Skip to main content
Journal of Anatomy logoLink to Journal of Anatomy
. 2020 Nov 2;238(4):1036–1041. doi: 10.1111/joa.13351

A simple nuclear contrast staining method for microCT‐based 3D histology using lead(II) acetate

Brian Metscher 1,
PMCID: PMC7930760  PMID: 33140846

Abstract

X‐ray microtomography (microCT) enables histological‐scale 3D imaging of many types of biological samples, but it has yet to rival traditional histology for differentiation of tissue types and cell components. This report presents prima facie results indicating that a simple lead(II) acetate staining solution can impart preferential X‐ray contrast to cell nuclei. While not strictly selective for nuclei, the staining reflects local cell‐density differences. It can be applied in a single overnight treatment and does not require hematoxylin staining or drying of the sample. The stain is removable with EDTA, and it may enhance early calcifications. A basic protocol is given as a guide for further testing and optimization.

Keywords: 3D histology, hematoxylin, imaging, lead(II) acetate, limb development, morphology, staining, X‐ray microtomography


A simple lead acetate staining (“Bleikern”) was found to impart useful X‐ray contrast to cell nuclei for microCT imaging. It can be applied in a single overnight treatment and allows histology‐like 3D imaging. The stain is removable with EDTA, and it may enhance early calcifications.

graphic file with name JOA-238-1036-g004.jpg

1. INTRODUCTION

General contrast stains have enabled microCT imaging to become a standard tool for visualizing 3D micromorphology of soft tissues, but after a full decade, the lack of tissue specificity still limits the use of X‐ray microscopy for 3D histological investigation of tissues and organisms. The need for 3D histology is widely recognized in pathology, tissue reconstruction, and other applications (Pichat et al., 2018; Roberts et al., 2012). In a recent advance toward 3D histological contrasting for microCT, Busse et al. (2018) demonstrated an X‐ray contrasting method using eosin and critical point drying.

Although an enormous number of histological staining techniques have been used in the past century (Gray, 1954), the prevalent standard is hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) (Bancroft & Gamble, 2008; Wittekind, 2003). This generally applicable method most often comprises nuclear staining with hematoxylin (actually a metal‐dye complex with its oxidized form, hematein) followed by a less specific counterstain, typically eosin or a similar anionic dye (Kiernan, 2008a), which together render good overall differential coloring of cellular components. Some hematoxylin solutions are prepared with a metal mordant (commonly aluminium) to form a “lake” which is applied as a stain, but in some procedures the metal is applied before the hematoxylin as a pre‐mordant. In this case the metal binds to the target tissue and the hematoxylin binds to the metal to render a colored complex (Kiernan, 2015).

Heavy metal treatments of various kinds are a mainstay in electron microscopy for imparting contrast to tissue elements (Björkman & Hellstrom, 1965; Hayat, 1970). Metal‐mordanted hematoxylin methods are natural candidates for X‐ray dense nuclear staining, and many such methods have been explored in the history of histology (Smith, 2010). Among these, several lead hematoxylin methods are known (Guida & Cheng, 1980; Solcia et al., 1969), but they are not frequently used in light microscopy, as they offer no particular advantages over the well‐established aluminium and iron methods.

However, Müller et al. (2018) have recently demonstrated nucleus‐specific contrasting in microCT imaging of mouse liver tissue using a lead‐mordanted hematoxylin stain. Their results showed definite preferential staining of nuclei in liver tissue, but the procedure took about a week to complete and included critical‐point drying of the sample.

Preliminary results presented here demonstrate a fast and simple method of cell‐nucleus contrasting for microCT, based on the lead(II) acetate mordant used in previous methods. The present method, dubbed “Bleikern,” does not require hematein staining of the bound mordant metal and can be applied to fixed and stored tissue samples in one overnight treatment.

2. METHODS

The embryo and tissue samples used were left over from previous studies, and some were of uncertain provenance. All had been fixed in paraformaldehyde (PFA) or buffered formalin (NBF). The mouse intestines were from adult wild‐type BL6 mice that were NBF fixed (as part of a study at the Medical University of Vienna), stored at 4°C in water, and dissected and re‐processed as needed. Chick embryo limbs (approx. stage HH30) had been PFA fixed and stored in methanol at −20°C. Axolotl limbs were taken from NBF‐fixed specimens (ca. 20 mm length) of unknown source, stored in 70% ethanol for at least 15 years. Mouse embryos and embryonic limbs were fixed and stored in NBF at 4°C for several years; these also were left over from an earlier project and their source is not known.

The staining solution was lead(II) acetate trihydrate (Pb(CH3COO)2·3H2O, CAS 6080‐56‐4; Sigma‐Aldrich 467863) dissolved in distilled water at 20% w/v (0.53 M, pH ~5.5). This solution was stored at room temperature and could be used for at least 2 weeks (up to 4 weeks according to Müller et al. (2018)). Concentrations of 10%, 2%, and 1% were also prepared in distilled water. All samples were washed in distilled water before lead staining.

Mouse intestine samples were either stored in 70% ethanol at room temperature or were transferred directly to PBS or to distilled water. Small pieces about 1 × 2 mm were cut and stained 1, 2, or 3 days in 20% lead acetate solution at room temperature (ca. 24‐26°C) with some rocking or occasional agitation. Chick limbs, axolotl limbs, and mouse embryos were stained overnight in 1‐10% lead(II) acetate trihydrate solution. PTA and IKI staining was carried out as reported in (Metscher, 2009a, 2009b).

For microCT imaging, samples were mounted in polypropylene pipet tips or small polyethylene tubes in 1% low‐melting temperature agarose in water (Metscher, 2011). MicroCT scans were made using an Xradia MicroXCT system (Zeiss Microscopy) equipped with a tungsten X‐ray source and scintillator detectors with secondary optical magnification. Source anode voltage was set to 40 or 60 kV. Projection images were taken every 0.2° over a half‐rotation of the sample; tomographic slices were reconstructed using the Xradia XMReconstructor software.

Images were analyzed and illustrations prepared using XM3DViewer (Xradia), Fiji (Schindelin et al., 2012; https://fiji.sc/), Adobe Photoshop, and Dragonfly (https://www.theobjects.com/dragonfly).

3. RESULTS

Aqueous lead(II) acetate staining was demonstrated first in mouse small intestine samples, which are known to have a distinctive pattern of cell nuclei in histological sections (Figure 1a). Using a 20% aqueous solution (~0.53 M pH ~5.5), the lead staining was found to impart X‐ray contrast to cell nuclei and other tissue components, without a hematein staining step (Figure 1). Staining durations of 1, 2, and 3 days were found to be effective. The staining results with intestine samples were somewhat inconsistent, likely owing to the variable enteric environment; some high‐contrast debris can be noted in Figure 1b.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Bleikern staining highlights cell nuclei. Scale bars 100 µm. (a) Mouse small intestine, H&E section, reproduced from (Schweer et al., 2013). (b) Adult mouse small intestine stained in 20% lead(II) acetate solution (aqueous) for 2 days at room temperature. Maximum‐intensity projection of four consecutive virtual slices from a microCT scan; 1.0 µm voxel size. (c) Axolotl larva forelimb stained overnight in 2% lead(II) acetate. Single virtual section, 2.0 µm voxel size. Blood cells (arrows) and early ossification of bone (stars) are indicated. (d) Chick embryo (stage ~HH30) digit stained overnight in 2% lead(II) acetate. Single virtual section, 1.0 µm voxel size

Several other samples were tested to show the contrasting of cell nuclei qualitatively. Amphibians are known to have particularly large cells, and the nuclei show clearly in a larval axolotl limb (Figure 1c). It was also observed that the early bone matrix in the limb gained much higher X‐ray absorption with lead staining.

Studies of limb morphogenesis commonly require mapping of cell densities, and a chick embryo limb stained overnight allowed microCT imaging of the cell distribution (Figure 1d). Some shrinkage was observed in lead‐stained limbs.

A few preliminary tests showed that EDTA treatment (e.g., 50 mM EDTA for 1 hour) removed the lead staining from tissues without apparent damage. X‐ray projection images showed no discernable contrast (data not shown).

A lead(II) acetate solution of 2% (~53 mM) was found to stain nuclei effectively with an overnight incubation (approx. 18 hours) at room temperature (which was around 26°C during the summer these experiments were conducted). Compared with two standard microCT contrast stains, phosphotungstic acid and Lugol's iodine (PTA and IKI; Metscher, 2009a,b), the lead staining is more preferential for nuclei (Figure 2). Bleikern stains the nuclei in embryonic blood cells (Figure 1c), but unlike PTA and IKI, it does not stain blood more strongly than other tissues (Figure 2b,c).

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Comparison of Bleikern (overnight staining in 2% lead(II) acetate) with other stains in higher‐resolution scans. Virtual sections from microCT images of mouse embryos, approximately E12.5 (Theiler stage ~21). Scale bars 200 µm. (a) Mouse limb, Bleikern, 1.0 µm voxel size. (b) Mouse limb IKI stained. Arrows indicate blood. (c) Mouse spinal region, Bleikern, 1.1 µm voxel size. (d) Mouse spinal region, PTA stained. Arrows indicate blood

Because microCT imaging is often employed most effectively for overview visualization of intact samples, this staining was also tested on whole mouse embryos. A single overnight staining in 2% lead(II) acetate solution was sufficient for complete contrasting of a 12.5‐day (approx. Theiler stage 21) mouse embryo, previously fixed in paraformaldehyde (Figure 3). This method allows differentiation of tissues according to local cell density, and thus can function as a general histological stain at lower resolutions. The staining is uniform throughout the embryo and does not accumulate in the surface regions. However, X‐ray dense particles were sometimes observed on the sample's surface (e.g., Figure 2c).

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Bleikern as a general contrast stain, compared here with other stains in whole mouse embryos ~E12.5 (Theiler stage ~21). Scale bars 500 µm. B‐F are single virtual sections from microCT scans. (a) H&E stained section from the eHistology Atlas with Kaufman Annotations, Plate 29a, Image a, (http://www.emouseatlas.org/emap/eHistology/ (Graham et al., 2015). (b) Bleikern staining, 2% overnight. Complete image data available at https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4034294. (c) Bleikern, same scan as in (b), showing differentiation of organs according to cell density. 2.5 µm voxel size. (d) OsO4, sample prepared as for TEM (Metscher, 2020). (e) PTA, favors collagen, penetrates more slowly and stains blood heavily. (f) IKI, can emphasize keratin; also stains blood strongly

4. DISCUSSION

The results presented here show that an aqueous solution of lead acetate at 2% concentration (~53 mM) works as a preferential nuclear stain for X‐ray microtomography, but it is not highly specific to nuclei. For example the first images are not clean enough to allow segmentation of the nuclei by global thresholding of the image. These preliminary tests demonstrate some potential of the method for cell‐resolution histology, although the results are limited by the useful resolution of a 14‐year‐old laboratory‐based microtomography system.

The procedure demonstrated here did not involve critical‐point drying, thus allowing scanning in liquid medium and leaving open the possibility of further processing of the same sample. Neither acidic re‐fixation in Bouin or FAA nor acidification of the lead solution with acetic acid made any noticeable improvement to the specificity or intensity of the nuclear stain. However, it is still possible that acid treatment and hematein complexing might enhance the nuclear specificity of the staining (Kiernan, 2008b).

It was found that care was needed to avoid exposing the lead(II) to anions that cause unwanted precipitation. Thus the samples were washed in distilled water before and after staining. Subsequent dehydration to alcohol did not increase non‐specific lead deposition, nor did washing in ammonium acetate solution, but neither gave any noticeable improvement to signal or background. Tap water, whose ion content can vary greatly, is likely to give unpredictable results. (Ammonium acetate solution did not cause precipitation and might offer an alternative wash buffer.)

Staining by divalent lead was easily removed with EDTA, allowing the possibility to stain and image precious samples without damage, such as museum specimens (Akkari et al., 2018; Keklikoglou et al., 2019). Systematic tests will be needed to optimize the EDTA concentration and treatment times for various samples.

In samples with early bone mineralization, the lead staining increased the X‐ray absorption of the bone matrix substantially, presumably due to Pb2+– Ca2+ ion substitution (stars in Figure 1c). This effect could possibly be used to enhance the detection of early mineralization of skeletal elements and teeth.

The present study was only to demonstrate a simple and fast method for contrasting cell nuclei for microCT imaging and determine its general efficacy. Quantifying the nuclear specificity and other staining effects will require experiments designed for those purposes. Sub‐micron X‐ray microtomography applied to standard samples such as onion roots or sea urchin embryos may provide more direct tests to determine the specificity of Bleikern staining to nuclear proteins versus nucleic acids.

A baseline staining procedure is given here as a starting point for applying this method. The following steps must be tested and optimized for any new sample.

  • 1
    Samples fixed in formalin or paraformaldehyde.
    The effect of acidic fixatives (Bouin, FAA) has not been tested.
  • 2

    Store in fixative, buffer‐diluted fixative, 70% ethanol, or methanol.

  • 3

    Take samples to distilled water.

Soluble anions can precipitate lead(II) salts, so tap water should be avoided.

  • 4

    Staining solution: 2% (w/v) lead(II) acetate trihydrate in distilled water.

Like other lead compounds, lead acetate is toxic and must be handled according to standard safety procedures. The staining solution was still effective after 2 weeks at room temperature. Its maximum shelf‐life was not determined.

  • 5

    Incubate samples in staining solution overnight or longer with rocking or occasional agitation.

It is possible that at least some samples can be stained for shorter times; minimum or optimal staining times and penetration rates were not assessed, and the permanence of the staining has not been tested.

  • 6

    Change samples to distilled water and wash several times over an hour or more.

  • 7

    Samples can be moved to methanol or 70% ethanol.

  • 8

    Mount sample in agarose or alcohol for microCT imaging.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

The author is grateful to Nina Kraus for her assistance in carrying out this work. No conflict of interest is associated with this work.

Metscher B. A simple nuclear contrast staining method for microCT‐based 3D histology using lead(II) acetate. J. Anat. 2021;238:1036–1041. 10.1111/joa.13351

DATA AVAILABILITY

The original tomographic image data are available on request from the author.

REFERENCES

  1. Akkari, N. , Ganske, A.‐S. , Komerički, A. & Metscher, B. (2018) New avatars for Myriapods: Complete 3D morphology of type specimens transcends conventional species description (Myriapoda, Chilopoda). PLoS One, 13, e0200158. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Bancroft, J.D. & Gamble, M. (2008) Theory and practice of histological techniques. Churchill Livingstone. [Google Scholar]
  3. Björkman, N. & Hellstrom, B. (1965) Lead‐ammonium acetate; a staining medium for electron microscopy free of contamination by carbonate. Stain Technology, 40, 169–171. [Google Scholar]
  4. Busse, M. , Muller, M. , Kimm, M.A. , Ferstl, S. , Allner, S. , Achterhold, K. et al. (2018) Three‐dimensional virtual histology enabled through cytoplasm‐specific X‐ray stain for microscopic and nanoscopic computed tomography. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 115, 2293–2298. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Graham, E. , Moss, J. , Burton, N. , Roochun, Y. , Armit, C. , Richardson, L. & et al. (2015) The atlas of mouse development eHistology resource. Development, 142, 1909. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Gray, P. (1954) The microtomist's formulary and guide. New York, Toronto: The Blakeston Company Inc. [Google Scholar]
  7. Guida, V.G. & Cheng, T.C. (1980) Lead hematoxylin‐basic fuchsin – New stain for molluscan hemocytes. Transactions of the American Microscopical Society, 99, 135–140. [Google Scholar]
  8. Hayat, M.A. (1970) Principles and techniques of electron microscopy: Biological applications. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold. [Google Scholar]
  9. Keklikoglou, K. , Faulwetter, S. , Chatzinikolaou, E. , Wils, P. , Brecko, J. , Kvacek, J. et al. (2019) Micro‐computed tomography for natural history specimens: A handbook of best practice protocols. European Journal of Taxonomy, 522, 1–55. [Google Scholar]
  10. Kiernan, J.A. (2008a) Anionic counterstains. Cold Spring Harbor Protocols, 2008, pdb.top51. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Kiernan, J.A. (2008b) Nuclear stains. Cold Spring Harbor Protocols, 2008(8), pdb.top50. 10.1101/pdb.top50 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Kiernan, J.A. (2015) Histological and histochemical methods, 5th edition. Banbury: Scion Publishing Ltd. [Google Scholar]
  13. Metscher, B.D. (2009a) MicroCT for comparative morphology: Simple staining methods allow high‐contrast 3D imaging of diverse non‐mineralized tissues. BMC Physiology, 9, 11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Metscher, B.D. (2009b) MicroCT for developmental biology: A versatile tool for high‐contrast 3D imaging at histological resolutions. Developmental Dynamics, 238, 632–640. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Metscher, B.D. (2011) X‐ray microtomographic imaging of intact vertebrate embryos. Cold Spring Harbor Protocols, 2011, 1462–1471. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Metscher, B. (2020) First contrast‐enhanced microCT scan of a mouse embryo. figshare, 10.6084/m9.figshare.12733040.v1 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  17. Müller, M. , Kimm, M.A. , Ferstl, S. , Allner, S. , Achterhold, K. , Herzen, J. et al. (2018) Nucleus‐specific X‐ray stain for 3D virtual histology. Scientific Reports, 8, 17855. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Pichat, J. , Iglesias, J.E. , Yousry, T. , Ourselin, S. & Modat, M. (2018) A survey of methods for 3D histology reconstruction. Medical Image Analysis, 46, 73–105. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Roberts, N. , Magee, D. , Song, Y. , Brabazon, K. , Shires, M. , Crellin, D. et al. (2012) Toward routine use of 3D histopathology as a research tool. American Journal of Pathology, 180, 1835–1842. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Schindelin, J. , Arganda‐Carreras, I. , Frise, E. , Kaynig, V. , Longair, M. , Pietzsch, T. et al. (2012) Fiji: An open‐source platform for biological‐image analysis. Nature Methods, 9, 676–682. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Schweer, J. , Kulkarni, D. , Kochut, A. , Pezoldt, J. , Pisano, F. , Pils, M.C. et al. (2013) The cytotoxic necrotizing factor of Yersinia pseudotuberculosis (CNFY) enhances inflammation and Yop delivery during infection by activation of Rho GTPases. PLoS Path, 9, e1003746. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Smith, A.A. (2010) Hematein chelates of unusual metal ions for tinctorial histochemistry. Biotechnic & Histochemistry, 85, 43–54. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Solcia, E. , Capella, C. & Vassallo, G. (1969) Lead‐haematoxylin as a stain for endocrine cells – Significance of staining and comparison with other selective methods. Histochemie, 20, 116–126. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Wittekind, D. (2003) Traditional staining for routine diagnostic pathology including the role of tannic acid. 1. Value and limitations of the hematoxylin‐eosin stain. Biotechnic and Histochemistry, 78, 261–270. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

The original tomographic image data are available on request from the author.


Articles from Journal of Anatomy are provided here courtesy of Anatomical Society of Great Britain and Ireland

RESOURCES