Skip to main content
Journal of Pharmacy & Bioallied Sciences logoLink to Journal of Pharmacy & Bioallied Sciences
. 2020 Oct 8;12(4):475–481. doi: 10.4103/jpbs.JPBS_340_19

Pharmaceuticals Poisoning: Reported by the National Poison Centre in Malaysia between 2010 and 2015

Iqdam Abdulmaged Alwan 1,, Ammar Ihsan Awadh 2, Balamurugan Tangiisuran 3, Halilol Rahman Mohamed Khan 3, Noorfatimah Yahaya 1, Mohamed Isa Majid 3
PMCID: PMC7909058  PMID: 33679096

ABSTRACT

Background and Purpose:

The wide availability of medications has led to an increased exposure of humans to the possibility of poisoning. An unavoidable effect due to the availability of these medications has also led to a rising increment in the number of poisoning cases. All drugs, especially when administered in large doses or overextended periods, can initiate a toxic condition. Therefore, the objective of this study was to examine nationwide, the patterns attributed to poisoning, and to describe the sociodemographic, and geographic distribution of poisoning, by identifying the category of substances implicated in these cases.

Data Sources and Methods:

A retrospective study based on telephone calls reported on poisoning caused by pharmaceutical products undertaken by the National Poisoning Centre (NPC) in Penang (Malaysia) was used as the basis of this study covering the period between 2010 and 2015. The study included the mode and type of poisoning, exposure routes as well as the incidence locations.

Results:

A total of 10,998 cases were examined, finding that females represented 5,899 cases (53.6%) being intoxicated more frequently compared to the number of males, 3,839 (34.9%). The age group of poisoning cases ranged between 20 and 29 years representing 2,579 (23.4%) of reported cases. The common mode of poisoning was attributed to suicide 5,203 (47.3%) from among the 10,998 cases and the highest poisoning agents reported were from the psychiatric group of pharmaceutical products of 2,287 (21%).

Conclusion and Implications:

These findings indicate a rising trend of suicidal poisoning attempts between 2013 and 2015, which emphasizes the need for more stringent and effective enforcement protocols to limit the rising incidence of poisoning. As such, analyzing the trends in poisoning in a particular zone periodically could help health policy-makers to develop management policies and prevention strategies.

KEYWORDS: Malaysia NPC, overdose, pharmaceuticals poisoning, suicide

INTRODUCTION

Pharmaceutical products in the form of medicines are substantial components of both modern and traditional medicine which are prescribed and used rationally.[1] Medicines can contribute to poisoning in several ways, for example, as a result of an overdose of the prescribed medication, over-the-counter drug abuse, or via drug interactions.[2] Accidental or intentional exposure to pharmaceuticals has drawn worldwide attention to this issue. According to the world drug report, it is estimated that up to 190,000 deaths each year are related to pharmaceutical products.[3] The United States (US) accounts for approximately one-quarter of the estimated number of drug-related deaths globally including drug overdose deaths which continue to grow in the US, having more than tripled between 1999 and 2015, from 16,849 to 52,404 annually.[3] Nowadays, poisoning is the leading cause of death from injuries in the US, with drugs causing 9 of 10 deaths through poisoning.[4] Death as a result of drug poisoning in Asia, however, is unclear given the lack of data and poor coverage in reporting the number of mortalities. However, it has been estimated that in 2013, there were between 13,600 and 100,700 deaths.[5]

Given the continual updating of information in parallel with poisons and poisonings, several problems remain which need to be resolved. First, there is insufficient awareness of the potential dangers of poisons. In most developing countries, trained personnel for poisoning care as well as diagnostic and treatment facilities are limited. Second, it is essential to provide more detailed national information on pharmaceutical poisonings which may contribute to the planning and development of national poison policies. In Malaysia, pharmaceutical products are responsible for much of the recent increments in poisoning incidences.

The National Poison Centre (NPC) of Malaysia was initially established in 1995 through the Drug and Poison Information Service (DPIS) and remains the only poison information center in Malaysia. The DPIS receives calls from the all states of Malaysia including East Malaysia (Sabah and Sarawak).[6]

DPIS is considered one of the important, if not primary reference points for healthcare professionals and members of the public in managing poisoning incidences. Accordingly, the objective of this study is to evaluate the drug and pharmaceuticals poisoning trends recorded by the NPC over 6 years between January 1, 2010 and December 31, 2015.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This study is a retrospective review of pharmaceutical poisoning cases, representing inquiries to the NPC in Malaysia. As a multiracial country, the total population in Malaysia in 2010 was 28.3 million consisting of Bumiputera (67.4%), Chinese (24.6%), Indians (7.3%), and others (0.7%).[7] Accordingly, this motivated the researcher of this study to evaluate the differences in poisoning patterns between the three ethnic groups. The telephone inquiries received were actioned by a team of nine experts including pharmacists and health scientists, being experts in toxicology, along with expert consultants for managing complex cases.

The telephone calls were entered into a standardized Poison Case Report Form (PCRF), adapted from the WHO IPCS INTOX system and then entered into a retrievable database.[8] The details of each call included the enquirer’s name, address, product/poison information (name of the drug/medicine), patient’s age, sex, route, and duration of exposure, mode and symptoms of poisoning, treatment provided already, and other necessary queries regarding the patient. All information relating to the call was documented. The records were extracted where the substance code was “Pharmaceutical,” and each PCRF was manually reviewed for inclusion.

Regarding the ethical issues, all personal information belonging to the patient was removed before conducting the descriptive analysis to ensure the patient’s privacy was protected. Descriptive analysis was performed in this study using the Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) version 22.0. In describing the results, descriptive statistics, such as frequency and percentage, were used.

RESULTS

During the period of this study (2010–2015), the total number of poisoning cases [incidences] reported to the NPC was 29,675 and the number of pharmaceutical poisoning cases was 10,998, representing 37.06% of all reported poisoning cases. In 2010, the total number of cases having pharmaceutical poisoning was 1976 cases, which increased in 2011 to 2349 cases. In 2012, the number of reported cases, however, decreased with only 1276 cases reported. However, this number quickly rose in 2013, reaching 1533 cases, and constantly increased to 1867 cases in 2014 and 1997 cases reported in 2015 [Figure 1].

Figure 1.

Figure 1

The total number of cases with pharmaceutical poisoning reported each year to the National Poison Centre (NPC)

The demographic characteristics of the subjects involved in pharmaceutical poisoning are displayed in Table 1. The age group of the subject that topped the list was between 20-29 years (23.4%) followed by the infants and toddlers aged between 0-4 years (23.0%) and then by those aged between 30-39 years (13.9%). The number of intoxicated females was higher compared to males (F: 53.6% and M: 34.9%). Among the three main races in Malaysia, Malays constituted the highest percentage with 33.9%, followed by Indians (22.2%) and Chinese (19.1%) [Table 1].

Table 1.

Demographic characteristics of pharmaceutical poisoning cases

Characteristics Number Percent (%)
Gender N = 10,998
Male 3839 34.9
Female 5899 53.6
Others 1260 11.5
Age group (years) N = 10,998
0–4 2527 23.0
5–9 411 3.7
10–14 302 2.7
15–19 1270 11.5
20–29 2579 23.4
30–39 1532 13.9
40–49 838 7.6
50–59 485 4.4
Above 60 467 4.2
Unrecorded 77 0.7
Unclassified adult 510 4.6
Race N = 10,998
Malay 3723 33.9
Chinese 2098 19.1
Indian 2444 22.2
Unrecorded/unknown 2020 18.4
Others 596 5.4
Non-Malaysian 117 1.1

The distribution of causative agent groups that led to poisoning revealed that psychiatric drugs had the highest incidence; 21% of the total data over the 6 years, followed by topical agents 18%, and analgesics 15% [Table 2]. However, the highest group of poisoning cases were recorded by the group representing psychiatric agents where the most common product causing poisoning was paracetamol (an analgesic) with a total of 802 reported poisoning cases for the 6 years. This number is considered the highest among other pharmaceutical products and alone accounts for approximately 50% of total analgesic poisoning, and approximately 7.3% from pharmaceutical poisoning in total.

Table 2.

Poisoning cases according to the groups of pharmaceutical agents (total 10,998 cases from 2010 to 2015)

Pharmaceutical agent Number of cases Percentage (%)
Analgesic 1616 14.7
Antidiabetic 223 2.0
Antiepileptic 315 2.9
Anti-infective 281 2.6
Cardiovascular 520 4.7
Cough and cold 911 8.3
Cytotoxic 10 0.1
Gastrointestinal 283 2.6
Hematologic 27 0.2
Herbal remedies 249 2.3
Hormones 263 2.4
Psychiatric 2287 20.8
Respiratory 321 2.9
Topical agent 1946 17.7
Veterinary 22 0.2
Vitamins/minerals/food supplements 250 2.3
Mixed pharmaceuticals 906 8.2
Other pharmaceutical 530 4.8
Unknown pharmaceutical 38 0.3

*The term (other pharmaceutical) refers to a drug or medication which is not listed under any of the above mentioned groups (mixed pharmaceuticals), can be combination drugs, or exposed to more than one medication

Less common was calamine lotion, which was listed under the group of topical agents, with 323 reported cases, representing approximately 16.6% of topical agent’s cases, followed by 245 acriflavine-related cases representing 12.6% of all topical agents. From among the cough and cold group, chlorpheniramine displayed the highest recorded product with 253 cases or 27.7% of all group cases. Regarding the psychiatric group, the majority of cases were distributed across a variety of psychiatric related products, the highest being for alprazolam, with 168 cases or 7.3%, followed by clonazepam with 142 cases (6.2%) and others consisted of amitriptyline with 86 cases (3.8%), risperidone with 107 cases (4.7%), valproic acid and zolpidem each with 94 cases (4.1%), and lastly haloperidol with 79 cases (3.5%) [Figure 2].

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Data of the most common pharmaceutical products that resulted in poisoning over six years, according to the number of reported cases, and regardless of their group product classification

Regarding the distribution of incidences by state, the majority of incidences were reported in the Selangor state area (22.9%) having 2520 cases reported to the NPC followed by 1722 cases (15.7%) in Perak. The less reported number of cases was in Negeri Sembilan and Johor (9.5%), (9.4%), respectively, and (8.5%) in Kuala Lumpur [Table 3].

Table 3.

Incidence of reported cases with pharmaceutical poisoning distributed by the states in the whole 6-year period

State Number Percent (%)
Perlis 9 0.1
Kedah 523 4.8
Pulau Pinang 761 6.9
Perak 1722 15.7
Selangor 2520 22.9
WP Kuala Lumpur 935 8.5
WP Putrajaya 186 1.7
Negeri Sembilan 1040 9.5
Melaka 371 3.4
Johor 1038 9.4
Pahang 726 6.6
Terengganu 80 0.7
Kelantan 197 1.8
Sarawak 257 2.3
Sabah 492 4.5
WP Labuan 16 0.1
Unknown 125 1.1
Total 10,998

Concerning the mode of poisoning, the most common (incident category) was related to intentional poisoning (60%), with unintentional poisoning representing 36.75%. From among the 10,998 pharmaceutical poisoning incidents that were reported, suicidal poisoning was the highest (47.3%), followed by accidental poisoning (30.5%), and the misuse of pharmaceuticals (5.1%). Interestingly, the number of suicidal poisoning incidences reportedly increased between 2010 and 2011 from (50.9%) to (52.9%), respectively, which then decreased between 2012 and 2013 from 45.9% to 40.3%. However, the incidence of suicidal poisoning subsequently rose after that between 2014 and 2015 to reach 44.8%, as shown in Table 4.

Table 4.

Types of intentional and unintentional poisoning cases (counted by the number of cases) in each year from 2010 to 2015

Intentional poisoning Year of reporting
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
Suicidal 1006 1243 586 618 855 895
Abortion 1 1 1 3 2 10
Abuse 18 18 9 11 14 37
Others 15 13 6 9 46 141
Unknown 109 104 59 93 113 141
Misuse 105 111 63 99 75 112
Total 1254 1490 724 833 1105 1195

Unintentional poisoning Year of reporting
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015

Accidental 533 677 413 519 571 636
Environmental 0 1 0 2 1 0
Others 4 2 2 2 9 5
Therapeutic 59 72 49 99 110 98
Unknown 3 3 12 10 10 11
Misuse 28 30 12 22 20 17
Total 627 785 488 654 721 767

According to the exposure type, most cases were due to acute exposure to the pharmaceutical product itself (90.2%) with chronic (long term) exposure of 0.8%. Acute and chronic exposure combined was 8.5%, meaning that the patient had been using a particular medicine for an extended period with a large dose of the same product consumed by the patient resulting in an acute/chronic type of exposure. According to the route of exposure, the most common route was via ingestion (98.7%), with fewer exposure routes through injection (0.8%), and cutaneous (0.2%), whereas ocular and inhalation were each 0.1%, and 0.1% for other routes [Table 5].

Table 5.

Type of exposure and route of exposure of pharmaceuticals (6-year record of a total of 10,998 patients)

Characteristics Number Percent (%)
Type of exposure N = 10,998
Acute 9921 90.2
Chronic 83 0.8
Acute or chronic 939 8.5
Unknown 55 0.5
Route of exposure N = 10,998
Ingestion 10,854 98.7
Inhalation 10 0.1
Cutaneous 23 0.2
Ocular 6 0.1
Injection 83 0.8
Mucosal 2 0.0
Placental 1 0.0
Others 13 0.1
Unrecorded 5 0.0

DISCUSSION

The most significant or highest rate of poisoning in Malaysia was due to pharmaceutical agents, among other chemical products. The results of this study revealed that an increase in pharmaceutical poisoning incidences occurred between 2010 and 2011. However, after 2012 the number of reported cases, based on the data, halved because the center had decreased their operating hours to between 9.00 AM and 5.00 PM; before the center was operated 24 h a day. This issue obviously influenced the number of cases that were recorded in 2012 onward. Nevertheless, the percentage of intentional poisonings constantly grew over 6 years. In other countries, the rates of poisoning incidences tend to vary widely, which may be attributed to the country’s culture. For instance, in some countries, patients tend to use folk or traditional medicine for treatment rather than to seek medical advice.[9]

Of the 10,998 recorded cases reported over 6 years resulting from pharmaceutical poisoning in Malaysia, the annual rate of recorded incidents ranged between 4.42 and 8.14 per 100,000 population. Interestingly, women outnumbered men, which is similar to many studies conducted in Middle East countries such as Iran and Turkey, in addition to countries such as the US and Norway.[10,11,12,13] Also, sociopsychological problems such as marital disharmony, family conflicts, and loss of family members are more intolerable for women compared to men. For example, Zhang et al.[14] found that suicide attempts, including suicidal poisonings, were more common in women in China.

As mentioned earlier in this study, the incidence of poisoning was often found to be highest among the 20–29 years age group of which a similar finding was found Indian and Iranian studies.[4,10,15] Unfortunately, however, mental stress was often seen to be the cause in the 12–30 years age group with the main reasons being unemployment, starting employment, and settlement in life,[16] and possibly due to failure in relationships, educational matters, and the inability to cope with the high expectation of parents.[17,18] Sadly, this group of people appears to be emotionally unstable or not mature enough to tolerate extreme mental pressure.[19,20]

Notwithstanding, the psychiatric drug group also shows the highest incidence of poisoning among other groups of pharmaceutical agents, of which similar findings have been reported in Turkey.[21] In this study, it was found that paracetamol was responsible for the majority of poisoning incidences associated with drugs, which is similar to those reported in the US and Scotland.[22,23] For instance, in the case of Malaysia, in 2012 the data revealed that 56.7% of reported poisoning incidences were due to intentional poisoning, and 32.4% were a result of accidental poisoning. In contrast, in the US, accidental poisonings were most commonly reported representing approximately 80% of cases in 2012.[24]

In summary, it is anticipated that the poisoning patterns and characteristics associated with the incidence of poisoning in this study will serve as the basis for future study.

CONCLUSION

In this study, data related to poisoning and pharmaceutical products in Malaysia were examined by describing in detail the number of reported attempted suicidal cases which were significantly high. Accordingly, this finding warrants adequate safety measures for the storage and application of these substances to be introduced. In addition, parental supervision and educational programs are necessary to curb the high incidence of poisoning among young adults. As such, community psychiatry programs and psychological consults are required to identify high-risk young adults who may be more likely to commit suicide.

Financial support and sponsorship

Nil.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.

Acknowledgement

The authors thank staff at the National Poison Centre Malaysia for their contribution to this report, with special thanks to statistician from the National Poison Centre, Noor Afiza Abdul Rani for her contribution in statistical analysis.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Who.int [Internet] Health topics: pharmaceutical products. [Last accessed on 2019 Jan 30]. Available from: http://www.who.int/topics/pharmaceutical_products/en/
  • 2.Toxipedia.org [Internet] Drug poisoning and overdose. 2011. [Last accessed on 2018 Dec 23]. Available from: http://www.toxipedia.org/display/toxipedia/Drug+Poisoning+and+Overdose .
  • 3.Unodc.org [Internet] The United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime: World Drug Report. 2017. [Last accessed on 2019 Feb 13]. Available from: http://www.unodc.org/wdr2017/field/Booklet_1_EXSUM.pdf .
  • 4.Warner M, Chen LH, Makuc DM, Anderson RN, Minino AM. Drug poisoning deaths in the United States, 1980–2008. NCHS Data Brief. 2011;81:1–8. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Unodc.org [Internet] The United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime: World Drug Report. 2015. [Last accessed on 2019 Mar 1]. Available from: Available from: http://www.unodc.org/wdr2015/
  • 6.Awang R, Rahman AF, Abdullah WZ, Lajis R, Majid MI. Trends in inquiries on poisoning: a five-year report from the national poison centre, Malaysia. Med J Malaysia. 2003;58:375–9. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Dosm.gov.my [Internet] Population distribution and basic demographic characteristic report. 2010. [Last accessed on 2019 Feb 15; cited 2018 Nov 15]. Available from: https://www.dosm.gov.my/v1/index.php?r=column/cthemeByCat&cat=117&bul_id=MDMxdHZjWTk1SjFzTzNkRXYzcVZjdz09&menu_id=L0pheU43NWJwRWVSZklWdzQ4TlhUUT09 .
  • 8.Who.int [Internet] Data management system: component databases. [Last accessed on 2019 Mar 4]. Available from: https://www.who.int/ipcs/poisons/intox_dms_components/en/
  • 9.Hanssens Y, Deleu D, Taqi A. Etiologic and demographic characteristics of poisoning: a prospective hospital-based study in Oman. J Toxicol Clin Toxicol. 2001;39:371–80. doi: 10.1081/clt-100105158. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Ghane T, Behmanesh Y, Khazei F. Annual report of drug and poison information in Iran from march 2012 to march 2013. Acta Med Iran. 2016;54:525–9. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Avsarogullari L, Senol V, Akdur O, Akin A, Durukan P, Ozkan S. Characteristics of acute adult poisonings in a university hospital emergency department in central turkey: a three-year analysis. J Pak Med Assoc. 2012;62:129–33. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Stacks.cdc.gov [Internet] National Center for Health Statistics: NCHS Data on Drug-poisoning Deaths. [Last accessed on 2019 Mar 22]. Available from: https://stacks.cdc.gov/view/cdc/47291/cdc_47291_DS1.pdf .
  • 13.Hovda KE, Bjornaas MA, Skog K, Opdahl A, Drottning P, Ekeberg O, et al. Acute poisonings treated in hospitals in Oslo: a one-year prospective study (I): pattern of poisoning. Clin Toxicol (Phila) 2008;46:35–41. doi: 10.1080/15563650601185969. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Zhang J, Jiang C, Jia S, Wieczorek WF. An overview of suicide research in China. Arch Suicide Res. 2002;6:167–84. doi: 10.1080/13811110208951174. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Nair PK, Revi NG. One-year study on pattern of acute pharmaceutical and chemical poisoning cases admitted to a tertiary care hospital in Thrissur, India. Asia Pac J Med Toxicol. 2015;4:79–82. [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Uzun I, Karayel FA, Akyildiz EU, Turan AA, Toprak S, Arpak BB. Suicide among children and adolescents in a province of turkey. J Forensic Sci. 2009;54:1097–100. doi: 10.1111/j.1556-4029.2009.01115.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Fergusson DM, Woodward LJ, Horwood LJ. Risk factors and life processes associated with the onset of suicidal behaviour during adolescence and early adulthood. Psychol Med. 2000;30:23–39. doi: 10.1017/s003329179900135x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Zhao CJ, Dang XB, Su XL, Bai J, Ma LY. Epidemiology of suicide and associated socio-demographic factors in emergency department patients in 7 general hospitals in northwestern china. Med Sci Monit. 2015;21:2743–9. doi: 10.12659/MSM.894819. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Cash SJ, Bridge JA. Epidemiology of youth suicide and suicidal behavior. Curr Opin Pediatr. 2009;21:613–9. doi: 10.1097/MOP.0b013e32833063e1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Zhang J, Jia C. Suicidal intent among young suicides in rural china. Arch Suicide Res. 2011;15:127–39. doi: 10.1080/13811118.2011.565269. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Zöhre E, Ayrık C, Bozkurt S, Köse A, Narcı H, Çevik İ, et al. Retrospective analysis of poisoning cases admitted to the emergency medicine. Arch Iran Med. 2015;18:117–22. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.McLoone P, Crombie IK. Hospitalisation for deliberate self-poisoning in Scotland from 1981 to 1993: trends in rates and types of drugs used. Br J Psychiatry. 1996;169:81–5. doi: 10.1192/bjp.169.1.81. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Krenzelok EP. The FDA acetaminophen advisory committee meeting–what is the future of acetaminophen in the United States? The perspective of a committee member. Clin Toxicol (Phila) 2009;47:784–9. doi: 10.1080/15563650903232345. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Ruhm CJ. Drug poisoning deaths in the United States, 1999-2012: a statistical adjustment analysis. Popul Health Metr. 2016;14:2. doi: 10.1186/s12963-016-0071-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Pharmacy & Bioallied Sciences are provided here courtesy of Wolters Kluwer -- Medknow Publications

RESOURCES