Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 Mar 3.
Published in final edited form as: Methods Mol Biol. 2020;2097:83–90. doi: 10.1007/978-1-0716-0203-4_5

Testing the Specificity of Compounds Designed to Inhibit CPT1A in T Cells

Roddy S O’Connor 1,2, Michael C Milone 3,4
PMCID: PMC7925958  NIHMSID: NIHMS1669412  PMID: 31776920

Abstract

In response to antigen and costimulation, T cells undergo a series of metabolic transitions that fulfill the biosynthetic demands of clonal expansion, differentiation, and effector function. Following antigen clearance, the oxidation of long-chain fatty acids (LCFAO) has been implicated in the transition from effector to central memory T cells. However, studies demonstrating a role for LCFAO in memory T-cell development have largely relied on the use of etomoxir (ETO), a small molecule inhibitor of the long-chain fatty acid transporter CPT1A. Understanding how the depletion of nutrients including LCFA that might occur in tumor microenvironments affects T-cell proliferation, differentiation, and function has important implications for tumor immunotherapy. Here, we combine the analysis of posttranscriptional gene silencing with extracellular flux assays to determine if etomoxir exerts nonspecific effects on oxidative metabolism. The off-target effects of ETO that we describe highlight the challenges of using pharmacologic inhibitors in loss-of-function approaches in T cells.

Keywords: Etomoxir, CPT1A, shRNA

1. Introduction

Following antigen stimulation, T cells follow an ordered differentiation program involving activation, proliferation, and differentiation. T-cell activation induces a series of metabolic transitions that support the entire proliferation and differentiation processes. A metabolic shift to glycolysis in activated T cells supports energy generation, macromolecular biosynthesis, and redox homeostasis. Since it was widely accepted that etomoxir inhibits CPT1A, the rate-limiting enzyme in LCFAO, long-chain fatty acids have been implicated in the formation of memory T cells following antigen clearance [13].

Concerns about the specificity of etomoxir have been raised in recent studies on immune cells. We showed that etomoxir concentrations at commonly used concentrations elicit nonspecific effects on oxidative metabolism, culminating in ROS production, mitochondrial matrix swelling, and GSH depletion in primary human T cells undergoing high rates of clonal expansion [4]. Complementary studies provided genetic evidence that ablating CPT1A in T cells had minimal consequence on either memory T-cell formation or regulatory T-cell development [5]. In studies on macrophage metabolism, etomoxir treatment limited the polarization of macrophages toward an M2 lineage [6]. In contrast to T cells, there was no phenotype in macrophages lacking either CPT1a [7] or CPT2 [8] despite their inability to oxidize LCFA. In isolated mitochondrial preparations, etomoxir concentrations above 10 μM inhibited the mitochondrial adenine nucleotide transporter as well as complex 1 of the electron transport chain [9]. Here, we developed an assay to test the specificity of etomoxir in cells genetically engineered to lack CPT1A expression. T cells expressing lentiviral shRNA against CPT1A were seeded on matrix-coated XF “Seahorse” cell culture dishes. Their metabolic parameters, including rates of oxygen consumption and glycolysis, were assessed in response to varying doses of etomoxir treatment.

2. Materials

2.1. Cell Culture

  1. Primary human T cells.

  2. T-cell growth medium: RPMI 1640 supplemented with 10% FBS, 10 mM HEPES, 2 mM l-glutamine, 100 U/ml penicillin G, and 100 μg/ml streptomycin.

  3. 4.5 μm Dynabeads containing immobilized antihuman CD3 and antihuman CD28.

  4. Etomoxir (sterile) diluted in QH2O and sterile filtered with a 2 μM filter.

  5. Lentiviral supernatants with shRNA targeting CPT1A or scramble shRNA against the human β-actin gene as described previously in [10].

2.2. XF Flux Analyzer

  1. XF96 analyzer with WAVE software.

  2. XF96 cell culture microplate and XF sensor cartridge.

  3. 1.36 mg/ml Cell-Tak (Corning).

  4. 0.1 M sodium bicarbonate, pH 8.0 (sterile filtered).

  5. 1 N NaOH.

  6. Etomoxir.

  7. XF assay medium: Non-buffered RPMI 1640 containing 5.5 mM glucose, 2 mM l-glutamine, and 5 mM HEPES. Adjust the pH to 7.4 with 0.1 N NaOH.

  8. Sterile filter assay medium with a 0.2 μM filter following pH adjustment.

2.3. Immunoblotting

  1. RIPA-2 lysis buffer (50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 8.0, 150 mM NaCl, 1% NP-40, 0.5% deoxycholic acid, 0.1% SDS).

  2. Protease inhibitor (Mini Complete, Roche).

  3. Phosphatase inhibitor (PhosSTOP, Roche).

  4. PDVF membrane.

  5. Running buffer (0.1% SDS, Tris/Glycine solution).

  6. Transfer buffer (Tris/Glycine).

  7. Tris-buffered saline (TBS).

  8. TBS containing 0.1% Tween-20 (TBS-T).

  9. Blocking solution: 5% nonfat dry milk in TBS-T.

  10. 7.5% separating gel (solutions used: 1.5 M Tris–HCl, pH 8.8, 10% SDS, 30% acrylamide bis 37.5:1, 10% ammonium persulfate, TEMED). See Note 1 for details.

  11. 4% stacking gel (solutions used: 0.5 M Tris–HCl, pH 6.8, 10% SDS, 30% acrylamide bis 37.5:1, 10% ammonium persulfate, TEMED). See Note 2 for details.

  12. Sample buffer (solutions used: 0.5 M Tris-HCl, pH 6.8, 50% glycerol in QH2O, 10% SDS, 2-mercaptoethanol, pinch of bromophenol blue). See Note 3 for details.

3. Methods

3.1. T-Cell Activation

  1. Day 0. Activate 6e6 primary human T cells with anti-CD3/anti-CD28 Dynabeads at a ratio of 3 beads to 1 cell.

  2. Day 1. Activated T cells are infected with either scramble or shRNA lentivirus against CPT1A.

  3. Day 3. Determine infection efficiencies by flow cytometry. Count and refeed T cells at a concentration of 0.8–1.0 × 106 cells/ml.

  4. Day 5. Lyse 1.0 × 106 scramble vs. shRNA CPT1A cells in RIPA-2 containing protease and phosphatase inhibitors.

3.2. XF Flux Analysis (See Fig. 1)

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

The specificity of etomoxir for CPT1A is lost at concentrations above 5 μM. Primary human T cells expressing either control or shRNA against CPT1A were restimulated with Dynabeads and expanded for 5 days. Oxygen consumption rates (OCR) in control (a) vs. shRNA cells (c) are shown. OCR was measured under basal conditions and after the introduction of etomoxir (dotted lines). The corresponding glycolytic rates (ECAR) in control (b) and shRNA cells (d) are shown. (Figure adapted from R. S. O’Connor et al., The CPT1a inhibitor, etomoxir induces severe oxidative stress at commonly used concentrations. Sci Rep 8, 6289 (2018))

  1. Day 0 (7 days prior to assay). Prepare the extracellular matrix adhesive (Cell-Tak) by combining 3 ml sodium bicarbonate with 50 μl of Cell-Tak solution and 20 μl NaOH.

  2. Coat all wells of the XF cell microplate with 12 μl Cell-Tak.

  3. Incubate the microplate overnight at 37 °C.

  4. Rinse three times in sterile QH2O, air-dry, and then store at 4 °C until use.

  5. Day 6 (1 day prior to assay). Add 200 μl of the calibrant solution to hydrate the XF sensor cartridge. Leave overnight at room temperature.

  6. Day 7 (day of assay). Transfer the hydrated XF sensor cartridge to a CO2-free, 37 °C incubator for 5–6 h (see Note 4).

  7. Prepare etomoxir in assay medium at a concentration of 40 vs. 400 μM. Store in a 37 °C water bath until use.

  8. Design the experiment using the WAVE software; include triplicate measurements to ensure steady-state measurement.

  9. Centrifuge 2.7 × 106 T cells per condition at 1200 × g for 5 min.

  10. Aspirate, and wash with 1× PBS.

  11. Resuspend the cell pellets in 1.575 ml of XF assay medium prepared in Subheading 2.2 step 7.

  12. Mix and seed T cells at 175 μl/well for a total of 8 technical replicates.

  13. Centrifuge the XF microplate at 1000 × g for 5 min and transfer to a CO2-free, 37 °C incubator for 30 min.

  14. Add 25 μl of etomoxir to injection port A of the sensor cartridge.

  15. Insert the hydrated XF sensor cartridge to calibrate the instrument.

  16. Following instrument calibration, replace the calibration plate with the cell culture microplate.

  17. Run the XF assay to measure cellular oxygen consumption (OCR) and extracellular acidification (ECAR) under basal conditions and in response to either 5 μM or 50 μM etomoxir (see Note 5).

3.3. Immunoblotting

  1. Apply the protein/sample buffer mixture to the SDS-PAGE gel matrix.

  2. Perform electrophoresis for 1.5 h at 150 V.

  3. Transfer the proteins from the gel to the PDVF membrane using a current of 250 mA for 110 min.

  4. Incubate the membrane in 5% nonfat dry milk in TBS containing 0.1% Tween-20 (TBS-T) for 1 h.

  5. With a razor blade, cut the membranes into two segments: 250–60 kDa, 60–30 kDa.

  6. Probe the 250–60 kDa membrane overnight at 4 °C with a 1:500 dilution of anti-CPT1A antibody (Cell Signaling Technology) in 0.5% nonfat milk in TBS-T.

  7. After a series of three washes (1× quick, 1 × 10 min, 3 × 5 min) in TBS-T, incubate the membrane with an HRP-conjugated goat anti-rabbit IgG (cell signaling), diluted 1:10,000 in the blocking solution.

  8. Wash in TBS-T as follows: 1× quick, 1 × 10 min, 3 × 5 min washes.

  9. Perform a final rinse in TBS.

  10. Probe the 60–30 kDa segment with a 1:2000 dilution of anti-beta actin antibody (Cell Signaling Technology) in 0.5% nonfat milk in TBS-T.

  11. Wash as described above, and incubate the membrane with an HRP-conjugated sheep anti-mouse IgG (Amersham), diluted 1:5000 in the blocking solution.

  12. Mix equal volumes of the West Femto SuperSignal Chemiluminescent reagent A and B prior to use. Add to the blot for 5 min.

  13. Wrap on saran wrap, expose the ECL Hyperfilm for 1 min in a cassette, and develop as necessary.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by grants from the University of Pennsylvania-Novartis Alliance.

4. Notes

1. Separating gel preparation.

7.5% separating gel Volume
QH2O 38.8 ml
1.5 M Tris–HCl, pH 8.8 20.0 ml
10% SDS 800 μl
30% acrylamide/bis solution 20 ml
Vacuum 5 min
10% ammonium persulfate 400 μl
TEMED 40 μl
Total 80 ml

2. Stacking gel preparation.

4% stacking gel Volume
QH2O 12.2 ml
0.5 M Tris–HCl, pH 6.8 5.0 ml
10% SDS 200 μl
30% acrylamide/bis solution 2.66 ml
Vacuum 5 min
10% ammonium persulfate 200 μl
TEMED 20 μl
Total 20 ml

3. Sample buffer.

5x sample buffer Volume
QH2O 175 μl
0.5 M Tris–HCl, pH 6.8 125 μl
50% glycerol in QH2O 500 μl
10% SDS 200 μl
2-Mercaptoethanol 50 μl
Bromophenol blue Pinch
Final volume 1 ml

4. Previous protocols recommended overnight hydration of the XF sensor cartridge in a CO2-free, 37 °C incubator. As this extended duration results in dehydration, it is preferable to add 200 μl of the calibration solution and leave overnight on the bench at room temperature. On the morning of the assay, transfer to a CO2-free, 37 °C incubator for 5 h.

5. The inherent metabolic flexibility of T cells ensures they can use fuel sources interchangeably. Inhibiting long-chain fatty acid oxidation will promote a corresponding shift to glycolysis (increase in ECAR measurements). In cells expressing shRNA against CPT1A, there should be no further increase in ECAR at doses specific to the CPT1A target.

References

  • 1.van der Windt GJ, O’Sullivan D, Everts B, Huang SC, Buck MD, Curtis JD, Chang CH, Smith AM, Ai T, Faubert B, Jones RG, Pearce EJ, Pearce EL (2013) CD8 memory T cells have a bioenergetic advantage that underlies their rapid recall ability. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 110(35):14336–14341. 10.1073/pnas.1221740110 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.O’Sullivan D, van der Windt GJ, Huang SC, Curtis JD, Chang CH, Buck MD, Qiu J, Smith Am, Lam WY, Di Plato LM, Hsu FF, Birnbaum MJ, Pearce EJ, Pearce EL (2014) Memory CD8(+) T cells use cell-intrinsic lipolysis to support the metabolic programming necessary for development. Immunity 41(1):75–88. 10.1016/j.immuni.2014.06.005 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Pearce EL, Walsh MC, Cejas PJ, Harms GM, Shen H, Wang LS, Jones RG, Choi Y (2009) Enhancing CD8 T-cell memory by modulating fatty acid metabolism. Nature 460(7251):103–107. 10.1038/nature08097 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.O’Connor RS, Guo L, Ghassemi S, Snyder NW, Worth AJ, Weng L, Kam Y, Philipson B, Trefely S, Nunez-Cruz S, Blair IA, June CH, Milone MC (2018) The CPT1a inhibitor, etomoxir induces severe oxidative stress at commonly used concentrations. Sci Rep 8(1):6289. 10.1038/s41598-018-24676-6 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Raud B, Roy DG, Divakaruni AS, Tarasenko TN, Franke R, Ma EH, Samborska B, Hsieh WY, Wong AH, Stuve P, Arnold-Schrauf C, Guderian M, Lochner M, Rampertaap S, Romito K, Monsale J, Bronstrup M, Bensinger SJ, Murphy AN, McGuire PJ, Jones RG, Sparwasser T, Berod L (2018) Etomoxir actions on regulatory and memory T cells are independent of Cpt1a-mediated fatty acid oxidation. Cell Metab 28(3):504–515. 10.1016/j.cmet.2018.06.002 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Huang SC, Everts B, Ivanova Y, O’Sullivan D, Nascimento M, Smith AM, Beatty W, Love-Gregory L, Lam WY, O’Neill CM, Yan C, Du H, Abumrad NA, Urban JF Jr, Artyomov MN, Pearce EL, Pearce EJ (2014) Cell-intrinsic lysosomal lipolysis is essential for alternative activation of macrophages. Nat Immunol 15(9):846–855. 10.1038/ni.2956 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Divakaruni AS, Hsieh WY, Minarrieta L, Duong TN, Kim KKO, Desousa BR, Andreyev AY, Bowman CE, Caradonna K, Dranka BP, Ferrick DA, Liesa M, Stiles L, Rogers GW, Braas D, Ciaraldi TP, Wolfgang MJ, Sparwasser T, Berod L, Bensinger SJ, Murphy AN (2018) Etomoxir inhibits macrophage polarization by disrupting CoA homeostasis. Cell Metab 28(3):490–503. 10.1016/j.cmet.2018.06.001 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Nomura M, Liu J, Rovira II, Gonzalez-Hurtado E, Lee J, Wolfgang MJ, Finkel T (2016) Fatty acid oxidation in macrophage polarization. Nat Immunol 17(3):216–217. 10.1038/ni.3366 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Divakaruni AS, Rogers GW, Andreyev AY, Murphy AN (2016) 12.03: The CPT inhibitor etomoxir has an off-target effect on the nucleotide translocase and respiratory complex I. Biochim Biophys Acta 1857:e118 [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Milone MC, Fish JD, Carpenito C, Carroll RG, Binder GK, Teachey D, Samanta M, Lakhal M, Gloss B, Danet-Desnoyers G, Campana D, Riley JL, Grupp SA, June CH (2009) Chimeric receptors containing CD137 signal transduction domains mediate enhanced survival of T cells and increased antileukemic efficacy in vivo. Mol Ther 17(8):1453–1464. 10.1038/mt.2009.83 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES