Abstract
Leucokinins (LKs) constitute a neuropeptide family first discovered in a cockroach and later identified in numerous insects and several other invertebrates. The LK receptors are only distantly related to other known receptors. Among insects, there are many examples of species where genes encoding LKs and their receptors are absent. Furthermore, genomics has revealed that LK signaling is lacking in several of the invertebrate phyla and in vertebrates. In insects, the number and complexity of LK-expressing neurons vary, from the simple pattern in the Drosophila larva where the entire CNS has 20 neurons of 3 main types, to cockroaches with about 250 neurons of many different types. Common to all studied insects is the presence or 1–3 pairs of LK-expressing neurosecretory cells in each abdominal neuromere of the ventral nerve cord, that, at least in some insects, regulate secretion in Malpighian tubules. This review summarizes the diverse functional roles of LK signaling in insects, as well as other arthropods and mollusks. These functions include regulation of ion and water homeostasis, feeding, sleep–metabolism interactions, state-dependent memory formation, as well as modulation of gustatory sensitivity and nociception. Other functions are implied by the neuronal distribution of LK, but remain to be investigated.
Keywords: diuretic hormone, behavior, sleep, feeding, neuromodulation, neurohormone
1. Introduction
Neuropeptide signaling regulates major aspects of development, growth, reproduction, physiology, and behavior of animals. A large number of structurally diverse peptides have been identified that act on different types of receptors as co-transmitters, neuromodulators, and hormones [1,2,3,4,5,6]. In insects, one of the peptides that has attracted substantial attention recently is leucokinin (LK), although it was discovered in a cockroach more than 30 years ago [7]. We thus decided that it is timely to review what we know about LK signaling in insects and other invertebrates.
Like many other well-known insect neuropeptides, LKs were first identified from extract of the head of the Madeira cockroach Leucophaea maderae (now Rhyparobia maderae) by assaying purified fractions for their activity on hindgut contractions of this animal (see [7,8,9]). Altogether, eight LKs (sequence-related paracopies) were identified in L. maderae, which share the C-terminus pentapeptide FXSWGamide [7,10]. Apart from stimulatory action on muscles, another early function assigned to LKs was a role as a diuretic factor that increases secretion in the Malpighian (renal) tubules of various insects [11,12,13,14]. As we shall see in later sections, we now know that LKs have truly pleiotropic functions as neuromodulators and hormones in insect development, physiology, and behavior.
In earlier studies, these peptides were named kinins with a species prefix, such as achetakinins, muscakinins, and lymnokinins, and only later the original name leucokinin was adopted more generally for peptides with the generic C-terminus pentapeptide. Thus, we will use LK here, except when some species-specific aspect is discussed and a species-specific name has been assigned. Early on, it was suggested that the LKs are ancestrally related to the vertebrate tachykinins due to some rather minor amino acid sequence similarities (see, e.g., [7]). Now, with the aid of increased amounts of sequence data and improved bioinformatics tools, we know that LKs and their receptors, LK receptors (LKRs), are not ancestrally related to the tachykinins and their receptors [3,15,16]. In fact, it seems that the LKs and LKRs have no vertebrate orthologs, but they are, with some notable exceptions, present widely among studied arthropods and occur in tardigrades, annelids, and mollusks.
In insects, the genes encoding precursors of LKs can generate varying numbers of isoforms, or paracopies, of LK peptides. Hence, there are from one paracopy in, e.g., Drosophila [17,18,19] to 17 in Periplaneta americana [20] or even 26 in the western flower thrips, Frankliniella occidentalis [21]. The largest number of paracopies was identified in the sea slug Aplysia, wherein the LK precursor may give rise to 60 peptides, of which more than 30 are amidated LKs [22]. The first LK receptor (LKR), a G-protein-coupled receptor (GPCR), was identified in the snail Lymnaea stagnalis [23]. Later, a cattle tick LKR [24] and a Drosophila LKR were characterized [25].
Using antisera to LK-I of L. maderae, researchers showed that this peptide is produced by sets of neurons in the cockroach and blowfly brains [26]. Next, it was found that segmentally repeated LK-expressing neurons in abdominal neuromeres of the ventral nerve cord (VNC) are conserved throughout insect species studied [27,28,29,30,31]. These are neurosecretory cells, usually two pairs in each neuromere, with axon terminations associated with peripheral nerves, neurohemal organs, or the body wall of the abdomen. It was suggested that these cells release LK as a circulating hormone that acts on the renal tubules and visceral muscle [27,32]. In contrast to the conserved neuronal expression of LK in neurons of abdominal neuromeres, the brain neurons producing LK are highly variable in numbers and types in different insect species (see [27,28,30,31,33,34]). Thus, one could expect inter-species differences in the complexity of LK signaling in neuronal circuits. Finally, LKs are colocalized with other neuropeptides in some neuronal systems, increasing the plasticity in neuromodulation, also in a species-specific fashion.
This review summarizes different aspects of LK and LKR sequences, distribution, and function in insects. We also highlight LK signaling in other invertebrates, including mollusks, annelids, ticks, and crustaceans and discuss the potential of LKs with reference to peptide analogs in control of pest insects.
2. Leucokinins and Their Receptors in Invertebrates
2.1. Discovery of Leucokinins and Their Receptors—a Brief History
After their discovery in L. maderae in 1986 [7], LKs have been detected in numerous bilaterian invertebrates, but thus far there is no record of related peptides in vertebrates [3,15,35]. Between 1987 and 1999, biochemical identification of LKs from tissue extracts was performed for the locust Locusta migratoria [36], cricket Acheta domesticus [37], mosquitos (Aedes aegypti and Culex salinarius) [38,39], housefly Musca domestica [40], the moth Helicoverpa zea [41], and the vinegar fly Drosophila melanogaster [17], as well as the snail Lymnaea stagnalis [23].
Early on, immunohistochemistry demonstrated that LKs are produced by both neurons and neurosecretory cells in the brain of L. maderae [26]. Next, an analysis of LK distribution in the entire L. maderae CNS revealed morphological details of the numerous brain neurons, as well as two pairs of neurosecretory cells in each of the abdominal ganglia [27]. Similar pairs of abdominal LK neurons have been detected in all insects investigated, whereas brain neurons display variations in number and structure [28,29,30,31]. During the mid-1990s immunohistochemistry furthermore suggested presence of LK-like peptides in the spider Cupiennius salei [42], the snails Helix pomatia and L. stagnalis [43,44], and the nematode Ascaris suum [45].
The first identification of a gene encoding an LK precursor was derived from analysis of cDNA from the mosquito A. aegypti [46], and the first LK receptor was identified and characterized in the snail L. stagnalis [23]. Thus, by 1997, it was clear that LKs are encoded by a typical peptide precursor and act on a G-protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) of a new subfamily. Later, an LKR was identified and characterized from a cattle tick [24]. Bioinformatics indicated that this tick LK receptor is related to CG10626 in the Drosophila genome [47] and a gene encoding a precursor with a single Drosophila LK (CG13480) was subsequently identified [18,19]. The Drosophila LKR (CG10626) was finally characterized by means of an in vitro cell expression system [25].
Today, as we shall see in the following sections, LK encoding genes, LK peptides, and their receptors have been identified in multiple organisms from a few different invertebrate phyla. Interestingly, there are quite a few examples of invertebrates that do not seem to possess components of the LK signaling pathway, even among insects. Sequences of LKs from numerous insect species can be gleaned in the DINeR database (http://www.neurostresspep.eu/diner/infosearch, see [48]). This database has 299 sequence entries for LKs from analysis of 86 different insect species, and 50 entries for LK functions in several of these insects. The details of LK occurrence are discussed later.
Early studies demonstrated that LKs stimulate contractions in visceral muscle of the cockroach [9,10,36,49], and that they act in vitro on Malpighian (renal) tubules of several insect species to induce secretion [11,12,13,14,40,50]. Moreover, in Drosophila, LK has potent diuretic activity [17,25]. Immunocytochemical localization of LKs in the CNS of insects such as cockroaches and locusts suggests further modulatory roles in interneuronal systems in the antennal lobe, central complex, biological clock circuits, visual system, as well as hormonal roles by means of neurosecretory cells in the brain and abdominal ganglia [26,27,30,34]. In these insects, many of the LK neurons have bilateral arborizations supplying neuropils in both brain hemispheres. About 140 LK immunolabeled neurons were detected in the locust brain and 160 in that of the cockroach [27,34]. In contrast, there are only two pairs of distinct LK neurons in the Drosophila brain and each of these neurons is restricted to one hemisphere [28,33]. It is, however, possible that an additional four pairs of neurosecretory cells (designated anterior LK neurons, ALKs) in the brain express low levels of LK (see [33,51]). We discuss the distribution of LK, LKR, and their function in more detail in later sections.
2.2. Leucokinins and Their Receptors in Insects and Other Invertebrates—a Comparison between Taxa
Today, there is a wealth of information on LKs and LKRs in invertebrates. In Figure 1, we show amino acid sequences of LKs of some representative invertebrates, including arthropods, a tardigrade, annelids, and mollusks. These LKs are C-terminally amidated and vary in length between 6 and 21 amino acids in common model insects. However, there seem to be some LKs that are even longer (see DINeR database). In insects, the LKs are characterized by an FXSWGamide or FXPWGamide C-terminus, and in other invertebrates FX1X2WX3amide, where X3 is S, A, or G. The organization of LK precursors (prepro-LK) display substantial variation, with some (e.g., in Drosophila) producing only a single copy of an LK and others multiple copies, for example, 12 in the kissing bug Rhodnius prolixus, 26 in the western flower thrips Frankliniella occidentalis, and 27 in the bristletail Meinertellus cundinamarcensis [17,21,52,53] (Figure 2). Although LKs were first identified in the cockroach L. maderae, there is, to our knowledge, no information about the organization of the LK precursor of this species. However, the LK precursor of Periplaneta americana has been described [20] (Figure 2 and Figure S1). Interestingly, this precursor can give rise to 17 LK paracopies, but only three of these are identical to LKs of L. maderae (Figure S1).
Outside arthropods, multiple LK paracopies are also known. In the annelid worm Urechis unicinctus, eight paracopies of LKs have been identified [56], and the largest number of LKs was found in the LK precursor of the marine slug Aplysia californica with 30 (Figure 3) [22]. In some species, such as Frankliniella, Rhodnius, the bed bug Cimex lectularius, and Aplysia, the prepro-LK can give rise to additional non-LK peptides, resulting in a total of about 60 peptides in Aplysia [21,22,52,57]. Of note is that, to our knowledge, none of these non-LK peptides have been studied further in any organism (and very few have been verified by mass spectrometry). There are few cases of a species having more than one LK precursor; one is the squid Sepia officinalis with two prepro-LKs [58] (Figure 3).
A striking feature is that in many invertebrate species whose genomes have been sequenced, LK precursors have not been found. Actually, to our knowledge, only arthropods, tardigrades, annelids, and mollusks have thus far been shown to produce LK precursors. Even among insects, not all species have LKs. For instance, in the order Coleoptera (beetles), 34 species have been analyzed, and only in four, Pogonus chalceus, Gyrinus marinus, Carabus violaceus, and Carabus problematicus (all in suborder Adephaga), LK precursors were found [60,61,62]. Thus, no LK precursor was detected in the “model Coleopteran” Tribolium castaneum. LK precursors and receptors are missing also in, for example, some parasitic wasps (e.g., Nasonia vitripennis), but not in all [63,64], and were not found in any ant species analyzed to date [65,66,67]. An LK precursor is also missing in the phyllopod crustacean Daphnia [68], although they are present in decapod crustaceans (see [69]). It can be noted that an LK-like peptide sequence (Nlp43: KQFYAWAamide) has been identified in nematodes such as C. elegans [70] (see Figure 1), but it is not derived from a canonical LK precursor and no LKR could be found [3,15]. Furthermore, LK signaling components are not found in cnidarians (see [71,72]) or flatworms (Platyhelminthes) [73]. In lower bilaterians, such as species of Xenoturbella and Nemertodermatid worms (both phylum Xenacoelomorpha), orthologs of LK-type receptors were detected by bioinformatics, but no LK peptides [74]. Finally, in some species, such as honey bees, LK precursors have been identified that could generate three LKs, but the cleaved peptide products could not be detected by mass spectrometry [65]. However, since orthologs of LKRs have been identified in five sequenced bee genomes, it is likely that LK signaling is present in these hymenopterans, but not in ants [65,75]. In support of the importance of LK signaling in honeybees, a recent paper showed that the lkr gene influences labor division in foraging for pollen and nectar in the Asian honeybee (Apis cerana) [76].
As noted above, the LKRs identified seem to have no vertebrate orthologs and are found only in the invertebrate species where LK precursors have been detected (Figure 4), possibly with the exception of Xenacoelomorphs mentioned above. Only a few LKRs have been characterized by ligand activation (Figure 4). Thus, LK signaling is not universally present among invertebrates, in contrast to several other more widespread neuropeptides, such as adipokinetic hormone (AKH)/GnRH, neuropeptide F, and insulin-like peptides (see [1,2,3,15]), and this begs the question as to whether some other neuropeptide system has taken over LK functions. It is also interesting to note the large differences in number of paracopies in the different LK precursors, ranging from 1 to about 30.
3. LK Expression Is in Diverse Types of Neurons in the Cockroach L. maderae (R. maderae)
The distribution of a given neuropeptide in neurons and other cells can provide some initial hints as to whether its functions are diverse or not. Thus, some peptides are present in very small sets of uniform neurons (e.g., SIFamide or eclosion hormone), suggesting few and/or orchestrating functions, and others in large populations of diverse types (such as short neuropeptide F (sNPF) and tachykinins), indicating multiple diverse functions [1,77]. Functional analysis has verified that some neuropeptides are utilized by neurons (and/or other cells) to globally orchestrate development, physiology, or behavior, and others play multiple distributed roles that are more localized and circuit-specific [1,77]. The latter type of peptide action may be in the form of cotransmission, together with other neurotransmitters or neuromodulators [78,79,80]. Therefore, what does the distribution of LKs in different insects tell us about their functions?
The distribution of LKs was first analyzed in L. maderae, using antisera to LK-I that recognized the eight isoforms known at the time [26,27,32]. In this cockroach, the number and diversity in cell types expressing LKs is large, suggesting a wide range of functions for this set of peptides (Figure 5A–C). Thus, we used these old LK immunohistochemical data to illustrate a peptidergic system quite different from that in Drosophila (see Figure 5D) and some other insects, such as locusts (Figure 6A).
There are about 160 LK neurons with cell bodies in the protocerebrum of the brain (Figure 5A), some in bilateral clusters and others occurring in bilateral pairs distributed in different regions [27]. No cell bodies were detected in deuto- and tritocerebrum, and only a small set of weakly immunoreactive neurons were detected in the fused subesophageal ganglion. In each of the two lateral neurosecretory cell (LNC) groups there were six LK cells, and in the median neurosecretory cell group (MNC), about 100 were found (Figure 5A). Both the LNCs and MNCs send LK-immunolabeled axons to the neurohemal area of the corpora cardiaca, suggesting that the LKs can be released as hormones into the circulation. Radioimmunoassay analysis of HPLC-separated corpora cardiaca extracts suggested that all eight LKs known at the time are present in this tissue [32]. Furthermore, it was indeed shown by radioimmunoassay (RIA) that release of LKs can be triggered in vitro from the corpora cardiaca of both cockroach [88] and cricket [89]. Furthermore, in the bug Rhodnius, RIA of hemolymph demonstrated both LK and diuretic hormone (DH44) release after feeding, suggesting a postprandial hormonal role of LK [90].
In contrast to Drosophila where one pair of LK interneurons is seen in the brain and one pair in the subesophageal zone (SEZ) (Figure 5D), the cockroach brain has a complex set of interneurons (Figure 5A–C). Different LK neurons, originating in the protocerebrum, send processes to the central body; optic lobe (medulla and lobula); antennal lobes; and to various neuropil regions in the proto-, deuto-, and tritocerebrum. Two pairs of large LK-immunoreactive descending neurons (DNs) send axons throughout the ventral nerve cord, finally ending in the terminal abdominal ganglion. These pairs of DNs have collateral arborizations ipsilaterally in most of the glomeruli of the antennal lobe and posterior deutocerebrum (Figure 5A,B). A small set of branches from the DNs innervates the calyces of the mushroom bodies [81] (Figure 5B). The group of LK neurons associated with the medulla [27] has been described in more detail as part of the accessory medulla complex that is a pacemaker region of the circadian clock [91,92,93]. Some of these LK neurons colocalize pigment-dispersing factor (PDF), which is one of the major neuromodulators of the clock in L. maderae and Drosophila [91,93,94].
Similar to Drosophila and other studied insects, each abdominal ganglion has sets of neurosecretory cells (ABLKs; abdominal ganglion LK neurons) expressing LK. However, instead of one pair of ABLKs in each ganglion/neuromere, as seen in Drosophila and some other dipteran flies [28], L. maderae has two pairs [27]. Two pairs of ABLKs are also seen in, e.g., crickets, crane flies, moths, and mosquitos, whereas there are three pairs in the first four abdominal ganglia of locusts and two in the following ganglia (Figure 6B) and up to 10 pairs per ganglion in dragonflies [29,30,95,96]. In cockroaches and locusts, these ABLKs send varicose axons to the lateral heart nerves and transverse nerves, where neurohemal areas (perivisceral organs) are formed; moreover, spiracles receive LK axon terminations [27,30,97]. Although LK was originally isolated by means of its activity on hindgut contractions, no LK innervation of this tissue was detected [27], suggesting that this myotropic action is mediated by hormonal LK. Another difference to Drosophila is that the cockroach thoracic ganglia each have at least two pairs of LK-expressing interneurons that arborize widely in the lateral portions of the ganglia [27,30].
As in Drosophila, there are no LK expressing enteroendocrine cells (EECs) in the L. maderae intestine. However, there are bi- or multipolar LK neurons in the posterior midgut with ascending axons running via the esophageal nerve to end with arborizations in the frontal ganglion and tritocerebrum [27]. These might be proprioceptive cells that signal gut distension to the frontal ganglion and other feeding circuits. Additionally, LK-immunoreactive axons from the retrocerebral complex (in particular the frontal and hypocerebral ganglia) were found to innervate the pharynx and esophagus [27]. Mapping of LK neurons in the brain of the cockroach Nauphoeta cinerea revealed a similar set of neuron types [30].
Thus, taken together, the cockroach LK neurons are more diverse than those in Drosophila (Figure 5A–D) and seem to underlie distributed functions in different brain/ganglion regions. Such functions may include neuromodulation in the olfactory system, visual system, central complex, mushroom bodies, circadian clock, tritocerebral neuropil, circuits of the thoracic ganglia, and the frontal ganglion (regulation of feeding) [27]. The two pairs of protocerebral descending LK neurons (Figure 5A,B), which span the entire ventral nerve cord, may provide a pathway for linking protocerebral and olfactory systems to regulate ganglionic activity. In addition, there are three types of neurosecretory cells producing LKs, namely, LNCs, MNCs, and the ABLKs, which probably release LKs into the circulation to target peripheral organs such as Malpighian tubules, heart, and visceral muscle. Furthermore, peripheral cells were found in the intestine of L. maderae that may be proprioceptors.
Unfortunately, there are no data on any functions of LKs in cockroaches, except the stimulatory activity on the hindgut muscle in vitro [7,9]. Thus, we can only speculate that LK signaling in the cockroach is functionally more diverse than in Drosophila with its four neurons in the brain/SEZ and 22 ABLKs. The four brain/SEZ neurons of Drosophila (Figure 5D) do not seem to have any obvious analogs in the cockroach brain, but there are three bilateral pairs of L. maderae LK neurons that could play roles similar to the pair of LHLKs (one is labeled LHn in Figure 5A,C). The SELKs are descending neurons in Drosophila with cell bodies and processes in the SEZ [33,51], whereas the cockroach descending neurons originate in the protocerebrum and innervate the antennal lobes on their descent (Figure 5A,B). The LK-expressing LNCs of L. maderae may be analogous to the ALKs of Drosophila (Figure 5D). These Drosophila ALK neurons can be seen in several Lk-Gal4 lines, but only in early larvae do they consistently label with antisera to LK [33,51]. These Drosophila neurons were first described as LNCs expressing ion transport peptide (ITP), a peptide that may act in regulation of thirst and hunger and probably also plays a role in ion transport in the intestine [98,99]. The Drosophila ALKs were also shown to express tachykinins (TKs) and short neuropeptide F (sNPF), and these peptides were found to regulate metabolic and desiccation stress responses [82]. It is not known whether the L. maderae LNCs express further neuropeptides, but possibly their functional roles are similar to those of Drosophila. On the basis of the anatomy and distribution of the cockroach LK neurons, one could speculate that some of the other LK functions determined in Drosophila also apply to L. maderae—roles in the circadian clock output and sleep, in feeding, and in regulation of water and ion homeostasis (see [17,51,100,101,102,103]).
4. Distribution of LK in Other Invertebrates: What Can Comparative Studies Teach Us?
In the previous section, we described the LK neurons of the cockroach L. maderae with some comparative comments on Drosophila, two insects that highlight two extremes in terms of number and diversity of LK neurons. Here, we briefly summarize findings of interest in other invertebrates and discuss coexpression of LK and other peptides.
4.1. LK in Neurons of the Brain of Other Insects
LK distribution has also been described in the brains of several other insects, including the blood-sucking bug Rhodnius prolixus, the locusts Locusta migratoria and Schistocerca gregaria, the cricket Acheta domesticus, and the mosquito Aedes aegypti [30,31,34], which is summarized in Table 1. As an example, we show LK neurons in L. migratoria (Figure 6A), where some interesting features differ from Drosophila and Leucophaea.
Table 1.
Species | CB | AL | OL | LH | TC, SEZ | Clock | DNs | LNC | MNC |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
L. maderae | x | x | x | x | x | x | x | x | x |
L. migratoria | x | x | x | x | x | x | − | − | |
D. melanogaster | − | − | − | x | x | − | x | x 2 | − |
R. prolixus 3 | x | x | x | ||||||
A. domesticus 3 | x | x | x | ||||||
A. aegypti 3 | x | x |
Notes: x, present; −, not present; no annotation, not clear whether present or not (no statement is provided in papers). Acronyms: CB, central body; AL, antennal lobe; OL, optic lobe; LK, lateral horn; TC, tritocerebrum; SEZ subesophageal zone; DNs, descending neurons; LNC, lateral neurosecretory cells; MNC, median neurosecretory cells. 1 The majority of the LK cell bodies are in the protocerebrum and subesophageal zone (SEZ), but processes innervate neuropils in other brain regions. 2 In ALK neurons (LNCs), the LK expression is strong in larvae and weak and variable in adults. 3 The description of distribution of LK neurons and their processes is not detailed.
The distribution of various neuropeptides has been extensively investigated in the locust brain, some in exquisite detail (see [104,105]), whereas the LK distribution has received more superficial attention. In the brain of L. migratoria, about 140 LK immunoreactive neurons were detected [34] (Figure 6A). Their cell bodies are primarily located in the protocerebrum, but about 5–6 pairs were detected in the tritocerebrum. No clear-cut neurosecretory cells were seen in the brain, but LK-expressing interneurons are associated with the optic lobe and the accessory medulla (pacemaker center of the clock), the central body, and antennal lobe [34,105]. As in the L. maderae brain, two pairs of descending LK neurons innervate the antennal lobes on their way to the ventral ganglia in S. gregaria [34,106]. There is an additional pair of larger tritocerebral descending neurons in L. migratoria [34] (Figure 6A). Distinct LK immunolabeled processes can be seen in protocerebral neuropils such as the upper and lower divisions of the central body, the median and lateral accessory lobes of the central complex, and the protocerebral bridge, but not in the mushroom bodies. In the optic lobes, specifically the most basal portion of the lamina, different layers of the medulla (including the accessory medulla) and lobula contain LK fibers. A supply of immunoreactive fibers can also be seen in the glomeruli of the antennal lobe and many of the non-glomerular neuropils of proto-, deuto-, and tritocerebrum contain diffusely arborizing LK fibers.
An interesting finding is that in S. gregaria a set of four SIFamide-expressing neurons in the pars intercerebralis of the brain colocalize LK [83] (see Figure 6A). As in Drosophila, the processes from these SIFamide neurons innervate most neuropil regions of the brain and ventral nerve cord [83,85]. The LK expression in these neurons is weak in adult locusts, but nevertheless suggests that LK may play a role in the signaling of these SIFamide neurons. The homolog SIFamide neurons in Drosophila are known in to orchestrate feeding, sleep, and mating in a nutritional state-dependent fashion [85,107,108]. Another interesting aspect of these SIFamide neurons in the locust is that they are identical to the LK-expressing primary commissure pioneer neurons (PCPs) that lay down an early axonal tract (commissure) in the brain of the locust embryo [83,84]. Since the LK immunolabeling was found stronger in the SIFamide neurons in younger stages than in the adult [84], it is suggestive that LK plays a role of during neuronal development and axonal pathfinding in the brain.
In the brains of the cricket Acheta domesticus and the mosquito Aedes aegypti, the distribution of LK neurons is similar to that in L. maderae, with both LNCs and MNCs and their axon terminations in the corpora cardiaca expressing the peptide, but other interneurons were not described in enough detail for comparisons to be made [30]. The same authors found that there are no LK-immunoreactive neurons in the brain of the honeybee Apis mellifera, but only neurosecretory cells in the abdominal ganglia [30].
Finally, in the brain of the blood-sucking bug Rhodnius prolixus, about 180 pairs of LK-immunoreactive neurons were detected, 30 pairs of which were more strongly labeled [31]. These were later confirmed by in situ hybridization [109]. Processes of LK interneurons were seen widely in brain neuropils. In starved specimens, a set of MNCs and their processes in the corpora cardiaca could be detected with LK antiserum [31], suggesting LK expression is dependent on nutritional state and that this peptide plays a role as a systemic hormone. Injection of a biostable analog of an LK displayed decreased intake of blood in a feeding assay [110]. Furthermore, RIA of hemolymph demonstrated that LK is released after feeding [90]. In R. prolixus, LK does not display diuretic activity in the Malpighian tubules or anterior midgut (in contrast to, e.g., DH44), but it decreases the resistance and transepithelial voltage of the epithelium and also increases the frequency of contractions in the anterior midgut [31,111]. LK also induces contraction in the R. prolixus hindgut [109,110]. R. prolixus is the only insect that has thus far displayed LK-producing enteroendocrine cells in the midgut [31].
4.2. LK in Neurons of the Nervous System of Other Invertebrates
The only phylum outside arthropods where bona fide LK distribution has been described is in mollusks. LK-expressing neurons in mollusks have been mapped for Lymnaea stagnalis, Helix pomatia, and Aplysia californica [22,44,112].
In the snail Helix, about 700 LK immunoreactive neurons were found in the CNS [112]. Buccal, cerebral, and pedal ganglia, as well as the viscero–parietal–pleural ganglion complex, all express LK in numerous neurons. One giant LK neuron was found in the pedal ganglion. Two major groups of LK neurons in the cerebral ganglia send axons into commissures to other ganglia and into several peripheral nerves [112]. Several peripheral tissues such as buccal mass, oviduct and intestinal muscle, and “skeletal” muscle (of foot, lip, and tentacle) are supplied by varicose LK axons. In addition, bipolar LK neurons were found in the intestine and were shown to send axons into the extensive meshwork of LK fibers seen there. Some groups of LK neurons in the cerebral ganglion coexpress tachykinin immunoreactivity [112]. It is not clear whether any of the LK neurons serve as bona fide neurosecretory cells, but it cannot be excluded that the abundant superficial LK axons in peripheral tissues might release LK into the circulation.
In Aplysia, the majority of the LK neurons were found in the buccal ganglion, which is known to house feeding motor neurons and pattern-generating interneurons [22]. LK neurons were also seen in the cerebral ganglion, where higher-order feeding interneurons are located. These authors found that the buccal motor neuron B48 expresses LK and that application of this peptide ex vivo modulated a parameter of the consummatory feeding behavior [22]. One target of LK action is a central pattern generator element that modulates the duration of the protraction phase of feeding responses. Thus, this Aplysia study provides a mechanistic description of LK modulation of food ingestion, something that is lacking thus far for Drosophila and other insects. However, roles of LK in food consumption and post-feeding physiology have been demonstrated in Drosophila [51,103,113] and are suggestive in Rhodnius [31,111].
4.3. Neurosecretory Cells and Hormonal Roles of LK in Invertebrates
One striking conserved feature is that all studied insects have segmental abdominal neurosecretory cells (ABLKs), varying in number between one pair per neuromere in Drosophila (Figure 6C) and blowflies, to up to 10 pairs in dragonflies [28,29,30,31,96]. Commonly insects have two to three pairs per neuromere/ganglion (see [29,30,97]) (Figure 6B). These neurosecretory cells have axon terminations associated with peripheral nerves (including lateral heart nerves), perisympathetic organs, and the body wall muscle of the abdomen. Since these abdominal cells are the only LK-expressing neurosecretory cells in several species studied, it is suggestive that these cells release LK as a circulating hormone. Thus, an important function of LKs is as hormones that act systemically, as diuretic factors, and that they are also likely to regulate gut contractions in some species (see [9,11,36,49,50,75,87,114,115]). As mentioned, LK release has been demonstrated in L. maderae, A. domesticus, and R. prolixus [32,89,90]. In several insect species, including Drosophila, Musca domestica, Manduca sexta, and Rhodnius prolixus, the abdominal LK cells coexpress the neuropeptide DH44 [31,87,116,117]. In Rhodnius, the DH44 stimulates secretion in the Malpighian tubules, whereas LK has no direct action on tubules, but may act elsewhere (e.g., anterior midgut and hindgut) to assist in rapid diuresis [31,110,111]. Both LK and DH44 are released after feeding in Rhodnius [90]. In Drosophila, on the other hand, both DH44 and LK stimulate secretion in the tubules, but by acting on different cell types and with different signal pathways downstream the receptors [17,75,87,118,119].
As mentioned above, some insect species possess additional LK-expressing neurosecretory cells systems in the brain. It is not known whether the cells of the brain and the abdominal ganglia (when both exist) play different functional roles, but it is at least likely that LK release in these cell groups are under control by different central neuronal circuits. It is also possible that in the LNCs other neuropeptides are colocalized with LK, as is the case in the Drosophila ALKs with additional TK, ITP, and sNPF [51,82]. For instance, in M. sexta and L. migratoria, sets of LNCs are known to produce ITP [120,121]. Interestingly, the only insect known that has LK-expressing endocrine cells in the midgut is R. prolixus [31]. Thus, LK is a rare peptide in intestinal signaling, in contrast to many other neuropeptides (see [122,123,124]).
In crustaceans, LKs have not yet been detected in the canonical neurosecretory system, the X-organ/sinus gland of the eyestalks, or in the stomatogastric system [125]. However, in pericardial organs of the crab Cancer borealis, varicose LK immunoreactive axons were detected (probably derived from cell bodies in thoracic ganglia), suggesting that hormonal release of LK is possible [126]. Peptides from the pericardial organs are known to act as circulating hormones on circuits of the crab stomatogastric ganglion, and indeed shrimp LK applied to the ganglion has a distinct modulatory action on the pyloric rhythm of the network [126].
Not all arthropods seem to use LKs as hormones. In the spider Cupiennius salei, no LK-immunolabeled neurosecretory cells were detected, and actually the LK interneurons are not segmentally arranged, but the nine pairs of cell bodies are clustered anteriorly in the supraesophageal ganglion [42]. However, in another arachnoid, the tick Rhipicephalus appendiculatus, four pairs of neurosecretory cells located anteriorly in the prothocerebral lobe produce LK [127]. These cells have arborizing axon terminations in neurohemal areas in the neural sheath surrounding the CNS, and colocalize the neuropeptide myosuppressin.
In mollusks, no bona fide neurosecretory cells producing LK have been described, but in the snail H. pomatia, sets of LK neurons clustered in cerebral ganglia have axons running out in several nerve roots to innervate peripheral tissues [112]. These peripheral varicose axons might release LK into the circulation, but further studies are required to verify this.
Although LK has been demonstrated in annelids, such as Urechis unicinctus and Capitella teleta [56,128], there are, as far as we know, no reports on the cellular localization of the peptide. In the parasitic nematode Ascaris suum, LK immunoreactivity was detected in neurons [45], but no LK precursor gene has been identified in nematodes, and thus it is not clear what endogeneous peptide the antiserum recognized.
4.4. Specific Roles of LK Signaling in Arthropods
Here, we present a brief summary of the diverse functions of LK signaling in arthropods. Most of the recent work has been performed in Drosophila, but we will describe that only very briefly in Section 4.4.5, since a more detailed review on Drosophila will appear elsewhere. In Table 2, we list known functions of LK signaling in different insects and some other invertebrates.
Table 2.
Function | Species | Stage | Reference |
---|---|---|---|
Mediate hunger-regulated nociception | D. melanogaster | Adult | [129] |
Link clock and sleep-regulating neurons | D. melanogaster | Adult | [100] |
Inhibit postprandial sleep | D. melanogaster | Adult | [101] |
Starvation-induced sleep suppression | D. melanogaster | Adult | [102,103] |
Signaling to insulin-producing cells | D. melanogaster | Adult | [51,103] |
Regulation of feeding and metabolism | D. melanogaster | Adult | [51,103] |
State-dependent expression of water- and sugar-seeking memories | D. melanogaster | Adult | [130] |
Modulate food choice | D. melanogaster | Adult | [131] |
Regulation of defensive post-mating response in females | D. melanogaster | Adult | [132] |
Induce secretion in renal tubules | Multiple insects | Adult | (see [50,75,133]) |
Water and ion homeostasis, modulation of desiccation response | D. melanogaster | Adult | [87,134] |
Myostimulatory action (visceral muscle) | Multiple insects | Adult | [9,40] |
Larval locomotion | D. melanogaster | Larva | [135] |
Pre-ecdysis behavior | D. melanogaster | Larva | [136] |
Tracheal clearance at ecdysis | D. melanogaster | Larva | [137] |
Regulation of meal size |
D. melanogaster
A. aegypti R. prolixus |
Adult | [113] [138] [110] |
Modulation of aversive response to bacteria | D. melanogaster | Adult | [139] |
Regulation of starvation-induced hyperactivity | D. melanogaster | Adult | [140] |
Longevity (LK knockdown extends lifespan) | D. melanogaster | Adult | [141] |
Modulation of sugar taste responses |
D. melanogaster
A. aegypti A. cerana 2 |
Adult | [141] [138] |
Cotransmission in SIFamide neurons | S. gregaria | All 1 | [83] |
Cotransmission in PDF clock neurons | L. maderae | Adult | [93] |
Regulation of digestive enzyme release | O. arenosella | Adult | [142] |
Labor division in foraging for nectar/pollen in honeybees | A. cerana | Adult | [76] |
Modulation in stomatogastric ganglion (feeding) | Cancer borealis (crab) | Adult | [143] |
Regulation of nutrition-dependent fecundity | R. microplus (tick) | Adult | [144] |
Notes: 1 The LK expression in SIFamide neurons is stronger during development, but remains throughout development and adult stage. 2 The Asian honeybee Apis cerana.
4.4.1. Myostimulatory Action
LKs act in vitro to increase frequency and amplitude of contractions in the hindgut of L. maderae [7,9] and the housefly Musca domestica [40], and in the anterior midgut and hindgut of the bug R. prolixus [109,110,111], but have no effect on neither hindgut nor oviduct contractions in the locust L. migratoria [36,49].
4.4.2. Diuretic Action
A more widespread action is the stimulatory action of LKs on Malpighian tubules shown in [11,12,14,17,41,46,50,75,97,116]. In the studied insects, LKs activate the LKR, leading to an increase in intracellular calcium, which activates a chloride shunt conductance and water transport across the tubule epithelium [14,118,145,146]. In dipteran insects, such as Drosophila, Anopheles gambiae, and Aedes aegypti, this action is mediated by stellate cells of the tubules, which express the LKR [25,75,118,147]. LK signaling appears secondarily lost in most species of beetles (Coleoptera), and mining of the genome of Triboleum castaneum shows that other signaling systems known to be associated with diuretic functions in insects are greatly expanded [75].
4.4.3. Modulation of Sugar Gustation in the Mosquito Aedes aegypti and Asian Honeybee Apis cerana
In females of the mosquito Aedes aegypti, application of a protease-resistant LK to the mouthparts and proleg tarsi resulted in inhibition of sucrose feeding and induction of an escape behavior, wherein the insect walked or flew away from the food [138]. It was shown that the LKR is expressed in chemosensory cells in proleg tarsi and labellar sensillae, and LK analog applied to mouthparts blocked the electrophysiological response to sugar in chemosensory sensillae. Furthermore, LKR-RNAi (RNA interference) by injection of double-stranded RNA eliminated the inhibitory effect of LK on sugar feeding [138]. This effect of a stable LK analog suggests a promising lead for a feeding deterrent in control of mosquitos as disease vectors [138]. Moreover, in the Asian honeybee A. cerana, sucrose-sensing is modulated by LK signaling [76]. Knockdown of the LKR by RNAi decreased the sensitivity to sucrose in a proboscis extension response assay. Furthermore, the Lkr gene influences division of labor in foraging in these bees, and nectar foragers display lower Lkr expression than those foraging for pollen [76].
4.4.4. Feeding and Fecundity in the Cattle Fever Tick
In the cattle fever tick Rhipicephalus microplus, silencing of the LKR by double-stranded RNA injection induced decreased egg production and hatching of eggs laid, and also delayed oviposition [144]. This effect appears to be indirect since the authors did not report expression of the LKR in ovaries but did report expression in the outer muscle layer of the midgut [144]. It was suggested that LK action on the gut affects gut motility and potentially uptake and processing of nutrients, and this in turn affects nutrient availability and fecundity [144]. An inhibitory effect of LKs on release of the digestive enzymes protease and amylase from the midgut was in fact shown in the moth Opisina arenosella [142], and myostimulatory effects of LKs are known in several insects [8,9,111]. It is possible that the LK action in the tick also includes the CNS, which could affect control of feeding and/or hormone release that reduces reproductive output.
4.4.5. Feeding in Rhodnius prolixus and A. aegypti
In R. prolixus and females of the mosquito Aedes aegypti, protease-resistant LK analogs reduce food intake when injected in the former and applied to the mouthparts and proleg tarsi of the latter [110,138]. Thus, LKs can have anti-feedant activity.
4.4.6. Functional Roles of LK in Drosophila
In recent years, Drosophila studies have employed genetic interventions and have revealed actions of specific LK neurons in the brain, SEZ, and abdominal neuromeres (Table 2, Figure 7). The two LHLK neurons (Figure 5D) were shown to modulate metabolism–sleep interactions and serve as clock output [100,101,102,103], modulating state-dependent water and sugar-enforced memory [130], and probably food choice [131]. This pair of LHLK neurons also regulates insulin-producing cells, which may contribute to sleep–metabolism effects [51,103]. The abdominal ABLKs (see Figure 6C) regulate water and ionic homeostasis along with associated stress [51,87] and mechanosensory-induced defensive post-mating response in females [132]. Moreover, in Drosophila, LK modulates gustatory neurons, but it is not clear which neurons are responsible [139,141], although the SELKs are in a favorable position. The ABLKs co-express DH44 and specific knockdown of this peptide in ABLKs affect water and ionic homeostasis, as well as feeding [87]. The ALK neurons (Figure 5D) are likely to signal with LK, ITP, sNPF, and TKs [51,82]. The function of LK in these cells is not yet known, but sNPF and TKs regulate metabolic and ionic stress responses [82], and ITP modulates water and ionic homeostasis, as well as feeding and drinking [98]. As seen in Figure 7, some of the functions of LKs appear conserved between Drosophila and other insects: clock-sleep functions, modulation of gustatory neurons, regulation of water and ion homeostasis, and possibly feeding.
5. Targeting the LK Signaling System with Peptide Analogs to Aim at Pest Control
Neuropeptides regulate many vital processes in the daily life of insects such as development, growth, feeding, reproduction, metabolism, and water and ion homeostasis. These roles, taken together with the high specificity and activity at very low doses, render neuropeptides and their cognate receptors potential leads for the development of eco-friendly insecticidal agents [148,149,150,151,152,153,154,155]. Of the different peptides known, LKs have received considerable attention since the LK/LKRs signaling system seems to have no vertebrate orthologs and it plays a key role in regulation of many vital physiological and behavioral processes in insects, as shown in Section 4.4. In insects, LKs are multifunctional neuropeptides that share a common C-terminal pentapeptide sequence FX1X2WGamide, where X1 can be H, N, S, A, or Y and X2 can be S, P, A, or R (see Figure 1B); this pentapeptide is also the active core of LKs, facilitating peptide design [40,152,156]. As noted in a previous section, LKs have been identified a wide range of insects (see the DINeR database: http://www.neurostresspep.eu/diner/infosearch), with the exception of most beetles (Coleoptera), all ants, and some wasps (Hymenoptera) [60,62,63,64,65,67]. Since LKs are rapidly degraded by peptidases, analogs of insect LKs have been synthesized with a modified chemical structure to increase stability [152,156]. Replacement of the X2 residue of the C-terminal pentapeptide core sequence (FX1X2WGamide) with an alpha-aminoisobutyric acid (Aib) resulted in resistance to hydrolysis by angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) and neprilysin (NEP) [157,158]. A rationale for this is that the X2 position is the primary site of susceptibility to peptidase cleavage. Incorporation of a second Aib residue adjacent to the secondary peptidase hydrolysis site (N-terminal to the F residue) further enhances biostability [157]. These short LK analogs have activities that are similar to or exceed those of native insect kinins when tested on recombinant LKRs from the southern cattle tick Rhipicephalus microplus and the dengue vector, Aedes aegypti [59,159,160,161]. Both in tissue bioassays and in recombinant LKR experiments in vitro, it was shown that that the F residue (in position one), W (in position four), and the amidated C-terminus of the LK pentapeptide core are crucial for LK activity [159,160,162]. Some modified biostable insect LK analogs have potential to be used in the integrated pest management because they reduce gain in body weight in corn earworm Helicoverpa zea larvae [157,163] and increase aphid mortality [164,165,166]. A biostable LK mimetic, (analog 1728; K-Aib-1), was shown to inhibit sugar taste receptors and act as a feeding deterrent in Aedes aegypti mosquitoes [138]. Moreover, in the bug R. prolixus, a stable LK analog displayed antifeeding activity after injection [110], and induced increased activity on hindgut contractions [109]. In female ticks, knocking down the expression of the LKR leads to a significant reduction of their reproductive fitness [144]. Hence, the tick LKR might be a promising target for developing more potent analogs. A recent study screened 14 predicted R. microplus LKs (Rhimi-K) and 11 LK analogs containing Aib and found that all of them were full agonists and displayed potent effects on the LKR of R. microplus [59]. These tick LKs and LK mimetics provide putative tools for tick physiology and management. However, the practical exploitation of the insect and tick LKs and LKRs for pest control is still in its early stages. More work is needed to solve the bio-stability, cost of production, and bio-safety of neuropeptide analogs, as well as to find efficient modes of peptide administration to target pest insects.
6. Conclusions
In this review, we have shown that expression of LKs is variable among invertebrates. Not only is it absent in many taxa, including some insect groups, but also its cellular expression varies between different insect species. Thus, there are 20 LK neurons of 3 major types in the CNS of the Drosophila larva (plus the enigmatic ALKs) and about 250 of multiple types in that of adult L. maderae [27,33]. A conserved feature is, however, the segmentally arranged neurosecretory ABLKs found in all insects studied (see [27,30,31,95]). This suggests that a hormonal role of LKs is a conserved feature among insects, and that a common action is to induce secretion in the Malpighian tubules [50,75] and potentially action on contractility and epithelial transport in the gut [9,111]. Most other functional roles of LK have been studied only in Drosophila, and thus it is not clear at this point to what extent further functions are conserved. However, as seen in Table 2, regulation of taste receptors and feeding, signaling in clock and sleep circuits, as well as gut function may be outputs of LKs in several invertebrate species.
Interestingly, even amongst insects, genes encoding LK and LKR are lacking in many species. Is the lack of LK signaling compensated somehow? A clue can be obtained from looking at diuretic functions in beetles (Coleoptera) where most species have no LK signaling components. In the beetle Tenebrio molitor, genes encoding other diuretic hormones and their receptors (and associated downstream molecules) are upregulated, suggesting that peptide hormones are interchangeable to some extent [75]. This is also emphasized by the fact that LKs are strong diuretic factors in some insect species such as Drosophila and mosquitos, but have no direct action on diuresis in, e.g., Rhodnius [17,31,111]. Regulation of water and ion homeostasis is complex, with several peptide hormones involved [1,50,114,133]. In locusts and Drosophila, colocalized LK and DH44 activate different signaling systems downstream of their receptors, but act synergistically to induce secretion in tubules [87,114]. The interactions between LKs and other diuretic and antidiuretic hormones are not yet known, but it is likely that hormonal regulation of water and ion balance differs between different taxa both in terms of hormones involved and cellular mechanisms.
Moreover, in the CNS, functions of LKs may be carried out by other neuropeptides when LKs have been lost (or never evolved), but what could be the significance of the larger number and diversity of LK neurons in the cockroach brain compared to that of Drosophila? Many neuropeptides act as local neuromodulators, often as cotransmitters of small-molecule neurotransmitters [78,79,80,167]. Thus, it is likely that LK produced in smaller interneurons of L. maderae serve local neuromodulatory/cotransmitter roles, similar to, for instance, TKs and sNPF in Drosophila [16,78,168,169]. In Drosophila, on the other hand, the four LK interneurons in the brain/SEZ have relatively wide arborizations and seem to play roles in orchestration of physiology and behavior. Clearly, we need more experimental data from other insects to be able to understand core functions of LK signaling and to further appreciate how some functions may have diversified during evolution. Finally, as described in the previous section, LKRs have been chosen as candidate targets for development of stable peptide mimetics for use in insect and tick pest control. Perhaps also development of small molecule ligands of LKRs would be useful in this quest to interfere with the vital LK signaling.
Acknowledgments
We thank Meet Zandawala for valuable comments on an earlier version of the paper.
Supplementary Materials
The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/1422-0067/22/4/1531/s1: Figure S1. The LK precursor and LK peptides in the cockroach P. americana. Text File S1. Sequences of LKRs in different species used for the cladogram in Figure 4. (PDF file).
Funding
This research was funded by Vetenskapsrådet (Swedish Research Council), grant number 2015-04626 (to DRN), the National Natural Science Foundation of China, grant number 32022011 & 31772205 (to SFW), and the APC was funded by Stockholm University.
Data Availability Statement
Data is contained within the article or Supplementary Material.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript; or in the decision to publish the results.
Footnotes
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
References
- 1.Nässel D.R., Zandawala M. Recent advances in neuropeptide signaling in Drosophila, from genes to physiology and behavior. Prog. Neurobiol. 2019;179:101607. doi: 10.1016/j.pneurobio.2019.02.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Jékely G., Melzer S., Beets I., Kadow I.C.G., Koene J.M., Haddad S., Holden-Dye L. The long and the short of it—A perspective on peptidergic regulation of circuits and behaviour. J. Exp. Biol. 2018;221:jeb166710. doi: 10.1242/jeb.166710. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Jékely G. Global view of the evolution and diversity of metazoan neuropeptide signaling. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2013;110:8702–8707. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1221833110. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Johnson E.C. Invertebrate Neuropeptides and Hormones: Basic Knowledge and Recent Advances. Transworld Research Network; Trivandrum, India: 2006. Post-genomic approaches to resolve neuropeptide signaling in Drosophila; pp. 1–46. [Google Scholar]
- 5.Strand F.L. Neuropeptides: Regulators of Physiological Processes. The MIT Press; Cambridge, MA, USA: 1999. p. 658. [Google Scholar]
- 6.Schoofs L., De Loof A., Van Hiel M.B. Neuropeptides as Regulators of Behavior in Insects. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 2017;62:35–52. doi: 10.1146/annurev-ento-031616-035500. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Holman G., Cook B., Nachman R. Primary structure and synthesis of two additional neuropeptides from Leucophaea maderae: Members of a new family of cephalomyotropins. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. Part C Comp. Pharmacol. 1986;84:271–276. doi: 10.1016/0742-8413(86)90093-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Holman G.M., Nachman R.J., Wright M.S. Insect Neuropeptides. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 1990;35:201–217. doi: 10.1146/annurev.en.35.010190.001221. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Holman G., Nachman R., Schoofs L., Hayes T., Wright M., DeLoof A. The Leucophaea maderae hindgut preparation: A rapid and sensitive bioassay tool for the isolation of insect myotropins of other insect species. Insect Biochem. 1991;21:107–112. doi: 10.1016/0020-1790(91)90070-U. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Holman G., Cook B., Nachman R. Isolation, primary structure and synthesis of leucokinins VII and VIII: The final members of this new family of cephalomyotropic peptides isolated from head extracts of leucophaea maderae. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. Part C Comp. Pharmacol. 1987;88:31–34. doi: 10.1016/0742-8413(87)90043-0. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Coast G.M., Holman G., Nachman R.J. The diuretic activity of a series of cephalomyotropic neuropeptides, the achetakinins, on isolated Malpighian tubules of the house cricket, Acheta domesticus. J. Insect Physiol. 1990;36:481–488. doi: 10.1016/0022-1910(90)90098-Z. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Hayes T., Pannabecker T.L., Hinckley D., Holman G., Nachman R., Petzel D., Beyenbach K. Leucokinins, a new family of ion transport stimulators and inhibitors in insect Malpighian tubules. Life Sci. 1989;44:1259–1266. doi: 10.1016/0024-3205(89)90362-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Hayes T.K., Holman G.M., Pannabecker T.L., Wright M.S., Strey A.A., Nachman R.J., Hoel D.F., Olson J.K., Beyenbach K.W. Culekinin depolarizing peptide: A mosquito leucokinin-like peptide that influences insect Malpighian tubule ion transport. Regul. Peptides. 1994;52:235–248. doi: 10.1016/0167-0115(94)90058-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Pannabecker T.L., Hayest T., Beyenbach K. Regulation of epithelial shunt conductance by the peptide leucokinin. J. Membr. Biol. 1993;132:63–76. doi: 10.1007/BF00233052. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Mirabeau O., Joly J.-S. Molecular evolution of peptidergic signaling systems in bilaterians. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2013;110:E2028–E2037. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1219956110. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Nässel D.R., Zandawala M., Kawada T., Satake H. Tachykinins: Neuropeptides That Are Ancient, Diverse, Widespread and Functionally Pleiotropic. Front. Neurosci. 2019;13:1262. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2019.01262. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Terhzaz S., O’Connell F.C., Pollock V.P., Kean L., A Davies S., A Veenstra J., A Dow J. Isolation and characterization of a leucokinin-like peptide of Drosophila melanogaster. J. Exp. Biol. 1999;202:3667–3676. doi: 10.1242/jeb.202.24.3667. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Hewes R.S., Taghert P.H. Neuropeptides and Neuropeptide Receptors in the Drosophila melanogaster Genome. Genome Res. 2001;11:1126–1142. doi: 10.1101/gr.169901. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Broeck J.V. Neuropeptides and their precursors in the fruitfly, Drosophila melanogaster. Peptides. 2001;22:241–254. doi: 10.1016/S0196-9781(00)00376-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Zeng H., Qin Y., Du E., Wei Q., Li Y., Huang D., Wang G., Veenstra J.A., Li S., Li N. Genomics- and Peptidomics-Based Discovery of Conserved and Novel Neuropeptides in the American Cockroach. J. Proteome Res. 2020 doi: 10.1021/acs.jproteome.0c00596. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Rotenberg D., Baumann A.A., Ben-Mahmoud S., Christiaens O., Dermauw W., Ioannidis P., Jacobs C.G.C., Jentzsch I.M.V., Oliver J.E., Poelchau M.F., et al. Genome-enabled insights into the biology of thrips as crop pests. BMC Biol. 2020;18:1–37. doi: 10.1186/s12915-020-00862-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Zhang G., Vilim F.S., Liu D.-D., Romanova E.V., Yu K., Yuan W.-D., Xiao H., Hummon A.B., Chen T.-T., Alexeeva V., et al. Discovery of leucokinin-like neuropeptides that modulate a specific parameter of feeding motor programs in the molluscan model, Aplysia. J. Biol. Chem. 2017;292:18775–18789. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M117.795450. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Cox K.J.A., Tensen C.P., Van Der Schors R.C., Li K.W., Van Heerikhuizen H., Vreugdenhil E., Geraerts W.P.M., Burke J.F. Cloning, Characterization, and Expression of a G-Protein-Coupled Receptor fromLymnaea stagnalisand Identification of a Leucokinin-Like Peptide, PSFHSWSamide, as Its Endogenous Ligand. J. Neurosci. 1997;17:1197–1205. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.17-04-01197.1997. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Holmes S.P., He H., Chen A.C., Lvie G.W., Pietrantonio P.V. Cloning and transcriptional expression of a leucokinin-like peptide receptor from the Southern cattle tick, Boophilus microplus (Acari: Ixodidae) Insect Mol. Biol. 2000;9:457–465. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2583.2000.00208.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Radford J.C., Davies S.A., Dow J.A.T. Systematic G-protein-coupled Receptor Analysis inDrosophila melanogaster Identifies a Leucokinin Receptor with Novel Roles. J. Biol. Chem. 2002;277:38810–38817. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M203694200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Nässel D.R., Lundquist C. Insect tachykinin-like peptide: Distribution of leucokinin immunoreactive neurons in the cockroach and blowfly brains. Neurosci. Lett. 1991;130:225–228. doi: 10.1016/0304-3940(91)90402-F. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Nässel D.R., Cantera R., Karlsson A. Neurons in the cockroach nervous system reacting with antisera to the neuropeptide leucokinin I. J. Comp. Neurol. 1992;322:45–67. doi: 10.1002/cne.903220105. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Cantera R., Nässel D.R. Segmental peptidergic innervation of abdominal targets in larval and adult dipteran insects revealed with an antiserum against leucokinin I. Cell Tissue Res. 1992;269:459–471. doi: 10.1007/BF00353901. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Cantera R., Hansson B.S., Hallberg E., Nässel D.R. Postembryonic development of leucokinin I-immunoreactive neurons innervating a neurohemal organ in the turnip moth Agrotis segetum. Cell Tissue Res. 1992;269:65–77. doi: 10.1007/BF00384727. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Chen Y., Veenstra J.A., Davis N.T., Hagedorn H.H. A comparative study of leucokinin-immunoreactive neurons in insects. Cell Tissue Res. 1994;276:69–83. doi: 10.1007/BF00354786. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Te Brugge V.A., Nässel D.R., Coast G.M., Schooley D.A., Orchard I. The distribution of a kinin-like peptide and its co-localization with a CRF-like peptide in the blood-feeding bug, Rhodnius prolixus. Peptides. 2001;22:161–173. doi: 10.1016/S0196-9781(00)00373-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Winther Å.M.E., Lundquist C.T., Nässel D.R. Multiple Members of the Leucokinin Neuropeptide Family are Present in Cerebral and Abdominal Neurohemal Organs in the Cockroach Leucophaea maderae. J. Neuroendocr. 1996;8:785–792. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2826.1996.05219.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.De Haro M., Al-Ramahi I., Benito-Sipos J., López-Arias B., Dorado B., Veenstra J.A., Herrero P. Detailed analysis of leucokinin-expressing neurons and their candidate functions in the Drosophila nervous system. Cell Tissue Res. 2009;339:321–336. doi: 10.1007/s00441-009-0890-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Nässel D.R. Insect myotropic peptides: Differential distribution of locustatachykinin- and leucokinin-like immunoreactive neurons in the locust brain. Cell Tissue Res. 1993;274:27–40. doi: 10.1007/BF00327982. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Elphick M.R., Mirabeau O., Larhammar D. Evolution of neuropeptide signalling systems. J. Exp. Biol. 2018;221:jeb151092. doi: 10.1242/jeb.151092. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Schoofs L., Holman G., Proost P., Van Damme J., Hayes T.K., De Loof A. Locustakinin, a novel myotropic peptide from Locusta migratoria, isolation, primary structure and synthesis. Regul. Peptides. 1992;37:49–57. doi: 10.1016/0167-0115(92)90063-Z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Holman G.M., Nachman R.J., Wright M.S. Chromatography and Isolation of Insect Hormones and Pheromones. Springer Nature; New York, NY, USA: 1990. A Strategy for the Isolation and Structural Characterization of Certain Insect Myotropic Peptides that Modify the Spontaneous Contractions of the Isolated Cockroach Hindgut; pp. 195–204. [Google Scholar]
- 38.Veenstra J.A. Isolation and Identification of 3 Leucokinins from the Mosquito Aedes aegypti. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 1994;202:715–719. doi: 10.1006/bbrc.1994.1989. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Meola S.M., Clottens F.L., Holman G.M., Nachman R.J., Nichols R., Schoofs L., Wright M.S., Olson J.K., Hayes T.K., Pendleton M.W. Isolation and immunocytochemical characterization of three tachykinin-related peptides from the mosquito, Culex salinarius. Neurochem. Res. 1998;23:189–202. doi: 10.1023/A:1022432909360. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Holman G., Nachman R.J., Coast G.M. Isolation, characterization and biological activity of a diuretic myokinin neuropeptide from the housefly, Musca domestica. Peptides. 1999;20:1–10. doi: 10.1016/S0196-9781(98)00150-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Blackburn M.B., Wagner R.M., Shabanowitz J., Kochansky J.P., Hunt N.F., Raina A.K. The isolation and identification of three diuretic kinins from the abdominal ventral nerve cord of adult Helicoverpa zea. J. Insect Physiol. 1995;41:723–730. doi: 10.1016/0022-1910(95)00005-F. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Schmid A., Becherer C. Leucokinin-like immunoreactive neurones in the central nervous system of the spider Cupiennius salei. Cell Tissue Res. 1996;284:143–152. doi: 10.1007/s004410050574. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Elekes K., Nässel D.R. Tachykinin-related neuropeptides in the central nervous system of the snail Helix pomatia: An immunocytochemical study. Brain Res. 1994;661:223–236. doi: 10.1016/0006-8993(94)91199-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Elekes K., Hernádi L., Kiss T., Muneoka Y., Nässel D.R. Tachykinin- and leucokinin-related peptides in the molluscan nervous system. Acta Biol. Hung. 1995;46:281–294. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Smart D., Johnston C., Shaw C., Halton D., Buchanan K. Use of specific antisera for the localisation and quantitation of leucokinin immunoreactivity in the nematode, Ascaris suum. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. Part C Pharmacol. Toxicol. Endocrinol. 1993;106:517–522. doi: 10.1016/0742-8413(93)90172-H. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Veenstra J.A., Pattillo J.M., Petzel D.H. A Single cDNA Encodes All Three AedesLeucokinins, Which Stimulate Both Fluid Secretion by the Malpighian Tubules and Hindgut Contractions. J. Biol. Chem. 1997;272:10402–10407. doi: 10.1074/jbc.272.16.10402. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Adams M.D., Celniker S.E., Holt R.A., Evans C.A., Gocayne J.D., Amanatides P.G., Scherer S.E., Li P.W., Hoskins R.A., Galle R.F., et al. The genome sequence of Drosophila melanogaster. Science. 2000;287:2185–2195. doi: 10.1126/science.287.5461.2185. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Yeoh J.G., Pandit A.A., Zandawala M., Nässel D.R., Davies S.-A., Dow J.A.T. DINeR: Database for Insect Neuropeptide Research. Insect Biochem. Mol. Biol. 2017;86:9–19. doi: 10.1016/j.ibmb.2017.05.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Schoofs L., Broeck J.V., De Loof A. The myotropic peptides of Locusta migratoria: Structures, distribution, functions and receptors. Insect Biochem. Mol. Biol. 1993;23:859–881. doi: 10.1016/0965-1748(93)90104-Z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Coast G.M., Orchard I., E Phillips J., A Schooley D. Insect diuretic and antidiuretic hormones. Adv. Insect Physiol. 2002;29:279–409. doi: 10.1016/s0065-2806(02)29004-9. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Zandawala M., Yurgel M.E., Texada M.J., Liao S., Rewitz K., Keene A.C., Nässel D.R. Modulation of Drosophila post-feeding physiology and behavior by the neuropeptide leucokinin. PLoS Genet. 2018;14:e1007767. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1007767. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Te Brugge V., Paluzzi J.-P., Neupert S., Nachman R.J., Orchard I. Identification of kinin-related peptides in the disease vector, Rhodnius prolixus. Peptides. 2011;32:469–474. doi: 10.1016/j.peptides.2010.10.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Derst C., Dircksen H., Meusemann K., Zhou X., Liu S., Predel R. Evolution of neuropeptides in non-pterygote hexapods. BMC Evol. Biol. 2016;16:51. doi: 10.1186/s12862-016-0621-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Tanaka Y., Suetsugu Y., Yamamoto K., Noda H., Shinoda T. Transcriptome analysis of neuropeptides and G-protein coupled receptors (GPCRs) for neuropeptides in the brown planthopper Nilaparvata lugens. Peptides. 2014;53:125–133. doi: 10.1016/j.peptides.2013.07.027. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Li X., Du L., Jiang X.-J., Ju Q., Qu C.-J., Qu M.-J., Liu T.-X. Identification and Characterization of Neuropeptides and Their G Protein-Coupled Receptors (GPCRs) in the Cowpea Aphid Aphis craccivora. Front. Endocrinol. 2020;11:640. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2020.00640. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Hou X., Qin Z., Wei M., Fu Z., Liu R., Lu L., Bai S., Ma Y., Zhang Z. Identification of the neuropeptide precursor genes potentially involved in the larval settlement in the Echiuran worm Urechis unicinctus. BMC Genom. 2020;21:1–13. doi: 10.1186/s12864-020-07312-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Predel R., Neupert S., Derst C., Reinhardt K., Wegener C. Neuropeptidomics of the Bed Bug Cimex lectularius. J. Proteome Res. 2017;17:440–454. doi: 10.1021/acs.jproteome.7b00630. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Zatylny-Gaudin C., Cornet V., LeDuc A., Zanuttini B., Corre E., Le Corguillé G., Bernay B., Garderes J., Kraut A., Couté Y., et al. Neuropeptidome of the CephalopodSepia officinalis: Identification, Tissue Mapping, and Expression Pattern of Neuropeptides and Neurohormones during Egg Laying. J. Proteome Res. 2016;15:48–67. doi: 10.1021/acs.jproteome.5b00463. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Xiong C., Kaczmarek K., Zabrocki J., Nachman R.J., Pietrantonio P.V. Activity of native tick kinins and peptidomimetics on the cognate target G protein-coupled receptor from the cattle fever tick, Rhipicephalus microplus (Acari: Ixodidae) Pest Manag. Sci. 2020;76:3423–3431. doi: 10.1002/ps.5704. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Pandit A.A., Davies S.-A., Smagghe G., Dow J.A.T. Evolutionary trends of neuropeptide signaling in beetles—A comparative analysis of Coleopteran transcriptomic and genomic data. Insect Biochem. Mol. Biol. 2019;114:103227. doi: 10.1016/j.ibmb.2019.103227. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Veenstra J.A. Coleoptera genome and transcriptome sequences reveal numerous differences in neuropeptide signaling between species. PeerJ. 2019;7:e7144. doi: 10.7717/peerj.7144. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Ragionieri L., Predel R. The neuropeptidome of Carabus (Coleoptera, Adephaga: Carabidae) Insect Biochem. Mol. Biol. 2020;118:103309. doi: 10.1016/j.ibmb.2019.103309. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Yu K., Xiong S., Xu G., Ye X., Yao H., Wang F., Fang Q., Song Q., Ye G. Identification of Neuropeptides and Their Receptors in the Ectoparasitoid, Habrobracon hebetor. Front. Physiol. 2020;11:575655. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2020.575655. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Hauser F., Neupert S., Williamson M., Predel R., Tanaka Y., Grimmelikhuijzen C.J.P. Genomics and Peptidomics of Neuropeptides and Protein Hormones Present in the Parasitic WaspNasonia vitripennis. J. Proteome Res. 2010;9:5296–5310. doi: 10.1021/pr100570j. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Veenstra J.A., Rodriguez L., Weaver R.J. Allatotropin, leucokinin and AKH in honey bees and other Hymenoptera. Peptides. 2012;35:122–130. doi: 10.1016/j.peptides.2012.02.019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Nygaard S., Zhang G., Schiøtt M., Li C., Wurm Y., Hu H., Zhou J., Ji L., Qiu F., Rasmussen M., et al. The genome of the leaf-cutting antAcromyrmex echinatiorsuggests key adaptations to advanced social life and fungus farming. Genome Res. 2011;21:1339–1348. doi: 10.1101/gr.121392.111. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Calkins T.L., Tamborindeguy C., Pietrantonio P.V. GPCR annotation, G proteins, and transcriptomics of fire ant (Solenopsis invicta) queen and worker brain: An improved view of signaling in an invasive superorganism. Gen. Comp. Endocrinol. 2019;278:89–103. doi: 10.1016/j.ygcen.2018.12.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Dircksen H., Neupert S., Predel R., Verleyen P., Huybrechts J., Strauss J., Hauser F., Stafflinger E., Schneider M., Pauwels K., et al. Genomics, Transcriptomics, and Peptidomics ofDaphnia pulexNeuropeptides and Protein Hormones. J. Proteome Res. 2011;10:4478–4504. doi: 10.1021/pr200284e. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Veenstra J.A. Similarities between decapod and insect neuropeptidomes. PeerJ. 2016;4:e2043. doi: 10.7717/peerj.2043. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Husson S.J., Mertens I., Janssen T., Lindemans M., Schoofs L. Neuropeptidergic signaling in the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans. Prog. Neurobiol. 2007;82:33–55. doi: 10.1016/j.pneurobio.2007.01.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Takahashi T. Comparative Aspects of Structure and Function of Cnidarian Neuropeptides. Front. Endocrinol. 2020;11:339. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2020.00339. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72.Koch T.L., Grimmelikhuijzen C.J.P. A comparative genomics study of neuropeptide genes in the cnidarian subclasses Hexacorallia and Ceriantharia. BMC Genom. 2020;21:1–21. doi: 10.1186/s12864-020-06945-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73.McVeigh P., Mair G.R., Atkinson L., Ladurner P., Zamanian M., Novozhilova E., Marks N.J., Day T.A., Maule A.G. Discovery of multiple neuropeptide families in the phylum Platyhelminthes. Int. J. Parasitol. 2009;39:1243–1252. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpara.2009.03.005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74.Thiel D., Franz-Wachtel M., Aguilera F., Hejnol A. Xenacoelomorph Neuropeptidomes Reveal a Major Expansion of Neuropeptide Systems during Early Bilaterian Evolution. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2018;35:2528–2543. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msy160. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 75.A Halberg K., Terhzaz S., Cabrero P., Davies S.A., Dow J.A.T. Tracing the evolutionary origins of insect renal function. Nat. Commun. 2015;6:6800. doi: 10.1038/ncomms7800. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76.Ji Y., Li X., Ji T., Tang J., Qiu L., Hu J., Dong J., Luo S., Liu S., Frandsen P.B., et al. Gene reuse facilitates rapid radiation and independent adaptation to diverse habitats in the Asian honeybee. Sci. Adv. 2020;6:eabd3590. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.abd3590. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77.Nässel D.R., Pauls D., Huetteroth W. Neuropeptides in modulation of Drosophila behavior: How to get a grip on their pleiotropic actions. Curr. Opin. Insect Sci. 2019;36:1–8. doi: 10.1016/j.cois.2019.03.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 78.Nässel D.R. Substrates for Neuronal Cotransmission With Neuropeptides and Small Molecule Neurotransmitters in Drosophila. Front. Cell. Neurosci. 2018;12:83. doi: 10.3389/fncel.2018.00083. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79.Svensson E., Apergis-Schoute J., Burnstock G., Nusbaum M.P., Parker D., Schiöth H.B. General Principles of Neuronal Co-transmission: Insights From Multiple Model Systems. Front. Neural Circuits. 2019;12:117. doi: 10.3389/fncir.2018.00117. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 80.Nusbaum M.P., Blitz D.M., Marder E. Functional consequences of neuropeptide and small-molecule co-transmission. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 2017;18:389–403. doi: 10.1038/nrn.2017.56. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 81.Nässel D.R., Homberg U. Neuropeptides in interneurons of the insect brain. Cell Tissue Res. 2006;326:1–24. doi: 10.1007/s00441-006-0210-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 82.Kahsai L., Kapan N., Dircksen H., Winther Å.M.E., Nässel D.R. Metabolic Stress Responses in Drosophila Are Modulated by Brain Neurosecretory Cells That Produce Multiple Neuropeptides. PLoS ONE. 2010;5:e11480. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0011480. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 83.Gellerer A., Franke A., Neupert S., Predel R., Zhou X., Liu S., Reiher W., Wegener C., Homberg U. Identification and distribution of SIFamide in the nervous system of the desert locustSchistocerca gregaria. J. Comp. Neurol. 2014;523:108–125. doi: 10.1002/cne.23671. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 84.Ludwig P., Williams L., Nässel D.R., Reichert H., Boyan G.S. Primary commissure pioneer neurons in the brain of the grasshopperSchistocerca gregaria: Development, ultrastructure, and neuropeptide expression. J. Comp. Neurol. 2000;430:118–130. doi: 10.1002/1096-9861(20010129)430:1<118::AID-CNE1018>3.0.CO;2-M. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 85.Terhzaz S., Rosay P., Goodwin S.F., Veenstra J.A. The neuropeptide SIFamide modulates sexual behavior in Drosophila. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2007;352:305–310. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2006.11.030. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 86.Nässel D.R. Neuropeptides in the nervous system of Drosophila and other insects: Multiple roles as neuromodulators and neurohormones. Prog. Neurobiol. 2002;68:1–84. doi: 10.1016/S0301-0082(02)00057-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 87.Zandawala M., Marley R., Davies S.A., Nässel D.R. Characterization of a set of abdominal neuroendocrine cells that regulate stress physiology using colocalized diuretic peptides in Drosophila. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 2018;75:1099–1115. doi: 10.1007/s00018-017-2682-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 88.Muren J.E., Lundquist C.T., Nässel D.R. Quantitative determination of myotropic neuropeptide in the nervous system of the cockroach leucophaea maderae: Distribution and release of leucokinins. J. Exp. Biol. 1993;179:289. [Google Scholar]
- 89.Chung J., Goldsworthy G., Coast G. Haemolymph and tissue titres of achetakinins in the house cricket acheta domesticus: Effect of starvation and dehydration. J. Exp. Biol. 1994;193:307–319. doi: 10.1242/jeb.193.1.307. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 90.Brugge V.T., Orchard I. Evidence for CRF-like and kinin-like peptides as neurohormones in the blood-feeding bug, Rhodnius prolixus. Peptides. 2002;23:1967–1979. doi: 10.1016/S0196-9781(02)00184-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 91.Stengl M., Arendt A. Peptidergic circadian clock circuits in the Madeira cockroach. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 2016;41:44–52. doi: 10.1016/j.conb.2016.07.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 92.Arnold T., Korek S., Massah A., Eschstruth D., Stengl M. Candidates for photic entrainment pathways to the circadian clock via optic lobe neuropils in the Madeira cockroach. J. Comp. Neurol. 2019;528:1754–1774. doi: 10.1002/cne.24844. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 93.Petri B., Stengl M., Wurden S., Homberg U. Immunocytochemical characterization of the accessory medulla in the cockroach Leucophaea maderae. Cell Tissue Res. 1995;282:3–19. doi: 10.1007/BF00319128. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 94.Renn S.C., Park J.H., Rosbash M., Hall J.C., Taghert P.H. A pdf Neuropeptide Gene Mutation and Ablation of PDF Neurons Each Cause Severe Abnormalities of Behavioral Circadian Rhythms in Drosophila. Cell. 1999;99:791–802. doi: 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)81676-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 95.Helle J., Dircksen H., Eckert M., Nässel D.R., Spörhase-Eichmann U., Schürmann F.W. Putative neurohemal areas in the peripheral nervous system of an insect, Gryllus bimaculatus, revealed by immunocytochemistry. Cell Tissue Res. 1995;281:43–61. doi: 10.1007/bf00307957. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 96.Kim M.Y. Ph.D. Thesis. Stockholm University; Stockholm, Sweden: 1998. Neuropeptides related to tachykinins and leucokinins in the developing nervous sytem of insects.210p [Google Scholar]
- 97.Thompson K., Rayne R., Gibbon C., May S.T., Patel M., Coast G., Bacon J. Cellular colocalization of diuretic peptides in locusts: A potent control mechanism. Peptides. 1995;16:95–104. doi: 10.1016/0196-9781(94)00158-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 98.Gáliková M., Dircksen H., Nässel D.R. The thirsty fly: Ion transport peptide (ITP) is a novel endocrine regulator of water homeostasis in Drosophila. PLoS Genet. 2018;14:e1007618. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1007618. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 99.Dircksen H., Tesfai L.K., Albus C., Nässel D.R. Ion transport peptide splice forms in central and peripheral neurons throughout postembryogenesis ofDrosophila melanogaster. J. Comp. Neurol. 2008;509:23–41. doi: 10.1002/cne.21715. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 100.Cavey M., Collins B., Bertet C., Blau J. Circadian rhythms in neuronal activity propagate through output circuits. Nat. Neurosci. 2016;19:587–595. doi: 10.1038/nn.4263. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 101.Murphy K.R., A Deshpande S., E Yurgel M., Quinn J.P., Weissbach J.L., Keene A.C., Dawson-Scully K., Huber R., Tomchik S.M., Ja W.W. Postprandial sleep mechanics in Drosophila. eLife. 2016;5:e19334. doi: 10.7554/eLife.19334. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 102.Murakami K., Yurgel M.E., Stahl B.A., Masek P., Mehta A., Heidker R., Bollinger W., Gingras R.M., Kim Y.-J., Ja W.W., et al. translin Is Required for Metabolic Regulation of Sleep. Curr. Biol. 2016;26:972–980. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2016.02.013. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 103.Yurgel M.E., Kakad P., Zandawala M., Nässel D.R., Godenschwege T.A., Keene A.C. A single pair of leucokinin neurons are modulated by feeding state and regulate sleep–metabolism interactions. PLoS Biol. 2019;17:e2006409. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.2006409. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 104.Homberg U. Neurotransmitters and neuropeptides in the brain of the locust. Microsc. Res. Tech. 2002;56:189–209. doi: 10.1002/jemt.10024. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 105.Homberg U., Hofer S., Pfeiffer K., Gebhardt S. Organization and neural connections of the anterior optic tubercle in the brain of the locust, Schistocerca gregaria. J. Comp. Neurol. 2003;462:415–430. doi: 10.1002/cne.10771. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 106.Ignell R. Monoamines and neuropeptides in antennal lobe interneurons of the desert locust, Schistocerca gregaria: An immunocytochemical study. Cell Tissue Res. 2001;306:143–156. doi: 10.1007/s004410100434. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 107.Martelli C., Pech U., Kobbenbring S., Pauls D., Bahl B., Sommer M.V., Pooryasin A., Barth J., Arias C.W.P., Vassiliou C., et al. SIFamide Translates Hunger Signals into Appetitive and Feeding Behavior in Drosophila. Cell Rep. 2017;20:464–478. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2017.06.043. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 108.Sellami A., Veenstra J.A. SIFamide acts on fruitless neurons to modulate sexual behavior in Drosophila melanogaster. Peptides. 2015;74:50–56. doi: 10.1016/j.peptides.2015.10.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 109.Bhatt G., Da Silva R., Nachman R.J., Orchard I. The molecular characterization of the kinin transcript and the physiological effects of kinins in the blood-gorging insect, Rhodnius prolixus. Peptides. 2014;53:148–158. doi: 10.1016/j.peptides.2013.04.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 110.Sangha V., Nachman R.J., Lange A., Orchard I. Physiological effects of biostable kinin and CAPA analogs in the Chagas disease vector, Rhodnius prolixus. Insect Biochem. Mol. Biol. 2019;114:103223. doi: 10.1016/j.ibmb.2019.103223. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 111.Brugge V.T., Ianowski J.P., Orchard I. Biological activity of diuretic factors on the anterior midgut of the blood-feeding bug, Rhodnius prolixus. Gen. Comp. Endocrinol. 2009;162:105–112. doi: 10.1016/j.ygcen.2009.01.025. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 112.Elekes K., Hernádi L., Muren J.E., Nässel D.R. Peptidergic neurons in the snail Helix pomatia: Distribution of neurons in the central and peripheral nervous systems that react with an Antibody raised to the insect neuropeptide, leucokinin I. J. Comp. Neurol. 1994;341:257–272. doi: 10.1002/cne.903410210. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 113.Al-Anzi B., Armand E., Nagamei P., Olszewski M., Sapin V., Waters C., Zinn K., Wyman R.J., Benzer S. The Leucokinin Pathway and Its Neurons Regulate Meal Size in Drosophila. Curr. Biol. 2010;20:969–978. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2010.04.039. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 114.Coast G.M. Neuropeptides implicated in the control of diuresis in insects. Peptides. 1996;17:327–336. doi: 10.1016/0196-9781(95)02096-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 115.Dow J.A.T., A Davies S. The Drosophila melanogaster malpighian tubule. Adv. Insect Physiol. 2001;28:1–83. [Google Scholar]
- 116.Iaboni A., Holman G.M., Nachman R.J., Orchard I., Coast G.M. Immunocytochemical localisation and biological activity of diuretic peptides in the housefly, Musca domestica. Cell Tissue Res. 1998;294:549–560. doi: 10.1007/s004410051205. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 117.Chen Y., Veenstra J.A., Hagedorn H., Davis N.T. Leucokinin and diuretic hormone immunoreactivity of neurons in the tobacco hornworm, Manduca sexta, and co-localization of this immunoreactivity in lateral neurosecretory cells of abdominal ganglia. Cell Tissue Res. 1994;278:493–507. doi: 10.1007/BF00331367. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 118.Cabrero P., Terhzaz S., Romero M.F., Davies S.A., Blumenthal E.M., Dow J.A.T. Chloride channels in stellate cells are essential for uniquely high secretion rates in neuropeptide-stimulated Drosophila diuresis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2014;111:14301–14306. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1412706111. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 119.Cabrero P., Radford J.C., E Broderick K., Costes L., Veenstra J.A., Spana E.P., A Davies S., Dow J.A.T. The Dh gene of Drosophila melanogaster encodes a diuretic peptide that acts through cyclic AMP. J. Exp. Biol. 2002;205:3799–3807. doi: 10.1242/jeb.205.24.3799. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 120.Dircksen H. Insect ion transport peptides are derived from alternatively spliced genes and differentially expressed in the central and peripheral nervous system. J. Exp. Biol. 2009;212:401–412. doi: 10.1242/jeb.026112. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 121.Drexler A.L., Harris C.C., Pena M.G.D., Asuncion-Uchi M., Chung S., Webster S., Fuse M. Molecular characterization and cell-specific expression of an ion transport peptide in the tobacco hornworm, Manduca sexta. Cell Tissue Res. 2007;329:391–408. doi: 10.1007/s00441-007-0391-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 122.Veenstra J.A., Agricola H.-J., Sellami A. Regulatory peptides in fruit fly midgut. Cell Tissue Res. 2008;334:499–516. doi: 10.1007/s00441-008-0708-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 123.Chen J., Kim S.-M., Kwon A.J.Y. A Systematic Analysis of Drosophila Regulatory Peptide Expression in Enteroendocrine Cells. Mol. Cells. 2016;39:358–366. doi: 10.14348/molcells.2016.0014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 124.Reiher W., Shirras C., Kahnt J., Baumeister S., Isaac R.E., Wegener C. Peptidomics and Peptide Hormone Processing in theDrosophilaMidgut. J. Proteome Res. 2011;10:1881–1892. doi: 10.1021/pr101116g. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 125.Christie A.E. Crustacean neuroendocrine systems and their signaling agents. Cell Tissue Res. 2011;345:41–67. doi: 10.1007/s00441-011-1183-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 126.Saideman S.R., Christie A.E., Torfs P., Huybrechts J., Schoofs L., Nusbaum M.P. Actions of kinin peptides in the stomatogastric ganglion of the crab Cancer borealis. J. Exp. Biol. 2006;209:3664–3676. doi: 10.1242/jeb.02415. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 127.Šimo L., Slovák M., Park Y., Žitňan D. Identification of a complex peptidergic neuroendocrine network in the hard tick, Rhipicephalus appendiculatus. Cell Tissue Res. 2008;335:639–655. doi: 10.1007/s00441-008-0731-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 128.Veenstra J.A. Neuropeptide evolution: Neurohormones and neuropeptides predicted from the genomes of Capitella teleta and Helobdella robusta. Gen. Comp. Endocrinol. 2011;171:160–175. doi: 10.1016/j.ygcen.2011.01.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 129.Ohashi H., Sakai T. Leucokinin signaling regulates hunger–driven reduction of behavioral responses to noxious heat in Drosophila. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2018;499:221–226. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2018.03.132. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 130.Senapati B., Tsao C.-H., Juan Y.-A., Chiu T.-H., Wu C.-L., Waddell S., Lin S. A neural mechanism for deprivation state-specific expression of relevant memories in Drosophila. Nat. Neurosci. 2019;22:2029–2039. doi: 10.1038/s41593-019-0515-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 131.Sareen P., McCurdy L.Y., Nitabach M.N. A neural signature of choice under sensory conflict in Drosophila. bioRxiv. 2020 doi: 10.1101/2020.08.14.251553. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 132.Liu C., Zhang B., Zhang L., Yang T., Zhang Z., Gao Z. A neural circuit encoding mating states tunes defensive behavior in Drosophila. Nat. Commun. 2020;11:1–14. doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-17771-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 133.Coast G.M. The endocrine control of salt balance in insects. Gen. Comp. Endocrinol. 2007;152:332–338. doi: 10.1016/j.ygcen.2007.02.018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 134.Liu Y., Luo J., Carlsson M.A., Nässel D.R. Serotonin and insulin-like peptides modulate leucokinin-producing neurons that affect feeding and water homeostasis inDrosophila. J. Comp. Neurol. 2015;523:1840–1863. doi: 10.1002/cne.23768. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 135.Okusawa S., Kohsaka H., Nose A. Serotonin and Downstream Leucokinin Neurons Modulate Larval Turning Behavior in Drosophila. J. Neurosci. 2014;34:2544–2558. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3500-13.2014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 136.Kim D.-H., Han M.-R., Lee G., Lee S.S., Kim Y.-J., Adams M.E. Rescheduling Behavioral Subunits of a Fixed Action Pattern by Genetic Manipulation of Peptidergic Signaling. PLoS Genet. 2015;11:e1005513. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1005513. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 137.Kim D.-H., Kim Y.-J., Adams M.E. Endocrine regulation of airway clearance in Drosophila. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2018;115:1535–1540. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1717257115. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 138.Kwon H., Agha M.A., Smith R.C., Nachman R.J., Marion-Poll F., Pietrantonio P.V. Leucokinin mimetic elicits aversive behavior in mosquito Aedes aegypti (L.) and inhibits the sugar taste neuron. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2016;113:6880–6885. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1520404113. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 139.Charroux B., Daian F., Royet J. Drosophila Aversive Behavior toward Erwinia carotovora carotovora Is Mediated by Bitter Neurons and Leukokinin. iScience. 2020;23:101152. doi: 10.1016/j.isci.2020.101152. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 140.Chi W., Liu W., Fu W., Xia S., Heckscher E.S., Zhuang X. RNA-binding protein Syncrip regulates Starvation-Induced Hyperactivity in adult Drosophila. bioRxiv. 2020 doi: 10.1101/2020.01.07.897652. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 141.López-Arias B., Dorado B., Herrero P. Blockade of the release of the neuropeptide leucokinin to determine its possible functions in fly behavior: Chemoreception assays. Peptides. 2011;32:545–552. doi: 10.1016/j.peptides.2010.07.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 142.Harshini S., Nachman R., Sreekumar S. Inhibition of digestive enzyme release by neuropeptides in larvae of Opisina arenosella (Lepidoptera: Cryptophasidae) Comp. Biochem. Physiol. Part B: Biochem. Mol. Biol. 2002;132:353–358. doi: 10.1016/S1096-4959(02)00047-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 143.Saideman S.R., Blitz D.M., Nusbaum M.P. Convergent Motor Patterns from Divergent Circuits. J. Neurosci. 2007;27:6664–6674. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0315-07.2007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 144.Brock C.M., Temeyer K.B., Tidwell J., Yang Y., Blandon M.A., Carreón-Camacho D., Longnecker M.T., Almazán C., De León A.A.P., Pietrantonio P.V. The leucokinin-like peptide receptor from the cattle fever tick, Rhipicephalus microplus, is localized in the midgut periphery and receptor silencing with validated double-stranded RNAs causes a reproductive fitness cost. Int. J. Parasitol. 2019;49:287–299. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpara.2018.11.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 145.O’Donnell M.E., Rheault M., Davies S.A., Rosay P., Harvey B.J., Maddrell S.H.P., Kaiser K., Dow J.A.T. Hormonally controlled chloride movement across Drosophila tubules is via ion channels in stellate cells. Am. J. Physiol. Content. 1998;274:R1039–R1049. doi: 10.1152/ajpregu.1998.274.4.R1039. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 146.Coast G.M., Chadwell B.A., Standen E.M., Lauder G.V., Ashley-Ross M.A. Intracellular Na+, K+ and Cl- activities in Acheta domesticus Malpighian tubules and the response to a diuretic kinin neuropeptide. J. Exp. Biol. 2012;215:2774–2785. doi: 10.1242/jeb.072223. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 147.Radford J.C., Terhzaz S., Cabrero P., Davies S.-A., Dow J.A.T. Functional characterisation of the Anopheles leucokinins and their cognate G-protein coupled receptor. J. Exp. Biol. 2004;207:4573–4586. doi: 10.1242/jeb.01317. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 148.Alford L., Marley R., Dornan A.J., Pierre J.-S., Dow J.A., Nachman R.J., Davies S.-A. Assessment of neuropeptide binding sites and the impact of biostable kinin and CAP2b analogue treatment on aphid (Myzus persicae and Macrosiphum rosae) stress tolerance. Pest Manag. Sci. 2019;75:1750–1759. doi: 10.1002/ps.5372. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 149.Alford L., Marley R., Dornan A., Dow J.A.T., Nachman R.J., Davies S.A. Desiccation, thermal stress and associated mortality in Drosophila fruit flies induced by neuropeptide analogue treatment. J. Pest Sci. 2019;92:1123–1137. doi: 10.1007/s10340-019-01100-0. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 150.Audsley N., Down R.E. G protein coupled receptors as targets for next generation pesticides. Insect Biochem. Mol. Biol. 2015;67:27–37. doi: 10.1016/j.ibmb.2015.07.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 151.Hill C.A., Sharan S., Watts V.J. Genomics, GPCRs and new targets for the control of insect pests and vectors. Curr. Opin. Insect Sci. 2018;30:99–106. doi: 10.1016/j.cois.2018.08.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 152.Nachman R.J. Biorational Control of Arthropod Pests. Springer Nature; Dordrecht, The Netherlands: 2009. Agonists/Antagonists of the Insect Kinin and Pyrokinin/PBAN Neuropeptide Classes as Tools for Rational Pest Control; pp. 21–48. [Google Scholar]
- 153.Pietrantonio P.V., Xiong C., Nachman R.J., Shen Y. G protein-coupled receptors in arthropod vectors: Omics and pharmacological approaches to elucidate ligand-receptor interactions and novel organismal functions. Curr. Opin. Insect Sci. 2018;29:12–20. doi: 10.1016/j.cois.2018.05.016. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 154.Altstein M., Nässel D.R. Neuropeptide Signaling in Insects. Adv. Exp. Med. Biol. 2010;692:155–165. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4419-6902-6_8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 155.Nachman R.J., Pietrantonio P.V., Coast G.M. Toward the Development of Novel Pest Management Agents Based upon Insect Kinin Neuropeptide Analogues. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 2009;1163:251–261. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2008.03633.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 156.Nachman R.J., Pietrantonio P.V. Interaction of mimetic analogs of insect kinin neuropeptides with arthropod receptors. Taurine 6. 2010;692:27–48. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4419-6902-6_3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 157.Nachman R.J., Strey A., Isaac E., Pryor N., Lopez J.D., Deng J.G., Coast G.M. Enhanced in vivo activity of peptidase-resistant analogs of the insect kinin neuropeptide family. Peptides. 2002;23:735–745. doi: 10.1016/S0196-9781(01)00654-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 158.Nachman R.J., Isaac R.E., Coast G.M., Holman G. Aib-Containing Analogues of the Insect Kinin Neuropeptide Family Demonstrate Resistance to an Insect Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme and Potent Diuretic Activity. Peptides. 1997;18:53–57. doi: 10.1016/S0196-9781(96)00233-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 159.Taneja-Bageshwar S., Strey A., Isaac R.E., Coast G.M., Zubrzak P., Pietrantonio P.V., Nachman R.J. Biostable agonists that match or exceed activity of native insect kinins on recombinant arthropod GPCRs. Gen. Comp. Endocrinol. 2009;162:122–128. doi: 10.1016/j.ygcen.2008.10.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 160.Taneja-Bageshwar S., Strey A., Zubrzak P., Pietrantonio P.V., Nachman R.J. Comparative structure-activity analysis of insect kinin core analogs on recombinant kinin receptors from Southern cattle tickBoophilus microplus (Acari: Ixodidae) and mosquitoAedes aegypti (Diptera: Culicidae) Arch. Insect Biochem. Physiol. 2006;62:128–140. doi: 10.1002/arch.20129. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 161.Taneja-Bageshwar S., Strey A., Zubrzak P., Williams H., Reyes-Rangel G., Juaristi E., Pietrantonio P.V., Nachman R.J. Identification of selective and non-selective, biostable β-amino acid agonists of recombinant insect kinin receptors from the southern cattle tick Boophilus microplus and mosquito Aedes aegypti. Peptides. 2008;29:302–309. doi: 10.1016/j.peptides.2007.07.034. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 162.Nachman R.J., Coast G.M., Holman G., Beier R.C. Diuretic activity of C-terminal group analogues of the insect kinins in Acheta domesticus. Peptides. 1995;16:809–813. doi: 10.1016/0196-9781(95)00047-N. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 163.Nachman R.J., Coast G.M., Douat C., Fehrentz J.-A., Kaczmarek K., Zabrocki J., Pryor N.W., Martinez J. A C-terminal aldehyde insect kinin analog enhances inhibition of weight gain and induces significant mortality in Helicoverpa zea larvae. Peptides. 2003;24:1615–1621. doi: 10.1016/j.peptides.2003.06.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 164.Smagghe G., Mahdian K., Zubrzak P., Nachman R.J. Antifeedant activity and high mortality in the pea aphid Acyrthosiphon pisum (Hemiptera: Aphidae) induced by biostable insect kinin analogs. Peptides. 2010;31:498–505. doi: 10.1016/j.peptides.2009.07.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 165.Zhang C., Li X., Song D., Ling Y., Zhou Y., Yang X. Synthesis, aphicidal activity and conformation of novel insect kinin analogues as potential eco-friendly insecticides. Pest Manag. Sci. 2020;76:3432–3439. doi: 10.1002/ps.5721. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 166.Zhang C., Qu Y., Wu X., Song D., Ling Y., Yang X. Design, synthesis and aphicidal activity of N-terminal modified insect kinin analogs. Peptides. 2015;68:233–238. doi: 10.1016/j.peptides.2014.07.028. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 167.Marder E. Neuromodulation of Neuronal Circuits: Back to the Future. Neuron. 2012;76:1–11. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2012.09.010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 168.Kim S.M., Su C.-Y., Wang J.W. Neuromodulation of Innate Behaviors inDrosophila. Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 2017;40:327–348. doi: 10.1146/annurev-neuro-072116-031558. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 169.Root C.M., Ko K.I., Jafari A., Wang J.W. Presynaptic Facilitation by Neuropeptide Signaling Mediates Odor-Driven Food Search. Cell. 2011;145:133–144. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2011.02.008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
Data is contained within the article or Supplementary Material.