Skip to main content
BMC Cancer logoLink to BMC Cancer
. 2021 Mar 1;21:211. doi: 10.1186/s12885-021-07887-5

Metabolic alterations in meningioma reflect the clinical course

Waseem Masalha 1,2,, Karam Daka 1,2, Jakob Woerner 3, Nils Pompe 3, Stefan Weber 3, Daniel Delev 4, Marie T Krüger 5, Oliver Schnell 1,2, Jürgen Beck 1,2, Dieter Henrik Heiland 1,2,#, Juergen Grauvogel 1,2,#
PMCID: PMC7923818  PMID: 33648471

Abstract

Background

Meningiomas are common brain tumours that are usually defined by benign clinical course. However, some meningiomas undergo a malignant transformation and recur within a short time period regardless of their World Health Organization (WHO) grade. The current study aimed to identify potential markers that can discriminate between benign and malignant meningioma courses.

Methods

We profiled the metabolites from 43 patients with low- and high-grade meningiomas. Tumour specimens were analyzed by nuclear magnetic resonance analysis; 270 metabolites were identified and clustered with the AutoPipe algorithm.

Results

We observed two distinct clusters marked by alterations in glycine/serine and choline/tryptophan metabolism. Glycine/serine cluster showed significantly lower WHO grades and proliferation rates. Also progression-free survival was significantly longer in the glycine/serine cluster.

Conclusion

Our findings suggest that alterations in glycine/serine metabolism are associated with lower proliferation and more recurrent tumours. Altered choline/tryptophan metabolism was associated with increases proliferation, and recurrence. Our results suggest that tumour malignancy can be reflected by metabolic alterations, which may support histological classifications to predict the clinical outcome of patients with meningiomas.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12885-021-07887-5.

Keywords: Tumour metabolism, Meningioma

Background

Meningiomas are common brain tumours in adults; they account for 13–26% of all intracranial tumours [1]. The 2016 World Health Organization (WHO) classification divided meningiomas into three histological grades (I to III) and described 16 histopathological subtypes [2]. These WHO grades have presented a significant correlation with clinical outcomes in several recent studies. The majority of meningiomas are benign tumours (90%) that are mainly treated by surgery, followed by an innocent clinical course [1]. Atypical meningiomas (WHO grade II) reveal a worse clinical outcome due to higher recurrence rates of up to 30–40% [2]. In addition, a small subset of meningiomas (1–2.8%) is classified as anaplastic; they show a particularly aggressive clinical course and a recurrence rate of nearly 100% [1].

A few benign meningiomas (WHO grade I) can transform into an aggressive growth pattern and recur after a short period of time. To address the variety of clinical outcomes within the WHO grade I group, multiple research groups have investigated the genetic landscape of meningiomas and have shown region-specific genomic alterations [3]. The authors have identified five genetic subgroups based on transcriptional similarity and associated mutational patterns. Meningiomas most frequently contained an NF2, SMARCB1 (Group1), TRAF7/KLF4 (Group2), and PI3K (Group3) mutation, which drive WNT pathway activation. In another group, there was Hedgehog pathway activation detected by transcriptional profiles and mainly based on mutations in genes such as SMO [4]. The last subgroup comprised meningiomas that showed a distinct mutation in the POLR2A gene followed by dysregulated RNA synthesis [3, 5]. others suggested that malignant meningiomas have different DNA methylation patterns than other types of meningiomas and that the differently methylated genes could serve as diagnostic biomarkers for malignant transformation [6]. The importance of TERT promoter mutations and their potential use as biomarkers to identify meningiomas at risk of malignant transformation was also reported [7].

Besides genomic alterations, tumour metabolism has recently been described as a hallmark driver of malignancy and tumour development. Different tumour entities, including brain and other solid tumours, have shown numerous metabolic alterations. A strong association between altered tumourmetabolism and chromosomal instability has been reported [8]. These metabolic alterations were detected independently of the WHO grade [9, 10]. Serna et al. [11] showed that metabolic aggressiveness is driven by alterations in the expression of IGF1R (insulin-like growth factor 1 receptor), which is involved in the regulation of glycolysis. Following the hypothesis of altered glycolysis in meningiomas, researchers have shown that different components of glycolysis are transformed, including phosphofructokinase (PFK) and lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), both of which were significantly increased in anaplastic meningioma compared with other histological subtypes. In addition, there were alterations in tryptophan metabolism, a phenomenon that forced the immune-escape mechanism to increase kynurenine pathway activity [12, 13]. Today, increased opportunities in bioinformatics and metabolic profiling have allowed detecting associations between metabolic networks and clinical parameters to predict metabolic patterns and associated clinical outcomes. Our aim was to identify benign and potentially malignantly transformed meningiomas within the defined WHO grade I by metabolic profiling and computational analysis.

Methods

Contact for reagent and resource sharing

Further information and requests for resources, raw data, and reagents should be directed to and will be fulfilled by DH Heiland (dieter.henrik.heiland@uniklinik-freiburg.de). A full table of all materials is given in the supplementary information.

Ethical approval

For this study, we included 43 patients who underwent surgery at the Department of Neurosurgery of the University Medical Center Freiburg. The local ethics committee of the University of Freiburg approved data evaluation, imaging procedures, and the experimental design (protocols 100,020/09 and 5565/15). The methods were carried out in accordance with the approved guidelines. Written informed consent was obtained from each patient. The studies were approved by an institutional review board.

Imaging, tissue collection, and histology

Tumour tissue was sampled from the meningioma core, snap-frozen in liquid nitrogen immediately after resection, and processed for further metabolic analysis. Representative tissue from all samples were fixed using 4% phosphate-buffered formaldehyde and embedded in paraffin following standard procedures. Hemotoxylin and eosin (H&E) staining was performed on 4 μm paraffin sections using standard protocols. This staining confirmed the correct sampling.

Metabolite extraction and hydrogen nuclear magnetic resonance (1H-NMR) analysis

Metabolites were extracted with 400 μL ice-cold 80% methanol and 400 μL ice-cold water, homogenized with a tissue grinder (VWR, Radnor, PA, USA), sonicated at 1 °C, then centrifuged at 15,000 g for 20 min to remove protein. Extracts were dried by lyophilization and resuspended in 650 μL deuterated water as described by Beckonert et al [14] Six-hundred microliters of the suspension was transferred to NMR tubes for the subsequent NMR procedure. 1H-NMR spectra were collected at the Institute of Physical Chemistry of the University of Freiburg with a Bruker Avance III HDX 600-MHz NMR spectrometer (Bruker, Rheinstetten, Germany), equipped with a PABBO BB/19F-1H/D Z-GRD probe head. Each individual spectrum was recorded with two dummy scans and 32 scans with 64 k points in the time domain. The sweep width was set to 16.02 ppm with an offset of 4.691 ppm. This resulted in an acquisition time of 3.4 s for each scan and a dwell time of 52 microseconds. The relaxation delay was set to 2 s for acquisition, and the water signal was suppressed by an excitation sculpting scheme [15].

Postprocessing of metabolic data

To adjust the spectra from multiple batches, spectra were manually aligned by setting the peak of l-lactic acid at 1.310 ppm. All acquisition and processing of the spectra were performed with TopSpin 3.2 patch level 6. A detailed description of the methods was given in a recently published study by Heiland et al [16] All spectra were analyzed with the software package “batman,” an R-software-based tool for metabolite detection in complex spectra [17]. This tool fits a predefined list of metabolites by a Bayesian approach. Hao et al. [17] provided a detailed description of the batman algorithm. Normalization of the spectra was performed by the pseudo-counted quantile (pQ) normalization algorithm integrated in the KODAMA package. Further processing of metabolic data is described in the subsequent subsections.

Cluster analysis

Normalized metabolic data were processed with AutoPipe (https://github.com-/heilandd/AutoPipe), a software package for automated unsupervised clustering. First, the number of subgroups was computed by the Partitioning Around Medoids (PAM) algorithm (Cluster number k = 2–12). To identify the optimal number of clusters, we calculated the mean silhouette width of each cluster composition. Next, to identify the core samples of each cluster, we removed samples with a negative silhouette width from further analysis. We then used either the PAMR algorithm [18], a machine-learning-based method, or a generalized linear model [19] to identify characteristic up- or downregulated metabolites of each subgroup.

Weighted correlation network analysis (WCNA)

WCNA is a robust tool for integrative network analysis and has been used in recent studies [2022]. It is based on a scaled-topology-free-based network approach and uses the topological overlapping measurement to identify corresponding modules. These modules were analyzed by their eigengene correlation to each metabolite. The correlation of the intramodular connectivity (kME) and metabolites was used as input for a “Cluster of Clusters Analysis.” This analysis integrates expression modules and metabolites, which presents equal correlation values (kME and metabolite intensity values). A detailed description of WCNA is given in a previous publication [23].

Functional analysis

Metabolic data was processed by pathviewer, an R package that includes Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) pathway maps [24]. Expression data (as described above) and normalized, log2-transformed, and median-centered metabolic data were integrated in the pathviewer algorithm. Enrichment analysis of metabolic data was performed with the DOSE package and the web-based tool MetaboAnalyst 3.0 (www.metaboanalyst.ca).

Survival analysis

Progression-free survival analysis was conducted using Kaplan-Meier analysis, with the betweed-cluster differences analyzed using a log-rank test.

Results

Meningiomas revealed two distinct metabolic clusters

We started our investigation by purifying metabolites from 43 meningiomas localized at different anatomical regions, including the convexity in 12 cases (27.9%), the falcine site in 6 cases (13.9%), the sphenoid ridge in 6 cases (13.9%), the frontobasal region in 9 cases (20.9%), the petroclival region in 2 cases (4.6%), the spinal site in 3 cases (6.9%), and 5 cases at other regions. The histopathological analysis showed 28 patients with WHO grade I meningiomas (65.1%), 12 with WHO grade II meningiomas (27.9%), and 3 patients with WHO grade III meningiomas (6.9%). Two patients with a WHO grade II meningioma and 3 patients with a WHO grade III meningioma showed a tumour recurrence within 1 year. Twenty-four (55.9%) patients had a proliferation index (MIB-1) below 5% and 19 (44.1%) patients had a proliferation index (MIB-1) above 5%. A gross total resection (Simpson grade 1 + 2) was achieved in 37 patients and a subtotal resection (Simpson grade 3 + 4) was achieved in 6 patients. A detailed overview of all parameters can be found in Table 1.

Table 1.

Patients data

Parameter Cluster 1
N = 15
Cluster 2
N = 28
Significance level (p)
Sex (N,%)
 Male (N = 10) 2 (14.2%) 8 (28.5%) 0.45****
 Female (N = 33) 13 (86.6%) 20 (71.4%)
Age (mean, SD) 62.3 ± 13.1 64.4 ± 12.8 0.62*
Size (cm3) (mean, SD) 48.3 ± 51.8 88.6 ± 103.3 0.09*
Peritumoral edema (N, %)
 high 4(26.6%) 18(64.3%) 0.02***
 low 11(73.4%) 10(35.7%)
Location (N, %)
 falx 3(20%) 3(10.7%) 0.64****
 convexity 2(13.3%) 10(35.7%) 0.16****
 frontobasal 4(26.6%) 5(17.8%) 0.69****
 sphenoid wing 2(13.3%) 4(14.2%) 1***
 petroclival 1(6.6%) 1(3.5%) 1****
 spinal 2(13.3%) 1(3.5%) 0.11****
 others 1(6.6%) 4(14.2%) 0.64****
Simpson grade (N, %)
 Grade 1 5(33.3%) 7(25%) 0.74****
 Grade 2 9(60%) 16(57.1%) 1***
 Grade 3 0(0%) 3(10.7%) 0.54****
 Grade 4 1(6.6%) 2(7.1%) 1****
Preoperative KPS (median, 95% CI) 80% CI(70–80%) 70% CI(%60–80%) 0.01**
Postoperative KPS (median, 95% CI) 90% CI(80–90%) 70% CI(50–90%) 0.007**
Proliferation index (N, %)
 MIB1 < 5% 15(100%) 9(32.1%) 0.01****
 MIB1 > 5% 0(0%) 19(67.9%)
Pathology (N, %)
 WHO grade I 15(100%) 13(46.4%) 0.001****
 WHO grade II + III 0(0%) 15(53.6%)

SD standard deviation

CI confidence interval

KPS Karnofsky score

* T-test

**Wilcoxon test

***Chi-squared test

****Fisher’s exact test

Metabolites were analyzed using NMR and processed by a comprehensive computational analysis (Fig. 1). Representative MRI and histological staining’s are illustrated in Fig. 1b-c. We first conducted an unsupervised cluster analysis of the top 100 most variable metabolites by PAM clustering. The optimal number of clusters was defined by maximal mean silhouette widths (Fig. 2a, b). The analysis revealed two distinct clusters. In the first cluster, named Metabolic Cluster I, we found upregulated glycine/serine metabolism with the major signature metabolites glycine, serine, and arginine. Patients in this cluster were exclusively histological grade I and showed a significantly lower rate of edema (p < 0.05) and a low proliferation rate (mean 1.2, interquartile range [IQR] 0.3, p < 0.05) compared to cluster II. The second cluster (Metabolic Cluster II) was easily separable into two subclusters by PAM clustering. One subcluster contained patients with a medium proliferation rate of 2.1 (IQR 0.7) and increased edema compared with Cluster I (p < 0.05; Fig. 2a, b). The pathway that separated the clusters was choline metabolism. For the second subcluster, we found increased tryptophan metabolism and also a strong activation of the choline pathway. Furthermore, the proliferation rate was massively increased (mean 11.7, IQR 4.3, p < 0.05), and there was edema in most of the patients compared to patients in cluster I. We found a high incidence of meningioma WHO grade II (n = 12) and III (n = 3) but also meningioma WHO grade I (n = 13) (Fig. 2a, b). Kaplan-Meier analysis showed a significant longer progression-free survival in favour of cluster I (p = 0.0083), suggesting that metabolic alterations may reflect the clinical course of the disease, Fig. 3.

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

a Workflow of metabolite extraction, identification of metabolite and bioinformatical analysis. The extracted specimens are analyzed by NMR analysis. Metabolite are fitted and further analyzed by unsupervised clustering and network analysis. b T1-weighted MRI images with contrast are illustrated. c Representative H&E stainings of WHO grade I-III (upper panel) and KI-67 immunostainings (bottom panel) of WHO grade I-III

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

a In the upper plot, the silhouette widths of both clusters are shown ordered by different cluster subgroups. In the middle panel, a heatmap illustrate the metabolic intensity of the top ranked metabolites. At the bottom panel, the information on clinical properties is available. These are color-coded and explained in the side panel. b In the upper panel, the plot illustrates the optimal number of clusters. The optimal number of clusters was achieved by PAM clustering from 2 to 10 number of clusters by calculating the mean silhouette widths. In the bottom panel, a network analysis of the metabolic pathways highly enriched in cluster 1 and 2 respectively is given. c A weighted correlation network analysis (WGNC) was performed to explore the associated clinical features and molecular/metabolic, further detailed interpretation of all identified modules is given in the supplementary data

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3

Kaplan-Meier Kurve for Prgression-free survival based on different Clusters (Cluster 1 in yellow vs Cluster 2 in blue)

WCNA of metabolic profiles in Meningiomas

We aimed to characterize the metabolic pathways in detail and performed a WCNA of metabolic profiles. There were five metabolic modules (Fig. 2c). Three modules showed a strong association with the WHO grade based on a logistic model that included WHO grade and module eigengene. From that model, we considered module GI (associated with WHO grade I, R = 0.25, padj = 0.05), module GII (associated with WHO grade II, R = 0.26, padj = 0.05), and module GIII (associated with WHO grade III, R = 0.28, padj = 0.01) for further analysis. The other modules failed to achieve a significant correlation with the WHO grade. First, we analyzed the correlation between the GI module eigengene and clinical features (Figure S1A). We found a significant negative correlation between module GI and perifocal edema (R = − 0.3, padj = 0.01) and the histologically defined atypical meningiomas (R = − 0.38, padj = 0.03), which confirmed our NMR findings. Meningiomas with a module GI signature were mostly observed in the convexity (R = − 0.32, padj = 0.04). The histological subtype of a “transitional meningioma” was highly significantly associated with the GI signature (R = − 0.41, padj = 0.001). Next, we examined the enrichment of metabolic pathways in each module. A metabolite set enrichment analysis (MSEA) showed a significant upregulation of the glycine/serine pathway (Enrichment Score = 1.75, p = 0.0067) and glutamate metabolism (Enrichment Score = 1.52, p = 0.047) (Figure S1B). We computed a network based on the metabolites of module GI. Connections within the network were based on intramodular connectivity. From that network, we identified the amino acids serine and glycine and the metabolite creatine as key metabolic players in grade I meningiomas.

In the next step, we examined the correlation between the GII module eigengene and clinical features (Figure S2A). There was a significant correlation between module GII and perifocal edema (R = 0.25, padj = 0.05) and the histologically defined atypical meningioma (R = 0.41, padj = 0.02). There was no correlation between localization and the module eigengene. The metabolic network of module GII identified tryptophan and kynurenic acid as hub metabolites (Figure S2B). In line with the network findings, a metabolic pathway analysis uncovered upregulation of the tryptophan metabolism pathway (Enrichment Score = 1.83, p = 0.0093; Fig. 2c). To characterize module GIII, we examined the correlation between module eigengene and clinical features (Fig. S2D). No clinical feature was associated with this module, except the WHO grade (R = 0.28, padj = 0.01). In addition, there was no correlation between localization and module eigengene. We next computed a network of metabolites for module GIII. Choline, iso-leucine, and sphingosine were hub metabolites, (Figure S2E). In line with the network findings, a metabolic pathway analysis uncovered an upregulation of the choline metabolism pathway (Enrichment Score = 1.06, p = 0.0014).

Discussion

Due to a favorable clinical course, most meningiomas are classified as benign. Nevertheless, 20% of patients within this subgroup present a tumour recurrence, even after gross total resection [1, 25]. These tumour subtypes are difficult to identify and challenging for future treatment. To better predict their clinical outcome, researchers have performed metabolic analysis by high resolution magic angle spinning (HR-MAS) and reported a correlation between metabolic and WHO graduation of meningiomas [9]; however, these findings were limited by a small number of observed metabolites. We aimed to investigate a global metabolic profiling to identify specific subgroups that are driven by unique metabolic alterations and associated with WHO grades. We performed ex vivo metabolic profiling by NMR spectroscopy of meningioma specimens, including all WHO grades (I, II, and III), followed by computational detection of metabolites and cluster analysis.

Our cluster analysis identified two major metabolic clusters, of which one cluster was divided into two subclusters of meningiomas based on the top 100 most variable metabolites. The first metabolic cluster was highlighted by serine and glycine metabolism, which provides a basis for synthesis of other amino acids, proteins, and lipids. Their metabolism could increase the antioxidative capacity and reduce cellular reactive oxygen species (ROS). In particular, the glycine cleavage system fuels mono-carbon metabolism within a complex cellular network based on folate compound reactions, which play a central role in cellular redox balance over modulation of the NADP+/NADPH-ratio [26]. This network is also an essential component of methylation reactions that may be relevant for the maintenance of the cellular epigenetic status [27]. In our study, serine and glycine metabolism was associated with benign meningiomas (WHO grade I) and a significantly low proliferation index (p = 0.01). This cluster was also accompanied by significantly lower edema based on magnetic resonance imaging (p = 0.02; Fig. 2, Table 1) compared with higher grades. The role of glycine in meningiomas has been controversially discussed. While some authors have reported a complete absence of glycine in aggressive meningioma [28], others have shown a significantly increased glycine/alanine ratio. Furthermore, a significantly increased ratio of glycine to glutamine/glutamate in rapidly recurrent meningiomas and an increased glycine value in benign meningioma has been observed [29, 30]. By contrast, Monleon and colleagues found increased glycine levels in atypical meningiomas due to hypothesized increased angiogenesis [9]. These discrepancies with regard to glycine levels suggest the existence of more complex subgroups within the pathological delineation of grade I meningiomas. In line with published data, we detected altered glycine/serine metabolism in a subgroup of benign meningiomas. Other clusters also contain grade I tumours, which results in inaccurate individual metabolic levels within grade I meningiomas.

The second metabolic cluster was defined by choline and tryptophan metabolism. Choline is an important component of the cell membrane. Higher choline concentrations are usually present in brain tumours compared with normal brain tissue. Thereby, choline acts as a brain tumour marker [31]. Elevated choline peaks can also be detected in regions with high tumour cell density, in which the tissue is not necessarily anaplastic [32]. The increased rate of proliferation, which we observed in tumours of the second cluster, consequently drives the choline metabolism due to increased demand of membrane components. Previous findings have suggested that choline levels are significantly increased in benign meningioma with an aggressive clinical course [9, 11]. Further, Mishra and colleagues reported high choline levels in malignant meningioma [33]. By contrast, others have reported a prominent choline level in WHO grade I meningioma. While they did not observe differences in choline concentrations within all WHO grades, they only included a small number of WHO grade II + III meningiomas in their study [29]. We further identified altered tryptophan metabolism; this amino acid is mainly metabolized by three pathways: the serotonin (5-hydroxytryptamine [5-HT]) pathway, the kynurenine (KYN) pathway, and the tryptamine pathway [34]. Researchers have reported that an overexpression of the tryptophan catabolizing enzymes indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase 1/2 or tryptophan 2,3-dioxygenase are associated with tumour progression. These two enzymes convert tryptophan into kynurenine [35, 36], which is involved in the immune escape mechanism [37, 38]. This indicates that the tryptophan and the kynurenine pathways play an important role in tumour progression and immune response. Researchers have confirmed the increased tryptophan metabolism in high-grade meningiomas [12, 13]. In line with the reported findings, we confirmed the increased tryptophan metabolism in high-grade meningiomas (grade II and III) but also identified benign meningiomas with upregulated choline and tryptophan metabolism. These tumours were significantly associated with a shorter PFS in our study (p = 0.0083) (Fig. 3). This insight provides a possible rationale suggesting that some benign classified meningioma manifest a less favorable course than others.

Taken together our findings suggest an important role for tumour metabolism in meningiomas that only partially overlaps with respect to their histological grading. We addressed the questions as to how metabolic changes in meningiomas can provide a possible explanation for different clinical features within these histologically classified tumours. Our metabolic profiling revealed distinct subgroups marked by different activated metabolic programs. Patients with predominant activation of glycine/serine metabolism showed favorable grading and a low proliferation index. The second metabolic subgroups were marked by upregulated choline and tryptophan metabolism; it mainly contained high-grade meningiomas but also some lower-grade tumours. The current study is limited by the relatively low number of enrolled patients and the short follow-up time. However, although WHO grade II and III meningiomas are rare, we were able to include 15 patients in this study. A re-evaluation with a longer follow-up should be carried out to confirm these results.

Conclusion

In summary, our results suggest that tumour malignancy is reflected by metabolic alterations that can support histological classifications in order to predict the clinical outcome of patients with meningiomas. In our study, we investigated choline as a metabolic marker to predict early recurrence and reduced PFS, which is a well-detectable metabolite in in-vivo MR spectroscopy. Further studies are needed to validate this potential correlation in a larger cohort, which would provide a clinical implication for MR spectroscopy in meningioma.

Supplementary Information

12885_2021_7887_MOESM1_ESM.png (790.2KB, png)

Additional file 1: Supplementary Figure 1. A) Heatmap of correlation of module eigengene of module GI and clinical features. B) Metabolic set enrichment analysis (MSEA) of module GI and KEGG pathways. C) Network of metabolites of module GI, nodes and edges were defined by correlation coefficients between all metabolites of module GI. D) A volcano plot reveals differential metabolic intensities between WHO grade I and III meningioma.

12885_2021_7887_MOESM2_ESM.png (1MB, png)

Additional file 2: Supplementary Figure 2. A) Heatmap containing correlations of module eigengene (module GII) and clinical features. B) Network of metabolites of module GII, nodes and edges were defined by correlation coefficients between all metabolites of module GII. C) Metabolic set enrichment analysis (MSEA) of module GII and KEGG pathways. D) Correlation of module eigengene (module GIII) and clinical features. E) Network analysis of module GIII, nodes and edges were defined by correlation coefficients between all metabolites. F) Metabolic set enrichment analysis (MSEA) of module GIII and KEGG pathways.

12885_2021_7887_MOESM3_ESM.png (250.9KB, png)

Additional file 3: Supplementary Figure 3. A-B) Scatter plot of different metabolic intensities between WHO grade I and II (A) and II and III (B), respectively. Colors indicate the corrected p-values, cyane points with FDR p < 0.05.

Acknowledgements

Written consent to publish the study was obtained from the patients.

We thank the “Struktur- and Innovationsfonds für die Forschung Baden-Württemberg” (SI-BW) and the DFG for financing NMR instrumentation, which is operated within the MagRes Center of the University of Freiburg.

Abbreviations

NMR

Nuclear magnetic resonance

WHO

World Health Organization

IGF1R

Insulin-like growth factor 1 receptor

PFK

Phosphofructokinase

LDH

Lactate dehydrogenase

H-NMR

Hydrogen Nuclear Magnetic Resonance

ppm

Parts per million

pQ

Pseudo-counted quantile

WCNA

Weighted correlation network analysis

kME

Intramodular connectivity

MSEA

Metabolite set enrichment analysis

HR-MAS

High resolution magic angle spinning

ROS

Reactive oxygen species

5-HT

5-Hydroxytryptamine

KYN

Kynurenine

PFS

Progression-free survival

Authors’ contributions

WM drafted the manuscript and participated in the data collection. KD, JW, and NP conducted the laboratory tests. DD participated in the preparation of the manuscript and in the data collection. MTK participated in the design of the figures. OS, SW, and JB participated in the preparation of this article by revising it with regard to important intellectual content. DHH and JG coordinated the study and revised the article for important intellectual content. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Funding

This study was funded by the German Cancer Society (Seeding Grand TII) and Müller-Fahnenberg-Stiftung. The funding institutions did not play any role in the planning of the study and the collection, analysis and interpretation of the data, nor in the writing of the manuscript.

Availability of data and materials

Further information and requests for resources, raw data, and reagents should be directed to and will be fulfilled by DH Heiland (dieter.henrik.heiland@uniklinik-freiburg.de). A full table of all materials is given in the supplementary information.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

For this study, we included 43 patients who underwent surgery at the Department of Neurosurgery of the Medical Center, University of Freiburg. The local ethics committee of the University of Freiburg approved the data evaluation, imaging procedures, and experimental design (protocols 100020/09 and 5565/15). The methods were carried out in accordance with the approved guidelines. Written informed consent was obtained from each patient. The studies were approved by an institutional review board.

Consent for publication

All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Competing interests

No potential conflicts of interest were disclosed by the authors.

Footnotes

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Dieter Henrik Heiland and Juergen Grauvogel contributed equally to this work.

References

  • 1.Rogers L, et al. Meningiomas: knowledge base, treatment outcomes, and uncertainties. A RANO review. J Neurosurg. 2015;122:4–23. doi: 10.3171/2014.7.JNS131644. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Louis DN, et al. The 2016 World Health Organization classification of tumors of the central nervous system: a summary. Acta Neuropathol. 2016;131:803–820. doi: 10.1007/s00401-016-1545-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Clark VE, et al. Recurrent somatic mutations in POLR2A define a distinct subset of meningiomas. Nat Genet. 2016;48:1253–1259. doi: 10.1038/ng.3651. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Brastianos PK, et al. Genomic sequencing of meningiomas identifies oncogenic SMO and AKT1 mutations. Nat Genet. 2013;45:285–289. doi: 10.1038/ng.2526. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Pfisterer WK, et al. Implicating chromosomal aberrations with meningioma growth and recurrence: results from FISH and MIB-I analysis of grades I and II meningioma tissue. J Neuro-Oncol. 2008;87:43–50. doi: 10.1007/s11060-007-9498-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Gao F, et al. DNA methylation in the malignant transformation of meningiomas. PLoS One. 2013;8:e54114. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0054114. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Goutagny S, et al. High incidence of activating TERT promoter mutations in meningiomas undergoing malignant progression. Brain Pathol. 2014;24:184–189. doi: 10.1111/bpa.12110. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Dunn J, et al. Integration and comparison of transcriptomic and proteomic data for meningioma. Cancers (Basel). 2020;12:3270. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 9.Monleón D, et al. Metabolic aggressiveness in benign meningiomas with chromosomal instabilities. Cancer Res. 2010;70:8426–8434. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-10-1498. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Bender L, et al. Metabolomic profile of aggressive Meningiomas by using high-resolution magic angle spinning nuclear magnetic resonance. J Proteome Res. 2020;19:292–299. doi: 10.1021/acs.jproteome.9b00521. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Serna E, et al. Gene expression profiles of metabolic aggressiveness and tumor recurrence in benign meningioma. PLoS One. 2013;8:e67291. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0067291. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Bosnyák E, et al. Molecular imaging correlates of tryptophan metabolism via the kynurenine pathway in human meningiomas. Neuro-Oncology. 2015;17:1284–1292. doi: 10.1093/neuonc/nov225.38. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Zitron IM, Kamson DO, Kiousis S, Juhász C, Mittal S. In vivo metabolism of tryptophan in meningiomas is mediated by indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase 1. Cancer Biol Ther. 2013;14:333–339. doi: 10.4161/cbt.23624. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Beckonert O, et al. Metabolic profiling, metabolomic and metabonomic procedures for NMR spectroscopy of urine, plasma, serum and tissue extracts. Nat Protoc. 2007;2:2692–2703. doi: 10.1038/nprot.2007.376. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Hwang T-L. Water Suppression that Works. Excitation sculping using Arbitrary Waveforms and plused fields gradients. J Magn Reson. 1995;112:275–279. doi: 10.1006/jmra.1995.1047. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Heiland DH, et al. The integrative metabolomic-transcriptomic landscape of glioblastome multiforme. Oncotarget. 2017;8:49178–49190. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.16544. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Hao J, et al. Bayesian deconvolution and quantification of metabolites in complex 1D NMR spectra using BATMAN. Nat Protoc. 2014;9:1416–1427. doi: 10.1038/nprot.2014.090. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Hastie TJ, Narasimhan B, Tibshirani RJ, Chu G. Predictive analysis of microarrays. 2002. pp. 1–41. [Google Scholar]
  • 19.McCullagh P, Nelder JA. Generalized Linear Models. 500. 1989. [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Langfelder P, Horvath S. WGCNA: an R package for weighted correlation network analysis. BMC Bioinformatics. 2008;9:559. doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-9-559. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Holtman IR, et al. Induction of a common microglia gene expression signature by aging and neurodegenerative conditions: a co-expression meta-analysis. Acta Neuropathol Commun. 2015;3:31. doi: 10.1186/s40478-015-0203-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Iancu OD, et al. Cosplicing network analysis of mammalian brain RNA-Seq data utilizing WGCNA and mantel correlations. Front Genet. 2015;6:174. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2015.00174. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Heiland DH, et al. Integrative network-based analysis of magnetic resonance spectroscopy and genome wide expression in Glioblastoma multiforme. Sci Rep. 2016;6:29052. doi: 10.1038/srep29052. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Luo W, Brouwer C. Pathview: an R/bioconductor package for pathway-based data integration and visualization. Bioinformatics. 2013;29:1830–1831. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btt285. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Rogers CL, et al. Pathology concordance levels for meningioma classification and grading in NRG oncology RTOG trial 0539. Neuro-Oncology. 2016;18:565–574. doi: 10.1093/neuonc/nov247. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Amelio I, Cutruzzolá F, Antonov A, Agostini M, Melino G. Serine and glycine metabolism in cancer. Trends Biochem Sci. 2014;39:191–198. doi: 10.1016/j.tibs.2014.02.004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Gut P, Verdin E. The nexus of chromatin regulation and intermediary metabolism. Nature. 2013;502:489–498. doi: 10.1038/nature12752. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Cheng L, Chang I-W, Louis D, Gonzalez G. Correlation of high-resolution magic angle spinning proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy with histopathology of intact human brain tumor Specimens1. Cancer Res. 1998;58:1825–1832. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Pfisterer WK, et al. Using ex vivo proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy to reveal associations between biochemical and biological features of meningiomas. Neurosurg Focus. 2010;28:E12. doi: 10.3171/2009.11.FOCUS09216. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Pfisterer WK, et al. Fluorescent in situ hybridization and ex vivo 1H magnetic resonance spectroscopic examinations of meningioma tumor tissue: is it possible to identify a clinically-aggressive subset of benign meningiomas? Neurosurgery. 2007;61:1048–1059. doi: 10.1227/01.neu.0000303201.62123.5c. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Gillies RJ, Barry JA, Ross BD. In vitro and in vivo 13C and 31P NMR analyses of phosphocholine metabolism in rat glioma cells. Magn Reson Med. 1994;32:310–318. doi: 10.1002/mrm.1910320306. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Preul M, et al. Accurate, nonivasive diagnosis of human brain tumors by using proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy. Nat Med. 1996;2:323–325. doi: 10.1038/nm0396-323. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Mishra G, Phatak S, Kakde D. Role of magnetic resonance spectroscopy in classifying MENINGIOMAS with HIST op a THOLOGICAL CORRELA TION. Int J Sci Res. 2018;7:2277–8179. [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Mefford IN, Barchas JD. Determination of tryptophan and metabolites in rat brain and pineal tissue by reversed-phase high-performance liquid chromatography with electrochemical detection. J Chromatogr. 1980;180:187–193. doi: 10.1016/S0378-4347(00)81604-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Metz R, et al. Novel tryptophan catabolic enzyme IDO2 is the preferred biochemical target of the antitumor indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase inhibitory compound D-1-methyl-tryptophan. Cancer Res. 2007;67:7082–7087. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-07-1872. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.de Jong RA, et al. Serum tryptophan and kynurenine concentrations as parameters for indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase activity in patients with endometrial, ovarian, and vulvar cancer. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2011;21:1320–1327. doi: 10.1097/IGC.0b013e31822017fb. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Sucher R, et al. IDO-mediated tryptophan degradation in the pathogenesis of malignant tumor disease. Int J Tryptophan Res. 2010;3:113–120. doi: 10.4137/IJTR.S4157. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Prendergast G, Cancer C. Why tumours eat tryptophan. Nature. 2011;478:192–194. doi: 10.1038/478192a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

12885_2021_7887_MOESM1_ESM.png (790.2KB, png)

Additional file 1: Supplementary Figure 1. A) Heatmap of correlation of module eigengene of module GI and clinical features. B) Metabolic set enrichment analysis (MSEA) of module GI and KEGG pathways. C) Network of metabolites of module GI, nodes and edges were defined by correlation coefficients between all metabolites of module GI. D) A volcano plot reveals differential metabolic intensities between WHO grade I and III meningioma.

12885_2021_7887_MOESM2_ESM.png (1MB, png)

Additional file 2: Supplementary Figure 2. A) Heatmap containing correlations of module eigengene (module GII) and clinical features. B) Network of metabolites of module GII, nodes and edges were defined by correlation coefficients between all metabolites of module GII. C) Metabolic set enrichment analysis (MSEA) of module GII and KEGG pathways. D) Correlation of module eigengene (module GIII) and clinical features. E) Network analysis of module GIII, nodes and edges were defined by correlation coefficients between all metabolites. F) Metabolic set enrichment analysis (MSEA) of module GIII and KEGG pathways.

12885_2021_7887_MOESM3_ESM.png (250.9KB, png)

Additional file 3: Supplementary Figure 3. A-B) Scatter plot of different metabolic intensities between WHO grade I and II (A) and II and III (B), respectively. Colors indicate the corrected p-values, cyane points with FDR p < 0.05.

Data Availability Statement

Further information and requests for resources, raw data, and reagents should be directed to and will be fulfilled by DH Heiland (dieter.henrik.heiland@uniklinik-freiburg.de). A full table of all materials is given in the supplementary information.


Articles from BMC Cancer are provided here courtesy of BMC

RESOURCES