Skip to main content
Scientific Reports logoLink to Scientific Reports
. 2021 Mar 1;11:4827. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-84229-2

Use of bladder antimuscarinics is associated with an increased risk of dementia: a retrospective population-based case–control study

Tomor Harnod 1, Yu-Cih Yang 2,3, Lu-Ting Chiu 2,3, Jen-Hung Wang 4, Shinn-Zong Lin 1, Dah-Ching Ding 5,6,
PMCID: PMC7921664  PMID: 33649451

Abstract

The association between bladder antimuscarinic use and dementia development is unclear. We used data from the Taiwan National Health Insurance Research Database to determine the association between the exposure dose and duration of bladder antimuscarinics and the subsequent dementia risk. We enrolled participants aged 55 years or more and defined a dementia cohort (International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification codes 290, 294.1, and 331.0). We used a propensity score matching method, and randomly enrolled two controls without dementia. We evaluated dementia risk with respect to the exposure dose and duration of treatment with seven bladder antimuscarinics (oxybutynin, propiverine, tolterodine, solifenacin, trospium, darifenacin, and fesoterodine) used for at least 1 year before the index date, after adjusting for age, sex, comorbidities, and medications. The dementia risk was 2.46-fold (95% confidence interval: 2.22–2.73) higher in Taiwanese patients who used bladder antimuscarinics for ≥ 1 year than in those who were not exposed to this treatment. The risk proportionally increased with increasing doses of antimuscarinics for less than 4 years. Taiwanese patients aged 55 years or more on bladder antimuscarinics exhibited a higher risk of dementia. Additional studies in other countries are required to determine whether this result is valid worldwide.

Subject terms: Bladder disease, Dementia

Introduction

Dementia is a common neurological degenerative disorder, the prevalence of which increases with age. Dementia is currently one of the leading causes of disability and death in older adults, and there are no reliable treatments to reverse the development and progression of dementia. However, some evidence suggests that changing the lifestyle and environment of patients may help reduce dementia development1,2. Consequently, dementia is usually under diagnosed globally3,4; early identification and reducing exposure to risk factors are important strategies to prevent dementia in the general population5.

Anticholinergic (AC) agents can block the acetylcholine (Ach) activity in both central and peripheral nervous systems6. The most commonly used ACs are tricyclic antidepressants, first-generation antihistamines, and bladder antimuscarinics7. Several studies in western countries have suggested that ACs might affect cognition, thereby increasing the risk of dementia among users79. Therefore, ACs are recommended to be avoided in frail and older adults. However, most of these studies showed limited correlation between the use of ACs for the central nervous system and dementia development. It is unclear whether the increased risk of dementia observed in these studies was caused by ACs specifically or with interaction of other medications used for co-existing brain disorders. Moreover, antimuscarinics may affect bladder function at the efferent or afferent axis. They serve as antagonists of the muscarinic AC receptor and operate on the post-junctional excitatory receptors in detrusor muscles10. There are considerable differences in brain penetration between the bladder antimuscarinics and ACs used for the central nervous system disorders. It is uncertain whether the urogenital use of antimuscarinic ACs would increase the risk of developing dementia due to the apparent pharmacodynamic differences between urogenital and central nervous ACs. For further investigation, we aimed to study the correlation between the exposure of bladder antimuscarinics and the risk of developing subsequent dementia. We used data from a nationwide, population-based database in Taiwan to analyze their possible relationships.

Methods

Data resource

The dataset used in this study was derived from the National Health Insurance Research Database (NHIRD) in Taiwan, which covers approximately 99% of the entire population of 23 million people in Taiwan. The Longitudinal Health Insurance Database (LHID) includes all original claims data and registration files from 2000 to 2013 for one million individuals randomly sampled from the Registry for Beneficiaries of the NHIRD program in 2000 in Taiwan. This database has been validated by several studies1113, to prove the correct coding of different diseases. This study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of China Medical University and the Hospital Research Ethics Committee (IRB permit number: CMUH-104-REC2-115) and is in compliance with institutional guidelines. Written informed consent from patients was waived due to low risk, and the study was approved by the institutional IRB of China Medical University and the Hospital Research Ethics Committee.

Study subjects

In this case–control study, we aimed to examine the effects of bladder antimuscarinics on the development of dementia. Study subjects comprised patients with dementia coded with ICD-9-CM 290, 294.1, and 331.0, and diagnosed by a neurologist or a general physician in the medical care system of Taiwan during 2000–2013. The first diagnosed date of dementia was defined as the index date. Disease diagnosis in the LHID was defined according to the International Classification of Disease, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD-9-CM). The controls were subjects without dementia during 2000–2013 and were randomly selected from the LHID.

We excluded individuals younger than 55 years and individuals with missing data of age and sex. Considering that such a short-term exposure to antimuscarinics was less likely to cause dementia, subjects who used antimuscarinics for less than 1 year were excluded. For each dementia case, we used a propensity score matching method and randomly selected two controls from the non-dementia group. The controls were assigned the same index year as their matched cases with respect to age, sex, comorbidities, and medications mentioned below.

Exposure assessment and covariates

The use of bladder antimuscarinics was evaluated before the index date. For those who used ACs for at least 1 year before the index date, we obtained data of seven types of bladder antimuscarinics (oxybutynin, G04BD04; propiverine, G04BD06; tolterodine, G04BD07; solifenacin, G04BD08; trospium, G04BD09; darifenacin, G04BD10; fesoterodine, G04BD11) based on World Health Organization ATC codes14. Patients without any prescription of ACs during the study period were classified as AC non-users. The duration of AC use was categorized as medium (1–3 years), long (4–7 years), and prolonged (> 7 years) durations. The cumulative dose of AC use during the study period was quantified for each patient using the World Health Organization Defined Daily Dose (DDD)14, and graded as follows: non-use, low-dose (≤ 207), medium-dose (207–3271), and high-dose (> 3271) users.

Several modifiable risk factors are shared among patients with dementia1,5, and we additionally adjusted for the effects of occurrence of various cardiovascular diseases to predispose dementia among the subjects. Therefore, we adjusted pre-existing comorbidities including hypertension (ICD-9-CM code 401–405, A260, and A269), stroke (ICD-9-CM code 430–437, and A29), transient ischemic attack (ICD-9-CM code 435.9), subarachnoid hemorrhage (ICD-9-CM code 852.0), coronary heart disease (ICD-9-CM code 414.00, 414.05, 414.8, and 414.9), heart failure (ICD-9-CM code 428.0), atrial fibrillation (ICD-9-CM code 427.9), hyperlipidemia (ICD-9-CM code 272.0–272.4), and diabetes mellitus (ICD-9-CM code 250 and A181). Moreover, anxiety (ICD-9-CM code 300.0), depression (ICD-9-CM code 296.2, 296.3, 296.82, 300.4, 309.0, 309.1, and 311), bipolar disorder (ICD-9-CM code 296.0, 296.1, 296.4, 296.5, 296.6, 296.7, 296.8, and 296.89), schizophrenia (ICD-9-CM code 295 and A211), severe learning difficulties (ICD-9-CM code 319), cognitive decline (ICD-9-CM code 311), asthma (ICD-9-CM code 493), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (ICD-9-CM code 490–496), and renal disease (ICD-9-CM code 403.01, 403.11, 403.91, 404.02, 404.03, 404.12, 404.13, 404.92, 404.93, V42.0, V45.1, V56.x, and 790) were included and adjusted15,16.

Furthermore, we adjusted for the potentially confounding effects of other drugs, including aspirin, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, antihypertensives, statins, anxiolytics, hypnotics, antidepressants, and anti-Parkinson’s disease and antipsychotic medications. Treatment with these drugs before the index date was evaluated as a part of the analysis.

Statistical analysis

Propensity score matching was used to optimize comparability between the dementia and non-dementia groups using a non-parsimonious multivariable logistic regression model, with dementia as the dependent variable. Age, sex, comorbidities, medications, and index year were used as independent variables to match cases between the two groups. Descriptive statistics for the cases of dementia and non-dementia groups were reported, including demographic characteristics, comorbid disease, and medications. The standardized difference was used to test the differences in continuous and categorical matching variables. A standardized mean difference of ≤ 0.10 indicates a negligible difference between the groups.

We used conditional logistic regression to assess the risk of dementia associated with bladder antimuscarinics. The odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) for dementia were calculated and subsequently adjusted for covariates including age, sex, comorbidities, and medications. The covariates adjusted for in the analytical models were listed as adjusted OR (aOR). To assess the dose–effect relationship, we analyzed the risks of dementia according to the cumulative DDD of bladder antimuscarinics (≤ 207 DDD, 207–3271 DDD, and > 3271 DDD) relative to non-users and stratified by 1–3, 4–7, and > 7 exposure years. We used SAS statistical software (Version 9.4 for Windows; SAS Institute, Inc., Cary, NC, USA) for data analysis. Results with a P-value of less than 0.05 were considered to be statistically significant.

Results

Table 1 shows the demographic and clinical characteristics of the study population. A total of 20,246 patients with dementia and 40,394 patients without dementia were enrolled in this study between January 1, 2000 and December 31, 2013 in the propensity score-matched population. The mean (SD) age was 77.3 (8.54) and 77.3 (10.3) years in the dementia and non-dementia groups, respectively. Among the subjects, females aged 75 to 84 years were dominant (Table 1). After propensity score matching, distribution of age, sex, comorbidities, and medications did not significantly differ between the groups. The detailed flow chart for the identification of the study subjects is shown in Fig. 1.

Table 1.

Characteristics of patients with and without dementia and comparison between baseline and during follow-up.

Characteristic Original populationa, no. (%) Standardized difference§ PS matched populationb, no. (%) Standardized difference§
Dementia cohort Non dementia cohort Dementia cohort Non dementia cohort
(n = 20,690) (n = 194,980) (n = 20,246) (n = 40,394)
Sex
Female 10,849 (52.4) 93,169 (47.8) 0.093 10,625 (52.5) 20,626 (51.1) 0.028
Male 9841 (47.6) 101,808 (52.2) 0.093 9621 (47.5) 19,768 (48.9) 0.028
Age at diagnosis of dementia
55–64 1898 (9.17) 86,719 (44.5) 0.869 1869 (9.23) 5388 (13.3) 0.13
65–74 5672 (27.4) 55,493 (28.4) 0.023 5566 (27.5) 11,030 (27.3) 0.004
75–84 9280 (44.8) 35,567 (18.2) 0.598 9055 (44.7) 14,533 (36.0) 0.179
85–94 3609 (17.4) 14,042 (7.20) 0.315 3533 (17.4) 7721 (19.1) 0.043
 ≥ 95 231 (1.12) 3159 (1.62) 0.043 223 (1.10) 1722 (4.26) 0.197
Age at diagnosis of dementia (mean, SD) 77.3 (8.53) 68.8 (10.5) 0.888 77.3 (8.54) 77.3 (10.3) 0.001
Comorbidity
Hypertension 10,007 (48.4) 58,313 (29.9) 0.385 9781 (48.3) 20,635 (51.1) 0.055
Stroke 4858 (23.5) 26,496 (13.6) 0.257 4750 (23.5) 9983 (24.7) 0.029
Transient ischemic attack 417 (2.02) 1830 (0.94) 0.089 407 (2.01) 808 (2.00) 0.001
Subarachnoid hemorrhage 130 (0.63) 510 (0.26) 0.055 129 (0.64) 251 (0.62) 0.002
Coronary heart disease 1675 (8.10) 7950 (4.08) 0.169 1639 (8.10) 3319 (8.22) 0.004
Heart failure 1765 (8.53) 7794 (4.00) 0.188 1721 (8.50) 3395 (8.40) 0.003
Atrial fibrillation 35 (0.17) 148 (0.08) 0.027 35 (0.17) 67 (0.17) 0.002
Hyperlipidemia 6476 (31.3) 35,008 (17.9) 0.314 6326 (31.2) 13,099 (32.4) 0.025
Diabetes 6992 (33.8) 39,287 (20.1) 0.311 6827 (33.7) 14,271 (35.3) 0.034
Anxiety 4093 (19.7) 21,192 (10.8) 0.249 4000 (19.7) 8285 (20.5) 0.019
Depression 3418 (16.5) 16,673 (8.55) 0.242 3337 (16.5) 6913 (17.1) 0.017
Bipolar disorder 488 (2.36) 2240 (1.15) 0.092 475 (2.35) 970 (2.40) 0.004
Schizophrenia 735 (3.55) 3564 (1.83) 0.107 717 (3.54) 1476 (3.65) 0.006
Severe learning difficulties 142 (0.69) 711 (0.36) 0.045 140 (0.69) 290 (0.72) 0.003
Cognitive decline 906 (4.38) 3939 (2.02) 0.134 882 (4.36) 1755 (4.34) 0.001
Asthma 5525 (26.7) 29,949 (15.3) 0.281 5394 (26.6) 11,518 (28.5) 0.042
COPD 10,404 (50.3) 61,864 (31.7) 0.384 10,177 (50.3) 21,551 (53.3) 0.062
Renal disease 2211 (10.7) 10,814 (5.55) 0.189 2161 (10.7) 4498 (11.1) 0.015
Medication
Aspirin 16,415 (79.3) 109,091 (55.9) 0.516 16,049 (79.2) 32,063 (79.4) 0.003
Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs 20,322 (98.2) 177,372 (90.9) 0.325 19,884 (98.2) 39,606 (98.1) 0.012
Antihypertensives 19,244 (93.0) 141,644 (72.6) 0.561 18,823 (92.9) 37,731 (93.4) 0.017
Statin 5839 (28.2) 33,062 (16.9) 0.272 5704 (28.2) 11,265 (27.9) 0.006
Anxiolytic 19,226 (92.9) 151,847 (77.8) 0.436 18,798 (92.8) 37,251 (92.2) 0.024
Hypnotic 10,175 (49.1) 55,308 (28.3) 0.437 9960 (49.2) 19,701 (48.8) 0.008
Anti-depressants drug 9721 (46.9) 25,319 (13.0) 0.657 8231 (40.7) 11,460 (28.4) 0.261
Anti-Parkinson’s disease drug 4177 (20.2) 22,563 (11.6) 0.583 3767 (18.6) 3400 (8.42) 0.301
Anti-psychotic drug 12,885 (62.3) 76,063 (39.0) 0.702 12,616 (62.3) 21,428 (53.0) 0.188

PS propensity score, COPD chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

aAll comorbidities and medications before ps matching.

bAll comorbidities and medication were after ps matching.

*P-value using chi-square for the comparisons between with and without fetal adverse.

Average age using Wilcoxon rank-sum test for verification.

§A standardized mean difference of ≤ 0.10 indicates a negligible difference between the cohorts.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Flow chart for establishing antimuscarinic use and comparison cohorts using the National Health Insurance Research Database (NHIRD).

Table 2 presents the association between bladder antimuscarinics and the risk of developing dementia. After adjusting for potential confounders, antimuscarinic users exhibited a 2.46-fold increased risk of dementia compared with that in non-users (95% CI = 2.22–2.73). With respect to comorbidities, subjects with hypertension (aOR = 0.93, 95% CI = 0.89–0.98), asthma (aOR = 0.91, 95% CI = 0.89–0.97), and COPD (aOR = 0.86, 95% CI = 0.82–0.90) exhibited a lower risk of developing dementia. As for medication use, patients using aspirin, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, statin, anxiolytics, and hypnotics exhibited a lower risk of developing dementia. On the contrary, those using anti-depressants drug, anti-Parkinson's disease drug, and anti-psychotic drug showed a higher risk of developing dementia (Table 2).

Table 2.

Risk of dementia with prior use of bladder antimuscarinic drugs, other medications, and comorbidities.

Variable N Dementia Crude OR (95%CI) P-value Adjusted OR (95%CI)* P-value
Bladder antimuscarinic drugs
Non-use 57,833 19,212 1 (reference) 1 (reference)
Use 2807 1034 1.17 (1.08–1.26)  < 0.0001 2.46 (2.22–2.73)  < 0.0001
Comorbidity
Hypertension
No 30,224 10,465 1 (reference) 1 (reference)
Yes 30,416 9781 0.89 (0.86–0.92)  < 0.0001 0.93 (0.89–0.98) 0.0064
Stroke
No 45,907 15,496 1 (reference) 1 (reference)
Yes 14,733 4750 0.93 (0.89–0.97) 0.0007 1.00 (0.94–1.06) 0.99
Transient ischemic attack
No 59,425 19,839 1 (reference) 1 (reference)
Yes 1215 407 1.00 (0.89–1.13) 0.93 1.05 (0.88–1.25) 0.57
Subarachnoid hemorrhage
No 60,260 20,117 1 (reference) 1 (reference)
Yes 380 129 1.02 (0.82–1.26) 0.81 1.03 (0.76–1.38) 0.82
Coronary heart disease
No 55,682 18,607 1 (reference) 1 (reference)
Yes 4958 1639 0.98 (0.92–1.04) 0.6 1.00 (0.91–1.09) 0.98
Heart failure
No 55,524 18,525 1 (reference) 1 (reference)
Yes 5116 1721 1.01 (0.95–1.07) 0.68 1.07 (0.98–1.17) 0.11
Atrial fibrillation
No 60,538 20,211 1 (reference) 1 (reference)
Yes 102 35 1.04 (0.69–1.57) 0.84 1.11 (0.70–1.76) 0.62
Hyperlipidemia
No 41,215 13,920 1 (reference) 1 (reference)
Yes 19,425 6326 0.94 (0.91–0.98) 0.003 1.02 (0.97–1.08) 0.27
Diabetes
No 39,542 13,419 1 (reference) 1 (reference)
Yes 21,098 6827 0.93 (0.89–0.96)  < 0.0001 0.99 (0.95–1.04) 0.95
Anxiety
No 48,355 16,246 1 (reference) 1 (reference)
Yes 12,285 4000 0.95 (0.91–0.99) 0.03 1.03 (0.97–1.10) 0.31
Depression
No 50,390 16,909 1 (reference) 1 (reference)
Yes 10,250 3337 0.95 (0.91–1.00) 0.05 1.00 (0.94–1.07) 0.83
Bipolar disorder
No 59,195 19,771 1 (reference) 1 (reference)
Yes 1445 475 0.97 (0.87–1.09) 0.67 0.95 (0.81–1.13) 0.62
Schizophrenia
No 58,447 19,529 1 (reference) 1 (reference)
Yes 2193 717 0.96 (0.88–1.06) 0.48 0.96 (0.83–1.11) 0.62
Severe learning difficulties
No 60,210 20,106 1 (reference) 1 (reference)
Yes 430 140 0.96 (0.78–1.17) 0.71 0.94 (0.70–1.25) 0.67
Cognitive decline
No 58,003 19,364 1 (reference) 1 (reference)
Yes 2637 882 1.00 (0.92–1.08) 0.94 1.03 (0.92–1.15) 0.53
Asthma
No 43,728 14,852 1 (reference) 1 (reference)
Yes 16,912 5394 0.91 (0.87–0.94)  < 0.0001 0.91 (0.86–0.97) 0.004
COPD
No 28,912 10,069 1 (reference) 1 (reference)
Yes 31,728 10,177 0.88 (0.85–0.91)  < 0.0001 0.86 (0.82–0.90)  < 0.0001
Renal disease
No 53,981 18,085 1 (reference) 1 (reference)
Yes 6659 2161 0.95 (0.90–1.00) 0.08 0.95 (0.88–1.02) 0.18
Medication
Aspirin
Non-use 12,528 4197 1 (reference) 1 (reference)
Use 48,112 16,049 0.99 (0.95–1.03) 0.76 0.88 (0.84–0.92)  < 0.0001
Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs
Non-use 1150 362 1 (reference) 1 (reference)
Use 59,490 19,884 1.09 (0.96–1.23) 0.16 0.82 (0.72–0.95) 0.008
Antihypertensives
Non-use 4086 1423 1 (reference) 1 (reference)
Use 56,554 18,823 0.93 (0.87–0.99) 0.04 0.81 (0.75–0.87)  < 0.0001
Statin
Non-use 43,671 14,542 1 (reference) 1 (reference)
Use 16,969 5704 1.01 (0.97–1.05) 0.45 0.96 (0.92–1.00) 0.04
Anxiolytic
Non-use 4591 1448 1 (reference) 1 (reference)
Use 56,049 18,798 1.09 (1.02–1.16) 0.005 0.84 (0.78–0.90)  < 0.0001
Hypnotic
Non-use 30,979 10,286 1 (reference) 1 (reference)
Use 29,661 9960 1.01 (0.98–1.05) 0.32 0.83 (0.80–0.86)  < 0.0001
Anti-depressants drug
Non-use 40,949 12,015 1 (reference) 1 (reference)
Use 19,691 8231 1.73 (1.66–1.79)  < 0.0001 1.60 (1.54–1.67)  < 0.0001
Anti-Parkinson's disease drug
Non-use 53,473 16,479 1 (reference) 1 (reference)
Use 7167 3767 2.48 (2.36–2.61)  < 0.0001 2.22 (2.11–2.34)  < 0.0001
Anti-psychotic drug
Non-use 26,596 7630 1 (reference) 1 (reference)
Use 34,044 12,616 1.46 (1.41–1.51)  < 0.0001 1.29 (1.24–1.34)  < 0.0001

OR odds ratio.

*Adjusted for age, sex, all comorbidities, all medications, other anticholinergic drugs.

Table 3 presents the association between the cumulative DDD of bladder antimuscarinics and the risk of dementia by stratification according to the exposure to antimuscarinics. In patients who had been taking antimuscarinics for less than 4 years before the index date, an increased DDD was proportionally associated with the increased risk of developing dementia (aOR = 2.23, 95% CI = 1.12–4.44 for ≤ 207 DDD; aOR = 2.35, 95% CI = 0.87–6.32 for 207–3271 DDD; aOR = 12.8, 95% CI = 5.15–32.1 for > 3271 DDD) compared with that in the controls. In individuals exposed for 4–7 years, those who used ≤ 207 DDD (aOR = 2.82, 95% CI = 1.68–4.75), 207–3271 DDD (aOR = 2.23, 95% CI = 1.10–4.53), and > 3271 DDD (aOR = 1.90, 95% CI = 0.94–3.81) of antimuscarinics did not exhibit the trend of proportional increase in the risk of developing dementia. In patients with an exposure duration greater than 7 years, only those taking antimuscarinics at 207–3271 DDD (aOR = 1.19, 95% CI = 1.00–1.41) presented an equal risk of developing dementia compared with that in the controls (Table 3).

Table 3.

Risk of dementia associated with cumulative use of bladder antimuscarinic drugs among study patients.

Exposure category Study patients, no (%) OR (95% CI)
Case patients Controls Unadjusted P-value Adjusted P-value
Exposure in the 1 to 3 years before index date
Patients, no. 1085 9493 NA NA
Cumulative use (TSDDs)
Non-use 1062 (97.8) 9334 (98.3) 1 (reference) 1 (reference)
 ≤ 207 10 (0.92) 96 (1.01) 0.91 (0.47–1.76) 0.79 2.23 (1.12–4.44) 0.02
207–3271 5 (0.46) 45 (0.47) 0.97 (0.38–2.46) 0.96 2.35 (0.87–6.32) 0.09
 > 3271 8 (0.74) 18 (0.19) 3.90 (1.69–9.00) 0.001 12.8 (5.15–32.1)  < 0.0001
Exposure in the 4 to 7 years before the index date
Patients, no. 1766 3980 NA NA
Cumulative use (TSDDs)
Non-use 1706 (96.6) 3883 (97.6) 1 (reference) 1 (reference)
 ≤ 207 31 (1.76) 43 (1.08) 1.64 (1.03–2.61) 0.03 2.82 (1.68–4.75)  < 0.001
207–3271 15 (0.85) 25 (0.63) 1.36 (0.71–2.59) 0.34 2.23 (1.10–4.53) 0.02
 > 3271 14 (0.79) 29 (0.73) 1.09 (0.57–2.08) 0.77 1.90 (0.94–3.81) 0.07
Exposure for more than 7 years before the index date
Patients, no. 17,395 26,921 NA NA
Cumulative use (TSDDs)
Non-use 16,490 (94.8) 25,496 (94.7) 1 (reference) 1 (reference)
 ≤ 207 256 (1.47) 444 (1.65) 0.89 (0.76–1.04) 0.14 1.07 (0.89–1.29) 0.42
207–3271 325 (1.87) 466 (1.73) 1.07 (0.93–1.24) 0.3 1.19 (1.00–1.41) 0.04
 > 3271 324 (1.86) 515 (1.91) 0.97 (0.84–1.11) 0.69 1.03 (0.87–1.23) 0.66

OR odds ratio.

*Adjusted for age, sex, all comorbidities, all medications, and other anticholinergic drugs.

Table 4 presents the duration (years) of dementia identified in the dementia group and presents the year of study entry in the non-dementia group. We calculated the duration of exposure in both groups. The mean (SD) duration of exposure was 5.87 (3.96) and 5.93 (3.47) years in the dementia and non-dementia groups (Table 4).

Table 4.

Number of patients identified and duration of exposure.

Group P-value
Dementia cohort Non-dementia cohort
N % N %
Year of entry study 0.04
2000 1189 5.87 2274 5.63
2001 1105 5.46 2060 5.1
2002 1103 5.45 2112 5.23
2003 1129 5.58 2267 5.6
2004 1374 6.79 2766 6.85
2005 1368 6.76 2787 6.9
2006 1454 7.18 2876 7.12
2007 1524 7.53 2989 7.4
2008 1479 7.31 2904 7.19
2009 1638 8.09 3243 8.03
2010 1676 8.28 3300 8.17
2011 1743 8.61 3457 8.56
2012 1790 8.84 3966 9.82
2013 1674 8.27 3393 8.4
Duration of exposure, years
Mean (SD) 5.87 (3.96) 5.93 (3.47) 0.23

Discussion

In this retrospective nation-wide population-based case–control study, we noted that the risk of dementia increased 2.46-fold in Taiwanese patients aged 55 years or older who had been previously using bladder antimuscarinics for 1 year or more. Specifically, the risk proportionally increased with increasing dosage in patients taking antimuscarinics for less than 4 years. Richardson et al. reported that dementia development was associated with an increased use of antidepressant, urological, and anti-Parkinson agents6. They suggested that prior exposure to ACs of up to 20 years before the diagnosis of incident dementia could be detected. However, in our study, we noted that dementia development might be associated with an increasing dose of antimuscarinics for medium exposure duration. We believe that antidepressants, antihistamines, and bladder antimuscarinics should be started at different ages in patients. A medium exposure duration (< 4 years) would be related to less death claims in elderly subjects on antimuscarinics than in those with long or prolonged use in this study. We carefully adjusted the possible confounding effects from central nervous system disorders and ACs used for purpose other than urogenital organs in the study design. To our knowledge, this is the first study to report the dose–response effects on dementia development in patients using bladder antimuscarinics for less than 4 years in an Asian population.

We further observed a different relationship between the risk of dementia development and the duration of antimuscarinics exposure than that in other studies. The risk of dementia development seemed to decrease by time in patients on a high dose of antimuscarinics (> 3271 DDD). Those on antimuscarinics and aged 75–84 years seemed to be resistant to a higher risk of developing dementia. It implied a higher mortality rate for the first few years in aged patients with urogenital disorders. Once they crossed the high-risk period of urogenital disorders, the very aged survivors show a trend to resist developing another disorder. As in any observational study, the positive association that we observed between bladder antimuscarinics and dementia risk should be considered a part of numerous factors involved in dementia patho-mechanism. The directionality of the association can only be hypothesized by current data. To maintain the quality of life of patients, we suggest that primary caregivers should not limit the use of antimuscarinics for urogenital disorders before the symptoms of dementia are observed in the patients.

In this study, we analyzed the correlations between seven bladder antimuscarinics (oxybutynin, propiverine, tolterodine, solifenacin, trospium, darifenacin, and fesoterodine) and the subsequent dementia development. There are five subtypes (M1–M5) of muscarinic ACh receptors, and the M2 and M3 muscarinic Ach receptors are the major receptors that mediate smooth muscle contraction, proliferation, and remodeling of the bladder17,18. In contrast, evidence from recent postmortem human brain studies have implicated the involvement of the M1 muscarinic Ach receptors in various psychiatric disorders19,20. Some studies have further demonstrated the dominant functional distribution of the M1 muscarinic receptors for ACh uptake in the human brain21,22. Our study results implied that bladder antimuscarinics might possibly produce subtle effects on M1 activity, in addition to their known antagonistic effects on the M2 and M3 receptors. Because of the potential effect of bladder antimuscarinics on the M1 muscarinic receptor, bladder antimuscarinics has been supposed to cause dementia development. Furthermore, we cannot completely rule out the role of other subtypes of muscarinic receptors besides the M1 receptor that exhibits less expressed in the brain, and the brain penetration of various bladder antimuscarinics might be different. More laboratory studies could help clarify the detailed mechanism of different antimuscarinics and expression of different ACh subtypes in dementia development.

Globally, approximately 47 million people suffer from dementia with an estimated global cost of 818 billion US dollar in 2015, and the patient number would triple by 20501. Older adults who develop dementia are less likely to return to their ordinary lives than those who do not. The mechanisms of dementia development are too complicated to be fully understood in older adults with co-existing chronic disorders. First, older adults with bladder disorders might have sedentary lifestyles with poor sleep and personal hygiene or even with alcohol abuse and drug addiction. Sedentary lifestyles would potentially increase the risk of dementia development23,24. Second, bladder disorders often exist with local or systemic inflammation to associate with an increased risk of dementia development15,16. It is difficult to design a study that can distinguish the effects of inflammatory disorders from that of antimuscarinics on dementia development. However, the relationship between the risk of dementia and the dose of bladder antimuscarinics provides supports our hypothesis25. These results indicate that bladder antimuscarinics increase predisposition to dementia development.

The major limitation of this study was that dementia cases diagnosed using the ICD-9-CM coding system are often underestimated26. Although the NHI program covers nearly 99% of Taiwanese citizens and guarantees equality of access to medical services for everyone throughout the country, some dementia cases might be outside the scope of our study. With a higher rate of dementia diagnosis in older adults with bladder disorders, there might be some patients who did not receive bladder antimuscarinics before the incident dementia diagnosis. Second, we could not directly contact the patients because their identities were anonymized in the accessible LHID. Therefore, we could not analyze all confounding factors for dementia development within the patients’ families or the psychological burden on patients. Third, the poor adherence to bladder antimuscarinics in patients was another potential limitation of this study. However, our study demonstrates a statistically significant increase in the risk of dementia development in patients using bladder antimuscarinics. These results highlight the need to further explore bladder antimuscarinics as a predisposing factor for dementia development.

Conclusions

Taiwanese patients aged 55 years or more undergoing treatment with bladder antimuscarinics exhibited a higher risk for dementia development. Additional studies in other countries are required to determine whether this result is valid worldwide.

Author contributions

T.H.: data interpretation, manuscript preparation; Y.C.Y., L.T.C.: data analysis, manuscript preparation; J.H.W.: study design; S.Z.L.: study design; D.C.D.: study concepts, design and manuscript preparation, and revision.

Funding

This study was partially supported by the Taiwan Ministry of Health and Welfare Clinical Trial Center (MOHW109-TDU-B-212-114004); China Medical University Hospital, Academia Sinica Stroke Biosignature Project (BM10701010021); MOST Clinical Trial Consortium for Stroke (MOST 108-2321-B-039-003); Tseng-Lien Lin Foundation, Taichung, Taiwan; and Katsuzo and Kiyo Aoshima Memorial Funds, Japan.

Data availability

The original data are available at NHI, and we are not allowed to release despite reasonable application.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Footnotes

Publisher's note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

References

  • 1.Livingston G, et al. Dementia prevention, intervention, and care. Lancet. 2017;390:2673–2734. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)31363-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Matthews FE, et al. A two-decade comparison of prevalence of dementia in individuals aged 65 years and older from three geographical areas of England: Results of the Cognitive Function and Ageing Study I and II. Lancet. 2013;382:1405–1412. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(13)61570-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Jellinger KA, Attems J. Neuropathology and general autopsy findings in nondemented aged subjects. Clin. Neuropathol. 2012;31:87–98. doi: 10.5414/NP300418. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Sonnen JA, et al. Ecology of the aging human brain. Arch. Neurol. 2011;68:1049–1056. doi: 10.1001/archneurol.2011.157. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Winblad B, et al. Defeating Alzheimer’s disease and other dementias: A priority for European science and society. Lancet Neurol. 2016;15:455–532. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(16)00062-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Richardson K, et al. Anticholinergic drugs and risk of dementia: Case-control study. BMJ. 2018;361:k1315. doi: 10.1136/bmj.k1315. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Chatterjee S, et al. Anticholinergic burden and risk of cognitive impairment in elderly nursing home residents with depression. Res. Soc Admin. Pharm. 2020;16:329–335. doi: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2019.05.020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Gray SL, et al. Cumulative use of strong anticholinergics and incident dementia: A prospective cohort study. JAMA Intern. Med. 2015;175:401–407. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2014.7663. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Coupland CAC, et al. Anticholinergic drug exposure and the risk of dementia: a nested case-control study. JAMA Intern. Med. 2019;179:1084–1093. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2019.0677. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Hegde SS. Muscarinic receptors in the bladder: From basic research to therapeutics. Br. J. Pharmacol. 2006;147:S80–S87. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjp.0706560. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Shen Y-C, et al. Association of hysterectomy with bipolar disorder risk: A population-based cohort study. Depress. Anxiety. 2019;36:543–551. doi: 10.1002/da.22904. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Lin L-Y, Warren-Gash C, Smeeth L, Chen P-C. Data resource profile: The National Health Insurance Research Database (NHIRD) Epidemiol. Health. 2018;40:e2018062. doi: 10.4178/epih.e2018062. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Hung L-C, et al. Validation of a novel claims-based stroke severity index in patients with intracerebral hemorrhage. J. Epidemiol. 2017;27:24–29. doi: 10.1016/j.je.2016.08.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.WHO Collaborating Centre for Drug Statistics and Methodology. https://www.fhi.no/en/hn/drug/who-collaborating-centre-for-drug-statistics-methodology/.
  • 15.Darweesh SKL, et al. Inflammatory markers and the risk of dementia and Alzheimer’s disease: A meta-analysis. Alzheimers. Dement. 2018;14:1450–1459. doi: 10.1016/j.jalz.2018.02.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Koyama, A. et al. The role of peripheral inflammatory markers in dementia and Alzheimer’s disease: A meta-analysis. J. Gerontol. A Biol. Sci. Med. Sci.68, 433–440 (2013). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 17.Arrighi N, et al. Different muscarinic receptor subtypes modulate proliferation of primary human detrusor smooth muscle cells via Akt/PI3K and map kinases. Pharmacol. Res. 2013;74:1–6. doi: 10.1016/j.phrs.2013.04.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Chen S, et al. M3 receptor modulates extracellular matrix synthesis via ERK1/2 signaling pathway in human bladder smooth muscle cells. J. Cell. Biochem. 2020;121:4496–4504. doi: 10.1002/jcb.29688. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Odagaki Y, Kinoshita M, Meana JJ, Callado LF, García-Sevilla JA. Functional coupling of M1 muscarinic acetylcholine receptor to Gαq/11 in dorsolateral prefrontal cortex from patients with psychiatric disorders: A postmortem study. Eur. Arch. Psychiatry Clin. Neurosci. 2019;270:869–880. doi: 10.1007/s00406-019-01088-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Odagaki Y, et al. Functional activation of Gαq coupled to 5-HT2A receptor and M1 muscarinic acetylcholine receptor in postmortem human cortical membranes. J. Neural Transm. 2017;124:1123–1133. doi: 10.1007/s00702-017-1749-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Masuoka T, et al. Augmentation of endogenous acetylcholine uptake and cholinergic facilitation of hippocampal long-term potentiation by acetylcholinesterase inhibition. Neuroscience. 2019;404:39–47. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2019.01.042. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Thompson KJ, Tobin AB. Crosstalk between the M1 muscarinic acetylcholine receptor and the endocannabinoid system: A relevance for Alzheimer’s disease? Cell. Signal. 2020;70:109545. doi: 10.1016/j.cellsig.2020.109545. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Deckers K, et al. Target risk factors for dementia prevention: A systematic review and Delphi consensus study on the evidence from observational studies. Int. J. Geriatr. Psychiatry. 2015;30:234–246. doi: 10.1002/gps.4245. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Fan L, Xu W, Cai Y, Hu Y, Wu C. Sleep duration and the risk of dementia: A systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective cohort studies. J. Am. Med. Dir. Assoc. 2019;20:1480–1487.e5. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2019.06.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Orsini N, Li R, Wolk A, Khudyakov P, Spiegelman D. Meta-analysis for linear and nonlinear dose-response relations: Examples, an evaluation of approximations, and software. Am. J. Epidemiol. 2012;175:66–73. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwr265. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Brown A, et al. Comparison of dementia recorded in routinely collected hospital admission data in England with dementia recorded in primary care. Emerg. Themes Epidemiol. 2016;13:11. doi: 10.1186/s12982-016-0053-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

The original data are available at NHI, and we are not allowed to release despite reasonable application.


Articles from Scientific Reports are provided here courtesy of Nature Publishing Group

RESOURCES