Table 1.
Study Type | Duration of the Study | Material and Methods | References | Main Findings |
---|---|---|---|---|
Review | The articles were conducted from January 2010 until April 2015 | The first group, containing eight articles, discussed protein or amino acid supplementation alone on sarcopenia. The second group, containing six articles, discussed exercise alone on sarcopenia. The last group, containing six articles, discussed both protein or amino acid supplementation and exercise on sarcopenia | Naseeb MA et al. [122] | Protein intakes should exceed the current recommended dietary allowance RDA (0.8 g/kg body mass per day) |
The European Society for Clinical Nutrition and Metabolism (ESPEN) hosted a Workshop on Protein Requirements in the Elderly | Healthy older people for older people who are malnourished or at risk of malnutrition because they have acute or chronic illness. Older adults above 65 years |
Deutz NE et al. [121] | Higher protein intakes in older adults in relation to the current protein RDA: a 25–50% increase for healthy individuals, a 50–90% increase those suffering from acute or chronic disease, and greater than 50% increase above the RDA for those experiencing severe illness or injury |
|
Observational and cross-sectional study | Noninstitutionalized participants from the 2005-2014 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey | Data from 11,680 adults were categorized into 51–60 years (n = 4016), 61–70 years (n = 3854), and 71 years and older (n = 3810) for analysis | Krok-Schoen JL et al. [123] | Over 30% failed to meet the current protein RDA |
Parallel-group randomized trial, protein consumption at the current RDA or twice the RDA (2RDA) affects skeletal muscle mass and physical function in elderly men | Before treatment and after 10 wk of intervention | 29 men aged > 70 y (mean ± SD) body mass index (in kg/m2): 28.3 ± 4.2 | Mitchell CJ et al. [124] | Increasing protein intake to twice RDA (1.6 g/kg per day) resulted in significant gains in lean tissue mass in healthy older men |
The current evidence related to dietary protein intake and muscle health in elderly adults | / | Elderly population of the United State | Baum JI et al. [125] | The consumption of dietary protein consistent with the upper end of the AMDRs (as much as 30–35% of total caloric intake) may prove to be beneficial, although practical limitations may make this level of dietary protein intake difficult The consumption of high-quality proteins that are easily digestible and contain a high proportion of EAAs lessens the urgency of consuming diets with an extremely high protein content |
A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials to investigate effect of whey protein supplementation on long- and short-term appetite | / | Eight publications met inclusion criteria, five records were on short-term and three records on long-term appetite | Mollahosseini M et al. [126] | Increasing daily protein intake to twice the RDA translates to an 80 kg older adult consuming about 130 protein daily. Given that protein increases satiety in a dose-dependent manner |
Review | Seniors over 50 with reduced protein intake | Paddon-Jones D et al. [127] | Results from muscle protein anabolism, appetite regulation and satiety research support the contention that meeting a protein threshold (approximately 30 g/meal) represents a promising strategy for middle-aged and older adults concerned with maintaining muscle mass while controlling body fat | |
A multicenter, randomized, double-blinded, controlled trial with evaluation the effects of two high-quality oral nutritional supplements (ONS) differing in amount and type of key nutrients in older adult men and women | A 24-week intervention period with two energy-rich (330 kcal) ONS treatment groups | Malnourished and sarcopenic men and women, 65 years and older (n = 330) | Cramer JT et al. [128] | The recommendation to increase protein intake while simultaneously maintaining, and in many cases increasing, energy intake can present a protein paradox. Dietary supplementation strategies to increase protein intake may unintentionally result in partial energy redistribution, which may negatively affect both protein and energy intake |
Experimental protocol that compared the stimulatory role of leucine, BCAA and EAA ingestion on anabolic signaling following exercise | / | Eight healthy male volunteers with mean (± E) age 27 ± 2 yr, body weight 84 ± 3 kg, height 181 ± 3 cm, and maximal leg strength 430± 13 kg | Moberg M et al. [129] | The capacity of resistance exercise to sensitize muscle to the anabolic potential of dietary protein is primarily achieved through a timely supply of EAA |
All trials were single-blind, randomized, and counterbalanced | All laboratory visits were separated by a minimum of 7 days | Seven (n = 7) younger (18–45 years; four males, three females) and seven (n = 7) older (60–80 years; four males, three females) volunteers | Lees MJ et al. [130] | The ingestion of a novel, gel-based, leucine-enriched EAA supplement results in substantial aminoacidemia and anabolic signaling in younger and older individuals. This formulation can augment dietary protein consumption, intracellular anabolic signaling, and aminoacidemia in older adults without deleterious effects on appetite and subsequent energy intake |
A systematic review of interventional evidence was performed through the use of a random-effects meta-analysis model | The effect of dietary protein supplementation during prolonged (>6 wk) resistance-type exercise training | 680 subjects | Cermak NM et al. [131] | Gains in lean tissue mass were of greater magnitude in both younger and older adults when combining resistance training with protein supplementation vs. resistance training alone. Increases in type II muscle fiber cross-sectional area in older adults following resistance training |
A systematic review, meta-analysis and meta-regression | Only randomized controlled trials with RET ≥6 weeks in duration and dietary protein supplementation | 49 studies with 1863 participants | Morton RW et al. [132] | Protein supplementation augmented muscle growth during resistance training when habitual dietary protein intakes were, on average, below 1.6 g/kg body mass per day in younger adults. However, the impact of protein supplementation on muscle mass was reduced with advancing age |
Available studies linking protein intake with physical function and health parameters in elderly 80 years old or older | / | Elderly cohorts including very old participants aged 80 years and older | Franzke B et al. [133] | The amino acid composition of a given protein source can influence the extent and amplitude of postprandiam MPS, and induce varying patterns of aminoacidemia |
Studies assessing the relation between dietary protein intake and indexes of muscle mass, physical function, distribution, and muscle mass and function | / | Persons aged > 80 y sarcopenic | Traylor DA et al. [134] | The leucine content of a given protein source is particularly important in attenuating declines in a muscle mass when consumed alongside other essential amino acid EAA |
Clinical trials anabolic response to essential amino acid plus whey protein composition is greater than whey protein alone in young healthy adults | / | 16 healthy male and females. Characteristics: age, body weight, body mass index, lean body mass, fat mass |
Park S et al. [135] | Provision of ample dietary EAA and leucine are necessary to support a skeletal muscle anabolic response in older adults. Nutritional supplementation with EAA and leucine alongside meals containing suboptimal protein content (i.e., breakfast and lunch) could assist older adults in achieving their per meal protein intake |
Study time-dependent concordance and discordance between human muscle protein synthesis and mTORC1 signaling | Recruitment for healthy young men (n = 8; 21 ± 2 y old (mean ± SEM); body mass index (in kg/m2): 22.9 ± 0.9) began in January 2008 | Eight postabsorptive healthy men (≈21 y of age) were studied during 8.5 h of primed continuous infusion of [1,2-13C2]leucine with intermittent quadriceps biopsies for determination of muscle protein synthesis MPS and anabolic signaling | Atherton PJ et al. [136] | When skeletal muscle is refractory to the anabolic effects of leucine during the postprandial ‘muscle-full’ period, it would be prudent that protein-based snacks or supplements are administered between meals when additional nutritional supplementation is required to reach their daily protein goal |
Protocol study that demonstrates the refractoriness of muscle to nutrient-led anabolic stimulation in the postprandial period | / | Healthy, recreationally active older males (n = 16, 70.3 ± 2.6 years, BMI 25.5 ± 1.8 (mean ± SD) were recruited by mail and local advertising | Mitchell WK et al. [137] | Supplements may be most likely to be effective when taken in between meals, perhaps in the form of low dose EAA mixtures, rather than leucine alone; the efficacy of which may be limited in the absence of exogenous EAA to promote whole body and skeletal muscle net balance |