Erythema Nodosum: A Practical Approach and Diagnostic Algorithm

Abstract

Erythema nodosum is the most common form of panniculitis and is characterized by tender erythematous nodules mainly in the lower limbs on the pretibial area. The exact cause of erythema nodosum is unknown, although it appears to be a hypersensitivity response to a variety of antigenic stimuli. Although the etiology is mostly idiopathic, ruling out an underlying disease is imperative before diagnosing primary erythema nodosum. Erythema nodosum can be the first sign of a systemic disease that is triggered by a large group of processes, such as infections, inflammatory diseases, neoplasia, and/or drugs. The most common identifiable causes are streptococcal infections, primary tuberculosis, sarcoidosis, Behçet disease, inflammatory bowel disease, drugs, and pregnancy. We propose a diagnostic algorithm to optimize the initial work-up, hence initiating prompt and accurate management of the underlying disease. The algorithm includes an initial assessment of core symptoms, diagnostic work-up, differential diagnosis, and recommended therapies. Several treatment options for the erythema nodosum lesions have been previously reported; nevertheless, these options treat the symptoms, but not the triggering cause. Making an accurate diagnosis will allow the physician to treat the underlying cause and determine an optimal therapeutic strategy.

Key Points

Erythema nodosum is mainly idiopathic, although it can be the first sign of a systemic disease.

Several conditions have been described as triggering causes of erythema nodosum; thus, an optimized cost-effective initial work-up is necessary.

An algorithm that includes an initial assessment of core symptoms, diagnostic work-up, differential diagnosis, and recommended therapies can lead to a prompt and accurate diagnosis and an optimal therapeutic strategy.

Definition

Panniculitis is a heterogeneous group of inflammatory processes that affect the subcutaneous cellular tissue. They are classified into two groups: (1) lobular or (2) septal panniculitis. Erythema nodosum (EN) is the most common form of panniculitis and it is the prototypic septal panniculitis [1]. Erythema nodosum was first described by Robert Willan in 1798 [2]. Historical data concerning EN date back to 1762 to a prior possible description of an EN lesion in a letter from Wolfgang Amadeus, Mozart’s father, which could be the first record of this disease [3]. This review aims to evaluate the current literature of the triggering factors and treatment options for EN to propose an easy-to-follow diagnostic algorithm. A search of the literature was performed in PubMed. Keywords used included: “erythema nodosum” and any of the following: “etiology, Behçet’s disease, sarcoidosis, tuberculosis, inflammatory bowel disease, streptococcal infection, drugs or vaccines, malignancies or cancer,” “epidemiology,” “therapy or treatment,” “diagnosis,” “histopathology,” and “pathophysiology.” The search was limited to articles published from 1950 to 2020. Titles and abstracts in English and Spanish were reviewed for eligibility. References of selected relevant articles were scanned, and papers from these sources were also included.

Epidemiology

The incidence of EN varies according to the triggering factor and its ethnic, racial, and geographic differences. In north-western Spain, the annual incidence rate of biopsy-proven EN for the population aged 14 years and older was 52 cases/million and the incidence was higher in the first half of the year when streptococcal infections are more frequent [4]. In Egypt, the foremost etiology reported between 1994 and 2002 was primary tuberculosis (TB) [5], while in Spain, sarcoidosis was the most frequent identified etiology [4]. Among adults, this condition affects women more frequently, with a male:female ratio of ~ 1:5 [6]. In children, there is no difference regarding sex, up to the age of 12 years [7]. The maximum number of incidences occurs between the second and third decades although it can occur at any age [8, 9].

Pathogenesis

Erythema nodosum is considered a hypersensitivity response to a variety of antigenic stimuli. It has been proposed that EN may be the result of the formation of immune complexes and their deposition in the venules of the septae of the subcutaneous fat [10]. Evidence of circulating immune complexes in early lesions supports the suggestion that the antigen, antibody, and complement play a significant role in the pathogenesis and circulating immune complexes may contribute to tissue injury [11, 12]. However, some authors have reported a lack of circulating immune complexes in uncomplicated EN, and a type IV delayed hypersensitivity reaction has been proposed [13]. Several adhesion molecules and inflammatory mediators are involved in the development of the lesions. Expression of adhesion molecules, such as E-selectin, P-selectin, platelet endothelial cell adhesion molecule, vascular cell adhesion molecule-1, and intercellular adhesion molecule-1, on endothelial cells in patients with EN has been observed [14]. Early lesions are characterized by a neutrophilic inflammatory infiltrate in which activated neutrophils might cause oxidative tissue damage and inflammation owing to the production of reactive oxygen intermediates [10, 15]. High levels of cytokines and growth factors, mainly involved in neutrophil recruitment and activation, have been reported both in the skin (mainly interleukin [IL]-6, IL-8, IL-12, interferon-γ, granulocyte colony-stimulating factor and monocyte chemoattractant protein-1) and serum (mainly IL-6, IL-8, IL-12, tumor necrosis factor-α, interferon-γ, granulocyte colony-stimulating factor, and monocyte chemoattractant protein-1) of patients with EN [16]. Increased acute-phase reactants have been detected in patients with EN [12].

Clinical Presentation

The clinical course of EN is characterized by an acute onset of sensitive and erythematous nodules and plaques of 1–6 cm in diameter (Fig. 1a). Lesions are bilateral and symmetric, typically distributed on the distal lower extremities of the pretibial areas, although lesions can also involve the ankles, thighs, and forearms. Erythema nodosum is generally self-limited and resolves within 1–6 weeks by turning from a bright red to a yellow–brown or green-bluish discoloration, resembling bruises (Fig. 1b). These bruise-like evolution lesions are known as “erythema contusiformis” [10]. Coexistence of lesions in different stages of the evolution can be seen in the same patient. The nodules heal without ulceration, scarring, or atrophy, and recurrences are not uncommon [1, 10, 17].

Fig. 1.

Clinical features of erythema nodosum (EN). a Erythematous tender nodules bilaterally on the shins. b Bruise-like appearance “erythema contusiformis”

The skin lesions are frequently accompanied by systemic symptoms, such as fever, malaise, headache, gastrointestinal complaints (such as abdominal pain, vomiting, and diarrhea), cough, lymphadenopathy, weight loss, and arthralgia, mainly in the ankles and knees [18, 19]. Some of these findings might be suggestive of EN secondary to a systemic disease, and these findings can provide important diagnostic clues.

The diagnosis is usually made in a characteristic clinical scenario and is easily distinguished from other nodular lesions. However, it should be confirmed by a deep incisional or excisional biopsy with a generous portion of subcutaneous fat. Once the pathological diagnosis has been made, the real challenge is the identification of the underlying etiology of EN, if present, before considering it idiopathic.

Histologic Findings

Erythema nodosum shows characteristic features of a predominantly septal panniculitis without vasculitis (Fig. 2a). Early lesions present with hemorrhage and edematous septa with a prominent mixed inflammatory infiltrate consisting of lymphocytes, histiocytes, eosinophils, and numerous neutrophils, infiltrating from the septa to the periphery of the adjacent lobules [20]. Late lesions show effacement of the lobules with fibrotic and thickened septa infiltrated by lymphocytes, histiocytes, multinucleated giant cells, and just a few neutrophils (Fig. 2b). The radial Miescher’s granulomas consist of small collections of histiocytes arranged around a central star-shaped cleft. This is a relatively specific but not pathognomonic feature. Small- and even medium-sized vasculitis has occasionally been reported [21].

Fig. 2.

Erythema nodosum (EN) histopathological features. Hematoxylin and eosin staining. a A predominantly septal panniculitis, at × 5 magnification. b Lymphohistiocytic infiltrate with the presence of neutrophils and giant multinucleated cells at × 100 magnification

Etiology

The etiology varies according to the affected population, the geographical area, and the seasonal period, although according to the literature 32–72% of EN cases remain with an unknown etiology [4, 19, 22]. Erythema nodosum may be the first sign of a systemic disease, triggered by a large group of processes, such as infections, inflammation, neoplasias, and/or drugs (Table 1). The most common identifiable causes are streptococcal infections, primary TB, sarcoidosis, Behçet disease, drugs, pregnancy, and inflammatory bowel disease [19].

Table 1.

Etiologies of erythema nodosum [1, 9, 10, 93]

Etiology
Primary	Idiopathic
Secondary
Infections
Bacterial	Beta-hemolytic Streptococcus, Staphylococcus, Escherichia coli, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Mycobacterium tuberculosis, atypical mycobacteria, yersiniosis, salmonellosis, shigellosis, brucellosis, rickettsiosis, leptospirosis, tularemia, Bartonella henselae, syphilis, leprosy, Borrelia burgdorferi, meningococcemia, gonorrhea, chancroid, Campylobacter spp., Chlamydia pisttaci, Corynebacterium diphteriae, Cutibacterium acnes, Moraxella cataralis, Pasteurella pseudotuberculosis
Viruses	Infectious mononucleosis, hepatitis B and C, cytomegalovirus, herpes simplex, parvovirus B19, HIV, measles, varicella, poxvirus (milker’s nodule and Orf disease), Coronavirus Disease 2019
Fungal	Coccidioidomycosis, blastomycosis, histoplasmosis, sporotrichosis, nocardiosis, mucormycosis, aspergillosis, dermatophytosis (Trichophyton spp.)
Parasites	Amebiasis, giardiasis, toxoplasmosis, taeniasis, ascariasis, hydatidosis, trichomoniasis, sparganum larvae, hookworm infestation
Systemic diseases	Sarcoidosis, inflammatory bowel disease, celiac disease, colon diverticulosis, Behçet disease, Reiter syndrome, systemic lupus erythematosus, antiphospholipid syndrome, rheumatoid arthritis, ankylosing spondylitis, Takayasu arteritis, Berger disease, panarteritis nodosa, Wegener granulomatosis, Sweet syndrome, adult Still disease, acne fulminans, Sjögren syndrome, IgA nephropathy, chronic active hepatitis, granulomatous mastitis
Drugs	Penicillin, amoxicillin, ampicillin, cephalosporins, ciprofloxacin, sulfonamides, sulfonylureas, cotrimoxazole, streptomycin, minocycline, nitrofurantoin, bromides and iodides, oral contraceptives, progesterone, gold salts, hydantoin, carbamazepine, ACE inhibitors, ARBs, proton pump inhibitors, leukotriene inhibitors, aromatase inhibitors, granulocytic colony-stimulating factors, fluoxetine, among others. Vaccines (tetanus, diphtheria, and acellular pertussis, BCG, hepatitis B, human papillomavirus, malaria, rabies, smallpox, typhoid, and cholera)
Malignancies	Hodgkin and non-Hodgkin lymphoma, leukemia, sarcoma, pelvic carcinoma, carcinoid tumor, renal, cervix, gastric, colorectal, pulmonary, hepatocellular, and pancreatic carcinoma
Pregnancy

ACE angiotensin-converting enzyme, ARBs angiotensin II receptor blockers, HIV human immunodeficiency virus, IgA immunoglobulin A

Behçet Disease

Patients diagnosed with Behçet disease present with EN lesions in about 44% of the cases, with EN being the initial manifestation of the disease in up to 5.7% of the cases [23]. Several diagnostic criteria have been proposed for Behçet disease, and in the International Study Group International Criteria for Behçet’s Disease, EN is included as a criterion [24]. Based on the histopathology, two forms of presentation are found: (1) the EN type with the typical septal panniculitis pattern in 27% of these cases and with a possible association with mild symptoms and (2) an EN-like with a lobular-mixed panniculitis pattern and vasculitis, representing 73% of cases, with an apparent association with severe disease [25].

Inflammatory Bowel Disease

Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) can present as ulcerative colitis or as Crohn’s disease. In addition to the gastrointestinal symptoms, up to 40% of these patients can have a variety of extraintestinal manifestations [26]. Erythema nodosum occurs in 4–15% of patients with Crohn’s disease and in 3–10% of patients with ulcerative colitis [27, 28], with a female predilection [29, 30].

Sarcoidosis

In sarcoidosis, the most common skin lesion is EN [31]. Löfgren syndrome, an acute presentation of sarcoidosis, is characterized by EN, bilateral hilar lymphadenopathy, and fever. In conjunction with the EN lesions, patients can have periarticular ankle inflammation and papular lesions on the knees and elbows [17]. Diagnosis of sarcoidosis is usually made when clinical and radiological data are confirmed by a tissue biopsy (noncaseating granulomas) [32].

Infections

Erythema nodosum can present as a reactive cutaneous manifestation of infections, such as bacterial, viral, fungal, and protozoal.

Streptococcal Infection

After a pharyngeal streptococcal infection, skin lesions appear in about 2–3 weeks [10]. A throat culture, a rapid antigen Streptococcus test, or antistreptolysin O titers should be ordered when this etiology is suspected [33]. The antibody response is first seen during the second or third week of the acute episode and usually peaks in 4–5 weeks. Pharyngeal culture is still the gold standard for documenting the presence of group A β-hemolytic Streptococcus in these patients. Leukocytosis with neutrophilia and mild normochromic anemia can also occur [34].

Tuberculosis

In some developing countries in which the prevalence of TB is high, Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection is a contributing etiologic factor in EN development. A Chinese study reported a positive polymerase chain reaction analysis and interferon-γ-release assay in 30.4% and 59.4% of patients with EN, respectively [35]. Furthermore, another study suggests that EN among patients with M. tuberculosis infection is common, and EN appears to be a strong predictor or an early symptom of TB. Almost 50% of individuals with EN were diagnosed with TB within 1 month of their EN diagnoses, thus patients should be examined carefully and followed closely [36]. Chest radiography, sputum acid-fast bacilli smear, mycobacterial culture, and nucleic acid amplification testing should be obtained to rule out pulmonary TB. Additionally a tuberculin skin test or interferon-γ release assay should be performed [37]. These studies are mandatory in endemic regions. Furthermore, infection with an atypical mycobacteria species has been associated with EN [10].

Other Infections

Among other leading bacterial infections are Salmonella enteritidis, Salmonella typhimurium, Campylobacter jejuni, Yersenia enterocolitica, Mycoplasma, and Bartonella [38, 39]. Fungal infections, such as coccidioidomycosis [40] blastomycosis [41], and histoplasmosis [42], have been implicated in EN development. Patients’ geographical locations and history of travel to these mycosis-endemic regions can provide diagnostic clues. An association between Coronavirus Disease 2019 and EN has been recently reported [43, 44]. Other infections that can develop EN are summarized in Table 1.

Drugs and Vaccines

Drugs are another frequent etiologic factor of EN and have been identified as the cause of EN in 2.9–5% of patients [4, 19, 45]. Sulfonamides, bromides, and oral contraceptives are the most commonly associated medications [10]. Some vaccines, such as tetanus, diphtheria, and acellular pertussis, BCG, hepatitis B, human papillomavirus, malaria, rabies, smallpox, typhoid, and cholera have been associated with subsequent development of EN [46]. All patients should be carefully questioned about recent medications or vaccines.

A role for different hormones in the development of EN has been described. Pregnancy represents the etiologic cause in 2–6% of patients [6, 19, 45]. Oral contraceptive pills and aromatase inhibitors are associated with EN development [47, 48].

Malignancies

An underlying malignancy can be responsible for EN symptoms in patients with unexplained EN and constitutional symptoms. Hematologic malignancies (leukemia and lymphoma) are most frequently associated with EN lesions, [49–52] and more rarely, solid neoplasms (lung, colon, cervix, hepatic, pancreatic, parathyroid, and carcinoid tumors) have been implicated [53–59]. In some cases, EN lesions indicate disease relapse [60]. Radiation can precipitate EN, this must be taken into account in patients undergoing this treatment [61–63]. Patients with recurrent EN or poor response to conventional treatments should be investigated for an underlying malignancy.

Diagnostic Assessment

Because of the extensive number of possible etiologic processes, the diagnostic approach must be cost effective to initiate a specific treatment. Not all patients may need an extensive work-up, this will allow a cost reduction. Investigations should be tailored to diseases suspected from a careful history and physical examination. Systemic symptoms or altered laboratory test results favor secondary EN [5]; however, in symptomatic patients without a disease-specific clinical finding, a complete work-up must be performed to rule out a severe disease. This examination can lead to early diagnosis and prompt treatment, thus preventing the progression of a serious or life-threatening illness.

Diagnosis of EN is based on clinical presentation and histopathological findings. To identify the underlying cause, the initial work-up must contain a detailed medical history and physical examination. Paraclinical studies including a laboratory work-up and radiologic imaging studies might be necessary. We propose a diagnostic algorithm (Fig. 3) to assist clinicians in making an accurate and timely diagnosis to initiate appropriate treatment for the underlying condition.

Fig. 3.

Approach to the diagnosis of patients with erythema nodosum. ASO antistreptococcal O titers, GAS group A streptococci, ICBD International Criteria for Behçet’s Disease, ISG International Study Group, RADT rapid antigen detection tests, TB tuberculosis

The initial diagnostic work-up should be aimed at identifying common etiologies. Interrogation for disease-specific and non-specific symptoms, such as fever, fatigue, malaise, weight loss, organ-specific symptoms, and any recently used drugs, is necessary. Laboratory tests and imaging must be guided by the clinical findings, the choice of testing should be based on the history and physical examination. However, the etiology may vary depending on other factors such as the race and geographic location of the patient (Table 2), these factors also determine the laboratory tests and imaging studies that must be requested. Based on what has been published in the literature and taking into account the most frequently reported etiological factors of EN (Table 2), we propose a practical diagnostic algorithm [4–6, 19, 22, 38, 39, 45, 64–66]. We suggest that an initial laboratory work-up should include a complete blood count, erythrocyte sedimentation rate, C-reactive protein, antistreptolysin O titer, throat swab culture, and chest radiography. A pregnancy test must be done in all women of child-bearing age. A sputum acid-fast bacilli smear, mycobacterial culture, and tuberculin skin test or interferon-γ release assay must be performed in the TB endemic regions and with abnormal chest x-rays. If diarrhea, abdominal pain, or other gastrointestinal discomfort is present, a stool examination, culture, and coproparasitoscopic stool study must be performed. Mert et al. reported that leukocytosis, an elevated C-reactive protein level, an accelerated erythrocyte sedimentation rate, the presence of prolonged fever, cough, sore throat, diarrhea, arthritis, non-relapsing EN, and an abnormal chest x-ray were predictors of secondary EN, while recurrent EN predicted primary EN [5, 19].

Table 2.

Etiologic factors reported in erythema nodosum series

First author (publication date) Country	Erez et al. (1987) Israel	Puavilai et al. (1995) Thailand	Cribier et al. (1998) France	García-Porrúa et al. (1999) Spain	Psychos et al. (2000) Greece	Sota et al. (2004) Spain	Mert et al. (2004) Turkey	Mert et al. (2007) Turkey	Varas et al. (2015) Chile	Babamahm-oudi et al. (2016) Iran	Porges et al. (2019) Israel
Patient total, n	44	100	129	102	132	45	50	100	91	21	45
Idiopathic, %	32	72	55	34.3	35	33	46	53	32	19.4	9
Secondary, %	68	28	45	65.7	65	67	54	47	68	80.6	91
Infectious
Streptococcal	44	6	28	6.9	6	6.6	16	11	31.8	4.76	16
Primary TB	2	12	0.8	4.9	1.5	22.2	18	10	6.6	–	–
Other	–	–	3.9	21.6	1.5	28.7	–	–	9.9	33.68	7
Sarcoidosis	2	–	10.8	21.6	28	0	12	10	11	4.76	7
Behçet disease	–	3	–	2	3.8	–	2	6	2.2	0	–
Inflammatory bowel disease	2	–	1.5	3	–	–	4	3	2.2	4.76	7
Drugs	10	7	–	2.9	7.6	4.4	–	5	1	14.28	17
Pregnancy	6	–	–	–	6	–	2	2	–	9.52	2
Malignancy	–	–	–	1	–	–	–	–	–	–	2

TB tuberculosis

If the initial work-up is inconclusive, further laboratory testing and imaging studies should be performed. No test abnormalities specific to EN have been described. Unfortunately, in most cases, no specific etiology can be found; therefore, these patients are considered as idiopathic or primary EN.

Differential Diagnoses

Differential diagnoses are summarized in Table 3. The main differential diagnoses are erythema induratum of Bazin, superficial thrombophlebitis, and other forms of panniculitis. Histopathology is essential for diagnoses of greater precision.

Table 3.

Differential diagnoses of EN [93, 94, 95]

Differential diagnosis	Comments
Erythema induratum of Bazin	Lobular panniculitis mainly associated with tuberculosis. Subcutaneous painful erythematous nodules, usually located on the back of the legs, prone to necrotic ulceration and scarring
Superficial thrombophlebitis	Usually presents with tenderness, local pain, induration, and erythema along the course of a superficial vein. A palpable nodular cord might be present because of a thrombus in the affected vein
Cutaneous polyarteritis nodosa	Medium-sized artery vasculitis. Painful subcutaneous nodules, livedo reticularis and/or ulcers usually located on the lower extremities. Mild systemic symptoms can be present
Panniculitis-like T cell lymphoma	Solitary or multiple nodules or plaques primarily on the extremities and the trunk. As the nodules and plaques resolve, they may be replaced by areas of lipoatrophy. Systemic symptoms can be present
EN leprosum	Type 2 leprosy reactional state. Erythematous inflamed nodules and papules that may be superficial, mainly affects the face and the extremities. Systemic symptoms can be present
Pancreatic panniculitis	Subcutaneous nodules on the legs, but also on the thorax, abdomen, arms, and scalp. The nodules can become fluctuant and ulcerate, draining an oily material. Associated with pancreatic disorders
Alpha-1 antitrypsin deficiency	Subcutaneous, erythematous-purpuric, tender nodules or plaques that can ulcerate and drain. Usually affects the lower trunk and proximal extremities. Heals with scarring and atrophy. Can be associated with emphysema or hepatic dysfunction
Lupus panniculitis	Subcutaneous tender nodules and plaques located on the face, arms, shoulders, hips, buttocks, breasts, and trunk

EN erythema nodosum

Treatment

Therapy options are summarized in Table 4. Symptomatic support is an adequate approach for most patients. Compression bandages and limb elevation may be used for edema and pain relief [67]. Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, such as indomethacin at 100–150 mg/day or naproxen 500 mg/day, may be used for pain control [68, 69]. Caution should be taken with the use of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs in patients with IBD as these drugs may worsen IBD symptoms [70].

Table 4.

Treatment of erythema nodosum

Treatment	Mechanism of action	Dosage	Comments/pregnancy risk categorya [96]
Compression bandage and limb elevation [67]	Edema and pain relief
Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs	Anti-inflammatory		Caution in patients with IBD as they may trigger a flare-up or worsen an ongoing acute disease episode Pregnancy category C
Indomethacin [68]		100–150 mg daily
Naproxen [19, 69]		500–1000 mg daily
Potassium iodide [71, 72, 74, 97]	Anti-inflammatory, neutrophil chemotaxis and suppression of toxic radicals	300–900 mg daily	Use with caution in patients with thyroid diseases Pregnancy category D
Colchicine [78, 79, 80]	Anti-inflammatory, decreases neutrophil chemotaxis and degranulation	1–2 mg daily	Consider in patients with Behçet syndrome Pregnancy category C
Dapsone [82]	Anti-inflammatory, inhibits neutrophil myeloperoxidase and chemotaxis	50–75 mg daily	Consider in recurrent and recalcitrant lesions Consider G6PD deficiency screening Pregnancy category C
Hydroxychloroquine [83, 84]	Anti-inflammatory	200 mg twice daily	Consider in chronic and recurrent cases Pregnancy category C (not formal)
Intralesional corticosteroids	Anti-inflammatory		Consider in recalcitrant nodules Pregnancy category C
Triamcinolone acetonide [10]		5 mg/mL
Oral corticosteroids	Anti-inflammatory		Consider in severe disease Exclude an underlying infectious etiology before its use Pregnancy category D in first trimester, C in second and third trimester
Prednisone [10]		40–60 mg daily
Tetracyclines	Anti-inflammatory; suppresses leukocyte chemotaxis and reactive oxygen species		Consider for recalcitrant lesions Pregnancy category D
Minocycline [85]		100 mg twice daily
Tetracycline [86]		500 mg twice to four times daily
Erythromycin [98]	Anti-inflammatory	500 mg four times daily	Consider for recalcitrant lesions Pregnancy category B
TNF-α inhibitors	Anti-inflammatory, inhibits TNF-α		Screen for latent tuberculosis, HBV, HCV, and HIV infection before use Consider in patients with IBD Pregnancy category B
Etanercept [87, 88]		25–50 mg twice weekly tapering to 25–50 mg weekly
Adalimumab [89, 90]		40 mg every 2 weeks
Infliximab [91, 92]		5 mg/kg in weeks 0, 2, and 6
Thalidomide [9]	Anti-inflammatory, thought to be through inhibition of TNF-α release and activity	No specific data	Consider in patients with IBD Pregnancy category X
Cyclosporine A [9]		No specific data	Consider in patients with IBD Pregnancy category C

G6PD glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase, HBV hepatitis B virus, HCV hepatitis C virus, HIV human immunodeficiency virus, IBD inflammatory bowel disease, TNF tumor necrosis factor

^aFormer US Food and Drug Administration pregnancy risk category

In refractory disease, oral potassium iodide may be used with a dose of 300–900 mg daily divided into three doses and tapered to 150 mg/day [71, 72]. Although it has been used for a long time with a good response rate [73, 74], a recent study showed low improvement and suggested that its potential efficacy in inflammatory skin disorders is overestimated [72]. The exact mechanism by which potassium iodide exerts its anti-inflammatory effect is unknown. The anti-inflammatory effects are due to increases in IL-10 and IL-35 levels [75] and the suppression of chemotaxis in neutrophils and their capability to generate toxic radicals [76]. Common acute side effects are diarrhea, nausea, vomiting, and stomach pain. Symptoms of iodism or potassium toxicity may appear with prolonged use. It is contraindicated during pregnancy or while breastfeeding [77].

Colchicine at 1–2 mg/day, adjusted to body weight, has been used mainly in patients with EN and Behçet disease [78–80]. It decreases neutrophil chemotaxis and degranulation. Common side effects are gastrointestinal symptoms (diarrhea, abdominal pain, and nausea) [81].

Dapsone inhibits neutrophil myeloperoxidase and neutrophil chemotaxis. Doses of 50–75 mg/day have been used with caution because of its potential side effects, including methemoglobinemia, hemolysis, agranulocytosis, and peripheral motor neuropathy [82]. Potassium iodide, colchicine, and dapsone are drugs used for treating neutrophilic dermatosis, making them a good option for EN associated with Bechet disease.

Systemic and intralesional corticosteroids are rarely used to treat EN. Prednisone 40 mg/day has been used in severe conditions. For recalcitrant nodules, intralesional triamcinolone acetonide 5 mg/mL, injected to the center of an inflamed lesion, has been used. An underlying infection or malignancy should be ruled out before using corticosteroids [10].

Some patients respond to hydroxychloroquine 200 mg twice daily [83, 84]. Tetracyclines, such as minocycline 100 mg twice daily and tetracycline 500 mg every 6–12 h, have been considered as an option for chronic EN [85, 86]. Tumor necrosis factor-α inhibitors such as etanercept [87, 88], adalimumab [89, 90], and infliximab [91, 92] have been used in patients with recalcitrant disease. Thalidomide and cyclosporine A have been used in EN associated with IBD [9, 28].

Prognosis

The prognosis of EN is usually excellent with spontaneous resolution of the lesions in most patients. However, when an underlying condition is identified, it should be treated, and if a drug has been identified as a trigger, it should be withdrawn when feasible.

Conclusions

Although a large percentage of patients with EN have an unknown etiology, it can be the first sign of a systemic disease in some patients. An early diagnosis is important for optimal management of the underlying disease; thus, a detailed medical history, physical examination, laboratory tests, and imaging studies should be performed during the initial work-up. The diagnostic algorithm for EN described in this study is intended to help physicians make a timely and accurate diagnosis of the underlying cause, which could be a potentially life-threatening condition, and to determine an optimal treatment strategy.

Declarations

Funding

No sources of funding were received for the preparation of this article.

Conflicts of interest/competing interests

Daniela Michelle Pérez-Garza, Sonia Chavez-Alvarez, Jorge Ocampo-Candiani, and Minerva Gomez-Flores have no conflicts of interest that are directly relevant to the content of this article.

Ethics approval

Not applicable.

Consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Patients signed an informed consent regarding the publication of their data and photographs.

Availability of data and material

Not applicable.

Code availability

Not applicable.

Authors’ contributions

All authors made substantial contributions to the conception and design of the work; drafted the work or revised it critically for important intellectual content; and approved the version to be published.