Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 Oct 1.
Published in final edited form as: Drug Discov Today Dis Models. 2019 Dec 20;32(Pt A):5–11. doi: 10.1016/j.ddmod.2019.10.007

In vitro models of HIV-1 infection of the Central Nervous System

Celeste Faia 1,2, Karlie Plaisance-Bonstaff 1, Francesca Peruzzi 1,2,3,*
PMCID: PMC7938360  NIHMSID: NIHMS1544048  PMID: 33692833

Abstract

Neurocognitive disorders associated with HIV-1 infection affect more than half of persons living with HIV (PLWH) under retroviral therapy. Understanding the molecular mechanisms and the complex cellular network communication underlying neurological dysfunction is critical for the development of an effective therapy. As with other neurological disorders, challenges to studying HIV infection of the brain include limited access to clinical samples and proper reproducibility of the complexity of brain networks in cellular and animal models. This review focuses on cellular models used to investigate various aspects of neurological dysfunction associated with HIV infection.

Introduction

Before the introduction of the antiretroviral therapy (ART), the brain of HIV/AIDS patients presented with extended areas of inflammation due to viral replication and microglia activation, causing encephalopathy [13]. At present, however, with an effective ART treatment that keeps the virus at very low or undetectable levels, HIV patients rarely develop encephalopathy. Still, over 50% of those infected will develop neurological problems. The HIV-associated neuropathology (also called neuroHIV) includes alterations in neuronal and glia function, both of which are exacerbated by the abuse of alcohol and drugs. In vitro cellular models provide important tools to assess molecular mechanisms underlying neuronal damage or immune and glia activation. Since its first description as AIDS dementia in the middle 80’s [49], thousands of published studies have allowed to acquire valuable information on the mechanisms of neuronal dysfunction associated with HIV infection using cellular and animal models. Here, we review cellular models in neuroHIV (summarized in Table 1), as animal models have been reviewed in great details elsewhere [1014]. As there are numerous studies investigating neurotoxicity due to HIV infection, we apologize for not citing all the literature.

Table 1.

Summary of cellular models discussed in this review.

Cellular model Description References
Cell lines SK-N-SH, SH-S5Y5 and B103, neuro2A, PC12 40, 41, 4248, 79
Primary cells Astrocytes, neurons, mixed cultures glia/neurons, iPSCs 1537, 39, 54, 55, 56, 66, 67, 68, 73, 74, 76, 77, 80, 81
Organotypic explants Human fetal or rodent brain slices 38, 99104
Neuronal progenitors Primary human or rodent neural progenitors or commercially available iPSCs 105111
Blood brain barrier models Primary human or rodent pericytes, bilayer with astrocytes and endothelial cells, human brain microvascular endothelial cells, human immortalized endothelial cell line (hCMEC/D3), human vein endothelial cells (HUVEC) 116130

Cell lines and primary cell models

Primary rodent and human cells and cell lines are used to investigate various aspects of viral protein-mediated cellular toxicity, as well as studying the interaction between viral proteins and opioids, common comorbidity factors in persons living with HIV (PLWH). The effect of viral proteins and cocaine, alone or in combination is investigated on isolated human or rodent primary neurons, astrocytes, or in mixed cultures of neurons and glia. The general flow for neuroHIV research begins with an initial observation in clinical samples acquired from HIV-positive patients (typically archived brain tissue, cerebrospinal fluid or brain imaging), followed by in vitro experiments using primary cells, cell lines, induced Pluripotent Stem Cells (iPSCs), organotypic brain slices, or mixed cultures derived from the combination of any of those cellular systems; results are then further validated using animal models or HIV clinical samples (i.e. immunohistochemistry, in situ hybridization, etc…). These type of studies have allowed for the characterization of cellular events involved in neuronal toxicity, including toxicity due to viral proteins such as Tat, gp120 and Nef. Perhaps one of the first mechanisms of neurotoxicity demonstrated using primary neuronal cultures was calcium dysregulation [1524] and apoptotic cell death induced by HIV-1 gp120 [2529] and Tat [17,3037]. Oxidative stress has also been extensively investigated using in vitro cellular models [1524,36,3846]. Primary rat astrocytes were used to determine the neurotoxic effects of three antiretroviral compounds, maraviroc, darunavir and raltegravir, alone or in combination after simultaneous exposure to lipopolysaccharide (LPS) [47]. All three drugs induced the production of reactive oxygen species (ROS) and the inhibition of matrix metalloproteinase 2 (MMP2) and MMP9 [47]. Additionally, peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor γ (PPARγ) agonist rosiglitazone reversed the gp120-mediated inflammatory response of primary mixed cultures of rat astrocytes and microglia [48].

Cellular models are utilized to investigate inflammatory pathways involved in neuroHIV. Infiltration of monocytes/macrophages into the brain parenchyma is critical to HIV-mediated neuroinflammation and neuropathogenesis [4951], even in the combination ART (cART) era [52,53]. Zheng et al. utilized human fetal primary astrocytes to show that HIV-infected or immune-activated macrophages secrete tumor necrosis factor α (TNF-α) and interleukin 1β (IL-1β), which in turn stimulate astrocytic production of chemokine C-X-C motif ligand 8 (CXCL8) [54]. Secreted IL-1β can also result in production and secretion of stromal cell-derived factor 1 (SDF-1) by astrocytes, contributing to neuropathogenesis [55]. Human fetal primary astrocytes were used to investigate inflammation and the effect of the anti-retroviral drug abacavir in the induction of endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress in those cells [56]. Regarding inflammatory mechanisms, the inflammasome component nucleotide-binding oligomerization leucine rich repeat and pyrin domain containing 3 (NLRP3) has been found to be activated by HIV-1 infection in macrophages [57], and polymorphisms of this gene have been linked to increased susceptibility to HIV-1 infection [58,59]. Rapid increase of inflammasome proteins in microglia has been found to contribute to HIV-associated brain disease [60]. Among the mechanisms implicated in the activation of the inflammasome in microglia, the viral proteins Tat and R have been found to contribute to neuroinflammation [6163]. The leucine-rich repeat kinase 2 (LRRK2) is an important regulator of microglia activation during inflammation [64], and its inhibition attenuates Tat-induced pro-inflammatory responses in vitro and in vivo [65]. Recently, using cultured human astrocytes, Ojeda et al. showed selective mitochondrial degradation (mitophagy) as a mean to counteract inflammation when the infection is productive, while astrocytes exposed to the virus in an abortive module showed mitochondrial damage, inflammasome activation and cell death [66]. The importance of mitophagy in the development of HIV-associated neurological disorders was additionally established in human neurons [67]. Exposure of neurons to gp120 and Tat accelerates mitochondria fragmentation through mitochondrial dynamin-related protein 1 (DRP1), increased microtubule-associated protein light chain 3 beta (LC3B) and selective recruitment of Parkin/SQSTM1 (sequestosome 1) to the damaged mitochondria [67]. In mouse primary neuronal cultures, HIV-vpr protein was additionally shown to disrupt mitochondria axonal transport and accelerate neuronal aging [68].

The effect of viral proteins on the cytoskeleton and on synapto-dendritic function and integrity has been observed in the brain of HIV-infected individuals with encephalitis [69]. Few years later, several details in the molecular events underlying neurite function have been identified. For instance, elevated levels of osteopontin observed in the plasma, brain and CSF of HIV-positive individuals [70,71] blocks the negative effect of HIV env on neurite growth via an integrin/TORC1/2 signaling pathway [72]. Rat hippocampal neurons were utilized to determine the actin cytoskeleton-mediated attenuation of an N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor (NMDAR)-evoked increase in intracellular calcium in response to HIV-Tat [73]. Microtubule associated protein 2 (MAP-2) mediated intracellular trafficking from the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) to the Golgi apparatus (GA) of the complex mannose binding lectin (MBL)/gp120 [74]. Related to the protein MAP-2, our lab has shown that Tat causes rapid degradation of this structural protein and degeneration of cytoskeletal filaments. The mechanism involves Tat-mediated translocation of the proteasome to the site of microtubule filaments [75]. We additionally found that Tat promotes aberrant splicing of Tau exon 10 through increased levels of the serine/arginine rich splicing factor SC35, which is retained in nuclear speckles [76]. The mechanism further involved Tat-mediated increased expression of the dual specificity tyrosine phosphorylation regulated kinase 1A (DYRK1A) [76]. A proteomic approach was used to model HIV-infected microglia and astrocytes crosstalk. In this study, the interaction of vesicular stomatitis virus pseudotyped HIV infected murine microglia with astrocytes showed extensive cytoskeletal rearrangements that modulated cell death and migratory pathways [77].

Among the cell lines, human neuroblastoma SK-N-SH, and its derivative SH-SY5Y, mouse neuro2A and rat PC12 can be differentiated into various neuronal subtypes through their stimulation with different compounds. Amid the most recent findings, Gerena et al. have shown the presence of soluble Insulin Receptor (sIR) in the cerebrospinal fluid of HIV+ patients with neurocognitive dysfunction, and that the viral protein Tat can trigger the release of sIR from cultured SH-SY5Y neurons [78]. SH-SY5Y and mouse primary neuronal cells were also used to show dysregulation of the transcription factor E2F3 by Tat [79]. The rat B103 neuroblastoma cultures and in vivo models were used to show that the anticancer drug sunitinib protects from Tat-induced neurotoxicity via activation of autophagy [40].

Using human fetal brain cultures Nath et al. demonstrated synergistic neurotoxicity between gp120 and Tat, which can be prevented by memantine [80]. Primary rat fetal neurons were used to demonstrate the rapid induction of endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress by Tat [81].

The most abundant brain cells involved in neuronal plasticity and protection are astrocytes, which have been extensively investigated as possible HIV reservoirs, given that viral particles, DNA, RNA, and proteins were detected in these cells, even though the mechanism of viral entry were unclear unknown [8291]. Failure to detect CD4 receptor in astrocytes parallels with lack of viral replication in these cells [92], a concept that has led to the hypothesis that astrocytes can uptake and release viral particles by endocytosis [83,9395]. However, more recently, using advanced technologies Russell R et al. elegantly demonstrated that astrocytes are not infected by HIV, but that they phagocytose viral material from infected macrophages [96]. Recent literature using highly sensitive in situ hybridization techniques, RNAscope and DNAscope demonstrated the presence of viral RNA, but not DNA, in astrocytes in brains of virally suppressed individuals [97].

Organotypic explant models

In addition to dissociated neuronal cell cultures, organotypic brain slices offer a tridimensional cellular system that allows a more complex simulation of in vivo conditions [98]. While this in vitro model is still employed to investigate mechanisms of neuronal damage in neurodegenerative disorders, it has been not fully explored in the field of HIV. In fact, only 13 articles contain the keywords “organotypic brain slice” and “HIV” up to year 2011. Nevertheless, the first study using rat hippocampal slices explants was in 1996 and demonstrated neurotoxicity mediated by HIV-1 envelope protein gp120 [99]. Co-culture of the hippocampal explants with macrophages provided a more complex model of HIV-induced neurotoxicity and brain damage [100]. Treatment of mouse organotypic hippocampal slice cultures with Tat resulted in increased production of indoleamine 2, 3 dioxygenase (IDO) in an interferon γ (IFNγ)-independent but p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase-dependent manner [101]. Rat organotypic hippocampal slices were used to study the effect of recombinant Tat on microtubule formation and oxidative stress-related neuronal injury [38]. Human fetal organotypic brain slices placed on semipermeable hydrophilic membrane inserts on top of wells containing cultured HIV-infected T cells, allowed for the study of the effect of HIV, HIV proteins, and other molecules released by the infected T cells on neuronal cells [102]. The authors suggest this model could be used to study the dynamics and the microenvironment of brain tissue exposed to HIV-1 [102]. In another study, pre-treatment of a rat hippocampal-entorhinocortical slice with moderate amounts of ethanol protects against pro-inflammatory HIV-1 gp120 protein [103]. Long term ethanol exposure, however, sensitizes the hippocampus to the neurotoxicity mediated by HIV-1 Tat in a NMD A receptor-dependent manner [104].

Neuronal progenitor models

Models of HIV-associated neuronal damage include human and rodent progenitor cells and iPSCs. These models have been successfully explored for neurodegenerative disorders, including Alzheimer’s, Huntington’s and fronto-temporal dementia [reviewed in [105]]. Rat E15 brain neuronal progenitors were used to investigate neurons and astrocytes response to signaling by SDF-1 and gp120 [106]. Our laboratory has also utilized rat neural progenitors to determine calpain-mediated cleavage of Tat and the role of cleaved Tat isoforms in neurotoxicity [107]. Mouse neural progenitor cells (NPCs) served as a model to investigate the neurotoxic effect of combined antiretroviral therapy [108]. The authors found that a combination of three drugs, tenofivir disoproxil fumarate, raltegravir and emtricitabine, inhibits proliferation and induces apoptosis of progenitor cells [108]. Methamphetamine treatment increased HIV production and decreased neuronal differentiation in mouse and human neural progenitors [109]. On the other hand, platelet derived growth factor BB (PDGF-BB) signaling pathways seem to protect the negative action of cocaine and HIV-Tat on neural progenitor differentiation [110]. Using human NPCs, it was observed that expression of Tat in primary astrocytes resulted in deregulation of miRNAs, particularly miR-320a, and enhanced ATP release. The mechanism involved voltage-dependent anion channel protein 1 (VDAC1) upregulation upon the Tat-induced downregulation of miR-320a [111].

Blood brain barrier (BBB) models

The protective effects of the blood brain barrier (BBB) on the brain is compromised by HIV infection [recently reviewed in [112,113]]. In particular, the density of pericytes is reduced in HIV-associated neurocognitive disorder [114,115], and their function is compromised allowing monocyte infiltration and overall leakage [115]. Commercially available primary human brain vascular pericytes were used to demonstrate that these cells can efficiently silence HIV-1 expression, and that viral latency renders pericytes sensitive to the excess of extracellular glutamate [116]. Oda et al. established a bilayer model of BBB using astrocytes and endothelial cells on 3μm polyethylene terephthalate (PET) membrane inserts, which were cultured in growth medium for seven days before exposure to HIV or HIV+ peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) [117]. As suggested by the authors, this model could be useful to assess the HIV DNA copy numbers of transmigrated cells pre- and post-targeted ART and to understand the role of oxidative stress related to HIV DNA and HIV-associated neurocognitive impairment [117]. Even if HIV infects only about 5% of pericytes [118], the propagation of injury signals can occur to neighboring cells through gap junctions [119]. Human immortalized cerebral microvascular endothelial cell line (hCMEC/D3) was used to test polymeric nanoparticles for HIV therapy [120], and to investigate the effects of HIV-1 Tat and methamphetamine on BBB integrity and function [121]. The use of biodegradable nanoparticles crossing the BBB has been explored to improve brain delivery efficiency of antiretroviral drugs and is reviewed elsewhere [122]. Human brain microvascular endothelial cells (HBMEC) obtained from adult brain tissue are often utilized to model BBB in vitro. These cells have been used to show increased expression of HIV-induced pro-inflammatory factors [123,124]. Bhargavan et al used this model to investigate molecular details of endothelial inflammation and BBB dysfunction caused by HIV-induced Toll-like 3 receptor (TLR3) activation [125]. Exposure of HBMEC to HIV resulted in increased release of extracellular vesicles (ECV) carrying amyloid β from these cells [126]. Interestingly, exosomes shed by HBMECs are able to transport antiviral molecules to macrophages, as a possible defense mechanism against HIV invasion of the CNS [127]. Human vein endothelial cells (HUVECs) treated with antiretroviral drugs underwent premature senescence associated with inflammation and oxidative stress, which had detrimental effects on astrocytes [128]. The same cellular model has been used to investigate the effects of viral proteins on the BBB [129], or the transendothelial migration of CD16+ monocytes under pro-inflammatory stimuli [130].

Conclusions

Finding the best cellular model to recapitulate all aspects of a disease is critical for the advancement of our knowledge in the field and to devise proper therapy. Neurological disorders have historically challenged our ability to reproduce the complexity of the brain in vitro, and HIV-1 infection is no exception. The infection itself evolved with the introduction of combined antiretroviral therapy, presenting with less obvious signs of inflammation due to viral replication, as well as less cell death, though neuronal cells show an increase in subtle damages overall. Even with all the undisputable limitations, cellular models remain an invaluable tool to investigate biological and molecular aspects of HIV infection of the CNS, as they allow us to advance the field.

Acknowledgments

This work is supported by NIH P20GM121288 and P30GM114732.

Footnotes

Publisher's Disclaimer: This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.

Conflict of interests statement

The Authors declare no conflict of interests.

References

  • 1.Masliah E et al. (1996) Patterns of neurodegeneration in HIV encephalitis. J NeuroAIDS 1 (1), 161–173 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Price RW (1996) The cellular basis of central nervous system HIV-1 infection and the AIDS dementia complex: introduction. J NeuroAIDS 1 (1), 1–29 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Williams KC and Hickey WF (1996) Traffic of lymphocytes into the CNS during inflammation and HIV infection. J NeuroAIDS 1 (1), 31–55 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Ho DD et al. (1985) Isolation of HTLV-III from cerebrospinal fluid and neural tissues of patients with neurologic syndromes related to the acquired immunodeficiency syndrome. N Engl J Med 313 (24), 1493–1497 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Horoupian DS et al. (1984) Acquired immune deficiency syndrome and multiple tract degeneration in a homosexual man. Ann Neurol 15 (5), 502–505 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Jordan BD et al. (1985) Neurological syndromes complicating AIDS. Front Radiat Ther Oncol 19, 82–87 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Koppel BS et al. (1985) Central nervous system involvement in patients with acquired immune deficiency syndrome (AIDS). Acta Neurol Scand 71 (5), 337–353 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Resnick L et al. (1985) Intra-blood-brain-barrier synthesis of HTLV-III-specific IgG in patients with neurologic symptoms associated with AIDS or AIDS-related complex. N Engl J Med 313 (24), 1498–1504 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Shaw GM et al. (1985) HTLV-III infection in brains of children and adults with AIDS encephalopathy. Science 227 (4683), 177–182 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Denton PW et al. (2016) Using animal models to overcome temporal, spatial and combinatorial challenges in HIV persistence research. J Transl Med 14, 44. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Kumar N et al. (2016) Animal models to achieve an HIV cure. Curr Opin HIV AIDS 11 (4), 432–441 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Mallard J and Williams KC (2018) Animal models of HIV-associated disease of the central nervous system. Handb Clin Neurol 152, 41–53 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Policicchio BB et al. (2016) Animal Models for HIV Cure Research. Front Immunol 7, 12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Gelman BB et al. (2018) When do models of NeuroAIDS faithfully imitate “the real thing”? J Neurovirol 24 (2), 146–155 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Fitting S et al. (2014) Interactive HIV-1 Tat and morphine-induced synaptodendritic injury is triggered through focal disruptions in Na(+) influx, mitochondrial instability, and Ca(2)(+) overload. J Neurosci 34 (38), 12850–12864 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Haughey NJ and Mattson MP (2002) Calcium dysregulation and neuronal apoptosis by the HIV-1 proteins Tat and gp120. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr 31 Suppl 2, S55–61 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Kruman II et al. (1998) HIV-1 protein Tat induces apoptosis of hippocampal neurons by a mechanism involving caspase activation, calcium overload, and oxidative stress. Exp Neurol 154 (2), 276–288 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Lannuzel A et al. (1995) HIV-1 envelope proteins gp120 and gp160 potentiate NMDA-induced [Ca2+]i increase, alter [Ca2+]i homeostasis and induce neurotoxicity in human embryonic neurons. Eur J Neurosci 7 (11), 2285–2293 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Meeker RB et al. (2016) Novel p75 neurotrophin receptor ligand stabilizes neuronal calcium, preserves mitochondrial movement and protects against HIV associated neuropathogenesis. Exp Neurol 275 Pt 1, 182–198 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Meucci O and Miller RJ (1996) gp120-induced neurotoxicity in hippocampal pyramidal neuron cultures: protective action of TGF-beta1. J Neurosci 16 (13), 4080–4088 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Norman JP et al. (2007) HIV-1 trans activator of transcription protein elicits mitochondrial hyperpolarization and respiratory deficit, with dysregulation of complex IV and nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide homeostasis in cortical neurons. J Immunol 178 (2), 869–876 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Perry SW et al. (2010) Human immunodeficiency virus-1 Tat activates calpain proteases via the ryanodine receptor to enhance surface dopamine transporter levels and increase transporter-specific uptake and Vmax. J Neurosci 30 (42), 14153–14164 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Scorziello A et al. (1997) TGF-beta1 prevents gp120-induced impairment of Ca2+ homeostasis and rescues cortical neurons from apoptotic death. J Neurosci Res 49 (5), 600–607 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Zou S et al. (2015) Oligodendrocytes Are Targets of HIV-1 Tat: NMDA and AMPA Receptor-Mediated Effects on Survival and Development. J Neurosci 35 (32), 11384–11398 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Bachis A and Mocchetti I (2006) Semisynthetic sphingoglycolipid LIGA20 is neuroprotective against human immunodeficiency virus-gp120-mediated apoptosis. J Neurosci Res 83 (5), 890–896 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Chen W et al. (2005) Ethanol potentiates HIV-1 gp120-induced apoptosis in human neurons via both the death receptor and NMDA receptor pathways. Virology 334 (1), 59–73 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Guo L et al. (2013) Curcumin protects microglia and primary rat cortical neurons against HIV-1 gp120-mediated inflammation and apoptosis. PLoS One 8 (8), e70565. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Kaul M and Lipton SA (1999) Chemokines and activated macrophages in HIV gp120-induced neuronal apoptosis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 96 (14), 8212–8216 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Shah A et al. (2013) HIV gp120- and methamphetamine-mediated oxidative stress induces astrocyte apoptosis via cytochrome P450 2E1. Cell Death Dis 4, e850. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Agrawal L et al. (2007) Preventing HIV-1 Tat-induced neuronal apoptosis using antioxidant enzymes: mechanistic and therapeutic implications. Virology 363 (2), 462–472 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Dong H et al. (2019) Role of FOXO3 Activated by HIV-1 Tat in HIV-Associated Neurocognitive Disorder Neuronal Apoptosis. Front Neurosci 13, 44. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Eugenin EA et al. (2003) MCP-1 (CCL2) protects human neurons and astrocytes from NMDA or HIV-tat-induced apoptosis. J Neurochem 85 (5), 1299–1311 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Eugenin EA et al. (2007) HIV-tat induces formation of an LRP-PSD-95-NMDAR-nNOS complex that promotes apoptosis in neurons and astrocytes. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 104 (9), 3438–3443 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.New DR et al. (1997) Human immunodeficiency virus type 1 Tat protein induces death by apoptosis in primary human neuron cultures. J Neurovirol 3 (2), 168–173 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Pingle SC et al. (2007) Activation of the adenosine A1 receptor inhibits HIV-1 tat-induced apoptosis by reducing nuclear factor-kappaB activation and inducible nitric-oxide synthase. Mol Pharmacol 72 (4), 856–867 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Shi B et al. (1998) Neuronal apoptosis induced by HIV-1 Tat protein and TNF-alpha: potentiation of neurotoxicity mediated by oxidative stress and implications for HIV-1 dementia. J Neurovirol 4 (3), 281–290 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Singh IN et al. (2005) Differential involvement of p38 and JNK MAP kinases in HIV-1 Tat and gp120-induced apoptosis and neurite degeneration in striatal neurons. Neuroscience 135 (3), 781–790 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Butler TR et al. (2011) Neurodegenerative effects of recombinant HIV-1 Tat(1–86) are associated with inhibition of microtubule formation and oxidative stress-related reductions in microtubule-associated protein-2(a,b). Neurochem Res 36 (5), 819–828 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Ferrucci A et al. (2013) Extracellular HIV-1 viral protein R affects astrocytic glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate dehydrogenase activity and neuronal survival. J Neurovirol 19 (3), 239–253 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Fields JA et al. (2017) The anticancer drug sunitinib promotes autophagyand protects from neurotoxicity in an HIV-1 Tat model of neurodegeneration. J Neurovirol 23 (2), 290–303 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Kim SH et al. (2015) MSM ameliorates HIV-1 Tat induced neuronal oxidative stress via rebalance of the glutathione cycle. Am J Transl Res 7 (2), 328–338 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Lipton SA (1994) AIDS-related dementia and calcium homeostasis. Ann N Y Acad Sci 747, 205–224 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Masliah E et al. (1996) Pathogenesis of HIV-1 associated neurodegeneration. Crit Rev Neurobiol 10 (1), 57–67 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.New DR et al. (1998) HIV-1 Tat induces neuronal death via tumor necrosis factor-alpha and activation of non-N-methyl-D-aspartate receptors by a NFkappaB-independent mechanism. J Biol Chem 273 (28), 17852–17858 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Perry SW et al. (2005) HIV-1 transactivator of transcription protein induces mitochondrial hyperpolarization and synaptic stress leading to apoptosis. J Immunol 174 (7), 4333–4344 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Williams R et al. (2010) Cooperative induction of CXCL10 involves NADPH oxidase: Implications for HIV dementia. Glia 58 (5), 611–621 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Latronico T et al. (2018) In vitro effect of antiretroviral drugs on cultured primary astrocytes: analysis of neurotoxicity and matrix metalloproteinase inhibition. J Neurochem 144 (3), 271–284 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Omeragic A et al. (2017) Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-gamma: potential molecular therapeutic target for HIV-1-associated brain inflammation. J Neuroinflammation 14 (1), 183. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Budka H (1986) Multinucleated giant cells in brain: a hallmark of the acquired immune deficiency syndrome (AIDS). Acta Neuropathol 69 (3–4), 253–258 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Masliah E et al. (1992) Spectrum of human immunodeficiency virus-associated neocortical damage. Ann Neurol 32 (3), 321–329 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Navia BA et al. (1986) The AIDS dementia complex: II. Neuropathology. Ann Neurol 19 (6), 525–535 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Albrecht DS et al. (2016) In Vivo Imaging of Human Neuroinflammation. ACS Chem Neurosci 7 (4), 470–483 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Peluso MJ et al. (2013) Cerebrospinal fluid and neuroimaging biomarker abnormalities suggest early neurological injury in a subset of individuals during primary HIV infection. J Infect Dis 207 (11), 1703–1712 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Zheng JC et al. (2008) HIV-1-infected and/or immune-activated macrophages regulate astrocyte CXCL8 production through IL-1beta and TNF-alpha: involvement of mitogen-activated protein kinases and protein kinase R. J Neuroimmunol 200 (1–2), 100–110 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Peng H et al. (2006) HIV-1-infected and/or immune activated macrophages regulate astrocyte SDF-1 production through IL-1beta. Glia 54 (6), 619–629 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Nooka S and Ghorpade A (2017) HIV-1-associated inflammation and antiretroviral therapy regulate astrocyte endoplasmic reticulum stress responses. Cell Death Discov 3, 17061. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Hernandez JC et al. (2014) HIV-1 induces the first signal to activate the NLRP3 inflammasome in monocyte-derived macrophages. Intervirology 57 (1), 36–42 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Pontillo A et al. (2010) A 3’UTR SNP in NLRP3 gene is associated with susceptibility to HIV-1 infection. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr 54 (3), 236–240 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Pontillo A et al. (2012) Polymorphisms in inflammasome’ genes and susceptibility to HIV-1 infection. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr 59 (2), 121–125 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Walsh JG et al. (2014) Rapid inflammasome activation in microglia contributes to brain disease in HIV/AIDS. Retrovirology 11, 35. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Chivero ET et al. (2017) HIV-1 Tat Primes and Activates Microglial NLRP3 Inflammasome-Mediated Neuroinflammation. J Neurosci 37 (13), 3599–3609 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Mamik MK et al. (2017) HIV-1 Viral Protein R Activates NLRP3 Inflammasome in Microglia: implications for HIV-1 Associated Neuroinflammation. J Neuroimmune Pharmacol 12 (2), 233–248 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Periyasamy P et al. (2019) HIV-1 Tat-mediated microglial inflammation involves a novel miRNA-34a-NLRC5-NFkappaB signaling axis. Brain Behav Immun [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Greggio E et al. (2012) Parkinson’s disease and immune system: is the culprit LRRKing in the periphery? J Neuroinflammation 9, 94. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Puccini JM et al. (2015) Leucine-rich repeat kinase 2 modulates neuroinflammation and neurotoxicity in models of human immunodeficiency virus 1-associated neurocognitive disorders. J Neurosci 35 (13), 5271–5283 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Ojeda DS et al. (2018) Cell Death Is Counteracted by Mitophagy in HIV-Productively Infected Astrocytes but Is Promoted by Inflammasome Activation Among Nonproductively Infected Cells. Front Immunol 9, 2633. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Teodorof-Diedrich C and Spector SA (2018) Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 gp120 and Tat Induce Mitochondrial Fragmentation and Incomplete Mitophagy in Human Neurons. J Virol 92 (22) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Wang Y et al. (2017) HIV-1 Vpr disrupts mitochondria axonal transport and accelerates neuronal aging. Neuropharmacology 117, 364–375 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Masliah E et al. (2004) Patterns of gene dysregulation in the frontal cortex of patients with HIV encephalitis. J Neuroimmunol 157 (1–2), 163–175 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Brown A et al. (2011) Osteopontin enhances HIV replication and is increased in the brain and cerebrospinal fluid of HIV-infected individuals. J Neurovirol 17 (4), 382–392 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Burdo TH et al. (2008) Osteopontin is increased in HIV-associated dementia. J Infect Dis 198 (5), 715–722 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Calvez M et al. (2019) Osteopontin counters human immunodeficiency virus type 1-induced impairment of neurite growth through mammalian target of rapamycin and beta-integrin signaling pathways. J Neurovirol [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Krogh KA et al. (2015) HIV-1 Tat activates a RhoA signaling pathway to reduce NMDA-evoked calcium responses in hippocampal neurons via an actin-dependent mechanism. J Neurochem 132 (3), 354–366 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Teodorof C et al. (2014) Intracellular mannose binding lectin mediates subcellular trafficking of HIV-1 gp120 in neurons. Neurobiol Dis 69, 54–64 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Aprea S et al. (2006) Tubulin-mediated binding of human immunodeficiency virus-1 Tat to the cytoskeleton causes proteasomal-dependent degradation of microtubule-associated protein 2 and neuronal damage. J Neurosci 26 (15), 4054–4062 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Kadri F et al. (2015) HIV-1-Tat Protein Inhibits SC35-mediated Tau Exon 10 Inclusion through Up-regulation of DYRK1A Kinase. J Biol Chem 290 (52), 30931–30946 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Wang T et al. (2008) Proteomic modeling for HIV-1 infected microglia-astrocyte crosstalk. PLoS One 3 (6), e2507. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Gerena Y et al. (2019) Release of Soluble Insulin Receptor From Neurons by Cerebrospinal Fluid From Patients With Neurocognitive Dysfunction and HIV Infection. Front Neurol 10, 285. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Santerre M et al. (2019) HIV-1 Tat protein promotes neuronal dysregulation by inhibiting E2F transcription factor 3 (E2F3). J Biol Chem 294 (10), 3618–3633 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Nath A et al. (2000) Synergistic neurotoxicity by human immunodeficiency virus proteins Tat and gp120: protection by memantine. Ann Neurol 47 (2), 186–194 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Norman JP et al. (2008) HIV-1 Tat activates neuronal ryanodine receptors with rapid induction of the unfolded protein response and mitochondrial hyperpolarization. PLoS One 3 (11), e3731. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82.Al-Harti L et al. (2018) Astrocytes as an HIV CNS reservoir: highlights and reflections of an NIMH-sponsored symposium. J Neurovirol 24 (6), 665–669 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83.Chauhan A et al. (2014) Endocytosis-mediated HIV-1 entry and its significance in the elusive behavior of the virus in astrocytes. Virology 456-457, 1–19 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 84.Chauhan A et al. (2014) HIV-1 endocytosis in astrocytes: a kiss of death or survival of the fittest? Neurosci Res 88, 16–22 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 85.Churchill M and Nath A (2013) Where does HIV hide? A focus on the central nervous system. Curr Opin HIV AIDS 8 (3), 165–169 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 86.Churchill MJ et al. (2006) Use of laser capture microdissection to detect integrated HIV-1 DNA in macrophages and astrocytes from autopsy brain tissues. J Neurovirol 12 (2), 146–152 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 87.Guillemin G et al. (2000) Simian immunodeficiency virus mac251 infection of astrocytes. J Neurovirol 6 (3), 173–186 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 88.Lambotte O et al. (2003) HIV-1 persistence, viral reservoir, and the central nervous system in the HAART era. Brain Pathol 13 (1), 95–103 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 89.Li GH et al. (2016) Astrocytes as an HIV Reservoir: Mechanism of HIV Infection. Curr HIV Res 14 (5), 373–381 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 90.Narasipura SD et al. (2014) Epigenetic regulation of HIV-1 latency in astrocytes. J Virol 88 (5), 3031–3038 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 91.Tornatore C et al. (1994) HIV-1 infection of subcortical astrocytes in the pediatric central nervous system. Neurology 44 (3 Pt 1), 481–487 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 92.Liu Y et al. (2004) CD4-independent infection of astrocytes by human immunodeficiency virus type 1: requirement for the human mannose receptor. J Virol 78 (8), 4120–4133 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 93.Chauhan A and Khandkar M (2015) Endocytosis of human immunodeficiency virus 1 (HIV-1) in astrocytes: a fiery path to its destination. Microb Pathog 78, 1–6 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 94.Clarke JN et al. (2006) Novel pathway of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 uptake and release in astrocytes. Virology 348 (1), 141–155 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 95.Gray LR et al. (2014) HIV-1 entry and trans-infection of astrocytes involves CD81 vesicles. PLoS One 9 (2), e90620. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 96.Russell RA et al. (2017) Astrocytes Resist HIV-1 Fusion but Engulf Infected Macrophage Material. Cell Rep 18 (6), 1473–1483 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 97.Ko A et al. (2019) Macrophages but not Astrocytes Harbor HIV DNA in the Brains of HIV-1-Infected Aviremic Individuals on Suppressive Antiretroviral Therapy. J Neuroimmune Pharmacol 14 (1), 110–119 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 98.Humpel C (2018) Organotypic Brain Slice Cultures. Curr Protoc Immunol 123 (1), e59. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 99.Aggoun-Zouaoui D et al. (1996) The HIV-1 envelope protein gp120 induces neuronal apoptosis in hippocampal slices. Neuroreport 7 (2), 433–436 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 100.Brana C et al. (1999) A macrophage hippocampal slice co-culture system: application to the study of HIV-induced brain damage. J Neurosci Methods 90 (1), 7–11 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 101.Fu X et al. (2011) HIV-1 Tat activates indoleamine 2,3 dioxygenase in murine organotypic hippocampal slice cultures in a p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase-dependent manner. J Neuroinflammation 8, 88. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 102.Martinez R et al. (2011) A two-culture method for exposure of human brain organotypic slice cultures to replicating human immunodeficiency virus type 1. J Neurosci Methods 200 (1), 74–79 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 103.Sivaswamy S et al. (2010) Neuroprotective preconditioning of rat brain cultures with ethanol: potential transduction by PKC isoforms and focal adhesion kinase upstream of increases in effector heat shock proteins. Eur J Neurosci 32 (11), 1800–1812 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 104.Self RL et al. (2004) Cytotoxic effects of exposure to the human immunodeficiency virus type 1 protein Tat in the hippocampus are enhanced by prior ethanol treatment. Alcohol Clin Exp Res 28 (12), 1916–1924 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 105.Han SS et al. (2011) Constructing and deconstructing stem cell models of neurological disease. Neuron 70 (4), 626–644 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 106.Lazarini F et al. (2000) Differential signalling of the chemokine receptor CXCR4 by stromal cell-derived factor 1 and the HIV glycoprotein in rat neurons and astrocytes. Eur J Neurosci 12 (1), 117–125 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 107.Passiatore G et al. (2009) HIV-1 Tat C-terminus is cleaved by calpain 1: implication for Tat-mediated neurotoxicity. Biochim Biophys Acta 1793 (2), 378–387 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 108.Xu P et al. (2017) Combined Medication of Antiretroviral Drugs Tenofovir Disoproxil Fumarate, Emtricitabine, and Raltegravir Reduces Neural Progenitor Cell Proliferation In Vivo and In Vitro. J Neuroimmune Pharmacol 12 (4), 682–692 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 109.Skowronska M et al. (2018) Methamphetamine increases HIV infectivity in neural progenitor cells. J Biol Chem 293 (1), 296–311 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 110.Yang L et al. (2016) Mechanisms of Platelet-Derived Growth Factor-BB in Restoring HIV Tat-Cocaine-Mediated Impairment of Neuronal Differentiation. Mol Neurobiol 53 (9), 6377–6387 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 111.Fatima M et al. (2017) Novel insights into role of miR-320a-VDAC1 axis in astrocyte-mediated neuronal damage in neuroAIDS. Glia 65 (2), 250–263 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 112.Al-Obaidi MMJ et al. (2018) Disruption of the blood brain barrier is vital property of neurotropic viral infection of the central nervous system. Acta Virol 62 (1), 16–27 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 113.Sillman B et al. (2018) Neuropathogenesis of human immunodeficiency virus infection. Handb Clin Neurol 152, 21–40 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 114.Aguilera KY and Brekken RA (2014) Recruitment and retention: factors that affect pericyte migration. Cell Mol Life Sci 71 (2), 299–309 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 115.Persidsky Y et al. (2016) Dysfunction of brain pericytes in chronic neuroinflammation. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 36 (4), 794–807 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 116.Piekna-Przybylska D et al. (2019) HIV-1 infection renders brain vascular pericytes susceptible to the extracellular glutamate. J Neurovirol 25 (1), 114–126 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 117.Oda R et al. (2018) In Vitro Blood-Brain Barrier Modeling adapted for Peripheral Blood Mononuclear Cell Transmigration from HIV-Positive Patients for Clinical Research on Therapeutic Drug Intervention. P R Health Sci J 37 (3), 155–159 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 118.Nakagawa S et al. (2012) Infection of human pericytes by HIV-1 disrupts the integrity of the blood-brain barrier. J Cell Mol Med 16 (12), 2950–2957 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 119.Cho HJ et al. (2017) HIV Alters Gap Junction-Mediated Intercellular Communication in Human Brain Pericytes. Front Mol Neurosci 10, 410. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 120.Martins C et al. (2019) Using microfluidic platforms to develop CNS-targeted polymeric nanoparticles for HIV therapy. Eur J Pharm Biopharm 138, 111–124 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 121.Patel S et al. (2017) Effects of HIV-1 Tat and Methamphetamine on Blood-Brain Barrier Integrity and Function In Vitro. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 61 (12) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 122.DeMarino C et al. (2017) Biodegradable Nanoparticles for Delivery of Therapeutics in CNS Infection. J Neuroimmune Pharmacol 12 (1), 31–50 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 123.Chaudhuri A et al. (2008) HIV-1 activates proinflammatory and interferon-inducible genes in human brain microvascular endothelial cells: putative mechanisms of blood-brain barrier dysfunction. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 28 (4), 697–711 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 124.Chaudhuri A et al. (2008) STAT1 signaling modulates HIV-1-induced inflammatory responses and leukocyte transmigration across the blood-brain barrier. Blood 111 (4), 2062–2072 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 125.Bhargavan B and Kanmogne GD (2018) Toll-Like Receptor-3 Mediates HIV-1-Induced Interleukin-6 Expression in the Human Brain Endothelium via TAK1 and JNK Pathways: Implications for Viral Neuropathogenesis. Mol Neurobiol 55 (7), 5976–5992 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 126.Andras IE et al. (2017) Extracellular vesicles of the blood-brain barrier: Role in the HIV-1 associated amyloid beta pathology. Mol Cell Neurosci 79, 12–22 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 127.Sun L et al. (2016) Exosomes contribute to the transmission of anti-HIV activity from TLR3-activated brain microvascular endothelial cells to macrophages. Antiviral Res 134, 167–171 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 128.Cohen J et al. (2018) HIV antiretroviral therapy drugs induce premature senescence and altered physiology in HUVECs. Mech Ageing Dev 175, 74–82 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 129.Langford D et al. (2005) Signalling crosstalk in FGF2-mediated protection of endothelial cells from HIV-gp120. BMC Neurosci 6, 8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 130.Ancuta P et al. (2004) Transendothelial migration of CD16+ monocytes in response to fractalkine under constitutive and inflammatory conditions. Immunobiology 209 (1-2), 11–20 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES