Skip to main content
PLOS ONE logoLink to PLOS ONE
. 2021 Feb 25;16(2):e0247229. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0247229

Effects of therapeutic hypothermia on death among asphyxiated neonates with hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized control trials

Biruk Beletew Abate 1,*, Melaku Bimerew 1,#, Bereket Gebremichael 2,#, Ayelign Mengesha Kassie 1,, MesfinWudu Kassaw 1,, Teshome Gebremeskel 1,, Wubet Alebachew Bayih 3,
Editor: Georg M Schmölzer4
PMCID: PMC7906350  PMID: 33630892

Abstract

Background

Hypoxic perinatal brain injury is caused by lack of oxygen to baby’s brain and can lead to death or permanent brain damage. However, the effectiveness of therapeutic hypothermia in birth asphyxiated infants with encephalopathy is uncertain. This systematic review and meta-analysis was aimed to estimate the pooled relative risk of mortality among birth asphyxiated neonates with hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy in a global context.

Methods

We used the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) guidelines to search randomized control trials from electronic databases (PubMed, Cochrane library, Google Scholar, MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), and meta register of Current Controlled Trials (mCRT)). The authors extracted the author’s name, year of publication, country, method of cooling, the severity of encephalopathy, the sample size in the hypothermic, and non-hypothermic groups, and the number of deaths in the intervention and control groups. A weighted inverse variance fixed-effects model was used to estimate the pooled relative risk of mortality. The subgroup analysis was done by economic classification of countries, methods of cooling, and cooling devices. Publication bias was assessed with a funnel plot and Eggers test. A sensitivity analysis was also done.

Results

A total of 28 randomized control trials with a total sample of 35, 92 (1832 hypothermic 1760 non-hypothermic) patients with hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy were used for the analysis. The pooled relative risk of mortality after implementation of therapeutic hypothermia was found to be 0.74 (95%CI; 0.67, 0.80; I2 = 0.0%; p<0.996). The subgroup analysis revealed that the pooled relative risk of mortality in low, low middle, upper-middle and high income countries was 0.32 (95%CI; -0.95, 1.60; I2 = 0.0%; p<0.813), 0.5 (95%CI; 0.14, 0.86; I2 = 0.0%; p<0.998), 0.62 (95%CI; 0.41–0.83; I2 = 0.0%; p<0.634) and 0.76 (95%CI; 0.69–0.83; I2 = 0.0%; p<0.975) respectively. The relative risk of mortality was the same in selective head cooling and whole-body cooling method which was 0.74. Regarding the cooling device, the pooled relative risk of mortality is the same between the cooling cap and cooling blanket (0.74). However, it is slightly lower (0.73) in a cold gel pack.

Conclusions

Therapeutic hypothermia reduces the risk of death in neonates with moderate to severe hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy. Both selective head cooling and whole-body cooling method are effective in reducing the mortality of infants with this condition. Moreover, low income countries benefit the most from the therapy. Therefore, health professionals should consider offering therapeutic hypothermia as part of routine clinical care to newborns with hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy especially in low-income countries.

Introduction

Hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy (HIE) is a complication resulting from intrapartum and neonatal asphyxia. Adverse intrapartum events remains a major cause of neonatal mortality and burden of disease in emerging economies [1, 2]. Neonatal encephalopathy due to perinatal asphyxia occurs in 1 up to 3 per 1000 live births in high-income countries, and in up to 20 per 1000 live births in low and middle-income countries [3]. The burden in low and middle-income countries is far higher than in high-income countries, and it accounts for approximately one million deaths annually [4]. If not treated, 62% of infants with perinatal hypoxic brain injury will die or have moderate to severe disabilities by the age of 18 to 22 months; treatment reduces this rate to 41% [5, 6]. Survivors also develop long-term neurologic disabilities as follows: 45% have cognitive and developmental delay or learning difficulties, 29%, some degree of cerebral palsy, 26%, blindness or vision defects, 17%, gross motor and coordination problems, epilepsy, 9%, hearing loss or deafness, and 1%, behavioral issues [7, 8].

Intrapartum hypoxia resulting in hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy (HIE) is one of the causes of neonatal encephalopathy, with no definitive test to make the diagnosis. In addition, very little knowledge is available in terms of neuroprotective strategies, the use of therapeutic hypothermia (TH) is one of the strategies commonly used and shown most promising neuroprotective intervention [9, 10].

In neonates with perinatal asphyxia, admission hyperoxemia increased the incidence of Hypoxic Ischemic Encephalophathy (HIE). Among neonates with HIE, admission hyperoxemia increased the risk of abnormal brain magnetic resonance imaging findings. The careful use of oxygen during and after resuscitation is necessary [11]. The phenomenon in which oxygen supplementation following a period of oxygen deficiency augments the injury is known as “the oxygen paradox”. Thus a powerful mean to reduce HIE is to avoid hyperoxia which results in rapid cell swelling [12].

Regarding the percentage of oxygen a systematic review and meta-analysis revealed that there is a significant reduction in the risk of neonatal mortality and a trend towards a reduction in the risk of sever HIE in newborn resuscitated with 21% O2 [13]. Hypoxic insults to the brain have been associated with an elevation in brain temperature. It is speculated that this temperature increase is caused by increased metabolic demands and inflammatory mediators released after acute ischemic injury [14]. Hypothermia prevents death in neonates with hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy due to perinatal asphyxia and considered to be the standard treatment for infants with this condition [1, 15]. It has been suggested that lowering core body temperature by 1°C results in a 6% to 10% reduction in whole-body metabolic demands [16].

Two methods of hypothermia are commonly used (selective head cooling and whole-body hypothermia) [17]. Brain cooling is effective in reducing the extent of brain injury even when it is initiated up to 5.5 hours after brain ischemia in near-term sheep fetuses. Reductions in brain temperature by 2°C to 5°C provide neuroprotection in newborn and adult animal models of brain ischemia [18].

Improved survival and neurodevelopmental outcome at 18 months of age have been reported in multiple trials of therapeutic hypothermia, and currently, it is the only neuroprotective strategy for neonates suspected to have suffered an intrapartum hypoxic-ischemic event.

According to International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation (ILCOR) 2020, hypothermia treatment cooling only be considered in neonatal care facilities with the capabilities for multidisciplinary care and availability of adequate resources to offer intravenous therapy, respiratory support, pulseoximetry, antibiotics, anticonvulsants, and pathology testing [19].

Previous randomized control trials conducted across the world reported the relative risk of mortality among birth asphyxiated neonates with hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy after the implementation of therapeutic hypothermia. The relative risk of mortality in such randomized control trials ranged from 0.00 [20] to 0.95 [21]. This indicates, there is an inconsistency report on the relative risk of mortality across different countries in the world. Moreover, there is no globally denoted pooled data which can be used as a baseline in designing strategies for the prevention of neonatal mortality particularly due to hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy. Therefore, this systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to estimate the pooled relative risk of mortality among birth asphyxiated neonates with hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy in a global context.

Methods

Reporting

The results of this review were reported based on the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis statement (PRISMA) guideline (S1 Checklist).

Searching strategy and information sources

We identified studies providing data on the effect of therapeutic hypothermia/ cooling therapy on newborn mortality from hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy from PubMed, Cochrane library, Google Scholar, MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), and metaRegister of Current Controlled Trials (mCRT). The last search was performed in April, 2020. The search was performed by using keywords/phrases and medical subject headings (MeSH) terms. To retrieve additional potentially eligible studies snowball searching in the reference list of papers was also conducted. Articles with incomplete reported data were handled through contacting corresponding authors. We used the search terms independently and/or in combination using Boolean operators like “OR” or “AND”.

The core search terms and phrases were “neonates”, “newborn”, “infant”, and “therapeutic hypothermia”, “cooling therapy”, "asphyxia", "hypoxic-ischemic", "hypoxic-ischemic”, “encephalopathy”. The search strategies were developed using different Boolean operators. Remarkably, to fit advanced PubMed database, the following search strategy was applied: (neonate [MeSH Terms] OR newborn OR perinatal OR infant) AND (hypothermia [MeSH Terms] OR cool OR cooling OR temperature OR body temperature) AND (death OR mortality) AND (asphyxia [MeSH Terms] OR hypoxic-ischemic OR hypoxic-ischaemic OR hypoxia OR brain OR encephalopathy AND therapy (S1 Table).

Study selection

Retrieved studies were exported to reference manager software, Endnote version 8 to remove duplicate studies. Two investigators (BB and TG) independently reviewed the retrieved studies using their titles and abstracts before retrieval of full-text papers. We used pre-specified inclusion criteria to further screen the full-text articles. Disagreements were discussed during a consensus meeting with other reviewers (AM and MW) for the final selection of studies to be included in the analysis.

Eligibility criteria

We included RCTs that analyzed the effect of whole-body hypothermia or selective head cooling on newborn mortality from hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy compared with non-hypothermic patients. We only included studies that fulfilled all criteria. There were no restrictions for language, length of follow up, publication date, or status. Researches that did not report our outcome of interest were excluded.

Quality assessment

After combining the Database search results duplicate articles were removed using Endnote (version X8). The Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) Critical Appraisal Checklist for Randomized Controlled Trials was used [22, 23]. Four independent authors appraised the quality of all potential studies to be included for analysis. The appraisal was repeated by exchanging with each other. Thus, one paper was appraised by two Authors. Any disagreement between the reviewers was solved by taking the mean score of the two reviewers (S2 Table).

Data extraction

The authors developed a data extraction form on the excel sheet which includes the author’s name, year of publication, country, method of cooling, the severity of encephalopathy, the sample size in the hypothermic, and non-hypothermic groups, and the number of deaths in the intervention and control groups. The data extraction sheet was piloted using 4 papers randomly. The extraction form was adjusted after piloted the template. Two of the authors extracted the data using the extraction form in collaboration. The third and fourth authors checked the correctness of the data independently. Any disagreements between reviewers were resolved through discussions with a third reviewer and fourth reviewer if required. Any mistyping of data was resolved through crosschecking with the included papers. If we got incomplete data, we excluded the study after two attempts were made to contact the corresponding author by email.

Statistical analysis

The primary outcome was the relative risk (RR) of death, which was calculated as the proportion of death among hypothermic over the proportion of death among non-hypothermic patients.

After the data was extracted using Microsoft Excel format, we imported the data to STATA version 14.0 statistical software for further analysis. Using the binomial distribution formula, standard error was calculated for each study. We pooled the estimates RR of death by a fixed-effects model meta-analysis [24]. The pooled estimates RR of death with 95% CI were presented using forest plots. We examined the heterogeneity between the studies using Cochrane’s Q statistics (Chi-square), inverse variance (I2), and p-values [25]. Subgroup analysis was done by stratifying studies using the method of cooling and the economy classification of the country where the study was conducted (low-income economies, lower-middle-income economies, upper-middle-income economies, and high-income economies) [26].

When statistical pooling is not possible, non-pooled data was presented in table form. Sensitivity analysis was employed to see the effect of a single study on the overall estimation. Publication bias was checked by the funnel plot and more objectively through Egger’s regression test [27].

Results

Study selection

A total of 21,572 studies were identified using electronic searches (through Database searching (n = 21,560) and other sources (n = 12)). After duplication removed, a total of 11,150 articles remained (10422 duplicated). Finally, 1500 studies were screened for full-text review and, 28 articles with a total sample of 3.592 (1,832 hypothermic 1,760 non-hypothermic) patients were included for the final analysis (Fig 1).

Fig 1. PRISMA flow diagram showed the results of the search and reasons for exclusion.

Fig 1

Characteristics of included studies

Table 1 summarizes the characteristics of the 28 included studies in the systematic review and meta-analysis [20, 21, 2850]. Regarding the income of countries in which the trail was done, 15 studies were done in high income, 4 studies in upper middle income, 7 in low middle income, and 2 studies in low-income countries. Regarding methods of cooling used, 20 studies used whole body cooling while the remaining 8 studies used selective head cooling. Eleven included studies used cold gel pack, 9 studies used cooling blanket, and 8 studies used cooling caps as a cooling device. There were 1126/3592 deaths, 483/1832 in the hypothermia group, and 643/1760 in the control group (Tables 1 and 2).

Table 1. Distribution of studies on the effects of therapeutic hypothermia on death among asphyxiated neonates with hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy.

Authors Year Country Income N Hypo: STD Cooling method/Device Mortality HYPO:STD Relative risk Yes Total Overall appraisal
Lin et al. [28] 2006 China upper-middle 32:30 SHC: cooling caps 2:2 0.94 12/13 Included
Zhou et al. [29] 2010 China upper-middle 138:118 SHC: cooling caps 31:46 0.85 13/13 Included
Akisu et al. [20] 2013 Turkey upper-middle 11:10 SHC: cooling caps 0:2 0 13/13 Included
Robertson et al. [30] 2008 Uganda Low 21:15 WBC: cooling blanket 1:7 0.1 11/13 Included
Thayyil et al. [31] 2013 India low-middle 17:16 WBC: cooling blanket 4:2 3.2 12/13 Included
Bharadwaj et al. [32] 2012 India low-middle 62:62 WHC: cold gel pack 3:6 0.5 11/13 Included
Bhat et al. [33] 2006 India low-middle 20:15 WHC: cold gel pack 3:5 0.45 13/13 Included
Azzoparadi et al. [21] 2009 UK High 163:162 WHC: cooling blanket 42:44 0.86 12/13 Included
Jacobs et al. [34] 2011 Australia High 91:78 WHC: cold gel pack 51:58 0.75 12/13 Included
Shankaran et al. [35] 2005 USA High 102:103 WHC: cooling blanket 45:64 0.71 12/13 Included
Simbruner et al. [36] 2010 Germany High 53:58 WHC: cooling blanket 27:48 0.62 11/13 Included
Gluckman et al. [37] 2005 USA High 108:110 SHC: cooling caps 36:42 0.82 13/13 Included
Zhou et al. [29] 2010 China upper-middle 100:94 SHC: cooling caps 31:46 0.65 12/13 Included
Eicher et al. [38] 2005 USA High 32:33 WHC: cooling blanket 10:14 0.75 13/13 Included
Battin et al. [39] 2003 New Zealand High 13:13 SHC: cooling caps 5:7 0.72 12/13 Included
Shankaran et al. [40] 2002 USA High 9:10 WHC: cooling blanket 2:3 0.74 13/13 Included
Joy et al. [41] 2012 India low-middle 58:58 WHC: cold gel pack 1:4 0.25 11/13 Included
Maoulainine et al. [42] 2017 Morocco Low 19:19 SHC; cooling caps 3:7 0.43 13/13 Included
Laptook et al. [43] 2018 USA High 83:85 WBC: cooling blanket 6:5 0.86 12/13 Included
Gane et al. [44] 2013 India low-middle 53:50 WBC: cold gel pack 4:8 0.5 13/13 Included
Selway et al [45] 2010 USA High 102:103 WBC: cold gel pack 24:38 0.65 12/13 Included
Susan et al. [34] 2011 USA High 110:111 WBC: cold gel pack 55:67 0.77 13/13 Included
Jose et al. [46] 2018 India low-middle 74:70 WBC: cold gel pack 18:28 0.6 12/13 Included
Azzopardi et al. [47] 2014 UK High 145:135 WHC: cooling blanket 47:49 0.95 10/13 Included
Shankaran et al. [48] 2012 USA High 58:43 WBC: cold gel pack 6:7 0.64 10/13 Included
Battin et al. [49] 2001 New Zealand High 20:20 SHC: cooling caps 3:4 0.75 11/13 Included
Gane et al. [44] 2013 India low-middle 60:60 WBC: cold gel pack 4:8 0.5 10/13 Included
Namasivayam et al. [43] 2017 USA High 78:79 WBC: cold gel pack 19:22 0.85 11/13 Included

Table 2. Neonatal baseline characteristics of included studies on the effects of therapeutic hypothermia on death among asphyxiated neonates with hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy.

SR no Authors Year Mean BW (g) HYPO: STD GA (weeks) HYPO: STD Apgar score HYPO: STD Moderate NE (n–%) HYPO: STD Severe NE (n–%) HYPO: STD
1. Lin et al. [28] 2006 3310: 3430 38.7: 39.1 3:3 16: 15 7: 6
2. Zhou et al. [29] 2010 3360: 3299 NA: NA NA: NA 41: 41 38: 35
3. Akisu et al. [20] 2013 3410: 3270 39.3: 39.1 4.3: 4.1 7: 5 3:3
4. Robertson et al. [30] 2008 3300: 3200 38: 38 4.7: 5.2 10: 10 6:1
5. Thayyil et al. [31] 2013 2977: 2890 38: 38.9 4.3: 4.5 6: 5 2:2
6. Bharadwaj et al. [32] 2012 2967: 2899 39.8: 40 NA: NA 5.34: 5.26 55:7
7. Bhat et al. [33] 2006 NA: NA NA: NA NA: NA NA:NA NA:NA
8. Azzopardi et al. [21] 2009 3450: 3350 40.3: 40.1 4:4: 4 65: 57 98: 95
9. Jacobs et al. [34] 2011 NA: NA NA: NA NA: NA NA: NA NA:NA
10. Shankaran et al. [35] 2005 3385: 3370 NA: NA NA: NA 69: 66 32: 40
11. Simbruner et al. [36] 2010 3300: 3300 39.2: 39.4 3.4: 3.4 24: 17 38: 46
12. Gluckman et al. [37] 2005 3399: 3504 38.9: 39.1 NA: NA NA: NA NA:NA
13. Zhou et al. [29] 2010 3360: 3299 NA: NA NA: NA 41: 41 38: 35
14. Eicher et al. [38] 2005 3241: 3550 38.8: 39.1 NA: NA 5:5 25: 25
15. Battin et al. [39] 2003 3333: 3371 40: 39.8 5: 5 NA: NA NA:NA
16. Shankaran et al. [40] 2002 NA: NA NA: NA NA: NA NA: NA NA:NA
17. Joy et al. [41] 2012 2840: 2910 NA: NA 3.81: 3.45 51:9 7:7
18. Maoulainine et al. [42] 2017 3336: 3300 NA: NA NA: NA NA: NA NA:NA
19. Laptook et al. [43] 2018 3379: 3303 39:39 4.2: 4.3 73: 78 10:7
20. Gane et al. [44] 2013 2792: 2903 NA: NA 3: 3 44: 45 15: 16
21. Selway et al. [45] 2010 NA: NA NA: NA NA: NA NA: NA NA: NA
22. Susan et al. [34] 2011 3348: 3515 3939.2 3: 3 63: 54 30: 29
23. Jose et al. [46] 2018 3259: 3278 NA: NA NA: NA 51: 39 22: 28
24. Azzopardi et al. [47] 2014 3467: 3351 40.3: 40.1 NA: NA 62: 57 83: 78
25. Shankaran, et al. [48] 2012 3172: 3555 NA: NA NA: NA 28: 41 15: 16
26. Battin, et al. [49] 2001 3333: 3458 39.5: 39.4 5: 5 NA: NA NA:NA
27. Gane, et al. [44] 2013 2792: 2903 NA: NA 3: 3 45: 44 15: 16
28. Namasivayam et al. [43] 2017 NA: NA NA: NA NA: NA NA: NA NA:NA

Characteristics of excluded studies

Almost all excluded studies were case series. The majority used whole body cooling methods. The highest proportion of those studies was from Africa. Regarding the exclusion criteria some studies were excluded because the study discontinued due to adverse outcomes, study details unclear, the protocol only, and they were case series (Table 3).

Table 3. Characteristics of excluded studies on the effects of therapeutic hypothermia on death among asphyxiated neonates with hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy.

Excluded Studies Country Cooling method Device N Comments Reasons for exclusion
Horn [56] South Africa Selective head cooling Frozen gel packs 4 Due to wide temperature fluctuations, the study stopped prematurely Case series
Thomas [57] India Whole-body cooling Frozen gel packs 20 The mean rectal temperature during cooling was 32.96 oC. Case series
Horn [58] South Africa Selective head cooling Selective head 5 A pilot study with frozen gel packs around the head Case series
Rajhans [59] India Whole-body cooling Blanketrol II 5 Only two babies completed cooling for 72 hours Case series
Horn [60] South Africa Selective head cooling Servo controlled Fan 10 Excessive shivering reported in the cooled infants. Case series
Robertson [61] Uganda Whole-body cooling Water bottles 56 Study protocol of a previously published cooling trial. Protocol only
Thomas [57] India Whole-body cooling Frozen gel packs 14 The adverse outcome was seen in 3 (2 deaths, 1 developmental delay) of the 14 infants (out of 20) Case series
Li [62] China Whole-body cooling Not described 93 Hypothermic induced within 10 hours, maintaining rectal temperature 33.5uC for 72 hours. Study details unclear.
See [63] Malaysia Whole-body cooling Ambient Temperature 17 Cooled by manipulating environmental temperature; report no neurological deficit in 14/15 stage 2 NE babies. Case series
Horn [64] South Africa Selective Head Cooling Frozen gel packs 14 Active rewarming using a radiant warmer Case series
Tan [53] Uganda Whole-body cooling Water bottles 19 One year follow up of previously recruited infants from a cooling trial. Duplicate data

Inclusion and exclusion criteria of studies included in the meta-analysis

Almost all included randomized control trials used similar eligibility criteria. They used the following inclusion criteria: 5 min or 10 min Apgar score, cord PH 7.1, base deficit, GA> = 36 weeks, BW> = 2500 g, and encephalopathy. On the other hand, Major congenital malformation, metabolic disorder, chromosomal abnormalities, congenital infection, persistent pulmonary hypertension, premature rupture of membranes, and >6 h of age used as exclusion criteria (Table 4).

Table 4. Inclusion and exclusion criteria of included studies on the effects of therapeutic hypothermia on death among asphyxiated neonates with hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy.

Authors Inclusion criteria Exclusion criteria
Lin ZL et al. [28] 5 min Apgar,6 AND Cord pH,7.1 or base deficit .15 mmol/L AND encephalopathy Major congenital abnormalities, persistent pulmonary
Hypertension
Zhou WH et al. [29] 5 min Apgar,6 AND Cord pH,7 or base deficit #16 mmol/L AND need for resuscitation at 5 minutes of age Major congenital abnormalities, maternal fever
.38uC, infection, rupture of membranes .18
hours or foul-smelling liquor, another encephalopathy
Akisu M et al. [20] 5 min Apgar,6 AND Cord pH,7.1 or base deficit .10 mmol/L AND encephalopathy Major congenital malformation, metabolic disorder, chromosomal abnormalities, congenital infection, transitory drug depression
Robertson et al. [30] 5 min Apgar,6 AND encephalopathy (Thompson score .5) Apnoea or cyanosis, absent cardiac output .10 min
Thayyil S et al. [31] 5 min Apgar,6 AND encephalopathy (Thompson score .5) Major congenital malformations, Imminent death at the time of randomization
Bharadwaj et al. [32] 10 min Apgar,6 AND arterial pH#7 or base excess $12 meq AND encephalopathy Major congenital abnormalities, no spontaneous respiration by 20 min, outborn babies
Bhat M et al. [33] 10 minute Apgar,5 AND Cord pH,7 and or base deficit of .18 meq/L Major congenital abnormalities, persistent pulmonary
Hypertension
Azzoparadi et al. [21] GA> = 36 weeks with PHI, moderate to severe encephalopathy, and abnormal background on aEEG Major congenital abnormalities or >6 h of age
Jacobs et al. [34] GA > = 35 weeks with PHI and moderate or severe encephalopathy Major congenital abnormalities, >6 h of age, BW <2 kg, overt bleeding, required >80% oxygen, death was imminent, or therapeutic hypothermia had commenced before assessment
Shankaran et al. [35] GA> = 36 weeks with PHI, <6 h of age, and encephalopathy or seizures Major congenital abnormalities, BW < = 1800 g, or >6 h of age
Simbruner et al. [36] GA> = 36 weeks, PHI, encephalopathy, and abnormal EEG or aEEG findings Major congenital malformations, >5.5 h of age, received anticonvulsant therapy, BW <1800 g, HC less than the third percentile for GA if BW and length are greater than the third percentile, imperforate anus, or gross hemorrhage
Gluckman et al. [37] GA> = 36 weeks with PHI, moderate to severe encephalopathy, and abnormal background on an EEG Major congenital abnormalities, >5.5 h of age, received prophylactic anticonvulsants, BW <1800 g, HC <2 SD for gestation if BW and length >−2 SD, or critically ill and unlikely to benefit from intensive care
Zhou et al. [29] GA> = 37 weeks, BW> = 2500 g, PHI, and encephalopathy Major congenital abnormalities, signs of infection, other causes of encephalopathy or severe anemia
Eicher DJ et al. [38] > = 35 weeks gestation, > = 2000 gm birth weight, were <6 hours after birth and encephalopathy Neonates with clinical sepsis, maternal chorioamnionitis, weight or head circumference less than 10th percentile for gestation age, or congenital abnormalities were excluded
Battin MR et al. [39] 1) gestational age >37 weeks; 2) 5-minute Apgar score below 6 or cord/first arterial pH <7.1; and 3) encephalopathy Major congenital abnormalities or those who presented to National Women’s Hospital neonatal unit after 6 hours of age
Shankaran et al. [40] All term infants who were >36 weeks’ gestation and admitted to the neonatal intensive care unit at below 6 hours of age 1) inability to perform random assignment by 6 hours of age, 2) chromosomal abnormality, 3) major congenital anomaly, 4) severe growth restriction (< = 1800 g birth weight), 5) infant unlikely to survive
Joy R et al. [41] GA> = 37 weeks, BW> = 2500 g, PHI, and encephalopathy Major congenital abnormalities, signs of infection, other causes of encephalopathy or severe anemia
Maoulainine et al. [42] GA> = 36 weeks with PHI, <6 h of age, and encephalopathy or seizures Major congenital abnormalities, BW < = 1800 g, or >6 h of age
Laptook AR et al. [43] GA> = 36 weeks with PHI, moderate to severe encephalopathy, and abnormal background on an EEG Major congenital abnormalities or >6 h of age
Gane B. D et al. [44] > = 37 weeks with umbilical cord blood or arterial blood (within the first postnatal hour) PH < = 7 or base deficit > = 16 meq with evidence of encephalopathy more than 6 h of age at the time of randomization, had major congenital abnormalities, did not establish spontaneous respiration by 20 min after birth
Selway L et al. [45] 1) gestational age >37 weeks; 2) 5-minute Apgar score below 6 or cord/first arterial pH <7.1; and 3) encephalopathy Major congenital abnormalities or those who presented to National Women’s Hospital neonatal unit after 6 hours of age
Susan E. et al. [34] 35 weeks’ gestation or more at birth, could have hypothermia initiated within 6 hours of birth, had moderate or severe encephalopathy hypothermia could not start within6 hours of birth if the birth weight was less than 2 kg if major congenital abnormalities were suspected
Jose S et al. [46] moderate and severe encephalopathy within 6 hours after birth after an acute perinatal event Major congenital abnormalities, signs of infection, other causes of encephalopathy or severe anemia
Azzopardi M.D et al.[47] GA> = 37 weeks, BW> = 2500 g, PHI, and encephalopathy Major congenital abnormalities, signs of infection, other causes of encephalopathy or severe anemia
Shankaran, MD et al. [48] GA> = 36 weeks with PHI, <6 h of age, and encephalopathy or seizures Major congenital abnormalities, BW < = 1800 g, or >6 h of age
Battin, M. R et al. [49] GA> = 36 weeks with PHI, <6 h of age, and encephalopathy or seizures Major congenital abnormalities, BW < = 1800 g, or >6 h of age
Gane, B. D et al. [44] GA> = 37 weeks, BW> = 2500 g, PHI, and encephalopathy Major congenital abnormalities, signs of infection, other causes of encephalopathy or severe anemia
Namasivayam A et al. [43] GA> = 36 weeks with PHI, moderate to severe encephalopathy, and abnormal background on aEEG Major congenital abnormalities or >6 h of age

Meta-analysis

The effects of therapeutic hypothermia on death among asphyxiated neonates with hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy

All of the studies (n = 28) reported the magnitude of mortality among cooled and non-cooled neonates with hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy [20, 21, 2850]. The authors calculated the relative risk of mortality in all included studies. The relative risk of mortality ranged from 0.00 l [20] up to 0.95 [21].

The fixed-effects model analysis from those studies revealed that the pooled relative risk of mortality was found to be 0.74 (95%CI; 0.67, 0.80; I2 = 0.0%; p<0.996) (Fig 2).

Fig 2. Forest plot showing the effects of therapeutic hypothermia on death among asphyxiated neonates with hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy.

Fig 2

Subgroup analysis of the effects of therapeutic hypothermia on death among asphyxiated neonates with hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy

The subgroup analysis was done through stratifying by country income level, method of cooling, and device of cooling. Based on this, the pooled relative risk of mortality was 0.32, 0.5, 0.62, and 0.76 in the low, low middle, upper-middle, and high-income countries respectively (Fig 3 and Table 5). The relative risk of mortality was the same in selective head cooling and whole-body cooling method which was 0.74 (Fig 4 and Table 5).

Fig 3. Subgroup analysis by the country level of income on the effects of therapeutic hypothermia on death among asphyxiated neonates with hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy.

Fig 3

Table 5. Subgroup analysis of the effects of therapeutic hypothermia on death among asphyxiated neonates with hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy.
Variables Characteristics Pooled prevalence (95% CI) I2(P-value)
Country income level High 0.76 (0.69, 0.83) 0.0% (0.975)
Upper middle 0.62 (0.41, 0.83) 0.0% (0.634)
Low-middle 0.50 (0.14, 0.86) 0.0% (0.998)
Low 0.32 (-0.95, 1.60) 0.0% (0.813)
Methods of cooling Selective head cooling 0.74 (0.60, 0.87) 0.0% (0.798)
Whole body cooling 0.74 (0.66, 0.81) 0.0% (0.998)
Device of cooling Cooling caps 0.74 (0.60, 0.87) 0.0% (0.798)
Cooling blanket 0.74 (0.64, 0.85) 0.0% (0.721)
Cold gel pack 0.73 (0.62, 0.84) 0.0% (0.993)
Fig 4. Subgroup analysis by the method of cooling effects of therapeutic hypothermia on death among asphyxiated neonates with hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy.

Fig 4

Regarding the cooling device, the pooled relative risk of mortality is the same between the cooling cap and cooling blanket (0.74). However, it is slightly lower (0.73) in the cold gel pack (Fig 5 and Table 5).

Fig 5. Subgroup analysis by the device of cooling effects of therapeutic hypothermia on death among asphyxiated neonates with hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy.

Fig 5

Sensitivity analysis

We employed a leave-one-out sensitivity analysis to identify the impact of the individual study on the pooled relative risk of mortality. The results of this sensitivity analysis showed that our findings were not dependent on a single study. Our pooled estimated relative risk varied between 0.72(0.65, 0.79) [36] and 0.75(0.68, 0.82) [21] after the deletion of a single study (S1 Fig).

Publication bias

We have also checked publication bias and a funnel plot showed symmetrical distribution (S2 Fig). Egger’s regression test p-value was 0.156, which indicated the absence of publication bias (S3 Fig).

Discussion

This systematic review and meta-analysis of RCTs was conducted to assess the effectiveness of therapeutic hypothermia/cooling therapy to reduce mortality of asphyxiated neonates with hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy. Therapeutic hypothermia is found to be effective to reduce the risk of death in neonates with moderate to severe hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy. In addition, both selective head cooling and whole-body cooling methods are effective in reducing the mortality of infants with this condition.

The pooled relative risk of mortality among birth asphyxiated neonates who have got cooling therapy was found to be nearly 26% lower compared with those who haven’t got cooling therapy. This result was similar with a systematic review and meta-analysis conducted in 2010 and 2013 [3, 15, 17, 51].

The above-mentioned similarity between our finding and others can be explained by different scientific assumption. Pathophysiologically, it is known that birth asphyxia leads to hypoxia and hypoxic ischemic insult. Initially, hypoxic ischemic (HI) insult results in primary energy failure which is characterized by decreased ATP production. This in turn leads to loss of integrity of the neuronal cell membrane, with calcium entry into the cell facilitated by activation of NMDA receptor and other excitotoxic neurotransmitters. At this stage, decreasing cerebral metabolism, antagonizing NMDA receptors and suppressing excitotoxic neurotransmitters are fundamental interventional strategies to be used to reverse brain damage/ treat HIE in asphyxiated neonates. In the absence of any intervention, secondary energy failure associated with moderate to severe HIE will occur after 6–48 hours’ period of latency due to oxidative stress, inflammation, and ultimately leads to cell death. At this stage, interventional strategies targeted to reduce oxidative stress markers, inflammation and cell death are crucial to treat HIE in asphyxiated neonates [44, 52].

Another mechanism could be through reducing cerebral metabolism by inhibiting post depolarization release of many toxins. It can also reduce oxidative stress-induced DNA damage by reducing stress markers, attenuate excitatory brain damage, and suppress inflammation and programmed cell death (apoptosis) [44]. So, it is assumed that asphyxiated neonates who got cooling therapy will have reduced risk of mortality than neonates without cooling therapy.

The subgroup analysis by income in our study found that cooling therapy can reduce mortality of asphyxiated neonates in low and middle income countries better than in high income countries. In contrast to this result, a systematic review and meta-analysis conducted in low and middle income (LMI) countries found no significant reduction of neonatal mortality with cooling therapy in those countries. But, it had failed to exclude clinically important benefits/ harms of cooling therapy due to wide CI. Rather, it had explained as the apparent lack of treatment effect might be due to the heterogeneity and poor quality of the included studies, inefficiency of the low technology cooling devices, lack of optimal neonatal intensive care [53].

In line with results of this meta-analysis, literatures had revealed that cooling therapy can reduce mortality of asphyxiated neonates in LMI countries [15, 53]. However, safety and affordability of cooling therapy in those countries was under question [52]. Since this meta-analysis had not explored safety and affordability issues of cooling therapy, authors had failed to strongly praise direct application of cooling therapy in LMI countries. According to ILCOR (2020) cooling treatment should be considered when neonatal care facilities fulfill infrastructures and adequate resources to offer intravenous therapy, respiratory support, pulseoximetry, antibiotics, anticonvulsants, and pathology testing [19].

Concerning cooling methods, the relative risk of mortality among asphyxiated neonates who got selective head cooling therapy or whole-body cooling therapy was found to be the same. A meta-analysis conducted in 2012 had revealed a slightly reduced risk of mortality in neonates who got whole body cooling therapy than neonates with selective head cooling therapy [51]. Literature indicated that, even if both whole-body and selective head cooling are effective methods to provide cooling therapy and have comparable outcomes, whole-body cooling is more commonly used due to the ease of administration. Selective head cooling is more problematic (vulnerable for high temperature fluctuations and hyperthermia during rewarming) which makes it difficult for clinical application. Whole body cooling provides systemic effect with cooling of almost all parts of the brain, while selective head cooling cools only cortical part of the brain [28, 54, 55]. Due to these reasons, authors of this meta-analysis believe that whole body cooling is more applicable and effective than selective head cooling; but it needs further research and explanation.

Regarding cooling devices, the pooled relative risk of mortality was found to be the same between cooling cap and cooling blanket. However, it was slightly lower in cold gel pack. Literatures comparing cooling cap, cooling blanket and cold gel pack in terms of effectiveness were not found. So, authors of this meta-analysis suggest the need for further researches on this issue.

Strength and limitations

This meta-analysis has several strengths. One is absence of heterogeneity among included randomized control trials in all pooling analysis. Besides, included randomized control trials have high quality as assessed by JBI quality appraisal checklist for randomized control trials. This study also has certain limitations. First, this systematic review and meta-analysis only assessed the impact of therapeutic hypothermia on mortality. It lacks data on the impact of reducing disabilities and chronic complications among survived infants. Moreover, safety and affordability issues of applying therapeutic hypothermia in LMIC is not addressed here and needs further investigation.

Conclusion

Therapeutic hypothermia reduces the risk of death in neonates with moderate to severe hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy. Both selective head cooling and whole-body cooling method are equally effective in reducing the mortality of infants with this condition. Cold gel pack was slightly better than the cooling cap and cooling blanket in reducing mortality. Cooling therapy can be applied by using low-cost servo-controlled cooling devices/ low technology devices like ice pack, cold gel pack, cooling cap, cooling fans, cooling blanket, water bottles and others. Therefore, health professionals should consider offering therapeutic hypothermia as part of routine clinical care to newborns with hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy especially in low- and middle-income countries after exploring safety issues with fulfillment of neonatal care facilities infrastructures and adequate resources to offer multi care like intravenous therapy, respiratory support, pulseoximetry, antibiotics, anticonvulsants, and pathology testing. Additional randomized control trial targeting safety, affordability and effective method of cooling and cooling devices to be applied in LMI countries should also be investigated.

Supporting information

S1 Checklist. PRISMA checklist.

(DOCX)

S1 Fig

Sensitivity analysis the effects of therapeutic hypothermia on death among asphyxiated neonates with hypoxic ischemic encephalopathy.

(DOCX)

S2 Fig. Funnel plot showing publication bias on the effects of therapeutic hypothermia on death among asphyxiated neonates with hypoxic ischemic encephalopathy.

(DOCX)

S3 Fig. Eggers test showing publication bias on the effects of therapeutic hypothermia on death among asphyxiated neonates with hypoxic ischemic encephalopathy.

(DOCX)

S1 Table. Search strategy used for one of the databases.

(DOCX)

S2 Table. Quality appraisal result of included studies; using Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) quality appraisal checklist.

(DOCX)

S1 Synopsis

(DOCX)

Abbreviations

HIE

Hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy

WHO

World Health Organization

CI

Confidence interval

AOR

Adjusted Odds Ratio

BW

Birth Weight

GA

Gestational Age

RR

Relative Risk

PRISMA

Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses

SHC

Selective Head Cooling

WBC

Whole Body Cooling

LMI

Low and middle income

Data Availability

All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting information files.

Funding Statement

The author(s) received no specific funding for this work.

References

  • 1.Prof.-Aggrey-Wasunna.pdf. Neonatal Therapeutic hypothermia. http://wwwkenyapaediatricorg/. 2018.
  • 2.Levene ML, Kornberg J, Williams T. The incidence and severity of post-asphyxial encephalopathy in full-term infants. Early human development. 1985;11(1):21–6. 10.1016/0378-3782(85)90115-x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Edwards AD, Brocklehurst P, Gunn AJ, Halliday H, Juszczak E, Levene M, et al. Neurological outcomes at 18 months of age after moderate hypothermia for perinatal hypoxic ischaemic encephalopathy: synthesis and meta-analysis of trial data. Bmj. 2010;340:c363. 10.1136/bmj.c363 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Lawn JE, Cousens S, Zupan J, Team LNSS. 4 million neonatal deaths: when? Where? Why? The lancet. 2005;365(9462):891–900. 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)71048-5 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Shankaran S, Pappas A, McDonald SA, Vohr BR, Hintz SR, Yolton K, et al. Childhood outcomes after hypothermia for neonatal encephalopathy. New England Journal of Medicine. 2012;366(22):2085–92. 10.1056/NEJMoa1112066 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Finer N, Robertson C, Richards R, Pinnell L, Peters K. Hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy in term neonates: perinatal factors and outcome. The Journal of pediatrics. 1981;98(1):112–7. 10.1016/s0022-3476(81)80555-0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Murray DM, Bala P, O’CONNOR CM, Ryan CA, Connolly S, Boylan GB. The predictive value of early neurological examination in neonatal hypoxic–ischaemic encephalopathy and neurodevelopmental outcome at 24 months. Developmental Medicine & Child Neurology. 2010;52(2):e55–e9. 10.1111/j.1469-8749.2009.03550.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Mwaniki MK, Atieno M, Lawn JE, Newton CR. Long-term neurodevelopmental outcomes after intrauterine and neonatal insults: a systematic review. The Lancet. 2012;379(9814):445–52. 10.1016/S0140-6736(11)61577-8 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Encephalopathy Neonatal and Neurologic Outcome ne. Report of the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists’ Task Force on neonatal encephalopathy. Pediatrics 2014;133(5):e1483–1488. [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Martinello K, Hart AR, Yap S, Mitra S, Robertson NJ. Management and investigation of neonatal encephalopathy: 2017 update. Archives of Disease in Childhood-Fetal and Neonatal Edition. 2017;102(4):F346–F58. 10.1136/archdischild-2015-309639 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Kapadia VS, Chalak LF, DuPont TL, Rollins NK, Brion LP, Wyckoff MH. Perinatal asphyxia with hyperoxemia within the first hour of life is associated with moderate to severe hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy. The Journal of pediatrics. 2013;163(4):949–54. 10.1016/j.jpeds.2013.04.043 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Saugstad OD. The oxygen paradox in the newborn: keep oxygen at normal levels. The Journal of Pediatrics. 2013;163(4):934–5. 10.1016/j.jpeds.2013.06.003 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Saugstad OD, Ramji S, Soll RF, Vento M. Resuscitation of newborn infants with 21% or 100% oxygen: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis. Neonatology. 2008;94(3):176–82. 10.1159/000143397 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Karaszewski B, Wardlaw JM, Marshall I, Cvoro V, Wartolowska K, Haga K, et al. Early brain temperature elevation and anaerobic metabolism in human acute ischaemic stroke. Brain. 2009;132(4):955–64. 10.1093/brain/awp010 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Galvao TF, Silva MT, Marques MC, de Oliveira ND, Pereira MG. Hypothermia for perinatal brain hypoxia-ischemia in different resource settings: a systematic review. Journal of tropical pediatrics. 2013;59(6):453–9. 10.1093/tropej/fmt047 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Verco LJ, Hockings LE. Therapeutic hypothermia for brain injury. Anaesthesia & Intensive Care Medicine. 2013;14(9):371–4. [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Shah PS, editor Hypothermia: a systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical trials. Seminars in Fetal and Neonatal Medicine; 2010: Elsevier. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Gunn AJ, Gunn TR, Gunning MI, Williams CE, Gluckman PD. Neuroprotection with prolonged head cooling started before postischemic seizures in fetal sheep. Pediatrics. 1998;102(5):1098–106. 10.1542/peds.102.5.1098 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Wyckoff MH, Wyllie J, Aziz K, de Almeida MF, Fabres J, Fawke J, et al. Neonatal life support: 2020 international consensus on cardiopulmonary resuscitation and emergency cardiovascular care science with treatment recommendations. Circulation. 2020;142(16_suppl_1):S185–S221. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Akisu M, Huseyinov A, Yalaz M, Cetin H, Kultursay N. Selective head cooling with hypothermia suppresses the generation of platelet-activating factor in cerebrospinal fluid of newborn infants with perinatal asphyxia. Prostaglandins, leukotrienes and essential fatty acids. 2003;69(1):45–50. 10.1016/s0952-3278(03)00055-3 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Azzopardi DV, Strohm B, Edwards AD, Dyet L, Halliday HL, Juszczak E, et al. Moderate hypothermia to treat perinatal asphyxial encephalopathy. New England Journal of Medicine. 2009;361(14):1349–58. 10.1056/NEJMoa0900854 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Peters MD, Godfrey CM, McInerney P, Soares CB, Khalil H, Parker D. The Joanna Briggs Institute reviewers’ manual 2015: methodology for JBI scoping reviews. 2015. [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Institute JB. Meta-analysis of statistics: assessment and review instrument (JBI mastari). Adelaide: Joanna Briggs Institute. 2006;20032007. [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Borenstein M, Hedges LV, Higgins JP, Rothstein HR. A basic introduction to fixed‐effect and random‐effects models for meta‐analysis. Research synthesis methods. 2010;1(2):97–111. 10.1002/jrsm.12 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Higgins JP, Thompson SG, Deeks JJ, Altman DG. Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses. Bmj. 2003;327(7414):557–60. 10.1136/bmj.327.7414.557 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Bank W. Country and Lending Groups [Online]. 2013. [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Egger M, Smith GD, Schneider M, Minder C. Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test. Bmj. 1997;315(7109):629–34. 10.1136/bmj.315.7109.629 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Lin Z, Yu H, Lin J, Chen S, Liang Z, Zhang Z. Mild hypothermia via selective head cooling as neuroprotective therapy in term neonates with perinatal asphyxia: an experience from a single neonatal intensive care unit. Journal of perinatology. 2006;26(3):180–4. 10.1038/sj.jp.7211412 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Zhou W-h Cheng G-q, Shao X-m Liu X-z, Shan R-b Zhuang D-y, et al. Selective head cooling with mild systemic hypothermia after neonatal hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy: a multicenter randomized controlled trial in China. The Journal of pediatrics. 2010;157(3):367–72. e3. 10.1016/j.jpeds.2010.03.030 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Robertson NJ, Nakakeeto M, Hagmann C, Cowan FM, Acolet D, Iwata O, et al. Therapeutic hypothermia for birth asphyxia in low-resource settings: a pilot randomised controlled trial. The Lancet. 2008;372(9641):801–3. 10.1016/S0140-6736(08)61329-X [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Thayyil S, Shankaran S, Wade A, Cowan FM, Ayer M, Satheesan K, et al. Whole-body cooling in neonatal encephalopathy using phase changing material. Archives of Disease in Childhood-Fetal and Neonatal Edition. 2013;98(3):F280–F1. 10.1136/archdischild-2013-303840 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Bharadwaj SK, Vishnu Bhat B. Therapeutic hypothermia using gel packs for term neonates with hypoxic ischaemic encephalopathy in resource-limited settings: a randomized controlled trial. Journal of tropical pediatrics. 2012;58(5):382–8. 10.1093/tropej/fms005 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Bhat MA. Re: Therapeutic hypothermia following perinatal asphyxia. Archives of Disease in Childhood-Fetal and Neonatal Edition. 2006;91(6):F464–F. 10.1136/fnn.2006.097915 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Jacobs S, Morley C, Inder T, Stewart M, Smith K, McNamara P, et al. Infant Cooling Evaluation Collaboration. Whole-body hypothermia for term and near-term newborns with hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy: a randomized controlled trial. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2011;165(8):692–700. 10.1001/archpediatrics.2011.43 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Shankaran S, Laptook AR, Ehrenkranz RA, Tyson JE, McDonald SA, Donovan EF, et al. Whole-body hypothermia for neonates with hypoxic–ischemic encephalopathy. New England Journal of Medicine. 2005;353(15):1574–84. 10.1056/NEJMcps050929 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Simbruner G, Mittal RA, Rohlmann F, Muche R. Systemic hypothermia after neonatal encephalopathy: outcomes of neo. nEURO. network RCT. Pediatrics. 2010;126(4):e771–e8. 10.1542/peds.2009-2441 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Gluckman PD, Wyatt JS, Azzopardi D, Ballard R, Edwards AD, Ferriero DM, et al. Selective head cooling with mild systemic hypothermia after neonatal encephalopathy: multicentre randomised trial. The Lancet. 2005;365(9460):663–70. 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)17946-X [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Eicher DJ, Wagner CL, Katikaneni LP, Hulsey TC, Bass WT, Kaufman DA, et al. Moderate hypothermia in neonatal encephalopathy: efficacy outcomes. Pediatric neurology. 2005;32(1):11–7. 10.1016/j.pediatrneurol.2004.06.014 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Battin MR, Penrice J, Gunn TR, Gunn AJ. Treatment of term infants with head cooling and mild systemic hypothermia (35.0 C and 34.5 C) after perinatal asphyxia. Pediatrics. 2003;111(2):244–51. 10.1542/peds.111.2.244 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Shankaran S, Laptook A, Wright LL, Ehrenkranz RA, Donovan EF, Fanaroff AA, et al. Whole-body hypothermia for neonatal encephalopathy: animal observations as a basis for a randomized, controlled pilot study in term infants. Pediatrics. 2002;110(2):377–85. 10.1542/peds.110.2.377 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Joy R, Pournami F, Bethou A, Bhat VB, Bobby Z. Effect of therapeutic hypothermia on oxidative stress and outcome in term neonates with perinatal asphyxia: a randomized controlled trial. Journal of tropical pediatrics. 2013;59(1):17–22. 10.1093/tropej/fms036 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Maoulainine F, Elbaz M, Elfaiq S, Boufrioua G, Elalouani F, Barkane M, et al. Therapeutic hypothermia in asphyxiated neonates: Experience from neonatal intensive care unit of University Hospital of Marrakech. International journal of pediatrics. 2017;2017. 10.1155/2017/3674140 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Laptook AR, Shankaran S, Tyson JE, Munoz B, Bell EF, Goldberg RN, et al. Effect of therapeutic hypothermia initiated after 6 hours of age on death or disability among newborns with hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy: a randomized clinical trial. Jama. 2017;318(16):1550–60. 10.1001/jama.2017.14972 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Gane BD, Bhat V, Rao R, Nandhakumar S, Harichandrakumar K, Adhisivam B. Effect of therapeutic hypothermia on DNA damage and neurodevelopmental outcome among term neonates with perinatal asphyxia: a randomized controlled trial. Journal of tropical pediatrics. 2014;60(2):134–40. 10.1093/tropej/fmt098 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Selway LD. State of the science: hypoxic ischemic encephalopathy and hypothermic intervention for neonates. Advances in Neonatal Care. 2010;10(2):60–6. 10.1097/ANC.0b013e3181d54b30 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Jose S. Effect of hypothermia for perinatal asphyxia on childhood outcomes. International Journal of Contemporary Pediatrics. 2017;5(1):86. [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Azzopardi D, Strohm B, Marlow N, Brocklehurst P, Deierl A, Eddama O, et al. Effects of hypothermia for perinatal asphyxia on childhood outcomes. New England Journal of Medicine. 2014;371(2):140–9. 10.1056/NEJMoa1315788 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Shankaran S, Laptook AR, McDonald SA, Higgins RD, Tyson JE, Ehrenkranz RA, et al. Temperature profile and outcomes of neonates undergoing whole body hypothermia for neonatal hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy. Pediatric Critical Care Medicine. 2012;13(1):53. 10.1097/PCC.0b013e31821926bc [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Battin MR, Dezoete JA, Gunn TR, Gluckman PD, Gunn AJ. Neurodevelopmental outcome of infants treated with head cooling and mild hypothermia after perinatal asphyxia. Pediatrics. 2001;107(3):480–4. 10.1542/peds.107.3.480 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Bhat BV, Adhisivam B. Therapeutic cooling for perinatal asphyxia-Indian experience. The Indian Journal of Pediatrics. 2014;81(6):585–91. 10.1007/s12098-014-1348-0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Tagin MA, Woolcott CG, Vincer MJ, Whyte RK, Stinson DA. Hypothermia for neonatal hypoxic ischemic encephalopathy: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis. Archives of pediatrics & adolescent medicine. 2012;166(6):558–66. 10.1001/archpediatrics.2011.1772 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Nair J, Kumar VH. Current and emerging therapies in the management of hypoxic ischemic encephalopathy in neonates. Children. 2018;5(7):99. 10.3390/children5070099 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Pauliah SS, Shankaran S, Wade A, Cady EB, Thayyil S. Therapeutic hypothermia for neonatal encephalopathy in low-and middle-income countries: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PloS one. 2013;8(3). 10.1371/journal.pone.0058834 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Thayyil S, Costello A, Shankaran S, Robertson NJ. Therapeutic Hypothermia for Neonatal Encephalopathy: Implications for Neonatal Units in India. Indian pediatrics. 2009;46(4). [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.AlKharfy TM. Induced hypothermia to treat neonatal hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy. Review of literature with meta-analysis and development of national protocol Neurosciences (Riyadh). 2013;18(1):18–26. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Horn A, Woods D, Thompson C, Els I, Kroon M. Selective cerebral hypothermia for post-hypoxic neuroprotection in neonates using a solid ice cap. South African Medical Journal. 2006;96(9):976–81. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Thomas N, George KC, Sridhar S, Kumar M, Kuruvilla KA, Jana AK. Whole body cooling in newborn infants with perinatal asphyxial encephalopathy in a low resource setting: a feasibility trial. Indian pediatrics. 2011;48(6):445–51. 10.1007/s13312-011-0076-z [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Horn A, Harrison M, Linley L. Evaluating a simple method of neuroprotective hypothermia for newborn infants. Journal of tropical pediatrics. 2010;56(3):172–7. 10.1093/tropej/fmp089 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Rajhans A, Chouthai N, Joshi R. Whole body hypothermia (WBH) for newborns with moderate to severe hypoxic ischemic encephalopathy (HIE) in India. Pediatric Academic Society Boston. 2012. [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Horn A, Thompson C, Woods D, Nel A, Bekker A, Rhoda N, et al. Induced hypothermia for infants with hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy using a servo-controlled fan: an exploratory pilot study. Pediatrics. 2009;123(6):e1090–e8. 10.1542/peds.2007-3766 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Robertson NJ, Hagmann CF, Acolet D, Allen E, Nyombi N, Elbourne D, et al. Pilot randomized trial of therapeutic hypothermia with serial cranial ultrasound and 18–22 month follow-up for neonatal encephalopathy in a low resource hospital setting in Uganda: study protocol. Trials. 2011;12(1):138. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Li T, Xu F, Cheng X, Guo X, Ji L, Zhang Z, et al. Systemic hypothermia induced within 10 hours after birth improved neurological outcome in newborns with hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy. Hospital practice. 2009;37(1):147–52. 10.3810/hp.2009.12.269 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.See K, Jamal SS, Chiam M. Short term outcome of therapeutic hypothermia in term infants with moderate to severe hypoxic ischaemic encephalopathy; the Sungai Buloh experience. Med J Malaysia. 2012;67(3):265. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Horn AR, Joolay Y, Tooke L, Harrison MC. A servo-assisted gel-pack cooling method for newborn infants with hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy. Journal of tropical pediatrics. 2012;58(3):236–8. 10.1093/tropej/fmr069 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Decision Letter 0

Georg M Schmölzer

10 Sep 2020

PONE-D-20-24388

Effects of therapeutic hypothermia on death among asphyxiated neonates with hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized control trials

PLOS ONE

Dear Dr. Biruk Beletew Abate,

Thank you for submitting your manuscript to PLOS ONE. After careful consideration, we feel that it has merit but does not fully meet PLOS ONE’s publication criteria as it currently stands. Therefore, we invite you to submit a revised version of the manuscript that addresses the points raised during the review process.

Please submit your revised manuscript by Oct 25 2020 11:59PM. If you will need more time than this to complete your revisions, please reply to this message or contact the journal office at plosone@plos.org. When you're ready to submit your revision, log on to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/ and select the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder to locate your manuscript file.

Please include the following items when submitting your revised manuscript:

  • A rebuttal letter that responds to each point raised by the academic editor and reviewer(s). You should upload this letter as a separate file labeled 'Response to Reviewers'.

  • A marked-up copy of your manuscript that highlights changes made to the original version. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Revised Manuscript with Track Changes'.

  • An unmarked version of your revised paper without tracked changes. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Manuscript'.

If you would like to make changes to your financial disclosure, please include your updated statement in your cover letter. Guidelines for resubmitting your figure files are available below the reviewer comments at the end of this letter.

If applicable, we recommend that you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io to enhance the reproducibility of your results. Protocols.io assigns your protocol its own identifier (DOI) so that it can be cited independently in the future. For instructions see: http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submission-guidelines#loc-laboratory-protocols

We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript.

Kind regards,

Georg M. Schmölzer

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Journal Requirements:

When submitting your revision, we need you to address these additional requirements.

1. Please ensure that your manuscript meets PLOS ONE's style requirements, including those for file naming. The PLOS ONE style templates can be found at

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=wjVg/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_main_body.pdf and

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=ba62/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_title_authors_affiliations.pdf

2. Please include your tables as part of your main manuscript and remove the individual files. Please note that supplementary tables (should remain/ be uploaded) as separate "supporting information" files.

3. Please include a caption for figure 4.

4. Please include captions for your Supporting Information files at the end of your manuscript, and update any in-text citations to match accordingly. Please see our Supporting Information guidelines for more information: http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/supporting-information.

[Note: HTML markup is below. Please do not edit.]

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented.

Reviewer #1: No

**********

2. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #1: I Don't Know

**********

3. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #1: Yes

**********

4. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #1: Yes

**********

5. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #1: This meta-analysis and systematic review by Biruk Beletew et al regarding effect of hypothermia on mortality in HIE newborn babies is important and timely. The authors basically confirm previous meta-analyses demonstrating a 25% reduction in mortality after cooling. However, the authors conclude that cooling is most efficient in low income countries. If this is correct, it is important because until recently there has been concerns regarding cooling in such areas due to higher mortality. Further, the authors find similar effects using head cooling and total body cooling.

I have some comments and concerns:

1.Introduction first sentence: Perhaps it is more appropriate to write: intrapartum and neonatal asphyxia. A modern term of birth asphyxia is however adverse intrapartum events

2. In the introduction the authors should mention that a powerful mean to reduce HIE is to avoid hyperoxia. See for instance:

Kapadia VS, Chalak LF, DuPont TL, Rollins NK, Brion LP, Wyckoff MH. Perinatal asphyxia with hyperoxemia within the first hour of life is associated with moderate to severe hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy. J Pediatr. 2013;163(4):949-954.

Saugstad OD. The oxygen paradox in the newborn: keep oxygen at normal levels. J Pediatr. 2013;163(4):934-935.

and reducing death:

Saugstad OD, Ramji S, Soll RF, Vento M. Resuscitation of newborn infants with 21% or 100% oxygen: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis. Neonatology. 2008;94(3):176-182.

3. It would be useful to separate data in studies in which the newborns were resuscitated with 100% O2 (approx before 2010) and with air.

4. I have problems with some of the results. The authors find in general a reduced relative risk of death (RR 0.74). That is a 26 % reduction. how can this be turned to a 75% reduced risk of death in the discussion part? See: "The pooled relative risk of mortality among birth asphyxiated neonates who have got cooling therapy was found to be nearly 75% lower compared with those who haven’t got cooling therapy." Please explain

5. Regarding the results from low income countries two studies seem to be included. One of these is naturally Robertson NJ et al from Uganda 2008. In this study there was an approiximate 6 fold increased risk of death in the cooled babies compared to non cooled. (There was also more seizures in the cooled group). The Robertson study is small, still, based on this how is it possible to get a RR of 0.32 for death in low income countries ? The Robertson study has been very important for recommendations of being cautious using cooling in low income areas.

Conclusion

This study has many merits. It is well performed and well written. It deals with a highly important topic. My main objection is that I dont understand all the results. I look forward to a clarification by the authors.

**********

6. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: Yes: Ola Didrik Saugstad

[NOTE: If reviewer comments were submitted as an attachment file, they will be attached to this email and accessible via the submission site. Please log into your account, locate the manuscript record, and check for the action link "View Attachments". If this link does not appear, there are no attachment files.]

While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com/. PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Registration is free. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email PLOS at figures@plos.org. Please note that Supporting Information files do not need this step.

PLoS One. 2021 Feb 25;16(2):e0247229. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0247229.r002

Author response to Decision Letter 0


20 Oct 2020

Date: 9/24/2020

To: "PLOS ONE" plosone@plos.org

From: "Biruk Beletew Abate" birukkelemb@plos.com

Subject: Point to point response / 'Response to Reviewers'.

PONE-D-20-24388

Effects of therapeutic hypothermia on death among asphyxiated neonates with hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized control trials

PLOS ONE

To Editor

Dear Academic Editor (Georg M. Schmölzer) we have no word to explain our deepest thanks for your constructive comments and helping us throughout the process. Since we have agreed with all points you raised we believe we have carefully amended the paper as per your point of view. We have presented the point to point response below. Thank you again since you have contributed much for our better paper.

Editor comment 1. Please ensure that your manuscript meets PLOS ONE's style requirements, including those for file naming. The PLOS ONE style templates can be found at

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=wjVg/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_main_body.pdf and https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=ba62/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_title_authors_affiliations.pdf

Authors’ response: Thanks for supplying us the PLOS ONE style templates and we make sure the manuscript is as per these templates.

Editor comment 2. Please include your tables as part of your main manuscript and remove the individual files. Please note that supplementary tables (should remain/ be uploaded) as separate "supporting information" files.

Authors’ response: We have included tables and figures as part of the manuscript and we have uploaded the supplementary tables and figures as separate "supporting information" files as per your recommendation.

Editor comment 3. Please include a caption for figure 4.

Authors’ response: We have included as per your comment

Editor comment 4. Please include captions for your Supporting Information files at the end of your manuscript, and update any in-text citations to match accordingly. Please see our Supporting Information guidelines for more information: http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/supporting-information.

Authors’ response: we have included captions for your Supporting Information files at the end of the manuscript

To Reviewer #1:

Dear Ola Didrik Saugstad (Reviewer) we would like to forward our deep-seated gratitude for your interesting and valuable comments. We all really appreciate your potential and optimism while you give such constructive and in-depth comments. Since we have agreed with all of your points raised we believe we have amended the manuscript as per your comments. We would like to thank you again since you are contributing for our better paper by giving such comments which is important to improve the quality of this paper. Below we have written the point to point response to issues you raised.

Reviewer comment: This meta-analysis and systematic review by Biruk Beletew et al regarding effect of hypothermia on mortality in HIE newborn babies is important and timely. The authors basically confirm previous meta-analyses demonstrating a 25% reduction in mortality after cooling. However, the authors conclude that cooling is most efficient in low income countries. If this is correct, it is important because until recently there has been concerns regarding cooling in such areas due to higher mortality. Further, the authors find similar effects using head cooling and total body cooling.

I have some comments and concerns:

Reviewer comment: 1.Introduction first sentence: Perhaps it is more appropriate to write: intrapartum and neonatal asphyxia. A modern term of birth asphyxia is however adverse intrapartum events

Authors’ response: we amended the sentence as per your comment: Introduction; page 3 line 50 and 51.

Reviewer comment: 2. In the introduction the authors should mention that a powerful mean to reduce HIE is to avoid hyperoxia. See for instance:

Kapadia VS, Chalak LF, DuPont TL, Rollins NK, Brion LP, Wyckoff MH. Perinatal asphyxia with hyperoxemia within the first hour of life is associated with moderate to severe hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy. J Pediatr. 2013;163(4):949-954.

Saugstad OD. The oxygen paradox in the newborn: keep oxygen at normal levels. J Pediatr. 2013;163(4):934-935.

and reducing death:

Saugstad OD, Ramji S, Soll RF, Vento M. Resuscitation of newborn infants with 21% or 100% oxygen: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis. Neonatology. 2008;94(3):176-182.

Authors’ response: We really thank you for providing us such very important papers related to our manuscript. We have downloaded all the above references, used and cited in the introduction part of the manuscript as per your recommendation.

Reviewer comment: 3. It would be useful to separate data in studies in which the newborns were resuscitated with 100% O2 (approx before 2010) and with air.

Authors’ response: we included those studies which have similar resuscitation status which is the standard treatment including 21 % O2. That is why we didn’t conduct subgroup analysis by level of resuscitation separately.

Reviewer comment: 4. I have problems with some of the results. The authors find in general a reduced relative risk of death (RR 0.74). That is a 26 % reduction. how can this be turned to a 75% reduced risk of death in the discussion part? See: "The pooled relative risk of mortality among birth asphyxiated neonates who have got cooling therapy was found to be nearly 75% lower compared with those who haven’t got cooling therapy." Please explain

Authors’ response: It was by mistake we said 75%. Now we have amended it to 26%. Sorry for our mistake and thanks since you remembered us.

Reviewer comment: 5. Regarding the results from low income countries two studies seem to be included. One of these is naturally Robertson NJ et al from Uganda 2008. In this study there was an approiximate 6 fold increased risk of death in the cooled babies compared to non cooled. (There was also more seizures in the cooled group). The Robertson study is small, still, based on this how is it possible to get a RR of 0.32 for death in low income countries ? The Robertson study has been very important for recommendations of being cautious using cooling in low income areas.

Authors’ response: Regarding the Robertson study; the authors taken small number of studies which was 21:15 hypothermic and standard treatment respectively. As a result during pooling we are doing a weighted mean , that means studies which have large sample size will have high contribution on the pooled effect while studies like Robertson will have small contribution. While the other study, Maullanie et al, in low income country have a larger sample size and the RR is 0.43. That is why RR of 0.32 for death in low income which is near to 0.43.

Reviewer comment: Conclusion

This study has many merits. It is well performed and well written. It deals with a highly important topic. My main objection is that I don’t understand all the results. I look forward to a clarification by the authors.

Authors’ response: we really thank you for the above constructive comments. Regarding the results; since, this systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to assess the effect of therapeutic hypothermia on death among asphyxiated neonates with hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy.

As a result we extracted the author's name, year of publication, country, method of cooling, the severity of encephalopathy, the sample size in the hypothermic, and non-hypothermic groups, and the number of deaths in the intervention and control groups. The primary outcome was the relative risk (RR) of death, which was calculated as the proportion of death among hypothermic over the proportion of death among non-hypothermic patients. We calculated the RR for each included studies. Finally we pooled the estimates RR of death. The pooled relative risk of mortality after implementation of therapeutic hypothermia was found to be 0.74 (95%CI; 0.67, 0.80; I2=0.0%; p<0.996). That means a 26% reduction in mortality is revealed among cooled (hypothermic) groups compared to non-hypothermic groups. The relative risk of mortality was the same in selective head cooling and whole-body cooling method which was 0.74. Regarding the cooling device, the pooled relative risk of mortality is the same between the cooling cap and cooling blanket (0.74).

Attachment

Submitted filename: Response to Reviewers.docx

Decision Letter 1

Georg M Schmölzer

19 Jan 2021

PONE-D-20-24388R1

Effects of therapeutic hypothermia on death among asphyxiated neonates with hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized control trials

PLOS ONE

Dear Dr. Biruk Beletew Abate,

Thank you for submitting your manuscript to PLOS ONE. After careful consideration, we feel that it has merit but does not fully meet PLOS ONE’s publication criteria as it currently stands. Therefore, we invite you to submit a revised version of the manuscript that addresses the points raised during the review process.

Please submit your revised manuscript by March 31 2021. If you will need more time than this to complete your revisions, please reply to this message or contact the journal office at plosone@plos.org. When you're ready to submit your revision, log on to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/ and select the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder to locate your manuscript file.

Please include the following items when submitting your revised manuscript:

  • A rebuttal letter that responds to each point raised by the academic editor and reviewer(s). You should upload this letter as a separate file labeled 'Response to Reviewers'.

  • A marked-up copy of your manuscript that highlights changes made to the original version. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Revised Manuscript with Track Changes'.

  • An unmarked version of your revised paper without tracked changes. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Manuscript'.

If you would like to make changes to your financial disclosure, please include your updated statement in your cover letter. Guidelines for resubmitting your figure files are available below the reviewer comments at the end of this letter.

If applicable, we recommend that you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io to enhance the reproducibility of your results. Protocols.io assigns your protocol its own identifier (DOI) so that it can be cited independently in the future. For instructions see: http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submission-guidelines#loc-laboratory-protocols

We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript.

Kind regards,

Georg M. Schmölzer

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

[Note: HTML markup is below. Please do not edit.]

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. If the authors have adequately addressed your comments raised in a previous round of review and you feel that this manuscript is now acceptable for publication, you may indicate that here to bypass the “Comments to the Author” section, enter your conflict of interest statement in the “Confidential to Editor” section, and submit your "Accept" recommendation.

Reviewer #1: All comments have been addressed

**********

2. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented.

Reviewer #1: Partly

**********

3. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #1: I Don't Know

**********

4. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #1: Yes

**********

5. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #1: No

**********

6. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #1: This manuscript has been much improved and I want to congratulate the authors. I stlll have some comments

1. I am still concerned regarding the results of low income countries. Only two studies are available and listed, Robertson et al and Maoulainine et al. Robertson found higher mortality with hypothermia while Maoulainine et al found the opposite. Could the authors explain to me that in the table Robertson et al has an ES (is this relative risk?) of 0.10 while Maoulainine et al show 0.43. The fact is that Robertson's results are far above 1 although not significant (5. 0, 95 %CI 0,7-37). Maoulainine et al's study from Morrocco includes 38 babies (19 in each group) while Robetson et al include 36 babies , of these 21 treated with cooling and 15 received standard care. The size of these two studies therefore are quite similar.

2. I suggest the authors also refer to the most recent guidelines from ILCOR (2020) regarding hypothermia treatment cooling to only be considered in neonatal care facilities with the capabilities for “multidisciplinary care and availability of adequate resources to offer intravenous therapy, respiratory support, pulseoximetry, antibiotics, anticonvulsants, and pathology testing”

2. Some language issues

line 65: one of the strategies

line 113. What is "snowball search"?

i

line 152: Instead of "the mistyping" perhaps better is "any mistyping"

Line 186: methods head cooling. Remove "head"

Line 198, comma lacking, base deficit

Line: 236 ischemia not eschemia

line 238: methods

278: literature not literatures

Conclusion: A well performed study, and now much improved. Please check the calculations mentioned above and change conclusions accordingly.

**********

7. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: Yes: Ola Didrik Saugstad

[NOTE: If reviewer comments were submitted as an attachment file, they will be attached to this email and accessible via the submission site. Please log into your account, locate the manuscript record, and check for the action link "View Attachments". If this link does not appear, there are no attachment files.]

While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com/. PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Registration is free. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email PLOS at figures@plos.org. Please note that Supporting Information files do not need this step.

PLoS One. 2021 Feb 25;16(2):e0247229. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0247229.r004

Author response to Decision Letter 1


2 Feb 2021

PONE-D-20-24388R1

Effects of therapeutic hypothermia on death among asphyxiated neonates with hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized control trials

PLOS ONE

Date: 9/24/2020

To: "PLOS ONE" plosone@plos.org

From: "Biruk Beletew Abate" birukkelemb@plos.com

Subject: Point to point response / 'Response to Reviewers'.

PONE-D-20-24388R1

Effects of therapeutic hypothermia on death among asphyxiated neonates with hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized control trials

PLOS ONE

To Editor

Dear Academic Editor (Georg M. Schmölzer) we have no word to explain our deepest thanks for your constructive comments and helping us throughout the process. We have added one Author who fulfill the authorship criteria of the journal whom the corresponding author forgot during submission of the manuscript. For this we ask apologize. Thank you again since you have contributed much for our better paper.

To Reviewer #1:

Dear Ola Didrik Saugstad (Reviewer) we would like to forward our deep-seated gratitude for your interesting and valuable comments. We all really appreciate your potential and optimism while you give such constructive and in-depth comments. Since we have agreed with all of your points raised we believe we have amended the manuscript as per your comments. We would like to thank you again since you contributed much the quality of this paper. Below we have written the point to point response to indicate we addressed the issues you raised.

Reviewer comment:: This manuscript has been much improved and I want to congratulate the authors. I still have some comments

Authors’ response: thanks since you recognized our effort, we have again amended the manuscript considering all your comments.

Reviewer comment: 1. I am still concerned regarding the results of low income countries. Only two studies are available and listed, Robertson et al and Maoulainine et al. Robertson found higher mortality with hypothermia while Maoulainine et al found the opposite. Could the authors explain to me that in the table Robertson et al has an ES (is this relative risk?) of 0.10 while Maoulainine et al show 0.43. The fact is that Robertson's results are far above 1 although not significant (5. 0, 95 %CI 0,7-37). Maoulainine et al's study from Morrocco includes 38 babies (19 in each group) while Robetson et al include 36 babies , of these 21 treated with cooling and 15 received standard care. The size of these two studies therefore are quite similar.

Authors’ response: as you explained from low income countries only two studies were included because these are the only studies which included the outcome of interest and fulfill the study’s inclusion criteria. However, you are correct this is the limitation of this study. Regarding the estimate in the two studies, you are again correct the Robertson's results not significant (5. 0, 95 % CI 0,7-37).

For purpose of clarity, in Robertson's results the proportion of death among neonates with therapeutic hypothermia and standard treatment were 1/21and 7/15 respectively. Then the relative risk of death among neonates with cooling therapeutic becomes 0.10(Robertson NJ, Nakakeeto M, Hagmann C, Cowan FM, Acolet D, Iwata O, et al. Therapeutic hypothermia for birth asphyxia in low-resource settings: a pilot randomised controlled trial. The Lancet. 2008;372(9641):801-3). Meanwhile, Maoulainine et al's study from Morrocco includes 38 babies (19 in each group) 3:7 the proportion of death among neonates with theraputhic hypothermia and standard treatment were 3/19 and 7/19 respectively. Then the relative risk of death among neonates with cooling therapeutic becomes 0.43 (Maoulainine F, Elbaz M, Elfaiq S, Boufrioua G, Elalouani F, Barkane M, et al. Therapeutic hypothermia in asphyxiated neonates: Experience from neonatal intensive care unit of University Hospital of Marrakech. International journal of pediatrics. 2017;2017. The measure of the estimate was RR. Your comment is correct and we have tried to amend the manuscript as per your comment. Thanks for your detail noticing of the manuscript.

Reviewer comment: 2. I suggest the authors also refer to the most recent guidelines from ILCOR (2020) regarding hypothermia treatment cooling to only be considered in neonatal care facilities with the capabilities for “multidisciplinary care and availability of adequate resources to offer intravenous therapy, respiratory support, pulseoximetry, antibiotics, anticonvulsants, and pathology testing”.

Authors’ response: thanks for supplying us with such a latest source which we have included the idea the manuscript (Back ground; page 4, Line 92-95) and in Discussion ; page 13, Line 280-283).

2. Some language issues

Reviewer comment: line 65: one of the strategies

Authors’ response: amended; line 66

Reviewer comment: line 113. What is "snowball search"?

Authors’ response: "snowball search" is to refer the following process. When we get an article with the outcome of interest of the meta-analysis we then look at all references of that article and if we get any cross-referenced article which include our outcome of interest we will download the PDF and again we look at its references this process continues until we didn’t get any new article. We tried to indicate this when we say snowball.

Reviewer comment: line 152: Instead of "the mistyping" perhaps better is "any mistyping"

Authors’ response: amended; line 158

Reviewer comment: Line 186: methods head cooling. Remove "head"

Authors’ response: amended; line 192

Reviewer comment: Line 198, comma lacking, base deficit

Authors’ response: amended; line 204

Reviewer comment: Line: 236 ischemia not eschemia

Authors’ response: amended; 238

Reviewer comment: line 238: methods

Authors’ response: amended; 240

Reviewer comment: 278: literature not literatures

Authors’ response: amended; 283

Reviewer comment: Conclusion: A well performed study, and now much improved. Please check the calculations mentioned above and change conclusions accordingly.

Authors’ response: we have amended the conclusion considering your comments in other parts of the manuscript. Line 308-320.

Thanks in advance

Attachment

Submitted filename: Response to reviewer.docx

Decision Letter 2

Georg M Schmölzer

4 Feb 2021

Effects of therapeutic hypothermia on death among asphyxiated neonates with hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized control trials

PONE-D-20-24388R2

Dear Dr. Biruk Beletew Abate,

We’re pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been judged scientifically suitable for publication and will be formally accepted for publication once it meets all outstanding technical requirements.

Within one week, you’ll receive an e-mail detailing the required amendments. When these have been addressed, you’ll receive a formal acceptance letter and your manuscript will be scheduled for publication.

An invoice for payment will follow shortly after the formal acceptance. To ensure an efficient process, please log into Editorial Manager at http://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/, click the 'Update My Information' link at the top of the page, and double check that your user information is up-to-date. If you have any billing related questions, please contact our Author Billing department directly at authorbilling@plos.org.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please notify them about your upcoming paper to help maximize its impact. If they’ll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team as soon as possible -- no later than 48 hours after receiving the formal acceptance. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information, please contact onepress@plos.org.

Kind regards,

Georg M. Schmölzer

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Additional Editor Comments (optional):

Reviewers' comments:

Acceptance letter

Georg M Schmölzer

11 Feb 2021

PONE-D-20-24388R2

Effects of therapeutic hypothermia on death among asphyxiated neonates with hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized control trials

Dear Dr. Abate:

I'm pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been deemed suitable for publication in PLOS ONE. Congratulations! Your manuscript is now with our production department.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please let them know about your upcoming paper now to help maximize its impact. If they'll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team within the next 48 hours. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information please contact onepress@plos.org.

If we can help with anything else, please email us at plosone@plos.org.

Thank you for submitting your work to PLOS ONE and supporting open access.

Kind regards,

PLOS ONE Editorial Office Staff

on behalf of

Dr. Georg M. Schmölzer

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Associated Data

    This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

    Supplementary Materials

    S1 Checklist. PRISMA checklist.

    (DOCX)

    S1 Fig

    Sensitivity analysis the effects of therapeutic hypothermia on death among asphyxiated neonates with hypoxic ischemic encephalopathy.

    (DOCX)

    S2 Fig. Funnel plot showing publication bias on the effects of therapeutic hypothermia on death among asphyxiated neonates with hypoxic ischemic encephalopathy.

    (DOCX)

    S3 Fig. Eggers test showing publication bias on the effects of therapeutic hypothermia on death among asphyxiated neonates with hypoxic ischemic encephalopathy.

    (DOCX)

    S1 Table. Search strategy used for one of the databases.

    (DOCX)

    S2 Table. Quality appraisal result of included studies; using Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) quality appraisal checklist.

    (DOCX)

    S1 Synopsis

    (DOCX)

    Attachment

    Submitted filename: Response to Reviewers.docx

    Attachment

    Submitted filename: Response to reviewer.docx

    Data Availability Statement

    All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting information files.


    Articles from PLoS ONE are provided here courtesy of PLOS

    RESOURCES