Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Biochemistry and Biophysics Reports logoLink to Biochemistry and Biophysics Reports
. 2021 Mar 3;26:100976. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrep.2021.100976

Mesenchymal stem cell conditioned medium increases glial reactivity and decreases neuronal survival in spinal cord slice cultures

Chelsea R Wood a,1,∗, Esri H Juárez b, Francesco Ferrini b,c, Peter Myint d, John Innes d, Laura Lossi b, Adalberto Merighi b, William EB Johnson a
PMCID: PMC7933697  PMID: 33718633

Abstract

Ex vivo spinal cord slice cultures (SCSC) allow study of spinal cord circuitry, maintaining stimuli responses comparable to live animals. Previously, we have shown that mesenchymal stem/stromal cell (MSC) transplantation in vivo reduced inflammation and increased nerve regeneration but MSC survival was short-lived, highlighting that beneficial action may derive from the secretome. Previous in vitro studies of MSC conditioned medium (CM) have also shown increased neuronal growth. In this study, murine SCSC were cultured in canine MSC CM (harvested from the adipose tissue of excised inguinal fat) and cell phenotypes analysed via immunohistochemistry and confocal microscopy. SCSC in MSC CM displayed enhanced viability after propidium iodide staining. GFAP immunoreactivity was significantly increased in SCSC in MSC CM compared to controls, but with no change in proteoglycan (NG2) immunoreactivity. In contrast, culture in MSC CM significantly decreased the prevalence of βIII-tubulin immunoreactive neurites, whilst Ca2+ transients per cell were significantly increased. These ex vivo results contradict previous in vitro and in vivo reports of how MSC and their secretome may affect the microenvironment of the spinal cord after injury and highlight the importance of a careful comparison of the different experimental conditions used to assess the potential of cell therapies for the treatment of spinal cord injury.

Keywords: Mesenchymal stem/stromal cell, Spinal cord slice cultures, Astrocyte hypertrophy, Neuronal survival, Calcium imaging

Highlights

  • •

    Treatment of spinal slices with conditioned medium caused cell phenotypic changes.

  • •

    Resident astrocytes become hypertrophic, yet neuronal axonal outgrowth reduced.

  • •

    Signalling cells reduced in number but increased their signalling activity.

  • •

    Highlights importance of simulation systems and systemic factors in CNS models.

Abbreviations

CM

Conditioned medium

CSPG

Chondroitin sulphate proteoglycan

DMEM

Dulbecco's modified eagle medium

FBS

Fetal bovine serum

GFAP

Glial fibrillary acidic protein

MSC

Mesenchymal Stem/Stromal Cell

NG2

Neuron-glial antigen 2

SC

Spinal cord

SCI

Spinal cord injury

SCSC

Spinal cord slice culture

PFA

Paraformaldehyde

PI

Propidium iodide

P/S

Penicillin/Streptomycin

1. Introduction

Organotypic SCSC preserve much of spinal cord structure and neuronal circuitry, whilst simultaneously allowing the manipulation in vitro experimentation affords [[1], [2], [3]]. SCSC have been used to model inflammation [[4], [5], [6]], microenvironmental changes [3,7,8], and potential cell therapies [9,10].

MSC injected in vivo into the site of spinal cord injury (SCI) release large numbers of growth factors, cytokines and immunomodulatory factors, influencing neuronal growth and angiogenesis [[11], [12], [13], [14], [15], [16]]. Administration of bone marrow derived MSC in vivo showed functional improvement [13,14,17], axonal/neurite growth within the injury [13,18] and increased levels of cytokines such as BDNF, VEGF [19] IL4, IL13 [12] and NGF [20]. Similar effects and improvements have been shown following administration of MSC derived from adipose tissue [15,21,22] and umbilical cord [23,24]. In 2018, a study showed that rodent MSC CM was shown to have protective effects when injected into a rodent model of SCI [25]. There has been, however, minimal research into the effect of CM on SCSC. Early studies have shown that rat muscle cell and fibroblast CM increased neuronal growth within spinal cord explants [26,27], although more recent studies have examined how cell secretomes might influence spinal cell survival and growth after grafting experiments [28,29].

Although SCSC are useful tools in neuroscience research [30], to date no studies have specifically assessed the effects of MSC CM on murine SCSC. The aim of this study was to explore levels of cell survival, astrocyte reactivity, chondroitin sulphate proteoglycans (CSPG) and neuronal cell processes in murine SCSC following canine MSC CM treatment, providing the basis for development of a suitable ex vivo assay for testing the efficacy of canine MSC CM for future veterinary clinical work. As the preparation of SCSC from dog pups is impracticable for technical and ethical issues, we decided to use murine SCSC that are widely characterized in our laboratories for the study of spinal cord circuitry ex vivo. Therefore, our approach of investigating canine MSC and canine MSC CM explores a new avenue in the field of veterinary medicine and has translational potential for human clinics, due to dogs having repeatedly demonstrated to be valuable translational models for human diseases [[31], [32], [33], [34]].

2. Materials and methods

2.1. MSC isolation and expansion

Institutional ethical approval was obtained for this study (University of Chester: 060/16/CW/BS, May 18, 2016). MSC were isolated at the Veterinary Tissue Bank (Chirk, UK) from surgically extracted sections of dog inguinal fat pads (n = 3 donors).

Following collagenase digestion and preferential plastic adhesion (described previously [35]), cells were cultured in Dulbecco's modified Eagle medium/F-12 + GlutaMAX™ (DMEM/F-12), supplemented with 1% penicillin/streptomycin (P/S) and 10% foetal bovine serum (FBS) (all Gibco®, Life Technologies™, Paisley, UK) in a humidified atmosphere of 5% CO2 at 37 °C. Cultures reaching 80% confluence were passaged using 0.25% trypsin-EDTA (Gibco®, Life Technologies™). Characterisation of culture-expanded cells was completed as reported previously [35] and cells were shown to exhibit an MSC phenotype, i.e., plastic adherence, an appropriate cluster of differentiation profile and tri-lineage differentiation potential [36].

2.2. Generation of MSC CM

As mouse SCSC are routinely cultured in a Neurobasal containing medium which is different from the standard MSC culture medium, MSC were conditioned using Neurobasal to generate an appropriate CM for the spinal slice assays. Briefly, MSC (passages 4–5) were seeded into a T75 culture flask at a density of 20,000 cells/cm2 in 15 ml DMEM/F-12 and incubated overnight at 37 °C/5% CO2 allowing cell adherence. Cells were washed once with warm sterile phosphate buffered saline (PBS); then 15 ml Neurobasal conditioning medium, consisting of Neurobasal Medium-A supplemented with 2% B27 50x, 2% 100 mM l-glutamine and 1% antibiotic/antimycotic (all Gibco®, Fisher Scientific) was added to the flask. One T75 flask produces approximately 15 ml of CM, which was harvested after 3 days incubation, filtered (0.2 μm) and stored at −80 °C in 1.5 ml aliquots. Control medium samples minus cells were prepared in tandem, following the same protocol.

2.3. SCSC preparation

Institutional ethical approval was obtained for this study (Italian Ministry of Health: authorisation number 485/2017-PR). SCSC were prepared from a total of 9 mixed gender CD1 mouse pups (postnatal day 7–11) from different litters. In each set of experiments a total of 3 pups were used to obtain between 6 and 10 slices to be put in culture. The preparation of SCSC followed a well-established protocol in the lab, as described previously [4,37] (Fig. 1). In brief, mice were euthanised and a dorsal laminectomy was performed on ice-cold cutting solution (containing in mM: 130 N-Methyl-d-glucamine, 10 Glucose, 24 NaHCO3, 5 MgCl2, 3.5 KCl, 0.5 CaCl2, 1.25 NaH2PO4, and pH adjusted to 7.35). Meninges were removed, and the spinal cord glued to a small agar block, dorsal side up. Transverse slices (350 μm thick) were obtained using a vibratome (Leica VT 1200, amplitude 1.7, 10 mm s−1), washed and placed individually into well inserts (Millicell®, 12mm/0.4 μm, Massachusetts, USA). Inserts were placed into wells containing 250 μl high serum medium, consisting of 50% Eagle Basal Medium, 25% horse serum, 25% Hanks balanced salt solution, 0.5% glucose, 0.5% 200 mM l-glutamine, and 1% antibiotic/antimycotic (all Gibco®, Fisher Scientific) and incubated at 34 °C/5% CO2. After 4 days of equilibration, fresh Neurobasal medium (supplemented with B27 2%, l-glutamine 2%, and antibiotics/antimycotics 1%; all Gibco®) was added to wells and slices incubated a further 3 days.

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

Open in a new tab

Schematic representation of experimental design: treating SCSC with MSC CM versus control medium. A) Mice were dissected to remove the spinal cord and the lumbar region sliced at 350 μm intervals. Slices were washed and placed individually in well inserts. B) SCSC were equilibrated in high serum and Neurobasal media prior to treating with either MSC CM or control medium. C) After 3 days of treatment with MSC CM or control medium, SCSC were fixed and immunohistochemistry performed before mounting on slides or D) incubated with Oregon Green 488 BAPTA-1AM prior to calcium imaging analysis. (For interpretation of the references to colour in this figure legend, the reader is referred to the Web version of this article.)

2.4. MSC CM treatment of SCSC

After seven days equilibration, medium was replaced with 250 μl MSC CM or control Neurobasal medium (n = 3 independent experiments). Culture plates were then incubated undisturbed at 34 °C/5% CO2 for 72hr.

2.5. Cell viability in SCSC

As we have previously demonstrated that an initial phase of cell death follows the preparation of SCSC [29] and we wanted to rule out any possible detrimental effect of CM onto cell survival ex vivo, we devised a series of experiments to ascertain the degree of cell death at the end of the culture period. To do so, following culture in MSC CM or control medium (n = 3), 10 μl of 1.5 mM propidium iodide (PI) solution was added to slices and incubated at 34 °C/5% CO2 for 10 min. SCSC were then washed twice each in PBS (pH 7.4–7.6) and dH2O, before fixation in 4% paraformaldehyde (PFA) in 0.1 M phosphate buffer, pH 7.4 for 1 h at room temperature. Washes were repeated prior to montage in anti-fade fluorescence-free mounting solution. Slides were visualised and imaged under 20x magnification via widefield fluorescence microscopy (Leica DM6000, Leica Microsystems, Wetzlar, Germany). Using ImageJ software, the “Count Particles” function counted PI-stained nuclei of area sizes between 7 and 40 mm2. Values were expressed as number of PI-stained nuclei per mm2.

2.6. Immunohistochemistry and confocal microscopy

Following culture in MSC CM or control medium (n = 3), slices were fixed for 1 h at room temperature in 4% PFA, followed by repeated washes with PBS, then incubated with 250 μl blocking buffer (0.3% Triton-X, 2.5% normal horse serum in PBS) for 1 h at room temperature, continuously shaking. Slices were then incubated overnight at +4 °C with 250 μl blocking buffer containing the primary antibodies diluted at optimal titre (below) or in blocking buffer alone. Rabbit polyclonal primary antibodies (obtained from Abcam) were anti-βIII tubulin (1/1000) (ab18207), anti-GFAP (Glial fibrillary acidic protein) (1/1000) (ab7260), and anti-NG2 (Neuron-glial antigen 2) (1/1000) (ab129051). Slices were subsequently washed repeatedly with PBS and incubated with horse anti-rabbit Dylite 488 (1/250) (DI-1088, VectorLabs) in PBS for 3 h at room temperature. After further washes, slices were mounted using an anti-fade fluorescence-free mounting solution containing DAPI (VectorLabs). Confocal microscopy was used to visualise and image immunoreactivity (Leica TCS SP5) and the ImageJ neurite tracer software [38,39] was used for image analysis of fluorescence intensity and cell process lengths.

2.7. Calcium imaging

Single cell calcium imaging, a method correlating the functional data based on calcium shifts operated by different intracellular and extracellular mechanisms integrated with their cell phenotypes, is a widely recognized mean to assess the response of neuronal and glial cells to local stimuli and has been used extensively in vitro (isolated cells), ex vivo (brain or spinal cord slices) and in vivo (two-photon microscopy) [40]. The method involves the use of a cell-permeable calcium indicator or genetically encoded calcium indicator that, once entered the cytosol or synthesized by the cell, responds to variations of the intracellular calcium concentration by changing the intensity of fluorescent emission or the ratio of fluorescent emission at two different wavelengths [41]. Here we used the cell permeant indicator Oregon Green™ that was loaded into SCSC as previously described [42]. Briefly, following treatment with MSC CM or control medium, SCSC were incubated with 250 μl loading solution for 1 h at 34 °C/5% CO2. The loading solution consisted of 1 μl Oregon Green™/DMSO mix (50 μg Oregon Green™ 488 BAPTA ((1,2-bis(o-aminophenoxy)ethane-N,N,N′,N'-tetraacetic acid)-1AM in 4 μl DMSO) and 2 μl 20% pluronic F-127 acid (in DMSO)) in 1 ml Neurobasal medium. Slices were washed and mounted onto a confocal microscope (Leica TCS SP5) stage equipped with a buffer transfer system continually perfusing the preparation with oxygenated artificial cerebral spinal fluid (125 mM NaCl, 2.5 mM KCl, 25 mM NaHCO3, 1 mM NaHPO4, 25 mM glucose, 1 mM MgCl2, 2 mM CaCl2 in dH2O). Digitised time-lapse images were collected under 40x water immersion objective, (excitation wavelength 488 nm, emission wavelength 495–530 nm) at 204 ms frame intervals totalling 1000 frames. Gain, offset and pinhole were constant throughout imaging. SCSC activity was unchanged when challenged with 60 mM KCl, making it difficult to unequivocally identify calcium oscillating cells as neurons [43]; therefore, the term ‘active cells’ has been used thereafter.

2.8. Statistical analysis

Statistical analysis was completed using IBM SPSS statistics software. Each independent experiment (n = 3) contained a minimum of 3 spinal cord slices per dish incubated with MSC CM or control medium. Data sets were tested for normal distribution using Shapiro Wilk while parameter relationships and group differences were tested for significance using Student t-tests (normally distributed data) or Mann-Whitney U tests (non-normally distributed data). Data have been shown as means and standard errors of the means (s.e.m.) or standard deviations (s.d.; for pooled data only) as indicated in figure legends. Significance was accepted at p ≤ 0.05 (5% level).

3. Results

3.1. Culturing SCSC within MSC CM enhanced GFAP astrocytic immunostaining but did not affect CSPG levels in glia

There was increased cell viability in SCSC cultured in MSC CM compared to SCSC in control medium, although this difference was non-significant. The number of PI-stained nuclei was 17 ± 11 (per mm2) in SCSC within MSC CM, compared to 39 ± 17 (per mm2) in SCSC within control medium (Fig. 2A and B).

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

Open in a new tab

MSC CM preserved cell survival and promoted astrocytic hypertrophy within SCSC. (A) Representative fluorescent images of SCSC in control medium (left) and MSC CM (right) after staining with PI. (B) Analysis revealed increased dead cell numbers per mm2 in control medium compared to MSC CM. Data are means ± s.e.m. (t-Test; n = 3 donors) p = 0.329. Scale bar = 50 μm. (C) Representative fluorescent images of astrocytic hypertrophy visualised by GFAP antibody, of SCSC treated with control medium and MSC CM. Greater intensity of staining was observed from SCSC treated with MSC CM. (D) Data analysis revealed a significant increase in GFAP fluorescent intensity and (E) a moderate increase in the length of astrocyte processes in SCSC treated with MSC CM. Data are means ± s.d. (Mann-Whitney U, t-Test; n = 3 donors) *p ≤ 0.05, ***p ≤ 0.001. Scale bar = 100 μm. (F) Representative fluorescent images of CSPG levels visualised by NG2 antibody, of SCSC treated with control medium and MSC CM. Intensity of staining is marginal between conditions. (G) Data analysis revealed a slight, but non-significant increase in NG2 fluorescent intensity between SCSC treated with control medium and MSC CM. Data are means ± s.d. (Mann-Whitney U; n = 3 donors) p = 0.355. Scale bar = 100 μm.

MSC CM increased astrocytic reactivity as delineated by GFAP immunoreactivity in SCSC compared to control medium (Fig. 2C). Both observed levels of GFAP staining (Fig. 2D) and astrocytic process total length (Fig. 2E) were significantly increased in SCSC cultured in MSC CM compared with control medium (p ≤ 0.005 and p ≤ 0.05, respectively), although there were no marked increases in CSPG levels (NG2 immunostaining).

3.2. Culturing SCSC within MSC CM reduced the prevalence of neuronal cell processes but increased cellular signalling activity

SCSC cultured within MSC CM showed a significant decrease in total neurite length (Fig. 3A) compared to control medium, determined by βIII-tubulin immunopositivity (p ≤ 0.005) (Fig. 3B). The length of βIII-tubulin immunopositive neurites in MSC CM and control medium were 2458 μm ± 1026 μm and 5722 μm ± 1472 μm, respectively. Analysis of calcium imaging footage showed no difference in overall frequency of calcium-dependent signalling per microscopic field, between SCSC within MSC CM compared to controls, which were 4 ± 1.1 peaks per 204s and 4 ± 0.6 peaks per 204s, respectively (p = 0.738) (Fig. 3C and D). There was a significant decrease in the number of active cells in SCSC within MSC CM compared to controls, i.e., 3 ± 2 active cells (per field of view) and 10 ± 2 (per microscopic field), respectively (p ≤ 0.01) (Fig. 3E). In those active cells, there was a significant increase in calcium oscillations in MSC CM compared to controls, which were 1.6 ± 1 peaks per 204s and 0.4 ± 0.1 peaks per 204s, respectively (p ≤ 0.01) (Fig. 3F).

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3

Open in a new tab

MSC CM reduced neurite extension in cultured neurons and the number of active cells but increased the frequency of Ca2+transients in active cells. (A) Representative fluorescent images of neurite outgrowth visualised by βIII-tubulin antibody, of SCSC cultured in control medium (left) or MSC CM (right). A greater number of longer neuronal cell processes were observed under control conditions. (B) Data analysis revealed a significant decrease in neuronal cell process length between slices in control medium and MSC CM. Data are means ± s.d. (t-Test; n = 3 donors) ***p ≤ 0.001. Scale bar = 100 μm. (C) Graphical representation of fluorescence changes denoting calcium oscillations over time (204 s). (D) Recording analysis revealed no difference in the overall frequency of calcium transients in active cells from each field of view between SCSC within MSC CM or control medium. (E) A significantly reduced number of active cells (per field of view) was observed in SCSC within MSC CM but (F) these active cells displayed a significantly higher frequency of calcium transients (per 204 s) when cultivated in MSC CM. Data are means ± s.d. (Mann-Whitney U, t-Test; n = 3 donors) **p ≤ 0.01.

4. Discussion

The slice culturing technique used for this study is a well characterised interface static method [44] whereby slices receive oxygen from the top and nutrients across the porous membrane at the bottom, allowing for interaction of the slices with soluble molecules contained in culture medium. Likewise, standardised methods of analysis were used to assess the effects of the MSC CM compared with control medium.

Previous studies [45] demonstrated that after an initial phase (four days) of cell death in SCSC, PI-stained dead cell numbers drop to remain relatively stable thereafter. In keeping with these observations, we allowed SCSC to recover for at least four days before treatment with MSC CM. The latter was associated with enhanced cell survival compared to control medium, indicating possible neuroprotective effects, although the difference was not statistically significant. Still, this observation (together with the results of calcium imaging experiments – see below) demonstrated that our SCSC were perfectly viable after several days in vitro. Increased GFAP immunopositivity and astrocytic process length was observed in these conditions, suggesting that MSC CM increased glial cell survival and reactivity.

Astrocytic growth has been repeatedly reported in CNS organotypic cultures [45]. However, unchanged NG2 levels in the increased presence of astrocytic growth seen in MSC CM was an unexpected finding. A major component of SCI pathology is the occurrence of astrogliosis, glial proliferation, atrophy, increased GFAP expression, and CSPG secretion (an inhibitor of neuronal growth and wound repair) [46,47]. In this study, we observed no increase in NG2 levels, as a marker of CSPGs, which may be due to loss of CSPG into surrounding medium, cell mediated degradation of CSPG molecules [48,49] or because NG2 has been reported to increase at later time points after SCI [50].

Observation of a significant decrease in βIII-tubulin immunoreactive neurites in response to MSC CM treatment was initially surprising, due to previous studies proving the neurogenic properties of MSC CM [35,51,52]. In vivo axotomy of primary afferent fibres, which is necessary to prepare SCSC, was long ago reported to cause death of spinal cord neurons receiving monosynaptic input from these fibres [53]. Therefore, it seems reasonable to hypothesise that the spinal neurons reached a steady state of lower survival during equilibration in plain medium and before cultivation in MSC CM. If so, the presence of MSC CM would have been unable to protect them from death.

Another possible explanation for βIII-tubulin immunoreactivity reduction is that the SCSC microenvironment may not be permissive for neuronal maturation, or that MSC CM could potentially secrete bioactive molecules in a paracrine fashion, potentially causing differentiation of resident neural precursors towards a glial lineage. Supporting evidence includes previous experiments where, after transplantation of neural stem cells into organotypic slices, survival but no increased neuronal maturation was observed [7]. Furthermore, increased GFAP immunopositivity coupled with no change in βIII-tubulin immunopositivity were similarly found elsewhere, demonstrating transplanted neural stem cells had a greater affinity for endogenous glial cells in SCSC, and differentiated towards a glial lineage [54].

To our knowledge, nobody has investigated effects of MSC CM on cell activity in SCSC. Calcium imaging showed that although overall cell activity was unchanged (measured as calcium transients), the signalling frequency of individual active cells increased in response to MSC CM. The type of calcium responses and temporal pattern [43] are strongly suggestive that spontaneous calcium oscillations in SCSC reflect increased neuronal network activity. However, neuronal cell process outgrowth was decreased in response to MSC CM and, although initially unexpected, a previous in vitro study on Xenopus embryonic spinal cord found similar results - neurons that exhibited slower rates of axonal outgrowth signalled more frequently [55].

A key question that is raised in this study is by which mechanism of action the MSC CM is causing the observed effects onto SCSC. Previous studies which have revealed potential mechanisms can help to provide some speculation as to possible factors at play in this study. Various experiments have shown that MSC transplantation causes an increase in neurotrophic factors such as NGF and BDNF [19,20], and causes shifts in the immune response through increases of the interleukins (IL) 4 and 13 [12,15,[21], [22], [23], [24]]. Of note is that throughout many of these studies MSC survival was low, indicating that the observed changes were due to their secretome, rather than the cells themselves. In vitro studies on MSC CM have used both ELISA and mass spectrometry, revealing that the MSC secretome contains a myriad of factors that promote both neurogenesis and immune modulation [[56], [57], [58]]. This knowledge, combined with the data from this study, suggests that the here observed changes are a response to neurotrophic factors (that have yet to be identified) present within the MSC CM.

In conclusion, further studies are required to fully understand why the effects of MSC CM differ between in vitro cell cultures and SCSC, why they contrast with MSC transplants into SCI sites, and to ascertain the specific mechanism(s) of action(s). These differences highlight the importance of model systems to examine effects of cell transplants and secretion on the CNS. SCSC were cultured without corresponding circulatory models, which could alter how resident cells respond to the MSC, i.e., no immune cell influx nor a nutrient provision/waste removal system. Hence, the results from this study suggest that effects of MSC and derived factors may depend on more systemic factors than those seen within the CNS alone.

Funding

This work was supported by the Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council Grant No. BB/M017311/1 and the National Centre for the Replacement Refinement & Reduction of Animals in Research Crack It solution Neuroinflammation and nociception in a dish (https://nc3rs.org.uk/crackit/crack-it-news/new-solution-neuroinflammation-and-nociception-dish) fund.

CRediT authorship contribution statement

Chelsea R. Wood: Conceptualization, Investigation, Formal analysis, Visualization, Writing – original draft, preparation, Writing – review & editing. Esri H. Juárez: Investigation, Formal analysis. Francesco Ferrini: Conceptualization, Investigation, Formal analysis, Resources. Peter Myint: Conceptualization, Resources, Funding acquisition. John Innes: Conceptualization, Resources, Funding acquisition. Laura Lossi: PI staining. Adalberto Merighi: Conceptualization, Supervision, Visualization, Funding acquisition, Writing – review & editing. William E.B. Johnson: Conceptualization, Supervision, Visualization, Funding acquisition, Writing – review & editing, All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Declaration of competing interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study, the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data, writing of the manuscript, or decision to publish results.

Acknowledgements

MSC were supplied by The Veterinary Tissue Bank Ltd., Chirk, UK.

References

  • 1.V Krassioukov A., Ackery A., Schwartz G., Adamchik Y., Liu Y., Fehlings M.G. An in vitro model of neurotrauma in organotypic spinal cord cultures from adult mice. Brain Res. Protoc. 2002;10:60–68. doi: 10.1016/S1385-299X(02)00180-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Patar A., Dockery P., Howard L., McMahon S.S. Cell viability in three ex vivo rat models of spinal cord injury. J. Anat. 2019;234:244–251. doi: 10.1111/joa.12909. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Ravikumar M., Jain S., Miller R.H., Capadona J.R., Selkirk S.M. An organotypic spinal cord slice culture model to quantify neurodegeneration. J. Neurosci. Methods. 2012;211:280–288. doi: 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2012.09.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Ferrini F., Chiara S., Lossi L., Gambino G., Merighi A. Modulation of inhibitory neurotransmission by the vanilloid receptor type 1 (TRPV1) in organotypically cultured mouse substantia gelatinosaneurons. Pain. 2010;150:128–140. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2010.04.016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Giacco V., Panattoni G., Medelin M., Bonechi E., Aldinucci A., Ballerini C., Ballerini L. Cytokine inflammatory threat, but not LPS one, shortens GABAergic synaptic currents in the mouse spinal cord organotypic cultures. J. Neuroinflammation. 2019;16:1–14. doi: 10.1186/s12974-019-1519-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.De Berdt P., Bottemanne P., Bianco J., Alhouayek M., Diogenes A., Llyod A., Gerardo-Nava J., Brook G.A., Miron V., Muccioli G.G., des Rieux A. Stem cells from human apical papilla decrease neuro-inflammation and stimulate oligodendrocyte progenitor differentiation via activin-A secretion. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 2018;75:2843–2856. doi: 10.1007/s00018-018-2764-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Kim H.M., Lee H.J., Lee M.Y., Kim S.U., Kim B.G. Organotypic spinal cord slice culture to study neural stem/progenitor cell microenvironment in the injured spinal cord. Exp. Neurobiol. 2010;19:106–113. doi: 10.5607/en.2010.19.2.106. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Pandamooz S., Salehi M.S., Zibaii M.I., Safari A., Nabiuni M., Ahmadiani A., Dargahi L. Modeling traumatic injury in organotypic spinal cord slice culture obtained from adult rat. Tissue Cell. 2019;56:90–97. doi: 10.1016/j.tice.2019.01.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Cho J.S., Park H.W., Park S.K., Roh S., Kang S.K., Paik K.S., Chang M.S. Transplantation of mesenchymal stem cells enhances axonal outgrowth and cell survival in an organotypic spinal cord slice culture. Neurosci. Lett. 2009;454:43–48. doi: 10.1016/j.neulet.2009.02.024. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Jeong D.K., Taghavi C.E., Song K.J., Lee K.B., Kang H.W. Organotypic human spinal cord slice culture as an alternative to direct transplantation of human bone marrow precursor cells for treating spinal cord injury. World Neurosurg. 2011;75:533–539. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2010.10.042. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Sung P.H., Lo Chang C., Tsai T.H., Chang L.T., Leu S., Chen Y.L., Yang C.C., Chua S., Yeh K.H., Chai H.T., Chang H.W., Chen H.H., Yip H.K. Apoptotic adipose-derived mesenchymal stem cell therapy protects against lung and kidney injury in sepsis syndrome caused by cecal ligation puncture in rats. Stem Cell Res. Ther. 2013;4:9–15. doi: 10.1186/scrt385. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Nakajima H., Uchida K., Guerrero A.R., Watanabe S., Sugita D., Takeura N., Yoshida A., Long G., Wright K.T., Johnson W.E.B., Baba H. Transplantation of mesenchymal stem cells promotes an alternative pathway of macrophage activation and functional recovery after spinal cord injury. J. Neurotrauma. 2012;29:1614–1625. doi: 10.1089/neu.2011.2109. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Neuhuber B., Timothy Himes B., Shumsky J.S., Gallo G., Fischer I. Axon growth and recovery of function supported by human bone marrow stromal cells in the injured spinal cord exhibit donor variations. Brain Res. 2005;1035:73–85. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2004.11.055. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Hofstetter C.P., Schwarz E.J., Hess D., Widenfalk J., El Manira A., Prockop D.J., Olson L. Marrow stromal cells form guiding strands in the injured spinal cord and promote recovery. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. Unit. States Am. 2002;99:2199–2204. doi: 10.1073/pnas.042678299. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Tang L., Lu X., Zhu R., Qian T., Tao Y., Li K., Zheng J., Zhao P., Li S., Wang X., Li L. Adipose-derived stem cells expressing the neurogenin-2 promote functional recovery after spinal cord injury in rat. Cell. Mol. Neurobiol. 2016;36:657–667. doi: 10.1007/s10571-015-0246-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Massoto T.B., Santos A.C.R., Ramalho B.S., Almeida F.M., Martinez A.M.B., Marques S.A. Mesenchymal stem cells and treadmill training enhance function and promote tissue preservation after spinal cord injury. Brain Res. 2019;1726 doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2019.146494. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Chopp M., Xue C.A., Zhang H., Li Y., Wang L., Chen J., Lu D., Lu M., Rosenblum M. Spinal cord injury in rat : treatment with bone marrow stromal cell transplantation. Neuroreport. 2000;11:3001–3005. doi: 10.1097/00001756-200009110-00035. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Ide C., Nakai Y., Nakano N., Seo T.-B., Yamada Y., Endo K., Noda T., Saito F., Suzuki Y., Fukushima M., Nakatani T. Bone marrow stromal cell transplantation for treatment of sub-acute spinal cord injury in the rat. Brain Res. 2010;1332:32–47. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2010.03.043. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Wang L.J., Zhang R.P., Li J.D. Transplantation of neurotrophin-3-expressing bone mesenchymal stem cells improves recovery in a rat model of spinal cord injury. Acta Neurochir. 2014;156:1409–1418. doi: 10.1007/s00701-014-2089-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Tan Y., Uchida K., Nakajima H., Guerrero A.R., Watanabe S., Hirai T., Takeura N., Liu S.-Y., Johnson W.E., Baba H. Blockade of interleukin 6 signaling improves the survival rate of transplanted bone marrow stromal cells and increases locomotor function in mice with spinal cord injury. J. Neuropathol. Exp. Neurol. 2013;72:980–993. doi: 10.1097/NEN.0b013e3182a79de9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Menezes K., Nascimento M.A., Gonçalves J.P., Cruz A.S., Lopes D.V., Curzio B., Bonamino M., De Menezes J.R.L., Borojevic R., Rossi M.I.D., Coelho-Sampaio T. Human mesenchymal cells from adipose tissue deposit laminin and promote regeneration of injured spinal cord in rats. PloS One. 2014;9 doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0096020. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Kim Y., Jo S.H., Kim W.H., Kweon O.K. Antioxidant and anti-inflammatory effects of intravenously injected adipose derived mesenchymal stem cells in dogs with acute spinal cord injury. Stem Cell Res. Ther. 2015;6:229. doi: 10.1186/s13287-015-0236-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Urdzíková L.M., Růžička J., LaBagnara M., Kárová K., Kubinová Š., Jiráková K., Murali R., Syková E., Jhanwar-Uniyal M., Jendelová P. Human mesenchymal stem cells modulate inflammatory cytokines after spinal cord injury in rat. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2014;15:11275–11293. doi: 10.3390/ijms150711275. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Bao C.S., Li X.L., Liu L., Wang B., Yang F.B., Chen L.G. Transplantation of human umbilical cord mesenchymal stem cells promotes functional recovery after spinal cord injury by blocking the expression of IL-7. Eur. Rev. Med. Pharmacol. Sci. 2018;22:6436–6447. doi: 10.26355/eurrev_201810_16056. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Tsai M.-J., Liou D.-Y., Lin Y.-R., Weng C.-F., Huang M.-C., Huang W.-C., Tseng F.-W., Cheng H. Attenuating spinal cord injury by conditioned medium from bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells. J. Clin. Med. 2018;8:23. doi: 10.3390/jcm8010023. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Dribin L.B., Barrett J.N. Conditioned medium enhances neuritic outgrowth from rat spinal cord explants. Dev. Biol. 1980 doi: 10.1016/0012-1606(80)90060-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Dribin L.B., Barrett J.N. Two components of conditioned medium increase neuritic outgrowth from rat spinal cord explants. J. Neurosci. Res. 1982;8:271–280. doi: 10.1002/jnr.490080217. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Park H., Lim M., Jung H., Lee S., Paik K., Chang M. Human mesenchymal stem cell-derived Schwann cell-like cells exhibit neurotrophic effects, via distinct growth factor production, in a model of spinal cord injury. Glia. 2010;58:1118–1132. doi: 10.1002/glia.20992. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Sypecka J., Koniusz S., Kawalec M., Sarnowska A. The organotypic longitudinal spinal cord slice culture for stem cell study. Stem Cell. Int. 2015;2015 doi: 10.1155/2015/471216. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Lossi L., Merighi A. The use of ex vivo rodent platforms in neuroscience translational research with attention to the 3RS philosophy. Front. Vet. Sci. 2018;5:1–14. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2018.00164. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.McMahill B.G., Borjesson D.L., Sieber-Blum M., Nolta J.A., Sturges B.K. Stem cells in canine spinal cord injury--promise for regenerative therapy in a large animal model of human disease. Stem Cell Rev Rep. 2015;11:180–193. doi: 10.1007/s12015-014-9553-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Moore S.A., Granger N., Olby N.J., Spitzbarth I., Jeffery N.D., Tipold A., Nout-Lomas Y.S., Da Costa R.C., Stein V.M., Noble-Haeusslein L.J., Blight A.R., Grossman R.G., Basso D.M., Levine J.M. Targeting translational successes through CANSORT-SCI: using pet dogs to identify effective treatments for spinal cord injury. J. Neurotrauma. 2017;34:2007–2018. doi: 10.1089/neu.2016.4745. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Hu H.Z., Granger N., Balakrishna Pai S., Bellamkonda R.V., Jeffery N.D. Therapeutic efficacy of microtube-embedded chondroitinase ABC in a canine clinical model of spinal cord injury. Brain. 2018;141:1017–1027. doi: 10.1093/brain/awy007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Jeffery N.D., Hamilton L., Granger N. Designing clinical trials in canine spinal cord injury as a model to translate successful laboratory interventions into clinical practice. Vet. Rec. 2011;168:102–107. doi: 10.1136/vr.d475. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Al Delfi I.R., Sheard J.J., Wood C.R., Vernallis A., Innes J.F., Myint P., Johnson W.E.B. Canine mesenchymal stem cells are neurotrophic and angiogenic : an in vitro assessment of their paracrine activity. Vet. J. 2016;217:10–17. doi: 10.1016/j.tvjl.2016.09.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Dominici M., Le Blanc K., Mueller I., Slaper-Cortenbach I., Marini F., Krause D., Deans R., Keating A., Prockop D., Horwitz E. Minimal criteria for defining multipotent mesenchymal stromal cells. The International Society for Cellular Therapy position statement. Cytotherapy. 2006;8:315–317. doi: 10.1080/14653240600855905. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Ferrini F., Russo A., Salio C. Fos and pERK immunoreactivity in spinal cord slices: comparative analysis of in vitro models for testing putative antinociceptive molecules. Ann. Anat. 2014;196:217–223. doi: 10.1016/j.aanat.2013.11.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Longair M.H., Baker D.A., Armstrong J.D. Simple neurite tracer: open source software for reconstruction, visualization and analysis of neuronal processes. Bioinformatics. 2011;27:2453–2454. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btr390. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Tavares G., Martins M., Correia J.S., Sardinha V.M., Guerra-Gomes S., das Neves S.P., Marques F., Sousa N., Oliveira J.F. Employing an open-source tool to assess astrocyte tridimensional structure. Brain Struct. Funct. 2017;222:1989–1999. doi: 10.1007/s00429-016-1316-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.de Melo Reis R.A., Freitas H.R., de Mello F.G. Cell calcium imaging as a reliable method to study neuron–glial circuits. Front. Neurosci. 2020;14:1–14. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2020.569361. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Merighi A., Lossi L. The evolution of immunocytochemistry in the dissection of neural complexity. In: Merighi A., Lossi L., editors. Immunocytochem. Relat. Tech. Springer; New York, New York, NY: 2015. pp. 1–35. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Salio C., Ferrini F., Muthuraju S., Merighi A. Presynaptic modulation of spinal nociceptive transmission by glial cell line-derived neurotrophic factor ( GDNF ) J. Neurosci. 2014;34:13819–13833. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0808-14.2014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Pasti L., Volterra A., Pozzan T., Carmignoto G. Intracellular calcium oscillations in astrocytes: a highly plastic, bidirectional form of communication between neurons and astrocytes in situ. J. Neurosci. 1997;17:7817–7830. doi: 10.1523/jneurosci.17-20-07817.1997. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Stoppini L., Buches P.-A., Muller D. A simple method for organotypic cultures of nervous tissue. J. Neurosci. Methods. 1991;37:173–182. doi: 10.1016/0165-0270(91)90128-M. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Lossi L., Alasia S., Salio C., Merighi A. Cell death and proliferation in acute slices and organotypic cultures of mammalian CNS. Prog. Neurobiol. 2009;88:221–245. doi: 10.1016/j.pneurobio.2009.01.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Lukovic D., Manzano V.M., Stojkovic M., Bhattacharya S.S., Erceg S. Concise review: human pluripotent stem cells in the treatment of spinal cord injury. Stem Cell. 2012;30:1787–1792. doi: 10.1002/stem.1159. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Rossignol S., Schwab M., Schwartz M., Fehlings M.G. Spinal cord injury: time to move? J. Neurosci. 2007;27:11782–11792. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3444-07.2007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.D'Ortho M.P., Will H., Atkinson S., Butler G., Messent A., Gavrilovic J., Smith B., Timpl R., Zardi L., Murphy G. Membrane-type matrix metalloproteinases 1 and 2 exhibit broad-spectrum proteolytic capacities comparable to many matrix metalloproteinases. Eur. J. Biochem. 1997;250:751–757. doi: 10.1111/j.1432-1033.1997.00751.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Wright K.T., El Masri W., Osman A., Chowdhury J., Johnson W.E.B. Concise review: bone marrow for the treatment of spinal cord injury: mechanisms and clinical applications. Stem Cell. 2011;29:169–178. doi: 10.1002/stem.570. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Patar A., Dockery P., Howard L., McMahon S. Analysis of reactive astrocytes and NG2 proteoglycan in ex vivo rat models of spinal cord injury. J. Neurosci. Methods. 2019;311:418–425. doi: 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2018.09.027. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Wright K.T., El Masri W., Osman A., Roberts S., Chamberlain G., Ashton B.A., Johnson W.E.B. Bone marrow stromal cells stimulate neurite outgrowth over neural proteoglycans (CSPG), myelin associated glycoprotein and Nogo-A. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2007;354:559–566. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2007.01.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Wright K.T., Uchida K., Bara J.J., Roberts S., El Masri W., Johnson W.E.B. Spinal motor neurite outgrowth over glial scar inhibitors is enhanced by coculture with bone marrow stromal cells. Spine J. 2014;14:1722–1733. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2014.01.021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Maxwell D.J., Fyffe R.E.W., Brown A.G. Fine structure of normal and degenerating primary afferent boutons associated with characterized spinocervical tract neurons in the cat. Neuroscience. 1984;12:151–163. doi: 10.1016/0306-4522(84)90144-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Pandamooz S., Salehi M.S., Zibaii M.I., Ahmadiani A., Nabiuni M., Dargahi L. Epidermal neural crest stem cell-derived glia enhance neurotrophic elements in an ex vivo model of spinal cord injury. J. Cell. Biochem. 2018;119:3486–3496. doi: 10.1002/jcb.26520. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Gomez T.M., Spitzer N.C. In vivo regulation of axon extension and pathfinding by growth-cone calcium transients. Nature. 1999;397:350–355. doi: 10.1038/16927. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Park C.W., Kim K.-S., Bae S., Son H.K., Myung P.-K., Hong H.J., Kim H. Cytokine secretion profiling of human mesenchymal stem cells by antibody array. Int. J. Stem Cells. 2009;2:59–68. doi: 10.15283/ijsc.2009.2.1.59. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Walter M.N.M., Wright K.T., Fuller H.R., MacNeil S., Johnson W.E.B. Mesenchymal stem cell-conditioned medium accelerates skin wound healing: an in vitro study of fibroblast and keratinocyte scratch assays. Exp. Cell Res. 2010;316:1271–1281. doi: 10.1016/j.yexcr.2010.02.026. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Walter M.N.M., Kohli N., Khan N., Major T., Fuller H., Wright K.T., Kuiper J.H., Johnson W.E.B. Human mesenchymal stem cells stimulate EaHy926 endothelial cell migration : combined proteomic and in vitro analysis of the influence of donor-donor. variability. 2015;11:18–24. doi: 10.46582/jsrm.1101004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Biochemistry and Biophysics Reports are provided here courtesy of Elsevier

RESOURCES