Dear Editor,
Metformin, a widely prescribed drug for treating type II diabetes, has shown an important anti-cancer property.1 However, new launched clinical trials did not achieve such desirable results.2 One explanation could be that metformin’s anti-cancer mechanisms and precise therapeutic targets remain unclear. To identify potential therapeutic targets of metformin in bladder cancer, we screened differential proteins with metformin treatment in T24 cells by high-throughput protein chip. As shown in Fig. 1a, Clusterin was screened as a target of metformin in bladder cancer. The direct binding of metformin with Clusterin was further confirmed by Surface Plasmon Resonance (SPR) analysis (Fig. 1b). Meanwhile, results from Western blot and RT-PCR showed that treatment with metformin resulted in significant Clusterin downregulation in UMUC3 and J82 cells (Supplementary Fig. S1a, b). Clusterin is a conserved glycoprotein which plays key roles in cellular stress response and survival.3 As evidenced by its key roles in cancer, Clusterin served as a therapeutic target for fighting tumor growth.
We examined the basal level of Clusterin in human bladder cancer cell lines. As shown in Fig. 1c, d, Supplementary Fig. S2a, UMUC3 cells were characterized by significantly highest Clusterin expression while J82 cells were lowest. Interestingly, metformin inhibited cell proliferation, colony formation, migration, and induced apoptosis (Supplementary Fig. S2b–e) greater in higher Clusterin UMUC3 cells compared with lower Clusterin J82 cells.
To determine the direct role of Clusterin in bladder cancer cells growth, we used siRNAs and lentivirus to modulate Clusterin levels in UMUC3 and J82 cells (Supplementary Fig. S3a). Knockdown of Clusterin dramatically suppressed cell viability, migration, colony formation, and induced apoptosis compared with control cells (Fig. 1e, Supplementary Fig. S3b–d). We next examined the effect of metformin with Clusterin-silencing conditions. Figure 1e showed that in Clusterin knockdown UMUC3 cells, low concentration of metformin (0–8 mM) inhibited proliferation stronger than in parental cells, indicating that both knocking down Clusterin and metformin treatment inhibited cellular proliferation in a synergetic fashion. However, when the concentrations of metformin (8–64 mM) were high, metformin itself reduced the expression of Clusterin, making the loss of Clusterin in these cells almost completely. Thus, the inhibitory effect of metformin in Clusterin knockdown cells is inversely lower than in parental cells, suggesting that anticancer effect of metfornin relies on Clusterin expression. Therefore, in lower Clusterin J82 cells, knocking down of Clusterin did not induce any significant decrease in the inhibitory effect of metformin (Fig. 1e). Metformin also significantly inhibited basal migration, colony formation, and induced apoptosis in control cells. However, these effects of metformin in Clusterin knockdown cells were significantly reduced (Supplementary Fig. S3b–d). We also successfully induced Clusterin overexpression in UMUC3 and J82 cells (Supplementary Fig. S3e). Bladder cancer cells with stable Clusterin overexpression led to increased cellular proliferation, colony formation and migration (Supplementary Fig. S3f–h). Meanwhile, cells with stable Clusterin overexpression were characterized by higher metformin induced inhibition of proliferation, colony formation as well as migration compared with control cells (Supplementary Fig. S3f–h). Taken together, these results suggested that bladder cancer cells characterized by higher Clusterin are more sensitive to metformin induced inhibition of growth.
Previously, we found that metformin reduced FASN expression in bladder cancer cells.4 Furthermore, FASN and SREBP-1c were significantly higher in bladder cancer cell lines and tissues (Supplementary Fig. S4a, b). Therefore, we systematically investigated the function of metformin in bladder cancer lipogenesis. Lipid-droplet staining showed that metformin, dramatically decreased the number, size, and staining intensity of lipid bodies both in UMUC3 and J82 cells (Fig. 1f, Supplementary Fig. S4c). Meanwhile, SREBP-1c and its downstream effectors were significant decreased (Fig. 1g, Supplementary Fig. S4d). We also conducted lipid metabolite analysis with metformin treatment via Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometer (GC-MS). As shown in (Fig. 1h), the contents of long-chain and short-chain fatty acids were significantly decreased in comparison to that of the controls. Since Clusterin participates in lipid transport and metabolism,5 we speculated that whether Clusterin plays roles in metformin caused lipogenesis inhibition. As shown in Fig. 1i, the depleted levels of fatty acids correlated with the striking reduction in Clusterin expression. Meanwhile, knocking down Clusterin decreased cellular neutral lipid levels and both protein and mRNA expressions of SREBP-1c and its downstream effectors (Fig. 1j, k, Supplementary Fig. S4e, f), suggesting that silencing Clusterin restrained the transcriptional activity of SREBP-1c and inhibited lipogenesis. Furthermore, double immunofluorescence staining showed Clusterin was distributed in the cytoplasm while SREBP-1c located in both cytoplasm and nucleus (Supplementary Fig. S4g). Knockdown Clusterin significantly reduced SREBP-1c in both nucleus and cytosol (Supplementary Fig. S4h). However, CO-IP showed no binding between Clusterin and SREBP-1c in cells (Supplementary Fig. S4i). Taken together, these results confirmed that metformin reduced formation of neutral lipid which is mediated by Clusterin.
To investigate the role of Clusterin in tumorigenesis, subcutaneous tumors bearing stable knockdown Clusterin (UMUC3-shCLU) and parental UMUC3 cells (UMUC3-shCtrl) were implanted, respectively. The tumors derived from UMUC3-shCLU cells resulted in a remarkably slower growth rate (Supplementary Fig. S5a), smaller tumor size, and weight (Fig. 1l, Supplementary Fig. S5b). Finally, we confirmed that Clusterin, FASN, and SREBP-1c protein levels were decreased in UMUC3-shCLU cell developed tumor tissue (Supplementary Fig. S5c). These results suggest that Clusterin depletion can effectively suppress bladder tumor xenografts in vivo.
Given the potent inhibitory effects of metformin in bladder cancer cell growth, we evaluated its antitumor activity in vivo using nude mice bearing UMUC3-luc orthotopic models (Supplementary Fig. S6a). Intravesical metformin substantially decelerated tumor growth (Fig. 1m) and significantly reduced the weight of bladders (Supplementary Fig. S6b, c). Furthermore, metformin treated mice showed reduced lipogenesis (Supplementary Fig. S6d). H&E and Ki67 staining demonstrated that metformin effectively inhibited tumor growth (Supplementary Fig. S6d). Meanwhile, we found that metformin decreased Clusterin, SREBP-1c, and FASN levels (Supplementary Fig. S6d). In summary, we demonstrated that metformin blocked bladder cancer growth and inhibited lipogenesis-associated proteins in orthotopic models which were established by high expressed Clusterin UMUC3 cell line.
To explore the correlation between Clusterin and bladder cancer progression, we first examined its expressions in bladder tumor patient specimens. Immunohistochemistry analysis of tissue microarray showed that Clusterin protein level was significantly higher in bladder cancer compared with normal bladder (p = 0.0003) (Fig. 1n (a, b)). In particular, it expressed higher in muscle invasive bladder cancer compared with non-muscle invasive bladder cancer (p < 0.05) (Fig. 1n (a)), consistent with the results of TCGA database and clinical samples (Fig. 1o, and Supplementary Fig. S7). Immunohistochemistry analyses showed that Clusterin level was positively correlated with tumor stage and differentiation grade (Fig. 1n (c, d)). These results implied that Clusterin expression positively correlates with bladder cancer progression and may serve as a biomarker for treating with metformin in a personalized medicine fashion.
In summary, our study proved that Clusterin is a target of metformin and the susceptibility to Clusterin-depended growth inhibitory effects of metformin in bladder cancer. Moreover, metformin targets Clusterin and inactivates SREBP-1c and its downstream target FASN, leading to blockage of de novo fatty acid synthesis to inhibit growth of bladder cancer (Fig. 1p). These results uncovered an important role for Clusterin-regulated lipogenesis in maintaining bladder tumor growth and survival. This study provides a novel potential approach for individualized treatment with metformin in cancer patients with differential expression of Clusterin.
Supplementary information
Acknowledgements
We would like to take this opportunity to acknowledge Dr. Jun Zhou of Department of Pathology, Xiangya Hospital for her generous assistance on pathological assessments of all specimens. This research was funded by National Natural Science Foundation of China (81703008, 81874212), Opening Fund for Key Laboratory of Molecular Pharmacology and Drug Evaluation (Yantai University), Ministry of Education (P201905) and Huxiang High-Level Talent Innovation Team (2018RS3072), Major Scientific and Technological Projects for Collaborative Prevention and Control of Birth Defect in Hunan Province (2019SK1012) and Key Grant of Research and Development in Hunan Province (2020DK2002).
Author contributions
Concept and design: M.P. and X.Y.; development of methodology: J.D., M.P., and X.Y.; acquisition of data: J.D., M.P., S.Z., D.X., X.H., J.W., S.X.; analysis and interpretation: J.D., M.P., S.Z., D.X., X.H., J.W., S.X.; writing, review, and/or revision of the manuscript: J.D., M.P., and X.Y.; study supervision: M.P. and X.Y.
Data availability
The data sets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Footnotes
These authors contributed equally: Jun Deng, Mei Peng
Contributor Information
Mei Peng, Email: Meipeng@csu.edu.cn.
Xiaoping Yang, Email: Xiaoping.Yang@hunnu.edu.cn.
Supplementary information
The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1038/s41392-021-00493-8.
References
- 1.Wang C, et al. Metformin inhibits pancreatic cancer metastasis caused by SMAD4 deficiency and consequent HNF4G upregulation. Protein Cell. 2021;12:128–144. doi: 10.1007/s13238-020-00760-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Kitson SJ, et al. PRE-surgical Metformin In Uterine Malignancy (PREMIUM): a multi-center, randomized double-blind, placebo-controlled phase III trial. Clin. Cancer Res. 2019;25:2424–2432. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-18-3339. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Hoter A, Naim HY. Heat shock proteins and ovarian cancer: important roles and therapeutic opportunities. Cancers. 2019;11:1389. doi: 10.3390/cancers11091389. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Peng M, et al. High efficacy of intravesical treatment of metformin on bladder cancer in preclinical model. Oncotarget. 2016;7:9102–9117. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.6933. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Wang X, et al. Melittin inhibits tumor growth and decreases resistance to gemcitabine by downregulating cholesterol pathway gene CLU in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Cancer Lett. 2017;399:1–9. doi: 10.1016/j.canlet.2017.04.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
The data sets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.