Skip to main content
Age and Ageing logoLink to Age and Ageing
letter
. 2020 Dec 5;50(2):597–598. doi: 10.1093/ageing/afaa257

Adaptation of the comprehensive geriatric assessment to a virtual delivery format

Julia Loewenthal 1,, Clark DuMontier 2,3, Lisa Cooper 4, Laura Frain 5, Louis S Waldman 6, Shoshana Streiter 7, Kristin Cardin 8, Samir Tulebaev 9, Houman Javedan 10, Ariela R Orkaby 11,12, Tammy Hshieh 13,14
PMCID: PMC7936026  PMID: 33284967

Sir,

The COVID-19 pandemic necessitated rapid implementation of telehealth to facilitate care delivery. Telehealth is important for providing safe care to older adults at increased vulnerability to COVID-19 with needs for ongoing management of other acute and chronic conditions. The U.S. Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services reported approximately 13,000 beneficiaries per week received a telemedicine visit prior to the pandemic, with expansion to over 1.7 million per week by the end of April 2020 [1], a 130-fold increase in visits.

Our division, part of a tertiary medical center, cares for older adults through co-management models embedded into orthopedic, trauma, and thoracic surgery, oncology, hospital medicine, and primary care. The core tool for evaluation and management of older adults is the comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA). Videoconference encounters are comparable to face-to-face encounters for cost, patient acceptance, and diagnostic accuracy [2]. Based on limited data, many older patients are interested in and satisfied with telehealth visits. Reported barriers include low confidence in ability to use technology and hearing impairment [3,4]. The feasibility and effectiveness of the virtual CGA for care remains unknown. Two geriatric oncology groups reported their experience in adapting the CGA for telehealth [5,6]. Here, we describe how we adapted the CGA for virtual delivery and compare this to in-person delivery (Table 1).

Table 1.

Domains of the comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA) as delivered during in-person vs. telehealth clinical encounters.

Domain In-person CGA Telehealth CGA
Comorbidities Chart review Clinical interview Same, but improved interview with involvement of caregiver
Geriatric Medication Review Semi-structured interview using chart list and patient input Semi-structured interview and medication reconciliation in the home
Function ADLs and IADLs Same
Mobility Falls screen Falls screen
Chair stands With video: Chair stands, observation of gait and movement in living space
Timed up and go (TUG) Gait speed
Sensory Finger rub/whisper test for hearing For patients who are hard of hearing: ensure access to hearing aids, use amplification device, use closed captioning.
Visual screening
For patients with visual impairment: ensure access to glasses, involve caregiver with video technology.
Cognition Clinical interview Cognitive screening tests* Telephone-only: clinical interview, telephone-MoCA, CAM
With video: Mini-Cog or MoCA
Mood Mood screening questionnaire# Same
Nutrition Food quality and access Food quality and access
Mini Nutritional Assessment (MNA) MNA
Clinic weight Ask for weight on home scale
Physical exam With video: Physical exam
Social Domains Clinical interview regarding social domains (e.g. home services, caregiver stress/support, social network, etc.) Same
Advance Care Planning Serious illness conversation Serious illness conversation
Completion of HCP and/or MOLST form in person Completion of remote HCP and/or MOLST form (via two-clinician verbal authorization, electronic communication, or mail)
Frailty Frailty screen^ Same

*Confusion Assessment Method (CAM), Mini-Cog, Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA), or other indicated cognitive screening tool.

#May include Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ) -2 or − 9, Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS), Generalized Anxiety Disorder (GAD) -2 or − 7, and/or other indicated tools.

^FRAIL scale (fatigue, resistance, ambulation, illnesses, and loss of weight), Clinical Frailty Scale (CFS), and/or frailty index (FI).

Both inpatient and outpatient services moved to virtual delivery at the height of the pandemic in our area (Appendix). After 4 weeks, inpatient services transitioned to a hybrid model while outpatient remained mostly virtual. In a qualitative survey of the clinicians in our division, all reported using telehealth and found it highly feasible with plans to continue use in the future. Seventy-one percent of clinicians reported that patients found telehealth acceptable all of the time, with 29% most of the time.

Access is crucial for the success of telehealth. In March 2020 the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services modified the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act, allowing clinicians to use any remote communication technology for communication with patients. Our hospital used videoconferencing technology integrated into the electronic health record, requiring patients to have access to a smartphone, tablet, or computer in addition to internet or cellular data. Recent reports suggest many older adults lack digital access to facilitate telehealth, and a proportion with access struggled to use technology for video or even telephone-only visits [7,8]. Our services used approximately 76% telephone-only and 26% video visits. We found that patients with Medicare used video visits more often than patients with private insurers (Appendix). As the model for CGA delivery continues to evolve, it will be important to both prioritize access and identify CGA domains that can be adequately assessed by each visit modality.

Declaration of Sources of Funding

C DuMontier is supported by the Harvard Translational Research in Aging Training Program (National Institute on Aging of the National Institutes of Health: T32AG023480). A Orkaby is funded by Veterans Administration Clinical Science Research and Development Career Development Award (CDA-2) IK2-CX001800.

Supplementary Material

aa-20-1359-File002_afaa257

Contributor Information

Julia Loewenthal, Division of Aging, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA.

Clark DuMontier, Division of Aging, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA.

Lisa Cooper, Division of Aging, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA.

Laura Frain, Division of Aging, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA.

Louis S Waldman, Division of Aging, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA.

Shoshana Streiter, Division of Aging, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA.

Kristin Cardin, Division of Aging, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA.

Samir Tulebaev, Division of Aging, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA.

Houman Javedan, Division of Aging, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA.

Ariela R Orkaby, Division of Aging, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; New England Geriatric Research, Education, and Clinical Center (GRECC), VA Boston Healthcare System, Boston, MA.

Tammy Hshieh, Division of Aging, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA.

Declaration of Conflicts of Interest

None.

References

  • 1. Verma  S.  Early Impact of CMS Expansion of Medicare Telehealth During COVID-19. Health Affairs Blog, July 15, 2020. DOI: 10.1377/hblog20200715.454789. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Bashshur  RLS, Gary  W. History of telemedicine: evolution, context, and transformation. vol. 2009. New Rochelle (NY): Mary Ann Liebert, 2009. [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Hawley  CE, Genovese  N, Owsiany  MT  et al.  Rapid integration of home telehealth visits amidst COVID-19: what do older adults need to succeed?  J Am Geriatr Soc  15 Sep, 2020. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Murphy  RP, Dennehy  KA, Costello  MM  et al.  Virtual geriatric clinics and the COVID-19 catalyst: a rapid review. Age Ageing  20 Aug, 2020. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. DiGiovanni  G, Mousaw  K, Lloyd  T  et al.  Development of a telehealth geriatric assessment model in response to the COVID-19 pandemic. J Geriatr Oncol  2020 Jun; 11: 761–3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Wall  SA, Knauss  B, Compston  A  et al.  Multidisciplinary telemedicine and the importance of being seen. J Geriatr Oncol  29 May, 2020. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Roberts  ET, Mehrotra  A. Assessment of disparities in digital access among Medicare beneficiaries and implications for telemedicine. JAMA Intern Med  3 Aug, 2020. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Lam  K, Lu  AD, Shi  Y, Covinsky  KE. Assessing telemedicine Unreadiness among older adults in the United States during the COVID-19 pandemic. JAMA Intern Med  3 Aug, 2020. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

aa-20-1359-File002_afaa257

Articles from Age and Ageing are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES