Skip to main content
Journal of Cellular and Molecular Medicine logoLink to Journal of Cellular and Molecular Medicine
. 2021 Feb 6;25(5):2471–2483. doi: 10.1111/jcmm.16170

Non‐muscle myosin II regulates aortic stiffness through effects on specific focal adhesion proteins and the non‐muscle cortical cytoskeleton

Kuldeep Singh 1,2, Anne B Kim 1, Kathleen G Morgan 1,
PMCID: PMC7933926  PMID: 33547870

Abstract

Non‐muscle myosin II (NMII) plays a role in many fundamental cellular processes including cell adhesion, migration, and cytokinesis. However, its role in mammalian vascular function is not well understood. Here, we investigated the function of NMII in the biomechanical and signalling properties of mouse aorta. We found that blebbistatin, an inhibitor of NMII, decreases agonist‐induced aortic stress and stiffness in a dose‐dependent manner. We also specifically demonstrate that in freshly isolated, contractile, aortic smooth muscle cells, the non‐muscle myosin IIA (NMIIA) isoform is associated with contractile filaments in the core of the cell as well as those in the non‐muscle cell cortex. However, the non‐muscle myosin IIB (NMIIB) isoform is excluded from the cell cortex and colocalizes only with contractile filaments. Furthermore, both siRNA knockdown of NMIIA and NMIIB isoforms in the differentiated A7r5 smooth muscle cell line and blebbistatin‐mediated inhibition of NM myosin II suppress agonist‐activated increases in phosphorylation of the focal adhesion proteins FAK Y925 and paxillin Y118. Thus, we show in the present study, for the first time that NMII regulates aortic stiffness and stress and that this regulation is mediated through the tension‐dependent phosphorylation of the focal adhesion proteins FAK and paxillin.

Keywords: aortic stiffness, contractility, focal adhesion, non‐muscle myosin II, smooth muscle contraction

1. INTRODUCTION

Non‐muscle myosin II (NMII) is a member of the conventional class II myosin family. Contrary to its name, NMII is expressed in essentially all eukaryotic cells including muscle cells and plays a role in many fundamental cellular and developmental processes such as cell adhesion, 1 , 2 cell migration, 3 and cytokinesis. 4 Similar to smooth muscle myosin II, NMII is composed of two heavy chains (230 kD), two regulatory light chains (20 kD), and two essential light chains (17 kD). 5 Enzymatic activity is known to be regulated by phosphorylation of both regulatory light chains and heavy chains. 6

There are three NMII isoforms: non‐muscle myosin IIA (NMIIA), non‐muscle myosin IIB (NMIIB) and non‐muscle myosin IIC (NMIIC). The corresponding heavy chains are encoded by three different genes (MYH9, MYH10 and MYH14, respectively), which are located on three different chromosomes. 7 , 8 Although all three NMII isoforms contain similar domain structures and exhibit 60%‐80% amino acid sequence identity, 9 they have different expressions and intracellular localizations in different cell and tissue types. NMIIA and NMIIB isoforms are expressed at a high level in many smooth muscle tissues, whereas NMIIC expression is low in SM tissue and high in neuronal tissue. 7 Ablation of NMIIA and NMIIB in the whole mouse results in lethality at an embryonic stage, 2 , 10 , 11 whereas ablation of NMIIC causes no known phenotypic change. 12 In addition to the classical roles in cell adhesion, cell migration, and cytokinesis, a few studies have reported NMII involvement in the regulation of the biomechanics of smooth muscle contraction. 6 , 13 , 14 , 15 However, the subcellular molecular mechanisms by which NMII regulate smooth muscle biomechanics remain unclear and are likely to be tissue‐specific.

Stiffness is an important biomechanical property of the aorta. Aortic stiffness increases with age and is an independent predictor of negative cardiovascular outcome, including hypertension, stroke, kidney disease and vascular dementia. 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 Recent studies have shown that vascular smooth muscle cells (VSMCs) contribute significantly to the total vascular wall stiffness. 20 , 21 There are three dynamic components of the VSM cell that have been shown to contribute to VSMC stiffness: first, the cyclic attachment of cross‐bridges in contractile filament; second, the remodelling and transmission of force and stiffness through a non‐muscle actin cytoskeleton 22 , 23 ; and third, remodelling of focal adhesion complexes connected to the non‐muscle actin cytoskeleton. 24 Although NMII has been shown to be involved in the cell‐mediated extracellular matrix reorganization and the resulting changes to the matrix stiffness, 25 its possible role in the regulation of VSM cell stiffness has not been investigated.

The goal of this study was to determine whether NMII plays a role in the biomechanical properties of the aortic wall, and if so, to determine the molecular mechanisms. Here we show that NMII is, indeed, involved in the regulation of both aortic stress and stiffness. Furthermore, we show that the molecular mechanisms by which NMII regulates aortic stiffness include tension‐dependent alterations of the phosphorylation state of smooth muscle focal adhesion proteins and the cortical non‐muscle actin cytoskeleton of the smooth muscle cell.

2. MATERIALS AND METHODS

2.1. Animals and aortic tissue preparation

C57BL/6J adult male mice (~3‐4 months old) were used in this study. All the procedures were performed according to a protocol approved by the Boston University IACUC. Mice were killed by inhalation with an overdose of isoflurane in a closed chamber. Aortic tissue was quickly excised, rinsed and placed in an ice‐cold oxygenated (95% O2‐5% CO2) physiological saline solution (PSS; in mmol/L: 120 NaCl, 5.9 KCl, 11.5 Dextrose, 25 NaHCO3, 1.2 NaH2PO4, 1.2 MgCl2, 2.5 CaCl2; pH, 7.4). Axial rings (5 mm length) were cut from the thoracic aorta for biomechanics. At the end of the protocol, rings were quick‐frozen in a dry‐ice, acetone, 10 mmol/L dithiothreitol, 10% TCA slurry and stored at −80°C.

2.2. Measurement of aortic geometry and biomechanics

Axial length, diameter, and wall thickness of aortic tissue were quantitated to determine the cross‐sectional area and used to calculate aortic stress and stiffness. Ex vivo aortic stress and stiffness were measured as previously described. 20 , 26 , 27 Briefly, thin triangular pieces of wire (0.01‐inch diameter) were threaded through the lumen of the aortic ring and suspended in an organ bath (50 ml) containing 37°C oxygenated PSS (95% O2‐5% CO2). The upper triangle was connected to a computer‐controlled motorized lever arm (Dual‐Mode Lever Arm System, Model 300C, Aurora Scientific), which also functions as a force transducer. Aortic rings were stretched in the circumferential direction to the previously determined optimum length (1.8 × slack length).

Aortic stiffness was determined by high‐frequency (40 Hz), small‐amplitude (1%) sinusoidal length perturbations. Aortic tissue stiffness is defined as the change in stress divided by the change in strain in response to the sinusoidal oscillations, (ΔF/A)/ΔL/L 0) where ΔF is the amplitude of force output during cyclic stretches, A is the cross‐sectional area, ΔL is the amplitude of cyclic length changes, and L 0 is the optimal length. Stress was calculated as force ΔF divided by the cross‐sectional area (A = 2hι where h is the wall thickness and ι is the axial length of the ring).

2.3. Isolation of single differentiated smooth muscle cells from mouse aorta

To avoid any cytoskeletal changes that could occur during cell culture, freshly dissociated VSMCs (dVSMCs) were used in this study. Contractile dVSMCs were enzymatically isolated from mouse aorta tissue according to a previously published method 22 and poured over glass coverslips on ice and allowed to adhere for 1 hour under an atmosphere of 100% oxygen.

2.4. Cell staining, immunofluorescence microscopy and colocalization quantification

dVSMCs were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde for 20 minutes and washed twice with 0.1 mmol/L glycine in 1% BSA Hank's Balanced Salt Solution (HBSS), permeabilized with 0.1% Triton X‐100 for 10 minutes and blocked with 10% goat serum in 0.05% Triton X‐100 and 1% BSA HBSS for 30 minutes. Cells were incubated overnight with the desired primary antibody in 2% goat serum and 1% BSA HBSS. Cells were incubated with secondary antibody and mounted with fluoroshield with DAPI (Abcam). For γ‐cytoplasmic actin staining, cells were fixed with 1% paraformaldehyde for 20 minutes followed by ice‐cold methanol for 3 minutes. Cells were washed twice with HBSS containing 0.075% BSA.

For high‐resolution deconvolution microscopy, three‐dimensional image stacks were acquired with Nikon Eclipse TE 2000‐E inverted microscope using a Nikon Plan Apochromat 60X (Numerical Aperture 1.4) oil immersion objective and a charge‐coupled device camera (Cool SNAP HQ2, Photometrics). NIS‐Element Advanced Research software was used to capture images, and out‐of‐focus fluorescence was removed by deconvolution of z‐stacks. The degree of colocalization was quantified from merged images of different actin isoforms with NM II isoforms by using Pearson's correlation coefficient (PCC). The ‘colocalization tool’ in the NIKON NIS‐Element Advanced Research software was used to measure PCC values. For accurate measurement of the PCC, cells were carefully outlined to avoid any unlabelled extracellular regions that can artificially inflate PCC values if included in the region of measurement. 28 A total of 20 cells (five cells from each group) were analysed for colocalization quantification.

2.5. A7r5 cell culture and siRNA transfection

A7r5 rat aortic SMCs (ATCC) were cultured in growth medium composed of Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium (DMEM), supplemented with 10% foetal bovine serum and 1% glutamine and maintained under humidified conditions at 37°C and 5% CO2. Expression of NMII isoforms was inhibited by ON‐TARGETplus SMARTpool siRNAs specific for NMIIA and NMIIB, purchased from Horizon discovery. ON‐TARGETplus Non‐targeting Control siRNA was used as a control. Cells were seeded at a density of 1 × 105 cells/mL and were transfected using DharmaFECT (Horizon Discovery), at a final concentration of 25 nmol/L in an antibiotic‐free Opti‐MEM medium according to the manufacturer's instructions. siRNA knockdown was analysed after 72 hours of transfection by Western blot using antibodies specific to NMIIA and NMIIB. Cells were lysed on ice, and samples were stored at −80°C.

2.6. Western blotting

Frozen aortic tissue was quickly homogenized and total protein measured as described previously by our group. 29 Bands were normalized to GAPDH.

2.7. Actin polymerization assay

An actin polymerization assay was performed according to the protocol described previously. 30 Each aortic strip was placed in a 0.5 mL tissue homogenization tube (Precellys, Bertin Technologies) containing pre‐warmed lysis and F‐actin stabilization buffer (in mmol/L: 50 PIPES pH 6.9, 50 NaCl, 5 MgCl2, 5 EGTA) 5% [V/V] Glycerol, 0.1% Nonidet P40, 0.1% Triton X‐100, 0.0% Tween 20, 0.1% 2‐mercapto‐ethanol, 0.001% Antifoam C with 1 mmol/L ATP and 1× protease inhibitor cocktail (Cytoskeleton, Inc). The tissue was quickly homogenized. 100 μL of homogenates was incubated at 37°C for 20 minutes and spun at 150 000 g for 60 minutes at 37°C in Optima TLX ultracentrifuge (Beckman Coulter). The supernatant (G‐actin) was carefully pipetted, 100 μL of ice‐cold F‐actin depolymerization buffer (8 mol/L urea) was added to each pellet, and the pellet was dissolved by triturating every 15 minutes for 1 hour. The solution was spun at 2300 g for 5 minutes at 4°C, and the supernatant collected to give the final F‐actin fraction. Equal volume of G and F‐actin samples was resolved by SDS‐PAGE and immunoblotting with anti‐actin primary antibody (Cytoskeleton).

2.8. Chemicals and antibodies

(−)‐Blebbistatin, primaquine and phenylephrine were purchased from Sigma. siRNA transfection reagents were purchased from Horizon Discovery. DPBA was purchased from Santa Cruz Biotechnology. The following primary antibodies were used: NMIIA (rabbit, 1:200), NMIIB (rabbit, 1:200), GAPDH (rabbit, 1:20 000) and α‐smooth muscle actin (mouse 1:10 000) from Sigma; β‐Cytoplasmic actin (mouse 1:500) and γ‐Cytoplasmic actin (mouse 1:500), a gift from Christine Chaponnier; phospho‐FAK Y925 (rabbit, 1:200) and phospho‐Paxillin Y118 (rabbit, 1:250) from Cell Signaling Technologies; FAK monoclonal antibody (mouse, 1:250) from Thermo Fisher Scientific; anti‐Paxillin (mouse, 1:500) from BD biosciences; anti‐actin antibody (rabbit, 1:500) from Cytoskeleton. For immunofluorescence experiments, goat anti‐mouse and goat anti‐rabbit Alexa Fluor 488 and Alexa Fluor 568 (1:1000, Invitrogen) were used as secondary antibodies. For Western blotting experiments, IRDye 680 RD and IRDye 800CW labelled goat anti‐rabbit and goat anti‐mouse (LI‐COR, 1:10 000) were used as secondary antibodies.

2.9. Statistical analysis

All results are presented as mean ± SEM Analysis was carried out using the GraphPad Prism 8 software. Two‐tailed student's t tests were used when comparing values between two experimental groups. The significance of differences between two individual datasets was taken at P < .05. We used two‐way ANOVA to compare parameters among treatment groups followed by Turkey's multiple comparisons test.

3. RESULTS

3.1. Ex vivo inhibition of non‐muscle myosin II in the mouse inhibits alpha agonist‐activated aortic stress and stiffness

To elucidate the role of NMII in vascular function, we used a small molecule inhibitor of NMII, blebbistatin (Bleb). Blebbistatin binds to the myosin ADP‐Pi complex of the myosin ATPase cycle and interferes with the release of phosphate; therefore, it blocks the myosin II head in the actin‐detached state and prevents actin‐myosin interactions. 31 Based on in vitro and ex vivo characterization, blebbistatin has been shown to be a cell permeable selective inhibitor of NMII (IC50 ~ 0.5‐5 μmol/L) and has a low binding affinity towards smooth muscle myosin (SMII) (IC50 ~ 15‐80 μmol/L). 4 , 31 , 32 , 33 , 34 , 35 , 36 , 37 , 38 Only the active (−)‐enantiomer of blebbistatin is known to inhibit NMII activity, and only this enantiomer was used in the present study. 32 , 33 , 39

To determine the effective concentration of blebbistatin required to alter the biomechanics of mouse aorta tissue, we performed a dose response analysis. Cell viability was confirmed by the addition of 51 mmol/L KCl PSS to the tissue bath (Figure 1A). After returning to normal PSS, aortic tissues were treated with 10 μmol/L of the alpha agonist, phenylephrine. Once the phenylephrine‐induced contraction reached steady state (~30 minutes), either vehicle alone (DMSO) or incremental blebbistatin concentrations (2, 5 and 10 μmol/L) were added to the tissue bath. Stress and stiffness were measured at steady state. Dose response analysis revealed that blebbistatin significantly inhibits phenylephrine‐induced aortic stress at 5 and 10 μmol/L compared to control vehicle‐treated tissues (Figure 1B). The 2 μmol/L blebbistatin concentration had no statistically significant effect.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Effect of blebbistatin on biomechanical properties of aortic tissue activated by an alpha agonist. A, Isometric force development in control vehicle‐treated aorta tissue (upper panel) and blebbistatin‐treated aorta tissue (lower panel). Aortic rings were treated for 30 min with 2, 5 and 10 μmol/L blebbistatin after PE stimulation. B, Blebbistatin significantly inhibited PE‐induced aortic stress at 5 and 10μmol/L as compared to control vehicle‐treated tissues (n = 8). C, Blebbistatin significantly inhibited PE‐induced aortic stiffness at 5 and 10 μmol/L as compared to only vehicle‐treated tissues. No statistically significant inhibition was found at 2 μmol/L on aortic stress and stiffness as compared to vehicle‐treated tissues (n = 8). Values in graphs are normalized to PE‐induced control stress/stiffness. Control stress/stiffness refers to the stress/stiffness measured in the presence of PE before blebbistatin/vehicle treatment. ** and **** indicate P < 0.005 and <0.0001, respectively. Two‐way ANOVA

To investigate the role of NMII specifically in aortic stiffness, we used biomechanical techniques to quantitate agonist‐induced aortic stiffness in the presence and absence of blebbistatin. 30 As seen in Figure 1C, blebbistatin significantly decreases phenylephrine‐induced increases in aortic stiffness at 5 and 10 μmol/L concentrations (n = 8) as compared to control tissues treated with vehicle only. However, similar to the aortic stress, no statistically significant effect was observed on aortic stiffness at 2 μmol/L concentration of blebbistatin as compared to control tissue.

3.2. Blebbistatin also decreases depolarization‐induced increases in aortic stress and stiffness

Multiple signalling pathways coexist in SM cells, which contribute to SM contractility and stiffness. 40 Membrane depolarization activates SM by a signalling mechanism involving the activation of voltage gated Ca2+ channels, Ca2+ influx, Ca2+ binding to calmodulin, Ca2+‐calmodulin complex to activate myosin light chain kinase, phosphorylation of myosin light chains, and actin‐myosin cross‐bridge cycling and contraction.

To determine whether NMII is involved in the depolarization‐mediated pathway of contraction, aorta tissues were treated with 10 μmol/L blebbistatin for 30 minutes followed by treatment with a depolarizing physiological saline solution containing 51 mmol/L KCl. Blebbistatin significantly decreases the KCl‐induced increase in aortic stress as compared to only vehicle‐treated tissues (Figure 2A,B). KCl‐induced aortic stiffness was also significantly decreased by blebbistatin (Figure 2C). These results indicate that NMII affects parts of signalling pathways common to both KCl and PE activation, either in the contractile filaments, focal adhesions or non‐muscle actin cytoskeleton. 40

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Blebbistatin inhibits depolarization‐induced aortic stress and stiffness. A, Typical time course of isometric force responses during depolarization of aortic tissue with 51 mmol/L KCl PSS in control tissue (upper panel) and tissue pre‐treated with blebbistatin for 30 min (lower panel). B, Blebbistatin significantly decreases depolarization‐induced stress in blebbistatin‐treated tissues (Vehicle control: 124 ± 2.5%, bleb: 49.6 ± 5.3%; n = 3). C, Inhibition of depolarization‐induced increase in aortic stiffness in blebbistatin pre‐treated tissue as compared to control vehicle‐treated tissues (Vehicle control: 136.3 ± 7.4%, bleb: 53.33 ± 3.3%; n = 3). The values are expressed as a % of KCl1‐induced increase in aortic stress and stiffness (average ± SEM). Two‐tailed unpaired t test ***P < .001

3.3. Isoform‐specific localization of actin isoforms and NMII isoforms in dVSMCs of mouse aorta

NMII isoforms are reported to have distinct intracellular localization patterns in different cell types. 7 , 41 , 42 The above results could be explained by an effect of NM II to regulate aortic stress and stiffness by interacting with (a) the contractile filaments, (b) the focal adhesions or (c) the NM actin cytoskeleton (see more details in Section 3.4). To study whether NMII localizes with the contractile filaments in the core of the cell or with the non‐muscle cytoskeleton adjacent to the plasmalemma, we enzymatically dissociated single dVSMCs from the mouse aorta and imaged the cells with high‐resolution deconvolution microscopy as previously described. 22 Our laboratory has published that α‐smooth muscle actin associates with contractile filaments in the core of the VSMC, whereas γ‐cytoplasmic actin associates with the sub‐plasmalemmal cell cortex and β‐cytoplasmic actin is located in punctate dense bodies in ferret VSMC. 43 Also, Dugina et al 44 reported similar findings for actin isoforms in fibroblast and epithelial cells. To determine the localization of these actin isoforms in mouse aortic cells, we used isoform‐specific actin antibodies to localize different actin populations in mouse aortic smcs and found a similar pattern. α‐smooth muscle actin filaments (α‐SMA) appear to snake through the core of the cell (Figure 3Aa), but in contrast, β‐cytoplasmic actin (β‐CYA) is distributed throughout the cells in punctatae (Figure 3Ab). γ‐cytoplasmic actin (γ‐CYA), on the other hand, is confined to the cell cortex (Figure 3Ac).

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Subcellular localization of actin and NM myosin II isoforms in vascular smooth muscle cells of mouse aorta. A, Freshly enzymatically isolated dVSMCs from mouse aortas were fixed and probed with isoform‐specific antibodies for smooth muscle actin isoforms. Deconvolution immunofluorescence microscopy was used to increase the resolution of the imaging. Results indicate that α‐SMA (a) is present in central filaments, presumably the previously described contractile filaments. 43 β‐CYA (b) is localized in punctate structures throughout the cell, and γ‐CYA (c) specifically is localized to the cell cortex. B, Colabeling was detected (Panel c) (arrows) of NMIIA (Panel a) with α‐SMA (Panel b) (upper row). Colabeling was detected (Panel f) (arrows) of NMIIA (Panel d) and γ‐CYA (Panel e) (lower row). Colocalization is detected digitally and displayed in merged images by yellow staining (c and f and at higher magnification to the right). C, Colocalization of NMIIB (a) with α‐SMA (b) in dVSMCs (upper row). Colocalization is detected digitally and shown in the merged image by yellow staining (c, enlarged view). NMIIB did not colocalize with γ‐CYA (lower row). A merged image is displayed in f (higher magnification to the right) and shows a lack of yellow staining. D, Summary graph of NM myosin II and actin isoform colocalization through the use of Pearson's correlation coefficients (PCC). PCC values are expressed as the mean ± SEM. Scale bar, 5 μm

We then costained for the NMII isoforms to allow comparison with the specific actin isoforms in the aortic smcs. We found that NMIIA colocalizes with α‐SMA filaments (Figure 3B, upper row), presumably in the contractile filaments in the core of the cell (Figure 3B upper row, enlarged view). Then, we costained for NMIIA and the cortical γ‐CYA (Figure 3B, lower row). The merged image shows that NMIIA also colocalizes with cortical γ‐CYA (Figure 3B, lower row, enlarged view).

Next, we investigated the localization of the NMIIB isoform (Figure 3C). First, we compared it with that of α‐SMA in the contractile filaments (Figure 3C, upper row). Similar to NMIIA, the merged image shows that NMIIB colocalizes with contractile filaments (Figure 3C upper row, enlarged view). However, when we co‐labelled NMIIB with γ‐CYA (Figure 3C, lower row), there was a lack of yellow signal in the merged image, which indicates that NMIIB does not colocalize with cortical γ‐CYA (Figure 3C lower row, enlarged view). This difference in the localization of NMIIA and NMIIB in the cell cortex suggests that NMIIA has an additional function that NMIIB does not share in the function of cortical γ‐actin filaments, even though they may have similar functions in the contractile filaments.

To objectively quantify the degree of colocalization between NMII isoforms and actin isoforms, Pearson's correlation coefficients (PCC) were calculated using the ‘Colocalization’ tool in Nikon NIS‐Element Advanced Research software. PCC values near zero indicate a lack of correlation between fluorescence intensities of two images, whereas a PCC value of 1 indicates a perfect linear relationship between the two images. A high degree of colocalization was indicated in merged images of NMIIA/α‐SMA, NMIIA/γ‐CYA and NMIIB/α‐SMA because the PCC values were 0.84 ± 0.02, 0.77 ± 0.01 and 0.81 ± 0.03, respectively. In contrast, a relatively low degree of colocalization (PCC = 0.48 ± 0.03) was indicated for the NMIIB/γ‐CYA images (Figure 3D). A total of 20 cells (five from each group) were analysed for quantification.

3.4. Non‐muscle myosin II regulates aortic stiffness via inhibition of tyrosine phosphorylation of focal adhesion proteins

Focal adhesions (FA) are protein complexes near the cell membrane that connect the actin cytoskeleton to the extracellular matrix via integrins in many different cell types. 27 , 45 Agonist stimulation of VSMCs activates a signalling cascade that ultimately increases actomyosin cross‐bridge cycling. The mechanical force generated by the actomyosin cross‐bridge cycling, in turn, increases the tension on the non‐muscle cytoskeleton and activates the engagement of FA proteins (focal adhesion kinase (FAK), talin and paxillin) with the integrins. It has previously been shown in several systems that, in non‐muscle cells, physical tension on the integrins leads to autophosphorylation of FAK at tyrosine 397, which then causes this site to bind to the Src homology domain (SH2) of the Src protein. It has been demonstrated for many cell types that the formation of this FAK‐Src complex promotes the subsequent phosphorylation of paxillin at Y118 and FAK at Y925, Y576, Y577 and Y861. 46 , 47 The stimulus‐induced increase in moderate tension at the focal adhesion in non‐muscle cells is known to lead to the growth of the FA 48 and, in smooth muscle cells, leads to further increases in force and stiffness. 27 , 30

To determine whether NMII modulates aortic stiffness via effects on FA signalling in VSMCs, we compared the agonist‐induced phosphorylation of FAK and paxillin in the presence and absence of blebbistatin. FAK Y925 is a Src substrate that signals downstream to ERK and ultimately regulates the aortic stiffness and contractility. The alpha agonist phenylephrine (PE) increases the phosphorylation of FAK Y925 and paxillin Y118. Interestingly, the PE‐induced increase in phosphorylation of FAK and paxillin was significantly inhibited by blebbistatin (n = 6; Figure 4A,B). These data indicate that NMII is required for the stimulus‐induced and tension‐dependent phosphorylation of FA proteins. The data also point to a possible role for NMII in the tension‐dependent growth of focal adhesions in disorders of increased aortic stiffness. 27

Figure 4.

Figure 4

The NM myosin II inhibitor, Blebbistatin, suppresses phenylephrine‐induced phosphorylation of focal adhesion proteins. A, Representative FAK Tyr 925 phosphorylation immunoblots of tissue extracts from unstimulated preparations (Uns), PE‐stimulated preparations and PE‐stimulated preparations in the presence of 10 μmol/L blebbistatin (top). Mean results are shown in the bottom panel. FAK Tyr 925 phosphorylation increased significantly in response to 10−5 mol/L PE. Blebbistatin significantly inhibited the PE‐induced increase in FAK Tyr 925 phosphorylation (n = 6). B, Representative Paxillin Tyr 118 phosphorylation immunoblots of tissue extracts of unstimulated, PE‐stimulated and PE‐stimulated preparations in the presence of 10 μmol/L blebbistatin (top). Mean results (bottom) show that Paxillin Tyr 118 phosphorylation increases in response to PE in a blebbistatin‐inhibitable manner (n = 6). *P < 0.05, unpaired student t test

Next, to validate the blebbistatin effect on phosphorylation of FA proteins, we used a complimentary siRNA knockdown approach to inhibit specific NMII isoforms in serum‐starved A7r5 cells, a differentiated SMC line from rat thoracic aorta. 49 A7r5 cells were transfected with non‐targeting, and NMIIA‐ and NMIIB‐specific siRNAs in reduced serum media (OptiMEM). 72 hours post‐transfection, NMIIA and NMIIB protein expression was analysed by Western blot. Both NMIIA and NMIIB protein expression in siRNA‐transfected cells were reduced to ~65% and ~75%, respectively, as compared to non‐targeting siRNA‐transfected control cells (Figure 5A‐C). Further, to analyse the knockdown effect of NMII isoforms on FA signalling, 72 hours post‐transfected cells were stimulated with 3 μmol/L phorbol ester (DPBA) to quantitate the DPBA‐induced tyrosine phosphorylation of FA proteins FAK 925 and Paxillin 118. Similar to the above blebbistatin results, the DPBA‐induced increase in tyrosine phosphorylation of FAK 925 and Paxillin 118 was significantly suppressed in both NMIIA and NMIIB siRNA‐transfected cells as compared to non‐targeting control cells (Figure 5D‐F). Taken together, these findings indicate a role of NM myosin II in tension‐dependent phosphorylation of FA proteins which ultimately regulates aortic stiffness.

Figure 5.

Figure 5

siRNA knockdown of NM myosin II isoforms in A7r5 cells down‐regulates agonist‐induced phosphorylation of focal adhesion proteins. A, A typical Western blot depicting isoform‐specific knockdown of NMIIA and NMIIB. B and C showing depletion in NMIIA (n = 6) and NMIIB (n = 9) protein levels after 72 h siRNA knockdown as compared to non‐targeting siRNA‐transfected control cells. Statistical significance was tested by two‐tailed unpaired t test, ****P < 0.0001. D, Representative immunoblot of DPBA‐induced phosphorylation of FAK and paxillin in siRNA‐transfected cells. E and F, Densitometry analysis of Western blots shows that DPBA‐induced increase in tyrosine phosphorylation of FAK Y925 and Paxillin Y118 is suppressed in both NMIIA and NMIIB siRNA‐transfected cells (n = 6). Statistical significance was tested by Two‐way ANOVA, Turkey's multiple comparison test, mean ± SEM **P < 0.005, ***P < 0.001, ns, non‐significant

3.5. NM myosin II is not required for the endocytic recycling of focal adhesion proteins

FAs in contractile dVSM cells are dynamic in nature. Prior studies from our laboratory and those of others have shown that redistribution of FA proteins occurs 24 , 50 , 51 in response to the addition of vasoconstrictors, and the cyclic remodelling of FA proteins requires an endocytic recycling pathway in vascular smooth muscles. 24 Thus, we speculated that the endocytic recycling of the focal adhesion proteins might be NM myosin II‐dependent. To test this hypothesis, we first determined whether endosomes have any role in the regulation of aortic stiffness in VSM. We inhibited endosome function by treating the tissue for 1 hour with 150 μmol/L primaquine, an inhibitor of endosome budding. As seen in Figure 6A‐C, both PE‐induced aortic stress and stiffness decreased in the primaquine treated tissues as compared to control tissues.

Figure 6.

Figure 6

Effect of primaquine on aortic contractility and phosphorylation of focal adhesion proteins. A, Isometric force recording during stimulation of aortic tissue with phenylephrine in the absence (upper) and presence of primaquine (lower). B, Primaquine pre‐treatment significantly decreased PE‐induced aortic stress (n = 5). C, PE‐induced increase in aortic stiffness decreased in the presence of primaquine (n = 5). The values are presented as % of KCl‐induced contraction. D‐E, Primaquine has no effect on PE‐induced phosphorylation of FAK Y925 (n = 3) and paxillin Y118 (n = 6). Upper panels: typical Western blot images, Lower panel: mean densitometry analysis of raw images. F, Inhibition of PE‐induced actin polymerization by the primaquine (n = 5). *P < 0.05, **P < 0.005, ***P < 0.001, unpaired, two‐tailed Student's t test

Then, we asked whether endosomes are necessary for the regulation of phosphorylation of FA proteins observed here. Thus, we examined the phosphorylation of FAK and paxillin in the presence or absence of primaquine and found that PE increases the phosphorylation of FAK and paxillin at Y925 and Y118 sites, respectively; however, no significant changes were detectable in the phosphorylation of FAK and paxillin in the presence of primaquine (Figure 6D‐E). These data indicate that the endosomes are not necessary for the role of NMII in regulating FA phosphorylation and that the phosphorylation of FA proteins, which is regulated by NMII, must occur, temporally, before entry into the endosomes.

Additionally, the question arises as to how the endosome regulates aortic stiffness in VSM. Previous studies have shown that actin polymerization increases in the presence of agonists and that it is also a key regulator of vascular contractility and stiffness. 23 , 30 Thus, we tested whether endosomes regulate aortic stiffness via regulation of actin polymerization and whether actin polymerization is sensitive to primaquine treatment. Aortic tissues were treated in the presence and absence of primaquine. As shown by filamentous/globular actin ratios in Figure 6F, the PE‐induced increase in actin polymerization was significantly decreased in primaquine‐treated tissues. Thus, these data indicate that endosomes regulate aortic stiffness in VSMCs via an effect on actin polymerization and that this mechanism does not involve an effect on NMII.

4. DISCUSSION

The present study demonstrates that NMII regulates stress and stiffness in aortic SMC. Further, we show here that NMII not only localizes to the cell cortex and the contractile filaments, but also regulates aortic stress and stiffness via effects on FA signalling and the activity of the contractile filaments. Our data support the hypothesis that in addition to the SMII, NMII regulates tonic force maintenance and contributes to smooth muscle contractility as well as aortic stiffness, which therefore may provide a novel therapeutic target for the treatment of vascular disease.

These data support earlier findings from urinary bladder, in which mice deficient in smooth muscle myosin heavy chain (SM‐MHC) but expressing non‐muscle myosin heavy chain A and B (NM‐MHC A and B) can generate force and shortening in the smooth muscle. 14 The fact that the bladder tissue of SMMHC‐deficient mice demonstrated a slowed tonic contraction and lacked an initial peak in force typical of bladder muscle also suggests that there are qualitative differences in the properties of the contractions caused by activity of NMII and SMII, respectively. 13 Furthermore, urinary bladder tissue from newborn mice, which express high amounts of NMII, demonstrates an approximately 55% inhibition of force by blebbistatin, but adult bladder tissue, which expresses high amounts of SMII, is reported to be insensitive to blebbistatin. 52 Taken together, these bladder studies and our current studies suggest a role of NMII in the regulation of smooth muscle contractility.

Of note, another group 39 has reported an apparently low level of NMII in rabbit smooth muscles, but that blebbistatin concentration (~4‐5 μmol/L) inhibited the tonic contractions of adult rabbit femoral and saphenous arteries, suggesting either a significant functional effect of the low abundance NMII in this tissue or an action of blebbistatin separate from its inhibition of NMII. Therefore, the role of NMII in smooth muscle contraction may be organ‐specific and species‐specific.

In this study, we inhibited NMII with blebbistatin to determine its contribution in vascular contractility and stiffness in mouse aorta. Blebbistatin is known to selectively inhibit NMII (IC50 ~0.5‐5 μmol/L) and has a low affinity towards smooth muscle myosin II (IC50 ~80 μmol/L) as well as myosin classes I, V and X. 31 , 32 , 33 However, one group has suggested that blebbistatin can also inhibit some smooth muscle myosin IIs (IC50 ~ 3‐6.5μmol/L). 39 , 53 The reasons for the discrepancy in IC50 values for SMII are not clear but may be because of the different preparations of smooth muscle myosin, 54 species/tissue‐specific differences or protocol differences. In the present study, we show that blebbistatin significantly inhibits both PE‐induced stress and stiffness at 5 and 10 μmol/L (Figure 1A‐C) in mouse aorta. Our results are consistent with those of Rhee et al 55 in which they showed that 15 and 25 μmol/L of active blebbistatin inhibits tonic force maintenance in both bladder and aorta tissue. Importantly, our results are first to show that blebbistatin inhibits agonist‐induced aortic stiffness which is a recognized risk factor associated with ageing‐induced vascular dementia, as well as kidney and heart disease.

Although NMII isoforms share considerable similarity in their amino acid sequence and molecular structure, they exhibit differential expression, function and subcellular localization in different tissues. 7 , 37 , 41 , 42 The NMIIA isoform is predominantly expressed in adult bladder tissue, whereas the NMIIB isoform is highly expressed in the aorta tissue. 13 , 55 Our results in freshly isolated dVSMCs from mouse aorta demonstrate that NMIIA isoforms colocalize with α‐SMA‐containing contractile filaments as well as with γ‐CYA at the cell cortex (Figure 3B). Moreover, we show that NMIIB colocalizes with α‐SMA contractile filaments. However, we did not observe colocalization of NMIIB with γ‐CYA a marker of cortical actin (Figure 3C).

NMMII isoforms have been implicated in actin and focal adhesion remodelling in many different cell types. 56 , 57 , 58 A major finding of this study is that both blebbistatin and siRNA knockdown of NM myosin II isoforms suppress the agonist‐induced increase in tyrosine phosphorylation of FAK Y925 and paxillin Y118 (Figures 4 and 5). Previous studies have shown that multiple pathways coexist in SMC to regulate smooth muscle contraction (Figure 7). The alpha agonist phenylephrine has specifically been shown to activate multiple signalling pathways in VSM including (a) activation of calcium‐mediated signalling events which lead to activation of myosin light chain phosphorylation and actomyosin cross‐bridge cycling and contraction and (b) PKC activation leading to the activation of Raf, MEK and ERK. ERK, in turn, phosphorylates and dis‐inhibits Caldesmon (CaD) to remove an inhibitory action on the contractile filament leading to an activation of SMC and increased stiffness. 27 , 59 Our present results show that NMII increases phosphorylation of FA proteins that cause FA growth and generate cortical tension to increase cellular stiffness. 27 Additionally, the cortical activation of ERK leads to targeting of activated ERK to the contractile filaments and disinhibition of CaD, which further increases aortic contractility and stiffness (Figure 7). Thus, the inhibition of NMII by blebbistatin results in less cytoskeletal tension, which prevents phosphorylation of FAK and paxillin and ultimately leads to decreased stiffness and stress (Figure 7). Taken together, it appears that NMII regulates aortic stiffness by inhibiting cross‐bridge cycling and also by decreasing tension in the non‐muscle actin cytoskeleton through prevention of phosphorylation of FA proteins.

Figure 7.

Figure 7

NM myosin II isoform function in the regulation of aortic stress and stiffness

CONFLICT OF INTEREST

The authors confirm that there are no conflicts of interest.

AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS

Kuldeep Singh: Conceptualization (equal); Data curation (lead); Formal analysis (lead); Investigation (lead); Methodology (lead); Supervision (supporting); Validation (equal); Visualization (lead); Writing‐original draft (lead); Writing‐review & editing (equal). Anne B Kim: Data curation (supporting); Formal analysis (supporting); Investigation (supporting); Methodology (supporting). Kathleen G. Morgan: Conceptualization (equal); Funding acquisition (lead); Investigation (supporting); Methodology (supporting); Project administration (lead); Validation (equal); Visualization (supporting); Writing‐original draft (supporting); Writing‐review & editing (equal).

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

This research was supported by NIH NIA AG053274.

Singh K, Kim AB, Morgan KG. Non‐muscle myosin II regulates aortic stiffness through effects on specific focal adhesion proteins and the non‐muscle cortical cytoskeleton. J Cell Mol Med. 2021;25:2471–2483. 10.1111/jcmm.16170

DATA AVAILABILITY STATEMENT

The data that support the finding of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

REFERENCES

  • 1. Shewan AM, Maddugoda M, Kraemer A, et al. Myosin 2 is a key Rho kinase target necessary for the local concentration of E‐cadherin at cell‐cell contacts. Mol Biol Cell. 2005;16(10):4531‐4542. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Conti MA, Even‐Ram S, Liu C, Yamada KM, Adelstein RS. Defects in cell adhesion and the visceral endoderm following ablation of nonmuscle myosin heavy chain II‐A in mice. J Biol Chem. 2004;279(40):41263‐41266. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Betapudi V, Licate LS, Egelhoff TT. Distinct roles of nonmuscle myosin II isoforms in the regulation of MDA‐MB‐231 breast cancer cell spreading and migration. Cancer Res. 2006;66(9):4725‐4733. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Ma X, Kovacs M, Conti MA, et al. Nonmuscle myosin II exerts tension but does not translocate actin in vertebrate cytokinesis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2012;109(12):4509‐4514. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Winkelmann DA, Almeda S, Vibert P, Cohen C. A new myosin fragment: visualization of the regulatory domain. Nature. 1984;307(5953):758‐760. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Zhang W, Gunst SJ. Non‐muscle (NM) myosin heavy chain phosphorylation regulates the formation of NM myosin filaments, adhesome assembly and smooth muscle contraction. J Physiol. 2017;595(13):4279‐4300. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Golomb E, Ma X, Jana SS, et al. Identification and characterization of nonmuscle myosin II‐C, a new member of the myosin II family. J Biol Chem. 2004;279(4):2800‐2808. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Simons M, Wang M, McBride OW, et al. Human nonmuscle myosin heavy chains are encoded by two genes located on different chromosomes. Circ Res. 1991;69(2):530‐539. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Heissler SM, Manstein DJ. Nonmuscle myosin‐2: mix and match. Cell Mol Life Sci. 2013;70(1):1‐21. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Takeda K, Kishi H, Ma X, Yu ZX, Adelstein RS. Ablation and mutation of nonmuscle myosin heavy chain II‐B results in a defect in cardiac myocyte cytokinesis. Circ Res. 2003;93(4):330‐337. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Wang A, Ma X, Conti MA, Liu C, Kawamoto S, Adelstein RS. Nonmuscle myosin II isoform and domain specificity during early mouse development. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2010;107(33):14645‐14650. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Ma X, Jana SS, Conti MA, Kawamoto S, Claycomb WC, Adelstein RS. Ablation of nonmuscle myosin II‐B and II‐C reveals a role for nonmuscle myosin II in cardiac myocyte karyokinesis. Mol Biol Cell. 2010;21(22):3952‐3962. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Lofgren M, Ekblad E, Morano I, Arner A. Nonmuscle Myosin motor of smooth muscle. J Gen Physiol. 2003;121(4):301‐310. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Morano I, Chai GX, Baltas LG, et al. Smooth‐muscle contraction without smooth‐muscle myosin. Nat Cell Biol. 2000;2(6):371‐375. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15. Yuen SL, Ogut O, Brozovich FV. Nonmuscle myosin is regulated during smooth muscle contraction. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2009;297(1):H191‐H199. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16. Mitchell GF, Hwang SJ, Vasan RS, et al. Arterial stiffness and cardiovascular events: the Framingham Heart Study. Circulation. 2010;121(4):505‐511. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17. Blacher J, Guerin AP, Pannier B, Marchais SJ, Safar ME, London GM. Impact of aortic stiffness on survival in end‐stage renal disease. Circulation. 1999;99(18):2434‐2439. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18. Mitchell GF. Aortic stiffness, pressure and flow pulsatility, and target organ damage. J Appl Physiol. 2018;125(6):1871‐1880. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19. Rabkin SW. Arterial stiffness: detection and consequences in cognitive impairment and dementia of the elderly. J Alzheimers Dis. 2012;32(3):541‐549. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20. Gao YZ, Saphirstein RJ, Yamin R, Suki B, Morgan KG. Aging impairs smooth muscle‐mediated regulation of aortic stiffness: a defect in shock absorption function? Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2014;307(8):H1252‐H1261. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21. Hill MA, Meininger GA. Small artery mechanobiology: roles of cellular and non‐cellular elements. Microcirculation. 2016;23(8):611‐613. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22. Kim HR, Gallant C, Leavis PC, Gunst SJ, Morgan KG. Cytoskeletal remodeling in differentiated vascular smooth muscle is actin isoform dependent and stimulus dependent. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol. 2008;295(3):C768‐C778. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23. Kim HR, Graceffa P, Ferron F, et al. Actin polymerization in differentiated vascular smooth muscle cells requires vasodilator‐stimulated phosphoprotein. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol. 2010;298(3):C559‐C571. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24. Poythress RH, Gallant C, Vetterkind S, Morgan KG. Vasoconstrictor‐induced endocytic recycling regulates focal adhesion protein localization and function in vascular smooth muscle. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol. 2013;305(2):C215‐C227. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25. Hindman B, Goeckeler Z, Sierros K, Wysolmerski R. Non‐muscle myosin II isoforms have different functions in matrix rearrangement by MDA‐MB‐231 cells. PLoS One. 2015;10(7):e0131920. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26. Brozovich FV, Morgan KG. Stimulus‐specific changes in mechanical properties of vascular smooth muscle. Am J Physiol. 1989;257(5 Pt 2):H1573‐H1580. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27. Saphirstein RJ, Gao YZ, Jensen MH, et al. The focal adhesion: a regulated component of aortic stiffness. PLoS One. 2013;8(4):e62461. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28. Dunn KW, Kamocka MM, McDonald JH. A practical guide to evaluating colocalization in biological microscopy. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol. 2011;300(4):C723‐C742. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29. Nicholson CJ, Seta F, Lee S, Morgan KG. MicroRNA‐203 mimics age‐related aortic smooth muscle dysfunction of cytoskeletal pathways. J Cell Mol Med. 2017;21(1):81‐95. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30. Nicholson CJ, Singh K, Saphirstein RJ, et al. Reversal of aging‐induced increases in aortic stiffness by targeting cytoskeletal protein‐protein interfaces. J Am Heart Assoc. 2018;7(15): 1‐17. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31. Kovacs M, Toth J, Hetenyi C, Malnasi‐Csizmadia A, Sellers JR. Mechanism of blebbistatin inhibition of myosin II. J Biol Chem. 2004;279(34):35557‐35563. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32. Limouze J, Straight AF, Mitchison T, Sellers JR. Specificity of blebbistatin, an inhibitor of myosin II. J Muscle Res Cell Motil. 2004;25(4–5):337‐341. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33. Straight AF, Cheung A, Limouze J, et al. Dissecting temporal and spatial control of cytokinesis with a myosin II Inhibitor. Science. 2003;299(5613):1743‐1747. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34. Shu S, Liu X, Korn ED. Blebbistatin and blebbistatin‐inactivated myosin II inhibit myosin II‐independent processes in Dictyostelium. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2005;102(5):1472‐1477. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35. Wang HH, Tanaka H, Qin X, et al. Blebbistatin inhibits the chemotaxis of vascular smooth muscle cells by disrupting the myosin II‐actin interaction. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2008;294(5):H2060‐H2068. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36. Kim JH, Wang A, Conti MA, Adelstein RS. Nonmuscle myosin II is required for internalization of the epidermal growth factor receptor and modulation of downstream signaling. J Biol Chem. 2012;287(33):27345‐27358. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37. Even‐Ram S, Doyle AD, Conti MA, Matsumoto K, Adelstein RS, Yamada KM. Myosin IIA regulates cell motility and actomyosin‐microtubule crosstalk. Nat Cell Biol. 2007;9(3):299‐309. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38. Wang K, Wloka C, Bi E. Non‐muscle myosin‐II is required for the generation of a constriction site for subsequent abscission. iScience. 2019;13:69‐81. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39. Eddinger TJ, Meer DP, Miner AS, Meehl J, Rovner AS, Ratz PH. Potent inhibition of arterial smooth muscle tonic contractions by the selective myosin II inhibitor, blebbistatin. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 2007;320(2):865‐870. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40. Brozovich FV, Nicholson CJ, Degen CV, Gao YZ, Aggarwal M, Morgan KG. Mechanisms of vascular smooth muscle contraction and the basis for pharmacologic treatment of smooth muscle disorders. Pharmacol Rev. 2016;68(2):476‐532. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41. Kelley CA, Sellers JR, Gard DL, Bui D, Adelstein RS, Baines IC. Xenopus nonmuscle myosin heavy chain isoforms have different subcellular localizations and enzymatic activities. J Cell Biol. 1996;134(3):675‐687. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42. Maupin P, Phillips CL, Adelstein RS, Pollard TD. Differential localization of myosin‐II isozymes in human cultured cells and blood cells. J Cell Sci. 1994;107(Pt 11):3077‐3090. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43. Gallant C, Appel S, Graceffa P, et al. Tropomyosin variants describe distinct functional subcellular domains in differentiated vascular smooth muscle cells. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol. 2011;300(6):C1356‐C1365. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44. Dugina V, Zwaenepoel I, Gabbiani G, Clement S, Chaponnier C. Beta and gamma‐cytoplasmic actins display distinct distribution and functional diversity. J Cell Sci. 2009;122(Pt 16):2980‐2988. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45. Burridge K, Fath K, Kelly T, Nuckolls G, Turner C. Focal adhesions: transmembrane junctions between the extracellular matrix and the cytoskeleton. Annu Rev Cell Biol. 1988;4:487‐525. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46. Katz BZ, Romer L, Miyamoto S, et al. Targeting membrane‐localized focal adhesion kinase to focal adhesions: roles of tyrosine phosphorylation and SRC family kinases. J Biol Chem. 2003;278(31):29115‐29120. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47. Mitra SK, Hanson DA, Schlaepfer DD. Focal adhesion kinase: in command and control of cell motility. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2005;6(1):56‐68. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48. Webb DJ, Donais K, Whitmore LA, et al. FAK‐Src signalling through paxillin, ERK and MLCK regulates adhesion disassembly. Nat Cell Biol. 2004;6(2):154‐161. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49. Vetterkind S, Saphirstein RJ, Morgan KG. Stimulus‐specific activation and actin dependency of distinct, spatially separated ERK1/2 fractions in A7r5 smooth muscle cells. PLoS One. 2012;7(2):e30409. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50. Opazo Saez A, Zhang W, Wu Y, Turner CE, Tang DD, Gunst SJ. Tension development during contractile stimulation of smooth muscle requires recruitment of paxillin and vinculin to the membrane. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol. 2004;286(2):C433‐C447. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51. Tang DD. The dynamic actin cytoskeleton in smooth muscle. Adv Pharmacol. 2018;81:1‐38. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52. Ekman M, Fagher K, Wede M, Stakeberg K, Arner A. Decreased phosphatase activity, increased Ca2+ sensitivity, and myosin light chain phosphorylation in urinary bladder smooth muscle of newborn mice. J Gen Physiol. 2005;125(2):187‐196. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53. Zhang X, Kuppam DS, Melman A, DiSanto ME. In vitro and in vivo relaxation of urinary bladder smooth muscle by the selective myosin II inhibitor, blebbistatin. BJU Int. 2011;107(2):310‐317. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54. Zhang HM, Ji HH, Ni T, Ma RN, Wang A, Li XD. Characterization of blebbistatin inhibition of smooth muscle myosin and nonmuscle myosin‐2. Biochemistry. 2017;56(32):4235‐4243. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55. Rhee AY, Ogut O, Brozovich FV. Nonmuscle myosin, force maintenance, and the tonic contractile phenotype in smooth muscle. Pflugers Arch. 2006;452(6):766‐774. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56. Arous C, Rondas D, Halban PA. Non‐muscle myosin IIA is involved in focal adhesion and actin remodelling controlling glucose‐stimulated insulin secretion. Diabetologia. 2013;56(4):792‐802. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57. Pasapera AM, Schneider IC, Rericha E, Schlaepfer DD, Waterman CM. Myosin II activity regulates vinculin recruitment to focal adhesions through FAK‐mediated paxillin phosphorylation. J Cell Biol. 2010;188(6):877‐890. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58. Vicente‐Manzanares M, Zareno J, Whitmore L, Choi CK, Horwitz AF. Regulation of protrusion, adhesion dynamics, and polarity by myosins IIA and IIB in migrating cells. J Cell Biol. 2007;176(5):573‐580. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59. Tang DD, Turner CE, Gunst SJ. Expression of non‐phosphorylatable paxillin mutants in canine tracheal smooth muscle inhibits tension development. J Physiol. 2003;553(Pt 1):21‐35. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

The data that support the finding of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.


Articles from Journal of Cellular and Molecular Medicine are provided here courtesy of Blackwell Publishing

RESOURCES