Skip to main content
PMC home page
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2022 Jun 1.
Published in final edited form as: Eat Weight Disord. 2020 Jun 26:10.1007/s40519-020-00947-y. doi: 10.1007/s40519-020-00947-y

Differences in Severity of Eating Disorder Symptoms between Adults with Depression and Adults with Anxiety

Roni Elran-Barak 1, Andrea B Goldschmidt 2
PMCID: PMC7906044  NIHMSID: NIHMS1672444  PMID: 32592138

Abstract

Objectives:

Anxiety and depression are both considered maintaining factors for eating disorders (ED) but it is still unclear if one is more strongly associated with ED symptoms than the other. We examined differences in severity of ED symptoms among adults with either, both, or neither depression and anxiety.

Methods:

Volunteers (N=3,780) to the project implicit mental health website (https://implicit.harvard.edu/) self-reported their ED status (current ED: n=374, past ED: n=436; no ED: n = 2,970), their current depression/anxiety status, and their ED symptoms (using the Eating Attitudes Test). ANOVA with post-hoc comparisons were used to examine relationships between ED symptoms and comorbid depression/anxiety status among currently ill, recovered, and never ill individuals.

Results:

Participants without comorbidities had the least and participants with both comorbidities had the most severe ED symptoms (p=.021). Participants with anxiety alone had more severe ED symptoms relative to those with depression alone across groups (current ED: p=.024; past ED: p=.019; no EDs: p=.021).

Discussion:

These findings demonstrate, in contrast with an earlier study among youth with EDs (Hughes et al, 2013), that comorbid anxiety may be linked with more severe ED symptoms relative to comorbid depression. It is possible that anxiety serves as a maintaining factor for ED symptoms such that dieting and other ED-related behaviors may function to modulate symptoms of anxiety.

Keywords: Eating Disorders, Depression, Anxiety, Comorbidity

INTRODUCTION

Eating disorders (EDs) are complex psychiatric conditions that are often chronic and disabling (Hoek, 2016; Udo & Grilo, 2019). Clinical and community studies report that the majority of individuals with EDs suffer from at least one psychiatric comorbidity (Ulfvebrand et al., 2015) that may precede the onset of the ED, occur concurrently with the ED, and/or persist after recovery from the ED (CYNTHIA M Bulik, 2002). Rates of specific comorbid psychiatric conditions vary significantly across studies (Blinder et al., 2006; Swanson et al., 2011), but evidence suggests that mood and anxiety disorders are the most common psychiatric comorbidities among patients with EDs (Hughes et al., 2013), with up to two-thirds of female inpatients diagnosed with an anxiety disorder and up to 90% diagnosed with major depressive disorder (Blinder et al., 2006). Despite these high rates, research studies investigating the presentation of ED symptoms among individuals with EDs and mood disorders only versus anxiety disorders only are scarce.

It is critical to understand how ED vary according to the presence of anxiety symptoms, depression symptoms, or both for several reasons (Goel et al., 2020). First, given that comorbidity is associated with chronicity and increased likelihood of dropout from treatment (Fassino et al., 2009), identification of the links between ED symptoms and comorbidity status may inform treatment planning, for example, in order to tailor specific interventions for patients with ED and anxiety versus ED and depression. Second, there is a considerable overlap between symptoms of ED and symptoms of depression (e.g., changes in appetite, fatigue, emotional instability, guilt, and self-hatred) as well as symptoms of anxiety (e.g., stress around food, eating, and weight gain) (N T Godart et al., 2007; Nathalie T Godart et al., 2000), but it is unclear how this overlap influences ED symptomatology. Third, despite the understanding that these comorbidities are often associated with severe ED symptoms (Brand-Gothelf et al., 2014; Milos et al., 2002; Sidor et al., 2015), it is still largely unknown if comorbid depression alone is associated with more severe ED symptoms relative to comorbid anxiety alone or vice versa. Indeed, to our knowledge, only two studies to date have explored this question of comorbid depression alone vs. anxiety alone (Cynthia M Bulik et al., 1996; Hughes et al., 2013). While Bulik et al. (Cynthia M Bulik et al., 1996) suggested that among women with bulimia nervosa there were no difference in ED symptoms (e.g., food restriction, frequency of binge eating, purging behaviors) in those with only mood disorder relative to those with only anxiety disorder, Hughes et al. (Hughes et al., 2013) suggested that among youth with EDs, depression comorbidity was linked with more complex and severe ED presentation (e.g., more binge eating, purging, dietary restraint, weight/shape concerns) compared with no comorbidity and compared with anxiety comorbidity alone. However, recent studies using adequately powered samples to detect which is more strongly related to the severity of ED symptoms (depression, anxiety, or the combination of depression and anxiety) are largely unavailable.

It is of interest to study the relationships of depression and anxiety with ED symptoms, not only among those with a current diagnosis of EDs, but also among those who have recovered from EDs, and those without a diagnosis of an ED. Studies suggest that depression tends to develop after the onset of the ED (Holtkamp et al., 2005; Ivarsson et al., 2000) while anxiety tends to develop before the onset of the ED (Nathalie T Godart et al., 2000). Hence, a better understanding of the relationship of depression and anxiety to ED symptoms among adults with EDs, as well as among those who have recovered from EDs, and those without a diagnosis of an ED, may inform our understanding of the development of ED and its comorbidities. Furthermore, EDs are often associated with a long recovery process (Eddy et al., 2017) and some recovered individuals continue to struggle with psychological and psychiatric difficulties, such as depression and anxiety (Bardone-Cone et al., 2010; CYNTHIA M Bulik, 2002), for many years after the recovery. Studies (Wagner et al., 2006) report that people recovered from EDs may have similar rates of mood and anxiety disorders as currently ill patients. In contrast, other studies suggest that long-term recovered individuals are quite similar to healthy controls (Bardone-Cone et al., 2010) or fall between currently ill and healthy controls (Yackobovitch-Gavan et al., 2009) in their psychological and psychiatric functioning. However, studies looking at depression alone versus anxiety alone among people who have recovered from EDs are scarce.

The current study expands upon the work of Bulik et al. (Cynthia M Bulik et al., 1996) and Hughes et al. (Hughes et al., 2013) who have examined ED symptoms among clinical samples of patients with EDs and depression alone versus anxiety alone. Our study examines ED symptoms among a non-clinical sample that includes both ill and recovered individuals, as well as people without a history of EDs. It is important to use a non-clinical sample to explore links between ED symptoms, depression, and anxiety, as it is well documented (Forrest et al., 2017; Swanson & Field, 2016) that clinical and non-clinical samples have different characteristics, and specifically different rates of comorbidities. Moreover, as a result of the Berkson’s bias (Berkson, 1946), individuals with more than one diagnosis are more likely to seek clinical care, thereby artificially inflating rates of comorbidities in clinical samples.

The present study explored the following research question among a large convenience sample that included three groups of volunteers with past/present diagnosis of EDs and with no history of EDs:

What are the differences between adults with either, neither, or both comorbid depression and anxiety in terms of ED symptoms?

We hypothesized that those with comorbid depression and/or anxiety would have more ED symptoms relative to those without comorbidities. Despite the dearth of research and the inconsistent findings about specific comorbidities and ED symptoms (Cynthia M Bulik et al., 1996; Hughes et al., 2013), we hypothesized that anxiety would be related to more severe ED symptoms, since anxiety usually pre-dates the illness while depression tends to come after the illness (Nathalie T Godart et al., 2000), and since some preliminary findings imply that, relative to other affective temperaments, the anxious temperament may have the strongest impact on eating psychopathology among patients with anorexia nervosa (Marzola et al., 2020).

METHOD

Procedure.

Project Implicit Mental Health website (PIMH) (Glenn et al., 2017; Werntz et al., 2016) is a sister-site to Project Implicit website (Nosek, 2005) (https://implicit.harvard.edu/) and a demonstration and research public website that allows visitors to learn about their implicit biases associated with mental illness. Volunteers to the PIMH website completed the informed consent form that included information about the upcoming tasks (e.g., “this study examines attitudes, preferences, and beliefs related to mental health issues”). After consenting, participants self-selected a mental-health domain (e.g., eating, depression, anxiety, mental illness) (https://implicit.harvard.edu/implicit/user/pih/pih/selectatest.html) and completed, in random order, the self-report questionnaire and the Implicit Association Test (IAT) (Werntz, Steinman, Glenn, Nock, & Teachman, 2016). Participants were then given the opportunity to view their IAT score and feedback if they wished. Although the results of the IAT were not included in the current analyses, only volunteers to the eating domain who completed both the IAT and the EAT-26 were included in the analyses in order to assure participants’ commitment to the study. Volunteers were not specifically asked to select a domain that was most relevant to them, but it could potentially be that domain selection was related to personal preferences.

Participants characteristics.

Volunteers were 2,785 women (73.7%) and 956 men (25.3%) with mean age of 27.96 (SD=11.31) who self-selected to participate in the implicit eating attitudes study on the PIMH website between May 2016 and September 2017. Male participants were not included in the final analyses as most males were in the “never ED group”, and we did not have sufficient number of male participants in the two ED groups. Participants were residents of 72 different countries, but the majority (64.3%) reported being residents of the United States. About two-thirds (64.9%) were White, 9.1% were Asian, 12.5% were Hispanic, and 6.6% were African American. Most participants (81.2%) had acquired higher than high school education. Participants characteristics by eating disorder history are presented in Table 1.

Table 1:

Participants characteristics by eating disorder history.

Current ED Past ED No ED
n=374 n=436 n=2,970
Background characteristics
Female gender %(n) 90.5(335) 90.6(393) 70.0(2,057)
Age (SD) 25.34(9.81) 26.32(8.72) 28.53(11.74)
High Education %(n) 82.4(304) 84.0(361) 84.0(2,404)
Caucasians %(n) 68.4(256) 73.2(319) 63.3(1,880)
BMI (SD) 26.12(8.76) 25.28(11.75) 25.42(6.78)
Eat-26 (SD) 25.84(14.41) 15.92(11.48) 8.52(8.52)
Comorbidities
Non %(n) 36.6(137) 58.7(256) 81.4(2,417)
Only depression %(n) 10.2(38) 6.0(26) 3.6(108)
Only anxiety %(n) 20.9(78) 17.0(74) 8.5(253)
Both %(n) 32.4(121) 18.3(80) 6.5(192)
Open in a new tab

Demographics.

Participants reported their gender, age, height, weight, race, and education among other demographic information.

Mental Health History.

Volunteers were prompted with the introductory sentence “The next questions ask for insight into your current and past mental health challenges. Responding is entirely optional.” Volunteers who selected to proceed were prompted with the following question: “Are you currently, or have you ever struggled with moderate to severe mental or emotional difficulties (e.g., alcohol or drug problems, depression, panic attacks, anxiety, eating disorder, attention deficit, etc.) that lasted a minimum of several weeks and interfered with your daily life? [yes/no].” Volunteers who selected the “yes” response were prompted with the following instructions: “We are interested in your current and past mental health difficulties. Please read the following list of disorders and indicate whether you are currently struggling or have struggled in the past with these types of mental illnesses. If you have never struggled with any of the disorders below, please leave this form blank and click Continue.” A list of disorders were than provided in the following order: “(1) anxiety disorders (e.g., panic disorder, specific phobia/fear, social anxiety); (2) Depressive disorders (e.g., depression); (3) Eating disorders (e.g., anorexia, bulimia, binge-eating disorder); (4) Substance-related and addictive disorders (e.g., alcoholism/alcohol abuse, drug abuse); (5) Neurocognitive disorders (e.g., dementia, delirium, Alzheimer’s, traumatic brain injury); (6) Bipolar disorders (e.g., bipolar disorder, mania); (7) Schizophrenia spectrum or other psychotic disorders (e.g., schizophrenia, psychosis); (8) Obsessive-compulsive and related disorders (e.g., obsessive-compulsive disorder, hoarding, hair-pulling, body dysmorphic disorder); (9) Trauma and stress-related disorders (e.g., post-traumatic stress disorder [PTSD]); (10) Sleep-wake disorders (e.g., insomnia); (11) Personality disorders (e.g., borderline, antisocial, avoidant); (12) Other mental disorders (e.g., dissociative disorders, conversion disorder, sexual dysfunction, impulse-control disorders). In the present study, only information about current depression, anxiety, and OCD was used, in addition to information about past/current EDs. A total of 106 participants who reported that their ED is both current and past were classified as currently ill. Participants with OCD (n=65) were included in the anxiety group. Although DSM-5 includes OCD and anxiety disorders in two different chapters, studies suggest that these two conditions are closely related to each other, and there continues to be an ongoing debate and controversy about whether they should be grouped together (Vigne et al., 2019).

Eating Attitudes Test.

The 26-item version of the Eating Attitudes Test (EAT-26; Garner & Al, 1982) measures ED symptoms. The items describe various eating-related symptoms (e.g., oral control, dieting, food preoccupation) and participants report how often they experience each symptom, on a scale of Always, Usually, Often, Sometimes, Rarely, and Never. As originally recommended (Garner & Garfinkel, 1979), the EAT-26 score was computed by summing all responses, while also computing three separate scores for three subscales: Dieting, Bulimia and Food Preoccupation, and Oral Control. Higher score on the EAT-26 and its subscales reflect more severe ED symptoms.

Statistical Analyses.

All analyses were conducted in SPSS-23. Chi2 and ANOVA with LSD post-hoc comparisons were used to compare characteristics (i.e., gender, age, education, race, BMI, Eat-26 score) of participants of the following four groups: adults with current depression and no anxiety, adults with current anxiety and no depression, adults with both current depression and anxiety, adults with no current depression or anxiety. These four groups were compared separately among participants with current/past/no EDs.

RESULTS

Analyses indicated that there were significant group differenced in EAT-26 score (p<.001) such that across all groups (i.e., among people with past/present/no EDs), those with anxiety alone had higher EAT-26 score relative to those with depression alone. We will discuss these results by group category.

Volunteers with current ED.

The 374 volunteers (90.5% females) who self-identified as currently suffering from an ED had a mean age of 25.3 (9.8) years and a mean EAT-26 score of 25.8 (14.4). About one third (36.6%) of these currently ill volunteers self-reported that they don’t suffer from current depression or anxiety, and the remainder reported that they suffer from depression only (10.2%), anxiety only (20.9%), or both (32.4%). As presented in Table 2 there were significant group differenced in EAT-26 score (p<.001). LSD post-hoc comparisons suggested that those without depression or anxiety had lower (p<.001) EAT-26 score (21.2±12.8) relative to those with both comorbidities (31.5±14.3). In addition, relative to those with anxiety only (26.4±14.7), those with depression only (20.0±11.7) reported lower ED symptoms (p=.024).

Table 2:

Eating disorder (ED) symptoms by ED history and by comorbidity of depression/anxiety.

Comorbidity No ED Past ED Current ED All participants
n=2,970 n=436 n=374 n=3,780
Age Non 28.79 (12.03)ab 25.14 (6.53)a 26.22 (10.19) 28.53 (11.75)b
Only depression 30.17 (12.64)b 26.92 (7.71)ab 28.56 (13.88) 29.53 (12.64)b
Only anxiety 26.08 (9.87)a 25.68 (6.54)a 24.60 (9.57) 25.57 (9.31)a
Both 27.98 (9.62)a 27.47 (8.69)b 24.17 (8.06) 26.13 (8.91)a
Test statistics 5.32 p=.001 2.73 p=.043 2.29 p=.078 13.81 p<.001
Females %(n) Non 68.7 (1620)b 89.8 (221) 88.1 (111) 71.5 (1952)a
Only depression 62.1 (64)a 85.7 (18) 96.9 (31) 72.4 (113)a
Only anxiety 78.7 (222)c 89.2 (74) 89.8 (79) 82.8 (375)b
Both 77.4 (152)c 95.3 (80) 91.9 (114) 85.6 (345)b
Test statistics 20.20 p<.001 3.07 p=.38 2.72 p=.44 55.4 p<.001
BMI Non 25.14 (6.53)a 24.50 (6.57) 27.16 (9.32) 25.18 (6.71)a
Only depression 26.92 (7.71)bc 25.20 (5.74) 27.73 (10.16) 26.85 (8.04)a
Only anxiety 25.68 (6.54)a 27.22 (23.72) 25.66 (8.55) 25.95 (11.81)ab
Both 27.47 (8.69)c 25.81 (6.89) 24.96 (7.79) 26.36 (8.13)c
Test statistics 9.01 p<.001 1.11 p=.35 1.73 p=.16 5.19 p=.001
Eat-26 Total score Non 8.02 (8.26)a 15.22 (11.73)ab 21.20 (12.78)a 9.27 (9.47)a
Only depression 8.50 (6.73)a 10.41 (8.14)a 20.03 (11.69)a 11.12 (9.30)b
Only anxiety 10.77 (10.26)b 16.82 (12.01)bc 26.44 (14.73)b 14.94 (13.07)c
Both 11.32 (9.21)b 18.51 (10.33)c 31.50 (14.31)c 19.08 (14.26)d
Test statistics 16.48 p<.001 3.66 p=.013 13.99 p<.001 125.2 p<.001
Eat-26 Dieting score Non 5.41 (5.83)a 10.96 (8.59)bc 13.71 (8.48)a 6.29 (6.66)a
Only depression 5.90 (5.55)a 7.36 (5.84)ab 13.56 (8.53)a 7.67 (6.96)b
Only anxiety 7.42 (7.37)b 11.42 (8.15)cd 16.87 (9.49)b 10.00 (8.77)c
Both 7.53 (6.74)b 13.13 (7.58)d 20.25 (8.45)c 12.64 (9.29)d
Test statistics 15.4 p<.001 3.23 p=.022 13.33 p<.001 111.3 p<.001
Eat-26 Bulimia score Non 1.54 (2.19) 1.98 (2.56) 2.25 (3.30)a 1.61 (2.29)a
Only depression 1.31 (2.03) .86 (1.36) 1.44 (2.15)a 1.27 (1.97)a
Only anxiety 1.77 (2.36) 2.29 (2.78) 3.88 (4.32)b 2.27 (3.02)b
Both 1.84 (2.37) 2.48 (3.01) 4.57 (4.76)b 2.82 (3.61)c
Test statistics 2.3 p=.075 2.46 p=.063 9.97 p<.001 125.2 p<.001
Eat-26 Oral control score Non 1.07 (2.20)a 2.29 (3.04) 5.24 (4.06)a 1.37 (2.57)a
Only depression 1.29 (1.88)ab 2.18 (3.32) 5.03 (3.71)a 2.18 (2.95)b
Only anxiety 1.58 (2.61)bc 3.11 (3.34) 5.70 (4.08)ab 2.66 (3.47)b
Both 1.95 (2.87)c 2.90 (3.39) 6.67 (4.09)b 3.62 (3.98)c
Test statistics 12.3 p<.001 1.86 p=.136 3.16 p=.024 88.7 p<.001
Open in a new tab

Notes: Significant group differences appear in bold.

Different superscript letters indicate that post-hoc caparisons suggested that the absolute mean values differ significantly among each column (p < .05).

Volunteers with past ED.

The 436 volunteers (90.6% females) who self-reported past EDs had a mean age of 26.3 (9.7) years and a mean EAT-26 score of 15.9 (11.5). More than half (58.7%) of these recovered volunteers self-reported that they do not suffer from current depression or anxiety, and the rest reported that they suffer from depression only (6.0%), anxiety only (17.0%), or both (18.3%). As presented in Table 2, there were significant group differenced in EAT-26 score (p=.013). LSD post-hoc comparisons suggested that those without depression or anxiety had lower (p=.023) EAT-26 score (15.2±11.7) relative to those with both comorbidities (18.5±10.3). In addition, relative to those with anxiety only (16.8±12.0), those with depression only (10.4±8.1) reported lower ED symptoms (p=.019).

Volunteers with no ED.

The 2,970 volunteers (70.0% females) who self-reported no history of EDs had a mean age of 28.5 (11.7) years and a mean EAT-26 score of 8.5 (8.5). Majority (81.4%) of these volunteers with no ED self-reported that they don’t suffer from current depression or anxiety, and the rest reported that they suffer from depression only (3.6%), anxiety only (8.5%), or both (6.5%). As presented in Table 2, there were significant group differenced in EAT-26 score (p<.001). LSD post-hoc comparisons suggested that those without depression or anxiety had lower (p<.001) Eat-26 score (9.3±9.5) relative to those with both comorbidities (19.1±14.3). In addition, relative to those with anxiety only (14.9±13.1), those with depression only (11.1±9.3) reported lower ED symptoms (p=.021).

We also used the three subscales of the EAT-26 in order examine relationships between specific ED symptoms and comorbidities. Table 2 demonstrates that dieting score was significantly higher among those with anxiety alone relative to depression alone, among all three groups. Bulimia score was significantly higher among those with anxiety alone relative to depression alone, only among participants with current ED. Oral-control score was significantly higher among those with anxiety alone relative to depression alone, only among participants without EDs.

DISCUSSION

The literature suggests that EDs are highly correlated with depression and anxiety (CYNTHIA M Bulik, 2002). We used a large non-clinical sample of adults with past/present/no EDs, in order to examine ED symptoms among individuals with depression only relative to anxiety only. In contrast with an earlier study among youth with EDs (Hughes et al., 2013), our study provides initial findings suggesting that comorbid anxiety alone may be linked with more severe ED symptoms relative to comorbid depression alone. Although results are based on cross-sectional data, it is possible that anxiety serves as a maintaining factor for ED symptoms such that dieting and other ED-related behaviors may function to modulate symptoms of anxiety (Lavender et al., 2013).

As expected, our data indicated that volunteers without comorbidities had the least and volunteers with both comorbidities had the most severe ED symptoms. This is not surprising given that people without comorbidities tend to be more psychologically stable and therefore are likely to experience less ED related symptoms. Alternatively, it could be that those who did not report comorbidities have a tendency to minimize symptomatology, and this may apply to both their ED symptoms and other psychiatric symptoms.

Interestingly, among all examined groups (i.e., those with past/present/no EDs), comorbid anxiety alone was linked with more severe ED symptoms relative to comorbid depression alone - a finding which contradicts previous reports. While several previous studies have suggested no differences between depression alone and anxiety alone (Cynthia M Bulik et al., 1996), a study among children and youth (Hughes et al., 2013) has suggested that depression comorbidity is linked with more severe ED symptoms relative to anxiety comorbidity, especially in regard to binge eating, purging, dietary restraint and weight/shape concerns. It is noteworthy that a study among college-aged young adults (Bodell et al., 2012) reported that comorbid anxiety, but not comorbid depression, was linked with greater psychosocial impairment for individuals with BN. But this last study did not conduct a direct comparison between participants with comorbid depression alone and anxiety alone. These discrepancies between studies may be due to different study designs. For example, although different anxiety-related conditions (e.g., panic disorders, specific phobias, social anxiety, or OCD) may have different psychological and psychosocial outcomes, different measures of anxiety (e.g., the state/trait anxiety inventory) may vary from one another in their sensitivity to these different anxiety-related conditions. In addition, we used the EAT-26 (Garner & Al, 1982) and relied on self-report diagnosis among a large sample of adults with past/present/no EDs, while Hughes et al (Hughes et al., 2013) used the EDE (Cooper & Fairburn, 1987) with a smaller sample drawn from intake assessments of children and adolescents at a specialist ED clinic. It is well documented that clinical and non-clinical samples have different characteristics, and specifically different levels of comorbidities, as people who are more distressed and present with more comorbidities are more likely to seek treatment (Forrest et al., 2017; Swanson & Field, 2016).

Importantly, our results indicated that in terms of severity of ED symptoms, people with depression alone were quite similar to those without comorbidities, while people with anxiety alone were quite similar to those with both comorbidities (i.e., depression and anxiety). These findings, which imply that anxiety can be linked with more ED symptoms relative depression, contradict several previous studies (Hughes et al., 2013). Nevertheless, this finding may not be surprising, given that anxiety is known to be linked with the core psychopathology of EDs (Lavender et al., 2013; Spindler & Milos, 2007). People with EDs, and specifically those with anorexia nervosa, tend to be pervasively anxious and preoccupied about issues related to shape, weight, and food, such that any slight increase in body weight or any augmentation in meal plan results in severe anxiety (CYNTHIA M Bulik, 2002). Moreover, anxiety disorders and EDs share similar cognitive and behavioral characteristics (e.g., perfectionism among some patients with anorexia) and it is well documented that premorbid obsessional/anxious traits are prevalent among people with EDs (Nathalie T Godart et al., 2000). It is possible that these traits can become exaggerated during the acute phase of the illness, and that people with these traits are more likely to experience their ED symptoms as stressful and score higher on the EAT-26. However, it is crucial to remember that most kids with anxiety-related conditions (e.g., children with pathological fear of separation) do not develop an ED (Matthies et al., 2018). In any case, it is important to note that the current cross-sectional findings cannot determine whether depression and/or anxiety intensify ED symptoms or whether more severe ED symptoms contribute to the development of depression and/or anxiety. In addition, due to the nature of our data collections, several anxiety-related conditions were grouped together (e.g., panic disorder, specific phobia, social anxiety, obsessive-compulsive disorder, hoarding, hair-pulling, body dysmorphic disorder). Therefore our research design did not enable us to determine whether a specific anxiety-related condition had a stronger impact on ED symptoms than another (Nathalie T Godart et al., 2000). Future studies may examine the differential impact of each of these anxiety-related conditions on ED symptoms.

These findings may make a contribution to clinical practice (Hildebrandt et al., 2012). Several studies have highlighted the importance of taking into account comorbidities in all phases of ED management, including assessment, treatment, and follow-up (Brand-Gothelf et al., 2014; N T Godart et al., 2007; Milos et al., 2002; Pallister & Waller, 2008; Sidor et al., 2015). Our findings add to these studies by emphasizing that depression and anxiety may be differentially related to EDs, and that anxiety may have a stronger link with ED symptoms than does depression. Indeed, current theories argue that people with anxiety disorders share temperamental and personality characteristics (e.g., perfectionism, rigidity, and compulsivity) with people who have EDs, and specifically with people who have anorexia nervosa (Pallister & Waller, 2008). Furthermore, avoidance – a natural behavioral response to anxiety – is extremely common among those with EDs; for example, they make use of this response when they avoid eating high-fat foods or when they don’t go to the beach for fear of being seen in a swimming suit. Therefore, our findings suggest that it may be important for clinicians who treat patients with EDs to learn how to adopt strategies akin to those used to treat anxiety (e.g., exposure, self-monitoring, or mindfulness techniques), as these strategies may also be effective for the treatment of EDs (Koskina et al., 2013). For instance, Hildebrandt et al. (Pallister & Waller, 2008) have demonstrated how several forms of exposure-based behavioral interventions, such as exposure to fear of gaining weight and exposure to high-fat foods, can be effective in the treatment of anorexia nervosa.

This is the first study to examine ED symptoms among a large sample that includes volunteers with past/present/no EDs and different comorbidities. One important strength of the current study, which uses an Internet-based sample as opposed to a clinical sample, results from the Berkson’s bias – that individuals with more than one diagnoses are more likely to seek clinical care, thereby artificially inflating rates of comorbidities in clinical samples. Several limitations should be noted. First, although the current sample was very large and heterogeneous, it was not a representative sample. Participants voluntarily selected to take an online test that measures their implicit attitudes. Nevertheless, data collected from Project Implicit have been studied intensively for several years, and the validity of results is comparable to that of similar data collected in experimental laboratory conditions (Klein et al., 2014; Nosek et al., 2002). Second, we don’t know what the specific ED diagnosis was, and it could be that the relationships between depression, anxiety, and ED symptoms vary by ED diagnosis. In addition, there are specific anxiety and depression related-conditions (e.g., weight phobia, alexithymia) which were not measured. Third, past and present ED diagnoses and comorbidities were assessed by self-report and not according to clinical records. Relatedly, height and weight were also assessed by self-report, which is likely less accurate than objective measurement. However, previous studies show that web responders usually provide accurate information about themselves (Kraut et al., 2004). Fourth, participants had to indicate whether they currently suffer from depression and/or anxiety, but information about levels of these two comorbidities were unavailable. Fifth, we have decided to include participants with OCD in the anxiety group, given that these two conditions are closely related to each other, and despite the fact that OCD and anxiety are listed in two separate chapters in DSM-5 (Vigne et al., 2019). Last, it is important to remember that clinicians and researchers are still struggling with the definition of recovery from EDs (Slof-Op’t Landt et al., 2019), and different studies have used different definitions of recovery (e.g., self-assessed vs. objective assessment and partial vs. full abstinence from symptoms). Relatedly, definitions of recovery may vary across research participants.

To conclude, the present study examined ED symptoms among individuals with comorbid depression and anxiety and past/present/no EDs. Future studies are warranted to confirm our cross-sectional findings via the use of prospective designs with clinical assessments of EDs, depression, and anxiety (as opposed to self-report). Prospective designs are warranted as a causal inference is essential for the complete understanding of the relations between comorbidities and ED symptoms before and after the onset of the disorder.

What is already known on this subject?

Eating Disorders (EDs) are highly correlated with depression and anxiety (CYNTHIA M Bulik, 2002), but it is still largely unknown if comorbid depression alone is associated with more severe ED symptoms relative to comorbid anxiety alone or vice versa. While Bulik et al. (Cynthia M Bulik et al., 1996) suggested that among women with bulimia nervosa there were no difference in ED symptoms in those with only mood disorder relative to those with only anxiety disorder, Hughes et al. (Hughes et al., 2013) suggested that among youth with EDs, depression comorbidity was linked with more complex and severe ED presentation compared with no comorbidity and compared with anxiety comorbidity alone.

What does this study add?

Our findings demonstrated, in contrast with earlier studies (Cynthia M Bulik et al., 1996; Hughes et al., 2013), that comorbid anxiety alone may be linked with more severe ED symptoms relative to comorbid depression alone. Although results are based on cross-sectional data, it is possible that anxiety serves as a maintaining factor for ED symptoms such that dieting and other ED-related behaviors may function to modulate symptoms of anxiety (Lavender et al., 2013).

Funding:

This research received no specific grant from any funding agency.

Footnotes

Conflict of interest: The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest.

Data availability statement: Approval to use the data was obtained from Dr. Bethany A Teachman (PhD) from the University of Virginia (USA). Data available on request from the first author (REB).

Compliance with Ethical Standards: Dr. Bethany A Teachman (PhD) from the University of Virginia (USA) was responsible for data collection. This study was approved by the University of Virginia Institutional Review Board for the Social and Behavioral Sciences.

REFERENCES

  1. Bardone-Cone AM, Harney MB, Maldonado CR, Lawson MA, Robinson DP, Smith R, & Tosh A (2010). Defining recovery from an eating disorder: Conceptualization, validation, and examination of psychosocial functioning and psychiatric comorbidity. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 48(3), 194–202. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Berkson J (1946). Limitations of the application of fourfold table analysis to hospital data. Biometrics Bulletin, 2(3), 47–53. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Blinder BJ, Cumella EJ, & Sanathara VA (2006). Psychiatric comorbidities of female inpatients with eating disorders. Psychosomatic Medicine, 68(3), 454–462. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Bodell LP, Brown TA, & Keel PK (2012). The impact of bulimic syndromes, mood and anxiety disorders and their comorbidity on psychosocial impairment: what drives impairment in comorbidity? European Eating Disorders Review, 20(1), 74–79. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Brand-Gothelf A, Leor S, Apter A, & Fennig S (2014). The impact of comorbid depressive and anxiety disorders on severity of anorexia nervosa in adolescent girls. The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 202(10), 759–762. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Bulik CYNTHIAM (2002). Anxiety, depression and eating disorders. Eating Disorders and Obesity: A Comprehensive Handbook, 2(1), 193–198. [Google Scholar]
  7. Bulik Cynthia M, Sullivan PF, Carter FA, & Joyce PR (1996). Lifetime anxiety disorders in women with bulimia nervosa. Comprehensive Psychiatry, 37(5), 368–374. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Cooper Z, & Fairburn C (1987). The eating disorder examination: A semi-structured interview for the assessment of the specific psychopathology of eating disorders. International Journal of Eating Disorders, 6(1), 1–8. [Google Scholar]
  9. Eddy KT, Tabri N, Thomas JJ, Murray HB, Keshaviah A, Hastings E, Edkins K, Krishna M, Herzog DB, & Keel PK (2017). Recovery From Anorexia Nervosa and Bulimia Nervosa at 22-Year Follow-Up. The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry, 78(2), 184–189. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Fassino S, Pierò A, Tomba E, & Abbate-Daga G (2009). Factors associated with dropout from treatment for eating disorders: a comprehensive literature review. BMC Psychiatry, 9(1), 67. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Forrest LN, Smith AR, & Swanson SA (2017). Characteristics of seeking treatment among US adolescents with eating disorders. International Journal of Eating Disorders, 50(7), 826–833. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Garner, & Al E (1982). Eating Attitudes Test (EAT-26). Psychological Medicine, 12, 871–878. 10.1037/t06908-000 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Garner DM, & Garfinkel PE (1979). The Eating Attitudes Test: An index of the symptoms of anorexia nervosa. Psychological Medicine, 9(2), 273–279. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Glenn JJ, Werntz AJ, Slama SJ, Steinman SA, Teachman BA, & Nock MK (2017). Suicide and self-injury-related implicit cognition: A large-scale examination and replication. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 126(2), 199. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Godart NT, Perdereau F, Rein Z, Berthoz S, Wallier J, Jeammet P, & Flament MF (2007). Comorbidity studies of eating disorders and mood disorders. Critical review of the literature. Journal of Affective Disorders, 97(1–3), 37–49. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Godart Nathalie T, Flament MF, Lecrubier Y, & Jeammet P (2000). Anxiety disorders in anorexia nervosa and bulimia nervosa: co-morbidity and chronology of appearance. European Psychiatry, 15(1), 38–45. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Goel NJ, Sadeh-Sharvit S, Trockel M, Flatt RE, Fitzsimmons-Craft EE, Balantekin KN, Monterubio GE, Firebaugh M-L, Wilfley DE, & Taylor CB (2020). Depression and anxiety mediate the relationship between insomnia and eating disorders in college women. Journal of American College Health, 1–6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Hildebrandt T, Bacow T, Markella M, & Loeb KL (2012). Anxiety in anorexia nervosa and its management using family-based treatment. European Eating Disorders Review, 20(1), e1–e16. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Hoek HW (2016). Review of the worldwide epidemiology of eating disorders. Current Opinion in Psychiatry, 29(6), 336–339. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Holtkamp K, Müller B, Heussen N, Remschmidt H, & Herpertz-Dahlmann B (2005). Depression, anxiety, and obsessionality in long-term recovered patients with adolescent-onset anorexia nervosa. European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 14(2), 106–110. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Hughes EK, Goldschmidt AB, Labuschagne Z, Loeb KL, Sawyer SM, & Grange D. Le. (2013). Eating disorders with and without comorbid depression and anxiety: similarities and differences in a clinical sample of children and adolescents. European Eating Disorders Review, 21(5), 386–394. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Ivarsson T, Råstam M, Wentz E, Gillberg IC, & Gillberg C (2000). Depressive disorders in teenage-onset anorexia nervosa: a controlled longitudinal, partly community-based study. Comprehensive Psychiatry, 41(5), 398–403. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Klein R, Ratliff K, Vianello M, Adams R Jr, Bahník S, Bernstein M, Bocian K, Brandt M, Brooks B, & Brumbaugh C (2014). Data from investigating variation in replicability: A “many labs” replication project. Journal of Open Psychology Data, 2(1). [Google Scholar]
  24. Koskina A, Campbell IC, & Schmidt U (2013). Exposure therapy in eating disorders revisited. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 37(2), 193–208. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Kraut R, Olson J, Banaji M, Bruckman A, Cohen J, & Couper M (2004). Psychological research online: report of Board of Scientific Affairs’ Advisory Group on the Conduct of Research on the Internet. American Psychologist, 59(2), 105. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Lavender JM, De Young KP, Wonderlich SA, Crosby RD, Engel SG, Mitchell JE, Crow SJ, Peterson CB, & Le Grange D (2013). Daily patterns of anxiety in anorexia nervosa: Associations with eating disorder behaviors in the natural environment. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 122(3), 672. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Marzola E, Porliod A, Panero M, De-Bacco C, & Abbate-Daga G (2020). Affective temperaments and eating psychopathology in anorexia nervosa: Which role for anxious and depressive traits? Journal of Affective Disorders, 266, 374–380. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Matthies S, Schiele MA, Koentges C, Pini S, Schmahl C, & Domschke K (2018). Please Don’t Leave Me—Separation Anxiety and Related Traits in Borderline Personality Disorder. Current Psychiatry Reports, 20(10), 83. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Milos G, Spindler A, Ruggiero G, Klaghofer R, & Schnyder U (2002). Comorbidity of obsessive-compulsive disorders and duration of eating disorders. International Journal of Eating Disorders, 31(3), 284–289. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Nosek BA (2005). Moderators of the relationship between implicit and explicit evaluation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 134(4), 565. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Nosek BA, Banaji MR, & Greenwald AG (2002). Harvesting implicit group attitudes and beliefs from a demonstration web site. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 6(1), 101. [Google Scholar]
  32. Pallister E, & Waller G (2008). Anxiety in the eating disorders: Understanding the overlap. Clinical Psychology Review, 28(3), 366–386. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Sidor A, Baba CO, Marton-Vasarhelyi E, & Chereches RM (2015). Gender differences in the magnitude of the associations between eating disorders symptoms and depression and anxiety symptoms. Results from a community sample of adolescents. Journal of Mental Health, 24(5), 294–298. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Slof-Op’t Landt MCT, Dingemans AE, de la Torre Y Rivas J, & van Furth EF (2019). Self-assessment of eating disorder recovery: Absence of eating disorder psychopathology is not essential. International Journal of Eating Disorders. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Spindler A, & Milos G (2007). Links between eating disorder symptom severity and psychiatric comorbidity. Eating Behaviors, 8(3), 364–373. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Swanson SA, Crow SJ, Le Grange D, Swendsen J, & Merikangas KR (2011). Prevalence and correlates of eating disorders in adolescents: Results from the national comorbidity survey replication adolescent supplement. Archives of General Psychiatry, 68(7), 714–723. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Swanson SA, & Field AE (2016). Commentary: Considerations for the use of registry data to study adolescent eating disorders. International Journal of Epidemiology, 45(2), 488–490. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Udo T, & Grilo CM (2019). Psychiatric and medical correlates of DSM-5 eating disorders in a nationally representative sample of adults in the United States. International Journal of Eating Disorders, 52(1), 42–50. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Ulfvebrand S, Birgegård A, Norring C, Högdahl L, & von Hausswolff-Juhlin Y (2015). Psychiatric comorbidity in women and men with eating disorders results from a large clinical database. Psychiatry Research, 230(2), 294–299. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Vigne P, Simões BFT, de Menezes GB, Fortes PP, Dias RV, Laurito LD, Loureiro CP, Moreira-de-Oliveira ME, Albertella L, & Lee RSC (2019). The relationship between obsessive-compulsive disorder and anxiety disorders: A question of diagnostic boundaries or simply severity of symptoms? Comprehensive Psychiatry, 94, 152116. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Wagner A, Barbarich-Marsteller NC, Frank GK, Bailer UF, Wonderlich SA, Crosby RD, Henry SE, Vogel V, Plotnicov K, & McConaha C (2006). Personality traits after recovery from eating disorders: do subtypes differ? International Journal of Eating Disorders, 39(4), 276–284. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Werntz AJ, Steinman SA, Glenn JJ, Nock MK, & Teachman BA (2016). Characterizing implicit mental health associations across clinical domains. Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry, 52, 17–28. 10.1016/j.jbtep.2016.02.004 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Yackobovitch-Gavan M, Golan M, Valevski A, Kreitler S, Bachar E, Lieblich A, Mitrani E, Weizman A, & Stein D (2009). An integrative quantitative model of factors influencing the course of anorexia nervosa over time. International Journal of Eating Disorders, 42(4), 306–317. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES