Significance
Glioblastoma (GBM) is the most aggressive and lethal brain tumor in adults. The GBM microenvironment is highly immunosuppressive, rendering T cells incapable of recognizing and eliminating malignant cells. We developed bispecific T cell engagers (BiTEs) that successfully engage patients' T cells to attack and kill GBM expressing interleukin 13 receptor alpha 2 (IL13Rα2). Neural stem cells (NSCs) engineered to secrete BiTE migrate readily within the brain tissue to established tumors and produce BiTE protein within the malignant tissue. Treatment of animals bearing IL13Rα2-expressing patient-derived GBM xenografts with therapeutic NSCs resulted in significant survival benefits in mice. These results show an exciting potential of NSCs as a delivery platform for BiTE therapy to improve outcomes for GBM patients.
Keywords: bispecific T cell engagers, delivery, GBM, neural stem cells, immunotherapy
Abstract
Glioblastoma (GBM) is the most lethal primary brain tumor in adults. No treatment provides durable relief for the vast majority of GBM patients. In this study, we've tested a bispecific antibody comprised of single-chain variable fragments (scFvs) against T cell CD3ε and GBM cell interleukin 13 receptor alpha 2 (IL13Rα2). We demonstrate that this bispecific T cell engager (BiTE) (BiTELLON) engages peripheral and tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes harvested from patients' tumors and, in so doing, exerts anti-GBM activity ex vivo. The interaction of BiTELLON with T cells and IL13Rα2-expressing GBM cells stimulates T cell proliferation and the production of proinflammatory cytokines interferon γ (IFNγ) and tumor necrosis factor α (TNFα). We have modified neural stem cells (NSCs) to produce and secrete the BiTELLON (NSCLLON). When injected intracranially in mice with a brain tumor, NSCLLON show tropism for tumor, secrete BiTELLON, and remain viable for over 7 d. When injected directly into the tumor, NSCLLON provide a significant survival benefit to mice bearing various IL13Rα2+ GBMs. Our results support further investigation and development of this therapeutic for clinical translation.
Routine treatment of newly diagnosed glioblastoma (GBM) consists of surgical resection, chemotherapy, and radiation, which results in a median GBM patient survival of less than 2 y, with just 5% of patients surviving beyond 5 y (1). The blood–brain barrier (BBB) limits therapeutic access to the tumor (2). An immunosuppressive microenvironment and molecular heterogeneity of GBM present a unique set of challenges for developing effective therapies for this type of brain tumor (3–10).
The development of treatments for lessening the immunosuppressive effects of GBM represents an active area of preclinical and clinical neuro-oncology research. Many, if not all, approaches being tested involve increasing T cell cytotoxic antitumor activity (11–17). Large numbers of functional cytotoxic tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) correlate with improved progression-free survival for GBM patients (18–21). However, the immunosuppressive milieu of GBM impairs T cell cytolytic function, altering the effectiveness of T cell-based therapies for treating GBM (22–26). Numerous lymphocyte-directed treatments are being investigated, including the use of bispecific T cell engagers (BiTEs) (17, 27, 28). BiTEs can be produced and used without patient-specific BiTE individualization and can, therefore, be considered “off-the-shelf” therapeutics (29–32). The use of BiTEs targeting tumor-associated antigens (TAAs) has been approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in treating liquid malignancies, and BiTE-associated treatments are currently being evaluated in multiple clinical studies for solid tumors (e.g., NCT03792841, NCT04117958, and NCT03319940) (33–36).
BiTEs consist of two single-chain variable fragments (scFvs) connected by a flexible linker (37). One of the scFvs is directed to a TAA and the other to CD3 epsilon (ε) that is expressed on T cells (38). BiTEs engage TILs and cancer cells in a major histocompatibility complex (MHC)-independent manner and are, therefore, unaffected by MHC down-regulation that occurs in GBM cells (37–40). The specificity of BiTE's tumor antigen-directed scFv is imperative to harness the full therapeutic potential of the recombinant molecule (41). BiTE anticancer activity requires BiTE binding with malignant and immune cells simultaneously; single-arm binding to a tumor antigen or CD3ε is therapeutically ineffective (42, 43).
The short half-life of BiTEs in plasma necessitates a frequent or continuous infusion into patient circulation to maintain therapeutic levels of BiTE (43–45). Several approaches have been proposed and tested to compensate for the rate of BiTE biologic life in treating peripheral cancers (45–47). These include the recombinant protein's sustained production by subcutaneous injection of mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) seeded into a synthetic extracellular matrix scaffold, liver translation of BiTE messenger RNA (mRNA), and peritumoral delivery of MSCs secreting BiTEs. A recent study also explored the use of modified immune cell delivery of BiTE to GBM (48), and the reduction of tumor burden in treated animals has been observed. It remains to be determined if these bicistronic antiglioma treatments share chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cells' fate, which includes a low penetrance and short survival of CARs within the brain (27, 49, 50); both are limiting factors for sustained and efficient delivery of BiTEs by CAR T cells.
Neural stem cells (NSCs) have inherent advantages as a cellular carrier of antineoplastic agents to the site of GBM since they are native to the brain. NSCs have demonstrated tropism to brain tumors in several preclinical models. These cells can withstand a harsh oxygen-deprived environment of GBM. Here, we investigated NSCs as producers of BiTEs targeting the tumor-associated antigen interleukin 13 receptor alpha 2 (IL13Rα2) and their antitumor activity using in vitro and in vivo models of GBM. In vitro, BiTEs show significant antitumor activity when used in cocultures that include T cells harvested from patients’ blood and tumor tissue. In vivo, NSCs modified for BiTE synthesis migrate to a tumor in animal subjects’ brains while functioning as intra- and peritumoral BiTE producers. The following are details of the results from our experiments in characterizing NSCs that produce IL13Rα2-directed BiTEs. We interpret these findings as support for additional safety and efficacy analysis for their potential clinical translation in treating GBM patients.
Results
Development of Tumor-Targeting BiTEs.
BiTE-targeting IL13Rα2 was generated using the scFv of mAb47 against the IL13Rα2 that has been previously described by our group and scFv of the mAb OKT3 directed toward the invariable ε chain of CD 3 (CDε) (49, 51–54). ScFvs were connected using a flexible glycine/serine linker in the following orientation: mAbOKT3VH-mAbOKT3VL-mAb47VL-mAb47VH (Fig. 1A). Short (SL, 5 amino acids) and long (LL, 23 amino acids) linkers were used to construct BiTESLON and BiTELLON. BiTESLOFF and BiTELLOFF control molecules were generated by replacing the complementary determinant region 3 of the mAb47 light chain with the sequence of the mAb MOPC-21, which prevents IL13Rα2 binding (Fig. 1A) (38). A polyhistidine (6His) tag was added at the C terminus of BiTE constructs for BiTE purification and detection. All acronyms for BiTE molecules are listed in SI Appendix, Table S1. Lentiviral vectors (pLVX-IRES-ZsGreen1) encoding complementary DNA (cDNA) for each BiTE were constructed, and corresponding lentiviral particles were used to transduce HEK293T cells for the production of BiTE proteins. Recombinant BiTE proteins were purified from culture supernatants using HisPure resin. Purified BiTE integrity was verified by Western blotting using anti-His antibodies (Fig. 1B).
Fig. 1.
Design of BiTE targeting IL13Rα2-expressing gliomas. (A) BiTEs consist of the scFv fragments of mAbOKT3 against the CD3ε and scFv of mAb47 against IL13Rα2 connected by either short or long linkers named as BiTESLON and BiTELLON, respectively. The CDR3 of the light chain (VL/M) of the mA47 was replaced with a sequence of the nonspecific MOPC21 antibody to generate BiTELLOFF and BiTESLOFF to controls with abridged binding to IL13Rα2. (B) Western blotting showed a specific single band after affinity purification and detection with anti-His antibodies at ∼55 kDa. (C) Increasing concentration of BiTE molecules bound to human IL13Rα2 immobilized on ELISA plates (1 μg/mL) and detected using anti-His tag antibodies. EC50 of BiTELLON is 6.767 μg/mL, and EC50 of BiTESLON is 57.87 μg/mL. (D) BiTELLON but not BiTELLOFF engaged CDε-expressing cells from glioma patients in the killing of IL13Rα2-expressing glioma cells (target-to-effector [T:E] ratio 1:20, two-way ANOVA, n = 3–4, ****P < 0.0001). (E) Example of flow cytometry chromatogram for IL13Rα2-negative GBM39 cell line and IL13Rα2-positive cell lines, GBM6, and GBM12. (F) Expression of IL13Rα2 at the cell surface in GBM6, GBM12, and GBM39 cell lines (one-way ANOVA, n = 3, ****P < 0.0001). (G) Binding of BiTELLON and BiTELLOFF to GBM cell lines (one-way ANOVA, n ≥ 3, ****P < 0.0001). (H) Expression of CD3ε on the surface of GBM patients' PB lymphocytes and TILs (n ≥ 6). (I) CD3ε expression on the cell surface of CCRF-CEM, a T lymphoblastoid cell line (28), and Jurkat, a T lymphoblast cell line. (J) Binding of BiTELLON to CEM and Jurkat cell lines (n = 3). OD450nm, optical density at 450 nm. MFI, median fluorescent intensity.
Characterization of BiTE Binding and Function.
Binding of purified BiTEs to IL13Rα2 and CD3ε epitopes was examined using an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) and cell-binding assays. BiTELLON showed 8.5× higher affinity binding to immobilized IL13Rα2 than BiTESLON (effective concentration, 50% [EC50] values of 6.767 µg/mL and 57.87 µg/mL, respectively) (Fig. 1C). Control BiTEs did not bind to IL13Rα2 (Fig. 1C).
A majority of gliomas express IL13Rα2, with GBM expressing it at the highest levels (SI Appendix, Fig. S1A) (55, 56). The ability of BiTEs to engage donor T cells in antiglioma activity was determined using cocultures of IL13Rα2-expressing GBM cells (SI Appendix, Fig. S1 B and C) with BiTEs and T cells. BiTELLON successfully engages T cells, as indicated by BiTE concentration-dependent cytotoxicity, with a maximal effect observed at 2.5 μg/mL (Fig. 1D and SI Appendix, Fig. S1D). BiTESLON did not induce T cell antitumor activity (Fig. 1D).
Patient-derived xenograft cell lines GBM6, GBM12, and GBM39 express different levels of IL13Rα2 (Fig. 1 E and F). BiTELLON binds to GBM6, and GBM12 cells, but not to GBM39 in which IL13Rα2 is either absent or expressed at a level beneath that required for flow cytometry detection. At a concentration of 2 μg/mL, BiTELLON saturates IL13Rα2 in GBM6 and -12 (Fig. 1G) and occupies 50% of available receptor in U251 cells (SI Appendix, Fig. S1E).
Flow cytometry analysis of GBM patient T cell CD3ε expression revealed substantial interpatient variability in peripheral blood (PB) and TIL (20) populations. CD3ε-associated fluorescence intensity ranged from 649 to 3,058 and from 706 to 1,753 for PB and TILs, respectively (Fig. 1H). We used human lymphocyte Jurkat and CEM cell lines to further test BiTE interaction with CD3 (Fig. 1I and SI Appendix, Fig. S1 F and G) and observed saturation binding as BiTE concentrations approached 1.5 μg/mL (Fig. 1J). BiTE CD3ε binding was also apparent when using IL13Rα2 binding defective BiTELLOFF (SI Appendix, Fig. S1H).
To examine BiTE-induced T cell antitumor activity in vitro, we used the chromium 51 (51Cr) release assay. BiTELLON engaged T cell killing of IL13Rα2-expressing GBM6 and GBM12 glioma cells in a target-to-effector (T:E) ratio-dependent fashion (Fig. 2 A and B). GBM39 cells, negative for IL13Rα2 expression, were not killed by the T cells, at any tested T:E ratio, in the presence of BiTELLON and BiTELLOFF (Fig. 2C). Similar killing activity was observed with T cells harvested from the blood of a patient with another type of brain tumor, colloidal meningioma, in coculture with IL13Rα2-positive GBMs in the presence of BiTELLON, but not IL13Rα2-negative cells or BiTELLOFF (SI Appendix, Fig. S2 A–C). At day 3 of coculturing, the majority of IL13Rα2-expressing GBM cells were killed by T cells in the presence of BiTELLON, but not in BiTELLOFF (Fig. 2D). GBM cell killing was associated with proliferation and activation of T cells, as exemplified by the expression of CD69 and CD25 T cell markers. There was no proliferation or expression of activation molecules for T cells cocultured with BiTELLOFF, or for T cells cultured with BiTELLON, as well as BiTELLOFF in the absence of IL13Rα2-expressing GBM cells (Fig. 2 E–G and SI Appendix, Fig. S2 D–F). T cell proliferation and activation were associated with significant increases in T cell secretion of IL2, interferon γ (IFNγ), and tumor necrosis factor α (TNFα) (Fig. 2 H–J and SI Appendix, Fig. G-I).
Fig. 2.
BiTELLON activates T cell and induces the killing of IL13Rα2+ gliomas. Chromium 51 (51Cr) release assay shows that (A) GBM6 and (B) GBM12 are killed by donor T cells in the presence of BiTELLON, but not BiTELLOFF, in all tested target-to-effector (T:E) ratios (two-way ANOVA, n = 4, ****P < 0.0001). (C) GBM39 gliomas are spared by donor T cells in the presence of either BiTELLON or BiTELLOFF. (D) Bright-field pictures of T cells with IL13Rα2-expressing GBMs after 3 d in coculture in the presence of BiTELLON(I) and BiTELLOFF(II) (Scale bar: 50 μm.). (E) Proliferation and expression of activation markers (F) CD69 and (G) CD25 after coculture of donor T cells for 3 d with BiTELLON, BiTELLOFF, stimulation with CD2CD3CD28 beads (Stim.) or absence of any form of stimulation (No stim.) with GBM12 gliomas (one-way ANOVA, n = 3, ****P < 0.0001). ELISA for the production of (H) IL2 (24 h), (I) IFNγ (48 h), and (J) TNFα (48 h) by T cells after coculture with GBM12 in the presence of BiTELLON, BiTELLOFF, stimulation with CD2CD3CD28 beads (Stim.), or absence of any form of stimulation (No stim.) (one-way ANOVA, n ≥ 4, ****P < 0.0001).
BiTE Engages GBM Patients' Lymphocytes in an Antiglioma Activity.
It has been shown that T cells in GBM patients exhibit an exhaustion phenotype characterized by the expression of PD1/TIM3/Lag3 (8, 57, 58). Our analysis of patients' peripheral lymphocytes and TILs indicates cells that are positive for all exhaustion markers (triple-positive cells) comprise 5.48 ± 4.8% of PB PD1+CD8s and 7.67 ± 3.87 of PD1+TILs (Fig. 3 A and B). Low-level expression of activation markers CD69 and CD25 was detected in CD8+ cells (Fig. 3 C and D). In addition, flow cytometry analysis showed that 35.68 ± 5.21% of PB CD8s and 28.99 ± 5.218% of TILs isolated from patients' tissues are positive for IFNγ (SI Appendix, Fig. S3A). The average number of TNFα+ cells within the PB CD8s and TILs was 1.83 ± 0.7% and 8.67 ± 6.17%, respectively (SI Appendix, Fig. S3B).
Fig. 3.
BiTELLON engages GBM patients' lymphocytes in an antiglioma activity. Basal levels of (A) PD-1, exhaustion markers (B) PD1, Lag3, Tim3, and activation markers (C) CD69, (D) CD25, in cells isolated from PB and TILs as evaluated by flow cytometry (n ≥ 7). GBM12 51Cr killing assay determined the reengagement of PB and TILs from GBM (E) patient 1 and (F) patient 2 into glioma killing in the presence of BiTELLON and CD2CD3CD28 beads (Stim.), but not BiTELLOFF or not stimulation (No stim.) (one-way ANOVA, n ≥ 2, *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001, ****P < 0.0001). Flow cytometric analysis of (G) PD-1 and (H) PD-1, Tim3, and Lag3 after coculture for 3 d of PB lymphocytes or TILs with IL13Rα2-expressing gliomas (n = 3). Evaluation of (I) secreted (ELISA) and (J) intracellular (flow cytometry) levels of IFNγ in lymphocytes isolated from GBM patients’ PB (one-way ANOVA, n = 2–12, *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ****P < 0.0001). Secreted (K and L) intracellular (flow cytometry) levels of IFNγ in TILs isolated from GBM patients (one-way ANOVA, n = 2–3, *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ****P < 0.0001).
We processed blood and tissues from two GBM patients and found that PB and TILs could be stimulated for antiglioma activity when cocultured with IL13Rα2+ GBMs in the presence of BiTELLON, but not BiTELLOFF (Fig. 3 E and F). The potency of TILs cocultured with BiTELLON in killing GBM cells was variable between patients in relation to bead-stimulated cells.
PB and TIL cocultured with GBM cells showed activation and increased expression of PD-1 at the cell surface (Fig. 3G and SI Appendix, Fig. S3 C and D). There was also an increase of triple+ peripheral lymphocytes and TILs after BiTELLON and bead stimulation, but not when treated with BiTELLOFF or in unstimulated conditions (BiTELLON: PB CD8 triple+ 13.52 ± 6.38% and TILs triple+ 20.52 ± 9.98%; Stimulated: PB CD8 triple+ 28.03 ± 17.45% and TILs triple+ 35.15 ± 1.66%) (Fig. 3H).
BiTELLON induced significantly more IFNγ+ PB CD8 cells, as compared to BiTELLOFF or unstimulated cells (P < 0.0001) (Fig. 3 I and J). In stratifying cells according to exhaustion markers, we determined that contributors to the production of IFNγ in BiTELLON-stimulated cultures are distributed within all exhaustion marker subtypes, with PD1+Lag3+ cells comprising the largest subgroup (46.53 ± 1.7%) (SI Appendix, Table S2). In positive control PB coculture (activated with beads), PD-1+ cells were determined as the major producers of IFNγ (SI Appendix, Table S2). The profile of TNFα in cocultured PB lymphocytes was similar to the IFNγ (SI Appendix, Fig. S3 E and F).
Patient TILs secreted significantly more IFNγ when cocultured with BiTELLON than negative controls and bead-stimulated cells (P < 0.005) (Fig. 3K). Flow cytometry analysis also showed a higher expression of IFNγ+ in TILs when cultured with BiTELLON as compared to negative controls, but not to bead-activated cultures (Fig. 3L). When stratified by individual exhaustion phenotypes, triple+ TILs were the most significant contributors to IFNγ in BiTELLON- and bead-stimulated culture conditions (SI Appendix, Table S2). Flow cytometry analysis revealed that BiTELLON causes an increase in TIL intracellular TNFα (SI Appendix, Fig. S3G). The most significant contributors to the pool of TNFα+ cells were triple+ TILs (SI Appendix, Table S2).
Altogether, these data show that BiTELLON stimulates antiglioma activity in patient T cells and induces cytokine production in triple exhausted TILs.
Development of NSCs Secreting Functional BiTE.
BiTEs can cross the BBB, but the rate at which they are degraded and cleared from the body necessitates repeated systemic administration in cancer patients (35, 59). We and others have demonstrated that NSCs can migrate in the brain toward GBM cells/tissue and produce therapeutic antibodies for extended periods of time (60–62). For this study, we modified immortalized NSCs (63–65) for BiTELLON and BiTELLOFF synthesis and secretion (SI Appendix, Fig. S4A) (60). Modified NSCs were fluorescence-activated cell sorter (FACS) sorted by their expression of the ZsGreen1 reporter (Fig. 4A). Cytogenic studies of NSCs modified for synthesis and secretion of BiTELLON (NSCLLON) showed the same karyotype as the parental NSCs (SI Appendix, Fig. S4B). Results from immunocytochemical analysis (Fig. 4 B and C) and Western blotting (Fig. 4D) showed that NSCLLON and NSCLLOFF produce BiTE protein. BiTEs secreted by NSCLLON, but not NSCLLOFF, showed strong binding to human recombinant IL13Rα2 (hrIL13Rα2) immobilized on ELISA plates (Fig. 4E). Quantitative analysis revealed that 1 × 106 of NSCLLON produced 1.6 ± 0.13 μg of BiTE within the first 24 h and 2.42 ± 0.26 μg after an additional day in culture (48 h) (Fig. 4F). NSCLLON and NSCLLOFF are tropic for GBM cells in vitro (Fig. 4G and SI Appendix, Fig. S4C).
Fig. 4.
NSCs produce and deliver BiTELLON protein to tumors in vivo. BiTE-transduced NSCs were sorted for the expression of (A) ZsGreen1 (sample histogram) protein and evaluated for the production of BiTE proteins using immunocytochemistry by (B) NSCLLON and (C) NSCLLOFF cells immobilized on cover glass (cells-DAPI-nucleus [I], NSC-ZsGreen1 [II], BiTE protein-α-His-Tag [III], and [IV] merged together. (Scale bars: 50 μm.) (D) Western blotting using anti-His Tag and anti–glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (anti-GAPDH) antibodies. (E) NSCLLON but not NSCLLOFF produced protein binding to IL13Rα2 protein immobilized on ELISA plates. (F) Production dynamics of BiTELLON by NSCLLON after 24 and 48 h in culture (t test, n = 3, **P < 0.01). (G) Migratory capacity of parental (NSCs) and modified NSCLLON and NSCLLOFF toward conditioned media collected from human xenograft cell lines GBM39, GBM12, and GBM6 cultured in vitro was assessed in invasion chambers (one-way ANOVA, n = 3, *P < 0.05). (H) Immunocytochemical analysis of NSCLLON labeled with superparamagnetic iron oxide contrast (SPIO) particles used for dynamic in vivo tracking of NSCs by MRI. Scale bar, 50 µm. (I) Labeled NSCLLON injected into a contralateral hemisphere, robustly egressed from the injection site, and migrated toward the tumor. The change in the NSCLLON movement within the brain is expressed as a change in R2*, a signal corresponding to labeled NSCs (P = 0.0005 as described in SI Appendix, Statistics and data analysis) and achieved (J) maximum tumor coverage within 2 d (P = 0.0063). Purple arrow, injection time point = 0 h. AU, arbitrary units.
Iron-labeled NSCLLON (Fig. 4H and SI Appendix, Fig. S4 D and E) were followed by MRI for 5 d after injection into the hemisphere contralateral to the tumor-bearing brain of animal subjects (SI Appendix, Fig. S4F), as previously described (62). T2* (effective T2) weighted MRI signal showed NSCLLON accumulation in the tumor-bearing hemisphere that reached a maximum level at 24 to 48 h after injection (Fig. 4I and SI Appendix, Fig. S4 G and H). The signal from the hemisphere injected with NSCLLON (contralateral to the tumor-bearing hemisphere) was highest at 3 h after injection and progressively decreased after that (Fig. 4I). Quantitative analysis of R2* data (where R2* is 1/T2*), revealed maximal tumor coverage by NSCLLON within 48 h from the intracranial injection of cells (P = 0.0063) (Fig. 4J and SI Appendix, Fig. S4G).
NSCs could be immunosuppressive or immunoreactive due to the presence of MHCI and PDL-1 at their cell surface (SI Appendix, Fig. S5A) (66, 67). NSCs express MHCI on the surface (SI Appendix, Fig. S5A). Profiling for checkpoint molecules showed that 20.02 ± 2.26% of NSCLLON and 39.57 ± 3.9% of NSCLLOFF expressed a low level of PD-1 ligand (PDL-1) at the cell surface (SI Appendix, Fig. S5 B–D). Modified NSCs do not express PDL-2 or cytotoxic T lymphocyte-associated protein 4 (CTLA4) (SI Appendix, Fig. S5 C and D). The presence of PDL-1 did not affect secreted BiTELLON from promoting a strong T cell antiglioma response (NSCs vs. NSC supernatant) (SI Appendix, Fig. S5E).
NSCLLON, but not BiTEs from NSCLLOFF, produced BiTE that potently stimulates donor’s lymphocytes, leading to the killing of IL13Rα2-positive GBM cells (Fig. 5 A and B). NSCLLON and NSCLLOFF did not induce lymphocyte killing of IL13Rα2-negative cells (Fig. 5C). GBM patient lymphocytes were also activated against GBM cells by NSCLLON (Fig. 5D). NSCLLON, but not NSCLLOFF, up-regulated lymphocyte expression of granzyme B (GrzmB) and Lamp1, markers of degranulation, and mediators of the perforin-associated killing of IL13Rα2+ GBM cells. These effects were not observed in the absence of IL13Rα2 (Fig. 5E). BiTEs secreted by the NSCLLON also induced lymphocyte proliferation (Fig. 5F), activation (Fig. 5 G and H), and production of type 1 cytokines: IL2, IFNγ, and TNFα (Fig. 5 I–K) in cocultures with IL13Rα2-positive GBM cells (Fig. 5 F–K and SI Appendix, Fig. S5 F–K).
Fig. 5.
BiTELLON secreted by NSCs is functional in vitro. NSCLLON produce BiTE protein that induced a robust killing in two IL13Rα2+ cell lines, (A) GBM6 and (B) GBM12 (two-way ANOVA, n = 4, **P < 0.01, ****P < 0.0001). (C) BiTE secreting NSCs did not engage donor T cells to kill GBM39, an IL13Rα2-negative cell line. (D) NSCLLON presence in a coculture, but not NSCLLOFF, induced GBM patient's T cells' reengagement to kill GBM12 cells (two-way ANOVA, n = 3, ***P < 0.001). (E) Coculture of donor T cells with GBM12 in the presence of NSCLLON and bead stimulation, but not NSCLLOFF or absence of stimulation, induced expression of Granzyme B (GrzmB) and Lamp1 (markers of cytotoxic T cell activity), (F) proliferation and expression of activation markers (G) CD69 and (H) CD25 in T cells (one-way ANOVA, n ≥ 3, ****P < 0.0001). Activation of T cells was associated with the production of (I) IL2 (24 h), (J) IFNγ (48 h), and (K) TNFα (48 h) by T cells after coculture with GBM12 in the presence of BiTELLON or stimulation with CD2CD3CD28 beads (Stim.), but not in BiTELLOFF or absence of any form of stimulation (No stim.) (one-way ANOVA, n ≥ 4, ****P < 0.0001).
NSCLLON Administration Extends the Survival of Glioma-Bearing Animals.
We injected NSCLLON proximally (1.5 mm) to GBM12 intracranial tumors in NSG mice (SI Appendix, Fig. S6A). Immunohistochemical analysis of sections of brains harvested on days 3 and 7 following NSCLLON injection showed robust infiltration of the tumor mass by stem cells and the production of BiTE protein within the tumor and at the tumor periphery (Fig. 6A and SI Appendix, Fig. S6 B and C). We also evaluated NSCLLON for the duration of in vivo viability by histopathologic analysis of resected mouse brains from animal subjects euthanized at 90 d following NSCLLON injection (SI Appendix, Fig. S7 A–C), with GBM12 serving as a positive control. There were no Ki67-positive (e.g., proliferating) cells found in the mouse brain injected with NSCLLON, in contrast to the brain with GBM12 tumors (SI Appendix, Fig. S7B). Only a few NSCLLON cells were detected near the third ventricle, but not in other brain regions (SI Appendix, Fig. S7C). Moreover, implantation of NSCLLON in tumor-bearing mice in the absence of T cells did not affect the tumor progression compared to untreated control mice in GBM12- and GBM39-bearing mice (GBM12 median survival: not treated [NT], 22 d; NSCLLON, 26 d; log-rank test, P = 0.269) (SI Appendix, Fig. S7D) (GBM39 median survival: NT, 84.5 d; NSCLLON, 71 d; log-rank test, P = 0.095) (SI Appendix, Fig. S7E). Interestingly, the ex-vivo analysis of GBM6 and GBM12 glioma cells harvested from brain xenografts showed a much smaller fraction of glioma cells expressing IL13Rα2 (SI Appendix, Fig.S7 F and G) in comparison to GBM6 and GBM12 cells cultured in vitro (Fig. 1 E and F). Infiltration of NSCLLON into the tumor mass with the accompanied secretion of BiTELLON could be detected in tumors 3 d after NSCLLON injection (Fig. 6 A, II, III, and IV and SI Appendix, Fig. S6B). Both NSCs and BiTE were also detectable in the tumor at day 7 postinjection, albeit at lower levels (Fig. 6 A, II vs. 6 A, VI and Fig. 6 A, III vs. 6 A, VII).
Fig. 6.
NSCLLON treatment significantly extends the survival of glioma-bearing animals. (A) NSCLLON injected superior and 1.5 mm proximal to the tumor mass (for large magnification and orientation concerning NSCLLON injection, please see SI Appendix, Fig. S6) persist for an extended time, infiltrate tumor mass (direction of infiltration is shown with red arrows), and secrete therapeutic proteins in situ (dotted line marks the tumor edge, DAPI cells, blue; NSCs, green; BiTELLON, magenta; I–IV, 3 d and V–VIII, 7 d after injection; NSCs and BiTE expression are shown with white arrows) (Scale bar: 50 μm). (B–D) Animals bearing IL13Rα2-expressing gliomas (1.0 × 105 GBM6 or GBM12) were treated with a single intracranial (i.c.) injection of 1 × 106 NSCLLON and PB cells, either at the tumor mass i.c. (red, 1.5 × 106 PB) or injected intravenously (i.v.) (blue, 7 × 106 PB). (B) GBM12-bearing animals treated with NSCLLON and PB i.c. survived significantly longer than not treated (NT) or treated with NSCVC and PB (Kaplan–Meier survival curves were compared using log-rank tests, P < 0.0001, and adjusted for P values using the Holm–Sidak method: NT vs. NSCVC P = 0.31, NSCVC vs. NSCLLON ***P = 0.0003, n = 8). (C) Similarly, treated mice transplanted with GBM6 cells survived significantly longer from the control NSCVC or NT animals (Kaplan–Meier survival curves were compared using log-rank tests, P = 0.0002, and adjusted for P values using the Holm–Sidak method: NT vs. NSCVC P = 0.54, NSCVC vs. NSCLLON ***P = 0.0009, n ≥ 8). (D) GBM6-bearing mice treated with an i.c. NSCLLON and i.v. PB lived significantly longer than mice transplanted with control NSCVC and i.v. PB animals (Kaplan–Meier survival curves were compared using log-rank tests, ***P < 0.001, n = 11).
We treated GBM12-bearing mice by intratumoral injection with either NSCLLON or NSC vector control (NSCVC) and PB lymphocytes (Fig. 6B). Treatment with NSCs secreting therapeutic BiTEs increased average animal survival by 67%. Animals bearing GBM6 tumors were treated using the same protocol as for GBM12-bearing animals (Fig. 6C). GBM6-bearing mice treated with NSCLLON+ PB lived on average 63.3% longer than animals that were NT or those that received an injection of NSCVC+ PB . In contrast to GBM6 and GBM12, treatment of mice bearing IL13Rα2-negative GBM39 tumors with NSCLLON and PB did not extend animals' survival compared to the NT group (SI Appendix, Fig. S7E). Animals bearing GBM6 tumors and treated with intratumoral injection of NSCLLON but an intravenous infusion of PB also survived significantly longer than mice treated with control NSCVC (Fig. 6D). Histopathologic analysis of brains from the control and treated animals showed the absence of therapy-related toxicity, including demyelination, encephalomyelitis, or neuronal loss.
Altogether, these data show that NSCs secreting BiTELLON deliver a sustained therapeutic protein source for local engagement of CD3+ cells for an antiglioma activity.
Discussion
This study reports the development and functional analysis of NSCs secreting novel proteins that stimulate patient-derived T cell antitumor activity in vitro and in vivo. We show that IL13Rα2-targeted BiTEs, secreted by NSCLLON, promote T cell killing of IL13Rα2+ tumor cells by engaging the tumor cell antigen target with T cell CD3ε. The genetically modified NSCs produce and secrete BiTE in vivo while infiltrating the tumor mass, with treated animals bearing intracranial tumors experiencing significant survival benefit.
Demonstration of target specificity is essential for limiting undesirable side effects from BiTE treatment of cancer patients (30, 32, 44, 68), and, for this reason, we have developed BiTE targeting IL13Rα2 (51, 52). We show BiTELLON binding specificity for PDX cells expressing IL13Rα2 and T cell CD3ε, with this dual binding specificity promoting T cell-mediated cell death to IL13Rα2-positive tumor cells. The absence of cell killing in T cell–tumor cell cocultures with nonbinding BiTELLOFF, and in cocultures where tumor cells lack the IL13Rα2 antigenic target, supports the specificity of BiTELLON. Maximal BiTE antitumor activity was observed at a concentration of 2.5 µg/mL and a T:E cell ratio (1:5), suggesting that relatively low amounts of recombinant protein are needed for antineoplastic effect (43).
Prolong T cells' stimulation results in the expression of activation markers PD-1, Tim3, Lag3, and T cell exhaustion (69, 70). GBMs are known to suppress lymphocyte activation processes and promote T cell exhaustion characterized by T cell expression of PD-1, Tim3, and Lag3 (57, 58). Our results show that BiTELLON activates patient-derived peripheral and tumor-infiltrating T cells to kill IL13Rα2+ GBMs, irrespective of T cell expression of these proteins.
It has been shown that activation of T cells by targeted immunotherapeutics can lead to aberrant cytokine production and cytokine release storm (CRS) in treated patients (44, 71). In our study, donor T cells stimulated directly with BiTELLON, or by BiTELLON secreted by NSCs, produced IFNγ and TNFα, but only in the presence of IL13Rα2-expressing tumor cells. Interestingly, we found that CD8+ T cells, positive for PD-1, Tim3, and Lag3, are major contributors to the pool of secreted cytokines when treated with BiTELLON, while in the presence of IL13Rα2-expressing cells. Notably, BiTELLON successfully activated both PB lymphocytes and TIL cells against IL13Rα2-expressing tumor in cases when T cells were harvested from patients receiving steroid treatment, which is known to suppress T cell activity (72, 73).
Unlike blood vessels of a healthy brain, GBM vasculature is considered to be disorganized and leaky, allowing larger molecules to pass from circulation to tumor tissue. Indeed, systemically delivered BiTEs, directed against the tumor-associated antigen epidermal growth factor variant III (EGFRvIII), were shown to reach the intracranial tumor in an amount that was sufficient to reduce tumor burden (74). Nonetheless, it is expected that the systemic administration of BiTE for treating GBM would require repeated treatments. Interventions such as focused ultrasound transiently opening the blood–tumor barrier (74) might be an option to improve the delivery of therapeutic protein to GBM. An approach that would potentially circumvent the need for repeated administrations is to deliver treatment locally and using a platform for sustaining therapeutic presence. To achieve this, we have investigated direct intracranial administration of BiTE-secreting NSCs. Therapeutic NSCs' migration toward and dissemination within brain tumors in mice, following systemic and intracranial NSCs' administration routes, have been previously demonstrated by our group and colleagues (67, 74, 75). In the current study, intracranially administered NSCLLON show tropism to and dissemination within glioma xenografts. Our results also show that NSCLLON persist and secrete BiTE for at least 7 d following administration, thereby extending the supply of BiTE within the tumor. Others have reported the persistence of engineered human NSCs in a mouse brain for up to 12 wk (74). Nevertheless, it is anticipated that there will be a decrease in the number of NSCs within the tumor over time, as indicated by MRI (Fig. 4 I and J and SI Appendix, Fig. S4G). This results in decreased levels of locally secreted BiTEs, contributing to this therapy’s limited antitumor efficacy. Sustained or repeated delivery of therapeutic NSCs to brain tumor patients, using already clinically available methods, such as an Ommaya reservoir placement, would presumably extend treatment benefit.
The drawback of many targeted therapies against tumors is antigen escape (27, 28, 49), necessitating the development of therapeutics to multiple targets. This is partly due to the heterogeneous expression of TAA, including IL13Rα2, in GBM tissue (28, 55, 75). In our experimental models, only a fraction of GBM12 and GBM6 cells express IL13Rα2 in vivo, recapitulating the pattern of antigen expression in GBM. Thus, treatment-associated selection against TAA-positive cells is another factor that would likely limit the therapeutic efficacy of any BiTE therapy directed to a single tumor antigen. Antigen escape in tumors treated with CAR T cells directed to a single target has been demonstrated in preclinical and clinical GBM studies (27, 28, 49). The CAR T cells secreting BiTEs have recently been investigated as a platform for targeting multiple tumor antigens (48). However, the short life of CAR T cells in the tumor environment is expected to translate into a similarly short presence of BiTEs produced by T cells. Stem cells engineering strategy or loading NSCs with vectors encoding for multispecific molecules could overcome the limitations mentioned above. The oncolytic virus expressing BiTE, cytokine, and checkpoint blockade has been generated and tested in combination with CAR T cells (76). A multifunctional vector delivered to the tumor by NSCs will ensure a robust intratumoral distribution of therapeutic molecules.
Tumor inhibition of T cell function through an aberrant expression of immune checkpoint proteins and tumor MHC down-regulation is a critical mechanism by which GBM escapes antitumor immune response (39, 57, 58). Based on this knowledge, immune-checkpoint inhibitor (3) therapy has been tested in clinical trials. However, the results have shown a lack of survival benefit for treated GBM patients (3, 77–79). Based on the results presented here, it would be interesting to compare the antitumor activity of local NSCLLON administration in combination with systemically or locally delivered checkpoint inhibitors. Interestingly, a BiTE molecule engineered to interact with T cells and PD-L1 has been recently tested in preclinical models of PD-L1–positive tumors, with results showing extended survival of treated animal subjects (80). Based on these findings and results presented here, one can envision a scenario in which multiple types of modified NSCs, each producing BiTEs that target distinct tumor antigens, were used in treating GBM patients.
It is relevant to consider shortcomings associated with animal models that lack a fully functional immune system and, therefore, have an inherent deficiency in recapitulating the tumor microenvironment of a GBM. Future studies utilizing immunocompetent hosts will be necessary for revealing BiTE interactions with a fully functional host immune system (81). The use of humanized mouse models, in which mice have been modified for durable production of human immune cells, or the use of genetically engineered mice that express the human CD3 receptor, will also be of interest.
Thus, the current study represents a starting point for expanding the investigation of BiTEs produced by genetically modified NSCs, for treating GBM. The results we have in hand are encouraging and merit continued exploration of this therapeutic modality.
Materials and Methods
For a detailed description of cell lines, generation of BiTE molecules and NSCs secreting BiTEs, functional in vitro assays, flow cytometry, immunocytochemistry, animal tumor, and MRI studies, statistics, and data analysis, please see SI Appendix, Materials and Methods.
Supplementary Material
Acknowledgments
This research was supported by NIH Grants R33NS101150 (to I.V.B.), R01NS106379 (to I.V.B.), and P50CA221747 (to M.S.L.). The Northwestern Nervous System Tumor Bank is supported by the P50CA221747 Specialized Program of Research Excellence for Translational Approaches to Brain Cancer. Histology services were provided by the Northwestern University Mouse Histology and Phenotyping Laboratory, which is supported by National Cancer Institute Grant P30-CA060553 awarded to the Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center. We thank Dolonchampa Maji, Ph.D. (Department of Neurological Surgery), Sergii Pshenychnyi, Ph.D. (the Recombinant Protein Production Core), and the Small Animal Imaging Facility at Northwestern University for assistance with this project.
Footnotes
Competing interest statement: I.V.B. and M.S.L. have a patent for the use of ScFv47 for IL13Rα2-targeted cancer therapies. K.S.A. holds a patent covering the use of neural stem cells for cancer therapy.
This article is a PNAS Direct Submission.
This article contains supporting information online at https://www.pnas.org/lookup/suppl/doi:10.1073/pnas.2015800118/-/DCSupplemental.
Data Availability
All study data are included in the article and/or SI Appendix.
References
- 1.Stupp R., et al., Effect of tumor-treating fields plus maintenance temozolomide vs maintenance temozolomide alone on survival in patients with glioblastoma: A randomized clinical trial. JAMA 318, 2306–2316 (2017). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Ostermann S., et al., Plasma and cerebrospinal fluid population pharmacokinetics of temozolomide in malignant glioma patients. Clin. Cancer Res. 10, 3728–3736 (2004). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Zhao J., et al., Immune and genomic correlates of response to anti-PD-1 immunotherapy in glioblastoma. Nat. Med. 25, 462–469 (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Cloughesy T. F., et al., Neoadjuvant anti-PD-1 immunotherapy promotes a survival benefit with intratumoral and systemic immune responses in recurrent glioblastoma. Nat. Med. 25, 477–486 (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Schalper K. A., et al., Neoadjuvant nivolumab modifies the tumor immune microenvironment in resectable glioblastoma. Nat. Med. 25, 470–476 (2019). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Patel A. P., et al., Single-cell RNA-seq highlights intratumoral heterogeneity in primary glioblastoma. Science 344, 1396–1401 (2014). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Martinez-Lage M., et al., Immune landscapes associated with different glioblastoma molecular subtypes. Acta Neuropathol. Commun. 7, 203 (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Fecci P. E., Sampson J. H., The current state of immunotherapy for gliomas: An eye toward the future. J. Neurosurg. 131, 657–666 (2019). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Hodges T. R., et al., Mutational burden, immune checkpoint expression, and mismatch repair in glioma: Implications for immune checkpoint immunotherapy. Neuro-oncol. 19, 1047–1057 (2017). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Quail D. F., Joyce J. A., The microenvironmental landscape of brain tumors. Cancer Cell 31, 326–341 (2017). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Galon J., et al., Type, density, and location of immune cells within human colorectal tumors predict clinical outcome. Science 313, 1960–1964 (2006). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Dudley M. E., et al., Adoptive cell transfer therapy following non-myeloablative but lymphodepleting chemotherapy for the treatment of patients with refractory metastatic melanoma. J. Clin. Oncol. 23, 2346–2357 (2005). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Louveau A., et al., Structural and functional features of central nervous system lymphatic vessels. Nature 523, 337–341 (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Hu X., et al., Meningeal lymphatic vessels regulate brain tumor drainage and immunity. Cell Res. 30, 229–243 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Dupont G., et al., Our current understanding of the lymphatics of the brain and spinal cord. Clin. Anat. 32, 117–121 (2019). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Prasad S., Lokensgard J. R., Brain-Resident T., Brain-resident T cells following viral infection. Viral Immunol. 32, 48–54 (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Congdon K. L., Sanchez-Perez L. A., Sampson J. H., Effective effectors: How T cells access and infiltrate the central nervous system. Pharmacol. Ther. 197, 52–60 (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Kim A., et al., The prognostic significance of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes assessment with hematoxylin and eosin sections in resected primary lung adenocarcinoma. PLoS One 14, e0224430 (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Hida A. I., et al., Diffuse distribution of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes is a marker for better prognosis and chemotherapeutic effect in triple-negative breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res. Treat. 178, 283–294 (2019). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Castaneda C. A., et al., Relationship between tumor-associated immune infiltrate and p16 staining over clinicopathological features in acral lentiginous melanoma. Clin. Transl. Oncol. 21, 1127–1134 (2019). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Zengin M., Prognostic role of tumour-infiltrating T lymphocytes in stage IIA (T3N0) colon cancer: A broad methodological study in a fairly homogeneous population. Ann. Diagn. Pathol. 41, 69–78 (2019). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Rizvi N. A., et al., Cancer immunology. Mutational landscape determines sensitivity to PD-1 blockade in non-small cell lung cancer. Science 348, 124–128 (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Topalian S. L., et al., Safety, activity, and immune correlates of anti-PD-1 antibody in cancer. N. Engl. J. Med. 366, 2443–2454 (2012). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Robert C., et al., Anti-programmed-death-receptor-1 treatment with pembrolizumab in ipilimumab-refractory advanced melanoma: A randomised dose-comparison cohort of a phase 1 trial. Lancet 384, 1109–1117 (2014). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Powles T., et al., MPDL3280A (anti-PD-L1) treatment leads to clinical activity in metastatic bladder cancer. Nature 515, 558–562 (2014). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Ansell S. M., et al., PD-1 blockade with nivolumab in relapsed or refractory Hodgkin’s lymphoma. N. Engl. J. Med. 372, 311–319 (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.O’Rourke D. M., et al., A single dose of peripherally infused EGFRvIII-directed CAR T cells mediates antigen loss and induces adaptive resistance in patients with recurrent glioblastoma. Sci. Transl. Med. 9, eaaa0984 (2017). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Brown C. E., et al., Regression of glioblastoma after chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy. N. Engl. J. Med. 375, 2561–2569 (2016). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Fossati M., et al., Immunological changes in the ascites of cancer patients after intraperitoneal administration of the bispecific antibody catumaxomab (anti-EpCAM×anti-CD3). Gynecol. Oncol. 138, 343–351 (2015). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Jäger M., et al., Immunomonitoring results of a phase II/III study of malignant ascites patients treated with the trifunctional antibody catumaxomab (anti-EpCAM x anti-CD3). Cancer Res. 72, 24–32 (2012). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Benonisson H., et al., CD3-Bispecific antibody therapy turns solid tumors into inflammatory sites but does not install protective memory. Mol. Cancer Ther. 18, 312–322 (2019). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Goéré D., et al., Potent immunomodulatory effects of the trifunctional antibody catumaxomab. Cancer Res. 73, 4663–4673 (2013). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Topp M. S., et al., Phase II trial of the anti-CD19 bispecific T cell-engager blinatumomab shows hematologic and molecular remissions in patients with relapsed or refractory B-precursor acute lymphoblastic leukemia. J. Clin. Oncol. 32, 4134–4140 (2014). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Kebenko M., et al., A multicenter phase 1 study of solitomab (MT110, AMG 110), a bispecific EpCAM/CD3 T-cell engager (BiTE®) antibody construct, in patients with refractory solid tumors. OncoImmunology 7, e1450710 (2018). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Choi B. D., et al., Systemic administration of a bispecific antibody targeting EGFRvIII successfully treats intracerebral glioma. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 110, 270–275 (2013). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Newman M. J., Benani D. J., A review of blinatumomab, a novel immunotherapy. J. Oncol. Pharm. Pract. 22, 639–645 (2016). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Yu L., Wang J., T cell-redirecting bispecific antibodies in cancer immunotherapy: Recent advances. J. Cancer Res. Clin. Oncol. 145, 941–956 (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Frankel S. R., Baeuerle P. A., Targeting T cells to tumor cells using bispecific antibodies. Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol. 17, 385–392 (2013). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Palesch D., et al., Cathepsin G-mediated proteolytic degradation of MHC class I molecules to facilitate immune detection of human glioblastoma cells. Cancer Immunol. Immunother. 65, 283–291 (2016). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Marra A., Curigliano G., T-cell bispecific antibodies to bypass MHC class I loss in breast cancer. Ann. Oncol. 30, 877–879 (2019). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Godbersen C., et al., NKG2D ligand-targeted bispecific T-cell engagers lead to robust antitumor activity against diverse human tumors. Mol. Cancer Ther. 16, 1335–1346 (2017). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Ferrini S., et al., Targeting of T lymphocytes against EGF-receptor+ tumor cells by bispecific monoclonal antibodies: Requirement of CD3 molecule cross-linking for T-cell activation. Int. J. Cancer 55, 931–937 (1993). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Bargou R., et al., Tumor regression in cancer patients by very low doses of a T cell-engaging antibody. Science 321, 974–977 (2008). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Kroschinsky F.et al.; Intensive Care in Hematological and Oncological Patients (iCHOP) Collaborative Group , New drugs, new toxicities: Severe side effects of modern targeted and immunotherapy of cancer and their management. Crit. Care 21, 89 (2017). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Stadler C. R., et al., Elimination of large tumors in mice by mRNA-encoded bispecific antibodies. Nat. Med. 23, 815–817 (2017). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Compte M., et al., Tumor immunotherapy using gene-modified human mesenchymal stem cells loaded into synthetic extracellular matrix scaffolds. Stem Cells 27, 753–760 (2009). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Szoor A., et al., T cell-activating mesenchymal stem cells as a biotherapeutic for HCC. Mol. Ther. Oncolytics 6, 69–79 (2017). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Choi B. D., et al., CAR-T cells secreting BiTEs circumvent antigen escape without detectable toxicity. Nat. Biotechnol. 37, 1049–1058 (2019). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Krenciute G., et al., Transgenic expression of IL15 improves antiglioma activity of IL13Rα2-CAR T cells but results in antigen loss variants. Cancer Immunol. Res. 5, 571–581 (2017). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Moyano A. L., et al., microRNA-219 reduces viral load and pathologic changes in theiler’s virus-induced demyelinating disease. Mol. Ther. 26, 730–743 (2018). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Balyasnikova I. V., et al., Characterization and immunotherapeutic implications for a novel antibody targeting interleukin (IL)-13 receptor α2. J. Biol. Chem. 287, 30215–30227 (2012). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Kim J. W., et al., A novel single-chain antibody redirects adenovirus to IL13Rα2-expressing brain tumors. Sci. Rep. 5, 18133 (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Pituch K. C., et al., Adoptive transfer of IL13Rα2-specific chimeric antigen receptor T cells creates a pro-inflammatory environment in glioblastoma. Mol. Ther. 26, 986–995 (2018). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Krenciute G., et al., Characterization and functional analysis of scFv-based chimeric antigen receptors to redirect T cells to IL13Rα2-positive glioma. Mol. Ther. 24, 354–363 (2016). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Jarboe J. S., Johnson K. R., Choi Y., Lonser R. R., Park J. K., Expression of interleukin-13 receptor alpha2 in glioblastoma multiforme: Implications for targeted therapies. Cancer Res. 67, 7983–7986 (2007). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Joshi B. H., Plautz G. E., Puri R. K., Interleukin-13 receptor alpha chain: A novel tumor-associated transmembrane protein in primary explants of human malignant gliomas. Cancer Res. 60, 1168–1172 (2000). [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Davidson T. B., et al., Expression of PD-1 by T cells in malignant glioma patients reflects exhaustion and activation. Clin. Cancer Res. 25, 1913–1922 (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Woroniecka K., et al., T-cell exhaustion signatures vary with tumor type and are severe in glioblastoma. Clin. Cancer Res. 24, 4175–4186 (2018). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Schaller T. H., et al., Pharmacokinetic analysis of a novel human EGFRvIII:CD3 bispecific antibody in plasma and whole blood using a high-resolution targeted mass spectrometry approach. J. Proteome Res. 18, 3032–3041 (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Kanojia D., et al., Neural stem cells secreting anti-HER2 antibody improve survival in a preclinical model of HER2 overexpressing breast cancer brain metastases. Stem Cells 33, 2985–2994 (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Dey M., et al., Intranasal oncolytic virotherapy with CXCR4-enhanced stem cells extends survival in mouse model of glioma. Stem Cell Reports 7, 471–482 (2016). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Spencer D., et al., Pharmacologic modulation of nasal epithelium augments neural stem cell targeting of glioblastoma. Theranostics 9, 2071–2083 (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Aboody K. S., et al., Neural stem cells display extensive tropism for pathology in adult brain: Evidence from intracranial gliomas. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 97, 12846–12851 (2000). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Aboody K. S., et al., Neural stem cell-mediated enzyme/prodrug therapy for glioma: Preclinical studies. Sci. Transl. Med. 5, 184ra59 (2013). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Portnow J., et al., Neural stem cell-based anticancer gene therapy: A first-in-human study in recurrent high-grade glioma patients. Clin. Cancer Res. 23, 2951–2960 (2017). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Zhao D., et al., Neural stem cell tropism to glioma: Critical role of tumor hypoxia. Mol. Cancer Res. 6, 1819–1829 (2008). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Gutova M., et al., Quantitative evaluation of intraventricular delivery of therapeutic neural stem cells to orthotopic glioma. Front. Oncol. 9, 68 (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Ellerman D., Bispecific T-cell engagers: Towards understanding variables influencing the in vitro potency and tumor selectivity and their modulation to enhance their efficacy and safety. Methods 154, 102–117 (2019). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Sakuishi K., et al., Targeting Tim-3 and PD-1 pathways to reverse T cell exhaustion and restore anti-tumor immunity. J. Exp. Med. 207, 2187–2194 (2010). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Wherry E. J., Kurachi M., Molecular and cellular insights into T cell exhaustion. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 15, 486–499 (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Neelapu S. S., et al., Chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy—Assessment and management of toxicities. Nat. Rev. Clin. Oncol. 15, 47–62 (2018). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72.Pountain G. D., Keogan M. T., Hazleman B. L., Brown D. L., Effects of single dose compared with three days’ prednisolone treatment of healthy volunteers: Contrasting effects on circulating lymphocyte subsets. J. Clin. Pathol. 46, 1089–1092 (1993). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73.Scudeletti M., et al., Immune regulatory properties of corticosteroids: Prednisone induces apoptosis of human T lymphocytes following the CD3 down-regulation. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 876, 164–179 (1999). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74.Li Z., et al., L-MYC expression maintains self-renewal and prolongs multipotency of primary human neural stem cells. Stem Cell Reports 7, 483–495 (2016). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75.Biernat W., Huang H., Yokoo H., Kleihues P., Ohgaki H., Predominant expression of mutant EGFR (EGFRvIII) is rare in primary glioblastomas. Brain Pathol. 14, 131–136 (2004). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76.Porter C. E., et al., Oncolytic adenovirus armed with BiTE, cytokine, and checkpoint inhibitor enables CAR T cells to control the growth of heterogeneous tumors. Mol. Ther. 28, 1251–1262 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77.Guo H., et al., Deliver anti-PD-L1 into brain by p-hydroxybenzoic acid to enhance immunotherapeutic effect for glioblastoma. J. Control. Release 320, 63–72 (2020). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 78.Stanimirovic D., Kemmerich K., Haqqani A. S., Farrington G. K., Engineering and pharmacology of blood-brain barrier-permeable bispecific antibodies. Adv. Pharmacol. 71, 301–335 (2014). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79.Boado R. J., Zhou Q. H., Lu J. Z., Hui E. K., Pardridge W. M., Pharmacokinetics and brain uptake of a genetically engineered bifunctional fusion antibody targeting the mouse transferrin receptor. Mol. Pharm. 7, 237–244 (2010). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 80.Horn L. A., et al., CD3xPDL1 bi-specific T cell engager (BiTE) simultaneously activates T cells and NKT cells, kills PDL1+ tumor cells, and extends the survival of tumor-bearing humanized mice. Oncotarget 8, 57964–57980 (2017). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 81.Day C. P., Merlino G., Van Dyke T., Preclinical mouse cancer models: A maze of opportunities and challenges. Cell 163, 39–53 (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
All study data are included in the article and/or SI Appendix.






