Skip to main content
PLOS One logoLink to PLOS One
. 2021 Mar 4;16(3):e0247173. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0247173

The pronounced lung lesions developing in LATY136F knock-in mice mimic human IgG4-related lung disease

Yuko Waseda 1,*, Kazunori Yamada 2, Keishi Mizuguchi 3, Kiyoaki Ito 2, Satoshi Watanabe 4, Masahiko Zuka 5, Tamotsu Ishizuka 1, Marie Malissen 6, Bernard Malissen 6, Mitsuhiro Kawano 2, Shoko Matsui 7
Editor: Michal A Olszewski8
PMCID: PMC7932159  PMID: 33661938

Abstract

Rationale

Immunoglobulin (Ig) G4-related disease (IgG4-RD) is a novel clinical disease entity characterized by an elevated serum IgG4 concentration and tumefaction or tissue infiltration by IgG4-positive plasma cells. Pathological changes are most frequently seen in the pancreas, lacrimal glands, and salivary glands, but pathological changes in the lung also exist. Linker for activation of T cell (LAT)Y136F knock-in mice show Th2-dominant immunoreactions with elevated serum IgG1 levels, corresponding to human IgG4. We have reported that LATY136F knock-in mice display several characteristic features of IgG4-RD and concluded that they constitute an appropriate model of human IgG4-RD in salivary glands, pancreas, and kidney lesions.

Objectives

The aim of this study is to evaluate whether lung lesions in LATY136F knock-in mice can be a model of IgG4-related lung disease.

Methods

Lung tissue samples from LATY136F knock-in mice (LAT) and wild-type mice (WT) were immunostained for IgG1 and obtained for pathological evaluation, and cell fractions and cytokine levels in broncho-alveolar lavage fluid (BALF) were analyzed.

Results

In the LAT group, IgG1-positive inflammatory cells increased starting at 4 weeks of age and peaked at 10 weeks of age. The total cell count and percentage of lymphocytes increased significantly in BALF in the LAT group compared to the WT group. In BALF, Th2-dominant cytokines and transforming growth factor-β were also increased. In the LAT group, marked inflammation around broncho-vascular bundles peaked at 10 weeks of age. After 10 weeks, fibrosis around broncho-vascular bundles and bronchiectasis were observed in LATY136F knock-in mice but not WT mice.

Conclusions

LATY136F knock-in mice constitute an appropriate model of lung lesions in IgG4-RD.

Introduction

In recent years, immunoglobulin (Ig) G4-related disease (IgG4-RD) has been established as a new disease entity [1]. IgG4-RD is characterized by high levels of IgG and IgG4 in serum, infiltration of IgG4-positive plasma cells, obliterative phlebitis or obliterative arteritis and lymphocytes, as well as a form of fibrosis called storiform fibrosis in some organs, such as the pancreas, salivary glands, kidney, retroperitoneum, and periaorta [24].

IgG4 is a subclass of IgG without complement binding ability and is associated with a decrease in symptoms in the context of IgE-mediated allergy due to an allergen-blocking effect at the mast cell level and/or at the level of the antigen-presenting cell [5]. This means that IgG4-RD has IgE-mediated type I allergy as a characteristic of the disease, and IgG4 as a blocking antibody may accumulate in each organ.

IgG4-RD is said to coexist with many allergic diseases, such as rhinitis, conjunctivitis, bronchial asthma, and urticaria [6]. Interleukins (IL) 4, 5, 10, and 13 and transforming growth factor β (TGF-β) are overexpressed through an immune reaction in which type 2 helper T cells (Th2) predominate, followed by activation of regulatory T cells [7]. These cytokines contribute to eosinophilia, elevated serum IgG4 and IgE concentrations, and progression of fibrosis that are characteristic of IgG4-RD [8].

In humans with IgG4-RD, some clinicoradiological and pathological studies of IgG4-related lung disease (IgG4-RLD) demonstrated that intrathoracic lesions include lymphatic routes with vascular involvement [911].

Regarding the lungs, IgG4-positive plasma cells may infiltrate into the lung even in connective tissue diseases [12], and patients with diseases other than IgG4-RD will be included based on comprehensive diagnostic criteria alone. Therefore, we established diagnostic criteria unique to the lungs so that lung lesions can be accurately diagnosed based on clinical, radiological, and pathological findings [13].

IgG4-RLD is also likely to be associated with an allergic disease. Recently, several studies have been conducted on the cause of IgG4-RD [14, 15]. However, the relationship between these diseases and Th2-dominated allergic reactions, including reactions in the lung, is not clear.

Linker for activation of T cell (LAT) is an adaptor protein that is a major substrate for the Zap70 protein tyrosine kinase in T cells and initiates most intracellular events that characterize the T cell receptor signaling pathway [16]. In LATY136F mice, in which the tyrosine residue at position 136 is replaced with phenylalanine, binding of LAT to phospholipase C-γ1 is lost. LATY136F knock-in mice develop lymphoproliferative disorder and show expansion of polyclonal CD4+ T cells along with high Th2 cytokine production. In parallel, they show massive activation of B cells as well as elevated serum levels of IgG1 and IgE. Mouse IgG1 is induced by Th2 cytokines and does not bind to C1q. Thus, mouse IgG1 is considered to be a homologue of human IgG4 [17, 18].

Several animal models of IgG4-RD have been established [1922]. We first reported that LATY136F knock-in mice display several immunopathological features characteristic of IgG4-RD in organs such as salivary glands, pancreas, and kidney, as well as dural lesions in which many IgG1-positive cells and fibrosis are present [23, 24].

Because IgG4-RD shows many intrathoracic lesions on chest computed tomography, and allergic symptoms are also observed, we examined whether LATY136F knock-in mice constitute a model of the lung pathology associated with IgG4-RLD. Thus, the aim of this study was to estimate lung lesions in LATY136F knock-in mice and evaluate whether LATY136F knock-in mice constitute an appropriate model of human IgG4-RLD.

Methods

Animals

All experimental procedures were reviewed and approved by the Animal Experimentation Committee and Gene Recombination Experiment Safety Committee of Kanazawa University (AP-10174, Kindai6-1013) from 2013 to 2019. We used a combination of midazolam, medetomidine, and butorphanol tartrate for anesthesia to minimize discomfort to the mice. For euthanasia, we placed the mice in a closed container filled with carbon dioxide gas, exposed the mice for a sufficient period of time, confirmed complete respiratory arrest, and then performed cervical dislocation. LATY136F knock-in mice [17] and WT C57BL/6 mice were housed in a controlled temperature (23 ± 2°C) and humidity (30–70%), and circadian light-dark cycle of 12 h, with ad libitum access to food and water and underwent microbiological monitoring tests four times a year.

All animal experiments were performed in accordance with the Guidelines for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals of the Takara-machi Campus of Kanazawa University.

Study population

LATY136F knock-in mice (n = 66; males, 36; females, 30) and wild-type (WT) mice (n = 70; males, 38; females, 32) 4–20 weeks old were included in this study.

Histopathology and immunohistochemistry

Because we observed that the development of different tissue lesions was comparable in male and female mice, mice of both sexes were used for the present study. Tissue samples were fixed in 20% formalin and embedded in paraffin. To score the largest cut surface over the entire field of view, all organs were sectioned and stained with hematoxylin-eosin (H-E) for basic observations, with Elastica van Gieson (EVG) stain for elastic fibers, and with Azan for estimation of collagen in fibrosis. The specific primary antibodies used were as follows: goat anti-mouse IgG1 (1:2000, SouthernBiotech, Birmingham, AL, USA), goat anti-mouse IgG (1:4000, SouthernBiotech), and rat purified anti-mouse CD138 (syndecan-1; 1:1000, BioLegend, San Diego, CA, USA). Heat-induced epitope retrieval was performed at 120°C for 10 min using 10 mM citrate buffer (pH 6) without Tween 20. Ethylenediamine-tetraacetic acid buffer (pH 9) was also used for CD138. Thereafter, the tissues were incubated with the primary antibodies at 4°C overnight. After washing with phosphate-buffered saline, the sections were incubated with an amino acid polymer (Hystofine simple stain mouse MAX-PO (R), Nichirei, Tokyo, Japan) at room temperature for 30 min according to the manufacturer’s instructions. After washing with phosphate-buffered saline again, the sections were reacted with diaminobenzidine-tetrahydrochloride solution (DAKO, Glostrup, Denmark).

The severity of fibrosis was semiquantitatively assessed according to the method of Ashcroft et al. [25] The entire lung section was viewed at a magnification of 100×. Thirty to thirty-five fields in each section were analyzed, and a score ranging from 0 (normal lung) to 8 (total fibrosis) was assigned. The mean score of all fields was taken as the fibrosis score of that lung section. Criteria for grading pulmonary fibrosis were as follows. Grade 0 = normal lung; Grade 1 = minimal fibrous thickening of alveolar or bronchial walls; Grade 2–3 = moderate thickening of walls without obvious damage to lung architecture; Grade 4–5 = increased fibrous mass; Grade 6–7 = severe distortion of structure and large fibrous areas; Grade 8 = total fibrotic obliteration of the field. CD138+ and IgG1+ cells were counted under a 200× objective. Evaluation of tissue specimens was performed by one cytotechnologist and one pulmonologist who were blinded to the genotype of the mice.

Broncho-alveolar lavage (BAL)

LATY136F knock-in mice and WT mice were killed at 8–9 weeks of age, and BAL was obtained. After excision of the trachea, a plastic cannula was inserted into the trachea, and 2 ml saline solution was injected gently with a syringe and then withdrawn. This procedure was repeated three times. A 100-μl aliquot of BAL fluid (BALF) was reserved for total cell counts and evaluation of cell differentiation. The remaining BALF was centrifuged immediately at 1,100 rpm for 10 min. The total cell number was determined with a standard hemocytometer. Cell differentiation was examined by counting at least 200 cells on smears prepared with cytospin and Wright-Giemsa staining. Supernatants were stored at −80°C until use for measurement of cytokines.

Measurement of cytokines/chemokines in BALF

The remaining BALF was used to measure levels of the following cytokines: IL-4, IL-5, IL-6, IL-10, IL-13, interferon (IFN)-γ, tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α, eotaxin, and RANTES (Luminex® Multiplex Assays; ThermoFisher Scientific/Invitrogen, Tokyo, Japan). TGF-β1 was measured with an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (Quantikine; R&D Systems, Minneapolis, MN, USA).

Statistical analysis

Mann-Whitney U tests were performed for comparison of the Ashcroft score and cytokines and chemokines in BALF. Statistical analysis was performed using statistical software (SPSS 12.0J, 2003, SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA).

Results

Development of tissue inflammatory lesions in the lung of LATY136F knock-in mice starts with infiltration of IgG1-positive lymphoplasmacytic cells and is followed by fibrosis

H-E staining showed that the lungs were almost normal at 4 weeks of age, and inflammation around the bronchi, bronchioles, and vessels began after 4 weeks of age. Inflammation peaked at 6–10 weeks and decreased at 20 weeks. Fibrosis was worse and resembled traction bronchiectasis at 20 weeks. Fig 1, lower left, shows a 20-week lung that was also bleeding.

Fig 1. Histopathological appearance of the lung of LATY136F knock-in mice.

Fig 1

Hematoxylin-eosin (H-E) staining showed that inflammation started after 4 weeks and peaked at 6–10 weeks. Inflammation decreased at 20 weeks, but the fibrosis was getting worse.

Six-week lung tissue showed marked lymphoplasmacytic cell infiltration into the interstitium of the peribronchovascular wall with H-E staining, obliterative phlebitis with EVG staining, and fibrosis with Azan staining (Fig 2).

Fig 2. Inflammatory cells, obliterative phlebitis, and storiform fibrosis existed in LATY136F knock-in mice.

Fig 2

H-E staining in lung tissues at 6 weeks of age. a, b; inflammatory cells around the bronchi (a: H-E ×40, b: H-E ×200, enlargement of the boxed area in a), c; obliterative phlebitis (EVG ×400), d; fibrosis (Azan ×200).

In the LAT group, the numbers of CD138+ and IgG1+ cells were 300 and 240 cells/high-power field at 10 weeks, respectively. The cell numbers peaked at 10 weeks and then decreased. In contrast, in the WT group, neither CD138+ nor IgG1+ cells changed throughout this time course (Fig 3A and 3B).

Fig 3. Immunostaining for plasma cells in tissue lesions of 10-week-old LATY136F knock-in mice.

Fig 3

In the LAT group, the numbers of CD138+ and IgG1+ cells peaked at 10 weeks and then decreased (3A a, b, 3B). In the WT group, neither CD138+ cells nor IgG1+ cells changed (3A c, d, 3B).

When fibrosis was evaluated using the Ashcroft score, we found no difference between LATY136F knock-in mice and WT mice at 4 weeks, but LATY136F knock-in mice had a significantly higher score than WT mice after 6 weeks (LAT vs. WT at 6 w: 4.5 vs. 0.6, p < 0.05, at 10 w: 4.9 vs. 0.4, p < 0.05, and at 20 w: 5.8 vs. 0.6, p < 0.05). In addition, in LATY136F knock-in mice, the score significantly increased over time (LAT 6 w vs. LAT 10 w: 4.5 vs. 4.9, p < 0.05, LAT 10 w vs. LAT 20 w: 4.9 vs. 5.8, p < 0.05). Therefore, lung fibrosis began at 4 weeks and worsened at 20 weeks in the LAT group (Fig 4).

Fig 4. Evaluation of fibrosis according to the Ashcroft score in LATY136F knock-in mice.

Fig 4

When fibrosis was evaluated using the Ashcroft score, lung fibrosis began at the 4th week and was significantly getting worse at 20 weeks in the LAT group. On the other hand, no significant change was seen in the WT group.

BALF findings in LATY136F knock-in mice with increased lymphocytes and Th2-dominant cytokines

To evaluate the cellular and humoral components of BALF at the time when a large amount of cell infiltration was present in the tissue, BALF of 8- to 9-week-old mice was evaluated after the tissue evaluation.

Regarding BALF cell composition, the lymphocyte percentage found in the LAT group was higher than in the WT group (74.5 ± 11.0 vs. 15.5 ± 17.2, respectively, p < 0.01). Moreover, the total cell count and numbers of lymphocytes were significantly higher in the LAT group than the WT group (11.9 ± 8.1 vs. 2.0 ± 0.4, p < 0.01; 10.4 ± 7.3 vs. 0.42 ± 0.37, p < 0.01, respectively) (Fig 5).

Fig 5. Cell differentiation and cell counts of BALF in LATY136F knock-in mice.

Fig 5

Regarding BALF cell differentiation in the LAT group at 8–9 weeks of age, the lymphocyte fraction was predominantly higher than in the WT group. The total cell count and numbers of lymphocytes were significantly higher in the LAT group.

In the LAT group, the BALF levels of IL-13 and eotaxin were significantly higher (IL-13: 0.80 ± 0.8 vs. 0.47 ± 0.2, p < 0.01, eotaxin: 48.9 ± 22.5 vs. 3.8 ± 1.5, p < 0.01), and the IFN-γ levels were significantly lower than in the WT group (0.06 ± 0.02 vs. 0.4 ± 2.6, p < 0.005). IL-4 also tended to be higher in the LAT group than the WT group (2.9 ± 2.6 vs. 1.4 ± 0.7, p = 0.081).

IL-10 was not significantly different between the two groups (LAT group vs. WT group; 1.18 ± 6.1 vs. 2.3 ± 1.5, p = 0.271), and IL-5 and RANTES were below the level of sensitivity in both groups. TGF-β1, which may play a central role in the progression of fibrosis, was overexpressed in the LAT group compared to the WT group (207.7 ± 238.6 vs. 64.9 ± 32.5, p < 0.01). Likewise, TNF-α was significantly higher in the LAT group than in the WT group (3.2 ± 3.9 vs. 1.0 ± 1.2, respectively, p < 0.05) (Table 1).

Table 1. Cytokine/chemokine findings in BALF.

LAT (n = 8) WT (n = 7)
IL-4 (pg/mL) 2.87 ± 2.55 1.35 ± 0.67 p = 0.081
IL-5 (pg/mL) 0.86 ± 0.76 0.65 ± 0.64 p = 0.601
IL-6 (pg/mL) 1.38 ± 1.41 1.01 ± 0.92 p = 0.352
IL-10 (pg/mL) 1.18 ± 6.05 2.27 ± 1.45 p = 0.271
IL-12p70 (pg/mL) 0.16 ± 0.03 0.16 ± 0.09 p = 0.719
IL-13 (pg/mL) 0.80 ± 0.82 0.47 ± 0.15 p = 0.005
IFN-γ (pg/mL) 0.06 ± 0.02 0.37 ± 2.64 p = 0.001
TNF-α (pg/mL) 3.23 ± 3.92 0.97 ± 1.15 p = 0.028
Eotaxin (pg/mL) 48.9 ± 22.5 3.77 ± 1.54 p = 0.001
Rantes (pg/mL) 0.82 ± 0.31 0.82 ± 0.31 p = 0.896
TGF-β1 (pg/mL) 207.7 ± 238.6 64.9 ± 32.5 p = 0.003

In the LAT group, IL-13, TNF-α, eotaxin, and TGF-β1 levels in BALF were significantly higher, and the IFN-γ levels were significantly lower than in the WT group. TGF-β1, which may play a central role in promotion of fibrosis, was overexpressed in the LAT group. IL-10 was not significantly different between the two groups, and IL-5 and RANTES were below the level of sensitivity in both groups.

Discussion

IgG4-RD includes lesions with increased IgG4+ plasma cells, Th2 cytokine-producing CD4+ T cells, and regulatory T cells in multiple organs [5, 8]. The lesions are more common in the pancreas, lacrimal glands, and salivary glands, but lesions are also seen in the kidneys, bile ducts, and lungs [4].

The histological findings of IgG4-RLD are marked lymphoplasmacytic cell infiltration into the interstitium of the peribronchovascular sheath, interlobular septal wall and/or pleura, an IgG4/IgG-positive cell ratio >40% and/or >10 IgG4-positive cells/high-power field, obliterative phlebitis or obliterative arteritis, and storiform fibrosis or fibrosis consisting of proliferating spindle-shaped cells around infiltrating lymphocytes [13].

Several animal models of IgG4-RD have been reported [1922]. Our previous study using LATY136F knock-in mice examined lesions in the pancreas, salivary glands, and kidneys, as well as dural lesions [23]. Here, we further investigated whether these mice could also constitute appropriate models of lung lesions in IgG4-RD.

Because human IgG4 is considered to be equivalent to mouse IgG1, immunostaining for IgG and IgG1 in pathological tissues was performed as an indicator of inflammation [26]. IgG could not be stained well, and thus CD138, a marker of plasma cells, was used instead. Results showed that a large number of CD138+ and IgG1+ plasma cells were present in lung lesions, and the number increased significantly compared to WT mice and peaked at 10 weeks of age. Furthermore, the Th2 cytokines, IL-13 and IL-4, tended to be elevated in the BALF of LATY136F knock-in mice. IL-5 was below the level of detection in the multiplex cytokine assay and could not be evaluated. In addition, the Th1 cytokine, IFN-γ, was low, which was consistent with the fact that these mice tended to express Th2 cytokines.

Regarding fibrosis, the value of TGF-β1 measured in BALF of LATY136F knock-in mice was significantly higher than that in WT mice. In addition, in lung tissue, LATY136F knock-in mice showed a significantly higher Ashcroft score, which is an indicator of fibrosis, than WT mice, indicating that fibrosis increased with time. Lung lesions of LATY136F knock-in mice also had characteristic pathological findings of IgG4-RLD. This was similar to the findings previously described in other organs such as salivary glands, pancreas, and kidney in LATY136F knock-in mice [23], indicating that lung lesions in LATY136F knock-in mice are also very similar to IgG4-RD.

Interestingly, the inflammatory cytokine, TNF-α, was elevated in LATY136F knock-in mice. Mast cells activated by IgE release TNF-α and cause systemic allergic inflammation [27], and the same may occur in LATY136F knock-in mice. The role of mast cells in LATY136F knock-in mice and their association with IgG4-RD should be explored in future studies.

Several cytokines and chemokines such as IL-5 and RANTES could not be detected in BALF using the multiplex cytokine assay. These are major Th2 cytokines, and more sensitive measurement methods are needed. Because BALF was diluted with physiological saline, the concentrations of certain cytokines may be low to undetectable. This result is considered to be a limitation of the present study, and measuring cytokines and chemokines in lung tissue remains to be performed in the future.

In conclusion, lung lesions in LATY136F knock-in mice constitute an appropriate model of lung lesions in human IgG4-RD. This new and clinically relevant mouse model of IgG4-RD allows more detailed understanding of the pathogenesis and relevant therapeutic strategies. Further studies on the detailed cellular and molecular profiles that may accelerate inflammation and fibrosis of the lung are warranted.

Supporting information

S1 File

(DOCX)

Data Availability

All relevant data are within the manuscript and its Supporting information files.

Funding Statement

Japan society for the promotion of science Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research Yuko Waseda: JSPS KAKENHI (19K08646, 16K09531) https://nrid.nii.ac.jp/ja/nrid/1000080536037/ Kazunori Yamada: JSPS KAKENHI (17K09999) https://nrid.nii.ac.jp/ja/nrid/1000090397224/ Mitsuhiro Kawano: JSPS KAKENHI (26461487) https://nrid.nii.ac.jp/ja/nrid/1000020361983/ Shoko Matsui: JSPS KAKENHI (19K08645, 15K09212, 24591158) https://nrid.nii.ac.jp/ja/nrid/1000040334726/.

References

  • 1.Umehara H. A new clinical entity: IgG4-related disease (IgG4-RD) discovered in the 21st century. Intern Med. 2012; 51(8):821–2. 10.2169/internalmedicine.51.7223 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Hamano H, Kawa S, Horiuchi A, Unno H, Furuya N, Akamatsu T, et al. High serum IgG4 concentrations in patients with sclerosing pancreatitis. N Engl J Med. 2001; 344(10):732–8. 10.1056/NEJM200103083441005 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Umehara H. A new clinical entity: IgG4-related disease (IgG4-RD) discovered in the 21st century. Intern Med. 2012; 51(8):821–2. 10.2169/internalmedicine.51.7223 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Yamada K, Yamamoto M, Saeki T, Mizushima I, Matsui S, Fujisawa Y, et al. New clues to the nature of immunoglobulin G4-related disease: a retrospective Japanese multicenter study of baseline clinical features of 334 cases. Arthritis Res Ther. 2017; 19(1): 262. 10.1186/s13075-017-1467-x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Aalberse RC, Stapel SO, Schurman J, Rispens T. Immunoglobulin G4: an odd antibody. C Exp Allergy. 2009; 39(4):469–77. 10.1111/j.1365-2222.2009.03207.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Yamamoto M, Takano K, Kamekura R, Aochi S, Suzuki C, Ichimiya S, et al. Analysis of allergic reaction in IgG4-related disease. Mod Rheumatol. 2018; 29(6):1063–5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Zen Y, Fujii T, Harada K, Kawano M, Yamada K, Takahira M, et al. Th2 and regulatory immune reactions are increased in immunoglobin G4-related sclerosing pancreatitis and cholangitis. Hepatology. 2007; 45(6):1538–46. 10.1002/hep.21697 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Stone JH, Zen Y, Deshpande V. IgG4-related disease. N Engl J Med. 2012; 366(6):539–51. 10.1056/NEJMra1104650 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Zen Y, Inoue D, Kitao A, Onodera M, Abo H, Miyayama S, et al. IgG4 related Lung and Pleural Disease: A Clinicopathologic Study of 21 Cases. Am J Surg Path. 2009; 33(12):1886–93. 10.1097/PAS.0b013e3181bd535b [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Inoue D, Zen Y, Abo H, Gabata T, Demachi H, Kobayashi T, et al. Immunoglobulin G4-related lung disease: CT findings with pathologic correlations. Radiology. 2009; 251(1):260–70. 10.1148/radiol.2511080965 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Matsui S, Hebisawa A, Sakai F, Yamamoto H, Terasaki Y, Kurihara Y, et al. Immunoglobulin G4-related lung disease: Clinicoradiological and pathological features. Respirology. 2013; 18(3):480–7. 10.1111/resp.12016 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Stone JH, Brito-Zeron P, Bosch X, Ramos-Cassals M. Diagnostic approach to the complexity of IgG4-related disease. Mayo Clin Proc. 2015; 90(7):927–39. 10.1016/j.mayocp.2015.03.020 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Matsui S, Yamamoto H, Minamoto S, Waseda Y, Mishima M, Kubo K, Proposed diagnostic criteria for IgG4-related respiratory disease. Resp Investig. 2016; 54(2):130–2. 10.1016/j.resinv.2015.09.002 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Shiokawa M, Kodama Y, Sekiguchi K, Kuwada T, Tomono T, Kuriyama K, et al. Laminin 511 is a target antigen in autoimmune pancreatitis. Sci. Transl. Med. 2018; 10:eaaq0997. 10.1126/scitranslmed.aaq0997 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Terao C, Ota M, Iwasaki T, Shiokawa M, Kawaguchi S, Kuriyama K, et al. IgG4-related disease in the Japanese population: a genome-wide association study. Lancet Rheumatol. 2019; 1(1):E14–22. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Mingueneau M, Roncagalli R, Grégoire C, Kissenpfennig A, Miazek A, Archambaud C, et al. Loss of the LAT Adaptor Converts Antigen-Responsive T Cells into Pathogenic Effectors that Function Independently of the T Cell Receptor. Immunity. 2009; 31(2):197–208. 10.1016/j.immuni.2009.05.013 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Aguado E, Richelme S, Nunez-Cruz S, Miazek A, Mura AM, Richelme M, et al. Induction of T helper type 2 immunity by a point mutation in the LAT adaptor. Science. 2002; 296(5575):2036–40. 10.1126/science.1069057 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Genton C, Wang Y, Izui S, Malissen B, Delsol G, Fournie GJ, et al. The Th2 lymphoproliferation devel- oping in LatY136F mutant mice triggers polyclonal B cell activation and systemic autoimmunity. J Immu- nol. 2006; 177(4):2285–93. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Uchida K, Okazaki K, Nishi T, Uose S, Nakase H, Ohana M, et al. Experimental immune-mediated pancreatitis in neonatally thymectomized mice immunized with carbonic anhydrase II and lactoferrin. Lab Invest. 2002; 82(4):411–24. 10.1038/labinvest.3780435 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Qu WM, Miyazaki T, Terada M, Okada K, Mori S, Kanno H, et al. A novel autoimmune pancreatitis model in MRL mice treated with polyinosinic:polycytidylic acid. Clin Exp Immunol. 2002; 129:27–34. 10.1046/j.1365-2249.2002.01881.x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Sakaguchi Y, Inaba M, Tsuda M, Quan GK, Omae M, Ando Y, et al. The Wister Bonn Kobri rat, a unique animal model for autoimmune pancreatitis with extrapancreatic exocrinpathy. Clin Exp Immunol. 2008; 152(1):1–12. 10.1111/j.1365-2249.2008.03588.x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Haruta I, Yanagisawa N, Kawamura S, Furukawa T, Shimizu K, Kato H, et al. A mouse model of autoimmune pancreatitis with salivary gland involvement triggered by innate immunity via persistent exposure to avirulent bacteria. Lab Invest. 2010; 90:1757–69. 10.1038/labinvest.2010.153 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Yamada K, Zuka M, Ito K, Mizuguchi K, Kakuchi Y, Onoe T, et al. LatY136F knock-in mouse model for human IgG4-related disease. PLoS ONE. 2018; 13(6): e0198417. 10.1371/journal.pone.0198417 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Cui Y, Masaki K, Zhang X, Yamasaki R, Fujii T, Ogata H, et al. A novel model for treatment of hypertrophic pachymeningitis. Ann of Clin and Trans Neuro. 2019; 6(3):431–44. 10.1002/acn3.715 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Achcroft T, Simpson JM, Timbrell V. Simple method of estimating severity of pulmonary fibrosis on a numerical scale. J Clin Pathol. 1988; 41:467–70. 10.1136/jcp.41.4.467 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Lilienthal GM, Rahmöller J, Petry J, Bartsch YC, Leliavski A, Ehlers M. Potential of Murine IgG1 and Human IgG4 to Inhibit the Classical Complement and Fcγ receptor Activation Pathways. Front Immunol. 2018; 9:958. 10.3389/fimmu.2018.00958 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Bischoff SC. Role of mast cells in allergic and non-allergic immune responses: comparison of human and murine data. Nature Rev Immunol. 2007; 7:93–104. 10.1038/nri2018 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Decision Letter 0

Michal A Olszewski

16 Dec 2020

PONE-D-20-29792

The pronounced lung lesions developing in LATY136F knock-in mice mimic human IgG4-related lung disease

PLOS ONE

Dear Dr. Waseda,

Thank you for submitting your manuscript to PLOS ONE. After careful consideration, we feel that it has merit but does not fully meet PLOS ONE’s publication criteria as it currently stands. Therefore, we invite you to submit a revised version of the manuscript that addresses the points raised during the review process.

We greatly appreciate your patience during the very long time it took us to review your work. Both reviewers recommended minor revisions and I concur entirely with their decision.

Please submit your revised manuscript by Jan 28 2021 11:59PM. If you will need more time than this to complete your revisions, please reply to this message or contact the journal office at plosone@plos.org. When you're ready to submit your revision, log on to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/ and select the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder to locate your manuscript file.

Please include the following items when submitting your revised manuscript:

  • A rebuttal letter that responds to each point raised by the academic editor and reviewer(s). You should upload this letter as a separate file labeled 'Response to Reviewers'.

  • A marked-up copy of your manuscript that highlights changes made to the original version. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Revised Manuscript with Track Changes'.

  • An unmarked version of your revised paper without tracked changes. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Manuscript'.

If you would like to make changes to your financial disclosure, please include your updated statement in your cover letter. Guidelines for resubmitting your figure files are available below the reviewer comments at the end of this letter.

If applicable, we recommend that you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io to enhance the reproducibility of your results. Protocols.io assigns your protocol its own identifier (DOI) so that it can be cited independently in the future. For instructions see: http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submission-guidelines#loc-laboratory-protocols

We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript.

Kind regards,

Michal A Olszewski, DVM, PhD

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Journal Requirements:

When submitting your revision, we need you to address these additional requirements.

1. Please ensure that your manuscript meets PLOS ONE's style requirements, including those for file naming. The PLOS ONE style templates can be found at

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=wjVg/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_main_body.pdf and

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=ba62/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_title_authors_affiliations.pdf

2. At this time, we request that you  please report additional details in your Methods section regarding animal care, as per our editorial guidelines:

(i) Please state the source of mice used in the study (i.e. where the mice were originally purchased from)

(ii) Please describe the care received by the animals, including the frequency of monitoring and the criteria used to assess animal health and well-being.

(iii) Please confirm at what age the mice were euthanised.

Thank you for your attention to these requests.

3. Please provide the product number and any lot numbers of the antibodies, luminex multiplex assays and ELISA assays for your study.

4. To comply with PLOS ONE submission guidelines, in your Methods section, please provide additional information regarding your statistical analyses. For more information on PLOS ONE's expectations for statistical reporting, please see https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submission-guidelines.#loc-statistical-reporting

Editor's Comment

Apart from the clarifications requested by the reviewers, please make sure that the paper is edited by a native English speaker or a English editing company to help with fixing all grammar errors that make some areas of this paper unclear.

[Note: HTML markup is below. Please do not edit.]

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Partly

**********

2. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

3. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

4. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: No

**********

5. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #1: The manuscript “The pronounced lung lesions developing in LATY136F knock-in mice mimic human IgG4-related lung disease” by Waseda et al is a concise report that correlated mice that express an alternate form of LAT and the spontaneous lymphoproliferative disorder they develop to human IgG4-related disease. The authors find that these mice exhibit strong Th2 inflammation early in life, followed by fibrosis. This study is quite straight-forward, but would benefit from more detail in many places.

Concerns:

1. This study uses knock-in of LAT in which tyrosine 136 is substituted with a phenylalanine, thereby preventing downstream signaling. This results in drastic lymphoproliferation. Is there any evidence that LAT is involved in human disease? The authors also discuss lung involvement in the introduction and mention clinical characteristics, but these characteristics are not defined. More detail about the clinical observations in this disease and how they correlate to what is seen in the animal model would be helpful.

2. The authors briefly mention the Th2 nature of their observations and the potential link with allergic disease, but there is no follow-up on this in either the experiments or in the discussion. Are there differences in IgE in this model?

3. Figure 1 needs more detail in the results and figure legend, especially regarding the 20 week sections. It seems that the image on the left is H&E staining and the image on the right is not, but this is unclear and the stains for each section needs to be defined.

4. The Ashcroft score needs to be defined.

5. In general, Figures 1-3 would benefit from greater details in the results section.

Reviewer #2: Dr. Wasada et al present a well argued manuscript describing the use of a LAT knock-in mouse as a model of IgG4-RD of the lung. This is a well executed follow-up study of their prior work, published in this journal, establishing this same mouse model in other organs commonly affected by human IgG4 disease. While the authors provide a compelling argument, there are a few minor issues that I suspect, if addressed, would improve the author's argument.

1) Figure 1: you present two LAT 20w x20 figures at the bottom with largely different appearances. Does this speak to the heterogeneity of the results at 20w? If so, would it help to show cumulative data, compiling the fibrosis scores. If this is true heterogeneity, it may be beneficial to add actual datapoints to Figure 3B, 4, and 5 instead of just showing the median.

2) Redundancy: the statement, "In addition, in Lat knock in mice, the score significantly increased over time." This is already shown in the sentence above, just with data re-arranged. I would re-word or eliminate this.

3) I'm assuming you chose to study BALF at 8,9 weeks due to your prior results suggesting peak inflammation occurred between 6-10 weeks. I wonder if you would have found greater cytokine production at an earlier time-point. It would have been interesting to see the composition of the lymphocytes found in the BALF. This could be done fairly easily using flow cytometry and could provide some insight into the unique cytokine pattern you found with bead array.

4) Next steps. Now that you have established this model, how do you intend to study it further?

5) Wording. There are some phrases throughout the manuscript that are hard to follow, or do not seem to add anything to your argument. For example, on page two, "Regarding the lungs, in addition to comprehensive diagnostic criteria, diagnostic criteria unique to the lungs were established, and diagnosis of lung lesions is performed based on the clinical characteristics." The clarity of your message could be improved greatly by a grammatical review focused on reducing redundancy.

**********

6. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: No

[NOTE: If reviewer comments were submitted as an attachment file, they will be attached to this email and accessible via the submission site. Please log into your account, locate the manuscript record, and check for the action link "View Attachments". If this link does not appear, there are no attachment files.]

While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com/. PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Registration is free. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email PLOS at figures@plos.org. Please note that Supporting Information files do not need this step.

PLoS One. 2021 Mar 4;16(3):e0247173. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0247173.r002

Author response to Decision Letter 0


19 Jan 2021

January 12, 2021

Joerg Heber, Editor-in-Chief

PLOS ONE

Dear Dr. Heber:

We wish to re-submit our manuscript titled “The pronounced lung lesions developing in LATY136F knock-in mice mimic human IgG4-related lung disease”.

We thank you and the reviewers for your thoughtful suggestions and insights. The manuscript has benefited from these insightful suggestions. I look forward to working with you and the reviewers to move this manuscript closer to publication in PLOS ONE.

The manuscript has been rechecked, and the necessary changes have been made in accordance with the reviewers’ suggestions. The responses to all comments are given below.

Thank you for your consideration. I look forward to hearing from you.

Sincerely,

Yuko Waseda

Third Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medical Sciences, University of Fukui, 23-3 Matsuoka Shimoaizuki, Eiheiji, Fukui, Japan, 910-1193

TEL: +81-776-61-8355

FAX: +81-776-61-8111

E-mail: yuwaseda@gmail.com

RESPONSE TO REVIEWER’S COMMENTS

Reviewer #1: The manuscript “The pronounced lung lesions developing in LATY136F knock-in mice mimic human IgG4-related lung disease” by Waseda et al is a concise report that correlated mice that express an alternate form of LAT and the spontaneous lymphoproliferative disorder they develop to human IgG4-related disease. The authors find that these mice exhibit strong Th2 inflammation early in life, followed by fibrosis. This study is quite straight-forward, but would benefit from more detail in many places.

Concerns:

1. This study uses knock-in of LAT in which tyrosine 136 is substituted with a phenylalanine, thereby preventing downstream signaling. This results in drastic lymphoproliferation. Is there any evidence that LAT is involved in human disease? The authors also discuss lung involvement in the introduction and mention clinical characteristics, but these characteristics are not defined. More detail about the clinical observations in this disease and how they correlate to what is seen in the animal model would be helpful.

COMMENT: 1

Thank you for your comment. First, whether LAT is related to human disease is unclear. The characteristics of lung lesions in human IgG4-RD were described in the Introduction. The pathological findings include high levels of IgG and IgG4 in serum, infiltration of IgG4-positive plasma cells, obliterative phlebitis or obliterative arteritis and lymphocytes, as well as a form of fibrosis called storiform fibrosis in some organs, such as the pancreas, salivary glands, kidney, retroperitoneum, and periaorta. We found that the lungs of LAT mice also had high serum IgG and IgG1 levels and had histopathology similar to that of humans. Clinical findings include many allergic diseases, such as rhinitis, conjunctivitis, bronchial asthma, and urticaria, but we have not yet investigated whether LAT mice have allergic diseases. Furthermore, in humans, IgG4-RD involves HLA-DRB1 and FCGR2B at the general level (Reference 15), but whether it is related to LAT has not been investigated. We believe that this is also something that needs further consideration in the future, and this manuscript did not consider it to that extent.

2. The authors briefly mention the Th2 nature of their observations and the potential link with allergic disease, but there is no follow-up on this in either the experiments or in the discussion. Are there differences in IgE in this model?

COMMENT: 2

Thank you for your advice. As shown in P5L3, one of the characteristics of IgG4-RD is the presence of allergic disease, and IgE often increases. In reference 11, the median IgE of IgG4-related lung disease in 18 patients was 367 (34-2560) U/mL. In addition, IgE is increased in LAT mice (Reference 18). In this study, we revealed that Th2 cytokines are also predominant in the lungs. We believe that this model, including our previous reports, represents the clinical conditions of IgG4-RD. We did not mention it this time, but we will look into presence of allergic disease in LAT mice in future studies.

3. Figure 1 needs more detail in the results and figure legend, especially regarding the 20 weeks sections. It seems that the image on the left is H&E staining and the image on the right is not, but this is unclear and the stains for each section needs to be defined.

COMMENT: 3

Thank you for your comment. The image on the right is also H-E staining. The left lung was bleeding, so it looks different from the right lung, but it was similar in terms of bronchodilation etc.

4. The Ashcroft score needs to be defined.

COMMENT: 4

We have added the requested information to the text (P10L6).

5. In general, Figures 1-3 would benefit from greater details in the results section.

COMMENT: 5

We have added more details to the text describing Figure 1-3.

Reviewer #2: Dr. Wasada et al present a well argued manuscript describing the use of a LAT knock-in mouse as a model of IgG4-RD of the lung. This is a well executed follow-up study of their prior work, published in this journal, establishing this same mouse model in other organs commonly affected by human IgG4 disease. While the authors provide a compelling argument, there are a few minor issues that I suspect, if addressed, would improve the author's argument.

1) Figure 1: you present two LAT 20w x20 figures at the bottom with largely different appearances. Does this speak to the heterogeneity of the results at 20w? If so, would it help to show cumulative data, compiling the fibrosis scores. If this is true heterogeneity, it may be beneficial to add actual datapoints to Figure 3B, 4, and 5 instead of just showing the median.

COMMENT: 1)

Thank you for your advice. The image on the left looks different because the lung was bleeding, but it is similar if you disregard the effect of bleeding. Because some mice bleed during fibrosis progression, we showed some lungs that are bleeding and some that are not.

2) Redundancy: the statement, "In addition, in Lat knock in mice, the score significantly increased over time." This is already shown in the sentence above, just with data re-arranged. I would re-word or eliminate this.

COMMENT: 2)

Thank you for your advice. The previous sentence shows that the Ashcroft score of LAT mice is significantly higher than that of WT mice after 6 weeks, and the next sentence, "In addition, in Lat knock in mice, the score significantly increased over time.", is a comparison between LAT mice and states that they are different over time.

3) I'm assuming you chose to study BALF at 8,9 weeks due to your prior results suggesting peak inflammation occurred between 6-10 weeks. I wonder if you would have found greater cytokine production at an earlier time-point. It would have been interesting to see the composition of the lymphocytes found in the BALF. This could be done fairly easily using flow cytometry and could provide some insight into the unique cytokine pattern you found with bead array.

COMMENT: 3)

Thank you for your fruitful advice. Unfortunately, we have not examined cytokines earlier than 8-9 weeks, but in future experiments, we will use flow cytometry to examine the temporal changes in cytokines.

4) Next steps. Now that you have established this model, how do you intend to study it further?

COMMENT: 4)

Thank you for your comment. IgG4-RD is considered to be an allergic disease. Therefore, we would like to examine whether LAT mice have any allergic diseases and evaluate whether inflammation and fibrosis are improved by using antibody preparations such as anti-IL-4, IL-5, and IL-13 antibodies. I think these will be effective for the treatment of IgG4-RD.

5) Wording. There are some phrases throughout the manuscript that are hard to follow, or do not seem to add anything to your argument. For example, on page two, "Regarding the lungs, in addition to comprehensive diagnostic criteria, diagnostic criteria unique to the lungs were established, and diagnosis of lung lesions is performed based on the clinical characteristics." The clarity of your message could be improved greatly by a grammatical review focused on reducing redundancy.

COMMENT: 5)

Thank you for your comments. Regarding the lung, IgG4-positive plasma cells may infiltrate the lung even in lungs with collagen disease (we added reference 12), and patients with diseases other than IgG4-related lung disease will be included based on comprehensive diagnostic criteria alone. Therefore, we established diagnostic criteria unique to the lungs. We rewrote the text to suggest that lung lesions can be accurately diagnosed based on clinical findings, pathological findings, and imaging findings. We also had the entire sentence proofread by a native English-speaking scientist.

Attachment

Submitted filename: ResponseToRevewers 20210112.docx

Decision Letter 1

Michal A Olszewski

3 Feb 2021

The pronounced lung lesions developing in LATY136F knock-in mice mimic human IgG4-related lung disease

PONE-D-20-29792R1

Dear Dr. Waseda,

We’re pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been judged scientifically suitable for publication and will be formally accepted for publication once it meets all outstanding technical requirements.

Within one week, you’ll receive an e-mail detailing the required amendments. When these have been addressed, you’ll receive a formal acceptance letter and your manuscript will be scheduled for publication.

An invoice for payment will follow shortly after the formal acceptance. To ensure an efficient process, please log into Editorial Manager at http://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/, click the 'Update My Information' link at the top of the page, and double check that your user information is up-to-date. If you have any billing related questions, please contact our Author Billing department directly at authorbilling@plos.org.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please notify them about your upcoming paper to help maximize its impact. If they’ll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team as soon as possible -- no later than 48 hours after receiving the formal acceptance. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information, please contact onepress@plos.org.

Kind regards,

Michal A Olszewski, DVM, PhD

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Additional Editor Comments (optional):

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. If the authors have adequately addressed your comments raised in a previous round of review and you feel that this manuscript is now acceptable for publication, you may indicate that here to bypass the “Comments to the Author” section, enter your conflict of interest statement in the “Confidential to Editor” section, and submit your "Accept" recommendation.

Reviewer #2: All comments have been addressed

**********

2. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented.

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

3. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

4. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

5. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

6. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #2: The authors were able to partly answer my comments, but I believe sufficiently to make the manuscript acceptable for publication. It is a bit worrisome when individual datapoints are not shown in figures, especially when analyzing mouse data. This was one of my comments that was not addressed and this remains my only reservation.

**********

7. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #2: No

Acceptance letter

Michal A Olszewski

11 Feb 2021

PONE-D-20-29792R1

The pronounced lung lesions developing in LATY136Fknock-in mice mimic human IgG4-related lung disease

Dear Dr. Waseda:

I'm pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been deemed suitable for publication in PLOS ONE. Congratulations! Your manuscript is now with our production department.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please let them know about your upcoming paper now to help maximize its impact. If they'll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team within the next 48 hours. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information please contact onepress@plos.org.

If we can help with anything else, please email us at plosone@plos.org.

Thank you for submitting your work to PLOS ONE and supporting open access.

Kind regards,

PLOS ONE Editorial Office Staff

on behalf of

Dr. Michal A Olszewski

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE


Articles from PLoS ONE are provided here courtesy of PLOS

RESOURCES