Skip to main content
Elsevier - PMC COVID-19 Collection logoLink to Elsevier - PMC COVID-19 Collection
. 2021 Feb 25;150:112087. doi: 10.1016/j.fct.2021.112087

Inflammation, immunity and potential target therapy of SARS-COV-2: A total scale analysis review

Shukur Wasman Smail a,b, Muhammad Saeed c, Twana alkasalias d,e,f, Zhikal Omar Khudhur g, Delan Ameen Younus e, Mustafa Fahmi Rajab a, Wayel Habib Abdulahad h,i, Hafiz Iftikhar Hussain j, Kamal Niaz k, Muhammad Safdar l,
PMCID: PMC7905385  PMID: 33640537

Abstract

Coronavirus disease-19 (COVID-19) is a complex disease that causes illness ranging from mild to severe respiratory problems. It is caused by a novel coronavirus SARS-CoV-2 (Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2) that is an enveloped positive-sense single-stranded RNA (+ssRNA) virus belongs to coronavirus CoV family. It has a fast-spreading potential worldwide, which leads to high mortality regardless of lows death rates. Now some vaccines or a specific drug are approved but not available for every country for disease prevention and/or treatment. Therefore, it is a high demand to identify the known drugs and test them as a possible therapeutic approach. In this critical situation, one or more of these drugs may represent the only option to treat or reduce the severity of the disease, until some specific drugs or vaccines will be developed and/or approved for everyone in this pandemic. In this updated review, the available repurpose immunotherapeutic treatment strategies are highlighted, elucidating the crosstalk between the immune system and SARS-CoV-2. Despite the reasonable data availability, the effectiveness and safety of these drugs against SARS-CoV-2 needs further studies and validations aiming for a better clinical outcome.

Keywords: Coronavirus disease-19, Immunotherapeutic drugs, Repurpose, Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2, Monoclonal antibodies, Vaccine

1. Introduction

As of January 26, 2021, a sum of 100,346,160 confirmed cases of the COVID-19 have been revealed in 210 nations and territories around the world (WHO, 2020a), that is due to the virus named as severe acute respiratory syndrome-coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) originated from Wuhan, China in December 2019 (Shanmugaraj et al., 2020). Depending on clinical manifestations, the COVID-19 is grouped into mild, moderate, and severe. In severe cases of COVID-19, the patients exhibit hyper inflammation and cytokine storms (CS) that drive acute lung injury (ALI), acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), disseminated intravascular coagulation (Elli et al., 2019), multiple organ failure and death (Shanmugaraj et al., 2020).

SARS-CoV-2 is a new strain of Coronavirus that's newly capable of infecting humans (Wang et al., 2020a). It is a +ssRNA virus, even though the origin is not yet clear. The source could be from bats as it shares 96% similarity with coronaviruses (CoVs) isolated from bats RaTG13 complete genome (Dong et al., 2020). It might be transferred to humans through a missing link as an intermediate host that could be scaly ant-eater (pangolin) based on an amino acid chain in the receptor-binding domain (RBD) of CoVs discovered in pangolins or snake (Lam et al., 2020).

The SARS-CoV-2’ corresponded CS is characterized by increasing level of inflammatory cytokines and chemokines (interleukin (IL)-6, IL-1β, tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α, interferon-γ-inducible protein (IP10), decreasing level of helper (Th) and cytotoxic T-lymphocytes (CTLs), down-regulating the interferon (IFN)-γ expressing Th cells (Pedersen and Ho, 2020; Huang et al., 2020). This hyperinflammatory state produces oxidative stress that leads to damage to alveolar and endothelial cells in the lung. The damage of these cells disrupts the pulmonary barrier and vascular leakage that consequently enhances lung edema and ARDS. Chemokines recruit the macrophage and neutrophil into the lung that causes ALI (Ye et al., 2020a). COVID-19 patients with CS exhibit a high level of IL-6 (Herold et al., 2020), that have a major role in coagulation, disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC), and multiple organ failure including heart (Bester et al., 2018).

Yet, there are some vaccine and medications for preventing or curing the disease. There is a wide variety of therapeutics that have been explored to treat COVID-19, initially suggested for other diseases and already established safety profiles and approved by the food and drug Administration (FDA). Such treatments are referred to by the World Health Organization (WHO) (WHO, 2020b) as repurpose medications (WHO, 2020b). Among them, the antivirals drugs such as favipiravir, umifenovir, remdesivir, lopinavir, and retonavir, the antimicrobial agents such as chloroquine and hydroxychloroquine, anthelmintics (ivermectin), antihypertensives (Losartan) (Wu et al., 2020a; Saber-Ayad et al., 2020), and known immunotherapies; are currently used as a treatment option. There are many ongoing clinical trials regarding the safety and effectiveness of repurposing immunotherapeutics to mitigate the symptoms of COVID-19 (Lythgoe and Middleton, 2020).

The purpose of the current review is to highlight and discuss the immunotherapeutic options to treat COVID-19, including non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), corticosteroids, monoclonal antibodies, IFNs, convalescent plasma, and other treatments that are known to have immune-modulatory properties. Such immunotherapeutic showed promising efficacy against other CoVs including severe acute respiratory syndrome-coronavirus-1 (SARS-CoV-1), Middle East respiratory syndrome-CoV (MERS-CoV), and other viruses that might have the potential for SARS-CoV-2 treatment and prophylaxis. This might help scientists and pharmaceutical industries to design an appropriate immune intervention for COVID-19 therapy.

2. Methodology

For current study a bibliographic search of more than 420 peer-reviewed papers in scientific data including PubMed, Scopus, Science Magazine, EMBASE, WHO and Google Scholar about SARS-CoV-2 was done. But approximately 337 peer-reviewed papers relevant to SARS-CoV-2 were included as shown in Fig. 1 A. All scientific data was reviewed with key words of “SARS-COV-2 structure”, “cell tropism of SARS-CoV-2”, “clinical presentation of COVID-19”, “immune response to COVID-19”, “cytokines and immunopathogenesis of SARS-CoV-2”, “immunotherapeutic strategies”, “monoclonal antibodies for COVID-19”, and “treatment strategy COVID-19”.

Fig. 1a.

Fig. 1a

Flow diaghram of included studies. The flow chart depicts the number of citation and resources materials that have been screened, excluded and/or included in the review.

3. SARS-CoV-2: structure and cell tropism

CoVs are classified under the Coronaviridae family within Nidovirales order; which comprises other families such as Roniviridae and Arteriviridae. The classification is based on the conserved genome organization and viral genomic replication mechanisms (Frieman et al., 2010). CoVs possess enveloped virions and +ssRNA genomes. These viruses are capable of infecting a wide variety of animal species in addition to human beings (WHO, 2013). The main source of CoVs transmission is through close contact with an infected person via respiratory droplets (Shereen et al., 2020). According to the type of invading virus, other diseases may be initiated e.g., neurological disease and hepatitis (Teig et al., 2002).

Based on the comparisons of the whole genome sequence of the CoVs, they can be divided into alpha-CoVs and beta-CoVs groups which may cause diseases in mammals, including the humans (Su et al., 2016; Wong et al., 2016; Chan et al., 2020). The third group gamma-CoVs; the fourth group delta-CoVs; include viruses that mainly cause diseases in birds (Su et al., 2016; Genc et al., 2004). There are some controversies about whether to classify SARS-CoV-2 into a new group. Despite that SARS-CoV-2 has numerous distinctive characteristics; however, the genetic variation in the viral genome is insufficient to include it into a new group. The succeeded investigations concluded that beta-CoV is the best group that fits SARS-CoV-2 (Liu et al., 2020a).

CoVs have a distinct feature of the coronal structure, regarding the name corona (crown-like) that represents projections covering the envelope when examined under the electron microscope (NIAID, 2020). These spike-shaped particles are virion of roughly spherical or polymorphism shapes within 80 nm–160nm diameters (Guy et al., 2001). In general, the morphology of the virion particles of SARS-CoV-2 represents a model of CoVs shape. A lipid bilayer covers the outer margins of most virions (Liu et al., 2020b). To fill the gap in the understanding of the origin of SARS-CoV-2, a team of researchers had collaborated after one month of the epidemic to establish the first genome sequence of the virus by January 10, 2020 (holmes, 2020). The sequenced genome was determined to be 29,811 base pairs long (Sah et al., 2020), which made SARS-CoV-2 one of the largest + ssRNA viruses identified to date. More than ten open read frames (ORFs) are presented within the SARS-CoV-2 genome, similar to that of SARS-CoV-1, both viruses have the order and organization of the same genes. Two-thirds of the SARS-CoV-1 genome is occupied by ORF1a/1b, which is the most imperative ORF and is translated into 16 nonstructural proteins (NSP 1–16). Four structural proteins (SPs); spike (S) protein, matrix (M) protein, nucleocapsid (N) protein, and envelope (E) protein are translated from other ORFs in the remaining genome (Kim et al., 2020). The genes in the rest ORFs coded into accessory proteins that are not recognized to have any function in viral replications (Li et al., 2020a).

The fusion of the SARS-CoV-2 virus to the host surface membrane is mediated by the two functional subunits S1 and S2 of the S surface proteins (Hoffmann et al., 2020). The S1 subunit binds to the host cellular receptor, and then the S2 subunit fuses with the cellular membrane (Yan et al., 2018). The entry point for the SARS-CoV-2 is delivered by a functional receptor metallopeptidase angiotensin converting-enzyme 2 (ACE2) (Biospace2, 2020) (Gheblawi et al., 2020). Tissue tropism of SARS-CoV-2 is best elucidated by the ACE2 localization in most organs such as the heart, kidney, vascular endothelial, testis as well as epithelial of the small intestine and alveolar epithelial cells (Danesh et al., 2011; Haagmans et al., 2004; Heinz et al., 2003).

4. Clinical presentation of COVID-19

The COVID-19 is divided into three stages based on the severity of the disease (Shi et al., 2020a): stage 1 is a mild stage characterized by an asymptomatic period in which the virus may or may not be measured; stage 2 is a moderate stage in which the virus is detected followed by pneumonia; stage 3 is the severe stage with high load of the virus, usually followed by severe pneumonia, ALI, ARDS and CS (Wang et al., 2020a). The incubation period of the disease varies among the cases, but it is usually between 2 and 14 days. The initial symptoms include cough, fever, dyspnea, and then followed by pneumonia in some cases (Li et al., 2020b).

The diagnostic procedure is based on positive laboratory tests for the virus, epidemiological history, clinical manifestation, and CT scan (Ai et al., 2020; Control and Revision, 2020). Huang et al. initially documented the clinical signs and symptoms of COVID-19 (Huang et al., 2020). They reported that hospitalized patients have a fever (98%), cough (76%), dyspnea (55%), most of them developed dyspnea after eight days of first symptoms, 32% of them have relative hypoxemia so they needed ICU, but 10% required a mechanical ventilator (Huang et al., 2020). However, with the spreading of the virus globally, a range of other symptoms was reported such as diarrhea, vomiting, loss of appetite and abdominal pain (Pan et al., 2020). Regarding laboratory diagnosis, it is usually based on real-time-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) because of higher accuracy than other methods such as serological tests and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) however due to false-negative results, other mentioned criteria for diagnosis should not be excluded as occurred in the diagnosis of SARS-CoV-1 (Chang, 2005).

Disease management is one of the most challenging approaches faced by the health care systems. This is attributed to the lack of previous experience and the unavailability of drugs or vaccines, as COVID-19 is a new and different pandemic. Therefore, clinicians initially relied on supportive care, trying a variety of known antiviral drugs as repurposing agents that were used to treat other viruses such as MERS-CoV, SARS-CoV-1, Ebola virus, and others diseases (Yi et al., 2020). Varieties of repurposing immunotherapies have been tested for infected individuals until we have a proper randomized clinical trial (Li and De Clercq, 2020; Caly et al., 2020).

5. Immunology of SARS-CoV-2

Memory T cells initiated by prior microbes can make the immune system strong and memorize the infection to instantly attack the same pathogen. However, little is known about the human memory T cells in the SARS-CoV-2 that recognize the same agent. So, here we discussed the detailed immunological response.to COVID-19 infection.

5.1. Immune response to SARS-CoV-2

The detailed immune response of the virus is not fully understood yet, but it is believed to resemble other CoVs (Liang et al., 2020). After entering the cell employing endocytosis, the pathogen-associated molecules (PAMP) to the virus, stimulate toll-like receptors (TLR3 and TLR9) on the endosome. The virus may leave the endosome in the cytoplasm and stimulates soluble cytoplasmic pattern recognition receptors (PRR) (retinoic acid-inducible gene 1 (RIG-1), melanoma differentiation-associated protein 5 (MDA5) and nucleotide-binding oligomerization domain, leucine-rich repeat and pyrin domain-containing protein 3 (NLRP3) (Addi et al., 2008). After stimulation, the endocytic or cytosolic PRR, IFN regulatory factors (IRFs), and nuclear factor kappa-light-chain enhancer of activated B cell (NF-кB) will be phosphorylated and translocated to the nucleus to activate the part of DNA which is responsible for the production of IFNs (Abbas et al., 2018). Type Ⅰ IFN includes IFN-α and IFN-β which are secreted by infected cell and act as paracrine bind to their receptor on the adjacent intact cells to activate Janus kinase-signal transducer and activators of transcription (JAK-STAT); the activated STAT1 and STAT2 form a complex with IRF9 which again translocate the nucleus to activate interferon-stimulated genes (ISGs) on the nucleus to yield a huge amount of antiviral proteins (Van de Sandt et al., 2012) (de Wit et al., 2016). Type Ⅲ IFN includes IFN-ʎ also increases the antiviral state of neighboring infected cells through the same mechanism. Additionally, IFNs activate dendritic cells (DC), which in turn activate natural killer cells (NK) upon the secretion of IL-12; NK cells can kill and eliminate the virally infected cells (Mysliwska et al., 2004). The TLRs recognize invading pathogens and activate the innate immune system. TLR plays a vital role in releasing pro-IL-1β when binds to SARS-CoV-2 infecting host. Pro-IL-1β is cleaved by pro-inflammatory protease caspase-1 which is activated by multi-protein complex; inflammasome. Consequently, pro-IL-1β is converted into its active mature form. In extension to innate immune response, the adaptive immune response starts when the virus is processed and presented by infected cells and APCs to CTL and Th cells, respectively. IL-12 increases the autolytic activity of CTL. IL-12 and IFN-γ can shift Th to Th1, which further activate CTL. During CoVs infection, B lymphocyte is also activated to generate antibody and memory cells (Rabi et al., 2020). Beside cellular immunity of both arms of the immune response, humoral responses also play an important aspect to eradicate the virus. Humoral responses include an antibody, complement, and other soluble factors (Traggiai et al., 2004). The evidence for this antibody which formed in post-MERS-CoV infection can be identified (Niu et al., 2018).

Although immune response activates against CoVs infection, the CoVs still can induce infection because they have the mechanism to evade the immune system that may be scrutinized by decrease secretion of IFN-β via expression of the protein by orf3b and orf8 (Chen et al., 2020a). Decreasing T lymphocyte by the CoVs is another mechanism of immune evasion which is more common in COVD-19 patients (Liu et al., 2020c).

5.2. Cytokines and Immunopathogensis of SARS-CoV-2

The inflammation which develops during the severe immune response to CoVs like a double-edged sword that can kill the virus, but it also produces CS which culminates by lung damage and death (Prompetchara et al., 2020) via increasing oxidative stress (Channappanavar and Perlman, 2017a). In patients with COVID-19, there is an over-activation of immune responses (Catanzaro et al., 2020). However, the hyperactive immune inflammation and systemic damage by SARS CoV-2 is yet to be determined.

The interaction of the virus with PRR also results in the production of a huge amount of pro-inflammatory cytokines, such as 1L-1β, IL-6, TNF-α (Ahmadpoor and Rostaing, 2020), and chemokines such as CCL2 and IP-10 (Reghunathan et al., 2005). These chemokines are capable of navigating macrophage, neutrophil, T-lymphocyte, and NK to the target location of the infection. This induces a hyper-inflammatory state in severe cases of COVID-19 (Prompetchara et al., 2020).

The inflammatory signature recorded in the blood of COVID 19 patients showed induction in the IL-1B, IL-1RA, IL-7, IL-8, IL-9, IL-10, fibroblast growth factor (FGF), IFN-γ, granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF), granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF), interferon-γ-inducible protein (IP10), platelet-derived growth factor (PDGF), monocyte chemo-attractant protein (MCP1), macrophage inflammatory protein 1 alpha (MIP1A), TNFα, vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) (Huang et al., 2020; Conti et al., 2020a).

Cytokine storm (CS) is the network of molecular events occurring due to excessive and dysregulated immune response to infection (Ye et al., 2020b). It is manifested by excessive accumulation of inflammatory cells, complements, inflammatory cytokines, and chemokines (Song et al., 2020). It usually occurs in severe cases of COVID-19 that leads to ARDS and DIC and multiple organ failure. IL-6, TNF-α, and IL-1β play a critical role in driving CS (Soy et al., 2020). The level of IL-6 is increased in patients infected by SARS-CoV-2, in which it makes a major contribution to tissue damage and inflammation. IL-6 contributes to atherogenesis, it plays a crucial role in the activation of coagulation after the elevation of thrombin-antithrombin III complexes and the prothrombin activation fragment F1 + (Stouthard et al., 1996a). Moreover, coagulation is induced by IL-6 as a consequence of building hepatic of acute-phase proteins comprising of C-reactive protein (CRP), ferritin, and fibrinogen (Heinrich et al., 1990). Elevated concentration of IL-6 cytokine in COVID-19 patients can lead to DIC and multiple organ failure. D-dimer is one of the mediators of coagulation; Zhou et al. (2020) uncovered that the increased amount of D-dimer was observed in cases of SARS-CoV-2. IL-1β also rises in COVID-19 which mediates lung, inflammation of the tissue, fibrosis, and fever (Conti et al., 2020a).

TNF is a cell signaling inflammatory cytokine; it acts as an inflammation amplifier in every acute inflammatory situation (Xanthoulea et al., 2004). Blood and tissue samples of COVID-19 patients observed the presence of TNF molecules (Wang et al., 2020b). The expression of adhesion molecules of lung capillary endothelial cells is increased by a pro-inflammatory TNF-α cytokine. Hence, the affinity of the neutrophil to adhere to the capillary endothelial cells is increased (Wardlaw, 1990). The activated neutrophils secrets more chemokines; IL-8 that work with anaphylatoxin (C5a, C4a, and C3a) to provoke neutrophil recruitment to the capillary endothelial cells and then to migrate into the adjacent tissue (Takahashi et al., 1993).

The C–C motif ligand 2 (CCL2) is another chemokine released due to fusion of SARS-CoV-2 with ACE2 receptor (Chen et al., 2010). The CCL2 plays an important role in the migration of monocytes, memory T cells, and basophils and positioning them in tissues to participate in the inflammatory process (Stouthard et al., 1996b). ARDS is an acute inflammatory lung injury that occurs in severe cases of COVID-19, which is characterized by pulmonary edema, hypoxia and opacification of the lungs upon CT scan (Organization, 2020). It usually develops after one week of the disease in some cases due to elevation of inflammatory cytokines, especially in elderly people (Ely et al., 2002). Elderly people, those with comorbidities, infected by SARS-CoV-2 tend to be more susceptible to initiate ARDS, which is in line with the death rates detected in older cases when compared with younger individuals (Carver and Jones, 2020). Among inflammatory cytokines, VEGF and TNF-α play a central role in driving ARDS (Bhatia and Moochhala, 2004). In addition, the level of VEGF is elevated in COVID-19 patients. In a study conducted by Kaner et al. (2000), they stated that VEGF was overexpressed in the lungs, which can play a vital role in the increase of pulmonary vascular permeability in the primitive stages of ARDS (Kaner et al., 2000). TNF-α is raised in COVID-19 and it has also a role in pulmonary edema by up-regulating adhesion molecules and disrupting endothelial barrier in the blood vessels (Yang et al., 2010).

ACE2 is expressed in a wide variety of organs such as lungs, gut, kidney, cardiovascular and central nervous systems, as well as adipose tissues (Herichova and Szantoova, 2013). Imai, Kuba (Imai et al., 2005) described the imperative role of ACE2 in the regulation of innate immunity. They have observed a more serious pulmonary inflammation in mice with deletion mutations of ACE2 prompted by acid aspiration compared with wild-type mice. These results can provide a notion that the inflammation could be more severe by the lowered ACE2 expression. The S protein in the SARS-CoV-2 envelope binds to the ACE2 surface protein to induce viral entry into the host cell and the virus also depends on TMPRSS2 as protease to cell entry (Hoffmann et al., 2020). The latest investigations recognized ACE2 as a doorway “receptor” for the novel SARS-CoV-2 virus, hence, significantly associating inflammation and cardiovascular disorder (Chen et al., 2020b). When SARS-CoV-2 binds to ACE2 receptor, the virus is endocytosed by the host cell and proteolytic cleavage process is activated; thus, the ACE2 losses its protective function (Verdecchia et al., 2020). The ACE2 system provides a cascade of protection against pulmonary diseases, heart failure and diabetes mellitus (Gheblawi et al., 2020).

Another detrimental effect of SARS-CoV-2 is the dysfunction of endoplasmic reticulum (ER), causing an ER stress response (Koseler et al., 2020). The impaired folding of proteins in the lumen of ER has resulted in the aggregation of misfolded proteins; hence trigger the unfolded protein response (Yang et al., 2010), which maintains the homeostasis of endoplasmic reticulum organelles (Bravo et al., 2013). Assuming that the ER stress is persisted and it is irreparable, the unfolded protein response (UPR) will trigger the apoptosis process (Ron and Walter, 2007). The induction of ER stress response is activated in case of viral infections. The UPR acts as a defense mechanism against the virus and the protein synthesis is attenuated to minimize the burden on the ER (Fung and Liu, 2014a). The level of protein entering the ER can fluctuate significantly under various physiological states and natural conditions. At the point when protein production enhances the folding and unfolding of stored proteins in the ER and lead to ER stress. Excessive lipid damage and pro-inflammatory chemokines lead to ER stress. To sustain homeostasis, cells are responsible for defensive signaling pathways known as UPR. UPR signaling pathways activate three vital stress transducers such as PKR-like ER protein kinase (PERK), enacting transcriptional factor-6 (ATF6), or inositol-requiring protein-1 (IRE1). Triggering of these sensors communicates the sign across the ER layer to the cytosol and the nucleus, however lower the function of these can lead to pathogenesis of SARS-CoV-2 (Fung and Liu, 2014a).

The interaction between CoV and the host, induces the ER stress response and UPR activation. Different signaling processes are modulated through activation of the three branches of UPR; mitogen-activated protein kinase activation, apoptosis, autophagy, and innate immune response (Fung and Liu, 2014b). Nabirotchkin, Peluffo (Nabirotchkin et al., 2020) also reported that ER stress and UPR may participate in the pathogenesis of the novel SARS-CoV-2 virus, and concluded that the utilization of drug repositioning could be a good strategy to treat patients with COVID-19.

6. Immunotherapeutic strategies

Here, we focus on promising immunotherapies that increase immunity against SARS-CoV-2 or decrease inflammatory cascades since sometimes excessive inflammatory response occurs against the virus that leads to CS syndrome that eventually results in coagulation abnormalities, as well as, respiratory, and multiple organ failure (Channappanavar and Perlman, 2017b; Kouhpayeh et al., 2020). An immune-modulating therapy also called an anti-inflammatory agent which is used in hyper-inflammatory conditions. Generally, the prediction of healing from CS is unfavorable, hence identification and utilization of such repurpose medication may have a significant effect and probably reduce mortality (Chen et al., 2020a; Siddiqi and Mehra, 2020). The application of immunotherapeutic drugs that mostly act as an anti-inflammatory agent is challenging and the side effects of the drugs should be taken into accounts: first, anti-inflammatory agents decrease immunity that delays clearance of the virus and increase the chances of patient to secondary bacterial infection (Singanayagam et al., 2018a). Second, most immunotherapeutic drugs have a single or specific target, as they inhibit only one cytokine, which makes the inflammation difficult to control since inflammation is the result of multiple cytokines (Zídek et al., 2009; Zhang et al., 2020a). Third, some immunotherapeutics are not selective such as JAK inhibitors which may also reduce TNF-α level (Yarilina et al., 2012); the latter is very crucial in the removal of viruses (Zhang et al., 2020a; Seo and Webster, 2002). Last but not the least, some immunotherapeutic should be used in combination with other drugs that counteract their side effects. For instance, corticosteroids increase the chance of bacterial infection by damaging the T lymphocytes (Stanbury and Graham, 1998) therefore, they should be used with antimicrobials; e.g., thymosin (Liu et al., 2020d). The application of anti-inflammatory agents, besides their side effects, could survive the critical case of COVID-19 patients especially one or two weeks after onset of the disease due to CS (Zhang et al., 2020a; Horby et al., 2020). Therefore, the application of anti-inflammatory agents provides a narrow window for those that their survival window is finite and will probably lead to the achievement of a more positive outcome (Zhang et al., 2020a).

6.1. NSAIDs

NSAIDs are anti-inflammatory agents that function as inhibitors of cyclooxygenase COX enzyme which are responsible for the production of inflammatory prostaglandins (Fig. 1 B). At the onset of the COVID-19 outbreak, there was contradictory information concerning the safety and effectiveness of NSAIDs (Willsher, 2020).

Fig. 1b.

Fig. 1b

Immune response, immunopathology, and mechanism of action of immunotherapeutics for SARS-CoV-2 infection (intracellular). Inhibitory effects represented by red lines, while activating effects represented by green lines. Created withBioRender.com

The spike protein surrounding SARS-CoV-2 engages in angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) and permits virus entry. Inhibitors like brilacicin (Haagmans et al., 2004) and antibodies in the convalescent plasma (Lythgoe and Middleton, 2020) prevent the binding of the virus to its receptor. TMPRSS2 may help the virus to enter the cell which can be inhibited by RHB-107 (Shi et al., 2020a) therapy. After binding of the virus to its receptor, it enters the endosome. It needs AAK1 for endocytosis as a regulator (it is inhibited Baricitinib (Frieman et al., 2010)). After membrane fusion with the endosomal membrane, it releases naked RNA into the cytosol. Inside the cytoplasm, it translates its RNA-dependent RNA polymerase (RdRp) to replicate its RNA and it undertakes gene expression. After the synthesis of protein and viral RNA, they accumulate inside the ER and Golgi apparatus. they leave ERGIC by exocytosis. it needs cyclophilin A to virion assembly which may be inhibited by Cyclosporine A (Biospace2, 2020). Consequently, the new virions are formed and released to infect another cell. The endocytosis of the virus is initiated by the engagement of SARS-CoV-2 and ACE2 on the surface of the infected cell through S protein and TMPRSS2. The virus releases its genome into the cytosol. Naked RNA is recognized by cytosolic receptors such as RIG-1, MDA-5, or NLRP3. RIG-1 and MDA-5 activate IRFs that enter the nucleus. Once NLRP3 activated by naked RNA, eventually it causes activation of inflammasome which in turn leads to activation of caspase-1 (CA-1), inflammasome is inhibited by tranilast (NIAID, 2020) while CA-1 is inhibited by thalidomide (Hoffmann et al., 2020). CA-1 drives the activation of IL-1B which is a potent inflammatory cytokine. When dsRNA is formed during RNA replication of the virus, the immune response is elicited by activation of TLR-3 within the endosome, IRF, and NF-Κb which results in the production of inflammatory cytokines and interferons (IFNs). IFNs generation has an essential role in releasing antiviral proteins to defend healthy cells and it is augmented by interferon therapies (Saber-Ayad et al., 2020). TLR‐4 on the cell membrane surface might recognize PAMP and DAMP of the virus and stimulate proinflammatory cytokines via the MyD88‐dependent signaling pathway and NF‐κB activation. Melatonin (Gheblawi et al., 2020) is believed to prevent these interactions while NF‐κB is inactivated by CD24FC (Liu et al., 2020a) treatment. TLR7/TLR9 is activated upon sensing PAMP of SRAS-CoV-2 (i.e ssRNA), similar to the TLR4 signaling system, it can activate the MyD88‐dependent signaling pathway and NF‐κB. The other transcriptional activations of NF‐κB beside inflammatory cytokines and chemokines are ceramidase and phospholipase A2 (PLA2) enzymes. The former catalyzes ceramide in the cell membrane into sphingosine which further catabolized by shingokinase (SK) into chemotactic sphingosine 1 phosphate (S1P). Inhibitors like Opaganib (Heinz et al., 2003) can inhibit the SK enzyme, it prevents the formation of S1P that egresses the T lymphocyte from the lymph node to the site of inflammation. Regarding PLA2, it degrades phospholipid (PL) in the cell membrane to form arachidonic acid (AA) that in turn catabolized by cyclo-oxygenase 2 (COX2) enzyme into inflammatory prostaglandin (PG). PLA2 is inhibited by corticosteroids (Shanmugaraj et al., 2020) and while and COX2 is inhibited by NSAIDs (WHO, 2020a) and auranofin (Li et al., 2020b). Interactions of the virus to the cell results in the generation large amount of cytokines (TNF-α, IL-1, IL-6) and chemokines (IL-8 and CXCL2) from the infected cell. The former is inhibited by levamisole (Yan et al., 2018) to mitigate cytokine storm (CS) and acute lung injury that may occur in COVID-19 patients. While the chemokines recruit the lymphocyte and leukocyte to the site of inflammation. . (For interpretation of the references to color in this figure legend, the reader is referred to the Web version of this article.)

The safety profile of NSAIDs was not good during SARS-CoV-1 infection because of two opposed actions. First, NSAIDs down-regulate ACE2 in the respiratory system that reduces pulmonary function (Fu et al., 2020). Second, NSAIDs up-regulate ACE2 especially in diabetic patients and patients that take ACE2 receptor inhibitors (such as losartan) (Fang et al., 2020), therefore, the over-expression of ACE2 receptors might facilitate the entry of SARS-CoV-2 and increases the chance of infection.

Some COVID-19 patients took acetaminophen or ibuprofen to reduce fever and pain, which are the manifestations of the disease. The impact of ibuprofen on human was shown in (Table 1 ). Michael Day established that the infected people should not take ibuprofen to reduce fever instead take acetaminophen because that ibuprofen might be an aggravating factor for the disease (Day, 2020a). As of 17th March 2020, NHS medical practitioners in the UK announced CAS alert regarding using NSAIDs after worsening the symptoms of four COVID-19 cases as patients were taking these drugs without underlying other health problems (Day, 2020a).

Table 1.

Selected targets and products being actively investigated for SARS-Cov-2.

Immunotherapy Mechanism Number of patients Proposed benefits or Results References
NSAIDs (e.g. ibuprofen) COX inhibitor 4 First, NSAIDs down-regulate ACE2 in the respiratory system that reduces pulmonary function. Second, NSAIDs up-regulate ACE2 especially in diabetic patients and patients that take ACE2 receptor inhibitors (such as losartan), the over-expression of ACE2 receptors might facilitate the entry of SARS-CoV-2 and increases the chance of infection.
It showed worsening the symptoms of SARS-CoV-2 infection. This case has been shown in 4 children in France.
Fu et al. (2020)
Fang et al. (2020)
(Day, 2020b)
Corticosteroids
1-methylprednisolone)
2- dexamethasone
phosholipase A2 inhibitor 46
101
56 from 85
18 from 34
350
Methylprednisolone could improve both clinical and radiological outcome.
Methyprednisolone suppresses the immune system by decreasing the production of anti-inflammatory and pro-inflammatory cytokines.
Hindering of cytokine release syndrome in patients which is the main severe pathophysiology of COVID-19.
Improves the outcomes as it has a great role in decreasing CRP level.
MP has role is removing high fever, improving oxygenation, making breathing better and stops the progression of infection.
the use of dexamethasone as supportive care for moderate and severe COVID-19 patients lead to decrease duration of mechanical ventilator and mortality rate
It decreases organ failure problems in the patients after careful usage.
Wang et al. (2020c).
(Wang et al., 2020d)
(Liu et al., 2020f)
(Corral et al., 2020)
(Gong et al., 2020)
(Nicastri et al., 2020)
(Tomazini et al., 2020)
Tocilizumab (TCZ IL-6 inhibitor 21
15
1
100
It caused improvement of both the fever and oxygenation (75%) in COVID-19 patients. Apart from that, both the biochemical profile (peripheral lymphocytes 52%) and radiological opacifications (90.5%) are improved.
It decreases cytokine storm such as IL-6 storm. It is very effective in critically ill patients. It is regarded as antagonist for IL-6 receptor that decreases mortality rate.
Tocilizumab treated a man 60 years old patient of COVID-19 case with multiple myeloma.
It has role in returning CRP, Ferritin and Fibrinogen to normal level
(Xu et al., 2020b)
(Luo et al., 2020)
(Zhang et al., 2020d)
(Toniati et al., 2020)
Sarilumab IL-6 inhibitor 8 of 15 patients Improvement in oxygenation with decreasing in the inflammatory response. Benucci et al. (2020)
Siltuximab IL-6 inhibitor 21
33 of 188
Siltuximab in 700–1200 mg resulted in improvement of clinical conditions in 33% patients through reduction of CRP, worsening the condition in 24% of patients, and there were no change in the clinical conditions of the others.
It decreased the mortality rate in a significant way in the patients who took Siltuximab. As it has role in lowering the hyperinflammation associated cytokines.
(Gritti et al., 2020a)
(Gritti et al., 2020b)
Leronlimab chemokine receptor 5 (CCR5) antagonism 11 It decreases the viral load, IL-6 and CCL5. There is no space on CCR5 on macrophage to be occupied by CCL5. Patterson et al. (2020)
Bevacizumab VEGF antagonism
Adalimumab Anti-TNF-α., may decrease adhesion molecule and migration of leukocyte 1
2
It is used in a 30 year male with Crohn's disease with COVID-19, in which fever and chest pain have been disappeared after 24 h. After 5 days, he was asymptomatic.
It has role in quick recovery from COVID-19 symptoms. Even in the patients with psoriasis.
(Tursi et al., 2020)
(Valenti et al., 2020)<!-Para Run-on-->
Emapalumab IFN-γ antagonistic property.
Anakinra Inhibitor of inflammasome and IL-1β 29
9 (−1)
52 anakinra group with 44 without anakinra
8
11 of 14
5
1
1-High dose of it resulted in decreasing CRP and improving of respiratory function in 72% of patients, the rate of survival among patients were 90%.
2- Moderate dose of it brought about decrease in CRP in 5 patients out of 8 patients at day 11, stopping in extra pulmonary lesion at day 8. the rate of survival among patients were 100%
3-it decreased the use of mechanical ventilation among anakinra group and the death rate without producing any serious side effects
It decreased the need for vasopressors, lowered HScore, and improved respiratory function in those sever patients.
It decreased MV, patients discharged home soon.
After using of high dose of it, it showed very rapid improvement in respiration with a very fast clearance of inflammation.
A 33-year old man with pericarditis has been treated after infected with COVID-19 by using IL-1 antagonist (anakinra)
Cavalli et al. (2020)
(Aouba et al., 2020)
(Huet et al., 2020)
(Dimopoulos et al., 2020)
(Navarro‐Millán, Sattui, Lakhanpal, Zisa, Siegel, Crow)
(Pontali et al., 2020)
(Karadeniz et al., 2020)
Eculizumab Inhibitor of complement factor C5 and prevents MAC formation. 4
1 out of 4
Eculizumab induced a drop in inflammatory markers. Mean C Reactive Protein levels dropped from 14.6 mg/dl to 3.5 mg/dl and the mean duration of the disease was 12.8 days.
Prevent patients to increase CRP, LDH, hospitalization, not need oxygen supploementation
Diurno et al. (2020)
(Kulasekararaj et al. et al.)
Ravulizumab (Ultomiris) Inhibitor of complement factor C5 and prevents MAC formation. 1 out of 4 Prevent patients to increase CRP, LDH, hospitlaization (Kulasekararaj et al. et al.)
IFX-1 Inhibits the biological activity of C5a
AMY-101 Inhibitors of C3 1 Normalalization of CRP, LDH; decrease oxygen requirement and improvement of leukocytosis and lymphocytopenia (Mastaglio et al., 2020)
Nivolumab Inhibitors of PD-1
Interferon Decreases the SARS-CoV-2 activity through the phosphorylation of STAT1 77
20
5
20
2944
42
60
50
814
1-Vero E6 cell showed decrease in viral titer after 24 and 48 h of IFN-α treatment by 3 logs and 4 logs, respectively.
2- It is effective for reducing viral load and inflammatory markers (CRP and IL-6).
Fever decreased in all patients just in 7 days, all other symptoms are declined gradually, and viral load deceased to zero after 10 days.
Oxygen demand and symptoms are improved, with the decreased of hospitalization period.
All patients were feeling good, fever has been decreased, and there is no any death report after discharge.
Interferon alpha nasal drops showed an protective effect for most susceptible people.
Mortality rate decreased significantly, and discharging has been increased.
Improvement in oxygenation and increasing the discharge from hospital.
Decreasing in the viral load.
Higher recovery rate in those who received IFN-alpha 2b.
(Lokugamage et al., 2020b)
(Zhou et al., 2020)
(Dastan et al., 2020)
(Payandemehr et al., 2020)
(Meng et al., 2020)
(Davoudi-Monfared et al., 2020)
(Irvani et al., 2020)
(Gruber, 2020)
(Pereda et al., 2020)
Convalescent plasma Eradicates the virus through inhibition of viral attachment and replication. 6
10
5
4
2
6
80
6
7
6
4
52 of 103
25
All patients did not admit to ICU. Some patients showed clearance of virus for throat swab while some others showed improvement in radiological examination.
Improvement in the symptoms in severe cases.
Viral load decreased, fever decreased within 3 days after transfusion, oxygen level increased.
All patients recovered from the infection including one pregnant woman. This method has role in boosting the immune system of newly infected patients.
Increasing in the survival rate of sever cased patients, in which both patients present sever pneumonia and ARDS. This method doesn't have any adverse effect.
Decreasing in the symptoms, radiological improvements and elimination of virus without any adverse effect.
Great improvement has been seen in patient's symptoms who received the convalescent plasma before day 14.
COVID-19 Negative results achieved after 3 days of infusioin.
Neutralization of viremia after CP transfusion.
Not requirement for mechanical ventilation. Early discharge from hospital.
It's regarded as a potential therapy for severe cases without any adverse effect.
Decrease in the severity of the disease, faster discharge.
It is regarded as a safe method for treating this disease. 9 of the patients cured just after one week.
(Ye et al., 2020d)
(Zeng et al., 2020a)
(Shen et al., 2020)
(Tanne, 2020b)
(Ahn et al., 2020)
(Ye et al., 2020d)
(Cunningham et al., 2020)
(Zeng et al., 2020b)
(Duan et al., 2020b)
(Zhang et al., 2020e)
(Zhang et al., 2020f)
(Li et al., 2020c)
(Salazar et al., 2019)
Baricitinib JAK and AAK inhibitors 20 out of 76 (56 are control)
1 out of 4
12 and 12 standard control
15
22
113 patients and 78 controls
It inhibits endocytosis of virus and inflammation mediated SARS-CoV-2 infection
Reduce mortrality rate (5%), reduce oxygen need, and CRP while increase P/F ratio
Her IFN-γ, TNF-α and IL are lower than the others
Symptoms, CRP, procalcitonin spO2 and PaO2/Fi O2 are improved
Most of the pateints showed improvement in presenting symptoms, inflammatory markers, and oxgen requirement
Supplemental oxygen requirement, ferittin and CRP levels are reduced in most of the patients.
Fatality rate is decreasesd, most of the clinical, laboratory (IL-6 and CRP) and respiratory functions are improved.
Zhang et al. (2020b)
(Bronte et al., 2020)
(Lo Caputo et al., 2020)
(Cantini et al., 2020a)
(Titanji et al., 2020)
(Milligan et al., 2020)
(Cantini et al., 2020b)
Ruxolitinib Inhibitor of JAK, and activate Treg 14
20 out of 41
1
It reduces (COVID-19 inflammation score) by ¾ in most of patients.
Improved in CT of lung.reduced mortrality rate. Levele of 7 cytokines (IL-6, NGF-β, MIP-α, MIP-β, VEGF, IL-12 (P40) and macrophage migration inhibitory factors and CRP were decreased
IL-6, CRP decreased while IL-2R increased.
La Rosée et al. (2020)
(Cao et al., 2020b)
(Koschmieder et al. et al.)
Tofacitinib Inhibitor of JAK1 and JAK3
Jaktinib JAK1 and JAK2 inhibitor
Imatinib TYK inhibitor 1 (Case report) Pulmonary opacities were disappeared. Her clinical signs improved. Morales-Ortega et al. (2020)
Thymosin Activates different subsets of T-cells (CTL, Th, and Treg) and NK cell activity, and reverses the side effects of corticosteroids 76 severe cases
In vitro
11 out of 25
It increased survival rate by restoration of lymphocytopenia and reversion of exhausted T cell. It also normalized the CD+4/CD+8 ratio.
It increased number of T cells. It did not change CD+4/CD+8 ratio, it protect T cell from excessive activation. It decreased granzyme B.
Number of lymphocytes were raised in critical patients after treatment
Zhang et al. (2020b)
(Xu et al., 2020b)
Fingolimod S1PR inhibitor
Pirfenidone Targets IL-1β, IL-4 and anti-oxidant effect and reduce pulmonary fibrosis in post SARS-CoV-2 infection
CD24FC Prevents the formation of NF-KB and reduces IL-6 and IL-1
Tranilast Inflammasome inhibitor blocks the formation of inflammatory prostaglandins via inhibiting COX2 in fibroblast and macrophage and decreases the release of IL-6 from endothelial cells.
IL-2 Anti-inflammatory and anti-viral properties
Rhu-GM-CSF (sargramostim) Act as an immune-modulator that activate alveolar macrophage to remove debris
vMIP Strong chemokine antagonism In vitro It increased CTL, inhibited chemokine receptor and related signal pathway Li et al. (2020d)
NK cell Anti-viral property
T cell immunotherapy Reverses T-cell deficiency
Pluristem (PLX) Anti-inflammatory characteristics, and activate Treg and M2 macrophages 7 (only 6 patients completed 1 week of treatments) The survival rates were 100% among Israeli patients. 66% of patients were showing improvement of respiratory parameters. Rubin (2020)
Thalidomide Immunomodulatory properties 1 (case report) It decreased cytokines including IL-6, IL-10, and IFN-γ. It raised the absolute lymphocyte count. Chen et al. (2020c)
Levamisole Reverse the Th to normal level to treat lymphocytopenia, and decreases inflammation
Cyclosporine A Cyclophilin A, MPTP pore and D inhibitors
Melatonin Prevents binding virus products to TLR4, and ameliorates free radical driven lung damage
BPI-002 CTLA-4 inhibitor
Brilacidin Antiviral property that bind to spike protein of SARS-CoV-2
Opaganib (Yeliva: ABC294640) Sphingosine kinase (SK) inhibitor 7 (2 patients were excluded) It decreased the level of CRP (non-significantly) but it increased the level of lymphocytes. Kurd et al. (2020)
RHB-107 (Upomastat, WX-671) Trypsin-like serine protease (S1 family) inhibitor
Auranofin Inhibits phosphorylation of JAK-1 and STAT-3, and inhibits COX Inflammatory cytokines (IL-6, TNF-α and IL-1β) and NF-КB would also decreased in tissue culture after 24 and 48 h of auranofin treatment.
It is very effective in decrease viral load of SARS-CoV-2 in Huh7 tissue culture cell by 70% after 24 h of auranofin treatment and 85% after 48 auranofin treatment
(Rothan et al., 2020)

Since May 2019, a review of ibuprofen and ketoprofen has been ongoing with signals that varicella infection and certain bacterial infections could be aggravated by these drugs (EMA, 2020). The Swedish health agency is against using NSAIDs randomly to treat COVID-19 symptoms, it explains that the anti-inflammatory and antipyretic effects can mask symptoms of a deterioration in the disease picture in infection (RELIS et al., 2020). A study has shown that ibuprofen in vitro inhibits peripheral blood mononuclear cells and IgM and IgG synthesis (Bancos et al., 2009).

Indomethacin is another NSAID that is used for the treatment of gout and rheumatoid arthritis (Amici et al., 2006). The in vitro studies verified the efficacy of the drug in inhibiting the replication of the virus and reducing the damage caused by canine CoVs. It is also proven that the in vivo application of indomethacin in an infected dog is effective at a dose of 1 mg/kg to combat against SARS-CoV-1 (Amici et al., 2006).

The ongoing clinical trials regarding consuming ibuprofen in COVID-19 patients in the UK and Argentina are NCT04334629 and NCT04382768, respectively. While, NCT04383899 is the clinical trial to know the side effects of ibuprofen in patients with COVID-19 among French people.

For decades, one of the most important problems in using NSAIDs is the panic that spread in the community due to their side effects including hypertension, renal problems, and gastrointestinal problems (Risser et al., 2009). Keeping in mind these reasons, there are few completed and ongoing trials concerning the use of NSAIDs in COVID-19 patients. If practitioners and researchers find the lowest safe effective dose of NSAIDs by their study to reduce the symptomatic treatment of COVID-19, it will be a good solution at that moment since there are no drugs and vaccines to overcome the disease. The justifications of not using NSAIDs are not too strong since the upregulation of ACE2 occurs during the chronic use of the drugs which make the person vulnerable to the disease. When the person is infected with the disease, the upregulation of the ACE2 receptor either will not happen strongly during the acute onset of the infection or will not affect the severity of the disease (NICE, 2020). Another justification is that the antipyretic property of the NSAIDs reduces killing the virus by the body because clinicians believe that fever is the weapon to reduce replication of the virus (Baron, 2001). If this justification is true, it must be fulfilled over other antipyretic agents including acetaminophen. Finally, the evidence of the upregulation of ACE2 by the drug are originated from the animal models, they may not transferable to the human (Ferrario et al., 2005).

6.2. Corticosteroids

Corticosteroids are potent immunomodulators that suppress the immune system, so they are used to treat various diseases and inflammatory conditions. It is administered at a low dose to treat some cancer and auto-immune diseases in which inflammation is predominated (Russell et al., 2020a). One should be cautious of prescribing corticosteroids for such individuals as they can be like a double-edged sword; this is for several advantages and disadvantages. This group of medication could be used in a CS and the hyper-inflammatory state as it could have both an immunosuppressant effect and an anti-inflammatory effect (Rhen and Cidlowski, 2005) (Channappanavar and Perlman, 2017a). The above property could combat CS phenomenon in patients infected with COVID-19, such as ALI, ARDS, and coagulopathy status (Elli et al., 2019) (Chen et al., 2020a).

The lethal effect of severe COVID-19 pneumonia is related to the pathological inflammatory reaction characterized by the destruction of deep airway and alveoli (Xu et al., 2020a). Thymosin has been clinically used in patients with COVID-19 in adjunct to corticosteroids to reverse the side effects of corticosteroids (Huang et al., 2020).

However, some data from China demonstrates that in those patients with severe pneumonia, early introduction of a short course of low dose methylprednisolone could improve both clinical and radiological outcome (Wang et al., 2020c). It has been documented that the use of dexamethasone as supportive care for moderate and severe COVID-19 patients leads to a decrease in the duration of mechanical ventilator and mortality rate (Table 1) (Nicastri et al., 2020; Villar et al., 2020).

On the other hand, corticosteroid therapy has serious clinical complications. The most common adverse effects caused by corticosteroid are a secondary bacterial and fungal infection (Broersen et al., 2015) (Singanayagam et al., 2018b). Hence, to overcome secondary infection in severe COVID-19 patients, clinicians should immediately add full-dose antibacterial drugs (Wang et al., 2020c).

The use of corticosteroids are still controversial, however, Wang, Jiang (Wang et al., 2020c). Noticed no significant effect of glucocorticoid treatment on the outcome of approximately half of the infected patients with new CoVs. Also, Russell, Millar (Russell et al., 2020b) studied the effect of steroids on COVID related lung damages and concluded no clinical evidence to support such therapy. In another study completed in China, where steroid treatment was observed to increase clinical symptoms, biomarkers, and radiological findings in young individuals (Zha et al., 2020). For the above reasons, the WHO is against the routine use of corticosteroids to treat pneumonia and ARDS in COVID-19 patients (WHO, 2020b). However, in their last living guidance, WHO strongly recommends systemic (intravenous or oral) corticosteroid therapy (e.g. 6 mg of dexamethasone orally or intravenously daily or 50 mg of hydrocortisone intravenously every 8 h) for 7–10 days in patients with severe and critical COVID-19 (WHO, 2020a). Broadly speaking, according to the guidelines, corticosteroids are not given to the COVID-19 case without ARDS but its utilization for COVID-19 with ARDS is still used since the dose and the time of administration are not known (Ye et al., 2020c). It needs time to adjust the dose in order not to delay viral clearance and not predisposing to secondary bacterial infection. Corticosteroids also need many clinical trials to know other side effects including lymphocyte damage (Turnell et al., 1973). Therefore, we highlight the attentiveness of using the drug while more research should be implemented to ensure the efficacy and safety of corticosteroid.

6.2. Monoclonal antibodies

6.3.1. IL-6 blockade

The IL-6 production is a response to both infection and tissue injury, which promptly contributes to the host defense via inducing acute phase proteins, hematopoiesis, and inflammation (Reghunathan et al., 2005). Despite that IL6 expression is controlled by various mechanisms comprising the post-transcriptional and transcriptional process. Often its concentration is debilitating and contributes to multiple autoimmune disorders and inflammatory conditions (Tanaka et al., 2014). Based on its position, there are two types of IL-6 receptors (IL-6R): membrane-bound (mIL-6R) and a soluble form (sIL-6R), the latter binds to IL-6 to form a complex which binds to gp130 on the cell membrane to complete the signal transduction system and respond to infection via an inflammatory response (Davies and Choy, 2014). Further, the SARS-CoV-2 infection observations found an increase in inflammatory cytokines (Conti et al., 2020b). Hence, the blockage of IL-6 could have a significant impact on reducing inflammation in COVID-19 patients.

Globally, the intensive care beds are limited and with the COVID-19 outbreak, such units will become overwhelmed with severe ARDS cases (Paneru, 2020). To date, neither a vaccine nor specific antiviral therapy is available to combat novel CoV, therefore the administration of cytokine inhibitor especially IL-6 which has a role in hyper-inflammation could mitigate the severity of the disease (Cao et al., 2020a) (Mehta et al., 2020).

In addition to the immunological characteristics of COVID-19 patients in critical care, units have suggested hyper-activation of the humoral immune pathway, including IL-6 as a critical mediator for respiratory failure, shock, and multi-organ damage (Frink et al., 2009). This cytokine release syndrome that culminates in the release of a huge amount of pro-inflammatory cytokines must be under the tight control of immunological homeostasis and sometimes it is the target for immunotherapeutic (Coomes and Haghbayan, 2020). During the ALI, macrophage activating syndrome and ARDS result from CS that occurs when pro-inflammatory cytokines mainly IL-6 are released in huge amount so blockage of IL-6 is therapeutically important to reduce CS in COVID-19 patients (McGonagle et al., 2020).

Towards a drug, Tocilizumab (TCZ) is an example of mAb that acts as an IL-6 inhibitor that binds to both mIL-6R and sIL-6R (Fig. 1 C), it is used to treat RA to reduce inflammation. It has been approved to treat cytokine release syndrome followed chimeric antigen receptor -T (CAR-T) cell immunotherapy therapy in the United States since 2017 (Zhang et al., 2020a).

Fig. 1c.

Fig. 1c

Immune response, immunopathology, and mechanism of action of immunotherapeutics for SARS-CoV-2 infection (extracellular). Inhibitory effects represented by red lines, while activating effects represented by green lines. Created withBioRender.com

The dendritic cells (DCs), The professional antigen-presenting cells, present viral protein to Th cell then different subsets of Th (Th1, Th2, Treg, Th17) is polarized depending on the cytokines. COVID-19 Patients had elevated levels of IL1B, IFN-γ, IP10, and MCP-1 signifying hyper-activation of Th1 cell reactions. The activated T cells egress from the lymph node to the site of infection through the interaction of S1P to S1PR which can be blocked by Fingolimod (Chan et al., 2020). IFN-γ causes activation of macrophage through binding to its receptor on it; tyrosine kinase (TYK) is the signal transduction of IFNR. Macrophage activation can be inhibited by prevent binding IFN-γ to its receptor by emapalumab (Ye et al., 2020a) or blocking TYK via imatinib (Su et al., 2016). When Th2 is polarized, different types of cytokine (IL4, IL5, IL10, and IL-13) will be generated, primarily help B cells to produce antibodies which in turn trigger classical activation of complement 3 (C3) and (C5) which culminate in membrane attack complex (MAC) formation and damage of the viral infected cell. C3 is inhibited by AMY-101 (Control and Revision, 2020). C5 and MAC are inhibited by eculizumab (Bester et al., 2018) and ravulizumab (WHO, 2020b). C3a, C4a, and C5a are also formed which act as anaphylatoxin that attracts neutrophil and macrophage to the site of inflammation and increases oxidative stress that induces acute lung damage (ALI). The oxidative stress is mitigated by the administration of pirfenidone (Genc et al., 2004) and tranilast (NIAID, 2020) and also by the administration of C5a antagonists such as IFX-1 (Ai et al., 2020). Neutrophil and Monocyte (macrophage) are synthesized and attracted to the site of inflammation by GM-CSF which is augmented by GM-CSF (Liu et al., 2020b). Another factor to prevent migration of monocyte from the bloodstream to the site of infection is to block its chemokine receptors such as CCR5 and CXCR4 by leronlimab (Lam et al., 2020) and vMIP (holmes, 2020), respectively. The production of the polarized Th17 cells during SARS-CoV-2 infection has been associated with elevated levels of IL-6 and could also be influenced by transforming growth factor-β (TGFβ). Th17 cells are associated with driving harmful inflammation in the case of SARS-CoV-2 infection. The IL-17 is released by Th17 acting as a chemotactic protein that drives monocyte and neutrophil to the site of infection. TGF-β and IL-2 play a vital role in the production of induced Treg cells; Treg can mitigate hyper-inflammatory response once activated. Treg can be supported by the administration of IL-2 (Guy et al., 2001), thymosin (Wong et al., 2016), or pluristem (Li et al., 2020a) therapy. SARS-CoV-2 is eliminated directly by the activation of CTL and NK cells. Both of them are influenced by IL-2 which secretes by naïve T helper cell (Th0) which in turn augmented by T-cell immunotherapy (Kim et al., 2020). CTL and NK cells are boosted by the administration of IL-2 (Guy et al., 2001) therapy. Once the SARS-CoV-2 virus is introduced into the tissue cells, such as respiratory epithelial cells, viral peptides are presented via class I major histocompatibility complex (MHC) proteins to CTL. Inflammatory cytokines (IL-6, IL-1, and TNF-α), that secrete by activated DCs and viral infected cells, have an essential role in acute phase response and cytokine storm (CS) during SARS-CoV-2 infection. They affect on brain stem to produce fever. They induce the liver to produce acute phase reactants (CRP, ferritin, and fibrinogen). The latter two contribute to coagulopathy and septic shock. We can depress the action of IL-6 either by preventing its binding to its receptor (through tocilizumab (Elli et al., 2019), sarilumab (Wang et al., 2020a) or siltuximab (Dong et al., 2020) treatments or inhibiting its signal transduction system by Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors such as baricitinib (Frieman et al., 2010), ruxolitinib (WHO, 2013), tofacitinib (Shereen et al., 2020) or jakotinib (Teig et al., 2002). TNF-α besides its role in the acute-phase response can bind to its receptor on the blood vessel to increase adhesion molecules and enhances the extravasation of neutrophil that causes ALI. It also works with VEGF to induce pulmonary edema by disrupting the endothelial barrier of lung blood vessels. TNF-α and VEGF are inhibited by preventing binding to their receptor by adalimumab (Huang et al., 2020) and bevacizumab (Pedersen and Ho, 2020), respectively. Regarding IL-1, it can be inhibited by preventing its ligation to the receptor by Kineret (Herold et al., 2020). Lymphocyte exhaustion and lymphopenia are common in SARS-CoV-2 infection which can be reversed by the administration of programmed cell death-protein1 (PD1/PD-L1) inhibitors nivolumab (Wu et al., 2020a), or cytotoxic T-cell-associated protein 4 (CTLA4) inhibitors BP1-002 (Danesh et al., 2011) could have an important role in the prevention of lymphopenia or restore lymphocyte counts in severe cases of COVID-19 patients. . (For interpretation of the references to color in this figure legend, the reader is referred to the Web version of this article.)

Xu & Han (Xu et al., 2020b) reported in his retrospective study among 21 patients that administration of TCZ in severe cases of COVID-19 in the dose of 400 mg with a combination of antiviral therapy resulted in improvement of both the fever and oxygenation (75%) remarkably within few days. Apart from that, both the biochemical profile (peripheral lymphocytes 52%) and radiological opacifications (90.5%) improved. This research showed promised results that the application of this mAb might be beneficial in severe cases of COVID-19 (Table 1).

Lately, many clinical trials have registered to know the efficacy and safety of TCZ to relieve CS and pneumonia in severe cases of COVD-19. There are clinical trials (ChiCTR2000029765), (ChiCTR2000030796), (ChiCTR2000030442) and (ChiCTR2000030894) that address the use of TCZ alone or in combination with other drugs to treat COVID-19 (Zhang et al., 2020a).

Sarilumab (Kevzara) is also another inhibitor of IL-6 that interferes with IL-6 signaling by binding to both mIL-6R and sIL-6R (Fig. 1C), it is used for the treatment of RA. The “NCT04315298” is the identifier for the clinical trial which has been launched in the United States to know the safety profile of Sarilumab in COVID-19 cases.

Siltuximab (Sylvant) is another IL-6 antagonist that also binds to both types of IL-6R (Fig. 1C), it is approved since 2014 by FDA to treat multicentric Castleman's disease which is a rare disorder characterized by hyper-inflammation (Davis et al., 2015). Gritti, Raimondi (Gritti et al., 2020a) found that siltuximab administration leads to a reduction of both CRPs via inhibition of IL-6 in COVID-19 patients (Table 1).

IL-6 blockade agents, that act as immune-modulators, besides their advantage for decreasing inflammation in CS of COVID-19, delay viral clearance; this problem can be tackled by combination with antiviral drugs. They also increase vulnerability to a secondary bacterial infection which can be prevented by their administration with antibiotics. It is also important to address the number for scaling severity of disease and determine the number (the time) when these immune-modulatory agents can be applied. This can be achieved by the measurement of CRP and IL-6 in COVID-19 patients.

6.3.2. Leronlimab (pro 140)

Leronlimab is another mAb that is based on IgG4 to treat various diseases including AIDS, metastatic cancer, and nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) which exhibits inflammation. It is chemokine receptor 5 (CCR5) antagonism (Fig. 1C), CCR5 is a chemokine that recruits leukocyte to the site of inflammation (CytoDyn, 2020), it is reported that the deletion of CCR5 protects against inflammation (Muntinghe et al., 2009). The FDA has authorized and approved the starting of a new stage 2 trial to analyze the benefits and purposes of leronlimab in the treatment of patients which are dealing with weak to average respiratory complications who have been diagnosed with COVID-19 (Tucker, 2020). CytoDyn, The developer of Leronlimab “CytoDyn”, informed in a media publication that in their trial of treatment with leronlimab; after 3 days of treatment 8 patients with COVID19 who were severely sick, presented development in various significant immunologic biomarkers, comprising of cytokines, IL-6, and an aim in approaching the normalization of the CD4/CD8 proportionality (CytoDyn, 2020) (Table 1).

Glass and Lane (2003) showed that the blockage of CCR5 restores the INF-γ and CD+4/CD + ratio during SARS-CoV-1 infection (Glass and Lane, 2003). CCL5 is a chemokine that binds to the CCR5 receptor thereby it drives inflammation. The blockage of this CCL5-CCR5 axis by leronlimab has a role in mitigating the disease. Leronlimab ‘s safety profile is not clear yet since CCR5 that expresses on CTL has a role in driving it to the affected area and increasing the antiviral activity. It was expected that leronlimab besides anti-inflammatory effects, delayed viral clearance, however, a recent study revealed that the application of corticosteroids did not affect viral clearance time and length of hospital stay in mild COVID‐19 cases (Kaner et al., 2000).

6.3.3. Bevacizumab (Avastin)

Pulmonary edema is the foremost harm, causing characteristics of ALI/ARDS which are the main complications of SARS-CoV-2 infection (Salehi et al., 2020). The results of the postmortem autopsy form COVID-19 cases recorded that there was pulmonary edema that was more serious and more noticeable than the SARS infection. Therefore, pulmonary CT scanning and pathological data can likewise conclude that inflammatory exudation which causes pulmonary edema is the main distinguishable factor of COVID-19 (Xu et al., 2020a). Nonetheless, special pharmacotherapy is still needed. VEGF is the strongest and most effective inducing aspect to enhance vascular permeability and induces angiogenesis. It is released in cases of hypoxia. Bevacizumab is a VEGF antagonist widely being used for the treatment of various cancers (Ferrara et al., 2005). Bevacizumab works by blocking VEGF and thus preventing it to bind with its receptor (Fig. 1C), consequently the formation of new vasculature and vascular permeability is rendered. Therefore, the application of Bevacizumab may be a favorable medicine for serious and extreme COVID-19 cases. “NCT04305106” is the clinical trial, titled as, “application of Bevacizumab in severe cases of COVID-19 patients”.

NCT04305106” and “NCT04275414” are the clinical trial titles application of Bevacizumab in severe cases of COVID-19 patients.

All things considered; bevacizumab is important to reduce pulmonary edema that accompanies SARS-CoV-2 infection. Its effective dose and safety profile should be revealed in the clinical trials since the drug has a long half.

6.3.4. Adalimumab (Humira)

It is anti-TNF-α mAb that prevents TNF-α from inducing its inflammatory response which is used for the treatment of RA, irritable bowel diseases, and ankylosing spondylitis (Mounach and El Maghraoui, 2014). The TNF-α inhibitors reduce capillary leakage by reducing the expression of the adhesion molecule and VEGF (Paleolog et al., 1998). It also reduces inflammatory cytokine (IL-1 and IL-6) in RA (Charles et al., 1999). The TNF-α has a role in many inflammatory driven diseases including COVID-19 (Russell et al., 2020a). Diao, Wang (Diao et al., 2020) demonstrated high levels of TNF-α were seen in patients diagnosed with COVID-19. Russell, Moss (Russell et al., 2020a) established that TNF-α inhibition in COVID-19 cases is safe. Therefore, the application of Adalimumab enrolls in two clinical trials: “ChiCTR2000030089” and “ChiCTR2000030580”. Recent studies suggested that COVID-19 patients taking Adalimumab or other anti-TNF for other diseases are less likely to be admitted in hospital.

Altogether, TNF-α inhibitors may improve severe symptoms of COVID-19 because they decrease other potent inflammatory cytokines that are responsible for CS beside TNF-α. It is better to be given directly after hospitalization before CS begins. Because of its strong anti-inflammatory effects, further clinical trials should be done to assure its safety profile; it may prone the patients to secondary bacterial infection since bacterial superinfection is common during viral infections.

6.3.5. Emapalumab (Gamifant)

IFN-γ is an inflammatory cytokine and possesses many biological activities (Liu et al., 2002). It can enhance the major histocompatibility complex (MHC) expression, activate macrophage function, stimulate chemokine production; its products can be up-regulated by the chemokines IP-10, which is found to be significantly increased in severe cases of SARS. The IP-10 levels are extremely high and it seems to be a more reliable marker for viral infection, which have documented in SARS-CoV-1 (Cinatl et al., 2004). Huang, Su (Huang et al., 2005) noted that IFN-γ related CS was found in SARS-CoV-1 infection which might be involved in pulmonary damage of SARS patients (Huang et al., 2005).

Emapalumab is humanized mAb with IFN-γ antagonistic property (Fig. 1C), it is approved in the United States for treatment of primary hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis (HLH) if the disease doesn't respond to its primary treatment (Al-Salama, 2019). It is effective for that disease which is its hyper-inflammation overwhelmed by activation of T cell and macrophage. However, there is no evidence for the contribution of IFN-γ in CS of COVID-19 (Xiong et al., 2020). It is proven that emapalumab decreases CXCL9 which is the chemokine that polarizes Th1 (Hatterer et al., 2012). In addition, CXCL9 upregulates RORγt that polarizes toward Th17 (Hatterer et al., 2012) which is believed to play a detrimental role in COVID-19 (Pacha et al., 2020). “NCT04324021” is an ongoing clinical trial on using a combination of emapalumab with anakinra to treat CS in COVID-19 patients.

6.3.6. Complement (C) inhibitors

The complement, especially C5 and C3, has a detrimental role in driving inflammation in COVID-19. The C5a is elevated in COVID-19 patients based on research done in China, so clinical trials with antibodies that inhibit C5a are conducted (Dong et al., 2020). One explanation for the contribution of C5a in SRAS-CoV-2 mediated inflammation is for its chemotaxis effect that recruits macrophages and neutrophils to the site of infection. Thrombotic microangiopathy is caused by various reasons in COVID-19, and one of the scenarios is SARS-CoV-2 mediated complement activation. The SARS-CoV-1 murine model with a lack of C3 showed decreased severity of the disease and organ damage (Gralinski et al., 2018). MERS-CoV murine model with C5a inhibition showed decreased levels of cytokine, viral load, and lung damage (Jiang et al., 2018). Today, antagonists of C5 and C5a are approved by the FDA for the treatment of complement related disorders. C5a antagonists have a better safety profile than C5 because it does not inhibit membrane attack complex (MAC) formation and hence does not weaken the immune system's ability to kill the virus.

Eculizumab (Soliris) and ravulizumab (Ultomiris) are mAbs approved to bind to complement factor C5 and prevent the formation of MAC (Fig. 1C). They affect the complement system, which may help to minimize organ damage in severe patients. These drugs were first FDA listed for paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria, which is the rare disease of the blood and later for hemolytic uremic syndrome and myasthenia gravis (Volk et al., 2016) (McKeage, 2019). “NCT04288713” is a clinical trial underpinned the use of eculizumab in SRAS-CoV-2 related CS.

Another drug engineered to suppress C5a biological activity is IFX-1 which is also a monoclonal anti-human complement factor C5a antibody designed to inhibit the biological activity of C5a (Fig. 1C). The drug is not thought to affect MAC formation (C5b-9). It can regulate the tissue and organ damage associated with the inflammatory response through a C5a selective blockade. IFX-1 is under consideration to treat inflammatory conditions (Sun et al., 2014). The clinical trial for therapeutical application of INFX-1in severe COVID-19 cases have been registered as “NCT04333420”.

In COVID-19, activation of C3 is responsible for inflammation as part of an innate immune response contributing to coagulopathy and organ failure (Risitano et al., 2020). Hence, in critical cases of COVID-19, C3 inhibition can provide an opportunity to inhibit complement-mediated inflammatory reactions. Compastatin Cp40/AMY 101 is a potent selective C3 inhibitor used in complement-induced disorders such as ARDS (Zimmerman et al., 2000), which is one of the COVID-19 cases' fatal complications (Table 1).

Additional questions must be answered before using C5a, C5, and C3 inhibitors such as what is the time window for drug intervention? What are the indicators for increasing complement during SARS-CoV-2 infection? It is clear that there is not a routine indicator for complement activation; we must depend on alternative routine indicators that mirror increased complements such as CRP, ferritin, and IL-6.

6.3.7. Nivolumab (Opdivo)

Zhang, Zhao (Zhang et al., 2020a) found that functional exhaustion of antiviral lymphocytes occurred in COVID-19 patients. This depresses of functional activity of T or NK cells are due to immune checkpoints such as programmed death receptor-1 (PD-1). Chiappelli, Khakshooy (Chiappelli et al., 2020) reported that PD-1 over-expressed in COVID-19 patients, therefore, checkpoint inhibitors like anti-PD-1 would be helpful.

Nivolumab (Opdivo) is a fully human monoclonal PD-1 antibody that functions as a negative regulatory checkpoint molecule in immunosuppression (Deeks, 2014) (Fig. 1C). “NCT04333914” is a clinical trial in COVID-19 patients that combined this drug with chloroquine analog (GNS561) and tocilizumab.

In short, PD-1 inhibitors are important to abrogate the exhaustion of CTL which is responsible for killing the virus. At the same time, they may produce immune hyper-activation that may exacerbate lung damage in COVID-19 patients. However, Immune hyper-activation is not a common side effect of PD-1 inhibitors but clinical consideration should be taken during administration of them. Side effects of these drugs may synergize with the pathogenesis of SARS-CoV-2 in immune hyper-activation and CS leads to fatal outcomes.

6.4. Interferons (IFNs)

IFNs are a group of cytokines with antiviral properties by inducing the intact neighboring cells to release molecules that interfere with viral replication. They increase the autolytic activity of NK and macrophage against the virus. There are three families of IFNs: type Ⅰ (IFN-α and IFN-β), type Ⅱ (IFN-γ), and type Ⅲ (IFN-λ) (Samuel, 2001). Type Ⅰ IFNs have the main role in the eradication of CoVs (SARS-CoV-1 and MERS-CoV) (Dandekar and Perlman, 2005). So, they are used as a treatment to combat CoVs and hepatitis B virus (HBV) specially IFN-α but it produces many systematic side effects such as depression of bone marrow, production flu-like symptoms, increasing suicidal ideas. Currently, there are many attempts to replace IFN-α with safer IFN-λ which has fewer side effects. IFN-λ or IFN-γ has less antiviral activity if compared to type1 IFNs, so they are used synergistically with low doses with IFN-α to increase antiviral activity and decrease side effects of them (Sainz et al., 2004). The CoVs have strategies to evade the immune system, one of these strategies is to reduce type1 IFNs to dampen the immune system and spread easily from one cell to another (Dandekar and Perlman, 2005).

Larkin, Jin (Larkin et al., 2003) underpinned that a combination of IFN-α and IFN-γ in vitro provided strong synergistic antiviral activities at much lower dosages of IFN than normally required. Lowering the dose of IFNs in combination therapy offers the advantage of the reduction in undesired side effects for the patients. Nagata, Iwata (Nagata et al., 2008) have described the destructive effect of CS in adult mice after SARS-CoV-1 infection, while IV injections of TNF-α were not beneficial, intraperitoneal IFN-γ injection showed a protective effect. Cinatl, Morgenstern (Cinatl et al., 2003) reported the in vitro superiority of IFN-β over -α and -γ while suggesting the effectiveness of IFN-γ over IFN-α in Vero cell cultures of SARS-CoV-1 infection. Scagnolari, Vicenzi (Scagnolari et al., 2004) also reported the synergistic effects of IFN-γ and -β on Vero cells infected with SARS-CoV. Another study established that IFN-α and IFN-γ co-administration caused hyper-activated IRF-1 and STAT1, which lastly resulted in a more vigorous antiviral activity replication of viruses (Zhang et al., 2006).

Although IFNs are available as medicinal products, some adverse effects should be considered for their direct indication. Moreover, the protocol for their indication including proper timing and dosing should be confirmed (Zoumbos et al., 1985).

Shen and Yang (2020) believe that the treatment of COVID-19 patients with IFN-α and IFN-β show promised results since SARS-CoV-2 is more sensitive to these IFN as compared to SARS-CoV-1. To confirm this idea, infected patients were sprayed with IFN-α2b and found to infected patients, he saw that the infection rate with SARS-CoV-2 would be decreased. Another study reported that this type of treatment can also be utilized for prophylaxis of the disease (Lokugamage et al., 2020a). Sheahan, Sims (Sheahan et al., 2020) reported that a combination of type 1 IFN with potential repurposes antiviral drugs such as lopinavir/ritonavir, remdesivir, and ribavirin could yield better efficacy (Table 1).

The administration of IFN-α2b in five mU twice daily in inhalable form is the guideline used by the physician in China (Lu, 2020) (Dong et al., 2020). There are many clinical trials regarding the use of IFN in COVID-19 either alone or in combination. Zhou et al. conducted a research on 77 COVID-19 patients in China for 11 days (median times), they used IFN-α2b 5 mU twice daily in respirable form with and without umifenovir 200 mg three times daily for the patients, and revealed that this treatment is effective for reducing viral load and inflammatory markers (CRP and IL-6) (Zhou et al., 2020).

“ChiCTR2000029387” is the clinical trial that is designed to use IFN-α2b in combination lopinavir/ritonavir (Lu, 2020) (Dong et al., 2020) “NCT04276688” is another clinical trial for subcutaneous application of IFN-β1b in combination with lopinavir/ritonavir and ribavirin for COVID-19 patients. “NCT04331899” is a clinical trial that claims to use III IFN (Peginterferon) in mild cases in the United States. “NCT04315948″ is the trial that compares a combination of IFN-β1b and lopinavir/ritonavir with other repurposed drugs (Sallard et al., 2020).

Generally, the physicians are waiting for the results of clinical trials to know the exact dose, time of administration, and the side effects of IFNs. It is also essential to determine in which phase, IFN must be given since IFN administration has flaws, such as the pulmonary lesions which are also more predominantly in the second phase. Therefore, IFN treatment in this phase may produce interferonopathies and exacerbate pulmonary lesions. Conversely, the pulmonary lesions are less significant in the early stage, so its administration may be effective in this stage but it does not mean that IFN is not used in the third phase (hyperinflammatory state), all of these uncertainties must be proved in the clinical trials.

6.5. Convalescent plasma

There is an old, yet new, the strategy of immune therapy to prevent or cure viral and bacterial infections (Casadevall and Scharff, 1995). It includes the collection and utilization of antibodies from the plasma of recovered patients who have developed humoral immunity against the same disease’ causative pathogen. The antibodies-based immune therapy offers a proximate immunity to the patients. At present, it is a more beneficial approach to target SARS-COV-2 than the prophylaxis vaccination, since it doesn't require a long time to prepare and validate before treating the patients. Unlike the distinct targeted mAb therapy, the convalescent plasma contains neutralizing antibodies that prevent the viral duplication and/or virus-human cell bindings. Apart from the neutralization effect, the antibodies may induce antibody-dependent cell-mediated cytotoxicity (via NK cells), complement induced cytotoxicity and phagocytosis (Van Erp et al., 2019).

During the last two decades, plasma containing antibodies have been used to treat different pandemics such as SARS, MERS, and Ebola virus. Despite that, the approach wasn't so effective and promising with the Ebola virus (Van Griensven et al., 2016). the strategy was more pronounced with SARS and MERS, as observed via a significant reduction in death rates when compared to the non-treated group (Duan et al., 2020a). Some papers and trials have been testing the effect of convalescent plasma on COVID-19 patients. The effect was prominent, and the safety of the treatment was reported, however, the sample size included in the study was relatively small (Table 1). Yet, there are no specific regulations to collect and use the convalescent plasma from recovered COVID-19 patients worldwide; however, the FDA organization issued few recommendations for regulated investigational purposes. The donor should be a COVID 19 confirmed and recovered patient, who has been 14 days of disease-free confirmed via a serological or molecular test. Additionally, the antibody titer test should be performed before the donation, where the neutralizing antibody titer of 1/160 is required (Tanne, 2020a). Like other treatment strategies, the convalescent plasma has some risks; such as the one which is related to the blood transfer that may get an accidental infectious disease or the one which is attributed to serum sickness. Other risks may be justified by the concept of antibody-dependent enhancement of infection, especially if the donor plasma has a lower titer of neutralizing antibodies (Casadevall and Pirofski, 2020). In such a case, the treatment would induce an adverse effect and enhance the infection severity (Katzelnick et al., 2017).

To highlight, the absence of scientific proves and the unavailability of standardized protocols for the correct doses and therapeutic management, plus the diversity in the nature of infection among different people, make this mode of immune therapy for COVID 19 limited relatively.

6.6. JAK inhibitors

Janus kinases (JAKs) consist of a family of intracellular tyrosine kinase (TYK) enzymes that phosphorylate and alter the activity of tyrosine hydroxyl residues in their target proteins. JAKs compromise four family groups of enzymes: JAK1, JAK2, JAK3, and TYK2. JAK3 is mainly present in hematopoietic cells, while kinases JAK1, JAK2, and TYK2 are ubiquitous. Numerous cytokines, such as ILs and IFNs, and hormones such as erythropoietin, thrombopoietin, and growth hormone trigger JAKs. Binding a cytokine to its receptor causes activation of JAKs associated with that receptor and eventually results in phosphorylation of STATs, that is, activation of STATs. Phosphorylated STAT dimers translocate to the nucleus, where they regulate the expression of hundreds of proteins involved in the immune response and contributing to inflammation (Roskoski, 2016). JAK inhibitors are used for treating many diseases: RA, irritable bowel diseases, and many skin disorders.

6.6.1. Baricitinib

Baricitinib (Olumiant) is JAK inhibitor that works by inhibiting JAK1 and JAK2 enzymes (Fig. 1C). It has been proposed as a potential candidate for COVID-19 therapy, taking in to account its relative safety and high affinities. A therapeutic dosage of either 2 mg or 4 mg once daily was enough to achieve inhibition plasma concentration. The biggest concern about JAK inhibitors, however, is that it can inhibit several inflammatory cytokines like INF-α, which plays an important role in curbing virus activity. To validate their effectiveness further clinical trials and studies are done (Richardson et al., 2020) (Table 1). Another mechanism of baricitinib is inhibition of an adaptor protein complex (AP2)-associated protein kinase (AAK) which has the main role in clathrin-mediated endocytosis of the virus. AAK1 inhibitors can block the virus passage into cells and can help to avoid virus infections (Zhang et al., 2020b) (Fig. 1C).

The other major viral input factor is endocytosis. Baricitinib is commercially available for RA and in clinical development for irritable bowel disease as a JAK1, JAK2, and TYK2 inhibitor and can inhibit endocytosis. This effect does not occur with the less selective JAK inhibitor, Tofacitinib (Richardson et al., 2020).

6.6.2. Ruxolitinib (Jakafi)

Ruxolitinib, another JAK1 and JAK2 inhibitor, is used as therapeutics for many inflammatory conditions: autoimmune diseases (Schwartz et al., 2017) and graft versus host disease (GVHD), which are resistant to corticosteroid therapy (Choi et al., 2014). Its ability to activate regulatory T lymphocyte (Treg) can be considered as another mechanism for its immunosuppress activity (Elli et al., 2019). Its side effects can be explained by inhibition of JAK enzyme in the NK cell in which the cell does not respond to IL-12, IL-2 and IL-15 activation and maturation that consequently results in decreasing TNF-α and INF-γ which affects the maturation of DC and polarization Th1 negatively (McLornan et al., 2015); the whole process can be scrutinized by decreasing the antiviral activity of NK and CTL and delay viral clearance in COVID-19 patients. These side effects were well underpinned in myeloproliferative neoplasm (MPN) patients during taking ruxolitinib (Heine et al., 2013). “ChiCTR2000029580” is the clinical trial that addresses the use of ruxolitinib in combination with stem cells to treat SARS-CoV-2 infection. NCT04331665 is another clinical trial that tests ruxolitinib for the treatment of COVID-19 to know its efficacy and safety. Table 1 provides further results from research on the use of this drug in COVID-19 patients.

6.6.3. Tofacitinib (Xeljanz)

It is also JAK inhibitor that when given orally, it is an inhibitor of JAK1 and JAK3 in a small dose (5 mg) and inhibitor of JAK2 in a larger dose (10 mg or above), but does not affect the AAK2 and clathrin-mediated endocytosis (Stebbing et al., 2020). So, it has fewer side effects if compared to other biological agents that are termed biological disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (bDMARDs) that subject patients to other infections (Favalli et al., 2020). It is approved by the FDA and the European Medicine Agency (EMA) for treatment of RA with or without methotrexate for those who don't tolerate other bDMARDs (EMA, 2017; Caporali and Zavaglia, 2019), it is also used for the treatment of irritable bowel disease (Panés and Gisbert, 2019).

The detailed mechanism of anti-inflammatory properties are due to its capacity to bind to adenosine triphosphate (ATP) binding site of JAKs which makes them irresponsive to multiple cytokines: IL21, IL-4, and IFN-γ (Meyer et al., 2010) and IL-6 have a major role in enhancing inflammation in COVID-19 patients (Shi et al., 2020b).

6.6.4. Jakotinib

Jakotinib dihydrochloride monohydrate is also a potent JAK1 and JAK2 inhibitor that is in the clinical trials for the treatment of myelofibrosis, alopecia areata, and pulmonary fibrosis, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (Saber-Ayad et al., 2020) (springer, 2020). (ChiCTR2000030170) is the clinical trial for using jakotinib hydrochloride to treat severe cases of COVID-19.

In general, the side effects of JAK inhibitors should not be overlooked. They may aggravate coagulopathy which is found in some COVID-19 cases as FDA warns the experts who use JAK inhibitors. They might re-activate some latent viruses such as the herpes zoster virus. Likewise, they could decrease the response of some antiviral cytokines (such as IFN) or some immune-boosting cytokines (IL-2 and IL-7).

On balance, the inhibitors of a selective single cytokine such as tocilizumab and anakinra may not be effective to treat CS, since it is the result of multiple cytokines. It is hypothesized to use multiple cytokine inhibitors especially JAK and TYK inhibitors because they can attenuate many inflammatory cytokines that are responsible for the formation of CS. JAK inhibitors which work on JAK1 and JAK2 are important therapeutically to treat COVID-19. Those inhibitors reduce IL-6 which is the main contributor to CS. However, the utilization of JAK and TYK inhibitors are not free from drawbacks, since JAK and TYK are shared by other cytokines (IL-2, IL-12, and IFN-γ), so blocking them by inhibitors; they may decrease the antiviral activity of CTL and NK cell. JAK inhibitors produce anemia because it is also signal transductors of erythropoietin hormone. JAK inhibitors are contraindicated in pregnancy, breastfeeding, and those who are in high blood clot risk.

6.7. Anakinra (Kineret)

Infection of the upper and lower respiratory tract with SARS-COV-2 can cause a mild or extremely severe respiratory syndrome with the release of inflammatory cytokines such as IL-1. Binding of SARS-COV-2 to the TLR induces the releases of pro-IL-1 which is cleaved by caspase-1, accompanied by activation of inflammasome and production of active mature IL-1 development which is a mediator of lung inflammation, fever, and fibrosis. It has been shown that the suppression of pro-inflammatory members of the IL-1 family has a therapeutic impact in many inflammatory diseases, including viral infections (Conti et al., 2020b).

Repression of IL-1 has been shown to help many inflammatory diseases, including RA (Fang et al., 2020). It is well known that overexpression of IL-1 is considered to be characteristic of SARS-CoV infection, likely by activation of the transcription factor nuclear factor, activator protein 1, and activating factor 2.

The approved anakinra which treats CAPS (cryopyrin-associated periodic syndrome), RA, and still's a disease, represses the IL-1 biological activity by binding to the IL-1 type 1 receptor (Fig. 1C), expressed in a wide range of tissues and organs (Kaiser et al., 2012). Another target for ankinara is neutrophil extracellular traps (NETs), which are formed to destroy the virus by active neutrophils. NETs are considered one of the risk factors in COVID-19 mediated CS to induce coagulopathy (Barnes et al., 2020). Anakinra has two characteristics that make it the drug of choice for tackling COVID-19 related CS: first, it rarely produces opportunistic bacterial infection; second, it has a short half-life (3 h) this allows for the prompt stoppage and clearing from the blood (Cavalli and Dinarello, 2015; Rajasekaran et al., 2014; Fleischmann et al., 2006). NCT04324021 emphasizes the utilization of the anakinra with emapalumab in COVID-19. Table 1 indicates more findings of studies on the use of this medication in COVID-19 patients.

To sum up, the IL-1 has a critical role in causing ARDS and CS which secondary to SARS-CoV-2 infection, so its inhibition by anakinra may yield a promising result. However, the safety profile is proven by some researchers but because of the small sample size we cannot guarantee its safety; the conduction of a study with a large sample size is recommended.

6.8. Other miscellaneous agents

6.8.1. Thymosin

There are several immune modulators and drugs which can be tested and used to treat COVID 19. Among them is thymosin, which is a polypeptide hormone secreted by thymus cells, it has different forms, among them the α1 and β4 are chemically synthesized. It plays a vital role in immune stimulation and homeostasis and has been used in the treatment of different immunodeficiency diseases and cancer (Low and Goldstein, 1984). Thymosin’ broad action as an immunomodulator (via direct interaction with TLRs on DCs), activating different subsets of T-cells (CTL, Th, and Treg), inducing NK cell activity and many others (Pica et al., 2018) (Fig. 1C). Among the different immune actions, thymosin reduces effectively the proinflammatory CS phenomenon, suggesting it as a promising therapeutic candidate for targeting SARS-COV-19. The immunological picture of COVID-19 patients may determine the relevance of such treatment, whether they are lymphocytopenic and have massive inflammatory responses (Table 1).

On the other hand, methylprednisolone has been widely used during the current COVID‐19 epidemic and the side effect of corticoid‐induced death of thymocytes should be considered (Fauci, 1975). So, it is suggested to use thymosin α1 before methylprednisolone administration (Liu et al., 2020e).

Yet, no studies have been reported for the uses of thymosin to treat COVID 19, therefore we would like to highlight the importance of investigating its therapeutic action against COVID-19.

6.8.2. Fingolimod

Other immune modulators, such as a sphingosine-1-phosphate receptor (S1PR) inhibitor (fingolimod), have been already on a single clinical trial (NCT04280588) in China without any reported results yet. The fingolimod (used to treat multiple sclerosis) is an immune modulator that prevents the lymphocyte from migrating outside the lymph node (Fig. 1C). Such treatment can be combined with other treatments and should specify a specific type of patient who suffers from some immunological diseases (Stepanovska and Huwiler, 2019). Modulation of S1PR by fingolimod abrogates asthma by depresses bronchial contraction, changing DC function, and down-regulating the expression of cytokines (IL-6 and IL-8) (Idzko et al., 2006; Rahman et al., 2016).

By and large, fingolimod may improve the pulmonary edema in ARDS of COVID-19 cases which are produced by chemotaxis of inflammatory cells including lymphocyte. Its safety must be confirmed by clinical trials since fingolimod approved by FDA to treat relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS), it produces severe lymphopenia.

6.8.3. Pirfenidone

Pirfenidone (Esbriet), is an anti-inflammatory and anti-pulmonary fibrotic drug that targets IL-1β and IL-4 and has an anti-oxidant effect. The efficacy of such a drug should be evaluated against COVID-19, this is because most of the patients suffer from lung fibrosis as well as its anti-oxidant effect can be useful for reducing the recorded coagulation effect of the virus. Currently, there is a running clinical trial (NCT04282902) in China, where the drug is used in combination with other drugs aiming at reducing the rate of infection among different patients (Rosa and Santos, 2020).

To a great extent, applications of anti-fibrotic treatments are essential to mitigate pulmonary fibrosis which is secondary to SRAS-CoV-2 infection. When it is used, it will reduce pulmonary fibrosis in SARS-CoV-2 survivors, so it helps the recovery of the lung after viral infection.

6.8.4. CD24Fc

CD 24 extracellular domain-IgG1 Fc domain recombinant fusion protein (CD24Fc) is composed of heat-stable mucins like CD24 and Fc portion of IgG1 which are linked commercially. The former is a receptor on hematopoietic cell (B, T lymphocyte and macrophage, DC) and non-hematopoietic cell (neuronal cell), has a role in hematopoietic and neuronal differentiation; it is also an immune check inhibitor has a role in cancer and autoimmune disease (Toubai et al., 2014). Its anti-inflammatory effects belong to two actions: first, it prevents binding DAMP to PRR (e.g TLR), and second, by interacting with sigelcs G/10 forms a complex that blocks the signal transduction pathway of TLR (Chen et al., 2009). By these two functions, the CD24Fc can prevent the formation of NF-KB and pro-inflammatory cytokines compromising IL-6 and IL-1(223) (Fig. 1B).

CD24Fc, an immune checkpoint inhibitor, is commercially prepared and it is in clinical trials to treat many disorders such as RA, multiple sclerosis, and GVHD. Phase Ⅱ of clinical trials of CD24Fc was recently started to be given to leukemia patients after bone marrow transplantation to prevent GVHD. NCT04317040 is the clinical trial for using CD24Fc as supportive care to treat COVD-19 patients.

6.8.5. Tranilast

Tranilast, a tryptophan like molecule, acts as anti-histamine and anti-inflammatory effects through many mechanisms (Darakhshan and Pour, 2015): it blocks the release of histamine from mast cells (Azuma et al., 1976), it blocks the formation of inflammatory prostaglandins via inhibiting COX2 in fibroblasts and macrophages (Inone et al., 1997; Pae et al., 2008) and it decreases the release of IL-6 from endothelial cells (Spiecker et al., 2002). It is a potent inhibitor of NLRP3 which is an inflammasome that drives inflammation in many disorders including bronchial asthma (Huang et al., 2018) (Fig. 1B). Tranilast represses fibrosis by inhibition of fibroblast activity (Isaji et al., 1987) and collagen formation via reducing the activity of TGF-β (Suzawa et al., 1992). It has been proved that it mitigates the pulmonary fibrosis in experimental animals (Mori et al., 1995).

Because of anti-inflammatory and anti-fibrotic properties, it is believed to be useful to tackle the COVID-19, for this purpose clinical trial “ChiCTR2000030002” claims to use tranilast in SARS-CoV2 driven inflammation.

6.8.6. Cytokine based therapy

Cytokines are a group of glycoproteins that control many physiological hemostasis in the body comprising inflammation, hematopoiesis, and tissue remodeling and repair, but those which connect function between two arms of the immune system (non-specific and specific) are the most importance (Abbas et al., 2018).

Interleukin-2 (IL-2) plays a central role among cytokines since it has pleiotropic roles including the proliferation of T lymphocyte, enhances the production of the memory cell, and controls the polarity of Th to Th1 (Abbas et al., 2018). Its anti-inflammatory propriety is due to the expansion and stabilization of Treg cell that induces immunological tolerance which is very important in decreasing the inflammation in post-viral infection (Wang et al., 2016) (Fig. 1C). Its antiviral activity belongs to its ability to expand viricidal immune cells (CTL and NK) (Blattman et al., 2003) and stimulate the formation of a memory cell for CTL (Bachmann et al., 2007). One of the major obstacles that we face in the administration of IL-2 is short half-life and it is degraded shortly after being administrated so it must be given with monoclonal antibody (JES6-1) which attaches to IL-2 in the body and thus its destruction is prevented (Wang et al., 2016). If it is given at a low dose, it can control persistent viral infection (Molloy et al., 2009) via the formation of the memory cell of CTL (Kahan et al., 2015). In chronically infected mice, administrated IL-2 can increase expression of CD 44 and CD 127 in CTL memory cell; it can eradicate the virus (West et al., 2013).” ChiCTR2000030167” is the ongoing clinical trial that aims to use IL-2 to strengthen CTL against SARS-CoV2 and control inflammation.

GM-CSF is a hematopoietic growth factor that stimulates the production of macrophages at low doses then followed by granulocytes by increasing the dose. It is also an immune-modulator (Shi et al., 2006). The therapeutic recombinant rh-GM-CSF can be given to the disease in which the leukopenia is common to prevent secondary bacterial infection (Andrade et al., 1990). It stimulates the ability of macrophages to kill parasites (Weiser et al., 1987). “ChiCTR2000030007“ titles the clinical trial aims to reverse leukopenia which sometimes occurs in post-SARS-CoV2 infection.

Viral macrophage-inflammatory protein (vMIP), a virus-based protein, is produced by HHV8 as an evading mechanism to protect itself from T cell inflammatory driving killing. Therapeutically, we can get benefit from it to control inflammation because it is a strong chemokine antagonism by inhibiting CXCR4 receptor (Lindow et al., 2003) (Table 1) (Fig. 1C). ChiCTR2000029636 is the identifier of a clinical trial that is going to be given in the inhalator form to COVID-19 to know its safety and efficacy.

6.8.7. Adoptive cell therapy

NK cell is one of the adoptive based cell therapies, which are given to COVID-19 patients. It is manufactured by Cellularity Company from the human placenta. The FDA permitted investigational new drug (IND) therapy to use allogeneic NK cell named CYNK-001 in COVID-19 patients since NK cell can combat SARS-CoV2 by many ways; it can kill the virus directly by granzyme and apoptosis receptor (Guidotti and Chisari, 2006), stimulates the activation of macrophage, triggers to shift polarity of Th to Th1 (Cook et al., 2015) thereby it can activate CTL that kills the virus. CYNK-001 can also induce the formation of the long-lasting memory cell and humoral response (Lam and Lanier, 2017). National Research Project for SARS (National Research Project for SARS BG, 2004) found the number of NK cells lower in SARS patients compared to control, so it is believed that the administration of CYNK-001 could be a beneficial treatment in COVID-19 patients. NCT04280224, ChiCTR2000030329, and NCT04324996 are examples of clinical trials on the administration of NK cell which are started or going to begin soon.

T cell immunotherapy is another cell-based therapy to fight SARS-CoV2, the virus that leads to COVID-19, it is manufactured by AlloVir conjointly with Baylor college of medicine to fight SARS-CoV1, MERS-CoV, and SARS-CoV2. This kind of therapy may find the key to treat COVID-19 since T cell deficiency are more common in these viral infections (AlloVir, 2020).

Pluristem (PLX) is an allogeneic mesenchymal-like stem cell that decreases CS by activation of Treg and M2 macrophages which decrease inflammation that accompanies COVID-19; PLX is now used by researchers in Israel for treatment of COVID-19 patients (Arena, 2020) (Table 1) (Fig. 1C).

6.8.8. Thalidomide

It is a glutamic acid derivative that was previously used as anti-histamine and sedative agent in many allergic conditions, nausea, and vomiting during pregnancy (NVP) in pregnant women since it caused many limb deformities in newborn infants, and was withdrawn from the market (Zhu et al., 2014a). Importantly, now it is introduced to the market to other indications compromising anti-cancer and anti-inflammatory agents because it is a good inhibitor of many pro-inflammatory cytokines including IL-6, IL-1β, and TNF-α (Zhou et al., 2013) (Table 1) (Fig. 1B).

It has previously been documented that the utilization of this drug combined with some antiviral drugs showed an excellent result to treat a severe case of H1N1 (Zhu et al., 2014b). It is also found that uses of this drug with corticosteroids (e.g. dexamethasone) were very beneficial to decrease NK/T cell in ECSIT V140A positive lymphoma (Wen et al., 2018). The immunomodulatory properties of thalidomide make it a suitable repurpose drug to use in COVD-19 patients, but it should not be used to treat female COVID-19 patients who are pregnant because of its teratogenic effects. There are two clinical trials regarding the utilize of thalidomide which is registered as NCT04273581 and NCT04273529.

6.8.9. Levamisole

One of the immune-modulator agents that act as an immune-stimulator in some conditions and immune-suppressor in other conditions depending on time and dose of administration, so it must be given with precautions (Zhang and Liu, 2020). It works on cellular immunity especially Th cell. It is proven that if it is administrated with ascorbic acid, it can reverse the Th to normal level in the treatment of measles (Joffe et al., 1983). For this reason, levamisole will be one of the candidate therapeutics to treat COVID-19 since lymphocytopenia is more common in this disease (Qin et al., 2020). It binds and deactivates papain-like protease (PLpr) which determines the virulence of SARS-CoV-1 (Niemeyer et al., 2018). The bioinformatics proved that any drug that inhibits PLpr, it can inhibit also SARS-CoV-2 replication (Wu et al., 2020b).

In concert, levamisole can boost the immune system to fight against the virus indirectly at one side; it may inhibit the SARS-CoV-2 replication via binding to PLpr at the other side. NCT04331470, NCT04383717, and NCT04360122 are the ongoing clinical trials to determine the efficacy of levamisole with other drugs to combat SARS-CoV-2 infection.

6.8.10. Cyclosporine A

This drug is mainly used in solid organ transplantation and some autoimmune diseases (Ziaei et al., 2016). It binds to cyclophilin A which is used as a receptor for nucleoprotein (NP) of SARS-CoV for virus assembly and release of a new virus (Luo et al., 2004). By this mechanism, it inhibits the spread of the virus from one cell to another and inhibits viral replication in SARS-CoV By inhibition of cyclophilin A (Fig. 1B), it can mediate immune-suppressive property through the prevention of the formation of IL-2 (Golan et al., 2017). It can also act as an inhibitor of cyclophilin D, through this mechanism it protects mitochondria from damage by inhibition of MPTP pore and restoring unfolded protein response (Yang et al., 2010) (Lebedev et al., 2016; Sanchez-Pernaute and Romero-Bueno, 2020). It may beneficial for the treatment of COVID-19 (Zhang and Liu, 2020; Saed Sayad, Sayad).

On the whole, cyclosporine A besides decreasing CS can rescue pneumocyte and cardiocyte from death via inhibition of MPTP pore and restoring UPR. We suggest strongly that utilization of this drug in the randomized preclinical trials to know its safety in COVID-19 patients since it has severe side effects when it is used in organ transplantation such as nephrotoxicity and bacterial infection. We also recommend low doses and in combination with antibiotics to overcome severe immunosuppressive properties and secondary bacterial infection that usually accompanies its usage. There are serious drug interactions between cyclosporine A and some antivirals (Vogel et al., 2004). For this reason, we suggest not to use protease inhibitor antivirals such as lopinavir and ritonavir in clinical trials to overcome delay viral clearance as side effects of cyclosporine A. NCT04412758, NCT04392531, 2020-002123-11 (HIUS-4-2020) and 2020-001262-11 (FJD-COVID19-20-01) are identifiers for clinical trials that use cyclosporine A as symptomatic treatment of SARS-CoV-2 infection.

6.8.11. Melatonin

It is a hormone, secreted by the pineal gland in the brain, with anti-inflammatory, antioxidant, and immune regulator properties. Inflammation causes acute lung injury and ARDS in COVID-19 patients (Qin et al., 2020); the inflammation is the product of engaging of virus products to TLR4 that leads to IL-6 that has a central role in driving inflammation, melatonin prevents binding virus products to TLR4 thereby control inflammation (Zhang et al., 2020c) (Fig. 1B). Inflammation enhances the production of oxidative stress that causes ALI; melatonin by decreasing free radical can control this damage (Wu et al., 2019) (Fig. 1C). Because of these properties, melatonin can be regarded as a potential supportive care treatment in COVID-19 (Zhang et al., 2020c).

Melatonin has antiviral properties against some viruses such as the Ebola virus that reduce the severity of infection (Anderson et al., 2015) but its effect on SARS-CoV-2 must be proved by the study. SARS-CoV-2 binds to ACE2 receptors on endothelium and cardiocyte causing cardiomyocyte damage, heart fibrosis, and endothelial dysfunction. Those cardiovascular complications caused by phosphorylation of STAT3 and JAK2 and increasing oxidative stress. It is believed that these abnormalities can be reversed by melatonin administration (Reiter et al., 2020). We suggest using a high dose of melatonin especially to elderly patients who have poor prognostic factors to the COVID-19. It is inexpensive, safe, and easily available. Therefore, it must be used for prophylaxis or treatment of COVID-19 cases either alone or in combination with other treatments.

6.8.12. BP1-002

BP1-002 is a CTLA-4 inhibitor which is an immune checkpoint thereby it can activate Th and CTL; the latter can kill the virus (Fig. 1C). It also acts as an adjuvant so that it can be given with the vaccine for enhancing the production of B lymphocyte memory cells against future viral infection (Kasunich and Cona, 2020). It is manufactured by Beyondspring Company in the USA and it is previously used for the treatment of colorectal cancer (Philippidis, 2020).

This treatment may provide benefits for COVID-19 patients since the CTLA-4 inhibitor enhances the virus-killing ability of CTL. BP1-002 is not free form side effects because it can also drive T lymphocyte hyper-activation and exacerbate inflammatory mediated lung damage.

6.8.13. Brilacicin

Brilacicin is defensin like molecule, defensin, in turn, can acts as antiviral, blocks virus entry, and stimulates APC to the site of infection (Park et al., 2018). It also binds to viral protein and thus prevents binding to their receptor in human cells. It is effective for blocking some virus including the influenza virus (Tenge et al., 2014) but it is not tested on any CoVs, it may work by binding to spike protein of SARS-CoV2 (Table 1) (Fig. 1B); it may also be used as an adjuvant with a vaccine for prophylaxis of COVID-19 but it beyond the scope of this review. However, the use of Brilacicin for the cure of COVID-19 is only a hypothesis as there are no clinical trials which prove an association of this drug with the disease.

6.8.14. Opaganib and RHB-107

Opaganib (Yeliva) and RHB-107 (upamostat) are selective sphingosine kinase (SK)-2 inhibitor and trypsin-like serine protease (S1 family) inhibitor respectively (Biospace2, 2020). Opaganib prevents the formation of SIP eventually it acts as an anti-inflammatory agent (Table 1) (Fig. 1B). RHB-107 blocks the attachment of the virus to the cell consequently it works as an antiviral agent (Biopharma, 2020) (Fig. 1B). They are used for many inflammatory-related conditions such as cancer and some gastrointestinal problems (Mittal, 2020).

In most of the cases the lung damage in COVID-19 is not due to the virus but it is related to a hyper-inflammatory response to the virus; because of the anti-inflammatory properties of Opaganib and antiviral properties of RHB-107, COVID-19 patients may get benefit from them. However, the use of Brilacicin, Opaganib and RHB-107 for the cure of COVID-19 is only a hypothesis as there are no clinical trials which prove an association of these drugs with the disease.

6.8.15. Auranofin

It is a gold salt; it was approved by the FDA since 1985 for the treatment of RA. It has anti-inflammatory properties due to its ability to inhibit phosphorylation of JAK-1 and STAT-3 which act as signal transduction of IL-6 (Kim et al., 2007) and via inhibition of COX enzyme that mediates the formation of inflammatory prostaglandin (Han et al., 2008) (Fig. 1B). It has anti-cancer and antiviral activity because of the capability of increasing oxidative stress through inhibition of thioredoxin reductase, induction ER stress, and activation of UPR thereby it kills cancer cell and viral infect cell (Fung and Liu, 2014c; Hetz, 2012). (Rothan et al., 2020) proved in his study that auranofin is very effective in decreasing the viral load of SARS-CoV-2 in Huh7 tissue culture cell by 70% and 85% after 24 and 48 h auranofin treatment, respectively. They also uncovered in their study that inflammatory cytokines (IL-6, TNF-α, and IL-1β) and NF-КB would also decrease in tissue culture after 24 and 48 h of auranofin treatment (Table 1).

Therefore, auranofin will provide “the light at the end of the tunnel” for treatment of ALI and inflammation in COVID-19 patients because it has anti-inflammatory, and antiviral properties.

6.8.16. Imatinib (Gleevec)

Imatinib, a TYK inhibitor of the JAK-TYK axis, is a medication based on inhibition of ABL kinase to the treatment of chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) and gastrointestinal stromal cancer. It affects cell migration by controlling actin polymerization. When translocation occurs between chromosome 9 and 22, ABL form chromosome 22 unites with BCR on chromosome forms BCR-ABL complex that has TYK activity leads to proliferation and migration of the cell in CML. Imatinib by blocking TYK activity is used for the treatment of this type of cancer (Weisberg et al., 2007) and eradication of CoVs since it also prevents the fusion of the envelope of the CoVs to the endosomal membrane (Coleman et al., 2016). (Dyall et al., 2014). The anti-coronal activity of Imanitib against MERS-CoV and SARS-CoV has been demonstrated. Imatinib has antiviral activity against coxsackievirus (Coyne and Bergelson, 2006), vaccinia virus (Newsome et al., 2006), and Ebola virus (Kouznetsova et al., 2014). One case report of COVID-19 patient was recorded to use imatinib (Table 1).

7. Conclusion

In conclusion, finding new vaccines and developing them to target the viruses is a hierarchic approach and also needs more time. However, it can be thought of as a backward approach by repurposing medications to control lung injury and commonly used immunotherapeutic drugs in controlling viral multiplication. If this approach is found to be convenient, then it can make a vast contribution to global viral security equity and global health. In this review, all the potential interventions for COVID‐19 infection have been summarized according to previous immunotherapeutic treatments of SARS, MERS, and other diseases. It has been found that the immunotherapeutic treatments are very significant to regulate host immune response against RNA viral infection. It is also revealed that clinical trials that have launched to investigate potential immunotherapeutic treatments for COVID-19 are also highlighted.

Declaration of competing interest

The author reports no conflicts of interest in this work.

Acknowledgment

The authors would like to acknowledge all researchers that have had a significant role in finding any piece of information on this pandemic.

Handling Editor: Dr. Jose Luis Domingo

References

  1. Abbas A.K., Lichtman A.H., Pillai S., Baker D.L., Baker A. 2018. Cellular and Molecular Immunology. [Google Scholar]
  2. Addi A.B., Lefort A., Hua X., Libert F., Communi D., Ledent C., et al. Modulation of murine dendritic cell function by adenine nucleotides and adenosine: involvement of the A2B receptor. Eur. J. Immunol. 2008;38(6):1610–1620. doi: 10.1002/eji.200737781. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Ahmadpoor P., Rostaing L. Why the immune system fails to mount an adaptive immune response to a COVID-19 infection. Transpl. Int. 2020;33(7):824–825. doi: 10.1111/tri.13611. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Ahn J.Y., Sohn Y., Lee S.H., Cho Y., Hyun J.H., Baek Y.J., et al. Use of convalescent plasma therapy in two COVID-19 patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome in Korea. J. Kor. Med. Sci. 2020;35(14) doi: 10.3346/jkms.2020.35.e149. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Ai T., Yang Z., Hou H., Zhan C., Chen C., Lv W., et al. Correlation of chest CT and RT-PCR testing in coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in China: a report of 1014 cases. Radiology. 2020:200642. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2020200642. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Al-Salama Z.T. Emapalumab: first global approval. Drugs. 2019;79(1):99–103. doi: 10.1007/s40265-018-1046-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. AlloVir . 2020. AlloVir Expands its Research Collaboration with Baylor College of Medicine to Discover and Develop Allogeneic, Off-The-Shelf, Virus-specific T-Cell Therapies for COVID-19.https://www.allovir.com/news-blog/allovir-expands-its-research-collaboration-with-baylor-college-of-medicine-to-discover-and-develop-allogeneic-off-the-shelf-virus-specific-t-cell-therapies-for-covid-19 [updated March 23, 2020]. Available from: [Google Scholar]
  8. Amici C., Di Coro A., Ciucci A., Chiappa L., Castilletti C., Martella V., et al. Indomethacin has a potent antiviral activity against SARS coronavirus. Antivir. Ther. 2006;11(8):1021. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Anderson G., Maes M., Markus R.P., Rodriguez M. Ebola virus: melatonin as a readily available treatment option. J. Med. Virol. 2015;87(4):537–543. doi: 10.1002/jmv.24130. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Andrade T.M., Carvalho E.M., Rocha H. Bacterial infections in patients with visceral leishmaniasis. J. Infect. Dis. 1990;162(6):1354–1359. doi: 10.1093/infdis/162.6.1354. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Aouba A., Baldolli A., Geffray L., Verdon R., Bergot E., Martin-Silva N., et al. Targeting the inflammatory cascade with anakinra in moderate to severe COVID-19 pneumonia: case series. Ann. Rheum. Dis. 2020 doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2020-217706. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Arena Pluristem begins dosing with Covid-19 therapy in Israel. 2020. https://www.clinicaltrialsarena.com/news/pluristem-covid-19-dosing-israel/ [updated 31 March 2020]. Available from:
  13. Azuma H., Banno K., Yoshimura T. Pharmacological properties of N‐(3′, 4′‐dimethoxycinnamoyl) anthranilic acid (N‐5′), a new anti‐atopic agent. Br. J. Pharmacol. 1976;58(4):483–488. doi: 10.1111/j.1476-5381.1976.tb08614.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Bachmann M.F., Wolint P., Walton S., Schwarz K., Oxenius A. Differential role of IL-2R signaling for CD8+ T cell responses in acute and chronic viral infections. Eur. J. Immunol. 2007;37(6):1502–1512. doi: 10.1002/eji.200637023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Bancos S., Bernard M.P., Topham D.J., Phipps R.P. Ibuprofen and other widely used non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs inhibit antibody production in human cells. Cell. Immunol. 2009;258(1):18–28. doi: 10.1016/j.cellimm.2009.03.007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Barnes B.J., Adrover J.M., Baxter-Stoltzfus A., Borczuk A., Cools-Lartigue J., Crawford J.M., et al. Targeting potential drivers of COVID-19: neutrophil extracellular traps. J. Exp. Med. 2020;217(6) doi: 10.1084/jem.20200652. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Baron S. 2001. Medical Microbiology. [Google Scholar]
  18. Benucci M., Giannasi G., Cecchini P., Gobbi F.L., Damiani A., Grossi V., et al. COVID‐19 pneumonia treated with Sarilumab: a clinical series of eight patients. J. Med. Virol. 2020 doi: 10.1002/jmv.26062. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Bester J., Matshailwe C., Pretorius E. Simultaneous presence of hypercoagulation and increased clot lysis time due to IL-1β, IL-6 and IL-8. Cytokine. 2018;110:237–242. doi: 10.1016/j.cyto.2018.01.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Bhatia M., Moochhala S. Role of inflammatory mediators in the pathophysiology of acute respiratory distress syndrome. J. Pathol. 2004;202(2):145–156. doi: 10.1002/path.1491. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Biopharma R. Develeopment pipeline: COVID-19 response 2020. https://www.redhillbio.com/covid19response Available from:
  22. Biospace2 RedHill Biopharma Announces Agreement with NIAID to Evaluate RHB-107 against COVID-19RedHill is pursuing both RHB-107 and opaganib as potential treatments for COVID-19. 2020. https://www.biospace.com/article/releases/redhill-biopharma-announces-agreement-with-niaid-to-evaluate-rhb-107-against-covid-19redhill-is-pursuing-both-rhb-107-and-opaganib-as-potential-treatments-for-covid-19/ [updated Apr 20, 2020]. Available from:
  23. Blattman J.N., Grayson J.M., Wherry E.J., Kaech S.M., Smith K.A., Ahmed R. Therapeutic use of IL-2 to enhance antiviral T-cell responses in vivo. Nat. Med. 2003;9(5):540–547. doi: 10.1038/nm866. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Bravo R., Parra V., Gatica D., Rodriguez A.E., Torrealba N., Paredes F., et al. Endoplasmic reticulum and the unfolded protein response: dynamics and metabolic integration. Int Rev Cell Mol Biol. 2013;301:215–290. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-12-407704-1.00005-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Broersen L.H., Pereira A.M., Jørgensen J.O.L., Dekkers O.M. Adrenal insufficiency in corticosteroids use: systematic review and meta-analysis. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2015;100(6):2171–2180. doi: 10.1210/jc.2015-1218. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Bronte V., Ugel S., Tinazzi E., Vella A., De Sanctis F., Canè S., et al. 2020. Baricitinib Restrains the Immune Dysregulation in COVID-19 Patients. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Caly L., Druce J.D., Catton M.G., Jans D.A., Wagstaff K.M. The FDA-approved Drug Ivermectin inhibits the replication of SARS-CoV-2 in vitro. Antivir. Res. 2020:104787. doi: 10.1016/j.antiviral.2020.104787. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Cantini F., Niccoli L., Matarrese D., Nicastri E., Stobbione P., Goletti D. Baricitinib therapy in COVID-19: a pilot study on safety and clinical impact. J. Infect. 2020;S0163–4453 doi: 10.1016/j.jinf.2020.04.017. (20)30228-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Cantini F., Niccoli L., Nannini C., Matarrese D., Natale M.E.D., Lotti P., et al. Beneficial impact of Baricitinib in COVID-19 moderate pneumonia; multicentre study. J. Infect. 2020;S0163–4453 doi: 10.1016/j.jinf.2020.06.052. (20)30433-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Cao B., Wang Y., Wen D., Liu W., Wang J., Fan G., et al. A trial of lopinavir–ritonavir in adults hospitalized with severe Covid-19. N. Engl. J. Med. 2020 doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2001282. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Cao Y., Wei J., Zou L., Jiang T., Wang G., Chen L., et al. Ruxolitinib in treatment of severe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19): a multicenter, single-blind, randomized controlled trial. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 2020;146(1):137–146. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2020.05.019. e3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Caporali R., Zavaglia D. Real-world experience with tofacitinib for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis. Clin. Exp. Rheumatol. 2019;37(3):485–495. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Carver C, Jones N. Are There Risk Factors and Preventative Interventions for Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS) in COVID-19? 2020.
  34. Casadevall A., Pirofski L-a. The convalescent sera option for containing COVID-19. J. Clin. Invest. 2020;130(4):1545–1548. doi: 10.1172/JCI138003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Casadevall A., Scharff M.D. Return to the past: the case for antibody-based therapies in infectious diseases. Clin. Infect. Dis. 1995;21(1):150–161. doi: 10.1093/clinids/21.1.150. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Catanzaro M., Fagiani F., Racchi M., Corsini E., Govoni S., Lanni C. Immune response in COVID-19: addressing a pharmacological challenge by targeting pathways triggered by SARS-CoV-2. Signal Transduction and Targeted Therapy. 2020;5(1):84. doi: 10.1038/s41392-020-0191-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Cavalli G., Dinarello C.A. Treating rheumatological diseases and co-morbidities with interleukin-1 blocking therapies. Rheumatology. 2015;54(12):2134–2144. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/kev269. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Cavalli G., De Luca G., Campochiaro C., Della-Torre E., Ripa M., Canetti D., et al. Interleukin-1 blockade with high-dose anakinra in patients with COVID-19, acute respiratory distress syndrome, and hyperinflammation: a retrospective cohort study. The Lancet Rheumatology. 2020;2(6):e325–e331. doi: 10.1016/S2665-9913(20)30127-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Chan J.F.-W., Kok K.-H., Zhu Z., Chu H., To K.K.-W., Yuan S., et al. Genomic characterization of the 2019 novel human-pathogenic coronavirus isolated from a patient with atypical pneumonia after visiting Wuhan. 2020;9(1):221–236. doi: 10.1080/22221751.2020.1719902. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Chang S.-C. Clinical findings, treatment and prognosis in patients with severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) J. Chin. Med. Assoc. 2005;68(3):106–107. doi: 10.1016/S1726-4901(09)70229-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Channappanavar R., Perlman S., editors. Seminars in Immunopathology. Springer; 2017. Pathogenic human coronavirus infections: causes and consequences of cytokine storm and immunopathology. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Channappanavar R., Perlman S. Pathogenic human coronavirus infections: causes and consequences of cytokine storm and immunopathology. Semin. Immunopathol. 2017;39(5):529–539. doi: 10.1007/s00281-017-0629-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Charles P., Elliott M.J., Davis D., Potter A., Kalden J.R., Antoni C., et al. Regulation of cytokines, cytokine inhibitors, and acute-phase proteins following anti-TNF-α therapy in rheumatoid arthritis. J. Immunol. 1999;163(3):1521–1528. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Chen G.-Y., Tang J., Zheng P., Liu Y. CD24 and Siglec-10 selectively repress tissue damage–induced immune responses. Science. 2009;323(5922):1722–1725. doi: 10.1126/science.1168988. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Chen I.Y., Chang S.C., Wu H.-Y., Yu T.-C., Wei W.-C., Lin S., et al. Upregulation of the chemokine (C-C motif) ligand 2 via a severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus spike-ACE2 signaling pathway. J. Virol. 2010;84(15):7703–7712. doi: 10.1128/JVI.02560-09. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Chen C., Zhang X., Ju Z., He W. Advances in the research of cytokine storm mechanism induced by Corona Virus Disease 2019 and the corresponding immunotherapies. Zhonghua shao shang za zhi= Zhonghua shaoshang zazhi= Chinese journal of burns. 2020;36:E005. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn501120-20200224-00088. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Chen L., Li X., Chen M., Feng Y., Xiong C. The ACE2 expression in human heart indicates new potential mechanism of heart injury among patients infected with SARS-CoV-2. Cardiovasc. Res. 2020;116(6):1097–1100. doi: 10.1093/cvr/cvaa078. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Chen C., Qi F., Shi K., Li Y., Li J., Chen Y., et al. 2020. Thalidomide Combined with Low-Dose Glucocorticoid in the Treatment of COVID-19 Pneumonia. [Google Scholar]
  49. Chiappelli F., Khakshooy A., Greenberg G. CoViD-19 immunopathology and immunotherapy. Bioinformation. 2020;16(3):219–222. doi: 10.6026/97320630016219. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Choi J., Cooper M.L., Alahmari B., Ritchey J., Collins L., Holt M., et al. Pharmacologic blockade of JAK1/JAK2 reduces GvHD and preserves the graft-versus-leukemia effect. PloS One. 2014;9(10) doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0109799. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. Cinatl J., Morgenstern B., Bauer G., Chandra P., Rabenau H., Doerr H. Treatment of SARS with human interferons. Lancet. 2003;362(9380):293–294. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(03)13973-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. Cinatl J., Jr., Hoever G., Morgenstern B., Preiser W., Vogel J.-U., Hofmann W.-K., et al. Infection of cultured intestinal epithelial cells with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus. Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences CMLS. 2004;61(16):2100–2112. doi: 10.1007/s00018-004-4222-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  53. Coleman C.M., Sisk J.M., Mingo R.M., Nelson E.A., White J.M., Frieman M.B. Abelson kinase inhibitors are potent inhibitors of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus and middle east respiratory syndrome coronavirus fusion. J. Virol. 2016;90(19):8924–8933. doi: 10.1128/JVI.01429-16. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  54. Conti P., Ronconi G., Caraffa A., Gallenga C., Ross R., Frydas I., et al. Induction of pro-inflammatory cytokines (IL-1 and IL-6) and lung inflammation by Coronavirus-19 (COVI-19 or SARS-CoV-2): anti-inflammatory strategies. J. Biol. Regul. Homeost. Agents. 2020;34(2):1. doi: 10.23812/CONTI-E. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  55. Conti P., Ronconi G., Caraffa A., Gallenga C., Ross R., Frydas I., et al. Induction of pro-inflammatory cytokines (IL-1 and IL-6) and lung inflammation by COVID-19: anti-inflammatory strategies. J. Biol. Regul. Homeost. Agents. 2020;34(2) doi: 10.23812/CONTI-E. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  56. Control CfD., Revision P.J. CDC 2019-novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV) real-time RT-PCR diagnostic panel. 2020;3:30. [Google Scholar]
  57. Cook K.D., Kline H.C., Whitmire J.K. NK cells inhibit humoral immunity by reducing the abundance of CD4+ T follicular helper cells during a chronic virus infection. J. Leukoc. Biol. 2015;98(2):153–162. doi: 10.1189/jlb.4HI1214-594R. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  58. Coomes E.A., Haghbayan H. Interleukin-6 in COVID-19: a systematic review and meta-analysis. medRxiv. 2020 doi: 10.1002/rmv.2141. 2020.03.30.20048058. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  59. Corral L., Bahamonde A., delas Revillas F.A., Gomez-Barquero J., Abadia-Otero J., Garcia-Ibarbia C., et al. medRxiv; 2020. GLUCOCOVID: A Controlled Trial of Methylprednisolone in Adults Hospitalized with COVID-19 Pneumonia. [Google Scholar]
  60. Coyne C.B., Bergelson J.M. Virus-induced Abl and Fyn kinase signals permit coxsackievirus entry through epithelial tight junctions. Cell. 2006;124(1):119–131. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2005.10.035. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  61. Cunningham A.C., Goh H.P., Koh D. Springer; 2020. Treatment of COVID-19: Old Tricks for New Challenges. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  62. CytoDyn . 2020. Treatment with CytoDyn's Leronlimab Indicates Significant Trend toward Immunological Restoration in Severely Ill COVID-19 Patients.https://www.cytodyn.com/newsroom/press-releases/detail/405/treatment-with-cytodyns-leronlimab-indicates-significant [updated 2-4-2020]. Available from: [Google Scholar]
  63. Dandekar A.A., Perlman S. Immunopathogenesis of coronavirus infections: implications for SARS. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 2005;5(12):917–927. doi: 10.1038/nri1732. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  64. Danesh A., Cameron C.M., León A.J., Ran L., Xu L., Fang Y., et al. Early gene expression events in ferrets in response to SARS coronavirus infection versus direct interferon-alpha2b stimulation. Virology. 2011;409(1):102–112. doi: 10.1016/j.virol.2010.10.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  65. Darakhshan S., Pour A.B. Tranilast: a review of its therapeutic applications. Pharmacol. Res. 2015;91:15–28. doi: 10.1016/j.phrs.2014.10.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  66. Dastan F., Nadji S.A., Saffaei A., Marjani M., Moniri A., Jamaati H., et al. Subcutaneous administration of Interferon beta-1a for COVID-19: a non-controlled prospective trial. Int. Immunopharm. 2020:106688. doi: 10.1016/j.intimp.2020.106688. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  67. Davies R., Choy E., editors. Seminars in Immunology. Elsevier; 2014. Clinical experience of IL-6 blockade in rheumatic diseases—implications on IL-6 biology and disease pathogenesis. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  68. Davis C.C., Shah K.S., Lechowicz M.J. Clinical development of siltuximab. Curr. Oncol. Rep. 2015;17(7):29. doi: 10.1007/s11912-015-0453-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  69. Davoudi-Monfared E., Rahmani H., Khalili H., Hajiabdolbaghi M., Salehi M., Abbasian L., et al. medRxiv; 2020. Efficacy and Safety of Interferon Beta-1a in Treatment of Severe COVID-19: A Randomized Clinical Trial. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  70. Day M. British Medical Journal Publishing Group; 2020. Covid-19: Ibuprofen Should Not Be Used for Managing Symptoms, Say Doctors and Scientists. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  71. Day M. British Medical Journal Publishing Group; 2020. Covid-19: European Drugs Agency to Review Safety of Ibuprofen. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  72. de Wit E., van Doremalen N., Falzarano D., Munster V.J. SARS and MERS: recent insights into emerging coronaviruses. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2016;14(8):523. doi: 10.1038/nrmicro.2016.81. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  73. Deeks E.D. Nivolumab: a review of its use in patients with malignant melanoma. Drugs. 2014;74(11):1233–1239. doi: 10.1007/s40265-014-0234-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  74. Diao B., Wang C., Tan Y., Chen X., Liu Y., Ning L., et al. Medrxiv; 2020. Reduction and Functional Exhaustion of T Cells in Patients with Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  75. Dimopoulos G., de Mast Q., Markou N., Theodorakopoulou M., Komnos A., Mouktaroudi M., et al. Favorable anakinra responses in severe COVID-19 patients with secondary hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis. Cell Host Microbe. 2020 doi: 10.1016/j.chom.2020.05.007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  76. Diurno F., Numis F.G., Porta G., Cirillo F., Maddaluno S., Ragozzino A., et al. Eculizumab treatment in patients with COVID-19: preliminary results from real life ASL Napoli 2 Nord experience. Eur. Rev. Med. Pharmacol. Sci. 2020;24(7):4040–4047. doi: 10.26355/eurrev_202004_20875. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  77. Dong L., Hu S., Gao J. Discovering drugs to treat coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) Drug discoveries & therapeutics. 2020;14(1):58–60. doi: 10.5582/ddt.2020.01012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  78. Duan K., Liu B., Li C., Zhang H., Yu T., Qu J., et al. Effectiveness of convalescent plasma therapy in severe COVID-19 patients. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. Unit. States Am. 2020 doi: 10.1073/pnas.2004168117. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  79. Duan K., Liu B., Li C., Zhang H., Yu T., Qu J., et al. medRxiv; 2020. The Feasibility of Convalescent Plasma Therapy in Severe COVID-19 Patients: a Pilot Study. [Google Scholar]
  80. Dyall J., Coleman C.M., Hart B.J., Venkataraman T., Holbrook M.R., Kindrachuk J., et al. Repurposing of clinically developed drugs for treatment of Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus infection. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2014;58(8):4885–4893. doi: 10.1128/AAC.03036-14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  81. Elli E.M., Baratè C., Mendicino F., Palandri F., Palumbo G.A. Mechanisms underlying the anti-inflammatory and immunosuppressive activity of ruxolitinib. Frontiers in Oncology. 2019;9:1186. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2019.01186. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  82. Ely E.W., Wheeler A.P., Thompson B.T., Ancukiewicz M., Steinberg K.P., Bernard G.R. Recovery rate and prognosis in older persons who develop acute lung injury and the acute respiratory distress syndrome. Ann. Intern. Med. 2002;136(1):25–36. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  83. EMA . 2017. Xeljanz, Summary of Product Information.https://www.ema.europa.eu/en/documents/product-information/xeljanz-epar-product-information_en.pdf Available from: [Google Scholar]
  84. EMA . 2020. EMA Advice on the Use of NSAIDs for Covid-19. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  85. Fang L., Karakiulakis G., Roth M. Are patients with hypertension and diabetes mellitus at increased risk for COVID-19 infection? The Lancet Respiratory Medicine. 2020 doi: 10.1016/S2213-2600(20)30116-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  86. Fauci A.S. Mechanisms of corticosteroid action on lymphocyte subpopulations. I. Redistribution of circulating T and b lymphocytes to the bone marrow. Immunology. 1975;28(4):669–680. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  87. Favalli E.G., Ingegnoli F., De Lucia O., Cincinelli G., Cimaz R., Caporali R. 2020. COVID-19 Infection and Rheumatoid Arthritis: Faraway, So Close! Autoimmunity Reviews; p. 102523. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  88. Ferrara N., Hillan K.J., Novotny W. Bevacizumab (Avastin), a humanized anti-VEGF monoclonal antibody for cancer therapy. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2005;333(2):328–335. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2005.05.132. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  89. Ferrario C.M., Jessup J., Chappell M.C., Averill D.B., Brosnihan K.B., Tallant E.A., et al. Effect of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibition and angiotensin II receptor blockers on cardiac angiotensin-converting enzyme 2. Circulation. 2005;111(20):2605–2610. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.104.510461. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  90. Fleischmann R.M., Tesser J., Schiff M.H., Schechtman J., Burmester G.R., Bennett R., et al. Safety of extended treatment with anakinra in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Ann. Rheum. Dis. 2006;65(8):1006–1012. doi: 10.1136/ard.2005.048371. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  91. Frieman M.B., Chen J., Morrison T.E., Whitmore A., Funkhouser W., Ward J.M., et al. SARS-CoV pathogenesis is regulated by a STAT1 dependent but a type I, II and III interferon receptor independent mechanism. PLoS Pathog. 2010;6(4) doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1000849. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  92. Frink M., van Griensven M., Kobbe P., Brin T., Zeckey C., Vaske B., et al. IL-6 predicts organ dysfunction and mortality in patients with multiple injuries. Scand. J. Trauma Resuscitation Emerg. Med. 2009;17(1):49. doi: 10.1186/1757-7241-17-49. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  93. Fu Y., Cheng Y., Wu Y. 2020. Understanding SARS-CoV-2-Mediated Inflammatory Responses: from Mechanisms to Potential Therapeutic Tools. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  94. Fung T.S., Liu D.X. Coronavirus infection, ER stress, apoptosis and innate immunity. Front. Microbiol. 2014;5(296) doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2014.00296. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  95. Fung T.S., Liu D. Coronavirus infection, ER stress, apoptosis and innate immunity. Front. Microbiol. 2014;5:296. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2014.00296. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  96. Fung T.S., Liu D.X. Coronavirus infection, ER stress, apoptosis and innate immunity. Front. Microbiol. 2014;5:296. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2014.00296. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  97. Genc M.R., Vardhana S., Delaney M.L., Onderdonk A., Tuomala R., Norwitz E., et al. Relationship between a toll-like receptor-4 gene polymorphism, bacterial vaginosis-related flora and vaginal cytokine responses in pregnant women. Eur. J. Obstet. Gynecol. Reprod. Biol. 2004;116(2):152–156. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2004.02.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  98. Gheblawi M., Wang K., Viveiros A., Nguyen Q., Zhong J.-C., Turner A.J., et al. Angiotensin-converting enzyme 2: SARS-CoV-2 receptor and regulator of the renin-angiotensin system. Circ. Res. 2020;126(10):1456–1474. doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.120.317015. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  99. Glass W.G., Lane T.E. Functional analysis of the CC chemokine receptor 5 (CCR5) on virus-specific CD8+ T cells following coronavirus infection of the central nervous system. Virology. 2003;312(2):407–414. doi: 10.1016/S0042-6822(03)00237-X. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  100. Golan DE, Armstrong EJ, Armstrong AW. Principles of Pharmacology : the Pathophysiologic Basis of Drug Therapy2017.
  101. Gong Y., Guan L., Jin Z., Chen S., Xiang G., Gao B. Effects of methylprednisolone use on viral genomic nucleic acid negative conversion and CT imaging lesion absorption in COVID‐19 patients under 50 years old. J. Med. Virol. 2020 doi: 10.1002/jmv.26052. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  102. Gralinski L.E., Sheahan T.P., Morrison T.E., Menachery V.D., Jensen K., Leist S.R., et al. Complement activation contributes to severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus pathogenesis. mBio. 2018;9(5) doi: 10.1128/mBio.01753-18. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  103. Gritti G., Raimondi F., Ripamonti D., Riva I., Landi F., Alborghetti L., et al. Use of siltuximab in patients with COVID-19 pneumonia requiring ventilatory support. MedRxiv. 2020 [Google Scholar]
  104. Gritti G., Raimondi F., Ripamonti D., Riva I., Landi F., Alborghetti L., et al. medRxiv; 2020. IL-6 Signalling Pathway Inactivation with Siltuximab in Patients with COVID-19 Respiratory Failure: an Observational Cohort Study. [Google Scholar]
  105. Gruber C. Nature Publishing Group; 2020. Impaired Interferon Signature in Severe COVID-19. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  106. Guidotti L.G., Chisari F.V. Immunobiology and pathogenesis of viral hepatitis. Annual review of pathology. 2006;1:23–61. doi: 10.1146/annurev.pathol.1.110304.100230. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  107. Guy J., Breslin J., Breuhaus B., Vivrette S., Smith L. Characterization of a coronavirus isolated from a diarrheic foal. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2001;38:4523–4526. doi: 10.1128/jcm.38.12.4523-4526.2000. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  108. Haagmans B.L., Kuiken T., Martina B.E., Fouchier R.A., Rimmelzwaan G.F., Van Amerongen G., et al. Pegylated interferon-α protects type 1 pneumocytes against SARS coronavirus infection in macaques. Nat. Med. 2004;10(3):290–293. doi: 10.1038/nm1001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  109. Han S., Kim K., Kim H., Kwon J., Lee Y.-H., Lee C.-K., et al. Auranofin inhibits overproduction of pro-inflammatory cytokines, cyclooxygenase expression and PGE 2 production in macrophages. Arch Pharm. Res. (Seoul) 2008;31(1):67–74. doi: 10.1007/s12272-008-1122-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  110. Hatterer E., Richard F., Malinge P., Sergé A., Startchick S., Kosco-Vilbois M., et al. P156 Investigating the novel mechanism of action for NI-0501, a human interferon gamma monoclonal antibody. Cytokine. 2012;59(3):570. [Google Scholar]
  111. Heine A., Held S.A.E., Daecke S.N., Wallner S., Yajnanarayana S.P., Kurts C., et al. The JAK-inhibitor ruxolitinib impairs dendritic cell function in vitro and in vivo. Blood. The Journal of the American Society of Hematology. 2013;122(7):1192–1202. doi: 10.1182/blood-2013-03-484642. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  112. Heinrich P.C., Castell J.V., Andus T. Interleukin-6 and the acute phase response. Biochem. J. 1990;265(3):621. doi: 10.1042/bj2650621. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  113. Heinz S., Haehnel V., Karaghiosoff M., Schwarzfischer L., Müller M., Krause S.W., et al. Species-specific regulation of Toll-like receptor 3 genes in men and mice. J. Biol. Chem. 2003;278(24):21502–21509. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M301476200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  114. Herichova I., Szantoova K.J.E.R. vol. 47. 2013. pp. 39–52. (Renin-angiotensin System: Upgrade of Recent Knowledge and Perspectives). 1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  115. Herold T., Jurinovic V., Arnreich C., Hellmuth J.C., von Bergwelt-Baildon M., Klein M., et al. Level of IL-6 predicts respiratory failure in hospitalized symptomatic COVID-19 patients. medRxiv. 2020 2020.04.01.20047381. [Google Scholar]
  116. Hetz C. The unfolded protein response: controlling cell fate decisions under ER stress and beyond. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2012;13(2):89–102. doi: 10.1038/nrm3270. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  117. Hoffmann M., Kleine-Weber H., Schroeder S., Krüger N., Herrler T., Erichsen S., et al. SARS-CoV-2 cell entry depends on ACE2 and TMPRSS2 and is blocked by a clinically proven protease inhibitor. Cell. 2020;181(2):271–280. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2020.02.052. e8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  118. holmes e. Initial genome release of novel coronavirus. 2020. http://virological.org/t/initial-genome-release-of-novel-coronavirus/319 [updated 14 January 2020]. Available from:
  119. Horby P., Lim W.S., Emberson J., Mafham M., Bell J., Linsell L., et al. 2020. Effect of Dexamethasone in Hospitalized Patients with COVID-19: Preliminary Report. 2020.06.22.20137273. [Google Scholar]
  120. Huang K.J., Su I.J., Theron M., Wu Y.C., Lai S.K., Liu C.C., et al. An interferon‐γ‐related cytokine storm in SARS patients. J. Med. Virol. 2005;75(2):185–194. doi: 10.1002/jmv.20255. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  121. Huang Y., Jiang H., Chen Y., Wang X., Yang Y., Tao J., et al. Tranilast directly targets NLRP3 to treat inflammasome‐driven diseases. EMBO Mol. Med. 2018;10(4) doi: 10.15252/emmm.201708689. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  122. Huang C., Wang Y., Li X., Ren L., Zhao J., Hu Y., et al. Clinical features of patients infected with 2019 novel coronavirus in Wuhan, China. Lancet. 2020;395(10223):497–506. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30183-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  123. Huet T., Beaussier H., Voisin O., Jouveshomme S., Dauriat G., Lazareth I., et al. Anakinra for severe forms of COVID-19: a cohort study. The Lancet Rheumatology. 2020 doi: 10.1016/S2665-9913(20)30164-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  124. Idzko M., Hammad H., Mv Nimwegen, Kool M., Müller T., Soullié T., et al. Local application of FTY720 to the lung abrogates experimental asthma by altering dendritic cell function. J. Clin. Invest. 2006;116(11):2935–2944. doi: 10.1172/JCI28295. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  125. Imai Y., Kuba K., Rao S., Huan Y., Guo F., Guan B., et al. Angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 protects from severe acute lung failure. Nature. 2005;436(7047):112–116. doi: 10.1038/nature03712. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  126. Inone H., Ohshima H., Kono H., Yamanaka M., Kubota T., Aihara M., et al. Suppressive effects of tranilast on the expression of inducible cyclooxygenase (COX2) in interleukin-1β-stimulated fibroblasts. Biochem. Pharmacol. 1997;53(12):1941–1944. doi: 10.1016/s0006-2952(97)00187-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  127. Irvani S.S.N., Golmohammadi M., Pourhoseingholi M.A., Shokouhi S., Darazam I.A. Effectiveness of Interferon Beta 1a, compared to Interferon Beta 1b and the usual therapeutic regimen to treat adults with moderate to severe COVID-19: structured summary of a study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials. 2020;21(1):1–3. doi: 10.1186/s13063-020-04382-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  128. Isaji M., Nakajoh M., Naito J. Selective inhibition of collagen accumulation by N-(3, 4-dimethoxycinnamoyl)anthranilic acid (N-5') in granulation tissue. Biochem. Pharmacol. 1987;36(4):469–474. doi: 10.1016/0006-2952(87)90353-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  129. Jiang Y., Zhao G., Song N., Li P., Chen Y., Guo Y., et al. Blockade of the C5a–C5aR axis alleviates lung damage in hDPP4-transgenic mice infected with MERS-CoV. Emerg. Microb. Infect. 2018;7(1):1–12. doi: 10.1038/s41426-018-0063-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  130. Joffe M., Sukha N., Rabson A. Lymphocyte subsets in measles. Depressed helper/inducer subpopulation reversed by in vitro treatment with levamisole and ascorbic acid. J. Clin. Invest. 1983;72(3):971–980. doi: 10.1172/JCI111069. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  131. Kahan S.M., Wherry E.J., Zajac A.J. T cell exhaustion during persistent viral infections. Virology. 2015;479–480:180–193. doi: 10.1016/j.virol.2014.12.033. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  132. Kaiser C., Knight A., Nordström D., Pettersson T., Fransson J., Florin-Robertsson E., et al. Injection-site reactions upon Kineret (anakinra) administration: experiences and explanations. Rheumatol. Int. 2012;32(2):295–299. doi: 10.1007/s00296-011-2096-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  133. Kaner R.J., Ladetto J.V., Singh R., Fukuda N., Matthay M.A., Crystal R.G. Lung overexpression of the vascular endothelial growth factor gene induces pulmonary edema. Am. J. Respir. Cell Mol. Biol. 2000;22(6):657–664. doi: 10.1165/ajrcmb.22.6.3779. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  134. Karadeniz H., Yamak B.A., Özger H.S., Sezenöz B., Tufan A., Emmi G. 2020. Successful Use of Anakinra in a Patient with COVID-19-Associated Pericarditis. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  135. Kasunich C., Cona R. 2020. BeyondSpring Files for Patent Protection on BPI-002 for the Treatment of Viral Infections Including COVID-19. [Google Scholar]
  136. Katzelnick L.C., Gresh L., Halloran M.E., Mercado J.C., Kuan G., Gordon A., et al. Antibody-dependent enhancement of severe dengue disease in humans. Science. 2017;358(6365):929–932. doi: 10.1126/science.aan6836. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  137. Kim N.H., Lee M.Y., Park S.J., Choi J.S., Oh M.K., Kim I.S. Auranofin blocks interleukin‐6 signalling by inhibiting phosphorylation of JAK1 and STAT3. Immunology. 2007;122(4):607–614. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2567.2007.02679.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  138. Kim D., Lee J.-Y., Yang J.-S., Kim J.W., Kim V.N., Chang H. The architecture of SARS-CoV-2 transcriptome. Cell. 2020;181(4):914–921. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2020.04.011. e10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  139. Koschmieder S, Jost E, Cornelissen C, Müller T, Schulze-Hagen M, Bickenbach J, et al. Favorable COVID-19 Course Despite Significant Comorbidities in a Ruxolitinib-Treated Patient with Primary Myelofibrosis.n/a(n/a). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  140. Koseler A., Sabırlı R., Gören T., Türkçüer İ., Kurt O. Endoplasmic reticulum stress markers in SARS-COV-2 infection and pneumonia: case-control study. Vivo. 2020;34 doi: 10.21873/invivo.11956. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  141. Kouhpayeh S., Shariati L., Boshtam M., Rahimmanesh I., Mirian M., Zeinalian M., et al. 2020. The Molecular Story of COVID-19; NAD+ Depletion Addresses All Questions in This Infection. [Google Scholar]
  142. Kouznetsova J., Sun W., Martínez-Romero C., Tawa G., Shinn P., Chen C.Z., et al. Identification of 53 compounds that block Ebola virus-like particle entry via a repurposing screen of approved drugs. Emerg. Microb. Infect. 2014;3(1):1–7. doi: 10.1038/emi.2014.88. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  143. Kulasekararaj AG, Lazana I, Large J, Posadas K, Eagleton H, Lord Villajin J, et al. Terminal Complement Inhibition Dampens the Inflammation during COVID-19.n/a(n/a). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  144. Kurd R., Ben-Chetrit E., Karameh H., Bar-Meir MJm . 2020. Compassionate Use of Opaganib for Patients with Severe COVID-19. [Google Scholar]
  145. La Rosée F., Bremer H.C., Gehrke I., Kehr A., Hochhaus A., Birndt S., et al. The Janus kinase 1/2 inhibitor ruxolitinib in COVID-19 with severe systemic hyperinflammation. Leukemia. 2020;34(7):1805–1815. doi: 10.1038/s41375-020-0891-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  146. Lam V.C., Lanier L.L. NK cells in host responses to viral infections. Curr. Opin. Immunol. 2017;44:43–51. doi: 10.1016/j.coi.2016.11.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  147. Lam T.T.-Y., Shum M.H.-H., Zhu H.-C., Tong Y.-G., Ni X.-B., Liao Y.-S., et al. Identification of 2019-nCoV related coronaviruses in Malayan pangolins in southern China. BioRxiv. 2020 doi: 10.1038/s41586-020-2169-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  148. Larkin J., Jin L., Farmen M., Venable D., Huang Y., Tan S.-L., et al. Synergistic antiviral activity of human interferon combinations in the hepatitis C virus replicon system. J. Interferon Cytokine Res. 2003;23(5):247–257. doi: 10.1089/107999003321829962. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  149. Lebedev I., Nemajerova A., Foda Z.H., Kornaj M., Tong M., Moll U.M., et al. A novel in vitro CypD-mediated p53 aggregation assay suggests a model for mitochondrial permeability transition by chaperone systems. J. Mol. Biol. 2016;428(20):4154–4167. doi: 10.1016/j.jmb.2016.08.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  150. Li G., De Clercq E. Nature Publishing Group; 2020. Therapeutic Options for the 2019 Novel Coronavirus (2019-nCoV) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  151. Li X., Geng M., Peng Y., Meng L., Lu S. Molecular immune pathogenesis and diagnosis of COVID-19. Journal of Pharmaceutical Analysis. 2020 doi: 10.1016/j.jpha.2020.03.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  152. Li Q., Guan X., Wu P., Wang X., Zhou L., Tong Y., et al. Early transmission dynamics in wuhan, China, of novel coronavirus-infected pneumonia. 2020;382(13):1199–1207. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2001316. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  153. Li L., Zhang W., Hu Y., Tong X., Zheng S., Yang J., et al. Effect of convalescent plasma therapy on time to clinical improvement in patients with severe and life-threatening COVID-19: a randomized clinical trial. Jama. 2020 doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.10044. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  154. Li S., Wang Y., Feng L., Jiang Z., Cong F., Chen Y., et al. 2020. Chemokine Receptor Inhibitor vMIP-II Promoting Lymphocytes in COVID-19 Patients and its Related Mechanism in Vitro. [Google Scholar]
  155. Liang Y., Wang M.-L., Chien C.-S., Yarmishyn A.A., Yang Y.-P., Lai W.-Y., et al. Highlight of immune pathogenic response and hematopathologic effect in SARS-CoV, MERS-CoV, and SARS-cov-2 infection. 2020;11(10223) doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2020.01022. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  156. Lindow M., Nansen A., Bartholdy C., Stryhn A., Hansen N.J.V., Boesen T.P., et al. The virus-encoded chemokine vMIP-II inhibits virus-induced Tc1-driven inflammation. J. Virol. 2003;77(13):7393–7400. doi: 10.1128/JVI.77.13.7393-7400.2003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  157. Liu D., Cardozo A.K., Darville M.I., Eizirik DcL. Double-stranded RNA cooperates with interferon-γ and IL-1β to induce both chemokine expression and nuclear factor-κB-dependent apoptosis in pancreatic β-cells: potential mechanisms for viral-induced insulitis and β-cell death in type 1 diabetes mellitus. Endocrinology. 2002;143(4):1225–1234. doi: 10.1210/endo.143.4.8737. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  158. Liu Z., Xiao X., Wei X., Li J., Yang J., Tan H., et al. Composition and divergence of coronavirus spike proteins and host ACE2 receptors predict potential intermediate hosts of SARS‐CoV‐2. J. Med. Virol. 2020;92(6):595–601. doi: 10.1002/jmv.25726. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  159. Liu C., Yang Y., Gao Y., Shen C., Ju B., Liu C., et al. bioRxiv; 2020. Viral Architecture of SARS-CoV-2 with Post-Fusion Spike Revealed by Cryo-EM. [Google Scholar]
  160. Liu R., Wang Y., Li J., Han H., Xia Z., Liu F., et al. Decreased T cell populations contribute to the increased severity of COVID-19. Clin. Chim. Acta. 2020;508:110–114. doi: 10.1016/j.cca.2020.05.019. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  161. Liu Y., Pang Y., Hu Z., Wu M., Wang C., Feng Z., et al. Thymosin alpha 1 (Tα1) reduces the mortality of severe COVID-19 by restoration of lymphocytopenia and reversion of exhausted T cells. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2020 doi: 10.1093/cid/ciaa630. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  162. Liu Y., Pan Y., Hu Z., Wu M., Wang C., Feng Z., et al. Thymosin alpha 1 reduces the mortality of severe coronavirus 2019 by restoration of lymphocytopenia and reversion of exhausted T cells. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2020 doi: 10.1093/cid/ciaa630. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  163. Liu J., Zheng X., Huang Y., Shan H., Huang J. Successful use of methylprednisolone for treating severe COVID-19. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 2020 doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2020.05.021. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  164. Lo Caputo S, Corso G, Clerici M, Santantonio TA. Baricitinib: A Chance to Treat COVID-19? 2020;n/a(n/a). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  165. Lokugamage K.G., Hage A., Schindewolf C., Rajsbaum R., Menachery V.D. SARS-CoV-2 sensitive to type I interferon pretreatment. BioRxiv. 2020 doi: 10.1128/JVI.01410-20. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  166. Lokugamage K.G., Hage A., Schindewolf C., Rajsbaum R., Menachery V.D. SARS-CoV-2 is sensitive to type I interferon pretreatment. BioRxiv. 2020 doi: 10.1128/JVI.01410-20. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  167. Low T., Goldstein A. Thymosins: structure, function and therapeutic applications. Thymus. 1984;6(1–2):27–42. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  168. Lu H. Drug treatment options for the 2019-new coronavirus (2019-nCoV) Bioscience trends. 2020;14(1):69–71. doi: 10.5582/bst.2020.01020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  169. Luo C., Luo H., Zheng S., Gui C., Yue L., Yu C., et al. Nucleocapsid protein of SARS coronavirus tightly binds to human cyclophilin A. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2004;321(3):557–565. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2004.07.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  170. Luo P., Liu Y., Qiu L., Liu X., Liu D., Li J. Tocilizumab treatment in COVID‐19: a single center experience. J. Med. Virol. 2020;92(7):814–818. doi: 10.1002/jmv.25801. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  171. Lythgoe M., Middleton P. Ongoing clinical trials for the management of the COVID-19 pandemic. Trends Pharmacol. Sci. 2020 doi: 10.1016/j.tips.2020.03.006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  172. Mastaglio S., Ruggeri A., Risitano A.M., Angelillo P., Yancopoulou D., Mastellos D.C., et al. The first case of COVID-19 treated with the complement C3 inhibitor AMY-101. Clin. Immunol. 2020;215:108450. doi: 10.1016/j.clim.2020.108450. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  173. McGonagle D., Sharif K., O'Regan A., Bridgewood C. Interleukin-6 use in COVID-19 pneumonia related macrophage activation syndrome. Autoimmun. Rev. 2020:102537. doi: 10.1016/j.autrev.2020.102537. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  174. McKeage K. Ravulizumab: first global approval. Drugs. 2019;79(3):347–352. doi: 10.1007/s40265-019-01068-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  175. McLornan D.P., Khan A.A., Harrison C.N. Immunological consequences of JAK inhibition: friend or foe? Current hematologic malignancy reports. 2015;10(4):370–379. doi: 10.1007/s11899-015-0284-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  176. Mehta P., McAuley D.F., Brown M., Sanchez E., Tattersall R.S., Manson J.J. COVID-19: consider cytokine storm syndromes and immunosuppression. Lancet. 2020 doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30628-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  177. Meng Z., Wang T., Li C., Chen X., Li L., Qin X., et al. An experimental trial of recombinant human interferon alpha nasal drops to prevent coronavirus disease 2019 in medical staff in an epidemic area. MedRxiv. 2020 doi: 10.2174/1568026621666210429083050. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  178. Meyer D.M., Jesson M.I., Li X., Elrick M.M., Funckes-Shippy C.L., Warner J.D., et al. Anti-inflammatory activity and neutrophil reductions mediated by the JAK1/JAK3 inhibitor, CP-690,550, in rat adjuvant-induced arthritis. J. Inflamm. 2010;7(1):41. doi: 10.1186/1476-9255-7-41. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  179. Milligan P.S., Amsden J., Norris S.A., Baker R.L., Myers J., Preston F., et al. 2020. Clinical Outcomes in a Cohort of Non-ventilated COVID-19 Patients with Progressive Hypoxemia and Hyper-Inflammatory Response Treated with Baricitinib. [Google Scholar]
  180. Mittal P. Mittal Global Clinical Trial Services; India: 2020. Coronavirus-where We Are? [Google Scholar]
  181. Molloy M.J., Zhang W., Usherwood E.J. Cutting edge: IL-2 immune complexes as a therapy for persistent virus infection. J. Immunol. 2009;182(8):4512–4515. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.0804175. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  182. Morales-Ortega A., Bernal-Bello D., Llarena-Barroso C., Frutos-Pérez B., Duarte-Millán M.Á., García de Viedma-García V., et al. Imatinib for COVID-19: a case report. Clin. Immunol. 2020;218:108518. doi: 10.1016/j.clim.2020.108518. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  183. Mori H., Tanaka H., Kawada K., Nagai H., Koda A. Suppressive effects of tranilast on pulmonary fibrosis and activation of alveolar macrophages in mice treated with bleomycin: role of alveolar macrophages in the fibrosis. Jpn. J. Pharmacol. 1995;67(4):279–289. doi: 10.1254/jjp.67.279. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  184. Mounach A., El Maghraoui A. Efficacy and safety of adalimumab in ankylosing spondylitis. Open Access Rheumatol. Res. Rev. 2014;6:83. doi: 10.2147/OARRR.S44550. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  185. Muntinghe F.L.H., Verduijn M., Zuurman M.W., Grootendorst D.C., Carrero J.J., Qureshi A.R., et al. CCR5 deletion protects against inflammation-associated mortality in dialysis patients. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 2009;20(7):1641–1649. doi: 10.1681/ASN.2008040432. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  186. Mysliwska J., Trzonkowski P., Szmit E., Brydak L.B., Machala M., Mysliwski A. Immunomodulating effect of influenza vaccination in the elderly differing in health status. Exp. Gerontol. 2004;39(10):1447–1458. doi: 10.1016/j.exger.2004.08.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  187. Nabirotchkin S., Peluffo A.E., Bouaziz J., Cohen D. 2020. Focusing on the Unfolded Protein Response and Autophagy Related Pathways to Reposition Common Approved Drugs against COVID-19. [Google Scholar]
  188. Nagata N., Iwata N., Hasegawa H., Fukushi S., Harashima A., Sato Y., et al. Mouse-passaged severe acute respiratory syndrome-associated coronavirus leads to lethal pulmonary edema and diffuse alveolar damage in adult but not young mice. Am. J. Pathol. 2008;172(6):1625–1637. doi: 10.2353/ajpath.2008.071060. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  189. National Research Project for SARS BG The involvement of natural killer cells in the pathogenesis of severe acute respiratory syndrome. Am. J. Clin. Pathol. 2004;121(4):507–511. doi: 10.1309/WPK7Y2XKNF4CBF3R. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  190. Navarro‐Millán I, Sattui SE, Lakhanpal A, Zisa D, Siegel CH, Crow MK. Use of anakinra to prevent mechanical ventilation in severe COVID‐19: a case series. Arthritis & Rheumatology. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  191. Newsome T.P., Weisswange I., Frischknecht F., Way M. Abl collaborates with Src family kinases to stimulate actin‐based motility of vaccinia virus. Cell Microbiol. 2006;8(2):233–241. doi: 10.1111/j.1462-5822.2005.00613.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  192. NIAID New images of novel coronavirus SARS-CoV-2. https://www.niaid.nih.gov/news-events/novel-coronavirus-sarscov2-images Now Available 2020 [updated February 13, 2020]. Available from:
  193. Nicastri E., Petrosillo N., Bartoli T.A., Lepore L., Mondi A., Palmieri F., et al. National institute for the infectious diseases "L. Spallanzani", IRCCS. Recommendations for COVID-19 clinical management. Infect. Dis. Rep. 2020;12(1):8543. doi: 10.4081/idr.2020.8543. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  194. NICE . The National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE); 2020. Acute Use of Non-steroidal Antiinflammatory Drugs (NSAIDs) for People with or at Risk of COVID-19 UK. [Google Scholar]
  195. Niemeyer D., Mösbauer K., Klein E.M. The papain-like protease determines a virulence trait that varies among members of the. SARS-coronavirus species. 2018;14(9) doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1007296. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  196. Niu P., Zhang S., Zhou P., Huang B., Deng Y., Qin K., et al. Ultrapotent human neutralizing antibody repertoires against Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus from a recovered patient. J. Infect. Dis. 2018;218(8):1249–1260. doi: 10.1093/infdis/jiy311. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  197. Organization W.H. World Health Organization; 2020. Clinical Management of Severe Acute Respiratory Infection when Novel Coronavirus ( nCoV) Infection Is Suspected: Interim Guidance, 25 January 2020. [Google Scholar]
  198. Pacha O., Sallman M.A., Evans S.E. COVID-19: a case for inhibiting IL-17? Nat. Rev. Immunol. 2020;20(6):345–346. doi: 10.1038/s41577-020-0328-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  199. Pae H.-O., Jeong S.-O., Koo B.S., Ha H.-Y., Lee K.-M., Chung H.-T. Tranilast, an orally active anti-allergic drug, up-regulates the anti-inflammatory heme oxygenase-1 expression but down-regulates the pro-inflammatory cyclooxygenase-2 and inducible nitric oxide synthase expression in RAW264. 7 macrophages. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2008;371(3):361–365. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2008.04.054. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  200. Paleolog E.M., Young S., Stark A.C., McCloskey R.V., Feldmann M., Maini R.N. Modulation of angiogenic vascular endothelial growth factor by tumor necrosis factor α and interleukin‐1 in rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum. 1998;41(7):1258–1265. doi: 10.1002/1529-0131(199807)41:7<1258::AID-ART17>3.0.CO;2-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  201. Pan L., Mu M., Yang P., Sun Y., Wang R., Yan J., et al. Clinical characteristics of COVID-19 patients with digestive symptoms in hubei, China: a descriptive, cross-sectional, multicenter study. Am. J. Gastroenterol. 2020;115(5):766–773. doi: 10.14309/ajg.0000000000000620. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  202. Paneru H.R. Intensive care units in the context of COVID-19 in Nepal: current status and need of the hour. Journal of Society of Anesthesiologists of Nepal. 2020;7(1):e291–e. [Google Scholar]
  203. Panés J., Gisbert J.P. Efficacy of tofacitinib treatment in ulcerative colitis. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2019;42(6):403–412. doi: 10.1016/j.gastrohep.2019.03.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  204. Park M.S., Kim J.I., Lee I., Park S., Bae J.-Y., Park M.-S. Towards the application of human defensins as antivirals. Biomol Ther (Seoul) 2018;26(3):242–254. doi: 10.4062/biomolther.2017.172. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  205. Patterson B.K., Seethamraju H., Dhody K., Corley M.J., Kazempour K., Lalezari J.P., et al. medRxiv; 2020. Disruption of the CCL5/RANTES-CCR5 Pathway Restores Immune Homeostasis and Reduces Plasma Viral Load in Critical COVID-19. [Google Scholar]
  206. Payandemehr P., Azhdarzadeh M., Bahrami-Motlagh H., Hadadi A., Najmeddin F., Shahmirzaei S., et al. Interferon beta-1a as a candidate for COVID-19 treatment; an open-label single-arm clinical trial. Advanced Journal of Emergency Medicine. 2020;4(2s):e51–e. [Google Scholar]
  207. Pedersen S.F., Ho Y.-C. SARS-CoV-2: a storm is raging. J. Clin. Invest. 2020;130(5) doi: 10.1172/JCI137647. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  208. Pereda R., Gonzalez D., Rivero H., Rivero J., Perez A., del Rosario Lopez L., et al. medRxiv; 2020. Therapeutic Effectiveness of Interferon-Alpha2b against COVID-19: the Cuban Experience. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  209. Philippidis A. COVID-19: top 60 Drug Treatments in Development: the biopharma industry is ramping up the development of dozens of potential drug therapies and clinical testing in an all-hands effort to combat the pandemic. Genetic Engineering & Biotechnology News. 2020;40(4):10–13. [Google Scholar]
  210. Pica F., Gaziano R., Casalinuovo I.A., Moroni G., Buè C., Limongi D., et al. Serum thymosin alpha 1 levels in normal and pathological conditions. Expet Opin. Biol. Ther. 2018;18(Suppl. 1):13–21. doi: 10.1080/14712598.2018.1474197. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  211. Pontali E., Volpi S., Antonucci G., Castellaneta M., Buzzi D., Tricerri F., et al. Safety and efficacy of early high-dose IV anakinra in severe COVID-19 lung disease. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 2020 doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2020.05.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  212. Prompetchara E., Ketloy C., Palaga T. Immune responses in COVID-19 and potential vaccines: lessons learned from SARS and MERS epidemic. Asian Pac. J. Allergy Immunol. 2020;38(1):1–9. doi: 10.12932/AP-200220-0772. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  213. Qin C., Zhou L., Hu Z., Zhang S., Yang S., Tao Y., et al. 2020. Dysregulation of Immune Response in Patients with COVID-19 in Wuhan, China. China. (February 17, 2020) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  214. Rabi F.A., Al Zoubi M.S., Kasasbeh G.A., Salameh D.M., Al-Nasser A.D. SARS-CoV-2 and coronavirus disease 2019: what we know so far. Pathogens. 2020;9(3):231. doi: 10.3390/pathogens9030231. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  215. Rahman M.M., Prünte L., Lebender L.F., Patel B.S., Gelissen I., Hansbro P.M., et al. The phosphorylated form of FTY720 activates PP2A, represses inflammation and is devoid of S1P agonism in A549 lung epithelial cells. Sci. Rep. 2016;6:37297. doi: 10.1038/srep37297. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  216. Rajasekaran S., Kruse K., Kovey K., Davis A.T., Hassan N.E., Ndika A.N., et al. Therapeutic role of anakinra, an interleukin-1 receptor antagonist, in the management of secondary hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis/sepsis/multiple organ dysfunction/macrophage activating syndrome in critically ill children. Pediatr. Crit. Care Med. 2014;15(5):401–408. doi: 10.1097/PCC.0000000000000078. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  217. Reghunathan R., Jayapal M., Hsu L.-Y., Chng H.-H., Tai D., Leung B.P., et al. Expression profile of immune response genes in patients with severe acute respiratory syndrome. BMC Immunol. 2005;6(1):2. doi: 10.1186/1471-2172-6-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  218. Reiter R.J., Abreu-Gonzalez P., Marik P.E., Dominguez-Rodriguez A. Therapeutic algorithm for use of melatonin in patients with COVID-19. Front. Med. 2020;7(226) doi: 10.3389/fmed.2020.00226. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  219. RELIS O., Midt-Norge R., Vest R., Nord-Norge R., Sør-Øst R. 2020. ACE-hämmare/ARB/glitazoner/NSAID Vid Covid-19. [Google Scholar]
  220. Rhen T., Cidlowski J.A. Antiinflammatory action of glucocorticoids — new mechanisms for old drugs. N. Engl. J. Med. 2005;353(16):1711–1723. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra050541. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  221. Richardson P., Griffin I., Tucker C., Smith D., Oechsle O., Phelan A., et al. Baricitinib as potential treatment for 2019-nCoV acute respiratory disease. Lancet. 2020;395(10223):e30–e31. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30304-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  222. Risitano A.M., Mastellos D.C., Huber-Lang M., Yancopoulou D., Garlanda C., Ciceri F., et al. Complement as a target in COVID-19? Nat. Rev. Immunol. 2020;20(6):343–344. doi: 10.1038/s41577-020-0320-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  223. Risser A., Donovan D., Heintzman J. Page TJAfp. NSAID prescribing precautions. 2009;80(12):1371–1378. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  224. Ron D., Walter P. Signal integration in the endoplasmic reticulum unfolded protein response. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2007;8(7):519–529. doi: 10.1038/nrm2199. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  225. Rosa S.G.V., Santos W.C. Clinical trials on drug repositioning for COVID-19 treatment. Rev. Panam. Salud Públic. 2020:44. doi: 10.26633/RPSP.2020.40. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  226. Roskoski R., Jr. Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors in the treatment of inflammatory and neoplastic diseases. Pharmacol. Res. 2016;111:784–803. doi: 10.1016/j.phrs.2016.07.038. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  227. Rothan H.A., Stone S., Natekar J., Kumari P., Arora K., Kumar M. The FDA-approved gold drug auranofin inhibits novel coronavirus (SARS-COV-2) replication and attenuates inflammation in human cells. Virology. 2020;547:7–11. doi: 10.1016/j.virol.2020.05.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  228. Rubin D. Pluristem reports preliminary data from its COVID-19 compassionate use program, treating seven patients with acute respiratory failure haifa, Israel. https://www.pluristem.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/04/PSTI-PR-Follow-up-on-Covid-19-treatments-FINAL-FOR-RELEASE.pdf April 7, 20202020 [updated 12 Apr, 2020]. Available from:
  229. Russell B., Moss C., George G., Santaolalla A., Cope A., Papa S., et al. Associations between immune-suppressive and stimulating drugs and novel COVID-19—a systematic review of current evidence. ecancermedicalscience. 2020;14 doi: 10.3332/ecancer.2020.1022. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  230. Russell C.D., Millar J.E., Baillie J.K. Clinical evidence does not support corticosteroid treatment for 2019-nCoV lung injury. Lancet. 2020;395(10223):473–475. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30317-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  231. Saber-Ayad M., Saleh M.A., Abu-Gharbieh E.J.P. The Rationale for Potential Pharmacotherapy of COVID-19. 2020;13(5):96. doi: 10.3390/ph13050096. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  232. Saed Sayad M, Sayad S. Cyclosporin A Is a Potential Inhibitor of SARS-CoV-2.
  233. Sah R., Rodriguez-Morales A.J., Jha R., Chu D.K.W., Gu H., Peiris M., et al. Complete genome sequence of a 2019 novel coronavirus (SARS-CoV-2) strain isolated in Nepal. Microbiology Resource Announcements. 2020;9(11) doi: 10.1128/MRA.00169-20. e00169-20. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  234. Sainz B., Jr., Mossel E.C., Peters C., Garry R.F. Interferon-beta and interferon-gamma synergistically inhibit the replication of severe acute respiratory syndrome-associated coronavirus (SARS-CoV) Virology. 2004;329(1):11–17. doi: 10.1016/j.virol.2004.08.011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  235. Salazar E, Perez KK, Ashraf M, Chen J, Castillo B, Christensen PA, et al. Treatment of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) patients with convalescent plasma. Am. J. Pathol. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  236. Salehi S., Abedi A., Balakrishnan S., Gholamrezanezhad A. Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19): a systematic review of imaging findings in 919 patients. Am. J. Roentgenol. 2020:1–7. doi: 10.2214/AJR.20.23034. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  237. Sallard E., Lescure F.-X., Yazdanpanah Y., Mentre F., Peiffer-Smadja N., for the C.D.F.S.C. Type 1 interferons as a potential treatment against COVID-19. Antivir. Res. 2020:104791. doi: 10.1016/j.antiviral.2020.104791. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  238. Samuel C.E. Antiviral actions of interferons. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 2001;14(4):778–809. doi: 10.1128/CMR.14.4.778-809.2001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  239. Sanchez-Pernaute O., Romero-Bueno F. Why choose cyclosporin A as first-line therapy in COVID-19 pneumonia. Reumatol. Clínica. 2020 doi: 10.1016/j.reuma.2020.03.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  240. Scagnolari C., Vicenzi E., Bellomi F., Stillitano M.G., Pinna D., Poli G., et al. Increased sensitivity of SARS-coronavirus to a combination of human type I and type II interferons. Antivir. Ther. 2004;9(6):1003–1011. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  241. Schwartz D.M., Kanno Y., Villarino A., Ward M., Gadina M., O'Shea J.J. JAK inhibition as a therapeutic strategy for immune and inflammatory diseases. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 2017;16(12):843–862. doi: 10.1038/nrd.2017.201. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  242. Seo S.H., Webster R.G. Tumor necrosis factor alpha exerts powerful anti-influenza virus effects in lung epithelial cells. J. Virol. 2002;76(3):1071–1076. doi: 10.1128/JVI.76.3.1071-1076.2002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  243. Shanmugaraj B., Siriwattananon K., Wangkanont K., Phoolcharoen W. Perspectives on monoclonal antibody therapy as potential therapeutic intervention for Coronavirus disease-19 (COVID-19) Asian Pac. J. Allergy Immunol. 2020;38(1):10–18. doi: 10.12932/AP-200220-0773. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  244. Sheahan T.P., Sims A.C., Leist S.R., Schäfer A., Won J., Brown A.J., et al. Comparative therapeutic efficacy of remdesivir and combination lopinavir, ritonavir, and interferon beta against MERS-CoV. Nat. Commun. 2020;11(1):1–14. doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-13940-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  245. Shen K.-L., Yang Y.-H. Springer; 2020. Diagnosis and Treatment of 2019 Novel Coronavirus Infection in Children: a Pressing Issue. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  246. Shen C., Wang Z., Zhao F., Yang Y., Li J., Yuan J., et al. Treatment of 5 critically ill patients with COVID-19 with convalescent plasma. Jama. 2020;323(16):1582–1589. doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.4783. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  247. Shereen M.A., Khan S., Kazmi A., Bashir N., Siddique R. COVID-19 infection: origin, transmission, and characteristics of human coronaviruses. J. Adv. Res. 2020;24:91–98. doi: 10.1016/j.jare.2020.03.005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  248. Shi Y., Liu C.H., Roberts A.I., Das J., Xu G., Ren G., et al. Granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) and T-cell responses: what we do and don't know. Cell Res. 2006;16(2):126–133. doi: 10.1038/sj.cr.7310017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  249. Shi Y., Wang Y., Shao C., Huang J., Gan J., Huang X., et al. COVID-19 infection: the perspectives on immune responses. Cell Death Differ. 2020;27(5):1451–1454. doi: 10.1038/s41418-020-0530-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  250. Shi Y., Tan M., Chen X., Liu Y., Huang J., Ou J., et al. medRxiv; China: 2020. Immunopathological Characteristics of Coronavirus Disease 2019 Cases in Guangzhou. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  251. Siddiqi H.K., Mehra M.R. COVID-19 illness in native and immunosuppressed states: a clinical-therapeutic staging proposal. J. Heart Lung Transplant. 2020 doi: 10.1016/j.healun.2020.03.012. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  252. Singanayagam A., Glanville N., Girkin J.L., Ching Y.M., Marcellini A., Porter J.D., et al. Corticosteroid suppression of antiviral immunity increases bacterial loads and mucus production in COPD exacerbations. Nat. Commun. 2018;9(1):2229. doi: 10.1038/s41467-018-04574-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  253. Singanayagam A., Glanville N., Girkin J.L., Ching Y.M., Marcellini A., Porter J.D., et al. Corticosteroid suppression of antiviral immunity increases bacterial loads and mucus production in COPD exacerbations. Nat. Commun. 2018;9(1):1–16. doi: 10.1038/s41467-018-04574-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  254. Song P., Li W., Xie J., Hou Y., You C. Cytokine storm induced by SARS-CoV-2. Clin. Chim. Acta. 2020;509:280–287. doi: 10.1016/j.cca.2020.06.017. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  255. Soy M., Keser G., Atagündüz P., Tabak F., Atagündüz I., Kayhan S. Cytokine storm in COVID-19: pathogenesis and overview of anti-inflammatory agents used in treatment. Clin. Rheumatol. 2020;39(7):2085–2094. doi: 10.1007/s10067-020-05190-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  256. Spiecker M., Lorenz I., Marx N., Darius H. Tranilast inhibits cytokine-induced nuclear factor κB activation in vascular endothelial cells. Mol. Pharmacol. 2002;62(4):856–863. doi: 10.1124/mol.62.4.856. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  257. springer Jaktinib - suzhou zelgen biopharmaceuticals. 2020. https://adisinsight.springer.com/drugs/800050559 Available from:
  258. Stanbury R.M., Graham E.M. Systemic corticosteroid therapy—side effects and their management. 1998;82(6):704–708. doi: 10.1136/bjo.82.6.704. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  259. Stebbing J., Phelan A., Griffin I., Tucker C., Oechsle O., Smith D., et al. COVID-19: combining antiviral and anti-inflammatory treatments. Lancet Infect. Dis. 2020 doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(20)30132-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  260. Stepanovska B., Huwiler A. Targeting the S1P receptor signaling pathways as a promising approach for treatment of autoimmune and inflammatory diseases. Pharmacol. Res. 2019 doi: 10.1016/j.phrs.2019.02.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  261. Stouthard J.M., Levi M., Hack C.E., Veenhof C.H., Romijn H.A., Sauerwein H.P., et al. Interleukin-6 stimulates coagulation, not fibrinolysis, in humans. Thromb. Haemostasis. 1996;76:738–742. 05. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  262. Stouthard J.M., Levi M., Hack C.E., Veenhof C.H., Romijn H.A., Sauerwein H.P., et al. Interleukin-6 stimulates coagulation, not fibrinolysis, in humans. Thromb. Haemostasis. 1996;76(5):738–742. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  263. Su S., Wong G., Shi W., Liu J., Lai A.C.K., Zhou J., et al. Epidemiology, genetic recombination, and pathogenesis of coronaviruses. Trends Microbiol. 2016;24(6):490–502. doi: 10.1016/j.tim.2016.03.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  264. Sun S., Zhao G., Liu C., Fan W., Zhou X., Zeng L., et al. Treatment with anti-C5a antibody improves the outcome of H7N9 virus infection in african green monkeys. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2014;60(4):586–595. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciu887. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  265. Suzawa H., Kikuchi S., Arai N., Koda A. The mechanism involved in the inhibitory action of tranilast on collagen biosynthesis of keloid fibroblasts. Jpn. J. Pharmacol. 1992;60(2):91–96. doi: 10.1254/jjp.60.91. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  266. Takahashi G., Andrews Dd, Lilly M.B., Singer J.W., Alderson M.R. 1993. Effect of Granulocyte-Macrophage Colony-Stimulating Factor and Interleukin-3 on Interleukin-8 Production by Human Neutrophils and Monocytes. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  267. Tanaka T., Narazaki M., Kishimoto T. IL-6 in inflammation, immunity, and disease. Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in biology. 2014;6(10):a016295. doi: 10.1101/cshperspect.a016295. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  268. Tanne J.H. Covid-19: FDA approves use of convalescent plasma to treat critically ill patients. British Medical Journal Publishing Group. 2020 doi: 10.1136/bmj.m1256. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  269. Tanne J.H. Covid-19: FDA approves use of convalescent plasma to treat critically ill patients. Bmj. 2020;368:m1256. doi: 10.1136/bmj.m1256. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  270. Teig N., Moses D., Gieseler S., Schauer U. Age‐related changes in human blood dendritic cell subpopulations. Scand. J. Immunol. 2002;55(5):453–457. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-3083.2002.01068.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  271. Tenge V.R., Gounder A.P., Wiens M.E., Lu W., Smith J.G. Delineation of interfaces on human alpha-defensins critical for human adenovirus and human papillomavirus inhibition. PLoS Pathog. 2014;10(9) doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1004360. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  272. Titanji B.K., Farley M.M., Mehta A., Connor-Schuler R., Moanna A., Cribbs S.K., et al. 2020. Use of Baricitinib in Patients with Moderate and Severe COVID-19. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  273. Tomazini B.M., Maia I.S., Bueno F.R., Silva M.V.A., Baldassare F.P., Costa E.L.V., et al. medRxiv; 2020. COVID-19-associated ARDS Treated with DEXamethasone (CoDEX): Study Design and Rationale for a Randomized Trial. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  274. Toniati P., Piva S., Cattalini M., Garrafa E., Regola F., Castelli F., et al. Tocilizumab for the treatment of severe COVID-19 pneumonia with hyperinflammatory syndrome and acute respiratory failure: a single center study of 100 patients in Brescia. Italy. Autoimmunity reviews. 2020:102568. doi: 10.1016/j.autrev.2020.102568. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  275. Toubai T., Hou G., Mathewson N., Liu C., Wang Y., Oravecz-Wilson K., et al. Siglec-G–CD24 axis controls the severity of graft-versus-host disease in mice. Blood, The Journal of the American Society of Hematology. 2014;123(22):3512–3523. doi: 10.1182/blood-2013-12-545335. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  276. Traggiai E., Becker S., Subbarao K., Kolesnikova L., Uematsu Y., Gismondo M.R., et al. An efficient method to make human monoclonal antibodies from memory B cells: potent neutralization of SARS coronavirus. Nat. Med. 2004;10(8):871–875. doi: 10.1038/nm1080. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  277. Tucker N. 2020. Leronlimab Continues to Improve Health in Patients with Novel Coronavirus USA. Available from: Leronlimab Continues to Improve Health in Patients with Novel Coronavirus. [Google Scholar]
  278. Turnell R., Clarke L., Burton A. Studies on the mechanism of corticosteroid-induced lymphocytolysis. Canc. Res. 1973;33(2):203–212. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  279. Tursi A., Angarano G., Monno L., Saracino A., Signorile F., Ricciardi A., et al. COVID-19 infection in Crohn's disease under treatment with adalimumab. Gut. 2020;69(7):1364–1365. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2020-321240. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  280. Valenti M., Facheris P., Pavia G., Gargiulo L., Borroni R.G., Costanzo A., et al. Non‐complicated evolution of COVID‐19 infection in a patient with psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis during treatment with adalimumab. Dermatol. Ther. 2020 doi: 10.1111/dth.13708. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  281. Van de Sandt C.E., Kreijtz J.H., Rimmelzwaan G.F. Evasion of influenza A viruses from innate and adaptive immune responses. Viruses. 2012;4(9):1438–1476. doi: 10.3390/v4091438. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  282. Van Erp E.A., Luytjes W., Ferwerda G., Van Kasteren P.B. Fc-mediated antibody effector functions during respiratory syncytial virus infection and disease. Front. Immunol. 2019;10 doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2019.00548. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  283. Van Griensven J., Edwards T., de Lamballerie X., Semple M.G., Gallian P., Baize S., et al. Evaluation of convalescent plasma for Ebola virus disease in Guinea. N. Engl. J. Med. 2016;374(1):33–42. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1511812. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  284. Verdecchia P., Cavallini C., Spanevello A., Angeli F. The pivotal link between ACE2 deficiency and SARS-CoV-2 infection. Eur. J. Intern. Med. 2020;76:14–20. doi: 10.1016/j.ejim.2020.04.037. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  285. Villar J., Ferrando C., Martinez D., Ambros A., Munoz T., Soler J.A., et al. Dexamethasone treatment for the acute respiratory distress syndrome: a multicentre, randomised controlled trial. The Lancet Respiratory medicine. 2020;8(3):267–276. doi: 10.1016/S2213-2600(19)30417-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  286. Vogel M., Voigt E., Michaelis H.-C., Sudhop T., Wolff M., Türler A., et al. Management of drug-to-drug interactions between cyclosporine A and the protease-inhibitor lopinavir/ritonavir in liver-transplanted HIV-infected patients. Liver Transplant. 2004;10(7):939–944. doi: 10.1002/lt.20165. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  287. Volk A.-L., Hu F.J., Berglund M.M., Nordling E., Strömberg P., Uhlen M., et al. Stratification of responders towards eculizumab using a structural epitope mapping strategy. Sci. Rep. 2016;6:31365. doi: 10.1038/srep31365. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  288. Wang H., Hou L., Kwak D., Fassett J., Xu X., Chen A., et al. Increasing regulatory T cells with interleukin-2 and interleukin-2 antibody complexes attenuates lung inflammation and heart failure progression. Hypertension. 2016;68(1):114–122. doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.116.07084. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  289. Wang D., Hu B., Hu C., Zhu F., Liu X., Zhang J., et al. Clinical characteristics of 138 hospitalized patients with 2019 novel coronavirus–infected pneumonia in Wuhan, China. Jama. 2020 doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.1585. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  290. Wang L., He W., Yu X., Hu D., Bao M., Liu H., et al. Coronavirus Disease 2019 in elderly patients: characteristics and prognostic factors based on 4-week follow-up. J. Infect. 2020 doi: 10.1016/j.jinf.2020.03.019. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  291. Wang Y., Jiang W., He Q., Wang C., Wang B., Zhou P., et al. medRxiv; China: 2020. Early, Low-Dose and Short-Term Application of Corticosteroid Treatment in Patients with Severe COVID-19 Pneumonia: Single-Center Experience from Wuhan. [Google Scholar]
  292. Wang Y., Jiang W., He Q., Wang C., Wang B., Zhou P., et al. A retrospective cohort study of methylprednisolone therapy in severe patients with COVID-19 pneumonia. Signal Transduction and Targeted Therapy. 2020;5(1):1–3. doi: 10.1038/s41392-020-0158-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  293. Wardlaw A. Leucocyte adhesion to endothelium. Clin. Exp. Allergy. 1990;20(6):619–626. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2222.1990.tb02700.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  294. Weisberg E., Manley P.W., Cowan-Jacob S.W., Hochhaus A., Griffin J.D. Second generation inhibitors of BCR-ABL for the treatment of imatinib-resistant chronic myeloid leukaemia. Nat. Rev. Canc. 2007;7(5):345–356. doi: 10.1038/nrc2126. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  295. Weiser W.Y., Van Niel A., Clark S.C., David J.R., Remold H.G. Recombinant human granulocyte/macrophage colony-stimulating factor activates intracellular killing of Leishmania donovani by human monocyte-derived macrophages. J. Exp. Med. 1987;166(5):1436–1446. doi: 10.1084/jem.166.5.1436. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  296. Wen H., Ma H., Cai Q., Lin S., Lei X., He B., et al. Recurrent ECSIT mutation encoding V140A triggers hyperinflammation and promotes hemophagocytic syndrome in extranodal NK/T cell lymphoma. 2018;24(2):154–164. doi: 10.1038/nm.4456. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  297. West E.E., Jin H.-T., Rasheed A.-U., Penaloza-MacMaster P., Ha S.-J., Tan W.G., et al. PD-L1 blockade synergizes with IL-2 therapy in reinvigorating exhausted T cells. J. Clin. Invest. 2013;123(6):2604–2615. doi: 10.1172/JCI67008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  298. WHO . 2013. WHO Guidelines for Investigation of Cases of Human Infection with Middle East Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus (MERS-CoV) [Google Scholar]
  299. WHO. COVID-19: Clinical Care, Corticosteroids for COVID-19. Living Guidance. 2 September 2020. WHO/2019-nCoV/Corticosteroids/2020.1.
  300. WHO . World Health Organization; 2020. Clinical Management of Severe Acute Respiratory Infection (SARI) when COVID-19 Disease Is Suspected: Interim Guidance, 13 March 2020. [Google Scholar]
  301. Willsher K.J.T.G. 2020. Anti-inflammatories May Aggravate Covid-19, France Advises. [Google Scholar]
  302. Wong L.-Y.R., Lui P.-Y., Jin D.-Y.J.V.S. A molecular arms race between host innate antiviral response and emerging human coronaviruses. 2016;31(1):12–23. doi: 10.1007/s12250-015-3683-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  303. Wu X., Ji H., Wang Y., Gu C., Gu W., Hu L., et al. Melatonin alleviates radiation-induced lung injury via regulation of miR-30e/NLRP3 Axis. Oxidative medicine and cellular longevity. 2019;2019 doi: 10.1155/2019/4087298. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  304. Wu R., Wang L., Kuo H.-C.D., Shannar A., Peter R., Chou P.J., et al. An update on current therapeutic drugs treating COVID-19. Curr Pharmacol Rep. 2020:1–15. doi: 10.1007/s40495-020-00216-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  305. Wu C., Liu Y., Yang Y., Zhang P., Zhong W., Wang Y., et al. Analysis of therapeutic targets for SARS-CoV-2 and discovery of potential drugs by computational methods. Acta Pharm. Sin. B. 2020;10(5):766–788. doi: 10.1016/j.apsb.2020.02.008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  306. Xanthoulea S., Pasparakis M., Kousteni S., Brakebusch C., Wallach D., Bauer J., et al. Tumor necrosis factor (TNF) receptor shedding controls thresholds of innate immune activation that balance opposing TNF functions in infectious and inflammatory diseases. J. Exp. Med. 2004;200(3):367–376. doi: 10.1084/jem.20040435. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  307. Xiong Y., Liu Y., Cao L., Wang D., Guo M., Jiang A., et al. Transcriptomic characteristics of bronchoalveolar lavage fluid and peripheral blood mononuclear cells in COVID-19 patients. Emerg. Microb. Infect. 2020;9(1):761–770. doi: 10.1080/22221751.2020.1747363. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  308. Xu Z., Shi L., Wang Y., Zhang J., Huang L., Zhang C., et al. Pathological findings of COVID-19 associated with acute respiratory distress syndrome. The Lancet respiratory medicine. 2020;8(4):420–422. doi: 10.1016/S2213-2600(20)30076-X. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  309. Xu X., Han M., Li T., Sun W., Wang D., Fu B., et al. Effective treatment of severe COVID-19 patients with Tocilizumab. China. 2020 doi: 10.1073/pnas.2005615117. 202003(00026):v1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  310. Yan L., Meng B., Xiang J., Wilson I.A., Yang B. Crystal structure of the post-fusion core of the human coronavirus 229E spike protein at 1.86 Å resolution. Acta Crystallogr. D: Struct. Biol. 2018;74(9):841–851. doi: 10.1107/S2059798318008318. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  311. Yang G., Hamacher J., Gorshkov B., White R., Sridhar S., Verin A., et al. The dual role of TNF in pulmonary edema. J. Cardiovasc. Dis. Res. 2010;1(1):29–36. doi: 10.4103/0975-3583.59983. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  312. Yarilina A., Xu K., Chan C., Ivashkiv L.B. Regulation of inflammatory responses in tumor necrosis factor-activated and rheumatoid arthritis synovial macrophages by JAK inhibitors. Arthritis Rheum. 2012;64(12):3856–3866. doi: 10.1002/art.37691. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  313. Ye Q., Wang B., Mao J. The pathogenesis and treatment of the 'Cytokine Storm' in COVID-19. J. Infect. 2020 doi: 10.1016/j.jinf.2020.03.037. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  314. Ye Q., Wang B., Mao J. Cytokine storm in COVID-19 and treatment. J. Infect. 2020:80. doi: 10.1016/j.jinf.2020.03.037. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  315. Ye Z., Wang Y., Colunga-Lozano L.E., Prasad M., Tangamornsuksan W., Rochwerg B., et al. Efficacy and safety of corticosteroids in COVID-19 based on evidence for COVID-19, other coronavirus infections, influenza, community-acquired pneumonia and acute respiratory distress syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis. CMAJ (Can. Med. Assoc. J.) 2020 doi: 10.1503/cmaj.200645. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  316. Ye M., Fu D., Ren Y., Wang F., Wang D., Zhang F., et al. Treatment with convalescent plasma for COVID‐19 patients in Wuhan, China. J. Med. Virol. 2020 doi: 10.1002/jmv.25882. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  317. Yi Y., Lagniton P.N.P., Ye S., Li E., Xu R.-H. COVID-19: what has been learned and to be learned about the novel coronavirus disease. Int. J. Biol. Sci. 2020;16(10):1753–1766. doi: 10.7150/ijbs.45134. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  318. Zeng F., Chen X., Deng G. Convalescent plasma for patients with COVID-19. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. Unit. States Am. 2020;117(23):12528. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2006961117. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  319. Zeng Q.-L., Yu Z.-J., Gou J.-J., Li G.-M., Ma S.-H., Zhang G.-F., et al. Effect of convalescent plasma therapy on viral shedding and survival in patients with coronavirus disease 2019. J. Infect. Dis. 2020;222(1):38–43. doi: 10.1093/infdis/jiaa228. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  320. Zha L., Li S., Pan L., Tefsen B., Li Y., French N., et al. mja; 2020. Corticosteroid Treatment of Patients with Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID‐19) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  321. Zhang L., Liu Y. Potential interventions for novel coronavirus in China: a systematic review. J. Med. Virol. 2020;92(5):479–490. doi: 10.1002/jmv.25707. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  322. Zhang X.-N., Liu J.-X., Hu Y.-W., Chen H., Yuan Z.-H. Hyper-activated IRF-1 and STAT1 contribute to enhanced Interferon stimulated gene (ISG) expression by Interferon α and γ co-treatment in human hepatoma cells. Biochim. Biophys. Acta Gene Struct. Expr. 2006;1759(8–9):417–425. doi: 10.1016/j.bbaexp.2006.08.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  323. Zhang W., Zhao Y., Zhang F., Wang Q., Li T., Liu Z., et al. The use of anti-inflammatory drugs in the treatment of people with severe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19): the Perspectives of clinical immunologists from China. Clin. Immunol. 2020;214:108393. doi: 10.1016/j.clim.2020.108393. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  324. Zhang W., Zhao Y., Zhang F., Wang Q., Li T., Liu Z., et al. The use of anti-inflammatory drugs in the treatment of people with severe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19): the Perspectives of clinical immunologists from China. Clin. Immunol. 2020;214:108393. doi: 10.1016/j.clim.2020.108393. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  325. Zhang R., Wang X., Ni L., Di X., Ma B., Niu S., et al. COVID-19: melatonin as a potential adjuvant treatment. Life Sci. 2020;250:117583. doi: 10.1016/j.lfs.2020.117583. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  326. Zhang X., Song K., Tong F., Fei M., Guo H., Lu Z., et al. First case of COVID-19 in a patient with multiple myeloma successfully treated with tocilizumab. Blood advances. 2020;4(7):1307. doi: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2020001907. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  327. Zhang L., Pang R., Xue X., Bao J., Ye S., Dai Y., et al. Anti-SARS-CoV-2 virus antibody levels in convalescent plasma of six donors who have recovered from COVID-19. Aging (Albany NY) 2020;12(8):6536. doi: 10.18632/aging.103102. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  328. Zhang B., Liu S., Tan T., Huang W., Dong Y., Chen L., et al. Treatment with convalescent plasma for critically ill patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection. Chest. 2020 doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2020.03.039. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  329. Zhou S., Wang F., Hsieh T.-C., Wu J M., Wu E. Thalidomide–a notorious sedative to a wonder anticancer drug. Curr. Med. Chem. 2013;20(33):4102–4108. doi: 10.2174/09298673113209990198. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  330. Zhou Q., Wei X.-S., Xiang X., Wang X., Wang Z.-H., Chen V., et al. MedRxiv; 2020. Interferon-a2b Treatment for COVID-19. [Google Scholar]
  331. Zhu H., Shi X., Ju D., Huang H., Wei W., Dong X. Anti-inflammatory effect of thalidomide on H1N1 influenza virus-induced pulmonary injury in mice. Inflammation. 2014;37(6):2091–2098. doi: 10.1007/s10753-014-9943-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  332. Zhu H., Shi X., Ju D., Huang H., Wei W., Dong X. Anti-inflammatory effect of thalidomide on H1N1 influenza virus-induced pulmonary injury in mice. Inflammation. 2014;37(6):2091–2098. doi: 10.1007/s10753-014-9943-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  333. Ziaei M., Ziaei F., Manzouri B. Systemic cyclosporine and corneal transplantation. Int. Ophthalmol. 2016;36(1):139–146. doi: 10.1007/s10792-015-0137-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  334. Zídek Z., Anzenbacher P., Kmonícková E. Current status and challenges of cytokine pharmacology. Br. J. Pharmacol. 2009;157(3):342–361. doi: 10.1111/j.1476-5381.2009.00206.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  335. Zimmerman J.L., Dellinger R.P., Straube R.C., Levin J.L. Phase I trial of the recombinant soluble complement receptor 1 in acute lung injury and acute respiratory distress syndrome. Crit. Care Med. 2000;28(9):3149–3154. doi: 10.1097/00003246-200009000-00004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  336. Zoumbos N.C., Gascon P., Djeu J.Y., Young N.S. Interferon is a mediator of hematopoietic suppression in aplastic anemia in vitro and possibly in vivo. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. Unit. States Am. 1985;82(1):188–192. doi: 10.1073/pnas.82.1.188. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Food and Chemical Toxicology are provided here courtesy of Elsevier

RESOURCES