Skip to main content
Oxford University Press - PMC COVID-19 Collection logoLink to Oxford University Press - PMC COVID-19 Collection
. 2021 Jan 11:gmaa176. doi: 10.1093/abbs/gmaa176

Cardiovascular disease in patients with COVID-19: evidence from cardiovascular pathology to treatment

Jinwen Luo 1,2,, Xiao Zhu 3,, Jie Jian 4, X u Chen 5,*, Kai Yin 6,*
PMCID: PMC7929476  PMID: 33428706

Abstract

The coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19) caused by the novel coronavirus severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) has rapidly developed into a global pneumonia pandemic. At present, COVID-19 has caused more than 70,000,000 confirmed cases with over 1,500,000 deaths worldwide, as reported by WHO. Cardiovascular disease is the major comorbidity of COVID-19 patients and is closely related to the severity of COVID-19. SARS-CoV-2 infection can directly or indirectly cause a series of cardiac complications, including acute myocardial injury and myocarditis, heart failure and cardiac arrest, arrhythmia, acute myocardial infarction, cardiogenic shock, Takotsubo cardiomyopathy, and coagulation abnormalities. Intensive research on the SARS-CoV-2-associated cardiovascular complications is urgently needed to elucidate its exact mechanism and to identify potential drug targets, which will help to formulate effective prevention and treatment strategies. Hence, this review will summarize recent progress regarding the effects of COVID-19 on the cardiovascular system and describe the underlying mechanism of cardiovascular injury caused by SARS-CoV-2.

Keywords: COVID-19, SARS-CoV-2, cardiovascular disease, cardiovascular injury, treatment

Introduction

Coronaviruses (CoVs) belong to the subfamily Coronavirinae in the family Coronaviridae and the order Nidovirales and can be divided into four genera: Alpha-coronavirus (α-CoV), Beta-coronavirus (β-CoV), Gamma-coronavirus (γ-CoV), and Delta-coronavirus (δ-CoV) [1,2,3]. It is known that only α-CoV and β-CoV can infect humans. In the past two decades, two outbreaks of atypical pneumonia caused by β-CoVs (SARS-CoV and MERS-CoV) were severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus (SARS) and Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus (MERS) [4,5]. Since the end of December 2019, an outbreak of novel coronavirus pneumonia was first reported in Wuhan city, Hubei Province, China, but the original source of the virus is not yet known. This newly emerged SARS-CoV-2 belongs to the β-CoV lineage B and is closely related to the SARS-CoV. It has been found that the genome sequence of SARS-CoV-2 shares more than 80% identical to those of SARS-CoV and bat SARS-like coronavirus [6,7]. Thus, it is believed that SARS-CoV-2 originates from bats and may infect humans through an unknown intermediate host.

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has rapidly developed into a pandemic. Cardiovascular comorbidities are common in patients infected with SARS-CoV-2. The infection of SARS-CoV-2 can directly or indirectly cause cardiovascular injury in COVID-19 patients. In addition, some antiviral drugs used for the treatment of COVID-19 have potential side effects on the cardiovascular system. These factors may lead to a significant increase in mortality rate in patients with COVID-19. Thus, it is necessary to attach great importance to cardiovascular complications in COVID-19 patients. In this review, we describe the impacts of COVID-19 on the cardiovascular system, the underlying mechanism of cardiovascular injury caused by SARS-CoV-2, and therapeutic strategies for cardiovascular complications in patients with COVID-19.

Structure and Genome of SARS-CoV-2

The SARS-CoV-2 genome (29,870 bp, excluding the poly (A) tail) is an enveloped, positive single-stranded RNA virus that includes 14 open reading frames (ORFs). The first two ORFs, ORF1a and ORF1b, representing approximately 67% of the entire genome that encodes 16 nonstructural proteins, while the remaining ORFs encode four structural proteins and eight accessory proteins (3a, 3b, p6, 7a, 7b, 8b, 9b, and ORF14) [8–10]. The four structural proteins are the spike surface glycoprotein (S), nucleocapsid protein (N), envelope protein (E), and membrane protein (M), which are essential for the assembly and infection of SARS-CoV-2. Homotrimers of S proteins make up the distinctive spike structure on the surface of the virus, which is crucial for mediating receptor recognition and membrane fusion [11,12]. Notably, angiotensin-converting enzyme II (ACE2) serves as a key receptor that mediates the entry of SARS-CoV-2 into the host cell [13–15]. During viral infection, the trimeric S protein can be further cleaved by a host cell furin-like protease into S1 and S2 subunits. S1 contains a receptor-binding domain that directly binds to the peptidase domain of ACE2, while S2 is responsible for membrane fusion [16–18] (Fig. 1). Wrapp et al. [19] revealed that the binding affinity of SARS-CoV-2 spike protein to ACE2 is approximately 10- to 20-fold higher than that of SARS-CoV, making it easier to spread from human to human. ACE2 is widely distributed and is expressed in abundance in the lungs, blood vessels, and heart [20–22], suggesting that SARS-CoV-2 could infect the cardiovascular system by the human receptor ACE2.

Figure 1.

Figure 1.

SARS-CoV-2 infects cardiomyocytes through the receptor ACE2 (A) Structure of SARS-CoV-2. Four structural proteins are as follows: spike protein (S-purple), nucleocapsid protein (N-blue), membrane protein (M-orange), and envelope protein (E-green). (B) SARS-CoV-2 enters cardiomyocytes through the receptor ACE2 and then undergoes internalization, membrane fusion, viral RNA release, replication, and assembly, thus completing the life cycle.

Impact of COVID-19 Infection on the Cardiovascular System

Apart from respiratory symptoms, many patients have cardiovascular symptoms, such as heart palpitations and chest tightness/pain, as the initial clinical manifestation of COVID-19 [23–27]. Moreover, several studies also showed that COVID-19 can exacerbate preexisting cardiovascular disease and/or cause new cardiovascular injuries [28,29]. COVID-19 patients with underlying cardiovascular diseases (hypertension, coronary heart disease, heart failure, etc.) displayed more severe clinical outcomes and higher mortalities [30–32]. These clinical findings indicated pronounced cardiovascular sequelae for SARS-CoV-2 infection. Therefore, it is important to identify cardiac-related manifestations in patients with COVID-19. The causal association between COVID-19 and cardiovascular abnormities is summarized in Fig. 2.

Figure 2.

Figure 2.

Schematic diagram of the underlying mechanism of cardiovascular injury caused by SARS-CoV-2 infection SARS-CoV-2 infection can cause cardiovascular injury through multiple mechanisms, including direct injury, downregulation of ACE2, immune injury, hypoxia injury, and psychological injury.

Acute myocardial injury and myocarditis

Acute myocardial injury can be caused by myocarditis and myocardial ischemia, which is mainly manifested by elevated troponin levels [33,34]. Ruan et al. [28] reported that SARS-CoV-2 infection can trigger fulminant myocarditis, resulting in acute myocardial injury in patients with COVID-19. Myocardial injury has also been described in 5 of the first 41 patients diagnosed with COVID-19 in Wuhan, China, with elevated serum high-sensitivity cardiac troponin I (hs-cTnI) levels (>28 ng/l) [35]. In this study, four of five patients with myocardial injury were admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU), accounting for 31% of the total number of ICU patients. Moreover, the mean systolic blood pressure in ICU patients was 145 mmHg, which was significantly higher than that of non-ICU patients (122 mmHg) [35]. Another report of 150 patients with COVID-19 in Wuhan, including 126 mild cases and 24 severe cases, showed that N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide, hs-cTnI, high-sensitivity CRP, and serum creatinine levels were higher in severe cases than in mild cases [36]. In addition, Wang et al. [37] reported a single-center case series of 138 hospitalized patients with COVID-19 in Wuhan, of which 36 patients with severe symptoms were treated in the ICU. The levels of myocardial injury biomarkers (hs-cTnI and creatine kinase) were markedly higher in ICU/severe cases than in their non-ICU counterparts [37]. Taken together, these studies suggest that the severity of COVID-19 is implicated in the occurrence of acute myocardial injury. It is therefore essential to monitor and manage myocardial injury in patients with severe COVID-19.

Heart failure and cardiac arrest

Virus infection is an important cause of aggravating heart failure or inducing acute heart failure. Previous reports have suggested that SARS-CoV and MERS-CoV infection can cause or aggravate heart failure [38–40]. Recently, a clinical study of 99 cases with confirmed COVID-19 from Wuhan showed that 11 (11%) patients had died of which 2 patients had no previous history of chronic heart disease but developed heart failure and eventually died of a sudden cardiac arrest [27]. Additionally, Chen et al. [26] reported that cardiac complications were observed more frequently in 113 deceased patients with COVID-19, including acute cardiac injury (72/94; 77%) and heart failure (41/83; 49%). Furthermore, regardless of the history of cardiovascular disease, heart failure is a common cardiac complication in deceased patients [26]. For heart failure reported in these articles, the possibility of right heart failure and associated pulmonary hypertension should be considered. Lung involvement in patients with COVID-19 can cause ventilation–perfusion mismatch and a decrease in pulmonary vascular beds. Then, microvascular occlusion and reduced functional residual capacity increase pulmonary vascular resistance, resulting in pulmonary hypertension and right heart failure. In order to reduce case fatality rate, it is necessary to attach great importance to the treatment and prevention of heart failure in patients with COVID-19.

Arrhythmia

Arrhythmias are common cardiac manifestations described in COVID-19 patients. It has been reported that a 55-day-old female infant infected with SARS-CoV-2 had tachycardia (150–170 beats per minute) [41]. Heart palpitations were also reported to be one of the initial symptoms in some patients with COVID-19 [25], which indicates the possibility of arrhythmia caused by SARS-CoV-2 infection. Moreover, a report of 138 hospitalized patients with COVID-19 in Wuhan, China, showed that 23 patients had arrhythmias, of which 16 (44.4%) were admitted to the ICU [37]. In addition, Cao et al. [42] also reported that patients with COVID-19 in ICU were more likely to suffer from arrhythmia (ICU 38.9% vs non-ICU 13.1%). These studies suggest that arrhythmia is one of the important cardiac complications in patients with severe COVID-19. However, the types of arrhythmia and specific ECG changes in COVID-19 patients have not been published or presented. Of note, arrhythmia can occur in patients with COVID-19, but the manifestations related to arrhythmia may be masked by respiratory symptoms. Therefore, patients with severe COVID-19 should be closely monitored for paroxysmal tachycardia or increased pulse rate that does not match the disease status.

Acute myocardial infarction

Acute myocardial infarction is a critical manifestation of coronary heart disease and has been reported as a common cardiac complication in patients with viral pneumonia [43–45]. Recently, a retrospective cohort study of 191 patients with confirmed COVID-19 showed that 15 (8%) patients had coronary heart disease [29]. Data from the National Health Commission of China showed that 17% of patients diagnosed with COVID-19 had coronary heart disease [46]. Notably, several studies showed that patients with severe COVID-19 had increased coagulation activity, marked by elevated D-dimer concentrations (>1 g/l) [26,29]. Local inflammation, induction of procoagulant factors, and hemodynamic changes may increase the risk of atherosclerotic plaque rupture, resulting in acute myocardial infarction. Thus, the highly contagious COVID-19 pneumonia may be closely related to the occurrence of acute myocardial infarction.

Takotsubo cardiomyopathy

Takotsubo cardiomyopathy, also called stress-induced cardiomyopathy, is a clinical syndrome characterized by acute and transient regional left ventricular systolic dysfunction usually triggered by physical or emotional stressors including infections [29,47]. The COVID-19 pandemic has caused an unprecedented health crisis, leading to anxiety, distress, and fear, with emerging cardiovascular implications. Several studies have noted the occurrence of Takotsubo cardiomyopathy in patients infected with COVID-19. In a retrospective cohort study involving 1914 patients with COVID-19, the incidence of Takotsubo cardiomyopathy increased significantly by 7.8% during the COVID-19 pandemic, compared with prepandemic incidences that ranged from 1.5% to 1.8% [48]. Meanwhile, among 21 patients with severe COVID-19, seven (33.3%) patients developed dilated cardiomyopathy, characterized by reduced left ventricular systolic function, without a past history of systolic dysfunction [49]. In addition, a number of the drugs used in COVID-19 may also cause cardiomyopathy, including IFN, bevacizumab, and chloroquine [50,51]. Thus, the current pandemic scenario of COVID-19 may represent an important trigger for Takotsubo cardiomyopathy, not only due to the respiratory infection, but by the profound psychological and emotional stress caused by the isolation period resulting in an excessive release of catecholamines.

Coagulation abnormalities

Patients with COVID-19 are more likely to have an elevated risk of arterial and venous thromboembolism due to a state of endothelial dysfunction, vascular inflammation, and hypercoagulability associated with SARS-CoV-2 infection [52]. Abnormal coagulation parameters, such as prothrombin time, fibrin degradation products, activated partial thromboplastin time, and D-dimer, were noted in patients with COVID-19. In particular, increased levels of fibrin degradation products and D-dimer were suggested to be closely associated with poor prognosis [52,53]. In an early report involving 1099 patients with COVID-19 from China, 46% of patients had elevated D-dimer levels (>0.5 mg/l) (60% of those with severe illness) [54]. Moreover, another report showed that fibrin degradation products and D-dimer levels were significantly higher in COVID-19 non-survivors compared to survivors, and 71.4% of non-survivors met clinical criteria for disseminated intravascular coagulation during the course of their disease [53]. Similarly, a small observational study involving 184 critically ill patients with COVID-19 revealed a 31% incidence of radiologically confirmed thrombotic complications (4% arterial and 27% venous) [55]. In addition, levels of factor VIII and fibrinogen were elevated in COVID-19 patients, suggesting a hypercoagulable state [56,57]. These studies suggest that a substantial proportion of patients with COVID-19 have coagulation abnormalities, which may contribute to the development of multiple cardiovascular manifestations of COVID-19.

Cardiogenic shock

Cardiogenic shock has been reported as a late complication of COVID-19. In seven patients with confirmed COVID-19, new-onset biventricular failure and vasoplegia were noted, prior to the development of severe cardiogenic shock [58]. Tavazzi et al. [59] reported a case of acute cardiac injury directly linked to myocardial localization of SARS-CoV-2 in a 69-year-old patient with flu-like symptoms rapidly degenerating into cardiogenic shock. Cardiogenic shock may be an uncommon but life-threatening complication of a SARS-CoV-2 infection. In a study by Yu et al. [60] among 226 patients admitted to an ICU for severe COVID-19, three (1.3%) patients developed cardiogenic shock. Besides, cardiogenic shock is often mixed with other types of shock following SARS-CoV-2 infection, such as vasoplegic shock [58,61]. Of note, circulatory and respiratory support with a combination of extracorporeal membranous oxygenation (ECMO) and percutaneous ventricular assist device should be considered in COVID-19 patients with a combined cardiogenic and vasoplegic shock.

Characteristics of Cardiovascular Pathology in Patients with COVID-19

Recently, by obtaining biopsy samples at autopsy, Xu et al. [62] investigated the pathological characteristics of the first patient who died from severe COVID-19. It was found that the pathological features of COVID-19 are related to myocardial inflammation and damage. The heart biopsy specimens of the patient with COVID-19 showed degeneration and necrosis of myocardial cells. Moreover, there were a few interstitial inflammatory infiltrates in the heart tissue, including monocytes, lymphocytes, and neutrophils [62]. In addition, if patients infected with COVID-19 have the underlying cardiovascular diseases (hypertension, coronary heart disease, etc.), the pathological characteristics may include vascular endothelial cell shedding, endovascular inflammation, and thrombosis. Notably, patients with COVID-19 have a large amount of mucus exudation in the lungs, which may affect heart function. Whether this has a specific effect on cardiovascular pathology needs further investigation. Taken together, understanding the characteristics of cardiovascular pathology in patients with COVID-19 may help provide new insights into the pathogenesis of cardiovascular disease caused by SARS-CoV-2 infection, which may help physicians to formulate a timely strategy for the treatment of patients with cardiovascular complications and to reduce mortality.

Mechanisms of Cardiovascular Injury in Patients with COVID-19

The mechanisms of cardiovascular injury caused by SARS-CoV-2 infection have not been fully elucidated, but it is speculated that SARS-CoV-2 affects the cardiovascular system through multiple mechanisms, including direct injury, downregulation of ACE2, immune injury, hypoxia injury, and psychological injury.

Direct injury

Although CoVs usually infect the respiratory tract, shedding of the virus in plasma or serum is common. Several studies showed that SARS-CoV-2 viral RNA is readily detected in the blood [63–65]. Importantly, the presence of viral RNA in the blood is positively correlated with COVID-19 severity [63]. Therefore, SARS-CoV-2 can directly infect cardiomyocytes through blood circulation. Direct SARS-CoV-2 infection can trigger inflammation, apoptosis, and necrosis of cardiomyocytes, thereby resulting in acute myocardial injury and myocarditis.

Downregulation of ACE2

The renin-angiotensin system (RAS) has been implicated in the development of cardiovascular disease. ACE2, a pivotal component of the RAS, was first discovered in 2000 [66]. ACE2, the first known human homologue of ACE, catalyzes the cleavage of Angiotensin I (Ang I) to Ang 1–9 and Ang II to Ang 1–7, the latter has beneficial effects on cardiovascular diseases, such as improving heart function, regulating blood pressure, and resisting atherosclerosis [67–71]. Therefore, ACE2 protects the cardiovascular system by degrading Ang II and increasing Ang 1–7. It is noteworthy that ACE2 is also an important target for SARS-CoV and SARS-CoV-2 infections. It has been reported that mice infected with human SARS-CoV trigger an ACE2-dependent myocardial infection with a significant reduction in ACE2 expression [72]. The presence of SARS-CoV in the hearts of deceased patients was also associated with a marked decrease in ACE2 protein expression [72], suggesting a key role of ACE2 in mediating SARS-CoV infection in the heart. Besides, SARS-CoV infection and the spike protein of SARS-CoV were found to reduce ACE2 expression and elevate Ang II levels [73,74], thereby increasing the risk of cardiovascular events. Recently, several studies showed that SARS-CoV-2 infection, expression, and replication are also closely related to its host cell receptor ACE2 [75,76]. The plasma levels of Ang II from SARS-CoV-2-infected patients were significantly elevated and linearly associated with viral load [77]. Therefore, the downregulation of ACE2 expression by SARS-CoV-2 infection may be an important cause of cardiovascular injury.

Immune injury

The immune response is likely to be highly involved in the process of SARS-CoV-2-related cardiac injuries. Upon entry into cardiomyocytes, SARS-CoV-2 rapidly replicates and triggers a strong immune response, which results in cytokine storm syndromes and heart tissue damage. Cytokine storm syndromes, also known as hypercytokinemia, are a group of disorders featured by excessive activation of T cells and uncontrolled production of pro-inflammatory cytokines largely due to viral infections [78–80]. Recently, accumulating evidence suggests that a number of patients with severe COVID-19 may have a cytokine storm syndrome, represented by elevated plasma levels of pro-inflammatory cytokines (IFN-γ, TNF-α, IL-6, IL-8, IL-12, MCP1, etc.) [27,35,81,82]. Moreover, Xu et al. [62] reported that CD4 and CD8 T cells in peripheral blood of patients with COVID-19 were over-activated, as manifested by the high proportions of HLA-DR (CD4 3.47%) and CD38 (CD8 39.4%) double-positive fractions. In addition, the concentration of pro-inflammatory CCR4+CCR6+Th17 is high in CD4 T cells [62]. These studies suggest severe immune injury caused by SARS-CoV-2 infection. Notably, cytokine storm syndromes trigger rupture or erosion of coronary plaques, thereby resulting in acute myocardial infarction and ventricular dysfunction [83–87]. Previous studies have revealed that patients with SARS have substantial left ventricular dysfunction due to the cytokine storm resulting from an overaggressive host immune response to SARS-CoV infection [88]. Therefore, SARS-CoV-2 infection can cause cardiovascular injury by inducing immune injury and cytokine storm.

Hypoxia injury

Hypoxemia is a common clinical manifestation of cardiac and pulmonary diseases. Numerous studies have shown that patients with severe COVID-19 have hypoxemia [54,89–91]. These critically ill patients usually require oxygen therapy, mechanical ventilation, and ECMO for respiratory support therapy. Thus, severe pneumonia caused by SARS-CoV-2 infection may impair gas exchange, eventually resulting in hypoxemia. SARS-CoV-2 infection-induced hypoxia injury may trigger pulmonary vasoconstriction and pulmonary hypertension, leading to cardiac insufficiency and heart failure [92,93]. Furthermore, hypoxia injury is likely to lead to secondary myocardial injury, thereby aggravating the impairment of cardiac function. Therefore, hypoxia injury may be an important mechanism of cardiovascular injury caused by SARS-CoV-2 infection.

Psychological injury

It has been reported that patients with COVID-19 pneumonia have different degrees of psychological pain, such as depression, fear, stress, and anxiety, which may affect the development and prognosis of the disease [94–96]. These physical and psychological stress processes could stimulate sympathetic nerve activity and enhance the release of catecholamines, causing a variety of cardiovascular dysfunctions, such as myocardial injury, cardiomyopathy, hypertension, coronary artery vasoconstriction, arrhythmia, and increased microvascular resistance [97,98]. Therefore, psychological injury is also a non-negligible factor causing cardiovascular injury in patients with COVID-19.

Role of General Practitioners in the Prevention and Control of Cardiovascular Disease during the Outbreak of COVID-19

During the COVID-19 outbreak, general practitioners working in the community were both gatekeepers and health promoters [99]. General practitioners are engaged in three phases of response to cardiovascular disease prevention and control in the fight against the COVID-19 outbreak. In phase 1, general practitioners help block the transmission of SARS-CoV-2 by monitoring people at designated checkpoints. In phase 2, general practitioners help identify high-risk groups with cardiovascular disease, and these groups will be specifically labeled for cardiovascular disease in their personal health files. If these people have a SARS-CoV-2 infection, general practitioners could conduct the initial treatment and then transfer patients timely to the hospital. In phase 3, general practitioners help provide rehabilitation for critically ill patients. Also, they help provide psychological counseling and support to the community, to eliminate fears and panic. Thus, general practitioners play a unique and irreplaceable role in the prevention and control of cardiovascular disease during the COVID-19 epidemic.

Drug Therapy for Cardiovascular Complications in Patients with COVID-19

Antiviral therapy

Although there are currently no specific effective therapies for COVID-19, various antiviral drugs are under active investigation. Of note, some antiviral drugs have been screened potentially for the treatment of COVID-19. Remdesivir is a nucleoside analogue prodrug with the broad-spectrum antiviral activity that interrupts virus RNA replication. It has been reported that remdesivir potently inhibits SARS-CoV-2 replication in vitro at low micromolar concentrations [100]. The first confirmed COVID-19 case in the USA was treated with intravenous remdesivir when the patient’s clinical condition was getting worse [101]. Similar to remdesivir, ribavirin and arbidol also prevent the replication of RNA viruses and have been reported to produce certain benefits in the treatment of COVID-19 pneumonia [102–104]. Chloroquine, a widely used antimalarial and autoimmune disease drug, has been demonstrated to have in vitro activity against SARS-CoV-2 [100]. Moreover, the therapeutic benefit of chloroquine for patients with COVID-19 was described in clinical studies [105]. Additionally, lopinavir/ritonavir, a protease inhibitor that can suppress the replication and synthesis of the HIV, was reported to improve the outcome of critically ill patients with SARS by alleviating ARDS [106]. It has been reported that lopinavir/ritonavir can successfully treat COVID-19, although the first randomized open-label trial showed that the benefits of lopinavir/ritonavir treatment do not go beyond standard care [107]. In this study, lopinavir/ritonavir resulted in a median time to clinical improvement that was 1 day shorter than the standard care group [107].

Antiviral drug-induced cardiotoxicity during the treatment of COVID-19 deserves attention. A rare but serious side effect of chloroquine therapy is cardiotoxicity. It has been reported that chloroquine in overdose (as in self-poisoning or when given by rapid intravenous administration) can cause hypotension, arrhythmias, and conduction disturbances [108–110]. In addition, the protease inhibitor lopinavir/ritonavir is also linked to increased risk of cardiovascular disease. It has been reported that lopinavir/ritonavir could cause hyperlipidemia and promote endothelial cell dysfunction [111–113], thereby increasing the risk of cardiovascular events. Therefore, it is necessary to closely monitor and manage the cardiotoxicity in patients undergoing antiviral therapy.

RAS inhibitors

ACE inhibitors (ACEIs) and Ang II receptor blockers (ARBs), as inhibitors of the RAS, are widely utilized in the treatment of cardiovascular diseases, such as hypertension, myocardial infarction, and heart failure. Importantly, the ACE2 receptor is the key entry point for SARS-CoV-2. There are concerns about the treatment with RAS inhibitors that may have the potential to upregulate ACE2 and increase the risk of developing a severe and fatal SARS-CoV-2 infection. However, ACEIs increase Ang I and decrease Ang II levels by inhibiting ACE, not ACE2 (Fig. 3). It has been reported that ACEIs in clinical use do not directly affect the activity of ACE2 [114]. Although ARBs have been shown to upregulate ACE2 in animal studies, this would not establish that it is sufficient to promote SARS-CoV-2 entry [115–117]. Moreover, Meng et al. [118] observed that COVID-19 patients with hypertension receiving ACEIs or ARBs therapy had a lower rate of severe diseases and a trend toward lower levels of CRP and IL-6 in peripheral blood. Meanwhile, ACEIs or ARBs therapy could significantly increase CD3+ and CD8+ T cell counts in peripheral blood and reduce the peak viral load [118], suggesting that RAS inhibitors could facilitate immune recovery of COVID-19 patients. Studies have revealed that patients with COVID-19 have increased Ang II levels compared to healthy people [77]. Therefore, these studies support the benefits of using ACEIs or ARBs to improve the clinical outcomes of patients with COVID-19 complicated by cardiovascular diseases. It is strongly recommended that COVID-19 patients who are taking ACEIs or ARBs for hypertension, heart failure, or other medical indications should not be discontinued.

Figure 3.

Figure 3.

Schematic diagram of the role of the RAS in cardiovascular injury and proposed SARS-CoV-2 action Renin catalyzes angiotensinogen to generate Ang I. The production of Ang II from Ang I is enhanced by ACE, and Ang II induces cardiovascular injury by stimulation of the AT1R, while ACE2 negatively regulates this pathway and protects against cardiovascular injury. By contrast, SARS-CoV-2 infection is mediated by the binding of spike protein to ACE2 and downregulates the protective molecule ACE2, thereby resulting in cardiovascular injury. ACEIs and ARBs, as inhibitors of the RAS, can inhibit ACE and AT1R, respectively, thus reducing cardiovascular injury.

Tocilizumab

Tocilizumab is a humanized anti-IL-6 receptor (IL-6R) monoclonal antibody that effectively blocks IL-6R-mediated signal transduction. IL-6 is the key molecule of cytokine storm syndromes and its level is markedly elevated in patients with COVID-19 [29,119]. Thus, tocilizumab may be a promising therapeutic option for patients with COVID-19 by virtue of its ability to inhibit cytokine storm syndromes. A multicenter, randomized controlled trial of tocilizumab (IL-6 receptor blockade) has also been approved in patients with COVID-19 and elevated IL-6 in China (ChiCTR2000029765) [120]. In addition, it is noteworthy that tocilizumab therapy can decrease hepatic LDL receptor expression and increase serum LDL cholesterol, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, and triglyceride levels [121], which may increase the risk of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. Thus, it is necessary to monitor the changes in lipid profile when tocilizumab is used for the treatment of COVID-19 patients with cardiovascular disease.

Statins

Statins are widely used for the secondary prevention of patients with coronary heart disease and have the effects of lowering lipids, anti-inflammation, and stabilizing plaque. Thus, statins can be used for the treatment and prevention of cardiovascular disease in patients with COVID-19. Notably, rhabdomyolysis was reported as an important side effect of statin therapy, and this risk is greater with concurrent use of drugs that suppress cytochrome p450-3A4 (CYP3A4), such as lopinavir and ritonavir [122]. Thus, statins should not be used together with lopinavir/ritonavir for patients with COVID-19.

Other treatments

Other treatments include antiplatelet therapy, diuretics, and calcium antagonists. Blood pressure and heart rate should be closely monitored when calcium antagonists are used in combination with other antiviral drugs. In addition, some drugs, such as coenzyme Q, vitamin C, and creatine phosphate sodium, may be used for myocardial protection and myocardial nutrition in patients with COVID-19.

Conclusion

The COVID-19 pandemic has caused a large number of deaths with over 70,000,000 confirmed cases worldwide, posing a serious threat to public health. Cardiovascular disease is a common comorbidity in patients with COVID-19 and such patients are at higher risk of severe disease and mortality. SARS-CoV-2 triggers viral infection–related heart damage by multiple mechanisms, such as direct injury, downregulation of ACE2, immune injury, hypoxia injury, and psychological injury. Therefore, it is necessary to continue to monitor the cardiovascular complications of COVID-19 and identify the risk factors for poor prognosis (e.g. age, smoking, obesity, blood pressure, etc.). Moreover, general practitioners will play an important role in the prevention and control of cardiovascular disease during the outbreak of COVID-19. They also conduct daily health monitoring and provide counseling for the patients’ psychological problems. Many COVID-19 patients complicated by cardiovascular disease are treated with ACEIs/ARBs, and clinical studies are necessary to explore the potential relationship between ACEIs/ARBs and COVID-19 prognosis. In addition, it is noteworthy that COVID-19 may become a chronic epidemic like seasonal influenza due to genetic recombination. Therefore, the design and development of vaccines and monoclonal antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 are also needed.

Contributor Information

Jinwen Luo, The Department of Cardio-thoracic Surgery, Hunan Children’s Hospital, Changsha 410007, China; Guangxi Key Laboratory of Diabetic Systems Medicine, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Guilin Medical University, Guilin 541100, China.

Xiao Zhu, Guangxi Key Laboratory of Diabetic Systems Medicine, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Guilin Medical University, Guilin 541100, China.

Jie Jian, College of Pharmacy, Guilin Medical University, Guilin 541004, China.

X u Chen, College of Pharmacy, Guilin Medical University, Guilin 541004, China.

Kai Yin, Guangxi Key Laboratory of Diabetic Systems Medicine, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Guilin Medical University, Guilin 541100, China.

Funding

This work was supported by the grants from the National Natural Sciences Foundation of China (Nos. 81970390 and 81470569), the Innovation Foundation for Postgraduate of Hunan Province (Nos. CX2017B550 and CX2016B490), the Natural Science Foundation of Hunan Province, China (No. 2018JJ2341), and the National College Students Innovation and Entrepreneurship Fund (Nos. 201710555015 and 201710555010).

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  • 1. Cui  J, Li  F, Shi  ZL. Origin and evolution of pathogenic coronaviruses. Nat Rev Microbiol  2019, 17: 181–192. doi: 10.1038/s41579-018-0118-9 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Su  S, Wong  G, Shi  W, Liu  J, Lai  ACK, Zhou  J, Liu  W, et al.  Epidemiology, genetic recombination, and pathogenesis of coronaviruses. Trends Microbiol  2016, 24: 490–502. doi: 10.1016/j.tim.2016.03.003 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Yang  D, Leibowitz  JL. The structure and functions of coronavirus genomic 3′ and 5′ ends. Virus Res  2015, 206: 120–133. doi: 10.1016/j.virusres.2015.02.025 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Drosten  C, Günther  S, Preiser  W, van der Werf  S, Brodt  HR, Becker  S, Rabenau  H, et al.  Identification of a novel coronavirus in patients with severe acute respiratory syndrome. N Engl J Med  2003, 348: 1967–1976. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa030747 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Zaki  AM, van Boheemen  S, Bestebroer  TM, Osterhaus  AD, Fouchier  RA. Isolation of a novel coronavirus from a man with pneumonia in Saudi Arabia. N Engl J Med  2012, 367: 1814–1820. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1211721 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Zhou  P, Yang  XL, Wang  XG, Hu  B, Zhang  L, Zhang  W, Si  HR, et al.  A pneumonia outbreak associated with a new coronavirus of probable bat origin. Nature  2020, 579: 270–273. doi: 10.1038/s41586-020-2012-7 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Lu  R, Zhao  X, Li  J, Niu  P, Yang  B, Wu  H, Wang  W, et al.  Genomic characterisation and epidemiology of 2019 novel coronavirus: implications for virus origins and receptor binding. Lancet  2020, 395: 565–574. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30251-8 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Wu  A, Peng  Y, Huang  B, Ding  X, Wang  X, Niu  P, Meng  J, et al.  Genome composition and divergence of the novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV) originating in China. Cell Host Microbe  2020, 27: 325–328. doi: 10.1016/j.chom.2020.02.001 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Chan  JF, Kok  KH, Zhu  Z, Chu  H, To  KK, Yuan  S, Yuen  KY. Genomic characterization of the 2019 novel human-pathogenic coronavirus isolated from a patient with atypical pneumonia after visiting Wuhan. Emerg Microbes Infect  2020, 9: 221–236. doi: 10.1080/22221751.2020.1719902 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Shang  W, Yang  Y, Rao  Y, Rao  X. The outbreak of SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia calls for viral vaccines. NPJ Vaccines  2020, 5: 18. doi: 10.1038/s41541-020-0170-0 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Li  F. Structure, function, and evolution of coronavirus spike proteins. Annu Rev Virol  2016, 3: 237–261. doi: 10.1146/annurev-virology-110615-042301 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Rothan  HA, Byrareddy  SN. The epidemiology and pathogenesis of coronavirus disease (COVID-19) outbreak. J Autoimmun  2020, 109: 102433. doi: 10.1016/j.jaut.2020.102433 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Yan  R, Zhang  Y, Li  Y, Xia  L, Guo  Y, Zhou  Q. Structural basis for the recognition of SARS-CoV-2 by full-length human ACE2. Science  2020, 367: 1444–1448. doi: 10.1126/science.abb2762 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Hoffmann  M, Kleine-Weber  H, Schroeder  S, Krüger  N, Herrler  T, Erichsen  S, Schiergens  TS, et al.  SARS-CoV-2 cell entry depends on ACE2 and TMPRSS2 and is blocked by a clinically proven protease inhibitor. Cell  2020, 181: 271–280.e8. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2020.02.052 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15. Letko  M, Marzi  A, Munster  V. Functional assessment of cell entry and receptor usage for SARS-CoV-2 and other lineage B betacoronaviruses. Nat Microbiol  2020, 5: 562–569. doi: 10.1038/s41564-020-0688-y [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16. Song  W, Gui  M, Wang  X, Xiang  Y. Cryo-EM structure of the SARS coronavirus spike glycoprotein in complex with its host cell receptor ACE2. PLoS Pathog  2018, 14: e1007236. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1007236 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17. Li  F, Li  W, Farzan  M, Harrison  SC. Structure of SARS coronavirus spike receptor-binding domain complexed with receptor. Science  2005, 309: 1864–1868. doi: 10.1126/science.1116480 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18. Walls  AC, Park  YJ, Tortorici  MA, Wall  A, McGuire  AT, Veesler  D. Structure, function, and antigenicity of the SARS-CoV-2 spike glycoprotein. Cell  2020, 181: 281–292.e6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19. Wrapp  D, Wang  N, Corbett  KS, Goldsmith  JA, Hsieh  CL, Abiona  O, Graham  BS, et al.  Cryo-EM structure of the 2019-nCoV spike in the prefusion conformation. Science  2020, 367: 1260–1263. doi: 10.1126/science.abb2507 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20. Zou  X, Chen  K, Zou  J, Han  P, Hao  J, Z.  H. Single-cell RNA-seq data analysis on the receptor ACE2 expression reveals the potential risk of different human organs vulnerable to 2019-nCoV infection. Front Med  2020, 14: 185–192. doi: 10.1007/s11684-020-0754-0 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21. Zhou  X, Zhang  P, Liang  T, Chen  Y, Liu  D, Yu  H. Relationship between circulating levels of angiotensin-converting enzyme 2-angiotensin-(1-7)-MAS axis and coronary heart disease. Heart Vessels  2020, 35: 153–161. doi: 10.1007/s00380-019-01478-y [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22. Hamming  I, Timens  W, Bulthuis  ML, Lely  AT, Navis  G, van Goor  H. Tissue distribution of ACE2 protein, the functional receptor for SARS coronavirus. A first step in understanding SARS pathogenesis. J Pathol  2004, 203: 631–637. doi: 10.1002/path.1570 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23. Deng  SQ, Peng  HJ. Characteristics of and public health responses to the coronavirus disease 2019 outbreak in China. J Clin Med  2020, 9: 575. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24. Wei  J, Xu  H, Xiong  J, Shen  Q, Fan  B, Ye  C, Dong  W, et al.  2019 novel coronavirus (COVID-19) pneumonia: serial computed tomography findings. Korean J Radiol  2020, 21: 501–504. doi: 10.3348/kjr.2020.0112 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25. Liu  K, Fang  YY, Deng  Y, Liu  W, Wang  MF, Ma  JP, Xiao  W, et al.  Clinical characteristics of novel coronavirus cases in tertiary hospitals in Hubei Province. Chin Med J (Engl)  2020, 133: 1025–1031. doi: 10.1097/CM9.0000000000000744 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26. Chen  T, Wu  D, Chen  H, Yan  W, Yang  D, Chen  G, Ma  K, et al.  Clinical characteristics of 113 deceased patients with coronavirus disease 2019: retrospective study. BMJ  2020, 368: m1091. doi: 10.1136/bmj.m1091 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27. Chen  N, Zhou  M, Dong  X, Qu  J, Gong  F, Han  Y, Qiu  Y, et al.  Epidemiological and clinical characteristics of 99 cases of 2019 novel coronavirus pneumonia in Wuhan, China: a descriptive study. Lancet  2020, 395: 507–513. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30211-7 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28. Ruan  Q, Yang  K, Wang  W, Jiang  L, Song  J. Clinical predictors of mortality due to COVID-19 based on an analysis of data of 150 patients from Wuhan, China. Intensive Care Med  2020, 46: 846–848. doi: 10.1007/s00134-020-05991-x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29. Zhou  F, Yu  T, Du  R, Fan  G, Liu  Y, Liu  Z, Xiang  J, et al.  Clinical course and risk factors for mortality of adult in patients with COVID-19 in Wuhan, China: a retrospective cohort study. Lancet  2020, 395: 1054–1062. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30566-3 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30. Grasselli  G, Zangrillo  A, Zanella  A, Antonelli  M, Cabrini  L, Castelli  A, Cereda  D, et al.  Baseline characteristics and outcomes of 1591 patients infected with SARS-CoV-2 admitted to ICUs of the Lombardy Region, Italy. JAMA  2020, 323: 1574–1581. doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.5394 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31. Wu  Z, McGoogan  JM. Characteristics of and important lessons from the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) outbreak in China: summary of a report of 72 314 cases from the Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention. JAMA  2020, 323: 1239–1242. doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.2648 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32. Li  B, Yang  J, Zhao  F, Zhi  L, Wang  X, Liu  L, Bi  Z, et al.  Prevalence and impact of cardiovascular metabolic diseases on COVID-19 in China. Clin Res Cardiol  2020, 109: 531–538. doi: 10.1007/s00392-020-01626-9 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33. Sandoval  Y, Smith  SW, Sexter  A, Thordsen  SE, Bruen  CA, Carlson  MD, Dodd  KW, et al.  Type 1 and 2 myocardial infarction and myocardial injury: clinical transition to high-sensitivity cardiac troponin I. Am J Med  2017, 130: 1431–1439.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2017.05.049 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34. Sarkisian  L, Saaby  L, Poulsen  TS, Gerke  O, Jangaard  N, Hosbond  S, Diederichsen  AC, et al.  Clinical characteristics and outcomes of patients with myocardial infarction, myocardial injury, and nonelevated troponins. Am J Med  2016, 129: 446.e5–446.e21. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2015.11.006 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35. Huang  C, Wang  Y, Li  X, Ren  L, Zhao  J, Hu  Y, Zhang  L, et al.  Clinical features of patients infected with 2019 novel coronavirus in Wuhan, China. Lancet  2020, 395: 497–506. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30183-5 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36. Chen  C, Chen  C, Yan  JT, Zhou  N, Zhao  JP, Wang  DW. Analysis of myocardial injury in patients with COVID-19 and association between concomitant cardiovascular diseases and severity of COVID-19. Zhonghua Xin Xue Guan Bing Za Zhi  2020, 48: 567–571. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37. Wang  D, Hu  B, Hu  C, Zhu  F, Liu  X, Zhang  J, Wang  B, et al.  Clinical characteristics of 138 hospitalized patients with 2019 novel coronavirus-infected pneumonia in Wuhan, China. JAMA  2020, 323: 1061–1069. doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.1585 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38. Alhogbani  T. Acute myocarditis associated with novel Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus. Ann Saudi Med  2016, 36: 78–80. doi: 10.5144/0256-4947.2016.78 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39. Moni  MA, Liò  P. Network-based analysis of comorbidities risk during an infection: SARS and HIV case studies. BMC Bioinform  2014, 15: 333. doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-15-333 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40. Liu  CL, Lu  YT, Peng  MJ, Chen  PJ, Lin  RL, Wu  CL, Kuo  HT. Clinical and laboratory features of severe acute respiratory syndrome vis-a-vis onset of fever. Chest  2004, 126: 509–517. doi: 10.1378/chest.126.2.509 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41. Cui  Y, Tian  M, Huang  D, Wang  X, Huang  Y, Fan  L, Wang  L, et al.  A 55-day-old female infant infected with 2019 novel coronavirus disease: presenting with pneumonia, liver injury, and heart damage. J Infect Dis  2020, 221: 1775–1781. doi: 10.1093/infdis/jiaa113 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42. Cao  J, Hu  X, Cheng  W, Yu  L, Tu  WJ, Liu  Q. Clinical features and short-term outcomes of 18 patients with corona virus disease 2019 in intensive care unit. Intensive Care Med  2020, 46: 851–853. doi: 10.1007/s00134-020-05987-7 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43. Chong  PY, Chui  P, Ling  AE, Franks  TJ, Tai  DY, Leo  YS, Kaw  GJ, et al.  Analysis of deaths during the severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) epidemic in Singapore: challenges in determining a SARS diagnosis. Arch Pathol Lab Med  2004, 128: 195–204. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44. Arabi  YM, Harthi  A, Hussein  J, Bouchama  A, Johani  S, Hajeer  AH, Saeed  BT, et al.  Severe neurologic syndrome associated with Middle East respiratory syndrome corona virus (MERS-CoV). Infection  2015, 43: 495–501. doi: 10.1007/s15010-015-0720-y [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45. Blackburn  R, Zhao  H, Pebody  R, Hayward  A, Warren-Gash  C. Laboratory-confirmed respiratory infections as predictors of hospital admission for myocardial infarction and stroke: time-series analysis of English data for 2004-2015. Clin Infect Dis  2018, 67: 8–17. doi: 10.1093/cid/cix1144 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46. Zheng  YY, Ma  YT, Zhang  JY, Xie  X. COVID-19 and the cardiovascular system. Nat Rev Cardiol  2020, 17: 259–260. doi: 10.1038/s41569-020-0360-5 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47. Templin  C, Ghadri  JR, Diekmann  J, Napp  LC, Bataiosu  DR, Jaguszewski  M, Cammann  VL, et al.  Clinical features and outcomes of takotsubo (stress) cardiomyopathy. N Engl J Med  2015, 373: 929–938. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1406761 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48. Jabri  A, Kalra  A, Kumar  A, Alameh  A, Adroja  S, Bashir  H, Nowacki  AS, et al.  Incidence of stress cardiomyopathy during the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic. JAMA Netw Open  2020, 3: e2014780. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.14780 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49. Arentz  M, Yim  E, Klaff  L, Lokhandwala  S, Riedo  FX, Chong  M, Lee  M. Characteristics and outcomes of 21 critically ill patients with COVID-19 in Washington State. JAMA  2020, 323: 1612–1614. doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.4326 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50. Driggin  E, Madhavan  MV, Bikdeli  B, Chuich  T, Laracy  J, Biondi-Zoccai  G, Brown  TS, et al.  Cardiovascular considerations for patients, health care workers, and health systems during the COVID-19 pandemic. J Am Coll Cardiol  2020, 75: 2352–2371. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2020.03.031 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51. Wu  L, O’Kane  AM, Peng  H, Bi  Y, Motriuk-Smith  D, Ren  J. SARS-CoV-2 and cardiovascular complications: from molecular mechanisms to pharmaceutical management. Biochem Pharmacol  2020, 178: 114114. doi: 10.1016/j.bcp.2020.114114 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52. Connors  JM, Levy  JH. COVID-19 and its implications for thrombosis and anticoagulation. Blood  2020, 135: 2033–2040. doi: 10.1182/blood.2020006000 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53. Tang  N, Li  D, Wang  X, Sun  Z. Abnormal coagulation parameters are associated with poor prognosis in patients with novel coronavirus pneumonia. J Thromb Haemost  2020, 18: 844–847. doi: 10.1111/jth.14768 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54. Guan  WJ, Ni  ZY, Hu  Y, Liang  WH, Ou  CQ, He  JX, Liu  L, et al.  Clinical characteristics of coronavirus disease 2019 in China. N Engl J Med  2020, 382: 1708–1720. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2002032 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55. Klok  FA, Kruip  M, NJM  VDM, Arbous  MS, Gommers  D, Kant  KM, Kaptein  FHJ, et al.  Incidence of thrombotic complications in critically ill ICU patients with COVID-19. Thromb Res  2020, 191: 145–147. doi: 10.1016/j.thromres.2020.04.013 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56. Panigada  M, Bottino  N, Tagliabue  P, Grasselli  G, Novembrino  C, Chantarangkul  V, Pesenti  A, et al.  Hypercoagulability of COVID-19 patients in intensive care unit: a report of thromboelastography findings and other parameters of hemostasis. J Thromb Haemost  2020, 18: 1738–1742. doi: 10.1111/jth.14850 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57. Ranucci  M, Ballotta  A, Di Dedda  U, Bayshnikova  E, Dei Poli  M, Resta  M, Falco  M, et al.  The procoagulant pattern of patients with COVID-19 acute respiratory distress syndrome. J Thromb Haemost  2020, 18: 1747–1751. doi: 10.1111/jth.14854 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58. Chau  VQ, Giustino  G, Mahmood  K, Oliveros  E, Neibart  E, Oloomi  M, Moss  N, et al.  Cardiogenic shock and hyperinflammatory syndrome in young males with COVID-19. Circ Heart Fail  2020, 13: e007485. doi: 10.1161/CIRCHEARTFAILURE.120.007485 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59. Tavazzi  G, Pellegrini  C, Maurelli  M, Belliato  M, Sciutti  F, Bottazzi  A, Sepe  PA, et al.  Myocardial localization of coronavirus in COVID-19 cardiogenic shock. Eur J Heart Fail  2020, 22: 911–915. doi: 10.1002/ejhf.1828 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60. Yu  Y, Xu  D, Fu  S, Zhang  J, Yang  X, Xu  L, Xu  J, et al.  Patients with COVID-19 in 19 ICUs in Wuhan, China: a cross-sectional study. Crit Care  2020, 24: 219. doi: 10.1186/s13054-020-02939-x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61. Li  H, Liu  L, Zhang  D, Xu  J, Dai  H, Tang  N, Su  X, et al.  SARS-CoV-2 and viral sepsis: observations and hypotheses. Lancet  2020, 395: 1517–1520. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30920-X [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62. Xu  Z, Shi  L, Wang  Y, Zhang  J, Huang  L, Zhang  C, Liu  S, et al.  Pathological findings of COVID-19 associated with acute respiratory distress syndrome. Lancet Respir Med  2020, 8: 420–422. doi: 10.1016/S2213-2600(20)30076-X [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63. Chen  W, Lan  Y, Yuan  X, Deng  X, Li  Y, Cai  X, Li  L, et al.  Detectable 2019-nCoV viral RNA in blood is a strong indicator for the further clinical severity. Emerg Microbes Infect  2020, 9: 469–473. doi: 10.1080/22221751.2020.1732837 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64. Zhang  W, Du  RH, Li  B, Zheng  XS, Yang  XL, Hu  B, Wang  YY, et al.  Molecular and serological investigation of 2019-nCoV infected patients: implication of multiple shedding routes. Emerg Microbes Infect  2020, 9: 386–389. doi: 10.1080/22221751.2020.1729071 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65. Chang  L, Yan  Y, Wang  L. Coronavirus disease 2019: coronaviruses and blood safety. Transfus Med Rev  2020, 34: 75–80. doi: 10.1016/j.tmrv.2020.02.003 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66. Donoghue  M, Hsieh  F, Baronas  E, Godbout  K, Gosselin  M, Stagliano  N, Donovan  M, et al.  A novel angiotensin-converting enzyme-related carboxypeptidase (ACE2) converts angiotensin I to angiotensin 1-9. Circ Res  2000, 87: E1-9. doi: 10.1161/01.RES.87.5.e1 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67. Ferrario  CM, Averill  DB, Brosnihan  KB, Chappell  MC, Iskandar  SS, Dean  RH, Diz  DI. Vasopeptidase inhibition and Ang-(1-7) in the spontaneously hypertensive rat. Kidney Int  2002, 62: 1349–1357. doi: 10.1111/j.1523-1755.2002.kid559.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68. Yang  JM, Dong  M, Meng  X, Zhao  YX, Yang  XY, Liu  XL, Hao  PP, et al.  Angiotensin-(1-7) dose-dependently inhibits atherosclerotic lesion formation and enhances plaque stability by targeting vascular cells. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol  2013, 33: 1978–1985. doi: 10.1161/ATVBAHA.113.301320 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69. Santos  RA, Castro  CH, Gava  E, Pinheiro  SV, Almeida  AP, Paula  RD, Cruz  JS, et al.  Impairment of in vitro and in vivo heart function in angiotensin-(1-7) receptor MAS knockout mice. Hypertension  2006, 47: 996–1002. doi: 10.1161/01.HYP.0000215289.51180.5c [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70. Chappel  MC, Ferrario  CM. ACE and ACE2: their role to balance the expression of angiotensin II and angiotensin-(1-7). Kidney Int  2006, 70: 8–10. doi: 10.1038/sj.ki.5000321 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71. Pei  Z, Meng  R, Li  G, Yan  G, Xu  C, Zhuang  Z, Ren  J, et al.  Angiotensin-(1-7) ameliorates myocardial remodeling and interstitial fibrosis in spontaneous hypertension: role of MMPs/TIMPs. Toxicol Lett  2010, 199: 173–181. doi: 10.1016/j.toxlet.2010.08.021 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72. Oudit  GY, Kassiri  Z, Jiang  C, Liu  PP, Poutanen  SM, Penninger  JM, Butany  J. SARS-coronavirus modulation of myocardial ACE2 expression and inflammation in patients with SARS. Eur J Clin Invest  2009, 39: 618–625. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2362.2009.02153.x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73. Imai  Y, Kuba  K, Penninger  JM. The discovery of angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 and its role in acute lung injury in mice. Exp Physiol  2008, 93: 543–548. doi: 10.1113/expphysiol.2007.040048 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74. Kuba  K, Imai  Y, Rao  S, Gao  H, Guo  F, Guan  B, Huan  Y, et al.  A crucial role of angiotensin converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) in SARS coronavirus-induced lung injury. Nat Med  2005, 11: 875–879. doi: 10.1038/nm1267 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75. Wan  Y, Shang  J, Graham  R, Baric  RS, Li  F. Receptor recognition by the novel coronavirus from Wuhan: an analysis based on decade-long structural studies of SARS coronavirus. J Virol  2020, 94: e00127-20. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76. Zhang  H, Penninger  JM, Li  Y, Zhong  N, Slutsky  AS. Angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) as a SARS-CoV-2 receptor: molecular mechanisms and potential therapeutic target. Intensive Care Med  2020, 46: 586–590. doi: 10.1007/s00134-020-05985-9 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77. Liu  Y, Yang  Y, Zhang  C, Huang  F, Wang  F, Yuan  J, Wang  Z, et al.  Clinical and biochemical indexes from 2019-nCoV infected patients linked to viral loads and lung injury. Sci China Life Sci  2020, 63: 364–374. doi: 10.1007/s11427-020-1643-8 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78. Channappanavar  R, Perlman  S. Pathogenic human coronavirus infections: causes and consequences of cytokine storm and immunopathology. Semin Immunopathol  2017, 39: 529–539. doi: 10.1007/s00281-017-0629-x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79. Wang  H, Ma  S. The cytokine storm and factors determining the sequence and severity of organ dysfunction in multiple organ dysfunction syndrome. Am J Emerg Med  2008, 26: 711–715. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2007.10.031 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80. Liu  Q, Zhou  YH, Yang  ZQ. The cytokine storm of severe influenza and development of immunomodulatory therapy. Cell Mol Immunol  2016, 13: 3–10. doi: 10.1038/cmi.2015.74 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81. Mehta  P, McAuley  DF, Brown  M, Sanchez  E, Tattersall  RS, Manson  JJ. COVID-19: consider cytokine storm syndromes and immunosuppression. Lancet  2020, 395: 1033–1034. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30628-0 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82. Qin  C, Zhou  L, Hu  Z, Zhang  S, Yang  S, Tao  Y, Xie  C, et al.  Dysregulation of immune response in patients with coronavirus 2019 (COVID-19) in Wuhan, China. Clin Infect Dis  2020, 71: 762–768. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciaa248 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83. Cirillo  P, Cimmino  G, D’Aiuto  E, Di Palma  V, Abbate  G, Piscione  F, Golino  P, et al.  Local cytokine production in patients with acute coronary syndromes: a look into the eye of the perfect (cytokine) storm. Int J Cardiol  2014, 176: 227–229. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2014.05.035 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 84. Tanaka  T, Narazaki  M, Kishimoto  T. Immunotherapeutic implications of IL-6 blockade for cytokine storm. Immunotherapy  2016, 8: 959–970. doi: 10.2217/imt-2016-0020 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 85. Mann  DL. Inflammatory mediators and the failing heart: past, present, and the foreseeable future. Circ Res  2002, 91: 988–998. doi: 10.1161/01.RES.0000043825.01705.1B [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 86. Tsimikas  S, Duff  GW, Berger  PB, Rogus  J, Huttner  K, Clopton  P, Brilakis  E, et al.  Pro-inflammatory interleukin-1 genotypes potentiate the risk of coronary artery disease and cardiovascular events mediated by oxidized phospholipids and lipoprotein(a). J Am Coll Cardiol  2014, 63: 1724–1734. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2013.12.030 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 87. Krishnamurthy  P, Lambers  E, Verma  S, Thorne  T, Qin  G, Losordo  DW, Kishore  R. Myocardial knockdown of mRNA-stabilizing protein HuR attenuates post-MI inflammatory response and left ventricular dysfunction in IL-10-null mice. FASEB J  2010, 24: 2484–2494. doi: 10.1096/fj.09-149815 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 88. Li  SS, Cheng  CW, Fu  CL, Chan  YH, Lee  MP, Chan  JW, Yiu  SF. Left ventricular performance in patients with severe acute respiratory syndrome: a 30-day echocardiographic follow-up study. Circulation  2003, 108: 1798–1803. doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000094737.21775.32 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 89. Yang  X, Yu  Y, Xu  J, Shu  H, Xia  J, Liu  H, Wu  Y, et al.  Clinical course and outcomes of critically ill patients with SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia in Wuhan, China: a single-centered, retrospective, observational study. Lancet Respir Med  2020, 8: 475–481. doi: 10.1016/S2213-2600(20)30079-5 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 90. Lai  CC, Shih  TP, Ko  WC, Tang  HJ, Hsueh  PR. Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) and coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19): the epidemic and the challenges. Int J Antimicrob Agents  2020, 55: 105924. doi: 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2020.105924 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 91. MacLaren  G, Fisher  D, Brodie  D. Preparing for the most critically ill patients with COVID-19: the potential role of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. JAMA  2020, 323: 1245–1246. doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.2342 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 92. Preston  IR. Clinical perspective of hypoxia-mediated pulmonary hypertension. Antioxid Redox Signal  2007, 9: 711–721. doi: 10.1089/ars.2007.1587 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 93. Giordano  FJ. Oxygen, oxidative stress, hypoxia, and heart failure. J Clin Invest  2005, 115: 500–508. doi: 10.1172/JCI200524408 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 94. Adams  JG, Walls  RM. Supporting the health care workforce during the COVID-19 global epidemic. JAMA  2020, 323: 1439–1440. doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.3972 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 95. Wang  C, Pan  R, Wan  X, Tan  Y, Xu  L, Ho  CS, Ho  RC. Immediate psychological responses and associated factors during the initial stage of the 2019 coronavirus disease (COVID-19) epidemic among the general population in China. Int J Environ Res Public Health  2020, 17: 1729. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 96. Xu  K, Cai  H, Shen  Y, Ni  Q, Chen  Y, Hu  S, Li  J, et al.  Management of corona virus disease-19 (COVID-19): the Zhejiang experience. Zhejiang Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban  2020, 49: 147–157. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 97. Ueyama  T, Kasamatsu  K, Hano  T, Tsuruo  Y, Ishikura  F. Catecholamines and estrogen are involved in the pathogenesis of emotional stress-induced acute heart attack. Ann N Y Acad Sci  2008, 1148: 479–485. doi: 10.1196/annals.1410.079 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 98. Kelly  RF, Sompalli  V, Sattar  P, K.  K. Increased TIMI frame counts in cocaine users: a case for increased microvascular resistance in the absence of epicardial coronary disease or spasm. Clin Cardiol  2003, 26: 319–322. doi: 10.1002/clc.4950260705 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 99. Li  DKT, Zhu  S. Contributions and challenges of general practitioners in China fighting against the novel coronavirus crisis. Fam Med Community Health  2020, 8: e000361. doi: 10.1136/fmch-2020-000361 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 100. Wang  M, Cao  R, Zhang  L, Yang  X, Liu  J, Xu  M, Shi  Z, et al.  Remdesivir and chloroquine effectively inhibit the recently emerged novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV) in vitro. Cell Res  2020, 30: 269–271. doi: 10.1038/s41422-020-0282-0 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 101. Holshue  ML, DeBolt  C, Lindquist  S, Lofy  KH, Wiesman  J, Bruce  H, Spitters  C, et al.  First case of 2019 novel coronavirus in the United States. N Engl J Med  2020, 382: 929–936. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2001191 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 102. Elfiky  AA. Anti-HCV, nucleotide inhibitors, repurposing against COVID-19. Life Sci  2020, 248: 117477. doi: 10.1016/j.lfs.2020.117477 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 103. Wu  J, Liu  J, Zhao  X, Liu  C, Wang  W, Wang  D, Xu  W, et al.  Clinical characteristics of imported cases of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in Jiangsu Province: a multicenter descriptive study. Clin Infect Dis  2020, 71: 706–712. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciaa199 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 104. Deng  L, Li  C, Zeng  Q, Liu  X, Li  X, Zhang  H, Hong  Z, et al.  Arbidol combined with LPV/r versus LPV/r alone against corona virus disease 2019: a retrospective cohort study. J Infect  2020, 81: e1–e5. doi: 10.1016/j.jinf.2020.03.002 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 105. Gao  J, Tian  Z, X.  Y. Breakthrough: chloroquine phosphate has shown apparent efficacy in treatment of COVID-19 associated pneumonia in clinical studies. Biosci Trends  2020, 14: 72–73. doi: 10.5582/bst.2020.01047 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 106. Chu  CM, Cheng  VC, Hung  IF, Wong  MM, Chan  KH, Chan  KS, Kao  RY, et al.  Role of lopinavir/ritonavir in the treatment of SARS: initial virological and clinical findings. Thorax  2004, 59: 252–256. doi: 10.1136/thorax.2003.012658 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 107. Cao  B, Wang  Y, Wen  D, Liu  W, Wang  J, Fan  G, Ruan  L, et al.  A trial of lopinavir-ritonavir in adults hospitalized with severe Covid-19. N Engl J Med  2020, 382: 1787–1799. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2001282 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 108. White  NJ. Cardiotoxicity of antimalarial drugs. Lancet Infect Dis  2007, 7: 549–558. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(07)70187-1 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 109. Roos  JM, Aubry  MC, Edwards  WD. Chloroquine cardiotoxicity: clinicopathologic features in three patients and comparison with three patients with Fabry disease. Cardiovasc Pathol  2002, 11: 277–283. doi: 10.1016/S1054-8807(02)00118-7 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 110. Haeusler  IL, Chan  XHS, Guérin  PJ, White  NJ. The arrhythmogenic cardiotoxicity of the quinoline and structurally related antimalarial drugs: a systematic review. BMC Med  2018, 16: 200. doi: 10.1186/s12916-018-1188-2 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 111. Limsreng  S, Marcy  O, Ly  S, Ouk  V, Chanroeurn  H, Thavary  S, Boroath  B, et al.  Dyslipidemias and elevated cardiovascular risk on lopinavir-based antiretroviral therapy in Cambodia. PLoS One  2016, 11: e0160306. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0160306 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 112. Montes  ML, Pulido  F, Barros  C, Condes  E, Rubio  R, Cepeda  C, Dronda  F, et al.  Lipid disorders in antiretroviral-naive patients treated with lopinavir/ritonavir-based HAART: frequency, characterization and risk factors. J Antimicrob Chemother  2005, 55: 800–804. doi: 10.1093/jac/dki063 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 113. Grubb  JR, Dejam  A, Voell  J, Blackwelder  WC, Sklar  PA, Kovacs  JA, Cannon  RO, et al.  Lopinavir-ritonavir: effects on endothelial cell function in healthy subjects. J Infect Dis  2006, 193: 1516–1519. doi: 10.1086/503807 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 114. Rice  GI, Thomas  DA, Grant  PJ, Turner  AJ, Hooper  NM. Evaluation of angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE), its homologue ACE2 and neprilysin in angiotensin peptide metabolism. Biochem J  2004, 383: 45–51. doi: 10.1042/BJ20040634 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 115. Ferrario  CM, Jessup  J, Chappell  MC, Averill  DB, Brosnihan  KB, Tallant  EA, Diz  DI, et al.  Effect of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibition and angiotensin II receptor blockers on cardiac angiotensin-converting enzyme 2. Circulation  2005, 111: 2605–2610. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.104.510461 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 116. Wang  X, Ye  Y, Gong  H, Wu  J, Yuan  J, Wang  S, Yin  P, et al.  The effects of different angiotensin II type 1 receptor blockers on the regulation of the ACE-AngII-AT1 and ACE2-Ang(1-7)-Mas axes in pressure overload-induced cardiac remodeling in male mice. J Mol Cell Cardiol  2016, 97: 180–190. doi: 10.1016/j.yjmcc.2016.05.012 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 117. Danser  AHJ, Epstein  M, Batlle  D. Renin-angiotensin system blockers and the COVID-19 pandemic: at present there is no evidence to abandon renin-angiotensin system blockers. Hypertension  2020, 75: 1382–1385. doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.120.15082 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 118. Meng  J, Xiao  G, Zhang  J, He  X, Ou  M, Bi  J, Yang  R, et al.  Renin-angiotensin system inhibitors improve the clinical outcomes of COVID-19 patients with hypertension. Emerg Microbes Infect  2020, 9: 757–760. doi: 10.1080/22221751.2020.1746200 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 119. Zhou  Y, Fu  B, Zheng  X, Wang  D, Zhao  C, Sun  R, Tian  Z, et al.  Pathogenic T cells and inflammatory monocytes incite inflammatory storm in severe COVID-19 patients. Nat Sci Rev  2020, 7: 998–1002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 120. Chinese Clinical Trial Registry . A Multicenter, Randomized Controlled Trial for the Efficacy and Safety of Tocilizumab in the Treatment of New Coronavirus Pneumonia (COVID-19). February  13, 2020. http://www.chictr.org.cn/showprojen.aspx?proj=49409 (6 March 2020, date last accessed).
  • 121. Strang  AC, Bisoendial  RJ, Kootte  RS, Schulte  DM, Dallinga-Thie  GM, Levels  JH, Kok  M, et al.  Pro-atherogenic lipid changes and decreased hepatic LDL receptor expression by tocilizumab in rheumatoid arthritis. Atherosclerosis  2013, 229: 174–181. doi: 10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2013.04.031 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 122. Ezad  S, Cheema  H, Collins  N. Statin-induced rhabdomyolysis: a complication of a commonly overlooked drug interaction. Oxf Med Case Rep  2018, 2018: omx104. doi: 10.1093/omcr/omx104 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Acta Biochimica et Biophysica Sinica are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES