Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 Dec 1.
Published in final edited form as: Curr Opin Allergy Clin Immunol. 2020 Dec;20(6):565–573. doi: 10.1097/ACI.0000000000000691

Artificial Intelligence and the Hunt for Immunological Disorders

Nicholas L Rider 1,*, Renganathan Srinivasan 2, Paneez Khoury 3
PMCID: PMC7908683  NIHMSID: NIHMS1651332  PMID: 33002894

Abstract

Purpose of Review:

Artificial intelligence (AI) has pervasively transformed many industries and is beginning to shape medical practice. New use cases are being identified in subspecialty domains of medicine and, in particular, application of AI has found its way to the practice of allergy-immunology. Here, we summarize recent developments, emerging applications and obstacles to realizing full potential.

Recent Findings:

Artificial/augmented intelligence and machine learning are being used to reduce dimensional complexity, understand cellular interactions and advance vaccine work in the basic sciences. In genomics, bioinformatic methods are critical for variant calling and classification. For clinical work, AI is enabling disease detection, risk profiling and decision support. These approaches are just beginning to have impact upon the field of clinical immunology and much opportunity exists for further advancement.

Summary:

This review highlights use of computational methods for analysis of large datasets across the spectrum of research and clinical care for patients with immunological disorders. Here, we discuss how big data methods are presently being used across the field clinical immunology.

Keywords: Artificial Intelligence, Machine Learning, Primary Immunodeficiency, Biomedical Informatics

Introduction:

Electronic health record (EHR) and scientific data are accumulating at a tremendous rate and patients are living longer with greater complexity.[1] Capitalizing on inferences from these large datasets is an important opportunity, requiring specific methods for gleaning necessary insights.[2] Appropriately constructed computational tools may facilitate interpretation of clinical and scientific information, reduce medical errors and prevent morbidity.[2, 3] For these reasons, artificial/augmented intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) have generated interest within the healthcare domain and are advancing use cases spanning diagnostic, quality-care, and research spectra.[46]

The terms AI and ML are often used interchangeably; however, AI is an umbrella term which refers to computed decision-making and ML is a subset of AI.[7] Additionally, the term “augmented intelligence” is an important concept relating to enhancement of human effort via complementary digital systems.[8] In ML, a programmed model is built from inputs which enables computer task-learning for making predictions with increasing precision over time.[2]

Recently, the concept of a human-computer collaboration spectrum emerged where AI tools fit along a continuum between fully human and fully computer-driven. [9] This view highlights levels of analytic complexity providing a framework for clarifying forms of ML. For example, a risk calculator may embed classic statistical methods requiring substantial human inference to build; whereas, a deep learning model can automatically classify inputs without much human intervention. Given substantial methodologic diversity, we will use the term “AI” throughout to generally refer to tools across the ML and computational spectrum(Table 1).

Table 1:

A Glossary of Relevant Terms for AI and ML

Term Definition
Algorithm (Machine Learning) An equation or set of rules by which a computational task is accomplished.
Artificial Intelligence See “Machine Learning”(syn.) The process by which a computer can automatically or semi-automatically perform a task and improve upon that performance over time without explicit instruction.
Augmented Intelligence A model of partnership between humans and AI to enhance learning and task cmopletion.
Big Data Data characterized by high volume which is accumulated with great velocity having tremendous variety in form.
Black Box A process whose mechanisms for output are not easily comprehensible.
Classification A machine learning task performed by separating examples or inputs into a category. Usually done by assessing the probability that a given input data example belongs to a specific output class. This is typically used for discrete data.
Data Mining The process of discovering patterns in data.
Data, Continuous A term typically used to imply quantitative data with an infinite number of possibilities. Data which can be counted. Often analyzed via regression.
Data, Discrete A term typically used to imply qualitative data which can be categorized by classification or into a class.
Deep Learning A process by which a computer can perform a task by learning complex concepts by first learning simple concepts via a multilayered (i.e. deep) network.
Governance, Data The process by which strategies, policies and decisions related to data are made. Typically relates to an enterprise process.
Labeled Data Data examples which have been tagged according to a particular class for training. These enable a compluter to more effectively distinguish features of relevance to the classification task. Used in supervised learrning.
Machine Learning See “Artificial Intelligence” (syn.) The process by which a computer can automatically or semi-automatically perform a task and improve upon that performance over time without explicit instruction.
Natural Language Processing (NLP) A sub-discipline of linguistics concerned with how computers and human language interact. A method for enabling computer-based analysis of unstructured text. (Syn. Text Mining)
Predictive Analytics A collection of methods aimed at ascertaining the probability of a given outcome.
Prescriptive Analytics An advanced form of analytics which aims to answer the question “what should be done?”.
Regression A machine learning task, based upon classical statistics, where relationships between variables is represented by a line or curve. This is typically utilized for and to predict continuous, real value, numbers.
Semi-supervised Learning A machine learning approach where a small amount of labeled data and a large amount of unlabeled data is used to train a model.
Structured Data Data with a clearly defined category or field prepared as such for ready retrieval and analysis.
Supervised Learning A machine learning approach where training occurs with labeled data.
Task A unit of execution or work performed by a computer.
Transparent Box A process whose mechanisms for output are clearly evident.
Unlabeled Data Data examples which have no prespecified tags or classification. These do not provide insight towards classification by a computer; thus, the machine must make assessment about inherant relationships among examples. Used in unsupervised learning.
Unstructured Data Data without a pre-defined category or model. Examples - text, audio data, and videos.
Unsupervised Learning A machine learning approach where training occurs without labeled data.
Use Case As applied to systems engineering, a use case defines the series of steps required for a role (i.e. person or agent) to interact with a system to achieve a goal. May also loosely be defined as an application for a particular approach.
1Witten, I.H. “Data Mining: Practical Machine Learning Tools and Techniques.” 4th ed. Elsevier 2019; Amsterdam.
2 Goodfellow, I., Bengio, Y., and Courville, A. “Deep Learning”, 1st ed., MIT Press 2016; Cambrige, MA.
3Shortliffe, E.H., and Cimino, J.J. “Biomedical Informatics: Computer Applications in Health Care and Biomedicine.” 4th ed. Springer-Verlag 2014; London.
4Burke, J. “Health Analytics: Gaining the Insights to Transform Health Care.” 1st ed. John Wiley & Sons; Hoboken, NJ.

Given the above, how can AI impact the domain of clinical immunology? In facilitating disease diagnosis, computational methods may highlight patients at risk for primary immunodeficiency diseases (PID).[10] For example, a risk-assessment algorithm can be embedded within a health plan data pipeline to identify patients with medical conditions, risks or clinical trajectories to facilitate early intervention. Additionally, rule-based analysis of structured laboratory data can enable population-wide assessment of risk for hypogammaglobulinemia.[11] Yet, these approaches should be seen as the tip of the clinical immunology opportunity iceberg as opportunities range from novel disease gene identification to subject selection for enrollment into clinical trials.[12, 13] In this review, we will provide an overview of AI and then explore its use within clinical immunology for advancing biological understanding, improving diagnosis and driving increased quality of care for patients with immunological disorders.

AI & Healthcare:

How is AI Suited to Manage Big Data?

By every standard of the definition, healthcare data represent ‘Big Data’(BD). In general, BD refers to data which are of tremendous volume, amassed with great velocity and is of substantial variety.[14] This duality of BD warrants consideration for both effectively using it and managing complexity. Unique BD features also require specific tools accomplish data inference.

Traditional ML algorithms are designed to ingest large amounts of data and find patterns. Here, inputs can be derived from routine clinical, laboratory and claims related data to form “examples” which are analyzed by the model after they are “labeled” based upon a pre-defined task.[15] During training, AI algorithms weight certain features more heavily as they relate to predicting a labeled class outcome according to the specific method schema chosen.[2, 7] Weighted features from the model are then retained for analysis of new inputs and may be revised with subsequent training examples.[16] With appropriate structuring, AI algorithms can input large amounts of varied and complex data, analyzed according to feature weights learned in training and output a prediction which can be acted upon.

How Does AI Work?

The task, use case or specific application for AI may be approached in several different ways and can require classification or regression.[7, 16] In all workflows, AI algorithms must be trained, validated and then tested. During testing, algorithmic performance, bias and variance should always be assessed on an “un-seen” dataset.[7, 15] A common approach for AI is supervised learning where training data are labeled (i.e. instances with and without disease) before loading into an algorithm for pattern assessment, followed by validation and performance measurement.[7] (Figure 1: BD) Some algorithms can ingest unlabeled data to perform “unsupervised” learning where patterns are learned from underlying data structure; however, almost all methods presently use some degree of supervised learning.[17] (Figure 1: A)

Figure 1: Machine Learning Examples.

Figure 1:

Classic machine learning approaches include unsupervised methods such as clustering algorithms (A) which find natural relationships between the data. Additionally, supervised learning via linear models(B), decision trees (C) and support vector machines (D) use labeled data to train models for regression or classification. Deep learning methods such as neural networks (E) pass inputs to subsequent layers where learning occurs at each node. Prediction error can be minimized by passing information backwards through a cost function before feeding forward for ultimate output classification. (Network model example constructed with http://alexlenail.me/NN-SVG/index.html)

Despite seeming magical, all AI algorithms are simply mathematical functions which describe input data and map to outputs. Examples of input data in healthcare include structured electronic health record (EHR) elements such as diagnostic codes, vital sign fields or demographic fields as well as unstructured data in the form of text and radiologic image data. Input data represent features of relevance to the desired prediction task and must be selected accordingly. Because inputs may be highly varied without clear inter-relationships, a variety of models must be experimentally applied and subsequently tuned to assess best performance in testing for the given task.[7, 16]

Deep Learning:

Deep learning (DL) is a distinct branch of AI which bears separate mention from traditional ML. While DL theory and application spans several decades, it has only recently become useful in practice with the application of more powerful processing units (i.e. Graphical Processing Units (GPUs)), availability of large datasets and the need to draw inferences from such data.[5, 18] The structure of a DL scheme (Figure 1, E) appears somewhat like a series of interconnected neurons, hence the term ‘neural network’. Here, data flows forward from an input layer to subsequent layers which refine classification at each node, while also feeding backwards to earlier layers (i.e. backpropagation) to minimize error via a cost function.[15]

Deep learning algorithms are particularly well suited for healthcare data.[5] These algorithms can handle disparate data types with ease and their performance often increases in linear fashion with amount of input data.[19] Examples of DL use in healthcare include prediction of mortality in the pediatric ICU [20], assessing the most likely disease course for patients with rheumatoid arthritis [21], mining structured EHR data [6] and extracting clinical concepts from text [22].

Wrangling Healthcare Data:

For AI to become routinely useful in healthcare, validated datasets must be available for analysis.[2] Unfortunately, assembling a useful dataset requires elements to be extracted from EHR data which is known to be unreliable, difficult to obtain and highly variable.[23, 24] One solution for enabling efficient information extraction for healthcare analytics is to partner data science teams, clinicians and laboratory scientists.[25] In this way, the technical knowledge of data scientists can complement clinical and scientific domain expert knowledge to optimize data extraction, dataset construction and analysis along a comprehensive and relevant trajectory.[26]

Using AI to Advance Care of Patients with Immunologic Disorders:

Basic Science and Genomic Applications:

Robust ML applications are evident in the basic sciences and range from basic pattern recognition to modeling complex immune networks, hypothesis generation and analysis efforts. The vast applications across basic science and genomic or bioinformatic approaches are beyond the scope of this review; however, representative examples of relevance to clinical immunology will be highlighted.

At a cellular level, deep convolutional neural networks (CNN) are being used to clarify cognate interactions between human immune cells for understanding cell-cell interactions[27]. Additionally, ML is improving vaccine design, vaccine dose modeling, and prediction of immune responses. [2830] Within the space of PID research, AI has helped identify candidate genes and understand protein folding interactions in common variable immune deficiency (CVID)[31].

Multiscale ML models, support vector machine (SVM) learning approaches [32] and long-short term memory (LSTM) networks [33] can integrate data about gene expression, protein interactions/pathways, microbiome data and model organism data for disease prediction. Genomic applications include “time-series AI” that may detect DNA sequence elements indicative of gene splicing [34] or methods to assist with variant calling of sequence data. [35, 36]

Data visualization approaches have also been applied to immunologic data sets for dimensionality reduction in the form of principal component analyses, or network diagrams to facilitate reduction of complexity in visualizing high-dimensional data.[37, 38] Graphical approaches to depicting complex data and developing new insights from publicly available data-sets from clinical trials are also possible using a variety of visualization approaches[39].

Disease Diagnosis:

Recent efforts to create computable phenotypes based upon EHR data have proven effective for automatic detection of patients with a variety of clinical conditions.[40, 41] Additionally, structured EHR data can be used to risk stratify patients for PID from large health systems.[10] Recently, a rule-based algorithm called the Software for Primary Immunodeficiency Recognition, Intervention and Tracking (SPIRIT®) Analyzer effectively analyzed claims data (diagnosis codes, pharmacy codes, demographic information) in a study of nearly 200,000 individuals at a large academic medical center.[10] Approximately 1% of the population here had a calculated medium-high risk for PID. One-year follow-up analysis of the risk group revealed that 1% were given a coded PID diagnosis or coded infection concerning for underlying susceptibility. This pilot study provided evidence that SPIRIT® could cull at-risk individuals from a general pediatric population. A longitudinal study is now underway to further assess performance of the SPIRIT® Analyzer and add a learning algorithm to the analysis.

Extending work of digitally encoded phenotypes, the Human Phenotype Ontology (HPO) program recently expanded to include terms relating to immunologic disorders.[42] Use of immune-disease relevant HPO annotation terms may enable linking of genomic variants and patient features to expedite identification of patients and their underlying genomic disease determinants.[43] The combination of HPO terms, unstructured EHR data mined with natural language processing (NLP), and structured laboratory and genomic data are being combined into a large federally funded dataset as part of the “All of Us” program to enable AI driven insights for diagnosis, patient care and research.[44] Other immunobiology, clinical and laboratory networks are being used to refine digital phenotypes and should be expected to facilitate diagnosis and advancement of science in clinical immunology.[45, 46]

Probabilistic models are also useful for disease diagnosis and prognosis [4749]. Specifically, use of Bayesian networks (BN) and Bayesian classifiers have impacted the field of Allergy-Immunology [50]. These networks combine domain expertise and conditional probabilities which enable calculation of joint probabilities of interest.[51] Recently, a BN was constructed to predict PID risk and provide prescriptive guidance about the most appropriate diagnostic evaluations which showed promising results.[52] This BN was trained on readily-available EHR data and can be accessed by a single end-user clinician via a web interface. Alternatively, the BN can ingest EHR claims data via an application-program interface (API) for automated performance.

Clinical Decision Support:

Clinical decision support (CDS) focuses on providing timely, validated evidence to clinicians, patients and families in a computable format through the EHR.[53] (Figure 2) Formats for CDS range from alerts, best practice reminders, order sets, clinical summaries and AI-based prediction.[54] The backbone of CDS is a rule-driven logic for reminding about routine clinical interventions such as vaccination timing or assessment of cardiovascular risk.[55]

Figure 2: Paradigm for a Data Pipeline Enabling CDS & Patient Decision-making.

Figure 2:

An example data pipeline schema originating from the clinician-patient interaction. Data entered into the EHR flows into a database/data warehouse where it can be structured, undergo analysis (asterisk) and transformation to information. This information can be fed back to clinicians to inform subsequent encounters (CDS-clinical decision support) or it may enable patient guidance about personal healthcare decisions as provided through the EHR patient portal. Reused with permission from [10].

A major concern about CDS relates to alert-fatigue and best practice notifications without appropriate outcomes-based automation[55, 56]. Balancing the number of alerts with patient safety is an ongoing challenge. Evidence for this includes a recent study which noted 80% of ignored alerts in an ICU setting were appropriate. [57] However, inappropriately ignored alerts in the same study were six times more likely to be associated with an adverse event. This report demonstrated that a CDS system for improving primary-care based asthma management was accessed in less than 20% of appropriate cases suggesting that usability is still a major hurdle [58, 59]. In every domain, CDS will require expert knowledge and deep clinical workflow understanding in order to drive efficacy and minimize intrusion.[53]

Yet the potential to improve care with CDS is real. For example, patient-facing, internet-of-things (IoT) technologies like wearables can reach patients dynamically and longitudinally to suggest improved health behaviors in real-time. One such application of immunology focused IoT technology is the Allergic Rhinitis and its Impact on Asthma (ARIA) Phase 3. This mobile application guides appropriate self-management of rhinitis, conjunctivitis and asthma via an innovative Mobile Airways Sentinel Network (MASK) [60]. This and other AI-based CDS have potential to merge different data sets by incorporating clinical and biomedical research into patient care, augmenting hypothesis-based research[61].

Current Limitations & Concerns about AI:

The promise of AI in healthcare is evident, yet several challenges remain before potency of these methodologies is fully realized. First, hype surrounding AI ability exceeds the science at present.[62] While AI is a powerful tool, we cannot expect technology to supersede insights of a well-trained clinician. This sentiment is beautifully conveyed by Cerrato and Halamka who state “…our enthusiastic take on digital innovation should not give readers the impression that AI will ever replace a competent physician. That said, there is little doubt that a competent physician who uses all the tools that AI has to offer will soon replace the competent physician who ignores these tools.”.[54] Algorithms are often considered to be a “black box” where mechanisms of output are not clearly evident raising suspicion and often leading to mistrust.[63] Concern about AI is warranted given previous indiscretions as in the situation with IBM’s Watson and its erroneous recommendations for cancer patients.[64]

Implicit bias is another major issue within the field of AI.[65] Thus, algorithms must be trained on a diverse population with respect to geography, disease state, gender, socioeconomic status and race or ethnicity to minimize performance gaps. Bias is already an appropriate concern within healthcare at-large and not isolated to the use of AI, but AI may further worsen such inequities.[65, 66] For example, healthcare quality is known to differ across socioeconomic strata which can affect performance of CDS systems.[67] Even high quality studies have inadvertently excluded underrepresented minorities thus exacerbating bias.[68] The field of AI science will need to overcome these and other challenges in order for the technology to have full utility in allergy-immunology and beyond.

Conclusions:

The fields of AI and medicine, specifically allergy-immunology, can be advanced together in exciting ways to improve patient care, research and clinical operations. Here we present some current applications and background information of relevance to AI’s potential for impacting clinical immunology. To advance the field of clinical immunology, health systems must be refined to facilitate implementation of AI, Allergist-Immunologists must seek to integrate AI/ML appropriately and look for collaboration with data scientists.

Key Points:

  • Artificial intelligence, augmented intelligence and machine learning represent a subset of biomedical informatics focused on analyzing large datasets to make inferences.

  • Analysis of large datasets with AI is already improving clinical work and research efforts in the field of clinical immunology.

  • Use of AI and ML within the clinical immunology domain will expand knowledge and provide new insights.

  • Clinical immunologists should become familiar with the principles of AI and data science or partner with data scientists to tackle new problems and advance our speciality.

Acknowledgements/Financial Support:

We wish to thank the Jeffrey Modell Foundation for grant funding (JMF Translational Grant- 58293-I).

Footnotes

Competing Interest Statement: NLR received consulting fees for scientific advisory activities with Takeda Pharmaceuticals, Horizon Therapeutics and CSL Behring. He also receives royalties from Wolters Kluwer for topic contribution to UpToDate. PK discloses that her contribution to this work is funded in part by DIR, NIAID. RS has nothing to declare.

Contributor Information

Nicholas L. Rider, Texas Children’s Hospital and the Baylor College of Medicine Houston.

Renganathan Srinivasan, The Vancouver Clinic.

Paneez Khoury, Laboratory of Parasitic Diseases. National Institute of Allergic and Infectious Diseases, NIH. Bethesda MD.

References:

  • *[1].Obermeyer Z and Lee TH, “Lost in Thought - The Limits of the Human Mind and the Future of Medicine,” N Engl J Med, vol. 377, no. 13, pp. 1209–1211, September 28 2017. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; The authors present an important perspective for utilizing artificial/augmented intelligence in healthcare.
  • **[2].Rajkomar A, Dean J, and Kohane I, “Machine Learning in Medicine,” N Engl J Med, vol. 380, no. 14, pp. 1347–1358, April 4 2019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; A very important perspective on the need for and rationale around using machine learning in medicine.
  • [3].McGlynn EA, McDonald KM, and Cassel CK, “Measurement Is Essential for Improving Diagnosis and Reducing Diagnostic Error: A Report From the Institute of Medicine,” JAMA, vol. 314, no. 23, pp. 2501–2, December 15 2015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • **[4].Schussler-Fiorenza Rose SM et al. , “A longitudinal big data approach for precision health,” Nat Med, vol. 25, no. 5, pp. 792–804, May 2019. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; An important example of using AI in a real-world healthcare setting.
  • *[5].Norgeot B, Glicksberg BS, and Butte AJ, “A call for deep-learning healthcare,” Nat Med, vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 14–15, January 2019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; In this short, but important viewpoint, the importance of deep learning in healthcare is presented.
  • *[6].Rajkomar A et al. , “Scalable and accurate deep learning with electronic health records,” NPJ Digit Med, vol. 1, p. 18, 2018. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; The authors present a practical appliation of deep learning for analyzing EHR records.
  • [7].Witten I, Frank E, Hall M, and Pal C, Data Mining: Practical Machine Learning Tools and Techniques. Morgan Kaufmann, 2017. [Google Scholar]
  • [8].“Augmented intelligence in health care. Report 41 of the AMA Board of Trustees,” Accessed on: June 2020Available: https://static1.squarespace.com/static/58d0113a3e00bef537b02b70/t/5b6aed0a758d4610026a719c/1533734156501/AI_2018_Report_AMA.pdf
  • **[9].Beam AL and Kohane IS, “Big Data and Machine Learning in Health Care,” JAMA, vol. 319, no. 13, pp. 1317–1318, April 3 2018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; Here, the authors present an important perspective for using AI in healthcare.
  • *[10].Rider NL et al. , “Calculation of a Primary Immunodeficiency “Risk Vital Sign” via Population-Wide Analysis of Claims Data to Aid in Clinical Decision Support,” Front Pediatr, vol. 7, p. 70, 2019. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; The authors present a practical application of automated disease detection in a real-world setting.
  • [11].Holding S, Khan S, Sewell WA, Jolles S, and Dore PC, “Using calculated globulin fraction to reduce diagnostic delay in primary and secondary hypogammaglobulinaemias: results of a demonstration project,” Ann Clin Biochem, vol. 52, no. Pt 3, pp. 319–26, May 2015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [12].Sevim Bayrak C and Itan Y, “Identifying disease-causing mutations in genomes of single patients by computational approaches,” Hum Genet, May 13 2020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • *[13].Juhn Y and Liu H, “Artificial intelligence approaches using natural language processing to advance EHR-based clinical research,” J Allergy Clin Immunol, vol. 145, no. 2, pp. 463–469, February 2020. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; The authors present use of NLP for cohort ascertainment in allergy-immunology patients.
  • [14].Chang W and Grady N, “NIST Big Data Interoperability Framework: Volume 1, Definitions,” NIST Pubs, Special Publication vol. 1, October 21, 2019. 2019. [Google Scholar]
  • [15].Goodfellow I, Bengio Y, and Courville A, Deep Learning. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2016. [Google Scholar]
  • [16].Alpaydin E, Introduction to Machine Learning, 4th ed. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2020. [Google Scholar]
  • [17].Hugle M, Omoumi P, van Laar JM, Boedecker J, and Hugle T, “Applied machine learning and artificial intelligence in rheumatology,” Rheumatol Adv Pract, vol. 4, no. 1, p. rkaa005, 2020. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [18].LeCun Y, Bengio Y, and Hinton G, “Deep learning,” Nature, vol. 521, no. 7553, pp. 436–44, May 28 2015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • *[19].Esteva A et al. , “A guide to deep learning in healthcare,” Nat Med, vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 24–29, January 2019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; The authors present a useful overview of deep learning for healthcare applications.
  • [20].Kim SY et al. , “A deep learning model for real-time mortality prediction in critically ill children,” Crit Care, vol. 23, no. 1, p. 279, August 14 2019. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • **[21].Norgeot B et al. , “Assessment of a Deep Learning Model Based on Electronic Health Record Data to Forecast Clinical Outcomes in Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis,” JAMA Netw Open, vol. 2, no. 3, p. e190606, March 1 2019. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; A superb example for the practical appliation of deep learning to aid in patient care.
  • [22].Xu J et al. , “Applying a deep learning-based sequence labeling approach to detect attributes of medical concepts in clinical text,” BMC Med Inform Decis Mak, vol. 19, no. Suppl 5, p. 236, December 5 2019. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [23].Ford E, Rooney P, Hurley P, Oliver S, Bremner S, and Cassell J, “Can the Use of Bayesian Analysis Methods Correct for Incompleteness in Electronic Health Records Diagnosis Data? Development of a Novel Method Using Simulated and Real-Life Clinical Data,” Front Public Health, vol. 8, p. 54, 2020. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • *[24].Saria S and Henry KE, “Too Many Definitions of Sepsis: Can Machine Learning Leverage the Electronic Health Record to Increase Accuracy and Bring Consensus?,” Crit Care Med, vol. 48, no. 2, pp. 137–141, February 2020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; The authors present an important challenge to using varied EHR data for machine learning.
  • [25].Dolezel D and McLeod A, “Big Data Analytics in Healthcare: Investigating the Diffusion of Innovation,” Perspect Health Inf Manag, vol. 16, no. Summer, p. 1a, Summer 2019. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [26].Burke J, Health Analytics: Gaining Insights to Transform Healthcare. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley, 2013. [Google Scholar]
  • [27].Liarski VM et al. , “Quantifying in situ adaptive immune cell cognate interactions in humans,” Nat Immunol, vol. 20, no. 4, pp. 503–513, April 2019. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [28].Rhodes SJ, Knight GM, Kirschner DE, White RG, and Evans TG, “Dose finding for new vaccines: The role for immunostimulation/immunodynamic modelling,” J Theor Biol, vol. 465, pp. 51–55, March 21 2019. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • *[29].Ong E, Sun P, Berke K, Zheng J, Wu G, and He Y, “VIO: ontology classification and study of vaccine responses given various experimental and analytical conditions,” BMC Bioinformatics, vol. 20, no. Suppl 21, p. 704, December 23 2019. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; The authors present an important example of automating research findings to optimize outcomes.
  • [30].Vree TB, Hekster CA, and van der Kleijn E, “Significance of apparent half-lives of a metabolite with a higher elimination rate than its parent drug,” Drug Intell Clin Pharm, vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 126–31, February 1982. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [31].Keller MD et al. , “Mutation in IRF2BP2 is responsible for a familial form of common variable immunodeficiency disorder,” J Allergy Clin Immunol, vol. 138, no. 2, pp. 544–550 e4, August 2016. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [32].Keerthikumar S et al. , “Prediction of candidate primary immunodeficiency disease genes using a support vector machine learning approach,” DNA Res, vol. 16, no. 6, pp. 345–51, December 2009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • *[33].Metwally AA, Yu PS, Reiman D, Dai Y, Finn PW, and Perkins DL, “Utilizing longitudinal microbiome taxonomic profiles to predict food allergy via Long Short-Term Memory networks,” PLoS Comput Biol, vol. 15, no. 2, p. e1006693, February 2019. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; Here, authors use deep learning approaches to facilitate understanding the microbiome for predicting food allergy.
  • *[34].Jaganathan K et al. , “Predicting Splicing from Primary Sequence with Deep Learning,” Cell, vol. 176, no. 3, pp. 535–548 e24, January 24 2019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; Authors present a useful approach towards prediction of splice-site variation with deep learning approaches for assessment of biological impact.
  • [35].Poplin R et al. , “A universal SNP and small-indel variant caller using deep neural networks,” Nat Biotechnol, vol. 36, no. 10, pp. 983–987, November 2018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [36].Ainscough BJ et al. , “A deep learning approach to automate refinement of somatic variant calling from cancer sequencing data,” Nat Genet, vol. 50, no. 12, pp. 1735–1743, December 2018. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [37].Lee AJ et al. , “DAFi: A directed recursive data filtering and clustering approach for improving and interpreting data clustering identification of cell populations from polychromatic flow cytometry data,” Cytometry A, vol. 93, no. 6, pp. 597–610, June 2018. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [38].Singhania A et al. , “Transcriptional profiling unveils type I and II interferon networks in blood and tissues across diseases,” Nat Commun, vol. 10, no. 1, p. 2887, June 28 2019. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [39].Calatroni A and Wildfire JJ, “Graphic depiction of bioinformatics data,” J Allergy Clin Immunol, vol. 140, no. 6, pp. 1519–1522, December 2017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • **[40].Bastarache L et al. , “Improving the phenotype risk score as a scalable approach to identifying patients with Mendelian disease,” J Am Med Inform Assoc, vol. 26, no. 12, pp. 1437–1447, December 1 2019. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; An important example of combining EHR elements for predicting genetic disease using AI.
  • [41].Gasteiger LM et al. , “Supplementation of the ESID registry working definitions for the clinical diagnosis of inborn errors of immunity with encoded human phenotype ontology (HPO) terms,” J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract, vol. 8, no. 5, p. 1778, May 2020. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [42].Kohler S et al. , “Expansion of the Human Phenotype Ontology (HPO) knowledge base and resources,” Nucleic Acids Res, vol. 47, no. D1, pp. D1018–D1027, January 8 2019. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [43].Kohler S, “Improved ontology-based similarity calculations using a study-wise annotation model,” Database (Oxford), vol. 2018, January 1 2018. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [44].Denny JC, Devaney SA, and Gebo KA, “The “All of Us” Research Program. Reply,” N Engl J Med, vol. 381, no. 19, pp. 1884–1885, November 7 2019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [45].Kurnat-Thoma E et al. , “Recent Advances in Systems and Network Medicine: Meeting Report from the First International Conference in Systems and Network Medicine,” Syst Med (New Rochelle), vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 22–35, 2020. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [46].Zhang XA et al. , “Semantic integration of clinical laboratory tests from electronic health records for deep phenotyping and biomarker discovery,” NPJ Digit Med, vol. 2, 2019. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [47].Li Y et al. , “Inferring multimodal latent topics from electronic health records,” Nat Commun, vol. 11, no. 1, p. 2536, May 21 2020. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [48].Ucar F and Korkmaz D, “COVIDiagnosis-Net: Deep Bayes-SqueezeNet based diagnosis of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) from X-ray images,” Med Hypotheses, vol. 140, p. 109761, April 23 2020. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [49].Kiebish MA et al. , “Multi-omic serum biomarkers for prognosis of disease progression in prostate cancer,” J Transl Med, vol. 18, no. 1, p. 10, January 7 2020. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [50].Tartarisco G et al. , “The soft computing-based approach to investigate allergic diseases: a systematic review,” Clin Mol Allergy, vol. 15, p. 10, 2017. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [51].Korb K and Nicholson A, Bayesian Artificial Intelligence, 2nd ed. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press, 2011. [Google Scholar]
  • [52].Rider NL et al. , “A risk prediction and clinical guidance system for evaluating patients with recurrent infections,” medrxiv, 2020. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [53].Tcheng J et al. , “Optimizing Strategies for Clinical Decision Support,” National Academy of Medicine, Washington, DC: 2017. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • **[54].Cerrato P and Halamka J, Reinventing Clinical Decision Support: Data Analytics, Artificial Intelligence, and Diagnostic Reasoning. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press, 2020. [Google Scholar]; A highly valuable reference for anyone wishing to better understand state of the art CDSS and use of AI within this tool.
  • [55].(2018, May 31, 2020). Clinical Decision Support (CDS). Available: www.healthit.gov/topic/safety/clinical-decision-support
  • *[56].Matheny M, Israni S, Ahmed M, and Whicher D, “Artificial Intelligence in Health Care: The Hope, the Hype, the Promise the Peril,” National Institute of Medicine, Washington, DC: 2019. [Google Scholar]; An important perspective on the hype-cycle relation to AI in healthcare.
  • [57].Wong A et al. , “Prospective evaluation of medication-related clinical decision support over-rides in the intensive care unit,” BMJ Qual Saf, vol. 27, no. 9, pp. 718–724, September 2018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [58].Gupta S et al. , “The Electronic Asthma Management System (eAMS) improves primary care asthma management,” Eur Respir J, vol. 53, no. 4, April 2019. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [59].Lam Shin Cheung J, Paolucci N, Price C, Sykes J, Gupta S, and N. Canadian Respiratory Research, “A system uptake analysis and GUIDES checklist evaluation of the Electronic Asthma Management System: A point-of-care computerized clinical decision support system,” J Am Med Inform Assoc, vol. 27, no. 5, pp. 726–737, May 1 2020. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [60].Bousquet J et al. , “Allergic Rhinitis and its Impact on Asthma (ARIA) Phase 4 (2018): Change management in allergic rhinitis and asthma multimorbidity using mobile technology,” J Allergy Clin Immunol, vol. 143, no. 3, pp. 864–879, March 2019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [61].Braun M, Hummel P, Beck S, and Dabrock P, “Primer on an ethics of AI-based decision support systems in the clinic,” J Med Ethics, April 3 2020. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • **[62].Topol EJ, “High-performance medicine: the convergence of human and artificial intelligence,” Nat Med, vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 44–56, January 2019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; An important perspective on the benefits and challenges of using AI in medicine.
  • [63].Castelvecchi D, “Can we open the black box of AI?,” Nature, vol. 538, no. 7623, pp. 20–23, October 6 2016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [64].Ross C and Swetlitz I, “IBM’s Watson supercomputer recommnded ‘unsafe and incorrect’ cancer treatments, internal documents show.,” Stat News, Available: https://www.statnews.com/2018/07/25/ibm-watson-recommended-unsafe-incorrect-treatments/ [Google Scholar]
  • **[65].Gianfrancesco MA, Tamang S, Yazdany J, and Schmajuk G, “Potential Biases in Machine Learning Algorithms Using Electronic Health Record Data,” JAMA Intern Med, vol. 178, no. 11, pp. 1544–1547, November 1 2018. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; The authors present concerns related to bias and AI. This important publication raises potential problems which ML practitioners in healthcare must be cognizant of.
  • [66].Stringhini S et al. , “Socioeconomic status and the 25 × 25 risk factors as determinants of premature mortality: a multicohort study and meta-analysis of 1.7 million men and women,” Lancet, vol. 389, no. 10075, pp. 1229–1237, March 25 2017. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [67].Arpey NC, Gaglioti AH, and Rosenbaum ME, “How Socioeconomic Status Affects Patient Perceptions of Health Care: A Qualitative Study,” J Prim Care Community Health, vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 169–175, July 2017. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [68].Esteva A et al. , “Dermatologist-level classification of skin cancer with deep neural networks,” Nature, vol. 542, no. 7639, pp. 115–118, February 2 2017. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES