Skip to main content
Poultry Science logoLink to Poultry Science
. 2021 Jan 5;100(3):100942. doi: 10.1016/j.psj.2020.12.039

Effects of a dietary direct-fed microbial and Ferulago angulata extract on growth performance, intestinal microflora, and immune function of broiler chickens infected with Campylobacter jejuni

Zahra Nooreh ∗, Kamran Taherpour ∗,1, Mohammad Akbari Gharaei ∗, Hassan Shirzadi ∗, Hossein Ali Ghasemi †
PMCID: PMC7936196  PMID: 33518316

Abstract

Colonization of the gastrointestinal tract by potentially pathogenic bacteria and their shedding in animal feces is a fundamental factor for both animal health and human food safety. This study was conducted to evaluate the efficacy of salinomycin (Sal), direct-fed microbial (DFM), and Ferulago angulata hydroalcoholic extract (FAE) against Campylobacter jejuni in broiler chickens in a 6-week pilot-scale study. A total of six hundred and seventy two 1-day-old broiler chickens were equally divided into 6 groups (each consisting of 8 replicates of 14 birds): negative control (NC; untreated and uninfected); positive control (PC; untreated, infected with C. jejuni); PC + Sal; PC + DFM; PC + 200 mg/kg of FAE (FAE200); or PC + 400 mg/kg of FAE (FAE400). All these groups (except NC) were challenged with C. jejuni on day 15. The results showed that all experimental treatments improved (P < 0.05) average daily gain compared with the PC group, and the best value was observed in the NC and FAE400 groups throughout the entire experimental period (day 1–42). The overall feed conversion ratio and mortality rate, as well as the population of C. jejuni (day 24 and 42) and Coliforms (day 42) in the ileum and cecum, were higher (P < 0.05) in broiler chickens fed with the PC diet than for chickens in the other groups, except those in the FAE200 group. Immune responses revealed that among challenged birds, those that were fed diets DFM and FAE400 had significantly higher IgG (day 24 and 42), IgA (day 24), IL-6 (day 24), and gamma interferon (day 24 and 42) concentrations than the PC group. In conclusion, dietary FAE, especially at a high level of inclusion in broiler diet (400 mg/kg), could beneficially influence the immune status, as well as improve growth performance and intestinal microflora under Campylobacter challenge, which was comparable to those of Sal and DFM supplements.

Key words: broiler performance, Campylobacter challenge, herbal extract, intestinal microflora, immune response

Introduction

Over the last decade, the genus Campylobacter has become the most identified foodborne pathogen in human gastrointestinal infections. Among the species of Campylobacter capable of causing serious diseases in humans, Campylobacter jejuni is the most common cause of foodborne diseases associated with farm animals, especially chickens (Saint-Cyr et al., 2017; Šikić Pogačar et al., 2020). C. jejuni colonizes the chicken ceca at high levels following infection, resulting in fecal shedding of the bacterium. This high fecal contamination level, combined with the coprophagic behavior of chickens, leads to the rapid spread of the infection (Ocejo et al., 2017; Smialek et al., 2018). Since the intestinal tract is the primary source of carcass contamination with Campylobacter, decreasing its load could minimize the bacterial contamination of poultry products during the slaughter and evisceration processes (Guyard-Nicodème et al., 2016). Although commercial broiler chickens are not currently being vaccinated against campylobacteriosis, new treatments urgently need to be developed that will provide adequate protection against Campylobacter colonization while also preventing adverse performance effects. In conventional management, campylobacteriosis is prevented and regulated by in-feed (or water) administration of antibiotic supplements, such as salinomycin (Sal) and flavophospholipol (Bolder et al., 1999). However, with increasing pressure to reduce (eliminate) the use of antibiotics and ionophore in poultry production, alternative strategies are required.

Recent evidence revealed that various dietary direct-fed microbial (DFM) supplements can influence host gut health and immunity against campylobacteriosis disease (Smialek et al., 2018; Rahimi et al., 2019, 2020; Mortada et al., 2020). Some commercial DFM have been also reported to enhance the development of both the intestinal lymphatic system and gastrointestinal epithelium (Murugesan et al., 2014; Gadde et al., 2017; Chen et al., 2020). Therefore, it is hypostasized that a healthy population of gut microbes by DFM supplementation may result in better control of invading pathogens within the intestine, which in turn may improve gut health and overall performance in broiler chickens especially under challenging related conditions.

Ferulago angulata, known as Chavir in Iran, is a plant of the Apiaceae family and is a native species of the western mountainous regions of Iran. This plant contains flavonoid and phenolic compounds that have a wide range of pharmacological effects, including antioxidant, anti-microbial, anti-inflammatory, and hemostatic activities (Kiziltas et al., 2017; Lorigooini et al., 2019). According to previous research, dietary F. angulata could enhance growth performance and beneficially affect the intestinal microbial composition and antibody response of broiler chickens (Rostami et al., 2015). In this connection, Bohlouli and Sadeghi (2016) also reported that the addition of F. angulata extract to the diet could effectively improve immunological indices in rainbow trout fingerling. Although the antimicrobial activity of the aerial parts of F. angulata against Salmonella typhi, Staphylococcus aureus, and Listeria monocytogenes has been confirmed (Ghasemi Pirbalouti et al., 2016), there is still a lack of literature on their use in the control of bacterial diseases such as campylobacteriosis.

Given all the above-mentioned aspects, the objective of this study was to assess and compare the potential effects of Sal, DFM, and F. angulata hydroalcoholic extract (FAE) on growth performance, intestinal microbiota, and immune response in commercial broiler chickens infected experimentally with C. jejuni.

Materials and methods

All procedures involving bird care and management were performed in accordance with and approved by the Animal Ethics Committee of Ilam University.

Anticoccidial, DFM, and F. angulata Extract

Salinomycin (Sacox 60, Intervet/Merck, Millsboro, DE), as an ionophore anticoccidial agent, was included at a rate of 60 mg/kg in all dietary phases for appropriate treatments. Multi-strain DFM (PrimaLac, Star Labs Inc., Clarksdale, MO) containing Lactobacillus casei, Lactobacillus acidophilus, Bifidobacterium bifidum, Streptococcus faecium, and Aspergillus oryzae was added at a dietary level of 1 g/kg. This level of DFM supplementation was selected to warrant survival and establishment in the intestines of treated broilers.

F. angulata plants were collected from Sirvan Mountains (Ilam Province, Iran). After botanical authentication, a voucher specimen was deposited at the Herbarium of Ilam University's Medicinal and Aromatic Plants Research Institute (Herbarium number IURS-1106). We received prior permission from the Forests Range and Watershed Management Organization of Ilam Province, and no endangered or protected species were sampled. The aerial parts of the plant (flower and leaf) were washed with clean water, air-dried, and then ground into a fine powder. Next, the dry powder was macerated at room temperature in ethanol (70:30 ethanol:water, v/v) for 72 h. The ethanol extract of F. angulata was evaporated under reduced pressure to remove ethanol and the final product was obtained in a powdered state (32% yield) after lyophilization. Gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC 7890, Agilent Tech. Inc., Santa Clara, CA, equipped with a MS 5975C detector and HP-5 ms capillary column) analyses were carried out to detect the components of FAE. The initial column temperature was set at 40°C lasting 3 min, and then programmed at 295°C for 10 min, with a heating rate of 10°C/min. The total analysis time was about 38 min. The main active components of FAE are shown in Table 1.

Table 1.

Major phytocomponents identified by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry in the hydroalcoholic extract of Ferulago angulata.

Peak no. Compounds RT Yield (g/kg)
1 Phenol 14.91 9.7
2 Pyrone 17.26 7.2
3 Malic acid 17.83 29.7
4 5-Hydroxymethylfurfural 18.59 46.2
5 Thymol 19.28 24.2
6 Carvacrol 19.65 53.2
7 Benzene, [2-nitro-1-(4-pentenylthio) ethyl]- 20.08 18.3
8 Dodecanoic acid, methyl ester 21.42 11.9
9 Benzocyclooctene, 7,8-dimethyl- 22.16 12.8
10 1,2,3-Benzenetriol (phenol) 22.40 58.4
11 β-D-Glucopyranose, 1,6-anhydro- 23.34 20.8
12 Myristic acid, methyl ester 23.75 17.4
13 Butyraldehyde, semicarbazone 25.07 57.9
14 9-Hexadecenoic acid, methyl ester 25.80 11.6
15 Pentadecanoic acid, 14-methyl-, methyl ester 25.98 55.6
16 Hexadecanoic acid, ethyl ester 26.49 44.2
17 9-Octadecenoic acid, methyl ester 27.86 207.5
18 Methyl stearate 28.02 29.1
19 2H-Pyrane-5-carboxamide (heterocyclic compound) 28.34 67.4
20 9,12,15-Octadecatrienoic acid, ethyl ester 28.57 37.2
21 Benzenesulfonothioic acid (thiosulfonic acid) 28.69 66.1
22 1H-1,3-Benzimidazole (heterocyclic compound) 29.20 30.2
23 2-(2-Nitrovinyl)furan 30.38 17.5

Abbreviation: RT, retention time.

Experimental Design

A total of 672 male Ross 308 broiler chickens were obtained from a local commercial hatchery. Broiler chickens were fed a starter diet from day 1 to 10, a grower diet from day 11 to 24, and a finisher diet from day 25 to 42 (Table 2). The non-medicated diets were formulated according to the nutritional recommendation by Ross 308 (2014) and fed in mashed form. The experimental groups were: 1) negative control (NC; untreated and uninfected); 2) positive control (PC; untreated, infected with C. jejuni); 3) PC + 60 mg/kg Sal; 4) PC + 1 g/kg DFM PrimaLac; 5) PC + 200 mg/kg FAE (FAE200), and 6) PC + 400 mg/kg FAE (FAE400). Each treatment had 8 replicate pens and 14 birds per replicate. On day 1, to avoid contagious bacterial infections, control and challenged birds were housed separately, in identical floor pens (1.4 m × 1.3 m) in the same building, with a solid wall partition isolating them. All tasks were performed with the control chickens first and then with bacteria-challenged chickens.

Table 2.

Composition of the basal starter, grower, and finisher diets and their nutrient profile.

Item Starter (1–10 d) Grower (11–24 d) Finisher (25–42 d)
Ingredient, g/kg
 Corn 470.3 596.0 659.9
 Wheat 55.8 50.0 50.0
 Soybean meal (44% crude protein) 290.2 161.5 102.8
 Corn gluten meal (60% crude protein) 100.0 114.8 115.0
 Soybean oil 35.0 34.0 30.9
 Limestone 14.5 12.3 10.0
 Dicalcium phosphate 19.5 18.0 18.3
 Sodium chloride 2.0 2.0 2.0
 Vitamin premix1 2.5 2.5 2.5
 Mineral premix2 2.5 2.5 2.5
 DL-Methionine 5.2 5.8 5.7
 L-Lysine HCl 2.5 0.6 0.4
Calculated values
 Metabolizable energy (kcal/kg) 2,950 3,000 3,050
 Crude protein (g/kg) 220.0 200.0 190.0
 Lysine (g/kg) 13.0 12.0 11.0
 Methionine (g/kg) 5.6 5.4 5.2
 Methionine + cysteine (g/kg) 9.2 9.0 8.8
 Calcium (g/kg) 10.4 9.5 9.2
 Available phosphorus (g/kg) 5.2 4.4 4.2
1

Provided per kilogram of diet: trans-retinol, 9,000 IU; cholecalciferol, 2,500 IU; α-tocopherol acetate, 45 mg; vitamin K, 5 mg; vitamin B1, 2 mg; vitamin B2, 6 mg; vitamin B6, 5 mg; vitamin B12, 0.03 mg; nicotineamide, 30 mg; pantothenic acid, 15 mg; folic acid, 1.1 mg; biotin, 0.13 mg; and choline, 450 mg.

2

Provided per kilogram of diet: Mn, 100 mg; Fe, 80 mg; Zn, 100 mg; Cu, 10 mg; I, 0.5 mg; Co, 0.2 mg; Se, 0.15 mg.

The room temperature was set at 34°C on the day of arrival, and then reduced by 0.40°C per day until 24°C, where it remained for the rest of the trial. Environmental relative humidity was maintained at 50 to 65% by periodically spraying the walkways with water and adjusting the humidifiers. The lighting program used was 24L∶0D from day 0 to 3 and 23L∶1D for the remainder of the experiment.

C. jejuni Challenge

Birds in the current study were challenged at day 15 because Campylobacter spp. is rarely detected in commercial broiler flocks in the first 2 wk and there is a lag phase before infection can be detected. The reasons for this lag period are not clear, but have been attributed to the protection provided by maternally produced antibodies, in-feed antibiotics, and the development of the intestine as well its microbial community (Cawthraw and Newell, 2010; Skoufos et al., 2019). An infectious and genetically stable strain of C. jejuni (ATCC 33291), which was isolated from infected commercial broilers, was used for the inoculation of birds. This strain was stored at −80°C in peptone broth containing 20% (v/v) glycerol until use. For the challenge experiment, the culture was prepared by the short-term subculture on blood agar and incubation of the plates at 42°C for 48 h and microaerobic (85% N2, 10% CO2, and 5% O2) conditions. After incubation, the bacteria were harvested and diluted in PBS, according to a method of Lamb-Rosteski et al. (2008). At 15 d of age, all birds except NC were challenged with 1 mL of inoculum in crop using a 1-mL syringe connected to a stainless steel and sterilized cannula. The inoculum concentration was estimated using an optical density reading at 600 nm. The inoculum was kept on ice until inoculation (maximum 2 h). The bacterial population in the inoculum used to challenge the birds was approximately 105 bacteria/mL (De Castro Burbarelli et al., 2017; Ocejo et al., 2017). The challenge dose was confirmed by cfu counts of serial 10-fold dilutions on Campylobacter blood-free selective agar base. Unchallenged broiler chickens (NC group) were given 1 mL of sterile PBS, producing the same management stress. Biosafety level 2 practices were applied during the trial, and all bacterial culture and inoculum preparation work was performed in a biological safety cabinet.

Growth Performance Parameters

Pen body weight and feed intake were recorded at placement, 10, 24, and 42 d of age for calculation of ADG and ADFI per bird for each replicate pen. Incidences of mortality were recorded daily in order to determine mortality rate. With the body weight of any deceased or culled chickens included, the total ADG and total ADFI for each pen were used for calculating mortality-adjusted feed conversion ratio (FCR) during each feeding period.

Gut Microflora

Prior to inoculation (day 15), and thereafter on day 24 and 42, 1 bird in each pen (n = 8 birds from each treatment group) was sacrificed and its ileum and ceca were harvested to determine the populations of Lactobacillus spp., C. jejuni, and Coliforms in both the ileum and ceca. Subsamples of ileal and cecal digesta (1 g) were instantly collected into glass containers for bacterial enumeration. Briefly, the digesta samples were serially diluted 10-fold in PBS and Lactobacillus spp., C. jejuni, and Coliforms were enumerated, respectively, on de Man, Rogosa, and Sharpe agar (Merck, 1.05289), blood-free Campylobacter agar (CM0739, Oxoid Ltd., Basingstoke, Hampshire, UK) containing selective supplement (SR 155E, Oxoid Ltd.), and MacConkey agar (Merck, 1.05465). Each dilution was plated in duplicate onto appropriate agar plates and the average of 2 bacterial counts was used in the statistical analysis. The MacConkey agar plates were incubated aerobically at 37°C for 24 h, while the de Man, Rogosa, and Sharpe agar plates were incubated anaerobically using a gas pack system (Merck Anaerocult type A) at 37°C for 72 h. The Campylobacter blood-free agar plates were also incubated under microaerobic conditions (85% N2, 10% CO2, and 5% O2) at 41.5 ± 1°C for 48 h (Vadalasetty et al., 2018). After incubation, for each bacterial type, the plates were enumerated, and bacterial counts were finally expressed as log10 cfu per gram of ileal digesta. The detection limit was considered as 102 bacteria/g of fresh digesta.

Immunological Measurements

On day 24 and 42, 2 birds per pen were randomly selected and blood samples were collected from the wing vein. The blood samples were kept at room temperature (approximately 25°C) for 2 h and then centrifuged at 580 × g for 10 min. Serum immunoglobulin (IgA, IgG, and IgM) levels were measured on flat-bottomed 96-well plates by ELISA using chicken-specific IgA, IgG, and IgM ELISA quantitation kits (Bethyl Laboratories Inc., Montgomery, TX). The concentrations of IL-6 and gamma interferon (IFN-γ) in serum samples were also measured using the commercially available chicken cytokine ELISA kits (R&D Systems, Wiesbaden, Germany). All measurements were performed at least in triplicate and according to the manufacturer's instructions.

Statistical Analysis

All the data were statistically analyzed as a completely randomized design using GLM procedures of SAS 9.4 (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC) with a pen as an experimental unit. All data were tested for outliers and normality of the residuals by employing the UNIVARIATE procedure of SAS. Mortality was converted to the square root of n + 1 prior to analysis (Si et al., 2001). Mean separation was conducted by the Tukey's multiple comparison test with differences deemed significant at P < 0.05.

Results

Chemical Composition of FAE

The main phytocomponents present in FAE recognized by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry analysis are shown in Table 1.

Among the active compounds in FAE, 9-octadecenoic acid methyl ester (207.5 g/kg); 2H-pyran-5-carboxamide (67.4 g/kg); benzenesulfonothioic acid (66.1 g/kg); 1,2,3-benzenetriol (58.4 g/kg); butyraldehyde, semicarbazone (57.9 g/kg); pentadecanoic acid, 14-methyl-, methyl ester (55.6 g/kg); and carvacrol (53.2 g/kg) were the major components.

Growth Parameters

The effects of the experimental treatments on broiler performance during different growing periods are presented in Table 3. Dietary treatments did not significantly affect the ADG, ADFI, and FCR during day 1 to 10. From day 11 to 24, the ADG in all experimental groups, except FAE200 group, was greater (P = 0.019) than that in the PC group. During the finisher phase (day 25–42) and the entire (day 1–42) experimental period, all experimental groups showed improved ADG (P < 0.05) compared with the PC group, with the highest values recorded in the NC and FAE400 groups. The PC birds also consumed less feed (P < 0.05) compared with the NC and FAE400 groups during the grower, finisher, and overall experimental periods.

Table 3.

Growth performance observed in broiler chickens infected with Campylobacter jejuni at 15 d of age and provided with diets supplemented with Sal, DFM, and Ferulago angulata extract at levels of 200 and 400 m/kg (FAE200 and FAE400, respectively).

Item NC1 PC2 Sal DFM FAE200 FAE400 SEM P-value
ADG (g)
 Day 1–10 22.7 22.5 22.9 23.4 22.5 23.2 0.73 0.451
 Day 11–24 54.3a 46.8b 53.7a 52.4a 49.1a,b 52.2a 2.06 0.019
 Day 25–42 85.7a 74.1c 82.8a,b 84.0a,b 79.7b 85.4a 1.65 <0.001
 Day 1–42 60.2a 52.5c 58.8a,b 59.0a,b 55.9b 59.5a 1.14 0.023
ADFI (g)
 Day 1–10 26.8 26.7 26.7 27.6 26.8 27.1 0.54 0.373
 Day 11–24 80.4a 73.2b 77.4a,b 76.1a,b 74.4b 79.8a 2.28 0.014
 Day 25–42 170.0a 158.5b 168.9a 168.6a 163.8a,b 168.2a 3.36 0.008
 Day 1–42 106.0a 98.7b 104.5a,b 104.2a,b 101.4a,b 105.1a 2.49 0.037
Feed conversion ratio
 Day 1–10 1.18 1.19 1.17 1.18 1.19 1.17 0.025 0.625
 Day 11–24 1.48a,b 1.56a 1.44b 1.45b 1.52a,b 1.53a,b 0.031 0.026
 Day 25–42 1.98b 2.14a 2.04a,b 2.01a,b 2.06a,b 1.97b 0.061 0.015
 Day 1–42 1.76b 1.87a 1.78b 1.76b 1.81a,b 1.77b 0.035 0.022
Mortality (Day 1–42, %) 3.12c 13.54a 5.21b,c 8.33b 9.38a,b 5.21b,c 1.35 <0.001

a–cMeans within a row not sharing the same superscript are different at P < 0.05. Values are means of 8 replicates (pens) per treatment.

Abbreviations: DFM, direct-fed microbial; Sal, salinomycin.

1

Negative control (not treated and uninfected).

2

Positive control (not treated, but infected).

From day 11 to 24, broiler chickens in the Sal and DFM groups exhibited a lower FCR (P = 0.026) than birds in the PC group. During the finisher phase, the FCR in the NC and FAE400 was better (P = 0.015) than that in the PC group. Moreover, the overall FCR and mortality rate were greater (P < 0.05) in broiler chickens in the PC group than for chickens in the other groups, except those in the FEA200 group. By comparison, the overall mortality was also lower (P < 0.001) for birds in the NC group than the DFM and FAE200 groups.

Intestinal Microbiota

The effects of dietary treatments on the populations of Lactobacillus spp., C. jejuni, and Coliforms in the ileum and cecum on day 15 (prior to inoculation), 24, and 42 are presented in Table 4. On day 15, although there were no treatment effects (P > 0.05) on Lactobacilli counts in the ileum, the cecal Lactobacilli count was highest (P = 0.039) in broiler chickens that were fed the DFM diet and differed from all other experimental treatments, except for broiler chickens fed the FAE200 diet. On day 24 and 42, broiler chickens in the DFM group also had higher (P < 0.05) ileal and cecal Lactobacilli counts than broiler chickens in the PC diet. However, at the same ages, the cecal Lactobacilli counts in the DFM group were similar (P > 0.05) to those in the NC group.

Table 4.

Microbial profile in ileum and ceca (log cfu/g fresh digesta) on day 15, 24, and 42, observed in broiler chickens infected with Campylobacter jejuni at 15 d of age and provided with diets supplemented with Sal, DFM, and Ferulago angulata extract at levels of 200 and 400 m/kg (FAE200 and FAE400, respectively).

Item NC1 PC2 Sal DFM FAE200 FAE400 SEM P-value
Lactobacillus spp.
 Ileum
 Day 15 7.65 7.90 7.75 8.38 8.15 7.96 0.35 0.234
 Day 24 7.44a,b 6.97b 6.87b 7.88a 7.36a,b 7.26a,b 0.26 0.017
 Day 42 7.25a 6.05b 5.88b 7.18a 6.58a,b 6.63a,b 0.31 0.009
 Ceca
 Day 15 8.83b 8.85b 8.70b 9.41a 9.04a,b 8.76b 0.18 0.039
 Day 24 8.62a 7.47b 7.52b 8.90a 8.31a,b 7.96a,b 0.37 0.023
 Day 42 8.43a 7.35b,c 7.05c 8.56a 7.69b 7.71b 0.20 0.005
C. jejuni
 Ileum
 Day 15 ND3 ND ND ND ND ND - -
 Day 24 NDd 8.55a 5.93c 6.41b,c 7.26b 6.04c 0.42 <0.001
 Day 42 4.75d 8.84a 6.32c 6.85b,c 7.33b 6.22c 0.29 <0.001
 Ceca
 Day 15 ND ND ND ND ND ND - -
 Day 24 NDc 8.47a 7.15b 7.24b 7.58a,b 6.90b 0.47 <0.001
 Day 42 5.84c 9.05a 7.22b 7.53b 7.77b 7.31b 0.51 0.002
Coliforms
 Ileum
 Day 15 6.59 6.67 6.31 6.44 6.30 6.09 0.30 0.232
 Day 24 6.87 7.16 6.15 6.39 6.64 6.23 0.47 0.089
 Day 42 6.94a,b 7.12a 5.79c 6.26b,c 6.30b,c 5.98c 0.29 0.028
 Ceca
 Day 15 7.25 7.31 7.09 6.98 7.14 6.88 0.19 0.177
 Day 24 7.15b,c 8.13a 6.92c 7.26b,c 7.85a,b 6.84c 0.31 0.008
 Day 42 7.39b,c 8.35a 6.75c 7.33b,c 7.93a,b 6.83c 0.42 0.037

a–dMeans within a row not sharing the same superscript are different at P < 0.05. Values are means of 8 replicates (pens) per treatment.

Abbreviations: DFM, direct-fed microbial; Sal, salinomycin.

1

Negative control (not treated and uninfected).

2

Positive control (not treated, but infected).

3

ND = non-detectable (<102 bacteria/g). The non-detected count was considered zero for the purpose of statistical analysis.

No C. jejuni was found in the ileal and cecal samples in the NC treatment on day 15 and 24 d of age. Among the challenged groups, the C. jejuni count in the ileum was lower (P < 0.05) in all treatment groups compared with that in the PC group, and the lowest bacterial counts were observed in the Sal and FAE400 groups at 24 and 42 d of age. In the cecum, all experimental groups, except FAE 200 group, exhibited lower C. jejuni counts (P < 0.001) compared to the PC group at 24 d of age. Moreover, on day 42, cecal C. jejuni counts were significantly lower (P = 0.002) in all treatment groups than in the PC group. By comparison, birds in all challenged groups exhibited higher (P < 0.05) ileal and cecal C. jejuni counts than birds in the NC group on day 42.

Although there were no significant differences among the experimental groups in the ileal Coliform counts at 15 and 24 d of age, all supplemented groups had lower ileal Coliform counts (P = 0.028) compared to the PC group on day 42. On day 24 and 42, all experimental groups, except the FAE200 group, also exhibited lower cecal Coliform counts (P < 0.05) compared with the PC group, and the Sal and FAE400 treatments had the lowest Coliform counts.

Immune Responses

The effects of dietary treatments on serum concentrations of IgG, IgA, and IgM in broiler chickens are shown in Table 5. The birds infected with C. jejuni (PC group) had greater (P < 0.05) serum concentrations of IgA (day 24) and IgG (day 24 and 42) than the uninfected birds (NC group). Among the infected birds, the serum IgA and IgG levels in the Sal, DFM, and FAE400 groups were higher (P < 0.05) compared with the PC group on day 24. The serum IgG level in the DFM and FAE400 groups was also higher (P = 0.001) compared with the PC group on day 42, whereas the IgA and IgM levels were not different (P > 0.05).

Table 5.

Serum concentrations of IgA, IgG, and IgM on day 24 and 42, observed in broiler chickens infected with Campylobacter jejuni at 15 d of age and provided with diets supplemented with Sal, DFM, and Ferulago angulata extract at levels of 200 and 400 m/kg (FAE200 and FAE400, respectively).

Item NC1 PC2 Sal DFM FAE200 FAE400 SEM P-value
Day 24
 IgA (mg/mL) 0.46c 0.63b 0.80a 0.79a 0.72a,b 0.82a 0.06 0.012
 IgG (mg/mL) 0.92c 1.52b 2.09a 2.26a 1.83a,b 2.23a 0.19 0.008
 IgM (mg/mL) 0.36 0.45 0.56 0.59 0.48 0.61 0.13 0.178
Day 42
 IgA (mg/mL) 0.73 0.80 0.82 0.87 0.78 0.93 0.08 0.092
 IgG (mg/mL) 1.31c 2.08b 2.68a,b 3.02a 2.56a,b 2.93a 0.26 0.001
 IgM (mg/mL) 0.54 0.67 0.78 0.90 0.86 1.02 0.22 0.087

a–c Means within a row not sharing the same superscript are different at P < 0.05. Values are means of 8 replicates (pens) per treatment.

Abbreviations: DFM, direct-fed microbial; Sal, salinomycin.

1

Negative control (not treated and uninfected).

2

Positive control (not treated, but infected).

The serum concentrations of IL-6 and IFN-γ on day 24 to 42 are presented in Figure 1. The serum concentration of IL-6 between the different experimental groups was not different (P > 0.05) on day 42. In contrast, birds infected with C. jejuni (PC group) had higher (P < 0.05) serum concentrations of IL-6 (day 24) and IFN-γ (day 24 and 42) than the NC birds. Among the challenged groups, serum IL-6 and IFN-γ concentrations in broiler chickens in the DFM and FAE400 groups were higher than the corresponding values in the PC group on day 24. Birds that received any of the test additives, except 200 mg/kg of FAE, also had higher (P < 0.05) serum IFN-γ concentration compared to that in the PC group on day 42 (Figure 1B).

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Serum concentrations of (A) IL-6 and (B) IFN-γ in broiler chickens after challenge with Campylobacter jejuni at 15 d of age. Means with different letters differ significantly (P < 0.05). Means represent 8 replicates (pens) per treatment. Abbreviations: DFM, direct-fed microbial supplemented diet, infected (1 g/kg of diet); FAE200, Ferulago angulata extract supplemented feed, infected (200 mg/kg of diet); FAE400, F. angulata extract supplemented feed, infected (400 mg/kg of diet); IFN, interferon; NC, negative control (non-treated, uninfected); PC, positive control (non-treated, infected); SAL, salinomycin supplemented diet, infected (60 mg/kg of diet).

Discussion

In addition to farm biosecurity steps, the public health importance of C. jejuni infection and the emergence of multi-antibiotic-resistant species of Campylobacter require new nutritional and management strategies to minimize the carriage of C. jejuni in live birds. To our knowledge, this is the first report evaluating the protective effect of DFM and FAE as feed additives against the C. jejuni challenge compared to Sal. The most obvious symptom of C. jejuni colonization is growth retardation that is described by weight loss (Awad et al., 2014), and there is also a highly significant correlation between Campylobacter positivity and poorer FCR in broiler chickens (Sparks, 2016; Khattak et al., 2018). On the other hand, the damage to the intestinal tissue decreases nutrient absorption and thus reduces feed intake and body weight, and eventually results in poor growth performance (Sweeney et al., 2017; Skoufos et al., 2019).

Results of the current study showed that the overall ADG and FCR of broilers treated with DFM were significantly better than the challenged chickens that did not receive any additives but were similar to the chickens that were infected and had received Sal. In line with the results of the current experiment, Rahimi et al. (2019) reported that adding DFM to the diet of turkey poults challenged with C. jejuni could minimize its negative effects on growth performance. Direct-fed microbial strains are able to compete for binding sites and occupy the most common receptors on the mucus of the gut wall. This could decrease intestinal colonization by Campylobacter and reduce their shedding and, subsequently, may effectively control the spread and prevalence of these bacteria in poultry (Saint-Cyr et al., 2017; Smialek et al., 2018). Therefore, the reason for improving the ADG and FCR in DFM treatment may be related to its effect on the microbial population of the gastrointestinal tract, in which case better bird growth will be provided by balancing the microbial population and protective effects against the pathological consequences of Campylobacter.

In the current experiment, there were also significant positive effects of a high level of FAE on ADG and FCR, which were similar to those observed in the Sal and DFM groups. In addition, among the challenged groups, the Sal and FAE400 groups had the lowest mortality rate, which was comparable to that in the NC group. It is well-known that phenolic compounds such as thymol and carvacrol cause degradation of cell membrane lipids in the presence of molecular oxygen, leading to changes in the membrane permeability to ions, which is accompanied by cell death as a result of inhibition of cellular enzyme discharge (Nazzaro et al., 2013; Kachur and Suntres, 2019). Natural bioactive compounds such as flavonoids, tannins, and saponins have also displayed high antioxidant and anti-inflammatory activities, which can protect the intestinal epithelium from oxidative and inflammatory damages (Scheurer et al., 2013; Tungmunnithum et al., 2018). The better ADG and FCR values in the Campylobacter-challenged broilers fed the high-FAE diet supported the above-mentioned results. The decrease in the mortality rate of the FAE400 group in the present study could be also explained by the higher serum IgA and IgG concentrations in the respective groups than those in the PC group.

Changes in nutrient composition of the diet, together with the microbiota to which the post-hatch chick is exposed, are key factors that determine the intestinal microbiome (Sweeney et al., 2017; Rubio, 2019). In this study, all dietary supplementation was used from the day-of-hatch, and birds were fed the additive until the end of the trial. Supplementing the broiler diet with Sal, DFM, and FAE400 in this study positively altered the intestinal microbiota by decreasing the proliferation of pathogenic bacteria in the ileum and ceca as compared with the PC birds on day 24 and 42 (9 and 27 d post-infection). Birds that received DFM supplementation also exhibited the highest ileal and cecal Lactobacilli counts at 42 d of age, indicating the ability of DFM to increase the growth of potentially beneficial bacteria. Corroborating our findings, Saint-Cyr et al. (2017) found that broiler chickens inoculated with a DFM strain Lactobacillus salivarius SMXD51 exhibited a reduction in Campylobacter colonization of the chicken ceca at 14 and 35 d of age. Although the exact mechanism of action is not fully understood, the capacity of DFM bacteria to adhere and compete for adhesion sites in the intestinal epithelium and the capacity to produce organic acids and effective antibacterial compounds might result in the impairment of pathogenic bacteria colonization in the gut (Willis and Reid, 2008; Arsi et al., 2015; Chen et al., 2020).

According to the results of the current study, although broiler chickens fed with the FAE400 diet had lower ileal and cecal Coliforms and C. jejuni counts than chickens fed with the PC diet on day 24 and 42, their C. jejuni counts were still higher than those of chickens fed with the NC diet. However, broiler chickens receiving the FAE400 diet handled the challenge during the infection period better than birds in the PC group with regard to the population of intestinal pathogenic bacteria at 24 and 42 d of age, which was comparable to the birds fed Sal, an in-feed anticoccidial. These results indicate that the high dietary FEA level (400 mg/kg) may have contributed to a lower prevalence and load of Campylobacter and Coliforms at market age. The antimicrobial activities of F. angulata have also been demonstrated by other investigators (Rostami et al., 2015; Ghasemi Pirbalouti et al., 2016; Mumivand et al., 2019). Previous reports of in vitro studies also showed that essential oils from different herbal plants, such as thyme, orange, rosemary, and clove oils were effective against both Salmonella and Campylobacter spp. (Thanissery et al., 2014; Thanissery and Smith, 2014), but no studies have yet examined the effect of FAE. Under in vivo studies, no consistent results were observed regarding the efficiency of herbal products on gut microbiota in broiler chickens even though active herbal components are commonly recognized as antimicrobial agents. For example, a decrease in the ileal counts of Escherichia coli and Clostridium spp. along with an increase in the count of Lactobacilli was observed by supplementation of broiler diet with elecampane rhizome extract (Abolfathi et al., 2019). El-Ashram and Abdelhafez (2020) also reported that the counts of Coliform, Lactobacilli, and Enterococcus were decreased, not affected, and increased, respectively, as a result of phytogenic supplementation. In contrast, no changes were observed in the cecal counts of Lactobacillus, Bifidobacterium, Coliform, and Clostridium spp. in broiler chickens after 6 wk feeding with a phytogenic blend (Oso et al., 2019). Therefore, it is hypothesized that the in vivo antimicrobial property of active components from herbs can be influenced by basal diet, environmental conditions, and hygiene practices. The antimicrobial properties of FEA against pathogenic bacteria, especially C. jejuni, in this study are supposed to promote a healthy gut, which in turn could be correlated with improved post-hatch performance.

As presented in Table 5 and Figure 1, serum IgA (day 24), IgG (day 24 and 42), IL-6 (day 24), and IFN-γ (day 24 and 42) concentrations in broiler chickens infected with Campylobacter were significantly greater than those of the uninfected birds. Similarly, antibody- and cell-mediated immunity are reported to be activated by infection with Clostridium perfringens (Du et al., 2016; Tian et al., 2016), E. coli (Huang et al., 2019), and Salmonella enteritidis (Shanmugasundaram et al., 2020). Antibodies have been suggested to minimize the invasion of epithelial cells by pathogenic bacteria when bacteria come into direct contact with local antibodies before entering the host (Lee et al., 2012). Serum immunoglobulins are important indicators to evaluate the humoral immunity of animals. Increased immunoglobulin concentrations can activate complement components to enhance chemotaxis or phagocytosis of immune cells in birds and thus protect them against infections (Long et al., 2020). In addition, the innate immune system plays an important role in host defense against infection. Both IL-6 and IFN-γ are important indicator cytokines that initiate cell-mediated immune responses and have broad biological activities in immune regulation, hematopoiesis, and inflammation (Park et al., 2008; Kishimoto, 2010). According to the results of this experiment, all dietary supplements, except 200 mg/kg FAE, have the potential to positively affect immune function in broiler chickens challenged with Campylobacter by increasing IgA and IgG levels. In addition, the DFM and FAE400 groups exhibited higher serum IL-6 and IFN-γ concentrations than the PC group. Similar results have been demonstrated in Campylobacter-challenged broilers in which administration of multispecies DFM (PoultryStar ME), composed of Lactobacillus reuteri, Pediococcus acidilactici, Bifidobacterium animalis, and Enterococcus faecium, could improve the transforming growth factor-β4 mRNA content at 14 d post-infection (Mortada et al., 2020). Recent evidence indicates that DFM may enhance host defenses against infection because of the bacteria's effect on host immunity and gut integrity under enteric pathogen challenge (De Oliveira et al., 2019; Šikić Pogačar et al., 2020).

Our results also indicated that supplementation of 400 mg/kg FAE in the broiler diet could result in enhancement of resistance to C. jejuni infection, probably by enhancing both cellular and humoral immune responses. Limited research has been performed on the impacts of F. angulata and their extracts on poultry health-related parameters during bacterial challenge. A previous report indicates that the use of 8 g/kg F. angulata powder in broiler diet may promote humoral immunity by increasing total anti-sheep red blood cell hemagglutinin titers (Rostami et al., 2015). In another study in hemp ducks, a mixed extract of 3 local herbs (Cortex Fraxini, Pulsatilla chinensis, and Eucommia ulmoides) increased the serum concentrations of IgG, IgA, and IL-2 (Bai et al., 2019). Gut microflora composition is reported to be directly responsible for improvement in intestinal health via antagonization of pathogenic bacteria, and modulation of immunity (Moraes et al., 2019). Therefore, positive changes in the intestinal microflora caused by FAE400 treatment may be directly related to the best broiler immune function, but how this relationship may influence the resistance to Campylobacter is not clear.

Conclusions

In conclusion, the high FAE dose helped the Campylobacter-challenged broiler chickens to perform as well as the chickens receiving DFM and Sal, and better than chickens in the PC group. Supplementing broiler diet with Sal, DFM, and a high dose (400 mg/kg) of FAE altered the intestinal microbiota by reducing the proliferation of pathogenic bacteria at 24 and 42 d of age. Moreover, feeding broiler chickens with DFM and FAE400 diets could positively influence immune response, which may be one of the mechanisms of their beneficial effects on intestinal health. However, further studies are required to clarify whether the restorative effect of supplements is caused by specific modes of action against C. jejuni infection or by immunomodulatory activities.

Acknowledgments

The authors wish to acknowledge the financial support received from Ilam University (Ilam, Iran) for this research.

Disclosures

None of the authors have any conflict of interest to declare.

References

  1. Abolfathi M.E., Tabeidian S.A., Foroozandeh Shahraki A.D., Tabatabaei S.N., Habibian M. Effects of ethanol extract of elecampane (Inula helenium L.) rhizome on growth performance, diet digestibility, gut health, and antioxidant status in broiler chickens. Livest. Sci. 2019;223:68–75. doi: 10.1080/1745039X.2019.1581027. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Arsi K., Donoghue A.M., Woo-Ming A., Blore P.J., Donoghue D.J. The efficacy of selected probiotic and prebiotic combinations in reducing Campylobacter colonization in broiler chickens. J. Appl. Poult. Res. 2015;24:327–334. [Google Scholar]
  3. Awad W.A., Molnár A., Aschenbach J.R., Ghareeb K., Khayal B., Hess C., Liebhart D., Dublecz K., Hess M. Campylobacter infection in chickens modulates the intestinal epithelial barrier function. Innate Immun. 2014;21:151–160. doi: 10.1177/1753425914521648. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Bai L., Song X., Fu Y.P., Chen S.F., Tian Y., Jia R.Y., Zou Y.F., Li L.X., Liang X.X., He C.L., Yin L.Z., Ye G., Lv C., Yue G.Z., Yin Z.Q. Effects of a mixed extract of Cortex Fraxini, Pulsatilla chinensis, and Eucommia ulmoides on immunity and antioxidant activity in hemp ducks. Livest. Sci. 2019;221:63–69. [Google Scholar]
  5. Bohlouli S., Sadeghi E. Growth performance and haematological and immunological indices of rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) fingerlings supplemented with dietary Ferulago angulata (Schlecht) boiss. Acta Vet. Brno. 2016;85:231–238. [Google Scholar]
  6. Bolder N.M., Wagenaar J.A., Putirulan F.F., Veldman K.T., Sommer M. The effect of flavophospholipol (Flavomycin®) and salinomycin sodium (Sacox®) on the excretion of Clostridium perfringens, Salmonella enteritidis, and Campylobacter jejuni in broilers after experimental infection. Poult. Sci. 1999;78:1681–1689. doi: 10.1093/ps/78.12.1681. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. De Castro Burbarelli M.F., Do Valle Polycarpo G., Lelis K.D., Granghelli C.A., De Pinho A.C.C., Queiroz S.R.A., Fernandes A.M., De Souza R.L.M., Moro M.E.G., De Andrade Bordin R., De Albuquerque R. Cleaning and disinfection programs against Campylobacter jejuni for broiler chickens: productive performance, microbiological assessment and characterization. Poult. Sci. 2017;96:3188–3198. doi: 10.3382/ps/pex153. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Cawthraw S., Newell D. Investigation of the presence and protective effects of maternal antibodies against Campylobacter jejuni in chickens. Avian Dis. 2010;54:86–93. doi: 10.1637/9004-072709-Reg.1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Chen C., Li J., Zhang H., Xie Y., Xiong L., Liu H., Wang F. Effects of a probiotic on the growth performance, intestinal flora, and immune function of chicks infected with Salmonella pullorum. Poult. Sci. 2020;99:5316–5323. doi: 10.1016/j.psj.2020.07.017. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. De Oliveira M.J.K., Sakomura N.K., De Paula Dorigam J.C., Doranalli K., Soares L., Viana G.D.S. Bacillus amyloliquefaciens CECT 5940 alone or in combination with antibiotic growth promoters improves performance in broilers under enteric pathogen challenge. Poult. Sci. 2019;98:4391–4400. doi: 10.3382/ps/pez223. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Du E., Wang W., Gan L., Li Z., Guo S., Guo Y. Effects of thymol and carvacrol supplementation on intestinal integrity and immune responses of broiler chickens challenged with Clostridium perfringens. J. Anim. Sci. Biotechnol. 2016;7:19. doi: 10.1186/s40104-016-0079-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. El-Ashram S., Abdelhafez G.A. Effects of phytogenic supplementation on productive performance of broiler chickens. J. Appl. Poult. Res. 2020;29:852–862. [Google Scholar]
  13. Gadde U., Oh S.T., Lee Y.S., Davis E., Zimmerman N., Rehberger T., Lillehoj H.S. The effects of direct-fed microbial supplementation, as an alternative to antibiotics, on growth performance, intestinal immune status, and epithelial barrier gene expression in broiler chickens. Probiotics Antimicrob. Proteins. 2017;9:397–405. doi: 10.1007/s12602-017-9275-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Ghasemi Pirbalouti A., Izadi A., Malek Poor F., Hamedi B. Chemical composition, antioxidant and antibacterial activities of essential oils from Ferulago angulata. Pharm. Biol. 2016;54:2515–2520. doi: 10.3109/13880209.2016.1162816. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Guyard-Nicodème M., Keita A., Quesne S., Amelot M., Poezevara T., Le Berre B., Sánchez J., Vesseur P., Martín A., Medel P., Chemaly M. Efficacy of feed additives against Campylobacter in live broilers during the entire rearing period. Poult. Sci. 2016;95:298–305. doi: 10.3382/ps/pev303. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Huang L., Luo L., Zhang Y., Wang Z., Xia Z. Effects of the dietary probiotic, Enterococcus faecium NCIMB11181, on the intestinal barrier and system immune status in Escherichia coli O78-challenged broiler chickens. Probiotics Antimicrob. Proteins. 2019;11:946–956. doi: 10.1007/s12602-018-9434-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Kachur K., Suntres Z. The antibacterial properties of phenolic isomers, carvacrol and thymol. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2019;60:3042–3053. doi: 10.1080/10408398.2019.1675585. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Khattak F., Paschalis V., Green M., Houdijk G.M., Soultanas P., Mahdavi J. TYPLEX® chelate, a novel feed additive, inhibits Campylobacter jejuni biofilm formation and cecal colonization in broiler chickens. Poult. Sci. 2018;97:1391–1399. doi: 10.3382/ps/pex413. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Kishimoto T. IL-6: from its discovery to clinical applications. Int. Immunol. 2010;22:347–352. doi: 10.1093/intimm/dxq030. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Kiziltas H., Ekin S., Bayramoglu M., Akbas E., Oto G., Yildirim S., Ozgokce F. Antioxidant properties of Ferulago angulata and its hepatoprotective effect against N-nitrosodimethylamine-induced oxidative stress in rats. Pharm. Biol. 2017;55:888–897. doi: 10.1080/13880209.2016.1270974. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Lamb-Rosteski J.M., Kalischuk L.D., Inglis G.D., Buret A.G. Epidermal growth factor inhibits Campylobacter jejuni-induced claudin-4 disruption, loss of epithelial barrier function, and Escherichia coli translocation. Infect. Immun. 2008;76:3390–3398. doi: 10.1128/IAI.01698-07. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Lee K.W., Lillehoj H.S., Park M.S., Jang S.I., Ritter G.D., Hong Y.H., Jeong W., Jeoung H.Y., An D.J., Lillehoj E.P. Clostridium perfringens α-toxin and NetB toxin antibodies and their possible role in protection against necrotic enteritis and gangrenous dermatitis in broiler chickens. Avian Dis. 2012;56:230–233. doi: 10.1637/9847-070711-ResNote.1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Long L.N., Kang B.J., Jiang Q., Chen J.S. Effects of dietary Lycium barbarum polysaccharides on growth performance, digestive enzyme activities, antioxidant status, and immunity of broiler chickens. Poult. Sci. 2020;99:744–751. doi: 10.1016/j.psj.2019.10.043. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Lorigooini Z., Koravand M., Haddadi H., Rafieian-Kopaei M., Shirmardi H.A., Hosseini Z. A review of botany, phytochemical and pharmacological properties of Ferulago angulata. Toxin Rev. 2019;38:13–20. [Google Scholar]
  25. Moraes P.O., Cardinal K.M., Gouvêa F.L., Schroeder B., Ceron M.S., Lunedo R., Frazzon A.P.G., Frazzon J., Ribeiro A.M.L. Comparison between a commercial blend of functional oils and monensin on the performance and microbiota of coccidiosis-challenged broilers. Poult. Sci. 2019;98:5456–5464. doi: 10.3382/ps/pez345. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Mortada M., Cosby D.E., Shanmugasundaram R., Selvaraj R.K. In vivo and in vitro assessment of commercial probiotic and organic acid feed additives in broilers challenged with Campylobacter coli. J. Appl. Poult. Res. 2020;29:435–446. [Google Scholar]
  27. Mumivand H., Aghemiri A., Aghemiri A., Morshedloo M.R., Nikoumanesh K. Ferulago angulata and Tetrataenium lasiopetalum: essential oils composition and antibacterial activity of the oils and extracts. Biocatal. Agric. Biotechnol. 2019;22:101407. [Google Scholar]
  28. Murugesan G.R., Gabler N.K., Persia M.E. Effects of direct-fed microbial supplementation on broiler performance, intestinal nutrient transport and integrity under experimental conditions with increased microbial challenge. Br. Poult. Sci. 2014;55:89–97. doi: 10.1080/00071668.2013.865834. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Nazzaro F., Fratianni F., De Martino L., Coppola R., De Feo V. Effect of essential oils on pathogenic bacteria. Pharmaceuticals. 2013;6:1451–1474. doi: 10.3390/ph6121451. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Ocejo M., Oporto B., Juste R.A., Hurtado A. Effects of dry whey powder and calcium butyrate supplementation of corn/soybean-based diets on productive performance, duodenal histological integrity, and Campylobacter colonization in broilers. BMC Vet. Res. 2017;13:199. doi: 10.1186/s12917-017-1121-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Oso A.O., Suganthi R.U., Reddy G.B.M., Malik P.K., Thirumalaisamy G., Awachat V.B., Selvaraju S., Arangasamy A., Bhatta R. Effect of dietary supplementation with phytogenic blend on growth performance, apparent ileal digestibility of nutrients, intestinal morphology, and cecal microflora of broiler chickens. Poult. Sci. 2019;98:4755–4766. doi: 10.3382/ps/pez191. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Park S.S., Lillehoj H.S., Allen P.C., Dong W.P., FitzCoy S., Bautista D.A., Lillehoj E.P. Immunopathology and cytokine responses in broiler chickens coinfected with Eimeria maxima and Clostridium perfringens with the use of an animal model of necrotic enteritis. Avian Dis. 2008;52:14–22. doi: 10.1637/7997-041707-Reg. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Rahimi S., Kathariou S., Fletcher O., Grimes J.L. Effect of a direct-fed microbial and prebiotic on performance and intestinal histomorophology of Turkey poults challenged with Salmonella and Campylobacter. Poult. Sci. 2019;98:6572–6578. doi: 10.3382/ps/pez436. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Rahimi S., Kathariou S., Fletcher O., Grimes J.L. The effectiveness of a dietary direct-fed microbial and mannan oligosaccharide on ultrastructural changes of intestinal mucosa of Turkey poults infected with Salmonella and Campylobacter. Poult. Sci. 2020;99:1135–1149. doi: 10.1016/j.psj.2019.09.008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Rostami F., Ghasemi H.A., Taherpour K. Effect of Scrophularia striata and Ferulago angulata, as alternatives to virginiamycin, on growth performance, intestinal microbial population, immune response, and blood constituents of broiler chickens. Poult. Sci. 2015;94:2202–2209. doi: 10.3382/ps/pev198. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Rubio L.A. Possibilities of early life programming in broiler chickens via intestinal microbiota modulation. Poult. Sci. 2019;98:695–706. doi: 10.3382/ps/pey416. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Saint-Cyr M.J., Haddad N., Taminiau B., Poezevara T., Quesne S., Amelot M., Daube G., Chemaly M., Dousset X., Guyard-Nicodème M. Use of the potential probiotic strain Lactobacillus salivarius SMXD51 to control Campylobacter jejuni in broilers. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2017;247:9–17. doi: 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2016.07.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Scheurer W., Spring P., Maertens L. Effect of 3 dietary phytogenic products on production performance and coccidiosis in challenged broiler chickens. J. Appl. Poult. Res. 2013;22:591–599. [Google Scholar]
  39. Shanmugasundaram R., Applegate T.J., Selvaraj R.K. Effect of Bacillus subtilis and Bacillus licheniformis probiotic supplementation on caecal Salmonella load in broilers challenged with Salmonella. J. Appl. Poult. Res. 2020;29:808–816. [Google Scholar]
  40. Si J., Fritts C.A., Burnham D.J., Waldroup P.W. Relationship of dietary lysine level to the concentration of all essential amino acids in broiler diets. Poult. Sci. 2001;80:1472–1479. doi: 10.1093/ps/80.10.1472. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Šikić Pogačar M., Langerholc T., Mičetić-Turk D., Možina S.S., Klančnik A. Effect of Lactobacillus spp. on adhesion, invasion, and translocation of Campylobacter jejuni in chicken and pig small-intestinal epithelial cell lines. BMC Vet. Res. 2020;16:34. doi: 10.1186/s12917-020-2238-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Skoufos I., Tzora A., Giannenas I., Bonos E., Tsinas A., ΜcCartney Ε., Lester H., Christaki E., Florou-Paneri P., Mahdavi J., Soultanas P. Evaluation of in-field efficacy of dietary ferric tyrosine on performance, intestinal health and meat quality of broiler chickens exposed to natural Campylobacter jejuni challenge. Livest. Sci. 2019;221:44–51. [Google Scholar]
  43. Smialek M., Burchardt S., Koncicki A. The influence of probiotic supplementation in broiler chickens on population and carcass contamination with Campylobacter spp. - field study. Res. Vet. Sci. 2018;118:312–316. doi: 10.1016/j.rvsc.2018.03.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Sparks N. Vol. 125. 2016. On-farm control of Campylobacter. (27th Ann. Aust. Poult. Sci. Symposium). [Google Scholar]
  45. Sweeney T., Meredith H., Vigors S., McDonnell M.J., Ryan M., Thornton K., O’Doherty J.V. Extracts of laminarin and laminarin/fucoidan from the marine macroalgal species Laminaria digitata improved growth rate and intestinal structure in young chicks, but does not influence Campylobacter jejuni colonisation. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 2017;232:71–79. [Google Scholar]
  46. Thanissery R., Smith D.P. Marinade with thyme and orange oils reduces Salmonella Enteritidis and Campylobacter coli on inoculated broiler breast fillets and whole wings. Poult. Sci. 2014;93:1258–1262. doi: 10.3382/ps.2013-03697. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Thanissery R., Kathariou S., Smith D.P. Rosemary oil, clove oil, and a mix of thyme-orange essential oils inhibit Salmonella and Campylobacter in vitro. J. Appl. Poult. Res. 2014;23:221–227. [Google Scholar]
  48. Tian X., Shao Y., Wang Z., Guo Y. Effects of dietary yeast β-glucans supplementation on growth performance, gut morphology, intestinal Clostridium perfringens population and immune response of broiler chickens challenged with necrotic enteritis. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 2016;215:144–155. [Google Scholar]
  49. Tungmunnithum D., Thongboonyou A., Pholboon A., Yangsabai A. Flavonoids and other phenolic compounds from medicinal plants for pharmaceutical and medical aspects: an overview. Medicines. 2018;5:93. doi: 10.3390/medicines5030093. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Vadalasetty K.P., Lauridsen C., Engberg R.M., Vadalasetty R., Kutwin M., Chwalibog A., Sawosz E. Influence of silver nanoparticles on growth and health of broiler chickens after infection with Campylobacter jejuni. BMC Vet. Res. 2018;14:1. doi: 10.1186/s12917-017-1323-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. Willis W.L., Reid L. Investigating the effects of dietary probiotic feeding regimens on broiler chicken production and Campylobacter jejuni presence. Poult. Sci. 2008;87:606–611. doi: 10.3382/ps.2006-00458. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Poultry Science are provided here courtesy of Elsevier

RESOURCES