Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 Mar 1.
Published in final edited form as: Am J Transplant. 2019 Aug 2;19(10):2705–2718. doi: 10.1111/ajt.15523

Vendor-Specific Microbiome Controls both Acute and Chronic Murine Lung Allograft Rejection by Altering CD4+Foxp3+ Regulatory T Cell Levels

Yizhan Guo a,b, Qing Wang a,b, Dongge Li a,b, Oscar Okwudiri Onyema a,b, Zhongcheng Mei a,b, Amir Manafi a,b, Anirban Banerjee a,b, Bayan Mahgoub a, Mark H Stoler c, Thomas H Barker d, David S Wilkes e, Andrew E Gelman f,g, Daniel Kreisel f,g, Alexander Sasha Krupnick a,b
PMCID: PMC7919421  NIHMSID: NIHMS1660976  PMID: 31278849

Abstract

Despite standardized post-operative care some lung transplant patients suffer multiple episodes of acute and chronic rejection while others avoid graft problems for reasons that are poorly understood. Using an established model of C57BL/10 to C57BL/6 minor antigen mismatched single lung transplantation we now demonstrate that the recipient microbiota contributes to variability in the alloimmune response. Specifically, mice from the Envigo facility in Frederick Maryland contain nearly double the number of CD4+Foxp3+ regulatory T cells (Tregs) than mice from the Jackson facility in Bar Harbor Maine or the Envigo facility in Indianapolis Indiana (18 vs. 9 vs. 7%). Lung graft recipients from the Maryland facility thus do not develop acute or chronic rejection. Treatment with broad spectrum antibiotics decreases Tregs and increases both acute and chronic graft rejection in otherwise tolerant strains of mice. Constitutive depletion of regulatory T cells, using Foxp3-driven expression of diphtheria toxin receptor, leads to the development of chronic rejection and supports the role of Tregs in both acute and chronic alloimmunity. Taken together our data demonstrate that the microbiota of certain individuals may contribute to tolerance through Treg-dependent mechanisms and challenges the practice of indiscriminate broad-spectrum antibiotic use in the perioperative period.

1 |. Introduction

Despite standardized treatment some lung allograft recipients experience multiple episodes of acute rejection while others remain rejection-free. In addition many lose their allograft 5–10 years post-engraftment due to chronic rejection1. Standard of care management includes routine scheduled perioperative biopsies for the diagnosis of acute rejection, which is then treated with accentuation of immunosuppression in an attempt to offset chronic rejection-mediated graft loss. Nevertheless many people with acute rejection never develop chronic rejection and many of those without acute rejection episodes develop chronic rejection2.

Animal modeling offers utility for understanding factors controlling alloimmunity but, similar to human observations, murine models vary widely. In the C57BL/10→C57BL/6 orthotopic left single lung transplant model we and others noted a wide variability in the outcome for both acute and chronic rejection between different laboratories35. Using this strain combination here we report that the outcomes of orthotopic left single lung transplant, performed in the same laboratory, vary widely based on the recipient facility of origin. We specifically demonstrate that the recipient microbiota plays a uniquely dominant role in controlling both acute and chronic rejection. Contrary to established data demonstrating that antibiotic treatment leads to a uniform downregulation of both allo- and tumor-specific immunity69 we now demonstrate that in certain individuals dysbiosis can drastically alter pulmonary and systemic levels of CD4+Foxp3+ regulatory T cells, thus increasing both acute and chronic rejection.

2 |. Materials and Methods

2.1. Animals

Male C57BL6/J (B6J), C57BL/6NJ (B6NJ), C57BL10/J (B10J), Foxp3tm3(DTR/GFP)Ayr/J (B6Foxp3DTR), Balb/cJ and B6.SJL/BoyJ CD45.1 congenic mice were purchased from the Jackson Laboratory (Bay Harbor, ME). C57BL10/NHsd (B10E) and C57BL6/NHsd mice were purchased from ENVIGO Indiana or Maryland facility (defined as B6EIndiana or B6EMaryland). Germ-free C57BL6/NTac mice were from Taconic (Albany, NY).

2.2. Orthotopic mouse lung transplantation

All animal procedures were performed in compliance with IACUC. Orthotopic left lung transplantations was performed with the combination of C57BL10/J donors and C57BL/6 recipients of different origins as described throughout the text10. For some studies of chronic rejection mice were treated with diphtheria toxin (50 ng/g intra-peritoneal) as previously described11.

2.3. Antibiotic ablation and transplantation of gut microbiota

Vancomycin hydrochloride was from GoldBio (St. Louis, MO) and Ampicillin, Metronidazole and Neomycin were from Sigma (St. Louis, MO). Antibiotic cocktail (VMNA) was made by dilution in phosphate buffered saline (PBS) to the final concentrations of 500mg/L for Vancomycin and 1g/L for all other antibiotics. 200μl of this mixture was administered to C57BL6 recipient mice via an 18-gauge gavage needle. Antibiotic cocktail was given for 5 consecutive days followed by 2 days’ rest before transplantation or fecal transfer. For some studies, Germ-Free mice or VMNA-induced dysbiosis mice were reconstituted with fecal samples derived from B6J, B6EIndiana or B6EMaryland mice. Fecal samples were collected freshly from anus and dissolved in sterile PBS prior to being orally gavaged into mice recipients12.

2.4. Histology

A lung pathologist blinded to the experimental condition graded acute rejection according to the International Society of Heart and Lung Transplantation (ISHLT) criteria13. Chronic rejection evaluation was modified from a recently described grading system by two separate individuals blinded to the experimental conditions3.

2.5. Flow Cytometry

For flow cytometric analysis, native or allograft lung tissue was well minced with a homogenizer and digested by placing it into RPMI 1640 medium (ThermoFisher,Waltham, MA) containing 0.5mg/ml collagenase II (Worthington Biochemical Corporation, Lakewood, NJ) and 5U/ml DNAse (Sigma, St. Louis, MO). The digested lung tissue was then stained using surface and intracellular primarily conjugated antibodies (full list of clones in supplemental methods).

2.6. Microbiome 16S rRNA gene sequencing and analysis

The fecal samples were collected from mice and underwent total DNA extraction with the DNeasy PowerSoil Kit (QIAGEN, Hilden, Germany) following the manufacturer’s instruction. Details of qPCR and analysis are presented in supplemental methods.

2.7. Statistics

Student’s t-test was used for continuous variable comparisons while the Mann-Whitney U test was used for categorical variable comparisons. Differences were considered significant at p < 0.05. p <0.01 is used as cut-off value in taxonomic differentiation between groups. Data visualization in all figures was accomplished by R (v.3.5.3) and GraphPad Prism 8.1.

3 |. Results

3.1. Antibiotic-induced dysbiosis eliminates vendor-specific differences in acute lung allograft rejection

B6 mice provide a unique platform to study murine lung transplantation due to consistent availability from multiple vendors and availability of multiple transgenic strains. We utilized donors and recipient mice from The Jackson Laboratory facility in Maine (B6J), or ENVIGO facilities in Indiana (B6EIndiana) or Maryland (B6EMaryland) based on their use in previous publications3,14,15. We specifically focused on immune responses in the C57BL10(B10) to C57BL6(B6) model of left single lung transplantation due to well-described phenotypic changes of acute and chronic rejection that resemble human pathology3,7,14,15.

Seven days post-engraftment none of the grafts had gross or histologic evidence of collapse, parenchymal or obliterative airway fibrosis (O-AF)(Figure 1a). B10 grafts placed into B6J or B6EIndiana recipients, however, demonstrated severe inflammatory changes with high levels of vascular cuffing and increased numbers of graft infiltrating T cells compared to grafts placed into B6EMaryland recipients (Figure 1b). Lungs engrafted into B6EMaryland recipients, however, were virtually free of inflammation (Figure 1a, b). Donor origin did not affect immune responses (Supplemental Figure 1a). We next performed whole exome sequencing of genomic DNA to determine if strain-specific genetic differences could play a role in disparate immune responses. We noted significant genetic similarity but also some differences between the three strains with minor variants, including SNVs (single nucleotide variation) and InDels (insertions and deletions) unique to each strain (Supplemental Figure 1b). Nevertheless, limited polymorphism was evident overall and none in loci of genes described as important to the transplant immune response such as CD4, CD8, Foxp3 or IL-17a (Supplemental Figure 1c). We thus decide to explore other factors that may contribute to strain-specific differences.

FIGURE 1.

FIGURE 1

Allo-immune response in the three strains of C57BL/6 recipients in presence or absence of VMNA-induced dysbiosis. (A) Gross pictures (first row), H&E stained histology pictures (second row) and ISHLT A grades (third row). (B) Total CD8+ and CD4+ T cell counts in lung grafts. Lung allografts were harvested day 7 post-engraftment. TXP: lung allografts. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001, NS: not significant.

To explore environmental factors, such as the microbiome, we next pre-treated recipient mice with oral vancomycin, metronidazole, neomycin and ampicillin (VMNA) antibiotics. Interestingly differences in cellular rejection, as well as graft T cell infiltration, disappeared when dysbiosis was induced with such antibiotic treatment (Figure 1a, b). This was due to a prominent increase in inflammation of B10 grafts placed into B6EMaryland recipients where both cellular infiltration as well as rejection grade increased after antibiotics (Figure 1a, b). Inflammatory changes remained unchanged in B6EIndiana recipients irrespective of antibiotic use while B6J recipients demonstrated a trend towards increased CD8+ T cell infiltration of the lung graft after antibiotic treatment (571,786± 78,043 without antibiotics vs. 782,515 ± 196,356 with antibiotic treatment). Taken together, these data indicate that the microbiota plays a prominent role in controlling acute cellular rejection. These data further suggest that antibiotic mediated alteration of the microbiome may not uniformly decrease the degree of the cellular immune response to allografts, as previously described6,7, but may be context, recipient, and facility dependent.

3.2. Vendor-specific CD4+Foxp3+ regulatory T cell abundance is microbiome dependent

We next considered the possibility that low-level inflammatory changes present in the recipients prior to transplantation may be responsible for differences between the three sets of mice. We evaluated resting lungs and saw no inflammation in any of the strains at baseline (Figure 2a). Flow cytometric analysis of resting lungs showed similar numbers of CD8+ T cells but B6EMaryland mice showed somewhat fewer lung resident CD4+ T cells (Figure 2a). In addition neither CD4+ nor CD8+ cells in the B6EMaryland mice underwent significant expansion after transplantation. (Supplemental Figure 2a). Resting lung CD4+ T cells from B6EMaryland mice had a significantly higher proportion of Foxp3 expressing CD4+ regulatory T cells (Tregs) compared to B6J or B6EIndana mice (Figure 2b). B6J mice had a higher proportion of Tregs compared to B6EIndiana mice (Figure 2b). Such differences were evident systemically in the spleen as well as peripheral lymph nodes and not just limited to the lungs (Supplemental Figure 2b). Transplantation accentuated these differences even further with close to 30% of CD4+ T cells expressing Foxp3 in B10J to B6EMaryland grafts (Figure 2c). Pretreatment of recipients with antibiotics decreased Foxp3 expression in CD4+ T cells of B6EMaryland as well as B6J-resident grafts but did not alter the expression in B6EIndana mice with already very low levels of Tregs (Figure 2c). It has been described that bacterial flora, specifically in the gut, can influence the generation of Foxp3+ regulatory T cells by modulating levels of systemic TGF-β16. In our system antibiotic treatment decreased TGF-β levels in B6EMaryland mice but did not alter its expression in the other strains. It is thus unlikely that microbiome-mediated TGF-β is solely responsible for vendor specific differences in Treg levels (Supplemental Figure 2c).

FIGURE 2.

FIGURE 2

Quantitative differences of CD4+Foxp3+ regulatory T cells in resting recipient lungs and lung allografts. (A) H&E stained histology pictures, total CD4+ and CD8+ T cell counts in resting lungs of the three different recipient mice. (B) Percentage of Foxp3+ cells among CD4+ T cells in resting lungs. (C) Percentage of Foxp3+ cells among CD4+ T cells in lung grafts harvested at day 7 after engraftment. (D) Expression of CD25 and GITR on CD4+Foxp3+ T cells. (E) Mixed lymphocyte reactions demonstrating inhibition of B6 CD8+ T cell proliferation, as determined by Ki-67 expression, in the presence of Balb/c dendritic cells and Tregs isolated from B6J and B6EMaryland mice. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001 NS: not significant.

Phenotypic analysis of Tregs from B6J and B6EMaryland mice demonstrated similar expression of CD25 and GITR (glucocorticoid-induced TNFR-related protein) indicating similar level of activation (Figure 2d). In an in vitro inhibition assay no significant differences in inhibitory capacity were evident between B6J and B6EMaryland -derived Tregs. Thus, we can conclude that strain-specific microbiota controls the quantitative but not necessarily qualitative differences in Tregs from select facilities.

3.3. Conventional mechanisms of fecal transfer do not recapitulate the B6EMaryland Treg high phenotype

Previous investigators have manipulated the murine microbiome through cohousing or forced fecal gavage in order to introduce select bacteria into a host6,12,17. We thus gavaged germ-free mice with fecal pellets obtained from either B6J, B6EMaryland, or B6EIndiana mice and established colonies from such reconstituted strains. Surprisingly such therapy failed to recapitulate the microbiome-dependent Treg differences described in Figures 2b above (Figure 3a). We next performed similar experiments in conventional mice through VMNA-induced dysbiosis in B6J and B6EIndiana mice followed by fecal reconstitution. No differences were evident in B10 graft recipients reconstituted with B6Maryland vs. autologous facility-identical fecal samples (Figure 3b). To expand on this further, we next co-housed B6J and B6EMaryland mice for a period of 2 months prior to challenging these two strains with a B10J allograft. However, we noted that the trend for increased inflammation and rejection in B6J recipients persisted while B6EMaryland recipients still manifested only low levels of inflammation (Supplemental Figure 3a, b). Taken together we can conclude that the vendor-specific differences in our system are complex in nature and are not easily or completely transmitted through fecal transfer.

FIGURE 3.

FIGURE 3

Conventional mechanisms of fecal transfer to recapitulate the B6EMaryland phenotype. (A) Percentage of Foxp3+ cells among CD4+ T cells in germ-free C57BL/6 mice colonies, which were reconstituted with fecal samples derived from B6J, B6EMaryland and B6EIndiana mice. (B) B6J or B6EIndiana recipients were treated with VMNA antibiotics and reconstituted with B6Maryland vs autologous facility-identical fecal samples, respectively, prior to engraftment of B10J donor lungs. Allograft rejection is evaluated by gross appearance, H&E staining, ISHLT A grade and flow cytometry analysis of lung allograft-infiltrating T cells and Treg differentiation. NS: not significant.

3.4. B6Maryland mice demonstrate bacterial diversity with a preponderance of unique tolerogenic Firmicutes

Bacteroides fragilis is known to facilitate Treg generation in the gut and can be difficult to inoculate as part of fecal transfer18. We thus suspected that differences in B. fragilis may be responsible for altered Treg levels but we were unable to detect differences in this bacteria between the three facilities (Supplemental Figure 4a). Taken together with the data described above we deduced that the relationship between the microbiome and tolerance in our system was more complex than a simple one to one relationship.

We next utilized 16S rRNA metagenomics to characterize fecal flora by both quantitative and qualitative analysis of OTUs (operational taxonomic units) as previously described1921. We first looked at the total abundances of all the OTUs in the fecal samples and noted no significant differences in total bacterial load (Figure 4a). However by evaluating the Shannon diversity index, which measures both the abundance and evenness of the species present22, we noted that both B6EMaryland and B6EIndiana mice have significantly more diverse composition of gut microbiota than the B6J strain (Figure 4a). Principal coordinates analysis (PCoA) of beta diversity, or similarity between the samples, also demonstrated that mice from the two ENVIGO facilities share greater similarity with each other compared to the B6J strain (Figure 4b). Relative phylum abundance analysis, filtering out the phyla that comprise <1% of the microbiome, demonstrated that Bacteroidetes and Firmicutes were the dominant phyla in all three strains of mice (Figure 4b). B6E mice contain more Bacteroidetes and less Firmicutes compared to B6J (Figure 4b). Given that B6EIndiana mice’s gut microbiota seemed highly analogous to B6EMaryland mice, but the two strains demonstrate major differences in Treg profiles (Figure 2b, c), we next performed a more detailed analysis at the order level and noted that B6EMaryland mice possessed an undefined population of Bacteroidales that is significantly less abundant in B6J or B6EIndiana mice (Supplemental Figure 4b).

FIGURE 4.

FIGURE 4

16s-rRNA analysis for the gut microbiota. (A) Total abundances of OTUs and Shannon Diversity Indices of resting mice (n=5). (B) Principle Component Analysis (PCoA) and relative abundances of phylum in resting mice (n=5). (C) Total abundances of OTUs and Shannon Diversity Indices of non-treated vs antibiotic treated mice (n=5). (D) Algorithm of identifying Treg related OTUs. The volcano plots demonstrate the two comparisons, cut-off values are −2 and +2 for the x-axes and 2 for the y-axes. The heat-map shows OTU abundances in different groups. Highlighted bacterial families were previously reported to induce Treg in a TGF-β dependent manner. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001, NS: not significant.

To narrow this down even further we took advantage of the fact that Tregs are attenuated by antibiotic treatment in both B6EMaryland and B6J mice. We thought it likely that the unique bacterial signature responsible for Treg expansion may be deduced by studying fecal samples in the presence or absence of antibiotics. We thus examined in parallel B6EMaryland and B6J mice in the presence or absence of antibiotics by total OTU abundance and Shannon diversity index (Figure 4c). We noted that the overall OTUs were not impacted while diversity was altered by antibiotic treatment, specifically in B6EMaryland mice (Figure 4c). After antibiotic treatment the Shannon diversity index of B6EMaryland mice became similar to that of resting B6J mice. We additionally performed overlapping component analysis (OCA) by analyzing taxonomy to identify antibiotic sensitive bacteria unique to the B6EMaryland strain that are not present in either B6J or B6EIndiana mice. Such an algorithm narrowed our search to 32 unique OTUs encompassing various phylum including similar Clostridium family members of the Firmicutes phylum that have been described to induce Tregs23 (Figure 4d). Taken together we can conclude that polymicrobial factors are likely to contribute to differences evident in Treg mediated immune responses and seen in various strains of B6 mice from different vendors but it is likely that Clostridia or other members of the Firmicutes phylum play a dominant role.

3.5. Chronic lung allograft rejection varies based on facility of origin and antibiotic treatment

The B10 to B6 model of lung transplantation can be used to study not only acute but chronic rejection as well, since changes resembling obliterative bronchiolitis (OB) or obliterative airway fibrosis (O-AF) occur in this strain combination3,14. We grafted B10J lungs to B6J, B6EMaryland or B6EIndiana mice and evaluated changes by histology 21 days after engraftment. Similar to previously described data B6EIndiana recipients demonstrated evidence of chronic rejection but neither B6J nor B6EMaryland recipients demonstrated evidence of O-AF (Figure 5a). Lack of chronic rejection in B6EMaryland recipients was understandable due to the lack of acute inflammatory changes. However, it was somewhat puzzling for the B6J recipients not to have evidence of chronic rejection due to severe acute rejection in this strain on day 7 (Figure 1a) and day 21 post engraftment (Supplemental Figure 5).

FIGURE 5.

FIGURE 5

The severity of chronic rejection differs between the three strains of mice and is altered by antibiotic treatment. (A) Gross pictures, low power/200X Masson’s Trichrome staining and H&E staining of lung allografts and levels (O-AF scores plotted at the bottom) of chronic allograft rejection on untreated mice. (B) Gross pictures, low power/200X Masson’s Trichrome staining and H&E staining of lung allografts and O-AF scores on antibiotic-treated B6J and B6EIndiana recipients. Arrow: typical lesions of obliterative airway fibrosis. TXP: lung allografts. **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001.

To further expand on this model we next evaluated O-AF in VMNA-treated B6 recipients of B10J lung grafts 21 days after engraftment. As the B6EMaryland mouse colony was terminated by ENVIGO and could not be utilized for further experiments24 we relied on B6J and B6EIndiana mice to obtain these data. Treatment with antibiotics induced severe O-AF changes in B6J recipients, including grade 2 to 4 airway lesions which we did not detect in any other transplant combination (Figure 5b). The severity of chronic rejection decreased in B6EIndiana recipient mice (Figure 5b) consistent with previously published results in mice from this facility7. Taken together we can conclude that early inflammatory changes do not necessarily lead to chronic lung allograft rejection and antibiotic-induced dysbiosis can have variable microbiome-specific effects on chronic lung graft rejection.

3.6. IL-17a/Foxp3 ratio can predict chronic lung allograft rejection

IL17a production and Th17 polarization of the microenvironment has been linked to chronic lung allograft fibrosis in both murine models and human observational studies5. It has also been demonstrated that neutralization of IL-17a can ameliorate graft fibrosis and development of O-AF4. We hypothesized that IL-17a-dependent O-AF development is controlled by vendor origin and dysbiosis. While T cells of both B6EIndiana and B6EMaryland-derived mice elaborated significant levels of IL-17a, B6J mice had much lower levels (Figure 6a). Furthermore, and unlike the case for Foxp3, IL-17a expression did not change after antibiotic treatment (Figure 6a). We found it somewhat surprising that B6EMaryland recipients did not develop O-AF despite the presence of high numbers of IL-17a producing T cells, similar to those found in B6EIndiana mice which did develop BO-like lesions (Figure 5a). In addition, B6J mice demonstrated low numbers of IL-17a producing T cells but developed O-AF after antibiotic treatment.

FIGURE 6.

FIGURE 6

Relative IL-17a levels and IL-17a/Foxp3 ratios in lung allografts. (A) Flow cytometry analysis of IL-17a expression in different compartments of T cells in lungs engrafted into untreated or antibiotic-treated recipients. (B) IL-17a/Foxp3 ratio within T cells in lung grafts. Lung allografts were harvested at day 21 after engraftment. p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001 NS: not significant.

Since Treg levels change after antibiotic treatment we next considered the possibility that the ratio of IL-17a producing T cells to Tregs, rather than the absolute number of Th-17 polarized T cells may determine the development of O-AF. We thus plotted the relative IL-17a/Foxp3 ratios in unmanipulated vs. antibiotic treated mice. We were forced to exclude B6EMaryland mice from such analysis due to the loss of this strain as described above24. Indeed this ratio correlated with O-AF as antibiotic-treated B6J mice with the highest IL-17a/Foxp3 ratio had the highest O-AF grade while untreated B6J recipients, that did not develop airway fibrosis, demonstrated very low IL-17a/Foxp3 ratios (Figure 6b). Intermediate IL-17a/Foxp3 ratio in B6EIndiana recipient mice correlated with mild but evident O-AF.

In order to evaluate whether Tregs directly modulate chronic lung allograft rejection we took advantage of a transgenic strain of B6 mice (B6Foxp3DTR)25 where ablation of Tregs can be accomplished through the administration of diphtheria toxin in the absence of microbiome manipulation. Such a system allows for a targeted reductionist approach to study IL-17a/Treg relationship in fibrosis without other confounding factors. We thus treated B6Foxp3DTR or B6NJ wild-type control mice with DT post-engraftment of a B10 lung graft. Twenty-one days later B10 grafts placed into B6Foxp3DTR recipients had evidence of both O-AF and pulmonary parenchymal fibrosis consistent with chronic rejection (Figure 7a-c) within the background of significant acute cellular rejection (Supplemental Figure 6). As expected elimination of Tregs was evident in B6Foxp3DTR mice, resulting higher IL-17a/Foxp3 ratios (Figure 7d). Taken together with previously published data that neutralization of IL-17a can ameliorate airway fibrosis4,5 we can now conclude that Tregs play a protective role against O-AF and that IL-17a/Foxp3 ratios can be used to predict the severity of chronic lung allograft rejection.

FIGURE 7.

FIGURE 7

Impact of Treg ablation on chronic lung allograft rejection. (A) Gross pictures, low power/200X Masson’s Trichrome staining and H&E staining of lungs engrafted into B6FoxpDTR and B6NJ control mice. Both strains received DT treatment after engraftment as described. Evaluation of chronic lung allograft rejection at day 21 post-engraftment by O-AF score (B) and parenchymal fibrosis score (C). (D) Flow cytometry analysis of mediastinal lymph nodes shows the ablation of CD4+Foxp3+ Tregs, stable IL-17a levels and significantly altered IL-17a/Foxp3 ratios. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001 NS: not significant.

4 |. Discussion

Commensal bacteria are a normal component of the mammalian gastrointestinal tract, as well as other mucosal tissues, and play an important role in both health and disease. Dysbiosis, or microbial imbalance, can be induced in otherwise healthy laboratory mice by treatment with antibiotics. It has been previously demonstrated that in C57BL/6 mice, specifically obtained from the ENVIGO Indiana facility, induction of dysbiosis with broad spectrum antibiotics can alter antigen presenting capacity of myeloid cells ameliorating rejection of both skin and heart grafts due to impaired priming of alloreactive T cells6. Similar findings have been described for chronic lung allograft rejection in a murine model7. These data are supported by human observational studies that use of antibiotics can downregulate the immune response and decrease the efficacy of tumor immunotherapy9. Based on such preclinical data it has become an assumption that alteration of the microbiome with broad spectrum antibiotics may be used as an easily implemented mechanism of immunomodulation in human transplant recipients.

In contrast to this notion we now demonstrate that normal variability in the recipient microbiome may have drastically differential effects on graft acceptance or rejection. While we are able to replicate data from Chicago-based investigators, and demonstrate downregulation of chronic lung allograft rejection in antibiotic-treated B6Indiana mice7 (Figure 5), similar treatment of Maryland and Jackson-derived mice resulted in an increase in acute and chronic rejection respectively (Figures 1 and 5). Thus, our data closely resemble recent reports describing that individual variability in the microbiome of melanoma patients contributes to the success or failure of PD-1 and CTLA-4-mediated immunotherapy26 and supports the recent report by Rey and colleagues demonstrating exacerbation of acute vascular rejection after disruption of the gut microbiome with antibiotics27. Our data further expand on the complexity that the commensal microbiome plays in orchestrating the homeostasis of the immune system2832. Unlike other investigators we were unable to completely recapitulate the microbiome-dependent tolerance of Maryland-derived mice through cohousing or fecal transfer (Figure 3, Supplemental Figure 3). Such data, combined with 16S rRNA sequencing identifying multiple bacterial species associated with tolerance, indicate a complex interrelationship between Treg levels and the microbiome. Alternatively it is possible that unique genetic polymorphisms present in mice from different facilities may uniquely interact with the microbiome to facilitate graft acceptance33. While we focused on analysis of gut specific microbiome by 16S rRNA sequencing of fecal pellets it remains to be determined whether the gut or pulmonary microbiome plays a dominant role in lung allograft survival. While multiple aspects of the gut microbota have been demonstrated to contribute to pulmonary as well as systemic immune responses7,34, an ever-growing understanding of the lung microbiome and the unique lung-gut axis suggests that local interactions may shape graft outcome as well35.

We found it interesting that microbiome-dependent downregulation of the immune response, in both Maryland and Jackson-derived mice, correlated with relatively higher proportion of Foxp3-expressing Tregs. Such data support the well-described, and at times bidirectional, interrelationship of this cell population with comensal organisms18,23. In addition to such correlative studies we definitively demonstrate that Tregs can prevent chronic lung allograft rejection, including obliterative airway fibrosis or bronchiolitis. Such data shed light on the often conflicting human observational studies describing a role for Tregs in the development of chronic lung allograft dysfunction3638. Interestingly, our data suggest that it may not be the absolute number but rather the ratio between regulatory and pathogenic T cells that affects graft fibrosis. This is clearly evident in Maryland mice with high numbers of both IL-17a producing as well as Foxp3-expressing T cells as well as Jackson mice containing low numbers of both. Only when this balance is perturbed does chronic rejection set in. Combined with previous reports demonstrating that ablation of IL-17a production can prevent chronic lung allograft disfunction4, we can conclude that strategies aimed at either augmenting Tregs or inhibiting Th-17 differentiation may be utilized concurrently or interchangeably to improve long-term graft survival. However it is important to point out that even such principles maybe individual strain and context dependent and it is possible that in certain strains of mice, such as those from the Envigo Indiana facility, other factors may control fibrosis7.

It did not escape us that neither early nor late peri-bronchial inflammation uniformly predicted airway fibrosis. Specifically, mice from Jackson demonstrate severe inflammatory changes post-engraftment but fail to develop fibrosis in the absence of microbiome ablation (Figure 1a, 5a). While on the surface such data seem counterintuitive to reports demonstrating a correlation between the number of acute rejection episodes and bronchiolitis obliterans3941, it does support the notion– that the quality of cell infiltrates rather than just quantity may control long-term allograft fate. Specifically low levels of TGF-β and IL-17a in Jackson mice may set the stage for inflammation in the absence of a profibrogenic environment. Such data is in line with clinical strategies espoused by some that histologically detected A1 rejection may not uniformly lead to chronic lung allograft dysfunction40,41. Such knowledge also begs for assessment of routine post-operative biopsies for factors other than simple histologic inflammation.

Supplementary Material

Supp table 1
Supplemental Data

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by 1I01BX002299-01, PO1 AI116501, R01AI145108, and UVA Cancer Center (Bioinformatics Core) via P30CA044579. Histology studies of this manuscript was supported by the Research Histology Core at the University of Virginia.

DK receives research support from Compass Therapeutics. ASK is a Founder and Chief Scientific Officer of Courier Therapeutics, DSW is Founder and Chief Scientific Officer of ImmuneWorks, Inc.

Disclosure

The authors of this manuscript have no conflicts of interest to disclosure as described by the American Journal of Transplantation. DK receives research support from Compass Therapeutics. ASK is a Founder and Chief Scientific Officer of Courier Therapeutics, DSW is Founder and Chief Scientific Officer of ImmuneWorks, Inc. None of these companies provided financial support or input into the execution or writing of this manuscript.

Abbreviations:

CTLA-4

cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated protein 4

GITR

glucocorticoid-induced TNFR-related protein

H&E

haemotoxylin and eosin

ISHLT

International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation

O-AF

obliterative airway fibrosis

OB

obliterative bronchiolitis

OTU

operational taxonomic units

PBS

phosphate buffered saline

PD-1

Programmed cell death protein 1

rRNA

ribosomal ribonucleic acid

TGF-β

transforming growth factor beta

Tregs

regulatory T cell

VMNA

vancomycin, metronidazole, neomycin and ampicillin

Footnotes

Other authors declare no potential conflicts of interest.

References

  • 1.Balsara KR, Krupnick AS, Bell JM, et al. A single-center experience of 1500 lung transplant patients. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2018;156(2):894–905 e893. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Knoop C, Estenne M. Acute and chronic rejection after lung transplantation. Semin Respir Crit Care Med. 2006;27(5):521–533. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Martinu T, Oishi H, Juvet SC, et al. Spectrum of chronic lung allograft pathology in a mouse minor-mismatched orthotopic lung transplant model. Am J Transplant. 2019;19(1):247–258. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Fan L, Benson HL, Vittal R, et al. Neutralizing IL-17 prevents obliterative bronchiolitis in murine orthotopic lung transplantation. Am J Transplant. 2011;11(5):911–922. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Shilling RA, Wilkes DS. Role of Th17 cells and IL-17 in lung transplant rejection. Semin Immunopathol. 2011;33(2):129–134. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Lei YM, Chen L, Wang Y, et al. The composition of the microbiota modulates allograft rejection. J Clin Invest. 2016;126(7):2736–2744. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Wu Q, Turturice B, Wagner S, et al. Gut Microbiota Can Impact Chronic Murine Lung Allograft Rejection. Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol. 2019;60(1):131–134. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Huemer F, Rinnerthaler G, Westphal T, et al. Impact of antibiotic treatment on immune-checkpoint blockade efficacy in advanced non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer. Oncotarget. 2018;9(23):16512–16520. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Derosa L, Hellmann MD, Spaziano M, et al. Negative association of antibiotics on clinical activity of immune checkpoint inhibitors in patients with advanced renal cell and non-small-cell lung cancer. Ann Oncol. 2018;29(6):1437–1444. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Okazaki M, Krupnick AS, Kornfeld CG, et al. A mouse model of orthotopic vascularized aerated lung transplantation. Am J Transplant. 2007;7(6):1672–1679. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Miyajima M, Chase CM, Alessandrini A, et al. Early acceptance of renal allografts in mice is dependent on foxp3(+) cells. Am J Pathol. 2011;178(4):1635–1645. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Sivan A, Corrales L, Hubert N, et al. Commensal Bifidobacterium promotes antitumor immunity and facilitates anti-PD-L1 efficacy. Science. 2015;350(6264):1084–1089. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Yousem SA, Berry GJ, Cagle PT, et al. Revision of the 1990 working formulation for the classification of pulmonary allograft rejection: Lung Rejection Study Group. J Heart Lung Transplant. 1996;15(1 Pt 1):1–15. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Suzuki H, Fan L, Wilkes DS. Development of obliterative bronchiolitis in a murine model of orthotopic lung transplantation. J Vis Exp. 2012(65). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Suzuki H, Lasbury ME, Fan L, et al. Role of complement activation in obliterative bronchiolitis post-lung transplantation. J Immunol. 2013;191(8):4431–4439. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Bauche D, Marie JC. Transforming growth factor beta: a master regulator of the gut microbiota and immune cell interactions. Clin Transl Immunology. 2017;6(4):e136. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Vetizou M, Pitt JM, Daillere R, et al. Anticancer immunotherapy by CTLA-4 blockade relies on the gut microbiota. Science. 2015;350(6264):1079–1084. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Round JL, Mazmanian SK. Inducible Foxp3+ regulatory T-cell development by a commensal bacterium of the intestinal microbiota. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010;107(27):12204–12209. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Janda JM, Abbott SL. 16S rRNA gene sequencing for bacterial identification in the diagnostic laboratory: pluses, perils, and pitfalls. J Clin Microbiol. 2007;45(9):2761–2764. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Schloss PD, Westcott SL. Assessing and improving methods used in operational taxonomic unit-based approaches for 16S rRNA gene sequence analysis. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2011;77(10):3219–3226. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Nguyen NP, Warnow T, Pop M, White B. A perspective on 16S rRNA operational taxonomic unit clustering using sequence similarity. NPJ Biofilms Microbiomes. 2016;2:16004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Reese AT, Dunn RR. Drivers of Microbiome Biodiversity: A Review of General Rules, Feces, and Ignorance. MBio. 2018;9(4). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Atarashi K, Tanoue T, Oshima K, et al. Treg induction by a rationally selected mixture of Clostridia strains from the human microbiota. Nature. 2013;500(7461):232–236. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Jamie Naden P The replacement of C57BL/6NHsd at Envigo facility 208 (located Frederick, MD) occured in March of 2018 as the old colony had been eliminated several months prior to that in January 2018. In: Krupnick A, Gou Y, eds. personal communication. [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Kim JM, Rasmussen JP, Rudensky AY. Regulatory T cells prevent catastrophic autoimmunity throughout the lifespan of mice. Nat Immunol. 2007;8(2):191–197. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Matson V, Fessler J, Bao R, et al. The commensal microbiome is associated with anti-PD-1 efficacy in metastatic melanoma patients. Science. 2018;359(6371):104–108. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Rey K, Manku S, Enns W, et al. Disruption of the Gut Microbiota With Antibiotics Exacerbates Acute Vascular Rejection. Transplantation. 2018;102(7):1085–1095. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Arpaia N, Campbell C, Fan X, et al. Metabolites produced by commensal bacteria promote peripheral regulatory T-cell generation. Nature. 2013;504(7480):451–455. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Atarashi K, Tanoue T, Shima T, et al. Induction of colonic regulatory T cells by indigenous Clostridium species. Science. 2011;331(6015):337–341. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Smith PM, Howitt MR, Panikov N, et al. The microbial metabolites, short-chain fatty acids, regulate colonic Treg cell homeostasis. Science. 2013;341(6145):569–573. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Round JL, Mazmanian SK. The gut microbiota shapes intestinal immune responses during health and disease. Nat Rev Immunol. 2009;9(5):313–323. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Shono Y, van den Brink MRM. Gut microbiota injury in allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Nat Rev Cancer. 2018;18(5):283–295. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Luca F, Kupfer SS, Knights D, Khoruts A, Blekhman R. Functional Genomics of Host-Microbiome Interactions in Humans. Trends Genet. 2018;34(1):30–40. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Livanos AE, Greiner TU, Vangay P, et al. Antibiotic-mediated gut microbiome perturbation accelerates development of type 1 diabetes in mice. Nat Microbiol. 2016;1(11):16140. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Shukla SD, Budden KF, Neal R, Hansbro PM. Microbiome effects on immunity, health and disease in the lung. Clin Transl Immunology. 2017;6(3):e133. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Bhorade SM, Chen H, Molinero L, et al. Decreased percentage of CD4+FoxP3+ cells in bronchoalveolar lavage from lung transplant recipients correlates with development of bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome. Transplantation. 2010;90(5):540–546. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Piloni D, Morosini M, Magni S, et al. Analysis of long term CD4+CD25highCD127- T-reg cells kinetics in peripheral blood of lung transplant recipients. BMC Pulm Med. 2017;17(1):102. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Mamessier E, Lorec AM, Thomas P, Badier M, Magnan A, Reynaud-Gaubert M. T regulatory cells in stable posttransplant bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome. Transplantation. 2007;84(7):908–916. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Sharples LD, McNeil K, Stewart S, Wallwork J. Risk factors for bronchiolitis obliterans: a systematic review of recent publications. J Heart Lung Transplant. 2002;21(2):271–281. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Khalifah AP, Hachem RR, Chakinala MM, et al. Minimal acute rejection after lung transplantation: a risk for bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome. Am J Transplant. 2005;5(8):2022–2030. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Hachem RR, Khalifah AP, Chakinala MM, et al. The significance of a single episode of minimal acute rejection after lung transplantation. Transplantation. 2005;80(10):1406–1413. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supp table 1
Supplemental Data

RESOURCES