Abstract
The prevalence of type 1 diabetes mellitus among transgender and gender diverse (TGD) youth is nearly five times higher than in the general pediatric population (9.9 per 1000 people vs. 1.93 per 1000 people). We hypothesize that minority stress experienced by TGD youth may lead to a higher prevalence of diabetes.
Keywords: transgender, gender dysphoria, gender diverse, transgender youth, diabetes, autoimmunity, minority stress, chronic disease
Introduction
The Gender Multispecialty Service (GeMS) at Boston Children's Hospital is a program focused on assessment and medical management of transgender and gender diverse (TGD) children and adolescents. For the past several years, clinicians have anecdotally noted an increased occurrence of type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM) in the clinic population.
There have been two prior reports of an association between T1DM and gender dysphoria; the first by Defreyne et al. reported a 2.3 times higher prevalence of T1DM in their population of transgender adults in Belgium when compared with the Belgian population as a whole (9 per 1000 vs. 4 per 1000) and the second, a report in TGD youth in the United States, found a 9.4-fold higher prevalence of T1DM in TGD youth compared with the prevalence in patients without TGD (24.77 per 1000 vs. 2.68 per 1000).1,2 In the United States, the prevalence of T1DM in the general pediatric population is estimated to be 1.93 per 1000.3 A similarly low prevalence of gender dysphoria among children and adolescents in the United States, estimated to be between 5 and 7 per 1000, would suggest a rare co-occurrence given such a low combined prevalence.4,5
Methods
Patients with T1DM and gender dysphoria seen in the GeMS program between January 1, 2007 and December 31st, 2018 were identified by International Classification of Diseases (ICD)-9 and ICD-10 code. Prevalence of T1DM was calculated and compared with previously published rates.3 Z-scores for anthropometric measures were determined based on the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) growth data and are presented for both sex designated at birth and affirmed gender.6 This study was approved by the Institutional Review Board.
Mean and standard deviation were used to summarize normally distributed variables, median and range were used to summarize non-normally distributed variables, and comparisons were made through Student's t-test and the Mann–Whitney test, respectively. Proportions were compared using Fisher's exact test. A p-value of <0.05 was considered significant, with no adjustment for multiple testing for this descriptive analysis. Stata Statistical Software: Release 16 (College Station, TX) was used for calculations.
Results
There were 1114 patients seen in GeMS during the study period, of which 11 had T1DM (Table 1). Of the TGD youth with T1DM 8 (72%) were white, 2 (18%) were African American, and 1 (9%) was Hispanic/Latinx. The majority, 9 (82%), were designated female at birth and had a transmasculine gender identity. Nine adolescents had initiated gender-affirming hormones (GAH); eight received testosterone, one received estrogen, and two had received pubertal suppression, of which one also received GAH.
Table 1.
Demographic Characteristics of Gender Diverse Patients With and Without Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus
| TGD (n=1114) | TGD and T1DM (n=11) | |
|---|---|---|
| Age at first gender clinic visit, years, mean (SD)* | 13 (3.7) | 16 (2.7) |
| Race, n (%) | ||
| White | 806 (72) | 8 (72) |
| Hispanic/Latino | 61 (5.5) | 1 (9) |
| African American | 30 (2.7) | 2 (18) |
| American Indian or Alaskan Native | 6 (0.5) | 0 |
| Asian | 27 (2.4) | 0 |
| Other/unknown | 184 (17) | 0 |
| Designated sex, n (%) | ||
| Male | 390 (35) | 2 (18) |
| Female | 724 (65) | 9 (82) |
| Affirmed gender, n (%) | ||
| Male | 663 (60) | 8 (73) |
| Female | 353 (32) | 2 (18) |
| Nonbinary | 98 (8.8) | 1 (0.09) |
| Gender-affirming therapy received, n (%) | ||
| GnRH agonist | 177 (16) | 2 (18) |
| Gender-affirming hormones | 482 (43) | 9 (82) |
p-value <0.05.
GnRHa, gonadotropin-releasing hormone analog; SD, standard deviation; T1DM, type 1 diabetes mellitus; TGD, transgender/gender diverse.
The TGD patients with T1DM presented to the GeMS clinic at an older age than the overall clinic population (16 vs. 13 years, p=0.007). There was no difference in race, designated sex, affirmed gender, or proportion receiving gender-affirming treatments between the T1DM patients and the broader GeMS population. The mean BMI in the T1DM group was in the normal range (24.6±2.2 kg/m2), with six individuals categorized as normal and five as overweight (Table 2).
Table 2.
Clinical Characteristics of Gender Diverse Patients with Type 1 Diabetes
| Subject | Race/Ethnicity | Designated sex | Affirmed gender | Age at T1DM diagnosis (years) | Age at first GeMS visit (years) | Antipancreatic antibody | BMI at first visit (kg/m2) | BMI z-score for sex designated at birth | BMI z-score for affirmed gender | BMI category | Gender-affirming medical therapy | T1DM insulin delivery |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | White | F | M | 3 | 20 | ? | 22.5 | 0.22 | −0.17 | Normal | GAH | MDI |
| 2 | Black | F | M | 9 | 16 | ? | 23.4 | 0.45 | 0.13 | Normal | GAH | Pump |
| 3 | Hispanic | F | M | 3 | 15 | ? | 24.4 | 0.99 | 1.1 | Normal | GAH | Pump |
| 4 | White/Hispanic | M | F | 16 | 15 | + | 28.2 | 1.8 | 1.7 | Overweight | Both | Pump |
| 5 | White | F | M | 8 | 15 | ? | 20.4 | 0.11 | 0.13 | Normal | GAH | MDI |
| 6 | White | F | M | 6 | 16 | ? | 26.0 | 1.2 | 1.3 | Overweight | GAH | MDI |
| 7 | Black | M | F | 6 | 10 | + | 27.2 | 2.2 | 2.2 | Obese | GnRH | MDI |
| 8 | White | F | M | 9 | 16 | + | 24.8 | 1.0 | 1.1 | Normal | GAH | MDI |
| 9 | White | F | M | 11 | 13 | + | 23.5 | 1.2 | 1.4 | Overweight | GAH | Pump |
| 10 | White | F | NB | 11 | 18 | + | 23.0 | 0.47 | 0.33 | Normal | Neither | MDI |
| 11 | White | F | M | 11 | 18 | + | 27.0 | 1.6 | 1.7 | Overweight | GAH | MDI |
BMI, body mass index; F, female; GAH, gender-affirming hormones; GeMS, Gender Multispecialty Service; M, male; MDI, multiple daily injection; NB, nonbinary; Pump, insulin pump; ?, unknown.
All patients had T1DM before presentation to the GeMS program except one, who was diagnosed within 2 weeks of their first appointment. The mean age at T1DM diagnosis for this cohort was 8.45±3.7 years (range 3–16 years), which was significantly younger than the average age at T1DM diagnosis in the United States of 14.5 years.3 The average age at the first visit to GeMS among those patients with T1DM, 16±2.7 years, was older than the average in our clinic, which is 13±3.7 years.
The prevalence of T1DM among children and adolescents in the United States is 1.93 per 1000; thus, the expected number of patients with T1DM among the 1114 TGD youth seen during the study period is 2.15.7 We found 11 individuals with T1DM and gender dysphoria, which is a prevalence rate of 9.87 per 1000, or a 5.11-fold higher prevalence rate than would be expected for youth with T1DM and gender dysphoria.
To estimate glycemic control in the patients with T1DM seen in GeMS, the mean hemoglobin A1c (HgbA1c) values 6 months before the first GeMS visit was compared with the mean value the 6 months after the first GeMS clinic visit. We noted a downward trend in HgbA1c from 8.46% to 8.16% among those patients with values available.
Discussion
This retrospective study revealed a significantly greater prevalence of TGD children and adolescents presenting with T1DM than seen in the general pediatric population. These findings contribute to the growing literature surrounding this topic.1,2 Similar to Logel et al., we found that the prevalence of T1DM among TGD youth is fivefold higher than in the general population.2
Although apparently correlated, a causal association between T1DM and TGD has yet to be demonstrated or explained. One compelling explanation is that the minority stress secondary to TGD status serves as a trigger for T1DM onset. It is well documented that TGD adults and adolescents have increased psychological stress with higher rates of social stigma, poor body image, depression, and suicidality.8–10 Stress increases the activity of the sympathetic nervous system and release of cortisol and other counter-regulatory hormones that decrease insulin sensitivity. Decreased insulin sensitivity leads to a higher demand for insulin release putting pressure on the pancreatic β cells, which may hasten autoimmune destruction and β cell failure.11 We and others have found that patients with T1DM and TGD present with T1DM younger than the U.S. average, at 8.5 years in our report and 9.9 years in the previous report compared with a national average of 14.5 years.3 The additional minority stress that TGD patients with T1DM experience compared with their cis-gender peers with T1DM may lead to earlier β cell failure and earlier presentation.
Gender-affirming medical treatment has been shown to decrease psychological stress in TGD individuals. We hypothesized that presenting to our gender-affirming clinic may, through a reduction in stress, improve insulin sensitivity and lead to improved glycemic control. A marginal improvement was observed in HgbA1c values, an average measure of glycemic control for the past 3 months, before and after the first gender clinic visit.12 Although not statistically significant, this downward trend suggests that initiating gender-related care may have a positive effect on glycemic control. We did not have enough data available to investigate the impact of GAH or pubertal blockade on glycemic control.
There are several limitations of our study and previous reports that may explain the link between gender dysphoria and T1DM.1,2 The available data are retrospective, observational, and done in majority Caucasian populations. T1DM is more prevalent in the Caucasian population, and as such, comparisons between these cohorts and the national prevalence are less reliable. The increased prevalence we observed may simply be a representation of the referral bias to these centers. Patients with T1DM, a chronic condition requiring frequent interactions with physicians and nurses, may develop a greater sense of comfort or familiarity with the medical system. Moreover, as care tends to be followed at larger tertiary centers, which are more likely to have gender clinics and promote trans-friendly environments, gender-affirming care and exploration may be easier to facilitate. One would then expect that patients with T1DM would present to gender-affirming care earlier than the population average; however, in our study the TGD patients with T1DM presented later (16±2.7 years vs. 13±3.7 years, p=0.007) than the average in our clinic population.
In summary, we report in this study a higher prevalence of T1DM in TGD youth than would be expected. Future studies should investigate the impact of gender-affirming care and hormone therapy on diabetes control and the role of minority stress in the genesis of T1DM in this population. All patients had T1DM before presentation to the GeMS program except one, who was diagnosed within 2 weeks of their first appointment.
Abbreviations Used
- BMI
body mass index
- CDC
Centers for Disease Control
- F
female
- GAH
gender-affirming hormones
- GeMS
Gender Multispecialty Service
- GnRHa
gonadotropin-releasing hormone analog
- HgbA1c
hemoglobin A1c
- ICD
International Classification of Diseases
- M
male
- MDI
multiple daily injection
- NB
nonbinary
- Pump
insulin pump
- SD
standard deviation
- T1DM
type 1 diabetes mellitus
- TGD
transgender/gender diverse
- ?
unknown
Author Disclosure Statement
The authors have no relevant financial conflicts of interest to disclose.
Funding Information
This study was supported by National Institutes of Health grant T32 DK007699 and Doris Duke Charitable Foundation grant 2019119.
Cite this article as: Maru J, Millington K, Carswell J (2021) Greater than expected prevalence of type 1 diabetes mellitus found in an urban gender program, Transgender Health 6:1, 57–60, DOI: 10.1089/trgh.2020.0027.
References
- 1. Defreyne J, De Bacquer D, Shadid S, et al. Is type 1 diabetes mellitus more prevalent than expected in transgender persons? A local observation. Sex Med. 2017;5:e215–e218 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2. Logel SN, Bekx MT, Rehm JL. Potential association between type 1 diabetes mellitus and gender dysphoria. Pediatr Diabetes. 2019;21:266–270 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. TWG for the SEARCH for Diabetes in Youth Study Group*. Incidence of diabetes in youth in the United States. JAMA. 2007;297:2716–2724 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Herman JL, Flores AR, Brown TN, et al. Age of Individuals Who Identify as Transgender in the United States. Los Angeles: UCLA, 2017 [Google Scholar]
- 5. Conron KJ, Scott G, Stowell GS, Landers SJ. Transgender health in Massachusetts: results from a household probability sample of adults. Am J Public Health. 2012;102:118–122 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. CDC Growth Charts. United States. 2000. Available at http://www.cdc.gov/growthcharts Accessed July14, 2015
- 7. Dabelea D, Mayer-Davis EJ, Saydah S, et al. Prevalence of type 1 and type 2 diabetes among children and adolescents from 2001 to 2009. JAMA. 2014;311:1778–1786 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. Clements-Nolle K, Marx R, Katz M. Attempted suicide among transgender persons: the influence of gender-based discrimination and victimization. J Homosex. 2006;51:53–69 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. Nuttbrock L, Hwahng S, Bockting W, et al. Psychiatric impact of gender-related abuse across the life course of male-to-female transgender persons. J Sex Res. 2010;47:12–23 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10. Reisner SL, Greytak EA, Parsons JT, Ybarra ML. Gender minority social stress in adolescence: disparities in adolescent bullying and substance use by gender identity. J Sex Res. 2015;52:243–256 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11. Sepa A, Ludvigsson J. Psychological stress and the risk of diabetes-related autoimmunity: a review article. Neuroimmunomodulation. 2007;13:301–308 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12. Dauber A, Wolfsdorf JI. HbA1c levels for the diagnosis of diabetes mellitus in children. Nat Rev Endocrinol. 2010;6:304–305 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
