Abstract
Purpose
Clubfoot is the most common congenital foot deformity in children. Caregivers often seek medical information on the internet. The aim of the study was to characterize how social media is used by caregivers to access medical information.
Methods
A search was performed on Facebook, Twitter and YouTube platforms. Information was quantitatively assessed. Comments were qualitatively assessed, and the Kruskal-Wallis test was used to study thematic comment distribution.
Results
In total, 58 Facebook groups and pages, 109 YouTube accounts and ten Twitter accounts related to clubfoot were discovered from 2007 to 2019. Facebook groups and pages had a collective 56 123 members and 80 544 total likes, respectively. YouTube had a collective 3 280 454 views, with 54 969 total comments throughout the accounts. Comment themes most commonly included sharing information and advice (38.7%), appreciation and success stories (12.8%), emotional support (12.7%) and social media as a second opinion (11.9%). Facebook groups contained a significantly higher number of comments related to ‘social media as a second opinion’ compared with Facebook pages (p = 0.001), Twitter (p = 0.016) and YouTube (p < 0.0001) while YouTube contained a significantly lower number of comments related to ‘sharing information’ compared with Facebook groups, pages and Twitter (p < 0.0001).
Conclusion
Social media continues to be a growing tool for information sharing and the findings of this study highlight the importance placed by caregivers on the advice of their peers. The online presence of caregivers may represent an opportunity for orthopaedic surgeons to communicate with patients and help them make informed decisions.
Level of evidence
IV
Keywords: clubfoot, talipes equinovarus, social media, information support, second opinion
Introduction
Clubfoot is the most common congenital foot deformity, affecting one in every 1000 live births.1 In addition to the burden of potential complications of surgical intervention, untreated clubfoot can result in skin and bone infections, difficulty with standard shoe wear, foot pain and limitations in mobility and economic opportunities.2 Families of children with clubfoot endure major difficulties including the stress and emotional response to the diagnosis, coping with serial casting schedules and prolonged bracing.
It is estimated that as of 2019, nine out of ten adults in the United States use the internet.3 As the internet continues to impact every aspect of the modern world, it has become an alternative source for healthcare information for many patients.4,5 With an estimated 2.95 billion users worldwide, social media platforms reach more people than ever and allow regular users to share content and interact with each other across the globe.6 As of April 2020, Facebook (FB) had 2.5 billion active users, followed by YouTube and Twitter, with two billion and 386 million active users, respectively.7
Patients utilize social media to seek advice on specific diseases, share personal experiences and gain knowledge about specific treatment processes.8-10 YouTube has been used by patients to view videos describing anatomy, symptomatology and treatment options, while Facebook has been used to share experiences of disease management. Twitter has been used by patients to share information regarding treatment and provide psychological support.11-14
Families of children requiring orthopaedic services are turning to the internet to gain health-related information as a source for alternative opinions.15-18 Ranade et al19 performed an analysis on YouTube videos pertaining to clubfoot and found hospital-created videos to be of higher information quality than private videos.
Social media can be an important source of information for parents of children with clubfoot regarding the treatment process.20 The aim of our study was to perform a quantitative and qualitative analysis of three social media platforms in order to characterize how social media can be used by caregivers of children with clubfoot.
Materials and methods
Search strategies
No institutional review board approval was required for this study. All information collected was publicly available and no personal information was recorded.
A search was performed on Facebook (pages/groups), YouTube and Twitter using the keyword ‘clubfoot’. An additional search was done for Twitter using the term ‘talipes equinovarus’ to maximize the results.
In order to select more ‘active’ Facebook groups, pages and YouTube videos; an arbitrary cut-off of 500 members/likes was selected. There were many search results with fewer than 500 members/likes; these results did not generate enough comment traffic to conduct a meaningful analysis and were excluded. On the contrary, due to the overall low number of Twitter accounts pertaining to clubfoot and more dynamic and interactive nature of communication via tweets, we felt that including all accounts would provide a representative sample of comments on the subject matter. Facebook groups were divided into public or private groups. A special request was sent to join all private groups. Data was collected on the number of likes, number of members, followers, total number of comments or tweets, country of origin, private or public status and year of creation. Based on identifying information, each search result was classified into one of five categories: medical institution, news, nonprofit organization, promotional information or story sharing.
Thematic analysis
To avoid any selection bias, all existing comments on YouTube, Facebook and Twitter were qualitatively analyzed, including main posts and post responses. The qualitative analysis was constructed in order to better understand common themes, topics, ideas and patterns of meaning as described by Kuckartz.21 Comments were assigned to a category by two authors independently (GH and BDB). The senior author (FEO) evaluated the comments for any discrepancies and made a final decision. Comment themes were determined using axial and open coding systems as described by Canty et al.22 The comment themes included sharing information and advice, appreciation and success stories, emotional support, social media as a second opinion, advertising services, challenges and difficulties and inequities and access issues. A text analysis was performed on YouTube comments (10 066 words) using the online programme Wordcloud generator (www.wordclouds.com). The global geographical distribution of social media platforms was traced via a frequency-based heat map (www.heatmapper.ca/).
Statistical analysis
The Kruskal-Wallis test was used to study thematic comment distribution between social media platforms. When making multiple comparisons, the Bonferroni correction adjusted the p-value for multiple comparisons; p < 0.05 was considered significant for all statistical analyses (SPSS; IBM, Armonk, New York).
Results
Quantitative results
Overall, 177 social media accounts were identified from 2007 to 2019, located in 25 countries with a total of 54 969 comments. The majority of the accounts were from the USA (51.2%) (Fig. 1). The number of social media accounts created per year increased steadily until a peak of 32 accounts in 2016 (Fig. 2a).
Fig 1.
Geographic heat map of social media accounts distribution, by density.
Fig 2.
a) Social media accounts created per year; b) social media accounts created per platform per year.
Facebook pages
In all, 37 Facebook pages with a total of 80 544 likes (mean of 2176.9 (509 to 15 236)) and 11 962 comments (mean of 323.3 (13 to 1065)) were identified. Out of the 37 pages identified, 12 (32.4%) were located in the USA (Table 1). The incidence of clubfoot Facebook page creation was highest in 2014 with seven pages created (Fig. 2b).
Table 1.
Global geographic distribution of social media accounts
| Country | Total social media platforms (%) | Facebook pages (%) | Facebook groups (%) | YouTube (%) | Twitter (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| USA | 92 (52) | 12 (32.4) | 10 (47.6) | 66 (60.6) | 4 (40.0) |
| India | 22(12.4) | 3 (8.2) | 0 (0) | 18 (16.5) | 1 (10.0) |
| UK | 11 (6.2) | 1 (2.7) | 3 (14.3) | 5 (4.6) | 2 (20.0) |
| Canada | 6 (3.4) | 1 (2.7) | 4 (19.0) | 1 (0.9) | 0 (0) |
| Philippines | 4 (2.3) | 4(10.8) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) |
| Pakistan | 4(2.3) | 1 (2.7) | 0 (0) | 3 (2.8) | 0 (0) |
| South Africa | 3 (1.7) | 1 (2.7) | 1 (4.8) | 0 (0) | 1 (10.0) |
| Zambia | 2 (1.1) | 1 (2.7) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 1 (10.0) |
| Malaysia | 2 (1.1) | 1 (2.7) | 0 (0) | 1 (0.9) | 0 (0) |
| Italy | 2 (1.1) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 2 (1.8) | 0 (0) |
| Germany | 2 (1.1) | 1 (2.7) | 0 (0) | 1 (0.9) | 0 (0) |
| Australia | 2 (1.1) | 1 (2.7) | 0 (0) | 1 (0.9) | 0 (0) |
| Tanzania | 1 (0.6) | 1 (2.7) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) |
| Somalia | 1 (0.6) | 1 (2.7) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) |
| Singapore | 1 (0.6) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 1 (0.9) | 0 (0) |
| Rwanda | 1 (0.6) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 1 (0.9) | 0 (0) |
| Netherlands | 1 (0.6) | 1 (2.7) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) |
| Liberia | 1 (0.6) | 1 (2.7) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) |
| Kenya | 1 (0.6) | 1 (2.7) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) |
| Ireland | 1 (0.6) | 1 (2.7) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) |
| Iraq | 1 (0.6) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 1 (0.9) | 0 (0) |
| Egypt | 1 (0.6) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 1 (0.9) | 0 (0) |
| Denmark | 1 (0.6) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 1 (0.9) | 0 (0) |
| Belize | 1 (0.6) | 1 (2.7) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) |
| Bangladesh | 1 (0.6) | 1 (2.7) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) |
| N/A | 12 (6.8) | 2 (5.4) | 3 (14.3) | 6 (5.6) | 1 (10.0) |
N/A, geographical information not available
Facebook groups
A total of 21 Facebook groups with a total of 56 123 members (mean of 2672.5 (515 to 7501)) and 30 551 comments (mean of 2182.2 (281 to 4752)). Out of the 21 groups identified, 20 private groups with 49 447 total members (mean of 2472.3 ± 1908.8; median of 2339; range 515 to 7501) and 27 159 total comments (mean of 2089.2 ± 1136.07; median of 2187; range of 281 to 4752) were identified along with only one public group with a total of 6676 members and 3392 comments.
Out of the 20 private groups identified, 13 were successfully joined with a membership total of 34 702 (mean of 2669 (515 to 5470)) and seven private groups could not be joined with a total of 14 745 members (mean of 2106 (561 to 7501)). Out of the 21 groups identified; ten (47.6%) were located in the USA (Table 1).
YouTube
A total of 109 YouTube videos with a total of 3 280 454 views (mean of 30 095.9 (524 to 396 663)) and 534 comments (mean of 4.9 (0 to 72)) were identified. YouTube videos accounted for (60.6%) of total social media accounts (Fig. 3). Out of the 109 YouTube videos identified, 66 (60.6%) were located in the USA (Table 1).
Fig 3.
Social media accounts distribution by platform.
Ten Twitter accounts with a total of 9834 followers (mean of 983.4 (59 to 4395)) and 11 922 comments (mean of 1192.2 (18 to 3349)) were identified. Out of the ten Twitter accounts identified, four (40%) were located in the USA (Table 1).
Qualitative results
A total of 177 individual accounts were classified into five main categories (Fig. 4). A total of 54 969 comments were coded into eight themes (Table 2). Sub-thematic analysis of a total of 54 969 comments was conducted (Table 3). A word cloud was generated using a total of 534 YouTube comments and the frequency distribution of the top ten words was plotted (Figs 5 and 6, respectively).
Fig 4.
Social media accounts categories.
Table 2.
Thematic analysis of overall comments across social media platforms
| Themes | Prevalence (%) | Description | Selected Comments |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharing information and advice | 38.70 | Sharing day-to-day care and helpful information regarding the treatment process of children with clubfoot based on personal experiences. | “….. My son (4 months old) just got his last casts (after his heel clips) off yesterday morning and we were given the [Brand] brace system with the only instructions to “keep his heel down” and “make sure he wears them 25hrs a day for 4 months””. |
| Appreciation and success stories | 12.81 | Sharing success stories of treatment, positive results from surgery and thanking others for providing help. | “thank you so much for sharing this. I’m having my first born in march and just found out she has club foot, we don’t know to what degree and won’t until she gets here but I’ve been so scared and nervous because it’s something i know next to nothing about. this brought me a lot of comfort. thank you”. |
| Emotional support | 12.71 | Building relationships based on shared emotional difficulties while taking care of a child with clubfoot. | “….I’m struggling to hold it together after finding out at my 21 week scan that my third child has bilateral club foot …. I am just so afraid of the syndromes that club foot can be associated with. I spend half the time fearing it’s more than clubfoot, and the other half the time panicking about the impact of club foot itself..…how on earth did you keep it all together?! I am just hoping that it’s “just” club foot and all will turn out okay”. |
| Social media as a second opinion | 11.93 | Offering or receiving recommendations regarding clubfoot management. | “I need advice. My five year old son left foot is regressing... again. He spent all of October in a full leg cast and all of November on a cast just below the knee. He spent an additional 2 weeks in a cast in January. I really want to avoid the tendon transfer surgery but I am not sure at what cost, I feel like he is spending his childhood in casts. Can anyone relate? Please post advice/opinions”. |
| Advertising services | 10.10 | Advertising for clubfoot-related accessories and equipment. | “Our springs have been redesigned to allow the shoes to be attached without engaging the springs or weighing down the springs. This means when the child is at rest, they will not exert enough strength to engage the springs, leaving the foot in permanent dorsiflexed position… We are giving you the ability to increase the resistance when you notice your child is overpowering the springs while resting in the bar”. |
| Challenges and difficulties | 9.31 | Challenges and negative experiences during casting, bracing or post-surgery. | “…My son is 11. He has aches and pain in his legs. He has had tenotomy and the two tendon transfers to both feet. Lately he hasn’t been able to go to school because he cant put any weight through his heels and his ankles are in so much pain.”. |
| Techniques and anatomy | 2.70 | Offering technical surgical details regarding clubfoot corrective surgery, sharing details regarding the structural anatomy and pathophysiology of clubfoot. | “The indication for [tendon] transfer is dynamic supination. In the absence of dynamic supination there is no reason for a transfer. There are reasons to exclude a transfer: connective tissue disorder, stiff feet, neurological feet. We could not have it and had day and night ADM instead”. |
| Inequities and access issues | 1.74 | Inability to afford or access treatment for clubfoot. | “Just wanna ask if clubfoot surgery is available in the Philippines [because] my grandson who was born 1 day old is having [this] condition particularly his right foot...is there any foundation who can help us to cure [this] kind of condition??”. |
Table 3.
Sub-thematic analysis of comments across social media platforms
| Themes | Facebook page (%) | Facebook group (%) | YouTube (%) | Twitter (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Emotional support and forming connections | 794 (6.6) | 4343 (14.2) | 46 (8.6) | 1801 (15.1) |
| Sharing information and advice | 4781 (40.0) | 12 401 (40.6) | 141 (26.4) | 3951 (33.1) |
| Appreciation and successes | 2219 (18.6) | 2432 (8.0) | 164 (30.7) | 2229 (18.7) |
| Challenges and difficulties | 876 (7.3) | 3311 (10.8) | 14 (2.6) | 916 (7.7) |
| Advertising/offering services | 1958 (16.4) | 1149 (3.8) | 3 (0.6) | 2440 (20.5) |
| Inequities and access | 201 (1.7) | 505 (1.7) | 20 (3.7) | 228 (1.9) |
| Social media as a second opinion | 302 (2.5) | 5993 (19.6) | 93 (17.4) | 172 (1.4) |
| Information regarding technique and anatomy | 831 (6.9) | 417 (1.3) | 53 (9.9) | 185 (1.6) |
Fig 5.
Word cloud of YouTube comments; larger size indicates more frequent words.
Fig 6.
Frequency distribution of the top ten words in the word cloud (verbs, adverbs and common nouns not related to clubfoot were removed for clarity).
Thematic comment distribution
Social media platforms were significantly different in terms of number of comments related to the identified themes (p < 0.0001). Pairwise comparisons showed that Facebook groups contained significantly higher number of comments related to ‘social media as a second opinion’ compared with Facebook pages (p = 0.001), Twitter (p = 0.016) and YouTube (p < 0.0001) while YouTube contained significantly lower number of comments related to ‘sharing information’ compared with Facebook groups (p < 0.0001), Facebook pages (p < 0.0001) and Twitter (p < 0.0001) (Table 4).
Table 4.
Kruskal-Wallis test comparing mean ranks of the number of comment themes between social media platforms
| Thematic categories | Facebook groups | Facebook pages | YouTube videos | chi-squared test | p-value | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Emotional support | 160 | 121.24 | 59.89 | 144 | 115.12 | < 0.0001a,b |
| Sharing information and advice | 160.00 | 132.2 | 56.00 | 141.20 | 127.69 | < 0.0001a,b,c |
| Appreciation and success stories | 151.35 | 129.9 | 57.76 | 139.85 | 106.10 | < 0.0001a,b,c |
| Challenges and difficulties | 157.70 | 119.8 | 62.11 | 127.60 | 106.31 | < 0.0001a,b |
| Advertising services | 146.05 | 108.4 | 70.41 | 95.40 | 71.06 | < 0.0001a |
| Inequities and access issues | 130.60 | 107.02 | 72.13 | 97.90 | 51.06 | < 0.0001a,b,d |
| Social media as a second opinion | 152.90 | 106.07 | 70.28 | 99.60 | 46 | < 0.0001a,d |
| Techniques and anatomy | 134.40 | 125.49 | 63.20 | 115.70 | 74 | < 0.0001a,b,c |
Pair-wise comparisons were all significant at (p < 0.05) except as shown below:
a Twitter versus Facebook pages (p > 0.05)
b Twitter versus Facebook groups (p > 0.05)
c Facebook groups versus Facebook pages (p > 0.05)
d Twitter versus YouTube (p > 0.05)
Discussion
Quantitative analysis
Social media platforms can be influential in terms of patient education and guiding treatment considerations, but may be currently underutilized by paediatric orthopaedic surgeons.23 This study demonstrates that caregivers of children with clubfoot share an average of 4581 comments per year on Facebook, YouTube and Twitter.
Creation of clubfoot themed social media accounts has increased over time, with a peak in 2016 (Fig. 2a). An increase in YouTube video creation in 2016 might have contributed to this trend (Fig. 2b). Clubfoot social media accounts rose from 86 to 118 in 2016, a 37.2 % increase. Simultaneously, clubfoot-related YouTube videos rose from 46 to 66, a 43.5 % increase. Although the quality of the videos was not assessed, this highlights the ability of YouTube to influence a vast audience and become a potential avenue for physicians to create educational content that engages millions.
Overall, 165 out of 177 (93.2%) social media platforms had a known country of origin. Accounts and videos were located in 25 countries (Table 1). Interestingly, despite the fact that 80% of all clubfoot cases are born in developing countries,24 more than half of social media accounts were located in the United States. This distribution likely reflects an overall decrease in access to the internet in developing countries and the exclusion of non-English content from our study.
YouTube held the majority of social media platforms, accounting for 109 out of 177 (61.5%) total social media platforms (Fig. 3). A total of 66 out of 109 (60.0%) YouTube videos were created by accounts located in the United States. The year 2017 had the highest number of YouTube videos created, 21 out of 109 (19.2%). With 3 280 454 million total views and 534 comments, there was a discrepancy between viewership and the interactive nature of YouTube videos. In total, 16 out of 109 (14.7%) videos had their comment section closed. YouTube videos are often shared on other social media platforms, elevating the total views. As such, no conclusion can be drawn as to the extent of engagement of caregivers on YouTube.
Facebook was the most interactive platform, accounting for 42 513 out of 54 969 (77.3%) total social media comments. A total of 22 out of 58 (37.9%) Facebook groups/pages were located in the United States. The year 2014 had the highest number of Facebook pages/groups created, 14 out of 58 (24.1%). In all, 20 out of 57 (35.0%) Facebook accounts were private and access was only gained to 13 (65%). Accessible private groups were the most interactive part of Facebook, accounting for 27 159 out of 42 513 (63.9%) total Facebook comments. The heavy caregiver usage and relative privacy of these groups may offer a strong starting point for information distribution by orthopaedic surgeons.
Twitter provided a negligible source of information in terms of the number of social media accounts, contributing only ten out of 177 (5.6%) total social media accounts (Fig. 3). A total of four out of ten (40.0%) Twitter accounts were located in the United States. The year 2016 had the highest number of Twitter accounts created, three out of ten (30.0%). Tweet text character limitation may limit caregivers from sharing detailed personal experiences making Twitter an undesirable medium for clubfoot-related conversations.
Thematic analysis
Comment analysis demonstrated a primarily informational role of social media platforms (Table 2). Comments seeking and distributing information categorized as ‘sharing information and advice’ accounted for 38.7% of all social media comments. Sharing advice comments were composed of personal day-to-day experiences caring for a child with clubfoot (Table 2). These experiences were depicted in words and uploaded images offering an educational usage of social media.
Sub-thematic analysis revealed different dominant themes among platforms. Analyzing YouTube comments revealed that ‘appreciation and success’ was the dominant theme accounting for 30.7% of all YouTube comments while other platforms played a significantly more prominent role in sharing information compared with YouTube (p < 0.0001) (Table 3). Most of the YouTube comments demonstrated the gratitude of users; they were uploading videos of their personal experiences and success stories of the treatment processes. The word cloud of YouTube’s comments (Fig. 5) contained the words ‘surgery’ and ‘thank’ among the top ten most frequent words with a frequency of 40 and 17, respectively (Fig. 6). This suggests caregivers felt comfortable sharing appreciation and success stories with other caregivers on YouTube.
The ‘personal touch’ of the comments was ubiquitous, and they were often describing personal experiences that facilitated caregiver-to-caregiver support. This trend can be explained by the powerful effect of caregiver-to-caregiver dialogue that enhances coping skills and acceptance of the child’s needs.25 ‘Emotional support’ emerged as the third most common theme overall, accounting for 12.7% of total social media comments with Facebook groups/pages and Twitter playing a significant role compared with YouTube. In this comment type, caregivers shared their distress during clubfoot management and their emotional challenges facing the diagnosis (Table 2). As such, social media can serve as a way for caregivers of children with clubfoot to facilitate their emotional adjustment and ability to care for their children.26
Notably, caregivers often sought a second opinion on Facebook groups which were the most significant source for such conversations compared with other social media platforms (p < 0.05). Under the ‘social media as a second opinion’ theme, caregivers usually posted their medical questions directed to other caregivers either as a case description, ultrasound results, images or videos. The responses ranged from offering medical advice based on previous experiences, referring caregivers to orthopaedic surgeons or redirecting them to health-related websites. In most cases, people without a medical background led discussions in this realm. While information sharing is valuable with regards to emotional support and experience sharing among caregivers, medical advice shared in this forum is at risk of being misleading and even dangerous for patients due to the absence of vetting by orthopaedic surgeons with specialized expertise.10
Information exchange regarding clubfoot was not only personal but also technical. A new theme that emerged from our analysis was ‘techniques and anatomy’. The majority of this comment type came from research-based Facebook groups, pages and Twitter accounts discussing pathophysiology and surgical techniques concerning clubfoot. Some Facebook pages discussed topics concerning aspects of the surgical correction of clubfoot. In addition, caregivers had the opportunity to submit questions regarding their concerns to board certified paediatric orthopaedic surgeons through the Facebook page of the Pediatric Orthopedic Society of North America, another excellent starting point for orthopaedic surgeons to engage patients online. Given patients’ interest in learning about their condition in meticulous detail and their enthusiasm for physicians to join social media,27 continued expansion of the presence of orthopaedic surgeons sharing content on clubfoot is anticipated. While this may serve as an avenue for physicians to educate parents and stimulate valuable discussion between their individual providers, it is important to consider the risk of providers prioritizing the use of this platform for marketing rather than education. These concerns highlight the importance of encouraging our well-respected orthopaedic societies, rather than individual physicians, to increase their presence to provide information that is mutually agreed upon by leaders in the field and supported by peer-reviewed evidence. An emphasis should be placed on posting information which is understandable at lower education levels and fostering enthusiasm for parents to be educated in their children’s care.28
A limitation of this study included the use of ‘clubfoot’ as the one keyword to search for clubfoot-related content, excluding results that may differ in nomenclature. Even though an additional search term ‘talipes equinovarus’ was used for Twitter, it did not result in any additional accounts. Another limitation is only English-based content was selected which prevented analyzing social media platforms of different languages. Access was not gained to seven out of 20 (35.0%) private groups, which limited this study from capturing different types of discussions taking place in those groups. Word cloud analysis of only YouTube comments may have produced results not representative of all social media platforms. In addition, word cloud generators analyze word frequency only with no consideration for the context in which they were used.29 Finally, this study represents only a snapshot of the current use of social media by caregivers. Reported numbers are prone to change due to the dynamic nature of social media platforms.
This study provides insight into the use of Facebook, YouTube and Twitter by caregivers of children with clubfoot as tools for information sharing. There was considerable variability among platforms and their use internationally. However, the presence of caregivers and nature of information being shared represent a potential opportunity for orthopaedic surgeons to share information supported by peer-reviewed evidence. Increasing the presence of surgeons and societies on these platforms should be with the goal of informing discussions between parents and their individual local providers who know their child and their condition personally. Information shared through social media does not supplant the patient/parent-physician relationship. Despite this, its heavy utilization by parents of children with clubfoot represents an opportunity to potentially improve patient care and health outcomes.
Open access
This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0) licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed.
Compliance with ethical standards
Funding statement
No benefits in any form have been received or will be received from a commercial party related directly or indirectly to the subject of this article.
Ethical statement
Ethical approval: This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.
Informed consent: Informed consent was not required for this work.
ICMJE Conflict of interest statement
None declared.
Author Contributions
GH: Study design, Data collection, Statistical analysis, Manuscript preparation.
BDB: Study design, Manuscript preparation.
JP: Manuscript preparation.
JI: Data analysis, Manuscript preparation.
FE-O: Study design, Manuscript preparation.
References
- 1. Parker SE, Mai CT, Strickland MJ, et al. Multistate study of the epidemiology of clubfoot. Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol 2009;85:897-904. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2. Dobbs MB, Gurnett CA. Update on clubfoot: etiology and treatment. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2009;467:1146-1153. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. Pew Research Center. Internet/Broadband Fact Sheet. June 12, 2019. www.pewresearch.org/internet/fact-sheet/internet-broadband/ (date last accessed 18 May 2020).
- 4. Harvey S, Memon A, Khan R, Yasin F. Parent’s use of the Internet in the search for healthcare information and subsequent impact on the doctor–patient relationship. Ir J Med Sci 2017;186:821-826. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Escoffery C, Miner KR, Adame DD, et al. Internet use for health information among college students. J Am Coll Health 2005;53:183-188. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Clement J. Number of social network users worldwide from 2010 to 2023. April 1, 2020. www.statista.com/statistics/278414/number-of-worldwide-social-network-users/ (date last accessed 25 May 2020).
- 7. Clement J. Most popular social networks worldwide as of April 2020, ranked by number of active users. April 24, 2020. www.statista.com/statistics/272014/global-social-networks-ranked-by-number-of-users/ (date last accessed 25 May 2020).
- 8. Santoro E, Castelnuovo G, Zoppis I, Mauri G, Sicurello F. Social media and mobile applications in chronic disease prevention and management. Front Psychol 2015;6:567. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. Guo L, Reich J, Groshek J, Farraye FA. Social media use in patients with inflammatory bowel disease. Inflamm Bowel Dis 2016;22:1231-1238. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10. De Martino I, D’Apolito R, McLawhorn AS, et al. Social media for patients: benefits and drawbacks. Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med 2017;10:141-145. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11. Tsuya A, Sugawara Y, Tanaka A, Narimatsu H. Do cancer patients tweet? Examining the twitter use of cancer patients in Japan. J Med Internet Res 2014;16:e137-e137. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12. Mukewar S, Mani P, Wu X, Lopez R, Shen B. YouTube and inflammatory bowel disease. J Crohns Colitis 2013;7:392-402. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13. Moorhead SA, Hazlett DE, Harrison L, et al. A new dimension of health care: systematic review of the uses, benefits, and limitations of social media for health communication. J Med Internet Res 2013;15:e85. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14. Farmer AD, Bruckner Holt CE, Cook MJ, Hearing SD. Social networking sites: a novel portal for communication. Postgrad Med J 2009;85:455-459. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15. Shuyler KS, Knight KM. What are patients seeking when they turn to the Internet? Qualitative content analysis of questions asked by visitors to an orthopaedics Web site. J Med Internet Res 2003;5:e24-e24. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16. Beall MS III, Golladay GJ, Greenfield ML, Hensinger RN, Biermann JS. Use of the internet by pediatric orthopaedic outpatients. J Pediatr Orthop 2002;22:261-264. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17. Baker JF, Devitt BM, Lynch S, et al. Internet use by parents of children attending a dedicated scoliosis outpatient clinic. Eur Spine J 2012;21:1972-1977. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18. Aslam N, Bowyer D, Wainwright A, Theologis T, Benson M. Evaluation of Internet use by paediatric orthopaedic outpatients and the quality of information available. J Pediatr Orthop B 2005;14:129-133. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19. Ranade AS, Belthur MV, Oka GA Malone JD. YouTube as an information source for clubfoot: a quality analysis of video content. J Pediatr Orthop B 2020;29:375-378. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20. Keil EJ, Shaikh H, Navarro SM, et al. Social media perceptions of clubfoot treatment: a global observational study. www.researchsquare.com/article/rs-43930/v1 (date last accessed 14 January 2021).
- 21. Kuckartz U. Qualitative text analysis: a systematic approach. Kaiser G, Presmeg N, eds. Compendium for early career researchers in mathematics education. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2019:181-197. [Google Scholar]
- 22. Canty MJ, Breitbart S, Siegel L, et al. The role of social media in selective dorsal rhizotomy for children: information sharing and social support. Childs Nerv Syst 2019;35:2179-2185. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23. Lander ST, Sanders JO, Cook PC, O’Malley NT. Social media in pediatric orthopaedics. J Pediatr Orthop 2017;37:e436-e439. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24. Ansar A, Rahman AE, Romero L, et al. Systematic review and meta-analysis of global birth prevalence of clubfoot: a study protocol. BMJ Open 2018;8):e019246. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25. Santelli B, Turnbull A, Higgins C. Parent to parent support and health care. Pediatr Nurs 1997;23:303-306. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26. DeHoff BA, Staten LK, Rodgers RC, Denne SC. The role of online social support in supporting and educating parents of young children with special health care needs in the United States: a scoping review. J Med Internet Res 2016;18:e333-e333. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27. Farnan JM, Snyder Sulmasy L, Worster BK, et al. Online medical professionalism: patient and public relationships: policy statement from the American College of Physicians and the Federation of State Medical Boards. Ann Intern Med 2013;158:620-627. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28. Ventola CL. Social media and health care professionals: benefits, risks, and best practices. P T 2014;39:491-520. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29. Heimerl F, Lohmann S, Lange S, Ertl, T . Word Cloud Explorer: Text Analytics based on Word Clouds. Proceedings of the 47th Hawaii International Conference on System Science (HICSS ‘14), 2014, 1833-1842. Washington, DC, USA: IEEE CS. [Google Scholar]