Skip to main content
PLOS One logoLink to PLOS One
. 2021 Feb 26;16(2):e0247863. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0247863

High prevalence of gastroschisis in Brazilian triple side border: A socioenvironmental spatial analysis

Suzana de Souza 1,*, Oscar Kenji Nihei 2, Cezar Rangel Pestana 1
Editor: JJ Cray Jr3
PMCID: PMC7909679  PMID: 33635898

Abstract

This research investigated the spatial association between socioenvironmental factors and gastroschisis in Brazilian triple side border. A geographic analysis for gastroschisis prevalence was performed considering census sector units using Global Moran Index, Local Indicator of Spatial Association Analysis and Getis Ord statistics. Sociodemographic factors included rate of adolescent and parturients over 35 years; population with no income and above 5 minimum wages; rate of late prenatal; and proximity to power transmission lines. Logistic regression models were applied to verify the association between socio-environmental factors and prevalence of gastroschisis. No global spatial correlation was observed in the distribution of gastroschisis (Moran´s I = 0.006; p = 0.319). However, multiple logistic regression showed census sectors with positive cases had higher probability to power transmission lines proximity (OR 3,47; CI 95% 1,11–10,79; p = 0,031). Yet, spatial scan statistic showed low risk for gastroschisis in southern city region (OR = 0; p = 0.035) in opposite to power transmission lines location. The study design does not allow us to attest the causality between power transmission lines and gastroschisis but these findings support the potential exposure risk of pregnant to electromagnetic fields.

Background

Gastroschisis is a birth defect characterized by abnormal abdominal wall closure with externalization of intra-abdominal structures. The defect is located in the paraumbilical region most common in the right side [1]. Cases of gastroschisis have increase worldwide from 1/50,000 live births up to 20-fold in recent decades [2]. Reduced maternal age is the only risk factor but an increase in all age groups has also been observed. The prevalence of gastroschisis may vary according to socioeconomic status, race, access to health services, nutrition, lifestyle and maternal education [3]. These determining factors can be addressed by preconception health care and early diagnosis.

Power Transmission Lines (PTL) emit non-ionizing radiation and its energy intensity is considered unable to break nucleic acids bonds [4, 5]. However, studies demonstrate electromagnetic fields EMF can penetrate cells and interact with biomolecules [6, 7]. An association between maternal residence close to PTL and abortion, birth defects and prematurity in newborns is also reported [810].

Foz do Iguassu hosts Itaipu Binacional as one of the largest hydroelectric power stattion in the world. The 50 Hz energy flow uses a direct current system, while the 60 Hz energy flow uses a 765 kV system. The PTL transmits the energy produced to other locations by crossing inhabited city areas. However, there are no studies addressing the potential impact of this proximity on population health in these exposure areas.

The Prevalence Rate of Gastroschisis (PRG) in Foz do Iguassu has been 6.93/10,000 live births in recent years [11], higher than average of 3/10,000 live births [1215]. The aim of this research was to investigate the potential spatial association between socioenvironmental factors and gastroschisis in Foz do Iguassu. This knowledge can contribute to both urban planning and preventive health care.

Materials and methods

Study design, setting and population

Ecological study with spatial approach included census sectors of Foz do Iguassu as the observation unit. The city is located in Brazil-Paraguay-Argentina triple border with 263,915 habitants distributed in 327 census sectors including 320 urban and 7 rural areas [16]. Spatial correlation analysis considered census sectors of urban area. Hydroelectric and the substation responsible to transmit power are located in the northern part of the city. Population was composed of all local live births in the period from 2012 to 2017. Records with “anomaly identification” empty or with a code for “Ignored” were excluded.

Data sources and study variables

The study used Information System on Live Births (Sistema de Informação Sobre Nascidos Vivos—SINASC) and Brazilian Institute of Geography and Statistics (IBGE) - 2010 demographic census as information sources [16]. SINASC is a birth database with records extracted from Declaration of Live Birth form. Data were requested to Municipal Health Department and exported to Microsoft® Excel® spreadsheets.

The variables obtained from SINASC were: Type of congenital anomaly (Gastroschisis (Q79.3, according to International Classification of Diseases–ICD)); Parturients age (Presented at SINASC as a continuous quantitative variable; in this research was categorized as adolescent (up to 19 years old), adult (20 to 34 years old) and advanced age (over 35 years old)); Prenatal start period (Presented at SINASC as a continuous quantitative variable; in this research was categorized as early prenatal care (beginning in the first semester of pregnancy) and late prenatal care (beginning after the first semester of pregnancy)). The variables obtained from IBGE were related to the “residents per capita income” (no income and above 5 minimum wages).

Power transmission lines

PTL were distributed according to energy towers latitude and longitude data using Google Earth™ version 7.15 software. All points were georeferenced on shapefile maps with SIRGAS2000 projection.

Data analysis

Latitude and longitude birth addresses were obtained using the Bathgeo web resource. Spatial analysis was performed based on gastroschisis cases in each census sector. To perform this calculation, all newborns with and without gastroschisis were georeferenced on the shapefile maps with SIRGAS2000 projection and counted according to the census sector. The gastroschisis prevalence was calculated according to the following formula:

PRG=NumberofgastroschisiscasesinthecensussectorNumberoflivebirthsinthecensussector×1,000

The exploratory spatial analysis of PRG was performed applying the Global Moran Index (Moran´s I), Local Indicator of Spatial Association (LISA) Analysis and Getis Ord (G) statistics using the GeodaTM software, version 1.12.1.131.

Global Moran´s Index

Univariate Global Moran´s Index (Moran´s I) is a test with null hypothesis for spatial independence; in this case, its value would be zero. Positive values (between 0 and +1) indicate direct correlation and negative values (between 0 and -1) inverse correlation. The Moran´s I provides a single measure for all census sectors [17]. Moran´s I is expressed by the following formula:

I=ijWijZi.Zj/Soizi2/n

Univariate Moran scatter plot consists of a spatially lagged variable on the y-axis and the original variable on the x-axis. Slope of the linear fits to scatter plot equals Moran’s I. In Moran´s I analysis, queen configuration was utilized as continuity weight and horizontal, vertical and diagonal neighbor census sectors were considered.

Scatter plot was decomposed in four quadrants. Upper-right and lower-left quadrants correspond to positive spatial autocorrelation (similar values at neighboring locations). We refer to them as high-high and low-low spatial autocorrelation respectively. In contrast, lower-right and upper-left quadrants correspond to negative spatial autocorrelation (dissimilar values at neighboring locations). We refer to them as high-low and low-high spatial autocorrelation respectively.

Local Indicator of Spatial Association analysis (LISA)

LISA was applied to local spatial association analysis to produce a specific value for each census sector and identify local spatial clusters with high or low prevalence [18]. The local version of Moran´s Index for each region i and year t is written as:

Ii,t=(xi,tμt)mojWij(xj,tμt)withmo=i(xi,tμt)2/n

Where xi,t is the observation in region i and year t, μt is the average among regions in year t and the sum over j is those with only neighboring values included [19]. LISA provides a statistically significant degree of spatial autocorrelation in each spatial unit. The cluster map obtained by Moran dispersion diagram and LISA statistics combination allows a more adequate geographic visualization of degree of concentration of the studied variable [20]. In LISA analysis, queen configuration was utilized as continuity weight.

Getis-Ord Statistics

Getis-Ord Statistics (G) is also a measure of local spatial association. This statistic for each region i and year t can be written as follows:

Gi,t(d)=jixij(d)xj,t/jixj,t

Where xij (d) are elements of a symmetric binary space weight matrix equal to one for all links within the distance d of a given region i is equal to zero for all other links, including the region i link to yourself [19].

The interpretation of G statistics is straightforward: a value larger than the mean (or, a positive value for a standardized z-value) suggests a high-high cluster or hot spot, a value smaller than the mean (or, negative for a z-value) indicates a low-low cluster or cold spot. In Getis-Ord Statistics, the queen configuration was utilized as continuity weight.

Spatial scan statistic

Spatial scan statistic technique was developed by Kulldorff and Nagarwalla (1995). The search for risk groups is performed by positioning a virtual circle of variable radius around each centroid and calculating the occurrence rate in each virtual circle. If the observed value of the region limited by the circle is larger than expected, it is called a risk cluster; if the value is lower than expected, it is called a low-risk or protective cluster, with this procedure being repeated until all centroids are tested [2123]. For identification of risk clusters for gastroschisis, Poisson discrete model was used considering the number of events in each area distributed according to a known risk. Null hypothesis is number of cases expected in each area is proportional to the size of its population. In Poisson model, the scanning statistic adjusts irregular population densities and analyzes the total number of cases observed [24]. The standard configuration applied by SaTScanTM software adopted the following criteria: no geographic overlap of the clusters, maximum cluster size equal to 50% of exposed population, circular-shaped clusters and 999 replications. Analyzes were purely spatial variation with Relative Risk (RR) and p values. RR refers to analysis a risk outcome within a geographically limited region, such as a census sector, defined as the risk λZ in the region compared to risk in all other regions [21, 25]:

λZ=E(YZ)EZ,
EZ=NPZP+,

where YZ is Poisson random variable of Z-region count, with expected number given by E (YZ); PZ is the population of Z region; P+ E(Yz); PZ is the population of Z region; P+ is the total population at risk in an area; and N is the total number of cases. In the same way, λA \ Z was also defined. Thus, the true relative risk is given as [21, 25]:

RR=λZλA/Z.

If both Z and A\Z have the same λZ = λAZ = λ, the relative risk is 1. Assuming that Z is selected independent of the observed values, the estimated relative risk is given by [21, 25]:

RR^=NZ/EZ(NNZ)/(EAEZ)

where N is the total number of cases, NZ is the number of cases in Z cluster; EA is the number of expected cases in the region under null hypothesis; EZ is the number of cases in the Z area under the null hypothesis. For interpretation, when RR is equivalent to 1, there is strong evidence to no cluster of risks on the map; if RR is below to 1, there is low risk or the area is protected; and above 1 represents a risk area. The program used for the spatial scan statistic was SaTScan™ version 9.6.

Logistic regression

Simple and multiple logistic regression models were applied to verify the association between sociodemographic variables, maternal residence close to PTL and gastroschisis prevalence. Logistic regression was chosen due to non-parametric distribution of data. Gastroschisis was considered as a dependent variable and the rate of adolescent parturients (RAP), rate of advanced age parturient (RAAP), population without income, population with income above 5 minimum wages, late prenatal rate and proximity to PTL were considered as independent variables.

To calculate the RAP, parturients under the age of 19 were geo-referenced according to census sector. The rate was calculated according to the following formula:

RAP=Numberparturientsundertheageof19inthecensussectorNumberoflivebirthsinthecensussector×1,000

To calculate RAAP, parturients over the age of 35 were geo-referenced according to census sector. The rate was calculated according to the following formula:

RAAP=Numberparturientsover35yearsoldinthecensussectorNumberoflivebirthsinthecensussector×1,000

To calculate the rate of late prenatal care (RLPC), mothers who started prenatal care from 4th month of pregnancy were selected and georeferenced according to census sector. The rate was calculated according to the following formula:

RLPC=NumberparturientswithlateonsetofprenatalcareinthecensussectorNumberoflivebirthsinthecensussector×100

The variable "without income" and "income above 5 minimum wages" is expressed in absolute numbers according to the number of households in census sector. The dependent variable was dichotomized into 0 and 1, where 0 are census sectors without cases of gastroschisis and 1 are census sectors with cases of gastroschisis. For the independent variable proximity to PTL, a distance matrix was created between the centroid of each census sector and a point closer to PTL. After empirical tests, the distance that included all census sector close to PTL was 850 meters. Census sector whose centroid was less than 850 meters from any point in PTL was considered exposed with the value 1, whereas census sector with centroid more than 850 meters from PTL was considered not exposed with a value of 0. Other variables were dichotomized based on their median, census sectors with independent variable above were considered exposed and below considered not exposed. First, a simple logistic regression analysis was performed for all independent variables. Statistical value of p≤0.20 were included in a multiple logistic regression model for both models. Odds Ratio (OR) was calculated with 95% Confidence Intervals (95% CI). The software used in the logistic regression analysis was EpiInfo ™ version 7.2.

Ethics review

This research was approved by Ethics Review Board of the Universidade Dinâmica das Cataratas; evaluation number: 2,856,426; Certified Ethical Presentation number: 92477918.0.0000.8527.

Results

A total of 15 gastroschisis cases were recorded to 26,182 births from 2012 to 2017 in Foz do Iguassu. The prevalence rate average was 5.73/10,000 live birth in the period (Fig 1).

Fig 1. Prevalence rate of gastroschisis in Foz do Iguassu from 2012 to 2017.

Fig 1

Fig 2A shows the map with urban census sectors of Foz do Iguassu. It is observed that PTL is located in the northern region. Spatial distribution of gastroschisis shows highest in north (minimum = 0; maximum = 20; average = 0.51; standard deviation = 2.54). Univariate Global Moran´s I analysis did not show spatial dependency of gastroschisis prevalence rate (Moran´s I = 0.006; p = 0.319) (Fig 2B).

Fig 2.

Fig 2

Spatial distribution of the prevalence rate of gastroschisis (A) and Univariate Global Moran´s Index Scatter Plot (B) in Foz do Iguassu from 2012 to 2017. Republished from Shapefile maps with SIRGAS2000 projection / UTM zone 21S under a CC BY license, with permission from Brazilian Institute of Geography and Statistics, original copyright 2020.

LISA did not identify significant High-High or Low-Low clusters (Fig 3A). However, Getis-Ord statistics identified 29 census sectors with high type (hot spot) and 233 census sectors with low type (cold spot) clusters of gastroschisis rates (Fig 3B).

Fig 3.

Fig 3

Local indicator of spatial association analysis (A) and Getis-Ord statistics of prevalence rate of gastroschisis(B) in Foz do Iguassu from 2012 to 2017. Republished from Shapefile maps with SIRGAS2000 projection/UTM zone 21S under a CC BY license, with permission from Brazilian Institute of Geography and Statistics, original copyright 2020.

The spatial scan statistic identified a significant region with low risk for gastroschisis (Circle D, OR = 0; p = 0.035) in the southern region of the city (Fig 4).

Fig 4. Relative Risk areas for gastroschisis in Foz do Iguassu from 2012 to 2017.

Fig 4

Republished from Shapefile maps with SIRGAS2000 projection/UTM zone 21S under a CC BY license, with permission from Brazilian Institute of Geography and Statistics, original copyright 2020.

In simple logistic regression, independent variables RAP (OR 7.07; CI 95% 1.57–31.89; p = 0.010), RAAP (OR 0,23; CI 95% 0,06–0,85; p = 0,027), population with income above 5 minimum wages (OR 0,23; CI 95% 0,06–0,86; p = 0,029) and proximity to PTL (OR 5,96; CI 95% 2,05–17,37; p = 0,001) were associated with gastroschisis prevalence. Multiple logistic regression analysis showed only the proximity to PTL (OR 3,47; CI 95% 1,11–10,79; p = 0,031) remained associated (Table 1).

Table 1. Simple and Multiple logistic regression analysis of socioenvironmental factors associated with gastroschisis prevalence in Foz do Iguassu from 2012 to 2017.

Simple Regression Multiple Regression
OR CI95% p-value OR CI95% p-value
Rate of adolescent parturients 7,07 1,57–31,89 0,010 3,38 0,63–18,07 0,153
Rate of parturient over 35 years 0,23 0,06–0,85 0,027 0,38 0,10–1,48 0,167
Population without income 0,96 0,34–2,72 0,947 - - -
Population with income above 5 minimum wages 0,23 0,06–0,86 0,029 0,77 0,18–3,35 0,736
Rate of Late Prenatal 1,40 0,49–3,96 0,524 - - -
Proximity to PLT 5,96 2,05–17,37 0,001 3,47 1,11–10,79 0,031

Discussion

This is the first study to investigate the association of socio-environmental factors and gastroschisis with possible impact of PTL. No global spatial dependency was observed in the distribution of gastroschisis. However, spatial scan statistic showed low risk for gastroschisis in areas opposite to PTL. In addition, multiple logistic regression showed high spot sectors with higher chance of being close to PTL.

Low frequency EMF has been shown to not cause DNA breaks [4]. However, some studies suggest it may react to cell membrane [6, 7, 26]. Although the 50/60 Hz seems to not directly cause genotoxic effects, the increase in free radicals may lead to genome instability, micronuclei formation and DNA repair dysfunction [6, 7, 26].

Most studies performed to establish a relation between EMF and diseases involve the incidence of cancer. The association between proximity to PTL and childhood leukemia, brain tumors and breast cancer has been described [2730]. In relation pregnancy risk, maternal residence may be related to abortion, congenital anomaly and prematurity [810]. In general, studies consider distances of ≤50, ≤100 and / or ≤500 meters from PTL as exposure factor.

Spatial epidemiology provides early risk information and timetable public health interventions in these areas. Simple logistic regression model showed incomes above 5 minimum wages was a protective factor against the prevalence of gastroschisis. In fact, income is reported as a determinant social determinant of health [31]. In particular, congenital anomalies provide information about nutrition condition and risk exposure to health population.

Limitation

The effects of environmental exposure on congenital anomalies present many challenges. Congenital anomalies are less common and difficult to obtain high statistical power to stablish standards. The association between environmental exposure and congenital anomalies is also influenced by other individual behavior or labor health quality. We were unable to determine EMF intensity in the exposed areas.

Conclusion

No global spatial dependency was observed in the distribution of gastroschisis in Foz do Iguassu. However, census sectors with anomaly cases had a higher chance of being close to PTL despite no causality between EMF and gastroschisis could be determined in this study. Spatial observation of the distribution cases can contribute to the management of health care for pregnant and newborns in more susceptible areas.

Supporting information

S1 Data

(XLSX)

Acknowledgments

The authors thank the Professor Marcos Augusto Moraes Arcoverde for the statistical consultancy.

Data Availability

All relevant data are within the manuscript and its Supporting Information files.

Funding Statement

The authors received no specific funding for this work.

References

  • 1.Ledbetter DJ. Congenital Abdominal Wall Defects and Reconstruction in Pediatric Surgery. Gastroschisis and Omphalocele. Surgical Clinics of North America. 2012;92(3):713–27. 10.1016/j.suc.2012.03.010 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Castilla EE, Mastroiacovo P. Gastroschisis: International Epidemiology and Public Health Perspectives. American Journal of Medical Genetics Part C. 2008;148:162–79. 10.1002/ajmg.c.30181 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Materna-kiryluk A, Więckowska B, Wiśniewska K, Czyżewska M. GEOSPATIAL CLUSTERING OF GASTROSCHISIS IN POLAND: DATA FROM THE POLISH REGISTRY OF CONGENITAL MALFORMATIONS (PRCM). 2016;29(3):461–70. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Anselmo CWSF, Bion FM, Catanho M, Medeiros M. Possíveis efeitos adversos dos campos eletromagnéticos (50/60 Hz) em humanos e em animais. Ciência & Saúde Coletiva. 2005;10:71–82. [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Nascimento SMC do. Ondas eletromagnéticas e o impacto na saúde humana. Revista Direito Ambiental e sociedade. 2017;7(2):203–27. [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Simkó M, Mattsson MO. Extremely low frequency electromagnetic fields as effectors of cellular responses in vitro: Possible immune cell activation. Journal of Cellular Biochemistry. 2004;93(1):83–92. 10.1002/jcb.20198 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Song K, Im SH, Yoon YJ, Kim HM, Lee HJ, Park GS. A 60 Hz uniform electromagnetic field promotes human cell proliferation by decreasing intracellular reactive oxygen species levels. PLoS ONE. 2018;13(7):1–18. 10.1371/journal.pone.0199753 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Blaasaas KGÅI, Tynes T, Lie RT. Risk of birth defects by parental occupational exposure to 50 Hz electromagnetic fields: a population based study. Occupational and environmental medicine. 2002;59:92–7. 10.1136/oem.59.2.92 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Li D, Odouli R, Wi S, Janevic T, Golditch I, Bracken TD, et al. A Population-Based Prospective Cohort Study of Personal Exposure to Magnetic Fields during Pregnancy and the Risk of Miscarriage. Epidemiology. 2002;13(1):9–20. 10.1097/00001648-200201000-00004 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Sadeghi T, Ahmadi A, Javadian M, Gholamian SA, Delavar MA, Esmailzadeh S, et al. Preterm birth among women living within 600 meters of high voltage overhead Power Lines: a case-control study. Romanian Journal of Internal Medicine [Internet]. 2017;0(0):1–13. Available from: http://www.degruyter.com/view/j/rjim.ahead-of-print/rjim-2017-0017/rjim-2017-0017.xml 10.1515/rjim-2017-0017 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Souza S de, Nampo FK, Pestana CR. Major birth defects in the Brazilian side of the triple border: a population-based cross-sectional study. Archives of Public Health. 2020;78(61):1–9. 10.1186/s13690-020-00443-w [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Togneri RM, Roberto L, Barbieri VO. Gastrosquise: Incidência e fatores associados. Salus J Health Sci. 2016;2(1):1–11. [Google Scholar]
  • 13.St. Louis AM, Kim K, Browne ML, Liu G, Liberman RF, Nembhard WN, et al. Prevalence trends of selected major birth defects: A multi-state population-based retrospective study, United States, 1999 to 2007. Birth Defects Research. 2017;109(18):1442–50. 10.1002/bdr2.1113 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Kirby RS. The prevalence of selected major birth defects in the United States. Seminars in Perinatology [Internet]. 2017;41:338–44. Available from: 10.1053/j.semperi.2017.07.004 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Silva JH da, Terças ACP, Pinheiro LCB, França GVA de, Atanaka M, Schüler-Faccini L. Profile of congenital anomalies among live births in the municipality of Tangará da Serra, Mato Grosso, Brazil,. Epidemiologia e Serviços de Saúde. 2018;27(3):1–10. 10.5123/S1679-49742018000300017 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.IBGE. Brazilian Institute of Geography and Statistics. Paraná: Foz do Iguaçu. [Internet]. 2020 [cited 2020 Jan 10]. Available from: https://www.ibge.gov.br/geociencias/organizacao-do-territorio/15774-malhas.html?=&t
  • 17.Melo EC, Mathias TA de F. Distribuição e autocorrelação espacial de indicadores da saúde da mulher e da criança, no Estado do Paraná, Brasil 1. Revista Latino-Americana de Enfermagem. 2010;18(6):1–10.20428689 [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Perobelli FS, Almeida ES de, Alvim MI da SA, Ferreira PGC. Produtividade do setor agrícola brasileiro (1991–2003): uma análise espacial. Nova Economia. 2007;17(1):65–91. [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Gallo J Le, Ertur C. Exploratory spatial data analysis of the distribution of regional per capita GDP in Europe, 1980–1995. Regional Science. 2003;82:175–201. [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Marconato M, Brambilla MA, Camara MRG da, Carvalho SC de, Nascimento SP do. Taxa De Pobreza E População Rural No Brasil: Análise Espacial Dos Períodos 2000 E 2010. Economia e Desenvolvimento. 2015;27(1):183–201. [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Arcoverde MAM, Berra TZ, Alves LS, Santos DT Dos, Belchior ADS, Ramos ACV, et al. How do social-economic differences in urban areas affect tuberculosis mortality in a city in the tri-border region of Brazil, Paraguay and Argentina. BMC Public Health. 2018;18(793):1–14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Kulldorff M, Nagarwalla N. Spatial disease clusters: Detection and inference. Statistics in Medicine. 1995;14(8):799–810. 10.1002/sim.4780140809 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.LUCENA SEDF, De Moraes RM. Detection of space-time cluster of homicides by stabbing in the João Pessoa city, Paraíba state, Brazil. Boletim de Ciencias Geodesicas. 2012;18(4):605–23. [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Brasil M da S, Fundação Oswaldo Cruz, Santos SM, Souza W V. Introdução à Estatística Espacial para a Saúde Pública. 3rd ed. Brasília: Ministério da Saúde; 2007. 124 p. [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Prates MO, Assunção RM. Relative risk estimates from spatial and space–time scan statistics: are they biased? Statistics in Medicine. 2014;33:2634–44. 10.1002/sim.6143 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Lechter GS. A radiação eletromagnética. Bioeletromagnetics. 1991;18(2):44–54. [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Klaeboe L, Blaasaas KG, Haldorsen T, Tynes T. Residential and occupational exposure to 50-Hz magnetic fields and brain tumours in Norway: A population-based study. Int J Cancer. 2005;115:137–41. 10.1002/ijc.20845 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Kliukiene J, Tynes T, Andersen A. Residential and Occupational Exposures to 50-Hz Magnetic Fields and Breast Cancer in Women: A Population-based Study. American journal of epidemiology. 2004;159(9):852–61. 10.1093/aje/kwh116 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Draper G, Vincent T, Kroll ME, Swanson J. Childhood cancer in relation to distance from high voltage power lines in England and Wales: a case-control study. BMJ. 2005;330:1–5. 10.1136/bmj.330.7481.1 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Feizi AAHP Arabi MAA. Acute childhood leukemias and exposure to magnetic fields generated by high voltage overhead power lines—a risk factor in Iran. Asian Pacific journal of cancer prevention: APJCP [Internet]. 2007;8(1):69–72. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17477775 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Fiorati RC, Arcêncio RA, Souza LB De. Social inequalities and access to health: challenges for society and the nursing field. Revista Latino-Americana de Enfermagem. 2016;24(e2687):1–8. 10.1590/1518-8345.0945.2687 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Decision Letter 0

JJ Cray Jr

10 Dec 2020

PONE-D-20-30903

High incidence of gastroschisis in Brazilian triple side border: a socioenvironmental spatial analysis

PLOS ONE

Dear Dr. de Souza,

Thank you for submitting your manuscript to PLOS ONE. After careful consideration, we feel that it has merit but does not fully meet PLOS ONE’s publication criteria as it currently stands. Therefore, we invite you to submit a revised version of the manuscript that addresses the points raised during the review process.

I know have the review of this work. Although the area and topic are certainly of interest there are suggestions of extensive revisions on all aspects of the submitted work.

Please submit your revised manuscript by Jan 24 2021 11:59PM. If you will need more time than this to complete your revisions, please reply to this message or contact the journal office at plosone@plos.org. When you're ready to submit your revision, log on to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/ and select the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder to locate your manuscript file.

Please include the following items when submitting your revised manuscript:

  • A rebuttal letter that responds to each point raised by the academic editor and reviewer(s). You should upload this letter as a separate file labeled 'Response to Reviewers'.

  • A marked-up copy of your manuscript that highlights changes made to the original version. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Revised Manuscript with Track Changes'.

  • An unmarked version of your revised paper without tracked changes. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Manuscript'.

If you would like to make changes to your financial disclosure, please include your updated statement in your cover letter. Guidelines for resubmitting your figure files are available below the reviewer comments at the end of this letter.

If applicable, we recommend that you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io to enhance the reproducibility of your results. Protocols.io assigns your protocol its own identifier (DOI) so that it can be cited independently in the future. For instructions see: http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submission-guidelines#loc-laboratory-protocols

We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript.

Kind regards,

JJ Cray Jr., Ph.D.

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Journal Requirements:

When submitting your revision, we need you to address these additional requirements.

1. Please ensure that your manuscript meets PLOS ONE's style requirements, including those for file naming. The PLOS ONE style templates can be found at

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=wjVg/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_main_body.pdf and

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=ba62/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_title_authors_affiliations.pdf

2. In the methods section, please provide additional information regarding how study variables were extracted from the database for analysis. Please ensure that you have described this in sufficient detail to allow your work to be replicated.

3.We note that you have indicated that data from this study are available upon request. PLOS only allows data to be available upon request if there are legal or ethical restrictions on sharing data publicly. For information on unacceptable data access restrictions, please see http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/data-availability#loc-unacceptable-data-access-restrictions.

In your revised cover letter, please address the following prompts:

a) If there are ethical or legal restrictions on sharing a de-identified data set, please explain them in detail (e.g., data contain potentially identifying or sensitive patient information) and who has imposed them (e.g., an ethics committee). Please also provide contact information for a data access committee, ethics committee, or other institutional body to which data requests may be sent.

b) If there are no restrictions, please upload the minimal anonymized data set necessary to replicate your study findings as either Supporting Information files or to a stable, public repository and provide us with the relevant URLs, DOIs, or accession numbers. Please see http://www.bmj.com/content/340/bmj.c181.long for guidelines on how to de-identify and prepare clinical data for publication. For a list of acceptable repositories, please see http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/data-availability#loc-recommended-repositories.

We will update your Data Availability statement on your behalf to reflect the information you provide.

4.We note that [Figure(s) 2, 3 and 4] in your submission contain map images which may be copyrighted. All PLOS content is published under the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0), which means that the manuscript, images, and Supporting Information files will be freely available online, and any third party is permitted to access, download, copy, distribute, and use these materials in any way, even commercially, with proper attribution. For these reasons, we cannot publish previously copyrighted maps or satellite images created using proprietary data, such as Google software (Google Maps, Street View, and Earth). For more information, see our copyright guidelines: http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/licenses-and-copyright.

We require you to either (1) present written permission from the copyright holder to publish these figures specifically under the CC BY 4.0 license, or (2) remove the figures from your submission:

1.    You may seek permission from the original copyright holder of Figure(s) [2, 3 and 4] to publish the content specifically under the CC BY 4.0 license. 

We recommend that you contact the original copyright holder with the Content Permission Form (http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=7c09/content-permission-form.pdf) and the following text:

“I request permission for the open-access journal PLOS ONE to publish XXX under the Creative Commons Attribution License (CCAL) CC BY 4.0 (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Please be aware that this license allows unrestricted use and distribution, even commercially, by third parties. Please reply and provide explicit written permission to publish XXX under a CC BY license and complete the attached form.”

Please upload the completed Content Permission Form or other proof of granted permissions as an "Other" file with your submission.

In the figure caption of the copyrighted figure, please include the following text: “Reprinted from [ref] under a CC BY license, with permission from [name of publisher], original copyright [original copyright year].”

2.    If you are unable to obtain permission from the original copyright holder to publish these figures under the CC BY 4.0 license or if the copyright holder’s requirements are incompatible with the CC BY 4.0 license, please either i) remove the figure or ii) supply a replacement figure that complies with the CC BY 4.0 license. Please check copyright information on all replacement figures and update the figure caption with source information. If applicable, please specify in the figure caption text when a figure is similar but not identical to the original image and is therefore for illustrative purposes only.

The following resources for replacing copyrighted map figures may be helpful:

USGS National Map Viewer (public domain): http://viewer.nationalmap.gov/viewer/

The Gateway to Astronaut Photography of Earth (public domain): http://eol.jsc.nasa.gov/sseop/clickmap/

Maps at the CIA (public domain): https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/index.html and https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/cia-maps-publications/index.html

NASA Earth Observatory (public domain): http://earthobservatory.nasa.gov/

Landsat: http://landsat.visibleearth.nasa.gov/

USGS EROS (Earth Resources Observatory and Science (EROS) Center) (public domain): http://eros.usgs.gov/#

Natural Earth (public domain): http://www.naturalearthdata.com/

[Note: HTML markup is below. Please do not edit.]

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented.

Reviewer #1: Yes

**********

2. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #1: Yes

**********

3. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #1: No

**********

4. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #1: No

**********

5. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #1: Dear Dr. JJ Cray

I am very thankful for the invitation to review the manuscript for PLOS ONE entitled "High incidence of gastroschisis in Brazilian triple side border: a socioenvironmental spatial analysis" (PONE-D-20-30903).

I did use the very best of my knowledge to help you decide and the authors to improve their manuscript.

Overall, the authors did an excellent research regarding the exposure of magnetic fields, and their association with live births with gastroschisis in Foz do Iguassu, a city located in Parana state – Brazil, which hosts one of the world's biggest hydroelectric dams.

They respected the manuscript organization present in the instruction to authors on the PLOS website. It has organized in Title, a non-structured Abstract, Background, Material and Methods, Results, Discussion, Limitation, Conclusion, Acknowledgments, References and presents the Result's figures at the end.

Observations regarding each manuscript section are below.

1) Title

It is specific, descriptive, and draws attention to the present question.

No recommendations in this section.

2) Abstract

It is a non-structured abstract that describes the study's primary objective, explains the method's principal points, and shows the main results and conclusion.

No recommendations in this section.

3) Background

The authors summarized the gastroschisis problem very well; nevertheless, PREVALENCE is the usual term in the medical literature when referring to a frequency measure of any congenital disease, not INCIDENCE.[1, 2]

I recommend altering the term INCIDENCE for PREVALENCE in this and all the other sections and figures.

1. Hook EB. Incidence and prevalence as measures of the frequency of birth defects. American journal of epidemiology. 1982;116(5):743-7.

2. Mason CA, Kirby RS, Sever LE, Langlois PH. Prevalence is the preferred measure of frequency of birth defects. Birth defects research Part A, Clinical and molecular teratology. 2005;73(10):690-2. Epub 2005/10/22. doi: 10.1002/bdra.20211. PubMed PMID: 16240384.

4) Materials and Methods

A) Study design, setting, and population

Line 74 - The term newborn covers the population of live births and stillbirths. As SINASC uses only the live births population, it would be better to replace the term to avoid confusion.

Line 74 – Is not the six years period (2012 – 2017) short for this analysis? Publications numbers 27 – 30 in the REFERENCES section present a study period that varies from 7 to 33 years.

The alteration of the term and the explanation for the six-year period are the recommendations in this section.

B) Data sources and study variables

All the SINASC database is available on the DATASUS website (www.datasus.gov.br), including the MICRODATA used in this research (http://www2.datasus.gov.br/DATASUS/index.php?area=0901&item=1&acao=28&pad=31655).

My recommendation in this section is to:

- Alter the statement in "Data Availability": NO – to YES, and refer to the DATASUS WEBSITE.

- Alter the statement that "Data cannot be shared publicly" because they already are public. In "Describe where the data may be found……appropriate details."

- The technical details should be expanded and clarified to ensure that readers understand precisely the steps made. It is not only to export the SINASC data to an Excel spreadsheet; TABWIN should be used first.

- The technical details should be expanded and clarified to ensure that readers precisely understand the steps to obtain all the SINASC and IBGE data.

C) Power Transmission Lines

No recommendations in this section.

D) Data analysis

The alteration to PREVALENCE instead of the term INCIDENCE as recommended before.

E) Global Moran's Index

No recommendations in this section.

F) Local indicator of spatial association analysis

No recommendations in this section.

G) Getis-Ord statistics

No recommendations in this section.

H) Spatial scan statistic

No recommendations in this section.

I) Logistic regression

Line 208: The authors used a distance of 850 meters between the centroid of the census sector to the closest point in PTL as an independent variable. No other paper in the REFERENCE section uses this distance (Ref 10: 600m, Ref 29: <200m, 200-600m, >600m, Ref 30: 500m), and in the DISCUSSION section line 272, the authors also describes the distances. So, the question is, why did the authors use 850m as standard?

The authors should clarify and expand the technical details to a better understanding.

Line 220: The authors could create another subsection entitle: Ethics Review to present the Ethics data from Plataforma Brasil, apart from Logistic regression.

5) Results

Line 225: (15 / 26,182) X 10,000 = 5.73 (PREVALENCE rate 2012 - 2017) not 5.75

Line 266, 228 & 241: Change the term Incidence for Prevalence

FIG 1, 2, 3 & Table 1: Change the term Incidence for Prevalence

6) Discussion

While the study appears to be sound, the language is unclear, making it difficult to follow. Please advise the authors to work with a writing coach or copyeditor to improve the text's flow and readability, principally in the Discussion's first paragraph.

7) Limitation

No recommendations in this section.

8) Conclusion

No recommendations in this section.

9) Acknowledgments

No recommendations in this section.

10) References

No recommendations in this section.

Overall, the manuscript's idea is outstanding. A major revision will be required, and an English revision from a Native speaker or a writing editing service. Some points must be better explained to clarify and give a better understanding to the readers.

Sincerely

Mauricio Giusti Calderon M.D, Ph.D

**********

6. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: Yes: MAURICIO GIUSTI CALDERON, M.D ,Ph.D

[NOTE: If reviewer comments were submitted as an attachment file, they will be attached to this email and accessible via the submission site. Please log into your account, locate the manuscript record, and check for the action link "View Attachments". If this link does not appear, there are no attachment files.]

While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com/. PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Registration is free. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email PLOS at figures@plos.org. Please note that Supporting Information files do not need this step.

Attachment

Submitted filename: PONE-D-20-30903 - Review 01.pdf

PLoS One. 2021 Feb 26;16(2):e0247863. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0247863.r002

Author response to Decision Letter 0


5 Feb 2021

RESPONSES TO THE REVIEWERS

PONE-D-20-30903

High incidence of gastroschisis in Brazilian triple side border: a socioenvironmental spatial analysis

Dear Reviewers,

We would like to thank you for the careful review and contribution to the paper. Journal requirements and reviewers´ comments are addressed in the responses bellow. Also, a revised marked version is also presented with changes highlighted in yellow.

Yours sincerely,

Suzana de Souza

Journal Requirements:

2. In the methods section, please provide additional information regarding how study variables were extracted from the database for analysis. Please ensure that you have described this in sufficient detail to allow your work to be replicated.

Authors’ answer: We have provided more information regarding study variables. Please see line 79 in Data sources and study variables subsection:

“The variables obtained from SINASC were:

• Type of congenital anomaly (Gastroschisis (Q79.3, according to International Classification of Diseases – ICD));

• Parturients age (Presented at SINASC as a continuous quantitative variable; in this research was categorized as adolescent (up to 19 years old), adult (20 to 34 years old) and advanced age (over 35 years old)).

• Prenatal start period (Presented at SINASC as a continuous quantitative variable; in this research was categorized as early prenatal care (beginning in the first semester of pregnancy) and late prenatal care (beginning after the first semester of pregnancy)).”

3. We note that you have indicated that data from this study are available upon request. PLOS only allows data to be available upon request if there are legal or ethical restrictions on sharing data publicly.

Authors’ answer: Data set are not subject to legal or ethical restriction. Minimal anonymized was upload to protect patient information.

4. We note that [Figure(s) 2, 3 and 4] in your submission contain map images which may be copyrighted. All PLOS content is published under the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0), which means that the manuscript, images, and Supporting Information files will be freely available online, and any third party is permitted to access, download, copy, distribute, and use these materials in any way, even commercially, with proper attribution. For these reasons, we cannot publish previously copyrighted maps or satellite images created using proprietary data.

Authors’ answer: Brazilian Institute of Geography and Statistics (IBGE) declared all extracted data (shapefile) is public and can be freely reproduced with source indicated. We have indicate source in each image. Written permission is upload. Please also see lines 230, 236 and 243 in Results section: “Source: Brazilian Institute of Geography and Statistics, 2010. SIRGAS2000 projection / UTM zone 21S.”

Reviewers' comments:

3) Background

The authors summarized the gastroschisis problem very well; nevertheless, PREVALENCE is the usual term in the medical literature when referring to a frequency measure of any congenital disease, not INCIDENCE.

I recommend altering the term INCIDENCE for PREVALENCE in this and all the other sections and figures.

Authors’ answer: We have changed the term INCIDENCE to PREVALENCE in these passages. Please see lines 44, 122, 219 and 272.

4) Materials and Methods

A) Study design, setting, and population

Line 74 - The term newborn covers the population of live births and stillbirths. As SINASC uses only the live births population, it would be better to replace the term to avoid confusion.

Authors’ answer: We have now used only the term "live births".

Line 74 – Is not the six years period (2012 – 2017) short for this analysis? Publications numbers 27 – 30 in the REFERENCES section present a study period that varies from 7 to 33 years.

The alteration of the term and the explanation for the six-year period are the recommendations in this section.

Authors’ answer: Live Birth Information System (SINASC) was created in 1990 but its implementation occurred only gradually in all Federation Units. We chose this period to collect more recent and consistent data to minimize bias in the study.

D) Data analysis

The alteration to PREVALENCE instead of the term INCIDENCE as recommended before.

Authors’ answer: We have changed the term INCIDENCE to PREVALENCE in these passages.

I) Logistic regression

Line 208: The authors used a distance of 850 meters between the centroid of the census sector to the closest point in PTL as an independent variable. No other paper in the REFERENCE section uses this distance (Ref 10: 600m, Ref 29: <200m, 200-600m, >600m, Ref 30: 500m), and in the DISCUSSION section line 272, the authors also describes the distances. So, the question is, why did the authors use 850m as standard?

The authors should clarify and expand the technical details to a better understanding.

Authors’ answer:, Unlike other studies, our distance analysis was based on the centroid of each census sector. After empirical tests, we found that the best distance to cover all census sectors near the power transmission lines was 850 meters. We added a sentence in order to better explain this choice. Please see line 202 in Logistic regression subsection: “After empirical tests, the distance that included all census sector close to PTL was 850 meters”.

Line 220: The authors could create another subsection entitle: Ethics Review to present the Ethics data from Plataforma Brasil, apart from Logistic regression.

Authors’ answer: We created a new subsection according to the suggestion. Please see line 213.

5) Results

Line 225: (15 / 26,182) X 10,000 = 5.73 (PREVALENCE rate 2012 - 2017) not 5.75

Authors’ answer: We fixed the error in the sentence.

Line 266, 228 & 241: Change the term Incidence for Prevalence

FIG 1, 2, 3 & Table 1: Change the term Incidence for Prevalence

Authors’ answer: We have changed the term INCIDENCE to PREVALENCE in all sections of the manuscript.

6) Discussion

While the study appears to be sound, the language is unclear, making it difficult to follow. Please advise the authors to work with a writing coach or copyeditor to improve the text's flow and readability, principally in the Discussion's first paragraph.

Authors’ answer: The manuscript was extensively revised. A new version is presented after English grammar and language improvements.

Attachment

Submitted filename: Response to Reviewers.docx

Decision Letter 1

JJ Cray Jr

16 Feb 2021

High prevalence of gastroschisis in Brazilian triple side border: a socioenvironmental spatial analysis

PONE-D-20-30903R1

Dear Dr. de Souza,

We’re pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been judged scientifically suitable for publication and will be formally accepted for publication once it meets all outstanding technical requirements.

Within one week, you’ll receive an e-mail detailing the required amendments. When these have been addressed, you’ll receive a formal acceptance letter and your manuscript will be scheduled for publication.

An invoice for payment will follow shortly after the formal acceptance. To ensure an efficient process, please log into Editorial Manager at http://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/, click the 'Update My Information' link at the top of the page, and double check that your user information is up-to-date. If you have any billing related questions, please contact our Author Billing department directly at authorbilling@plos.org.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please notify them about your upcoming paper to help maximize its impact. If they’ll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team as soon as possible -- no later than 48 hours after receiving the formal acceptance. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information, please contact onepress@plos.org.

Kind regards,

JJ Cray Jr., Ph.D.

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Additional Editor Comments (optional):

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. If the authors have adequately addressed your comments raised in a previous round of review and you feel that this manuscript is now acceptable for publication, you may indicate that here to bypass the “Comments to the Author” section, enter your conflict of interest statement in the “Confidential to Editor” section, and submit your "Accept" recommendation.

Reviewer #1: All comments have been addressed

**********

2. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented.

Reviewer #1: Yes

**********

3. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #1: Yes

**********

4. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #1: Yes

**********

5. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #1: Yes

**********

6. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #1: Congratulations.

All points raised were duly explained or corrected in a scientifically appropriate manner.

SINASC is a powerful tool, but little used for epidemiological studies of congenital malformations in Brazil, I hope you will follow this research line not only for gastroschisis, but also for other pathologies.

**********

7. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: Yes: MAURICIO GIUSTI CALDERON

Acceptance letter

JJ Cray Jr

18 Feb 2021

PONE-D-20-30903R1

High prevalence of gastroschisis in Brazilian triple side border: a socioenvironmental spatial analysis

Dear Dr. de Souza:

I'm pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been deemed suitable for publication in PLOS ONE. Congratulations! Your manuscript is now with our production department.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please let them know about your upcoming paper now to help maximize its impact. If they'll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team within the next 48 hours. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information please contact onepress@plos.org.

If we can help with anything else, please email us at plosone@plos.org.

Thank you for submitting your work to PLOS ONE and supporting open access.

Kind regards,

PLOS ONE Editorial Office Staff

on behalf of

Dr. JJ Cray Jr.

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Associated Data

    This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

    Supplementary Materials

    S1 Data

    (XLSX)

    Attachment

    Submitted filename: PONE-D-20-30903 - Review 01.pdf

    Attachment

    Submitted filename: Response to Reviewers.docx

    Data Availability Statement

    All relevant data are within the manuscript and its Supporting Information files.


    Articles from PLoS ONE are provided here courtesy of PLOS

    RESOURCES