Skip to main content
NCBI home page
BDJ Open logoLink to BDJ Open
. 2021 Feb 24;7:11. doi: 10.1038/s41405-020-00055-0

The colour stability of crystallized acetyl resin material in comparison to other restorative materials. An in-vitro study

Sarah Aburaisi 1,✉, Abdulkarim Basha 2, Khalid Al Najjar 3, Husam Al Saqat 3, Faisal Al Askar 3, Fareed Al Nazer 3
PMCID: PMC7904845  PMID: 33627634

Abstract

Aim

To investigate the colour stability of Crystalized Acetyl Resin, in comparison to three other aesthetic restorative materials, when immersed in different staining aqueous solutions.

Materials and methods

Fifteen disc-shaped specimens each, of the four materials tested, were immersed in either DW or 4 staining solutions. CIE L*a*b* values were recorded using a digital spectrophotometer on a weekly basis for 4 weeks. Data were compared using three- way/two-way ANOVA along with auto-regressive model.

Results

Two-way Anova indicates that there is a significant colour change in all materials over time when immersed in the different staining solutions. Auto-regressive model showed that the colour change in each successive week was statistically significant (P < 0.001).

Conclusion

The most staining solution affecting the materials during this study was black coffee. Within the limitation of this study, Acetyl Resin was the most colour stable material among the other materials.

Subject terms: Fixed prosthodontics, Dental biomaterials

Introduction

Modern day patients seeking dental treatment are increasingly aware of the ever-evolving aesthetic options available. The wide variety of restorative materials available nowadays gives the dentists an advantage in performing the best possible treatments, while still maintaining the aesthetic requirements of the patient. Materials like Glass ionomer (GIC), Composite, and Bis-acryl are available to serve such purposes. Patients’ ever increasing demand for aesthetics, even for temporary restorations, obligates the dentists to ensure that they avail such restorative materials that can withstand changes in the oral environment and also must maintain their aesthetic appearance over the period of service.

Certain patients show reluctance towards the conventional options, possibly owing to insufficient time or funds. This obligates the dentists to seek-out and offer newer cosmetic treatment options that are non-invasive. As of today, some of these cosmetic treatments are fabricated from a synthetic polymer known as Crystalized Acetyl Resin, which is a thermoplastic material. Crystalized Acetyl Resin, also known as Polyoxymethylene (POM) or Acetal, is a chain of alternating methyl groups linked by an oxygen molecule.1 The crystalline structure provides the material with high strength, wear resistance and flexibility. This along with its high creep resistance, fatigue endurance, and hydrophobic property, makes it a promising material in the dental aesthetics field. It can be formed into homopolymers or a copolymer.2 Clinical uses of Acetal include: (1) RPD frameworks, enhancing the aesthetics and can be an alternative material for Co–Cr allergic patients.2,3 (2) Cosmetic smile enhancement. (3) Temporary restorations over Implants. (4) raising vertical dimension.4

Whenever a material is newly introduced for commercial purposes, and its prime objective is to obtain a superior aesthetic outcome, its colour stability is considered a very critical property, as it directly affects its clinical longevity and success.5 this warrants the comparison of its optical properties with other existing materials that are used for similar purposes. The emergence of the shade specific GIC material, in contrast to conventional GIC (white opaque), improved their used as a tooth-coloured restoration that could be used in aesthetic regions. Micro-hybrid filled composite resin, in contrast to conventional composite resin with different filler size, or amalgam, made it possible to perform temporary restorations and procedures of caries control and core build-up, while accounting for the aesthetic component of the restoration.6 It is known that filler types for Composite Resin have a deleterious effect on its stability in different aspects of its properties7 and not only limited to its colour stability. Bis-acryl is yet another excellent example of a material that is reported to be of superior colour stability when compared with other materials in its category of usage.8

While assessing colour changes, visual inspection is a subjective physiological and psychological process, while the spectrophotometer, when used as a colour evaluation device, not only eliminates subjective interpretations but also enables the identification of small colour differences. The CIE (Commission Internationale de l’Eclairage) L*a*b* colour system is a uniform colour scale that covers all the colours visible to the human eye and is thus suitable for perceptual studies of colour differences in dental materials.9 Using the CIE L*a*b* colour system, different thresholds of colour change (∆E) values that produce visually perceptible differences have been reported in several studies. Generally, a colour difference (∆E) value of 3.7 or more is considered as visually perceptible and clinically unacceptable.10–12

To achieve an accumulative colour change in a material and reach distinct results, most studies recommend the immersion to last for at least 4 weeks.8,13–15 Selection of the staining solution came according to drinks commonly used by a wide range of the population.8,13,16 which included coffee, tea and soda (S).

Since the clinical implication of studies affecting the colour stability of a material is mandatory, we found that it has been reported that two cups of coffee, tea, and/or soda are consumed every day; where they remain in contact with the materials in the oral environment for 10 min/day. With this said, 7 days of materials’ immersion into such solutions would account for 2.8 years of clinical life.17

The aims of this study were to determine the colour stability of crystallized acetyl resin in comparison to three others, commonly used, restorative materials when exposed to different staining liquids; and to determine a time-dependent correlation of any recorded colour change.

The null hypothesis is that there will be no difference in colour stability of crystalized acetyl resin when compared to GIC, composite resin, and bis-acryl resin.

Materials and methods

Materials

Armamentarium

The list of test materials, test solutions, auxiliary materials, instruments, and equipment are depicted in Table 1 and Figs. 1 and 2.

Table 1.

Materials, instruments, and equipment used in the study.

a. Test materials
Material Brand name Manufacturer Shade
Micro-Hybrid packable composite Composan LCM micro-hybrid Promedica, Germany A1
GIC Medifil Promedica, Germany A1
Bis-Acryl Success CD Promedica, Germany A1
Acetal Acetal Zirlux, Germany A1
b. Test solutions
Solution (Code) Brand name Manufacturer Type Group
Distilled water (DW) Eco water Eco care LLC Control A
Black tea (BT) Lipton Yellow Label tea Unilever Mashreq -Tea Company, Egypt Staining B
Black coffee (BC) Nescafe classic Nestle, Egypt Staining C
Soda (S) Pepsi SSFCL Co., KSA Staining D
Energy drink (ED) Code Red Al Esayi Beverage Co. LTD., Jeddah, KSA Staining E
c. Auxiliary materials
Material Brand name Manufacturer
Poly vinyl siloxane Aquasil putty Dentsply Sirona, NY, USA
d. Instruments
Instrument Brand name Manufacturer
Spatula 675-3 Cement Spatula Medsey, Italy
Cellophane sheet N/A Jarir Bookstore, KSA
Iwanson caliper 1119 Stainless Steel Iwanson Caliper Renfert, Germany
Dispenser (Gun) Garant™ Dispenser 1:1/2:1, 77580 3MESPE, St Paul, Minn, USA
Glass stirrer Glass rod Ank trade store,Riyadh Saudi Arabia
Tissue paper Kleenex Saudi paper company, Riyadh Saudi Arabia
e. Equipment
Equipment Brand name Manfacturer
Curing light Curing Light XL 3000 3MESPE, St Paul, Minn, USA
Orbital shaker Orbital Shaker Table CT-155 Cientec Laboratories Equipment, Piracicaba, São Paulo, Brazil
Shade determinator VITA Easyshade® V Compact Advance 4.0 VITA Zahnfabrik H. Rauter GmbH & Co.KG, USA
CAD/CAM Inlab MC XL Dentsply Sirona, NY, USA
Glass slab N/A (Henry Schein co; New York, United States)
Open in a new tab
Fig. 1. The shade.

Fig. 1

Open in a new tab

A Recording with spectrophotometer display against white background and L* a* b* readings. B Iwanson spring. C Orbital shaker.

Fig. 2. Materials used.

Fig. 2

Open in a new tab

A Tested materials. B Addition silicone.

According to several studies, the lower the chroma of a material, the more markedly discoloured it becomes when compared to its more chromatic counterpart.18–20 taking this into consideration, shade A1 was selected for all the test materials.

Sample dimensions

Disc-shaped specimens of the four materials to be tested (Table 1a) were fabricated as stipulated by ISO #7491.21 with a diameter of 17 mm and thickness of 1 mm.

Sample size

In this study, a total of 15 specimens per test material (Total of 60) were fabricated.

Methods

Specimen fabrication

Fabrication of CAD/CAM discs (crystalized acetyl resin)

The dimensions of the disc specimens were fed into the software (inLab CAM software, Sirona Co; New York, USA) to conform to the ISO #7491. Milling was done on a Crystalized Acetyl Resin block (Henry Schein co; Zirlux Acetal, Germany) using a (inLab MC XL, Sirona Co; New York, USA). After milling of the specimens all the specimens were measured to ensure uniform thickness and diameter using an Iwanson spring caliper (Renfert, Germany, 1119 stainless).

Silicone mould fabrication

For fabrication of discs that did not involve the CAD/CAM technique, a Silicone mould was fabricated to duplicate the disc made by CAD/CAM. A plastic container with dimensions of 9 cm width, 17 cm length, and 10 mm height was used. The polyvinylsiloxane PVS (Aquasil Putty, Sirona co; New York, USA) (Fig. 2B) was mixed according to the manufacturer’s instructions and inserted inside the plastic box. One of the discs fabricated using CAD/CAM were placed over a glass slab and the plastic box containing the putty material was gently but firmly inverted over it till the edges of the box contacted the glass slab. The excess material was cut off and the entire ensemble was held in place till the PVS material had set. The disc was removed from the PVS material rendering a mould space for the fabrication of the remaining specimens (Figs. 3–6).

Fig. 4. GIC Speciments ready for measurements.

Fig. 4

Open in a new tab

A GIC (after 2 weeks). B GIC (after 4 weeks).

Fig. 5. Bis-acryl Speciments ready for measurements.

Fig. 5

Open in a new tab

A Bis-acryl (after 2 weeks). B Bis-acryl (after 4 weeks).

Fig. 3. Composite Speciments ready for measurements.

Fig. 3

Open in a new tab

A Composite resin (after 2 weeks). B Compositeresin (after 4 weeks).

Fig. 6. POM Speciments ready for measurements.

Fig. 6

Open in a new tab

A POM (after 2 weeks). B POM (after 4 weeks).

Fabrication of packable composite discs

Packable composite (Promedica co; Composan LCM, Neumunster, Germany) was dispensed onto a spatula and introduced into the silicone mould till filled. A cellophane sheet was placed over the material and thereafter pressed down using a glass slab, to ensure uniform thickness as well as a smooth surface. The material was light-polymerized through the glass slab using Curing Light XL 3000 with an intensity of 400 mW/cm2 (3MESPE, St Paul, Minn) for 20 s with the light tip ~1 mm away from the specimens.22 upon polymerization, the specimens were removed from the mould and examined visually for any porosities. The consistency of the testing surface was also observed to assess complete polymerization. Any specimen with fabrication errors was excluded and another specimen was fabricated in its place. All the specimens were measured to ensure uniform thickness and diameter using an Iwanson spring caliper (Renfert, Germany, 1119 stainless).

Fabrication of GIC discs

GIC (Medifil, Promedica co; Neumünster, Germany) was dispensed onto a mixing pad and mixed according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The material was then introduced into the silicone mould till filled. A cellophane sheet was placed over the material and thereafter pressed down using a glass slab, to ensure uniform thickness as well as a smooth surface. After the specified setting time had elapsed, the specimens were removed from the mould and examined visually for any defects. Any defective specimens were discarded and replaced with a freshly fabricated one. All the specimens were measured to ensure uniform thickness and diameter using an Iwanson spring (Renfert, Germany, 1119 stainless).

Fabrication of bis-acrylic discs

Bis-acrylic (Success CD, Promedica co; Neumunster, Germany) was dispensed directly into the mould space from the cartridge through the dispensing tips provided by the manufacturer. A cellophane sheet was placed over the material and thereafter pressed down using a glass slab, to ensure uniform thickness as well as a smooth surface. After the specified setting time had elapsed, the specimens were removed from the mould and examined visually for any defects. Any defective specimens were discarded and replaced with a freshly fabricated one. All the specimens were measured to ensure uniform thickness and diameter using an Iwanson spring caliper (Renfert, Germany, 1119 stainless).

Specimen pre-treatment

All the test specimens, from the four materials, were rinsed thoroughly with distilled water (DW) to remove any debris. A total of 60 coded plastic containers were used to store the specimens in DW at 37 ± 1 °C for 24 h to stimulate the condition of oral cavity environment.23

Preparation of staining solutions

Four staining agents were used, namely, black tea (BT), black coffee (BC), soda, and energy drink (ED); and the control solution was DW (Table 1b). The selected staining solutions were identified for the study as they have been commonly used by several researchers.8,13,14

The BT solution was prepared by immersing five teabags (Lipton Yellow Label Tea, Unilever Mashreq -Tea Company, Egypt) into 1000 ml of boiled water. The BC solution contained 20 g of coffee (Nescafe Classic, Nestle Egypt) poured into 1000 ml of boiled water. Both solutions were stirred every 30 min for 10 s until they cooled down to room temperature (25 °C) and were then filtered through a filter paper.24

No preparation was required pertaining to the soda, ED, and DW solutions.

During the duration of the study, the solutions were renewed every 2 days.25

Immersion of specimens in aqueous solutions

After 24 h in DW, the 15 specimens of each material were randomly divided into five groups (n = 3)26 and based on the test solution they were immersed in, they were named group A, B, C, D, and E (Table 1b). To prevent air entrapment and sedimentation of the solutions over the specimens, an Orbital shaker (Orbital Shaker Table CT-155, Cientec Laboratories Equipment, Piracicaba, São Paulo, Brazil) (Fig. 1C), was used in cycles. Each cycle comprised of using the orbital shaker 4 times a day, at 30 revolutions per minute, and with 1-h intervals.15,25 Such cycles were repeated every 24 h over the course of the study.

Cleaning procedure before recording colour measurements

At each time interval of the experiment, prior to recording the colour measurements, all the specimens were removed from their respective solutions, rinsed with DW for 5 min, and blotted dry with tissue paper. Any accumulated surface sediment was thus removed. Once the specimens had completely dried, colour measurements were taken on the testing side of each specimen disc. Thereafter, the specimens were re-immersed in their respective storage solutions.22,25

Colour measurement

The timeline observed for measurements were as follows: (1) at baseline, i.e., after 24 h in DW (T0), (2) after 7 days (T1), (3) after 2 weeks (T2), (4) After 3 weeks (T3), and after 4 weeks (T4).

The colour or shade measurements were recorded for all the specimens against a white background using a digital spectrophotometer (VITA Easyshade® V Compact Advance 4.0, VITA Zahnfabrik H. Rauter GmbH & Co.KG or shade)26–28 (Fig. 1A).

After obtaining the colour and shades measurements, each specimen was placed in its correspondingly labelled plastic container containing the respective control or staining agent.

Colour and shade measurements were recorded according to their L*, a*, and b* values, where L* indicates brightness or lightness (value), a* indicates the colour on the red-green coordinate, and b* indicates the colour on the yellow–blue coordinate.29 An overall shade was obtained upon every measurement (T0, T1, T2, T3, and T4) (Fig. 1A).

Determination of colour and calculation of colour changes

The colour and the shade change of each specimen were measured every week (1, 2, 3, and 4) relative to baseline shade, and the data of colour and shade change (ΔL*, Δa*, Δb*) measurements were entered onto an excel spreadsheet. The total colour change/difference (∆E*) was calculated for each specimen relative to its baseline colour using the colour difference formula: ΔE* = [(ΔL*)2 + (Δa*)2 + (Δb*) 2]1/2.30

Data tabulation and analyses

All data were entered into an excel spreadsheet. The colour changes in ΔL*, Δa*, Δb* and total colour changes [ΔE*(T4−T0)] for all the intervals were calculated using an Excel computer software package (Excel 7.0; Microsoft, Redmond, Wash).

The data were analyzed using Statistical Package for the Social Sciences Version 24 (IBM, USA). Discolouration results were analyzed by A three-factor analysis of variance (ANOVA) (with repeated measures on one factor (time) to investigate if statistically significant differences (P < 0.001) existed between the experimental groups across time. Two-way ANOVA was carried out to test if statistically significant (P < 0.001) existed between the experimental groups at each week, and auto-regressive model was done to account for the rate of change in colour as the weeks progressed.

Results

Repeated measures ANOVA for three factors

The results indicate that the effect of all three factors, i.e., material, solution, and duration of time, are statistically significant. The effects of various solutions on the various materials also showed statistical significance (Table 2).

Table 2.

Three-way analysis of variance.

Effect DF F value Pr > F
Material 3 27.80 <0.0001
Solution 4 120.07 <0.0001
Time 3 28.78 <0.0001
Material × Solution 12 3.94 <0.0001
Material × Time 9 0.90 0.5300
Solution × Time 12 2.63 0.0030
Material × Solution × Time 36 1.05 0.4080
Open in a new tab

Repeated measures ANOVA for two factors

The results indicate that there is a statistical significance of the effects of the solution on the material at each time interval (per week) (Table 3).

Table 3.

Two-way analysis of variance.

Effect DF F value Pr > F
Week 1
 Materials 3 6.76 0.001
 Solutions 4 14.75 <0.001
 Materials × Solutions 12 2.00 0.051
Week 2
 Materials 3 4.46 0.009
 Solutions 4 25.91 <0.001
 Materials × Solutions 12 0.98 0.487
Week 3
 Materials 3 5.33 0.003
 Solutions 4 39.27 <0.001
 Materials × Solutions 12 1.14 0.356
Week 4
 Materials 3 13.06 <0.001
 Solutions 4 47.85 <0.001
 Materials × Solutions 12 2.72 0.009
Open in a new tab

Auto-regressive model

The results show that the colour changes for each material as time progressed, showed statistically significant differences to the preceding week (P < 0.001) (Table 4).

Table 4.

Auto-regressive model.

Materials Estimate SE P 95% CI
ALL 0.53 0.06 <0.001 0.42 0.64
GIC only 0.58 0.11 <0.001 0.36 0.79
Bis-acryl only 0.45 0.12 <0.001 0.21 0.68
Packable only 0.49 0.11 <0.001 0.27 0.72
POM only 0.50 0.11 <0.001 0.27 0.72
Open in a new tab

Discussion

One of the most important aesthetic requirements of a restorative material to prove its longevity is its colour stability, especially when exposed to different oral environmental conditions.8 The current research evaluated the colour stability of four commonly used aesthetic restorative materials, with the aim of assessing if crystalized acetyl resin showed superior colour stability over time when immersed in four staining solutions.

Through the results of the study, it was revealed that the colour changes seen in crystalized acetyl resin showed statistical significance, as was the case with the other restorative materials tested, and it was significantly influenced by the time and staining solution. In light of these findings, the null hypothesis was rejected.

It was seen that BT and BC had the highest chromogenic properties which is in agreement with the results found in a previous study, where they concluded that the staining solution was the most significant factor affecting the colour stability.30

It was also seen that the least effective solution for discolouring the test materials across the board, was DW, wherein it showed no perceptible colour changes (∆E < 3.7) (Table 5 and Fig. 7). This was concurrent with a similar study and justifies its use as a control solution.31

Table 5.

Weekly ∆E values.

Week 1 Week 2 Week 3 Week 4
GIC (control) 0.31 (0.06) 0.34 (0.19) 0.38 (0.20) 0.42 (0.21)
GIC (black coffee) 13.50 (3.03) 13.48 (1.83) 16.14 (5.23) 17.61 (2.90)
GIC (black tea) 9.57 (1.43) 13.21(3.11) 18.10 (2.03) 28.08 (5.92)
GIC (soda) 4.75 (2.82) 9.75 (1.42) 12.49 (4.80) 17.71 (7.16)
GIC (energy drink) 1.37 (0.48) 8.89 (5.81) 6.94 (6.40) 0.00 (0.00)
Bis-acryl (control) 0.33 (0.12) 0.34 (0.29) 0.42 (0.29) 0.73 (0.43)
Bis-acryl (black coffee) 14.25 (3.25) 18.32 (7.30) 19.10 (3.58) 21.86 (6.73)
Bis-acryl (black tea) 7.97 (2.30) 11.30 (0.70) 19.57 (2.18) 19.85 (2.28)
Bis-acryl (soda) 10.91 (10.16) 14.00 (3.11) 18.11 (2.48) 21.29 (5.58)
Bis-acryl (energy drink) 5.92 (3.67) 6.57 (4.46) 7.23 (5.87) 10.92 (8.88)
POM (control) 0.28 (0.06) 0.34 (0.30) 0.36 (0.28) 0.54 (0.38)
POM (black coffee) 8.05 (0.91) 11.43 (4.41) 12.80 (4.41) 15.55 (4.41)
POM (black tea) 3.22 (0.70) 13.09 (4.81) 18.11 (5.33) 18.34 (3.47)
POM (soda) 3.38 (0.75) 5.84 (6.57) 9.90 (0.97) 11.51 (1.31)
POM (energy drink) 4.07 (1.16) 3.78 (1.98) 8.65 (7.26) 9.85 (7.94)
Composite (control) 0.36 (0.14) 0.37 (0.21) 0.42 (0.57) 0.47 (0.71)
Composite (black coffee) 17.86 (3.01) 17.45 (4.47) 27.58 (1.34) 36.05 (1.80)
Composite (black tea) 3.22 (0.70) 13.09 (4.81) 18.11 (5.33) 18.34 (3.47)
Composite (soda) 7.64 (4.92) 13.69 (7.89) 17.90 (2.56) 20.25 (2.43)
Composite (energy drink) 6.78 (1.79) 10.57 (4.08) 11.51 (6.04) 17.06 (2.85)
Open in a new tab

Fig. 7.

Fig. 7

Open in a new tab

Colour change over time of test materials in distilled water.

When analyzing the staining solutions, the results showed distinct effects depending on the material used. Overall, the solutions imparting the highest colour staining properties (Table 5) were BC (In composite (∆E 36.05)) (Fig. 8) and BT (In GIC (28.08)) (Fig. 9). The findings of this study is in agreement with the findings of Raeisosadat et al.,32 which suggested that BC affected the colour stability of composite more than BT and other solutions. While interpreting the results of staining solutions on GIC, the GIC was affected more by BT. These results is in agreement with the study of Hamid et al.,17 which indicated that BT affected the colour stability of GIC more than BC and other solutions. Whatever the case is, according to Sezai et al.33 and Um and Ruyter,13 such discoloration might be due to the adsorption and absorption process of the yellow colourant particles (Tannic acid) present in coffee; whereas for tea, it might be due to the adsorption process alone. These two processes are further explained to be due to the high affinity of the polymer phase of the materials to the colourant particles.13

Fig. 8.

Fig. 8

Open in a new tab

Colour change over time of test materials in black coffee.

Fig. 9.

Fig. 9

Open in a new tab

Colour change over time of test materials in black tea.

When inspecting the results of the soda and the ED, less colour change was observed in the samples (Table 5, Figs. 10 and 11). Although, when considering such solutions, their low pH is considered to be a convincing factor for surface deterioration; thereby causing a dynamic colour change. However, this was not the case here. As Um and Ruyter.13 mentioned, this is possibly attributed to their lack of yellow colourants. However, when taking into consideration the surface integrity of the GIC material immersed in the soda and ED, a deterioration of the surface was seen in soda, while an unanticipated full degradation of the discs was observed in ED. A similar deterioration is interpreted in another study,34 and was attributed to the presence of acids in such drinks. These, exceptionally low pH solutions by nature, caused the chelation of cement-forming ions, such as calcium, to an insoluble product.24

Fig. 10.

Fig. 10

Open in a new tab

Colour change over time of test materials in soda.

Fig. 11.

Fig. 11

Open in a new tab

Colour change over time of test materials in energy drink.

Packable composite showed the highest total colour change (∆E = 36.05) (Table 5). Composite, as a material, is made of a resin matrix, fillers, and silane coupling agent. The ability of solutions to cause staining in the composite material has been reported to be due to the absorption of water particles into the resin matrix.35 Composite resins that can absorb water are also able to absorb other fluids and is attributed to the hydrophilicity of the resin matrix.35 The water particles and/or fluids, when absorbed, causes expansion and plasticizing of the resin matrix; consequently causing micro-cracks and weaker bonds between the constituents (Fillers and Resin matrix).36 This allows for the penetration of the stains. This is applicable to all the solutions in this study. Although, soda, and ED might have a supplemental erosive effect, the absence of yellow colourants in them, as mentioned previously, made them less effective.13

Regarding the GIC material, the method of staining is explained by many studies to be a result of degradation of metal polyacrylate salts in GIC.37 This subsequently results in a rougher surface with voids, and the undissolved glass particles result in greater water and food colourant absorption.38 Thus, the staining of the GIC material was caused by the porosity of the glass particles, and micro-cracks.39 This process was also supported by another study, which concluded that a rougher surface of the GIC would show more colour change than its smoother counterpart.40

When assessing the results of the bis-acryl, colour change was observed in all staining solutions like all the other materials, with BC showing the highest change (∆E = 21.86) (Table 5). The colour change in this specific material, which is a resin based material, is attributed to the same factors affecting composite resin.41 In addition, it has also been reported that the discolouration be attributed to the alteration or oxidation of the amine accelerators in the material.13

The discoloration of crystalized acetyl resin has also been attributed to the properties of adsorption and absorption of water particles, as is the case with composite resin. Arikan et al.;42 measured the water sorption of acetal material and reported that the material had acceptable water sorption according to ISO specification. Regardless of the amount of water sorption, the fact that a material absorbs water, renders it likely to absorb other fluids and would be accountable for the discolouration seen. Nevertheless, Acetal was considered to be the most colour stable among the other materials tested in this study. This might be due to its crystalline component and that it is monomer free; as monomers are regarded to be responsible for colour change in most resinous materials.1 The solution that discoloured POM the most, in this study, was BT (∆E = 18.34). This is in disagreement with what Hamid et al.43 found and this might be due to the difference in the fabrication of the staining solutions and/or not using an orbital shaker. The omission of the orbital shaker might have caused sedimentation of the solution over the specimen thereby affecting the colour measurements in their study.

The results of the current study also depicted that colour stability was affected over time and were subsequently rendered more stained after each successive time interval (Figs. 7–11). This is in concurrence with a similar study where they reported that, as time increases, the tooth-coloured restorations become more discoloured.44

Conclusions

Within the limitations of this study, the conclusions are as follows:

  1. Acetyl resin was the most colour stable material among the other materials.

  2. Discolouration of acetyl resins increased proportionally with the immersion period.

  3. The most chromogenic staining solution for acetal was found to be the BT; while BC exhibited the most effects in the remaining materials.

  4. All the test materials showed clinically perceptible changes in colour with the four staining solutions.

Limitations

  1. Unexpected reaction of GIC in ED, which resulted in the full dissolution of the specimens by the end of the fourth week, rendering them unacceptable for providing readings.36

  2. It have been described in the literature that there are different brands and types of the digital spectrophotometer. Some of which are superior in colour determination than the Vita Easyshade V. Thus, it was essential that we declare such downside of this device.45

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Footnotes

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

References

  • 1.Fitton JS, Davies EH, Howlett JA, Pearson GJ. The physical properties of a polyacetal denture resin. Clin. Mater. 1994;17:125–129. doi: 10.1016/0267-6605(94)90135-X. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Turner JW, Radford DR, Sherriff M. Flexural properties and surface finishing of acetal resin denture clasps. J. Prosthodont. 1999;8:188–195. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-849X.1999.tb00034.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Arda T, Arikan A. An in vitro comparison of retentive force and deformation of acetal resin and cobalt-chromium clasps. J. Prosth Dent. 2005;94:267–274. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2005.06.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Introduction to SnapOn Smile®. Online information available at https://www.nnoha.org/nnoha-content/uploads/2013/09/Snap-on-Smile-Todays-Multi-purpose-Restorative-Appliance.pdf (2013).
  • 5.Ruyter IE, Nilner K, Möller B. Colour stability of dental composite resin materials for crown and bridge veneers. Dent. Mater. 1987;3:246–251. doi: 10.1016/S0109-5641(87)80081-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Nasim I, Neelakantan P, Sujeer R, Subbarao CV. Color stability of microfilled, microhybrid and nanocomposite resins—an in vitro study. J. Dent. 2010;38:e137–e142. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2010.05.020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Yoonis E, Kukletová M. Tooth-colored dental restorative materials in primary dentition. Scr. Med. 2009;82:108–114. [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Gupta G, Gupta T. Evaluation of the effect of various beverages and food material on the colour stability of provisional materials. An in vitro study. J. Conserv Dent. 2011;14:287–292. doi: 10.4103/0972-0707.85818. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Khokhar ZA, Razzoog ME, Yaman P. Colour stability of restorative resins. Quintessence Int. 1991;22:733–737. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Gross MD, Moser JB. A colourimetric study of coffee and tea staining of four composite resins. J. Oral Rehabil. 1977;4:311–322. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2842.1977.tb00997.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Okubo SR, Kanawati A, Richards MW, Childress S. Evaluation of visual and instrument shade matching. J. Prosthet. Dent. 1998;80:642–648. doi: 10.1016/S0022-3913(98)70049-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Cevik P. Effect of staining solutions on colour stability of different temporary crown materials. EC Dent. Sci. 2016;3:593–598. [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Um CM, Ruyter IE. Staining of resin-based veneering materials with coffee and tea. Quintessence Int. 1991;22:377–386. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Vichi A, Ferrari M, Davidson CL. Colour and opacity variation in three different resin based composite products after water aging. Dent. Mater. 2004;20:530–534. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2002.11.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Faraoni JJ, Quero IB, Schiavuzzo LS, Palma-Dibb RG. Colour stability of nanohybrid composite resins in drinks. Braz. J. Oral. Sci. 2019;18:e191601. doi: 10.20396/bjos.v18i0.8657327. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Al Kheraif A-AA-A, Bin Qasim SS, Ramakrishnaiah R, Rehman I. Effect of different beverages on the colour stability and degree of conversion of nano and microhybrid composites. Dent. Mater. J. 2013;32:326–333. doi: 10.4012/dmj.2011-267. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Hamid DM, Mahmoud GM, El-Sharkawy FM, Auf EA. Effect of surface protection, staining beverages and aging on the colour stability and hardness of recently introduced uncoated glass ionomer restorative material. Future Dent. J. 2018;4:288–296. doi: 10.1016/j.fdj.2018.05.004. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Eldiwany M, Friedl KH, Powers JM. Colour stability of light-cured and post-cured composites. Am. J. Dent. 1995;8:179–181. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Uchida H, Vaidyanathan J, Viswanadhan T, Vaidyanathan TK. Colour stability of denture composites as a function of shade. J. Prosthet. Dent. 1998;79:372–377. doi: 10.1016/S0022-3913(98)70147-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Mutlu-Sagesen L, Ergun D, Ozkan Y, Semiz M. Colour stability of dental composite after immersion in various media. Dent. Mater. J. 2005;24:382–390. doi: 10.4012/dmj.24.382. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.International Organization for Standardization. ISO 7491:2000 (E), Dental materials—determination of colour stability. http://www.webstore.ansi.org (2003).
  • 22.Guler AU, Yilmaz F, Kulunk T, Guler E, Kurt S. Effects of different drinks on stainability of resin composite provisional restorative materials. J. Prosthet. Dent. 2005;94:118–124. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2005.05.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Monteiro B, Spohr AM. Surface roughness of composite resins after simulated toothbrushing with different dentifrices. J. Int. Oral Health. 2015;7:1. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.McKenzie MA, Linden RW, Nicholson JW. The physical properties of conventional and resin-modified glass-ionomer dental cements stored in saliva, proprietary acidic beverages, saline and water. Biomaterials. 2003;24:4063–4069. doi: 10.1016/S0142-9612(03)00282-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Barbara N. An In-vitro Study Assessing the Colour Stability of Different Provisional Crown and Bridge Restorative Materials, A Mini-thesis Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Science in Dental Sciences in Restorative Dentistry At The Faculty Of Dentistry, University of The Western Cape (2006).
  • 26.Fontes ST, Fernández MR, Moura CM, Meireles SS. Colour stability of a nanofill composite: effect of different immersion media. J. Appl. Oral Sci. 2009;17:388–391. doi: 10.1590/S1678-77572009000500007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Akay C, Tanış MÇ, Gulverdiyeva M. Colouration of provisional restoration materials: a comparison of the effects of mouth rinses and green tea. Eur. Oral Res. 2018;52:19. doi: 10.26650/eor.2018.35588. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.VITA Zahnfabrik. VITA Easyshade® V [Internet]. VITA Zahnfabrik. https://www.vita-zahnfabrik.com/pdb_GG2G50G200_en,98478 (2019).
  • 29.CIE Publication No. 15.2 Colourimetry. Vienna: Central Bureau of the CIE; 1986. p. 74.
  • 30.Rutkunas V, Sabaliauskas V, Mizutani H. Effects of different food colourants and polishing techniques on colour stability of provisional prosthetic materials. Dent. Mater. J. 2010;29:167–176. doi: 10.4012/dmj.2009-075. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Costa ÍA, Lima EM. Effect of colorant solutions on the color stability of provisional prosthetic materials. Braz. J. Oral Sci. 2018;17:18153. doi: 10.20396/bjos.v17i0.8652654. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Raeisosadat F, et al. Staining microhybrid composite resins with tea and coffee. Avicenna J. Dent. Res. 2013;9:e30443. doi: 10.5812/ajdr.30443. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Sezai E, Emine O, Ozlem O, Memnune S, Gungor N. Seasonal variation of total phenolic, antioxidant activity, plant nutritional elements, and fatty acids in tea leaves (Camelllia sinensisvar. sinensisclone derepazari 7) grown in turkey. Pharm. Biol. 2008;46:683–687. [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Hamouda IM. Effects of various beverages on hardness, roughness, and solubility of esthetic restorative materials. J. Esthet. Restor. Dent. 2011;23:315–322. doi: 10.1111/j.1708-8240.2011.00453.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Pearson GJ, Longman CM. Water sorption and solubility of resin-based materials following inadequate polymerization by a visible-light curing system. J. Oral Rehabil. 1989;16:57–61. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2842.1989.tb01317.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Bagheri R, Burrow MF, Tyas M. Influence of food-simulating solutions and surface finish on susceptibility to staining of aesthetic restorative materials. J. Dent. 2005;33:389–398. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2004.10.018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Kalampalikis E, Koulaouzidou EA, Koliniotou-οumpia E, Helvatjoglu-Antoniades M. The influence of topical fluoride application on colour stability of aesthetic fluoride-releasing restorative materials. Balk. J. Dent. Med. 2014;18:24–28. doi: 10.1515/bjdm-2015-0003. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Maganur PC, Prabhakar AR, Satish V, Namineni S, Kurthukoti A. Erosive effect of soft drink and fresh fruit juice on restorative materials. World J. Dent. 2013;4:32–40. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10015-1199. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Chhabra C, Tavargeri A, Anegundi R, Patil S, Chhabra KG. Colour stability of esthetic restorative material after topical fluoride application. J. Res Dent. 2014;2:496–504. doi: 10.19177/jrd.v2e62014496-504. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.AutioUGold JT, Barrett A. Effect of fluoride varnishes on colour stability of esthetic restorative materials. Oper. Dent. 2004;29:636U41. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Kohli S, et al. Discolouration of polymethyl methacrylate versus Bisâ Acrylic based provisional crown and bridge dental resins: Effect of storage media and duration. Ann. Med. Health Sci. Res. 2017;7:195–199. [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Arikan A, Ozkan YK, Arda T, Akalin B. An in vitro investigation of water sorption and solubility of two acetal denture base materials. Eur. J. Prosthodontics Restor. Dent. 2005;13:119. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Hamid DM, El Sharkawy F. Colour stability of Acetal resin tooth–coloured clasp materials clasp materials against various staining beverages. Dent. J. 2013;59:2439. [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Abu‐Bakr N, et al. Colour stability of compomer after immersion in various media. J. Esthet. Restor. Dent. 2000;12.5:258–263. doi: 10.1111/j.1708-8240.2000.tb00232.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Kim-Pusateri S, et al. Reliability and accuracy of four dental shade-matching devices. J. Prosthet. Dent. 2009;101.3:193–199. doi: 10.1016/S0022-3913(09)60028-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from BDJ Open are provided here courtesy of Nature Publishing Group

RESOURCES