Skip to main content
BMJ Paediatrics Open logoLink to BMJ Paediatrics Open
. 2021 Mar 3;5(1):e001028. doi: 10.1136/bmjpo-2021-001028

Early life antibiotics and childhood gastrointestinal disorders: a systematic review

Kim Kamphorst 1,2,#, Emmy Van Daele 3,#, Arine M Vlieger 2, Joost G Daams 4, Jan Knol 3,5, Ruurd M van Elburg 1,
PMCID: PMC7931764  PMID: 33748435

Abstract

Background

In adults, there is increasing evidence for an association between antibiotic use and gastrointestinal (GI) disorders but in children, the evidence is scarce.

Objective

Assess the association between exposure to antibiotics in the first 2 years of life in term born children and the presence of chronic GI disorders later in childhood.

Design

For this systematic review the MEDLINE, Embase, WHO trial register and Web of Science were systematically searched from inception to 8 June 2020. Title and abstract screening (n=12 219), full-text screening (n=132) as well as the quality assessment with the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale were independently performed by two researchers.

Main outcome measures

The association between antibiotics and inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) (n=6), eosinophilic oesophagitis (EoE) (n=5), coeliac disease (CeD) (n=6), infantile colics (n=3), functional constipation (n=2), recurrent abdominal pain, regurgitation, functional diarrhoea and infant dyschezia were examined.

Results

Twenty-two studies were included, 11 cohort and 11 case–control studies. A best evidence synthesis showed strong evidence for an association between antibiotic exposure in the first 2 years of life and the presence of IBD, and CeD during childhood. Moderate evidence was found for an association with EoE and no association with functional constipation in the first year of life. There was insufficient evidence for the other studied disorders.

Conclusions

The use of antibiotics in early life may increase the risk of GI disorders later in life. Further studies are necessary to unravel the underlying mechanisms and determine potential preventive measures. Meanwhile judicious use of antibiotics in early childhood is highly warranted.

PROSPERO registration number

PROSPERO CRD42019132631.

Keywords: gastroenterology, epidemiology, neonatology


What is known about the subject?

  • Evidence about the association between antibiotic use and gastrointestinal (GI) disorders is increasing for adults, but in children the evidence remains scarce.

  • The incidence of GI disorders in childhood is increasing.

What this study adds?

  • Antibiotics in early life may increase the risk of GI disorders later in life especially inflammatory bowel disease and coeliac disease.

  • Although functional GI disorders are the most frequent in childhood, very few studies examined their association with antibiotics in early life.

Introduction

The incidence of paediatric gastrointestinal disorders (GI disorders), such as paediatric inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) and coeliac disease (CeD), is rising.1 2 The increase in paediatric GI disorders is most likely related to environmental factors and recently the focus has been on the role of the intestinal microbiome. A microbiome that has been disturbed by factors like stress, dietary change, environmental factors or drugs, can result in alterations in the immune system.3 Several studies have shown that a disturbed microbiome can be a cause or trigger of GI disorders, probably mediated by these immunological changes.4–7

One of the drugs with the most profound effect on the microbiome are antibiotics.8 The impact of antibiotics on the microbiome depends on various factors such as type of antibiotic, dosage and duration of exposure.8 Furthermore, age at exposure is probably also important. The gut of a newborn infant is almost sterile with a low diversity and matures according to several developmental stages with increasing diversity over time.9 The microbiome stabilises around the age of 2–3 years.9 Since this developing gut microbiota plays an important role in the training of both innate and adaptive immune system, it is likely that antibiotics will have their biggest impact when administered in the first 2 years of life.

For the association between antibiotic use and GI disorders, that has been shown in adults,10 there is only limited evidence in children.11 Therefore, the aim of this systematic review was to assess the association between exposure to antibiotics in the first 2 years of life and the presence of chronic GI disorders during childhood.

Method

Study selection

This systematic review was conducted according to the guidelines of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta‐Analyses and registered in PROSPERO CRD42019132631.12 13 MEDLINE, Embase, WHO trial register and Web of Science were systematically searched from inception to 8 June 2020 to identify all studies examining the association between antibiotic exposure in the first 2 years of life and the presence of common chronic (longer than 2 weeks, in order to exclude viral diarrhoea) GI disorders during the first 18 years of life. We searched for associations with IBD, eosinophilic oesophagitis (EoE), CeD, irritable bowel syndrome (IBS), (functional) abdominal pain (AP), constipation, dyspepsia, aerophagia, infantile colic, gastro-oesophageal reflux (GERD), regurgitation, dyschezia and chronic diarrhoea.

A multi stranded search approach comprised various concept combinations of children aged 0–4 years, prognosis, GI disorders and antibiotics. In order to reduce recall noise and enhance search results precision we used VOS-viewer to identify terms for NOTing out irrelevant records from databases searched.14 15 See online supplemental file 1 for the full search strategies.

Supplementary data

bmjpo-2021-001028supp001.pdf (97.4KB, pdf)

Patient and public involvement statement

As this is a systematic review of the literature, there were no patients involved in the design of the research question nor the study itself. Furthermore, for the same reason no approval for the study was required from an ethical committee.

In- and exclusion criteria

Studies were included if: (1) antibiotics were administered between full-term birth and 2 years of age; (2) study outcome was diagnosis with a chronic GI disorder during the first 18 years of life; (3) antibiotic use was before the diagnosis of the GI disorder; (4) a control group was included; (5) in case multiple studies were found examining similar outcomes in one cohort, only the study with the largest cohort was included. No restrictions were placed on the time period of publication. Searches were limited to studies conducted in humans and excluded if the full text was not available in English, Dutch, German or French.

All records found in the search were exported into Rayyan after deduplication.16 Two researchers (KK and EVD) independently performed title and abstract screening as well as full-text screening. After consensus about the study selection, data were entered into a data extraction form, which included: author, year of publication, country, study design, cases, controls/cohort, population age, sample size exposed to antibiotics, age at exposure, details about classification by type of antibiotics, type of GI disorder, method of diagnosis, confounders for which corrected and the association between exposure and outcome.

Methodological quality

To assess the risk of bias, two researchers (KK and EVD) independently assessed the methodological quality. Discrepancies were resolved by discussion until consensus was reached. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) was used, which has been developed to assess the quality of observational studies.17 The NOS includes different instruments for assessing case–control and cohort studies. Both scales contain a maximum of nine points and assess studies in three core areas: (1) selection of study participants; (2) comparability of groups; (3) detection of exposure/outcome. One point for comparability of groups was given when the study controlled for the main important confounder and a second point if controlled for a second important confounder, see online supplemental file 2. Studies were rated high quality with a score of eight or higher, moderate quality with a score between five and seven and weak quality with a score of four or less.18

Supplementary data

bmjpo-2021-001028supp002.pdf (42.5KB, pdf)

Data analyses

To synthesise the methodological quality of the studies, a commonly used best evidence synthesis was applied per disorder in which the methodological quality was considered according to the following definitions: (1) strong evidence, provided by generally consistent findings in at least two high-quality studies; (2) moderate evidence, provided by generally consistent results in one high-quality study and at least one moderate-quality or low-quality study, or generally consistent results in multiple moderate-quality or low-quality studies; (3) insufficient evidence, when less than two studies were available or inconsistent findings in multiple studies.19–21 Results were considered consistent when at least 75% of the studies showed results in the same direction.

Results

Search results

Of the 14 731 retrieved records, 12 219 remained after removing duplicates. These records were screened; 132 were assessed as eligible and read in full-text of which 110 were excluded and 22 studies included in this review. Details of the selection procedure are shown in figure 1.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses flow diagram of the study selection.

Study characteristics

The included studies were published between 2010 and 2020 (tables 1A–D): 11 cohort studies22–32 and 11 case–control studies.33–43 The studies were performed in Sweden (n=4),27 30 35 36 the USA (n=5),33 34 37 41 42 Italy (n=4),22 29 32 43 Denmark (n=2),23 31 Canada (n=2)38 39 and one in the UK,25 the Netherlands26 and Finland.40 There were two international studies, one in Denmark and Norway,28 and another in Finland, Germany, Sweden and the USA.24

Table 1A.

Study characteristics and association with antibiotics: inflammatory bowel disease

Author
Country
Design
Age at diagnosis* or cohort entry† or study endpoint‡ Cases/controls or cohort Cases exposed
Time exposure
Recording details
Confounders for which corrected Significant association Quality score
Canova et al
Italy
Case–control43
8.8 years* 70/700 33 (47%)
0–12 months
ATC code
  • Birth order.

  • Age mother (at birth).

  • Apgar score at 1 min.

  • Birth weight.

  • Education mother.

  • Gestational age.

  • Multiple birth.

  • Season of birth.

AB first 6 months of life childhood onset IBD
  • Any course aOR=1.458, 95% CI 0.81 to 2.63.

  • Dose-dependent

    • 2–3 courses aOR=2.29, 95% CI 1.01 to 5.24.

    • >4 courses aOR=6.25, 95% CI 1.70 to 23.05.


AB first 12 months of life childhood onset IBD
  • Any course aOR=1.08, 95% CI 0.64 to 1.80.

  • Dose-dependent: >4 courses aOR=2.92, 95% CI 1.32 to 6.46.

8/9
high
Hviid et al
Denmark
Cohort31
3.4 years* 117 (0.02%)
(50 CD and 67 UC)/577 627
84 (72%)
0–12 months
ATC code
  • Age.

  • Calendar period.

  • Other times since use.

  • Other types of antibiotics.

Increased risk of Crohn’s disease after:
AB use in the last 3 months:
  • 3–11 months RR=3.32, 95% CI 1.15 to 9.56.

  • 1 year RR=1.53, 95% CI 0.15 to 15.46.


AB use >3 months previously before diagnosis:
  • 0–2 months RR=4.19, 95% CI 1.64 to 10.68.

8/9
high
Kronman et al
UK
Cohort25
Exposed 4.2 years† 748 (0.07%)/1 072 426 436 (58%)
0–12 months
Systemic AB prescriptions
  • Age.

  • Chronic granulomatous disease.

  • IBD family.

  • Primary sclerosing cholangitis.

  • Sex.

  • Socioeconomic deprivation.

  • Exposure was associated with a 5.5-fold increased IBD risk (aHR=5.51, 95% CI 1.66 to 18.28).

  • Dose-dependent: exposure to >2 anti-anaerobic antibiotic courses was more highly associated with IBD development than exposure to one or two courses (aHR=4.77, 95% CI 2.13 to 10.68) versus (3.33, 95% CI 1.69 to 6.58).

  • Type-dependent: fluoroquinolone (aHR=2.09, 95% CI 1.10 to 3.98) and metronidazole exposure (aHR=186.25, 95% CI 10.86 to 3193.65) was significantly associated with IBD.

7/9
moderate
Örtqvist et al
Sweden
Cohort27
2 years* 95 (0.01%)
51 IBD (CD and/or UC), 20 CD and 24 UC/827 239
IBD 43 (84,3%)
CD 16 (80%)
UC 20 (83.3%)
0–12 months
ATC code
  • Delivery mode.

  • Education parents.

  • Ethnicity parents.

  • IBD parents.

No significant associations (any and PcV antibiotics) or dose–response relationship were found. 8/9
high
Shaw et al
Canada
Case–control38
8.4 years* 36/360 21 (58%)
0–12 months
ATC code
  • Age.

  • Place of residence.

  • Sex.

  • One or more dispensations of antibiotics was associated with 2.9 times the odds (95% CI 1.2 to 7.0, p=0.017) of having IBD.

  • Stratified by IBD type, only CD was significant (OR=5.3, 95% CI 1.6 to 17.4; p=0.006).

  • Dose-dependent: association for 2–4 (OR=2.9, 95% CI 1.1 to 7.8; p=0.039) and 5+ (OR=5.0, 95 % CI 1.3 to 18.9; p=0.18) prescriptions.

8/9
high
Virta et al
Finland
Case–control40
CD: 9.7 years‡
UC: 8.5 years‡
595
(233 CD, 362 UC)/2380
313 (52,6%)
0–12 months
ATC code
  • Age.

  • Place of residence.

  • Chronic diseases.

  • Sex.

  • Use of AB overall was not significant.

  • Type-dependent: phenoxymethylpenicillin was associated with an increased risk of CD. (aOR=2.54, 95% CI1.3 to 4.98).

8/9
high

AB, antibiotic; aHR, adjusted HR; aOR, adjusted OR; ATC, Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical (ATC) Classification System; CD, Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical (ATC) Classification System; IBD, inflammatory bowel disease; IRR, incidence rate ratio; PcV, phenoxymethylpenicillin; UC, ulcerative colitis.

Table 1B.

Study characteristics and association with antibiotics: eosinophilic oesophagitis (EoE)

Author
Country
Design
Age diagnosis* Cases/controls Cases exposed
Time exposure
Recording details
Confounders for which corrected Significant association Quality score
Jensen et al
North Carolina (USA)
Case–control33
Cases 11 years* 31/52 22 (71%)
0–12 months
Motherly reported
None Antibiotics were associated with EoE
(OR=6, 95% CI 1.7 to 20.8).
4/9
weak
Jensen et al
North Carolina (USA)
Case–control34
Cases 10.6 years* 127/121 91 (72%)
0–12 months
Motherly reported
  • Education mother.

  • NICU admission.

Antibiotics were associated with EoE
(aOR=2.30, 95% CI 1.21 to 4.38).
6/9
moderate
Radanoet al
Massachusetts (USA)
Case–control37
Cases 3 years* 25/74 17 (67%)
0–12 months
Parental reported
  • Age.

  • Atopy.

  • Atopy family.

  • Sex.

Antibiotics were associated with EoE (OR=3.61, 95% CI 1.11 to 11.74; p=0.03). 7/9
moderate
Slae et al
Canada
Case–control39
Cases 8.6 years* 102/167 60 (59%)
0–12 months
Parental reported
  • Breast feeding.

  • Birth order.

  • Day care attendance (early).

  • Exposure to farm animals.

  • Fast food consumption.

Rates of antibiotic exposure were similar for cases and controls. 3/9
weak
Witmer et al
USA
Case–control41
4.2 years* 1410/2820 409 (29%)
0–6 months
Pharmaceutical coding
  • Age.

  • Atopy (markers).

  • Delivery mode.

  • Erythema toxicum neonatorum.

  • Feeding problems.

  • Infantile colic.

  • Medication exposure.

  • Oral candidiasis.

  • Prematurity.

  • Prolonged rupture/chorioamnionitis.

  • Reflux.

  • Sex.

The association with antibiotic exposure was statistically significant (aOR=1.31, 95% CI1.10 to 1.56). 7/9
moderate

aOR, adjusted OR; NICU, Neonatale Intensive Care Unit.

Table 1C.

Study characteristics and association with antibiotics: coeliac disease (CeD)

Author
Country
Design
Age diagnosis* or study endpoint‡ Cases/controls or cohort Cases exposed
Time exposure
Recording details
Confounders for which corrected Significant association Quality score
Bittker and Bell
USA
Case–control42
6.1 years* 332/241 237 (71%)
0–24 months
Parental reported
  • Age.

  • Age mother (at birth).

  • Education mother.

  • Ethnicity.

  • Antibiotic exposure is associated with subsequent CeD (aOR=1.133, 95% CI 1.037 to 1.244; p=0.007).

  • Dose-dependent: ORs increase with number of antibiotic courses.

5/9
moderate
Canova et al
Italy
Cohort22
6.4 years* 1.227 CeD (0.6%)
866 confirmed‡ and
361 unconfirmed‡/203 557
336 (47%)
0–12 months
ATC code
  • Education mother

    (only in sensitivity analysis with pathological confirmed villous atrophy).

  • Sex.

  • Year of birth.

  • Increased risk of developing CeD after at least 1 AB course (IRR=1.24, 95% CI 1.07 to 1.43), (IRR=1.31, 95% CI 1.10 to 1.56) for histopathologically confirmed CeD.

  • Dose-dependent: risk increased with more AB courses (p trend <0.01).

  • Type-dependent: cephalosporin use was strongly associated with CeD onset (IRR=1.42, 95% CI 1.18 to 1.73), (IRR=1.51, 95% CI 1.21 to 1.89) for histopathologically confirmed CeD. For first-generation and second-generation drugs: (IRR=1.39, 95% CI 1.11 to 1.76 and third-generation and fourth-generation drugs: IRR=1.49, 95% CI 1.14 to 1.95).

8/9
high
Kemppainen et al
Finland, Germany, Sweden and the USA
Cohort24
21.4 months* 783 (11.9%)/6558 Unknown
0–24 months
Parental reported
  • Breastfeeding (at 90 days of age).

  • CeD genotype with family.

  • Delivery mode.

  • Maternal AB use during pregnancy.

  • Place of residence.

  • Probiotic use before 90 days of age.

  • Season of birth.

  • Sex.

  • Exposure to AB was not associated with CeD.

  • Dose-dependent: 2 or more doses of macrolides within the first year of life (157 of 6558 (2.4%)) had elevated CeD risk (HR=1.77, 95% CI 1.18 to 2.66; p=0.006 before but not after adjustment).

6/9
moderate
Mårild et al
Sweden
Case–control35
0–2 years* 132 coeliac disease/655
12 inflammation/60
17 normal mucosa/85
CeD 51 (39%)
Inflammation 6 (50%)
0–24 months
ATC code
  • Age.

  • Education mother.

  • Number of outpatient visits before biopsy.

  • Sex.

Exposure to AB was associated with CeD ORs for prior AB use (CeD): cases 51/132 (38.6%) controls 189/655 (28.9%) (OR=1.58, 95% CI 1.07 to 2.34). 8/9
high
Myléus et al
Sweden
Case–control36
14 months* 373/581 97 (26%)
0–6 months
Parental reported
  • Age.

  • Place of residence.

  • Sex.

No significantly increased risk for coeliac disease (OR=1.2, 95% CI 0.87 to 1.6; p=0.27). 7/9
moderate
Dydensborg Sander et al
Denmark and Norway
Cohort28
Danish: 11.6 years‡
Norwegian: 5.4 years‡
Danish:
1427 (0.12%)/1 168 656
Norwegian:
1919 (0.36%)/537 457
Danish:
622 (43.6%)
Norwegian:
390 (20.3%)
0–12 months
ATC code
  • Age mother.

  • Associated comorbidity.

  • Birth order.

  • Education mother.

  • Hospitalisation with infection.

  • Season of birth.

  • Sex.

  • Type 1 diabetes child and/or mother.

  • Exposure to systemic AB (penicillins and extended spectrum penicillins) was positively associated with diagnosed coeliac disease in both cohorts (pooled aOR=1.26, 95% CI 1.16 to 1.36).

  • Dose-dependent: between number of AB courses and risk of CeD (pooled aOR for each additional dispensed AB=1.08, 95% CI 1.05 to 1.11).

9/9
high

AB, antibiotic; aOR, adjusted OR; IRR, incidence rate ratio.

Table 1D.

Study characteristics and association with antibiotics: FGIDs: infantile colics, functional constipation (FC), recurrent abdominal pain (AP) and regurgitation, functional diarrhoea and infant dyschezia

Author
Country
Design
Age diagnosis* Cases/controls or cohort Cases exposed
Time exposure
Recording details
Confounders for which corrected Significant association Quality score
Infantile colics
Hestbaek et al
Denmark
Cohort23
0–6 months* 2183 (8.1%)/26 983 Excessive 895 (41%) extreme excessive 355 (50%)
0–6 months
Motherly reported
None At 6 months old, statistically significant associations between excessive crying and the use of antibiotics due to ear infections (OR=1.47, 95% CI 1.18 to 1.82) were found. 6/9
moderate
Oosterloo et al
The Netherlands
Cohort26
0–1 year* 74 (20%)/362 33 (45%)
0–7 days
Broad-spectrum AB intravenous for 2–3 days (AB2) or 7 days (AB7)
  • Atopy family.

  • Birth order.

  • Breastfeeding.

  • Day care attendance.

  • Delivery mode.

  • Education parents.

  • Tobacco exposure.

  • Antibiotic treatment was an independent risk factor for infantile colic (aOR=1.66, 95% CI1.00 to 2.77, p=0.05).

  • Doctors-diagnosed infantile colic was higher in AB+ than in AB− (4.0% vs 0.4%; p=0.014).

  • Duration-dependent: parent-reported infantile colic was higher in AB7 compared with no antibiotics (AB−) and AB2 (24.8%, 14.4% and 14.3%, p=0.048 and p=0.015).

8/9
high
Salvatore et al
Italy
Cohort32
0–1 year* 265 (41.9%)/632 141 (22.3%)
0–7 days
Hospital chart and parental report
  • Birth weight.

  • Breast feeding (at 1 month of life).

  • Delivery mode.

  • Duration of hospitalisation at birth.

  • Gestational age.

  • Neonatal complications.

No association was found (OR=1.16; 95% CI 0.79 to 1.70, p=0.439). 7/9
moderate
Functional constipation (FC)
Salvatore et al
Italy
Cohort32
0–1 year* 128 (26.6%)/632 141 (22.3%)
0–7 days
Hospital charts and parental reported
  • Birth weight.

  • Breast feeding (at 1 month of life).

  • Delivery mode.

  • Duration of hospitalisation at birth.

  • Gestational age.

  • Neonatal complications.

No association was found (OR=0.77; 95% CI 0.49 to 1.20, p=0.242) 7/9
moderate
Turco et al
Italy
Cohort29
0–1 year* 43 (10.7%)/465 15 (34.8%)
0–12 months
Parental reported
  • Anti-inflammatory drugs or corticosteroids.

  • Atopy and in family.

  • Birth order.

  • Breast feeding and weaning.

  • Education parents.

  • Fever episodes before onset.

  • FGIDs family.

  • Nursery school age.

  • Place of residence (>3000 citizens).

  • Sex.

  • Vitamin and food supplements.

No statistically significant association was found (26% vs 19%). 8/9
high
Recurrent abdominal pain (AP)
Uusijärvi et al
Sweden
Cohort30
12 years* Monthly: 231 (8.7%)
Weekly: 111 (4.2%)/2654
Monthly 1900 (71.5%)
Weekly 81 (72,9%)
0–24 months
Parental reported
  • Asthma at 12 years of age.

  • Asthma at 1 year.

  • Sex.

Stratified analyses showed that girls, who received antibiotics during both the first and the second year of life, had an increased risk of AP at 12 years (OR=1.65, 95% CI 1.09 to 2.49). 5/9
moderate
Regurgitation, functional diarrhoea and infant dyschezia
Salvatore et al
Italy
Cohort32
0–1 year* Regurgitation: 236 (37.3%)
Functional diarrhoea: 24 (3.8%)
Infant dyschezia: 199 (31.5%)/632
141 (22.3%)
0–7 days
Hospital charts and parental reported
  • Birth weight.

  • Breast feeding (at 1 month of life).

  • Delivery mode.

  • Duration of hospitalisation at birth.

  • Gestational age.

  • Neonatal complications.

No association was found for regurgitation (OR=1.29, 95% CI 0.88 to 1.90, p=0.190), functional diarrhoea (OR=0.90, 95% CI 0.33 to 2.45, p=0.835), or infant dyschezia (OR=1.29, 95% CI 0.87 to 1.93, p=0.205). 7/9
moderate

AB, antibiotic; FGIDs, functional gastrointestinal disorders.

The associations between antibiotics and the following GI disorders were examined: IBD (n=6),25 27 31 38 40 43 EoE (n=5),33 34 37 39 41 CeD (n=6),22 24 28 35 36 42 infantile colics (n=3),23 26 32 functional constipation (n=2),29 32 recurrent AP (n=1).30 One study examined several functional GI disorders (FGIDs): infantile colics, functional constipation, functional diarrhoea, infant dyschezia and regurgitation.32

Exposure to antibiotics was studied in the first 2 years of life (n=4),24 30 35 42 the first 18 months of life (n=1),23 the first year of life (n=13),22 25 27–29 31 33 34 37–40 43 the first 6 months of life (n=2)36 41 and the first week of life (n=2)26 32 (tables 1A–D). Since only a few studies provided details about type of antibiotics and/or number of antibiotic treatments in the first 2 years of life, the associations include mostly the overall antibiotic exposure.

Quality assessment

Ten studies were of high quality,22 26–29 31 35 38 40 43 ten studies moderate23–25 30 32 34 36 37 41 42 and two weak33 39 (table 2). Frequently observed weaknesses were a high dropout rate in the cohort studies, assessment of antibiotic exposure through parental reports, and no correction for important confounders.

Table 2.

Quality assessment

Cohort studies* Selection Comparability Outcome/exposure Score
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
Representativeness Selection Exposure Outcome Most important Second important Assessment Duration of follow-up Adequacy follow-up
Canova et al22 * * * * * * * * 8/9
Hestbaek et al23 * * * * * * 6/9
Hviid et al31 * * * * * * * * 8/9
Kemppainen et al24 * * * * * * 6/9
Kronman et al25 * * * * * * * 7/9
Oosterloo et al26 * * * * * * * * 8/9
Örtqvist et al27 * * * * * * * * 8/9
Salvatore et al32 * * * * * * * 7/9
Dydensborg Sander et al28 * * * * * * * * * 9/9
Turco et al29 * * * * * * * * 8/9
Uusijärvi et al30 * * * * * 5/9
Case–control studies† Case definition Cases Controls Definition controls Most important Second important Exposure Ascertainment Non-response rate Score
Bittker and Bell42 * * * * * 5/9
Canova et al43 * * * * * * * * 8/9
Jensen et al33 * * * * 4/9
Jensen et al34 * * * * * * 6/9
Mårild et al35 * * * * * * * * 8/9
Myléus et al36 * * * * * * * 7/9
Radano et al37 * * * * * * * 7/9
Shaw et al38 * * * * * * * * 8/9
Slae et al39 * * * 3/9
Virta et al40 * * * * * * * * 8/9
Witmer et al41 * * * * * * * 7/9

Comparability: most important confounder: IBD and CeD: presence of IBD/ CeD in 1st degree family member, EoE: sex, colics: atopy child and/or family, functional constipation: maternal education/social economic status, abdominal pain: lactose intolerance/cow’s milk allergy. Comparability: second important confounder: IBD: ethnicity and/or age, EoE: presence of other atopic diseases and/or ethnicity, CeD: sex and/or season of birth and/or the presence of other autoimmune diseases, colics: presence of GERD and/or type of feeding and/or being a first child, functional constipation: sex and/or age, abdominal pain: anxiety/depression/stress in the child and/or the parents.

*Cohort studies: 1. representativeness of the exposed cohort, 2. selection of the non-exposed cohort, 3. ascertainment of exposure, 4. demonstration that the outcome of interest was not present at start of the study, 5. comparability of cohorts on the basis of the design or analysis most important factor, 6. comparability of cohorts on the basis of the design or analysis second important factor, 7. assessment of outcome 8. was follow-up long enough for outcomes to occur and 9. adequacy of follow-up of cohort.

†Case–control studies: 1. is the case definition adequate? 2. representativeness of the cases, 3. selection of controls, 4. definition of controls, 5. comparability of cases and controls on the basis of the design or analysis most important factor, 6. comparability of cases and controls on the basis of the design or analysis second important factor, 7. ascertainment of exposure, 8. same method of ascertainment for cases and controls and 9. non-response rate.

CeD, coeliac disease; EoE, eosinophilic oesophagitis; GERD, gastro-oesophageal reflux; IBD, inflammatory bowel disease.

Inflammatory bowel disease

Exposure to early life antibiotics was associated with the development of IBD in five out of six studies25 31 38 40 43 (NOS=7,8,8,8,8), whereas no association was found in one study examining very early onset (VEO) IBD (before 6 years of age)27 (NOS=8). Three studies found a dose–response relation25 38 43 and an increased risk after fluoroquinolone,25 metronidazole25 and phenoxymethylpenicillin40 exposure. In two studies IBD was stratified by type and only the OR for Crohn’s disease, but not for ulcerative colitis, was significant.38 40 Forest plots of the main results are shown in figure 2A.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Forest plots per gastrointestinal disorder. (A) IBD; (B) EoE; (C) CeD; (D) FGID (infantile colics and functional constipation). CC, case control study, CH, cohort study, (!) Virta 2012 only shows the results of the phenoxymethylpenicillin analyses, overall use of antibiotics was not significant.

Eosinophilic oesophagitis

In four of the five studies early life antibiotics was associated with EoE33 34 37 41 (NOS=4,6,7,7), whereas in one study the rates of parental reported antibiotic use were similar for cases and controls39 (NOS=3) (figure 2B).

Coeliac disease

In four studies, of which three had a high quality, a significant association between early life antibiotics and the presence of CeD was found22 28 35 42 (NOS=8,9,8,5), whereas in two moderate quality studies no association was found24 36 (NOS=6,7) (figure 2C). Three studies showed a dose–response relationship between exposure to antibiotics and the risk of CeD.22 28 42 Furthermore, use of cephalosporin22 and multiple courses of macrolides24 showed a positive association with the development of CeD.

Infantile colics

Two studies found a significant association between early life antibiotics and infantile colics23 26 (NOS=6,8), while one study found no association32 (NOS=7) (figure 2D).

Functional constipation

In both studies, no association was found between early life antibiotic use and functional constipation in the first year of life29 32 (NOS=8,7).

Recurrent AP

The only study examining the association between antibiotic use in the first 2 years of life and the risk of recurrent AP at 12 years of age30 (NOS=5) found that only girls, but not boys, who received antibiotics in both the first and second year of life, had an increased risk of AP at 12 years.

Regurgitation, dyschezia and functional diarrhoea

In one study no association was found between antibiotics in the first week of life and regurgitation, dyschezia and functional diarrhoea32 (NOS=7).

Syntheses of individual results

Using the definitions for the best evidence synthesis, described in the method section, it can be concluded that there is strong evidence for an association of antibiotics in early life with IBD and CeD. There is moderate evidence for an association with EoE and no association with infantile constipation. The current evidence for an association between antibiotics in early life and the other studied GI disorders is considered insufficient.

Discussion

This systematic review with best evidence syntheses on the association between antibiotic exposure in the first 2 years of life and chronic GI disorders during childhood showed strong evidence for this association with IBD and CeD, and moderate evidence for this association with EoE. For the other studied GI disorders, insufficient evidence was found.

The question remains to what extent the association with IBD, EoE and CeD can be attributed to antibiotic exposure itself or to other factors such as infections and parental health seeking behaviour. Infections in early life have been proposed to contribute to the development of chronic GI disorders44 45 and it is difficult to differentiate between the role of infections and antibiotics which are prescribed for (suspected) infections. Furthermore, several GI disorders like CeD can remain undiagnosed for a long time. Higher parental health seeking behaviour can both lead to higher use of antibiotics and a higher chance of diagnosing the chronic GI disorder. Therefore, it remains unknown whether antibiotics are the true causative agent in the observed associations or whether they are intermediates in different mechanistic pathways through microbiome perturbations or changes in immune development after (suspected) infections.

Most studies found a clear association between antibiotics in early life and IBD. The study that focused on VEO-IBD, found no association between antibiotics and VEO-IBD. VEO-IBD is considered a different entity from later-onset IBD,44 since genetics play a far more important aetiological role than microbial dysbiosis.45 This may explain the lack of an association with early life antibiotics.

The primary goal of antibiotic administration is to prevent detrimental effects of serious and sometimes even life-threatening infections. However, especially in early life, antibiotics are overused, since they are often prescribed for viral upper respiratory tract infections.46 47 Given its association with the occurrence of IBD, CeD and EoE, it is highly important to prevent antibiotic overuse by strict adherence to guidelines. If antibiotics are necessary, treatment would be adjusted to minimise dysbiosis. Another possible solution is to shorten the time of antibiotic administration. Oosterloo et al found more health issues in the first year of life after 7 days compared with 2 days of antibiotics in the first week of life.26 Furthermore, whenever possible, narrow-spectrum antibiotics rather than broad-spectrum should be used, because these specifically reduce the capacity of pathogens to cause disease while leaving commensals unharmed.48 If adjustment of antibiotic treatment is not possible, interventions that restore or prevent dysbiosis should be considered, such as administration of prebiotics or probiotics or faecal transplants.49–52

Some limitations of this review need to be considered. As no randomised controlled trials were available, only associations but not causality can be examined. Additionally, the studied results were not evaluated for their precision and associations with wide CIs can indicate uncertainty about the magnitude of the association. Hence, the results must be interpreted with caution. Furthermore, both age at exposure as well as age at diagnosis varied substantially between the studies. In addition, study outcomes were also very heterogeneous, excluding a meta-analysis. Therefore, a best evidence synthesis was applied, taking the quality of the studies into account. Furthermore, the recording of antibiotic exposure was in half of the studies parental reported, which may have led to recall bias. The antibiotics were mostly analysed as overall use, without distinguishing between types of antibiotics and therefore, it was not possible to determine associations between certain type of antibiotics and GI disorders. Finally, for several functional GI disorders, like IBS or GERD, only few or even no studies were found which prohibits any conclusions on these GI disorders.

One of the strengths of this review is that the search string was built and performed by an information scientist. Besides the published articles, also conference abstracts were checked for relevant studies. Furthermore, this review studies the association between antibiotics in early life and all chronic GI disorders in childhood, which provides insights in the available evidence but also shows the gap of knowledge for these associations.

For future research, it is recommended to study the association between early life antibiotics and the presence of those GI disorders that currently lack sufficient studies. Furthermore, it is necessary to gain insights in the specific effect of different types of antibiotics on the microbiome in order to optimise therapies that can prevent or counteract the detrimental effects of antibiotics in early life.

Conclusion

This systematic review shows strong evidence for an association between antibiotic exposure in the first 2 years of life and the presence of IBD and CeD later in childhood. For the other included GI disorders, only moderate or insufficient evidence was found. In order to decrease the incidence of IBD and CeD, antibiotic administration in early life should be critically considered. Moreover, interventions need to be developed to restore the microbiome after unavoidable antibiotic exposure in order to prevent detrimental health consequences later in life.

Supplementary Material

Author's manuscript

Footnotes

KK and EVD contributed equally.

Contributors: KK contributed to the design, the analyses and interpretation of the study, drafting of the initial manuscript, and reviewed and revised the manuscript. EVD contributed to the analysis and interpretation of the study and critically revised the manuscript. AMV and RMvE contributed to the conception of the study, interpretation of the data and critically revised the manuscript. JGD conceptualised and performed the systematic search and critically revised the manuscript. JK contributed to the conception and design of the study and critically revised the manuscript. All authors approved the final manuscript as submitted and agree to be accountable for all aspects of the work.

Funding: This study was funded by Nutricia Netherlands B.V. as part of a public private partnership and by the Christine Bader foundation (CBSIKZ).

Competing interests: JK is a fulltime employee of Danone Nutricia Research (DNR), the PhD trajectory of EVD and KK are partly sponsored by DNR.

Patient consent for publication: Not required.

Provenance and peer review: Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.

Data availability statement: Data sharing not applicable as no datasets generated and/or analysed for this study. N/A.

Supplemental material: This content has been supplied by the author(s). It has not been vetted by BMJ Publishing Group Limited (BMJ) and may not have been peer-reviewed. Any opinions or recommendations discussed are solely those of the author(s) and are not endorsed by BMJ. BMJ disclaims all liability and responsibility arising from any reliance placed on the content. Where the content includes any translated material, BMJ does not warrant the accuracy and reliability of the translations (including but not limited to local regulations, clinical guidelines, terminology, drug names and drug dosages), and is not responsible for any error and/or omissions arising from translation and adaptation or otherwise.

References

  • 1.Sýkora J, Pomahačová R, Kreslová M, et al. Current global trends in the incidence of pediatric-onset inflammatory bowel disease. World J Gastroenterol 2018;24:2741–63. 10.3748/wjg.v24.i25.2741 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.King JA, Jeong J, Underwood FE, et al. Incidence of celiac disease is increasing over time: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Gastroenterol 2020;115:507–25. 10.14309/ajg.0000000000000523 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Levy M, Kolodziejczyk AA, Thaiss CA, et al. Dysbiosis and the immune system. Nat Rev Immunol 2017;17:219–32. 10.1038/nri.2017.7 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Bendtsen KM, Fisker L, Hansen AK, et al. The influence of the young microbiome on inflammatory diseases-Lessons from animal studies. Birth Defect Res C 2015;105:278–95. 10.1002/bdrc.21116 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Major G, Spiller R. Irritable bowel syndrome, inflammatory bowel disease and the microbiome. Curr Opin Endocrinol Diabetes Obes 2014;21:15–21. 10.1097/MED.0000000000000032 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Kennedy PJ, Cryan JF, Dinan TG, et al. Irritable bowel syndrome: a microbiome-gut-brain axis disorder? World J Gastroenterol 2014;20:14105. 10.3748/wjg.v20.i39.14105 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Weber TK, Polanco I. Gastrointestinal microbiota and some children diseases: a review. Gastroenterol Res Pract 2012;2012:1–12. 10.1155/2012/676585 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Ianiro G, Tilg H, Gasbarrini A. Antibiotics as deep modulators of gut microbiota: between good and evil. Gut 2016;65:1906–15. 10.1136/gutjnl-2016-312297 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Bokulich NA, Chung J, Battaglia T, et al. Antibiotics, birth mode, and diet shape microbiome maturation during early life. Sci Transl Med 2016;8:343ra82. 10.1126/scitranslmed.aad7121 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Theochari NA, Stefanopoulos A, Mylonas KS, et al. Antibiotics exposure and risk of inflammatory bowel disease: a systematic review. Scand J Gastroenterol 2018;53:1–7. 10.1080/00365521.2017.1386711 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Ungaro R, Bernstein CN, Gearry R, et al. Antibiotics associated with increased risk of new-onset Crohn’s disease but not ulcerative colitis: a meta-analysis. Am J Gastroenterol 2014;109:1728–38. 10.1038/ajg.2014.246 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, et al. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. Int J Surg 2010;8:336–41. 10.1016/j.ijsu.2010.02.007 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Page MJ, Shamseer L, Tricco AC. Registration of systematic reviews in Prospero: 30,000 records and counting. Syst Rev 2018;7:32. 10.1186/s13643-018-0699-4 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Wilczynski NL, McKibbon KA, Haynes RB. Search filter precision can be improved by NOTing out irrelevant content. AMIA Annual Symposium Proceedings, American Medical Informatics Association, 2011:1506-13. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.van Eck NJ, Waltman L. Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping. Scientometrics 2010;84:523–38. 10.1007/s11192-009-0146-3 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Ouzzani M, Hammady H, Fedorowicz Z, et al. Rayyan-a web and mobile APP for systematic reviews. Syst Rev 2016;5:210. 10.1186/s13643-016-0384-4 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Wells GA SB, O'Connell D, Peterson J. The Newcastle-Ottawa scale (NOS) for assessing the quality of nonrandomised studies in meta-analyses. Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, 2019. http://www.ohri.ca/programs/clinical_epidemiology/oxford.asp [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Wells G, Shea B, O'Connell D. Newcastle-Ottawa quality assessment form for cohort studies 2014:E17–18.
  • 19.van Tulder M, Furlan A, Bombardier C, et al. Updated method guidelines for systematic reviews in the Cochrane collaboration back review group. Spine 2003;28:1290–9. 10.1097/01.BRS.0000065484.95996.AF [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Veronese N, Solmi M, Luchini C, et al. Acetylcholinesterase inhibitors and memantine in bipolar disorder: a systematic review and best evidence synthesis of the efficacy and safety for multiple disease dimensions. J Affect Disord 2016;197:268–80. 10.1016/j.jad.2016.03.034 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Slavin RE. Best evidence synthesis: an intelligent alternative to meta-analysis. J Clin Epidemiol 1995;48:9–18. 10.1016/0895-4356(94)00097-A [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Canova C, Zabeo V, Pitter G, et al. Association of maternal education, early infections, and antibiotic use with celiac disease: a population-based birth cohort study in northeastern Italy. Am J Epidemiol 2014;180:76–85. 10.1093/aje/kwu101 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Hestbaek L, Sannes MM, Lous J. Large cohort study finds a statistically significant association between excessive crying in early infancy and subsequent ear symptoms. Acta Paediatr 2014;103:e206–11. 10.1111/apa.12570 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Kemppainen KM, Vehik K, Lynch KF, et al. Association between early-life antibiotic use and the risk of islet or celiac disease autoimmunity. JAMA Pediatr 2017;171:1217–25. 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2017.2905 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Kronman MP, Zaoutis TE, Haynes K, et al. Antibiotic exposure and IBD development among children: a population-based cohort study. Pediatrics 2012;130:e794–803. 10.1542/peds.2011-3886 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Oosterloo BC, van Elburg RM, Rutten NB, et al. Wheezing and infantile colic are associated with neonatal antibiotic treatment. Pediatr Allergy Immunol 2018;29:151–8. 10.1111/pai.12857 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Örtqvist AK, Lundholm C, Halfvarson J, et al. Fetal and early life antibiotics exposure and very early onset inflammatory bowel disease: a population-based study. Gut 2019;68:218–25. 10.1136/gutjnl-2017-314352 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Dydensborg Sander S, Nybo Andersen A-M, Murray JA, et al. Association between antibiotics in the first year of life and celiac disease. Gastroenterology 2019;156:2217–29. 10.1053/j.gastro.2019.02.039 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Turco R, Miele E, Russo M, et al. Early-life factors associated with pediatric functional constipation. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 2014;58:307–12. 10.1097/MPG.0000000000000209 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Uusijärvi A, Bergström A, Simrén M, et al. Use of antibiotics in infancy and childhood and risk of recurrent abdominal pain--a Swedish birth cohort study. Neurogastroenterol Motil 2014;26:841–50. 10.1111/nmo.12340 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Hviid A, Svanström H, Frisch M. Antibiotic use and inflammatory bowel diseases in childhood. Gut 2011;60:49–54. 10.1136/gut.2010.219683 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Salvatore S, Baldassarre ME, Di Mauro A, et al. Neonatal antibiotics and prematurity are associated with an increased risk of functional gastrointestinal disorders in the first year of life. J Pediatr 2019;212:44–51. 10.1016/j.jpeds.2019.04.061 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Jensen ET, Kappelman MD, Kim HP, et al. Early life exposures as risk factors for pediatric eosinophilic esophagitis. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 2013;57:67–71. 10.1097/MPG.0b013e318290d15a [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Jensen ET, Kuhl JT, Martin LJ, et al. Prenatal, intrapartum, and postnatal factors are associated with pediatric eosinophilic esophagitis. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2018;141:214–22. 10.1016/j.jaci.2017.05.018 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Mårild K, Ye W, Lebwohl B, et al. Antibiotic exposure and the development of coeliac disease: a nationwide case-control study. BMC Gastroenterol 2013;13:109. 10.1186/1471-230X-13-109 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Myléus A, Hernell O, Gothefors L, et al. Early infections are associated with increased risk for celiac disease: an incident case-referent study. BMC Pediatr 2012;12:194. 10.1186/1471-2431-12-194 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Radano MC, Yuan Q, Katz A, et al. Cesarean section and antibiotic use found to be associated with eosinophilic esophagitis. J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract 2014;2:475–7. 10.1016/j.jaip.2014.02.018 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Shaw SY, Blanchard JF, Bernstein CN. Association between the use of antibiotics in the first year of life and pediatric inflammatory bowel disease. Am J Gastroenterol 2010;105:2687–92. 10.1038/ajg.2010.398 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Slae M, Persad R, Leung AJ-T, et al. Role of environmental factors in the development of pediatric eosinophilic esophagitis. Dig Dis Sci 2015;60:3364–72. 10.1007/s10620-015-3740-7 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Virta L, Auvinen A, Helenius H, et al. Association of repeated exposure to antibiotics with the development of pediatric Crohn's disease--a nationwide, register-based finnish case-control study. Am J Epidemiol 2012;175:775–84. 10.1093/aje/kwr400 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Witmer CP, Susi A, Min SB, et al. Early infant risk factors for pediatric eosinophilic esophagitis. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 2018;67:610–5. 10.1097/MPG.0000000000002123 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Bittker SS, Bell KR. Potential risk factors for celiac disease in childhood: a case-control epidemiological survey]]&gt. Clin Exp Gastroenterol 2019;12:303–19. 10.2147/CEG.S210060 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Canova C, Ludvigsson JF, Di Domenicantonio R, et al. Perinatal and antibiotic exposures and the risk of developing childhood-onset inflammatory bowel disease: a nested case-control study based on a population-based birth cohort. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2020;17:2409. 10.3390/ijerph17072409 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Bernstein CN, Burchill C, Targownik LE, et al. Events within the first year of life, but not the neonatal period, affect risk for later development of inflammatory bowel diseases. Gastroenterology 2019;156:2190–7. 10.1053/j.gastro.2019.02.004 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Jiang H-Y, Zhang X, Zhou Y-Y, Hy J, Yy Z, et al. Infection, antibiotic exposure, and risk of celiac disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2020;35:557–66. 10.1111/jgh.14928 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.van Houten CB, Naaktgeboren C, Buiteman BJM, et al. Antibiotic overuse in children with respiratory syncytial virus lower respiratory tract infection. Pediatr Infect Dis J 2018;37:1077–81. 10.1097/INF.0000000000001981 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Arnolda G, Hibbert P, Ting HP, et al. Assessing the appropriateness of paediatric antibiotic overuse in Australian children: a population-based sample survey. BMC Pediatr 2020;20:1–8. 10.1186/s12887-020-02052-6 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Melander RJ, Zurawski DV, Melander C. Narrow-spectrum antibacterial agents. Medchemcomm 2018;9:12–21. 10.1039/C7MD00528H [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.McFarland LV. Use of probiotics to correct dysbiosis of normal microbiota following disease or disruptive events: a systematic review. BMJ Open 2014;4:e005047. 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-005047 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Kumar R, Sood U, Gupta V, et al. Recent advancements in the development of modern probiotics for restoring human gut microbiome dysbiosis. Indian J Microbiol 2020;60:1–14. 10.1007/s12088-019-00808-y [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Chua MC, Ben-Amor K, Lay C, et al. Effect of synbiotic on the gut microbiota of cesarean delivered infants: a randomized, double-blind, multicenter study. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 2017;65:102–6. 10.1097/MPG.0000000000001623 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Langdon A, Crook N, Dantas G. The effects of antibiotics on the microbiome throughout development and alternative approaches for therapeutic modulation. Genome Med 2016;8:39. 10.1186/s13073-016-0294-z [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary data

bmjpo-2021-001028supp001.pdf (97.4KB, pdf)

Supplementary data

bmjpo-2021-001028supp002.pdf (42.5KB, pdf)

Author's manuscript

Articles from BMJ Paediatrics Open are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES