The authors apologize for the mistakes in the Results section. In Table 4, sex, current or ex-smoker, current or ex-drinker, hypercholesterolemia, diabetes mellitus, history of CVD, and antihypertensive medication should have been treated as binary variables coded as 1 or 0. However, the authors used the binary variables divided by 1-standard deviation. This error caused an underestimation of the hazard ratios of the binary variables. For example, the standard deviation of sex (men=1 and women=0) was calculated as 0.47, although it is an inappropriate calculation. Thus, the correct hazard ratio of men is calculated as follows: 0.80 [the value before correction](1/0.47)=0.62 [after correction]. All corrections are shown below.
Page 29, Table 4
Table 4.
HR for CKD Development of Covariates
| Variables | HR (95% CI) | χ2 | P-value |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sex (men=1, women=0) | 0.62 (0.34–1.14) | 2.37 | 0.12 |
| Age (1-SD [10.2 years] increase) | 1.22 (0.97–1.52) | 2.95 | 0.086 |
| BMI (1-SD [3.02 kg/m2] increase) | 1.03 (0.88–1.21) | 0.17 | 0.68 |
| Current or ex-smoker (=1, non-smoker=0) | 1.92 (1.05–3.49) | 4.53 | 0.033 |
| Current or ex-drinker (=1, non-drinker=0) | 1.16 (0.79–1.70) | 0.55 | 0.46 |
| Hypercholesterolemia (=1, non-hypercholesterolemia=0) | 0.83 (0.59–1.17) | 1.10 | 0.29 |
| Diabetes mellitus (=1, non-diabetes mellitus=0) | 1.61 (0.94–2.77) | 2.98 | 0.085 |
| History of CVD (=1, no history of CVD=0) | 0.93 (0.34–2.58) | 0.017 | 0.90 |
| Antihypertensive medication (=1, no antihypertensive medication=0) | 1.02 (0.70–1.48) | 0.0097 | 0.92 |
| SBP (1-SD [=13.4-mmHg] increase) | 1.06 (0.91–1.24) | 0.57 | 0.45 |
| eGFR (1-SD [=17.2-mL/min/1.73 m2] decrease) | 3.18 (2.47–4.09) | 81.1 | <0.0001 |
| lnNT-proBNP (1-SD [=0.87] increase) | 1.26 (1.05–1.51) | 5.97 | 0.015 |
We calculated the HR (95% CI) for CKD development per 1-SD increase in age, BMI, SBP, baseline eGFR, and lnNT-proBNP. For binary variables, the hazard ratio of code “1” (vs. “0”) is indicated. Abbreviations as in Table 1.