Medical professionalism is changing with the increasing gap between what doctors have traditionally been trained to do and the realities of modern clinical practice.1 In high-income countries, the changing demographics of patients with an ageing population, the large proportion of patients with long-term conditions and multiple comorbidities, and rising health-care costs have placed huge pressures on health systems globally.2 Advances in technology and science have changed the way health professionals interact with patients, and democratisation of knowledge and increased accountability that come with changing patient and societal expectations have added to the demands placed on physicians.3 In many countries, inadequate staffing levels aggravate this situation.4 Morale among doctors is generally declining—eg, a survey in the UK showed 54% of physicians reported morale as low or very low4—and burnout is rising (prevalence about 66–80%).5, 6 There is a crisis in staff retention in some countries with up to 48% doctors considering leaving the profession.7
COVID-19 has exacerbated these tensions between medical professionalism and physician wellbeing. The pandemic has placed substantial demands on already overstretched, understaffed, and under-resourced health systems. COVID-19 has tested doctors and health-care workers to the limits of their professional competence and taken a considerable toll on their health and wellbeing.8 Core principles of medical professionalism—ie, primacy of patient welfare, patient autonomy, and social justice—have been challenged during the pandemic.9 Many doctors worldwide have had to change the way they work, having to prioritise patient care and make difficult decisions based on insufficient resources, including withholding and withdrawing potentially life-saving treatments.10, 11 Doctors have had to balance their personal risk with their duty to care for patients as well as balance professional versus caring responsibilities for household members in high-risk groups.12 The need to self-isolate if they or their family members have symptoms of COVID-19 take them away from front-line responsibilities. All these factors have caused a sense of guilt, tension, and moral injury.13 Moral injury in this context occurs when doctors are forced to make decisions that contradict their professional and moral commitments—the challenge of knowing what care patients need but being unable to provide it due to constraints beyond their control. The moral injury concept helps reframe such challenges from a focus on the individual to a system-wide perspective.14
The COVID-19 pandemic has changed how health professionals work, how we behave and interact within our teams and organisations, our understandings of personal health and risk, inequalities between doctors with different risk factors, and wellbeing and mental health.8 Globally more than 300 000 health-care workers have been infected with COVID-19 in 79 countries, over 7000 have died, and many more have suffered as a result of stress, burnout, and moral injury.13, 15
There is an urgent need for a system-level approach to address the issues that COVID-19 has created to better protect and safeguard our medical workforce for the future. Such approaches need to focus on organisational culture and staff wellbeing as integral to professionalism and central to patient care.16 Physicians' wellbeing must be recognised as a care quality indicator for all health systems.17 Improving the working lives of clinicians can optimise the performance of health systems, improve patient experience, drive population health, and reduce costs.16, 18
Targeted interventions are likely to be less effective if only aimed at the individual.17 During COVID-19, there have been many wellbeing initiatives for clinicians that have been well received.19 However, they need to be combined with organisational interventions including flexible working arrangements, enhanced teamwork, reductions in administrative burdens, and optimal use of technology.20 Health professionals need to be well supported throughout the COVID-19 pandemic. The medical profession, health systems, and society all have a part to play in ensuring this support is provided. Individual doctors need to be empowered to recognise their own limitations as well as their wellbeing and support needs.
The professions must adapt to the changing needs of modern clinical practice and shape how we balance the many competing demands on us. Health professionals must build on the changes that are good for patient care and resist those that are not. COVID-19 has shown that we must move away from a model of medical professionalism that can lead to moral injury and towards one that provides proactive support for professionals in a systematic way and is focused on supporting moral repair.21 With the second and subsequent waves of COVID-19 now well established in many countries, we need to ensure that we as a profession support our doctors and promote ways of working that incorporate the doctor, the patient, teams, health-care organisations, workplace environment, and health systems.1 Over time, this wider system approach will lead to greater cohesiveness within health care and support individual professionals in a safer, more sustainable way.
Acknowledgments
AFG is the President and MP the Global Vice President of the Royal College of Physicians, UK. We declare no other competing interests.
References
- 1.Royal College of Physicians . Royal College of Physicians; London: 2018. Advancing medical professionalism.https://www.rcplondon.ac.uk/projects/outputs/advancing-medical-professionalism [Google Scholar]
- 2.British Medical Association . British Medical Association; London: 2017. The changing face of medicine and the role of doctors in the future: presidential project 2017.https://www.bma.org.uk/media/2067/bma-the-changing-face-of-medicine-june-2017.pdf [Google Scholar]
- 3.Feiler T, Gaitskell K, Hordern J, et al. Personalised medicine: the promise, the hype and the pitfalls. New Bioethics. 2017;1:1–12. doi: 10.1080/20502877.2017.1314895. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Royal College of Physicians . Royal College of Physicians; London: 2019. Focus on physicians: 2018–19 census (UK consultants and higher specialty trainees)https://www.rcplondon.ac.uk/projects/outputs/focus-physicians-2018-19-census-uk-consultants-and-higher-specialty-trainees [Google Scholar]
- 5.Rosenstein LS, Torre M, Ramos MA, et al. Prevalence of burnout amongst physicians—a systematic review. JAMA. 2018;320:1131–1150. doi: 10.1001/jama.2018.12777. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.The Lancet Physician burnout: a global crisis. Lancet. 2019;394:93. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(19)31573-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.General Medical Council . General Medical Council; London: 2019. The state of medical education and practice in the UK 2019.https://www.gmc-uk.org/-/media/documents/somep-2019---full-report_pdf-81131156.pdf [Google Scholar]
- 8.Shaukat N, Ali D, Razzak J. Physical and mental health impacts of COVID-19 on healthcare workers: a scoping review. Int J Emerg Med. 2020;13:40. doi: 10.1186/s12245-020-00299-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.American Board of Internal Medicine Foundation. American College of Physicians. American Society of Internal Medicine Foundation. European Federation of Internal Medicine Medical professionalism in the new millennium: a physician charter. Ann Intern Med. 2002;136:243–246. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-136-3-200202050-00012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Liu Q, Luo D, Haase J, et al. The experiences of health-care providers during the COVID-19 crisis in China: a qualitative study. Lancet Glob Health. 2020;8:e790–e798. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(20)30204-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Rosenbaum L. Facing Covid-19 in Italy—ethics, logistics, and therapeutics on the epidemic's front line. N Engl J Med. 2020;382:1873–1875. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp2005492. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Harkin D. Covid-19: balancing personal risk and professional duty. BMJ. 2020;369 doi: 10.1136/bmj.m1606. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Williamson V, Murphy D, Greenberg N. COVID-19 and experiences of moral injury in frontline key workers. Occupat Med. 2020;70:317–319. doi: 10.1093/occmed/kqaa052. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Dean W, Talbot S, Dean A. Reframing clinician distress: moral injury not burnout. Fed Pract. 2019;36:447. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Amnesty International Global: Amnesty analysis reveals over 7000 health workers have died from COVID-19. Sept 3, 2020. https://www.amnesty.org/en/latest/news/2020/09/amnesty-analysis-7000-health-workers-have-died-from-covid19/
- 16.Lemaire JB, Wallace JE. Burnout among doctors. BMJ. 2017;358 doi: 10.1136/bmj.j3360. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Wallace JE, Lemaire JB, Ghali WA. Physician wellness: a missing quality indicator. Lancet. 2009;374:1714–1721. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(09)61424-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Bodenheimer T, Sinsky C. From triple to quadruple aim: care of the patient requires care of the provider. Ann Fam Med. 2014;12:573–576. doi: 10.1370/afm.1713. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Dzau VJ, Kirch D, Nasca T. Preventing a parallel pandemic—a national strategy to protect clinicians' well-being. N Engl J Med. 2020;383:513–515. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp2011027. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Garros D, Austin W, Dodek P. How can I survive this: coping during the COVID-19 pandemic. Chest. 2020 doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2020.11.012. published online Nov 18. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Shale S. Moral injury and the COVID-19 pandemic: reframing what it is, who it affects and how care leaders can manage it. BMJ Leader. 2020;4:224–227. [Google Scholar]