Abstract
Objective
To test in mice with a double mutation of the ApoE gene (ApoE-/-) whether spinal cord injury (SCI) hastens the native trajectory of, and established component risks for, atherosclerotic disease (AD), and whether Salsalate anti-inflammatory pharmacotherapy attenuates the impact of SCI.
Methods
ApoE-/- mice were anesthetized and underwent a T9 laminectomy. Exposed spinal cords were given a contusion injury (70 k-dynes). Sham animals underwent all surgical procedures, excluding injury. Injured animals were randomized to 2 groups: SCI or SCI+Salsalate [120 mg/Kg/day i.p.]. Mice were serially sacrificed at 20-, 24-, and 28-weeks post-SCI, and body mass was recorded. At sacrifice, heart and aorta were harvested intact, fixed in 10% buffered formalin, cleaned and cut longitudinally for en face preparation. The aortic tree was stained with oil-red-O (ORO). AD lesion histomorphometry was calculated from the proportional area of ORO. Plasma total cholesterol, triglycerides and proatherogenic inflammatory cytokines (PAIC’s) were analyzed.
Results
AD lesion in the aortic arch progressively increased in ApoE-/-, significant at 24- and 28-weeks. AD in SCI is significantly greater at 24- and 28-weeks compared to time-controlled ApoE-/-. Salsalate treatment attenuates the SCI-induced increase at these time points. Body mass in all SCI groups are significantly reduced compared to time-controlled ApoE-/-. Cholesterol and triglycerides are significantly higher with SCI by 24- and 28-weeks, compared to ApoE-/-, and Salsalate reduces the SCI-induced effect on cholesterol. PAIC’s interleukin-1β (IL-1β), interleukin-6 (IL-6), tumor necrosis factor α (TNFα), monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 (MCP-1), and chemokine (C-C motif) ligand 5 (CCL-5) are significantly greater with SCI compared to ApoE-/- at varying timepoints. Salsalate confers a marginal reducing effect on PAIC’s by 28-weeks compared to SCI. Regression models determine that each PAIC is a significant and positive predictor of lesion. (p’s <0.05).
Conclusions
SCI accelerates aortic AD and associated risk factors, and anti-inflammatory treatment may attenuate the impact of SCI on AD outcomes. PAIC’s IL-1β, IL-6, TNFα, MCP-1, and CCL-5 may be effective predictors of AD.
Introduction
Chronic spinal cord injury (SCI) results in a greater prevalence of risk factors for cardiovascular disease (CVD) and atherosclerotic disease (AD) when compared to the able-bodied population. These previously reported risks include central obesity [1–5], fasting dyslipidemia [6–8], hypertension (in persons with paraplegia) [5,7,8], and insulin resistance derived from the homeostatic model 2 (HOMA2) method or quantitative insulin sensitivity check index (QUICKI) [7,9,10]. Other established AD risk factors reported after SCI include physical deconditioning [11–14], postprandial lipemia [15,16], and inflammatory vascular stress [16–18]. These risks have an alarming tendency to cluster in persons with SCI [7,19], which escalates the global AD vulnerability of the population [7,20].
These widely reported AD risk factors after SCI raise a fundamental question whether–or to what extent–SCI alters the trajectory of atherogenesis and vascular system pathology. AD has long been viewed as a ‘lipid storage disease’ [21] and in this regard, It would be obvious to suggest that ‘dyslipidemia’ after SCI is uniquely responsible for AD risk in the population [10,22]. However, it is now better understood that narrowing of the arteries does not necessarily predict ‘hard disease’ (i.e. myocardial infarction), and that AD still evolves in persons having unremarkable lipid profiles, where nearly half of the cases involving symptomatic AD are unexplained by dysplipidemia [23–26]. More contemporary approaches to AD diagnosis and clinical management have focused on AD as an inflammatory disorder defined by the presence and actions of pro-atherogenic inflammatory cytokines (PAIC) [27,28]. whose integration into traditional lipid prediction models improves the forecasting of future AD [29], and whose targeted treatment decreases hard cardiac events [24,25]. While there are several reports of significantly elevated levels of PAIC after SCI [17,18], their role in stimulating atherogenesis remains unresolved. A clearer explication of risks that underlie AD progression after SCI is required if we are to understand who is at risk and how to undertake effective intervention.
A critical regulatory mechanism of PAIC is activation of IκB kinase complex β (IκKβ)/nuclear factor kappa B (NF-κB) signaling pathways, which mediates the synthesis of several key cytokines implicated in AD and SCI, including TNFα, IL-6, and IL-1β [30]. Substantial evidence supports pathological activation of NF-κB-mediated pathways in cardiometabolic diseases (CMD) including CVD and diabetes [31]. Importantly, the NF-κB axis can be inhibited by the use of non-acetylated salicylates without eliciting adverse effects [32]. The salicylate drug Salsalate has been shown to significantly reduce several inflammatory markers including IL-6 and TNFα [32–35], and ameliorate mechanisms involved in atherosclerosis in vitro [36]. and randomized placebo-controlled studies demonstrate that Salsalate was associated with a decreased pro-atherogenic lipid profile [37,38]. The extent of its effects on lipid profile and inflammation in SCI have not been evaluated.
The primary objective of this study is to quantify disease-specific changes–often referred to as ‘hard’ disease–in the aortas of mice that have undergone SCI compared to sham-treated mice. We evaluated lipid profiles and pro-atherogenic inflammatory cytokines as secondary, yet still important objectives, and test the biological effects of Salsalate pharmacotherapy on lipid, inflammatory and AD phenotype observed with SCI.
Materials and methods
Grouping and treatments
Four groups of mice began testing at 16 weeks of age. 3 groups: ApoE-/-SCI, ApoE-/-SCI/sal, ApoE-/-SCI/veh*, underwent contusion injury and 1 group: ApoE-/-sham*, sham procedure. A subset of animals from each group was sacrificed in week 20 when visible aortic lesions typically emerge in ApoE-/- mice, and this schema was repeated in weeks 24, when lesions are more pronounced and 28, when lesions are abundant [39–41]. In addition, a cohort of ApoE-/- mice were uninjured and untreated and sacrificed at the time points outlined above as a reference of the natural trajectory of AD lesion. Salsalate (Sigma; 120 mg/Kg/day) was dissolved in Dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) according to the manufacturer’s instruction and administered via i.p. injection. Pharmacotherapy was given once daily for 1-month following SCI, consistent with recent evidence indicating efficacy in mice [42,43]. (*These treatment and injury control groups showed no behavioral, biological and/or statistical difference from untreated and uninjured groups, and therefore were removed from analysis).
Experimental animals
All animal protocols were approved by the University of Miami Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee and are in accordance with National Research Council guidelines for the care and use of laboratory animals. Animals were group (socially) housed in a temperature- and humidity- controlled rodent vivarium, maintained on a reverse 12-hour light/dark cycle, and given food and water ad libitum. No additional environmental enrichment was provided due to its reported effects on the nervous system, including neurogenesis and levels of inflammation, which may affect experimental outcomes. Animals were acclimated for seven days prior to study experiments, which included being handled daily to get used to human contact and minimize distress. Following surgical procedures, animals were administered buprenorphine (0.1 mg/kg) BID for 3-days and gentamicin (0.5 mg/100 g) daily for 7-days post-surgery and pro re nata (PRN) thereafter. Animals were examined twice daily for post-stress health status by observation of activity level, respiratory rate, and general physical condition. Body weight was monitored every other day as an indicator of post-operative health. Excessive weight loss (>20%) and decreased grooming behavior was considered as criteria for early exclusion from the study and/or euthanasia. Physical conditions such as moribund state, dehydration, and anorexia were also considered as criteria for early termination and removal from randomized study group. Euthanasia was carried out by carbon dioxide inhalation according to the recommendations for euthanasia detailed in the 2007 Report of the American Veterinary Medical Association’s (AVMA) Panel on Euthanasia. Euthanasia was performed in a manner to avoid animal distress. The chamber was not pre-filled with gas before placing the animals inside, and the rate of CO2 flow into the chamber was slowly increased. Animals were in a deep state of sleep after one minute, then the CO2 flow rate was increased for another four minutes. After CO2 exposure, confirmation of termination was accomplished by cervical dislocation.
Traumatic SCI
Surgeries were performed at the Animal and Surgical Core Facility of the Miami Project to Cure Paralysis As we previously described [42,44,45], contusion injury was induced with the Infinite Horizon Impactor device adapted to the mouse. The infinite Horizon impactor device has been established in producing precise, graded contusion, with reproducible lesion volume and functional outcomes assessed using Basso, Beattie, Bresnahan (BBB) and Basso Mouse Scale (BMS) [46] open-field locomotor rating scales [47]. In brief, adult female ApoE-/- mice (C57BL/6 background [B6.129P2-ApoEtm1UNC/J], 15 weeks old, weight; 22–24g; Jackson Laboratories) were anesthetized with an intraperitoneal injection of ketamine (80±100 mg/kg) and xylazine (10 mg/kg). Complete anesthetization was determined by the lack of a stereotypical retraction of the hind-paw in response to a nociceptive stimulus. Mice were then subjected to a laminectomy at vertebrae T9 and the exposed spinal cord was injured at a predetermined impact force of 70 kdynes (severe injury). Sham-operated animals underwent all surgical procedures, including laminectomy, but their spinal cords were not injured. After surgery, animals were housed separately and treated with subcutaneous lactated Ringer’s solution to prevent dehydration. Manual bladder expression was performed twice daily. As described above, prophylactic antibiotic gentamicin was administered daily for 7 days to prevent urinary tract infections. We note, this study was limited to female mice as their neurogenic bladder following experiment SCI is more safely ‘expressed’ than in males, and studies support that female mice develop greater disease burden than in males [48].
Body mass
Body mass discriminated to 0.1g was measured on a calibrated analytic balance (Data Weighing Systems) at 16-weeks of age (Baseline: before SCI survival surgery); 20-, 24-, and 28-weeks of age (post-surgery: prior to necropsy).
Tissue collection
Plasma
On the day of sacrifice, mice were fasted for 7 hours, deeply anesthetized with an IP injection of a ketamine/ xylazine cocktail and exsanguinated by cardiac puncture using a heparinized needle. Samples were transferred to an EDTA coated tube and centrifuged (5000 x g, 15min). Plasma was collected, aliquoted and stored at -80°C until assay. Fasting plasma total cholesterol and triglyceride levels were assayed by enzymatic methods (Roche Diagnostics, Indianapolis, IN). PAIC’s were simultaneously analyzed using a multiplex assay consisting of a panel of 23 cytokine/chemokine biomarkers involved in the inflammatory/immune response (MILLIPLEX MAP Mouse Cytokine/Chemokine Magnetic Bead Panel; EMD Millipore, Danvers, MA).
Heart and aorta
On the day of sacrifice, and following exsanguination, the heart and aorta were removed intact, stripped of adventitia, and cut longitudinally to expose the area of definable lesion covering the luminal “en face” surface, a widely used and accepted method for quantification of atherosclerotic lesions in mice [49,50]. Tissues were stored in 10% buffered formalin for later staining and quantification of AD.
Quantitation and Statistical Analysis. Quantitation of Atherosclerosis. All histomorphometric procedures were performed blinded to treatment and grouping. The method for preparation of mice aortas and quantification of disease were performed as previously described [51]. Formalin-fixed aortas were stained with oil-red-O, and digitally photographed. A reference aorta template, created from the average size and shape of all the aortas in the sample, was overlaid onto each aorta image. Percent lesion area was calculated from the proportional area of pixels stained with oil-red-O for a given aortic section.
Analysis
Group comparisons
Between group differences were analyzed using main effects and interactions assessed by a 2-factor (Group [ApoE-/- vs. ApoE-/-SCI vs. ApoE-/-SCI/sal] by Time [week 16 vs. 20 vs. 24 vs. 28]) two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA), followed by Tukey post hoc for multiple comparison and reflect absolute change between all groups (GraphPad, Prism v8.4.2, R Studio v1.2.1335). Data are expressed as mean ± standard error of the mean. An a priori significance level of p ≤ 0.05 was accepted as different between groups. n = 8–12 for each group, dependent on quality of sample analysis and/or survival, where last observation carry-forward (LOCF) technique was used.
Linear regression
Regression analysis was performed to evaluate whether specific inflammatory analytes are significant predictors of heart disease, quantified by aortic lesion area (GraphPad, Prism v8.4.2, R Studio v1.2.1335). For simple linear regression: IL-1β, IL-6, TNFα, MCP-1, and CCL-5 were selected as predictor variables, and aortic plaque (area) as the response variable. Predictor selection was determined on the basis of between group differences observed following multiplex assay analysis and previously report association with AD (both described above). Multiple linear regression was performed using the above predictor variables to determine whether an integrated model could predict plaque lesion area. Variable distribution was assessed for normality and where necessary was logarithmically transformed. Normality, complete descriptive statistics, ANOVA main effect and interactions, and regression model statistics and diagnostics are summarized in supporting figures and tables.
Results
Atherosclerotic disease
Atherosclerotic lesion area in the aortic arch was visualized by ORO lipid stain and between group comparisons were made from acquired cumulative lesion prevalence maps (Fig 1A and 1B). All groups exhibited lesions which are increasingly evident at later time-points (Fig 1B). Quantification of lesion area in the aortic arch show that ApoE-/- exhibited significantly greater lesion area at 24- and 28- weeks compared to 16- and 20-weeks (Fig 2*). ApoE-/-SCI lesion area was significantly greater than time-controlled ApoE-/- at both 24- and 28- weeks (Fig 2^). Importantly, ApoE-/-SCI/sal lesion area is significantly reduced compared to ApoE-/-SCI at both 24- and 28-weeks, but not different from ApoE-/- at these time points (Fig 2†).
Body mass and lipids: Traditional AD risk factors
Body mass is significantly greater for all groups at 24- and 28-weeks compared to earlier timepoints regardless of experimental condition (Fig 3A*). ApoE-/-SCI and ApoE-/-SCI/sal (injury groups) exhibit significantly reduced body mass at each timepoint compared to time-controlled uninjured ApoE-/- (Fig 3A^) but are not significantly different from each other at any timepoint. All groups gained weight at the same rate after 20 weeks, with both injury groups being significantly greater at 28-weeks compared to previous timepoints (Fig 3A†††).
Both plasma cholesterol and triglycerides were significantly greater in all experimental groups at 28-weeks compared to ApoE-/- at previous timepoints (Figs 1C* and 3B*). Notably, at 24-weeks cholesterol in ApoE-/-SCI is significantly greater than ApoE-/- at 16- and 20-weeks (*), whereas neither time-controlled ApoE-/- or ApoE-/-SCI/sal are increased compared to any group at previous timepoints. However, at 28-weeks there is no difference in cholesterol levels between ApoE-/-, ApoE-/-SCI or ApoE-/-SCI/sal. A summary of group differences for body mass, total cholesterol and triglyceride are summarized in Table 1.
Table 1. Mean values of body mass and serum lipids across time.
Body Mass (g) +/-SEM | |||
Time Group | ApoE-/- | ApoE-/-SCI | ApoE-/-SCI/sal |
Age (Weeks): | |||
16 | 26.23 +/-0.57 | ||
20 | 27.74 +/-1.00 | 25.31 +/-0.32 | 25.45 +/-0.21 |
24 | 29.34 +/-0.83 | 26.87 +/-0.33 | 26.89 +/-0.32 |
28 | 32.46 +/-0.75 | 29.21 +/-0.40 | 29.48 +/-0.36 |
Cholesterol (mg/dL) +/-SEM | |||
Time Group | ApoE-/- | ApoE-/-SCI | ApoE-/-SCI/sal |
Age (Weeks): | |||
16 | 359.0 +/-16.66 | ||
20 | 381.3 +/-21.42 | 402.9 +/-18.62 | 388.7 +/-15.76 |
24 | 414.5 +/-18.91 | 516.2 +/-32.55 | 475.7 +/-22.44 |
28 | 577.1 +/-28.10 | 599.8 +/-32.06 | 585.3 +/-33.42 |
Triglyceride (mg/dL) +/-SEM | |||
Time Group | ApoE-/- | ApoE-/-SCI | ApoE-/-SCI/sal |
Age (Weeks): | |||
16 | 140.9 +/- 07.29 | ||
20 | 147.4 +/-09.03 | 148.5 +/-05.34 | 139.0 +/-09.42 |
24 | 161.0 +/-11.66 | 169.5 +/-09.94 | 169.5 +/-12.13 |
28 | 210.3 +/-09.22 | 241.2 +/-12.94 | 241.8 +/-12.22 |
Values are mean ± standard error of the mean. 16-weeks represent baseline values and 28-weeks represents study endpoint.
Inflammatory cytokines: Novel and emerging AD risk factors
Of the 23 plasma cytokines and chemokines measured 21 provided consistent results within the detectable ranges across all groups (S1A Fig). Analyses showed significant main effect or group x time interaction for 5 analytes: IL-1β, IL-6, TNFα, MCP-1, and CCL-5. Total concentration of these selected analytes, and concentration across time illustrate their mean and distribution between 1–1000 pg/mL (S1B Fig).
IL-1β, IL-6 and TNF-α were similar between experimental groups at each time point and all showed a tendency to higher levels over time. MCP-1 is significantly greater in all experimental groups at 28-weeks compared to ApoE-/- at all previous timepoints (Fig 4D*). At both 24- and 28-weeks, MCP-1 in ApoE-/-SCI is significantly greater than time-controlled ApoE-/- and ApoE-/-SCI at 20-weeks (Fig 2D*^†). Both injury groups (ApoE-/-SCI and ApoE-/-SCI/sal) exhibit significantly greater MCP-1 at 28-weeks compared to ApoE-/- at 24-weeks (Fig 4D^).
CCL-5 is significantly greater in all experimental groups at 28-weeks compared to ApoE-/- at 16- and 20-weeks (Fig 4E*). At 28-weeks, CCL-5 in ApoE-/-SCI is significantly greater that in ApoE-/-SCI at 20- and 24-weeks (Fig 4E*). Both injury groups (ApoE-/-SCI and ApoE-/-SCI/sal) exhibit significantly greater CCL-5 at 28-weeks compared to ApoE-/- at 24-weeks (Fig 4E^). Taken together, we observe several key time and group differences for key interleukins, including IL-1β and IL-6, and evidence for a strong injury effect on several important cytokines including TNFα, MCP-1, and CCL-5. Notably, several important effects of Salsalate are observed, in particular, mitigating significant effects of SCI on IL-1β and MCP-1.
Regression analysis: Serum analytes as predictors of aortic arch lesion
To determine predictors of AD, simple linear regression was performed among all experimental groups. IL-1β, IL-6, TNFα, MCP-1, and CCL-5 models determine that each is a significant and positive predictor of lesion (Fig 5A–5E, S4 Table). Corresponding coefficient estimates (β1) indicate that IL-6 and IL-1β are the strongest predictors of lesion. However, model r2 for TNFα and MCP-1 is highest amongst analytes, suggesting a better model fit of the data (S1 Table). Residual diagnostic plots demonstrate linearity of the regression models, normality, and constant variance (S2 Fig).
Given that these cytokine and chemokines may collectively mediate immune cell and inflammatory responses accompanying AD, multiple linear regression was performed incorporating all predictor variables (Fig 5F). The integrated model is a statistically significant and positive predictor of lesion, where the coefficient estimators (β1) for IL-1β and TNFα are significant. Of note, diagnostics for the integrated model suggest a slight positive upper-tail distribution (S2 Fig), however, this is a reasonable expectation as theoretically independent populations (i.e. experimental groups) are combined. Overall, these results illustrate that IL-1β and TNFα may best predict lesion when modelled individually or collectively.
Discussion
This study demonstrates that SCI accelerates the rate of AD in the aortic arch in a mouse model of AD. Disease load was associated with increased levels of plasma cytokines IL-1β, IL-6 and MCP. Treatment of SCI mice with Salsalate for 4 weeks after injury resulted in a significant decrease of AD compared to non-treated SCI 8 and twelve weeks after inury. Salsalate showed modest reductions in cytokine levels (TNF, MCP, CCL5) that could account for decreased disease. It is not known if plasma cytokine levels reflect the anti-inflammatory effect of Salsalate in the vessel wall, given the drugs mechanism of action it is possible that reduced disease is related to effects on local inflammation early in the disease process during salsalate treatment that resulted in slower disease progression.
Atherosclerosis is a complex disease whose origin and progression are regulated by interaction among multiple environmental and genetic factors. The component risks of AD are consistently reported after SCI and are caused to varying degrees by 1) secondary conditions imposed by injury 2) imprudent lifestyle choices, and 3) the interplay of genetic disposition and post-injury alterations in gene expression. In particular, several reports suggest that physical deconditioning coupled with a hypercaloric diet play a major role in AD pathogenesis [1,2,52–54], as they accompany acute SCI and are known causes of obesity and insulin resistance. We have previously reported in a study of young, healthy, predominantly nonsmoking cohort of persons with intact adrenergic function (i.e., injury below the T6 spinal cord level) nearly one-third of participants satisfied authoritative guidelines for a clinical diagnosis of CMD, and nearly two-thirds qualified for risk reduction by either lifestyle intervention or drug therapy [7]. However, as described, commonly understood risks may not appropriately predict AD in SCI, and emergent disease in persons with SCI may not be identified by ‘typical’ warning signs [55]. Several human studies in SCI have used carotid intima media thickness (IMT) as a proxy for “subclinical atherosclerosis [56–58]. However, as recently reviewed [59], despite the association between carotid IMT and “hard disease” it remains unclear whether routine measurement is “useful for the detection of subclinical atherosclerosis in clinical practice”, let alone determination of extant disease. Recent attention has focused on elevated proatherogenic inflammatory biomarkers, believed to be progenitors of atherosclerosis [5]. For example, several studies indicate that plasma homocysteine [60,61] and C-reactive protein (CRP) [62–64], markers of vascular disease and atherogenesis, as well as IL-6, soluble vascular adhesion molecule (sVCAM)-1, and endothelin-1, are significantly elevated in SCI compared to neurologically intact controls [65–67]. Despite a broader view including a pro-inflammatory phenotype as a predictor of AD, we still lack an understanding of which risk factors require the greatest attention with SCI. Moreover, the extent to which AD burden is hastened by SCI is unknown.
The ApoE-/- is a widely adopted model of AD, which rapidly develops atherosclerotic lesions and histopathological progression resembling human AD [39]. Notably, these mice develop fatty streaks (~10 weeks), intermediate lesions (~16 weeks) and fibrous plaques (~20 weeks), as well as altered blood lipids to an atherogenic phenotype. Disease time-course and severity can be manipulated by diet, activity, and drugs, making the ApoE-/- ideal to study AD after SCI. Results here show that atherosclerotic lesions appear first in the aortic arch in young mice and progress (with aging) in the thoracic and abdominal aorta. We show ApoE-/- intermediate lesions are present at 16 weeks, confirming previous literature, and that AD burden is visibly and statistically increased chronologically, although not markedly changed between 24- and 28-weeks. Importantly, our data demonstrate for the first time that SCI escalates so-called hard disease. The time-controlled increase in ApoE-/-SCI at 24- and 28-weeks compared to ApoE-/-, and the fact that lesions in ApoE-/-SCI at 24-weeks is greater that ApoE-/- at 28-weeks, demonstrate an accelerated trajectory of AD with SCI. A point of consideration is the initial decrease in activity due to injury. Although there is an established and well-defined locomotor recovery observed in our model of injury [42,46], the initial depression in activity level due to SCI may be a contributing factor to the disease pathology. Nonetheless, this fact does not change the conclusions reached in this study. It is also important to note, that disease of the aortic arch is a significant clinical indicator of vascular events such as myocardial infarction, cerebral infarction, peripheral embolism and death, and thus was the focus of our analyses. Although there is an indication that time and injury may increase lesion in both the thoracic and abdominal aorta, these data are incomplete and unquantified. Future studies are planned to improve complete case sample size, and more comprehensively analyze lesion of the entire aortic tree. Nonetheless, the data presented in the aortic arch supports that SCI may significantly contribute to premature AD and subsequent morbidity and mortality.
The traditional AD risk factors, body mass, cholesterol, and triglyceride all exhibit progressive age-related increases to varying degrees in ApoE-/-. Acutely post-SCI (all groups), there was a rapid and expected [42] decrease in body mass which persisted at all time-points, evidence for the well reported long-term loss of metabolically active lean tissue with SCI, including muscle [42,68–74] and bone [75–81]. A gradual age-related increase in triglyceride in ApoE-/- is shown, albeit significant only by 28-weeks. Effect of injury actuates an earlier significant rise in cholesterol at 24-weeks. Interpretation of these traditional AD risk factors are complex. Several studies suggest a strong link between ApoE and overweight/obesity [82]. ApoE-/- mice accumulate less body fat content and possess smaller adipocytes compared to wild type C57BL/6 controls [83]. Moreover, the knockout confers resistant to body mass and adipose tissue gain even under harmful dietary conditions including high-fat, high-cholesterol, and high-sucrose [84,85]. Notably, work in humans has shown a similar correlation between ApoE and body mass index (BMI) [86]. Studies of dyslipidemia using ApoE-/- mice demonstrate decreased clearance of remnant lipoproteins that leads to hypercholesterolemia and hypertriglyceridemia [87–89]. As ApoE-/- alone does not produce a marked increase in body mass, our results likely reflect normal physiological and structural gain associated with advancing age, as opposed to an obesogenic phenotype. It is also important to note that the discrepancy between obesity in the SCI population, and body mass reduction in our model is a limitation in evaluating it as an AD risk factor. It is not surprising, however, that we observed a shift in plasma lipid profile, albeit moderate, that is proatherogenic. Most compelling is the fact that ApoE-/- combined with SCI worsens hypercholesterolemia, in particular, which may be one antecedent to the increased AD burden we observe.
Inflammation is a major factor at all stages of AD. Multiple classes of cytokines play a key role in inflammation. PAIC-induced upregulation and activation of adhesion molecules and chemo-attractants, and migration and infiltration of immune cells, collectively contribute to AD progression [90,91]. As such, the robust cumulative effect of PAIC’s on AD is well recognized, as is the difficulty in discerning the effect of each one individually. Therefore, exploiting a high-throughput automated method allowed us to analyze and determine global patterns of PAIC change in this study. Our data provide evidence that physiological levels of several key cytokines are upregulated with time in ApoE-/- and that injury worsens their expression profile. For example, elevated IL-1β with SCI shown here, advance previous studies with ApoE-/- in which IL-1β is shown to worsen AD via upregulation of adhesion molecules and macrophage activation in the vascular wall [92–95]. Moreover, activation of IL-1β in AD is linked to the NLRP3 inflammasome [96], and we have reported NLRP3 inflammasome formation and IL-1β activation in visceral adipose tissue and pancreas [44], known intermediaries of metabolic diseases. A previous clinical trial has shown that targeting IL-1β reduced cardiovascular events [97], and one recent cross-sectional study reported that IL-1β levels were reduced in an SCI cohort with an anti-inflammatory intervention [98], These studies suggest that treatments targeted at IL-1β may have efficacy in AD and SCI. Similarly, our results indicate a greater overall, and earlier chronological rise in IL-6 with SCI. IL-6’s role in AD may be pathological [99] or protective [100] depending on the stage of atherogenesis. [Reviewed in [101,102]] In a previous study in humans with SCI examining subclinical atherosclerosis–as evaluated by carotid intima-media thickness (IMT)–no relationship with serum IL-6 was found [56], although the authors report an increase in leukocyte-derived IL-6. Nonetheless, our expression analysis and prediction models indicate a concurrent increase with aortic arch lesion and a positive relationship between the two, suggesting a proatherogenic effect.
Similarly, TNFα, MCP-1, and CCL-5 mediate pro-inflammatory effects via mechanisms associated with increased vascular injury leading to AD and myocardial infarction [103,104]. AD progression is directly correlated with TNFα production in In ApoE-/- [105], and in clinical studies, circulating levels of TNFα and soluble TNFRs are independent predictors of mortality in patients with heart failure [106]. However, in several seminal trials of anti-TNFα therapy, unexpected and worsened outcomes resulted [107,108]. It is now better appreciated that global/systemic TNFα inhibition may dysregulate divergent adverse and protective inflammatory responses conferred by specific TNFα receptors [104]. Interestingly, TNFα also upregulates the potent chemo-attractants MCP-1 and CCL-5 [109–112]. MCP-1 was the first chemokine implicated in AD pathogenesis and identified in both mouse and human atherosclerotic lesions [113,114]. CCL-5 is also expressed by a variety of immune and vascular cells in both mouse and human atherosclerotic lesions [115,116]. Not surprisingly, in ApoE-/- we show a progressive increase in TNFα, MCP-1, and CCL-5 which are significant by 28-weeks. Collectively, not only do we observe a strong effluence of several potent PAIC’s in a progressive time-course in ApoE-/-, we have demonstrated that our model of SCI can incite and accelerate increases in their serum expression. Aligned with our initial hypothesis, each of these PAIC’s were able to predict aortic lesion individually, and when incorporated into an ‘inflammatory’ model, IL-1β and TNFα may be forerunners of AD predictions. In this way, their incorporation into more robust models, including lipid and other proatherogenic predictors may better forecast AD risk.
Activation of the transcription factor NF-κB is known to play a key role in the proatherogenic effects of PAIC’s. NF-κB as a primary mediator of vascular disorders has extensively been reviewed [117], linked to diverse processes and a coordinated inflammatory response. Given the interplay of these pathogenic factors and that CMD risk clustering is evident in SCI, targeting NF-κB signaling is an attractive treatment strategy to mitigate these metabolic and disease risks. Low-dose salicylates (eg. Aspirin 81 mg/day) are shown to have anti-thrombotic effects, and higher doses (≥ 2 mg/day) are shown to have systemic anti-inflammatory effects [38,117]. Randomized clinical trials have shown that Salsalate improves glycemic and inflammatory markers in subjects with diabetes or related risk factors (i.e. obesity) [32,33,118,119]. The efficacy of Salsalate is less conclusive in studies evaluating vascular dysfunction [120] and extant coronary artery disease [121], however, the authors themselves discuss important limitations including trial duration, study power, administration with advanced disease and in concert with other guideline-directed pharmacotherapeutics. Notably, an important component of AD is platelet-mediated, where early inflammatory events may stimulate platelet attachment [122,123]. However, Salsalate has no effect on platelet activity [32,124–126], supporting that appropriate adjunctive treatment may be critical.
In general, Salsalate has systemic anti-inflammatory effects [Reviewed in [126]], and in particular, has been shown to improve atherosclerotic inflammatory responses [36], and pro-atherogenic lipid profiles [37]. Animal and in vitro studies using Salsalate have also shown favorable results with earlier intervention with respect to vascular dysfunction and inflammatory response [34,36]. Given these known effects of Salsalate on atherosclerosis, the focus of this study was directed at i. defining atherosclerosis in SCI–which has not been previously shown and ii. examining the effect of salsalate on the impact of SCI, as a means of streamlining between group comparisons and study resources. However, we note the lack of an ApoE-/- + Salsalate comparison group as a limitation in comprehensively evaluating differences between experimental groups. In this report, we did not find that Salsalate–i.e. ApoE-/-SCI/sal−significantly reduced PAIC’s examined when compared to SCI without treatment–i.e. ApoE-/-SCI alone. By 28-weeks, an argument could be made that all inflammatory analytes are observably lower, although it would be remiss to attribute this as a treatment effect. More likely is that the severity of SCI superimposed on a pro-inflammatory genotype resulted in a chronic–and robust–inflammatory response that could not be significantly thwarted. Importantly, the treatment schedule here lasted for only the first 30 days post-SCI which may be insufficient to i. overcome the early effects of SCI and ii. mitigate chronic time-related inflammation. Nonetheless, when examining the aortic arch, we do in fact demonstrate that Salsalate significantly reduces lesions at 24- and 28-weeks when compared to untreated SCI. This may represent a collective acute-phase effect on inflammatory machinery that slows–or delays–the processes involved in lesion formation. Given the current treatment schedule, it could be predicted that Salsalate only slows the progression of atherosclerosis and no differences would be notable if the observation window were extended beyond 28-weeks, when lesion load typically becomes saturated in the aortic arch. Longer studies with dose-scaling and/or longer treatment may address this, although it should be noted that a previously reported clinical study raised concern over deleterious endothelial function with long-term, high-does Salsalate therapy [38]. Taken together, our results are noteworthy insofar as they provide direct evidence that Salsalate attenuates aortic lesion and suggest a basis for future studies that more closely examines treatment dose, timing, and the effect on inflammatory analytes.
Conclusion
In this study we provide evidence that SCI accelerates systemic dyslipidemia, inflammation and atherosclerotic plaque. We show the potential for Salsalate to mitigate pro-inflammatory and proatherogenic consequences of SCI, and introduce PAIC’s that may effectively predict AD. Continued studies will clarify the extent to which Salsalate is a feasible treatment strategy for secondary health complications that accompany SCI, and better evaluate whether PAIC biomarkers are suitable to integrate into clinical models of AD risk.
Supporting information
Acknowledgments
We acknowledge and greatly appreciate the help and expertise of Drs. Douglas Lehmann and Daniel McGibney with statistical discussion. We also thank Dr. W. Dalton Dietrich and The Miami Project to Cure Paralysis for support.
Data Availability
All relevant data are within the manuscript and its Supporting Information files.
Funding Statement
This work was supported by the Craig H. Neilsen Foundation (https://chnfoundation.org) in the form of a grant awarded to MS (340428) and EEH, LLC in the form of a salary for EEH. The specific roles of this author are articulated in the ‘author contributions’ section. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
References
- 1.Chen Y, Cao Y, Allen V, Richards JS. Weight matters: physical and psychosocial well being of persons with spinal cord injury in relation to body mass index. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2011;92(3):391–8. Epub 2011/01/18. 10.1016/j.apmr.2010.06.030 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Chen Y, Henson S, Jackson AB, Richards JS. Obesity intervention in persons with spinal cord injury. Spinal Cord. 2006;44(2):82–91. Epub 2005/08/17. 10.1038/sj.sc.3101818 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Groah SL, Nash MS, Ljungberg IH, Libin A, Hamm LF, Ward E, et al. Nutrient intake and body habitus after spinal cord injury: an analysis by sex and level of injury. J Spinal Cord Med. 2009;32(1):25–33. Epub 2009/03/07. 10.1080/10790268.2009.11760749 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Groah SL, Nash MS, Ward EA, Libin A, Mendez AJ, Burns P, et al. Cardiometabolic risk in community-dwelling persons with chronic spinal cord injury. J Cardiopulm Rehabil Prev. 2011;31(2):73–80. Epub 2010/11/04. 10.1097/HCR.0b013e3181f68aba . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Wahman K, Nash MS, Lewis JE, Seiger A, Levi R. Increased cardiovascular disease risk in Swedish persons with paraplegia: The Stockholm spinal cord injury study. J Rehabil Med. 2010;42(5):489–92. Epub 2010/06/15. 10.2340/16501977-0541 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Bauman WA, Spungen AM, Raza M, Rothstein J, Zhang RL, Zhong YG, et al. Coronary artery disease: metabolic risk factors and latent disease in individuals with paraplegia. Mt Sinai J Med. 1992;59(2):163–8. Epub 1992/03/11. . [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Nash MS, Mendez AJ. A guideline-driven assessment of need for cardiovascular disease risk intervention in persons with chronic paraplegia. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2007;88(6):751–7. Epub 2007/05/30. S0003-9993(07)00167-0 [pii] 10.1016/j.apmr.2007.02.031 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Wahman K, Nash MS, Westgren N, Lewis JE, Seiger A, Levi R. Cardiovascular disease risk factors in persons with paraplegia: the Stockholm spinal cord injury study. J Rehabil Med. 2010;42(3):272–8. Epub 2010/04/27. 10.2340/16501977-0510 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Nash MS, Tractenberg RE, Mendez AJ, David M, Ljungberg IH, Tinsley EA, et al. Cardiometabolic Syndrome in People With Spinal Cord Injury/Disease: Guideline-Derived and Nonguideline Risk Components in a Pooled Sample. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2016;97(10):1696–705. Epub 2016/07/29. 10.1016/j.apmr.2016.07.002 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Bauman WA, Spungen AM. Carbohydrate and lipid metabolism in chronic spinal cord injury. J Spinal Cord Med. 2001;24(4):266–77. Epub 2002/04/12. 10.1080/10790268.2001.11753584 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Nash MS. Cardiovascular fitness after spinal cord injuries In: Lin V, editor. Spinal Cord Medicine. New York: Demos Medical Publications; 2002. p. 637–46. [Google Scholar]
- 12.Nash MS. Exercise as a health-promoting activity following spinal cord injury. J Neurol Phys Ther. 2005;29(2):87–103, 6. Epub 2006/01/03. 10.1097/01.npt.0000282514.94093.c6 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Nash MS, Jacobs PL, Mendez AJ, Goldberg RB. Circuit resistance training improves the atherogenic lipid profiles of persons with chronic paraplegia. J Spinal Cord Med. 2001;24(1):2–9. Epub 2001/10/06. 10.1080/10790268.2001.11753548 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Nash MS, van de Ven I, van Elk N, Johnson BM. Effects of circuit resistance training on fitness attributes and upper-extremity pain in middle-aged men with paraplegia. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2007;88(1):70–5. Epub 2007/01/09. S0003-9993(06)01371-2 [pii] 10.1016/j.apmr.2006.10.003 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Emmons RR, Garber CE, Cirnigliaro CM, Moyer JM, Kirshblum SC, Galea MD, et al. The influence of visceral fat on the postprandial lipemic response in men with paraplegia. J Am Coll Nutr. 2010;29(5):476–81. Epub 2011/04/21. 10.1080/07315724.2010.10719884 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Wang J, Zhang S, Jin Y, Qin G, Yu L, Zhang J. Elevated levels of platelet-monocyte aggregates and related circulating biomarkers in patients with acute coronary syndrome. Int J Cardiol. 2007;115(3):361–5. Epub 2006/08/05. 10.1016/j.ijcard.2006.03.019 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Frost F, Roach MJ, Kushner I, Schreiber P. Inflammatory C-reactive protein and cytokine levels in asymptomatic people with chronic spinal cord injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2005;86(2):312–7. Epub 2005/02/12. 10.1016/j.apmr.2004.02.009 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Manns PJ, McCubbin JA, Williams DP. Fitness, inflammation, and the metabolic syndrome in men with paraplegia. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2005;86(6):1176–81. Epub 2005/06/15. 10.1016/j.apmr.2004.11.020 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Bauman WA, Spungen AM. Metabolic changes in persons after spinal cord injury. Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am. 2000;11(1):109–40. Epub 2000/02/19. . [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Myers J, Lee M, Kiratli J. Cardiovascular disease in spinal cord injury: an overview of prevalence, risk, evaluation, and management. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2007;86(2):142–52. Epub 2007/01/26. 10.1097/PHM.0b013e31802f0247 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Libby P. Inflammation and cardiovascular disease mechanisms. Am J Clin Nutr. 2006;83(2):456S–60S. Epub 2006/02/14. 10.1093/ajcn/83.2.456S . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Nash MS, Lewis JE, Dyson-Hudson TA, Szlachcic Y, Yee F, Mendez AJ, et al. Safety, tolerance, and efficacy of extended-release niacin monotherapy for treating dyslipidemia risks in persons with chronic tetraplegia: a randomized multicenter controlled trial. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2011;92(3):399–410. Epub 2011/02/01. 10.1016/j.apmr.2010.06.029 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Blaha MJ, Rivera JJ, Budoff MJ, Blankstein R, Agatston A, O’Leary DH, et al. Association between obesity, high-sensitivity C-reactive protein >/ = 2 mg/L, and subclinical atherosclerosis: implications of JUPITER from the Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2011;31(6):1430–8. Epub 2011/04/09. 10.1161/ATVBAHA.111.223768 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Ridker PM. High-sensitivity C-reactive protein and cardiovascular risk: rationale for screening and primary prevention. Am J Cardiol. 2003;92(4B):17K–22K. Epub 2003/09/02. 10.1016/s0002-9149(03)00774-4 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Ridker PM, Danielson E, Fonseca FA, Genest J, Gotto AM Jr., Kastelein JJ, et al. Rosuvastatin to prevent vascular events in men and women with elevated C-reactive protein. N Engl J Med. 2008;359(21):2195–207. Epub 2008/11/11. 10.1056/NEJMoa0807646 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Rubin J, Chang HJ, Nasir K, Blumenthal RS, Blaha MJ, Choi EK, et al. Association between high-sensitivity C-reactive protein and coronary plaque subtypes assessed by 64-slice coronary computed tomography angiography in an asymptomatic population. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2011;4(3):201–9. Epub 2011/03/23. 10.1161/CIRCIMAGING.109.929901 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Ito T, Ikeda U. Inflammatory cytokines and cardiovascular disease. Curr Drug Targets Inflamm Allergy. 2003;2(3):257–65. Epub 2003/10/17. 10.2174/1568010033484106 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Libby P. Inflammation in atherosclerosis. Nature. 2002;420(6917):868–74. Epub 2002/12/20. 10.1038/nature01323 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Tracy RP. Inflammation, the metabolic syndrome and cardiovascular risk. Int J Clin Pract Suppl. 2003;(134):10–7. Epub 2003/06/10. . [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Tak PP, Firestein GS. NF-kappaB: a key role in inflammatory diseases. J Clin Invest. 2001;107(1):7–11. Epub 2001/01/03. 10.1172/JCI11830 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Rader DJ. Effect of insulin resistance, dyslipidemia, and intra-abdominal adiposity on the development of cardiovascular disease and diabetes mellitus. Am J Med. 2007;120(3 Suppl 1):S12–8. Epub 2007/02/27. 10.1016/j.amjmed.2007.01.003 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Fleischman A, Shoelson SE, Bernier R, Goldfine AB. Salsalate improves glycemia and inflammatory parameters in obese young adults. Diabetes Care. 2008;31(2):289–94. Epub 2007/10/26. 10.2337/dc07-1338 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Goldfine AB, Silver R, Aldhahi W, Cai D, Tatro E, Lee J, et al. Use of salsalate to target inflammation in the treatment of insulin resistance and type 2 diabetes. Clin Transl Sci. 2008;1(1):36–43. Epub 2009/04/02. 10.1111/j.1752-8062.2008.00026.x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Murthy SN, Desouza CV, Bost NW, Hilaire RC, Casey DB, Badejo AM, et al. Effects of salsalate therapy on recovery from vascular injury in female Zucker fatty rats. Diabetes. 2010;59(12):3240–6. Epub 2010/09/30. 10.2337/db09-1761 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Tilg H, Moschen AR. Inflammatory mechanisms in the regulation of insulin resistance. Mol Med. 2008;14(3–4):222–31. Epub 2008/02/01. 10.2119/2007-00119.Tilg [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Jung TW, Park HS, Jeong JH, Lee T. Salsalate ameliorates the atherosclerotic response through HO-1- and SIRT1-mediated suppression of ER stress and inflammation. Inflamm Res. 2019;68(8):655–63. Epub 2019/05/31. 10.1007/s00011-019-01248-6 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Ariel D, Kim SH, Liu A, Abbasi F, Lamendola CA, Grove K, et al. Salsalate-induced changes in lipid, lipoprotein, and apoprotein concentrations in overweight or obese, insulin-resistant, nondiabetic individuals. J Clin Lipidol. 2015;9(5):658–63. Epub 2015/09/10. 10.1016/j.jacl.2015.06.009 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Nohria A, Kinlay S, Buck JS, Redline W, Copeland-Halperin R, Kim S, et al. The effect of salsalate therapy on endothelial function in a broad range of subjects. J Am Heart Assoc. 2014;3(1):e000609 Epub 2014/01/07. 10.1161/JAHA.113.000609 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Jawien J, Nastalek P, Korbut R. Mouse models of experimental atherosclerosis. J Physiol Pharmacol. 2004;55(3):503–17. Epub 2004/09/24. . [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Rosenfeld ME, Polinsky P, Virmani R, Kauser K, Rubanyi G, Schwartz SM. Advanced atherosclerotic lesions in the innominate artery of the ApoE knockout mouse. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2000;20(12):2587–92. Epub 2000/12/16. 10.1161/01.atv.20.12.2587 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Wouters K, Shiri-Sverdlov R, van Gorp PJ, van Bilsen M, Hofker MH. Understanding hyperlipidemia and atherosclerosis: lessons from genetically modified apoe and ldlr mice. Clin Chem Lab Med. 2005;43(5):470–9. Epub 2005/05/19. 10.1515/CCLM.2005.085 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Bigford GE, Darr AJ, Bracchi-Ricard VC, Gao H, Nash MS, Bethea JR. Effects of ursolic acid on sub-lesional muscle pathology in a contusion model of spinal cord injury. PLoS One. 2018;13(8):e0203042 Epub 2018/08/30. 10.1371/journal.pone.0203042 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Nixon M, Wake DJ, Livingstone DE, Stimson RH, Esteves CL, Seckl JR, et al. Salicylate downregulates 11beta-HSD1 expression in adipose tissue in obese mice and in humans, mediating insulin sensitization. Diabetes. 2012;61(4):790–6. Epub 2012/02/24. 10.2337/db11-0931 [pii]. . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Bigford GE, Bracchi-Ricard VC, Keane RW, Nash MS, Bethea JR. Neuroendocrine and cardiac metabolic dysfunction and NLRP3 inflammasome activation in adipose tissue and pancreas following chronic spinal cord injury in the mouse. ASN Neuro. 2013;5(4):243–55. Epub 2013/08/09. 10.1042/AN20130021 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Bigford GE, Bracchi-Ricard VC, Nash MS, Bethea JR. Alterations in mouse hypothalamic adipokine gene expression and leptin signaling following chronic spinal cord injury and with advanced age. PLoS One. 2012;7(7):e41073 Epub 2012/07/21. 10.1371/journal.pone.0041073 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Basso DM, Fisher LC, Anderson AJ, Jakeman LB, McTigue DM, Popovich PG. Basso Mouse Scale for locomotion detects differences in recovery after spinal cord injury in five common mouse strains. J Neurotrauma. 2006;23(5):635–59. 10.1089/neu.2006.23.635 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Nishi RA, Liu H, Chu Y, Hamamura M, Su MY, Nalcioglu O, et al. Behavioral, histological, and ex vivo magnetic resonance imaging assessment of graded contusion spinal cord injury in mice. J Neurotrauma. 2007;24(4):674–89. 10.1089/neu.2006.0204 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Man JJ, Beckman JA, Jaffe IZ. Sex as a Biological Variable in Atherosclerosis. Circ Res. 2020;126(9):1297–319. Epub 2020/04/24. 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.120.315930 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Daugherty A, Whitman SC. Quantification of atherosclerosis in mice. Methods Mol Biol. 2003;209:293–309. Epub 2002/10/03. 10.1385/1-59259-340-2:293 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Whitman SC. A practical approach to using mice in atherosclerosis research. Clin Biochem Rev. 2004;25(1):81–93. Epub 2008/06/03. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Karra R, Vemullapalli S, Dong C, Herderick EE, Song X, Slosek K, et al. Molecular evidence for arterial repair in atherosclerosis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005;102(46):16789–94. Epub 2005/11/09. 10.1073/pnas.0507718102 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Charlifue S, Jha A, Lammertse D. Aging with spinal cord injury. Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am. 2010;21(2):383–402. Epub 2010/05/25. 10.1016/j.pmr.2009.12.002 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Jones LM, Legge M, Goulding A. Factor analysis of the metabolic syndrome in spinal cord-injured men. Metabolism. 2004;53(10):1372–7. Epub 2004/09/18. 10.1016/j.metabol.2004.04.013 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.National Cholesterol Education Program Expert Panel on Detection E, Treatment of High Blood Cholesterol in A. Third Report of the National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) Expert Panel on Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Cholesterol in Adults (Adult Treatment Panel III) final report. Circulation. 2002;106(25):3143–421. Epub 2002/12/18. . [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Groah SL, Menter RR. Long-term cardiac ischemia leading to coronary artery bypass grafting in a tetraplegic patient. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1998;79(9):1129–32. Epub 1998/09/28. 10.1016/s0003-9993(98)90183-6 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Matos-Souza JR, Pithon KR, Ozahata TM, Oliveira RT, Teo FH, Blotta MH, et al. Subclinical atherosclerosis is related to injury level but not to inflammatory parameters in spinal cord injury subjects. Spinal Cord. 2010;48(10):740–4. Epub 2010/02/17. 10.1038/sc.2010.12 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Szlachcic Y, Adkins RH, Reiter JC, Yee F, Shaw SJ, Hodis HN. Predictors of subclinical atherosclerosis in women with spinal cord injury. Top Spinal Cord Inj Rehabil. 2014;20(2):90–5. Epub 2014/12/06. 10.1310/sci2002-90 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Yoon ES, Heffernan KS, Jae SY, Kim HJ, Bunsawat K, Fernhall B. Metabolically healthy obesity and subclinical atherosclerosis in persons with spinal cord injury. J Rehabil Med. 2018;50(7):613–8. Epub 2018/06/09. 10.2340/16501977-2351 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Nezu T, Hosomi N, Aoki S, Matsumoto M. Carotid Intima-Media Thickness for Atherosclerosis. J Atheroscler Thromb. 2016;23(1):18–31. Epub 2015/10/16. 10.5551/jat.31989 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Clarke R, Daly L, Robinson K, Naughten E, Cahalane S, Fowler B, et al. Hyperhomocysteinemia: an independent risk factor for vascular disease. N Engl J Med. 1991;324(17):1149–55. Epub 1991/04/25. 10.1056/NEJM199104253241701 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Stampfer MJ, Malinow MR, Willett WC, Newcomer LM, Upson B, Ullmann D, et al. A prospective study of plasma homocyst(e)ine and risk of myocardial infarction in US physicians. JAMA. 1992;268(7):877–81. Epub 1992/08/19. . [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Mirhafez SR, Ebrahimi M, Saberi Karimian M, Avan A, Tayefi M, Heidari-Bakavoli A, et al. Serum high-sensitivity C-reactive protein as a biomarker in patients with metabolic syndrome: evidence-based study with 7284 subjects. Eur J Clin Nutr. 2016;70(11):1298–304. Epub 2016/11/03. 10.1038/ejcn.2016.111 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Pearson TA, Mensah GA, Alexander RW, Anderson JL, Cannon RO, 3rd, Criqui M, et al. Markers of inflammation and cardiovascular disease: application to clinical and public health practice: A statement for healthcare professionals from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2003;107(3):499–511. Epub 2003/01/29. 10.1161/01.cir.0000052939.59093.45 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Gibson AE, Buchholz AC, Martin Ginis KA, Group S-SR. C-Reactive protein in adults with chronic spinal cord injury: increased chronic inflammation in tetraplegia vs paraplegia. Spinal Cord. 2008;46(9):616–21. Epub 2008/04/17. 10.1038/sc.2008.32 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Bauman WA, Adkins RH, Spungen AM, Waters RL, Kemp B, Herbert V. Levels of plasma homocysteine in persons with spinal cord injury. J Spinal Cord Med. 2001;24(2):81–6. Epub 2001/10/06. 10.1080/10790268.2001.11753559 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Liang H, Chen D, Wang Y, Rimmer JH, Braunschweig CL. Different risk factor patterns for metabolic syndrome in men with spinal cord injury compared with able-bodied men despite similar prevalence rates. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2007;88(9):1198–204. Epub 2007/09/11. 10.1016/j.apmr.2007.05.023 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Wang TD, Wang YH, Huang TS, Su TC, Pan SL, Chen SY. Circulating levels of markers of inflammation and endothelial activation are increased in men with chronic spinal cord injury. J Formos Med Assoc. 2007;106(11):919–28. Epub 2007/12/08. 10.1016/S0929-6646(08)60062-5 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Burnham R, Martin T, Stein R, Bell G, MacLean I, Steadward R. Skeletal muscle fibre type transformation following spinal cord injury. Spinal Cord. 1997;35(2):86–91. Epub 1997/02/01. 10.1038/sj.sc.3100364 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Castro MJ, Apple DF Jr., Hillegass EA, Dudley GA. Influence of complete spinal cord injury on skeletal muscle cross-sectional area within the first 6 months of injury. Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol. 1999;80(4):373–8. Epub 1999/09/14. 10.1007/s004210050606 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Grimby G, Broberg C, Krotkiewska I, Krotkiewski M. Muscle fiber composition in patients with traumatic cord lesion. Scand J Rehabil Med. 1976;8(1):37–42. Epub 1976/01/01. . [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Lotta S, Scelsi R, Alfonsi E, Saitta A, Nicolotti D, Epifani P, et al. Morphometric and neurophysiological analysis of skeletal muscle in paraplegic patients with traumatic cord lesion. Paraplegia. 1991;29(4):247–52. Epub 1991/05/01. 10.1038/sc.1991.35 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72.Modlesky CM, Bickel CS, Slade JM, Meyer RA, Cureton KJ, Dudley GA. Assessment of skeletal muscle mass in men with spinal cord injury using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry and magnetic resonance imaging. J Appl Physiol (1985). 2004;96(2):561–5. Epub 2003/10/07. 10.1152/japplphysiol.00207.2003 [pii]. . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73.Round JM, Barr FM, Moffat B, Jones DA. Fibre areas and histochemical fibre types in the quadriceps muscle of paraplegic subjects. J Neurol Sci. 1993;116(2):207–11. Epub 1993/06/01. 10.1016/0022-510x(93)90327-u . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74.Scelsi R, Marchetti C, Poggi P, Lotta S, Lommi G. Muscle fiber type morphology and distribution in paraplegic patients with traumatic cord lesion. Histochemical and ultrastructural aspects of rectus femoris muscle. Acta Neuropathol. 1982;57(4):243–8. Epub 1982/01/01. 10.1007/BF00692178 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75.Battaglino RA, Lazzari AA, Garshick E, Morse LR. Spinal cord injury-induced osteoporosis: pathogenesis and emerging therapies. Curr Osteoporos Rep. 2012;10(4):278–85. Epub 2012/09/18. 10.1007/s11914-012-0117-0 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76.Frey-Rindova P, de Bruin ED, Stussi E, Dambacher MA, Dietz V. Bone mineral density in upper and lower extremities during 12 months after spinal cord injury measured by peripheral quantitative computed tomography. Spinal Cord. 2000;38(1):26–32. Epub 2000/04/13. 10.1038/sj.sc.3100905 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77.Garland DE, Stewart CA, Adkins RH, Hu SS, Rosen C, Liotta FJ, et al. Osteoporosis after spinal cord injury. J Orthop Res. 1992;10(3):371–8. Epub 1992/05/01. 10.1002/jor.1100100309 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 78.Giangregorio L, McCartney N. Bone loss and muscle atrophy in spinal cord injury: epidemiology, fracture prediction, and rehabilitation strategies. J Spinal Cord Med. 2006;29(5):489–500. Epub 2007/02/06. 10.1080/10790268.2006.11753898 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79.Maimoun L, Fattal C, Micallef JP, Peruchon E, Rabischong P. Bone loss in spinal cord-injured patients: from physiopathology to therapy. Spinal Cord. 2006;44(4):203–10. Epub 2005/09/15. 3101832 [pii] 10.1038/sj.sc.3101832 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 80.Qin W, Bauman WA, Cardozo C. Bone and muscle loss after spinal cord injury: organ interactions. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2010;1211:66–84. Epub 2010/11/11. 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2010.05806.x . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 81.Zehnder Y, Luthi M, Michel D, Knecht H, Perrelet R, Neto I, et al. Long-term changes in bone metabolism, bone mineral density, quantitative ultrasound parameters, and fracture incidence after spinal cord injury: a cross-sectional observational study in 100 paraplegic men. Osteoporos Int. 2004;15(3):180–9. Epub 2004/01/15. 10.1007/s00198-003-1529-6 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 82.Kypreos KE, Karavia EA, Constantinou C, Hatziri A, Kalogeropoulou C, Xepapadaki E, et al. Apolipoprotein E in diet-induced obesity: a paradigm shift from conventional perception. J Biomed Res. 2017. Epub 2018/05/18. 10.7555/JBR.32.20180007 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 83.Huang ZH, Reardon CA, Mazzone T. Endogenous ApoE expression modulates adipocyte triglyceride content and turnover. Diabetes. 2006;55(12):3394–402. Epub 2006/11/30. 10.2337/db06-0354 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 84.Chiba T, Nakazawa T, Yui K, Kaneko E, Shimokado K. VLDL induces adipocyte differentiation in ApoE-dependent manner. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2003;23(8):1423–9. Epub 2003/07/05. 10.1161/01.ATV.0000085040.58340.36 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 85.Hofmann SM, Perez-Tilve D, Greer TM, Coburn BA, Grant E, Basford JE, et al. Defective lipid delivery modulates glucose tolerance and metabolic response to diet in apolipoprotein E-deficient mice. Diabetes. 2008;57(1):5–12. Epub 2007/10/05. 10.2337/db07-0403 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 86.Zvintzou E, Skroubis G, Chroni A, Petropoulou PI, Gkolfinopoulou C, Sakellaropoulos G, et al. Effects of bariatric surgery on HDL structure and functionality: results from a prospective trial. J Clin Lipidol. 2014;8(4):408–17. Epub 2014/08/12. 10.1016/j.jacl.2014.05.001 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 87.Hinder LM, Vincent AM, Hayes JM, McLean LL, Feldman EL. Apolipoprotein E knockout as the basis for mouse models of dyslipidemia-induced neuropathy. Exp Neurol. 2013;239:102–10. Epub 2012/10/13. 10.1016/j.expneurol.2012.10.002 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 88.Poirier J. Apolipoprotein E and Alzheimer’s disease. A role in amyloid catabolism. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2000;924:81–90. Epub 2001/02/24. 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2000.tb05564.x . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 89.Trauner M, Claudel T, Fickert P, Moustafa T, Wagner M. Bile acids as regulators of hepatic lipid and glucose metabolism. Dig Dis. 2010;28(1):220–4. Epub 2010/05/13. 10.1159/000282091 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 90.Hansson GK, Libby P, Tabas I. Inflammation and plaque vulnerability. J Intern Med. 2015;278(5):483–93. Epub 2015/08/12. 10.1111/joim.12406 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 91.Szmitko PE, Wang CH, Weisel RD, de Almeida JR, Anderson TJ, Verma S. New markers of inflammation and endothelial cell activation: Part I. Circulation. 2003;108(16):1917–23. Epub 2003/10/22. 10.1161/01.CIR.0000089190.95415.9F . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 92.Clarke MC, Talib S, Figg NL, Bennett MR. Vascular smooth muscle cell apoptosis induces interleukin-1-directed inflammation: effects of hyperlipidemia-mediated inhibition of phagocytosis. Circ Res. 2010;106(2):363–72. Epub 2009/11/21. 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.109.208389 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 93.Kirii H, Niwa T, Yamada Y, Wada H, Saito K, Iwakura Y, et al. Lack of interleukin-1beta decreases the severity of atherosclerosis in ApoE-deficient mice. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2003;23(4):656–60. Epub 2003/03/05. 10.1161/01.ATV.0000064374.15232.C3 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 94.Garg NJ. Inflammasomes in cardiovascular diseases. Am J Cardiovasc Dis. 2011;1(3):244–54. Epub 2012/01/19. . [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 95.Mallat Z, Corbaz A, Scoazec A, Graber P, Alouani S, Esposito B, et al. Interleukin-18/interleukin-18 binding protein signaling modulates atherosclerotic lesion development and stability. Circ Res. 2001;89(7):E41–5. Epub 2001/09/29. 10.1161/hh1901.098735 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 96.Sheedy FJ, Grebe A, Rayner KJ, Kalantari P, Ramkhelawon B, Carpenter SB, et al. CD36 coordinates NLRP3 inflammasome activation by facilitating intracellular nucleation of soluble ligands into particulate ligands in sterile inflammation. Nat Immunol. 2013;14(8):812–20. Epub 2013/07/03. 10.1038/ni.2639 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 97.Ridker PM, Everett BM, Thuren T, MacFadyen JG, Chang WH, Ballantyne C, et al. Antiinflammatory Therapy with Canakinumab for Atherosclerotic Disease. N Engl J Med. 2017;377(12):1119–31. Epub 2017/08/29. 10.1056/NEJMoa1707914 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 98.Allison DJ, Beaudry KM, Thomas AM, Josse AR, Ditor DS. Changes in nutrient intake and inflammation following an anti-inflammatory diet in spinal cord injury. J Spinal Cord Med. 2019;42(6):768–77. Epub 2018/10/03. 10.1080/10790268.2018.1519996 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 99.Huber SA, Sakkinen P, Conze D, Hardin N, Tracy R. Interleukin-6 exacerbates early atherosclerosis in mice. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 1999;19(10):2364–7. Epub 1999/10/16. 10.1161/01.atv.19.10.2364 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 100.Schieffer B, Selle T, Hilfiker A, Hilfiker-Kleiner D, Grote K, Tietge UJ, et al. Impact of interleukin-6 on plaque development and morphology in experimental atherosclerosis. Circulation. 2004;110(22):3493–500. Epub 2004/11/24. 10.1161/01.CIR.0000148135.08582.97 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 101.Fontes JA, Rose NR, Cihakova D. The varying faces of IL-6: From cardiac protection to cardiac failure. Cytokine. 2015;74(1):62–8. Epub 2015/02/05. 10.1016/j.cyto.2014.12.024 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 102.Garbers C, Hermanns HM, Schaper F, Muller-Newen G, Grotzinger J, Rose-John S, et al. Plasticity and cross-talk of interleukin 6-type cytokines. Cytokine Growth Factor Rev. 2012;23(3):85–97. Epub 2012/05/19. 10.1016/j.cytogfr.2012.04.001 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 103.Wan W, Murphy PM. Regulation of atherogenesis by chemokines and chemokine receptors. Arch Immunol Ther Exp (Warsz). 2013;61(1):1–14. Epub 2012/12/12. 10.1007/s00005-012-0202-1 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 104.Urschel K. TNF-α in the cardiovascular system: from physiology to therapy. International Journal of Interferon, Cytokine and Mediator Research. 2015;5(7):9–25. [Google Scholar]
- 105.Canault M, Peiretti F, Poggi M, Mueller C, Kopp F, Bonardo B, et al. Progression of atherosclerosis in ApoE-deficient mice that express distinct molecular forms of TNF-alpha. J Pathol. 2008;214(5):574–83. Epub 2008/02/06. 10.1002/path.2305 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 106.Mann DL, Deswal A, Bozkurt B, Torre-Amione G. New therapeutics for chronic heart failure. Annu Rev Med. 2002;53:59–74. Epub 2002/01/31. 10.1146/annurev.med.53.082901.104004 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 107.Mann DL, McMurray JJ, Packer M, Swedberg K, Borer JS, Colucci WS, et al. Targeted anticytokine therapy in patients with chronic heart failure: results of the Randomized Etanercept Worldwide Evaluation (RENEWAL). Circulation. 2004;109(13):1594–602. Epub 2004/03/17. 10.1161/01.CIR.0000124490.27666.B2 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 108.Chung ES, Packer M, Lo KH, Fasanmade AA, Willerson JT, Anti TNFTACHFI. Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, pilot trial of infliximab, a chimeric monoclonal antibody to tumor necrosis factor-alpha, in patients with moderate-to-severe heart failure: results of the anti-TNF Therapy Against Congestive Heart Failure (ATTACH) trial. Circulation. 2003;107(25):3133–40. Epub 2003/06/11. 10.1161/01.CIR.0000077913.60364.D2 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 109.Murao K, Ohyama T, Imachi H, Ishida T, Cao WM, Namihira H, et al. TNF-alpha stimulation of MCP-1 expression is mediated by the Akt/PKB signal transduction pathway in vascular endothelial cells. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2000;276(2):791–6. Epub 2000/10/12. 10.1006/bbrc.2000.3497 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 110.Ammit AJ, Lazaar AL, Irani C, O’Neill GM, Gordon ND, Amrani Y, et al. Tumor necrosis factor-alpha-induced secretion of RANTES and interleukin-6 from human airway smooth muscle cells: modulation by glucocorticoids and beta-agonists. Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol. 2002;26(4):465–74. Epub 2002/03/29. 10.1165/ajrcmb.26.4.4681 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 111.Homma T, Matsukura S, Hirose T, Ohnishi T, Kimura T, Kurokawa M, et al. Cooperative activation of CCL5 expression by TLR3 and tumor necrosis factor-alpha or interferon-gamma through nuclear factor-kappaB or STAT-1 in airway epithelial cells. Int Arch Allergy Immunol. 2010;152 Suppl 1:9–17. Epub 2010/06/11. 10.1159/000312120 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 112.Ohta H, Wada H, Niwa T, Kirii H, Iwamoto N, Fujii H, et al. Disruption of tumor necrosis factor-alpha gene diminishes the development of atherosclerosis in ApoE-deficient mice. Atherosclerosis. 2005;180(1):11–7. Epub 2005/04/13. 10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2004.11.016 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 113.Nelken NA, Coughlin SR, Gordon D, Wilcox JN. Monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 in human atheromatous plaques. J Clin Invest. 1991;88(4):1121–7. Epub 1991/10/01. 10.1172/JCI115411 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 114.Rayner K, Van Eersel S, Groot PH, Reape TJ. Localisation of mRNA for JE/MCP-1 and its receptor CCR2 in atherosclerotic lesions of the ApoE knockout mouse. J Vasc Res. 2000;37(2):93–102. Epub 2000/04/08. 10.1159/000025720 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 115.Krohn R, Raffetseder U, Bot I, Zernecke A, Shagdarsuren E, Liehn EA, et al. Y-box binding protein-1 controls CC chemokine ligand-5 (CCL5) expression in smooth muscle cells and contributes to neointima formation in atherosclerosis-prone mice. Circulation. 2007;116(16):1812–20. Epub 2007/09/26. 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.107.708016 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 116.Pattison JM, Nelson PJ, Huie P, Sibley RK, Krensky AM. RANTES chemokine expression in transplant-associated accelerated atherosclerosis. J Heart Lung Transplant. 1996;15(12):1194–9. Epub 1996/12/01. . [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 117.McCarty MF. Salsalate may have broad utility in the prevention and treatment of vascular disorders and the metabolic syndrome. Med Hypotheses. 2010;75(3):276–81. Epub 2010/01/19. 10.1016/j.mehy.2009.12.027 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 118.Faghihimani E, Aminorroaya A, Rezvanian H, Adibi P, Ismail-Beigi F, Amini M. Salsalate improves glycemic control in patients with newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes. Acta Diabetol. 2013;50(4):537–43. Epub 2011/09/23. 10.1007/s00592-011-0329-2 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 119.Goldfine AB, Fonseca V, Jablonski KA, Pyle L, Staten MA, Shoelson SE, et al. The effects of salsalate on glycemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes: a randomized trial. Ann Intern Med. 2010;152(6):346–57. Epub 2010/03/17. 10.7326/0003-4819-152-6-201003160-00004 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 120.Goldfine AB, Buck JS, Desouza C, Fonseca V, Chen YD, Shoelson SE, et al. Targeting inflammation using salsalate in patients with type 2 diabetes: effects on flow-mediated dilation (TINSAL-FMD). Diabetes Care. 2013;36(12):4132–9. Epub 2013/10/17. 10.2337/dc13-0859 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 121.Hauser TH, Salastekar N, Schaefer EJ, Desai T, Goldfine HL, Fowler KM, et al. Effect of Targeting Inflammation With Salsalate: The TINSAL-CVD Randomized Clinical Trial on Progression of Coronary Plaque in Overweight and Obese Patients Using Statins. JAMA Cardiol. 2016;1(4):413–23. Epub 2016/07/22. 10.1001/jamacardio.2016.0605 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 122.Badimon L, Padro T, Vilahur G. Atherosclerosis, platelets and thrombosis in acute ischaemic heart disease. Eur Heart J Acute Cardiovasc Care. 2012;1(1):60–74. Epub 2012/04/01. 10.1177/2048872612441582 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 123.Massberg S, Brand K, Gruner S, Page S, Muller E, Muller I, et al. A critical role of platelet adhesion in the initiation of atherosclerotic lesion formation. J Exp Med. 2002;196(7):887–96. Epub 2002/10/09. 10.1084/jem.20012044 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 124.Estes D, Kaplan K. Lack of platelet effect with the aspirin analog, salsalate. Arthritis Rheum. 1980;23(11):1303–7. Epub 1980/11/01. 10.1002/art.1780231113 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 125.Mielants H, Veys EM, Verbruggen G, Schelstraete. Comparison of serum salicylate levels and gastro-intestinal blood loss between salsalate (Disalcid)and other forms of salicylates. Scand J Rheumatol. 1981;10(3):169–73. Epub 1981/01/01. 10.3109/03009748109095292 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 126.Ridker PM, Luscher TF. Anti-inflammatory therapies for cardiovascular disease. Eur Heart J. 2014;35(27):1782–91. Epub 2014/05/28. 10.1093/eurheartj/ehu203 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
All relevant data are within the manuscript and its Supporting Information files.