Abstract
A dominant mechanism of sudden cardiac death in the young is the progression of maladaptive responses to genes encoding proteins linked to hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM). Most are mutant sarcomere proteins that trigger the progression by imposing a biophysical defect on the dynamics and levels of myofilament tension generation. We discuss approaches for personalized treatments that are indicated by recent advanced understanding of the progression
Introduction
A dominant mechanism of sudden cardiac death in the young is the progressive maladaptive responses to genes encoding proteins linked to hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM)1–3. Most are mutant sarcomere proteins that trigger the progression by imposing a biophysical defect on the dynamics and levels of myofilament tension generation. The result is a disturbance in the control of cardiac function at the level of the sarcomere, which we have recently reviewed4,and which causes an increase in myofilament tension when activated by Ca2+. Depending on the mutation, the heart responds with progressive delayed relaxation, hyper-contractility, maladaptive mechano-transduction, and hypertrophic remodeling5–7. We have also summarized a potential role of vascular abnormalities in HCM progression8. Figure 1 summarizes this progression in a scheme emphasizing the diversity of carriers of the HCM mutations as well as the complex pathways progression can take. The complexity of clinical management of HCM has been extensively considered 9,10. As an example of this complexity, in Table 1 we have compared published retrospective data describing the differences in the general clinical course of symptomatic patients with HCM linked to mutations in either thin or thick filament proteins.11, 12 With thin filament mutations, there was a greater occurrence of progressive NYHA Class IV heart failure, with LVEF <50%, restrictive diastole, and severe atrial dilation and arrythmias. There was a greater occurrence of septal hypertrophy with thick filament mutations, whereas thin filament mutations exhibited apical concentric hypertrophy. Current therapies listed follow guidelines for therapeutic approaches related to clinical phenotype of atrial arrhythmias and symptomatic heart failure. Table 1 also lists therapy with Mavacamten, a myosin-directed molecule, which has demonstrated efficacy as a sarcomere and tension inhibitor in a phase 3 clinical trial (EXPLORER-HCM) treating patients with obstructive HCM13, 14. Treatment with Mavacampten, improves exercise capacity, outflow track obstruction, and NYHA heart failure class, but does not appear to prevent progression14. Treatment of patients with Ranolaxine or GS-967, both of which are late Na current inhibitors have also induced a reduction of the high tensions prevalent in the septum in patients with obstructive HCM15. Ranolazine may also act to depress enhanced myofilament response to Ca2+16.
Figure 1. Progression of disease in carriers of HCM mutations.

The scheme emphases the diversity of carriers as well as the complexity and diversity of pathological progression leading to outflow obstructions, heart failure, and in some cases to sudden cardiac death (SCD). These pathological signatures are triggered by the biophysical defect imposed by the mutation, but what happens next may involve a clinical course along the divergent pathways contributing to diseases via the different mechanisms outlined. Although microcirculatory disorders occur in HCM, understanding of the involvement of the blood and lymphatic vasculature and their endothelial and mural cell components are understudied, and thus poorly understood. See text for discussion of current approaches to risk stratification based on translational control mechanisms
Table 1. Comparison of triggering mutations in thin and thick filament proteins in the clinical course and therapies in HCM.
See text for sources of data, references and further discussion.
| Trigger/Clinical Course | Thin Filament Mutation | Thick Filament Mutation |
|---|---|---|
| Likely Biophysical Trigger | Increased Myofilament Ca-Response; Slowing of cross-relaxation kinetics Tension Cost (↑↑↑) |
Increase in cross-bridge relaxation kinetics: Enhanced DRX Tension Cost (↑↑↑) |
| Adverse Function | Diastolic Dysfunction (↑↑↑) Triphasic LV Filling (↑↑↑) Outflow Track Obstruction (↑) |
Diastolic Dysfunction (↑↑) Triphasic LV Filling (↑) Outflow Track Obstruction (↑↑↑) Hyper-contractility Increased Systolic Elastance |
| Early Adverse Remodeling | Apical Concentric Hypertrophy LV Mass (↑) Fibrosis (↑↑↑) |
Septal Hypertrophy (↑↑↑) LV Mass (↑↑) Fibrosis (↑↑) |
| Late Adverse Remodeling | Restrictive Evolution (↑↑↑) Symptomatic Heart Failure (↑↑↑) |
Hypokinetic Evolution (↑↑) Symptomatic Heart Failure (↑) |
| Altered E-C Coupling | Atrial /Ventricular Fibrillation Altered Ca-fluxes Sudden Cardiac Death (↑↑↑) |
Atrial /Ventricular Fibrillation Altered Ca-fluxes Sudden Cardiac Death |
| Altered Energetics | Tension Cost (↑↑) Oxidative Stress (↑) |
Tension Cost (↑) Reductive Stress (↑) Mitochondrial Abnormalities Mismatch of ATP demand |
| Therapies | ||
| Invasive | ICD Atrial Catheter Ablation |
ICD Atrial Catheter Ablation Septal Myectomy |
| Pharmacological | β-blockers Verapamil (++) Diltiazem Amiodarone Diuretics (+++) ACE Inhibitors (+++) ARBS (+++) Disopyramide |
β-blockers Verapamil Diltiazem (+++) Amiodarone Diuretics ACE Inhibitors (+) ARBS (+) Disopyramide (+++) Ranolazine (Late Na current Inhibitor |
| Phase 3 clinical trial | Sarcomere Inhibitor (Mavacampten) |
Data in Table 1 highlight unmet needs for patients progressing to serious cardiac disorders. One is the need for early diagnosis, stratification, and management. Early interventions in mouse models have demonstrated the prevention of progression5, 7. Some success at using various imaging techniques and strain measurements17 and exercise testing18 for stratification show promise. Compared to controls, patients harboring cTnT mutations and tested with cardiac magnetic resonance and [11C]-acetate positron emission tomography imaging demonstrated inefficiencies in myocardial oxygen consumption that occurred before mechanical dysfunction19. In the case of prevention of malignant arrhythmias, Maron B, Maron M. and colleagues20–22 have made a strong case for the implementation of a combination of relevant demographic and clinical risk variables together with physician experience, knowledge, and intuition in the decision of when and whether to implant an ICD. A second need is to broaden the diagnosis in relation to precision medicine in understanding the endophenotype1. A third is the need to determine early changes in the vascular and lymphatic compartments related to ischemia, fibrosis, and inflammation. Whereas alterations in the micro-circulation are documented in HCM, little is known of the evolution and impact of these changes23.
State of the art approaches aim to develop prognostic early biomarkers and therapeutic targets tailored to individuals.
An emerging approach to individualized therapies in precision medicine includes profiling mRNA and micro-RNA in heart tissue of animal models and of patients with different causal mutations11, 24, 25. In a recent example of this approach Vakrou et al.11 compared 5 week old (adolescent) mouse models with a mutation in the myosin heavy chain (R403Q-αMHC) and a mutation in cardiac troponin T (R92W-cTnT). Biophysical triggers are different in these two models, and although some similarities are indicated as listed in Table 1, the cTnT mutation induces diastolic abnormalities, whereas the MHC mutation does not. The experiments tested the hypothesis that progression to symptomatic HCM and sudden death involves different signaling pathways. Measurements included determination of differences in the transcriptome, miRNAome, as well as the redox environment with emphasis on mitochondrial generated reactive oxygen species. The data indicated significant elevations in oxidative stress in the R92W-cTnT hearts compared to hearts of littermates and R403Q-αMHC-mice, which demonstrated reductive stress with elevated levels of reduced glutathione. Reductive stress also drives cardiac remodeling.26 We have previously provided evidence that oxidative-stress related S-glutathionylation of myosin binding protein C (MyBPC3), slows cross-bridge kinetics and is likely to be responsible in part for the differences in diastolic function in the R92W-cTnT hearts16, 27–29. Vakrou et al.11 also reported an upregulation of the gene encoding the serpine1. Below we discuss the possible role of serpins, which were named for their activity as serum protease inhibitors. Serpins are large family of proteins that functions in protein quality control, processing of pro-matrix metalloproteinase 9, control of cell death, as well as inflammatory and infectious diseases.30–32,33 Bioinformatic analysis of the omic data revealed that the cTnT mutation was more closely associated with oxidative stress related fibrotic remodeling via the TGF-β pathway. These data indicated the use of anti-fibrotic angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) such as losartan as a basis for personalized early treatment of individuals harboring the R92W-cTnT mutation. It is also relevant that agents reducing oxidant stress and elevating reductive stress are not appropriate for use in the MHC mutant mice. In view of reduced levels of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-γ (PPARγ) and increased inflammatory signaling in the MHC mutants, pathway analysis indicated the use of prosiglitazone, which activates PPARγ and reduces inflammation.34 Thus, determinations of mRNA signatures contributed to understanding of the predominant clinical course as well potential interdictions to HCM progression.
More recently, Bos et al.25 compared mRNA profiles from healthy donor human heart samples and from myectomy samples from patients with HCM. In this case comparisons were made of major genotype groups expressing mutant cMYBP-C, likely to be mostly truncation mutants, and mutations in the myosin heavy chain (MHC-HCM). Tissue samples harvested from septal myectomies meant that obstructive HCM was common to both disease-causing genes. Thus, the transcriptomes of these two HCM cohorts were not analyzed separately. In HCM the most up-regulated gene compared to controls encodes angiotensin converting enzyme 2 (ACE2). As discussed below section, the most down-regulated gene encodes Serpin A3, Inasmuch as binding of virus to ACE2 is a triggering event in SARS-CoV-2 infection35, 36, Bos et al.25 emphasized the implications of this increase in ACE2 in myocardial injury in infected patients. A limitation of the study is that myectomy is a procedure of last resort to relieve obstruction to ventricular flows. Thus, it was not possible to make conclusions regarding whether increased levels of ACE2 were present mainly at this disease endpoint and whether they occurred in the cardiac myocytes. This last concern was addressed in recent study by Tucker37 et al, using single nucleus RNA-Seq (snRNA-Seq) analysis on biopsies from non-failing, HCM and DCM patients. While ACE2 expression predominates in cells associated with the microvasculature (pericytes), vascular smooth muscle cells and fibroblasts in non-failing hearts, its expression profile is significantly decreased in these cellular populations of HCM and DCM patients, but more importantly, was found to significantly increase in the cardiac myocytes of HCM and DCM patients37. Thus, the implications of ACE2 expression changes in inherited cardiomyopathies in the context of the present COVID-19 pandemic bear comment, especially considering the therapeutic challenges associated with treating HCM, a disease of the cardiac myocyte with different genetic origins.
SARS-CoV-2 and Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy
There is a growing recognition among the medical community at the forefront of tackling this pandemic, that the clinical management of patients with inherited cardiomyopathies and channelopathies needs to be prioritized differently with respect to COVID-19 than other forms of heart failure. A recent perspective by Limongelli and Crotti, lists COVID-19 medications in present use and their potential side effects in patients with cardiomyopathies38. This is reinforced by case reports of patients infected with SARS-CoV-2 showing post-mortem microscopic findings of putative viral particles inside various cellular and extracellular compartments of the heart, including the cardiac myocytes39. There are studies reporting high levels of virus not in myocytes, but cells of the endothelial compartment and pericytes40, 41, However, these studies were not carried out in hearts of HCM COVID-19 patients. As noted above, there is increased ACE2 expression in the cardiac myocytes of HCM patients, which could induce different mechanisms of cardiac injury for HCM patients with COVID-19. Some insight into these potential mechanisms have been provided by infecting SARS-CoV-2 into cardiomyocytes derived from human inducible pluripotent stem cells (hiPSC-CMs). SARS-CoV-2 infection of hiPSC-CMs induced a cessation of beating, cytotoxicity and cell death42. Internalization of the virus could be diminished by pre-incubation with an ACE2 antibody. Moreover, viral mediated transcriptomic changes showed downregulation of genes associated with metabolism, mitochondrial and contractile function, whereas genes associated with cytokine production were upregulated. Of note, ACE2 was downregulated in the infected myocytes which would be important to compare to iPSC derived cardiomyocytes from HCM patients which appear different ACE2 expression profiles as noted. Thus, while these data obtained in cell-based assays provide insight into the potential pathophysiologic consequences associated with SARS-CoV-2 infection in cardiac myocytes, they could be leveraged to study HCM patient specific hiPSC derived cardiomyocytes.
Serpins and HCM
An issue not explored to our knowledge is the potential significance of alterations in translation of genes encoding serpins in HCM. As summarized above, Volkou et al.11 reported that both the cTnT mutation in mice showed increases in Serpine1 compared to control litter mates. In contrast, Bos et al.25 reported that in human myectomy samples from heart with outflow obstructive HCM, Serpin A3 was the most downregulated gene. This difference in transcription of serpin genes may be of significance in understanding the difference in the clinical course of HCM mutations. The HCM cTnT mutations have a predominant fibrotic signature, and Serpine1 encodes plasminogen activator inhibitor (PAI), which is a well-known regulator of fibrosis in multiple tissues43. Although PAI-1 has been shown to repress cardiac fibrosis, studies reported by Flevaris et al.44 demonstrated PAI-1 can also lead to fibrosis in the myocardium by its specifically promoting TGF-β production. In the case of HCM linked to the MHC mutations, the clinical course indicates a predominant inflammatory signature in the mouse studies of Volkou et al. The MHC mutations progressing to outflow track obstruction are associated with down-regulation of cardiac Serpin A325. SerpinA3 is a serine protease inhibitor with multiple functions including maturation of pro-matrix metalloproteinase 9, regulation of apoptosis, infectious diseases, and inflammation.30–33 SerpinA3, known as anti-chymotrypsin or ACT, is an important inhibitor of neutrophil proteases, with cathepsin G as a major target45. In the heart cathepsin G, one of a class of inflammatory serum proteases (ISPs), activates inflammasome pathways and promotes pathological remodeling in the heart46, 47. Cathepsin G activity is important in cardiac repair after injury by adaptive proteolysis of dead cells and extracellular matrix. However, elevations in cathepsin G have been shown to activate the inflammasome and promote maladaptive remodeling in the uninjured heart. Hooshdara et al.46 reported inhibition of cathepsin G reduces myocyte death and improves remodeling after ischemia reperfusion injury. It may also be of significance that cathepsin G is immobilized on arterial endothelium with functions important in arterial myeloid cell recruitment with specific effects on arterial leukocyte adhesion. Thus, the imbalance between SerpinA3 levels and cathepsin G represent a maladaptive effect in HCM, and this imbalance is likely to exacerbate the effects of elevations of ACE 2 in HCM with the inflammatory processes in SARS-CoV-2 infections.
Transcriptional profiling in HCM
In summary, these recent publications provide evidence of the value of global mRNA profiling in HCM, a common cause of sudden death. There is a growing need to target the determination of the cell-specific transcriptome in the cardiac myocyte and the arterial endothelium in HCM. As such, the continual development and application of new and exciting approaches such as single-cell and single nucleus RNA-Seq, mRNA ORF ribosomal foot printing and ribosome affinity purification (TRAP) to isolate the cell-type actively translating mRNAs, offer greater in-depth cell-type specific and cellular resolution of transcriptomic profiles. Technical issues related to cardiac myocyte dissociation has largely stifled scRNA-Seq progress in the adult heart but have not precluded analysis of embryonic and neonatal hearts. Moreover, recent studies have selectively sacrificed the cardiac myocytes and have focused on characterization of non-myocyte cell populations in the adult heart in consideration of their contribution to heart disease. Of note, Li et al, used endothelial cell specific lineage tracing models to demonstrate distinct transcriptional profiles and pathways through which endothelial cells enhance neovasculogenesis in the heart following ischemic injury48. Despite exciting progress in scRNA-Seq approaches in the heart, the application to HCM remains elusive even in rodent HCM models. Ultimately, single nuclear RNA-Seq (snRNA-Seq) may provide the translational bridge into examining individualized cell type specific transcriptomic profiles since it circumvents cell isolation/labeling issues and holds the potential to isolate nuclei from frozen human biopsies49, 50. However, mRNA ORF ribosomal foot printing and ribosome affinity purification (TRAP) hold the possibility of examining post-transcriptional and co-translational regulation and to move beyond the use of transcriptomic profiling to help predict pathways and signaling networks, to identifying the actively translating proteome within pathways. The power of mRNA ORF ribosomal foot printing has already been demonstrated by its ability to infer evidence of protein truncations and microproteins in human dilated cardiomyopathic hearts but does not provide direct analysis of the cell-type translating proteome51. However, extension of the ribosome affinity purification (TRAP) approach whereby cell-type specific RiboTag reporter mice are crossed with HCM models, holds the possibility to combine simultaneous ribosome affinity purification of the actively translating mRNAs and proteins within the different cellular compartments52, 53.
In case of HCM patients infected with SARS-CoV-2, there is a threat to these translational mechanisms. The reliance of viruses on the host’s transcriptional and translational machinery for propagation and their capacity to manipulate mechanisms such as impairing cap-dependent ribosomal recruitment of host mRNA and targeting translation factor function may alter the balance of translation in favor of viral protein synthesis.54 In the context of HCM in which transcriptional and translational events are already enhanced to drive structural and functional remodeling, is it worth considering the possibility of detrimental viral interference of protein synthesis as a secondary insult to the host’s immune response, as well as the loss of general maintenance of cellular integrity. Thus, the application of these emerging “omics” approaches for discovery purposes and the potential to harmonize data from the actively translating mRNA and proteins pools, not only offers a more refined understanding of individualized cell-type and/or mutation specific therapies for HCM disease progression, but also the development of more effective means for diagnosing and treating those cells and organs infected by SARS-CoV-2.
NIH Funding Support:
RO1 HL 128468 (BMW, RJS); RO1 HL 119199 (RJS); RO1 HL 112626 (JK); PO1 HL 62426 (RJS, CMW, BMW, PHG)
References
- 1.Maron BJ, Maron MS, Maron BA and Loscalzo J. Moving Beyond the Sarcomere to Explain Heterogeneity in Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy: JACC Review Topic of the Week. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2019;73:1978–1986. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Neubauer S, Kolm P, Ho CY, Kwong RY, Desai MY, Dolman SF, Appelbaum E, Desvigne-Nickens P, DiMarco JP, Friedrich MG, Geller N, Harper AR, Jarolim P, Jerosch-Herold M, Kim DY, Maron MS, Schulz-Menger J, Piechnik SK, Thomson K, Zhang C, Watkins H, Weintraub WS and Kramer CM. Distinct Subgroups in Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy in the NHLBI HCM Registry. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2019;74:2333–2345. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Force T, Bonow RO, Houser SR, Solaro RJ, Hershberger RE, Adhikari B, Anderson ME, Boineau R, Byrne BJ, Cappola TP, Kalluri R, LeWinter MM, Maron MS, Molkentin JD, Ommen SR, Regnier M, Tang WH, Tian R, Konstam MA, Maron BJ and Seidman CE. Research priorities in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: report of a Working Group of the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute. Circulation. 2010;122:1130–3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Solaro CR and Solaro RJ. Implications of the complex biology and micro-environment of cardiac sarcomeres in the use of high affinity troponin antibodies as serum biomarkers for cardiac disorders. J Mol Cell Cardiol. 2020;143:145–158. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Alves ML, Dias FAL, Gaffin RD, Simon JN, Montminy EM, Biesiadecki BJ, Hinken AC, Warren CM, Utter MS, Davis RTR, Sakthivel S, Robbins J, Wieczorek DF, Solaro RJ and Wolska BM. Desensitization of myofilaments to Ca2+ as a therapeutic target for hypertrophic cardiomyopathy with mutations in thin filament proteins. Circ Cardiovasc Genet. 2014;7:132–143. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Sheehan KA, Arteaga GM, Hinken AC, Dias FA, Ribeiro C, Wieczorek DF, Solaro RJ and Wolska BM. Functional effects of a tropomyosin mutation linked to FHC contribute to maladaptation during acidosis. J Mol Cell Cardiol. 2011;50:442–50. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Lehman SJ, Tal-Grinspan L, Lynn ML, Strom J, Benitez GE, Anderson ME and Tardiff JC. Chronic Calmodulin-Kinase II Activation Drives Disease Progression in Mutation-Specific Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy. Circulation. 2019;139:1517–1529. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Marszalek RJ, Solaro RJ and Wolska BM. Coronary arterial vasculature in the pathophysiology of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. Pflugers Arch. 2019;471:769–780. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Gersh BJ, Maron BJ, Bonow RO, Dearani JA, Fifer MA, Link MS, Naidu SS, Nishimura RA, Ommen SR, Rakowski H, Seidman CE, Towbin JA, Udelson JE and Yancy CW. 2011 ACCF/AHA Guideline for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. Developed in collaboration with the American Association for Thoracic Surgery, American Society of Echocardiography, American Society of Nuclear Cardiology, Heart Failure Society of America, Heart Rhythm Society, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, and Society of Thoracic Surgeons. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2011;58:e212–60. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Maron BJ. Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy in childhood. Pediatric clinics of North America. 2004;51:1305–46. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Vakrou S, Fukunaga R, Foster DB, Sorensen L, Liu Y, Guan Y, Woldemichael K, Pineda-Reyes R, Liu T, Tardiff JC, Leinwand LA, Tocchetti CG, Abraham TP, O’Rourke B, Aon MA and Abraham MR. Allele-specific differences in transcriptome, miRNome, and mitochondrial function in two hypertrophic cardiomyopathy mouse models. JCI Insight. 2018;3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Coppini R, Ho CY, Ashley E, Day S, Ferrantini C, Girolami F, Tomberli B, Bardi S, Torricelli F, Cecchi F, Mugelli A, Poggesi C, Tardiff J and Olivotto I. Clinical phenotype and outcome of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy associated with thin-filament gene mutations. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014;64:2589–2600. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Elliott PM. The end of the beginning for drug therapy in obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy with EXPLORER-HCM. Cardiovasc Res. 2020;116:e175–e178. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Olivotto I, Oreziak A, Barriales-Villa R, Abraham TP, Masri A, Garcia-Pavia P, Saberi S, Lakdawala NK, Wheeler MT, Owens A, Kubanek M, Wojakowski W, Jensen MK, Gimeno-Blanes J, Afshar K, Myers J, Hegde SM, Solomon SD, Sehnert AJ, Zhang D, Li W, Bhattacharya M, Edelberg JM, Waldman CB, Lester SJ, Wang A, Ho CY and Jacoby D. Mavacamten for treatment of symptomatic obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (EXPLORER-HCM): a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial. Lancet. 2020;396:759–769. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Ferrantini C, Pioner JM, Mazzoni L, Gentile F, Tosi B, Rossi A, Belardinelli L, Tesi C, Palandri C, Matucci R, Cerbai E, Olivotto I, Poggesi C, Mugelli A and Coppini R. Late sodium current inhibitors to treat exercise-induced obstruction in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: an in vitro study in human myocardium. British journal of pharmacology. 2018;175:2635–2652. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Lovelock JD, Monasky MM, Jeong EM, Lardin HA, Liu H, Patel BG, Taglieri DM, Gu L, Kumar P, Pokhrel N, Zeng D, Belardinelli L, Sorescu D, Solaro RJ and Dudley SC Jr. Ranolazine improves cardiac diastolic dysfunction through modulation of myofilament calcium sensitivity. Circ Res. 2012;110:841–50. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Huang L, Que L, Xi Y, Zhuang J, Yuan H, Liu H, Li J, Dong Y, Jia Q and Lin J. Myocardial Mechanics Parameters That Predict Left Ventricular Outflow Tract Obstruction in Patients With Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy: A Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance Feature Tracking Analysis. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Magrì D, Mastromarino V, Gallo G, Zachara E, Re F, Agostoni P, Giordano D, Rubattu S, Forte M, Cotugno M, Torrisi MR, Petrucci S, Germani A, Savio C, Maruotti A, Volpe M, Autore C, Piane M and Musumeci B. Risk Stratification in Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy. Insights from Genetic Analysis and Cardiopulmonary Exercise Testing. Journal of clinical medicine. 2020;9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Parbhudayal RY, Harms HJ, Michels M, van Rossum AC, Germans T and van der Velden J. Increased Myocardial Oxygen Consumption Precedes Contractile Dysfunction in Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy Caused by Pathogenic TNNT2 Gene Variants. Journal of the American Heart Association. 2020;9:e015316. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Rowin EJ, Sridharan A, Madias C, Firely C, Koethe B, Link MS, Maron MS and Maron BJ. Prediction and Prevention of Sudden Death in Young Patients (<20 years) With Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy. Am J Cardiol. 2020;128:75–83. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Maron BJ, Rowin EJ and Maron MS. Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy: Is a ‘Cure’ Coming … Or Is It Already Here? Am J Med. 2020;133:886–888. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Maron MS, Brush J, Rowin EJ and Maron BJ. Back to the future: Predicting sudden death in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy relying on individual risk markers and physician judgment without mathematical scoring. Heart Rhythm. 2020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Aguiar Rosa S, Rocha Lopes L, Fiarresga A, Ferreira RC and Mota Carmo M. Coronary microvascular dysfunction in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: Pathophysiology, assessment, and clinical impact. Microcirculation. 2020:e12656. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Liu Y, Afzal J, Vakrou S, Greenland GV, Talbot CC, Jr., Hebl VB, Guan Y, Karmali R, Tardiff JC, Leinwand LA, Olgin JE, Das S, Fukunaga R and Abraham MR. Differences in microRNA-29 and Pro-fibrotic Gene Expression in Mouse and Human Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy. Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine. 2019;6:170. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Bos JM, Hebl VB, Oberg AL, Sun Z, Herman DS, Teekakirikul P, Seidman JG, Seidman CE, Dos Remedios CG, Maleszewski JJ, Schaff HV, Dearani JA, Noseworthy PA, Friedman PA, Ommen SR, Brozovich FV and Ackerman MJ. Marked Up-Regulation of ACE2 in Hearts of Patients With Obstructive Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy: Implications for SARS-CoV-2-Mediated COVID-19. Mayo Clinic proceedings. 2020;95:1354–1368. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Shanmugam G, Wang D, Gounder SS, Fernandes J, Litovsky SH, Whitehead K, Radhakrishnan RK, Franklin S, Hoidal JR, Kensler TW, Dell’Italia L, Darley-Usmar V, Abel ED, Jones DP, Ping P and Rajasekaran NS. Reductive Stress Causes Pathological Cardiac Remodeling and Diastolic Dysfunction. Antioxid Redox Signal. 2020;32:1293–1312. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Patel BG, Wilder T and Solaro RJ. Novel control of cardiac myofilament response to calcium by S-glutathionylation at specific sites of myosin binding protein C. Front Physiol. 2013;4:336. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Wilder T, Ryba DM, Wieczorek DF, Wolska BM and Solaro RJ. N-acetylcysteine reverses diastolic dysfunction and hypertrophy in familial hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2015;309:H1720–30. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Ryba DM, Warren CM, Karam CN, Davis RT 3rd, Chowdhury SAK, Alvarez MG, McCann M, Liew CW, Wieczorek DF, Varga P, Solaro RJ and Wolska BM. Sphingosine-1-Phosphate Receptor Modulator, FTY720, Improves Diastolic Dysfunction and Partially Reverses Atrial Remodeling in a Tm-E180G Mouse Model Linked to Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy. Circ Heart Fail. 2019;12:e005835. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Lomas DA, Belorgey D, Mallya M, Miranda E, Kinghorn KJ, Sharp LK, Phillips RL, Page R, Robertson AS and Crowther DC. Molecular mousetraps and the serpinopathies. Biochemical Society transactions. 2005;33:321–30. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Gooptu B and Lomas DA. Conformational pathology of the serpins: themes, variations, and therapeutic strategies. Annu Rev Biochem. 2009;78:147–76. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Asakura M and Kitakaze M. Global gene expression profiling in the failing myocardium. Circ J. 2009;73:1568–76. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Sanchez-Navarro A, González-Soria I, Caldiño-Bohn R and Bobadilla NA. Integrative view of serpins in health and disease: the contribution of serpinA3. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol. 2020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Cuzzocrea S, Pisano B, Dugo L, Ianaro A, Maffia P, Patel NS, Di Paola R, Ialenti A, Genovese T, Chatterjee PK, Di Rosa M, Caputi AP and Thiemermann C. Rosiglitazone, a ligand of the peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-gamma, reduces acute inflammation. Eur J Pharmacol. 2004;483:79–93. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Groß S, Jahn C, Cushman S, Bär C and Thum T. SARS-CoV-2 receptor ACE2-dependent implications on the cardiovascular system: From basic science to clinical implications. J Mol Cell Cardiol. 2020;144:47–53. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Thum T SARS-CoV-2 receptor ACE2 expression in the human heart: cause of a post-pandemic wave of heart failure?: Eur Heart J. 2020. May 14;41(19):1807–1809. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehaa410. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Tucker NR, Chaffin M, Bedi KC Jr., Papangeli I, Akkad AD, Arduini A, Hayat S, Eraslan G, Muus C, Bhattacharyya RP, Stegmann CM, Margulies KB and Ellinor PT. Myocyte-Specific Upregulation of ACE2 in Cardiovascular Disease: Implications for SARS-CoV-2-Mediated Myocarditis. Circulation. 2020;142:708–710. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Limongelli G and Crotti L. COVID-19 pandemia and inherited cardiomyopathies and channelopathies: a short term and long term perspective. Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2020;15:157. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Dolhnikoff M, Ferreira Ferranti J, de Almeida Monteiro RA, Duarte-Neto AN, Soares Gomes-Gouvêa M, Viu Degaspare N, Figueiredo Delgado A, Montanari Fiorita C, Nunes Leal G, Rodrigues RM, Taverna Chaim K, Rebello Pinho JR, Carneiro-Sampaio M, Mauad T, Ferraz da Silva LF, Brunow de Carvalho W, Saldiva PHN and Garcia Caldini E. SARS-CoV-2 in cardiac tissue of a child with COVID-19-related multisystem inflammatory syndrome. Lancet Child Adolesc Health. 2020;4:790–794. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Fox SE, Li G, Akmatbekov A, Harbert JL, Lameira FS, Brown JQ and Vander Heide RS. Unexpected Features of Cardiac Pathology in COVID-19 Infection. Circulation. 2020;142:1123–1125. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Chen L, Li X, Chen M, Feng Y and Xiong C. The ACE2 expression in human heart indicates new potential mechanism of heart injury among patients infected with SARS-CoV-2. Cardiovasc Res. 2020;116:1097–1100. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Sharma A, Garcia G Jr., Wang Y, Plummer JT, Morizono K, Arumugaswami V and Svendsen CN. Human iPSC-Derived Cardiomyocytes Are Susceptible to SARS-CoV-2 Infection. Cell Rep Med. 2020;1:100052. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Flevaris P and Vaughan D. The Role of Plasminogen Activator Inhibitor Type-1 in Fibrosis. Semin Thromb Hemost 2017;43:169–177. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Flevaris P, Khan SS, Eren M, Schuldt AJT, Shah SJ, Lee DC, Gupta S, Shapiro AD, Burridge PW, Ghosh AK and Vaughan DE. Plasminogen Activator Inhibitor Type I Controls Cardiomyocyte Transforming Growth Factor-β and Cardiac Fibrosis. Circulation. 2017;136:664–679. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Kalsheker NA. Alpha 1-antichymotrypsin. The international journal of biochemistry & cell biology. 1996;28:961–4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Hooshdaran B, Kolpakov MA, Guo X, Miller SA, Wang T, Tilley DG, Rafiq K and Sabri A. Dual inhibition of cathepsin G and chymase reduces myocyte death and improves cardiac remodeling after myocardial ischemia reperfusion injury. Basic Res Cardiol. 2017;112:62. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Miller SA, Kolpakov MA, Guo X, Du B, Nguyen Y, Wang T, Powel P, Dell’Italia LJ and Sabri A. Intracardiac administration of neutrophil protease cathepsin G activates noncanonical inflammasome pathway and promotes inflammation and pathological remodeling in non-injured heart. J Mol Cell Cardiol. 2019;134:29–39. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Li Z, Solomonidis EG, Meloni M, Taylor RS, Duffin R, Dobie R, Magalhaes MS, Henderson BEP, Louwe PA, D’Amico G, Hodivala-Dilke KM, Shah AM, Mills NL, Simons BD, Gray GA, Henderson NC, Baker AH and Brittan M. Single-cell transcriptome analyses reveal novel targets modulating cardiac neovascularization by resident endothelial cells following myocardial infarction. Eur Heart J. 2019;40:2507–2520. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.See K, Tan WLW, Lim EH, Tiang Z, Lee LT, Li PYQ, Luu TDA, Ackers-Johnson M and Foo RS. Single cardiomyocyte nuclear transcriptomes reveal a lincRNA-regulated de-differentiation and cell cycle stress-response in vivo. Nat Commun. 2017;8:225. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Tucker NR, Chaffin M, Fleming SJ, Hall AW, Parsons VA, Bedi KC Jr., Akkad AD, Herndon CN, Arduini A, Papangeli I, Roselli C, Aguet F, Choi SH, Ardlie KG, Babadi M, Margulies KB, Stegmann CM and Ellinor PT. Transcriptional and Cellular Diversity of the Human Heart. Circulation. 2020. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.van Heesch S, Witte F, Schneider-Lunitz V, Schulz JF, Adami E, Faber AB, Kirchner M, Maatz H, Blachut S, Sandmann CL, Kanda M, Worth CL, Schafer S, Calviello L, Merriott R, Patone G, Hummel O, Wyler E, Obermayer B, Mücke MB, Lindberg EL, Trnka F, Memczak S, Schilling M, Felkin LE, Barton PJR, Quaife NM, Vanezis K, Diecke S, Mukai M, Mah N, Oh SJ, Kurtz A, Schramm C, Schwinge D, Sebode M, Harakalova M, Asselbergs FW, Vink A, de Weger RA, Viswanathan S, Widjaja AA, Gärtner-Rommel A, Milting H, Dos Remedios C, Knosalla C, Mertins P, Landthaler M, Vingron M, Linke WA, Seidman JG, Seidman CE, Rajewsky N, Ohler U, Cook SA and Hubner N. The Translational Landscape of the Human Heart. Cell. 2019;178:242–260.e29. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Sanz E, Yang L, Su T, Morris DR, McKnight GS and Amieux PS. Cell-type-specific isolation of ribosome-associated mRNA from complex tissues. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009;106:13939–44. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Cleuren ACA, van der Ent MA, Jiang H, Hunker KL, Yee A, Siemieniak DR, Molema G, Aird WC, Ganesh SK and Ginsburg D. The in vivo endothelial cell translatome is highly heterogeneous across vascular beds. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2019;116:23618–23624. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Walsh D, Mathews MB and Mohr I. Tinkering with translation: protein synthesis in virus-infected cells. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol. 2013;5:a012351. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
