Skip to main content
Springer logoLink to Springer
. 2021 Mar 8;13(4):60. doi: 10.1007/s12520-021-01293-5

Agricultural diversification in West Africa: an archaeobotanical study of the site of Sadia (Dogon Country, Mali)

Louis Champion 1,2, Dorian Q Fuller 3,4,5, Sylvain Ozainne 1,6, Éric Huysecom 1, Anne Mayor 1,7,
PMCID: PMC7937602  PMID: 33758626

Abstract

While narratives of the spread of agriculture are central to interpretation of African history, hard evidence of past crops and cultivation practices are still few. This research aims at filling this gap and better understanding the evolution of agriculture and foodways in West Africa. It reports evidence from systematic flotation samples taken at the settlement mounds of Sadia (Mali), dating from 4 phases (phase 0=before first–third century AD; phase 1=mid eighth–tenth c. AD; phase 2=tenth–eleventh c. AD; phase 3=twelfth–late thirteenth c. AD). Flotation of 2200 l of soil provided plant macro-remains from 146 archaeological samples. As on most West African sites, the most dominant plant is pearl millet (Pennisetum glaucum). But from the tenth century AD, sorghum (Sorghum bicolor) and African rice (Oryza glaberrima) appear in small quantities, and fonio (Digitaria exilis) and barnyard millet/hungry rice (Echinochloa sp.), sometimes considered weeds rather than staple crops, are found in large quantities. Some samples also show remains of tree fruits from savannah parklands, such as baobab (Adansonia digitata), marula (Sclerocarya birrea), jujube (Ziziphus sp.), shea butter (Vittelaria paradoxa) and African grapes (Lannea microcarpa). Fonio and Echinochloa sp. cultivation appears here to be a later addition that helped to diversify agriculture and buffer against failures that might affect the monoculture of pearl millet. This diversification at the end of the 1st millennium AD matches with other evidence found in West Africa.

Keywords: Archaeobotany, Agriculture, Food diversification, Fonio, Rice, West Africa

Introduction

Food and drink form a foremost concern of all societies. Much of human energy is spent fuelling nutritional needs and tastes. Productivity of agriculture may ultimately determine population density, community size, and rate at which growing populations expand through migration (e.g. Fuller et al. 2019). Beyond subsistence needs, food is also crucial for structuring social relationships, reinforcing cultural identity and marking the calendar through seasonal feasts (Hastorf 2016: 142ff; Twiss 2019: 98ff). Feasting event and beer production are usually required by social conventions, and from African ethnographic examples it is estimated that 15–20% of agricultural production goes towards such productions (Dietler 2001: 81–82). Archaeobotanical evidence provide empirical data on past productive systems, from which estimates of the productive capacity and the potential raw materials for daily cuisine and feasts can be reconstructed (Mercuri et al. 2018a; Champion and Fuller 2019).

The aim of this paper is to contribute new empirical evidence that documents some of the evolution of West African food traditions during the past two millennia through the analysis of an important assemblage of archaeobotanical samples coming from the excavations of the stratified and well-dated settlement site of Sadia in Mali (Fig. 1). A key issue is the timing and extent of agricultural diversification in Africa, as crops such as African rice (Oryza glaberrima Steud.), fonio (Digitaria exilis (Kippist) Stapf.), cowpea (Vigna unguiculata) and sorghum (Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench) helped to expand the agricultural repertoire beyond the Neolithic reliance on pearl millet (Pennisetum glaucum) (Kahlheber and Neumann 2007; Champion and Fuller 2018a; Kay et al. 2019).

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

Map of the sites cited in the text (based on the database of Champion 2019)

Archaeological background

Localisation and current environment

The archaeological site of Sadia, located in the Seno Plain in Central Mali, is composed of five anthropogenic mounds covering an approximate area of 3 ha on a small natural elevation. It is settled along the Guringin Valley, perpendicular to the Bandiagara escarpment.

Archaeological work was part of an extensive interdisciplinary study of the Dogon Country conducted within the project ‘Human population and Palaeoenvironment in Africa’ under the leadership of E. Huysecom (Huysecom et al. 2004; Mayor 2011 b; Mayor et al. 2005, 2014; Ozainne 2013; Ozainne et al. 2017). Extensive surveys and small-scale test pits were first conducted along the Guringin valley (Loukou et al. 2013), and then two campaigns of excavations took place at the settlement site of Sadia in 2010 and 2011, the first one focusing on a vertical exploration of four mounds, and the second one on a spatial exposure at the summit of the main mound (Huysecom et al. 2011, 2012, 2015).

In the region, modern rainfall reaches 500–600 mm per annum, but probably varied in the past and was higher during the time of Sadia’s occupation (Mayor et al. 2005; Garnier et al. 2015). The environment is today a largely open Sahelian grassland with scattered trees and shrubs. A long history of pastoralism has encouraged high proportions of spiny taxa like Acacia, while selective cutting, tree management and possibly planting has helped to create a parkland of many useful tree species like Faidherbia albida, Vitellaria paradoxa, Adansonia digitata, Borassus aethiopum, Cordyla pinnata, Tamarindus indica and Sclerocarya birrea (Boffa 1999; Höhn and Neumann 2012; Taïbi 2019). Several of these trees produce edible fruits.

Traditional local agriculture focuses on pearl millet, sorghum and minor millets such as fonio as carbohydrate staples, with various vegetables and pulses, such as cowpea (Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp.), as companion crops. Occasional wild rice (e.g. Oryza barthii) and various other wild grasses gathering has been documented in the region, namely during periods of starvation or bad success of agriculture (Selleger 2014; personal inquiries). Currently, rice cultivation is mostly concentrated to the wetter setting in the Niger valley, such as the Inland Delta, and in the Sourou valley at the border with Burkina Faso. However, rice is also cultivated in the Dogon country, but represents only a very small contribution to local agriculture.

Chrono-stratigraphy

A total of 27 radiocarbon dates analysed with Bayesian modelling has enabled us to build a chrono-cultural framework of the site of Sadia, extending from about 750 to 1300 AD (Huysecom et al. 2011, 2012, 2015). The mounds’ development is preceded by a pre-tell occupation (phase 0) in a yellow sandy layer dated from a single radiocarbon date (1895±35 BP, ETH-40328) as a terminus ante quem of first to third century AD. The tell occupation itself includes three main phases (Fig. 2):

  • Phase 1 witnesses the foundation of the village of Sadia at the location of the most important mound of the site (mound I). It is dated from the middle of the eighth to the tenth century AD.

  • Phase 2 represents the most important growth of the site to as large as 1.5 ha which occurred mainly during the tenth and eleventh c. AD.

  • Phase 3 reaches a maximum area of approximately 3 ha during the twelfth and thirteenth c. AD, before the site is abandoned. Archaeological dwelling structures are well preserved, despite some disturbance of trees. As the summit of the site had been exposed to erosion, the exact date of its abandonment is unknown, but it is suggested that this occurred around 1300 AD.

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

Synthesised transects showing the extension of each phase in the four investigated mounds of Sadia (vertical scale magnified 7.5 times; From Huysecom et al. 2015:12)

The stratigraphy indicates a continuous occupation, without any interruptions or destructive layers.

Important features

Extensive excavations of 143 m2 conducted on the top of mound I allowed a better knowledge of the architectural characteristics of phase 3 (Figs. 3 and 4). Around 200 structures were found and revealed domestic units composed of circular rooms and spaces of different shapes limited by strait walls. Some of the circular rooms are too small for houses and were probably related to specific activities such as storing or cooking. Most of the buildings were made with mud bricks. Occupation floors, post holes, refuse pits, hearths and two burials of children were also found in deeper layers (Huysecom et al. 2015).

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3

View of Sadia mound I extensive excavation showing architectural features of phase 3 (photo APA 2011)

Fig. 4.

Fig. 4

Plan of Sadia mound I extensive excavation. Overview of architectural features of phase 3 (from Huysecom et al. 2015:15)

Animal remains studied by Louis Chaix (Museum of Natural History in Geneva) are mainly based on domesticates. Caprine remains are the largest part of the livestock (51%) with goat (Capra) being more important than sheep (Ovis). Cattle (Bos Taurus) represent around 30% of the animal remains. Donkeys (Equus asinus) and chickens (Gallus gallus) are present in small quantities. Wild animals (<5%) are represented by varieties of gazelles, giant rats, birds and reptiles (crocodiles, frogs and snakes). Fish are well-represented by species found in floodplains and temporary ponds. Diachronic analysis has shown a reduction in domesticates with a decrease of cattle that parallels an increase of caprines through the sequence (Huysecom et al. 2015).

Besides objects of local production like ceramics, iron objects or grindstones, some goods from medium- and long-distance trade were also found, such as copper jewellery and some carnelian and glass beads (Huysecom et al. 2015). Chemical analysis of one glass bead (eleventh–thirteenth c. AD) indicated a composition like the ones of beads discovered in the Iberian Peninsula and Southern Africa, but with an origin of the glass still unknown. These results highlight the trade connections between the Seno plain, the Niger Bend and the major trans-Saharan trade routes (Truffa Giachet 2019; Truffa Giachet et al. 2020).

Regional surveys have shown that many settlements of similar size were established in the Seno plain, suggesting the development of non-centralised agro-pastoral societies during a peaceful period. The turn of the thirteenth to the fourteenth century AD witnessed a large abandonment of the sites in the region, including Sadia, but also in most of West Africa. From abrupt climate changes to war, invasion (i.e. Songhay) and diseases (i.e. the plague), several reasons are proposed for this sub-continental settlement rupture. However, no strong evidence can confirm or refute any of the reasons yet (Huysecom et al. 2015; Champion 2019).

Material and methods

During excavations, Stephanie Kahlheber (University of Frankfurt) and colleagues from the Mission Culturelle de Bandiagara collected systematically archaeobotanical samples within the deep test pits in 2010 and in the horizontal excavation on mound I in 2011, where almost each context was sampled, except the wall remains. The average amount of soil collected was 15 l for each sample, but some smaller contexts, such as hearths, were collected in their entirety.

In total, around 2200 l of archaeological soil matrix coming from 146 samples was processed by bucket flotation directly in the field. Flotation is a method widely used to separate materials of different density, and is the most common way of recovering charred plant remains from archaeological contexts, as soil particles sink and charred plant remains float (Nesbitt 1995). Whether mechanical (using a flotation drum or machine) or manual (using buckets), the basic principle is to mix the sediment with water to wet it and break it apart. The buoyant material—including the plant macro-remains—is then poured off and collected in a fine mesh (Fuller 2008; Champion and Fuller 2019). The weight and volume of each flot was then measured, and each sample was sieved into five size fractions: >4 mm, 2–4 mm, 1–2 mm, 0.5–1 mm, <0.5 mm. The ≥0.5 mm sub-samples were sorted for charred plant elements such as seeds, fruits, and parenchyma with the aid of a low-power stereomicroscope (×10–40).

Identification of cereals, chaff, pulses, millets, weeds, nuts and fruits was made by comparing archaeological morphotypes with taxonomic specimens in the modern reference collection housed at the Institute of Archaeology, University College London, and isolate samples at the University of Geneva. Taxa identification follows the nomenclature of The Useful Plants of West Tropical Africa (Burkill 19852000). Photographs and descriptions of identification from a variety of published literature were also used (Fuller 2003; Fuller and Harvey 2006; Nixon 2011; Murray 2000, 2007; D’Andrea et al. 2001). For all the samples analysed, whole vegetal items were recorded by count in a list of taxa, from which tables of relative frequency were constructed, and ubiquity calculated. The relative frequency is the percentage of total seed count. It can be calculated by sample, phase, trench or site, as necessary. In addition, every taxon was logged in a ubiquity table. The ubiquity is the number of samples in which a taxon is present as a percentage of the total number of samples.

Results

Here we present the results of our analysis of seeds from all samples, integrating a previous preliminary analysis by B. Eichhorn and S. Kahlheber including grains and wood charcoal, which was published elsewhere (Huysecom et al. 2012, 2015). Of the 146 collected samples analysed here, only five were entirely devoid of identifiable macro-botanical remains. In total, around 10,104 plant remains were recorded within 141 samples for an average density of 4.5 remains per litre of soil. Almost all the remains comprise carbonised seeds, although some silicified African rice husks (mainly lemma) were found, and these are also included in the counts in Table 1, and Figs. 5 and 6, that provide frequency and ubiquity of important species.

Table 1.

Number of items recovered, frequency and ubiquity for the main crops from Sadia by phases. First line is the total number of items and second line gives frequency followed by ubiquity

Identified species Phase 0
‘pre-tell’
Phase 1
8–10th c.
Phase 2
10–11th c.
Phase 3
12–13th c.
Total

Number of samples

Volume of soil in litres

9

111

8

86

42

666

87

1317

146

2200

Pennisetum glaucum caryopsis 73 36 1015 695 1819
Pennisetum glaucum involucre 89 202 1428 1369 3088
Pennisetum glaucum total 162 238 2443 2064 4907

Frequency

Ubiquity

56%

89%

49%

100%

59%

95%

40%

88%

48%

91%

Digitaria exilis caryopsis 37 931 968

Frequency

Ubiquity

1%

19%

18%

53%

10%

40%

Echinochloa sp. caryopsis 2 237 480 719

Frequency

Ubiquity

1%

11%

6%

52%

9%

13%

7%

23%

Oryza glaberrima caryopsis 6 6 12
Oryza glaberrima Spikelets bases 108 59 167
Oryza glaberrima total 114 65 179

Frequency

Ubiquity

3%

50%

1.5%

25%

2%

29%

Vigna unguiculata seed 9 1 10

Frequency

Ubiquity

<1%

7%

<1%

1%

1%

3%

Sorghum bicolor caryopsis 10 47 57
Sorghum bicolor spikelet base 10 23 33
Sorghum bicolor total 20 70 90

Frequency

Ubiquity

<1%

17%

<1%

22%

<1%

18%

Hibiscus cf. sababdariffa caryopsis 5 29 34

Frequency

Ubiquity

2%

22%

<1%

11%

<1%

5%

Poaceae sp. grain 20 20 49 37 126

Frequency

Ubiquity

7%

67%

4%

38%

2%

12%

<1%

5%

1%

12%

Weeds and/or wild gathered plants 20 13 142 124 299

Frequency

Ubiquity

7%

78%

3%

50%

4%

43%

3%

29%

3%

37%

Tree/bush 50 125 214 90 479

Frequency

Ubiquity

17%

67%

26%

38%

5%

79%

2%

39%

5%

52%

Total number 288 489 4114 5213 10104
Density items/litre 2.6 5.7 6.2 3.9 4.6

Fig. 5.

Fig. 5

Frequency (% of remains of a species compared with the whole period assemblage) for the archaeobotanical dataset at Sadia, including 146 samples (n = number of samples by phase)

Fig. 6.

Fig. 6

Ubiquity (% of samples by phase in which each taxon is present) for major crops at Sadia

The archaeobotanical results indicate that the principal plant remains from Sadia are domesticated pearl millet, followed by fonio and Echinochloa sp. remains. Other domesticated crops are also present but in lower frequency: African rice, sorghum, Hibiscus and cowpea. The consumption of fruits of local trees and wild gathered grasses is also indicated.

This section presents a description of each of the main economic taxa found at Sadia, an analysis of their evolution through the four phases of the site occupation, and a spatial analysis for phase 3 on mound I.

Description of the main economic taxa at Sadia

Pearl millet, Pennisetum glaucum (L.) R. Br., Poaceae

Pearl millet is represented by 4907 remains (chaff and grains). Pearl millet is present in 91% of the samples and constitutes 48% of the total frequency. The seeds represent 37% (1819 grains) of the millet assemblage, while chaff (bristles and involucre bases, B in Fig. 7) represent 63% (3088) (Table 1). Due to their morphological characteristics, club-shaped grains and stalked involucres, these are all determined as domesticated pearl millet (after Brunken et al. 1977; Manning et al. 2011).

Fig. 7.

Fig. 7

SEM micrographs of Plant remains from Sadia. (a) Sorghum bicolor spikelet base with torn rachilla, AB 38 St 60. (b) Pennisetum glaucum involucres apex with bristles, AB 11 St26. (c) Oryza glaberrima spikelet base, AB 11 St26. (d) Digitaria exilis grain Embryo face, AB 4 St4. (e) Digitaria exilis grain Hilum face, AB 4 St4

Fonio, Digitaria exilis (Kippist.) Staph., Poaceae.

A total of 968 fonio grains, 10% of the total assemblage, were found in 40% of the samples (Table 1, D and E in Fig. 7). Fonio is a small-seeded millet, around 1.2 × 0.7 × 0.5 mm. The grain form is ovoid to oblong with an ovoid scutellum, less than half the length of the grain, and a roundish hilum on the ventral surface (Stapf 1915; Portères 1976).

Barnyard millet/hungry rice, Echinochloa sp., Poaceae

Echinochloa sp. is the third most important plant at Sadia. It is well represented with 719 caryopses representing 7% frequency and 23% ubiquity. In West Africa, Echinochloa sp. is represented by five different species. The grains present very similar characteristics making it difficult to distinguish one species from another.

African Rice, Oryza glaberrima Steud., Poaceae

African rice was found in 43 samples and represented 2% of the total assemblage (Table 1). This includes 12 grains and 167 spikelet bases (C in Fig. 7) and hundreds of husks (lemma/palea fragments).

Rice spikelet bases provide a good way to differentiate wild and domesticated rice. One of the most important key effects of plant domestication is a shift from natural seed dispersal to human seed dispersal. Mature wild grains fall naturally from the plant creating a smooth, round and regular abscission scar with a small distinct vascular port on the spikelet base. On the opposite, domesticated non-shattered grain needs human threshing to fall apart. The result of this labour is to create a less symmetrical scar with a dimpled appearance (Fuller et al. 2009; Fuller and Weisskopf 2011; Ishii et al. 2010). It is observed that within the 167 spikelet bases of the Sadia dataset, 60% are domesticated and only 6.5% are wild. A further 12% are classified as immature and, due to their bad preservation, the remaining 22% could not be determined. Excluding immature and indeterminate forms, the domesticated proportion can thus be estimated as ~90%. These data indicate that rice at Sadia was from already domesticated populations, with a small presence (~10%) of wild-type or weedy rice (O. barthii).

Sorghum, Sorghum bicolor subsp. bicolor (L.) Moench., Poaceae.

Only 90 (less than 1% of the total assemblage) sorghum remains, mainly grains (57) but also chaff (33), were found in 18% of the samples (Table 1). The chaff is composed of husks (lemma/palea), spikelet bases (A in Fig. 7), with the torn rachilla characteristic of domesticated sorghum. Such remains probably come from the dehusking waste of race bicolor (on races, see Fuller and Stevens 2018).

Cowpea, Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp., Fabaceae

In Sadia, cowpea remains are few, only 10 seeds (representing less than 1% of the total assemblage) were found. The seeds are flat with a sub-rectangular shape. The hilum is ovate and generally placed asymmetrically on the hilum edge (Fuller 2003; Fuller and Harvey 2006).

Roselle, Hibiscus sabdariffa Lin., Malvaceae

In total, 34 Roselle caryopses, representing less than 1% of the assemblage, were found. The identification was done following the criteria published by Kahlheber (2004).

Fruits, tree and bushes

In total, 479 remains of fruits, 5% of the total assemblage, were found in 52% of the samples (Table 1). Charred remains include baobab (Adansonia digitata L.), marula (Sclerocarya birrea A. Rich. syn. Poupartia birrea (A. Rich.) A. Chev.), jujube (Ziziphus sp.), shea butter (Vittelaria paradoxa Gaertn. f.), African grapes (Lannea acida A. Rich. Syn. L. microcarpa Engl. & Krause) and tamarind (Tamarindus indicus L.).

Weeds and/or wild gathered plants

A number of seeds of known weed taxa (299 seeds for 3% of the total assemblage in 37% of the samples) were recovered (Table 1). They include carpet weeds (Trianthema sp., family Aizoaceae) and button weeds (Borreira sp./Spermococce sp., family Rubiaceae), characterised by intermediate size, large-seeded weedy grasses (Paspalum and Echinochloa), and other monocots (Commelina spp.), characterised by quite large and heavy seeds.

Indeterminate Poaceae species

One hundred twenty-six Poaceae grains, undetermined to genus/species (1% frequency), were found in 12% of the samples. Because of the lack of reference collections complete for African grasses and due to preservation and damaged specimens (most of the caryopses were without hilum), it was not possible to make a more precise identification.

Diachronic analysis

The 146 samples studied have provided plant remains from four archaeological phases at Sadia. The diachronic distribution of archaeobotanical remains is summarised in Table 1, and Figs. 5 and 6.

Phase 0: ‘pre-tell phase’—before first–third century AD

Phase 0 is an occupation episode older than the occupation of the mound site. It is represented by nine archaeobotanical samples, totalling 111 l of sediment from mound I. As expected, pearl millet (Pennisetum glaucum) dominates identified remains, with a frequency of 56% for 162 remains of grain and involucres. Hibiscus sabdariffa is the only other cultivated plant of this phase, present with 5 seeds (≈ 2% of the assemblage).

Interestingly, there are no evidence of other cereals, either sorghum or fonio, but remains of weeds and gathered seeds (wild seeds) are well represented by around 7%. This category is dominated by Digitaria sp. seeds (elongated form, wild-type), which could be a wild gathered precursor to fonio, and by button weeds, Borreria sp. One single wild African rice spikelet base, Oryza barthii type, was also found. In addition, 9% of wild grasses (Poaceae) are present. With 17%, trees and shrubs are also well represented with various taxa: Marula tree (4%), baobab (4%), tamarind (≈ 1%), jujube (≈2%), shea butter nut tree (≈ 3%) and black plum (1%).

Phase 1: mid eighth–tenth c. AD

For the foundation phase of the tell of Sadia, only eight archaeobotanical samples, of 86 litres of sediment, have been acquired. The assemblage is composed of around 50% of pearl millet. A decrease of ‘weeds and gathered’ is visible: from 7% in phase 0 (with a ubiquity of 78%), these drop to less than 3%, with a presence in less than half of the samples in this phase. Only elongated wild Digitaria sp. and carpetweeds (Trianthema sp.) seeds are present. The trees and bushes (26%) are largely dominated by baobab remains with 17% of the total frequency and 87 seeds. This high frequency is explained by the presence of 69 large baobab seeds in only one of the samples.

Phase 2: tenth–eleventh c. AD

This period coincides with the most important expansion of the tell site. In this phase, the archaeobotanical results come from 42 samples: 23 from mound I, 12 samples from mound II and seven from mound III, comprising a total of 662 l of soil.

Once more, pearl millet dominates the dataset with 60% and 2443 remains (1015 grains and 1428 involucres). However, several other crops occur, including African rice (≈3%); sorghum (<1%); broad-seeded Digitaria (Digitaria exilis), identified as domesticated fonio (≈1%); and the pulse cowpea (<1%). In addition, seeds of Echinochloa sp. occur in a high quantity, around 6% of the total phase 2 frequency with 237 seeds. It is also noticeable that the weeds that appear for the first time in the assemblage in this period are all plausible rice weeds, such as Commelina cf. benghalensis (≈1%), Oryza barthii (<1%), Trianthema sp. (<1%), Borreria sp. (<1%), Eleusine indica (<1%), Digitaria sp. (1%) and Paspalum sp. (<1%). Beside this, presence of trees and shrubs dramatically decreased to ~5%, with a high proportion of marula nuts (around 3%).

Phase 3: twelfth–late thirteenth c. AD

Phase 3 is characterised by the end of the expansion and the abandonment of the site. It is well represented with a total of 87 samples from 1317 l of soil. This final phase has been sampled in two different ways: 22 samples were extracted during the 2010 vertical excavations in mound I (n=2), II (n=14) and III (n=6), and 65 samples come from the 2011 horizontal excavation of mound I.

With nearly one thousand grains representing 18% of all plant remains, spread across 53% of the samples, fonio represents an important crop during this period and a major increase over that seen in previous periods. Pearl millet remains still form the dominant taxon, but fall from 60% frequency, as seen in phase 2 (2443 remains in 95% of the samples), to less than 40% frequency (2064 remains in 88% of the samples) in phase 3. A reduction is seen across most of the assemblage in favour of fonio. The presence of Echinochloa also increases to more than 9% of the total in phase 3. Sorghum is rare (<1% of the phase frequency). African rice declines from 3 to 1%. Trees and bushes also decrease to less than 2%, with the presence of very few fruits of Marula, baobab or jujube (Ziziphus sp.) (less than 100 fruit fragments in total).

Spatial distribution for phase 3

Spatial analysis may offer interesting insights into intra-site patterns that could relate to activity areas or differences in food use across the site (Fig. 8). This kind of analysis, however, is made difficult by the fact that preserved plant remains require charring for preservation. Thus, food processing, crop-processing and other activities, if waste is simply left in situ, will not be readily visible due to decomposition, unless the building has burned down. Instead, it must be recognised that the waste of food plant use activities must have been gathered up and disposed in fires after which some of this material survived charring and got redeposited nearby (Fuller et al. 2014). Nevertheless, broad patterns contrasting across building contexts or areas of a site may still be possible (e.g. Hastorf 1991).

Fig. 8.

Fig. 8

Spatial distribution of the density of the main cash crops at Sadia, mound I. The small circles represent the hearths

The extensive horizontal surface of 143m2 excavated on Sadia mound I revealed numerous architectural features belonging to phase 3 (twelfth–thirteenth c. AD). Almost every structure, excluding wall remains, was sampled and around 3000 plant remains were extracted from 65 archaeobotanical samples, totalling 901 l of soil.

For the spatial analysis, densities were computed using QGIS 2.18.17 and the SAGA (2.3.2) Kernel density estimation tool, as well as quartic kernel and a 0.01-m cell resolution. The radius parameter was determined for each point dataset (i.e. each species and the total botanical samples assemblage) with an optimal bandwidth calculation based on the number of points and the spatial standard deviation, using the following formula: ((2/(3×nPoints))^(1/4))×standard deviation. Bandwidths vary between 1.37 m (total assemblage) and 1.88 m (Echinochloa).

The total assemblage distribution shows that remains are mainly found around the centre of the excavated area, while they appear in low amounts in the western part of the surface and show a more patchy pattern in the eastern part of the site. The separate analysis of the five hearth samples (small circles in Fig. 8) indicates similar proportions of the main crop remains as the other samples, with two exceptions. The first exception is Echinochloa sp. remains, which are not present inside the hearths but are often found in nearby structures. Echinochloa is also found in higher amounts in structure 7, which was interpreted as a silo pit (Huysecom et al. 2012). The second exception is fonio, which is mainly present in two specific places. One is structure 4, a pit that exclusively contained charred fonio grains that is 380 grains of the 968 grains from the total assemblage, representing 40% of the total fonio remains. The other is structure 26, a pit filled with a succession of dense ashy layers and carbonised wood and grain layers (see Fig. 4 for the numbered structures). This pit may contain refuse of the two hearths located close by. This group of structures including two hearths, one refuse pit and burnt clay bricks, full of domestic remains like animal bones and diversified charred plant remains may be interpreted as a kitchen area.

Oryza and sorghum also show particular spatial patterns, as Oryza mainly occurs in central and western part of the site, while sorghum is rather associated with the eastern part of the surface, in particular in structure 7. However, these specific distributions may be explained by sample/conservation biases, as both species are present in low amounts.

We assume here that remains were not massively translocated, but disposed into fires close to where crop-related activities took place, and then deposited after hearths were cleaned into nearby rubbish dumps. Consequently, precise activity areas are blurred, but broad patterns show that the different crops were not treated the same way in all areas of the settlement.

Discussion

Agricultural practices and food preparation

Based on modern ethnographic and agronomic observations as well as recent parallels (e.g. Portères 1976; Burnham 1980; Fuller et al. 2019; Champion 2019), the archaeobotanical remains indicate that Sadia’s inhabitants were practising primarily dry agriculture, possibly coupled with some wet rice agriculture in the later phase of the occupation. Sadia’s dry agriculture was probably composed of pearl millet and sorghum fields intercropped with cowpea. The field’s edges were probably, as it is often the case today, demarcated by sorrel (Hibiscus) cultivation. Fonio was likely grown in third or fourth years before fallowing or in areas of shallower soils. Fields were probably located in sandier soils at some distance from the Guringin river or from the eventual ponds, and the only water source was rainfall. The second type of agriculture found at Sadia was possibly related to the river itself. Indeed, the finds of African rice and Echinochloa sp. remains suggest that wet agriculture was also in practised around Sadia. Today, West African wet agricultural systems are dominated by rice with some décrue sorghum cultivation. Also, one of the most common weeds, especially in the Inland Niger Delta but also in the valley of the Sourou, only 60 km away, found growing in association with rice, is Bourgou grass, Echinochloa stagnina, which is gathered with the rice crop. Bourgou grass is also collected as fodder for livestock. However, Echinochloa sp. could be considered a cultivated crop as it may be an intended product from prepared fields, even if it lacks full domestication syndrome. It is fairly common that modern agricultural researchers consider small millet grasses as weeds rather than cultivars. This means that they have been under-researched in terms of intentional cultivation or domestication adaptations. It is worth noting that Echinochloa sp. has been domesticated several times in Asia (De Wet et al. 1983), and widely documented as gathered food grains (Harlan 1989; Yang et al. 2015). It has recently been shown to undergo selection and possible domestication also in the Middle Holocene Sahara (Mercuri et al. 2018b).

Pearl millet and sorghum

For sorghum and pearl millet, crop-husbandry processes are the same. The regular presence of pearl millet and sorghum remains in Sadia domestic contexts and the high involucre base/spikelet base numbers suggests that pearl millet and sorghum were stored as full panicles and were daily threshed when needed. Indeed, the bristle and involucre bases are usually separated from the grain during the threshing and winnowing steps of the crop processing. The high quantity of these elements found in each context and sample suggests that threshing and winnowing were processed in close relation with fires used for rubbish disposal, probably located not far from the household compounds. We infer that such crop-processing was a routine, household activity.

Pearl millet is one of the most common staple cereals used in Africa. Today, the seeds are generally transformed into porridge or beer (Jolly 2004; Haaland 2007; Ricquier 2014). So far, the first archaeological evidence of pearl millet consists of a couple of charred grains and seed impressions in ceramics that are dated to from ca. 2500 BC to 2000 BC and were found in the lower Tilemsi valley (Manning et al. 2011; Manning and Fuller 2014; Neumann 2018). Earlier evidence in the form of ceramic temper from the desert of Northern Mali suggest a sequence of pre-domestication cultivation starting from 4000 to 5000 BC (Fuller et al. in press). This supports domestication in or around the Tilemsi valley and subsequent spread southwards into the savannas and through the Sahel. Finds from Ounjougou and Windé Koroji south of the Niger river, and Birimi in Ghana, attest to the rapid spread of pearl millet cultivation by ca. 1700 BC (D’Andrea et al. 2001; Ozainne et al. 2009; Manning et al. 2011). Nevertheless, the possibility of a second independent domestication of pearl millet in Mauretania associated with the Tichitt-Oualata Neolithic cultures remains plausible (MacDonald et al. 2009; Manning and Fuller 2014). Regardless of the number of origins, pearl millet was established since the Neolithic as the primary staple grain in West Africa, as it continued for many areas into modern times. Sadia fits into this long-term tradition.

Concerning sorghum, genetic analyses on modern sorghum and recent archaeobotanical evidence support domestication of this cereal in the Eastern Sahel region around central/eastern Sudan (Fuller and Hildebrand 2013; Fuller and Stevens 2018). Data from sorghum chaff and spikelet impressions in ceramics indicate that morphologically domesticated forms were close to 70% the population before 3000 cal BC around the upper Atbara river east of Khartoum (Winchell et al. 2017, 2018; Barron et al. 2020), with domestication fully established at Jebel Moya, ca. 2500 BC (Brass et al. 2019), although some communities continued to use a mixture of wild and domesticated sorghum, such as at Kasala (eastern Sudan) at ca. 1850 cal BC (Beldados et al. 2018). Already between 2000 and 1700 cal BC, sorghum appears to have been introduced to India (Fuller and Stevens 2018). The first sorghum evidence in West Africa is inferred to date by around 650 cal BC from Alibori sites in North Benin (Champion and Fuller 2018a, 2018b), and sorghum is reported from sites near Lake Chad in the later First Millennium BC, such as Mege and Kursakata (Klee et al. 2004; Bigga and Kahlheber 2011; Fuller and Stevens 2018). In the Inland Niger Delta in Mali, the earliest evidence of sorghum appears around 250 cal BC in Jenne-Jeno and starts to spread in the area around 500 cal AD. It is only around the tenth century AD that sorghum is found outside the Niger river delta and banks, such as at the sites of Sadia, Tongo Maaré Diabal and Oursi. By that period, sorghum starts to be more widespread in West Africa, but always in smaller proportion than pearl millet or rice.

Cowpea

A very important characteristic of cowpea, from an agronomic perspective, is that it is very fast growing and relatively easy to cultivate. It is a versatile crop that can be intercropped with pearl millet and sorghum (D’Andrea et al. 2007; Fuller 2003), and its seeds and leaves can be collected several times before the plant dies. As with other Fabaceae (legumes), it fixes atmospheric nitrogen and therefore helps to boost soil nitrates. Thus, its cultivation in rotations can to a degree substitute for a fallow or lengthen the cycle between fallows.

It was during the initial pearl millet dispersion period that cowpea (Vigna unguiculata) appears to have been domesticated as an addition to agriculture, evident from finds in Ghana dated around 1700–1500 cal BC and from the Nok Culture around 800 cal BC (D’Andrea et al. 2007; Franke 2016).

In Sadia, cowpea was probably intercropped with pearl millet and sorghum. However, cowpea remains are usually processed directly in the field and are therefore less common archaeological remains compared to pearl millet that was routinely processed in the village.

African rice

In the current state of research, the earliest evidence for Oryza glaberrima comes from the Inland Niger Delta at the site of Dia. AMS dates on rice grains coming from the earliest occupation layers of this settlement mound place them in the 800–400 cal BC bracket (Murray 2007). Further chronological resolution is difficult, as this falls in the Iron Age calibration plateau, and thus a date of fifth century BC is just as probable as eighth century BC. This rice is regarded as already domesticated, on the basis of rice grain measurements, as spikelet bases were not recovered (Murray 2007). Given these data, it is not clear whether an earlier domestication process in the Inland Niger Delta should be hypothesised (as suggested by Portères 1976), or whether rice had spread to this area from another domestication zone, such as the tributaries of the Niger River to the southwest, as suggested by modern genetic studies (Meyer et al. 2016). Interestingly, the first divergence within African rice is inferred to be between western Guinea (coast and hill) races and those of the Niger basin (Meyer et al. 2016). But currently, with the exception of the site of Juffure in Gambia, dated to 1650–1900 cal AD (Gijanto and Walshaw 2014) and from Sadia (this study), all the sites with domesticated African rice are coming from within the Niger River Basin itself, including the Inland Niger Delta and river banks, like the Dendi in North Benin (Bedaux et al. 1978; Champion and Fuller 2018a, 2018b; Murray 2007).

In this context, there are different ways to understand the presence of African rice in Sadia, where it first appears around 900 cal AD. While early crop-processing stages (threshing and winnowing) and the presence of definitive rice weeds can support local cultivation, weedy taxa present might represent a combination of wild gathered millets, weeds from dryland millet cultivation (e.g. of fonio) or weed contaminants present in semi-processed rice spikelets received though trade. At present, the archaeobotanical data are ambiguous as to whether or not rice cultivation was actually conducted immediately around Sadia.

More generally, rice is well attested during this period on several archaeological sites located within the nearby Inland Niger Delta (Dia, Jenné-Jeno, Thièl, Tato à Sanouna, Toguéré Galia, Toguere Doupwil). Therefore, its presence at Sadia could result from trade and exchange, along with other items that circulated between both parts of the Bandiagara escarpment at this time (Huysecom et al. 2015). More easily, rice could also come from the Sourou valley located around 50 km south-east of Sadia on the other side of the flat sandy Seno plain, at the current border with Burkina Faso. The Sourou Valley is a large but understudied region of rice cultivation (Zwarts et al. 2019; Bin 2009; Yaro 1998). The region forms a 560-km2 humid area where every type of rice is currently cultivated (irrigated, rainfed and mainly deep-water rice). Inhabitants from the Sadia region are still buying and consuming the Sourou rice (Huysecom and Mayor personal observations). Although we do not know the ancestry of rice cultivation in this wet region, it is thus possible that the rice found in Sadia originated from the Sourou valley, an amazingly rich rice granary region where archaeological mound sites similar to Sadia are present but were never studied (Huysecom and Mayor observation).

Finally, several variants of wild rice are found today at the foot of the cliff and on the Bandiagara Plateau, as well as in some depressions of the Seno Plain. Collection from the wild and local cultivation of rice is practiced today in the region (Selleger 2014; Huysecom and Mayor personal observations). The rice found in Sadia could therefore be the product of local cultivation, especially if climatic conditions were a bit wetter than today, as rainfed rice typically requires a minimum of 700–800 mm of rainfall (Portères 1959; Jacquot and Courtois 1987).

Weeds and/or gathered seeds

Weedy taxa are likely to enter the site through being harvested with crops, and then removed during various stages of crop-processing, alongside chaff (Hillman 1984; Jones 1987; Thompson 1996; Fuller and Weber 2005; Harvey and Fuller 2005). Small, light weed seeds tend to be removed early in processing with the initial threshing and winnowing, while larger and heavier seeds are removed in subsequent winnowing (or sieving) after dehusking, and those seeds closest in weight/size to crop grains must be removed by final hand-picking of processed grain.

With their intermediate size and weight, carpet weeds and button weeds can be expected to have contaminated rice spikelets after threshing and winnowing. They are both widely reported groups of weeds of dry tropical agriculture, such as in millet cultivation or in rainfed rice, both in Asia and in Africa (Fuller and Boivin 2009). Commelina spp. produce quite large and heavy seeds, so they are likely to be removed in final processing after dehusking, including final hand-picking of clean grain. They are also well-known weeds of rice cultivation of both upland rainfed and lowland irrigated systems (Moody 1989; Weisskopf et al. 2014; Portères 1976; Bezançon 1995). These three types of weed taxa would be expected to have contaminated rice spikelets (i.e. in the husk), a form in which crops were likely to be traded as the husks would protect the grains from various forms of spoilage during exchange. The high presence of these species is an argument for the local cultivation of rice in Sadia.

Large-seeded weedy grasses Paspalum and Echinochloa could be contaminants removed in the latter processing stages, but it is also possible that they were present as gathered foods. It is currently not possible to determine whether these grasses represent weeds of harvested rice, gathered (or even managed/cultivated) foods or a combination of both. These large-seeded weedy grasses cannot be used as indicators of rice cultivation. However, it is worth noting that Oryza and Echinochloa show different spatial distributions in Sadia (Fig. 8), which supports the idea of Echinochloa as an important gathered or cultivated resource in its own right.

Fonio

The most common “Fonio” cereal is Digitaria exilis (commonly named true fonio or white fonio) domesticated from Digitaria longiflora (Hilu 1997; Adoukonou-Sagbadja et al. 2007). Fonio is widely cultivated across western Africa, but generally is considered a minor crop that is presently in decline. The arduousness of fonio processing due to the small size of the seeds seems to be related to its progressive disappearance (Portères 1976; Cruz et al. 2011). Moreover, the seeds require laborious dehusking, unlike pearl millet which is free-threshing and thus easily processed to clean grain for cooking or flour making (Fuller and Weber 2005). On the other hand, brewing can be achieved with some or all grain remaining in their husks, and fonio beers are common.

Economic importance of fonio lies in its ability to grow very quickly in poor, especially shallow, soils, in contrast to the deeper-rooted tall crops of sorghum and pearl millet. Nevertheless, yields are quite low. A study in Nigeria reports fonio yields between 22 and 322 kg/ha (Aliero and Morakinyo 2001), whereas pearl millet yields can be expected to be between 300 and 900 kg/ha (Fuller et al. 2019). Consequently, the interest of fonio is its ability to give reliable production in a very short time, even in low yields, on poorly cleared or shallow soils, which are marginal for pearl millet or sorghum and too dry for rice. It may be grown, for example, after a couple seasons of pearl millet or sorghum, before a fallow cycle (see, e.g. Portères 1976; Burnham 1980; Cruz et al. 2011).

Currently, fonio cultivation is declining. Boureima Tessougué, one of our informants from Dimbal (a village currently located 6 km from Sadia), explained in 2018 (pers. comm.) that cultivators are sowing less and less fonio for different reasons: the difficulty of cultivation and processing, and the lack of main d’oeuvre due to seasonal migration of young people to urban centres. They maintain the practice more for tradition, to keep seeds for the following year, than for real nutritional needs. But the importance of fonio is also symbolic in the Dogon Country, having a high significance in cosmological tales and in various rituals linked to animist cults (Dieterlen 1955; Griaule 1948).

Currently, timing of fonio domestication is unclear. However, Portères suggested that it was probably domesticated in the Inland Niger Delta (Portères 1959; Portères 1976). Its geographically widespread but patchy distribution could be taken to imply that it was once continuously distributed, and might therefore be of great antiquity (Blench 2006). However, finds have been strikingly absent from most archaeobotanical studies of either Neolithic or Iron Age sites, leading to the alternative hypothesis that it was a late, secondary domestication associated with diversification of agriculture, sometimes in a context of urbanisation (Champion and Fuller 2019). So far, the only strong regional evidence of fonio is coming from the site of Kirikongo in Burkina Faso (100–1500 cal AD), where fonio grains compose 8% of the total assemblage. However, only preliminary results are available from this site (Gallagher et al. 2016). In the current state of knowledge, the adoption of fonio in Sadia seems to occur shortly after its domestication.

Echinochloa

The high frequency of Echinochloa in Sadia raises the possibility that this was a major food resource, although domesticated form is not known in West Africa. However, it is an important gathered resource for some current populations (Portères 1976; Harlan 1989) and namely in the Dogon Country (Selleger 2014). Echinochloa colona and Brachiaria ramosa are still largely collected on a large scale in the Niger Valley during rice harvesting (Boré 1983). Moreover, it has been found as a major grain in some archaeobotanical studies, as in Essouk in North Mali (Nixon et al. 2011), and in the Inland Niger Delta at Jenné-jeno (McIntosh 1995). Indeed, this is often a utilised grain throughout the broad West African and Sahelian regions (Harlan 1989; Mercuri et al. 2018b), as well as Asia (Yang et al. 2015).

At Sadia, due to the quantity (up to 9% of the assemblage for phase 3 and 7% for phase 2) and size of the seeds, it seems probable that they represent a gathered or even cultivated cereal. The three main Echinochloa species (E. stagnina, E. pyramidalis and E. colona) are common weeds. E. stagnina is the bourgou grass growing in deep water (up to 4 m of water) and is usually gathered at the same time as rice harvesting and as the Paspalum species that are difficult to separate from rice, like in the valley of Sourou. It is considered the most common weed for floating rice types. However, bourgou is more often gathered as fodder for animal stock than as a grain for human consumption. In the Inland Niger Delta, this plant is claimed to be the most useful of all wild plants, providing, in addition to food and drink, fodder, thatch, caulking for boats, vegetable salt after calcining which is used to make soap and indigo dye. Also, it is the most common plant (domesticated or wild) that populates the Niger River floodplain (Burkill 1985; Chevalier 1932; Dalziel 1937; Portères 1952). E. colona, jungle rice, is also a wild weedy grass commonly found in irrigation ditches or near waterways but never in deep water. More common in the Senegal valley than in the Niger valley, it is often misidentified as E. stagnina. It is used more for the grain than for the fodder. E. colona is so appreciated as a minor cereal that it is the object of a kind of proto-cultivation as in some areas like in Sierra Leone, where it is cultivated (Burkill 1985). Asian populations of this species are the presumed ancestors of domesticated Indian Sawa millet (De Wet et al. 1983). E. pyramidalis is a Sahelian grass widely gathered on river edges. It is a weed of sorghum and irrigated rice cultivation. All the species are usually prepared in a similar manner to rice and are sometimes used to produce beer (Burkill 1985; Portères 1959; Boré 1983; Dalziel 1937).

In conclusion, weeds present in archaeobotanical assemblages can often suggest evidence of local cultivation. This assumes that before being sold or stored, crops are separated from the weeds, and by consequence, the weed seeds remain at the site where they were processed. However, the remains of Paspalum and Echinochloa species cannot be used here as indicators of rice cultivation, being more likely valued resources, gathered or traded in their own right.

Hibiscus

Hibiscus flowers are often used as a tea like beverage called ‘Carcadet’ or ‘Bissap’, but the seeds and leaves are also used to prepare sauces (Burkill 1997). It is certainly native to the African savannahs, but little is known of its origins as a cultivar, although Fuller and Hildebrand (2013) suggested it might have originated in the Sudan region. Currently, in West Africa, pearl millet fields and garden edges are often demarcated by Hibiscus sabdariffa cultivation (Gissima or sorrel). Presence of Hibiscus sabdariffa remains at Sadia provides some early evidence for its use.

Tree and shrubs

Tree and shrubs at Sadia mainly include baobab (Adansonia digitata), marula (Sclerocarya birrea), jujube (Ziziphus sp.), shea butter (Vittelaria paradoxa), African grapes (Lannea microcarpa), tamarind (Tamarindus indicus) and marula (Sclerocarya birrea) remains. These species are useful for their fruits, but also provide shade and manure for gardens and fields, and are often found in agroforestry parklands, a savannah landscape in which a few species of mature trees occur, scattered through cultivated or recently fallowed fields. Lannea microcarpa, the African grape, would have grown as vines on these trees or even within the settlement on outside walls or fences. Such fruits would have been a seasonal supplement to diet, providing variety, micronutrients (like vitamins), handy snacks and vegetal fat.

Sadia and the agricultural diversification of the Dogon Country

Interestingly, archaeobotanical results from Sadia indicate that during phase 0 (before the first to third century AD) and phase 1 (mid eighth to tenth c. AD), the only cultivated crop was pearl millet, which composed around half of the botanical assemblage. However, phase 0 is clearly not connected to the three other phases, as it is characterised by ceramics decorated with composite cord-wrapped roulettes, a décor typical of the late regional Neolithic period, which ends around 500 cal BC (Ozainne 2013; Huysecom et al. 2015). Thus, phase 0 may rather be related to the end of the initial wave of agricultural diffusion from the Tilemsi Valley, mainly characterised by the cultivation of pearl millet and the presence of chaff temper and cord-wrapped rouletted décors in the pottery production, along with domesticated livestock, mainly cattle remains.

Phase 1 may coincide with a later diffusion of agricultural population originating from the Tichitt area in Southern Mauritania, through the Inland Niger Delta, bringing mound site development and social complexity (Mayor et al. 2014; Champion and Fuller 2018a; Champion 2019). This wave is accompanied by the introduction of iron production technology (Robion-Brunner 2008) and more complex agricultural systems, i.e. mainly augmentation of production and crop diversification (Champion 2019; Champion and Fuller 2018a, 2018b). At Sadia, the ceramic assemblage also shows a marked transition from phase 1 to phase 2, with an increase of braided and folded strip roulettes décors and an abrupt decrease of composite roulettes (Huysecom et al. 2015).

Phase 2 witnesses the rise of agricultural complexity brought by the addition of four new domesticated crops: rice, fonio, sorghum and cowpea. The advent of rice, which could be related to trade as well as local production, possibly inspired by agricultural practices in the Inland Niger Delta, may echo the diversification of materials used for jewellery in the cultural sequence, suggesting the development of connections with regional urban trade centres along the Niger and Bani Rivers, such as Gao and Jenné-Jeno (Huysecom et al. 2015; Mayor et al. 2014; Truffa Giachet et al. 2020).

The emergence of these new staple crops (sorghum, fonio, African rice, cowpea) and pulses suggests that the expansion of the site is based on more diversified agricultural practices. Thus, phase 2 is interpreted as a period in which demand for increased grain production was met by some expansion of agriculture into marginal soils with low labour investment through the cultivation of “catch crops” of fonio, together with gathering of wild grain from open savannah grassland and fallows (i.e. Echinochloa). Environmental conditions are thought to remain stable, and generally wetter than later or modern periods, under conditions of the Medieval Climatic Anomaly (Nash et al. 2016; Mayor et al. 2005). Locally, climatic stability from phases 1 to 3 is supported by previously published wood charcoal analyses from Sadia (Huysecom et al. 2015). In other words, increasing population indicated by site size increase may have put pressure on established agricultural production and encouraged extensification and diversification. This expansion would have been focused on predictable availability of crops rather than increasing yields through intensification, a pattern that mirrors the model for initial African domestications posited by Marshall and Hildebrand (2002).

It is possible that other weedy grasses occurred as either weeds in fonio fields or part of wild grain gathering (i.e. narrow-grained Digitaria sp., Paspalum sp.), although their presence as weedy contaminants of rice cannot be ruled out. As already noted, Digitaria sp. (1%) and Paspalum sp. (<1%) could be present as rice weeds or as gathered volunteer grains in harvests of fonio or Echinochloa sp. gathering. In total, 3.5% of the phase 2 assemblage is characteristic of weeds that usual grow in association with rainfed or less wet rice. It is possible that they were cultivated locally around ponds, but if rainfall was insufficient to support rice cultivation locally, then rice would have been imported from wetter areas like the Inland Niger Delta or the valley of Sourou. These weeds would then be the result of removal of contaminants after trade, during local final stages of crop processing, in particular dehusking, final winnowing and hand-picking.

Phase 3, which immediately precedes the site’s abandonment, coincides with the rise of fonio cultivation, corresponding to a general west African pattern visible on most sites being abandoned around 1300–1400 cal AD (Champion 2019). This suggests a possible reduction in woodland cover and increasing cultivation of more marginal soils with fonio. Assuming that Echinochloa was gathered from wild grassland stands, its decrease could also result from an increase in fonio cultivation. Keeping in mind that the yields of fonio are perhaps only half or less than equivalent areas of pearl millet cultivation, caloric staple production through fonio would have required more land.

Wood charcoal analysis done by B. Eichhorn indicated a similar pattern of agricultural expansion through time. Indeed, the presence of Prosopis africana, Terminalia sp. and Vitellaria paradoxa (Shea butternut tree) wood charcoals corroborates that phase 0 is characterised by a savannah with open areas of pearl millet fields, in which the presence of fallow is inferred from the presence of Terminalia sp. that readily grow in old fallow. Prosopis sp. are characteristic of a savannah with limited agricultural influence. Wood charcoals from phase 1 seem to indicate an extension of the cultivation area with the rise of Shea butternut tree and decrease of Prosopis africana. During phases 2 and 3, the tree and shrub macro-remains dwindle, coinciding with a diminution of the useful tree species (Vitex sp., Vitellaria sp.) present in the wood charcoals. Moreover, the rise of old and young fallow species would indicate that the total land area under cultivation increased at this time, with more field area devoted to agriculture, some left uncultivated as long fallow, allowing for increased regeneration (Detarium microcarpa, Pterocarpus erinaceus, Terminalia etc.), and other areas with short fallow periods (Guiera senegalesis) (Huysecom et al. 2012, 2015).

Not far from Sadia, on the Bandiagara plateau, the Ounjougou area provides a great number of Holocene archaeological sites excavated during the same project (Ozainne et al. 2014, 2017; Fig. 9). None of these sites were systematically sampled and analysed for macro-archaeobotanical purposes. Nevertheless, direct evidence of domesticated pearl millet cultivation dated to the 2nd millennium BC was found at the site of Varves–Ouest. Two pearl millet grains were directly dated to 1981–1494 cal BC (95.4% calibration) or 1692–1533 cal BC (Bayesian HPD) (Erl-9196; 3416±109 BP), and to 1628–976 cal BC (95.4% calibration) or 1285–1055 cal BC (Bayesian HPD) (Erl-9197; 3078±131 BP) (Ozainne et al. 2009). Moreover, bilobate phytoliths (characteristic of pearl millet phytoliths) from the Yamé River deposit dated to 2600–2300 BC may constitute indirect evidence of pearl millet cultivation, several hundred years before the appearance of its charred grains in the archaeological record (Garnier et al. 2013). Both direct and indirect indicators of pearl millet agriculture coincide with a radical change in ceramic tradition associated with the presence of numerous grinding stones and the appearance of settlement structures (Huysecom et al. 2004; Ozainne et al. 2009; Eichhorn and Neumann 2014). Such material culture and the presence of domesticated pearl millet coincide with contemporaneous similar finds at Windé Koroji around 2200–1900 cal BC (Macdonald et al. 2017). In the Ounjougou region, settlement mound sites occur from around 800 BC. From around 400 cal BC to 300 cal AD, a noticeable occupational decrease is noted on the Bandiagara plateau and the Seno Plain, the only evidence of human activities being recorded in a few caves of the Bandiagara cliff (Mayor et al. 2005, 2014; Huysecom et al. 2015; Fig. 9). The final Holocene (300–1500 cal AD) is marked by the growth of mound sites into larger mounds on the Seno plain, such as Sadia and the appearance of iron production sites on the plateau (Ozainne et al. 2017; Robion-Brunner 2008). The apogee of Sadia, around 900–1250 AD, ‘corresponds to the establishment of networks of villages, self-reliant in food resources and everyday consumption goods, alongside the first urban settlements along the Niger (e.g. Jenné-Jeno)’ (Ozainne et al. 2017: 223).

Fig. 9.

Fig. 9

Summary of the Dogon Country late and terminal Holocene archaeological sequence with chronology and main characteristics of plant remains, domesticated animals and techniques

The long-term trend identified among the agro-pastoral community of Sadia indicates both the increase of agricultural production and the diversification of crops, with the consequence of bringing more land under cultivation, reducing the length of fallow, and removing or thinning woodlands. Wild resources were nevertheless important. During the apogee of the site, wild gathering of ‘kreb’ grasses, especially Echinochloa, became a prominent part of the subsistence economy. Local production was possibly also augmented with the cultivation of rice or its importation from wetter areas.

The agricultural diversification occurring at Sadia is probably the result of a combination of different factors. Firstly, the emergence of these new staple crops (sorghum, fonio, African rice, cowpea) coincided with the site expansion (from 1.5 ha in phase 2 to 3 ha in phase 3). We can suppose that this expansion was due to a rise of population, and in order to feed this growing population it was necessary to augment the food production and to explore new land (as the most suitable would have already been used) and new crops that are adapted to these new fields.

In that case, the expansion of the site is due to the emergence of new specialised cultivators. For the Inland Niger Delta, R. McIntosh developed the ‘pulse model’ theory and hypothesised that urbanisation and the growth of site size was supported by the emergence of specialist groups including agricultural specialists that could sustain a larger population. In the case of Sadia, these agricultural specialists developed a more diversified agriculture and developed new skills in the utilisation of local plants (e.g. Echinochloa, fonio) and local ecological niches.

Secondly, the utilisation of new soil (more marginal soil) with the adoption of new cultivars (cowpea, fonio, Echinochloa) could also result from growing insecurity (ecological and social) that pushed people to explore agricultural risk buffering. Indeed, Sadia’s growth and abandonment coincide with a more general trend observed in Sahelian West Africa where most of the sites collapsed between 1200 and 1500 AD (Mayor et al. 2005; Mayor 2011). From abrupt climate changes, to war (i.e. the Songhay invasion) and diseases (i.e. the plague the ravaged Europe in the 1300s), several reasons are proposed for this sub-continental settlement rupture (Breunig 2013; Macdonald 2013; McIntosh 1993, 2000). However, no strong evidence can confirm or refute any of these potential causes. Nevertheless, all these factors could have contributed to insecurity/instability that pushed towards both more specialised and more diversified agriculture. Although there is a lack of high precision climatic proxies near Sadia, the wider western African region appears to have experienced wetter conditions during the Medieval Climatic Anomaly (900–1250 AD) after which aridity set in (Nash et al. 2016). This could plausibly contribute to Sadia’s decline. In contrast, whereas a role for the plague pandemic in west Africa for abandonments of many sites from ca. 1350–1500 AD has been recently explored (Chouin 2018; Gallagher and Dueppen 2018), this is later than the abandonment of Sadia (ca. 1300 AD). Nevertheless, some inherent declines in soil fertility as result of agricultural expansion and accumulating soil exhaustion over the course of phases 2 and 3 could also have contributed to the site’s decline.

Sadia in its regional context

So far, archaeobotanical analyses have provided data on agricultural practices contemporary with the Sadia occupations in four neighbouring regions.

To the west of Sadia, the sites from the Inland Niger Delta (Dia, Jenne-Jeno, Toguere Doupwil, Toguere Galia) indicated agricultural practices mainly based on the use of African rice (which usually dominates), coupled to pearl millet, sorghum and fonio cultivation. Niger Delta agriculture was based mainly on wetland plant cultivation, complemented by those of dry land cultivation. Indeed, the archaeobotanical assemblages are largely dominated by samples that contain domesticated rice (Oryza glaberrima), Echinochloa colona and wild Brachiaria cf. ramosa. Brachiaria cf. ramosa is an annual wild grass that grows in very similar ecological conditions to floodplain rice (but not deepwater rice). The secondary agricultural practices are related to the cultivation of dry crops such as pearl millet (Pennisetum glaucum) and fonio (Digitaria exilis). Like in the Sadia region, pearl millet is present from the first millennium BC, and fonio is often more common on settlements during their final phases and just before the site’s abandonment. The presence of sorghum, a décrue cereal, is also notable, but only present in very small quantities.

To the north-east, the site of Tongo Maaré Diabal located in the north of the Dogon Country shows a very different archaeobotanical assemblage. Indeed, the foods consumed at this site included mainly pearl millet (up to 85%) and wild millet species (Digitaria sp.). The sporadic consumption of fruits of local trees (Sclerocarya birrea and Vitex sp.) is also indicated. These are recovered in low quantity (3% frequency in average). The proportion of various plant remains at Tongo Maaré Diabal appears little changed throughout the occupation. The introduction of sorghum is noticed from phase 3 (750–900 AD) until the abandonment phase (1000–1150 AD), but always in very small quantity.

The absence of agricultural diversification at Tongo Maaré Diabal is also visible through isotope analyses. Recent carbon and nitrogen isotope analysis on human teeth from people buried in the Bandiagara escarpment indicate diets with a major input of C4 foods (e.g. pearl millet) in the region of Tongo Maaré Diabal, and more diversified diets mixing C3 (e.g. rice and cowpea) and C4 foods in the southern part of the Bandiagara escarpment, close to Sadia. There, a temporal shift from a C4 food system to a mix system (C3 and C4) is also observed (Dlamini et al. 2019) and is convergent with our archaeobotanical results (Fig. 6, Table 1).

In the same way, nitrogen isotopes on pearl millet grains from Tongo Maaré Diabal show a lack of increase in pearl millet δ15N values during the 650-year occupation of the site, implying that manure/household waste was added only sporadically to pearl millet (Styring et al. 2019). In other words, manuring was not a normal practice for continued annual processing, suggesting instead fallowing cycles. This continuity in soil maintenance practice reflects the general lack of change in the botanical and charcoal assemblages.

Thirdly, to the east, in the Oursi region in Burkina Faso, archaeobotanical evidence is available since the Late Stone Age. Late Stone Age (Neolithic) Oursi inhabitants were probably seasonal agro-pastoralists, who were coming into this zone during the dry season and hunting wild animals and cultivating pearl millet. From 400 cal BC, permanent settlement mounds started to appear and grow. Economic subsistence was based on pearl millet cultivation. Cowpea was added to this agricultural system around 1 cal BC/AD, and sorghum around 500 cal AD, but in very low quantity. Throughout the sequence, fruit and wood charcoal remains of Adansonia digitata, Sclerocarya birrea, Balanites aegyptiaca and Vitellaria paradoxa suggest the presence of an agro-parkland system. Charred wood results illustrate that cultivation and settlement activities intensified considerably during the course of the occupation. For example, the system of fields and fallows, typical for this cultural landscape, replaced the natural Acacia savannah on the dune, as evidenced by the decrease of Acacia and the increase of Combretaceae charcoals (Höhn and Neumann 2012).

Finally, to the south, the site of Kirikongo also provides archaeobotanical data. This settlement site is composed of mounds representing household compounds. This site complex was founded around 100 cal AD and abandoned like many other sites around 1400–1500 cal AD, possibly including the impact of plague (Gallagher and Dueppen 2018). Inhabitants were performing a large array of economic tasks, from herding cattle, producing and forging iron, potting and cultivating. The most ubiquitous and numerically frequent plant taxon at the site is Shea Butter nut (Vitellaria paradoxa). The large quantity of carbonised shea fragments is attributed to the use of parching ovens, one of the steps in Shea butter production (Gallagher et al. 2016). Agricultural activities were based on pearl millet and fonio cultivation. Inhabitants were also collecting wild grasses and arboricultural products (baobab and shea butter). Archaeobotanical samples from the different settlement mounds is not fully published but initial results attest to the presence of sorghum from phase red II (1100–1260 cal AD) (Gallagher et al. 2016).

In addition, we should point out that large areas, such as the Sourou Valley, have never been the subject of archaeological research, even though important tell sites have been identified.

In brief, West African Sahelian sites contemporaneous from Sadia’s occupation usually show a high dominance of pearl millet. But from early Medieval times, the sites along the Niger River valley show a specific pattern, with a much more diversified agriculture than the sites located in the dry margins, such as the Oursi region sites or Tongo Maare Diabal in the northern part of the Dogon Country. Despite its rural remote location in the Seno plain, Sadia’s sequence evidence an agricultural diversification paralleling the Inland Niger Delta’s economy.

Conclusion

The archaeobotanical sequence at Sadia in Central Mali reveals the expected long-term dominance of pearl millet as a local staple crop in a landscape that resembles a managed parkland with many useful trees producing edible fruits. But diversification of agriculture is evidenced around the tenth c. AD with the adoption of sorghum, fonio and rice, the latter in the form of grain importation from the closest wetlands in the Inland Niger Delta or in the Sourou valley, or a local production inspired by the practices of these regions. In addition, evidence suggests some use of wild gathered savanna grains, a traditional component of subsistence found widely through the Saharan and Sahelian regions. In this context, grain crop diversification over time may correspond with an increasing use of land for field crops and decreasing persistence of useful savannah trees.

If we consider wider time and space scales, agriculture in the Dogon country seems to have developed in two separate steps. The first step, dating from 1900 to 1600 BC until 800–400 BC was based on pearl millet cultivation, probably coming from the Tilemsi Valley and recognised also in Winde Korodji in the northern part of the Dogon country. As in many West African areas, this period was followed by a cultural hiatus between around 400 BC and 300 AD, with no evidence of cultivation in the area, despite sporadic occupation recognised in the Bandiagara caves. After this hiatus, the second step coincides with a renewed pearl millet cultivation, the beginning of iron production and the development of village networks connected to important proto-urban trade centres. This might be related to influences from Southeast Mauretania associated with the Late Tichitt tradition and the setting of the Ghana empire. As in the neighbouring Inland Niger Delta, this led to a diversified agricultural system that included several domesticated crops (rice, sorghum, fonio and cowpea).

Previously, fonio was often considered a very ancient crop, with widespread and patchy modern distributions reflecting relict populations. Alternatively, we support the hypothesis that the fonios are later secondary domesticates, taken into cultivation to complement pearl millet, rice and sorghum, as risk-buffering crops for poor and shallow soils, plausibly in more than one time and place. The fonio millets may have been taken up secondarily to suit the more marginal agricultural conditions across the West African dry savannas and to help expand grain crop production as population centres grew. In this model, the evidence for fonio in the Seno plain at Sadia may be seen as a local development of cultivation at the interstices of established pearl millet agriculture and early rice expansion along the Niger river.

Acknowledgements

Special thanks go to Stefanie Kahlheber, who did the flotation and the preliminary analysis of Sadia’s archaeobotanical samples; the Swiss Cooperation Office in Bamako (BUCO), for its logistical support in the administrative management of our technical equipment and vehicles; the Mission Culturelle de Bandiagara (MCB) and the Institut des Sciences Humaines (ISH) for its hosting; the administrative and technical staff members of the Anthropology Unit of the Department of Genetics and Evolution of the University of Geneva, especially David Glauser for improving the illustrations; the workers of the village of Sadia who participated in the excavations on the Sadia site; the excavation technicians of Dimmbal (Mali), whose work and commitment are essential to the success of this research. All necessary permits were obtained for the described study which complied with all relevant regulations.

Funding

Open access funding provided by University of Geneva. Fieldwork and archaeobotanical sampling were carried out as part of the ‘Human population and paleoenvironment in Africa’ project funded by the Swiss National Science Foundation (project Nr 101213_124657), the Swiss-Liechtenstein Foundation for Archaeological Research Abroad (SLSA) and the Faculty of Sciences of the University of Geneva (AFRI budget line), p.i. Eric Huysecom, 2009–2012. The analysis of the archaeobotanical samples was part of the project ‘Tracking Humans in West Africa: a bio-archaeological study in the Dogon Country’ (Project Nr 100011_169403), p.i. Anne Mayor, 2016–2019, both projects of the Laboratory Archaeology and Population in Africa, at the University of Geneva. Archaeobotanical laboratory work has been carried out by Louis Champion as part of both ‘Tracking Humans in West Africa: a bio-archaeological study in the Dogon Country’ project and his PhD research project at University College London, while additional laboratory research and access to comparative databases has been supported by the ‘Comparative Pathways to Agriculture’ project (ERC Grant Agreement to Dorian Fuller nr 323842, 2013-2018).

Footnotes

In the memory of Barbara Eichhorn (1967–2020), colleague and friend who started this journey in Mali with us.

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Change history

5/20/2021

Springer Nature’s version of this paper was updated to present the correct Open Access funding note.

Contributor Information

Louis Champion, Email: Louis.Champion@unige.ch.

Dorian Q. Fuller, Email: d.fuller@ucl.ac.uk

Sylvain Ozainne, Email: Sylvain.Ozainne@admin.vs.ch.

Éric Huysecom, Email: Eric.Huysecom@unige.ch.

Anne Mayor, Email: Anne.Mayor@unige.ch.

References

  1. Adoukonou-Sagbadja H, Wagner C, Dansi A, Ahlemeyer J, Daïnou O, Akpagana K, Ordon F, Friedt W. Genetic diversity and population differentiation of traditional fonio millet (Digitaria spp.) landraces from different agro-ecological zones of West Africa. Theor Appl Genet. 2007;115:917–931. doi: 10.1007/s00122-007-0618-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Aliero AA, Morakinyo JA. Characterization of Digitaria exilis (Kipp.) Stapf and D. iburua Stapf accessions. Niger J Genet. 2001;16:10–21. [Google Scholar]
  3. Barron A, Fuller DQ, Stevens C, Champion L, Winchell F, Denham T. Snapshots in time: MicroCT scanning of pottery sherds determines early domestication of sorghum (Sorghum bicolor) in East Africa. J Archaeol Sci. 2020;123:105259. [Google Scholar]
  4. Bedaux RMA, Constandse-Westermann TS, Hacquebord L. Recherches archéologiques dans le Delta intérieur du Niger (Mali) Palaeohistorica. 1978;20:91–220. [Google Scholar]
  5. Beldados A, Manzo A, Murphy C, Stevens CJ, Fuller DQ. Evidence of sorghum cultivation and possible pearl millet in the second millennium BC at Kassala, Eastern Sudan. In: Mercuri AM, D’Andrea AC, Fornaciari R, Höhn A, editors. Plants and People in the African Past: Progress in African Archaeobotany. Cham: Springer; 2018. pp. 503–528. [Google Scholar]
  6. Bezançon G. Riziculture traditionnelle en Afrique de l’Ouest : valorisation et conservation des ressources génétiques. J d’Agriculture Tradit Bot appliquée. 1995;37:3–24. [Google Scholar]
  7. Bigga G, Kahlheber S. From gathering to agricultural intensification: archaeobotanical remains from Mege, Chad Basin, NE Nigeria. Rep Afr Archaeol. 2011;3:19–65. [Google Scholar]
  8. Bin S. La vallée du Sourou (Burkina Faso), entre agrobusiness et autonomie locale. Géocarrefour. 2009;84:1–2. [Google Scholar]
  9. Blench R. Archaeology, language and the African past. Lanham: Altamira Press; 2006. [Google Scholar]
  10. Boffa J-M. Agroforestry parklands in sub-Saharan Africa. Rome: FAO; 1999. [Google Scholar]
  11. Boré Y. Recensement des graminées sauvages alimentaires (cereales mineures utilisées en 5è, 6 è et 7e regions) Paris: Ecole Normale Supérieure; 1983. [Google Scholar]
  12. Brass M, Fuller DQ, MacDonald K, Stevens C, Adam A, Kozieradzka-Ogunmakin I, Abdallah R, Alawad O, Abdalla A, Gregory IV, Wellings J. New findings on the significance of Jebel Moya in the eastern Sahel. Azania: Archaeological Research in Africa. 2019;54(4):425–444. doi: 10.1080/0067270X.2019.1691845. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Breunig P. Pathways to food production in the Sahel. In: Mitchell P, Lane PJ, editors. In Oxford handbook of African Archaeology. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2013. pp. 555–570. [Google Scholar]
  14. Brunken J, de Wet JMJ, Harlan JR. The morphology and domestication of pearl millet. Econ Bot. 1977;31:163–174. [Google Scholar]
  15. Burkill H (1985) The useful plants of west tropical Africa. Volume 1-5., Royal Bota. ed. Kew, Richmond, Surrey
  16. Burkill H. The useful plants of west tropical Africa: families M-R. Kew: Royal Botanic Gardens; 1997. [Google Scholar]
  17. Burkill HM (2000) The Useful Plants of West Tropical Africa, Families SZ Addenda. Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, Richmond, United Kingdom, 5, p 686
  18. Burnham P. Changing agricultural and pastoral ecologies in the West African savanna region. In: Harris DR, editor. Human Ecology in Savanna Environments. London: Academic Press; 1980. pp. 147–170. [Google Scholar]
  19. Champion L (2019) The evolution of agriculture, food and drink in the Ancient Niger River Basin: archaeobotanical studies from Mali and Benin. University College of London
  20. Champion L, Fuller DQ (2018a) Archaeobotanical remains. In: Haour A (ed.), Two Thousand Years in Dendi, Northern Benin. Archaeology, History and Memory. Brill, Leiden, pp 216–233
  21. Champion L, Fuller DQ (2018b) New evidence on the development of millet and rice economies in the Niger River Basin: archaeobotanical results from Benin. In: Mercuri A, Fornaciari R, Höhn A (eds), Plants and People in the African Past. Springer Cham, pp 529–547
  22. Champion L, Fuller DQ (2019) Archaeobotany: methods. In: Oxford Research Encyclopedia of African History, pp 1–29
  23. Chevalier A. Ressources Végétales du Sahara et de ses Confins Nord et Sud. Paris: Muséum d’Histoire Naturelle; 1932. [Google Scholar]
  24. Chouin G (2018) Reflections on plague in African history (14th–19th c.). Afriques. 10.4000/afriques.2228
  25. Cruz J-F, Béavogui F, Dramé D (2011) Le fonio, une céréale africaine, Quae, CTA. ed. Versailles, France
  26. D’Andrea AC, Klee M, Casey J. Archaeobotanical evidence for pearl millet (Pennisetum glaucum) in Sub-Saharan West Africa. Antiquity. 2001;75:341–348. [Google Scholar]
  27. D’Andrea AC, Kahlheber S, Logan AL, Watson DJ (2007) Early domesticated cowpea (Vigna unguiculata) from Central Ghana. Antiquity 81(313):686–698
  28. Dalziel JD. The useful plants of west tropical Africa. Being an Appendix to The Flora of West Tropical Africa. London: Crown Agents for the Colonies; 1937. [Google Scholar]
  29. de Wet JMJ, Rao KP, Mengesha MH, Brink DE. Domestication of sawa millet (Echinochloa colona) Econ Bot. 1983;37:283–291. [Google Scholar]
  30. Dieterlen G. Mythe et organisation sociale au Soudan français. J la Société des Africanistes. 1955;25:39–76. [Google Scholar]
  31. Dietler M. Theorizing the feast: rituals of consumption, commensal politics and power in African contexts. In: Dietler M, Hayden B, editors. Feasts. Archaeological and Ethnographic Perspectives on food, politics, and power. Washington: Smithsonian Press; 2001. pp. 65–114. [Google Scholar]
  32. Dlamini N, Sealy J, Mayor A. Diet variability among pre-Dogon and early Dogon populations (Mali) from stable isotopes and dental diseases. Am J Phys Anthropol. 2019;169:287–301. doi: 10.1002/ajpa.23831. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Eichhorn B, Neumann K. Holocene vegetation change and land use at Ounjougou, Mali. In: Stevens CJ, Nixon S, Murray MA, Fuller DQ, editors. Archaeology of African Plant Use. Walnut Creek: Left Coast Press; 2014. pp. 83–96. [Google Scholar]
  34. Franke G. A chronology of the Central Nigerian Nok Culture - 1500 BC to the beginning of the Common Era. J Afr Archaeol. 2016;14:257–289. [Google Scholar]
  35. Fuller DQ (2003) African crops in prehistoric South Asia: a critical review. In: Food, Fuel and Fields. Progress in Africa Archaeobotany. Heinrich-Barth-Institut, Cologne, pp 239–271
  36. Fuller DQ. Archaeological science in field training. In: Ucko P, Ling Q, Hubert J, editors. From Concepts of the Past to Practical Strategies: The Teaching of Archaeological Field Techniques. London: Saffron Books, Eastern Art Publishing; 2008. pp. 183–205. [Google Scholar]
  37. Fuller DQ, Harvey EL. The archaeobotany of Indian pulses: identification, processing and evidence for cultivation. Environ Archaeol. 2006;11:219–246. [Google Scholar]
  38. Fuller DQ, Boivin N (2009) Crops, cattle and commensals across the Indian Ocean. Current and potential archaeobiological evidence. Etudes Ocean Indien 42–43:13–46
  39. Fuller DQ, Hildebrand E. Domesticating plants in Africa. In: Mitchell P, Lane P, editors. The Oxford Handbook of African Archaeology. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2013. pp. 507–526. [Google Scholar]
  40. Fuller DQ, Stevens CJ. Sorghum domestication and diversification: a current archaeobotanical perspective. In: Mercuri AM, D’Andrea AC, Fornaciari R, Höhn A, editors. Plants and People in the African Past. Cham: Springer; 2018. pp. 427–452. [Google Scholar]
  41. Fuller D, Weber S. Formation processes and paleoethnobotanical interpretation in South Asia. J Interdiscip Stud Hist Archaeol. 2005;2:93–115. [Google Scholar]
  42. Fuller DQ, Weisskopf A, 2011. The Early Rice Project : from domestication to global warming. Archaeol. Int. 44–51.
  43. Fuller DQ, Qin L, Zheng Y, Zhao Z, Chen X, Hosoya L, Sun G., 2009. Domestication rate in rice : spikelet. Science (80-). 1607–1610. [DOI] [PubMed]
  44. Fuller DQ, Stevens CJ, McClatchie M. Routine activities tertiary refuse and Labor organization. Social Inferences from everyday Archaeobotany. In: Madella M, Lancelotti C, Savard M, editors. Ancient Plants and Peoples. Tuscon: Contemporary Trends in Archaeobotany. The University of Arizona Press; 2014. pp. 174–217. [Google Scholar]
  45. Fuller, D.Q., Champion, L., Stevens, C.J., 2019. Comparing the tempo of cereal dispersal and the agricultural transition: two African and one West Asian trajectory., in: Einchornn, B., Höhn, A. (Eds.), Trees, grasses and crops – people and plants in sub-Saharan Africa and beyond. Frankfurter Archäologischen Schriften 37. Bonn, pp. 119–140.
  46. Fuller, D. Q., Barron, A., Champion, L., Dupuy, C., Commelin, D., Raimbault, M., Denham, T., in press. Transition from wild to domesticated pearl millet (Pennisetum glaucum) revealed in ceramic temper at three Middle Holocene sites in Northern Mali. African Archaeological Review (accepted) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  47. Gallagher DE, Dueppen SA (2018) Recognizing plague epidemics in the archaeological record of West Africa. Afriques 09, 10.4000/afriques.2198
  48. Gallagher DE, Dueppen SA, Walsh R. The archaeology of shea butter (Vitellaria paradoxa) in Burkina Faso, West Africa. J Ethnobiol. 2016;36:150–171. [Google Scholar]
  49. Garnier A, Neumann K, Eichhorn B, Lespez L. Phytolith taphonomy in the middle-to late-Holocene fluvial sediments of Ounjougou (Mali, West Africa) Holocene. 2013;23(3):416–431. [Google Scholar]
  50. Garnier A, Lespez L, Ozainne S, Ballouche A, Mayor A, Le Drézen Y, Rasse M, Huysecom E. L’incision généralisée de la vallée du Yamé (Mali) entre 2 350 et 1 700 ans cal. BP : quelle signification paléoenvironnementale et archéologique ? Quaternaire. 2015;26:49–66. [Google Scholar]
  51. Gijanto L, Walshaw S. Ceramic production and dietary changes at Juffure, Gambia. Afr Archaeol Rev. 2014;31:265–297. [Google Scholar]
  52. Griaule M. L’Alliance cathartique. Africa (Lond) 1948;18:242–258. [Google Scholar]
  53. Haaland R. Porridge and pot, bread and oven: food ways and symbolism in Africa and the near east from the Neolithic to the present. Cambridge Archaeol. J. 2007;17(2):165–182. [Google Scholar]
  54. Harlan JR. Wild-grass seed harvesting in the Sahara and Sub-Sahara of Africa. In: Harris DR, Hillman GC, editors. Foraging and farming: the evolution of plant exploitation. London: Unwin Hyman; 1989. pp. 79–98. [Google Scholar]
  55. Harvey E, Fuller DQ. Investigating crop processing using phytolith analysis: the example of rice and millets. J Archaeol Sci. 2005;32:739–752. [Google Scholar]
  56. Hastorf CA. Gender, space, and food in prehistory. In: Conkey M, Gero JM, editors. Engendering archaeology: Women and prehistory. Oxford: Blackwell; 1991. pp. 132–159. [Google Scholar]
  57. Hastorf CA. the social archaeology of food: thinking about eating from prehistory to the present. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2016. [Google Scholar]
  58. Hillman GC. Interpretation of archaeological plant remains: the application of ethnographic models from Turkey. In: van Zeist W, Casparie WA, editors. Plants and Ancient Man. Balkema: Studies in Palaeoethnobotany; 1984. pp. 1–41. [Google Scholar]
  59. Hilu KW. Fonio millets : ethnobotany , genetic diversity and evolution. South Afr J Bot Bot. 1997;63(4):185–190. [Google Scholar]
  60. Höhn A, Neumann K. Shifting cultivation and the development of a cultural landscape during the Iron Age (0–1500 AD) in the northern Sahel of Burkina Faso, West Africa: Insights from archaeological charcoal. Quat Int. 2012;249:72–83. [Google Scholar]
  61. Huysecom E, Ballouche A, Cissé L, Gallay A, Konaté D, Mayor A, Neumann K, Ozainne S, Perret S, Rasse M, Robert A, Robion C, Sanogo K, Serneels V, Soriano S, Stokes S. Paléoenvironnement et peuplement humain en Afrique de l’Ouest: rapport de la sixième campagne de recherche à Ounjougou (Mali) Jahresbericht SLSA. 2004;2003:27–68. [Google Scholar]
  62. Huysecom E, Ozainne S, Mayor A, Jeanbourquin C, Robion-Brunner C, Ballouche A, Chaix L, Cissé L, Eichhorn B, Garnier A, Guindo N, Kahlheber S, Le Drézen Y, Lespez L, Loukou YSB, Sanogo K, Serneels V, Soriano S, Soulignac R, Taïbi N. Le tell de Sadia en Pays dogon : la treizième année de recherches du programme “Peuplement humain et évolution paléoclimatique en Afrique de l’Ouest.”. Jahresbericht SLSA. 2011;2010:101–221. [Google Scholar]
  63. Huysecom E, Ozainne S, Mayor A, Jeanbourquin C, Loukou YSB, Canetti M, Ballouche A, Cantin N, Cissé L, Eichhorn B, Kahlheber S, Rasse M, Sanogo K. Fouilles en Pays dogon et reconnaissance archéologique au Sénégal oriental: la 14ème année de recherches du programme “Peuplement humain et paléoenvironnement en Afrique de l’Ouest”. Jahresbericht SLSA. 2012;2011:99–172. [Google Scholar]
  64. Huysecom E, Jeanbourquin C, Canetti M, Loukou S, Chaix L, Ozainne S, Mayor A, Le Drézen Y, Guindo N, Eichhorn B, Lespez L. Towards a better understanding of sub-saharan settlement mounds before AD 1400: The tells of Sadia on the Seno Plain (Dogon Country, Mali) J Afr Archaeol. 2015;13:7–38. [Google Scholar]
  65. Ishii S, Yamamoto M, Tago K, Otsuka S, Senoo K. Microbial populations in various paddy soils respond differently to denitrification-inducing conditions, albeit background bacterial populations are similar. Soil Sci Plant Nutr. 2010;56:220–224. [Google Scholar]
  66. Jacquot M, Courtois B (1987) Upland rice. Trop Agric
  67. Jolly É. Boire avec esprit. Nanterre: Bière de mil et société dogon. Société d’Ethnologie; 2004. [Google Scholar]
  68. Jones G. A statistical approach to the archaeological identification of crop processing. J Archaeol Sci. 1987;14:311–323. [Google Scholar]
  69. Kay AU, Fuller DQ, Neumann K, Eichhorn B, Höhn A, Morin-Rivat J, Champion L, Linseele V, Huysecom E, Ozainne S, Lespez L. Diversification, intensification and specialization: changing land use in western Africa from 1800 BC to AD 1500. J World Prehist. 2019;32(2):179–228. [Google Scholar]
  70. Kahlheber S (2004) Perlhirse und Baobab Archäobotanische Untersuchungen im Norden Burkina Faso. PhD Thesis. Johann Wolfgang Goethe Universität, Allemagne.
  71. Kahlheber S, Neumann K (2007) The development of plant cultivation in semi-arid West Africa. In: Denham,T, Iriarte J, Vrydaghs L (eds), Rethinking agriculture: archaeological and ethnoarchaeological perspectives. Left coast press, pp 320–346
  72. Klee M, Zach B, Stika H-P. Four thousand years of plant exploitation in the Lake Chad Basin (Nigeria), part III: plant impressions in potsherds from the Final Stone Age Gajiganna Culture. Veg Hist Archaeobotany. 2004;13:131–142. [Google Scholar]
  73. Loukou S, Huysecom E, Mayor A. L’occupation humaine de la vallée du Guringin (plaine du Séno, Mali) Azania. 2013;48:91–110. [Google Scholar]
  74. Macdonald KC (2013). Complex societies, urbanism, and trade in the Western Sahel, edited by P. Mitchell and P. Lane: OUP Oxford: 829-844.
  75. MacDonald KC, Vernet R, Martinón-Torres M, Fuller DQ. Dhar Néma: from early agriculture to metallurgy in southeastern Mauritania, Azania: Archaeological Research in Africa.Manning, K., Pelling, R., Higham, T., Schwenniger, J.-L., Fuller, D.Q., 2011. 4500-Year old domesticated pearl millet (Pennisetum glaucum) from the Tilemsi Valley, Mali: new insights into an alternative cereal domestication pathway. J Archaeol Sci. 2009;38:312–322. [Google Scholar]
  76. MacDonald KC, Champion L, Manning K. Windé Koroji Ouest (Mali, Second and Third Millennia BCE): the environmental and subsistence evidence. In: Rupp N, Beck C, Franke G, Wendt K, editors. Winds of Change: Archaeological Contributions in Honour of Peter Breunig. Bonn, Bonn: Verlag Dr. Rudolf Habelt; 2017. pp. 165–180. [Google Scholar]
  77. Manning KM, Fuller DQ. Early millet farmers in the Lower Tilemsi Valley, Northeastern Mali. In: Stevens CJ, Nixon S, Fuller DQ, editors. Archaeology of African Plant Use. Walnut Creek: Left Coast Press; 2014. pp. 73–82. [Google Scholar]
  78. Manning K, Pelling R, Higham T, Schwenniger JL, Fuller DQ (2011) 4500-Year old domesticated pearl millet (Pennisetum glaucum) from the Tilemsi Valley, Mali: new insights into an alternative cereal domestication pathway. J Archaeol Sci (2): 312–322
  79. Marshall F, Hildebrand E. Cattle before crops: the beginnings of food production in Africa. J World Prehist. 2002;16(2):99–143. [Google Scholar]
  80. Mayor A (2011) Traditions céramiques dans la boucle du Niger. Ethnoarchéologie et histoire du peuplement au temps des empires précoloniaux, Journal of African Archaeology monograph series. Africa Magna Verlag, Frankfurt am Main.
  81. Mayor A, Huysecom E, Gallay A, Rasse M, Ballouche A. Population dynamics and paleoclimate over the past 3000 years in the Dogon Country, Mali. J Anthropol Archaeol. 2005;24:25–61. [Google Scholar]
  82. Mayor A, Huysecom E, Ozainne S, Magnavita S. Early social complexity in the Dogon Country (Mali) as evidenced by a new chronology of funerary practices. J Anthropol Archaeol. 2014;34:17–41. [Google Scholar]
  83. McIntosh RJ. The pulse model: genesis and accommodation of specialization in the Middle Niger. J Afr Hist. 1993;34(2):181–220. [Google Scholar]
  84. McIntosh SK (1995) Excavations at Jenné-Jeno, Hambarketolo, and Kaniana (Inland Niger Delta, Mali), the 1981 Season. University of California Press.
  85. McIntosh RJ (2000) Clustered cities of the Middle Niger alternative routes to authority in prehistory in Africa’s urban past, edited by D. Anderson and R. J. A. R. Rathbone. Oxford: James Currey: 19-35.
  86. Mercuri AM, D’Andrea AC, Fornaciari R, Höhn A. Plants and people in the African past: themes and objectives of archaeobotany. In: Mercuri AM, Fornaciari R, D’Andrea AC, Höhn A, editors. Plants and People in the African Past. Cham: Progess in African Archaeobotany. Springer; 2018. pp. 1–9. [Google Scholar]
  87. Mercuri AM, Fornaciari R, Gallinaro M, Vanin S, Di Lernia S. Plant behaviour from human imprints and the cultivation of wild cereals in Holocene Sahara. Nat Plants. 2018;4:71–81. doi: 10.1038/s41477-017-0098-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  88. Meyer RS, Choi JY, Sanches M, Plessis A, Jonathan M, Amas J, Barretto A, Dorph K, Gross B, Dorian Q, Bimpong K, Ndjiondjop M, Gregorio GB, Michael D. Domestication history and geographical adaptation inferred from a SNP map of African rice. Nat Gen. 2016;48:1083. doi: 10.1038/ng.3633. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  89. Moody K. Weeds reported in rice in South and Southeast Asia. Los Banos: International Rice Research Institute; 1989. [Google Scholar]
  90. Murray MA. Fruits, vegetables, pulses and condiments. In: Nicholson PT, Shaw I, editors. Ancient Egyptian Materials and Technology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2000. pp. 609–655. [Google Scholar]
  91. Murray SS (2007) Identifying African rice domestication in the Middle Niger Delta (Mali), in: Fields of Change: Progress in African Archaeobotany. Groningen Archaeological Studies, pp. 53–61.
  92. Nash DJ, De Cort G, Chase BM, Verschuren D, Nicholson SE, Shanahan TM, Asrat A, Lézine AM, Grab SW. African hydroclimatic variability during the last 2000 years. Quat Sci Rev. 2016;154:1–22. [Google Scholar]
  93. Nesbitt M. Plants and people in Ancient Anatolia. Anatol Archaeol A Tribut to Peter Neve. 1995;58:68–81. [Google Scholar]
  94. Neumann K. Development of plant food production in the West African Savannas: archaeobotanical perspectives, in: Oxford Research Encyclopedia of African History. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2018. [Google Scholar]
  95. Nixon S, Murray MA, Fuller DQ. Plant use at an early Islamic merchant town in the West African Sahel: the archaeobotany of Essouk-Tadmakka (Mali) Veg Hist Archaeobotany. 2011;20:223–239. [Google Scholar]
  96. Ozainne S (2013) Un néolithique ouest-africain. Cadre chrono-culturel, économique et environnemental de l’Holocène récent en Pays dogon (Mali), Journal of African archaeology monograph series. Africa Magna Verlag, Frankfurt am Main
  97. Ozainne S, Lespez L, Le Drezen Y, Eichhorn B, Neumann K, Huysecom E. Developing a chronology integrating archaeological and environmental data from different contexts: the Late Holocene Sequence of Ounjougou (Mali) Radiocarbon. 2009;51:457–470. [Google Scholar]
  98. Ozainne S, Lespez L, Garnier A, Ballouche A, Neumann K, Pays O, Huysecom E. A question of timing: spatio-temporal structure and mechanisms of early agriculture expansion in West Africa. J Archaeol Sci. 2014;50:359–368. [Google Scholar]
  99. Ozainne S, Mayor A, Huysecom E. Chronology of human occupation during the Holocene in West Africa: the Dogon Country Radiocarbon Record. In: Rupp N, Beck C, Franke G, Wendt KP, editors. Winds of Change: Archaeological Contributions in Honour of Peter Breunig. Bonn: Verlag Dr. Rudolf Habelt GmbH; 2017. pp. 211–227. [Google Scholar]
  100. Portères R (1952) Les Rizières de ruissellement en Casamance. J. d’Agriculture Tradit. Bot. appliquée: 34–37
  101. Portères R. Les Appellations des Céréales en Afrique (suite et fin) J D’agriculture Tradit Bot appliquée. 1959;6(6):290–339. [Google Scholar]
  102. Portères R (1976) African cereals: Eleusine, Fonio, Black Fonio, Teff, Brachiaria, paspalum, Pennisetum, and African Rice. In: Harlan J, de Wet J, Stamler A (eds) Origins of African Plant Domestication. Mouton, The Hague, pp 409–463
  103. Ricquier, B (2014) The history of porridge in Bantuphone Africa, with words as main ingredients. Afriques. Débats, méthodes et terrains d’histoire 5
  104. Robion-Brunner C (2008) Vers une histoire de la production du fer sur le plateau de Bandiagara (pays dogon, Mali) durant les empires précoloniaux: peuplement des forgerons et traditions sidérurgiques. Université de Geneve
  105. Selleger C (2014) The use of wild food plant resources in the Dogon country, Mali. In: Chevalier A. (ed), Plants and People : Choices and Diversity through Time. Oxbow Books, pp 236–241
  106. Staph O (1915) Iburu and Fundi, Two Cereals of Upper Guinea. (Digitaria iburua; D. exilis.). Bull Misc Inf (Royal Bot Gard Kew) 8:381–386
  107. Styring AK, Diop AM, Bogaard A, Champion L, Fuller DQ, Gestrich N, Macdonald KC, Neumann K. Nitrogen isotope values of Pennisetum glaucum (pearl millet) grains: towards a reconstruction of past cultivation conditions in the Sahel, West Africa. Veg Hist Archaeobotany. 2019;28:663–678. [Google Scholar]
  108. Taïbi AN. Controversies surrounding socio-environmental changes and landscape dynamics in Dogon country (Mali) Espac Geogr. 2019;49:103–116. [Google Scholar]
  109. Thompson GB. Subsistence and environment: the botanical evidence. IV. Oxford: Oxbow books; 1996. The excavations of Khok Phanom Di: a prehistoric site in Central Thailand. [Google Scholar]
  110. Truffa Giachet M (2019) Étude archéométrique des perles en verre d’Afrique de l’Ouest: vers une meilleure compréhension des dynamiques techniques et commerciales à l’époque des empires précoloniaux. Université de Genève
  111. Truffa Giachet M, Gratuze B, Mayor A, Huysecom E (2020) Compositional and provenance study of glass beads from archaeological sites in Mali and Senegal at the time of the first Sahelian states. PLoS ONE 15(12): e0242027. 10.1371/journal.pone.0242027 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  112. Twiss KC. The archaeology of food: identity, politics, and ideology in the prehistoric and historic past. Cambridge: Cambridge. ed; 2019. [Google Scholar]
  113. Weisskopf A, Harvey E, Kingwell-Banham E, Kajale M, Mohanty R, Fuller DQ. Archaeobotanical implications of phytolith assemblages from cultivated rice systems,wild rice stands and macro-regional patterns. J Archaeol Sci. 2014;51:45–53. [Google Scholar]
  114. Winchell F, Stevens CJ, Murphy C, Champion L, Fuller DQ. Evidence for sorghum domestication in fourth millennium BC Eastern Sudan: Spikelet morphology from ceramic impressions of the Butan group. Curr Anthropol. 2017;58:673–683. [Google Scholar]
  115. Winchell F, Brass M, Manzo A, Beldados A, Murphy C, Stevens CJ, Fuller DQ. On the origins and dissemination of domesticated sorghum and pearl millet across Africa and into India: a view from the Butana Group of the far eastern Sahel. Afr Archaeol Rev. 2018;35:483–505. doi: 10.1007/s10437-018-9314-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  116. Yang X, Fuller DQ, Huan X, Perry L, Li Q, Li Z, Zhang J, Ma Z, Zhuang Y, Jiang L, Ge Y. Barnyard grasses were processed with rice around 10000 years ago. Sci Rep. 2015;5:16251. doi: 10.1038/srep16251. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  117. Yaro GJ. Formes de riziculture et différenciations socio-économiques dans la vallée du Sourou au Burkina. In: Cheneau-Loquay A, editor. Quel Avenir Pour Les Rizicultures de l’Afrique de l’Ouest ? Montpellier: CIRAD; 1998. pp. 10–20. [Google Scholar]
  118. Zwarts L, Bekkema M, Kamp J van der (2019) Atlas de la vallée du Sourou (Mali). In: Altenburg & Wymenga (ed), A&W-Rapport 2543 – Partie 1. Feanwâlden / Care International Mali, Bamako

Articles from Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences are provided here courtesy of Springer

RESOURCES