Abstract
Unicompartimental and total knee arthroplasty is one of the most successful and most performed operations worldwide. In the last years the number of primary knee arthroplasty increased constantly. The aim of this study is to analyze the rising numbers of primary knee arthroplasty and to see how it is used in Germany. In this retrospective study data, provided by the Federal Statistical Office of Germany from 2008 to 2018 was analyzed, using operation codes from the German procedure classification system and characteristics like age, sex and type of the prosthesis. We found a slight increase of unicompartimental and total knee arthroplasty over the investigated 10 years from 150.504 in 2008 up to 168.479 procedures in 2018, with a maximum of 169.334 in 2017. Most patients were female and over 65 years old. Interestingly, there was an obvious decrease of regular TKA in the year 2013, with a relevant impact on the total number of procedures. In the following years the number rised again reaching the former level in 2015 and is still increasing. The highest increase was found in partial knee arthroplasty, with a constant rise every year, starting with 7988 in 2008 up to 21.072 in 2018. In contrast, we found a relevant reduction of constrained prosthesis in primary TKA, whereas the number of semi-constrained prosthesis in primary TKA is again rising after a decrease in 2015. We found that the number of bicondylar TKA and especially UKA increased from 2008 to 2018. Regarding an aging population, we can expect a rising number for Primary knee arthroplasty and in consequence a rising number of revision arthroplasty in the future. This will be a challenging cost factor for the healthcare system in Germany.
Subject terms: Health care, Health care economics, Health policy
Introduction
In Germany, primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is one of the most performed surgical procedures.
Due to an increased life expectancy and demographic changes with an increasing number of older patients having a high demand on performance, the number primary knee arthroplasty is rising constantly1,2.
Intriguingly, also, the number of younger patients receiving primary knee arthroplasty is rising in the western population3–6. This development leads to high costs for the healthcare systems and to a consecutive increasing number of revision arthroplasties, which are burdensome for the patients7,8.
Especially unicompartimental knee arthroplasty (UKA) has gained interested in the last decade. Reasons are suspected benefits such as less tissue trauma, reduced blood loss during surgery and better functionality due to faster rehabilitation, recovery and improved range of motion9.
In Scandinavia, England, Australia and Canada arthroplasty registries numbers of these procedures are listed in national arthroplasty registries10–13. In October 2011 the German arthroplasty register (EPRD = Endoprothesenregister Deutschland) was founded and since then collected data from arthoplasty procedures. But not all hospitals and surgeons send their data to the EPRD, so there might be a lack of numbers.
Estimations for the future development of primary knee arthroplasty in Germany over the next decades exist7. However, trends of different primary arthroplasty procedures during the recent years have to be elucidated. Therefore, aim of the study was to analyze the overall trend of different primary knee arthroplasty procedures. In addition, the influence of age and sex on primary knee arthroplasty procedures was investigated from 2008 through 2018.
Materials and methods
Data from 2008 through 2018 was provided by the Federal Statistical Office of Germany (Destatis). This database includes all annual surgical procedures, based on operation and procedures codes (OPS) from all German hospitals and medical institutions. Since it is mandatory for all somatic German health care providers to settle up costs by the diagnosis related group system, all knee arthroplasty procedures were included to the provided data set. Destatis approved the use of data and there is no requirement of consent.
Ethical approval was not considered necessary by the Ethics Committee at the University of Regensburg since the study did not include identifiable human material or patient data. The study is in accordance with ethical standards of the local ethical committee.
A query of the database was performed for all patients who underwent Primary knee arthroplasty using the OPS code 5-822. Subgroup analysis was then performed depending on age and sex, for TKA and unicompartimental knee arthroplasty. Since a change in mostly all subgroups of the OPS codes was performed, subgroups before and after 2014 were adapted accordingly (see Table 1). Patellofemoral and bicompartimental arthroplasty procedures were excluded, due to their low volume in numbers. OPS codes 5-822.x0/x1/x2/y were also excluded since they stand for “other” and unspecified TKA which could not be allocated to a specific surgical procedure.
Table 1.
OPS code 5-822 | Description |
---|---|
00/01/02 | Unicompartemental knee arthroplasty with/without cement and hybrid |
10/11/12/20/21/22 | Bicondylar TKA, non-constrained, including posterior stabilized, with/without patella resurfacing, with/without cement and hybrid; including extended bending ability |
a1/a2/b1/b2/g0/g1/g2/j1/j2 | TKA, semi-constrained with femoral and tibial stem, with/without patella resurfacing, with/without cement and hybrid |
30/31/32/40/41/42 | |
h0/h1/h2 | TKA, constrained, with/without patella resurfacing, with/without cement and hybrid, including special prosthesis like tumor prosthesis |
60/61/62/70/71/72/90/91/92 |
Data was analyzed and graphically displayed using the statistical software SPSS Version 26.0 (IBM, SPSS Inc. Armonk, NY, USA).
Results
A slight increase of partial and total knee arthroplasty was observed over the investigated 11-year period from 150,504 in 2008 up to 168,479 procedures in 2018, with a maximum of 169,334 in 2017 (Fig. 1a). This represents a total increase of 12.0%. Around two thirds of all procedures have been performed in female patients (Fig. 1b) and most patients were older than 65 years (Fig. 1c).
Interestingly, there was an obvious decrease of bicondylar TKA in the years 2012 (− 4.5%) and 2013 (− 13.3%) compared to 2011, with a relevant impact on the total number of procedures (Figs. 1a, 2a). In the following years the number increased again reaching the former level in 2015 and has increased since then.
Regarding the analyzed subgroups, we found the highest increase in UKA, with a constant rise every year, starting with 7.988 in 2008 up to 21.072 in 2018 (Fig. 2b), which represents a total increase of about 164% in one decade. In contrast to the rising numbers of partial and bicondylar TKA, we found a relevant reduction of constrained prosthesis in primary knee arthroplasty, whereas the number of semi-constrained prosthesis in primary knee arthroplasty is again rising after a decrease in 2015. However, until 2018 it has not reached its maximum of 663 (Fig. 2c). But considering the high number of regular TKA in 2018 (137.726), the small number of 9305 constrained and semi-constrained prosthesis does not seem relevant (Fig. 2a,c).
The majority of patients, who underwent primary knee arthroplasty was female and minimum 65 years old. Over the observed period the distribution between male and female patients was always around one third to two thirds. Interestingly, the number of patients 65 years and older treated with primary knee arthroplasty did not change relevantly. Most of the growth of primary knee arthroplasty was related to patients younger than 65 years, from 39.595 in 2008, up to 57.947 in 2018, which represents a total increase of 46.3%.
Discussion
Primary knee arthroplasty is one of the most performed surgical procedures in Germany14. In western industrial nations, the healthcare system is challenged by demographic changes with an aging and concomitant shrinking population. Due to this growing population and the claim to have a good quality of life, the number of primary knee arthroplasty seems to be rising every year. Until today, access to arthroplasty in Germany is unrestricted, but as average life expectancy of women and men in Germany is 84.1, and 79.1 years, respectively (Statistisches Bundesamt), the need for Primary knee arthroplasty and revision arthroplasty is a relevant cost for the healthcare system7,8. A recent study tried to predict the development of total hip and knee arthroplasty (THA/TKA) in Germany up to the year 2040. The data showed, that the number of THA and TKA will increase despite an expected decrease of the population7. To our knowledge, this is the first study, which gives an overview of the actual numbers of primary knee arthroplasty in Germany over a period of 11 years, considering subprocedures, age and sex.
Regarding all primary knee arthroplasty procedures in Germany from 2008 to 2018 we found a slight increase over the years, which is in accordance with studies from the UK, Italy and the United States8,15,16.
In the year 2012, there has been a medial discussion about the high number of performed elective surgeries with focus especially on THA and TKA. The former minister of health, Daniel Bahr (FDP), has critisized the increasing number of operations in hospitals and wanted to limit them. In an interview with the Rheinische Post published on May 1st 2012 he said: “Germany is considered the world champion in total knee and hip arthroplasty. Health insurance companies and experts doubt whether the increase in the number of cases is necessary”. He also criticized orthopedic surgeons who would perform surgical procedures for economic reasons.
We assume, that this medical campaign with its concerns caused in the German population, lead to the observed decrease of regular TKA in 2012 and especially one year later in 2013. Interestingly, procedures, such as partial, constrained and semi-constrained knee arthroplasty, were not affected by this medial discussion. A further increase of TKA numbers in the following years could be observed as well.
During the observed 11-year period the number of UKA was rising constantly. This might be due to the further development of implants and instruments and better surgical techniques17. Several studies demonstrated UKA being a less invasive, more cost-effective alternative to TKA, if properly indicated and patient selection criteria are respected18–20. A typical indication for UKA is monocompartimental osteoarthritis after a former complete or partial meniscectomy, as it was regularly performed starting in the 1970s up to the early 1990s, especially in young patients after sport injuries21–24.
Meanwhile, several studies showed that especially complete meniscectomy leads to cartilage damage and osteoarthritis in the compartiment, caused by a deviation of the leg axis and a higher pressure on the cartilage25–27. In consequence, complete meniscectomy is a rare operation today. Nevertheless, there is still a relevant number of patients, who underwent meniscal damage and surgery. This patient cohort suffering from unicompartimental osteoarthritis might be an additional reason for the rising number of UKA, until today. Another reason for the increasing number of UKA, especially after 2016, could be in connection with a new regulation of statutory health insurance funds in Germany that came into force this year. Based on the work of Sihovnen et al.28, which casts doubt on the effectiveness of arthroscopic operations in degenerative meniscus tears, it was decided to stop remunerating this type of operation. This may have led to an increased indication position for UKA. This is reflected in a significant increase in UKA after 2016 (Fig. 2b).
Another interesting finding of this study was, that the majority of patients with TKA was female. The number of female patients has always been twice as high, compared to male patients during the observed period. This result is in accordance with former studies, which showed a higher incidence for osteoarthritis of the knee in female patients29,30. The reason for this unequal distribution seems to be multifactorial and should be investigated in future studies.
As expected, the majority of patients with TKA is over 65 years old and the number of these patients did not change relevantly. But we found a constant increase of patients younger than 65 years, who underwent primary knee arthroplasty during the observed period. This is in accordance with several studies, which predict a relevant increase of younger patients needing primary knee arthroplasty5,31–33. A major task, which will occupy us in the future with regard on revision surgery.
In contrast to the rising number of UKA and regular TKA, we found an obvious reduction of constrained TKA as well as a temporary decrease of semi-constrained TKA. This might be again due to the further development of implants and instruments and better surgical techniques, but needs to be investigated in future studies.
This study has several limitations. This is an evaluation of historical data provided by Destatis, so there might be a lack of captured numbers. As mentioned above, we excluded the OPS codes 5-822.x0/x1/x2/y, as well as patellofemoral and bicompartimental arthroplasty, so not all arthroplastic procedures were analyzed, but because of the small number of this operations, this seems negligible. Finally, we only analyzed primary knee arthroplasty procedures, revision arthroplasty has not been part of this study.
Conclusion
We found that the number of bicondylar TKA and especially UKA increased from 2008 to 2018. Regarding an aging population, we can expect a rising number for Primary knee arthroplasty and in consequence a rising number of revision arthroplasty in the future. This will be a challenging cost factor for the healthcare system in Germany.
Acknowledgements
The authors are not compensated and there are no institutional subsidies, corporate affiliations, or funding sources supporting this work unless clearly documented and disclosed.
Author contributions
M.W. developed the design of the study, drafted the manuscript and evaluated data. M.K., D.P. and V.F. evaluated the data and helped to draft the manuscript, Ma.K. performed the statistical analysis and helped to draft the manuscript. P.A. and V.A. participated in the coordination of the study and evaluated data, M.R. developed the design of the study and helped with data collection/interpretation. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Funding
Open Access funding enabled and organized by Projekt DEAL.
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Footnotes
Publisher's note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
These authors jointly supervised this work: Maximilian Kerschbaum and Markus Rupp.
References
- 1.Gademan MG, Hofstede SN, Vliet Vlieland TP, Nelissen RG, Marang-van de Mheen PJ. Indication criteria for total hip or knee arthroplasty in osteoarthritis: a state-of-the-science overview. BMC Musculoskelet. Disord. 2016;17:463. doi: 10.1186/s12891-016-1325-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Robertsson O, et al. Knee arthroplasty in Denmark, Norway and Sweden. A pilot study from the Nordic Arthroplasty Register Association. Acta Orthop. 2010;81:82–89. doi: 10.3109/17453671003685442. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Slover J, Zuckerman JD. Increasing use of total knee replacement and revision surgery. JAMA. 2012;308:1266–1268. doi: 10.1001/jama.2012.12644. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Kurtz SM, et al. Future young patient demand for primary and revision joint replacement: national projections from 2010 to 2030. Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. 2009;467:2606–2612. doi: 10.1007/s11999-009-0834-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Kurtz S, et al. Prevalence of primary and revision total hip and knee arthroplasty in the United States from 1990 through 2002. J. Bone Joint Surg. Am. 2005;87:1487–1497. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.D.02441. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Cram P, et al. Long-term trends in hip arthroplasty use and volume. J Arthroplasty. 2012;27:278–285. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2011.04.043. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Rupp M, Lau E, Kurtz SM, Alt V. Projections of primary TKA and THA in Germany from 2016 through 2040. Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. 2020 doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000001214. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Kurtz S, Ong K, Lau E, Mowat F, Halpern M. Projections of primary and revision hip and knee arthroplasty in the United States from 2005 to 2030. J. Bone Joint Surg. Am. 2007;89:780–785. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.F.00222. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Beard DJ, et al. Total versus partial knee replacement in patients with medial compartment knee osteoarthritis: the TOPKAT RCT. Health Technol. Assess. (Winchester, England) 2020;24:1–98. doi: 10.3310/hta24200. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Philipson MR, Westwood MJ, Geoghegan JM, Henry AP, Jefferiss CD. Shortcomings of the National Joint Registry: a survey of consultants' views. Ann. R. Coll. Surg. Engl. 2005;87:109–112. doi: 10.1308/1478708051603. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Bohm ER, Dunbar MJ, Bourne R. The Canadian Joint Replacement Registry-what have we learned? Acta Orthop. 2010;81:119–121. doi: 10.3109/17453671003685467. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.de Steiger RN, Graves SE. Orthopaedic registries: the Australian experience. EFORT Open Rev. 2019;4:409–415. doi: 10.1302/2058-5241.4.180071. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Mohaddes M, et al. Implant survival and patient-reported outcome following total hip arthroplasty in patients 30 years or younger: a matched cohort study of 1,008 patients in the Swedish Hip Arthroplasty Register. Acta Orthop. 2019;90:249–252. doi: 10.1080/17453674.2019.1599776. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Wengler A, Nimptsch U, Mansky T. Hip and knee replacement in Germany and the USA: analysis of individual inpatient data from German and US hospitals for the years 2005 to 2011. Dtsch. Arztebl. Int. 2014;111:407–416. doi: 10.3238/arztebl.2014.0407. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Culliford D, et al. Future projections of total hip and knee arthroplasty in the UK: results from the UK Clinical Practice Research Datalink. Osteoarthr. Cartil. 2015;23:594–600. doi: 10.1016/j.joca.2014.12.022. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Romanini E, et al. Total knee arthroplasty in Italy: reflections from the last fifteen years and projections for the next thirty. Int. Orthop. 2019;43:133–138. doi: 10.1007/s00264-018-4165-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Anagnostakos K, Kohn D. Partial knee replacement. Orthopade. 2014;43:874. doi: 10.1007/s00132-014-3005-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Beard DJ, et al. The clinical and cost-effectiveness of total versus partial knee replacement in patients with medial compartment osteoarthritis (TOPKAT): 5-year outcomes of a randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2019;394:746–756. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(19)31281-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Murray DW, Parkinson RW. Usage of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. Bone Joint J. 2018;100B:432–435. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.100B4.BJJ-2017-0716.R1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Siman H, et al. Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty vs total knee arthroplasty for medial compartment arthritis in patients older than 75 years: comparable reoperation, revision, and complication rates. J. Arthroplasty. 2017;32:1792–1797. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2017.01.020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.McGinity JB, Geuss LF, Marvin RA. Partial or total meniscectomy: a comparative analysis. J. Bone Joint Surg. Am. 1977;59:763–766. doi: 10.2106/00004623-197759060-00008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Northmore-Ball MD, Dandy DJ, Jackson RW. Arthroscopic, open partial, and total meniscectomy. A comparative study. J. Bone Joint Surg. Br. 1983;65:400–404. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.65B4.6874710. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Schimmer RC, Brulhart KB, Duff C, Glinz W. Arthroscopic partial meniscectomy: a 12-year follow-up and two-step evaluation of the long-term course. Arthroscopy. 1998;14:136–142. doi: 10.1016/s0749-8063(98)70031-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Tapper EM, Hoover NW. Late results after meniscectomy. J. Bone Joint Surg. Am. 1969;51:517–526. doi: 10.2106/00004623-196951030-00009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Macnicol MF, Thomas NP. The knee after meniscectomy. J. Bone Joint Surg. Br. 2000;82:157–159. doi: 10.1302/0301-620x.82b2.10847. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Pengas IP, et al. Total meniscectomy in adolescents: a 40-year follow-up. J. Bone Joint Surg. Br. 2012;94:1649–1654. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.94B12.30562. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Pengas IP, et al. Coronal knee alignment 40 years after total meniscectomy in adolescents: a prospective cohort study. Open Orthop. J. 2017;11:424–431. doi: 10.2174/1874325001711010424. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Sihvonen R, et al. Arthroscopic partial meniscectomy versus sham surgery for a degenerative meniscal tear. N. Engl J. Med. 2013;369:2515–2524. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1305189. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Anderson JJ, Felson DT. Factors associated with osteoarthritis of the knee in the first national Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (HANES I). Evidence for an association with overweight, race, and physical demands of work. Am. J. Epidemiol. 1988;128:179–189. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a114939. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Felson DT, et al. The prevalence of knee osteoarthritis in the elderly. The Framingham Osteoarthritis Study. Arthritis Rheum. 1987;30:914–918. doi: 10.1002/art.1780300811. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Aujla RS, Esler CN. Total knee arthroplasty for osteoarthritis in patients less than fifty-five years of age: a systematic review. J. Arthroplasty. 2017;32:2598–2603. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2017.02.069. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Losina E, Thornhill TS, Rome BN, Wright J, Katz JN. The dramatic increase in total knee replacement utilization rates in the United States cannot be fully explained by growth in population size and the obesity epidemic. J. Bone Joint Surg. Am. 2012;94:201–207. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.J.01958. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Maradit Kremers H, et al. Prevalence of total hip and knee replacement in the United States. J. Bone Joint Surg. Am. 2015;97:1386–1397. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.N.01141. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]