Skip to main content
Materials logoLink to Materials
. 2021 Feb 3;14(4):707. doi: 10.3390/ma14040707

Fly Ash with Ammonia: Properties and Emission of Ammonia from Cement Composites

Filip Chyliński 1,*, Anna Goljan 1, Agnieszka Michalik 1
Editor: Marijana Hadzima-Nyarko1
PMCID: PMC7913370  PMID: 33546246

Abstract

The article presents the results of tests performed on fly ash with a high content of ammonium (up to 400 ppm) from the NOx reduction process. The main properties of fly ash were tested according to EN 450-1 and the results were compared with fly ash without ammonium. The comparison showed that fly ash with high concentration of ammonium suits the requirements of the European standard. Although the requirements do not limit the ammonium content, using such material as an additive for cement composites causes the emission of gaseous ammonium during mixing and from the final product. For this reason, the emission of ammonium from mortars containing fly ash were tested. The results have shown that using high ammonium fly ash might pollute indoor air and affect the health of users.

Keywords: fly ash, ammonia, denitrification process, ammonia slip, ammonia emission, concrete

1. Introduction

Fly ash is a widely used by-product, no longer considered just a waste but a rather a valuable pozzolanic material added to cement composites to improve their properties [1,2,3,4,5,6,7]. It is used in cement and concrete manufacturing after fulfilling the requirements of various standards such as EN 197-1, EN 450-1 and ASTM C618 [8,9,10,11]. The world production of siliceous fly ash in 2016 was about 550 million tonnes [12].

Since 2010, when the EU members signed Directive 2010/75/EU on industrial emissions (integrated pollution prevention and control), the so-called IED Directive [13], the levels of emission of hazardous constituents of flue gases from power plants, including NOx, have been reduced. The level of NOx emissions has been reduced to 300 to 150 mg/Nm3 depending on the total rated thermal input of the combustion power plant. In order to meet the new requirements, the coal burning process had to be modified, in most cases by adding an installation for reducing nitrogen oxides. Two of the most popular installations are Selective Non-Catalytic Reduction (SNCR) and Selective Catalytic Reduction (SCR) [14,15,16]. Both installations use a reducing agent, which is injected directly to the combustion chamber (in SNCR) or into the flue gas before entering the catalytic zone. The reducing agent is a source of ammonium, which reduces the concentration of NOx and generates nitrogen. Due to dynamic processes, however, not all ammonium particles react, with some remaining in the flue gas, which is called “ammonia slip”. Part of the ammonium adsorbs on the surface of the spherical particles of fly ash and part reacts with other constituents of flue gas, forming ammonium sulphates, carbonates or chlorides. The ammonium content in fly ash depends on many factors [17,18] among which the main one is the ammonia slip level. Mazur et al. [19] have estimated that an ammonia overdose of 2 ppm might increase the ammonia content in fly ash by about 100 ppm. Fly ashes from power plants might even contain up to 2500 ppm of ammonium [20]. Due to its unpleasant odour and its harmful effects, good practice in the market dictates that fly ash should contain less than 100 ppm of ammonia, and in some countries like Germany, as little as 50 ppm [17,19,21].

The EN 450-1 and ASTM C618 standards [9,11], which contain the requirements for the properties of siliceous fly ash suitable for use as an additive for concrete, do not limit the ammonium content in fly ash. Similarly, the EN 197-1 standard [8] containing the requirements for fly ash used as part of cement does not limit the NH3 content.

Due to the lack of requirements for ammonium content in fly ash, the requirements for indoor air and volatile organic compounds (VOC) emissions from building materials could be adapted.

According to the US Department of Health and Human Services [22,23], long-term exposure to air with an NH3 concentration above 1 ppm can cause irritation of the eyes, nose and throat. The Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) limits exposure to air with 35 ppm of ammonia to no longer than 15 min and to air with 50 ppm to no longer than 5 min [24]. The British Health and Safety Executive limits the ammonia concentration in air at the workplace to 18 mg/m3 for no longer than 8 h [25]. At a level of 5 ppm or more, the odour of ammonia can be detected [26]. Only a handful of countries regulate the limits of ammonia content in indoor air in the workplace. A Finnish voluntary declaration [27] limits the emission of ammonia from building products into the indoor air to 0.03 or 0.06 mg/m2 h, depending on the type of room. A Polish national law project [28] will limit the ammonium content in indoor air to 300 or 100 µg/m3 depending on exposure—under or above 4 h a day. According to the European Registration, Evaluation, Authorisation and Restriction of Chemicals (REACH) directive [29], building materials containing inorganic ammonium salts are not to be marketed when the emission of ammonia (in special conditions) is higher than 3 ppm.

The emission of ammonia from cement composites was investigated by Hongseok et al. [22] who observed a rise of ammonia content in air from mortar with aggregate containing organic matter. Bai et. al. [30] investigated the emissions of ammonia from concrete containing urea-based antifreeze admixtures showing that this agent might be also a source of ammonia emissions. Shou et al. [31] measured the emissions of ammonia from concrete containing fly ash from the denitrification process. The level of ammonia content in air ranged from 65 to 3200 mg NH4+/kg fly ash where 80% of the emissions occurred during the first 8 h. The gas release was observed to last up to three weeks and after that the emissions reached a negligible level. Bentur and Larianovsky [32] measured the emission of ammonia from concrete mixes with fly ash and ammonium salts, starting from the first contact of binder with water. They registered the highest emission peak (up to 40 ppm) during the first 2 h. The maximum content of ammonia in the fly ash was 180 ppm.

The aim of this article was to answer the question of whether siliceous fly ash containing up to 400 ppm of ammonia might still be a useful and safe material for concrete production and service or whether it needs to be treated as a waste and lanfilled. In order to answer this question, a comparison of the properties of fly ash with high content of ammonia to fly ash without ammonia and the requirements stated in EN 450-1 [9] was made. The emission of gaseous ammonia from mortars with fly ash was also tested to check whether this building material would fulfil the requirements for the emission of VOCs and indoor air quality.

The article presents the results of tests chosen by previous investigations [18] that showed that these properties might be significant for fly ash containing ammonia, and also other tests found valuable in this area. The following tests were performed:

  • loss on ignition

  • fineness and water requirement

  • properties of fresh mortar

  • setting time

  • compressive and bending strength

  • pozzolanic activity

  • emission of ammonia from mortars

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Fly Ash and Cement

Tests were performed using siliceous fly ash from a Polish power plant equipped with an SNCR denitrification installation (samples A-E). The reference sample (REF) was from another Polish power plant without an installation for the denitrification of flue gases. Fly ash was certified according to the EN 450-1 standard [9] as fly ash Category A for concrete. Table 1 presents the ammonia content of the tested fly ash. The ammonium content in the fly ash at the day of arrival from the power plant was determined by leaching it into water (water: solid ratio—10:1) and determining the ammonium concentration in the water according to the EN 12457-4 standard [33].

Table 1.

Ammonia content in the tested fly ash (A–E—samples from denitrification process).

Sample Concentration in Water Solution (mg/L) Concentration in Fly Ash (mg/kg)
REF 0.9 9
A 12.2 122
B 18.3 183
C 16.1 161
D 42.8 428
E 37.5 375

In order to prepare grouts and mortars, Portland cement CEM I 42,5R was used. The cement was certified according to the EN 197-1 standard [8]. Table 2 and Table 3 present the main characteristics and composition of the cement used for the tests.

Table 2.

Main properties of cement used for tests.

Property Value
compressive strength (MPa)
- 2 days 32.2
- 28 days 59.0
flexural strength (MPa)
- 2 days 5.7
- 28 days 9.6
setting time (min) 170
end of setting time (min) 225
soundness expansion (mm) 0
loss on ignition (%) 3.30
insoluble residue (%) 0.90
specific surface area 1 (cm2/g) 3620
density (g/cm3) 3.10

1 Determined by the Blaine method.

Table 3.

Composition of cement used for tests.

Constituent SO3 Cl SiO2 Al2O3 Fe2O3 CaO MgO K2O Na2O Na2Oeq C3A
Content (%) 2.82 0.052 19.96 5.00 2.47 64.37 1.27 0.70 0.13 0.59 9.07

2.2. Loss on Ignition, Fineness and Water Requirement

For each sample of fly ash, the loss on ignition was tested according to EN 196-2 and EN 450-1 [9,34]. The fineness of fly ash was tested according to EN 451-2 [35]. Water requirement was tested according to EN 450-1 Annex B [9]. The tests were repeated three times for each sample and the average value was calculated.

2.3. Properties of Fresh Mortar

Due to the observation that bubbles of gaseous ammonia appear on the surface of fresh mortar (Figure 1), the properties of the fresh mortar were tested to check if gaseous ammonia affects the results of tests of air content, density and consistency. Air content, density and consistency were tested according to EN 1015-7, EN 1015-6 and EN 1015-3 respectively [36,37,38,39].

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Mortar emitting gaseous ammonia, (a) after compaction, (b) a few seconds after floating the surface, (c) hardened mortar with visible holes (black dots).

2.4. Setting Time

Tests on the influence of fly ash on the setting time of cement grouts were performed according to EN 196-3 and EN-450-1 [9,40]. The compositions of the tested grouts are given in Table 4.

Table 4.

Composition of tested grouts.

Sample Cement
(g)
Fly Ash Water
(g)
Standard Consistency
(%)
Standard Consistency
(mm)
(g) Type
CEM I 500 0 /– 128 25.5 5
25% REF 375 125 /Ref 127 25.5 4
25% A 375 125 /A 131 26.0 7
25% B 375 125 /B 131 26.0 6
25% C 375 125 /C 125 25.0 8
25% D 375 125 /D 126 25.0 5
25% E 375 125 /E 128 25.5 8

2.5. Compressive and Bending Strength

Mortars with the compositions from Table 5 were mixed and placed into prismatic moulds with dimensions of 160 mm × 40 mm × 40 mm according to EN 196-1 [41]. The following day, after demoulding, the samples were put into water at a temperature of 20 ± 2 °C and cured until the day of the test. Compressive and flexural strength were tested according to EN 196-1 [41] after 28, 90 and 180 days. The addition of fly ash was 25% and 50% of the binder mass. The amount of 25% of fly ash is typically used in the production of concrete and mentioned in the EN 206 standard [42] as the maximum amount to put in the place of CEM II/A Portland cement (higher amounts of fly ash might be used but cannot be treated as binders but rather as fillers). The amount of 50% of ash was used to check whether this significantly exceeded amount of fly ash with a high content of ammonia would affect the properties of the grout or mortar. Samples A, C and E of fly ash were chosen as the representative one for the low, medium and high concentration of ammonia to observe if there is an influence of ammonia for the tested properties of mortars.

Table 5.

Composition of tested mortars.

Sample Cement (g) Fly Ash (g)/Type Water (g) Sand (g)
CEM I 450.0 0.0 /– 225 1350
25% REF 337.5 112.5 /Ref
25% A 337.5 112.5 /A
25% C 337.5 112.5 /C
25% E 337.5 112.5 /E
50% REF 225.0 225.0 /Ref
50% A 225.0 225.0 /A
50% C 225.0 225.0 /C
50% E 225.0 225.0 /E

2.6. Pozzolanic Activity

The pozzolanic activity index was calculated by comparing the compressive strength values of mortars with fly ash to those of mortars without fly ash. According to EN 450-1 [9], a comparison should be made with samples containing 25% of fly ash (in the place of cement) and the reference sample (without fly ash).

2.7. Emission of Ammonia from Mortars

Tests on the emission of ammonia from mortars were performed to check how the ammonium from the fly ash affects the indoor air in buildings and whether they are safe to use. The tests were carried out in a testing chamber (Figure 2). The testing chamber conformed to the requirements of EN 16516 [43]. According to EN 16516 [43], the surface area of the tested sample should be chosen depending on the scenario for the model room. The model room has the following dimensions:

  • height 2.5 m

  • floor (and ceiling) 3 m × 4 m

  • one door with dimensions 0.8 m × 2 m

  • one window with a surface of 2 m2

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Testing chamber.

The sum of the area of the walls (without the doors and window) is 31.4 m2 and the volume is 30 m3. The loading factor in the model room (or the testing chamber) is calculated by the proportion of the area taken by the product (e.g., walls, ceiling) to the volume of the model room according to Equation (1):

L=PV (1)

where L—loading factor (m2/m3); P—area of intended use of the product (m2); V—volume of the testing chamber (m3).

Depending on the area of intended use of the product, the following loading factor values might be used:

  • 1.0 m2/m3 for the wall emission

  • 0.4 m2/m3 for the floor or ceiling emissions

  • 1.8 m2/m3 for the emission from walls, floor and ceiling

For the emission tests, samples D and E were chosen as the ones with the highest concentration of ammonia to observe if there is an emission of ammonia from mortars. Mortars with 15, 25 and 50% b.m. (binder mass) of fly ash were prepared for the test. The compositions of the tested mortars are given in Table 6.

Table 6.

Composition of mortars for the emission tests.

Sample Cement (g) Fly Ash (g)/Type Water (g) Sand (g)
15% D 382.5 67.5 /D 225 1.350
25% D 337.5 112.5 /D 225 1.350
50% D 225.0 225.0 /D 225 1.350
15% E 382.5 67.5 /E 225 1.350
25% E 337.5 112.5 /E 225 1.350
50% E 225.0 225.0 /E 225 1.350

The surface area of the tested mortar samples was 0.1 m2 and the volume of the chamber was 0.1 m3. The saturation index was 1 m2/m3, which is suitable for the scenario of testing emissions from the walls in the reference room. The emission tests were carried out in the sealed steel laboratory chamber shown in Figure 2, which fulfils the requirements of EN 16516 [43].

The scheme of the testing installation is shown in Figure 3.

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Scheme of the testing installation.

Airflow in the chamber was 0.05 m3/h (half of the volume of the chamber per hour). The temperature and humidity were measured during the test and the results are shown in Figure 4.

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Temperature and relevant humidity during the test for ammonia emissions.

In order to sample ammonia, the chamber air outlet channel was connected in parallel with two Dreschel bottles filled with 30 mL of 0.01 M H2SO4 solution, where the gaseous NH3 was absorbed. The sample was collected at a rate of 500 mL/min for 2 h using a GilAir Plus pump (Gilian, St. Petersburg, FL, USA)

The concentration of ammonia in the solution was analysed using a Metrohm 930 Compact IC Flex ion chromatograph equipped with a conductometry detector (Metrohm AG, Herisau, Switzerland). The chromatograph was equipped with a precolumn Metrosep C4 Guard/4.0 (length 5 mm and diameter 4 mm) and a Metrosep C6 column (length 150 mm and diameter 4 mm) filled with silica gel with carboxylic groups (particle size 5 μm). The eluent used for analysis was a 1.7 mmol/L nitric acid and 1.7 mmol/L dipicolinic acid. The eluent flow during the analysis was 0.9 mL/min, the temperature was 25 °C and the pressure of the eluent was 6.87 MPa. The volume of injection was 20 µL and the duration of analysis was 25 min. The concentration of ammonia in each of the Dreschel bottles was summarised and the concentration in the chamber air was calculated. The emission tests were carried for 28 days.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Loss on Ignition, Fineness and Water Requirement

Table 7 presents the average values of loss on ignition, fineness and water demand of fly ashes.

Table 7.

Physical characteristics of fly ashes.

Sample Loss on Ignition (%) Fineness (%) Water Demand (%)
REF 1.43 34.2 99
A 4.02 36.2 101
B 4.47 32.2 101
C 2.43 29.6 100
D 3.36 26.4 100
E 3.47 25.8 100

The results of tests in Table 7 show that the REF fly ash exhibits the lowest loss on ignition, which might be related with the modifications of the combustion chamber in the power plant aimed at lowering the amount of generated NOx. This is known to have an effect on different conditions during the burning of coal and lower temperatures. No correlation was found between the ammonium content in fly ash and its loss on ignition.

Fly ashes with lower fineness had the highest concentration of ammonia, which suggests that fly ashes with smaller grains and in fact higher surface might absorb higher amounts of ammonia. The correlation between those parameters was quite low with a coefficient of determination R2 = 0.76, which shows that if fineness determines the ammonia content it is not the only parameter.

The results of water demand of fly ashes show no influence of ammonia content on this parameter. The results of the tests of loss on ignition, fineness and water demand thus show that siliceous fly ash containing up to 400 ppm of ammonia might still be a useful material for concrete production.

3.2. Properties of Fresh Mortar

Table 8 presents the results of tests on the properties of fresh mortar.

Table 8.

Properties of fresh mortar.

Sample Density (kg/m3) Air Content (%) Consistency (mm)
100% CEM I 2.190 5.0 171
25% Ref 2.210 2.5 197
25% A 2.190 3.0 176
25% C 2.200 3.5 209
25% E 2.190 4.0 197
50% Ref 2.180 2.5 221
50% A 2.160 3.5 171
50% C 2.190 3.0 215
50% E 2.130 6.0 213

The density of fresh mortars is related with their air content and the amount of fly ash used in the place of cement due to their different density. The air content in fresh mortar might be affected by the generation of gaseous ammonia, which raises the “air” content, and also by the amount of unburned coal particles, which decreases air content [44,45]. Fly ash with the highest concentration of ammonia from those tested (E) and in the highest amount (50% E) increases the amount of air entered into the mortar, which in effect gives the lowest density of mortar. The results of the tests did not show any straight correlation between the ammonia content in fly ash and the density or air content.

The consistency of fresh mortar is related to factors such as the shape of particles, air content and the fineness of fly ash. There is no straight correlation between the content of ammonia and the consistency of fresh mortar. The lowest value of consistency was shown by the “100% CEM I” sample with no fly ash, while the “50% Ref” sample with the highest amount of fly ash and without ammonia had the highest consistency. These results can be explained by the properties of fly ash, which acts as a plasticising agent [46].

Results of tests on the properties of fresh mortar did not showed any potential risk of using fly ash containing up to 400 ppm of ammonia as an addition to concrete.

3.3. Setting Time

Table 9 presents the results of setting time tests of grouts with compositions described in Table 4. The addition of fly ash to grout increases its setting time, which is as per EN 450-1 [9]. In analysing the results of the performed tests, however, it has been observed that fly ash containing ammonia increases the setting time even more, which is also confirmed in the literature [47].

Table 9.

Setting time of grouts.

Sample Initial Setting Time Final Setting Time
(min) (%) (min) (%)
CEM I 165 100 225 100
25% Ref 185 112 320 142
25% A 215 130 345 153
25% B 230 139 355 158
25% C 230 139 345 153
25% D 305 185 415 184
25% E 255 155 365 162

Figure 5 shows the plots and correlation between the ammonia concentration in fly ash and the initial and final setting times of grouts. The correlation between those parameters sits quite well with the coefficient of determination R2 = 0.91 and 0.83 for the initial and final setting times respectively. According to the EN 450-1 standard [9], the relevant initial setting time for fly ash used for the concrete should not be higher than 200%. Tested fly ash containing up to 400 ppm of ammonia fulfils this requirement, however extrapolating the data from Figure 5, it can be calculated that fly ash containing more than 600 ppm of ammonia will not fulfil this requirement and cannot be used as an additive for concrete.

Figure 5.

Figure 5

Correlation between ammonia content and relevant setting time.

3.4. Compressive Strength, Bending Strength and Pozzolanic Activity

Figure 6 and Figure 7 present the results of compressive and flexural strength tests performed on mortars with the composition given in Table 5 after 28, 90 and 180 days of curing.

Figure 6.

Figure 6

Compressive strength of mortars.

Figure 7.

Figure 7

Flexural strength of mortars.

The compressive and flexural strength of mortars containing 25% and 50% of fly ash after 28 days of curing was lower than the reference sample without fly ash. After 90 days of curing, all samples containing 25% of fly ash almost reached the values of compressive strength obtained by the reference sample, which is also shown in Figure 8, where the activity index almost reaches the value of 100%. The flexural strength of mortars containing 25% of fly ash after 90 days of curing is from 2% to 9% higher than the reference values. After 180 days of curing, compressive and flexural strength increases for an additional 10%. Mortars containing 50% of fly ash did not reach the strength of the reference sample even after 180 days of curing.

Figure 8.

Figure 8

Activity index of fly ash.

Analysing the results of compressive and flexural strength, there was no influence between those parameters and the concentration of ammonia in fly ash. Although Fawzi and Kareem [48] have recorded that adding 1% of ammonia to the water decreases the compressive strength and increases the flexural strength of concrete, the concentration of ammonia in their tests was much higher.

Figure 8 presents the activity index of fly ash, which is the relative compressive strength of mortars containing 25% of fly ash to the reference mortar without fly ash. The EN 450-1 standard [9] requires the activity index after 28 days to be not less than 75% and after 90 days not less than 85%. All samples, even those containing fly ash with 400 ppm of ammonia, fulfil these requirements. The influence of ammonia on the activity index was not observed compared to the reference fly ash without ammonia.

3.5. Emission of Ammonia from Mortars

Figure 9 and Figure 10 present the results of emission of ammonia from mortars containing different amounts of fly ash, D and E, respectively. The composition of the tested mortars is given in Table 6.

Figure 9.

Figure 9

Emission of ammonia from mortars—sample D.

Figure 10.

Figure 10

Emission of ammonia from mortars—sample E.

The initial emissions from the samples of mortars containing 50% of fly ash reaches 21,000 and 13,000 µg/m3 for fly ash samples D and E, respectively. The concentration of ammonia in air falls over time and after about two weeks all registered values are at a level of about 300 µg/m3. After 28 days, when most of the concretes reach their declared parameters, the emission of ammonia from the tested mortars was negligible, even for those containing 50% b.m. of fly ash with 400 ppm of ammonia. Comparison of received levels of emission with literature data [17,22,30,49] is rather difficult due to different compositions of tested mortars/concretes, different initial amount of ammonia in composites and also different ways of measure the emission of ammonia. In our work we have tested the emission according to European standards but other researchers have performed their tests mostly according to their own procedures. The shape of our ammonia emission curves are similar to those of Shou et. al. [17] who observed that there is very high emission of ammonia during first days and a few days later the emissions rapidly fall. The emission of ammonia might be also related to the humidity. According to Figure 4 the highest emission are registered when the relative humidity is close to 90% and when humidity falls under 70% also the emission falls. This theory however needs to be proven in further experiments.

The requirements of the US Department of Health and Human Services [22,23] (less than 1 mg/m3) are fulfilled after 7 days for samples with 15% and 25% of fly ash, and after about 13 days for samples with 50% of fly ash. When the concentration is above 5 ppm an ammonia odour can be detected [26], which for samples 50% D and 50% E means a period of about one week. The most restrictive requirement stated in Polish national law [28] (300 or 100 µg/m3) might be fulfilled after 14–21 days.

4. Conclusions

After analysing the results of the performed tests, the following conclusions can be drawn:

  • no correlation between the ammonia content and loss on ignition and the fineness of fly ash was found

  • no significant effect of ammonia on mortar density and consistency was found

  • no significant effect of ammonia on compressive strength and pozzolanic activity was found

  • no significant influence of ammonia on water requirement was found

  • intense release of ammonia gas was observed when the ash came into contact with a strongly alkaline cement grout, which might also cause the observed increase of the air content in fresh mortar

  • ammonia in fly ash increases the initial and final setting times of the grouts within the limits permitted by the PN-EN 450-1 standard [1]. It was estimated, however, that ash containing more than 600 ppm of ammonia might extend the initial setting time not fulfilling the requirements of the standard

  • ammonia present in the tested fly ash significantly affects the emission of this gas from mortars. It was observed that the amount of ammonia emission increases with the increase of ammonia concentration in the ash and the amount of added ash to the mortar. After 28 days, however, when the cement composites reach their declared parameters, the emission of ammonia is negligible

In answer to the question posed at the beginning of this paper, namely is siliceous fly ash containing up to 400 ppm of ammonia still a useful and safe material for concrete production, all tested fly ashes fulfilled the crucial requirements of the EN 450-1 standard [9], which means that they might be used as a concrete additive. After a period of 28 days, the emission of ammonia is very low and it is safe to use those composites. Special care, however, needs to be taken during the process of mixing and casting, and the initial days of curing the cement composites with ammonia fly ashes due to the emissions of harmful ammonia.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, F.C., A.G. and A.M.; methodology, F.C., A.G. and A.M.; formal analysis, F.C.; investigation, F.C., A.G. and A.M.; resources, F.C., A.G. and A.M.; writing—original draft preparation, F.C., A.G. and A.M.; writing—review and editing, F.C.; visualization, F.C.; supervision, F.C.; project administration, F.C. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Data sharing not applicable. No new data were created or analyzed in this study.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Footnotes

Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

References

  • 1.Hill R.L., Folliard K.J. The Impact of Fly Ash on Air-Entrained Concrete. Concr. InFocus. 2006;5:71–72. [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Czarnecki L., Garbacz A., Sokołowska J.J. Fly Ash Polymer Concretes; Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Sustainable Construction Materials and Technologies; Ancona, Italy. 28 June 2010; pp. 127–138. [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Giergiczny Z. Fly ash and slag. Cem. Concr. Res. 2019;124:105826. doi: 10.1016/j.cemconres.2019.105826. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Czarnecki L., Woyciechowski P., Adamczewski G. Risk of concrete carbonation with mineral industrial by-products. KSCE J. Civ. Eng. 2017;22:755–764. doi: 10.1007/s12205-017-1623-5. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Karim M.R., Hossain M., Khan M.N.N., Zain M.F.M., Jamil M., Lai F.C. On the utilization of pozzolanic wastes as an alternative resource of cement. Materials. 2014;7:7809–7827. doi: 10.3390/ma7127809. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Chyliński F., Bobrowicz J., Łukowski P. Undissolved Ilmenite Mud from TiO2 Production—Waste or a Valuable Addition to Portland Cement Composites? Materials. 2020;13:3555. doi: 10.3390/ma13163555. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Harasymiuk J., Rudziński A. Old Dumped Fly Ash as a Sand Replacement in Cement Composites. Buildings. 2020;10:67. doi: 10.3390/buildings10040067. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.The European Parliament and the Council of the European Union . EN 197-1:2012 Cement—Part 1: Composition, Specifications and Conformity Criteria for Common Cements. European Committee for Standardization; Brussels, Belgium: 2012. [Google Scholar]
  • 9.The European Parliament and the Council of the European Union . EN 450-1:2012 Fly Ash for concrete—Part 1: Definition, Specifications and Conformity Criteria. European Committee for Standardization; Brussels, Belgium: 2012. [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Paul S.C., van Rooyen A.S., van Zijl G.P.A.G., Petrik L.F. Properties of cement-based composites using nanoparticles: A comprehensive review. Constr. Build. Mater. 2018;189:1019–1034. doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.09.062. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.ASTM International . ASTM C618-19 Standard Specification for Coal Fly Ash and Raw or Calcined Natural Pozzolan for Use in Concrete. ASTM International; West Conshohocken, PA, USA: 2019. [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Kołodyńska D., Franus W. Chitosan-zeolite composites obtained from fly ashes for heavy metal ions removal. Miner. Energy Econ. Res. Inst. Polish Acad. Sci. 2016;95:145–156. [Google Scholar]
  • 13.European Parliament and Council Directive . 2010/75/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 24 November 2010 on Industrial Emissions (Integrated Pollution Prevention and Control) Text with EEA Relevance. European Parliament and Council; Brussels, Belgium: 2010. [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Liu Y., Zhao J., Lee J.-M. Conventional and New Materials for Selective Catalytic Reduction (SCR) of NOx. Chem. Cat. Chem. 2018;10:1499–1511. doi: 10.1002/cctc.201701414. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Zhang X., lv S. Low-Temperature Selective Catalytic Reduction of NO with NH3 over Manganese Oxides Supported on Fly Ash-Palygorskite. J. Thermodyn. Catal. 2015;6:3. doi: 10.4172/2157-7544.1000153. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Bittner J., Gasiorowski S., Hrach F. Removing Ammonia from Fly Ash. Int. Ash Util. Symp. 2001;781:12–14. [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Ling Q., Xiaojian G., Qiyan L. Influences of coal fly ash containing ammonium salts on properties of cement paste. J. Environ. Manag. 2019;249:109374. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.109374. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Michalik A., Babińska J., Chyliński F., Piekarczuk A. Ammonia in fly ashes from flue gas denitrification process and its impact on the properties of cement composites. Buildings. 2019;9:225. doi: 10.3390/buildings9110225. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Mazur M., Janda T., Żukowski W. Chemical and thermal methods for removing ammonia from fly ashes. Czas. Tech. 2017;6:31–50. doi: 10.4467/2353737xct.17.085.6561. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Brendel J.G.F., Bonetti J.E., Rathbone R.F., Frey R.N. Investigation of Ammonia Adsorption on Fly Ash due to Instalation of Celective Catalytic Reduction System. West Virginia University Research Corporation; Pittsburg, PA, USA: Nov 1, 2000. Technical Report. [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Maj I., Kalisz S., Gądek W. Ammonia desorption from fly ash. E3S Web Conf. 2019;82:01012. doi: 10.1051/e3sconf/20198201012. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Jang H., So H., So S. Emission characteristic of ammonia in cement mortars using different sand from area of production. Environ. Eng. Res. 2016;21:241–246. doi: 10.4491/eer.2015.136. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.ATSDR . Toxicological Profile for Ammonia. Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry, ATSDR; Atlanta, GA, USA: 2004. pp. 15–16. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.U.S. National Agency . Occupational Safety and Health Guidelines. National Institute of Occupational Safety and Health; Washington, DC, USA: 1992. Occupational Safety and Health Guideline for Ammonia; pp. 1–7. [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Health and Safety Executive . EH40 Workplace Exposure Limits. Health and Safety Executive; Norwich, UK: 2011. [Google Scholar]
  • 26.U.S. Environmental Protection Agency . EPA Air Pollution Cost Manual—EPA Document. United States Environmental Protection Agency Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards; Washington, DC, USA: 2002. EPA/452/B-02-001. [Google Scholar]
  • 27.M1 Classification of Indoor Environment 2018 and Updated Criteria of RTS Environmental Classification. [(accessed on 31 December 2020)];2019 Sep; Available online: http://cer.rts.fi/en/m1-emission-class-for-building-material/m1-criteria-2/
  • 28.Proposal for a Regulation of the Minister of Health on the Permissible Concentrations and Intensities of Factors Harmful to Health Emitted by Building Materials, Devices and Equipment in Rooms Intended for Human Residence, [(accessed on 31 December 2020)];2020 Available online: http://legislacja.gov.pl/projekt/12339600/katalog/12731109#12731109. (In Polish)
  • 29.The European Parliament and the Council of the European Union . Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 18 December 2006 Concerning the Registration, Evaluation, Authorisation and Restriction of Chemicals (REACH), Establishing a European Chemicals Agency, Amending Directive 1999/45. European Parliament and Council; Brussels, Belgium: 2020. [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Bai Z., Dong Y., Wang Z., Zhu T. Emission of ammonia from indoor concrete wall and assessment of human exposure. Environ. Int. 2006;32:303–311. doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2005.06.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Shou L., Hayes J., Cheng W., Wu C.-Y., Townsend T., Vinson T., Schert J. Characterization of ammonia gas release from concrete added with ammoniated fly ash. Air Qual. Atmos. Heal. 2014;7:505–513. doi: 10.1007/s11869-014-0251-1. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Bentur A., Larianovsky P. Use of Ammonia Containing Fly Ash in Concrete. Isr. Natl. Coal Ash Board. 2016;11:2001–2002. [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Polish Committee for Standardization . EN 12457-4:2003 Characterisation of Waste—Leaching. Compliance Test for Leaching of Granular Waste Materials and Sludges—Part 4: One Stage Batch Test at a Liquid to Solid Ratio of 10 L/kg for Materials with Particle Size below 10 mm (without or with Limited Size Reduction); Polish Committee for Standardization; Warsaw, Poland: 2003. [Google Scholar]
  • 34.European Committee for Standardization . EN 196-2:2013-11 Method of Testing Cement—Part 2: Chemical Analysis of Cement. European Committee for Standardization; Brussels, Belgium: 2013. [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Polish Committee for Standardization . EN 451-2:2017 Method of Testing Fly Ash—Part 2: Determination of Fineness by Wet Sieving. Polish Committee for Standardization; Warsaw, Poland: 2017. [Google Scholar]
  • 36.European Committee for Standardization . EN 1015-7:1998 Methods of Test for Mortar for Masonry—Part 7: Determination of Air Content of Fresh Mortar. European Committee for Standardization; Brussels, Belgium: 1998. [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Polski Komitet Normalizacyjny . PN-EN 1015-7:2000 Methods of Test for Mortar for Masonry—Part 7: Determination of Air Content of Fresh Mortar. European Committee for Standardization; Brussels, Belgium: 2000. [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Polish Committee for Standardization . EN 1015-6:1998/A1:2006 Methods of Test for Mortar for Masonry—Part 6: Determination of Bulk Density of Fresh Mortar. Polish Committee for Standardization; Warsaw, Poland: 2006. [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Polish Committee for Standardization . EN 1015-3:1999 Methods of Test for Mortar for Masonry—Part 3: Determination of Consistence of Fresh Mortar (by Flow Table) Polish Committee for Standardization; Warsaw, Poland: 1999. [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Polish Committee for Standardization . EN 196-3:2016 Methods of Testing Cement—Part 3: Determination of Setting Times and Soundness. Polish Committee for Standardization; Warsaw, Poland: 2016. [Google Scholar]
  • 41.European Committee for Standardization . EN 196-1:2016-07 Methods of testing cement—Part 1: Determination of Strength. European Committee for Standardization; Brussels, Belgium: 2016. [Google Scholar]
  • 42.European Committee for Standardization . EN 206+A1:2016-12 Concrete—Specification, Performance, Production and Conformity. European Committee for Standardization; Brussels, Belgium: 2016. [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Polish Committee for Standardization . EN 16516:2017 Construction Products: Assessment of Release of Dangerous Substances—Determination of Emissions into Indoor Air. Polish Committee for Standardization; Warsaw, Poland: 2017. [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Jolicoeur C., To T.C., Benoît É., Hill R., Zhang Z., Pagé M. Fly ash-carbon effects on concrete air entrainment: Fundamental studies on their origin and chemical mitigation; Proceedings of the 2009 World of Coal Ash (WOCA) Conference; Lexington, KY, USA. 4–7 May 2009; pp. 1–23. [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Chyliński F., Kuczyński K., Łukowski P. Application of Ilmenite Mud Waste as an Addition to Concrete. Materials. 2020;13:866. doi: 10.3390/ma13040866. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Neville A.M., Brooks J.J. Concrete Technology. 2nd ed. Pearson Education Ltd.; Harlow, UK: 2010. [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Kim J.K., Cho S.D., Lee H.D., Kim S.C. Effect of ammonia concentration on the utilization of AGFA (Ammonia Contaminated Fly Ash) as an additive in mortar and concrete mixture. J. Ind. Eng. Chem. 2007;13:932–938. [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Fawzi N.M., Kareem S.L. Effect of incorporating ammonia solution on Some Mechanical Properties of Concrete; Proceedings of the International Culture, Art & Islamic Architecture Conference; Kish Island, Iran. 30 September 2016. [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Tyra M., Robl T., Drive P. Research in Ammonia Diffusivity in Portland Cement Based Mixes; Proceedings of the 2001 International Ash Utilization Symposium; Kentucky, KY, USA. 5 May 2001. [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

Data sharing not applicable. No new data were created or analyzed in this study.


Articles from Materials are provided here courtesy of Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (MDPI)

RESOURCES