Skip to main content
Frontiers in Plant Science logoLink to Frontiers in Plant Science
. 2021 Feb 18;11:614851. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2020.614851

New Insights Into Functions of IQ67-Domain Proteins

Chunyue Guo 1, Jun Zhou 1,2,*, Dengwen Li 1,*
PMCID: PMC7930834  PMID: 33679817

Abstract

IQ67-domain (IQD) proteins, first identified in Arabidopsis and rice, are plant-specific calmodulin-binding proteins containing highly conserved motifs. They play a critical role in plant defenses, organ development and shape, and drought tolerance. Driven by comprehensive genome identification and analysis efforts, IQDs have now been characterized in several species and have been shown to act as microtubule-associated proteins, participating in microtubule-related signaling pathways. However, the precise molecular mechanisms underpinning their biological functions remain incompletely understood. Here we review current knowledge on how IQD family members are thought to regulate plant growth and development by affecting microtubule dynamics or participating in microtubule-related signaling pathways in different plant species and propose some new insights.

Keywords: IQD, scaffold proteins, cortical microtubules, microtubule dynamics, organ shape

Introduction

IQ67-domain (IQD) proteins, originally identified in Arabidopsis thaliana and rice (Abel et al., 2005), are a class of calmodulin-binding proteins unique to plants (Levy et al., 2005). They are common in a wide variety of land plants from moss to vascular plants, and they play a critical role in basic host defenses (Abel et al., 2005; Levy et al., 2005), cell shaping (Huang et al., 2013; Liu et al., 2020), and drought resistance (Ma et al., 2014; Wu et al., 2016; Yuan et al., 2019). The proteins locate to various compartments including the nucleus, cytoplasm, plasma membrane, and microtubules in Arabidopsis (Burstenbinder et al., 2017b), but their subcellular localization patterns vary (Tables 1, 2).

TABLE 1.

Subcellular localization and subfamilies members of IQD genes in the plant species.

Arabidopsis thaliana Oryza sativa Solanum lycopersicum Brachypodium distachyon Populus trichocarpa Glycine max Phyllostachys edulis Cucumis sativus Brassica rapa Vitis vinifera
Subcellular localization Nucleus Membrane Microtubules Nucleus cytoplasm Microtubules cell nucleus chloroplasts, mitochondria 65% nucleus, chloroplasts, mitochondria, plasma membrane, endoplasmic reticulum (ER) Nucleus endoplasmic reticulum, chloroplast plasma membrane nucleus and membrane
subfamilies I∼IV I∼IV I∼IV Main group I (Subgroup A, B, and C) and II I∼IV I∼IV I-IV I-IV I-IV I-III eight subgroups
References Burstenbinder et al., 2017b Yang et al., 2020 Feng et al., 2014 Filiz et al., 2013 Ma et al., 2014 Feng et al., 2014 Wu et al., 2016 Cai et al., 2016 Ge et al., 2019 Yuan et al., 2019 Liu et al., 2020

TABLE 2.

List of IQD genes identified in virous plant species.

Species Name Mem Chra Length (aa) pI Orthologous relationships References
Arabidopsis thaliana AtIQD 33 5/5 103-794 8.5-11.3 (10.3) OsIQD Abel et al., 2005
Oryza sativa OsIQD 29 Mainly 1,5,3 303-893 8.3-11.5 (10.04) AtIQD Abel et al., 2005
Solanum lycopersicum SUN 34 12/12 128-862 AtIQD Huang et al., 2013
Brachypodium distachyon BdIQD 23 12/12 340-585 6.44-11.52 22↑ ≥ 7 OsIQD;OsIQD Filiz et al., 2013
Populus trichocarpa PtIQD 40 18/19 135-819(464) 10.3 ± 0.6 AtIQD Ma et al., 2014
Glycine max GmIQD 67 20/20 141-904 5.4-11.1 SUN Feng et al., 2014
Phyllostachys edulis PeIQD 29 190-940 5.02-11.12 OsIQD Wu et al., 2016
Zea mays ZmIQD 26 8/10 326-582 9.78-11.4 OsIQD;BdIQD Cai et al., 2016
Cucumis sativus CsIQD 28 7/7 261-1558 Ge et al., 2019
Brassica rapa BrIQD 35 9/10 290-744 5.42-11.46 (10.05) AtIQD(13 pairs) Yuan et al., 2019
Vitis vinifera VvIQD 49 19/19 137-1558 (732.76) 4.72-11.02 AtIQD Liu et al., 2020

aChromosomal locations of various species IQD genes.

IQD proteins have a central region of 67 conserved amino acids, the eponymous IQ67 domain, which is responsible for recruiting calmodulin, which acts as a Ca2+ sensor (Abel et al., 2013). There are two types of IQ67 domain: (1) the Ca2+-independent IQ motif, the IQ motif (IQxxxRGxxxR or I/L/VQxxxRxxxxR/K); and (2) the Ca2+-dependent IQ motifs, the 1-5-10 and 1-8-14 motifs. The IQ motif includes 1-3 IQ xxxRGxxxR/[ILV]QxxxRxxxx[RK], the 1-5-10 motif contains 1-4 [FILVW]x3[FILV]x4[FILVW], while the 1-8-14 motif contains 1-4 [FILVW]x6[FAILVW]x5[FILVW](Abel et al., 2005; Wu et al., 2011). The IQD protein family has now been comprehensively annotated in several plants (Table 2). Even though their functions differ in some plants studied, for example, SUN/IQD regulates cell division to elongate tomatoes (Wu et al., 2011); IQD1 acts as a defense against herbivores such as aphids in Arabidopsis (Abel et al., 2005; Levy et al., 2005); while ZmIQDs and PtIQDs respond to drought stress (Ma et al., 2014; Cai et al., 2016), the underlying molecular basis or the function of other undefined IQDs in different plants may share same mechanisms, but this has not been confirmed.

IQD Proteins, the Scaffold Proteins Associated Microtubules

Scaffolding proteins interact or bind with several proteins to form an anchoring complex in specific intracellular niches such as the cell membrane, cytoplasmic matrix, or nucleus, and they play an important role in signal transduction. As scaffolding proteins, IQDs play an important role in plant growth and development (Abel et al., 2013; Burstenbinder et al., 2013, 2017a) and link Ca2+ signals with some organelles (Burstenbinder et al., 2017b). Yeast two-hybrid and pulldown experiments have verified that Arabidopsis IQD1 and IQD20 interact with CaM/CaML both in vivo and in vitro.

Kinesin light chain is generally located at the end of kinesin and participates in cargo transport (Saez et al., 2020). Therefore, IQD may co-localize with microtubules in addition to its classic nuclear localization, a finding subsequently confirmed using high-resolution fluorescence microscopy. IQD1 interacted with KLCR1 and CaM, thereby linking kinesin to Ca2+ second messenger signaling (Steinhorst and Kudla, 2013; Bi et al., 2018). Other IQD family proteins may also mediate different kinesin-dependent cargo transport signaling pathways such as protein sorting or cell wall formation (Kong et al., 2015), and these proteins and interactions require further study.

Abnormal Shoot 6 and Cortical Microtubules

Microtubules in plant cells are non-centrosome microtubule organized (Paradez et al., 2006; Wasteneys and Ambrose, 2009). Cortical microtubules (CMTs) in the interphase, preprophase band (PPB), spindle and the membrane forming body (phragmoplast) in the mitosis cell form the plant-specific microtubule arrays (Hamada, 2014). Cortical microtubules (CMTs) determine the shape of plant cells (Wasteneys and Ambrose, 2009). Usually MT-associated proteins (MAPs) interact with cortical microtubules to regulate cell shape, such as Augmin complex, Katanin, SPR2, MOR1 and so on (Chen et al., 2016). However, the dynamic regulation of cortical microtubule arrays is complex, which need further studied.

Li et al., 2020 first identified two previously unknown plant-specific positive regulators of cMT severing and ordering, ABNORMAL SHOOT 6 (ABS6) and SHADE AVOIDANCE 4 (SAV4). ABS6 binds to MT through its C-terminal and it is a kind of plant-specific IQD protein (Li et al., 2020). KATANIN 1 (KTN1), the p60 catalytic subunit of the classical MT-severing enzyme katanin, positively regulate ABS6-mediated cMT severing (Li et al., 2020). Augmin complexes and SPR2 located to the cMT crossover sites suppress KTN1-mediated cMT severing (Wightman et al., 2013; Wang et al., 2018; Tian and Kong, 2019). However, it is not known whether SPR2 inhibit the microtubule cleavage function of ABS6 directly, and whether SPR2 interacts with ABS6 (Figure 1), similar to the direct physical interaction between ABS6, SAV4, and KTN1. Additionally, only half of the C-end of ABS6 is combined with MT, which is also an interesting issue to be explored. If, as Li et al. (2020) guess, other proteins are required to adjust the conformation of ABS6 to make the full-length ABS6 interact with KTN1 and SAV4. Which proteins can regulate its conformation, has not been studied so far.

FIGURE 1.

FIGURE 1

The role of microtubule-associated proteins in cortical microtubule severing and ordering. SPR2, Augmin localized in the cMT crossover sites can prevents KTN1-mediated cMTs severing and ordering (Wightman et al., 2013; Wang et al., 2018; Tian and Kong, 2019). KATANIN 1 (KTN1): p60 catalytic subunit of MT cleavage enzyme katanin, promotes cortical microtubule severing and ordering. It is the positive regulator of ABS6 in cortical microtubule severing and ordering (Li et al., 2020). ABS6, a plant-specific IQD protein and MAP, promotes cortical microtubule severing and ordering (Li et al., 2020).

The Role of IQD on Organ Shape

Arabidopsis IQD5 and Pavement Cell Shape

Pavement cell are tightly packed in plant epidermis, with many lobes (Cosgrove, 2018; Cosgrove and Anderson, 2020). The lobes formation would be related to the dynamics of the cytoskeleton (Panteris and Galatis, 2005; Cosgrove and Anderson, 2020).

Disordered cortical microtubules usually correlate with wider pavement cell indentations and reduced lobe length. Due to the abnormal expression of IQD5, IQD11, IQD14, IQD16, and IQD25 in Arabidopsis, cortical microtubules become disordered in pavement cells to affect their shape, indicating that IQD proteins may regulate anisotropic growth and shape formation by regulating the order of cortical microtubules (Burstenbinder et al., 2017b; Liang et al., 2018; Mitra et al., 2019). Different IQDs affect microtubule organization in different ways to produce unique phenotypes (Liang et al., 2018). Due to the limitations of intracellular Ca2+ imaging and the functional redundancy of the IQD family, the specific regulatory mechanisms are still unclear (Mitra et al., 2019). It is complex.

IQD5 is highly expressed in the vegetative organs of plants and combines evenly across cortical microtubules (Liang et al., 2018). In iqd5-1 mutants, microtubule stability decreases, thereby disordering microtubules in cotyledon cells and decreasing the interdigitation of pavement cells. Therefore, IQD5 stabilizes microtubules by decreasing their dynamics. In Arabidopsis M2 seedlings, pavement cells in IQD5 mutants (bQ18E, iqd5-1, and iqd5-2) lack interdigitating lobes compared to wild-type Col-0, with cells becoming smaller and rounder. In three-day-old cotyledons, leaf length is reduced and the neck width is increased in mutants. IQD5 therefore plays an essential role in regulating Arabidopsis leaf morphogenesis (Liang et al., 2018). However, the mechanisms of IQD5 affecting leaf morphogenesis remain to be explored.

Furthermore, Ca2+ signaling plays a key role for the pavement cell morphology and IQD5’s recruitment to cortical microtubules (Mitra et al., 2019). The IQD-KLCR module stabilizes cortical microtubules laterally, especially at the microtubule-plasma membrane interface (Mitra et al., 2019). Unlike IQD5, which inhibits microtubule dynamics to stabilize microtubules, microtubule-associated proteins exist in Arabidopsis that affect microtubule organization by promoting their growth, contraction, and catastrophe frequency, thereby enhancing microtubule dynamics and ensuring normal sorting (Liang et al., 2018) [e.g., MOR1 in the Arabidopsis MAP215 family (Twell et al., 2002)]. This coordinated regulation of microtubule dynamics by different proteins enables microtubule cytoskeletal organization, nucleation, and severing. Intracellular signals are thereby transmitted in an ordered manner to control normal plant development (Liang et al., 2018).

OsIQD14 and the Shape of Seed in Rice

Rice is an important crop that has been subject to extensive efforts to increase grain size and yields. Rice OsIQD14 (Yang et al., 2020), an IQD family protein, is highly expressed in rice seed hull cells, regulating microtubule cytoskeletal dynamics to control rice grain size. In addition to localizing to the nucleus and cytoplasm, OsIQD14 also distributes along microtubules. When OsIQD14 is depleted, grains become wider and shorter and crop yields increase; when OsIQD14 is overexpressed, grains become longer and narrower without an effect on overall yield. OsIQD14 interacts with MAPs to cause catastrophic events such as expansion and contraction, thereby reducing microtubule dynamics to form narrower cells. The IQD C-terminus binds to microtubules, and the IQ67 region at the N-terminus interacts with CAM; both proteins are located on microtubules.

However, the specific molecular mechanism of IQD affecting the shape of rice seeds, such as how to respond to Ca2 + signals to affect the interaction between IQD and CaM remains to be explored. Breeding has traditionally been manipulated by altering intracellular signal transduction through GW5 and GW5L (Duan et al., 2017; Liu et al., 2017). GW5 is an IQD protein located in the plasma membrane and is involved in brassinosteroid signaling. And It is similar to OsIQD14 about its regulation of seed shape (Duan et al., 2017; Liu et al., 2017; Yang et al., 2020).

OsIQD14 controls cytoskeletal dynamics and cell morphology in rice by integrating auxin and calcium signaling pathways to increase rice yield. Regarding its specific mechanism, many hypotheses have been proposed, including the interaction among OsIQD14, SPR2 and CaM proteins is regulated by auxin/blue light and Ca2 + signal (Yang et al., 2020). Moreover, it is unclear whether there are other microtubule-related proteins such as katanin, MOR1, and Augmin involved with the process, and how they regulate microtubule dynamics and respond to environment signals.

IQD/SUN in Tomato

The tomato plant is a useful model for studying fleshy fruit development. Since the Solanum lycopersicum genome is small and highly conserved, it serves as a reference for other species in the Solanaceae family such as peppers, eggplants, and potatoes (Wu et al., 2016). Due to improvements in living standards and cultural changes, new fruits and vegetables such as square watermelons, large green peppers, and long tomatoes are now of commercial interest. Therefore, the study of genes that regulate the shape of edible plant organs is of increasing interest. The microtubule-binding proteins IQD/SUN, OFP (ovate family protein), and TRM (TON1 recruiting motif proteins) can interact with each other to form complexes and combine with microtubules to regulate microtubule-related pathways and ultimately affect tomato fruit shape (van der Knaap et al., 2014; Lazzaro et al., 2018; Wu et al., 2018). SUN, OVATE, and TRM are all implicated in tomato shaping (Xiao et al., 2008, 2009; Wu et al., 2016). IQD is a microtubule-binding protein, and TRM is also located in microtubules (Lee et al., 2006; Drevensek et al., 2012). Ovate is the archetypal OFP, and while OFPs are mostly nuclear, the OFP-TRM complex migrates through the cell to bind to microtubules (Lazzaro et al., 2018; Snouffer et al., 2020). IQD/SUN and TRM elongate tomatoes, while ovate (OFP) inhibits elongation. IQD12 controls fruit elongation via alterations to cell division patterning, while TRM1-5-like genes promote the elongation of fruits, grains, leaves, and tubers, with OFP1 having the opposite effect (Wu et al., 2011, 2018; Lazzaro et al., 2018).

IQD locates to microtubules and regulates microtubule dynamics by interacting with KLCR, CMU (Cellulose-Microtubule Uncoupling), and other related proteins. AtIQD5 may mediate the coupling of cellulose synthase movement to orbital microtubules, and cortical microtubules act as the template to transport CSCs to the plasma membrane. The slightest deviation to the trajectory of anchoring to the cell wall will directly affect the cell wall positioning of CSCs, consequently affecting the directional deposition of cellulose in the cell wall and the direction of cell expansion (Endler and Persson, 2011); ultimately, this will change the cell shape and the organ. AtOPF4 directly affects cell wall formation by interacting with KNAT7 (Li et al., 2011). Furthermore, cell division is affected by Pok1, which is mainly regulated by TRM, as well as the interaction between Pok1 and ROPs (Rho-like GTPases). These proteins also locate to the PPB, spindle, and phragmoplast. OFP and TRM regulate cell division during ovary development (Wu et al., 2018). Similarly, AtIQD5 also localizes to the PPB, spindle, and cortical microtubules in roots. Moreover, OPFs, TRMs, and TTP complexes are involved in cell plate positioning during cell division, which in turn affects organ shape.

Conclusion and Perspectives

In addition to affecting the shape of the cells and organs of some plants, IQDs can also enhance drought resistance of some plants including cabbage, corn, moso bamboo, and poplar (Ma et al., 2014; Cai et al., 2016; Wu et al., 2016; Yuan et al., 2019). The 26 ZmIQD genes in maize are regulated by drought stress. BrIQD5 is a potential target gene to improve the drought tolerance of cabbage, and four drought-related proteins have been found to interact with BrIQD5. However, this work remains in its infancy, and the IQD-related molecular pathways underpinning drought resistance need further study.

For the important role of IQD in plants, we should try to use transgenic or gene editing technology to modify the structure or expression of IQD in plants. For example: transfer the osIQD14 gene of rice into wheat or corn to increase their production? Transform the drought resistance genes BrIQD5 in cabbage into wheat and corn to promote insistence level. This could be a direction for future exploration.

Author Contributions

CG wrote the manuscript and drew the figures. JZ revised the manuscript. DL conceived the study and edited the manuscript. All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Acknowledgments

We thank Dayong Li in National Engineering Research Center for Vegetables, Beijing Academy of Agriculture and Forestry Sciences, for the contribution to the discussion.

Footnotes

Funding. This work was supported by a grant from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (31771542 and 31871347).

References

  1. Abel S., Burstenbinder K., Muller J. (2013). The emerging function of IQD proteins as scaffolds in cellular signaling and trafficking. Plant Signal Behav. 8:e24369. 10.4161/psb.24369 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Abel S., Savchenko T., Levy M. (2005). Genome-wide comparative analysis of the IQD gene families in Arabidopsis thaliana and Oryza sativa. BMC Evol. Biol. 5:72. 10.1186/1471-2148-5-72 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Bi L., Weng L., Jiang Z., Xiao H. (2018). The tomato IQD gene SUN24 regulates seed germination through ABA signaling pathway. Planta 248 919–931. 10.1007/s00425-018-2950-6 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Burstenbinder K., Mitra D., Quegwer J. (2017a). Functions of IQD proteins as hubs in cellular calcium and auxin signaling: a toolbox for shape formation and tissue-specification in plants? Plant Signal Behav. 12:e1331198. 10.1080/15592324.2017.1331198 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Burstenbinder K., Moller B., Plotner R., Stamm G., Hause G., Mitra D., et al. (2017b). The IQD family of calmodulin-binding proteins links calcium signaling to Microtubules, Membrane Subdomains, and the Nucleus. Plant Physiol. 173 1692–1708. 10.1104/pp.16.01743 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Burstenbinder K., Savchenko T., Muller J., Adamson A. W., Stamm G., Kwong R., et al. (2013). Arabidopsis calmodulin-binding protein IQ67-domain 1 localizes to microtubules and interacts with kinesin light chain-related protein-1. J. Biol. Chem. 288 1871–1882. 10.1074/jbc.M112.396200 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Cai R., Zhang C., Zhao Y., Zhu K., Wang Y., Jiang H., et al. (2016). Genome-wide analysis of the IQD gene family in maize. Mol. Genet. Genomics 291 543–558. 10.1007/s00438-015-1122-7 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Chen X., Wu S., Liu Z., Friml J. (2016). Environmental and endogenous control of cortical microtubule orientation. Trends Cell Biol. 26 409–419. 10.1016/j.tcb.2016.02.003 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Cosgrove D. J. (2018). Nanoscale structure, mechanics and growth of epidermal cell walls. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 46 77–86. 10.1016/j.pbi.2018.07.016 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Cosgrove D. J., Anderson C. T. (2020). Plant cell growth: do pectins drive lobe formation in Arabidopsis pavement cells? Curr. Biol. 30 R660–R662. 10.1016/j.cub.2020.04.007 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Drevensek S., Goussot M., Duroc Y., Christodoulidou A., Steyaert S., Schaefer E., et al. (2012). The Arabidopsis TRM1-TON1 interaction reveals a recruitment network common to plant cortical microtubule arrays and eukaryotic centrosomes. Plant Cell 24 178–191. 10.1105/tpc.111.089748 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Duan P., Xu J., Zeng D., Zhang B., Geng M., Zhang G., et al. (2017). Natural variation in the promoter of GSE5 contributes to grain size diversity in rice. Mol. Plant 10 685–694. 10.1016/j.molp.2017.03.009 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Endler A., Persson S. (2011). Cellulose synthases and synthesis in Arabidopsis. Mol. Plant 4 199–211. 10.1093/mp/ssq079 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Feng L., Chen Z., Ma H., Chen X., Li Y., Wang Y., et al. (2014). The IQD gene family in soybean: structure, phylogeny, evolution and expression. PLoS One 9:e110896. 10.1371/journal.pone.0110896 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Filiz E., Tombuloglu H., Ozyigit I. I. (2013). Genome wide analysis of IQ67 domain (IQD) gene families in Brachypodium distachyon. Plant Omics. 6 425–432. [Google Scholar]
  16. Ge Q., Wang X. F., Li H., Ren Z. H., Wang L. N. (2019). Genome-wide identification and analysis of IQD/SUN gene family in cucumber. Genom. Appl. Biol. 38 4110–4119. 10.13417/j.gab.038.004110 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  17. Hamada T. (2014). Microtubule organization and microtubule-associated proteins in plant cells. Int. Rev. Cell Mol. Biol. 312 1–52. 10.1016/B978-0-12-800178-3.00001-4 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Huang Z., Van Houten J., Gonzalez G., Xiao H., van der Knaap E. (2013). Genome-wide identification, phylogeny and expression analysis of SUN. OFP and YABBY gene family in tomato. Mol. Genet. Genomics 288 111–129. 10.1007/s00438-013-0733-0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Kong Z., Ioki M., Braybrook S., Li S., Ye Z. H., Julie Lee Y. R., et al. (2015). Kinesin-4 functions in vesicular transport on cortical microtubules and regulates cell wall mechanics during cell elongation in plants. Mol. Plant 8 1011–1023. 10.1016/j.molp.2015.01.004 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Lazzaro M. D., Wu S., Snouffer A., Wang Y., van der Knaap E. (2018). Plant organ shapes are regulated by protein interactions and associations with microtubules. Front. Plant Sci. 9:1766. 10.3389/fpls.2018.01766 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Lee Y. K., Kim G. T., Kim I. J., Park J., Kwak S. S., Choi G., et al. (2006). LONGIFOLIA1 and LONGIFOLIA2, two homologous genes, regulate longitudinal cell elongation in Arabidopsis. Development 133 4305–4314. 10.1242/dev.02604 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Levy M., Wang Q., Kaspi R., Parrella M. P., Abel S. (2005). Arabidopsis IQD1, a novel calmodulin-binding nuclear protein, stimulates glucosinolate accumulation and plant defense. Plant J. 43 79–96. 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2005.02435.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Li E., Wang S., Liu Y., Chen J. G., Douglas C. J. (2011). OVATE FAMILY PROTEIN4 (OFP4) interaction with KNAT7 regulates secondary cell wall formation in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant J. 67 328–341. 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2011.04595.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Li Y., Deng M., Liu H., Li Y., Chen Y., Jia M., et al. (2020). ABNORMAL SHOOT 6 interacts with KATANIN 1 and SHADE AVOIDANCE 4 to promote cortical microtubule severing and ordering in Arabidopsis. J. Integr. Plant Biol. 1–19 10.1111/jipb.13003 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Liang H., Zhang Y., Martinez P., Rasmussen C. G., Xu T., Yang Z. (2018). The microtubule-associated protein IQ67 DOMAIN5 modulates microtubule dynamics and pavement cell shape. Plant Physiol. 177 1555–1568. 10.1104/pp.18.00558 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Liu J., Chen J., Zheng X., Wu F., Lin Q., Heng Y., et al. (2017). GW5 acts in the brassinosteroid signalling pathway to regulate grain width and weight in rice. Nat. Plants 3:17043. 10.1038/nplants.2017.43 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Liu Z., Haider M. S., Khan N., Fang J. (2020). Comprehensive sequence analysis of IQD gene family and their expression profiling in grapevine (Vitis vinifera). Genes 11:235. 10.3390/genes11020235 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Ma H., Feng L., Chen Z., Chen X., Zhao H., Xiang Y. (2014). Genome-wide identification and expression analysis of the IQD gene family in Populus trichocarpa. Plant Sci. 229 96–110. 10.1016/j.plantsci.2014.08.017 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Mitra D., Klemm S., Kumari P., Quegwer J., Moller B., Poeschl Y., et al. (2019). Microtubule-associated protein IQ67 DOMAIN5 regulates morphogenesis of leaf pavement cells in Arabidopsis thaliana. J. Exp. Bot. 70 529–543. 10.1093/jxb/ery395 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Panteris E., Galatis B. (2005). The morphogenesis of lobed plant cells in the mesophyll and epidermis: organization and distinct roles of cortical microtubules and actin filaments. New Phytol. 167 721–732. 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2005.01464.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Paradez A., Wright A., Ehrhardt D. W. (2006). Microtubule cortical array organization and plant cell morphogenesis. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 9 571–578. 10.1016/j.pbi.2006.09.005 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Saez T. M. M., Fernandez Bessone I., Rodriguez M. S., Alloatti M., Otero M. G., Cromberg L. E., et al. (2020). Kinesin-1-mediated axonal transport of CB1 receptors is required for cannabinoid-dependent axonal growth and guidance. Development 147:dev184069. 10.1242/dev.184069 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Snouffer A., Kraus C., van der Knaap E. (2020). The shape of things to come: ovate family proteins regulate plant organ shape. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 53 98–105. 10.1016/j.pbi.2019.10.005 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Steinhorst L., Kudla J. (2013). Calcium – a central regulator of pollen germination and tube growth. Biochim. Biophys. Acta Mol. Cell Res. 1833 1573–1581. 10.1016/j.bbamcr.2012.10.009 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Tian J., Kong Z. (2019). The role of the augmin complex in establishing microtubule arrays. J. Exp. Bot. 70 3035–3041. 10.1093/jxb/erz123 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Twell D., Park S. K., Hawkins T. J., Schubert D., Schmidt R., Smertenko A., et al. (2002). MOR1/GEM1 has an essential role in the plant-specific cytokinetic phragmoplast. Nat. Cell Biol. 4 711–714. 10.1038/ncb844 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. van der Knaap E., Chakrabarti M., Chu Y. H., Clevenger J. P., Illa-Berenguer E., Huang Z., et al. (2014). What lies beyond the eye: the molecular mechanisms regulating tomato fruit weight and shape. Front. Plant Sci. 5:227. 10.3389/fpls.2014.00227 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Wang G., Wang C., Liu W., Ma Y., Dong L., Tian J., et al. (2018). Augmin antagonizes katanin at microtubule crossovers to control the dynamic organization of plant cortical arrays. Curr. Biol. 28 1311–1317.e3. 10.1016/j.cub.2018.03.007 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Wasteneys G. O., Ambrose J. C. (2009). Spatial organization of plant cortical microtubules: close encounters of the 2D kind. Trends Cell Biol. 19 62–71. 10.1016/j.tcb.2008.11.004 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Wightman R., Chomicki G., Kumar M., Carr P., Turner S. R. (2013). SPIRAL2 determines plant microtubule organization by modulating microtubule severing. Curr. Biol. 23 1902–1907. 10.1016/j.cub.2013.07.061 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Wu M., Li Y., Chen D., Liu H., Zhu D., Xiang Y. (2016). Genome-wide identification and expression analysis of the IQD gene family in moso bamboo (Phyllostachys edulis). Sci. Rep. 6:24520. 10.1038/srep24520 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Wu S., Xiao H., Cabrera A., Meulia T., van der Knaap E. (2011). SUN regulates vegetative and reproductive organ shape by changing cell division patterns. Plant Physiol. 157 1175–1186. 10.1104/pp.111.181065 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Wu S., Zhang B., Keyhaninejad N., Rodríguez G. R., Kim H. J., Chakrabarti M., et al. (2018). A common genetic mechanism underlies morphological diversity in fruits and other plant organs. Nat. Commun. 9:4734. 10.1038/s41467-018-07216-8 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Xiao H., Jiang N., Schaffner E., Stockinger E. J., van der Knaap E. (2008). A retrotransposon-mediated gene duplication underlies morphological variation of tomato fruit. Science 319 1527–1530. 10.1126/science.1153040 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Xiao H., Radovich C., Welty N., Hsu J., Li D., Meulia T., et al. (2009). Integration of tomato reproductive developmental landmarks and expression profiles, and the effect of SUN on fruit shape. BMC Plant Biol. 9:49. 10.1186/1471-2229-9-49 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Yang B., Wendrich J. R., De Rybel B., Weijers D., Xue H. W. (2020). Rice microtubule-associated protein IQ67-DOMAIN14 regulates grain shape by modulating microtubule cytoskeleton dynamics. Plant Biotechnol. J. 18 1141–1152. 10.1111/pbi.13279 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Yuan J., Liu T., Yu Z., Li Y., Ren H., Hou X., et al. (2019). Genome-wide analysis of the Chinese cabbage IQD gene family and the response of BrIQD5 in drought resistance. Plant Mol. Biol. 99 603–620. 10.1007/s11103-019-00839-5 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Frontiers in Plant Science are provided here courtesy of Frontiers Media SA

RESOURCES