The impact of MexXY efflux pump expression on aminoglycoside resistance in clinical Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates has been debated. In this study, we found that, in general, elevated mexXY gene expression levels in clinical P. aeruginosa isolates confer to slight increases in aminoglycoside MIC levels; however, those levels rarely lead to clinically relevant resistance phenotypes. The main driver of resistance in the clinical isolates studied here was the acquisition of aminoglycoside-modifying enzymes (AMEs).
KEYWORDS: MexXY, aminoglycoside resistance, aminoglycoside-modifying enzymes, antibiotic efflux, antibiotic resistance
ABSTRACT
The impact of MexXY efflux pump expression on aminoglycoside resistance in clinical Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates has been debated. In this study, we found that, in general, elevated mexXY gene expression levels in clinical P. aeruginosa isolates confer to slight increases in aminoglycoside MIC levels; however, those levels rarely lead to clinically relevant resistance phenotypes. The main driver of resistance in the clinical isolates studied here was the acquisition of aminoglycoside-modifying enzymes (AMEs). Nevertheless, acquisition of an AME was strongly associated with mexY overexpression. In line with this observation, we demonstrate that the introduction of a gentamicin acetyltransferase confers to full gentamicin resistance levels in a P. aeruginosa type strain only if the MexXY efflux pump was active. We discuss that increased mexXY activity in clinical AME-harboring P. aeruginosa isolates might affect ion fluxes at the bacterial cell membrane and thus might play a role in the establishment of enhanced fitness that extends beyond aminoglycoside resistance.
INTRODUCTION
The metabolically versatile bacterium Pseudomonas aeruginosa is known to cause a wide range of opportunistic infections and is recognized as one of the leading causes of severe hospital-acquired acute infections (1–6). In cystic fibrosis (CF), P. aeruginosa frequently establishes lifelong chronic infections associated with hyperinflammation, severe tissue damage, and, ultimately, high mortality rates (7–9). Although antimicrobial therapy is a cornerstone of the management of CF, even intensified treatment is often not able to clear the infection (10–12). The recalcitrance of chronic P. aeruginosa infections against antibiotic treatment is only incompletely understood. A known important adaptive resistance trait is the induction of active efflux of antibiotics into the extracellular space (13–15). Multidrug efflux pumps recognize a variety of structurally diverse compounds as their substrates, including different clinically relevant antibiotic classes (3, 16). In P. aeruginosa, there are four efflux pump systems that are of particular interest: MexAB-OprM, MexCD-OprJ, MexEF-OprN, and MexXY-OprM (17, 18). Previous studies have shown that mexZ, encoding the negative regulator of MexXY-OprM, is one of the mutational hot spots in CF-derived P. aeruginosa isolates (19–22). P. aeruginosa mexZ mutants exhibit constitutive overexpression of MexXY-OprM. This efflux pump was shown to play an important role in the development of resistance against aminoglycosides and fluoroquinolones (23, 24), both being important antibiotic classes in the treatment of CF patients (10).
However, the causal contribution of P. aeruginosa MexXY-OprM pump expression to aminoglycoside resistance in the clinic is disputed. Recently published evolutionary studies did not detect the emergence of mexXY-overexpressing strains, even under prolonged aminoglycoside exposure (25, 26). Other studies show only limited aminoglycoside resistance in clinical isolates despite overexpression of the MexXY-OprM efflux pump (27). Nevertheless, the MexXY-OprM-overproducing strains seem to have a fitness advantage when grown under sub-MIC tobramycin concentrations, a condition that especially CF isolates face during chronic lung infections (7).
In this study, we aimed to shed further light on the impact of MexXY efflux pump expression on aminoglycoside resistance in clinical P. aeruginosa isolates. For this purpose, we analyzed the expression of genes encoding the MexXY efflux pump in a recently published collection of 412 clinical P. aeruginosa isolates from a variety of geographical origins and infection sites (28). We found that clinically relevant tobramycin resistance was, in general, not associated with elevated mexXY gene expression levels but that the acquisition of aminoglycoside-modifying enzymes (AMEs) was the main driver of resistance. However, acquisition of an AME was strongly associated with mexY overexpression, and the full gentamicin acetyltransferase-mediated gentamicin resistance potential was dependent on an active MexXY efflux pump.
RESULTS
mexY overexpression can be frequently found in clinical P. aeruginosa isolates.
In this study, we took advantage of previously recorded transcriptome data on 412 clinical P. aeruginosa isolates grown in LB medium until the late logarithmic phase (optical density at 600 nm [OD600], 2) (28). Most of the clinical isolates exhibited resistance against at least one class of antibiotics (29), and about one-third of the P. aeruginosa isolates have been isolated from CF patients. We focused on the expression of the MexXY-OprM efflux pump and extracted gene expression values for mexY across all isolates. We defined a cutoff value for high mexY gene expression by analyzing the distribution of normalized reads per gene (NRPG) over all analyzed clinical isolates (Fig. 1). We found a biphasic pattern of mexY gene expression and classified an isolate as overexpressing mexY if at least 575.44 NRPG mapped to mexY (Fig. 1, orange line). This resulted in the categorization of 53% (n = 217) of the clinical isolates as mexY overexpressing. Nine percent (n = 37) of the isolates exhibited intermediate mexY expression values (between 229.09 and 575.44 NRPG) (Fig. 1).
Under noninducing rich medium growth conditions, MexZ acts as a negative regulator of mexXY gene expression. We found at least one nonsynonymous mutation in mexZ in 86% (n = 187) of the mexY-overexpressing clinical isolates. There was no clear mutational hot spot within the mexZ gene sequence (Fig. S1 in the supplemental material), although isolates with high mexY expression levels tend to be enriched in mutations in the N-terminal region of the gene in which the DNA binding domain was identified (22). Nevertheless, our results suggest that inactivation of the negative regulator MexZ leads to constitutive efflux pump overexpression in the majority of our clinical isolates. However, there are additional MexXY-OprM expression regulators which might play a role in our data set, e.g., overexpression of the MexZ antirepressor AmrZ or activating mutations in the sensor histidine kinase of ParRS have been described to positively control mexXY expression (22).
Overexpression of mexY correlates with high MexY protein abundance.
To evaluate whether the constitutively high mexY transcript levels are translated into high protein levels, Western blot analysis was performed on a set of 53 clinical P. aeruginosa isolates (30). We included a PA14ΔmexZ (31) mutant as a control. Due to the inactivation of the negative regulator, MexZ, PA14ΔmexZ is producing elevated levels of the efflux pump (Fig. 2). In six of the clinical isolates, (almost) no MexY protein was detected despite mexY overexpression (Fig. 2, arrows). We cannot exclude that variations in the protein sequence impede the detection by the antibody used in the Western blot analysis. Nevertheless, in general, the clinical isolates, which exhibited high mexY transcripts, also produced high MexY protein expression levels. For most of the isolates (83%; n = 44), these levels were far above the levels of the PA14 ΔmexZ mutant. In line with the finding that not all clinical isolates harbored mexZ mutations, these results suggest additional levels of MexXY regulation in the clinical isolates studied here. In this respect, it is interesting that in a PA14 strain background with an inactivation of not only mexZ but also mexR and mexY expression was further increased (Fig. 2). MexR represses transcription of the mexAB-oprM operon, and OprM is an outer membrane factor that is shared between the MexXY and the MexAB efflux systems. Thus, there seems to be a functional link of the two efflux systems that also impacts mexY expression levels.
Increased mexY expression has a limited impact on resistance against tobramycin.
We next evaluated whether higher expression of mexXY-oprM was associated with aminoglycoside resistance. Among the group of mexY-overexpressing isolates, 51% (n = 110) were classified as tobramycin susceptible according to the standards defined by the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (tobramycin MIC < 16 μg/ml; Fig. 3) (32), indicating that mexY expression is not of major importance for exhibiting clinically relevant resistance levels. Nevertheless, we detected a significant yet limited impact of increased mexY expression levels on resistance toward tobramycin. Compared to the tobramycin susceptible isolates with low mexY expression (n = 151), the 110 tobramycin-susceptible isolates with high mexY expression exhibited a 2-fold higher mean MIC against tobramycin (2 μg/ml versus 1 μg/ml, respectively; Fig. 4). Our results are in agreement with previously published data demonstrating that efflux pump expression does play—albeit a minor—role in the development of resistance against tobramycin (25, 27).
The presence of aminoglycoside-modifying enzymes and fusA1 mutations are drivers of resistance against tobramycin.
Besides efflux pump overexpression, the acquisition of genes encoding for aminoglycoside-modifying enzymes (AME) is well-known to confer to aminoglycoside resistance (33). We therefore screened our clinical isolate collection for the presence of AMEs. Within the group of tobramycin-resistant isolates, 87% (n = 111) harbored at least one AME (for AME frequency, see Fig. S2), while in the group of tobramycin-susceptible isolates, only 5% (n = 14) contained at least one AME (Fig. 3). The presence of AMEs was thus significantly overrepresented in the resistant isolates (hypergeometric test for overrepresentation; P < 0.001), clearly indicating that a main driver for tobramycin resistance is the acquisition of an AME.
Recently, mutations in fusA were identified to contribute to elevated resistance levels following prolonged aminoglycoside treatment (20, 26, 34). Thus, we investigated the impact of those mutations on the overall resistance pattern in our data set. Of the overall 48 isolates with nonsynonymous fusA mutations, six isolates (12.5%) exhibited clinically relevant (MIC ≥ 16 μg/ml) tobramycin resistance levels that could not be attributed to the presence of an AME. This corresponds to 4.72% of all tobramycin-resistant isolates.
The full AME potential is dependent on mexXY expression.
Strikingly, 85% (n = 94) of the tobramycin-resistant AME-containing (AME+) isolates also overexpressed mexY. Only few (n = 6) tobramycin-resistant isolates that harbored an AME exhibited low mexY expression values. Eleven isolates expressed intermediate mexY levels (Fig. 3). To test for a possible correlation of the presence of an AME and mexY expression, we compared mexY expression values of all AME+ isolates and all non-AME-containing (AME−) isolates. We found a significant 6-fold increased median mexY expression in AME+ isolates (Fig. 5; P < 0.001). Of note, this correlation was specific to mexY. No correlation was identified between the presence of an AME and the expression of RND genes encoded in other important efflux systems (mexB, mexD, and mexF) (Fig. S3).
Our results suggest a functional link of mexXY-oprM expression and the presence of an acquired AME. To evaluate this further, we constructed clean deletions of structural genes of important “mex” efflux pump systems (PA14ΔmexAB, PA14ΔmexCD, PA14ΔmexEF, and PA14ΔmexXY) and introduced a gentamicin acetyltransferase on the cloning vector pSEVA621 (35) into the respective mutants, the PA14 wild type (WT), as well as into PA14ΔmexZ. The introduction of the AME into all strains conferred high gentamicin resistance levels (Fig. 6). The introduction of the AME into ΔmexCD or ΔmexEF strains did not lead to resistance levels that were different to those of PA14 AME+, indicating that these pumps do not play the same important role for the full AME-mediated resistance phenotype as MexXY. However, when the AME was introduced into the ΔmexAB mutant, this mutant showed the same phenotype as the ΔmexXY AME+ strain (Fig. 6), indicating that the MexAB-OprM efflux pump is important for the full resistance potential of the AME. However, this phenotype was lost in the ΔmexAB mutant when complemented with oprM on the pSEVA634 expression vector (Fig. S4). This suggests that the lack of OprM in the ΔmexAB AME+ strain, rather than the activity of the MexAB-OprM efflux pump, is responsible for the phenotype.
We then added the protonophore carbonylcyanid-m-chlorphenylhydrazone (CCCP), which has been demonstrated to inhibit efflux pumps (36) to PA14 WT AME+, PA14ΔmexXY AME+, as well as PA14ΔmexZ AME+, and again recorded the resistance profiles. In agreement with a functional contribution of the efflux pump activity to the high AME-mediated resistance levels, we observed a dose-dependent reduction of gentamicin resistance levels in the PA14 WT AME+ and the ΔmexZ AME+ strains, but not in the ΔmexXY AME+ strain (Fig. 7). It is important to note that CCCP can also decrease the uptake of aminoglycosides via the disruption of the proton motive force (37–39). However, we did not detect an increase in overall gentamicin resistance upon CCCP addition, indicating that the experimental conditions used in this study are not interfering with aminoglycoside uptake.
In conclusion, our results show that a functional MexXY-OrpM efflux pump is important for the full exploitation of the resistance potential of the horizontally acquired gentamicin acetyltransferase.
DISCUSSION
Aminoglycosides remain important in the treatment of P. aeruginosa infections, despite their known toxicity. In CF, for example, tobramycin inhalation is applied as a means to control chronic infection and as a first-line treatment for the eradication of early acquisition of P. aeruginosa. Resistance to aminoglycosides is, however, common (33, 40–42). Resistance typically results from drug inactivation by plasmid- or chromosome-encoded aminoglycoside-modifying enzymes (AMEs) or by mutation-driven resistance mechanisms (20, 26, 34). Nevertheless, resistance because of increased efflux is also commonplace, particularly in isolates from CF patients and intensive care units (19, 43–45). Furthermore, aminoglycoside uptake was shown to be inhibited by the presence of mono- and divalent cations (38). Thus, the environment, e.g., in the CF lung, might additionally impact aminoglycoside resistance levels.
The P. aeruginosa genome encodes several multidrug efflux pumps. MexXY-OprM is the only pump that has been described to export aminoglycosides (3, 46). In addition to aminoglycosides, various substances are known to induce the expression of mexXY such as fluoroquinolones or cephalosporins (47). Here, we correlated the expression of mexY, the substrate specificity-providing component of the MexXY-OprM efflux pump, in 412 clinical P. aeruginosa isolates from various geographical origins and infection sites with their respective tobramycin MICs. The high number of constitutively mexY-overexpressing isolates (53%) in our data set clearly shows the importance of the expression of the MexXY-OprM efflux pump in the clinical context. Furthermore, the high number of isolates in our strain collection that did not acquire an AME provided the unique opportunity to evaluate the contribution of mexXY gene expression to tobramycin MIC values across a large number of clinical isolates. Indeed, in agreement with previous studies, increased mexY expression positively correlated with a decrease in tobramycin susceptibility (27). This effect, however, was limited, and in general, isolates that overexpressed the pump exhibited MIC values that were only 2-fold higher compared to isolates that did not overexpress mexXY. In the majority of cases, this did not result in clinically relevant resistance phenotypes. Instead, the main driver of clinically relevant resistance against tobramycin in our set of clinical isolates was horizontally acquired AMEs. They act by either acetylating, nucleotidylating, or phosphorylating specific residues of the aminoglycosides and thereby decreasing the affinity of the compound toward the ribosome (33, 48).
Importantly, we observed a hitherto undetected high correlation between the presence of an AME and overexpression of mexY, indicating a relationship of pump overexpression and the exploitation of the full AME resistance potential. We showed that a laboratory strain that lacked the structural genes mexX and mexY did not gain the same aminoglycoside resistance level when harboring a gentamicin acetyltransferase compared to the wild type or an mexXY-overexpressing strain. In agreement, inhibition of efflux pumps via the protonophore CCCP (36) led to a concentration-dependent decrease in aminoglycoside resistance levels in mexXY-expressing strains but had no effect on the strain lacking the efflux pump-encoding genes.
Thus, even though the efflux system, on its own, is not a major resistance determinant, it is obviously important for the development of high-level AME-driven resistance against aminoglycoside antibiotics. These results indicate that MexXY is working synergistically with the AME and could be involved in the export of the AME-modified aminoglycosides that otherwise would accumulate in the cell. Nevertheless, it is also conceivable that not the export of the modified aminoglycoside per se but the enhanced activity of the efflux pump is important for the full resistance phenotype. In this context, two things are interesting. First, in P. aeruginosa, low extracellular pH increases resistance toward aminoglycosides (49, 50), and second, RND efflux pumps operate as drug/proton antiporters, and their activity has been shown to lead to intracellular H+ accumulation (51). Thus, increased activity of MexXY in the presence of an AME and aminoglycosides might lead to increased intracellular proton levels due to an elevated MexXY-driven efflux activity. The efflux pump-driven increase in the intracellular protons might further contribute to aminoglycoside resistance and possibly also to enhanced fitness under a variety of different stressful conditions.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Bacterial strains and growth conditions.
We analyzed efflux pump gene expression in 412 clinical P. aeruginosa isolates that have been previously collected from different laboratories and clinics and for which transcriptional profiles have been recorded (28). Unless otherwise stated, bacteria were grown in standard rich medium culture conditions (LB medium) at 37°C. All strains used in this study are listed in Table S1 in the supplemental material.
Generation of deletion mutants.
Markerless deletions of structural efflux pump genes were performed as previously described (52). Primers for the amplification of adjacent regions of the targeted genes from UCBPP-PA14 genomic template DNA are listed in Table S2. Briefly, approximately 500 bp located upstream and downstream of the target regions were amplified and then combined in an overlap extension PCR (to generate PA14ΔmexXY, PA14ΔmexCD, and PA14ΔmexEF) (53) or integrated into the pEX18AP cloning vector in a two-step process (to generate ΔmexAB). PA14ΔmexZ, PA14ΔmexR, and the double mutant PA14ΔmexZ/ΔmexR have been generated in the frame of a previous study (31).
Sequence variant calling.
We screened for mutations in mexZ, encoding the negative regulator of MexXY, in previously published whole-genome sequencing data (29). Mapping was accomplished using Stampy, and variant calling was performed using SAMtools (version 0.1.19) with P. aeruginosa strain UCBPP-PA14 (see “RNA sequencing”) or PAO1 (NCBI assembly accession no. GCA_000006765.1) as a reference. The strain background was assessed based on the phylogenetic analysis documented in Khaledi et al. (29). PA7-like isolates were excluded from this study.
Detection of aminoglycoside-modifying enzymes.
The resistance genotyping tool ARIBA (version 2.10.2) (54) using the CARD (55) as resistance factor database (downloaded via the ARIBA command “getref card” on 9 November 2020) was employed to detect aminoglycoside-modifying enzymes from the DNA sequencing reads directly in its default settings. We screened the results for resistance factor descriptions containing “aminoglycosides” and excluded hits for mexZ as well as the chromosomally encoded APH(3′)-II phosphotransferase from our analysis.
MexY protein immunodetection.
Overnight grown cultures of clinical isolates (published in reference 30) or PA14 deletion mutants (ΔmexZ or ΔmexR/ΔmexZ) were used to inoculate 10-ml LB main cultures (1:100). After growth to early stationary phase (OD600, 1.8 to 2.1), 1 ml of the culture was harvested by centrifugation (6.000 × g, 5 min). The pellet was either stored at −70°C or directly suspended in 100 μl lysis buffer (2% sodium dodecyl sulfate, 20 mM Tris hydrochloride, pH 8.0) and boiled at 95°C for 10 min. Residual cells were removed by centrifugation at 21,000 × g for 30 min, and the resulting supernatant was sonicated (3 min, setting of 100% ultrasound power, Elma Trassonic water bath) to shear DNA and reduce viscosity. The protein concentration was measured at an absorbance of 280 nm with a NanoDrop spectrophotometer (Thermo Scientific). In total, 60 μg of whole-cell protein solution was mixed 2:1 with SDS sample buffer and heated at 95°C for 10 min before it was applied to a 7.5% SDS-polyacrylamide gel (SDS-PAGE). After separation, the gel was subsequently blotted to a polyvinylidene difluoride (PVDF) membrane (Immobilon-P, Millipore). MexY protein was detected with purified, polyclonal anti-MexY serum (1:20,000) kindly provided by Katy Jeannot, University of Franche-Comté, Besançon, France, followed by a peroxidase-conjugated secondary antibody (anti-rabbit-PO; Dianova; 1:2,000) and Lumi-Light (chemiluminescent peroxidase substrate; Roche) incubation.
Determination of gentamicin resistance in PA14 efflux mutants.
In order to compare gentamicin resistance levels among the diverse PA14 efflux pump mutants, bacteria were grown for 24 h in Mueller-Hinton 2 medium (Sigma-Aldrich) containing 2-fold dilutions of gentamicin (Roth; concentration range, 50 μg/ml to 12,800 μg/ml) in 96-well plates at 37°C and at constant shaking (180 rpm). Each well was inoculated with an OD600 of 0.01. The lowest concentration of gentamicin, which prevented growth of the bacteria to an OD600 of 0.1, was recorded.
To inhibit efflux pump activity 40 μM, 20 μM, or 0 μM (control) carbonyl cyanide m-chlorophenyl hydrazine (CCCP; Sigma-Aldrich) dissolved in dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO; Sigma-Aldrich) was added to the medium.
Data availability.
The RNA sequencing (RNA-Seq) data of the clinical isolates are available from NCBI’s Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO; accession no. GSE122938). The DNA sequencing (DNA-Seq) data of the clinical isolates are available from NCBI's Sequence Read Archive (SRA; accession no. PRJNA526797).
Supplementary Material
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
We gratefully thank Sebastian Bruchmann and Marian Markovic for support with the construction of deletion mutants.
S.H. was funded by the European Union (ERC Consolidator Grant COMBAT 724290) and received funding from the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG; German Research Foundation) under Germany’s Excellence Strategy (EXC 2155 “RESIST”), project ID 39087428.
Footnotes
Supplemental material is available online only.
REFERENCES
- 1.Pendleton JN, Gorman SP, Gilmore BF. 2013. Clinical relevance of the ESKAPE pathogens. Expert Rev Anti Infect Ther 11:297–308. doi: 10.1586/eri.13.12. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Jones ME, Draghi DC, Thornsberry C, Karlowsky JA, Sahm DF, Wenzel RP. 2004. Emerging resistance among bacterial pathogens in the intensive care unit-a European and North American Surveillance study (2000-2002). Ann Clin Microbiol Antimicrob 3:14. doi: 10.1186/1476-0711-3-14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Lister PD, Wolter DJ, Hanson ND. 2009. Antibacterial-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa: clinical impact and complex regulation of chromosomally encoded resistance mechanisms. Clin Microbiol Rev 22:582–610. doi: 10.1128/CMR.00040-09. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Rahme LG, Ausubel FM, Cao H, Drenkard E, Goumnerov BC, Lau GW, Mahajan-Miklos S, Plotnikova J, Tan MW, Tsongalis J, Walendziewicz CL, Tompkins RG. 2000. Plants and animals share functionally common bacterial virulence factors. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 97:8815–8821. doi: 10.1073/pnas.97.16.8815. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Mesaros N, Nordmann P, Plésiat P, Roussel-Delvallez M, Van Eldere J, Glupczynski Y, Van Laethem Y, Jacobs F, Lebecque P, Malfroot A, Tulkens PM, Van Bambeke F. 2007. Pseudomonas aeruginosa: resistance and therapeutic options at the turn of the new millennium. Clin Microbiol Infect 13:560–578. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-0691.2007.01681.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Bassetti M, Vena A, Croxatto A, Righi E, Guery B. 2018. How to manage Pseudomonas aeruginosa infections. Drugs Context 7:212527. doi: 10.7573/dic.212527. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Folkesson A, Jelsbak L, Yang L, Johansen HK, Ciofu O, Høiby N, Molin S. 2012. Adaptation of Pseudomonas aeruginosa to the cystic fibrosis airway: an evolutionary perspective. Nat Rev Microbiol 10:841–851. doi: 10.1038/nrmicro2907. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Høiby N, Ciofu O, Bjarnsholt T. 2010. Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilms in cystic fibrosis. Future Microbiol 5:1663–1674. doi: 10.2217/fmb.10.125. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Lund-Palau H, Turnbull AR, Bush A, Bardin E, Cameron L, Soren O, Wierre-Gore N, Alton EWFW, Bundy JG, Connett G, Faust SN, Filloux A, Freemont P, Jones A, Khoo V, Morales S, Murphy R, Pabary R, Simbo A, Schelenz S, Takats Z, Webb J, Williams HD, Davies JC. 2016. Pseudomonas aeruginosa infection in cystic fibrosis: pathophysiological mechanisms and therapeutic approaches. Expert Rev Respir Med 10:685–697. doi: 10.1080/17476348.2016.1177460. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Döring G, Conway SP, Heijerman HG, Hodson ME, Høiby N, Smyth A, Touw DJ. 2000. Antibiotic therapy against Pseudomonas aeruginosa in cystic fibrosis: a European consensus. Eur Respir J 16:749–767. doi: 10.1034/j.1399-3003.2000.16d30.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Ratjen F, Brockhaus F, Angyalosi G. 2009. Aminoglycoside therapy against Pseudomonas aeruginosa in cystic fibrosis: a review. J Cyst Fibros 8:361–369. doi: 10.1016/j.jcf.2009.08.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Ibberson CB, Whiteley M. 2020. The social life of microbes in chronic infection. Curr Opin Microbiol 53:44–50. doi: 10.1016/j.mib.2020.02.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Piddock LV. 2006. Multidrug-resistance efflux pumps - not just for resistance. Nat Rev Microbiol 4:629–636. doi: 10.1038/nrmicro1464. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Neuberger A, Du D, Luisi BF. 2018. Structure and mechanism of bacterial tripartite efflux pumps. Res Microbiol 169:401–413. doi: 10.1016/j.resmic.2018.05.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Wang Y, Venter H, Ma S. 2016. Efflux pump inhibitors: a novel approach to combat efflux-mediated drug resistance in bacteria. Curr Drug Targets 17:702–719. doi: 10.2174/1389450116666151001103948. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Opperman TJ, Nguyen ST. 2015. Recent advances toward a molecular mechanism of efflux pump inhibition. Front Microbiol 6:421. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2015.00421. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Mesaros N, Glupczynski Y, Avrain L, Caceres NE, Tulkens PM, Van Bambeke F. 2007. A combined phenotypic and genotypic method for the detection of Mex efflux pumps in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. J Antimicrob Chemother 59:378–386. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkl504. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Poole K. 2001. Multidrug efflux pumps and antimicrobial resistance in Pseudomonas aeruginosa and related organisms. J Mol Microbiol Biotechnol 3:255–264. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Marvig RL, Sommer LM, Molin S, Johansen HK. 2015. Convergent evolution and adaptation of Pseudomonas aeruginosa within patients with cystic fibrosis. Nat Genet 47:57–64. doi: 10.1038/ng.3148. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.López-Causapé C, Sommer LM, Cabot G, Rubio R, Ocampo-Sosa AA, Krogh Johansen H, Figuerola J, Cantón R, Kidd TJ, Molin S, Oliver A. 2017. Evolution of the Pseudomonas aeruginosa mutational resistome in an international cystic fibrosis clone. Sci Rep 7:5555. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-05621-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Prickett MH, Hauser AR, McColley SA, Cullina J, Potter E, Powers C, Jain M. 2017. Aminoglycoside resistance of Pseudomonas aeruginosa in cystic fibrosis results from convergent evolution in the mexZ gene. Thorax 72:40–47. doi: 10.1136/thoraxjnl-2015-208027. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Guénard S, Muller C, Monlezun L, Benas P, Broutin I, Jeannot K, Plésiat P. 2014. Multiple mutations lead to MexXY-OprM-dependent aminoglycoside resistance in clinical strains of Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 58:221–228. doi: 10.1128/AAC.01252-13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Morita Y, Tomida J, Kawamura Y. 2015. Efflux-mediated fluoroquinolone resistance in the multidrug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa clinical isolate PA7: identification of a novel MexS variant involved in upregulation of the mexEF-oprN multidrug efflux operon. Front Microbiol 6:8. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2015.00008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Morita Y, Tomida J, Kawamura Y. 2012. MexXY multidrug efflux system of Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Front Microbiol 3:408. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2012.00408. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Sanz-García F, Hernando-Amado S, Martínez JL. 2018. Mutational evolution of Pseudomonas aeruginosa resistance to ribosome-targeting antibiotics. Front Genet 9:451. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2018.00451. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.López-Causapé C, Rubio R, Cabot G, Oliver A. 2018. Evolution of the Pseudomonas aeruginosa aminoglycoside mutational resistome in vitro and in the cystic fibrosis setting. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 62:e02583-17. doi: 10.1128/AAC.02583-17. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Frimodt-Møller J, Rossi E, Haagensen JAJ, Falcone M, Molin S, Johansen HK. 2018. Mutations causing low level antibiotic resistance ensure bacterial survival in antibiotic-treated hosts. Sci Rep 8:12512. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-30972-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Kordes A, Grahl N, Koska M, Preusse M, Arce-Rodriguez A, Abraham W-R, Kaever V, Häussler S. 2019. Establishment of an induced memory response in Pseudomonas aeruginosa during infection of a eukaryotic host. ISME J 13:2018–2030. doi: 10.1038/s41396-019-0412-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Khaledi A, Weimann A, Schniederjans M, Asgari E, Kuo T-H, Oliver A, Cabot G, Kola A, Gastmeier P, Hogardt M, Jonas D, Mofrad MR, Bremges A, McHardy AC, Häussler S. 2020. Predicting antimicrobial resistance in Pseudomonas aeruginosa with machine learning-enabled molecular diagnostics. EMBO Mol Med 12:e10264. doi: 10.15252/emmm.201910264. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Khaledi A, Schniederjans M, Pohl S, Rainer R, Bodenhofer U, Xia B, Klawonn F, Bruchmann S, Preusse M, Eckweiler D, Dötsch A, Häussler S. 2016. Transcriptome profiling of antimicrobial resistance in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 60:4722–4733. doi: 10.1128/AAC.00075-16. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Bruchmann S, Dotsch A, Nouri B, Chaberny IF, Haussler S. 2013. Quantitative contributions of target alteration and decreased drug accumulation to Pseudomonas aeruginosa fluoroquinolone resistance. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 57:1361–1368. doi: 10.1128/AAC.01581-12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute. 2017. Performance standards for antimicrobial susceptibility testing, 27th ed. CLSI supplement M100.27. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute, Wayne, PA. [Google Scholar]
- 33.Ramirez MS, Tolmasky ME. 2010. Aminoglycoside modifying enzymes. Drug Resist Updat 13:151–171. doi: 10.1016/j.drup.2010.08.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Bolard A, Plésiat P, Jeannot K. 2017. Mutations in gene fusA1 as a novel mechanism of aminoglycoside resistance in clinical strains of Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 62:e01835-17. doi: 10.1128/AAC.01835-17. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Martínez-García E, Aparicio T, Goñi-Moreno A, Fraile S, De Lorenzo V. 2015. SEVA 2.0: an update of the Standard European Vector Architecture for de-/re-construction of bacterial functionalities. Nucleic Acids Res 43:D1183–D1189. doi: 10.1093/nar/gku1114. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Pagès JM, Masi M, Barbe J. 2005. Inhibitors of efflux pumps in Gram-negative bacteria. Trends Mol Med 11:382–389. doi: 10.1016/j.molmed.2005.06.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Taber HW, Mueller JP, Miller PF, Arrow AS. 1987. Bacterial uptake of aminoglycoside antibiotics. Microbiol Rev 51:439–457. doi: 10.1128/MMBR.51.4.439-457.1987. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Hancock REW. 1981. Aminoglycoside uptake and mode of action-with special reference to streptomycin and gentamicin: II. Effects of aminoglycosides on cells. J Antimicrob Chemother 8:429–445. doi: 10.1093/jac/8.6.429. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Aires JR, Köhler T, Nikaido H, Plésiat P. 1999. Involvement of an active efflux system in the natural resistance of Pseudomonas aeruginosa to aminoglycosides. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 43:2624–2628. doi: 10.1128/AAC.43.11.2624. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Poole K. 2005. Aminoglycoside resistance in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 49:479–487. doi: 10.1128/AAC.49.2.479-487.2005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Langton Hewer SC, Smyth AR. 2017. Antibiotic strategies for eradicating Pseudomonas aeruginosa in people with cystic fibrosis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 4:CD004197. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004197.pub5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Fiel SB. 2014. Aerosolized antibiotics in cystic fibrosis: an update. Expert Rev Respir Med 8:305–314. doi: 10.1586/17476348.2014.896205. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Young DC, Zobell JT, Stockmann C, Waters CD, Ampofo K, Sherwin CMT, Spigarelli MG. 2013. Optimization of anti-pseudomonal antibiotics for cystic fibrosis pulmonary exacerbations: V. Aminoglycosides. Pediatr Pulmonol 48:1047–1061. doi: 10.1002/ppul.22813. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Lindsay CA, Bosso JA. 1993. Optimisation of antibiotic therapy in cystic fibrosis patients: pharmacokinetic considerations. Clin Pharmacokinet 24:496–506. doi: 10.2165/00003088-199324060-00005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Lau CH-F, Hughes D, Poole K. 2014. MexY-promoted aminoglycoside resistance in Pseudomonas aeruginosa: involvement of a putative proximal binding pocket in aminoglycoside recognition. mBio 5:e01068-14. doi: 10.1128/mBio.01068-14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Masuda N, Sakagawa E, Ohya S, Gotoh N, Tsujimoto H, Nishino T. 2000. Substrate specificities of MexAB-OprM, MexCD-OprJ, and MexXY-OprM efflux pumps in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 44:3322–3327. doi: 10.1128/aac.44.12.3322-3327.2000. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Hocquet D, Muller A, Blanc K, Plésiat P, Talon D, Monnet DL, Bertrand X. 2008. Relationship between antibiotic use and incidence of MexXY-OprM overproducers among clinical isolates of Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 52:1173–1175. doi: 10.1128/AAC.01212-07. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Llano-Sotelo B, Azucena EF, Kotra LP, Mobashery S, Chow CS. 2002. Aminoglycosides modified by resistance enzymes display diminished binding to the bacterial ribosomal aminoacyl-tRNA site. Chem Biol 9:455–463. doi: 10.1016/s1074-5521(02)00125-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Xiong YQ, Caillon J, Drugeon H, Potel G, Baron D. 1996. Influence of pH on adaptive resistance of Pseudomonas aeruginosa to aminoglycosides and their postantibiotic effects. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 40:35–39. doi: 10.1128/AAC.40.1.35. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Daikos GL, Jackson GG, Lolans VT, Livermore DM. 1990. Adaptive resistance to aminoglycoside antibiotics from first-exposure down-regulation. J Infect Dis 162:414–420. doi: 10.1093/infdis/162.2.414. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Olivares Pacheco J, Alvarez-Ortega C, Alcalde Rico M, Martínez JL. 2017. Metabolic compensation of fitness costs is a general outcome for antibiotic-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa mutants overexpressing efflux pumps. mBio 8:e00500-17. doi: 10.1128/mBio.00500-17. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Choi K-H, Schweizer HP. 2005. An improved method for rapid generation of unmarked Pseudomonas aeruginosa deletion mutants. BMC Microbiol 5:30. doi: 10.1186/1471-2180-5-30. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Ho SN, Hunt HD, Horton RM, Pullen JK, Pease LR. 1989. Site-directed mutagenesis by overlap extension using the polymerase chain reaction. Gene 77:51–59. doi: 10.1016/0378-1119(89)90358-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Hunt M, Mather AE, Sánchez-Busó L, Page AJ, Parkhill J, Keane JA, Harris SR. 2017. ARIBA: rapid antimicrobial resistance genotyping directly from sequencing reads. Microb Genom 3:10. doi: 10.1099/mgen.0.000131. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Jia B, Raphenya AR, Alcock B, Waglechner N, Guo P, Tsang KK, Lago BA, Dave BM, Pereira S, Sharma AN, Doshi S, Courtot M, Lo R, Williams LE, Frye JG, Elsayegh T, Sardar D, Westman EL, Pawlowski AC, Johnson TA, Brinkman FSL, Wright GD, McArthur AG. 2017. CARD 2017: expansion and model-centric curation of the comprehensive antibiotic resistance database. Nucleic Acids Res 45:D566–D573. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkw1004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
The RNA sequencing (RNA-Seq) data of the clinical isolates are available from NCBI’s Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO; accession no. GSE122938). The DNA sequencing (DNA-Seq) data of the clinical isolates are available from NCBI's Sequence Read Archive (SRA; accession no. PRJNA526797).