Abstract
Background: The prognostic factors in Japanese patients with wild-type transthyretin amyloidosis (ATTRwt) have not been elucidated.
Methods and Results: In this study we retrospectively analyzed the clinical characteristics and outcomes of 47 patients with ATTRwt (mean (±SD) age at diagnosis 80.3±4.6 years; 41 males). Fifteen patients died within 2 years of their diagnosis. Receiver operating characteristic and Kaplan-Meier analyses revealed that the best predictors of 2-year mortality were low serum albumin (≤3.75 g/dL), elevated high-sensitivity cardiac troponin T (hs-cTnT; >0.086 ng/mL), and reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF; <50%). According to the total number of these 3 risk factors, patients were stratified into 4 subgroups: low risk (no risk factors; n=15), intermediate-low risk (1 risk factor; n=15), intermediate-high risk (2 risk factors; n=7), and high risk (3 risk factors; n=10). The estimated 2-year survival rate of patients classified as low risk, intermediate-low risk, intermediate-high risk, and high risk was 93%, 80%, 83%, and 11%, respectively (P<0.001).
Conclusions: Low serum albumin, elevated hs-cTnT, and reduced LVEF are associated with a worse prognosis in Japanese patients with ATTRwt. The combination of these factors may be useful for predicting medium-term mortality in patients with ATTRwt.
Key Words: Albumin, High-sensitivity cardiac troponin T, Prognosis, Wild-type transthyretin amyloidosis
Wild-type transthyretin amyloidosis (ATTRwt) is a life-threatening disease characterized by restrictive cardiomyopathy with left ventricular (LV) hypertrophy caused by the deposition of wild-type transthyretin (TTR) that forms amyloid fibrils.1–4 Although treatment for ATTRwt had been limited to supportive care, tafamidis as disease-modifying treatment has recently been approved for the treatment of ATTRwt in Japan based on the Safety and Efficacy of Tafamidis in Patients With Transthyretin Cardiomyopathy (ATTR-ACT) trial.5,6
Several recent studies on ATTRwt have evaluated prognoses and proposed prognostic factors.7–14 However, an obvious staging system for ATTRwt has not been developed in Japan, and we recently reported that patients with ATTRwt in daily clinical practice present broad clinical features, unlike patients with classical characteristics.15 Furthermore, because the ATTR-ACT trial reported a beneficial effect of tafamidis on mortality after 18 months,5 selecting patients who are expected to survive more than 2 years is extremely important for the appropriate use of tafamidis. Therefore, in the present study we investigated prognostic markers for ATTRwt in a cohort of Japanese patients with the aim of determining markers to predict 2-year mortality after a diagnosis of ATTRwt.
Methods
Subjects and Data Collection
We retrospectively evaluated 70 consecutive ATTRwt patients who had been diagnosed at Kochi Medical School Hospital between April 2001 and August 2019 for all-cause death. Data were censored in September 2019 or at the last visit for patients who were lost to follow-up. The outcome was all-cause death. Data for the outcome were obtained from hospital medical records and via telephone interviews with primary care physicians. The diagnosis of ATTR was established by biopsy-proven TTR in at least 1 involved organ and/or positive uptake on technetium-99 m pyrophosphate (99 mTc-PYP) scintigraphy with a normal free light chain ratio and serum immunofixation. 99 mTc-PYP scintigraphy scans were defined as positive when they showed Grade 2 or 3 uptake of 99 mTc-PYP in the LV according to previously reported grading systems.16,17 The ATTRwt subtype was established based on the absence of TTR mutations and/or apparent signs and a family history consistent with ATTR variant (ATTRv). All patients had cardiac amyloidosis that satisfied the following conditions: (1) endomyocardial biopsy-proven TTR amyloid deposition; and (2) amyloid cardiomyopathy determined echocardiographically according to established criteria18 and/or positive uptake on 99 mTc-PYP scintigraphy.
Figure 1 shows the study patient flow chart. Inclusion criteria were a diagnosis of ATTRwt with cardiac amyloidosis and a clear outcome at 2 years. Twenty-three surviving patients with a follow-up period <2 years were excluded because their outcome at the 2-year time point after ATTRwt diagnosis was not still known. In all, 47 patients were included in the present study (Figure 1).
This study was approved by the Ethics Committee on Medical Research of Kochi Medical School, and was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and the ethical standards of the responsible committee on human experimentation.
Clinical Evaluation
Clinical manifestations and laboratory variables (including cardiac biomarkers, 12-lead electrocardiography (ECG) and echocardiography at the time of the initial diagnosis of ATTRwt) were evaluated in all patients.
Clinical and Laboratory Data In addition to medications, the following clinical and laboratory variables were recorded and used for analysis: sex, age at diagnosis, heart failure (HF) subtype according to the American College of Cardiology (ACC)/American Heart Association (AHA) guidelines,19 severity of HF according to New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional class, comorbidities, body surface area (BSA), body mass index (BMI), estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), and serum albumin (g/dL), hemoglobin, serum uric acid (UA), plasma B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP), and high-sensitivity cardiac troponin T (hs-cTnT) concentrations. The geriatric nutritional risk index (GNRI) was calculated as described previously20 using the following equation:
GNRI=14.89×serum albumin+41.7×(measured body weight/ideal body weight)
where ideal body weight (kg) was calculated using the Lorentz formula according to height (cm) for men and women separately:
Ideal body weight=(height−100)−(height−150)/4 for men
Ideal body weight=(height−100)−(height−150)/2 for women
BNP was measured using an enzyme immunoassay (TOSOH, Tokyo, Japan) and hs-cTnT was measured using an Elecsys troponin T high-sensitivity immunoassay (Roche Diagnostics, Rotkreuz, Switzerland). The normal range of this troponin marker in apparently healthy adults ≤0.014 ng/mL (99th percentile).21
Electrocardiography and Echocardiography Standard 12-lead ECG was performed for each patient and was reviewed retrospectively for overall interpretation as basic rhythm and QRS duration.
Echocardiographic parameters were measured prospectively in standard fashion as recommended by the American Society of Echocardiography (ASE) guidelines.22 LV internal dimensions and wall thickness were assessed according to the ASE guidelines. LV ejection fraction (LVEF) was calculated using the Teichholz method or modified Simpson’s method and the LV mass index (LVMI) was calculated using Devereux’s formula. Relative wall thickness (RWT) was calculated as follows:
RWT=2×PWTED/LVEDd
where PWTED is posterior wall thickness at end diastole and LVEDd is LV end-diastolic diameter. Left atrium (LA) volume was measured using the biplane method of disks in apical 4- and 2-chamber views. The LA volume index (LAVI) was calculated by dividing LA volume by BSA. Mitral inflow early (E) and late (A) diastolic velocities were measured using the pulsed wave Doppler method and the E/A ratio was calculated. Tissue Doppler early diastolic mitral velocity (e′) of the septal annulus and that of the lateral annulus were measured. Stroke volume (SV) was estimated using the LV outflow tract (LVOT) velocity−time integral measured by pulsed wave Doppler and the LVOT area using the following formula:
SV=[3.14×(LVOT diameter/2)2]×LVOT velocity−time integral
The SV index (SVI) was calculated by dividing SV by BSA.
Statistical Analysis
The endpoint was all-cause death. Survival was calculated from the day of diagnosis of ATTRwt until the date of death or last follow-up and assessed using the Kaplan-Meier method. Patients were divided into 2 groups according to the presence (non-survivors) or absence (survivors) of all-cause death during the entire follow-up period and within the 2 years from the initial diagnosis of ATTRwt. Patient features at the time of diagnosis were assessed, comparing survivors with non-survivors.
All data were assessed for normality using the Shapiro-Wilk test. Categorical variables are expressed as numbers (percentages) and continuous variables are presented as the mean±SD for normally distributed variables or as the median with interquartile range (IQR) for non-normally distributed variables. The significance of differences between 2 groups was assessed using the unpaired t-test or Mann-Whitney U test for continuous variables and the χ2 test for categorical variables. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was used to predict 2-year survival and 2-year mortality, and the area under the curve (AUC) was used to determine the cut-off value for each predictor variable. Variables that differed significantly between survivors and non-survivors at 2 years after the initial diagnosis were analyzed. In addition, variables that were proposed as prognostic markers of ATTR amyloidosis (i.e., BNP, eGFR, UA, LVEF, and RWT) in previous reports8,9 were analyzed. Survival was compared using the log-rank test. In all analyses, 2-tailed P<0.05 was considered significant. All analyses were performed using IBM SPSS statistics version 21.0 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA).
Results
Overall Survival and Cohort Characteristics of ATTRwt Patients
For the 47 patients with ATTRwt, the mean age at diagnosis was 80.3±4.6 years, and 41 (87.2%) were men. During the entire follow-up period (median 2.36 years; IQR 0.1–6.3 years), 30 of the 47 patients (63.8%) died. The median overall survival period of all patients predicted by Kaplan-Meier analysis was 3.80 years (95% confidence interval [CI] 2.24–5.36 years). The overall survival rates of the cohort at 1, 2, and 5 years were 79%, 68%, and 34%, respectively (Figure 2).
The clinical characteristics of ATTRwt patients are summarized in Table 1, whereas the ECG and echocardiographic characteristics at the time of diagnosis are summarized in Table 2. A comparison of survivors and non-survivors over the whole follow-up period revealed that survivors tended to have higher serum albumin concentrations than non-survivors (4.04±0.48 vs. 3.73±0.53 g/dL, respectively; P=0.055; Tables 1,2). There were no significant differences in any other characteristics or parameters between the 2 groups. Focusing on 2-year mortality (Tables 1,2), patients who survived for more than 2 years tended to be slightly younger than non-survivors at the time of diagnosis (79.5±4.2 vs. 82.0±5.0 years, respectively; P=0.079), had significantly lower hs-cTnT (0.064 vs. 0.095 ng/mL, respectively; P=0.033) and higher serum albumin (4.03±0.45 vs. 3.44±0.49 g/dL, respectively; P<0.001) concentrations, and a higher GNRI (99.1±8.3 vs. 89.9±8.2, respectively; P<0.001) than non-survivors. There were no significant differences in sex, BSA, BMI, severity of HF (ACC/AHA stage, NYHA class, plasma BNP concentration), prevalence of comorbidities, eGFR, serum UA concentration, or medication between the 2 groups.
Table 1.
All patients (n=47) |
During entire follow-up | Within 2-years of ATTRwt diagnosis | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Survivors (n=17) |
Non-survivors (n=30) |
P-value | Survivors (n=32) |
Non-survivors (n=15) |
P-value | ||
Age at diagnosis (years) | 80.3±4.6 | 80.5±3.4 | 80.2±5.1 | 0.846 | 79.5±4.2 | 82.0±5.0 | 0.079 |
Follow-up period (years) | 2.36 [1.43–3.50] |
2.43 [2.14–3.10] |
1.94 [0.57–4.39] |
0.440 | 3.01 [2.35–4.48] |
0.57 [0.12–1.21] |
<0.001 |
Male sex | 41 (87.2) | 15 (88.2) | 26 (86.7) | 1 | 27 (84.4) | 14 (93.3) | 0.648 |
Body surface area (m2) | 1.56±0.13 | 1.55±0.15 | 1.56±0.12 | 0.727 | 1.58±0.10 | 1.54±0.14 | 0.329 |
Body mass index (kg/m2) | 22.7±3.9 | 22.1±3.1 | 23.0±4.3 | 0.428 | 22.1±3.2 | 23.0±4.2 | 0.451 |
ACC/AHA Stage C/D | 42 (89.4) | 14 (82.4) | 28 (93.3) | 0.336 | 27 (84.4) | 15 (100) | 0.271 |
NYHA functional class ≥III | 37 (78.7) | 12 (70.6) | 25 (83.3) | 0.46 | 24 (75.0) | 13 (86.7) | 0.465 |
Comorbidities | |||||||
Hypertension or history of hypertension |
27 (57.4) | 9 (52.9) | 18 (60.0) | 0.761 | 17 (53.1) | 10 (66.7) | 0.529 |
Coronary artery disease | 8 (17.0) | 1 (5.9) | 7 (23.3) | 0.228 | 5 (15.6) | 3 (20.0) | 0.697 |
Aortic valve stenosis | 1 (2.1) | 0 | 1 (3.3) | NA | 0 | 1 (6.7) | NA |
Laboratory data | |||||||
BNP (pg/mL) | 303.5 [225.5–516.8] |
303.0 [223.0–416.0] |
372.0 [236.0–612.0] |
0.333 | 303.4 [224.8–434.0] |
401.0 [231.5–676.2] |
0.453 |
Hs-cTnT (ng/mL) | 0.071 [0.054–0.096] |
0.064 [0.051–0.083] |
0.080 [0.058–0.101] |
0.139 | 0.064 [0.051–0.086] |
0.095 [0.084–0.124] |
0.033 |
eGFR (mL/min/1.73 m2) | 49.9±19.4 | 49.5±18.1 | 50.2±20.5 | 0.902 | 50.5±20.4 | 48.7±18.0 | 0.770 |
Hemoglobin (g/dL) | 12.7±1.8 | 13.1±1.7 | 12.5±1.8 | 0.238 | 12.9±1.7 | 12.2±1.8 | 0.224 |
Serum albumin (g/dL) | 3.84±0.53 | 4.04±0.48 | 3.73±0.53 | 0.055 | 4.03±0.45 | 3.44±0.49 | <0.001 |
GNRI | 96.1±9.3 | 99.2±9.3 | 94.4±9.0 | 0.101 | 99.1±8.3 | 89.9±8.2 | <0.001 |
Serum uric acid (mg/dL) | 7.34±1.99 | 7.56±2.12 | 7.21±1.95 | 0.574 | 7.35±2.06 | 7.32±1.96 | 0.966 |
Medications | |||||||
Diuretics | 41 (87.2) | 14 (82.4) | 27 (90) | 0.653 | 27 (84.4) | 14 (93.4) | 0.648 |
ACE-I or ARB | 22 (46.8) | 9 (52.9) | 13 (43.3) | 0.558 | 18 (56.3) | 4 (26.7) | 0.070 |
Anticoagulant | 24 (55.3) | 8 (47.1) | 16 (53.3) | 0.766 | 13 (37.5) | 11 (73.3) | 0.060 |
The end point was all-cause death. Data are shown as the mean±SD, median [interquartile range], or n (%). ACC, American College of Cardiology Foundation; ACE-I, angiotensin-converting enzyme-inhibitor; AHA, American Heart Association; ARB, angiotensin receptor blocker; ATTRwt, wild-type transthyretin amyloidosis; BNP, B-type natriuretic peptide; eGFR, estimated glomerular filtration rate; GNRI, geriatric nutritional risk index; Hs-cTnT, high-sensitivity cardiac troponin T; NA, not available; NYHA, New York Heart Association.
Table 2.
All patients (n=47) |
During entire follow-up | Within 2-years of ATTRwt diagnosis | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Survivors (n=17) |
Non-survivors (n=30) |
P-value | Survivors (n=32) |
Non-survivors (n=15) |
P-value | ||
Electrocardiography | |||||||
Atrial fibrillation | 26 (55.3) | 8 (47.1) | 18 (60.0) | 0.543 | 15 (46.9) | 11 (73.3) | 0.121 |
QRS duration (ms) | 125±29 | 119±28 | 128±30 | 0.286 | 122±28 | 131±32 | 0.341 |
Echocardiography | |||||||
LVEDd (mm) | 46.0±6.1 | 47.2±7.7 | 45.4±4.9 | 0.340 | 45.9±6.1 | 46.4±6.1 | 0.785 |
LVESd (mm) | 34.3±7.1 | 35.1±8.7 | 33.8±6.1 | 0.563 | 33.6±7.0 | 35.6±7.3 | 0.377 |
IVS thickness (mm) | 14.0 [13.0–15.1] |
14.0 [13.0–15.9] |
14.0 [13.0–15.0] |
0.938 | 14.0 [13.0–15.3] |
14.0 [13.0–14.8] |
0.739 |
PW thickness (mm) | 13.0 [12.5–14.4] |
13.0 [12.9–14.0] |
13.2 [12.5–14.5] |
0.789 | 13.5 [12.8–14.6] |
13.0 [12.3–14.2] |
0.613 |
LVEF (%) | 49.6±11.7 | 48.6±13.6 | 50.2±10.7 | 0.655 | 51.1±12.1 | 46.5±10.5 | 0.220 |
SVI (mL/m2) | 33.3±9.7 | 35.9±10.7 | 31.3±8.6 | 0.165 | 36.1±10.2 | 27.9±5.7 | 0.015 |
LV mass index (g/m2) | 158.0±31.4 | 158.8±46.5 | 157.6±20.2 | 0.905 | 157.6±35.2 | 158.9±22.7 | 0.895 |
Relative wall thickness | 0.60±0.13 | 0.57±0.15 | 0.61±0.12 | 0.315 | 0.60±0.13 | 0.59±0.16 | 0.907 |
LA volume index (mL/m2) | 62.2±32.6 | 56.9±24.8 | 65.4±36.8 | 0.352 | 56.3±25.6 | 74.4±40.1 | 0.053 |
E/A ratio | 2.21±1.26 | 2.26±1.60 | 2.17±0.97 | 0.871 | 2.27±1.35 | 1.90±0.63 | 0.601 |
E/e’ ratio (septal) | 23.9±9.0 | 21.7±6.6 | 25.2±10.1 | 0.213 | 21.8±7.6 | 28.7±10.5 | 0.017 |
E/e’ ratio (lateral) | 16.6±5.1 | 16.1±5.3 | 16.9±5.1 | 0.601 | 16.1±4.8 | 17.6±5.9 | 0.395 |
The end point was all-cause death. Data are shown as the mean±SD, median [interquartile range], or n (%). ATTRwt, wild-type transthyretin amyloidosis; IVS, interventricular septum; LA, left atrium; LV, left ventricle; LVEDd, left ventricular end-diastolic diameter; LVEF, left ventricular ejection fraction; LVESd, left ventricular end-systolic diameter; PW, posterior wall; SVI, stroke volume index.
As can be seen from Table 2, there were no differences in ECG findings between survivors and non-survivors within the 2 years after diagnosis. However, with regard to echocardiographic parameters, survivors had a significantly higher SVI (36.1±10.2 vs. 27.9±5.7 mL/m2, respectively; P=0.015) and lower E/e′ ratio (septal; 21.8±7.6 vs. 28.7±10.5, respectively; P=0.017) than non-survivors (Table 2).
Factors Associated With 2-Year Mortality
Figure 3 shows the AUC values determined by ROC analysis of serum albumin, GNRI, hs-cTnT, SVI, and E/e′ (septal), which differed significantly between survivors and non-survivors during the 2-year period after diagnosis, for predicting 2-year survival and mortality. In addition, Figure 3 shows the AUC for BNP, eGFR, UA, LVEF, and RWT, which were proposed as prognostic markers of ATTR cardiac amyloidosis in previous reports,8,9 for predicting 2-year survival and mortality. Optimal cut-off values were obtained for each parameter according to ROC analysis. Based on the optimal cut-off values, patients were divided into 2 groups and the 2-year survival in each group was assessed by Kaplan-Meier analysis (Figure 4). The log-rank test indicated that the survival rate was higher for patients in the high (>3.75 g/dL) than low (≤3.75 g/dL) albumin group (estimated 2-year survival 85.9% vs. 38.9%, respectively; P=0.001), for patients in the low (≤0.086 ng/mL) than high (>0.086 ng/mL) hs-cTnT group (estimated 2-year survival 88.5% vs. 42.9%, respectively; P=0.001), and for patients in the high (≥50%) than low (<50%) LVEF group (estimated 2-year survival 86.5% vs. 45.0%, respectively; P=0.001). There were no significant differences in the estimated 2-year survival rates in groups stratified according to optimal cut-off values for each of GNRI, SVI, E/e′ ratio (septal), BNP, eGFR, UA, and RWT.
Furthermore, patients were divided into 4 subgroups by adding 1 point for each of the 3 risk factors using the above cut-off values (i.e., albumin ≤3.75 g/dL, hs-cTnT >0.086 ng/mL, and LVEF <50%). The low-risk group was defined as having none of the risk factors (n=15), the intermediate low-risk group was defined as having any 1 of the risk factors (n=15), the intermediate high-risk group was defined as having any 2 of the risk factors (n=7), and high-risk group was defined as having all 3 risk factors (n=10). The results of univariate Kaplan-Meier analysis of the probability of 2-year survival for each group are shown in Figure 5A. The estimated 2-year survival for patients in the low risk, the intermediate-low risk, the intermediate-high risk, and the high risk groups were 93%, 80%, 83%, and 11%, respectively (P<0.001). Figure 5B shows the results of Kaplan-Meier analysis of the probability of 2-year survival for the low- to intermediate-risk group vs. the high-risk group. The estimated 2-year survival rate for patients in the low- to intermediate-risk group was 86%, compared with 11% for patients in the high-risk group (P<0.001). In our cohort, patients in the high-risk group had a poor prognosis, with 67% sensitivity and 96% specificity for 2-year mortality.
Discussion
In this study we describe the prognosis of a cohort of Japanese patients with ATTRwt and investigate the characteristics particularly associated with 2-year mortality. The median overall survival period of all patients was predicted to be 3.80 years, and the 2-year survival rate in the cohort was 68%. Serum albumin, hs-cTnT, and LVEF were associated with 2-year mortality, and the combination of these parameters could be a simple marker with high potential for predicting 2-year mortality in patients with ATTRwt. Patients having 3 risk factors (albumin ≤3.75 g/dL, hs-cTnT >0.086 ng/mL, and LVEF <50%) had a poor prognosis, with an estimated 2-year survival rate of 11%. Conversely, patients with no more than 2 risk factors had estimated 2-year survival rates of 86%.
HF is a common condition in the aged population, and ATTRwt has been increasingly regarded as an important cause of HF, especially in elderly patients.23–26 Although the stage and severity of HF in patients with ATTRwt typically progress within a few years,7,9,27 treatments have been limited to supportive care. Recently, the novel TTR amyloid-stabilizing drug tafamidis was developed.5 The ATTR-ACT trial showed that tafamidis is safe and effective for reducing the substantial mortality and morbidity associated with ATTR cardiac amyloidosis. Following these results, tafamidis was approved for treatment of ATTRwt in Japan.6 In addition, because a beneficial effect on mortality was seen after 18 months of treatment with tafamidis in the ATTR-ACT trial, a better indication for tafamidis, would be to use it in ATTRwt patients who are expected survive for more than at least 2 years. However, only a few studies regarding the prognosis for ATTRwt have been reported from Japan.28,29 Therefore, in the present study we focused on identifying predictive factors of 2-year mortality.
Several prognostic factors, such as biomarkers and echocardiographic parameters, have been proposed in patients with ATTR amyloidosis. In a large series, Connors et al identified BNP, RWT, LVEF, and UA as factors associated with survival in a prospective cohort study of ATTRwt.9 The Mayo Clinic presented a staging system for ATTR cardiac amyloidosis, using N-terminal pro B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) and troponin T,7 whereas Gillmore et al proposed another staging system using NT-proBNP and eGFR.8 Conversely, in the present study, serum albumin, hs-cTnT, and LVEF were found to be markers of 2-year mortality in our cohort. These differences in clinical features may result from a bias in patient cohorts from referral tertiary centers or community-based medical facilities. We recently reported that patients with ATTRwt in daily clinical practice presented broad clinical features, unlike patients with classical characteristics.15 Therefore, previously published prognostic factors of ATTRwt may not be generalizable to our patients.
There have been few studies reporting serum albumin concentrations in patients with cardiac amyloidosis,7,9 but many previous studies have reported that low serum albumin concentrations or low GNRI, markers of nutritional status, are associated with increased mortality, especially in elderly patients with HF.30–35 Conversely, hs-cTnT and LVEF have been proposed in several reports to be diagnostic indicators and predictors of mortality in patients with cardiac amyloidosis, including ATTRwt.7,16,36,37 Collectively, the data indicate that combined measurement of serum albumin, hs-cTnT, and LVEF seems to be reasonable for evaluating HF status from a different perspective in patients with ATTRwt. These parameters can be easily measured in even routine studies in HF patients without any limitations due to technical challenges. We believe that this simple system will be useful for the assessment of prognosis and to guide clinical decision making to determine the treatment plan for patients with ATTRwt.
Study Limitations
This study has several limitations that need to be considered. First, this study was a single-center study with a relatively small sample size, which may have affected some of the statistical analyses. We did not have sufficient data to perform multivariable analysis. We acknowledge that the prognosis and characteristics of our patients may not reflect those of all ATTRwt patients worldwide. More data from larger groups are needed to validate our results. Second, the clinical parameters were based on a database at the time of diagnosis of ATTRwt. Some parameters, such as body weight and albumin and BNP concentrations, were not always reliable because of peripheral edema in the decompensated phase of HF. This study found a significant association between serum albumin concentration and the 2-year survival rate, but no significant association between GNRI and 2-year survival. For some patients, GNRI was calculated using body weight measured at the stage of decompensated HF. Therefore, GNRI reflects body fluid volume rather than nutritional status in the decompensated phase of HF. Third, with regard to albumin concentrations, most patients in this study did not undergo detailed examinations of liver condition. However, hypoalbuminemia is known to be an independent predictor of all-cause and cardiovascular mortality of HF regardless of the presence or absence of liver dysfunction.30,31 Fourth, hs-cTnT concentrations generally increase with renal dysfunction. A considerable number of patients in this study had renal dysfunction, and this may have affected the hs-cTnT values. Therefore, further studies are needed to evaluate hs-cTnT concentrations in the presence and absence of renal dysfunction. In addition, this study did not include echocardiographic strain and cardiac magnetic resonance findings, which are currently proposed as prognostic markers of ATTR cardiac amyloidosis.
Conclusions
Low serum albumin concentrations, elevated hs-cTnT concentrations, and reduced LVEF suggest a worse prognosis in Japanese patients with ATTRwt. The combination of these parameters may be a simple and useful prognostic marker for 2-year mortality in patients with ATTRwt.
Sources of Funding
This work was supported, in part, by Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research from the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (18k08078 to H.K.).
Disclosures
H.K. is a member of Circulation Reports’ Editorial Team. The other authors report no potential conflicts of interest.
IRB Information
This study was approved by the Ethics Committee on Medical Research of Kochi Medical School (Reference no. ERB-002080).
Acknowledgment
We would like to thank the physicians who made this study possible.
References
- 1. Merlini G, Westermark P.. The systemic amyloidosis: Clearer understanding of the molecular mechanisms offers hope for more effective therapies. J Intern Med 2004; 255: 159–178. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2. Gertz MA, Dispenzieri A, Sher T.. Pathophysiology and treatment of cardiac amyloidosis. Nat Rev Cardiol 2015; 12: 91–102. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. Rapezzi C, Merlini G, Quarta CC, Riva L, Longhi S, Leone O, et al.. Systemic cardiac amyloidoses: Disease profiles and clinical courses of the 3 main types. Circulation 2009; 120: 1203–1212. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Siddiqi OK, Ruberg FL.. Cardiac amyloidosis: An update on pathophysiology, diagnosis, and treatment. Trends Cardiovasc Med 2018; 28: 10–21. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Maurer MS, Schwartz JH, Gundapaneni B, Elliott PM, Merlini G, Waddington-Cruz M, et al; ATTR-ACT Study Investigators.. Tafamidis treatment for patients with transthyretin amyloid cardiomyopathy. N Engl J Med 2018; 379: 1007–1016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Endo J, Sano M, Izumiya Y, Tsujita K, Nakamura K, Tahara N, et al.. A statement on the appropriate administration of tafamidis in patients with transthyretin cardiac amyloidosis. Circ J 2019; 84: 15–17. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Grogan M, Scott CG, Kyle RA, Zeldenrust SR, Gertz MA, Lin G, et al.. Natural history of wild-type transthyretin cardiac amyloidosis and risk stratification using a novel staging system. J Am Coll Cardiol 2016; 68: 1014–1020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. Gillmore JD, Damy T, Fontana M, Hutchinson M, Lachmann HJ, Martinez-Naharro A, et al.. A new staging system for cardiac transthyretin amyloidosis. Eur Heart J 2018; 39: 2799–2806. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. Connors LH, Sam F, Skinner M, Salinaro F, Sun F, Ruberg FL, et al.. Heart failure resulting from age-related cardiac amyloid disease associated with wild-type transthyretin: A prospective, observational cohort study. Circulation 2016; 133: 282–290. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10. Coelho T, Maurer MS, Suhr OB.. THAOS – The Transthyretin Amyloidosis Outcomes Survey: Initial report on clinical manifestations in patients with hereditary and wild-type transthyretin amyloidosis. Curr Med Res Opin 2013; 29: 63–76. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11. Hanson JLS, Arvanitis M, Koch CM, Berk JL, Ruberg FL, Prokaeva T, et al.. Use of serum transthyretin as a prognostic indicator and predictor of outcome in cardiac amyloid disease associated with wild-type transthyretin. Circ Heart Fail 2018; 11: e004000. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12. Siepen FAD, Bauer R, Voss A, Hein S, Aurich M, Riffel J, et al.. Predictors of survival stratification in patients with wild-type cardiac amyloidosis. Clin Res Cardiol 2018; 107: 158–169. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13. Hutt DF, Fontana M, Burniston M, Quigley AM, Petrie A, Ross JC, et al.. Prognostic utility of the Perugini grading of 99 mTc-DPD scintigraphy in transthyretin (ATTR) amyloidosis and its relationship with skeletal muscle and soft tissue amyloid. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging 2017; 18: 1344–1350. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14. Martinez-Naharro A, Kotecha T, Norrington K, Boldrini M, Rezk T, Quarta C, et al.. Native T1 and extracellular volume in transthyretin amyloidosis. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 2019; 12: 810–819. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15. Ochi Y, Kubo T, Nakashima Y, Baba Y, Hirota T, Yamasaki N, et al.. Integrated diagnostic approach to wild-type transthyretin cardiac amyloidosis with the use of high-sensitivity cardiac troponin T measurement and 99 mTc-pyrophosphate scintigraphy. J Cardiol 2020; 75: 12–19. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16. Castano A, Haq M, Narotsky DL, Goldsmith J, Weinberg RL, Morgenstern R, et al.. Multicenter study of planar technetium 99 m pyrophosphate cardiac imaging: Predicting survival for patients with ATTR cardiac amyloidosis. JAMA Cardiol 2016; 1: 880–889. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17. Perugini E, Guidalotti PL, Salvi F, Cooke RM, Pettinato C, Riva L, et al.. Noninvasive etiologic diagnosis of cardiac amyloidosis using 99 mTc-3,3-diphosphono-1,2-propanodicarboxylic acid scintigraphy. J Am Coll Cardiol 2005; 46: 1076–1084. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18. Gertz MA, Comenzo R, Falk RH, Fermand JP, Hazenberg BP, Hawkins PN, et al.. Definition of organ involvement and treatment response in immunoglobulin light chain amyloidosis (AL): A consensus opinion from the 10th International Symposium on Amyloid and Amyloidosis, Tours, France, 18–22 April 2004. Am J Hematol 2005; 79: 319–328. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19. Yancy CW, Jessup M, Bozkurt B, Butler J, Casey DE Jr, Drazner MH, et al.. 2017 ACC/AHA/HFSA focused update of the 2013 ACCF/AHA Guideline for the Management of Heart Failure: A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines and the Heart Failure Society of America. Circulation 2017; 136: e137–e161. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20. Bouillanne O, Morineau G, Dupont C, Coulombel I, Vincent JP, Nicolis I, et al.. Geriatric nutritional risk index: A new index for evaluating at-risk elderly medical patients. Am J Clin Nutr 2005; 82: 777–783. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21. Saenger AK, Beyrau R, Braun S, Cooray R, Dolci A, Freidank H, et al.. Multicenter analytical evaluation of a high-sensitivity troponin T assay. Clin Chim Acta 2011; 412: 748–754. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22. Lang RM, Badano LP, Mor-Avi V, Afilalo J, Armstrong A, Ernande L, et al.. Recommendations for cardiac chamber quantification by echocardiography in adults: An update from the American Society of Echocardiography and the European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging 2015; 16: 233–270. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23. González-López E, Gallego-Delgado M, Guzzo-Merello G, de Haro-Del Moral FJ, Cobo-Marcos M, Robles C, et al.. Wild-type transthyretin amyloidosis as a cause of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction. Eur Heart J 2015; 36: 2585–2594. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24. Rapezzi C, Lorenzini M, Longhi S, Milandri A, Gagliardi C, Bartolomei I, et al.. Cardiac amyloidosis: The great pretender. Heart Fail Rev 2015; 20: 117–124. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25. González-López E, López-Sainz Á, Garcia-Pavia P.. Diagnosis and treatment of transthyretin cardiac amyloidosis: Progress and hope. Rev Esp Cardiol 2017; 70: 991–1004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26. Liu PP, Smyth D.. Wild-type transthyretin amyloid cardiomyopathy: A missed cause of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction with evolving treatment implications. Circulation 2016; 133: 245–247. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27. Pinney JH, Whelan CJ, Petrie A, Dungu J, Banypersad SM, Sattianayagam P, et al.. Senile systemic amyloidosis: Clinical features at presentation and outcome. Am Heart Assoc 2013; 2: e000098. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28. Sekijima Y, Yazaki M, Ueda M, Koike H, Yamada M, Ando Y.. First nationwide survey on systemic wild-type ATTR amyloidosis in Japan. Amyloid 2018; 25: 8–10. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29. Nakahashi T, Arita T, Yamaji K, Inoue K, Yokota T, Hoshii Y, et al.. Impact of clinical and echocardiographic characteristics on occurrence of cardiac events in cardiac amyloidosis as proven by endomyocardial biopsy. Int J Cardiol 2014; 176: 753–759. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30. Liu M, Chan CP, Yan BP, Zhang Q, Lam YY, Li RJ, et al.. Albumin levels predict survival in patients with heart failure and preserved ejection fraction. Eur J Heart Fail 2012; 14: 39–44. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31. Lyons O, Whelan B, Bennett K, O’Riordan D, Silke B.. Serum albumin as an outcome predictor in hospital emergency medical admissions. Eur J Intern Med 2010; 21: 17–20. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32. Arques S, Ambrosi P.. Human serum albumin in the clinical syndrome of heart failure. J Card Fail 2011; 17: 451–458. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33. Gotsman I, Shauer A, Zwas DR, Tahiroglu I, Lotan C, Keren A.. Low serum albumin: A significant predictor of reduced survival in patients with chronic heart failure. Clin Cardiol 2019; 42: 365–372. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34. Nishi I, Seo Y, Hamada-Harimura Y, Yamamoto M, Ishizu T, Sugano A, et al.. Geriatric nutritional risk index predicts all-cause deaths in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction. ESC Heart Fail 2019; 6: 396–405. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35. Yoshihisa A, Kanno Y, Watanabe S, Yokokawa T, Abe S, Miyata M, et al.. Impact of nutritional indices on mortality in patients with heart failure. Open Heart 2018; 5: e000730. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36. Takashio S, Yamamuro M, Izumiya Y, Hirakawa K, Marume K, Yamamoto M, et al.. Diagnostic utility of cardiac troponin T level in patients with cardiac amyloidosis. ESC Heart Fail 2018; 5: 27–35. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37. Qian G, Wu C, Zhang Y, Chen YD, Dong W, Ren YH.. Prognostic value of high-sensitivity cardiac troponin T in patients with endomyocardial-biopsy proven cardiac amyloidosis. J Geriatr Cardiol 2014; 11: 136–140. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]