Abstract
Peptide materials have recently been considered for use in various industrial fields. Because of their efficacy, safety, and low cost, therapeutic peptides are studied for various diseases, including atopic dermatitis (AD). AD is a common inflammatory skin disease impairing the patient’s quality of life. Various therapies, such as treatments with corticosteroids, calcineurin inhibitors, and antibody drugs, have been applied, but numerous side effects have been reported, including skin atrophy, burning, and infection. In the case of antibody drugs, immunogenicity against the drugs can be a problem. To overcome these side effects, small peptides are considered therapeutic agents. We previously identified the small wound healing peptide AES16-2M with a sequence of REGRT, and examined its effects on AD in this study. Interestingly, the administration of AES16-2M downregulated the AD disease score, ear thickness, serum IgE, and thymic stromal lymphopoietin (TSLP) in AD mice. The thickness of the epidermal layer was also improved by AES16-2M treatment. In addition, quantities of IL-4-, IL-13-, and IL-17-producing CD4 T cells from peripheral lymph nodes and spleens were reduced by injection of AES16-2M. Furthermore, the expression of TSLP was significantly reduced in AES16-2M-treated human keratinocytes. Therefore, these results suggest that AES16-2M can be a novel candidate for AD treatment.
Keywords: short peptide, AES16-2M, atopic dermatitis
1. Introduction
Peptide materials are currently interesting prospects as biomaterials that can be applied in various fields, including cosmetics, food, tissue repair, and therapeutics [1,2]. Chemically synthesized peptides have advantages for industrial uses, such as good safety, relatively low costs, and standard synthetic protocols [3,4]. Particularly in terms of therapeutic uses, numerous studies have identified functional peptides that can replace protein drugs with immunogenicity [4].
Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a chronic and common inflammatory skin disease caused by various genetic and environmental factors, and the worldwide prevalence of AD reaches up to 20% in the pediatric population [5,6,7,8]. AD patients suffer from itching, which can cause skin scratches, infections, and sleep disturbance [7,9]. Moreover, the social and emotional stress caused by the time and economic costs of treating the disease, and the damages to appearance, impair quality of life [7,9]. Because AD is an inflammatory disease mediated by cytokines such as IL-4, IL-13, IL-17, and thymic stromal lymphopoietin (TSLP) [10], topical corticosteroids and calcineurin inhibitors are applied as first-line therapy for AD patients in order to reduce inflammation [8]. However, their potential side effects, such as impaired skin barrier function, atrophy, burning, pruritus and infection, have been reported [8,11]. Although various antibody drugs, targeting T helper type 2 (Th2) cytokines and IgE, have been developed and used for AD treatment [12], protein drugs are relatively expensive, and are restricted in their long-term use as anti-drug antibody production reduces their efficacy [13,14]. To overcome these problems, functional peptides have recently been considered therapeutic agents because of their benefits of efficacy, safety, and low cost [3,4]. In particular, the potential immunogenicity of short peptides composed of less than 10 amino acids is considered very low, since the average size of the peptides loaded in MHC class II is over 10 amino acids in length [15].
We previously discovered a small peptide AES16-2M, with a sequence of REGRT, which shows dermal wound healing effects. AES16-2M was shown to induce ERK activation in keratinocytes and enhanced wound repair which is comparable to the respective effects of TGFβ and EGF [16]. Because both TGFβ and EGF attenuate AD in vivo and ERK activation in keratinocytes regulates skin inflammation [17,18,19], we hypothesized that the ERK-activating peptide, AES16-2M, could also ameliorate AD.
In this study, the therapeutic effects of AES16-2M were examined in the house dust mite allergen-induced AD model. The results show that the administration of AES16-2M significantly reduced the dermatitis score, ear thickness, and the level of blood IgE and TSLP in AD mice. The dermal tissue analysis also revealed that the AD-related thick epidermal layer was improved by AES16-2M treatment. In addition, we observed the production of IL-4, IL-13, and IL-17 in CD4 T cells from peripheral lymph nodes and spleens following the injection of AES16-2M. Furthermore, the expression of TSLP, a key factor for AD pathogenesis [20], was significantly decreased by AES16-2M in human keratinocytes. Therefore, these results suggest that AES16-2M could be a novel candidate for AD treatment.
2. Results
2.1. AES16-2M Ameliorates Dermatophagoides Farina Body-Induced AD in Mice
The properties of the AES16-2M peptide with 617.5 Da, pH 10.39 to 10.9 iso-electric point, 1.0 net charge at pH7.0, 1.7 average hydrophilicity, and over 10.0 mg/mL of water solubility, have been previously described [16] and are updated in this study. To investigate whether the wound healing peptide, AES16-2M, could improve AD, Dermatophagoides farina (Df) body-induced AD model was established, and 10 mg/kg of AES16-2M was used as the optimal dose determined by preliminary experiments. Surprisingly, AES16-2M administration attenuated AD symptoms and decreased the dermatitis scores significantly in AD mice, which results were comparable to those for the positive control group (dexamethasone) (Figure 1A,B). The histological analysis of dermal tissue sections also revealed that the thickness of the epidermal layer and the dermal infiltration of mononuclear cells following AD induction were improved as well (Figure 1C–E). In addition, the ear thickness of the AES16-2M-treated mice was thinner than that of vehicle-treated mice (Figure 1F). Since increased IgE and TSLP production is closely related to AD pathology [12], the total IgE levels from sera were determined. As expected, the serum IgE and TSLP levels were significantly lower in AES16-2M-administrated mice, and these levels were comparable to those in the dexamethasone group (Figure 1G,H). These results demonstrate that AES16-2M ameliorates AD in vivo.
2.2. AES16-2M Reduces the Generation of Th2 and Th17 Cells in the AD Model
It is well known that Th2 cells, which secrete IL-4 and IL-13, and IL-17-producing Th17 cells, are involved in AD development [10,21]. For these reasons, the changes in the populations of Th2 and Th17 cells were examined in the spleens and draining lymph nodes of the AD mice. The flow cytometric results determined that either IL-4-, IL13-, or IL-17-producing CD4 T cells were increased by AD induction, and that these populations were smaller in the spleens and lymph nodes from AES16-2M treated mice (Figure 2). These results suggest that AES16-2M efficiently reduces the generation of Th2 and Th17 cells, and attenuates AD pathogenesis.
2.3. AES16-2M Downregulates TSLP Expression in Normal Human Keratinocytes In Vitro
As AES16-2M showed its efficacy in the AD animal model, the potential therapeutic effects of the peptide on human cells were examined next. Because AES16-2M showed EGF-like effects on skin wound healing in our previous report [16], and because EGF administration reduces the expression of TSLP in skin [18] (an initial factor for AD pathogenesis) [20], AES16-2M was applied to activated normal human epidermal keratinocytes (NHEKs) to evaluate TSLP expression. The expression of CCL20, and Th17-recruiting chemokine, was also determined because the Th17 population was decreased by AES16-2M (Figure 2). Real-time PCR analysis showed that TSLP expression was induced by tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNFα) and interleukin-4 (IL-4) in NHEK while the induction was inhibited in the presence of AES16-2M (Figure 3A). CCL20 expression was downregulated, but the changes were not significant (data not shown). The inhibition was also confirmed via semi-quantitative PCR and visualized bands (Figure 3B). Accordingly, the results indicate that AES16-2M has potential therapeutic effects on AD with the regulation of TSLP expression in human keratinocytes.
3. Discussion
Functional peptides are considered novel candidates for drug development because of their advantages, including their efficacy, safety, and relatively lower costs and numerous studies have discovered bioactive peptides [3,4]. However, extremely short peptides with sequences of less than 10 amino acids, which are free of the immunogenicity problem [15], are rare. In the current study, we demonstrated that the short peptide AES16-2M, consisting of only five amino acids, attenuates AD symptoms, including dermatitis score, ear and epidermal layer thickness, sera IgE, and TSLP level in AD mice. AES16-2M was also shown to reduce the generation of Th2 and Th17 cells, which produce IL-4, IL-13, and IL-17. Furthermore, the inflammatory cytokine-induced TSLP expression in NHEKs was inhibited by AES16-2M. Although the quantities of Th2 cytokines were reduced in the spleens of AES16-2M treated mice (Figure 2), in vitro IL-4 production in the total splenocytes was not changed by the peptide (data not shown). Therefore, AES16-2M is not thought to regulate Th2 polarization directly in the secondary immune organs. Since AES16-2M downregulated the serum TSLP level in vivo, it could be involved in the decreased Th2 responses.
In our previous study, the reported wound healing effects of AES16-2M were comparable to those of EGF and TGFβ [16]. Many studies suggest that the wound healing capacity of skin is closely related to AD. Caspase-8 deficiency affects both skin wound repair and AD development via the induced inflammatory responses [22,23]. IL-4, one of the pivotal factors for AD development, reduces the wound-repair ability in dermal tissue [24]. In addition, several materials with wound healing abilities, such as EGF, TGFβ and quercetin, also have therapeutic effects on AD [17,18,25,26,27]. Consistent with these findings, AES16-2M attenuated AD symptoms, as well as improving wound healing [16].
It is also significant that AES16-2M induces wound repair through enhanced ERK phosphorylation in keratinocytes [16], because the inhibition of ERK aggravates inflammation in the skin [19] and ERK activation is a part of the EGF and TGFβ signaling pathways [28,29]. However, it is known that the phosphorylation of ERK also induces TSLP expression [18]. Since AES16-2M was shown to downregulate TSLP expression in NHEKs, the mechanisms of this should be studied further.
There are several advantages to the transdermal delivery of drugs, such as its avoiding of gastrointestinal degradation, its ease of application, and its direct effects especially on dermal diseases [30]. In this respect, AES16-2M seems to have a benefit in terms of skin penetration because of its very small size, consisting of just five amino acids sequence. It is also possible to enhance the dermal permeability of peptides easily by conjugation of fatty acid chains [31]. Therefore, AES16-2M could be a novel candidate for the topical application of AD skincare as a bioactive short peptide.
4. Materials and Methods
4.1. Peptide, Mice, AD Model and Cells
AES16-2M was synthesized and analyzed for purity, water solubility, and molecular weight by Anygen (Gwang Ju, Korea). Peptide with purity over 95% was used for this study.
AD was induced in mice as previously described [32]. Briefly, 4% of sodium dodecyl sulfate was applied to the shaved skin of six-week-old female Nc/Nga mice (Central Lab. Animal Inc., Seoul, Korea). Three hours post-SDS treatment, AD cream containing Dermatophagosides farinae (Df) body ointment (Biostir, Kobe, Japan) was applied topically on the shaved skin and ears (100 mg/mouse). The AD cream was administrated total 6 times in total over 3 weeks, and AES16-2M (10 mg/kg) or dexamethasone (2.5 mg/kg) was injected the day following AD cream treatment (S.C. injection, 6 times in total over for 3 weeks). Ten mice per group were used for the animal study. The mice were maintained in a specific pathogen-free facility and the experiments were performed according to the guidelines of the Korea University Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (KUIACUC-2020-0022).
Normal human epidermal keratinocytes (NHEK) were purchased from Promo Cell (Heidelberg, Germany) and were cultured in keratinocyte growth medium 2 (Promo cell).
4.2. Antibodies
Anti-CD3ε (145-2C11), anti-CD28 (37.51), alexa488-conjugated anti-IL-4 (11B11) and PerCP-Cy5.5-conjugated anti-CD4 (RM4-5) were purchased from BD Biosciences (San Diego, CA, USA). The PE-conjugated anti-IL13 (eBio13A) was from eBioscience (San Diego, CA, USA). The APC-conjugated anti-IL-17 (TC11-18H10.1) was from BioLegend (San Diego, CA, USA).
4.3. Evaluation of AD Score, Ear Thickness, IgE, and TSLP
The severity of AD was evaluated via a score of 0 (none), 1 (mild), 2 (moderate), and 3 (severe) for each symptom, including erythema/hemorrhage, scarring/dryness, edema, and excoriation/erosion [33]. Ear thickness was determined using an electronic caliper. For serum ELISA, blood samples were collected from mice of dermatitis score-matched 3 to 5 mice per group by cardiac puncture on day 21, and the total IgE and TSLP levels were examined using ELISA (eBioscience, San Diego, CA, USA).
4.4. Tissue Section Analysis
Skin tissues were isolated from mice and fixed in 10% formalin solution (Sigma-Aldrich, St Louis, MO, USA). The tissue samples were embedded in an optimum cutting temperature (OCT) compound (Sakura Finetek, Torrance, CA, USA), sectioned with a cryotome (Leica CM3050S, Leica, Berlin, Germany) at 5 mm thickness, and attached to slide glasses. Hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) staining was performed on the slides using the standard protocol [34].
4.5. PCR Analysis
HEK cells (2.5 × 105 cells/well) were seeded in a 24-well plate and activated with TNFa (10 ng/mL, Peprotech, Cranbury, NJ, USA) or TNFa plus IL-4 (50 ng/mL, Peprotech, Cranbury, NJ, USA) in the presence of AES16-2M (0 to 1000 ng/mL) for 24 h. After cultivation, the RNA was isolated from the HEK cells and TSLP expression was evaluated by quantitative PCR (qPCR, LightCycler®96, Roche, Indianapolis, IN, USA). Semi-qPCR was also performed and bands were visualized by Amersham Imager 600 (Amersham Biosciences, Uppsala, Sweden). The primers used for TSLP were 5′-GAGTGGGACCAAAAGTACCG-3′ (sense) and 5′-CCAGATAGCTAAGG-3′ (antisense).
4.6. Flow Cytometry
The spleens and peripheral lymph nodes from the dermatitis score-matched 5 mice per group were homogenized, and cells from 5 mice in the same group were mixed. Splenocytes or lymph node cells (2 × 106 cells/well) were cultivated separately in a 24-well plate in the presence of a plate-bound CD3ε antibody (1 μg/mL) and a soluble CD28 antibody (1mg/mL) for 20 h. Then, PMA (50 ng/mL, Sigma-Aldrich), ionomycin (1 mg/mL, Sigma-Aldrich) and monensin (1 mg/mL, Sigma-Aldrich) were added and incubated for 4 h. After the incubation, the cell surface molecules were stained with antibodies at a 1:500 dilution in FACS buffer for 15 min at RT and fixed with Cytofix/Cytoperm solution for 20 min at 4 °C (BD Biosciences, San Diego, CA, USA). Intracellular staining was performed in Perm/wash buffer for 1 h at 4 °C (BD Biosciences). FACSCalibur with CellQuest software was used for the flow cytometric analysis with gating of the live cells (BD Biosciences).
4.7. Statistical Analyses
A non-paired and two-tailed Student’s t-test was performed to compare the experimental groups and control groups. p-values < 0.05 were considered to be statistically significant.
Abbreviations
AD: atopic dermatitis; Df, Dermatophagoides farina; NHEK, normal human epidermal keratinocyte; Th2, T helper type 2; Th17, T helper type 17; TSLP, thymic stromal lymphopoietin.
Author Contributions
Conceptualization, D.C., H.J.P. and T.S.K.; methodology, D.C., H.J.P., T.S.K. and J.S.; validation, D.C., H.J.P., J.S. and M.S.K.; formal analysis, J.S., M.S.K. and S.P.; investigation, J.S., M.S.K. and S.P.; writing—original draft preparation, M.S.K.; writing—review and editing, D.C., H.J.P. and T.S.K.; supervision, D.C. and H.J.P.; project administration, D.C. and H.J.P.; funding acquisition, D.C. M.S.K. and J.S. contributed equally.All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Funding
This research was supported by Korea University, the grant to Kine Sciences (Q1826341).
Institutional Review Board Statement
The animal study was performed according to the guidelines of the Korea University Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (KUIACUC-2020-0022, approval date: 27 July 2020).
Informed Consent Statement
Not applicable.
Data Availability Statement
Data sharing not applicable.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Footnotes
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
References
- 1.Martínez-Villaluenga C., Hernández-Ledesma B. Peptides for Health Benefits 2019. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020;21:2543. doi: 10.3390/ijms21072543. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Hosoyama K., Lazurko C., Muñoz M., McTiernan C.D., Alarcon E.I. Peptide-Based Functional Biomaterials for Soft-Tissue Repair. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. 2019;7:205. doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2019.00205. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Fosgerau K., Hoffmann T. Peptide therapeutics: Current status and future directions. Drug Discov. Today. 2015;20:122–128. doi: 10.1016/j.drudis.2014.10.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Yavari B., Mahjub R., Saidijam M., Raigani M., Soleimani M. The Potential Use of Peptides in Cancer Treatment. Curr. Protein Pept. Sci. 2018;19:759–770. doi: 10.2174/1389203719666180111150008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Boothe W.D., Tarbox J.A., Tarbox M.B. Atopic Dermatitis: Pathophysiology. Adv. Exp. Med. Biol. 2017;1027:21–37. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-64804-0_3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Magnifico I., Petronio G.P., Venditti N., Cutuli M.A., Pietrangelo L., Vergalito F., Mangano K., Zella D., Marco R.D. Atopic Dermatitis as a Multifactorial Skin Disorder. Can the Analysis of Pathophysiological Targets Represent the Winning Therapeutic Strategy? Pharmaceuticals. 2020;13:411. doi: 10.3390/ph13110411. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Avena-Woods C. Overview of atopic dermatitis. Am. J. Manag. Care. 2017;23(Suppl. 8):S115–S123. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Luger T., Augustin M., Lambert J., Paul C., Pincelli C., Torrelo A., Vestergaard C., Wahn U., Werfel T. Unmet medical needs in the treatment of atopic dermatitis in infants: An Expert consensus on safety and efficacy of pimecrolimus. Pediatr. Allergy Immunol. 2020 doi: 10.1111/pai.13422. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Lifschitz C. The impact of atopic dermatitis on quality of life. Ann. Nutr. Metab. 2015;66(Suppl. 1):34–40. doi: 10.1159/000370226. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Sugaya M. The Role of Th17-Related Cytokines in Atopic Dermatitis. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020;21:1314. doi: 10.3390/ijms21041314. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Mayba J.N., Gooderham M.J. Review of Atopic Dermatitis and Topical Therapies. J. Cutan. Med. Surg. 2016;21:227–236. doi: 10.1177/1203475416685077. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Cabanillas B., Brehler A.-C., Novak N. Atopic dermatitis phenotypes and the need for personalized medicine. Curr. Opin. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 2017;17:309–315. doi: 10.1097/ACI.0000000000000376. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.De Groot A.S., Scott D.W. Immunogenicity of protein therapeutics. Trends Immunol. 2007;28:482–490. doi: 10.1016/j.it.2007.07.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Vaisman-Mentesh A., Rosenstein S., Yavzori M., Dror Y., Fudim E., Ungar B., Kopylov U., Picard O., Kigel A., Ben-Horin S., et al. Molecular Landscape of Anti-Drug Antibodies Reveals the Mechanism of the Immune Response Following Treatment With TNFα Antagonists. Front. Immunol. 2019;10:2921. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2019.02921. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Sercarz E.E., Maverakis E. Mhc-guided processing: Binding of large antigen fragments. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 2003;3:621–629. doi: 10.1038/nri1149. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Lee S., Kim M.S., Jung S.-J., Kim D., Park H.J., Cho D. ERK activating peptide, AES16-2M promotes wound healing through accelerating migration of keratinocytes. Sci. Rep. 2018;8:14398. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-32851-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Sumiyoshi K., Nakao A., Ushio H., Mitsuishi K., Okumura K., Tsuboi R., Ra C., Ogawa H. Transforming growth factor-beta1 suppresses atopic dermatitis-like skin lesions in NC/Nga mice. Clin. Exp. Allergy. 2002;32:309–314. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2222.2002.01221.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Kim Y.-J., Choi M.J., Bak D.-H., Lee B.C., Ko E.J., Ahn G.R., Ahn S.W., Kim M.J., Na J., Kim B.J. Topical administration of EGF suppresses immune response and protects skin barrier in DNCB-induced atopic dermatitis in NC/Nga mice. Sci. Rep. 2018;8:1–11. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-30404-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Pastore S., Mascia F., Mariotti R., Dattilo C., Mariani V., Girolomoni G. ERK1/2 regulates epidermal chemokine expression and skin inflammation. J. Immunol. 2005;174:5047–5056. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.174.8.5047. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Indra A.K. Epidermal TSLP: A trigger factor for pathogenesis of atopic dermatitis. Expert Rev. Proteom. 2013;10:309–311. doi: 10.1586/14789450.2013.814881. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Brandt E.B., Sivaprasad Y. Th2 Cytokines and Atopic Dermatitis. J. Clin. Cell. Immunol. 2011;2:110. doi: 10.4172/2155-9899.1000110. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Lee P., Lee D.-J., Chan C., Chen S.-W., Ch’En I., Jamora C. Dynamic expression of epidermal caspase 8 simulates a wound healing response. Nat. Cell Biol. 2009;458:519–523. doi: 10.1038/nature07687. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Li C., Lasse S., Lee P., Nakasaki M., Chen S.-W., Yamasaki K., Gallo R.L., Jamora C. Development of atopic dermatitis-like skin disease from the chronic loss of epidermal caspase-8. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2010;107:22249–22254. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1009751108. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Zhao Y., Bao L., Chan L.S., DiPietro L.A., Chen L. Aberrant Wound Healing in an Epidermal Interleukin-4 Transgenic Mouse Model of Atopic Dermatitis. PLoS ONE. 2016;11:e0146451. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0146451. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Xu J., Zanvit P., Hu L., Tseng P.-Y., Liu N., Wang F., Liu O., Zhang D., Jin W., Guo N., et al. The Cytokine TGF-β Induces Interleukin-31 Expression from Dermal Dendritic Cells to Activate Sensory Neurons and Stimulate Wound Itching. Immunity. 2020;53:371–383. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2020.06.023. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Doersch K.M., Newell-Rogers M.K. The impact of quercetin on wound healing relates to changes in αV and β1 integrin expression. Exp. Biol. Med. 2017;242:1424–1431. doi: 10.1177/1535370217712961. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Hou D.-D., Zhang W., Gao Y.-L., Sun Y.-Z., Wang H.-X., Qi R.-Q., Chen H.-D., Gao X.-H. Anti-inflammatory effects of quercetin in a mouse model of MC903-induced atopic dermatitis. Int. Immunopharmacol. 2019;74:105676. doi: 10.1016/j.intimp.2019.105676. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Guo G., Gong K., Wohlfeld B., Hatanpaa K.J., Zhao D., Habib A.A. Ligand-Independent EGFR Signaling. Cancer Res. 2015;75:3436–3441. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-15-0989. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Zhang Y.E. Non-Smad pathways in TGF-β signaling. Cell Res. 2009;19:128–139. doi: 10.1038/cr.2008.328. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Smyth H.D.C., Becket G., Mehta S. The influence of porosity changes in human epidermal membrane during iontophoresis on the permeability enhancement of a model peptide. Drug Dev. Ind. Pharm. 2009;35:1201–1209. doi: 10.1080/03639040902865673. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Lintner K., Peschard O. Biologically active peptides: From a laboratory bench curiosity to a functional skin care product. Int. J. Cosmet. Sci. 2000;22:207–218. doi: 10.1046/j.1467-2494.2000.00010.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Kim K.E., Jung M.J., Houh Y., Kim T.S., Lee W.J., Yang Y., Bang S.I., Kim C.H., Kim H., Park H.J., et al. Erdr1 Attenuates Dermatophagoides farina Body Extract-Induced Atopic Dermatitis in NC/Nga Mice. J. Investig. Dermatol. 2017;137:1798–1802. doi: 10.1016/j.jid.2017.04.018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Yamamoto M., Haruna T., Yasui K., Takahashi H., Iduhara M., Takaki S., Deguchi M., Arimura A. A novel atopic dermatitis model induced by topical application with dermatophagoides farinae extract in NC/Nga mice. Allergol. Int. 2007;56:139–148. doi: 10.2332/allergolint.O-06-458. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Cardiff R.D., Miller C.H., Munn R.J. Manual hematoxylin and eosin staining of mouse tissue sections. Cold Spring Harb. Protoc. 2014;2014:655–658. doi: 10.1101/pdb.prot073411. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Data Availability Statement
Data sharing not applicable.