Skip to main content
Antibiotics logoLink to Antibiotics
. 2021 Jan 29;10(2):127. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics10020127

The Role of Uniform Meropenem Usage in Acinetobacter baumannii Clone Replacement

Bence Balázs 1,2, Zoltán Tóth 1,2, Fruzsina Nagy 1,2, Renátó Kovács 1, Hajnalka Tóth 1,2, József Bálint Nagy 1,2, Ákos Tóth 3, Krisztina Szarka 1, László Majoros 1, Gábor Kardos 1,*
Editor: Michele Bartoletti
PMCID: PMC7911629  PMID: 33572723

Abstract

The dominant carbapenem resistant Acinetobacter baumannii harboring blaOXA-23-like carbapenemase was replaced by blaOXA-40-like carriers in a Hungarian tertiary-care center with high meropenem but relatively low imipenem use. We hypothesized that alterations in antibiotic consumption may have contributed to this switch. Our workgroup previous study examined the relation between resistance spiral and the antibiotic consumption, and the results suggest that the antibiotic usage provoked the increasing resistance in case of A. baumannii. We aimed at measuring the activity of imipenem and meropenem to compare the selection pressure exerted by the different carbapenems in time-kill assays. Strain replacement was confirmed by whole genome sequencing, core-genome multilocus sequence typing (cgMLST), and resistome analysis. Based on results of the time-kill assays, we found a significant difference between two different sequence-types (STs) in case of meropenem, but not in case of imipenem susceptibility. The newly emerged ST636 and ST492 had increased resistance level against meropenem compared to the previously dominant ST2 and ST49. On the other hand, the imipenem and colistin resistance profiles were similar. These results suggest, that the uniform meropenem usage may have contributed to A. baumannii strain replacement in our setting.

Keywords: carbapenem resistant Acinetobacter baumannii, blaOXA-23-like-carbapenemase, blaOXA-40-like carbapenemase, clonal dynamics, strain replacement, multidrug resistance, changepoint analysis

1. Introduction

Acinetobacter baumannii became an important nosocomial pathogen, especially in ventilator-associated pneumonia, wound, urinary tract, and bloodstream infections [1]. Three international clones (ICs) have been determined; IC I (includes ST1; ST7; ST8; ST19; ST20); IC II (includes ST2; ST45; ST47; ST59); IC III (includes ST3; ST13; ST14). In Europe, IC I and IC II cause the vast majority of infections and IC II was reported in most cases [2,3]. A. baumannii harbors chromosomally-encoded AmpC-type cephalosporinase and a chromosomal OXA-51-like oxacillinase [4,5,6]. The mentioned cephalosporinase together with porin mutations can be associated with low-level carbapenem resistance [7]. The chromosomally encoded OXA-51-like oxacillinase enzymes can also be linked to carbapenem resistance, especially in case of their overproduction when their expression is facilitated by upstream ISAba insertion sequences. Carbapenem resistance caused by these mechanisms appeared in the 1980s first, but this mechanism was soon replaced by plasmid-borne carbapenem-hydrolyzing class D β-lactamases (CHDLs) more efficient in conveying carbapenem resistance, i.e., OXA-23-like and OXA-58-like, later OXA24/40-like [4,6,8,9,10,11]. The blaOXA-23-like gene family has been found in A. baumannii in 1995 and detected worldwide in hospital outbreaks [12,13,14,15,16,17]. The blaOXA24/40-like genes were found in clinical isolates from northern Spain in 2002 [2]. When purified, all OXA carbapenemases show relatively weak activity against carbapenems, significant clinical resistance is due to the concerted action of the oxacillinases with promoting effects of ISAbas, overexpression of efflux pumps, and variations of different outer membrane proteins (ompA, carO, oprD, and omp33).

Our working group first investigated the molecular epidemiology of carbapenem resistant A. baumannii (CRAb) and the effect of carbapenem consumption on its distribution published in a previous study, where six clones were identified of which five were carbapenem resistant due to blaOXA-23-like genes (78.1% of all tested isolates), while the blaOXA-24/40-like gene was found in two sporadic isolates (1.2%) [17]. The present study investigates the changes in the occurrence of carbapenem resistance genes between 2012 and 2017 in relation to carbapenem usage patterns and characterizes representative isolates from the former (2010) study and from this period to uncover potential mechanisms in the background of strain dynamics.

2. Results

2.1. Antibiotic Consumption

Carbapenem consumption increased more or less steadily between 2005 and 2018 (Mann–Kendall tau = 0.684, p < 0.0001; Figure 1), meropenem usage increased four times between the two endpoints; mean usage was 0.64 defined daily dose per 100 occupied bed-days (DDD/100 OBDs) in 2007 while 2.69 DDD/100 OBDs in 2017. Imipenem consumption was similar in 2007 (mean usage 0.48 DDD/100 OBDs), but it did not change dramatically during the study period (mean usage 0.80 DDD/100 OBDs in 2017), as shown in Figure 1.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Changes in meropenem and imipenem consumption between 2004 and 2018 in tertiary-case in defined daily doses per 100 occupied bed-days (DDD/100 OBDs).

2.2. Resistance Phenotype

Antibiotic resistance was over 75% to all tested drugs except colistin (Figure S1). Carbapenem resistance steadily increased during the study (Mann–Kendall tau = 0.610, p < 0.0001). Over 90% of the isolates have been CRAb. Resistance to ciprofloxacin and gentamicin remained very high throughout the study, while amikacin and tobramycin resistance decreased in 2016–17 significantly (p < 0.0001). Colistin resistance was sporadic throughout.

2.3. Prevalence of the Resistance Genes

Prevalence of the aminoglycoside resistance genes decreased during the examination period (Figure S2). The dominant aph(3′)-VIa phosphotransferase gene prevalence decreased to 6.2% from 90.6% (p < 0.0001). The aac(6′)-Ib acetyl-transferase and the armA methyl-transferase show a similar pattern (p < 0.0001).

All of the isolates contained the blaOXA-51-like genes proving that all investigated isolates were A. baumannii (Figure S3). The dominant carbapenemase gene family between 2010 and 2014 was the blaOXA-23-like (Figure S3), but occurrence of the gene decreased significantly in 2016 and 2017 (p < 0.001). The prevalence of blaOXA-24/40-like carbapenemases showed an opposite trend, while in the beginning of the examination period the gene family was almost totally absent, its prevalence increased significantly in 2016 (p < 0.001), and it was even higher in 2017 (p < 0.001).

2.4. Whole Genome Sequencing (WGS)

In 2010, blaOXA-23-like carbapenemases proved to be blaOXA-23 in all sequenced strains representing all major pulsotypes, which belonged to ST1, ST2, and ST45. Only two isolates of the same minor pulsotype carried the blaOXA-24/40-like gene [17]; one of which proved to be ST79 and a blaOXA-24 carrier by WGS. All representative isolates from 2017 harboring only blaOXA-23-like acquired carbapenemase gene belonged to ST2. Representative isolates of the more abundant blaOXA-24/40-like carriers (75.0% in 2016 and 92.3% in 2017 of the total isolates), in turn, belonged to ST636 and ST492, all harboring blaOXA-72 or, in case of some ST636 isolates, blaOXA-72 together with blaOXA-23 (Table 1). The genetic environment of the blaOXA-23-like gene in these latter isolates was identical to that found in ST45 strains from 2010, also including the gene aph(3′)-Via [17]. No other types of carbapenemase genes were found in the sequenced genomes.

Table 1.

Result of the whole genome sequencing of selected isolates and relationship between Acinetobacter baumannii sequence types and the antibiotic resistance genes carried. Ac.No. = accession number; ST = sequence type; CHDLs = class D β-lactamases; Bl = β-lactams; Qui = quinolones; Agl = aminoglycosides; Sul = sulphonamides; Mac = macrolides; Phe = phenicols; Tet = tetracyclines.

Isolate Sample Year ST CHDLs Resistance Genes
Bl Qui Agl Sul Mac Phe Tet
4151
Ac.No.:
SRX9354489
Blood 2010 2 blaOXA-23
blaOXA-69
blaADC-25 aac(6′)-Ib-cr aac(6′)-Ib3
aadA1
aph(3′’)-Ib
aph(3′)-Ia
aph(3′)-VIa
aph(6)-Id
armA
sul1 mph(E)
msr(E)
catB8 tet(B)
8266
Ac.No.:
SRX9354496
Bronchial 2010 2 blaOXA-23
blaOXA-66
blaADC-25 aac(6′)-Ib-cr aac(6′)-Ib3
aadA1
aph(3′’)-Ib
aph(3′)-Ia
aph(3′)-VIa
aph(6)-Id
armA
sul1 mph(E)
msr(E)
catb8 tet(B)
8419
Ac.No.:
SRX9354497
Bronchial 2010 2 blaOXA-23
blaOXA-66
blaADC-25 aac(6′)-Ib-cr aac(6′)-Ib3
aadA1
aph(3′’)-Ib
aph(3′)-Ia
aph(3′)-VIa
aph(6)-Id
armA
sul1 mph(E)
msr(E)
catB8 tet(B)
2738
Ac.No.:
SRX9354478
Throat 2010 2 blaOXA-23
blaOXA-66
blaADC-25 aac(6′)-Ib-cr aac(6′)-Ib3
aadA1
aph(3′’)-Ib
aph(3′)-Ia
aph(3′)-VIa
aph(6)-Id
armA
sul1 mph(E)
msr(E)
catB8 tet(B)
2037
Ac.No.:
SRX9354477
Abscess 2010 1 blaOXA-23
blaOXA-69
blaADC-25 aac(3)-Ia
aadA1
aph(3′)-VIa
sul1
8160
Ac.No.:
SRX9354495
Urine 2010 1 blaOXA-69 blaADC-25 aac(3)-Ia
aadA1
aph(3′)-VIa
sul1
8664
Ac. No.:
SRX9354494
Canule 2010 45 blaOXA-23
blaOXA-66
blaADC-25 aph(3′)-Ia
aph(3′)-VIa
sul1 catA1
2729
Ac.No.:
SRX9354493
Bronchial 2010 45 blaOXA-23
blaOXA-66
blaADC-25 aac(6′)-Ib-cr aac(6′)-Ib3
aph(3′)-Ia
sul1 catA1 tet(A)
13803
Ac.No.:
SRX9354498
Blood 2010 79 blaOXA-24
blaOXA-65
blaADC-25
blaTEM-1B
aac(3)-IIa
aac(6′)-Ian
aph(3′’)-Ib
aph(3′)-VIa
aph(6)-Id
armA
sul2 cmlB1
5508
Ac.No.:
SRX9354499
Bronchial 2017 2 blaOXA-23
blaOXA-66
blaOXA-23 aac(6′)-Ib-cr aac(6′)-Ib3
aadA1
aph(3′’)-Ib
aph(3′)-Ia
aph(6)-Id
armA
sul1 mph(E)
msr(E)
catB8 tet(B)
6759
Ac.No.:
SRX9354479
Sputum 2017 2 blaOXA-23
blaOXA-66
blaADC-25 aac(6′)-Ib-cr aac(6′)-Ib3
aadA1
aph(3′’)-Ib
aph(3′)-Ia
aph(3′)-VIa
aph(6)-Id
armA
sul1 mph(E)
msr(E)
catB8 tet(B)
8363
Ac.No.:
SRX9354482
Bronchial 2017 2 blaOXA-23
blaOXA-66
blaADC-25 aac(6′)-Ib-cr aac(6′)-Ib3
aadA1
aph(3′’)-Ib
aph(3′)-Ia
aph(6)-Id
armA
sul1 mph(E)
msr(E)
catB8 tet(B)
9032
Ac.No.:
SRX9354481
Sputum 2017 2 blaOXA-23
blaOXA-66
blaADC-25 aac(6′)-Ib-cr aac(6′)-Ib3
aadA1
aph(3′’)-Ib
aph(3′)-Ia
aph(3′)-VIa
aph(6)-Id
armA
sul1 mph(E)
msr(E)
catB8 tet(B)
230
Ac.No.:
SRX9354485
Bronchial 2017 636 blaOXA-72
blaOXA-66
aac(3)-Ia
aadA1
aph(3′)-Ia
sul1 catA1
511
Ac.No.:
SRX9354486
Bronchial 2017 636 blaOXA-72
blaOXA-66
aac(3)-Ia
aadA1
aph(3′)-Ia
sul1 catA1
3603
Ac.No.:
SRX9354487
Bronchial 2017 636 blaOXA-72
blaOXA-23
blaOXA-66
blaADC-25 aac(3)-Ia
aadA1
aph(3′)-Ia
aph(3′)-VIa
sul1 catA1
9930
Ac.No.:
SRX9354492
Bronchial 2017 636 blaOXA-72
blaOXA-23
blaOXA-66
blaADC-25 aac(3)-Ia
aadA1
aph(3′)-Ia
aph(3′)-VIa
sul1
10135
Ac.No.:
SRX9354488
Nasal 2017 636 blaOXA-72
blaOXA-66
blaADC-25 aac(3)-Ia
aadA1
sul1 catA1
10177
Ac.No.:
SRX9354490
Throat 2017 636 blaOXA-72
blaOXA-66
blaADC-25 aac(3)-Ia
aadA1
sul1 catA1
10992
Ac.No.:
SRX9354483
Bronchial 2017 636 blaOXA-72
blaOXA-23
blaOXA-66
blaADC-25 aac(3)-Ia
aadA1
aph(3′)-Ia
aph(3′)-VIa
sul1
8733
Ac.No.:
SRX9354491
Drain 2017 636 blaOXA-72
blaOXA-66
blaADC-25 aac(3)-Ia
aadA1
aph(3′)-Ia
sul1
3593
Ac.No.:
SRX9354480
Bronchial 2017 492 blaOXA-72
blaOXA-66
blaADC-25 aadA2
aph(3′’)-Ib
aph(6)-IdarmA
sul1
sul2
mph(E)
msr(E)
tet(B)
8429
Ac.No.:
SRX9354484
Trachea 2017 492 blaOXA-72
blaOXA-66
blaADC-25 aadA2
aph(3′’)-Ib
aph(6)-IdarmA
sul1 sul2 mph(E)
msr(E)
tet(B)

The WGS confirmed acquisition of the blaOXA-23 carbapenemase at least two times in 2010, in case of ST1 and ST45. ST636 isolates were genetically highly uniform, distance based on allele presence is ≤4 alleles, while ST2 is more diverse, three of four sequenced isolates belonged to a subgroup distinct from the 2010 ST2 isolates by 20 alleles (Figure 2).

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Phylogenic tree of sequenced A. baumannii isolates based on core-genome multilocus sequence typing (cgMLST). Minimum spanning tree based on cgMLST allelic profiles of 22 A. baumannii isolates. Each circle represents an allelic profile based on sequence analysis of 2390 cgMLST target genes. The numbers on the connecting lines illustrate the numbers of target genes with different alleles. Closely related genotypes (<10 alleles difference) are shaded.

2.5. Time-Kill Assays

The examined isolates were resistant against meropenem and imipenem in clinical aspects, the minimum inhibitor concentrations (MICs) were >32 mg/L, except the only blaOXA-51-like (blaOXA-69 or the blaOXA-66) harboring isolates (MIC = 2 mg/L in both cases). Against blaOXA-23 carriers (ST2), meropenem showed a concentration-dependent bactericidal effect (Figure 3a) between 128 and 1024 mg/L (mean k = 0.48; 0.13–0.59), while blaOXA-72 carriers (ST636; ST492) were not killed at 256 mg/L (mean k = −0.27; −0.49–−0.01), only 512–1024 mg/L (mean k = 0.14; 0.00–0.28) were bactericidal, moreover, only a bacteriostatic effect was detected at 1024 mg/L against isolates harboring both genes (mean k = −0.14; 0.00–−0.25). Meropenem was bactericidal at 32 mg/L against those isolates, which harbored only the blaOXA-69 gene (chromosomally encoded blaOXA-51-like gene) (mean k = 0.08; 0.05–0.10). Imipenem showed concentration-independent killing between 128 and 1024 mg/L similar against blaOXA-72 (mean k = 0.17; 0.05–0.31) or blaOXA-23 (mean k = 0.36; 0.19–0.57) carrier strains, against isolates carrying blaOXA-23 and blaOXA-72 simultaneously imipenem was bactericidal at 256 mg/L (mean k = 0.43; 0.16–0.71) (Figure 3b). Similarly, meropenem was uniformly ineffective at lower (16–32 mg/L) concentrations, while imipenem was slightly more effective against blaOXA-72 carriers at 64 mg/L (data not shown). The effect of colistin was isolate rather than strain dependent (Figure 3c).

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Result of the time-kill assays, X axis shows the drug concentration, Y axis shows the mean k-values. Values above 0 (dashed line) indicate killing effect (see text for details). (a) Summary of the results of the time-kill assays against meropenem. (b) Summary of the results of the time-kill assay against imipenem. (c) Summary of the results of the time-kill assay against colistin.

2.6. Change-Point Analysis

CRAb incidence exhibited nine changepoints (Figure 4). Out of the antibiotic consumption, time-series changepoints corresponding with time-series of carbapenem use were found only in case of CRAb incidence (February 2009 vs. June 2009; October 2014 vs. December 2014).

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Results of the changepoint analysis. Grey line shows carbapenem consumption, black line shows incidence density of infections by CRAb. Dashed vertical lines mark the changepoints found, horizontal lines mark averages of sections of the time-series between changepoints. The two arrows mark the correspondences between changepoints in carbapenem consumption and incidence.

3. Discussion

The role of the selective pressure exerted by antibiotics as a provoker of resistance is well known. However, the response to selection pressure may be versatile and evolves over time. Hospital ecology of multiresistant bacteria is characterized by emergence and receding of different bacterial strains, is shaped by virulence, survival ability, and transmissibility of these strains and is fundamentally influenced by the selection pressure exerted by antibiotic use; shown to provoke spread and persistence of resistant strains by a number of studies. For example, the increasing amikacin usage provoked appearance of amikacin resistant but tobramycin sensitive Acinetobacter, while reducing amikacin consumption decreased the number of the resistant isolates [18]. Similar findings were reported between the intravenous fluoroquinolone usage and the fluoroquinolone-resistant A. baumannii [19].

In this study, the patterns of carbapenemase gene carriage and results of the WGS strongly suggest a strain switch, i.e., the newly appeared ST636 and ST492 CRAb strains carrying blaOXA-72 carbapenemase gene replaced the ST2 and ST45 blaOXA-23 carriers during the period 2014–2015. Similar emergence and spread of blaOXA-24/40-like carrier strains have been reported from several countries [20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27]. The strain replacement reported hereby is in line with the well-documented evolution of carbapenem resistance in A. baumannii from overexpressed blaOXA-51-like enzymes in sporadic isolates through blaOXA-23-like and blaOXA-58-like enzymes with potent carbapenem hydrolyzing activity carried by pandemic clones to emerging clones carrying blaOXA-24/40-like enzymes with even more efficient hydrolytic activity. This evolution towards more efficient hydrolysis of carbapenems is linked to increasing use of carbapenems in many countries, as documented earlier in this setting [17] and elsewhere [28,29,30,31]. This relationship is the inherent part of the Gram-negative resistance spiral, as carbapenem usage increases in response to the spread of extended spectrum β-lactamase (ESBL) producing Enterobacterales in our setting [32]. The link between the strain switch and carbapenem use is further supported by the coincident changepoints.

Sequenced ST636 isolates were highly similar, corresponding to clonal spread of these isolates within this setting, which may be an advent of the emergence of a new high-risk clone. Some isolates within this clone acquired another carbapenemase (blaOXA-23) most probably from ST45, one of the earlier resident clones, suggesting that ST636 is currently evolving in the setting.

Investigating the pattern of antibiotic consumption as a potential driver of this change, notable differences were found between killing kinetics of imipenem and meropenem. While meropenem killed the novel strains ST492 and especially ST636 markedly less efficiently at higher concentrations, the effect of imipenem was comparable in case of all examined strains. As monthly meropenem use exceeds imipenem use 5–10-fold, the difference in meropenem resistance levels may have provided the selective advantage fueling the emergence of blaOXA-72 producing strains, especially ST636 with exceedingly high meropenem resistance. This assumption may similarly be applied in other settings; in Colombia Villalobos et al. reported a high prevalence of CRAb together with strong preference for meropenem over imipenem in Colombia [33].

This is in line with the well-documented process that the more resistant strain is expected to outcompete the less resistant provided that the selection pressure is high enough to exceed the fitness cost of resistance [34], i.e., if it has a fitness advantage in a situation with high antibiotic pressure. This is elegantly demonstrated in case of trimethoprim and Escherichia coli by Baym et al. in an ingenious experimental setting [35]. It was also shown that transmission between patients is also strongly linked to drug use [36,37].

This principal precept is also applicable to small differences in fitness in the long run. Though the less efficient killing found in the present case may provide only a small advantage at clinically attainable carbapenem concentrations, such small competitive advantages may be important in selection between resistant strains as well as in shaping competitive interactions. For instance, in case of subclones of E. coli ST131, the success of pandemic H30Rx clones with very high fluoroquinolone resistance over other resistant subclones was linked to fluoroquinolone use [38] or methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) strain dynamics was driven by drug use patterns [39]. Thus, it may be assumed that the problem leading to and maintaining the problem of CRAb lies not only in overuse, but also in imbalanced consumption of carbapenems, i.e., the preference of meropenem over imipenem as empirical as well as targeted therapy. This is further supported by the acquisition of another potent carbapenemase by the already highly resistant ST636 and the extremely high level of meropenem resistance (but not of imipenem resistance) in these isolates, pointing out that strain evolution in this setting is driven towards even higher level of carbapenem resistance. Thus, even strains with clinically relevant high-level resistance may be outcompeted by more resistant novel clones under high selection pressure and thus attaining higher resistance levels may be evolutionarily advantageous even for highly resistant strains with significant clinical resistance.

Antibiotic stewardship efforts generally aim at reducing consumption of a drug family, considering individual drugs with the same spectra within this family equivalent. The present study draws attention to the fact that related compounds may not be equal, and one may favor spread of certain resistant strains and/or fuel evolution of higher resistance levels in already resistant strains. The other way around, versatile use of individual compounds within a drug group may oppose spread of resistance by decreasing uniform selection pressure. When total drug restriction is not feasible, such an approach may be advantageous.

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Clinical Isolates

Samples were identified by matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight (MALDI-TOF) Biotyper (Bruker, Daltonics). Nonduplicate A. baumannii isolates were collected between 2012 and 2017 (n = 74 in 2012; n = 118 in 2013; n = 128 in 2014; n = 136 in 2016 and n = 65 in 2017) at the Clinical Centre of the University of Debrecen, Hungary. Isolates from 2010–2011 have been characterized in an earlier work [17]. Susceptibility to amikacin, tobramycin, gentamicin, colistin, imipenem, meropenem, and ciprofloxacin were determined using the European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST) guidelines. Changes in susceptibility were analyzed by means of chi-square test.

4.2. Antibiotic Consumption and Changepoint Analysis

We collected monthly antibiotic consumption data between 2005 and 2017 in defined daily dose (DDD) per 100 occupied bed days (OBDs). Trend analysis was performed using a Mann–Kendall test in R statistical environment (Kendall package, MannKendall test). Time-series of CRAb incidence density per 100 bed-days and of consumption of different antibiotic groups were subjected to changepoint analysis in R statistical environment (changepoint package; changepoints in mean). To identify drug groups possibly involved, the changepoints of the CRAb incidence density was matched to changepoints of the different drug use series (coamoxiclav, third generation cephalosporins, carbapenems, fluoroquinolones, aminoglycosides, and colistin) to find temporally close changepoint patterns.

4.3. Resistance Genes

The carbapenemase genes blaOXA-23-like, blaOXA-24/40-like, and blaOXA-51-like and insertion sequences ISAba-1 were sought for using the methods of Woodford et al. and Turton et al. [8,9,40,41,42,43]. Occurrence of the aminoglycoside resistance genes aac(6′)-Ib; aph(3′)-Ia and armA were investigated using the methods of Frana et al., Vila et al., and Bogaerts et al. [41,42,43].

4.4. Whole Genome Sequencing

For whole genome sequencing, isolates representing all pulsotypes (A1; A2; B; C1; C2; D and those representing unique isolates) of the 2010/11 study (n = 9) were chosen. In this study, the isolates from 2017 (n = 14) were selected based on their differences in the resistance phenotype (i.e., susceptible to all investigated antibiotics, amikacin resistant but tobramycin susceptible; susceptible only to gentamicin and colistin, susceptible only to ciprofloxacin and colistin, and resistant against all investigated antibiotics except colistin).

Genomic DNA for all isolates was extracted by DNeasy UltraClean Microbial Kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany). Libraries were created using Nextera DNA Flex library preparation kit (Illumina, San Diego, CA, USA) and sequenced on MiSeq platform (Illumina) using MiSeq Reagent Kit v2 (300 cycles) (Illumina). The resulting FASTQ files were quality trimmed and then de novo assembled using the Velvet assembler integrated in Ridom SeqSphere+ software (Ridom GmbH, Münster, Germany). The cgMLST analysis was performed using SeqSphere+ software (Ridom) according to the ‘A. baumannii cgMLST’ version 1.0 scheme. Acquired antibiotic resistance genes were identified with ResFinder v3.9 (cge.cbs.dtu.dk/services/ResFinder/) and Comprehensive Antibiotic Resistance Database (CARD) v3.1.0 (card.mcmaster.ca/analyze). The raw sequence reads were uploaded to NCBI BioProject database (BioProject ID: PRJNA671692), accession numbers of the isolates are shown in Table 1.

4.5. Time-Kill Assay

In time-kill assays the effect of meropenem, imipenem, and colistin were investigated against 12 carbapenem resistant A. baumannii isolates representing all major STs (ST2; ST636, ST1, ST492). The starting inoculum was 106 CFU/mL, the drug concentrations were 16, 128–1024 mg/L in case of carbapenems, and 2–32 mg/L in case of colistin in Mueller-Hinton broth medium (Lab M Limited, Heywood, UK). In a smaller subset of strains (n = 4) the meropenem and imipenem time-kill assays were also performed at lower concentrations (16 and 32 mg/L) as well. All tubes were plated at 0, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, and 24 h to solid Mueller-Hinton media (Lab M Limited, Heywood, UK). The colonies were counted after 24 h of incubation at 37 °C. Killing rates (k) were determined: Nt  =  N0  ×  ekt, where Nt is the number of viable bacteria colonies at time t, N0 is the number of viable bacteria colonies in the initial inoculum, k is the killing rate, and t is the incubation time. Negative and positive k values indicate growth and killing, respectively. Bactericidal activity was defined as a 99.9% reduction of the starting inoculum. All tests were performed at least twice.

Acknowledgments

The antibiotic consumption data were kindly provided by the Central Clinical Pharmacy, Clinical Center, University of Debrecen.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/2079-6382/10/2/127/s1, Figure S1: Results of the Kirby-Bauer disk diffusion tests, based on EUCAST recommendation. Figure S2: The prevalence of aminoglycoside resistance genes among the A. baumannii isolates by year. Figure S3: The prevalence of carbapenemases among the A. baumannii by years.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization B.B., Á.T. and G.K.; methodology B.B., Z.T., R.K. and L.M.; software, B.B., Z.T., H.T. and G.K.; validation, Á.T.; formal analysis B.B., K.S., Á.T. and G.K.; investigation, B.B., Z.T., F.N., J.B.N.; writing—original draft preparation, B.B., G.K.; writing—review and editing, B.B., Á.T., G.K.; supervision G.K.; project administration B.B. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The study itself did not receive funding. Z.T., F.N., and B.B. were supported by the EFOP–3.6.3–VEKOP–16–2017–00009 project cofinanced by EU and the European Social Fund. G.K. and K.S. were supported by a Bolyai Research Scholarship of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The genomes sequenced in this study are available in the GenBank under the bioproject ID PRJNA671692.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Footnotes

Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

References

  • 1.Bergogne-Berezin E., Towner K.J. Acinetobacter spp. as nosocomial pathogens: Microbiological, clinical, and epidemiological features. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 1996;9:148. doi: 10.1128/CMR.9.2.148. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Lopez-Otsoa F., Gallego L., Towner K.J., Tysall L., Woodford N., Livermore D.M. Endemic carbapenem resistance associated with OXA-40 carbapenemase among Acinetobacter baumannii isolates from a hospital in northern Spain. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2002;40:4741–4743. doi: 10.1128/JCM.40.12.4741-4743.2002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Dijkshoorn L., Aucken H., Gerner-Smidt P., Janssen P., Kaufmann M.E., Garaizar J., Ursing J., Pitt T.L. Comparison of outbreak and nonoutbreak Acinetobacter baumannii strains by genotypic and phenotypic methods. J. Clin. Microbiol. 1996;34:1519–1525. doi: 10.1128/JCM.34.6.1519-1525.1996. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Paton R., Miles R.S., Hood J., Amyes S.G.B. ARI 1: β-lactamase-mediated imipenem resistance in Acinetobacter baumannii. Int. J. Antimicrob. Agents. 1993;2:81–87. doi: 10.1016/0924-8579(93)90045-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Bou G., Martínez-Beltrán J. Cloning, nucleotide sequencing, and analysis of the gene encoding an AmpC β-lactamase in Acinetobacter baumannii. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2000;44:428–432. doi: 10.1128/aac.44.2.428-432.2000. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Héritier C., Poirel L., Fournier P.E., Claverie J.M., Raoult D., Nordmann P. Characterization of the naturally occurring oxacillinase of Acinetobacter baumannii. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2005;49:4174–4179. doi: 10.1128/AAC.49.10.4174-4179.2005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Queenan A.M., Bush K. Carbapenemases: The versatile β-lactamases. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 2007;20:440–458. doi: 10.1128/CMR.00001-07. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Brown S., Amyes S.G.B. The sequences of seven class D β-lactamases isolated from carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii from four continents. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 2005;11:326–329. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-0691.2005.01096.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Woodford N., Ellington M.J., Coelho J.M., Turton J.F., Ward M.E., Brown S., Amyes S.G.B., Livermore D.M. Multiplex PCR for genes encoding prevalent OXA carbapenemases in Acinetobacter spp. Int. J. Antimicrob. Agents. 2006;27:351–353. doi: 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2006.01.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Brown S., Amyes S. OXA β-lactamases in Acinetobacter: The story so far. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 2005;57:1–3. doi: 10.1093/jac/dki425. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Lolans K., Rice T.W., Munoz-Price L.S., Quinn J.P. Multicity outbreak of carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii isolates producing the carbapenemase OXA-40. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2006;50:2941–2945. doi: 10.1128/AAC.00116-06. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Turton J.F., Kaufmann M.E., Glover J., Coelho J.M., Warner M., Pike R., Pitt T.L. Detection and typing of integrons in epidemic strains of Acinetobacter baumannii found in the United Kingdom. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2005;43:3074–3082. doi: 10.1128/JCM.43.7.3074-3082.2005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Marqué S., Poirel L., Héritier C., Brisse S., Blasco M.D., Filip R., Coman G., Naas T., Nordmann P. Regional occurrence of plasmid-mediated carbapenem-hydrolyzing oxacillinase OXA-58 in Acinetobacter spp. in Europe. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2005;43:4885–4888. doi: 10.1128/JCM.43.9.4885-4888.2005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Dalla-Costa L.M., Coelho J.M., Souza H.A., Castro M.E., Stier C.J., Bragagnolo K.L., Rea-Neto A., Penteado-Filho S.R., Livermore D.M., Woodford N. Outbreak of carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii producing the OXA-23 enzyme in Curitiba, Brazil. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2003;41:3403–3406. doi: 10.1128/JCM.41.7.3403-3406.2003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Jeon B.C., Jeong S.H., Bae I.K., Kwon S.B., Lee K., Young D., Lee J.H., Song J.S., Lee S.H. Investigation of a nosocomial outbreak of imipenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii producing the OXA-23 β-lactamase in Korea. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2005;43:2241–2245. doi: 10.1128/JCM.43.5.2241-2245.2005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Naas T., Levy M., Hirschauer C., Marchandin H., Nordmann P. Outbreak of carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii producing the carbapenemase OXA-23 in a tertiary care hospital of Papeete, French Polynesia. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2005;43:4826–4829. doi: 10.1128/JCM.43.9.4826-4829.2005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Mózes J., Ebrahimi F., Gorácz O., Miszti C., Kardos G. Effect of carbapenem consumption patterns on the molecular epidemiology and carbapenem resistance of Acinetobacter baumannii. J. Med. Microbiol. 2014;63:1654–1662. doi: 10.1099/jmm.0.082818-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Buisson Y., Van Nhieu G.T., Ginot L., Bouvet P., Schill H., Driot L., Meyran M. Nosocomial outbreaks due to amikacin-resistant tobramycin-sensitive Acinetobacter species: Correlation with amikacin usage. J. Hosp. Infect. 2011;15:83–93. doi: 10.1016/0195-6701(90)90024-i. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Villers D., Espaze E., Coste-Burel M., Giauffret F., Ninin E., Nicolas F., Richet H. Nosocomial Acinetobacter baumannii infections: Microbiological and clinical epidemiology. Ann. Intern. Med. 1998;129:182–189. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-129-3-199808010-00003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Dortet L., Bonnin R.A., Bernabeu S., Escaut L., Vittecoq D., Girlich D., Imanci D., Fortineau N., Naas T. First occurrence of OXA-72-producing Acinetobacter baumannii in Serbia. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2016;60:5724–5730. doi: 10.1128/AAC.01016-16. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Povilonis J., Šeputienė V., Krasauskas R., Juškaitė R., Miškinytė M., Sužiedėlis K., Sužiedėlienė E. Spread of carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii carrying a plasmid with two genes encoding OXA-72 carbapenemase in Lithuanian hospitals. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 2013;68:1000–1006. doi: 10.1093/jac/dks499. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Barnaud G., Zihoune N., Ricard J.D., Hippeaux M.C., Eveillard M., Dreyfuss D., Branger C. Two sequential outbreaks caused by multidrug-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii isolates producing OXA-58 or OXA-72 oxacillinase in an intensive care unit in France. J. Hosp. Infect. 2010;76:358–360. doi: 10.1016/j.jhin.2010.05.026. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Franolić-Kukina I., Bedenić B., Budimir A., Herljević Z., Vraneš J., Higgins P.G. Clonal spread of carbapenem-resistant OXA-72-positive Acinetobacter baumannii in a Croatian university hospital. Int. J. Infect. Dis. 2011;15:e706–e709. doi: 10.1016/j.ijid.2011.05.016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Kuo S.C., Yang S.P., Lee Y.T., Chuang H.C., Chen C.P., Chang C.L., Chen T.-L., Lu P.L., Hsueh P.R., Fung C.P. Dissemination of imipenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii with new plasmid-borne bla OXA-72 in Taiwan. BMC Infect. Dis. 2013;13:319. doi: 10.1186/1471-2334-13-319. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Saavedra S.Y., Cayô R., Gales A.C., Leal A.L., Saavedra C.H. Early dissemination of OXA-72-producing Acinetobacter baumannii strain in Colombia: A case report. Braz. J. Infect. Dis. 2014;18:678–680. doi: 10.1016/j.bjid.2014.05.017. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Vasconcelos A.T.R., Barth A.L., Zavascki A.P., Gales A.C., Levin A.S., Lucarevschi B.R., Cabral B.G., Brasiliense D.M., Rossi F., Furtado G.H.C., et al. The changing epidemiology of Acinetobacter spp. producing OXA carbapenemases causing bloodstream infections in Brazil: A BrasNet report. Diagn. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 2015;83:382–385. doi: 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2015.08.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Zarrilli R., Giannouli M., Rocco F., Loman N.J., Haines A.S., Constantinidou C., Pallen M.J., Triassi M., Di Nocera P.P. Genome sequences of three Acinetobacter baumannii strains assigned to the multilocus sequence typing genotypes ST2, ST25, and ST78. J. Bacteriol. 2011;193:2359–2360. doi: 10.1128/JB.00245-11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Scerpella E.G., Wanger A.R., Armitige L., Anderlini P., Ericsson C.D. Nosocomial outbreak caused by a multiresistant clone of Acinetobacter baumannii: Results of the case-control and molecular epidemiologic investigations. Infect. Control. Hosp. Epidemiol. 1995;16:92–97. doi: 10.1086/647063. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Mulin B., Talon D., Viel J.F., Vincent C., Leprat R., Thouverez M., Michel-Briand Y. Risk factors for nosocomial colonization with multiresistant Acinetobacter baumannii. Eur. J. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 1995;14:569–576. doi: 10.1007/BF01690727. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Manikal V.M., Landman D., Saurina G., Oydna E., Lal H., Quale J. Endemic carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter species in Brooklyn, New York: Citywide prevalence, interinstitutional spread, and relation to antibiotic usage. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2000;31:101–106. doi: 10.1086/313902. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Go E.S., Urban C., Burns J., Mariano N., Mosinka-Snipas K., Rahal J.J., Kreiswirth B., Eisner W. Clinical and molecular epidemiology of Acinetobacter infections sensitive only to polymyxin B and sulbactam. Lancet. 1994;344:1329–1332. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(94)90694-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Tóth H., Fésűs A., Kungler-Gorácz O., Balázs B., Majoros L., Szarka K., Kardos G. Utilization of vector autoregressive and linear transfer models to follow up the antibiotic resistance spiral in gram-negative bacteria from cephalosporin consumption to colistin resistance. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2019;69:1410–1421. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciy1086. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Villalobos A.P., Barrero L.I., Rivera S.M., Ovalle M.V., Valera D. Vigilancia de infecciones asociadas a la atención en salud, resistencia bacteriana y consumo de antibióticos en hospitales de alta complejidad, Colombia. Biomédica. 2014;34:67–80. doi: 10.7705/biomedica.v34i0.1698. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.López-Lozano J.M., Lawes T., Nebot C., Beyaert A., Bertrand X., Hocquet D., Aldeyab M., Scott M., Conlon-Bingham G., Farren D., et al. A nonlinear time-series analysis approach to identify thresholds in associations between population antibiotic use and rates of resistance. Nat. Microbiol. 2019;4:1160–1172. doi: 10.1038/s41564-019-0410-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Baym M., Lieberman T.D., Kelsic E.D., Chait R., Gross R., Yelin I., Kishony R. Spatiotemporal microbial evolution on antibiotic landscapes. Science. 2016;353:1147–1151. doi: 10.1126/science.aag0822. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Lipsitch M., Samore M.H. Antimicrobial use and antimicrobial resistance: A population perspective. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 2002;8:347. doi: 10.3201/eid0804.010312. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Almagor J., Temkin E., Benenson I., Fallach N., Carmeli Y., DRIVE-AB Consortium The impact of antibiotic use on transmission of resistant bacteria in hospitals: Insights from an agent-based model. PLoS ONE. 2018;13:e0197111. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0197111. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Johnson J.R., Johnston B., Kuskowski M.A., Sokurenko E.V., Tchesnokova V. Intensity and mechanisms of fluoroquinolone resistance within the H30 and H30Rx subclones of Escherichia coli sequence type 131 compared with other fluoroquinolone-resistant E. coli. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2015;59:4471–4480. doi: 10.1128/AAC.00673-15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Lawes T., López-Lozano J.M., Nebot C., Macartney G., Subbarao-Sharma R., Dare C.R., Edwards G.F.S., Gould I.M. Turning the tide or riding the waves? Impacts of antibiotic stewardship and infection control on MRSA strain dynamics in a Scottish region over 16 years: Non-linear time series analysis. BMJ Open. 2015;5 doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-006596. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Frana T.S., Carlson S.A., Griffith R.W. Relative distribution and conservation of genes encoding aminoglycoside-modifying enzymes in Salmonella enterica serotype Typhimurium phage type DT104. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2001;67:445–448. doi: 10.1128/AEM.67.1.445-448.2001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Vila J., Ruiz J., Navia M., Becerril B., Garcia I., Perea S., Lopez-Hernandez I., Alamo I., Ballester F., Planes A.M., et al. Spread of amikacin resistance in Acinetobacter baumannii strains isolated in Spain due to an epidemic strain. J. Clin. Microbiol. 1999;37:758–761. doi: 10.1128/JCM.37.3.758-761.1999. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Bogaerts P., Galimand M., Bauraing C., Deplano A., Vanhoof R., De Mendonca R., Rodriguez-Villalobos H., Struelens M., Glupczynski Y. Emergence of ArmA and RmtB aminoglycoside resistance 16S rRNA methylases in Belgium. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 2007;59:459–464. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkl527. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.O’Toole G.A. Microtiter dish biofilm formation assay. J. Vis. Exp. 2011:e2437. doi: 10.3791/2437. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Data Availability Statement

The genomes sequenced in this study are available in the GenBank under the bioproject ID PRJNA671692.


Articles from Antibiotics are provided here courtesy of Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (MDPI)

RESOURCES