Abstract
16S rRNA sequencing of human fecal samples has been tremendously successful in identifying microbiome changes associated with both aging and disease. A number of studies have described microbial alterations corresponding to physical frailty and nursing home residence among aging individuals. A gut-muscle axis through which the microbiome influences skeletal muscle growth/function has been hypothesized. However, the microbiome has yet to be examined in sarcopenia. Here, we collected fecal samples of 60 healthy controls (CON) and 27 sarcopenic (Case)/possibly sarcopenic (preCase) individuals and analyzed the intestinal microbiota using 16S rRNA sequencing. We observed an overall reduction in microbial diversity in Case and preCase samples. The genera Lachnospira, Fusicantenibacter, Roseburia, Eubacterium, and Lachnoclostridium—known butyrate producers—were significantly less abundant in Case and preCase subjects while Lactobacillus was more abundant. Functional pathways underrepresented in Case subjects included numerous transporters and phenylalanine, tyrosine, and tryptophan biosynthesis suggesting that protein processing and nutrient transport may be impaired. In contrast, lipopolysaccharide biosynthesis was overrepresented in Case and PreCase subjects suggesting that sarcopenia is associated with a pro-inflammatory metagenome. These analyses demonstrate structural and functional alterations in the intestinal microbiota that may contribute to loss of skeletal muscle mass and function in sarcopenia.
Subject terms: Microbiome, Musculoskeletal abnormalities, Next-generation sequencing, RNA sequencing
Introduction
The human gut microbiome consists of a highly diverse, complex, and evolving community of microorganisms that colonize the length of the alimentary tract. Natural fluctuations in composition of the gut microbiome are most pronounced at the extremes of age, namely infancy and old age1. A number of studies have demonstrated robust differences in gut microbiota composition in older individuals when compared with younger adults2,3. Moreover, the gut microbiome of older adults demonstrates significant inter- and intra-individual variability, although there is a large degree of temporal stability in this population4. The dynamic nature of the microbiome is hypothesized to underly the physiologic and pathologic changes associated with aging. For example, dysregulation in older persons’ immunomodulatory abilities (referred to as immunosenescence or inflammaging) and resultant increase in pro-inflammatory cytokines including tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α, interleukin (IL)-6, and IL-8, have been correlated with alterations in gut microbial composition5,6.
Frailty represents a syndrome or phenotype characterized by age-related decline in reserve and physiologic function across multiple organ-systems thus limiting individuals’ ability to tolerate minor stressors. An unfortunate, but inevitable, part of aging, frailty places individuals at increased risk for adverse health outcomes7,8. In skeletal muscle, frailty is manifested as sarcopenia, or the age-related decline in muscle mass and function. This loss of muscle function makes individuals of advanced age vulnerable to a number of devastating events including falls, fractures, disability, and mortality9. Sarcopenia and, more generally, physical frailty develop as a result of multiple pathophysiologic mechanisms including inadequate nutrition and physical activity, inflammation, immunosenescence, anabolic resistance, and oxidative stress10–13. These processes, particularly those related to inflammation and the immune system, are greatly influenced by the gut microbiome14,15. Indeed, several reports have correlated altered microbial diversity with poor physical performance in older patients16–19. One particular analysis determined that the microbial profile of older community dwellers meeting criteria for physical frailty was similar to that of nursing home patients, implicating microbial dysbiosis in age-related performance decline17. Further implicating the role of the gut microbiome in age-related decline, Buigues et al. demonstrated a beneficial effect of a prebiotic supplement containing inulin and fructooligosaccharides on two-measures of frailty, exhaustion and handgrip strength (which is also a clinical parameter for sarcopenia)20.
Preclinical data has strengthened the association between gut dysbiosis and age-related physical frailty and performance decline and has led to the hypothesis that a gut-muscle axis exists through which the microbiome influences whole body lean mass, skeletal muscle mass, and physical functioning21. By this model, variation in the gut microbiota and gut metagenome alters key biological processes such as the inflammatory milieu (for example, by increased permeability of the gut epithelial barrier)22, nutrient bioavailability23, and lipid metabolism24, and can contribute to age-related muscle decline. Although human data is limited, a number of studies in animal models support this hypothesis. In their pioneering work, Backhed et al. demonstrated that germ-free mice colonized with fecal samples from their conventionally-raised counterparts display a significant loss in lean body mass – which includes skeletal muscle mass25. This is contrasted by a recent comparison of pathogen-free and germ-free mice which demonstrated skeletal muscle atrophy, reduced expression of insulin-like growth factor 1, and reduced expression of genes corresponding to skeletal muscle growth and mitochondrial function in the germ-free cohort26. Taken together, these data suggest that the microbial influence on skeletal muscle is likely taxa dependent. Specific bacterial species shown to support skeletal muscle growth and function include Lactobacillus casei, Bifidobacterium longum, Eubacterium rectale, Clostridium coccoides, and Barnesiella intestinihominis27–29. The proposed mechanism by which these species enhance skeletal muscle physiology is through the production of short chain fatty acids (SCFAs) such as acetate, propionate, and butyrate21. Siddarth et al. have also demonstrated that lean body mass and gastrocnemius muscle mass decline with aging in direct relation to circulating levels of vitamin B12 and lipid metabolism, implicating a role for these processes in age-related muscle decline30. In contrast, expansion of pro-inflammatory species, such as those within the large Enterobacteriaceae family of gram-negative bacteria, is associated with poor skeletal muscle integrity31. Proposed mechanisms underlying the effect of these bacteria on skeletal muscle include inflammation-mediated epithelial permeability, circulation of bacterial toxins (i.e., lipopolysaccharide, LPS; indoxyl sulfate), and resultant insulin resistance and skeletal muscle atrophy32.
The development and availability of culture-independent approaches for evaluating microbial diversity, namely 16S ribosomal RNA (rRNA) sequencing, has fostered a surge in research on the human gut microbiota in recent years33. This research has provided an unprecedented understanding of the development, composition, and temporal stability of the gut microbiome while also identifying alterations associated with an array of pathologic processes34,35. While these approaches have been utilized to correlate microbial diversity with skeletal muscle mass and function in animal models and young adult humans, there are few published studies exploring microbiome alterations associated with physical frailty and muscular decline in the aged16,29,36,37. Moreover, to the best of our knowledge, no reports evaluating the gut microbiome in clinical sarcopenia exist. In this study, utilizing 16S rRNA analysis, we identified notable differences in microbial diversity between healthy older adults and those with sarcopenia. In addition to an overall reduction in microbial diversity in sarcopenia patients, our analysis revealed reduction in several butyrate-producing species providing novel insight into potential mechanisms by which microbial alteration may influence disease pathogenesis.
Results
Characteristics of study subjects
A total of 60 healthy controls (CON) and 27 sarcopenic (Case) or possibly sarcopenic (preCase) individuals were enrolled in this study. The criteria for defining sarcopenia (Case) and possible sarcopenia (preCase) are described in the Materials and Method section: briefly, Case individuals demonstrated impaired muscle function (i.e., grip strength, five-time chair test) and reduced muscle mass (by bioelectrical impedance analysis, BIA), while preCase individuals demonstrated only impaired function. Detailed demographic and clinical characteristics, including BIA muscle mass and performance on muscle function tests, are summarized for each group in Table 1. There was a slight, but statistically significant (p = 0.001), trend towards advanced age in the preCase and Case groups when compared to controls. There was also a significant (p < 0.05) reduction in albumin and hemoglobin/hematocrit in the preCase and Case groups. Finally, consistent with reduction of muscle mass and function in sarcopenia, body mass index (BMI), appendicular skeletal mass index (ASMI), and grip strength, were significantly reduced in preCase and Case individuals while the time required to complete the five-time chair stand test was delayed.
Table 1.
Clinical and demographic parameters of enrolled subjects. All values are reported as mean ± standard deviation unless otherwise noted.
| Sarcopenia (Case) | Possible sarcopenia (preCase) | Healthy control (CON) | P | F/χ2 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Number of subjects | 11 | 16 | 60 | ||
| Age in years | 76.45 ± 8.58 | 74.00 ± 6.94 | 68.38 ± 5.79 | 0.000 | F = 10.436 |
| Number of females (%) | n = 7 (63.64%) | n = 11 (68.75%) | n = 33 (55.00%) | 0.576 | χ2 = 1.102 |
| Albumin (g/L) | 40.39 ± 3.98 | 40.46 ± 4.17 | 45.85 ± 2.50 | 0.000 | F = 29.135 |
| Creatinine (μmol/L) | 73,115 ± 18.55 | 70.49 ± 14.22 | 66.75 ± 11.54 | 0.254 | F = 1.393 |
| Blood urea Nitrogen (mmol/L) | 5.71 ± 2.29 | 5.81 ± 1.86 | 5.26 ± 1.08 | 0.316 | F = 1.167 |
| C-reactive protein (mg/L) | 1.68 ± 1.74 | 2.13 ± 2.54 | 2.08 ± 3.09 | 0.923 | F = 0.080 |
| Hemoglobin (g/L) | 122.91 ± 17.84 | 125.06 ± 18.98 | 141.00 ± 12.90 | 0.000 | F = 12.081 |
| HCT (%) | 36.76 ± 4.50 | 36.93 ± 5.03 | 42.00 ± 3.0 | 0.000 | F = 18.029 |
| BMI (kg/m2) | 20.67 ± 3.27 | 21.50 ± 3.39 | 23.66 ± 2.49 | 0.001 | F = 7.846 |
| Appendicular Skeletal Mass index (kg/m2) | 6.97 ± 1.38 | 6.43 ± 1.22 | 7.84 ± 0.78 | 0.000 | F = 15.401 |
| Grip strength (kg) | 22.49 ± 9.67 | 21.76 ± 6.35 | 29.57 ± 8.09 | 0.001 | F = 8.196 |
| Five-time chair stand test (s) | 18.69 ± 14.09 | 15.40 ± 7.89 | 10.03 ± 1.13 | 0.000 | F = 12.724 |
All values are reported as mean ± standard deviation unless otherwise noted. Significant values highlighted in yellow.
Changes in overall microbial diversity and structure in sarcopenia
A total of 11,997,848 high-quality sequences were generated from 87 fresh human fecal samples with an average of 137,906 sequences per sample (Supplementary Table S1). High-quality sequences were clustered into 4,001 OTUs at 97% sequence identity. Next, a modified OTU table was obtained consisting of 3,856 OTUs (ranging from 35 to 1208 per sample) corresponding to 507 genera, 249 families, 145 orders, 93 classes, and 36 phyla. Adequate estimation of microbial diversity was ensured by measurement of the proportion of total bacterial species represented in samples from each group utilizing the Goods coverage analysis (Supplementary Fig. S1). Goods coverage values close to 1 (0.94–0.99, Case group; 0.98–0.99, preCase group; 0.96–0.99, CON group) suggested that the 16S rRNA sequencing results from each library represented the majority of bacterial species present within test samples.
Within-sample species richness and evenness was evaluated, and differences were detected between healthy control (CON), sarcopenic (Case), and possibly sarcopenic (preCase) subjects. The alpha diversity indices of Chao1 and observed species diversity are displayed in Fig. 1. Both the Chao1 and observed species diversity indices were both significantly higher in the CON group compared to the Case and preCase groups (al-Wallis test, both p < 0.05; Fig. 1A,B). There was no significant difference between Case and preCase samples (p = 0.916, Chao1; p = 0.907, observed species). These results demonstrate significant reduction in microbial diversity in Case and preCase groups. Differences in microbial composition between Case, preCase, and CON samples were detected using beta-diversity analyses. Phylogenetic variation between the microbial communities of CON, Case, preCase groups was revealed by generation of a partial least squares discrimination analysis (PLS-DA; Fig. 2A)38. There was significant divergence between the CON and Case (ANOSIM, R = 0.370, p = 0.0001) and CON and preCase (ANOSIM, R = 0.272, p = 0.0001) groups. In contrast, the Case and preCase groups demonstrated substantial phylogenetic closeness (ANOSIM, R = 0.048, p = 0.187). Between-group differences were further evaluated by calculating UniFrac distances. Unweighted-Unifrac analysis found that the microbial composition of Case and PreCase subjects was close to significantly different from CON subjects (p = 0.08; Fig. 2B). A three-axis principle components analysis (PCoA) plot is presented in Fig. 2C. Taken together, reduced microbial diversity in sarcopenic and possibly sarcopenic individuals and significant differences for microbial composition between healthy individuals and sarcopenic/possibly sarcopenic individuals suggest that the pathogenesis of sarcopenia may be strongly influenced by intestinal microbial factors.
Figure 1.

Alpha-diversity indices (A) Chao1 and (B) observed species are reduced in sarcopenic (Case) and possibly sarcopenic (preCase) samples compared to healthy control (CON) samples. Kruskal–Wallis test, *p < 0.05.
Figure 2.
Beta-diversity indices identify significantly different microbial compositions between healthy controls (CON), sarcopenic (Case), and possibly sarcopenic (preCase) subjects. (A) Partial least squares discriminant analysis (PLS-DA) displays clustering of points (representing individual samples) by group and groups are elliptically defined. (B) A heat map generated from the unweighted-Unifrac distance matrix. (C) A three-axis principle components analysis (PCoA) of unweighted-Unifrac distances.
Bacterial abundance and functionality in sarcopenia
Having identified significant differences in the microbial diversity and structure of sarcopenic (Case) and possibly sarcopenic (preCase) individuals, we then analyzed the abundance and taxonomic distribution of microbiota in these groups using Metastats. Indeed, we determined that the bacterial profiles of individuals in the Case and preCase groups was significantly different from that of the CON group. At the phylum level, the gut microbiota was dominated by Firmicutes (50.8%), Bacteroidetes (36.3%) Proteobacteria (6.4%) and Actinobacteria (5.1%) across the samples in our study. Notably, Firmicutes were significantly reduced in both the Case (40.4% vs 54.4%, p = 0.005) and preCase (44.5% vs. 54.4%, p = 0.005) groups compared to controls. There was no significant difference observed between the Case and preCase groups (40.4% vs 44.5%, p = 0.521). At the genus level, Lachnospira, Fusicantenibacter, Roseburia, Eubacterium, and Lachnoclostridium were significantly reduced, whereas Lactobacillus was significantly more abundant in the Case and preCase groups compared to the CON group (all p < 0.05; Fig. 3). These differentially abundant taxa were further analyzed as taxonomic biomarkers of sarcopenia using LEfSe (linear discriminative analysis, LDA = 3; Fig. 4). This analysis identified the bacterial families Porphyromonadaceae and Lactobacillaceae as taxonomic biomarkers of sarcopenia and possible sarcopenia, respectively.
Figure 3.
Taxonomic distribution of intestinal microbiota is altered in sarcopenic (Case) and possibly sarcopenic (preCase) subjects compared to healthy controls (CON). (A) Stacked columns for each of the groups show the mean of abundance for a given genus as a percentage of the total. (B) Heat map demonstrating the relative abundance of genera in each group. Wilcoxon test, * p < 0.05.
Figure 4.
Taxonomic biomarkers of sarcopenia. (A) Linear discriminant analysis effect size (LEfSe) analysis comparing sarcopenic (Case) and possibly sarcopenic (preCase) patients with healthy controls (CON). (B) Cladogram displaying differentially abundant taxonomic clades with LDA score > 3.0 in Case, PreCase, and CON subjects.
Clinical correlations of the microbiome with sarcopenia characteristics
Correlation analysis was performed between gut microbiota genera abundances and clinical characteristics of sarcopenia, namely muscle mass (ASMI via BIA) and function (grip strength and five-time chair stand test). Slight, but significant (p < 0.05) positive correlation was identified between Roseburia and Eubacterium and ASMI, indicating that these genera are less abundant in individuals with smaller muscle mass. Lachnospira (p < 0.05), Eubacterium (p < 0.01), and Ruminococcus were significantly positively correlated with grip strength, while Roseburia, Eubacterium, and Lachnospira were negatively correlated (p < 0.01) with five-time chair stand test time. This indicates that the abundance of these genera decrease in proportion with declining muscle function, in addition to reduced muscle mass (Fig. 5).
Figure 5.
Heatmap showing correlations between microbiota genera and sarcopenic characteristics. Abundance (based on sequence counts) of microbiota genera correlate with muscle mass (ASMI) and functional muscle tests (grip strength, five-time chair stand test). The intensity of the color represents the correlation with the corresponding characteristics (negative correlation, blue; positive correlation, pink). ASMI, appendicular skeletal muscle index. Spearman test, *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01.
Predictive functional analysis
We next sought to understand how the taxonomic variations between the Case, preCase, and CON groups may contribute to or be functionally influenced by sarcopenia. We employed the PICRUSt program which utilizes 16S rRNA reads to predict differentially expressed functional and metabolic pathways (Fig. 6 & Supplementary Figs. S2, S3)39. A number of pathways were overrepresented in preCase and Case subjects including the citrate cycle, lipopolysaccharide biosynthesis, and protein folding and associated processing. Underrepresented pathways in Case subjects include cytoskeletal proteins, transporters, ABC transporters, and phenylalanine, tyrosine, and tryptophan biosynthesis. These results suggest that key metabolic pathways related to cellular energy production, protein processing, and nutrient transport are differentially regulated in the pathologic setting of sarcopenia. In addition, enrichment of LPS biosynthesis and LPS biosynthesis proteins suggests that sarcopenia is associated with a pro-inflammatory metagenome. Overall, our results indicate that factors associated with sarcopenia influence both microbiota composition and functional diversity.
Figure 6.
Selected pathways predicted by PICRUSt functional classification of the metagenome content of the microbiota in (A) sarcopenic (Case; yellow) and (B) possibly sarcopenic (preCase) versus healthy control (CON; blue) subjects. Welch’s t-test.
Discussion
The gut microbiota has emerged as a new and exciting frontier for understanding physiological changes associated with aging and pathophysiologic changes in disease states. While a number of independent studies have hypothesized a gut-muscle axis, thereby providing a potential link between the microbiome and age-related muscle decline, no studies have directly explored the microbiota composition in human patients with sarcopenia. In this study, we used high-throughput 16S rRNA sequencing of fecal samples from 27 individuals meeting diagnostic criteria for sarcopenia/possible sarcopenia and 60 healthy controls to demonstrate, for the first time, microbial taxonomic and predicted functional variations in this disease process. At baseline, the sarcopenic, possibly sarcopenic, and control groups were similar in gender distribution, renal function, and inflammatory status. While blood factors including albumin, hemoglobin, and hematocrit were lower in the preCase and Case groups, this is consistent with previous reports demonstrating reduced blood protein levels in relation to decline in muscle mass40–42. While the mechanism underlying the loss of albumin and hemoglobin in sarcopenic and possibly sarcopenic individuals is unclear, it may represent a more general impairment in protein metabolism (i.e., reduced stores, declining synthesis, and enhanced catabolism) that is related to muscle aging43. A potential discrepancy in the groups is the slight, but significant, trend towards older age in the preCase and Case groups. This is likely due to the elimination of individuals with significant comorbidities from the healthy control group, thus biasing this group towards a younger composition. Similarly, since sarcopenia is an age-related process, it is reasonable that the preCase and Case groups would be biased towards older age. While potentially confounding our results with general age-related microbial alterations, it was essential to eliminate individuals from the control group in whom comorbidities may more strongly influence their microbiome structure.
Overall taxonomic diversity, assessed by alpha-diversity indices, was found to be reduced in sarcopenic (Case) and possibly sarcopenic (preCase) individuals. While microbial diversity is known to be reduced with aging44, our comparison of the Case and preCase samples with healthy controls (CON) suggests that aging-related reduction in diversity is exaggerated in the setting of sarcopenia. A number of events, exposures, and mechanisms accompanying aging are thought to underly the reduction in microbial diversity, including a rise in antibiotic and other prescription drug use, changes in dietary pattern, hospitalization and communal (i.e., nursing home) residency, chronic disease, and long-term, low-grade inflammation5,45,46. Interestingly, these conditions overlap with several risk factors for sarcopenia including chronic illness, malnutrition, sedentary lifestyle, polypharmacy, and nursing home residency47–50. More recently, in a cohort of female twins, Jackson et al. demonstrated robust associations between gut microbiota composition and frailty. Strikingly, microbial diversity demonstrated a strong inverse correlation with frailty index scores19. Further, in a randomized controlled trial, prebiotic supplementation was capable of reducing the burden of frailty suggesting that reduced microbial diversity may indeed be causative of physical decline20. Taken together with our results correlating reduced microbial diversity with sarcopenia, this suggests that the aging process may disrupt the microbiome and disturb gut-muscle axis homeostasis.
Our beta-diversity analyses identified an interesting reduction in the abundance of butyrate-producing genera in sarcopenic and possibly sarcopenic subjects These genera including Lachnospira, Fusicantenibacter, Roseburia, Eubacterium, and Lachnoclostridium all share a common ability to produce SCFAs, one of the most common of which is butyrate, a critical molecule through which microbiota influence host physiology51–54. Importantly, SCFAs are bacterial factors thought to attenuate inflammation and contribute to maintenance of skeletal muscle mass. Young germ-free mice fed a mixture of SCFAs (namely, acetate, propionate, and butyrate) displayed an elevated muscle mass:body weight ratio compared to those fed a control diet26. Walsh et al. further demonstrated that supplementation of butyrate in mice aged 16 months afforded substantial protection from hindlimb muscle atrophy via inhibition of histone deactylase55. SCFAs also appear to increase skeletal muscle function with several studies demonstrating improved exercise capacity or strength after SCFA supplementation26,56,57. Indeed, in our study these genera correlated slightly, but significantly, with muscle mass and functional parameters. These results suggest that a direct relationship exists between loss of these butyrate-producing bacteria and progression of muscle loss and impairment in sarcopenia. The decline in these bacteria is consistent with the negative association of age with abundance of SCFA-producing species in septuagenarians and super-centenarians previously reported58. Surpisingly, the butyrate-producer Faecalibacterium prausnitzii, which has been identified as less abundant in frail and older individuals in multiple previous studies6,19,59, was not found to be significantly reduced in our cohort. Moreover, subdominant genera and families including Eggerthella, Akkermansia, Anaerotruncus, Synergistaceae, Bilophila, and Christensenellaceae which have demonstrated increasing age-related trajectory in a previous analysis were not identified as enriched in our study58. While sarcopenia is an age-related disorder, and there are general microbiome-related processes that are altered in both aging and sarcopenia (i.e., butyrate production), these disparate results suggest that specific enriched or underrepresented taxa may be unique to each distinct process. One taxa that did demonstrate an increase in sarcopenic patients was the bacterial Porphyromonadaceae family, which emerged as a taxonomic biomarker of sarcopenia. Although less well characterized than the SCFA-producing bacteria, genera within this family (including Parabacteroides and Porphyromonas) have been associated with metabolic syndrome in both mouse models and humans60,61. In particular, the species Porphyromonas gingivalis relates to elevated glycemic levels in type two diabetics62. This suggests that P. gingivalis may impair insulin sensitivity, a mechanism postulated to underly sarcopenia63. Interestingly, the Lactobacillus genus, which is found in many probiotic formulations, was identified as a biomarker of the preCase group. One mechanism by which Lactobacillus-containing probiotics exert beneficial effects appears to be through ameliorating chronic, systemic inflammation. For example, Lactobacillus strains have been shown to reduce concentrations of the bacterial-derived endotoxin, lipopolysaccharide and related inflammatory factors64,65. The selective overrepresentation of this genus in preCase, but not Case subjects, suggests that reduction in inflammatory-modulating bacterial species may contribute to the progression of skeletal muscle decline. This is consistent with the known impact of chronic inflammation on the development of sarcopenia10.
PICRUSt analysis identified functional metabolic and physiologic pathways that are predicted to be over- or underrepresented in the Case, preCase, and CON samples. A number of key transport and amino acid synthesis pathways were underrepresented in Case samples compared to healthy controls. Of note, ATP-binding cassette (ABC) transporters, which are responsible for uptake of a number of substances including polar and hydrophobic amino acids66,67. The phenylalanine, tyrosine, and tryptophan biosynthesis pathways were also underrepresented in samples from sarcopenic individuals. Previous work has shown that essential amino acids – which include phenylalanine (and, by proxy, its derivative tyrosine) and tryptophan – are necessary for stimulation of muscle protein anabolism in older patients68. Because these amino acids are not produced naturally within the body, their ingestion and production by microbiota are thereby critical for maintenance of skeletal muscle. Therefore, reduction in their biosynthetic pathways may represent one mechanism contributing to sarcopenia pathogenesis. Conversely, a number of pathways were predicted to be overrepresented in Case samples, including the upregulation of LPS biosynthesis in the sarcopenic group. LPS is a gram-negative, bacteria-derived endotoxin that induces systemic inflammation. In rodents, LPS injection was shown to induce muscle catabolism through inflammatory signaling (i.e., upregulation of circulating TNF-α and muscle activation of NF-κB) and reduction in the concentration of circulating and muscle IGF-169. Interestingly, the pathways predicted in our analysis match closely to those identified in a recent preclinical analysis of the rat sarcopenia microbiome including pathogenic secretion systems (i.e., LPS), ABC transporters, and dietary metabolism30. Taken together, these functional results suggest that dysbiosis accompanying sarcopenia induces major shifts in anabolic-catabolic balance and inflammation.
It is important to note the limitations of this study, particularly those relating to the generalizability of our findings. The number of Case and preCase (n = 27) subjects was considerably smaller than the number of CON (n = 60) subjects. As our definition of sarcopenia is reliant on the recently released Asian Working Group for Sarcopenia 2019 Consensus Report70, we have been limited in enrolling subjects according to this new criteria. Fortunately, we were able to obtain a large number of reads from all groups and identified statistically significant differences in microbial diversity, composition, and function. In addition, subjects enrolled in this study were geographically located in Beijing, China. It is well known that geographic location and cultural differences (i.e., dietary patterns) contribute to varying microbiota structure and composition71. Even within similar geographic locations, the microbiome of individuals can vary based on their residence within the community versus skilled nursing facilities4. Caution must, therefore, be exercised in generalizing the results of our single institution trial to the larger global community. Overall, our data should be recognized as preliminary evidence that supports a role for the microbiota in sarcopenia. Future, more highly powered studies including subjects from multiple geographic regions are necessary. The reliance of our study on 16 s rRNA, and not metagenomic, data also limits our ability to identify enrichment of functional pathways based on presence of encoding genes. Rather, we used PICRUSt, which predicts functional pathways based on differentially represented bacterial species39. Future analyses employing a shotgun metagenomics approach or whole genome sequencing of bacteria would provide further insight into alterations in microbiome functional profiles occurring in sarcopenia and aging. Finally, the lack of independent cohort replication and/or functional preclinical validation make it unclear if consistent changes in the microbiota are causative or a result of the physiologic muscle decline that characterizes sarcopenia. Preclinical studies involving depletion and/or supplementation of taxa identified in this analysis are warranted to establish a causative effect. Additional clinical studies should assess the impact of pre- or probiotic supplementation on muscle mass and function in the older population.
In conclusion, this study provides a new, preliminary perspective on the influence of gut microbial variations on sarcopenia in a cohort of Chinese individuals of advanced age. The composition of the gut microbiota was significantly altered in older individuals that met diagnostic criteria for sarcopenia and possible sarcopenia when compared to healthy controls. Future studies are necessary to establish causal relationships and to determine if probiotic supplementation may be protective against sarcopenia, and more generally, physical frailty.
Materials and methods
Ethics statement
The protocol for this prospective pilot study to identify differences in the microbiome between sarcopenic, possibly sarcopenic, and healthy subjects of advanced age was approved by the Ethics Committee of the Peking Union Medical College Hospital, attached to the Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences (No. ZS-1586) on May 22, 2018. Approval was also obtained from the Institutional Review Board of the Institute of Basic Medical Sciences, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences (Approval Number: 009–2014, 031–2017). The protocol is registered online at the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (No. ChiCTR1800017115). All participants were made aware of the objectives, procedures, and potential risks of the study, and provided informed consent prior to enrollment. All study procedures were performed in accordance with the World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki Ethical Principles for Medical Research Involving Human Subjects.
Study participants
A prospective study was conducted from September 2018 to September 2019 during which 60 healthy controls and 27 patients with sarcopenia or possible sarcopenia (according to Asian Working Group for Sarcopenia 2019 Guidelines)70 were continuously recruited at the Peking Union Medical College Hospital in Beijing, China. Inclusion criteria of subjects were as follows: an age ≥ 60 years old, stable health, and ability to be autonomous. Possible sarcopenia was defined as: (1) grip strength < 28 kg (male) or < 18 kg (female); OR (2) five-time chair stand test ≥ 12 s. Sarcopenia was defined as muscle mass < 7.0 kg/m2 (male) or < 5.7 kg/m2 (female) by BIA, in addition to meeting criteria for possible sarcopenia above. Exclusion criteria of subjects were an inability to move and stand independently from a chair, neurological or musculoskeletal disease preventing performance of resistance exercise at home, chronic cardiopulmonary insufficiency preventing normal daily activities (either New York Heart Association Functional Classification III/IV or inability to tolerate 6-min walk test), renal insufficiency (creatinine clearance < 60 mL/min) or severe liver damage (transaminase levels elevated on more than two occasions) requiring limited protein intake (< 0.8 g/kg/day), or the presence of a malignant neoplastic disease. Exclusion criteria were based on factors known or likely to impact the intestinal microbiota or those that confound the diagnosis of sarcopenia9,72. Healthy controls were selected from the Peking Union Medical College Aging Cohort of Willing Donation to provide an approximately age-matched cohort. Healthy was defined as the absence of significant comorbidities including diabetes mellitus, gastrointestinal disease, hyperlipidemia, coronary artery disease, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and hepatorenal insufficiency. Baseline clinical and demographic values were compared via ANOVA and Chi-square for parametric and non-parametric data, respectively.
Sample collection, DNA extraction, and 16S rRNA sequencing
Fecal samples (several grams) were collected into sterile 2 mL vials containing DET (dimethyl sulfoxide) buffer in accordance with the field sampling protocols of Allwegene Technology, Beijing, China. Samples were stored at − 80 °C until further analysis. Total bacterial genomic DNA was extracted from fecal samples using the PowerSoil DNA Isolation Kit (MoBio Laboratories, CA, USA) following manufacturer’s instructions. The integrity and size of the DNA were checked by gel electrophoresis on 0.8% agarose gels. The universal primers 338F (5′- ACTCCTACGGGAGGCAGCAG-3′) and 806R (5′- GGACTACHVGGGTWTCTAAT-3′) were used for polymerase chain reaction (PCR) amplification of the V3-V4 hypervariable regions of the bacterial 16S rRNA gene to comprehensively define the bacterial composition and abundance in healthy controls and possibly sarcopenic/sarcopenic patients. The PCR products were mixed in equidensity ratios and then the mixed products were purified with the AxyPrep Gel Extraction Kit (Axygen Biosciences, NJ, USA). Sequencing libraries were generated using the NEBNext Ultra DNA Library Prep Kit for Illumina (New England Biolabs, MA, USA) following manufacturer’s recommendations with index codes added. Library quality was assessed on the Qubit 2.0 Fluorometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific, MA, USA) and Agilent Bioanalyzer 2100 system (Agilent Technologies, CA, USA). Library sequencing was performed on the IlluminaMiSeq PE300 platform (Illumina, CA, USA) at Allwegene Technology, Beijing, China and 300 bp paired-end reads were generated. Sequencing of the 87 samples yielded a total of 11,997,848 high-quality reads. On average, each sample yielded 137,906 sequences, ranging from 36,088 to 649,884.
Sequencing, bioinformatics, and statistical analyses
The analysis of sequence reads was conducted using Quantitative Insights Into Microbial Ecology (QIIME, v1.8.0, http://qiime.org/). Briefly, raw sequences with exact matches to the barcodes were assigned to respective samples and identified as valid sequences. Primer sequences and barcodes were removed and sequences underwent quality control. Paired-end reads were merged using Fast Length Adjustment of Short reads (FLASH; 1.2.0)73, sequences were denoised using USEARCH (v.8.0.1623)74, and chimera were checked with UCHIME75. The remaining high-quality sequences were clustered into operational taxonomic units (OTU) at 97% sequence identity using the UPARSE pipeline by VSEARCH (v.2.13.3)38. Clustering resulted in 4,001 OTUs, initially. Subsampling at a depth of 29,298 reads per sample to control for the differential sequencing effort left 3,856 OTUs (ranging from 35 to 1208). Sequences were aligned with MAFFT (v7.427) and taxonomy was assigned to the lowest possible taxonomic level using the Ribosomal Database Project (RDP) Classifier at a 70% bootstrap value threshold. The numbers of sequences were normalized for further analyses with the upper limit of rarefaction depths (− e 14,649) used as the cut-off value.
Alpha-diversity indices (observed species diversity and Chao1) were computed using QIIME. Kruskal–Wallis tests were used to identify significant between-group differences for alpha-diversity indexes between groups. Taxonomic abundances at the phylum and genus levels were analyzed using the Metastats function in Mothur76. To detect differentially abundant taxa between groups metagenomic biomarker discovery was performed using the linear discriminant analysis effect size (LEfSe) program (http://huttenhower.sph.harvard.edu/galaxy/root/index)77. Spearman correlation analysis was performed to identify species associated with sarcopenia clinical features (ASMI, grip-strength, and five-time chair stand test). The function of intestinal microbiota was predicted with the use of the phylogenetic investigation of communities by reconstruction of unobserved states program (PICRUSt, http://picrust.github.io/picrust/)39. Functional modules were compared between sarcopenic, possibly sarcopenic, and control subjects with STAMP v2.1.3 (http://kiwi.cs.dal.ca/ Software/STAMP) using Welch’s t-test. Statistical analyses were performed using the R software package.
Supplementary Information
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by the Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences Innovation Fund for Medical Sciences (CIFMS #2017-I2M-3-008) and the National Key R&D Program of China, NO.2018YFC2002100, 2018YFC2002104.
Author contributions
L.K. was involved in study design, drafting the manuscript, subject recruitment, and sample/data collection. P.L. was involved in sample/data collection and data analysis. D.W., T.W., and D.H. were involved in sample/data collection and performance of the Comprehensive Geriatrics Assessment. T.W. was involved in sample/data collection. X.Q. was involved in sample/data collection.
Data availability
The datasets generated during and/or analysed during the current study are available in the National Institues of Health (NIH) Sequence Read Archive (SRA), https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sra (Project Accession: PRJNA691136).
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Footnotes
Publisher's note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1038/s41598-021-84031-0.
References
- 1.Odamaki T, et al. Age-related changes in gut microbiota composition from newborn to centenarian: a cross-sectional study. BMC Microbiol. 2016;16:90. doi: 10.1186/s12866-016-0708-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Woodmansey EJ, McMurdo ME, Macfarlane GT, Macfarlane S. Comparison of compositions and metabolic activities of fecal microbiotas in young adults and in antibiotic-treated and non-antibiotic-treated elderly subjects. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2004;70:6113–6122. doi: 10.1128/AEM.70.10.6113-6122.2004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.He F, et al. Differences in composition and mucosal adhesion of bifidobacteria isolated from healthy adults and healthy seniors. Curr. Microbiol. 2001;43:351–354. doi: 10.1007/s002840010315. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Claesson MJ, et al. Composition, variability, and temporal stability of the intestinal microbiota of the elderly. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2011;108(Suppl 1):4586–4591. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1000097107. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Franceschi C, Garagnani P, Parini P, Giuliani C, Santoro A. Inflammaging: A new immune-metabolic viewpoint for age-related diseases. Nat. Rev. Endocrinol. 2018;14:576–590. doi: 10.1038/s41574-018-0059-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Biagi E, et al. Through ageing, and beyond: gut microbiota and inflammatory status in seniors and centenarians. PLoS ONE. 2010;5:e10667. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0010667. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Xue QL. The frailty syndrome: definition and natural history. Clin. Geriatr. Med. 2011;27:1–15. doi: 10.1016/j.cger.2010.08.009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Kojima G, Liljas AEM, Iliffe S. Frailty syndrome: implications and challenges for health care policy. Risk Manag Healthc Policy. 2019;12:23–30. doi: 10.2147/RMHP.S168750. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Cruz-Jentoft AJ, et al. Sarcopenia: Revised European consensus on definition and diagnosis. Age Ageing. 2019;48:16–31. doi: 10.1093/ageing/afy169. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Dalle S, Rossmeislova L, Koppo K. The Role of inflammation in age-related sarcopenia. Front. Physiol. 2017;8:1045. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2017.01045. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Haran PH, Rivas DA, Fielding RA. Role and potential mechanisms of anabolic resistance in sarcopenia. J Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle. 2012;3:157–162. doi: 10.1007/s13539-012-0068-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Wilson D, Jackson T, Sapey E, Lord JM. Frailty and sarcopenia: The potential role of an aged immune system. Ageing Res Rev. 2017;36:1–10. doi: 10.1016/j.arr.2017.01.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Gomes MJ, et al. Skeletal muscle aging: influence of oxidative stress and physical exercise. Oncotarget. 2017;8:20428–20440. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.14670. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Ni Lochlainn M, Bowyer RCE, Steves CJ. Dietary protein and muscle in aging people: The potential role of the gut microbiome. Nutrients. 2018 doi: 10.3390/nu10070929. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Wu HJ, Wu E. The role of gut microbiota in immune homeostasis and autoimmunity. Gut Microbes. 2012;3:4–14. doi: 10.4161/gmic.19320. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Claesson MJ, et al. Gut microbiota composition correlates with diet and health in the elderly. Nature. 2012;488:178–184. doi: 10.1038/nature11319. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Jeffery IB, Lynch DB, O'Toole PW. Composition and temporal stability of the gut microbiota in older persons. ISME J. 2016;10:170–182. doi: 10.1038/ismej.2015.88. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Maffei VJ, et al. Biological aging and the human gut microbiota. J. Gerontol. A. 2017;72:1474–1482. doi: 10.1093/gerona/glx042. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Jackson MA, et al. Signatures of early frailty in the gut microbiota. Genome Med. 2016;8:8. doi: 10.1186/s13073-016-0262-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Buigues C, et al. Effect of a prebiotic formulation on frailty syndrome: A randomized, double-blind clinical trial. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2016 doi: 10.3390/ijms17060932. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Lustgarten MS. The role of the gut microbiome on skeletal muscle mass and physical function: 2019 Update. Front. Physiol. 2019;10:1435. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2019.01435. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Sovran B, et al. Age-associated impairment of the mucus barrier function is associated with profound changes in microbiota and immunity. Sci. Rep. 2019;9:1437. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-35228-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Frampton J, Murphy KG, Frost G, Chambers ES. Short-chain fatty acids as potential regulators of skeletal muscle metabolism and function. Nat. Metab. 2020;2:840–848. doi: 10.1038/s42255-020-0188-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Sachs S, et al. Intermuscular adipose tissue directly modulates skeletal muscle insulin sensitivity in humans. Am. J. Physiol. Endocrinol. Metab. 2019;316:E866–E879. doi: 10.1152/ajpendo.00243.2018. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Backhed F, et al. The gut microbiota as an environmental factor that regulates fat storage. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2004;101:15718–15723. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0407076101. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Lahiri S, et al. The gut microbiota influences skeletal muscle mass and function in mice. Sci. Transl. Med. 2019 doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.aan5662. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Ni Y, et al. Lactobacillus and bifidobacterium improves physiological function and cognitive ability in aged mice by the regulation of gut microbiota. Mol. Nutr. Food Res. 2019;63:e1900603. doi: 10.1002/mnfr.201900603. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Huang WC, Chen YH, Chuang HL, Chiu CC, Huang CC. Investigation of the effects of microbiota on exercise physiological adaption, performance, and energy utilization using a gnotobiotic animal model. Front. Microbiol. 2019;10:1906. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2019.01906. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Fielding RA, et al. Muscle strength is increased in mice that are colonized with microbiota from high-functioning older adults. Exp. Gerontol. 2019;127:110722. doi: 10.1016/j.exger.2019.110722. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Siddharth J, et al. Aging and sarcopenia associate with specific interactions between gut microbes, serum biomarkers and host physiology in rats. Aging (Albany NY) 2017;9:1698–1720. doi: 10.18632/aging.101262. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Collins KH, et al. A High-fat high-sucrose diet rapidly alters muscle integrity, inflammation and gut microbiota in male rats. Sci. Rep. 2016;6:37278. doi: 10.1038/srep37278. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Grosicki GJ, Fielding RA, Lustgarten MS. Gut Microbiota contribute to age-related changes in skeletal muscle size, composition, and function: Biological basis for a gut-muscle axis. Calcif Tissue Int. 2018;102:433–442. doi: 10.1007/s00223-017-0345-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Jovel J, et al. Characterization of the gut microbiome using 16S or shotgun metagenomics. Front. Microbiol. 2016;7:459. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2016.00459. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Marchesi JR, et al. The gut microbiota and host health: A new clinical frontier. Gut. 2016;65:330–339. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2015-309990. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Cho I, Blaser MJ. The human microbiome: At the interface of health and disease. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2012;13:260–270. doi: 10.1038/nrg3182. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Clarke SF, et al. Exercise and associated dietary extremes impact on gut microbial diversity. Gut. 2014;63:1913–1920. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2013-306541. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Turnbaugh PJ, et al. A core gut microbiome in obese and lean twins. Nature. 2009;457:480–484. doi: 10.1038/nature07540. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Edgar RC. UPARSE: highly accurate OTU sequences from microbial amplicon reads. Nat. Methods. 2013;10:996–998. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.2604. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Langille MG, et al. Predictive functional profiling of microbial communities using 16S rRNA marker gene sequences. Nat. Biotechnol. 2013;31:814–821. doi: 10.1038/nbt.2676. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Visser M, et al. Lower serum albumin concentration and change in muscle mass: The Health, Aging and Body Composition Study. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 2005;82:531–537. doi: 10.1093/ajcn.82.3.531. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Uemura K, Doi T, Lee S, Shimada H. Sarcopenia and low serum albumin level synergistically increase the risk of incident disability in older adults. J. Am. Med. Dir. Assoc. 2019;20:90–93. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2018.06.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Hirani V, et al. Low hemoglobin concentrations are associated with sarcopenia, physical performance, and disability in older australian men in cross-sectional and longitudinal analysis: The concord health and ageing in men project. J. Gerontol. A. 2016;71:1667–1675. doi: 10.1093/gerona/glw055. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Paddon-Jones D, Rasmussen BB. Dietary protein recommendations and the prevention of sarcopenia. Curr. Opin. Clin. Nutr. Metab. Care. 2009;12:86–90. doi: 10.1097/MCO.0b013e32831cef8b. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Aleman FDD, Valenzano DR. Microbiome evolution during host aging. PLoS Pathog. 2019;15:e1007727. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1007727. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Biagi E, Candela M, Fairweather-Tait S, Franceschi C, Brigidi P. Aging of the human metaorganism: the microbial counterpart. Age (Dordr) 2012;34:247–267. doi: 10.1007/s11357-011-9217-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Roghmann MC, et al. Comparison of the microbiota of older adults living in nursing homes and the community. mSphere. 2017;2:15. doi: 10.1128/mSphere.00210-17. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Lau EM, Lynn HS, Woo JW, Kwok TC, Melton LJ., 3rd Prevalence of and risk factors for sarcopenia in elderly Chinese men and women. J. Gerontol. A. 2005;60:213–216. doi: 10.1093/gerona/60.2.213. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Senior HE, Henwood TR, Beller EM, Mitchell GK, Keogh JW. Prevalence and risk factors of sarcopenia among adults living in nursing homes. Maturitas. 2015;82:418–423. doi: 10.1016/j.maturitas.2015.08.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Su Y, Hirayama K, Han TF, Izutsu M, Yuki M. Sarcopenia prevalence and risk factors among Japanese community dwelling older adults living in a snow-covered city according to EWGSOP2. J. Clin. Med. 2019;8:14. doi: 10.3390/jcm8030291. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Walston JD. Sarcopenia in older adults. Curr. Opin. Rheumatol. 2012;24:623–627. doi: 10.1097/BOR.0b013e328358d59b. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Vanegas SM, et al. Substituting whole grains for refined grains in a 6-wk randomized trial has a modest effect on gut microbiota and immune and inflammatory markers of healthy adults. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 2017;105:635–650. doi: 10.3945/ajcn.116.146928. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Jalanka, J. et al. The Effect of Psyllium Husk on Intestinal Microbiota in Constipated Patients and Healthy Controls. Int J Mol Sci20, doi:10.3390/ijms20020433 (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 53.Tanaka S, Yamamoto K, Yamada K, Furuya K, Uyeno Y. Relationship of enhanced butyrate production by colonic butyrate-producing bacteria to immunomodulatory effects in normal mice fed an insoluble fraction of Brassica rapa L. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2016;82:2693–2699. doi: 10.1128/AEM.03343-15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.van Zanten GC, et al. The effect of selected synbiotics on microbial composition and short-chain fatty acid production in a model system of the human colon. PLoS ONE. 2012;7:e47212. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0047212. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Walsh ME, et al. The histone deacetylase inhibitor butyrate improves metabolism and reduces muscle atrophy during aging. Aging Cell. 2015;14:957–970. doi: 10.1111/acel.12387. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Scheiman J, et al. Meta-omics analysis of elite athletes identifies a performance-enhancing microbe that functions via lactate metabolism. Nat. Med. 2019;25:1104–1109. doi: 10.1038/s41591-019-0485-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Okamoto T, et al. Microbiome potentiates endurance exercise through intestinal acetate production. Am. J. Physiol. Endocrinol. Metab. 2019;316:E956–E966. doi: 10.1152/ajpendo.00510.2018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Biagi E, et al. Gut microbiota and extreme longevity. Curr. Biol. 2016;26:1480–1485. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2016.04.016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.van Tongeren SP, Slaets JP, Harmsen HJ, Welling GW. Fecal microbiota composition and frailty. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2005;71:6438–6442. doi: 10.1128/AEM.71.10.6438-6442.2005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Henao-Mejia J, et al. Inflammasome-mediated dysbiosis regulates progression of NAFLD and obesity. Nature. 2012;482:179–185. doi: 10.1038/nature10809. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Bajaj JS, et al. Linkage of gut microbiome with cognition in hepatic encephalopathy. Am. J. Physiol. Gastrointest. Liver Physiol. 2012;302:G168–175. doi: 10.1152/ajpgi.00190.2011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Makiura N, et al. Relationship of Porphyromonas gingivalis with glycemic level in patients with type 2 diabetes following periodontal treatment. Oral Microbiol. Immunol. 2008;23:348–351. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-302X.2007.00426.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Cleasby ME, Jamieson PM, Atherton PJ. Insulin resistance and sarcopenia: mechanistic links between common co-morbidities. J. Endocrinol. 2016;229:R67–81. doi: 10.1530/JOE-15-0533. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Rodes L, et al. Effect of probiotics Lactobacillus and Bifidobacterium on gut-derived lipopolysaccharides and inflammatory cytokines: An in vitro study using a human colonic microbiota model. J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2013;23:518–526. doi: 10.4014/jmb.1205.05018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Gao K, et al. Immunomodulation and signaling mechanism of Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG and its components on porcine intestinal epithelial cells stimulated by lipopolysaccharide. J. Microbiol. Immunol. Infect. 2017;50:700–713. doi: 10.1016/j.jmii.2015.05.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Tanaka KJ, Song S, Mason K, Pinkett HW. Selective substrate uptake: The role of ATP-binding cassette (ABC) importers in pathogenesis. Biochim. Biophys. Acta. 1860 doi: 10.1016/j.bbamem.2017.08.011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Hosie AH, Poole PS. Bacterial ABC transporters of amino acids. Res. Microbiol. 2001;152:259–270. doi: 10.1016/s0923-2508(01)01197-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Volpi E, Kobayashi H, Sheffield-Moore M, Mittendorfer B, Wolfe RR. Essential amino acids are primarily responsible for the amino acid stimulation of muscle protein anabolism in healthy elderly adults. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 2003;78:250–258. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/78.2.250. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Schakman O, et al. Role of IGF-I and the TNFalpha/NF-kappaB pathway in the induction of muscle atrogenes by acute inflammation. Am. J. Physiol. Endocrinol. Metab. 2012;303:E729–739. doi: 10.1152/ajpendo.00060.2012. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Chen LK, et al. Asian Working Group for Sarcopenia: 2019 Consensus update on sarcopenia diagnosis and treatment. J. Am. Med. Dir. Assoc. 2020;21:300–307. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2019.12.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Mueller S, et al. Differences in fecal microbiota in different European study populations in relation to age, gender, and country: A cross-sectional study. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2006;72:1027–1033. doi: 10.1128/AEM.72.2.1027-1033.2006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72.Casen C, et al. Deviations in human gut microbiota: A novel diagnostic test for determining dysbiosis in patients with IBS or IBD. Aliment Pharmacol. Ther. 2015;42:71–83. doi: 10.1111/apt.13236. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73.Magoc T, Salzberg SL. FLASH: Fast length adjustment of short reads to improve genome assemblies. Bioinformatics. 2011;27:2957–2963. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btr507. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74.Edgar RC. Search and clustering orders of magnitude faster than BLAST. Bioinformatics. 2010;26:2460–2461. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btq461. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75.Edgar RC, Haas BJ, Clemente JC, Quince C, Knight R. UCHIME improves sensitivity and speed of chimera detection. Bioinformatics. 2011;27:2194–2200. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btr381. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76.Jami E, Israel A, Kotser A, Mizrahi I. Exploring the bovine rumen bacterial community from birth to adulthood. ISME J. 2013;7:1069–1079. doi: 10.1038/ismej.2013.2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77.Segata N, et al. Metagenomic biomarker discovery and explanation. Genome Biol. 2011;12:R60. doi: 10.1186/gb-2011-12-6-r60. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
The datasets generated during and/or analysed during the current study are available in the National Institues of Health (NIH) Sequence Read Archive (SRA), https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sra (Project Accession: PRJNA691136).





