Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2022 Jan 1.
Published in final edited form as: Liver Transpl. 2020 Nov 8;27(1):9–11. doi: 10.1002/lt.25921

A Claims-Based Frailty Risk Score Is Associated With Hospitalization for Acute-on-Chronic Liver Failure: But Is It Frailty?

Jeremy Louissaint 1, Elliot B Tapper 1,2
PMCID: PMC7932682  NIHMSID: NIHMS1672223  PMID: 33048425

Frailty is a multidimensional construct that broadly refers to a health state of diminished physiological reserve resulting in a reduced tolerance to health stressors.(1) Although the concept of frailty has its roots in geriatrics, it has flourished in hepatology. Indeed, many patients with cirrhosis are frail, which portends an increased risk of hospitalizations and mortality.(2,3) It is recommended that we evaluate all patients with decompensated cirrhosis or undergoing transplant evaluation for frailty with a toolbox that includes physical performance measures and validated disability scales.(1) Despite its importance, there are 3 persistent challenges facing frailty research. First, frailty assessments are infrequently used due to time constraints and the need for specialized tools or staff.(1) Second, because of the need for performance measures, population-based studies of frailty are lacking. Third, given the difficulties in assessing hospitalized patients for physical frailty, tools beyond disability measures are limited.(3) For all of these reasons, we welcome the important study by Shah et al. in this issue that examines the potential role of claims-based indices of frailty in chronic liver disease in a cohort of recently hospitalized patients with cirrhosis.(4)

Finding Frailty in Claims Data

Multiple investigators have sought to estimate frailty from claims-based administrative billing codes. One such risk score is the hospital frailty risk score (HFRS), which is the cumulative weighted sum of 109 International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision (ICD-10) codes.(5) The HFRS was derived from a retrospective cohort of hospitalized patients age ≥75 years in the United Kingdom using cluster analyses linking ICD-10 codes to hospital days and costs. People with scores <5 are considered low risk and those with scores >15 are considered high risk. Higher scores are associated with readmissions and mortality. Interestingly, however, when it was compared with the gold-standard Fried Frailty Index, there was no meaningful association (κ = 0.22). The HFRS was recently applied to patients with inflammatory bowel disease where it was associated with increased hospitalizations and mortality.(6) The HFRS has not, nor has any administrative frailty score, been validated using established frailty indices in patients with cirrhosis.

The First Use of Claims-Based Frailty Scores in Cirrhosis

Using a large (n = 16,561) cirrhosis cohort with at least 1 hospitalization curated from the Veterans Health Administration by the Veterans Outcomes and Costs Associated with Liver Disease (VOCAL) group, Shah et al. examined the impact of claims-based frailty on the risk of acute-on-chronic liver failure (ACLF) hospitalizations (versus non-ACLF hospitalizations) and short-term mortality in cirrhosis. Median HFRSs were higher in those with an ACLF hospitalization compared with those with a non-ACLF hospitalization (11.8 versus 9.2). Interestingly, frailty scores increased with decreasing ACLF severity (ACLF 1 versus ACLF 3, 12.2 versus 10.8). The HFRS was associated with an increased risk of mortality (odds ratio 1.02 per 5-point HFRS increase, P = 0.004). In the subgroup of patients with an ACLF hospitalization, however, the HFRS did not predict mortality.

Is This Frailty?

This study has revealed that a claims-based frailty score is associated with incident ACLF hospitalizations and overall mortality in cirrhosis. However, it is unclear if our conclusion ought to be that frailty is associated with incident ACLF. We do not know whether the HFRS is detecting the physiological deficits measured when a patient performs chair stands, hand-grip tests, or walk-speed assessments. It turns out that there is poor agreement between the HFRS and established frailty measures.(5) Furthermore, the authors’ observed association between the HFRS and lower-grade ACLF is in contrast to prior work showing that a traditional frailty/disability measure (Karnofsky Performance Status) worsens with increased ACLF severity.(7) Instead of frailty, the HFRS is likely best described as an expanded measure of comorbidity, not unlike the Charlson comorbidity index.(5,6)

Can This Score Be Applied to Cirrhosis?

There are 4 reasons why any new comorbidity index or claims-based frailty score for patients with cirrhosis should be derived from patients with cirrhosis. First, a frailty index must discriminate robust from frail.(1) In contrast, using the cutoffs proposed by the HFRS, all subgroups studied by Shah et al. (non-ACLF hospitalization, ACLF 1 to 3 hospitalization) would have been classified as frail.

Second, the weighting of each code within the index must reflect frailty in cirrhosis. Instead, the HFRS lacks representation by key conditions known to impact frailty in cirrhosis, such as malnutrition, sarcopenia, ascites, and hepatic encephalopathy,(1,2) while nearly universal features of decompensated cirrhosis are heavily weighted: volume depletion, acute and chronic renal failure, hypotension, edema, and abnormal blood chemistries.

Third, because increasing frailty scores correlate with an increased risk of adverse outcomes, changes in frailty over time are meaningful in predicting future events.(8) The HFRS, however, is relatively static because it is calculated based on 2 years of preceding diagnostic codes which follow the patient in perpetuity.

Finally, patients with cirrhosis experience fragmented care, frequently dispersing their claims data across multiple health care systems.(9) Yet, the HFRS relies on 2 years of complete claims-based data. Shah et al. reveal that even in a centralized health care system, only 53% of the cohort have such complete data.

In conclusion, a claims-based risk score is associated with the risk of ACLF hospitalization and overall survival in chronic liver disease. The authors have initiated an exciting line of inquiry. However, we do not know if the chosen risk score truly captures frailty. Further study is needed to evaluate scores specific to patients with cirrhosis.

Acknowledgments

Elliot B. Tapper receives funding from the National Institutes of Health through the National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (1K23-DK-117055-01A1).

Abbreviations:

ACLF

acute-on-chronic liver failure

HFRS

hospital frailty risk score

ICD

International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision

VOCAL

Veterans Outcomes and Costs Associated with Liver Disease

REFERENCES

  • 1).Lai JC, Sonnenday CJ, Tapper EB, Duarte-Rojo A, Dunn MA, Bernal W, et al. Frailty in liver transplantation: an expert opinion statement from the American Society of Transplantation Liver and Intestinal Community of Practice. Am J Transplant 2019;19:1896–1906. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2).Tapper EB. Frailty and outcomes after liver transplantation. Curr Transplant Rep 2019;6:1–6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3).Tapper EB, Finkelstein D, Mittleman MA, Piatkowski G, Lai M. Standard assessments of frailty are validated predictors of mortality in hospitalized patients with cirrhosis. Hepatology 2015;62:584–590. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4).Shah S, Goldberg DS, Kaplan DE, Sundaram V, Taddei TH, Mahmud N. Patient frailty is independently associated with the risk of hospitalization for acute-on-chronic liver failure. Liver Transpl 2021;27:16–26. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5).Gilbert T, Neuburger J, Kraindler J, Keeble E, Smith P, Ariti C, et al. Development and validation of a Hospital Frailty Risk Score focusing on older people in acute care settings using electronic hospital records: an observational study. Lancet 2018;391:1775–1782. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6).Qian AS, Nguyen NH, Elia J, Ohno-Machado L, Sandborn WJ, Singh S. Frailty is independently associated with mortality and readmission in hospitalized patients with inflammatory bowel diseases. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2020. 10.1016/j.cgh.2020.08.010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7).Sundaram V, Jalan R, Wu T, Volk ML, Asrani SK, Klein AS, Wong RJ. Factors associated with survival of patients with severe acute-on-chronic liver failure before and after liver transplantation. Gastroenterology 2019;156:1381–1391. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8).Lai JC, Dodge JL, Kappus MR, Dunn MA, Volk ML, Duarte-Rojo A, et al. ; for Multi-Center Functional Assessment in Liver Transplantation (FrAILT) Study. Changes in frailty are associated with waitlist mortality in patients with cirrhosis. J Hepatol 2020;73:575–581. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9).Cohen-Mekelburg S, Waljee AK, Kenney BC, Tapper EB. Coordination of care is associated with survival and health care utilization in a population-based study of patients with cirrhosis. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2020;18:2340–2348. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES