buğday N, Küçükbay FZ, Apohan E, Küçükbay H, Serindağ A, Yeşilada Ö, Synthesis and evaluation of novel benzimidazole conjugates incorporating amino acids and dipeptide moieties. Lett Org Chem. 2017; 14: 198–206. [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Perez-Picaso L, Olivo HF, Argotte-Ramos R, Rodriguez-Gutierrez M, Rios MY, Linear and cyclic dipeptides with antimalarial activity. Bioorg Med Chem Lett. 2012; 7048–7051. 10.1016/j.bmcl.2012.09.094 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Mahindra A, Gangwal RP, Bansal S, Goldfarb NE, Dunn BM, Sangamwar NE, et al. Antiplasmodial activity of short peptide-based compounds. RSC Adv. 2015; 22674–22684. [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Bugday N, Kucukbay FZ, Kucubay H, Bua S, Bartolucci G, Leitans J, et al. Synthesis of novel dipeptide sulphonamide conjugates with effective carbonic anhydrase I, II, IX and XII. Bioorg Med Chem. 2018; 81: 311–318. 10.1016/j.bioorg.2018.08.032 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Micale N, Vairagoundar R, Yakovlev AG, Kozikowski AP. Design and synthesis of a potent and selective peptidomeimetic inhibitor of caspase-3. J Med Chem. 2004; 47(26): 6455–6458. 10.1021/jm049248f [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Panda SS, İbrahim MA, Küçükbay H, Meyers MJ, Sverdrup FM, El-Feky AA, et al. Synthesis and antimalarial bioassay of quinine-peptide conjugates. Chem Biol Drug Des. 2013; 82: 361–366. 10.1111/cbdd.12134 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Triglia T, Cowman AF, The mechanism of resistance to sulfa drugs in Plasmodium falciparum. Drug Resist Updat. 1999; 2: 15–19. 10.1054/drup.1998.0060 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Valente C, Guedes RC, Moreira R, Iley J, Gut J, Rosenthal PJ, Dipeptide vinyl sultams: synthesis via the Wittig-Horner reaction and activity against papain, falcipain-2 and Plasmodium falciparum. Bioorg Med Chem Lett. 2006; 16: 4115–4119. 10.1016/j.bmcl.2006.04.079 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Mallik SK, Li DY, Cui M, Song HO, Park H, Kim HS, Synthesis and evaluation of peptidyl α,β-unsaturated carbonyl derivatives as anti-malarial calpain inhibitors. Arch Pharm Res. 2012; 35: 469–479. 10.1007/s12272-012-0310-9 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Bianchin A, Bell A, Chubb AJ, Doolan N, Leneghan D, Stavropoulos I, et al. Design and evaluation of antimalarial peptides derived from prediction of short linear motifs in proteins related to erythrocyte invasion. PLoS ONE. 2015; 10:e0127383 10.1371/journal.pone.0127383 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Bell A, Antimicrobial peptides: The long and the short of it. Curr Pharm Des. 2011; 17: 2719–2731. 10.2174/138161211797416057 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Ugwu DI, Okoro UC, Ukoha PO, Okafor S, Ibezim A, Kumar NM, Synthesis, characterization, molecular docking and in vitro antimalarial properties of new carboxamides bearing sulphonamide. Eur J Med Chem. 2017; 135: 349–369. 10.1016/j.ejmech.2017.04.029 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Ugwuja DI, Okoro UC, Soman SS, Soni R, Okafor SN, Ugwu DI, New peptide derived antimalaria and antimicrobial agents bearing sulphonamide moiety. J Enzyme Inhib Med Chem. 2019; 34: 1388–1399. 10.1080/14756366.2019.1651313 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Reinders P, Vianen P, Van der Keur M, Van Engen A, Janse C, Tanke H. Computer software for testing drug susceptibility of malaria parasites. Cytometry. 1995, 19: 273–281. 10.1002/cyto.990190312 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Sutharsingh R, Kavimani S, Jayakar B, Uvarani M, Thangathirupathi A, Quantitative phytochemical and antioxidant studies on aerial parts of Naravelia zeylanica DC. Int J Pharm Studies Res. 2011; 2: 52–56. [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Berman H. M.; Westbrook J.; Feng Z.; Gilliland G.; Bhat T. N.; Weissig H.; et al. The protein data bank. Nucleic Acids Res. 2001; 28: 235–342. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Marti-Renom MA, Stuart AC, Fisemartir A, Sanchez R, Melo F, Sali A, Comparative protein structure modelling of genes and genomes. Annu Rev Biophys Biomol Struct. 2000; 29: 291–325. 10.1146/annurev.biophys.29.1.291 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Scott RP, Hunenberger PH, Tironi IG, Mark AE, Billeter SR, Fennen J, et al. The GROMOS bimolecular simulation program package. J Phys Chem. 1999; 103: 3596–3607. [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Chemical Computing Group, Molecular Operating Environment (MOE) software, 2010.
  • 34.Morris GM, Goodshell DS, Halliday RS, Huey R, Hart WE, Belew RK, Automated docking using a Lamarckian genetic algorithm and an empirical binding free energy function. J Comput Chem. 1998; 19: 1639–1662. [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Kirkman LA, Zhan W, Visone J, Dziedziech A, Singh PK, Fan H, et al. Antimalarial proteasome inhibitor reveals collateral sensitivity from intersubunit interactions and fitness cost of resistance. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2018; 115: E6863–E6870. 10.1073/pnas.1806109115 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Yuan Z, White R, The evolution of peptide deformylase as a target: contribution of biochemistry, genetics and genomics. Biochem Pharmacol. 2006; 71: 1042–1047. 10.1016/j.bcp.2005.10.015 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Ibezim A, Ezechukwu E, In-silico study of flavonoids from Cassia tora as potential anti-psoriatic agent. J Applied Pharm Sci. 2019; 9: 82–87. [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Shankar KR, Kumari NSR, Kiranmyi GVN, In vitro study of antioxidant and antimalaria activities of new chromeno-pyrano-chromene derivative. American J Phytomed Clinical Therap. 2014; 2: 1169–1176. [Google Scholar]

Decision Letter 0

Mohammad Shahid

11 Jun 2020

PONE-D-20-14557

New sulphonamide pyrolidine carboxamide derivatives: synthesis, molecular docking, antiplasmodial and antioxidant activities

PLOS ONE

Dear Dr. Ibezim,

Thank you for submitting your manuscript to PLOS ONE. After careful consideration, we feel that it has merit but does not fully meet PLOS ONE’s publication criteria as it currently stands. Therefore, we invite you to submit a revised version of the manuscript that addresses the points raised during the review process.

Please submit your revised manuscript by Jul 26 2020 11:59PM. If you will need more time than this to complete your revisions, please reply to this message or contact the journal office at plosone@plos.org. When you're ready to submit your revision, log on to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/ and select the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder to locate your manuscript file.

Please include the following items when submitting your revised manuscript:

  • A rebuttal letter that responds to each point raised by the academic editor and reviewer(s). You should upload this letter as a separate file labeled 'Response to Reviewers'.

  • A marked-up copy of your manuscript that highlights changes made to the original version. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Revised Manuscript with Track Changes'.

  • An unmarked version of your revised paper without tracked changes. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Manuscript'.

If you would like to make changes to your financial disclosure, please include your updated statement in your cover letter. Guidelines for resubmitting your figure files are available below the reviewer comments at the end of this letter.

If applicable, we recommend that you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io to enhance the reproducibility of your results. Protocols.io assigns your protocol its own identifier (DOI) so that it can be cited independently in the future. For instructions see: http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submission-guidelines#loc-laboratory-protocols

We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript.

Kind regards,

Mohammad Shahid, Ph.D.

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Journal Requirements:

When submitting your revision, we need you to address these additional requirements.

1. Please ensure that your manuscript meets PLOS ONE's style requirements, including those for file naming. The PLOS ONE style templates can be found at

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=wjVg/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_main_body.pdf and

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=ba62/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_title_authors_affiliations.pdf

2. Please include further information such as vendor, manufacturer and model details of all equipment and materials used in the study.

3. Please amend your Financial disclosure statement to only declare sources of funding for the study, and remove any other text.

4. We suggest you thoroughly copyedit your manuscript for language usage, spelling, and grammar. If you do not know anyone who can help you do this, you may wish to consider employing a professional scientific editing service.  

Whilst you may use any professional scientific editing service of your choice, PLOS has partnered with both American Journal Experts (AJE) and Editage to provide discounted services to PLOS authors. Both organizations have experience helping authors meet PLOS guidelines and can provide language editing, translation, manuscript formatting, and figure formatting to ensure your manuscript meets our submission guidelines. To take advantage of our partnership with AJE, visit the AJE website (http://learn.aje.com/plos/) for a 15% discount off AJE services. To take advantage of our partnership with Editage, visit the Editage website (www.editage.com) and enter referral code PLOSEDIT for a 15% discount off Editage services.  If the PLOS editorial team finds any language issues in text that either AJE or Editage has edited, the service provider will re-edit the text for free.

Upon resubmission, please provide the following:

  • The name of the colleague or the details of the professional service that edited your manuscript

  • A copy of your manuscript showing your changes by either highlighting them or using track changes (uploaded as a *supporting information* file)

  • A clean copy of the edited manuscript (uploaded as the new *manuscript* file)

5. PLOS requires an ORCID iD for the corresponding author in Editorial Manager on papers submitted after December 6th, 2016. Please ensure that you have an ORCID iD and that it is validated in Editorial Manager. To do this, go to ‘Update my Information’ (in the upper left-hand corner of the main menu), and click on the Fetch/Validate link next to the ORCID field. This will take you to the ORCID site and allow you to create a new iD or authenticate a pre-existing iD in Editorial Manager. Please see the following video for instructions on linking an ORCID iD to your Editorial Manager account: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_xcclfuvtxQ

6. Please include captions for your Supporting Information files at the end of your manuscript, and update any in-text citations to match accordingly. Please see our Supporting Information guidelines for more information: http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/supporting-information.

[Note: HTML markup is below. Please do not edit.]

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented.

Reviewer #1: Partly

**********

2. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #1: N/A

**********

3. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #1: Yes

**********

4. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #1: Yes

**********

5. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #1: The authors described the synthesis and biological evaluation of 32 dipeptides Ar1SO2-Pro-Ala-NHAr2. The synthesis is modular with moderate to good chemical yields. Some of these compounds exhibit single-digit micromolar IC50s against chloroquine sensitive strains of P. falciparum and act as radical scavengers well. Some computational studies were performed on the selected dipeptides.

One of the major concerns is that all the tested compounds are not very active against the malarial parasites or as antioxidant. It is hardly to call the functionalized dipeptide scaffold novel unless the authors can demonstrate they have good activity profiles. The screening of a 32-compound library with fixed amino acid backbone (Pro-Ala) is not diverse enough for SAR, and the expansion to a more inclusive compound set seems necessary to discover a more potent inhibitor. It is not entirely clear why the amino acid should be limited to Pro and Ala, at least some other amino acids should be considered. The toxicity of these test compounds should be evaluated.

The discussion in the Synthesis and characterization of new dipeptide derivatives (last paragraph under scheme 2) seems not delivering important information. It is focused on NMR data of the compounds. For example “Significantly, the methyl protons in toluenesulfonyl moiety integrated as singlet for three protons at about 2.40 ppm in the 1H NMR of compounds 9a-p and 10a-p”, why this information is significant? Do the authors try to confirm that the compounds are diastereomerically pure? And compounds 10a-p don’t even have a toluenesulfonyl moiety! The authors also tried to convey that a OMe is more deshielded than a Me on the aromatic ring, this is not necessary. In addition, the drawings in Scheme 2 need further improvement. First, as a medicinal chemistry manuscript, the identity of the test compounds is very important. No stereochemistry of the amino acid is labelled. The authors should clearly specify the configuration of the compounds since both enantiomers of the amino acids are available and different stereoisomers can alter the activity significantly. In structure 4/5, the X is missing. For the final products, the label should be changed as “9: X= Me, 10: X=NO2”. The current label is very confusing, since R’’=9 :x=Me is not correct.

Lipinski’s rule of five is an empirical guideline to assess the drug-likeness of a compound. However, there are many exceptions on both ways. Just using this guideline to evaluate the compounds conclude their drug likeness is not sufficient. One obvious liability is the instability of these peptide drugs in general: they are susceptible to enzymatic degradation. The authors should have a microsomal stability test on them.

**********

6. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: No

[NOTE: If reviewer comments were submitted as an attachment file, they will be attached to this email and accessible via the submission site. Please log into your account, locate the manuscript record, and check for the action link "View Attachments". If this link does not appear, there are no attachment files.]

While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com/. PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Registration is free. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email PLOS at figures@plos.org. Please note that Supporting Information files do not need this step.

PLoS One. 2021 Feb 24;16(2):e0243305. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0243305.r002

Author response to Decision Letter 0


31 Oct 2020

We have addressed the concerns raised by both the editor and reviewers and have also attached relevant files appropriately.

Attachment

Submitted filename: Response to reviewers_Plos One_latest.docx

Decision Letter 1

Mohammad Shahid

19 Nov 2020

New sulphonamide pyrolidine carboxamide derivatives: synthesis, molecular docking, antiplasmodial and antioxidant activities

PONE-D-20-14557R1

Dear Dr. Ibezim,

We’re pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been judged scientifically suitable for publication and will be formally accepted for publication once it meets all outstanding technical requirements.

Within one week, you’ll receive an e-mail detailing the required amendments. When these have been addressed, you’ll receive a formal acceptance letter and your manuscript will be scheduled for publication.

An invoice for payment will follow shortly after the formal acceptance. To ensure an efficient process, please log into Editorial Manager at http://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/, click the 'Update My Information' link at the top of the page, and double check that your user information is up-to-date. If you have any billing related questions, please contact our Author Billing department directly at authorbilling@plos.org.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please notify them about your upcoming paper to help maximize its impact. If they’ll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team as soon as possible -- no later than 48 hours after receiving the formal acceptance. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information, please contact onepress@plos.org.

Kind regards,

Mohammad Shahid, Ph.D.

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Additional Editor Comments (optional):

Reviewers' comments:

Acceptance letter

Mohammad Shahid

3 Dec 2020

PONE-D-20-14557R1

New sulphonamide pyrolidine carboxamide derivatives: synthesis, molecular docking, antiplasmodial and antioxidant activities

Dear Dr. Ibezim:

I'm pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been deemed suitable for publication in PLOS ONE. Congratulations! Your manuscript is now with our production department.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please let them know about your upcoming paper now to help maximize its impact. If they'll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team within the next 48 hours. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information please contact onepress@plos.org.

If we can help with anything else, please email us at plosone@plos.org.

Thank you for submitting your work to PLOS ONE and supporting open access.

Kind regards,

PLOS ONE Editorial Office Staff

on behalf of

Dr. Mohammad Shahid

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Associated Data

    This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

    Supplementary Materials

    S1 File. Detail spectral data used to characterise and describe the new sulphonamide pyrolidine carboxamide.

    (DOCX)

    Attachment

    Submitted filename: Response to reviewers_Plos One_latest.docx

    Data Availability Statement

    All relevant data are within the manuscript and its Supporting Information files.


    Articles from PLoS ONE are provided here courtesy of PLOS

    RESOURCES