Abstract
Little is known of gene-environment interactions for AD risk factors. Apolipoprotein E (APOE) and neighbors on chromosome 19q13.3 have variants associated with risks of AD, but with unknown mechanism. This study describes a novel link between APOE network, air pollution, and age-related diseases. Mice exposed to air pollution nano-sized particulate matter (nPM) had coordinate responses of Apoe-Apoc1-Tomm40 in cerebral cortex. In human, the AD vulnerable hippocampus and amygdala had stronger age decline in APOE cluster expression than the AD-resistant cerebellum and hypothalamus. Using consensus WGCNA, we showed that APOE has a conserved co-expressed network in rodent and primate brains. SOX1, which has AD-associated SNPs, was among the co-expressed genes in human hippocampus. Human and mouse shared 87% of potential binding sites for transcription factors in APOE cluster promoter, suggesting similar inducibility and a novel link between environment, APOE cluster and risk of AD.
Keywords: APOE, chromosome 19q13, air pollution, Alzheimer, aging
Narrative
Alleles of Apolipoprotein E (APOE) dominate the genetics of Alzheimer disease (AD) and brain aging with 7500 citations. Yet, barely twenty studies have considered GxE interactions of APOE alleles with air pollution or cigarette smoke, which are global AD environmental risk factors. Two population-based studies show increased risk of APOE4 carriers to air pollution for accelerated cognitive decline and dementia [1, 2]. Besides APOE, we must consider its neighboring genes, which are associated with risk of AD and other diseases with increased risk of accelerated cognitive loss (Fig. 1). We do not know how the expression of these genes may change during aging and AD, or in response to air pollution and cigarette smoke.
Figure 1.
Human Chromosome 19q13.32, showing APOE and the gene neighbors we assess for expression. This locus of more than 50 genes is extensively conserved in mammals (Suppl Fig. S5). Mice have these same genes in reversed order (inverted synteny).
TOMM40 was the first APOE gene neighbor with AD-risk variants [3], joined by APOC1, APOC2, APOC4, and NECTIN2 in complex AD haplotypes. More than 30 single nucleotide variants (SNPs) in coding and non-coding adjacent sequences are AD-associated; subsets may act in cis combination with APOE or independently [4–6]. APOE cluster genes encode diverse functions: lipoproteins (APOE, APOC1, -C2, -C4); inflammation (RELB, TGFB1); metabolism (IGFL1, TOMM40); brain development (NTF4); reproduction via gonadotrophins (CGB, LHB); and viral resistance (APOE, NECTIN2). Other than AD, the APOE cluster is associated with atherosclerosis and hyperlipidemia [7]; hypertension [8, 9]; obesity [10]; and longevity [11–13]. Because only APOE has been considered for GxE interaction with air pollution for risk of accelerated cognitive decline and AD dementia [1, 2], we examined other APOE cluster genes for response to air pollution in rodent brains. In human data, we examined APOE cluster expression in several tissues. APOE cluster genes are co-expressed in brain [14], as well as in liver [15]; in human hepatoma cells APOE, APOC1, and TOMM40 mRNA were regulated by the transcription factor PPARγ [16].
Because conserved gene clusters typically have coordinated expression [17, 18], we hypothesized that the APOE cluster coordinate expression would extend to primates (chimpanzee, monkey) and rat, as well as mouse. Unlike humans, these species do not develop brain AD-like neurodegeneration during aging [19, 20]. Inflammatory processes associated with air pollution in AD might involve endotoxins as well as combustion products, which were experienced sequentially in human evolution [29]: pre-Homo was exposed to high levels of endotoxin from savannah herds, followed by domestic fire, which introduced novel toxins in smoke and charred foods that also arise during fossil fuel combustion.
Responses to inhaled air pollution components are body-wide, including arterial endothelia, plasma cytokines, myocardium, lung, liver, and brain [21–25]. While the lung receives the majority of inhaled particulate material (PM), some may enter the brain through olfactory neurons [25, 26]. The ‘lung-to-brain’ route is shown for systemic responses and nanoscale particles [27].
We examined brain transcriptional responses to several components of air pollution: ultrafine PM (PM0.2, <0.2 μm diameter) and bacterial endotoxins which induce inflammation and oxidative stress [21]. Urban PM0.2 are derived from fossil fuels, burning biomass, and road dust, while LPS-like endotoxins are derived from gram-negative bacteria. PM0.2 are collected for 2 months continuously on filters from an urban freeway air corridor and eluted by sonication into water. Because this subfraction excludes polyaromatic hydrocarbons [21], we designated it as nPM in distinction from total PM0.2 [28]. Mice were exposed to re-aerosolized nPM at 300 μg/m3 for 15 hours per week during 8 to 15 weeks; the hourly average of 27 μg/m3 is within the upper range of current US roadway exposures, and far below the global upper range. Mouse genotypes included both sexes of C57BL/6 wildtype (‘B6’) and transgenics for human APOE3 and-E4 alleles (APOE-TR).
Initial findings on cerebral cortex led us to examine other data sets for APOE cluster gene co-regulation in cultured glia and lung. Human transcriptome data included brain region specific expression during normal aging by sex, and by clinical AD stage. Potential transcription factors were then identified with multi-species co-expression networks. Lastly, we examined aging and AD for their impact on APOE cluster expression and identified genetic variants in APOE-cluster transcription factors that may modify AD risk.
Apoe gene cluster response to air pollution in mouse cerebral cortex
Five Apoe cluster genes with strong AD associations [4] were analyzed for transcriptional responses to air pollution- nPM: Apoc1, Apoe, Bcam, Clptm1, Nectin2, Tomm40 (Fig. 2A,B). Cerebral cortex of wildtype (B6) and APOE-TR showed co-expression of Apoe, Apoc1, and Tomm40 over a 2-fold range for controls and nPM exposed (Fig. 2A,B). No sex differences were indicated. The APOE-TR differed from B6 by the inverse correlation of Bcam-Apoc1 mRNA (Fig 2A); this may be the first example of transcriptional inversion for APOE transgenes. The mRNA co-expression extended to protein levels of Apoc1, Apoe, and Nectin2 (Fig. 2C).
Figure 2.
Transcriptional response of the Apoe gene cluster to air pollution nPM in cerebral cortex of mice. A) Pearson correlation heatmap of nPM mediated gene expression changes in Apoe cluster of C57BL/6J (B6), APOE3-TR, and APOE4-TR mice (both sexes). Mice were exposed to 300 μg/m3 nPM at 8 wk (B6) or 15 wk (APOE-TR). N=16 per genotype (4/sex /treatment). * p < 0.05, Bonferroni multiple test correction. B) Scatter plots of Apoe-Apoc1 and Apoe-Tomm40 in APOE3 and APOE4-TR mice (both sexes) exposed to nPM or filtered air for 15 weeks; linear regression modeling of. Data source: GSE142066. C) Protein responses of male B6 mice in nPM (100–300 μg/m3 nPM for 3 weeks; 5 h/d, 3 d/wk). *** p < 0.001 in ANOVA test after FDR multiple test correction. N = 9/group.
Because air pollution activates glia [25, 29], we examined in vitro responses to nPM with mixed glia cultures from neonatal rat that contained astrocytes and microglia; LPS was included as a model for endotoxins in urban air pollution. For nPM, Apoc1-Apoe, and Apoe-Tomm40 had positive co-response (Fig. S1), matching in vivo responses. In contrast to mixed glia, LPS responses in adult mouse brain included the positive correlation of Apoe-Apoc1-Clptm1 expression, which paralleled the reported nPM responses (Fig. S2B). These differences may represent cell type specificity, shown for the Apoe promoter [30].
The diversity of responses to air pollution components was further explored with archived data from humans and rodents. Mouse lung responded with different Apoe cluster subsets to urban total air pollution [31] and coal tar [32] (Fig. S3) than cerebral cortex. Coal tar increased Apoc1, Apoe, and Nectin2, while ambient urban air only induced Apoc1; Tomm40 did not respond. Antioxidant and inflammatory responses of other chromosomal genes include Nqo1 and Il1b, which also responded to nPM in our prior study of Nrf2 regulated phase II gene expression in lung and brain [33]. These findings give additional insights for the heterogeneity of AD risk from APOE4 [34]. The different patterns of co-expression of APOE cluster genes to the above air pollution components will be further varied by the local chemistry of air pollution which can differ widely in oxidative activity and cytotoxicity for the same PM0.2 [21, 35].
Human and chimpanzee APOE gene cluster expression
Because the APOE cluster shows evolutionary stability between human and mouse, we reasoned that its coordinate gene expression would extend to chimpanzee, and monkey. Human RNA sequences from two databases were analyzed for brain regions and other tissues of both sexes for normal aging and AD. Gene pairs of APOC1-APOE, APOE-TOMM40, and BCAM-NECTIN2 were co-expressed in multiple human tissues (Fig. 3A); human and chimpanzee brain (Fig. 3B, C); and mouse brain (Fig. 2 above). Unlike humans, these species do not develop AD-like neurodegeneration with major pathway specific degeneration in the entorhinal cortex and hippocampus [19, 20].
Figure 3.
Coordinated expression of the human APOE cluster in human and chimpanzee. A) Human, all tissues, age 20–80 y: Pearson correlation heatmaps of APOE cluster expression (12,283 samples from 651 individuals); data from GTEx. B) Human brains, age 20–80 y: heatmaps of APOE cluster expression (2,112 brain regions, 321 individuals). Data from GTEx. C) Chimpanzee brain: Pearson correlation of APOE cluster expression (11 brain regions; 2 female, 1 male, 15–34 y). Data from GSE7540. * p < 0.05, after Bonferroni multiple test correction. D) Corroborating data for human brain, normal and AD, age 20–79 [70]: heatmaps of APOE cluster expression, control (119 brain regions, 35 individuals); AD brains (18 brain regions, 7 AD). E) Scatter plot and regression analysis of APOE-APOC1, NECTIN2-BCAM, CLPTM1-TOMM40, and NECTIN2-TOMM40 in GTEx for all brain regions and ages 20–39, 40–59, 60–79 y.
Age and AD
Gene pair co-expression was stable up to age 79 y for APOC1-APOE, BCAM-NECTIN2, CLPTM1-TOMM40, and NECTIN2-TOMM40 in the brain (Fig 3E). However, using principal component analysis (PCA), we showed that tissues and brain regions vary widely in APOE cluster expression (Fig. 4A, B). Brain was intermediate between white blood cells (highest variance) and liver (lowest). We further developed two PCs for brain regions that represent the changes in APOE cluster as one unit. In brain, the PC1 (60% variance, Fig. 4B) represented a positive correlation with APOE (r = 0.83), APOC1 (0.64), and a negative correlation with TOMM40 (−0.27), BCAM (−0.24), and NECTIN2 (−0.15) (Figure S5B). In contrast, the PC2 (25% variance, Fig. 4B) represented a positive correlation with APOC1 (0.97), APOE (0.54), and a negative correlation with TOMM40 (−0.58), CLPTM1 (−0.33), and BCAM (−0.24) (Figure S5C). APOC1 and APOE had the highest factor loading for PC1 and PC2 in this brain data. In the following sections, we described the changes in APOE cluster PCs rather than individual genes. The individual gene expression data is reported in Figure S4.
Figure 4.
The human APOE gene cluster has different expression by tissue, brain region, and age. A) Principal components of APOE cluster expression in multiple tissues (12,283 samples from 651 individuals). Blood, heart, and blood vessels had higher variance in APOE region expression than other tissues. Blood vessel: combined data from aorta, coronary, and tibial arteries. B) Principal components of APOE region expression for brain regions (2,112 brain regions, 321 individuals). C) Positive correlation of APOE expression and APOE cluster PC1 in brain.D) Association of sex and APOE cluster expression in brain. E) Age was associated with APOE cluster gene expression changes in five brain regions, tested by a mixed effects model; fixed effects: sex, age, brain regions, and interaction of age by brain region; random effect: subjects; outcome: APOE cluster PC1. *, significant interaction of age by brain region. Dataset for panels A-E: GTEx. F) Age-dependent changes in APOE cluster PC1 in normal aged and AD brains [70]. This association was tested by a mixed-effects model with fixed effects for sex, age group, and brain region (entorhinal cortex, superior frontal gyrus, postcentral gyrus, hippocampus), AD and interaction of AD, and age, and random effect, subjects. Outcome: APOE cluster PC1. *, significant interaction of age by AD. AD dataset: GSE48350. N = 57 controls (age <80 y, 35; >80, 22) and 28 AD brains (age <80, N= 7; >80, N= 21).
Five brain regions differed by age for PC1 of the APOE cluster (Fig. 4E). By age 60, APOE PC1 in cerebral cortex was below other brain regions (Table S1). The APOE cluster PC1 was higher than age-matched controls only for ages below 80 (Fig. 4F). Amygdala and hippocampus had strong progressive decreases of PC1, while cerebral cortex declines were modest. Although these brain samples excluded gross neuropathology, nonetheless after age 70, cognitively normal elderly frequently have modest cerebrovascular pathology and pre-clinical AD pathology (Braak stages I-II and CAA) [36–38]. APOE PC2 only showed age-mediated increase in cerebellum and no other regions (Figure S5, Table S3).
We examined genes on other chromosomes that are markers for gliosis of normal brain aging in human and rodent [29, 39, 40]. Consistent with earlier findings, GFAP, IBA1, and TNFα increased progressively during normal aging with brain region-specificity in hippocampus and amygdala. This parallel with the age increase of APOE PC1 (Fig. S4) suggests that the APOE cluster PC1 is representative for age changes in multiple inflammatory genes. The APOE cluster includes multiple transcription factors noted above that could mediate genome-wide aging changes.
For AD, co-expression differed from age-matched normal with stronger co-expression of BCAM-CLPTM1 and APOC1-TOMM40 (Fig. 3D). APOE and APOC1 mRNA paralleled APOE cluster PC1 in AD brains (Fig. S7). In general, the differences in APOE cluster between AD and non-AD brain was age-specific (Fig 5F, S7). Before age 80, AD and non-AD brains had larger difference in APOE PC1 (Figure 5F). At age <80, AD brains had higher mRNA levels for APOE, APOC1, and lower expression in TOMM40 and CLPTM1 (Fig. S7). After age 80, AD brains only had lower expression in NECTIN2 and CLPTM1. These findings confirm associations of elevated APOE mRNA in AD brains [41, 42], but indicate a need for a more detailed analysis of brain regions by age.
Figure 5.
APOE cluster genes shows conserved co-expression with four gene-modules in human, chimpanzee, and mouse. Data sources: human, GTEx; chimpanzee, GSE7540; mouse, GSE142066. For hub genes, see Supplementary excel file. A) Consensus WGCNA identified four modules associated APOE-cluster in brains of human, chimpanzee, and mouse (B6, APOE3 and APOE4-TR; both sexes). B) The heatmaps show the top canonical pathways and potential upstream regulators of top 50 hub genes of modules ME1–4, based on IPA analysis. P-values below 10−5 were converted to 10−5 for better visualization. C) Pearson correlation heatmap of top 5 hub genes of each model and APOE cluster genes in GTEx brain data. * p < 0.05 after multiple test correction. D) Venn diagram showing transcriptional factor binding motifs of APOE cluster genes of human and mouse. E) Heatmap presenting the number of TF binding motifs in the promoter of APOE cluster genes in human and mouse based on TRANFAC database for −10,000 to +1000 nucleotides from transcriptional start site. Potential TF binding sites were examined or each gene in the geneXplain and Ensembl databases.
Regulatory networks of the APOE cluster
The shared co-expression of APOE cluster genes cluster in several species suggested the possibility of shared regulatory networks. First, we analyzed gene modules in the consensus weighted gene co-expression network (WGCNA) for the brain transcriptomes of human, chimpanzee, and mouse. Next, APOE cluster genes were screened for transcription factor (TF) binding sites in promoters of human and mouse. Four WGCNA modules (ME1–4) were shared in human, chimpanzee, and mouse (Fig 5A,C). The top upstream regulators of modules ME1–4 included TGF-β3 (transforming growth factor-β3), CLPP (caseinolytic mitochondrial matrix peptidase proteolytic subunit), and NFKBIA (NF-κB inhibitor alpha) (Fig 5B).
APOE cluster gene expression differed by module. CLPTM1, BCAM, and NECTIN2 were positively correlated in all modules, while correlations of APOC1, APOE, and TOMM40 expression were restricted to subsets (Fig. 5C). The modules mediate diverse activities: protein homeostasis (protein ubiquitination), development (HIPPO signaling, WNT/β catenin signaling, stem cell pluripotency), DNA repair (non-homologous end-joining repair), immune system (osteoarthritis, STAT3, necroptosis), and metabolism (sirtuin signaling, TCA cycle II, purine biosynthesis).These four gene modules further document shared co-expression in human, chimpanzee, and mouse, which is consistent with the highly conserved gene synteny.
Next we searched for shared TF binding motifs in the promoters of APOE cluster genes in human and mouse using the TRANFAC database [43]. Promoters of APOE cluster genes in human and mouse shared 105 potential TF binding sites, comprising most (87%) of the identified TF motifs (Fig. 6B). The highest ranked binding sites included KLF6, ING4, and Sox-related factors, which are proximal to the transcription start sites (Fig. 6C). Notably, the APOE promoter lacked the CREB group and NR-DR of its gene neighbors (Fig. 5E).
Figure 6.
Phylogenetic comparison of the six APOE cluster promoters by multiple sequence alignments for human, neanderthal, chimpanzee, macaque monkey (primate lineage); mouse and rat (rodent); dog, and pig (omnivore). Figure S8 shows the APOE clusters of these species. Lengths of tree branches represent the relative sequence similarity, calculated by neighbor-joining algorithm. The promoters of human, neanderthal, chimpanzee, and macaque were clearly separated from promoters of mouse-rat, and dog-pig, as expected. The human and mouse APOE promoters were more conserved than the other four APOE cluster genes examined. The human and mouse APOE promoters were more conserved than the other four APOE cluster genes we examined: human-mouse distances rank in ascending order of distance APOE, 1.1; APOC1, 1.4; NECTIN2, 1.4; BCAM, 1.8; TOMM40, 2.1, CLPTM1, 1.6.
TF gene candidates with identified binding motifs were screened in GTEx brain data (Fig. 6B). These genes were ranked by their correlation with APOE cluster brain PC1. The initial screen included all brain regions; secondary analysis focused on hippocampus and amygdala for relevance to AD. Some of the top TFs with strong correlation with APOE PC1 included POU3F4, SOX2, and MLX (Table 1). At a relaxed criteria of lower correlation, several TF of the MAF gene group (Table 1) showed inverse correlation with APOE PC1: BACH1, MAFB, MAFG, NFE2, and NFE2L3 (Suppl, excel file). These genes also responded to air pollution in mouse brain (Nhlh2, −30%; Mafg, +30%), which mediate oxidative stress responses through NRF2.
Table 1.
Potential transcriptional regulators of APOE-cluster genes. The top ranked candidates were selected based on their transcriptional factor group, correlation with APOE PC1 in human brain, response to nPM in mouse cerebral cortex, identification as potential upstream regulator in WGCNA modules by IPA, and genetic variants associated with AD risk.
| Correlation with APOE region PC1 in human (r) | Responses to air pollution in the cerebral cortex of adult mice | upstream of modules | SNPs associated with risk of AD in IGAP meta-analysis | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SYMBOL | Factor | Chr | brain | hip | amyg | Log2 fold change | pval | ID | Location | Beta | pval | |
| POU3F4 | Dlx group | X | 0.22 | |||||||||
| SOX2 | Sox10 | 3 | 0.17 | 0.21 | ME3 | |||||||
| SIX3 | paired related HD factors | 2 | 0.17 | |||||||||
| HMX1 | Nkx group | 2 | 0.16 | |||||||||
| SOX1 | Sox10 | 4 | 0.15 | 0.23 | rs571564 rs12429920 |
3’UTR promoter |
0.05 −0.05 |
0.0071 0.0073 |
||||
| NEUROG2 | Myogenin group | 13 | 0.14 | ME3 | ||||||||
| HES5 | Ebox | 4 | 0.14 | 0.30 | ||||||||
| SOX3 | Sox10 | 1 | 0.12 | 0.24 | ME3 | |||||||
| NHLH2 | Myogenin group | X | 0.09 | 0.22 | −0.29 | 0.02 | ||||||
| DBP | ATF-2 group | X | 0.06 | 0.33 | ME3 | |||||||
| NFE2 | MAF group; AP-1 | 1 | −0.07 | −0.21 | ||||||||
| POU4F3 | Dlx group | 19 | −0.08 | 0.24 | ||||||||
| CHURC1 | Churchill | 12 | −0.08 | −0.24 | 0.02 | |||||||
| DMBX1 | paired related HD factors | 12 | −0.08 | −0.31 | −0.30 | |||||||
| NKX3–1 | Nkx group | 5 | −0.08 | −0.16 | ||||||||
| GLIS2 | GLI group | 14 | −0.09 | 0.36 | 0.01 | |||||||
| MAFG | MAF group | 1 | −0.09 | 0.30 | 0.00 | |||||||
| RREB1 | RREB-1 | 1 | −0.15 | 0.49 | 0.01 | |||||||
| BHLHE40 | Ebox; E2A group | 8 | −0.16 | |||||||||
| CEBPD | C/EBP group | 16 | −0.16 | −0.21 | ||||||||
| ELK4 | Ets-related factors | 17 | −0.16 | rs41304251 rs59990545 rs57847589 rs72750941 rs55736919 rs66742105 rs56927917 rs7521095 rs55781355 rs75638049 |
Intron Intron Intron Intron Intron Intron Intron Intron Intron Intron |
−0.33 −0.28 −0.28 −0.28 −0.28 −0.27 −0.26 −0.27 −0.26 −0.12 |
0.0001 0.0003 0.0003 0.0004 0.0004 0.0005 0.0005 0.0006 0.0008 0.0024 |
|||||
| KLF11 | Sp1 group | 6 | −0.16 | ME3 | ||||||||
| ATF1 | CREB group | 3 | −0.17 | |||||||||
| MLX | Ebox | 3 | −0.17 | |||||||||
Contrary to expectations from prior studies of human hepatocytes [16] noted earlier, we did not find a role for PPARγ or RXRA binding sites in the APOE cluster of cerebral cortex. Some of the APOE cluster upstream regulators (TGFB1, NFKBIA, Figure 5B) have PPARγ and RXRA binding sites (identified by TRANSFAC), which suggest an indirect effect of either TF. Moreover, there may be binding sites further down-stream or upstream of defined promoter regions. A direct comparison of mouse and human APOE promoters showed limited shared sequence beyond −180 nucleotide upstream [30]. Several TF binding sites in human were absent in mouse for PPARγ and a cluster of AP1/SP1/AP2.
Candidate regulatory genes were screened for AD-associated variants, using the GWAS of the International Genomics of Alzheimer’s project (IGAP). At a stringent criteria for genome wide significance (p <5×10−8), there were no SNPs for our genes of interest. Relaxed significance (p<0.003) showed 10 SNPs for AD risk in ELK4, and 2 SNPs in SOX1. SOX1 correlated positively with APOE cluster PC1 in hippocampus. For additional gene candidates, see Supplement excel file.
Promoter evolution
Because human and mouse shared 89% of TF binding motifs (Fig 5A), we compared the promoters of APOE, APOC1, BCAM, CLPTM1, and NECTIN2 of human with neanderthal, chimpanzee, macaque; mouse and rat (rodents); dog and pig (omnivore) (Fig. 6). The human and primate promoters were clearly separated from promoters of mouse-rat, and dog-pig, as expected. The human and mouse APOE promoters were more conserved than the other four APOE cluster genes (Figure 6). In contrast, the TOMM40 promoter was the least conserved between humans and rodents. The human and mouse APOE promoters were more conserved than the other four APOE cluster genes examined: human-mouse phylogenetic differences were ranked in ascending order of distance APOE, 1.1 (26.6% sequence similarity); APOC1, 1.4 (22.5%); NECTIN2, 1.4 (17.7%); CLPTM1, 1.6 (19.7%); BCAM, 1.8 (15.6%); TOMM40, 2.1 (19%).
The shared co-regulation of these six genes may have been a factor in the synteny that persisted in multiple lineages that diverged at least 100 million years ago, as observed for other co-regulated gene clusters [18]. Because topologically associated domains (TAD) of chromatin are conserved particularly for syntenic regions [44], the APOE gene cluster is likely to be within a TAD.
Inflammatory processes associated with air pollution might involve endotoxins as well as combustion products that were experienced sequentially in human evolution: pre-Homo was exposed to high levels of endotoxin from savannah animal herds, followed by domestic fire, which introduced novel toxins in smoke and charred foods that also arise during fossil fuel combustion [45]. The major histocompatibility complex (MHC) of mammals is another ancient ensemble of genes that mediate metabolism and reproduction, as well as in adaptive immunity [46]. The APOE and MHC clusters exemplify ‘life history gene complexes’ that mediate reproductive success through pleiotropic networks of metabolism, host defense, and reproduction [46, 47]. The APOE cluster includes two gonadotrophins (noted above, but not shown on Fig. 1).
The body-wide impact of the APOE gene cluster is enabled by extensive pleiotropies with systemic interactions of lipids (APOE, APOC1), energy (CYP2A, BCL3, OPA3, TOMM40); inflammation (C5a, IGFL1, IRF2B1, TGFβ1); immunity (CLPTM1, BCAM, NECTIN2); viral binding (APOE, NECTIN2); blood brain barrier (NECTIN2); gonadotrophins (CGB, LHB); transcription factors (BCL3, RELB, ZNF). The APOE cluster may also modulate AD risk via viral host defense (Table S2). APOE4 carriers show higher risk of infections for hepatitis B [48], herpes simplex virus 1 [49], and COVID19 [50]. These complex exogenous and endogenous interactions are outlined in Figure 7.
Figure 7.
The APOE cluster is a potential link between endogenous and exogenous AD risk factors. A) Schema of the complex interplay of AD risk factors through APOE cluster. B) Transcriptional network of APOE cluster (Table 1), and the relationship with vascular disease, AD, neuroinflammation, and oxidative stress response. Dashed lines are links based on the IPA database.
Besides haplotypes of variants associated with dementia, the body mass index (BMI) differs by haplotypes of APOE and TOMM40 [51]. The APOE cluster presents a regulatory nexus for infections, as well as non-infectious diseases. Both air pollution and APOE4 may increase vulnerability to COVID-9 infection [50, 52]. We anticipate expanding roles of the APOE gene cluster in global environmental hazards.
Vascular disease factors in the APOE gene cluster may contribute to the associations of air pollution and AD. APOE4 is a risk factor for ischemic heart disease, stroke, weak blood-brain barrier, microinfarcts (microbleeds), and hypertension [11, 53–56]. Air pollution is also a leading preventable risk factor of ischemic heart disease and stroke [57, 58]. Other APOE cluster genes associated with AD have vascular associations (Table S2). APOC1 modulates the AD risk factor of low HDL [59] by inhibiting the cholesterol ester transfer protein (CETP). Both NFKB and NRF2 pathways are involved in atherosclerosis [60, 61]. BHLHE40 (transcription factor, alternate name DEC1) also influences blood pressure [62]. Correlation of BHLE40 gene with the APOE cluster PC1 (Table 1, Fig. 7) suggests links between circadian rhythm, blood pressure, vascular disease, and AD progression.
A major unknown is how age changes in APOE cluster expression may influence its AD-associations [4, 5]. We need a new set of transgenic mice carrying AD-associated variants of the human APOE cluster for expanded GxE analysis and for testing of drug interventions. Transgene responses to exogenous and endogenous factors in the AD exposome [63] should be a priority in further development of APOE mice. We need a more comprehensive systems approach that combines multiple targets with the individual genotype and lifestyle of the patient [63, 64]. Cigarette smoking was recognized as an AD risk factor before air pollution [65], but is rarely considered in subject selection for drug trials. The identified transcriptional factor candidates could be combined with diagnostic or therapeutic ongoing studies (Fig. 7B).
In conclusion, we showed that the rodent Apoe gene cluster responds to external stimuli with coordinated gene expression changes that also differ for the human APOE cluster by age, sex, and stages of AD. The rodent gene responses to air pollution nPM in brain and lung may be useful biomarkers for human responses to air pollution. The transcription factor regulators of this network suggest links between changes in APOE gene cluster expression for cognitive aging and AD, as well as other age-related conditions. Future studies should consider screening for APOE-cluster coordinated changes in relationship to AD stages. We cannot remain content with mouse models of single AD genes without considering the GxE.
Methods
Data
This study examined RNAseq datasets from mouse, human, chimpanzee, and primary mixed glial culture to screen for the changes in 5 APOE gene-neighbors. Mouse datasets included cerebral cortex of young adults of both sexes from three mice genotypes: C57BL/6J (B6) and transgenic for human APOE3 or APOE4, by targeted replacement (APOE-TR). Mice were exposed to 300 μg/m3 nanosized particulate matter (nPM, 5 h/day, 3 d/wk) or filtered air for 8 (B6) or 15 wk (APOE-TR). Study design, collection of air pollution, and chemical composition are described in [21] and Figure S10. The nPM subfraction of ultrafine PM0.2 is depleted in polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons. RNA datasets were produced from mRNA libraries using TRUseq Stranded mRNA Kit (Illumina), and single end-sequencing (> 50 nt) using Illumina NextSeq500. Preprocessing used Partek flow software platform [66]. Rhe reads were aligned and quantified using mouse reference genome (mm10) with Tophat2 (v2.0.8b). Counts per million (CPM) were normalized using trimmed mean of M values (TMM) [67]. Data are accessible in NCBI GEO (GSE142066). Other used datasets include: Mouse lungs exposed to coal tar (GSE87690); Mouse lungs exposed to ambient air pollution (GSE41698); Rat fetal brain with maternal LPS challenge (GSE34058); and Adult mouse brain after LPS challenge (GSE3253).
Human data was accessed from Genotype-Tissue Expression (GTEx) database representing multiple tissues and brain regions of 651 men and women, aged 20–80 yr [68, 69]. The data was available as transcripts per kilobase million (TPM). Expression changes were further validated in a human brain microarray (GSE48350) [70].
Brain RNA data for chimpanzee (Pan troglodytes) included 11 brain regions from 2 female and 1 male, age 15–34 yr (GSE7540) [71]. Data were generated by human oligonucleotide arrays (GENECHIP Human Genome U95Av2 arrays (Affymetrix, Santa Clara, CA), representing 10,000 genes and 12,625 probes. Data from a genome wide association meta-analysis by the International Genomics of Alzheimer’s project (IGAP; 17,008 AD cases, 37,154 age-matched controls) was used to screen for potential AD single nucleotide mutations in the identified genes [72]. Mixed glial cDNA data was generated by Affymetrix Rat Whole Genome 230.2 array in our prior study [29].
Protein analysis
APOE, APOC1, and NECTIN2 protein levels were analyzed by mouse specific ELISA (LSBio: LS-F33290–1, LS-F5921–1, LS-F4714–1).
Consensus Weighted Gene Co-expression Analysis (WGCNA)
The consensus co-expression network was formed from the four brain expression datasets: GTEx (limited to human brain), chimpanzee and mouse (C57BL/6J, APOE-TR). We examined 7061 genes shared by all four datasets. Consensus co-expression networks were identified following methods previously described [73]. Briefly, the adjacency matrices (correlation) were constructed using log2 expression in each data set. The matrices were converted to scale free networks using the soft threshold power of six. Results were converted to topological overlap matrices (TOM); these were merged to form a consensus tree network using a hierarchical clustering of dissimilarity matrix (1-TOM). Modules of ≥ 30 genes were formed using a dynamic tree-cut algorithm. Singular value decomposition method was used to calculate the maximum amount of variance per module. Modules containing APOE gene clusters were identified by Ingenuity Pathway Analysis (IPA, Qiagen). Hub genes of modules were selected for eigengene connectivity (kME) of genes in each module.
Transcriptional factor binding sites
Transcription factor (TF) binding motifs in APOE gene-neighbors were predicted from TRANSFAC database [74, 75]. We screened for TF binding motifs with http://www.genexplain.com in APOE cluster genes of human and mouse, using default parameters of genexplain defined promoter boundaries: −10,000, +1000 nucleotides of transcription start sites (TSS). Genes from TF groups were manually extracted from genexplain for expression screening.
Statistical analysis
The Pearson correlation analysis, principle component analysis, and data management used Rstudio. Multiple sequence alignment and phylogenic analysis of the promoter sequences used MAFFT online tool [76]. Sequences (−5,000, +1000 nucleotides of the TSS) were from ENSEMBL reference genomes [77].
Results
Apoe gene cluster response to air pollution
Five genes of the mouse Apoe cluster shared transcriptional responses of cerebral cortex to air pollution nanosized particulate matter (nPM): Bcam, Nectin2, Tomm40, Apoe, Apoc1, and Clptm1. The strongest correlations were found for Apoe, Apoc1, and Tomm40 (Fig. 2A). Positive correlations of Apoe-Apoc1 (r = 0.57, p<0.01), and Apoe-Tomm40 (r = 0.72, p<0.0001) were generally consistent among mouse strains (Fig 2A–B). However, wildtype B6 differed from APOE-TR with inversely correlated expression of Bcam-Apoc1. While APOE mRNA showed a higher baseline in female APOE-TR mice, there was no sex difference in nPM response. Proteins of B6 male mice had corresponding responses to nPM for Apoe, Apoc1, and Nectin2 in. APOE protein was lowered (25%) by exposure to three nPM levels (Fig. 2C). Levels of APOE, APOC1, and NECTIN2 were positively correlated (r = 0.36–0.46).
Because air pollution activates astrocytes and microglia [25, 29], we examined response of mixed glial cultures (astrocyte: microglia, 3:1) to air pollution nPM, or to LPS as a model for endotoxins in urban air pollution (Fig. S1A). Glial mRNA for Apoe-Apoc1 and Apoe-Tomm40 were positively correlated (r = 0.78) (Fig. S1A), as observed for in vivo exposure. There was a strong correlation for glial Tomm40-Nectin2 response to LPS (r = 0.76) similar to in vivo. However, there was no in vitro response to nPM, in contrast to vivo. For Apoe-Tomm40, response to LPS, the expression was inversely correlated (r=−0.7), again in contrast to nPM responses in mouse brain and in vitro. In contrast to mixed glia, LPS responses in adult mouse brain included the positive correlation of Apoe-Apoc1-Clptm1 expression, which paralleled the reported nPM responses (Fig. S2B). These differences may represent cell type specificity, shown for the Apoe promoter [30].
Lung was also examined for APOE cluster responses to air pollution components because responses mediated by NFKB and NRF2 are systemic [33]. Since RNAseq was not available for mouse lung we accessed cDNA datasets for two other air pollutant exposures: ambient urban air by inhalation [31] or coal tar by gavage (Labib et al 2017). Each treatment induced different subsets of the Apoe cluster (Fig. S1). Coal tar increased Apoc1, Apoe, and Nectin2, while ambient urban air only induced Apoc1; Tomm40 did not respond. Antioxidant and inflammatory responses of genes located elsewhere include Nqo1 and Il1b, which also responded to nPM in our study of Nrf2 regulated phase II gene expression in lung and brain [33]. The different mouse genotypes and mode of exposure limit further comparisons.
Human and chimpanzee APOE gene cluster expression
Findings on rodent brain and glia were extended to human and chimpanzee RNA from three public databases: the human Genotype-Tissue Expression (GTEx) and GSE48350 databases for brain regions and other tissues (both sexes, ages 20–80 y, normal aging, and AD); and adult chimpanzee brain (GSE7540).
Humans had strong co-expression relationships in brain and other tissues for APOE-APOC1, APOE-TOMM40, and BCAM-NECTIN2 (Fig. 3 A, B). Other correlations included TOMM40-CLPTM1 (r = 0.8), BCAM-NECTIN2 (r = 0.7), and APOE-APOC1 (r = 0.65) (Fig. 3E). These relationships were consistent across adult ages 20 to 80. Chimpanzee brain also showed positive correlations among BCAM-CLPTM1, BCAM-NECTIN2, CLPTM1-NECTIN2 (Fig. 3C). The co-expression of APOE-APOC1 and TOMM40-CLPTM1 is shared, for human, chimpanzee, and rodent; (Fig. 2, 3). The apparent lack of species differences in the brain expression of APOE cluster is not conclusive because of the limited samples for chimpanzee.
Human brain age changes were corroborated with an independent cDNA dataset of brains with carefully defined AD neuropathology (GSE48350)[70]. For normal brain aging before age 80 with minimal AD changes, both datasets showed consistent co-expression of APOE-APOC1, TOMM40-CLPTM1, TOMM40-BCAM-NECTIN2 (Fig. 3D). AD may alter expression of APOE cluster, suggested in the lack of correlation in TOMM40-BCAM and BCAM-NECTIN, caveat the small sample.
APOE cluster gene expression varied widely by tissues in principal component analysis (PCA). At the extremes, white blood cells had the highest variance in APOE cluster expression (Fig. 4A), versus liver with the lowest variance. In brain, the PC1 (60% variance, Fig. 4B) represented a positive correlation with APOE (r = 0.83), APOC1 (0.64), and a negative correlation with TOMM40 (−0.27), BCAM (−0.24), and NECTIN2 (−0.15) (Figure S5B). In contrast, the PC2 (25% variance, Fig. 4B) represented a positive correlation with APOC1 (0.97), APOE (0.54), and a negative correlation with TOMM40 (−0.58), CLPTM1 (−0.33), and BCAM (−0.24) (Figure S5C). APOC1 and APOE had the highest factor loading for PC1 and PC2 in this brain data. In the following sections, we described the changes in APOE cluster PCs rather than individual genes. The individual gene expression data is reported in Figure S4.
Age and sex were examined for brain region differences in expression of the APOE cluster PC1. A mixed effect model was used to adjust for subject random effects; age was centered at age 60 to capture the baseline differences at this age. The GTEx brain samples were curated to exclude extensive pathology. At age 60, cerebral cortex had a lower baseline APOE PC1 than other brain regions (β: ranged 6-fold, from 0.005 in nucleus accumbens to 0.0008 in spinal cord; Table S1). Five brain regions differed by age for expression of the APOE cluster PC1. At older ages, cerebellar hemisphere and hypothalamus had higher APOE PC1. Contrarily, amygdala and hippocampal expression decreased with age. Cerebral cortex age changes were modest. Sex had a minor fixed effect on APOE cluster PC1 (3% sex difference, p<0.05) (Fig 4D; see Table S1 for full analysis).
We examined other genes outside of the APOE complex that are associated with the gliosis of normal brain aging in human and rodent [29, 39, 40]. Consistent with these earlier findings, GFAP, IBA1, and TNFα showed brain region-specific age-dependent increases, particularly in the hippocampus and amygdala, paralleling the age increase of APOE PC1 (Fig. S4). The APOE cluster PC1 is an indicator of change for all genes in the cluster. Individual gene mRNA changes with age differed by brain region: APOE, decreased in hippocampus; APOC1, decreased in hippocampus and amygdala, increased in cerebellar hemisphere; CLPTM1, decreased in amygdala, increased in hypothalamus; BCAM, decreased in amygdala and hypothalamus; NECTIN2, decreased in amygdala, cerebellar hemisphere, and hypothalamus; TOMM40, no strong age change (Fig. S4).
Because the GTEx dataset lacked ages >80 y, we examined older decades in the cDNA human brain dataset analyzed above [70] (GSE48350). Surprisingly, this oldest age group had no correlation of APOE-CLPTM1, CLPTM1-TOMM40, and NECTIN2-TOMM40. The increase of APOE PC1 in hippocampus (Fig. S6) warrants further study with larger samples. AD brains also differed by age below 80 yr. The APOE cluster PC1 was higher than age-matched controls only at ages <80 (Fig. 4F). Ages >80 y, had similarly higher expression of APOE in AD and controls than for young ages, suggesting an age ceiling for relationship of AD in the APOE cluster. APOE and APOC1 mRNA paralleled APOE cluster PC1 in the AD brains (Fig. S6). In contrast, some mRNA changes differed by the age of the AD patients. For AD >80 years, NECTN mRNA was higher than normal controls, while TOMM40 mRNA was lower for younger AD <80 years old. CLPTM1 mRNA had a lower level in AD brains in both age groups. BCAM did not differ from AD in old age.
Regulatory networks of the APOE cluster in relation to Alzheimer disease (AD)
Based on the above evidence for species-shared transcriptional relationships in the APOE gene cluster, we examined potential regulatory networks. First, we analyzed gene modules in the consensus weighted gene co-expression network for the brain transcriptome of human and mouse (both sexes of wildtype B6 and APOE-TR). Chimpanzee was included as a close human relative that, like wildtype rodents, does not incur AD brain-region specific neurodegeneration in old age [19, 20]. Second, we screened APOE cluster genes for transcriptional binding sites in promoters of human and mouse.
The consensus WGCNA identified four modules in association with APOE cluster genes in human, chimpanzee, and mouse. The top 50 hub genes of these modules by IPA were enriched for pathways of protein ubiquitination, HIPPO signaling, osteoarthritis signaling, and STAT3 (Fig. 5 A,B). The top upstream regulators of modules ME1–4 included TGF-β3 (transforming growth factor-β3), CLPP (caseinolytic mitochondrial matrix peptidase proteolytic subunit), OGA (O-GlcNAcase), and NFKBIA (NF-κB inhibitor alpha). APOE cluster expression showed differential correlations with these four modules. CLPTM1, BCAM, and NECTIN2 were positively correlated with all modules, whereas APOE, APOC1, and TOMM40 were selectively correlated with different subsets of modules: APOC1 had strong positive correlation with ME2, but negative correlation with ME1,3,4 (Fig. 5B); APOE expression was positively correlated with ME2; TOMM40 was positively correlated with ME1, 3, and 4, but not ME2. Overall, the four gene modules show conserved co-expression in human, chimpanzee, and mouse.
Next we searched for shared transcription factor (TF) binding motifs in the promoters of APOE cluster genes in human and mouse. Our target six genes are located on a 0.15 million nucleotide genome region, which has a conserved order but with inverted synteny [78] between human and mouse (Fig. 6). The APOE cluster of select other mammals is shown in Supplement (Fig. S8). Potential promoters in proximal and distal regions were examined in the TRANFAC database for −10,000 upstream to +1000 downstream nucleotides from transcriptional starting site (TSS) of each of these six genes [43]. Human and mouse shared 105 potential TF binding sites that comprise 87% of those identified in the APOE cluster (Fig. 5D). The highest binding sites included KLF6, ING4, and Sox-related factors, which are proximal to the TSS of most APOE cluster genes of mouse and human (Fig. 5E). Genes differed in the extent of shared motifs: for example, the APOE promoter did not share the CREB group, and NR-DR in gene neighbors. For details, see Supplementary excel file.
Because human and mouse shared 89% of TF binding motifs (Fig 5A), we compared the promoters of APOE, APOC1, BCAM, CLPTM1, and NECTIN2 of human with neanderthal, chimpanzee, macaque; mouse and rat (rodents); dog and pig (omnivore) (Fig. 6). The human and primate promoters were clearly separated from promoters of mouse-rat, and dog-pig, as expected. The human and mouse APOE promoters were more conserved than the other four APOE cluster genes (Figure 6). In contrast, the TOMM40 promoter was the least conserved between humans and rodents. The human and mouse APOE promoters were more conserved than the other four APOE cluster genes examined: human-mouse phylogenetic differences are ranked in ascending order of distance APOE, 1.1 (26.6% sequence similarity); APOC1, 1.4 (22.5%); NECTIN2, 1.4 (17.7%); CLPTM1, 1.6 (19.7%); BCAM, 1.8 (15.6%); TOMM40, 2.1 (19%).
The shared co-regulation of these six genes may have been a factor in the synteny that persisted in multiple lineages that diverged at least 100 million years ago, as observed for other co-regulated gene clusters [18]. Because topologically associated domains (TAD) of chromatin are conserved particularly for syntenic regions [44], the APOE gene cluster is likely to be within a TAD.
The top regulatory candidates sought by screening for mRNA differences of TF genes that were identified by binding motifs in GTEx brain data (Fig. 7B). Genes were ranked by their correlation with APOE cluster brain PC1 in GTEx data. The analysis included all brain regions, and was then restricted to hippocampus, or amygdala for relevance to AD. The top correlated TF genes included POU3F4 (r=0.22), SOX2 (r=0.17), MLX (r= −0.17), ATF1 (r= −0.17), MLX (r= −0.17), and BHLHE40 (r= −0.16) (Table 1). Hippocampal genes with the strongest correlations were SOX1 (r= 0.2), and DMBX1 (r = −0.3). In amygdala, DBP (r = 0.3) and DMBX1 (r = −0.3) were highly correlated with APOE PC1. A subset was enriched in upstream regulators of ME3 from consensus WGCNA of total brain: SOX2, NEUROG2, SOX3, DBP, and KLF1. Using a relaxed criteria of lower correlation, several genes from the MAF family showed inverse correlations with PC1: NFE2 (whole brain r= −0.07; amygdala r = −0.21), MAFG (brain r= −0.09), BACH1 (brain r= −0.14), NFE2L3 (brain r= −0.12), and MAFB (brain r = −0.12) (Table S1). These genes are associated with NRF2 mediated phase II gene responses to oxidative stress involving several genes that respond to air pollution: Nhlh2 (−30%) and Mafg (+30%). These genes also showed correlated APOE cluster expression in human brain for PC1: NHLH2 (amygdala r = 0.22); MAFG (brain r = −0.09).
Candidate regulatory genes were then screened for variants associated with AD risk, using GWAS of the International Genomics of Alzheimer’s project (IGAP). At stringent criteria for genome wide significance (p <5×10−8), there were no SNPs for our genes of interest. A relaxed significance (p<0.003) showed 10 SNPs for AD risk in ELK4, and 2 SNPs in SOX1. SOX1 was also positively correlated with APOE cluster PC1 in hippocampus. For additional gene candidates, see Supplement excel file.
Supplementary Material
Highlights.
APOE and its gene neighbors (APOE cluster) have coordinated response to air pollution components
The human brain also shows coordinate expression of the APOE cluster
Aging and Alzheimer’s alter APOE cluster expression with brain-region-specificity
The APOE cluster has a conserved pattern of gene regulation in mammals
The identified regulatory network of the APOE cluster gives novel links between the environment and risk of Alzheimer’s disease
Research in context:
Systemic review:
Our work depicts a potential novel link between exogenous and endogenous risk factors of Alzheimer’s disease through APOE and its gene neighbors (APOE cluster). We examined APOE cluster responses of the brain to air pollution: ultrafine PM (PM0.2, <0.2 μm diameter). Moreover, we analyzed multiple datasets from human, mouse, chimpanzee, and cell models to understand the changes in this cluster by age, sex, and other components of air pollution.
Interpretations:
Apoe gene cluster responds to external stimuli with coordinated gene expression changes that also differ for the human APOE cluster by age, sex, and stages of AD. The rodent gene responses to air pollution nPM in brain and lung may be useful biomarkers for human responses to air pollution. The transcription factor regulators of this network suggest links between changes in APOE gene cluster expression for cognitive aging and AD, as well as other age-related conditions.
Future direction:
Future studies should consider screening for APOE-cluster coordinated changes in relationship to AD stages. We cannot remain content with mouse models of single AD genes without considering the GxE.
Acknowledgement:
We appreciate comments from Christian Pike (USC), Hussein Yassine (USC), Derek Wildman (University of South Florida), Alexander Kulminski (Duke University). The evolutionary framework draws on discussions with members of the Center for Academic Research and Training in Anthropogeny (CARTA).
Funding: This work was supported by the Cure Alzheimer’s Fund (C.E.F.) and the National Institutes on Aging: C.E.F. (R01-AG051521, P50-AG005142, P01-AG055367); A.H. (PI: Kelvin Davis, T32- AG052374; Nelson Freimer, 5T32NS048004-15); M.T. (PI: Eileen Crimmins, T32-AG000037).
Footnotes
Conflict of interest: The authors have no conflict of interest to declare.
Data availability:
All data used in this paper are publicly available.
References
- [1].Cacciottolo M, Wang X, Driscoll I, Woodward N, Saffari A, Reyes J, et al. Particulate air pollutants, APOE alleles and their contributions to cognitive impairment in older women and to amyloidogenesis in experimental models. Transl Psychiatry. 2017;7:e1022. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [2].Kulick ER, Elkind MSV, Boehme AK, Joyce NR, Schupf N, Kaufman JD, et al. Long-term exposure to ambient air pollution, APOE-epsilon4 status, and cognitive decline in a cohort of older adults in northern Manhattan. Environ Int. 2020;136:105440. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [3].Roses AD, Lutz MW, Amrine-Madsen H, Saunders AM, Crenshaw DG, Sundseth SS, et al. A TOMM40 variable-length polymorphism predicts the age of late-onset Alzheimer’s disease. Pharmacogenomics J. 2010;10:375–84. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [4].Kulminski AM, Shu L, Loika Y, Nazarian A, Arbeev K, Ukraintseva S, et al. APOE region molecular signatures of Alzheimer’s disease across races/ethnicities. Neurobiol Aging. 2020;87:141 e1–e8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [5].Zhou X, Chen Y, Mok KY, Kwok TCY, Mok VCT, Guo Q, et al. Non-coding variability at the APOE locus contributes to the Alzheimer’s risk. Nat Commun. 2019;10:3310. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [6].Lutz MW, Sundseth SS, Burns DK, Saunders AM, Hayden KM, Burke JR, et al. A Genetics-based Biomarker Risk Algorithm for Predicting Risk of Alzheimer’s Disease. Alzheimers Dement (N Y). 2016;2:30–44. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [7].Davignon J, Roederer G. [Phenotype of apolipoprotein E, hyperlipidemia and atherosclerosis]. Union Med Can. 1988;117:56–61. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [8].Shi J, Liu Y, Liu Y, Li Y, Qiu S, Bai Y, et al. Association between ApoE polymorphism and hypertension: A meta-analysis of 28 studies including 5898 cases and 7518 controls. Gene. 2018;675:197–207. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [9].Kim IY, Grodstein F, Kraft P, Curhan GC, Hughes KC, Huang H, et al. Interaction between apolipoprotein E genotype and hypertension on cognitive function in older women in the Nurses’ Health Study. PLoS One. 2019;14:e0224975. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [10].Mooyaart AL, Valk EJ, van Es LA, Bruijn JA, de Heer E, Freedman BI, et al. Genetic associations in diabetic nephropathy: a meta-analysis. Diabetologia. 2011;54:544–53. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [11].Davignon J, Gregg RE, Sing CF. Apolipoprotein E polymorphism and atherosclerosis. Arteriosclerosis. 1988;8:1–21. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [12].Deelen J, Evans DS, Arking DE, Tesi N, Nygaard M, Liu X, et al. A meta-analysis of genome-wide association studies identifies multiple longevity genes. Nat Commun. 2019;10:3669. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [13].Lu F, Guan H, Gong B, Liu X, Zhu R, Wang Y, et al. Genetic variants in PVRL2-TOMM40-APOE region are associated with human longevity in a Han Chinese population. PLoS One. 2014;9:e99580. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [14].Babenko VN, Smagin DA, Kudryavtseva NN. RNA-Seq Mouse Brain Regions Expression Data Analysis: Focus on ApoE Functional Network. J Integr Bioinform. 2017;14:356–16. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [15].Allan CM, Taylor S, Taylor JM. Two hepatic enhancers, HCR.1 and HCR.2, coordinate the liver expression of the entire human apolipoprotein E/C-I/C-IV/C-II gene cluster. J Biol Chem. 1997;272:29113–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [16].Subramanian S, Gottschalk WK, Kim SY, Roses AD, Chiba-Falek O. The effects of PPARgamma on the regulation of the TOMM40-APOE-C1 genes cluster. Biochim Biophys Acta Mol Basis Dis. 2017;1863:810–6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [17].Mijalski T, Harder A, Halder T, Kersten M, Horsch M, Strom TM, et al. Identification of coexpressed gene clusters in a comparative analysis of transcriptome and proteome in mouse tissues. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005;102:8621–6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [18].Ghanbarian AT, Hurst LD. Neighboring Genes Show Correlated Evolution in Gene Expression. Mol Biol Evol. 2015;32:1748–66. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [19].Finch CE, Austad SN. Commentary: is Alzheimer’s disease uniquely human? Neurobiol Aging. 2015;36:553–5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [20].Rapoport SI. Hypothesis: Alzheimer’s disease is a phylogenetic disease. Medical Hypotheses. 1989;29:147–50. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [21].Haghani A, Johnson R, Safi N, Zhang H, Thorwald M, Mousavi A, et al. Toxicity of urban air pollution particulate matter in developing and adult mouse brain: Comparison of total and filter-eluted nanoparticles. Environ Int. 2020;136:105510. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [22].Haghani A, Cacciottolo M, Doty KR, D’Agostino C, Thorwald M, Safi N, et al. Mouse brain transcriptome responses to inhaled nanoparticulate matter differed by sex and APOE in Nrf2-Nfkb interactions. Elife. 2020;9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [23].Woodward NC, Pakbin P, Saffari A, Shirmohammadi F, Haghani A, Sioutas C, et al. Traffic-related air pollution impact on mouse brain accelerates myelin and neuritic aging changes with specificity for CA1 neurons. Neurobiol Aging. 2017;53:48–58. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [24].Pomatto LCD, Cline M, Woodward N, Pakbin P, Sioutas C, Morgan TE, et al. Aging attenuates redox adaptive homeostasis and proteostasis in female mice exposed to traffic-derived nanoparticles (‘vehicular smog’). Free Radic Biol Med. 2018;121:86–97. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [25].Mumaw CL, Levesque S, McGraw C, Robertson S, Lucas S, Stafflinger JE, et al. Microglial priming through the lung-brain axis: the role of air pollution-induced circulating factors. FASEB J. 2016;30:1880–91. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [26].Forman HJ, Finch CE. A critical review of assays for hazardous components of air pollution. Free Radic Biol Med. 2018;117:202–17. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [27].Aragon MJ, Topper L, Tyler CR, Sanchez B, Zychowski K, Young T, et al. Serum-borne bioactivity caused by pulmonary multiwalled carbon nanotubes induces neuroinflammation via blood-brain barrier impairment. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2017;114:E1968–E76. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [28].Morgan TE, Davis DA, Iwata N, Tanner JA, Snyder D, Ning Z, et al. Glutamatergic neurons in rodent models respond to nanoscale particulate urban air pollutants in vivo and in vitro. Environ Health Perspect. 2011;119:1003–9.21724521 [Google Scholar]
- [29].Woodward NC, Levine MC, Haghani A, Shirmohammadi F, Saffari A, Sioutas C, et al. Toll-like receptor 4 in glial inflammatory responses to air pollution in vitro and in vivo. J Neuroinflammation. 2017;14:84. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [30].Maloney B, Ge YW, Alley GM, Lahiri DK. Important differences between human and mouse APOE gene promoters: limitation of mouse APOE model in studying Alzheimer’s disease. J Neurochem. 2007;103:1237–57. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [31].Rowan-Carroll A, Halappanavar S, Williams A, Somers CM, Yauk CL. Mice exposed in situ to urban air pollution exhibit pulmonary alterations in gene expression in the lipid droplet synthesis pathways. Environ Mol Mutagen. 2013;54:240–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [32].Labib S, Williams A, Kuo B, Yauk CL, White PA, Halappanavar S. A framework for the use of single-chemical transcriptomics data in predicting the hazards associated with complex mixtures of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons. Arch Toxicol. 2017;91:2599–616. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [33].Zhang H, Liu H, Davies KJ, Sioutas C, Finch CE, Morgan TE, et al. Nrf2-regulated phase II enzymes are induced by chronic ambient nanoparticle exposure in young mice with age-related impairments. Free Radic Biol Med. 2012;52:2038–46. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [34].Kulminski AM, Huang J, Wang J, He L, Loika Y, Culminskaya I. Apolipoprotein E region molecular signatures of Alzheimer’s disease. Aging Cell. 2018;17:e12779. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [35].Zhang H, Haghani A, Mousavi AH, Cacciottolo M, D’Agostino C, Safi N, et al. Cell-based assays that predict in vivo neurotoxicity of urban ambient nano-sized particulate matter. Free Radic Biol Med. 2019;145:33–41. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [36].Malek-Ahmadi M, Perez SE, Chen K, Mufson EJ. Braak Stage, Cerebral Amyloid Angiopathy, and Cognitive Decline in Early Alzheimer’s Disease. J Alzheimers Dis. 2020;74:189–97. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [37].Duyckaerts C, Braak H, Brion JP, Buee L, Del Tredici K, Goedert M, et al. PART is part of Alzheimer disease. Acta Neuropathol. 2015;129:749–56. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [38].Guo T, Landau SM, Jagust WJ, Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging I. Detecting earlier stages of amyloid deposition using PET in cognitively normal elderly adults. Neurology. 2020;94:e1512–e24. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [39].Morgan TE, Xie Z, Goldsmith S, Yoshida T, Lanzrein AS, Stone D, et al. The mosaic of brain glial hyperactivity during normal ageing and its attenuation by food restriction. Neuroscience. 1999;89:687–99. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [40].Nichols NR, Day JR, Laping NJ, Johnson SA, Finch CE. GFAP mRNA increases with age in rat and human brain. Neurobiology of Aging. 1993;14:421–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [41].Akram A, Schmeidler J, Katsel P, Hof PR, Haroutunian V. Association of ApoE and LRP mRNA levels with dementia and AD neuropathology. Neurobiol Aging. 2012;33:628 e1–e14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [42].Lee EG, Tulloch J, Chen S, Leong L, Saxton AD, Kraemer B, et al. Redefining transcriptional regulation of the APOE gene and its association with Alzheimer’s disease. PLoS One. 2020;15:e0227667. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [43].Zeng J, Zhu S, Yan H. Towards accurate human promoter recognition: a review of currently used sequence features and classification methods. Brief Bioinform. 2009;10:498–508. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [44].Liao Y, Zhang X, Chakraborty M, Emerson JJ. Topologically associating domains and their role in the evolution of genome structure and function in Drosophila. bioRxiv. 2020:2020.05.13.094516. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [45].Trumble BC, Finch CE. The Exposome in Human Evolution: From Dust to Diesel. Q Rev Biol. 2019;94:333–94. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [46].Lerner SP, Finch CE. The major histocompatibility complex and reproductive functions. Endocr Rev. 1991;12:78–90. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [47].Finch CE, Rose MR. Hormones and the physiological architecture of life history evolution. Q Rev Biol. 1995;70:1–52. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [48].Qiao L, Luo GG. Human apolipoprotein E promotes hepatitis B virus infection and production. PLoS Pathog. 2019;15:e1007874. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [49].Linard M, Letenneur L, Garrigue I, Doize A, Dartigues JF, Helmer C. Interaction between APOE4 and herpes simplex virus type 1 in Alzheimer’s disease. Alzheimers Dement. 2020;16:200–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [50].Kuo C-L, Pilling LC, Atkins JL, Masoli JAH, Delgado J, Kuchel GA, et al. APOE e4 genotype predicts severe COVID-19 in the UK Biobank community cohort. The Journals of Gerontology: Series A. 2020. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [51].Kulminski AM, Loika Y, Culminskaya I, Huang J, Arbeev KG, Bagley O, et al. Independent associations of TOMM40 and APOE variants with body mass index. Aging Cell. 2019;18:e12869. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [52].Setti L, Passarini F, De Gennaro G, Baribieri P, Perrone MG, Borelli M, et al. SARS-Cov-2 RNA Found on Particulate Matter of Bergamo in Northern Italy: First Preliminary Evidence. medRxiv. 2020:2020.04.15.20065995. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [53].Sweeney MD, Montagne A, Sagare AP, Nation DA, Schneider LS, Chui HC, et al. Vascular dysfunction-The disregarded partner of Alzheimer’s disease. Alzheimers Dement. 2019;15:158–67. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [54].Hachinski V, Einhaupl K, Ganten D, Alladi S, Brayne C, Stephan BCM, et al. Preventing dementia by preventing stroke: The Berlin Manifesto. Alzheimers Dement. 2019;15:961–84. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [55].Finch CE, Shams S. Apolipoprotein E and Sex Bias in Cerebrovascular Aging of Men and Mice. Trends Neurosci. 2016;39:625–37. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [56].Rius-Perez S, Tormos AM, Perez S, Talens-Visconti R. Vascular pathology: Cause or effect in Alzheimer disease? Neurologia. 2018;33:112–20. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [57].Kaufman JD, Adar SD, Barr RG, Budoff M, Burke GL, Curl CL, et al. Association between air pollution and coronary artery calcification within six metropolitan areas in the USA (the Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis and Air Pollution): a longitudinal cohort study. Lancet. 2016;388:696–704. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [58].Schraufnagel DE, Balmes JR, Cowl CT, De Matteis S, Jung SH, Mortimer K, et al. Air Pollution and Noncommunicable Diseases: A Review by the Forum of International Respiratory Societies’ Environmental Committee, Part 1: The Damaging Effects of Air Pollution. Chest. 2019;155:409–16. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [59].Button EB, Robert J, Caffrey TM, Fan J, Zhao W, Wellington CL. HDL from an Alzheimer’s disease perspective. Curr Opin Lipidol. 2019;30:224–34. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [60].Ungvari Z, Tarantini S, Nyul-Toth A, Kiss T, Yabluchanskiy A, Csipo T, et al. Nrf2 dysfunction and impaired cellular resilience to oxidative stressors in the aged vasculature: from increased cellular senescence to the pathogenesis of age-related vascular diseases. Geroscience. 2019;41:727–38. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [61].Guzik TJ, Touyz RM. Oxidative Stress, Inflammation, and Vascular Aging in Hypertension. Hypertension. 2017;70:660–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [62].Nakashima A, Kawamoto T, Noshiro M, Ueno T, Doi S, Honda K, et al. Dec1 and CLOCK Regulate Na(+)/K(+)-ATPase beta1 Subunit Expression and Blood Pressure. Hypertension. 2018;72:746–54. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [63].Finch CE, Kulminski AM. The Alzheimer’s Disease Exposome. Alzheimers Dement. 2019;15:1123–32. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [64].Veitch DP, Weiner MW, Aisen PS, Beckett LA, Cairns NJ, Green RC, et al. Understanding disease progression and improving Alzheimer’s disease clinical trials: Recent highlights from the Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative. Alzheimers Dement. 2019;15:106–52. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [65].Durazzo TC, Mattsson N, Weiner MW, Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging I. Smoking and increased Alzheimer’s disease risk: a review of potential mechanisms. Alzheimers Dement. 2014;10:S122–45. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [66].Trapnell C, Roberts A, Goff L, Pertea G, Kim D, Kelley DR, et al. Differential gene and transcript expression analysis of RNA-seq experiments with TopHat and Cufflinks. Nat Protoc. 2012;7:562–78. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [67].Robinson MD, Oshlack A. A scaling normalization method for differential expression analysis of RNA-seq data. Genome Biol. 2010;11:R25. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [68].Consortium GT. Human genomics. The Genotype-Tissue Expression (GTEx) pilot analysis: multitissue gene regulation in humans. Science. 2015;348:648–60. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [69].Consortium GT. The GTEx Consortium atlas of genetic regulatory effects across human tissues. Science. 2020;369:1318–30. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [70].Berchtold NC, Coleman PD, Cribbs DH, Rogers J, Gillen DL, Cotman CW. Synaptic genes are extensively downregulated across multiple brain regions in normal human aging and Alzheimer’s disease. Neurobiol Aging. 2013;34:1653–61. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [71].Caceres M, Lachuer J, Zapala MA, Redmond JC, Kudo L, Geschwind DH, et al. Elevated gene expression levels distinguish human from non-human primate brains. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2003;100:13030–5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [72].Lambert JC, Ibrahim-Verbaas CA, Harold D, Naj AC, Sims R, Bellenguez C, et al. Meta-analysis of 74,046 individuals identifies 11 new susceptibility loci for Alzheimer’s disease. Nat Genet. 2013;45:1452–8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [73].Langfelder P, Horvath S. Tutorials for the WGCNA Package. UCLA; 2014. [Google Scholar]
- [74].Matys V, Kel-Margoulis OV, Fricke E, Liebich I, Land S, Barre-Dirrie A, et al. TRANSFAC and its module TRANSCompel: transcriptional gene regulation in eukaryotes. Nucleic Acids Res. 2006;34:D108–10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [75].Wingender E The TRANSFAC project as an example of framework technology that supports the analysis of genomic regulation. Brief Bioinform. 2008;9:326–32. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [76].Katoh K, Rozewicki J, Yamada KD. MAFFT online service: multiple sequence alignment, interactive sequence choice and visualization. Brief Bioinform. 2019;20:1160–6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [77].Hunt SE, McLaren W, Gil L, Thormann A, Schuilenburg H, Sheppard D, et al. Ensembl variation resources. Database (Oxford). 2018;2018. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [78].Saunders AM, Seldin MF. A molecular genetic linkage map of mouse chromosome 7. Genomics. 1990;8:525–35. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
All data used in this paper are publicly available.







