Skip to main content
PLOS ONE logoLink to PLOS ONE
. 2021 Mar 8;16(3):e0247516. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0247516

Facilitating factors and barriers in help-seeking behaviour in adolescents and young adults with depressive symptoms: A qualitative study

Eline Eigenhuis 1,*,#, Ruth C Waumans 1,#, Anna D T Muntingh 1, Marjan J Westerman 2, Marlinde van Meijel 1, Neeltje M Batelaan 1, Anton J L M van Balkom 1
Editor: Therese van Amelsvoort3
PMCID: PMC7939362  PMID: 33684154

Abstract

Objective

Despite the availability of mental health care, only a minority of depressed adolescents and young adults receive treatment. This study aimed to investigate facilitating factors and barriers in help-seeking behaviour of adolescents and young adults with depressive symptoms, using qualitative research methods.

Methods

In-depth, semi-structured interviews with 32 participants with current or previous depressive symptoms aged 16 to 24 years using thematic content analysis.

Findings

Our sample consisted mainly of adolescents who eventually found their way to professional help. Five main themes in help-seeking by adolescents and young adults were identified: (I) Individual functioning and well-being, (II) Health literacy, (III) Attitudinal aspects, (IV) Surroundings, and (V) Accessibility. Prompts to seek treatment were disease burden and poor academic performance. Health illiteracy negatively influenced treatment-seeking behaviour. Attitudinal aspects either hampered (shame, wanting to handle the problem oneself, negative attitudes towards treatment) or facilitated (positive attitudes towards treatment) help-seeking. Furthermore, adolescents’ surroundings (school, family, and peers) appeared to play a critical role in the recognition of depressive symptoms and encouragement to seek help. Barriers regarding accessibility of mental health care were found, whereas direct and easy access to treatment greatly improved mental health care use.

Conclusion

Facilitating factors can play a critical role in the help-seeking process of depressed adolescents and young adults, and may guide efforts to increase access to mental health care of this vulnerable age group. In particular, recognition and encouragement from school personnel and peers and easy access to care providers positively influenced help-seeking in our sample. Health illiteracy and attitudinal aspects appeared to be important barriers to seeking treatment and public/school campaigns aimed at reducing health illiteracy and stigma might be necessary to improve treatment-seeking and health care utilization in this age group.

Introduction

Depression is a major contributor to disease burden worldwide [1, 2]. In children, depression is uncommon, with a prevalence rate below 1% [3]. However, during adolescence the prevalence increases from a lifetime prevalence of 8.4% in the age group of 13–14 years to 15.4% in the age group of 17–18 years [4]. Median 12-month prevalence estimates of depression in adolescence are similar to the rates found in adults, i.e. between 4 and 7.5% [3, 5]. Furthermore, in this age group, depression and other mental disorders are by far the most important causes of disability [6]. Besides disease burden, adolescent depression may negatively influence individual development. During adolescence, teens establish relationships, educate themselves for their working life and develop personality traits that set the tone for adulthood. Accordingly, it was found that depression in adolescents has adverse outcomes in later life, including reduced educational achievements [79], poor social well-being [7], higher school dropout rates [10], increased high-risk behaviours and depression-related suicide [11]. Moreover, depression in adolescence is a significant predictor for mental health problems in adulthood, including depression [12, 13], suicidal behaviour [13], anxiety disorders [14] and medical problems [15].

Effective treatment for depression is available [16], and is effective, also for adolescents specifically [3]. Nonetheless, only a minority of 15–36% of depressed adolescents receive treatment [5, 1720], leaving at least two-thirds of adolescents untreated, resulting in a major impact on their development. Additionally, there is often a substantial delay between disease onset and initial treatment contact [21], which may prolong suffering and jeopardize a healthy development.

Increasing treatment-seeking behaviour might prevent these adverse effects. Rickwood and Thomas [22] proposed a general definition of help-seeking: “In the mental health context, help-seeking is an adaptive coping process that is the attempt to obtain external assistance to deal with a mental health concern”. Previous research on help-seeking behaviour for mental health problems in adolescents has identified several barriers for treatment contact. A recent systematic review including 54 studies on barriers and facilitators in help-seeking behaviours for common mental health problems in adolescents found that the two most cited barriers were stigma and negative beliefs towards mental health services and professionals [23]. Research also shows that the desire to handle problems on one’s own [24, 25], low perceived need for help [20, 25, 26],difficulty in identifying symptoms of mental illness [26, 27], perceived fear of psychotherapy, the belief that a psychotherapist would not be able to be found and financial concerns were also barriers to seeking help in adolescents [28]. While research into barriers to treatment for adolescents is readily available, few studies have addressed the role of facilitating factors. The little research that has been done shows that mental health literacy [29, 30], positive past experiences with help-seeking [3135], social support or encouragement from others [36, 37] and confidentiality and trust in the provider [25, 38] might facilitate help-seeking for adolescents with mental health issues. However, research on facilitating factors is scarce [23]. Previous research on both barriers and facilitators has focused mainly on adolescents with mental health issues in general. Data on facilitators for help-seeking behaviour in adolescents with depressive symptomatology is only available specifically for boys [31, 36]. The studies on facilitators that included both male and female adolescents with mental health problems used focus groups or quantitative methods to gain information on the topic [33, 38]. A downside to these research designs might be that narrative descriptions, required to be able to fully understand the specific pathways of facilitating factors in help-seeking, might be missed. Qualitative research is specifically intended to promote the growth of understanding, rather than to collect factual knowledge and causal explanations [39]. No previous research uses in-depth individual interviewing to study barriers and specifically facilitators within the help-seeking process of adolescents with depressive symptomatology.

More knowledge of facilitating factors and barriers may provide directions on how to improve access to mental health care for this vulnerable age group and can contribute to the reduction of treatment delay. In addition to adolescents we also included young adults in this study because the critical developmental stages as mentioned above are not limited to the period of adolescence but continue in young adulthood. The aim of the current qualitative study is to investigate which facilitating factors and barriers play a role in the search for professional help of depressed adolescents and young adults aged 16 to 24 years, using in-depth semi-structured individual interviews.

Methods

Study design

This study applied a qualitative study design by means of semi-structured interviews in order to retrieve in-depth information on possible facilitators and barriers for help-seeking. The aim was to include a heterogeneous group of male and female participants, with various levels of education, with and without treatment history, and from various ethnic backgrounds.

Sample and recruitment

Participants were purposively sampled between March 2017 and October 2018 from educational and mental health care institutions in the Netherlands, aiming at maximum diversity. Educational institutions included secondary vocational schools and three institutions for higher education of which one university. Participating mental health care institutions were public, outpatient mental health care centres. Snowball sampling was used to include extra participants with an ethnic minority background, participants without treatment history, and males. Adolescents and young adults between 16 and 24 years of age with depressive symptoms were recruited by social workers, school counsellors and health care professionals through face-to-face invitation, after which contact details were shared with the researchers if the adolescent was considering participating. Eligible participants were contacted by telephone or email by one of the researchers to provide additional information and to invite them for the interview. All potential participants received an information letter about the study. Participants received a small reward in the form of a €10 gift voucher.

Inclusion criteria were: 1) age between 16 and 24 years; 2) depressive symptoms with a minimum score of 6 on the Dutch version of the Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology (QIDS) or a history of depressive symptoms as defined by having received treatment for a depressive episode; and 3) sufficient knowledge of the Dutch or English language. The QIDS self-rated version [40] is a 16-item questionnaire measuring depressive symptoms. As we aimed to include a diverse population in order to gain a broad view of current perceptions among adolescents, there were no exclusion criteria other than mental health problems requiring immediate treatment, including prominent suicidality, psychosis, mania or current inpatient treatment.

Of the 37 adolescents approached by the researchers who initially agreed to participate, four females eventually did not participate, due to varying reasons (stay abroad, no show, lost during interview planning, and unknown reason). One participant was excluded as she appeared to have a psychotic disorder. Data collection ended when data saturation was achieved, which was checked through three additional interviews.

Interview procedure

Interviews were guided by a topic list, which was developed based on both literature and expert opinion. After a draft version of the topic list was created using relevant literature, it was discussed with experts from the field (including mental health care professionals and an educational counsellor, the research group and a client panel of two patients) for further fine-tuning and was adjusted accordingly. The topic list contained questions on demographic data and symptoms, open questions about reasons to seek treatment and barriers and facilitating factors in help-seeking; with subsequent items focusing on recognition or under-recognition of symptoms, wanting to deal with problems oneself, knowledge and expectation of treatment options, influence of social surroundings, stigma, practical barriers and previous experiences (e.g. ‘What are facilitating factors in help-seeking?’; ‘To what extent did positive previous experiences play a role in the help-seeking process?’). During the course of the study, the topic list was updated with new insights gathered from the data. The main adaptations concerned follow-up questions on facilitators, accessibility or practical barriers and the role of cultural influences.

The in-depth, semi-structured interviews were carried out by five female researchers (one psychologist (EE), one psychiatrist in training (RW), and three master students (MvM, AIM, MV), of whom two permanent researchers and three well-instructed interns. Frequent meetings and consultations between the interviewers guaranteed interview quality.

Interviews were conducted at the participants’ location of choice, which was typically at the office of the educational or mental health care institution they attended. A non-judgemental and open interviewing style was adopted. Interviews lasted 73 minutes on average (range 38–123 minutes). The interviews were audiotaped and transcribed verbatim. All identifiable information was deleted from the transcripts, and transcripts were provided with a research number.

Data analysis

Data collection and analysis took place in an iterative process. Data analysis was conducted in an inductive manner using thematic analysis [41], focusing on participants’ perceived barriers and facilitators in treatment-seeking.

The first interviews were carefully read and then manually coded by two researchers per interview independently (EE, RW, MvM), and differences were discussed until consensus was reached. Field notes were taken during the interviews and the coding process, and incorporated in the analysing process. Subsequent interviews were coded by each interviewer, using the computer software MAXQDA 12, and coding was double-checked by a second researcher. For each interview, a summary was written, which was also checked by a second researcher.

A preliminary thematic map was developed by two interviewers (RW, MvM) based on the first independently coded interviews and discussed in a small research team (RW, MvM, AM). The thematic map was further updated and adapted after every two or three new interviews in an iterative process by four of the interviewers (RW, EE, MvM, AIM). The main themes from the initial thematic map, differences and similarities between cases and possible explanations were then discussed amongst the coders and the research team (consisting of two psychiatrists (AvB, NB), one qualitative researcher (MW), one psychologist (AM) plus the aforementioned interviewers), and further reviewed and adjusted in subsequent meetings resulting in a final thematic map including the main themes. Data saturation was discussed and completed after 32 interviews.

Ethical considerations

The study protocol was approved by the VU medical centre research ethics committee (reference number 2016.591). The final 32 participants provided written informed consent prior to the start of the interview.

Findings

Participants

Thirty-two adolescents with current (N = 29), or a history (N = 3) of depressive symptoms, were interviewed. The participants had various cultural backgrounds and educational levels. Almost all of the participants sought and eventually received professional help for their depressive symptoms. The majority of participants were currently receiving a form of treatment for their depressive symptoms. Most were referred by their general practitioner (GP) to mental health care workers at the general practitioners’ office, or to more specialized treatment within a psychiatric outpatient centre. Some received treatment offered by their educational institutes, school psychologist or social worker. The data of the 32 interviews were used for our analysis. An overview of demographic variables can be found in Table 1.

Table 1. Characteristics of study sample (n = 32).

Sociodemographic Variables
Age, mean years (SD1), range 20.5 (.36), 16–23
Women, N (%) 21 (65.6)
Level of Education, N (%)
Low2 2 (6.25)
Intermediate3 12 (27.50)
High 18 (56.25)
Country of Origin Parents, N (%)
Western Europe 20 (62.5)
Eastern Europe 1 (3.1)
Northern Africa 2 (6.3)
South America 2 (6.3)
Southern Asia 2 (6.3)
Western Asia 4 (12.5)
Southeastern Asia 1 (3.1)
Current Severity of Depressive Symptomatology, N (%)
QIDS-SR
None * 3 (9.4)
Mild 0 (0.0)
Moderate 16 (50.0)
Severe 12 (37.5)
Very severe 1 (3.1)
Current Mental Health Care Use, N (%)
Social worker 4 (12.5)
School psychologist 3 (9.4)
Mental health care worker at GP’s office 2 (6.3)
Psychiatric outpatient centre 18 (56.3)
Treatment finished 2 (6.3)
Never had treatment 3 (9.4)
Antidepressant Medication, N (%)
Current use 9 (28.1)
Previous use 4 (12.5)
Never used antidepressant medication 19 (59.4)

1SD = standard deviation.

2Low = Primary school plus a maximum of 3 years of secondary education.

3Intermediate = Primary school plus 4 to 6 years of secondary education.

⁴High = Primary school plus 5 to 6 years of secondary education plus higher professional or university education.

⁵QID-SR = Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptoms-Self Report.

* = These participants were included because of their history of psychological or psychiatric treatment for depression.

Themes

Analysis of the interviews generated five main themes with different barriers and facilitators for help-seeking. These main themes were (I) Individual functioning and well-being, (II) Health literacy, (III) Attitudinal aspects, (IV) Surroundings, and (V) Accessibility. A complete overview of the findings can be found in Table 2. The most important themes are explained below.

Table 2. Main themes, facilitators (f) and barriers (b) and explanation of these factors in help-seeking for adolescents with depressive symptoms extracted from the interviews.

Main themes Facilitators (f) and barriers (b) Explanation
Individual functioning and well-being Academic performance (f/b) Poor academic performance facilitated help-seeking (f). Not noticing or not experiencing problems in academic performance hindered help-seeking (b)
Physical symptoms (f) Physical symptoms accompanying depression were often a reason to seek help (f)
Mental distress (f/b) Experiencing mental distress facilitated help-seeking (f). In others, depressive symptoms like feelings of hopelessness inhibited them from seeking help (b)
Health literacy Knowledge about depression (f/b) Knowledge (f) or limited knowledge (b) about depression
Attitudinal aspects Shame (b) Being ashamed of symptoms and dysfunctioning hindered help-seeking (b)
Dealing with symptoms by yourself (b) The idea that others are unable to help, mood is something you can only change by yourself, not wanting to become a burden to family members, and not being worthy of treatment were reasons not to seek help (b)
Openness (f) Being talkative and open (f)
Attitude towards treatment (f/b) Negative (b) or positive (f) attitude, formed by hearing negative or positive stories about mental health in the surroundings or by own previous experience
Surroundings Identifying and signaling of symptoms by others (f/b) School professionals, friends and parents noticing (f) or not noticing symptoms (f)
Stigma and cultural influences (b) Expected or perceived stigma (b) across all cultural backgrounds
Accessibility Accessibility of general practitioner (b) Embarrassment, stigma and the belief that the GP is only for physical symptoms (b)
Waiting time (b) Long waiting time (b)
Effectuation of referral (f/b) General practitioner or health care professional making sure referral is effectuated (f). Adolescent needed to effectuate referral themselves (b)
Direct access to treatment (f) Access to a school mental health worker, online applying for mental health care, having contact details of mental health care at hand(f)
Reimbursement (f) The idea that treatment will not be paid for by the insurance company after a certain age (f)

1. Individual functioning and well-being

1.1 Academic performance. Poor academic performance, indicated by the inability to study, bad results on tests and absence in school, were mentioned by many participants as an important prompt to seek help. As a participant stated:

I was at an all-time low and things weren’t going well at school, and I was suffering. I wanted a solution. I had always had dreams about what I wanted to become in life and what I wanted for my future, what I wanted to reach. And I just saw that big problem, blocking the way. I just couldn’t continue’ (female, age 19).

On the other hand, one male participant explained (in hindsight) that he performed very well at secondary school, which blinded him and his surroundings to his depressive symptoms and caused him not seek help.

1.2 Physical symptoms. Different physical symptoms were mentioned by the participants as the first or most prominent symptom and a reason to seek help from the general practitioner. A 20-year-old female suffered from chest pains while in secondary school and was referred to a cardiologist, before the mental origin of the symptoms was identified. Fatigue and a suspicion of an infectious disease like mononucleosis infectiosa, and back pain were also mentioned as reasons to seek help from the general practitioner. Another secondary school student said:

And then I was doing really bad. Also because I lost a lot of weight […] then I stopped getting my period and then my mother thought, how can you lose so much weight? What is going on with you? Then we went to my GP. And then I told him that it’s because I don’t feel any hunger because I feel so depressed. Then he referred me to a psychologist’ (female, age 16).

1.3 Mental distress. Participants named a variety of mental symptoms as the reason to seek help. Feeling down, sleeping problems, nightmares, suicidal thoughts, auto-mutilation and anhedonia were psychiatric symptoms referred to as the reason to seek help. Some participants sought help because they felt different; as though they had lost their old selves.

Most participants mentioned that mainly severe mental symptoms, like self-mutilation or suicide planning, motivated them to seek help. One participant almost tried to commit suicide, on his way to university, and then realised something was wrong:

You just need to feel like shit because teenagers always feel like shit. So then I was, yes, well, yes, I was always feeling bad and stupid and bad and just.. phew. But I thought: ‘That must be normal’. And then, that day [the day he almost jumped in front of a train] I was like: ‘Oh, this is actually not normal’ (male, age 23).

Two participants stated that their mental symptoms kept them from seeking help. One experienced feelings of worthlessness and hopelessness, which made him question the usefulness of psychotherapeutic help. Another participant said her negative self-image made her think she was not worth seeking help.

2. Health literacy

2.1 Knowledge about depression. Virtually all participants mentioned a lack of insight in their symptoms or the severity. Many participants interpreted fatigue, brooding or feeling down as normal inconveniences that occurred during puberty, or as a part of their personality. Some noticed symptoms but compared themselves to peers with more severe symptoms. The following participant initially did not seek help because of this comparison:

My best friend from secondary school was also very depressed, but in such an extreme way with violent self-harm […] and then I would think: ‘Yes, I’m a little depressed, but look at her! I shouldn’t make a big deal about my feelings’ (female, age 20).

The idea that symptoms would decrease by themselves and feelings of attitudinizing were often mentioned. Some characterized symptoms as purely physical and not mental, which caused them not to realize they needed help. In contrast, two participants stated that since they did not suffer from any physical symptoms, nothing could be wrong with them.

Multiple adolescents mentioned that they gained knowledge about depression through their education, which in turn led them to seek help. A student decided to seek help after learning about depression in a psychobiology university course. Her depressive symptoms started at age 12, but she only received help while at university:

And if I thought about it as in, negative thinking, or if I approached it in a more pragmatic way or something. Like yes, this is also an illness. Yes, I need to look at it as an illness and not as something I’m exaggerating or making up’ (female, age 20).

After watching a video about depression on You Tube, another participant decided to seek help. Another participant took a depression self-test online which made her decide to go to the GP. In three cases adolescents mentioned having knowledge about depression (through family members suffering from depression or education), but this knowledge did not immediately facilitate help-seeking. A university student with depressive symptoms from age 17, who sought help at age 21, explained:

I had my suspicions, yes, I mean, I wrote a thesis at secondary school about depression and while I was reading the symptoms of depression, I was really like: ‘Oh, I’m recognizing much more of this than I would like’. […] I knew what depression was but I didn’t do anything with that information. [interviewer: Why not?] I didn’t think that going to a psychologist or if I sought help, that that would help me, because the problems are in me and the solutions are also within me’ (female, age 21).

For most of the participants, they only became aware of suffering from depression and the need for treatment after seeking help and receiving information about depression from a mental health care professional or GP.

3. Attitudinal Aspects

3.1 Shame. Many participants mentioned that their own negative beliefs and shame about their symptoms prevented them from seeking help. The belief that their feelings and behaviour were abnormal or signs of weakness was a frequently expressed reason for not seeking help. The following participant had experienced depressive symptoms since she was 16 years old, but only received treatment at age 22 when her academic counsellor referred her to a university psychologist. She explains:

Well…since I was 16 my GP referred me to a psychologist, but at that age I thought: ‘Who goes to a psychologist? I’m not crazy’ (female, age 22).

Shame concerning academic malfunctioning and the belief that they were failing in life were also reasons mentioned for not seeking help. Two participants said that weakness makes you an unattractive person and this belief was the reason not to seek help.

3.2 Attitude towards treatment. Two participants explained that their negative attitude towards treatment kept them from seeking help. In both cases, this negative attitude was formed by hearing negative experiences about mental health treatment from friends. One of these participants explained:

I just heard many negative experiences from people around me that had been treated in mental health care institutions: ‘Yes the help is bad’ and ‘It’s not helping me at all’ and I never heard anything positive about mental health care, so as far as mental health care was concerned, I just thought it was best for me to stay far away from it’ (female, age 20).

In contrast, many participants mentioned positive attitudes towards treatment as a facilitator for seeking help. Multiple participants mentioned that having previous positive experiences with mental health care for other mental symptoms made it easier to seek help. One participant had positive expectations about mental health care because her father was a psychologist, she received help from mental health care shortly after the onset of symptoms:

Yes, it’s like seeing psychological help as something obvious. Just like a doctor is able to help you, a psychologist might also be able to help’ (female, age 18).

Some participants noticed positive effects of mental health care in significant others:

My girlfriend, she also went through some things, so she also had issues. And I notice with her that when she speaks to her psychologist, it relieves her, I think. I guess it’s helping her. Even though she doesn’t talk much about it to me. […] For me, that was one of the reasons why I thought a psychologist might also be helpful for me’ (male, age 21).

4. Surroundings

4.1 Identification of symptoms by others. Participants mentioned that teachers and mentors frequently noticed changes in behaviour like being quiet or unhappy in class, absence or bad results at school, which often led to a referral to a GP or mental health professional. One student said:

My absence at school, they asked me why that was and then I explained that I had some problems, that I was not always feeling well and fit enough to go to school. […] and then they said that.. they asked if I would like to speak to someone about my problems, then I said: ‘Yes, I would like to try that” (male, age 21).

Another participant stated that one of her secondary school teachers noticed that the contents of her poems were dark and gloomy. The teacher contacted the mentor and parents of the participant, after which the parents made an appointment with the GP. The participant was annoyed at first, but thankful for afterwards for signalling her problems. Another participant stated that a secondary school teacher noticed cuts on his arm, contacted the mother of the student, after which an appointment at the GP was made.

Quite a few participants mentioned that friends and parents also recognised depressive symptoms and advised or motivated participants to seek help from a GP or mental health professional. In a few cases, friends of the participants played a mediating role in recognising mental problems and informing teachers and mentors at school.

4.2 Inadequate identification and signaling of symptoms by others. In some cases participants mentioned that teachers and mentors did not notice any signs of mental suffering; especially when academic results were good. One participant stated that while he was absent, the university did not signal any problems or take action:

Quite often I didn’t show up at my study groups, missing deadlines, those kinds of things. […] University doesn’t even care how you are doing on a personal level, as long as you get enough points […] otherwise you’re thrown out. That’s the only thing that matters to them. It’s not a humane environment anymore […] the human support of students is failing dramatically. It is really, really, really a dire situation’ (male, age 23).

A 19-year-old female, in the first year of higher professional education stated that the educational institution noticed problems and she was repeatedly sent to talk to the dean about her academic results. She would have preferred teachers to ask questions about her mental well-being, and she would have liked to be referred to the school psychologist instead of the dean. Similarly, another female participant spoke to teachers in secondary school about her problems and low mood but they did not support her in seeking help.

In identifying depressive symptoms, compared to teachers and mentors, parents were mentioned by the participants much less often. Some participants mentioned that their parents did not seem to be aware of any mental problems, mental or otherwise. Some parents recognized symptoms of mental illness and encouraged help-seeking, others downplayed the symptoms or did not motivate their children to seek help. Some participants with a non-western background explained that limited knowledge about mental health within their families made help-seeking more challenging. The following quote comes from a girl that eventually sought help by herself, but was not facilitated by her family members:

I come, you know, from another cultural environment, so that is also a factor. [Interviewer: What’s your cultural background?] Arabic culture, so.. Iraq. I was born in Iraq, and there.. people didn’t grow up with psychological health care, so they will not say: ‘Oh, if you have psychological trouble, you need to do this…’. So it needed to come from within myself. […] I don’t want to say that psychological issues are not accepted, because it’s definitely accepted, but maybe they don’t take it super seriously. I think’ (female, age 22).

In some cases, participants stated that their parents’ own experience with mental health issues helped them to recognise depressive symptoms in their children.

4.3 Stigma and cultural influences. Many participants, from all cultural backgrounds, mentioned hiding their symptoms or not talking about them because of expected or perceived stigma. The fear of others having pity on them or being bullied was mentioned by multiple participants. Many also thought that if they had talked about their symptoms they would not have been understood by others or others would have thought they had failed in life. A participant with Dutch parents explained how she perceived stigma within her surroundings:

I felt ashamed about my problems and about visiting my school counsellor, especially towards my parents, but I also didn’t dare to speak about it with my peers. I think I was afraid of their judgement: ‘She can’t do it on her own, she needs help, she is weak, she is such a bad person’, you know?’ (female, age 20).

While some participants with Dutch parents mentioned stigma in their families, all participants of non-western origin spoke about stigma in relation to their cultural background. Three participants with parents from Western Asia emphasised the family belief that problems should be kept within the family. Two participants originating from Southern Asia and one from Western Asia explained that depression is not a term used within their communities and their parents were not open-minded about the subject. The following participant (born in the Netherlands, with parents originally from Southern Asia) explained his father’s view of psychological help:

Yes, it’s a real pity that everything is so concealed, that people don’t talk about it. There is definitely some kind of taboo where I come from, for example on seeking help from a psychologist. [Interviewer: did this influence you in any way?]. Yes definitely. My father was also like: ‘You will not find a job’ and stuff. He meant in medical school. He said: ‘Then they will ask for your data or something, and then you will never be able to find a job’. […] They have a very black and white view on psychologistsand on psychological treatment. Well, they think you will be referred to a psychiatric hospital right away. Yes it really works like that over there. […] For a long time I did not go to a psychologist because I also thought that I needed to deal with things by myself. And seeking helpI also didn’t understand how that would possibly help me’ (male, age 21).

A participant originating from Northern Africa said mental health stigma plays a big part in North African society, but found good support within her family. Another participant, born in the Netherlands and with parents originating from Northern Africa, did not feel understood by her parents but stated that stigma is not something specific to their culture:

It’s not the case with everybody. There are also enough North African women that do understand psychological issues, and will help you. Others don’t, do you understand? I think it has to do with the individual. [..] There are people out there that do understand like: ‘Hey, my daughter needs help, I’m going to find help for my daughter, I’m going to do it, I’m going to support her, so that she will get better’ (female, age 23).

5. Accessibility

5.1 Perceived accessibility of the general practitioner. Many participants experienced a barrier in approaching their GP. Embarrassment, stigma and believing the GP only treats physical symptoms were reasons mentioned for not going to the GP with depressive symptoms.

I thought it was such a stupid idea to go to my GP and say: ‘SoI want to die.’ Yes that seems super weird to say […] yes, the GP is there for normal symptoms, the ones you can see, if you know what I mean. So when you have a painful hand, or something. On a physical level’ (male, age 18).

5.2 Effectuation of referral. Many participants in our sample did not in the end receive treatment because they had to contact the psychologist or mental health care institution themselves (often by telephone), which was a barrier to them. Some participants commented that they had needed someone to push them to effectuate the referral. As a consequence, one participant appreciated his involved GP, who monitored the trajectory:

My GP was immediately like ‘OK, I will send you to my mental health care nurse and then I will see you in two months, to discuss how you are doing’. So he kept his communication lines short […] So I appreciated that. Because I do have the idea… I’m a person that can delay things quite often. So I like to have someone who pushes me a bit’ (male, age 23).

5.3 Direct access to treatment. Many participants mentioned that they found some form of help because their school offered assistance or treatment. Reported facilitators were: the possibility to receive support from a school social worker or school psychologist; a routine appointment with the school counsellor; or an active inquiry about well-being by a teacher or mentor when grades were deteriorating. In some cases, the school referred to a psychologist or strongly recommended the participant to seek help. In one case, the educational counsellor was also a psychologist and treated the student herself:

My academic counsellor in my political sciences course, was both an academic counsellor and a psychologist. So I saw her for two years’ (female, age 22).

One participant easily contacted a health professional because signing up was simplified by an online form and a telephone call from the institution the next day. One participant mentioned easy accessibility since she had direct contact details available from previous mental health care appointments. In addition, one of the participants had direct access to care as he was treated by his father. Another female was referred to a psychiatrist via her father.

Table 3 contains summaries of two interviews, demonstrating the complex process of barriers and facilitators in help-seeking.

Table 3. Summary of two interviews showing the complex process of barriers and facilitators in help-seeking.
Brian*, male, age 23, Dutch parents
In the case of Brian it took many years to receive help after the onset of symptoms.
In high school, as a result of stress and bad grades, he began feeling down. He thought what he was feeling was just part of being a teenager. He says, now, that he didn’t recognise what he felt as depressive symptoms but also that he didn’t want to acknowledge those symptoms because he thought positive thinking would make the symptoms go away. When he had his first suicidal thoughts, he spoke to his family about his low mood. His mother was worried and got stressed, but did not encourage him to seek help. After a while he took the initiative to see his GP about his feelings and the GP gave him a psychologist’s telephone number. He didn’t call because he was temporarily feeling better. His parents weren’t actively involved in his help-seeking process. After this, he stopped mentioning the issue and his family and friends didn’t ask either. He never discussed it with anyone, finding the subject too intense and thus to be avoided. A year later he was still underperforming at school and nothing had really changed. He began reflecting more about his situation. Talking to his sister also contributed to him realizing that he wasn’t feeling any better than a year before. It had been a very stressful year, including problems in his relationship. Altogether, this made him seek help on his own initiative. His parents were supportive. He called the psychologist’s number that the GP had given him the previous year. With hindsight, he thinks the GP should have done more and blames him for the delay in seeking psychological help.
Imane*, female, age 23, parents originating from Northern Africa
In the case of Imane, her family and school played a crucial role in getting her to receive help for depression.
She started feeling down and not doing well at school at the age of 14. She began eating more when she was feeling down and gained weight as a result. She started skipping school and teachers began asking if she might be depressed, but she didn’t address the problem. After flunking a class, she stopped school and started working. With hindsight, she says this was because she didn’t know how to seek help and this was her attempt at decreasing the symptoms. She says that she might not have wanted to see her own depression because she saw depression as something very severe and not treatable. She says that within her culture [Islamic culture] people don’t talk about depression, but in her home they do. Her mother (also depressed in the past) was very supportive. She spoke to her boyfriend and mother about how she was feeling. They told her to go to the GP. Her GP only focused on weight gain and gave her a flyer about physiotherapy. She didn’t complain because she thought that her depressed feelings were part of her personality and she had to live with them. After speaking to another friend, she decided to take care of herself and start school again. She discussed her symptoms with her school counsellor and got a referral to a psychologist at the age of 17.

*Names of participants are fictitious.

Discussion

This qualitative study aimed to investigate facilitating factors and barriers for formal treatment-seeking in adolescents and young adults with depressive symptoms. This study adds to the literature because contrary to previous studies focusing primarily on barriers [2426, 42, 43] there was specific attention for facilitating factors, yielding valuable additional information on adolescents’ and young adults’ pathways to professional mental health care.

Our study shows that help-seeking in adolescents with depressive symptoms is often a complex process with multiple interacting factors. We identified five main themes, which could either impede or facilitate help-seeking. Impairment or deterioration in individual functioning and well-being–such as poor academic performance, physical symptoms, and mental distress–was often a prompt for help-seeking, whereas good academic performance despite depressive symptoms could be a hindrance. Health literacy was one of the pivotal aspects in help-seeking; many adolescents reported a lack of knowledge about depression and treatment possibilities, and it was only after they had gained knowledge about depression that they came to understand their symptoms, which was an important factor in acknowledging a need for help. Attitudinal aspects (such as shame, wanting to deal with symptoms by oneself, and negative perception of treatment) hampered the treatment-seeking process; however, openness and a positive attitude towards professional care were identified as facilitators. Furthermore, the surroundings; parents, peers, and school personnel in particular played an important role in help-seeking. While recognition and motivation by important others facilitated help-seeking, expected or perceived stigma impeded the willingness of young men and women to seek treatment. Lastly, barriers regarding accessibility of mental health care were mentioned, while acknowledging that direct and easy access to treatment significantly improved mental health care use.

Our finding that impairment or deterioration in individual functioning and well-being prompt treatment-seeking is in accordance with previous research in adolescents [24, 32, 44] and adults [45, 46], although there are studies in adults that indicate otherwise [47, 48]. Furthermore, previous research found that adolescents and young adults with increased suicidal ideation [38] or higher levels of depression [49] communicate a lower tendency to seek treatment. In our sample, two participants reported that the nature of their depressive symptoms (feelings of hopelessness and worthlessness) deterred them from seeking help. Thus, it is dependent on the severity and type of depressive symptoms, and the interplay with other factors, whether this is a facilitating factor or a barrier to help-seeking.

Health illiteracy and problems with symptom recognition–a major barrier in help seeking in our sample–was also found in other studies in children, adolescents, and young adults [23, 2527, 50, 51], as well as in the adult population [45, 46]. Our study showed that for certain participants, increased knowledge about depression led to help-seeking. Correspondingly, research by Wright and colleagues [52] showed positive effects of a mental health awareness campaign for young people, leading to increased mental health literacy, a small increase in help-seeking behaviour, and a reduction of barriers to treatment.

Our finding that attitudinal aspects, including shame, positive or negative attitudes towards treatment, and wanting to deal with problems oneself influence treatment-seeking, has been found previously both in adults and youth [18, 2327, 31, 32, 38, 45, 47, 4951, 53, 54].

Furthermore, our findings show the importance of adolescents’ surroundings–family, peers, and school personnel in particular–who often played a crucial role both in the recognition of depressive symptoms and in active encouragement to seek treatment. In fact, for many participants in our sample, encouragement by school, parents, and peers was the prompt to search for help. These findings are consistent with previous studies [19, 23, 24, 3133, 38, 49, 53, 55] that also stress the role of parents, teachers, peers, and social surroundings in identifying symptoms and referral, both in adolescents and adults. Our study, however, extends the existing literature in several ways. While many studies endorse the important role of surroundings, this study describes the specific influence of family and school in more detail. For instance, our study found that in some cases parents had a negative influence on problem identification and treatment-seeking behaviour, since some participants mentioned that parents were unaware of their mental symptoms, had limited knowledge about mental health, or even downplayed the problem. Furthermore, this study gives more detailed insight into the important role of the school. Although a few participants reported under-recognition of symptoms by their school, many of our participants stated that school personnel made them aware of their symptoms and the severity of their situation. In addition, schools’ involvement comprised three other major aspects: (i) increased health literacy from information on depression obtained at school or university; (ii) assistance in finding professional treatment; and (iii) readily accessible basic support or treatment from school psychologists and social workers.

In addition to the above mentioned influences of social surroundings, expected or perceived stigma from others had a potential negative effect on help-seeking in our sample. Adolescents seem to be particularly vulnerable for perceived stigma, compared to adults [56]. Another interesting finding is that all adolescents in our sample with a family history of migration named the role of stigma in relation to their cultural background, compared to only a subgroup of Dutch participants. This seems in accordance with previous research, that found relatively higher vulnerability to stigma in (certain) adolescent and adult ethnic minority groups [20, 56, 57]. Thus, stigma seems to be a universal hindrance in treatment-seeking, but might be even more so in ethnic minorities. Although qualitative research is not the appropriate method to draw firm conclusions from observed frequencies, this is still an interesting finding that should be further investigated in the future.

Lastly, an important finding was the variance in accessibility of mental health care experienced in our sample. Although mental health care in the Netherlands is completely covered by an obligatory health insurance (after referral by a GP), problems concerning access to treatment were frequently mentioned and the pathway to mental health care appeared to be problematic and demanding in some cases. One main difficulty was the proactive role expected from the adolescent in arranging an appointment with a therapist after referral by a GP. This was potentially a barrier and some adolescents never succeeded in getting mental health care. Although accessibility problems were previously reported, most studies provided only limited information on this subject, mainly due to a quantitative study design [18, 24, 26, 43, 49] or a small sample in a rural area [42]. Due to the qualitative study design, our study contributes to existing literature by giving more detailed insight into the reasons and precise mechanisms of these access barriers. For instance, in our sample, all actions from the adolescent’s social surroundings that enabled direct access to treatment or shortcuts to care were facilitating. This included monitoring of the referral process by the GP or a family member, direct access to school personnel offering basic support or treatment, and facilitated access to health care professionals because of previous treatment or family connections with a care provider. Accordingly, research showed that access to mental health support at school indeed increased the likelihood of receiving basic mental health care, without influencing the amount of care received outside of school [58]. Apparently, getting mental health care can be a tough process for depressed adolescents and young adults, and any simplification of the process may have a positive effect.

Strengths and limitations

An important strength of our study is the use of in-depth interviews. Unlike quantitative data, this study design gives the opportunity to thoroughly investigate individual processes of help-seeking behaviour and interactions between the different impeding and facilitating factors. Furthermore, in addition to previous qualitative studies focussing on barriers [2426, 42, 43], our study paid specific attention to facilitators of the help-seeking process as well. Another strength of the study is the, for qualitative research standards, sizeable sample consisting of 32 participants who were recruited in various contexts (mental health care, general population, and schools), resulting in a sample with participants from various ethnic backgrounds, of different ages and levels of education. Furthermore, we included adolescents both with and without a treatment history.

Previous research has shown that the literature on help-seeking behaviour comprises a variety of studies with different methodology, focus and outcomes, hampering direct comparison [22]. In order to improve conceptual consistency, Rickwood and Thomas [22] presented a framework consisting of five aspects of help-seeking behaviour: Process (comprising the aspects of Orientation, Intention, Behaviour), Timeframe (i.e. past/next 4 weeks, past/next 12 months, Ever), Source (Formal help, Semi-formal help, Informal help, Self-Help), Type of help (Instrumental, Information, Affiliative, Emotional, Treatment) and Concern (General distress, Specific symptom types). Although we did not include this framework in the design of our study, our study can be categorised as focusing on all three Process aspects (Orientation, Intention and Behaviour) of help-seeking, in a broad time frame (Ever), from Formal help sources (Source), in participants with a specific syndrome type, i.e. depressive symptoms (Concern). Information on all types of help (Type) was gathered, with a specific focus on information and treatment. Future studies on help-seeking may use a conceptual framework such as described by Rickwood and Thomas [22] to increase homogeneity in study designs and comparability of the results.

A limitation of this study is the relatively small number of low-educated adolescents compared to high-educated participants. In addition, the number of untreated participants was relatively small, despite efforts to include more participants without a treatment history in the study. This could have resulted in an underrepresentation of barriers and facilitators that are specific to these subgroups. The findings of this study are most representative for females, adolescents from Dutch descent, drug-naïve adolescents and adolescents (eventually) seeking help from psychiatric outpatient centres. Future research could specifically focus on adolescents that did not receive professional help and low-educated adolescents to explore whether other processes play a role within the help-seeking process of these specific subgroups. Moreover, the interviews were conducted by five different researchers, risking a lack of continuity in the interviews. However, frequent discussions and meetings between the interviewers were held to guarantee interview quality, and having different views on the interviews and data may also have enriched data collection and analysis. Another limitation is the limited information that was gained on participants’ backgrounds, depression and anxiety scores at time of illness, or demographic variables, impeding thorough analysis of the impact of these factors on perceived barriers and facilitators.

Practical implications

Our study has several practical implications for facilitating treatment-seeking in depressed adolescents and young adults and gives indications for what could be improved to optimise this process.

To reduce barriers related to health illiteracy and stigma, school or public campaigns could be organised to improve health literacy and diminish the stigma of depression [52]. In addition, these campaigns could encourage young men and women to easily contact possible gatekeepers (e.g. the GP or school contact person) to help assess their symptoms and the need for treatment. Previous research has found promising effects from education and awareness programmes on mental health literacy, help-seeking behaviour or intention to seek help and stigma reduction [5963], using different methods including psycho-education and (video) presentations with former patients.

With regard to problem recognition and encouragement to seek treatment, parents, peers, and particularly school personnel can be made aware of their crucial role in identifying depressive symptoms in adolescents and young adults and consider discussing their concerns with them. Subsequently, they could actively encourage the adolescent to seek treatment if deemed necessary. Peer leading interventions have been developed previously and shown a positive effect [61] on referring suicidal peers for adult support. School personnel should be aware of signs of academic malfunctioning and be encouraged to discuss the student’s wellbeing when school results are worsening.

Concerning accessibility to treatment, general practitioners could monitor the referral of adolescent and young adult patients and check for follow-up, as this seems facilitating in this population. Mental health care institutions and therapists are encouraged to improve accessibility of care, e.g. by offering possibilities for online registration or easy telephone or chat contact, or actively reaching out to referred adolescent patients. Furthermore, in our sample waiting time appeared to be a problem. This is in accordance with previous research [62, 63] and indicates that the number of young adults in need of treatment exceeds the available treatment resources. This problem needs particular attention from policy makers and governments, and suggests that rearrangement of treatment resources for youngsters might be necessary. One of the most promising approaches to facilitate access to care seems to be the provision of basic mental health care in schools [58, 64]. This could be considered a form of stepped care, where school counselors and psychologists function as primary support for distressed adolescents.

Conclusion

This study found five main themes that play a role in adolescents’ and young adults’ help-seeking behaviour: individual functioning and well-being, health literacy, attitudinal aspects (including shame, wanting to deal with the problem oneself, and attitudes towards treatment), influences from social surroundings, and accessibility of care. Interventions aimed at improving health literacy and decreasing stigma, stimulating the positive effect of social surroundings on symptom recognition and encouragement to seek help, and facilitating accessibility to mental health care may further enhance help-seeking behaviour and reduce barriers to treatment for adolescents and young adults.

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank Annemiek Marschalk and Milly Vriens for their contribution to this research. We thank all the adolescents and young adults for their willingness to participate in this study and share their personal stories.

Data Availability

Data cannot be shared publicly because according to European law (AVG) data containing potentially identifying or sensitive patient information are restricted. The data are available from the Institutional Data Access Committee of GGZ inGeest with reference to project AFBA 14-196 (contact: datamanagement@ggzingeest.nl) for researchers who meet the criteria for access to confidential data.

Funding Statement

ADT Muntingh received funding from the Netherlands Organisation for Health Research and Development (ZonMw, www.zonmw.nl) (projectnr. 430000003). The funder had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

References

  • 1.Ormel J, Vonkorff M, Ustun TB, Pini S, Korten A, Oldehinkel T. Common Mental Disorders and Disability Across Cultures: Results From the WHO Collaborative Study on Psychological Problems in General Health Care. JAMA J Am Med Assoc. 1994;272(22):1741–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Public Health Group. Victorian Burden of Disease Study: mortality and morbidity in 2001. Melbourne: Victorian Government Department of Human Services; [Internet]. Victorian Burden of Disease Study: mortality and morbidity in 2001. 2005. p. 1–228. Available from: http://docs.health.vic.gov.au/docs/doc/C56AB6B23D556647CA2578860001CE34/$FILE/morbidity.pdf [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Thapar A, Stephan C, Pine D, Thapar A. Depression in adolescence. Lancet. 2012;379(9820):1056–67. 10.1016/S0140-6736(11)60871-4 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Merikangas K, Jian-ping H, Burstein M, Swanson S, Avenevoli S, Lihong C, et al. Lifetime Prevalence of Mental Disorders in US Adolescents: Results from the National Comorbidity Study-Adolescent Supplement. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2011;49(10):980–9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Avenevoli S, Swendsen J, He J-P, Burstein M, Merikangas KR. Major depression in the national comorbidity survey–adolescent supplement: Prevalence, correlates, and treatment. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry [Internet]. 2015. January;54(1):37–44. Available from: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=psyh&AN=2014-56197-007&site=ehost-live 10.1016/j.jaac.2014.10.010 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Adolescent Mental Health Fact Sheet [Internet]. World Health Organization. 2020. Available from: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/adolescent-mental-health
  • 7.Verboom CE, Sijtsema JJ, Verhulst FC, Penninx BWJH, Ormel J. Longitudinal associations between depressive problems, academic performance, and social functioning in adolescent boys and girls. Dev Psychol [Internet]. 2014;50(1):247–57. Available from: http://doi.apa.org/getdoi.cfm?doi=10.1037/a0032547 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Berndt ER, Koran LM, Finkelstein SN, Gelenberg AJ, Kornstein SG, Miller IM, et al. Lost human capital from early-onset chronic depression. Am J Psychiatry. 2000;157(6):940–7. 10.1176/appi.ajp.157.6.940 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Hysenbegasi A, Hass SL, Rowland CR. The impact of depression on the academic productivity of university students. J Ment Health Policy Econ. 2005;8(3):145–51. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Kessler C, Saunders B, Ph D, Foster L, Stang PE, AlE. of Psychiatric I: Educational Attainment influence. Am J Psychiatry. 1995;15(July):1026–32. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Hart SR, Kastelic EA, Wilcox HC, Beaudry MB, Musci RJ, Heley KM, et al. Achieving Depression Literacy: The Adolescent Depression Knowledge Questionnaire (ADKQ). School Ment Health. 2014;6(3):213–23. 10.1007/s12310-014-9120-1 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Kim-Cohen J, Caspi A, Moffitt TE, Harrington H, Milne BJ, Poulton R. Prior Juvenile Diagnoses in Adults With Mental Disorder. Arch Gen Psychiatry [Internet]. 2003;60(7):709. Available from: http://archpsyc.jamanetwork.com/article.aspx?doi=10.1001/archpsyc.60.7.709 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Fergusson DM, Horwood LJ, Ridder EM, Beautrais AL. Subthreshold depression in adolescence and mental health outcomes in adulthood. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2005;62(1):66–72. 10.1001/archpsyc.62.1.66 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Copeland W, Shanahan L, Costello E, Angold A. Childhood and adolescent psychiatric disorders as predictors of young adult disorders. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2009;66(7):764–72. 10.1001/archgenpsychiatry.2009.85 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Bardone AM, Moffitt TE, Caspi A, Dickson N, Stanton WR, Silva PA. Adult physical health outcomes of adolescent girls with conduct disorder, depression, and anxiety. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry [Internet]. 1998;37(6):594–601. Available from: https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-0031862762&partnerID=40&md5=8bafae034342fe924e72cf6c92b7a99c 10.1097/00004583-199806000-00009 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Cuijpers P, van Straten A, Driessen E, van Oppen P, Bockting C, Andersson G. Depression and Dysthymic disorders. In: Handbook of Evidence-Based Practice in Clinical Psychplpgy. England: John Wiley & Sons; 2012. p. 243–84. [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Costello EJ, He J, Sampson NA, Kessler RC, Merikangas KR. Services for adolescent psychiatric disorders: 12 month data from the national comorbidity survey-adolescent. 2014;14(4):384–99. 10.1176/appi.ps.201100518 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Eisenberg D, Golberstein E, Gollust SE. Help-seeking and access to mental health care in a university student population. Med Care. 2007;45(7):594–601. 10.1097/MLR.0b013e31803bb4c1 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Frojd S, Marttunen M, Pelkonen M, von der Pahlen B, Kaltiala-Heino R, Fröjd S, et al. Adult and peer involvement in help-seeking for depression in adolescent population: a two-year follow-up in Finland. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol [Internet]. 2007. December;42(12):945–52. Available from: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=psyh&AN=2008-03609-001&site=ehost-live 10.1007/s00127-007-0254-4 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Zivin K, Eisenberg D, Gollust SE, Golberstein E. Persistence of mental health problems and needs in a college student population. J Affect Disord. 2009;117(3):180–5. 10.1016/j.jad.2009.01.001 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Wang PS, Berglund PA, Olfson M, Kessler RC. Methods Delays in Initial Treatment Contact after First Onset of a Mental Disorder. Heal Serv. 2004;39(2):393–416. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Rickwood D, Thomas K. Conceptual measurement framework for help-seeking for mental health problems. Psychol Res Behav Manag. 2012;5:173–83. 10.2147/PRBM.S38707 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Aguirre Velasco A, Cruz ISS, Billings J, Jimenez M, Rowe S. What are the barriers, facilitators and interventions targeting help-seeking behaviours for common mental health problems in adolescents? A systematic review. BMC Psychiatry. 2020;20(1):1–22. 10.1186/s12888-019-2374-2 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Sylwestrzak A, Overholt CE, Ristau KI, Coker KL. Self-reported Barriers to Treatment Engagement: Adolescent Perspectives from the National Comorbidity Survey-Adolescent Supplement (NCS-A). Community Ment Health J [Internet]. 2015;51(7):775–81. Available from: 10.1007/s10597-014-9776-x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Martínez-Hernáez A, DiGiacomo SM, Carceller-Maicas N, Correa-Urquiza M, Martorell-Poveda MA. Non-professional-help-seeking among young people with depression: A qualitative study. BMC Psychiatry [Internet]. 2014. April 28;14:1–11. Available from: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=psyh&AN=2014-23056-001&site=ehost-live 10.1186/1471-244X-14-124 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Vanheusden K, Mulder CL, van der Ende J, van Lenthe FJ, Mackenbach JP, Verhulst FC. Young adults face major barriers to seeking help from mental health services. Patient Educ Couns. 2008;73(1):97–104. 10.1016/j.pec.2008.05.006 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Georgakakou-Koutsonikou N, Williams JM. Children and young people’s conceptualizations of depression: a systematic review and narrative meta-synthesis. Child Care Health Dev. 2017;43(2):161–81. 10.1111/cch.12439 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Pepin R, Segal DL, Coolidge FL. Intrinsic and extrinsic barriers to mental health care among community-dwelling younger and older adults. Aging Ment Health. 2009;13(5):769–77. 10.1080/13607860902918231 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Haavik L, Joa I, Hatloy K, Stain HJ, Langeveld J. Help seeking for mental health problems in an adolescent population: the effect of gender. J Ment Hea l [Internet]. 2019. September 3;28(5):467–74. Available from: 10.1080/09638237.2017.1340630 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Hassett A, Isbister C. Young men’s experiences of accessing and receiving help from child and adolescent mental health services following self-harm. SAGE Open. 2017;7(4). [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Lindsey MA, Korr WS, Broitman M, Bone L, Green A, Leaf PJ. Help-seeking behaviors and depression among African American adolescent boys. Soc Work. 2006;51(1):49–58. 10.1093/sw/51.1.49 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Timlin-Scalera RM, Ponterotto JG, Blumberg FC JM. A grounded School, theory study of help-seeking behaviors among White male high students. J Couns Psychol [Internet]. 2003;50(3):339–350. Available from: 10.1037/0022-0167.50.3.339 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Wilson CJ, Dean FP. Adolescent opinions about reducing help-seeking barriers and increasing appropriate help engagement. J Educ Psychol Consult. 2001;12(4):345–63. [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Wilson CJ, Dean FP. Brief report: Need for autonomy and other perceived barriers relating to adolescents’ intentions to seek professional mental health care. J Adolesc. 2012;35(1):233–7. 10.1016/j.adolescence.2010.06.011 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Cramer K. Mental health help seeking in schools: the impact of mental health literacy, stigma, and barriers to care. Vols. 78(3-A(E)), Dissertation Abstracts International Section A: Humanities and Social Sciences. 2017.
  • 36.Lindsey MA, Joe S, Nebbitt V. Family Matters: The Role of Mental Health Stigma and Social Support on Depressive Symptoms and Subsequent Help Seeking Among African American Boys. J Black Psychol. 2010;36(4):458–82. 10.1177/0095798409355796 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Gonçalves M., Moleiro C. The family-school-primary care triangle and the access to mental health care among migrant and ethnic minorities. J Immigr Minor Heal. 2012;14(4):682–90. 10.1007/s10903-011-9527-9 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Rickwood D, Deane FP, Wilson CJ, Ciarrochi J. Young people’s help-seeking for mental health problems. AeJAMH (Australian e-Journal Adv Ment Heal [Internet]. 2005. December;4(3). Available from: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=psyh&AN=2006-00699-008&site=ehost-live [Google Scholar]
  • 39.McLeod J. Qualitative research in counselling and psychotherapy. SAGE Publications Ltd; 2011. 10.1037/a0022067 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Rush JA, Trivedi MH, Ibrahim HM, Carmody TJ, Arnow B, Klein DN, et al. The 16-item Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology (QIDS), clinician rating (QIDS-C), and self-report (QIDS-SR): a psychometric evaluation in patients with chronic major depression. Biol Psychiatry [Internet]. 2003;54(5):573–83. Available from: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0006322302018668 10.1016/s0006-3223(02)01866-8 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Braun V, Clarke V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual Res Psychol. 2006;3(2):77–101. [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Aisbett DL, Boyd CP, Francis K, Newnham K. Understanding barriers to mental health service utilization for adolescents in rural Australia. Rural Remote Health. 2007;7(624):1–10. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Givens JL, Tjia J. Depressed medical students’ use of mental health services and barriers to use. Acad Med [Internet]. 2002. September;77(9):918–21. Available from: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=psyh&AN=2002-04313-002&site=ehost-live 10.1097/00001888-200209000-00024 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Sheffield JK, Fiorenza E, Sofronoff K. Adolescents’ willingness to seek psychological help: Promoting and preventing factors. J Youth Adolesc. 2004;33(6):495–507. [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Blumenthal R, Endicott J. Barriers to seeking treatment for major depression. Depress Anxiety. 1996;4(6):273–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Thompson A, Hunt C, Issakidis C. Why wait? Reasons for delay and prompts to seek help for mental health problems in an Australian clinical sample. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2004;39(10):810–7. 10.1007/s00127-004-0816-7 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Boerema AM, Kleiboer A, Beekman ATF, van Zoonen K, Dijkshoorn H, Cuijpers P. Determinants of help-seeking behavior in depression: a cross-sectional study. BMC Psychiatry. 2016;16:78. 10.1186/s12888-016-0790-0 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Mojtabai R, Olfson M, Mechanic D. Perceived need and help-seeking in adults with mood, anxiety, or substance use disorders. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2002;59(1):77–84. 10.1001/archpsyc.59.1.77 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Boyd CP, Hayes L, Nurse S, Aisbett DL, Francis K, Newnham K, et al. Preferences and intention of rural adolescents toward seeking help for mental health problems. Rural Remote Health. 2011;11(1):1582. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Gulliver A, Griffiths KM, Christensen H. Perceived barriers and facilitators to mental health help-seeking in young people: A systematic review. BMC Psychiatry [Internet]. 2010;10(1):113. Available from: http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-244X/10/113 10.1186/1471-244X-10-113 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.McCann T V, Mugavin J, Renzaho A, Lubman DI. Sub-Saharan African migrant youths’ help-seeking barriers and facilitators for mental health and substance use problems: a qualitative study. BMC Psychiatry. 2016;16:275. 10.1186/s12888-016-0984-5 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Wright A, McGorry PD, Harris MG, Jorm AF, Pennell K. Development and evaluation of a youth mental health community awareness campaign—The Compass Strategy. BMC Public Health. 2006;6:215. 10.1186/1471-2458-6-215 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Barney LJ, Griffiths KM, Jorm AF, Christensen H. Stigma about depression and its impact on help-seeking intentions. Aust N Z J Psychiatry. 2006;40(1):51–4. 10.1080/j.1440-1614.2006.01741.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Mojtabai R, Olfson M, Sampson NA, Jin R, Druss B, Wang PS, et al. Barriers to mental health treatment: Results from the National Comorbidity Survey Replication. Psychol Med [Internet]. 2011. August;41(8):1751–61. Available from: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=psyh&AN=2011-17192-017&site=ehost-live 10.1017/S0033291710002291 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Lindsey MA, Barksdale CL, Lambert SF, Ialongo NS. Social network influences on service use among urban, African American youth with mental health problems. J Adolesc Health. 2010;47(4):367–73. 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2010.01.025 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Clement S, Schauman O, Graham T, Maggioni F, Evans-Lacko S, Bezborodovs N, et al. What is the impact of mental health-related stigma on help-seeking? A systematic review of quantitative and qualitative studies. Psychol Med. 2015;45(1):11–27. 10.1017/S0033291714000129 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Flink IJE, Beirens TMJ, Butte D, Raat H. Help-seeking behaviour for internalizing problems: perceptions of adolescent girls from different ethnic backgrounds. Ethn Health. 2014;19(2):160–77. 10.1080/13557858.2013.801402 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Slade EP. Effects of school-based mental health programs on mental health service use by adolescents at school and in the community. Ment Health Serv Res. 2002;4(3):151–66. 10.1023/a:1019711113312 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Saporito JM. Reducing stigma toward seeking mental health treatment. Diss Abstr Int Sect B Sci Eng. 2009;70(6-B):3794. [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Rickwood D, Cavanagh S, Curtis L SR. Educating young people about mental health and mental illness: evaluating a school-based programme. Int J Ment Heal Promot. 2004;6(4):23–32. [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Wyman P, Hendricks Brown C, LoMurray M, Schmeelk-Cone K, Petrova M, Yu Q, et al. An outcome evaluation of the sources of strength suicide prevention program delivered by adolescent peer leaders in high schools. Am J Public Health. 2010;100(9):1653–61. 10.2105/AJPH.2009.190025 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Edbrooke-Childs J, Deighton J. Problem severity and waiting times for young people accessing mental health services. BJPsych Open. 2020;6(6):1–7. 10.1192/bjo.2020.103 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Iskra W, Deane FP, Wahlin T, Davis EL. Parental perceptions of barriers to mental health services for young people. Early Interv Psychiatry. 2018;12(2):125–34. 10.1111/eip.12281 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Choi K, Easterlin M. Intervention Models for Increasing Access to Behavioral Health Services Among Youth: A Systematic Review. J Dev Behav Pediatr. 2018;39(9):754–62. 10.1097/DBP.0000000000000623 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Decision Letter 0

Therese van Amelsvoort

15 Oct 2020

PONE-D-20-29462

Facilitating factors and barriers in help-seeking behaviour in adolescents and young adults with depressive symptoms: a qualitative study

PLOS ONE

Dear Dr. Eigenhuis,

Thank you for submitting your manuscript to PLOS ONE. After careful consideration, we feel that it has merit but does not fully meet PLOS ONE’s publication criteria as it currently stands. Therefore, we invite you to submit a revised version of the manuscript that addresses the points raised during the review process. Both reviewers see the importance of your study, however they several made suggestions for improvements.

Please submit your revised manuscript by Nov 29 2020 11:59PM. If you will need more time than this to complete your revisions, please reply to this message or contact the journal office at plosone@plos.org. When you're ready to submit your revision, log on to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/ and select the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder to locate your manuscript file.

Please include the following items when submitting your revised manuscript:

  • A rebuttal letter that responds to each point raised by the academic editor and reviewer(s). You should upload this letter as a separate file labeled 'Response to Reviewers'.

  • A marked-up copy of your manuscript that highlights changes made to the original version. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Revised Manuscript with Track Changes'.

  • An unmarked version of your revised paper without tracked changes. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Manuscript'.

If you would like to make changes to your financial disclosure, please include your updated statement in your cover letter. Guidelines for resubmitting your figure files are available below the reviewer comments at the end of this letter.

If applicable, we recommend that you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io to enhance the reproducibility of your results. Protocols.io assigns your protocol its own identifier (DOI) so that it can be cited independently in the future. For instructions see: http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submission-guidelines#loc-laboratory-protocols

We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript.

Kind regards,

Therese van Amelsvoort

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Journal Requirements:

When submitting your revision, we need you to address these additional requirements.

1. Please ensure that your manuscript meets PLOS ONE's style requirements, including those for file naming. The PLOS ONE style templates can be found at

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=wjVg/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_main_body.pdf and

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=ba62/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_title_authors_affiliations.pdf

[Note: HTML markup is below. Please do not edit.]

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Partly

**********

2. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #1: N/A

Reviewer #2: N/A

**********

3. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

4. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

5. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #1: Thank you for the opportunity to review your paper. This paper is qualitative study using interviews to study the help-seeking behaviours of young people with depression. The paper is well written, the findings are timely and relevant, and it contributes well to the literature.

Interview procedure

1. were any honoraria or remuneration provided to participants?

Data analysis

2. How have the quotes been selected? Have quotes been select to represent a wide range of participants? The reason I ask is because the demographics table indicates a large number of participants whose parents are from the Netherlands, but many of the quotes indicate otherwise, especially in the context of the cultural influences theme. Perhaps another quote could be added in this section from someone representing the Netherlands, given the large proportion.

Results

3. Qualitative is typically referred to as "findings" rather than "results"

4. Themes section: "personal themes" .. could you clarify what is meant by this? Perhaps this could also be clarified by the following table (2).

5. Section on physical symptoms: "a 20-year old female secondary school.." I'm wondering if this is correct given the age?

6. The themes could be strengthened by using (and adding to) a conceptual help-seeking framework (eg, Rickwood et al 2012) so that the terminology and findings can be compared across studies.

Strengths and Limitations

7. Limitations associated with the sample being more representative of people with parents from the Netherlands, females, seeking help from psychiatric outpatient centres, and not taking medications should be included.

Practical Implications

8. The findings are interesting and there have been some new studies coming out that have similar findings re: gatekeepers that could be referenced to complement the paper.

Reviewer #2: Summary

The manuscript provides a clear and thoughtful analysis and discussion. The authors draw a comprehensive picture of young people's access experiences, by identifying multifaceted barriers and facilitators. The diversity of the sample is a strength, and the data on participants’ educational, socio-economic, and ethnic backgrounds provide valuable context. Below are some suggestions for strengthening the manuscript, and enhancing its impact.

General Comments

Major: The abstract and introduction suggest a focus on youth who struggle to access care. However, the sample consists primarily of youth who did manage to access treatment. To set the readers’ expectations from the start, it would be helpful to emphasise that this study explored perceived facilitators and barriers, and that it did so from the perspective of youth who successfully navigated access. Given that only three out of 32 participants had never accessed mental health support, clarity and focus may be enhanced by removing these three cases from the sample.

Major: Barriers and facilitators to youth mental health treatment access are a relatively well-researched area, as demonstrated by a recently published systematic review on the topic that the authors may want to reference (Aguirre Velasco et al., 2020). The authors helpfully explain how they seek to add to existing research. It would be helpful to comment specifically on how this work adds to a study by Martínez-Hernáez et al (2014), which involved 105 in-depth interviews with depressed youth about barriers to professional help-seeking.

Major: In the discussion, the authors provide some thoughtful suggestions for how access may be facilitated, but it would be helpful to contextualise these ideas with reference to current debates and initiatives in the field, (e.g., see Aguirre Velasco et al., for a review of interventions). It appears that an implicit assumption is made that the supply of treatment resources is sufficient to meet the demand from youth who do not currently seek help. This may, however, not be the case in all contexts. Even in countries with well-developed mental health systems, waiting times are high and a major barrier to access (see Edbrooke-Childs and colleagues 2020). This could be acknowledged and discussed. Similarly, the authors could expand on what systems of care are most likely to mitigate the identified access barriers (e.g., integrated care pathways, stepped care models, needs-based care delivery).

Specific suggestions

Introduction:

*Line 52-53: (minor): “Furthermore, in this age group, depression and other mental disorders are by far the most important causes of disability (2)” – Consider providing an updated reference – e.g., the 2019 WHO fact sheet on adolescent mental health: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/adolescent-mental-health).

*Line 81-83 (minor): The authors state that quantitative research does not capture the “specific personal information, required to be able to fully understand the specific pathways of facilitating factors in help-seeking”. – Arguably, quantitative analysis can assess whether specific personal factors (e.g., demographic and clinical characteristics) predict service use. It cannot, however, provide thick narrative descriptions of how different factors or barriers influence service use. McLeod 2011 provides a thorough rationale for using qualitative research methods that may be helpful to reference.

Methods:

*(major): Line 99-100: Some additional information on the educational and mental health care institutions from which participants were recruited would be helpful. Were these high schools? Universities? Were mental health care institutions public or private? Were they outpatient or inpatient services?

*Line 122-123 (minor): “Interviews were guided by a topic list, which was developed based on both literature and expert opinion” – please elaborate what is meant by ‘expert opinion’ and what process was used to obtain this.

*Line 143 (major): “Data analysis was conducted using thematic content analysis”. Thematic analysis and content analysis may be considered to form two separate analytic approaches (see e.g. Joffe 2011). The authors reference a seminal guide to thematic analysis by Braun and Clark, and it is not clear why they call their approach thematic content analysis, rather than just thematic analysis. Clarification would be helpful. In Lines 151-156, the explanation of the coding process would benefit from review and refinement to clarify the sequence by which the authors identified overarching themes as well as more specific codes nested within each theme.

*Table 1 (minor): To protect confidentiality, the authors may want to consider grouping participants’ countries of origin. See also lines 342-346 where identification of specific countries may not be necessary (regions could be stated instead).

Results:

*Table 2 (minor): The authors state here “Not noticing problems in academic performance hindered help-seeking (b)”. The narrative discussion however suggests that some youth did not have academic performance issues, and therefore did not notice their mental health difficulties (rather than not noticing academic issues).

Discussion

*Line 408 (minor): “Individual malfunctioning – such as poor academic performance, physical symptoms, and mental distress – was often a prompt for help-seeking” – Malfunctioning may be perceived as a stigmatising term – functioning may be more neutral. Note that physical symptoms and mental distress can be distinguished conceptually from daily functioning, which refers to a young person’s ability to meet age appropriate role demands, and may be impaired by symptoms (see e.g., Rapee et al. 2012).

*Line 490 (minor): “Furthermore, a focus on adolescents and young adults aged 16-24 years is relatively uncommon” – the recent review by Aguirre Velasco, et al 2020 suggests that this broad age range has been covered by a number of studies. Consider rephrasing.

*Line 491 (minor): Typo in the reference.

*Line 492 (minor): The authors describe their qualitative sample as “extensive”. This may be misleading, as the sample is small compared with quantitative research, although sizeable for a qualitative study. Consider rephrasing.

Conclusion:

(minor) Ensure consistent wording is used to refer to the five key themes in the Abstract, Results, Discussion, and Conclusions.

References mentioned above:

Aguirre Velasco, A., Cruz, I.S.S., Billings, J. et al. What are the barriers, facilitators and interventions targeting help-seeking behaviours for common mental health problems in adolescents? A systematic review. BMC Psychiatry 20, 293 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12888-020-02659-0

Bear, H. A., Edbrooke-Childs, J., Norton, S., Krause, K. R., & Wolpert, M. (2020). Systematic Review and Meta-analysis: Outcomes of Routine Specialist Mental Health Care for Young People With Depression and/or Anxiety. Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 59(7), 810–841. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaac.2019.12.002

Edbrooke-Childs, J., & Deighton, J. (2020). Problem severity and waiting times for young people accessing mental health services. BJPsych Open, 6(6), E118. doi:10.1192/bjo.2020.103

Joffe, H., & Yardley, L. (2011). Content and Thematic Analysis. In D. F. Marks & L. Yardley (Eds.), Research Methods for Clinical and Health Psychology. Sage Publications. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781849209793

Martínez-Hernáez, A., DiGiacomo, S.M., Carceller-Maicas, N. et al. Non-professional-help-seeking among young people with depression: a qualitative study. BMC Psychiatry 14, 124 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-244X-14-124

McLeod, J. (2011). Qualitative Research in Counselling and Psychotherapy (2nd ed.). Sage Publications. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781849209663

Rapee, R. M., Bögels, S. M., Van Der Sluis, C. M., Craske, M. G., & Ollendick, T. (2012). Annual research review: Conceptualising functional impairment in children and adolescents. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry and Allied Disciplines, 53(5), 454–468. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7610.2011.02479.x

**********

6. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: No

[NOTE: If reviewer comments were submitted as an attachment file, they will be attached to this email and accessible via the submission site. Please log into your account, locate the manuscript record, and check for the action link "View Attachments". If this link does not appear, there are no attachment files.]

While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com/. PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Registration is free. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email PLOS at figures@plos.org. Please note that Supporting Information files do not need this step.

PLoS One. 2021 Mar 8;16(3):e0247516. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0247516.r002

Author response to Decision Letter 0


18 Dec 2020

Responses to reviewer #1:

Interview procedure

1. Were any honoraria or remuneration provided to participants?

Response: We thank the reviewer for this question. Indeed, participants received a small reward in the form of a €10 gift voucher. This has been added to the text on page 6 (under sample and recruitment):

“Participants received a small reward in the form of a €10 gift voucher.”

Data analysis

2. How have the quotes been selected? Have quotes been select to represent a wide range of participants? The reason I ask is because the demographics table indicates a large number of participants whose parents are from the Netherlands, but many of the quotes indicate otherwise, especially in the context of the cultural influences theme. Perhaps another quote could be added in this section from someone representing the Netherlands, given the large proportion.

Response: We agree that it is important to use representative quotes. The quotes have been selected to illustrate the different themes as good as possible and to represent a wide range of participants. Especially in the context of the cultural influences, there are many quotes of participants from non-western origin. In paragraph 4.3, stigma and cultural influence (page 18), we added the following quote of a participant with Dutch parents explaining how she perceived stigma within her surroundings, to represent this part of the interviewed population:

“A participant with Dutch parents explained how she perceived stigma within her surroundings:

‘I felt ashamed about my problems and about visiting my school counsellor, especially towards my parents, but I also didn’t dare to speak about it with my peers. I think I was afraid of their judgement: ‘She can’t do it on her own, she needs help, she is weak, she is such a bad person’, you know?’ (female, age 20).“

Results

3. Qualitative is typically referred to as "findings" rather than "results"

Response: Throughout the whole manuscript we changed the word ‘results’ into ‘findings’.

4. Themes section: "personal themes" .. could you clarify what is meant by this? Perhaps this could also be clarified by the following table (2).

Response: We agree that using the term ‘personal themes’ can be confusing. We changed the text so that it becomes clear that the five main themes concern either processes within an individual (such as individual functioning, health literacy and attitudinal aspects) or externally-oriented processes (the identification of symptoms and stigma by others, and accessibility of mental health care). The text now reads as follows (under ‘themes’ page 10):

“Analysis of the interviews generated five main themes with different barriers and facilitators for help-seeking. These main themes concerned processes within individuals (individual functioning, health literacy and attitudinal aspects) and externally-oriented processes (the identification of symptoms and stigma by others, and accessibility of mental health care).”

Additionally, we added a column in Table 2 named ‘type of process’ where we specify which themes considered ‘processes within individuals’ or considered ‘externally-oriented processes’ to give a clear overview of this division (page 10).

5. Section on physical symptoms: "a 20-year old female secondary school.." I'm wondering if this is correct given the age?

Response: This sentence is indeed confusing. This female participant appeared to be no longer in secondary school at the time of the interview, but she was talking about her experiences in the past, when she was in secondary school. We changed the text accordingly and it now reads ‘a 20-year-old female suffered from chest pains while in secondary school’ (page 12, lines 213-214).

6. The themes could be strengthened by using (and adding to) a conceptual help-seeking framework (eg, Rickwood et al 2012) so that the terminology and findings can be compared across studies.

Response: We thank the reviewer for this valuable suggestion as a conceptual help-seeking framework indeed provides context.

We have chosen to refer to the conceptual help-seeking framework by Rickwood & Thomas (2012) in the Methods and Discussion section, clarifying the focus of our study and thus facilitating comparison across studies. The definition of help-seeking proposed by Rickwood & Thomas (2012) was also added to our introduction:

Introduction (page 4):

“Rickwood and Thomas (Rickwood & Thomas, 2012) proposed a general definition of help-seeking: “In the mental health context, help-seeking is an adaptive coping process that is the attempt to obtain external assistance to deal with a mental health concern”.

Methods (page 5):

“In terms of the conceptual measurement framework from Rickwood and Thomas (22), this study focused on all three Process aspects (Orientation, Intention and Behaviour), in a broad time frame (Ever), from Formal help sources (Source), in participants with a specific syndrome type, i.e. depressive symptoms (Concern). Information on all types of help (Type) was gathered, with a specific focus on information and treatment.”

Discussion (page 22):

“This qualitative study aimed to investigate facilitating factors and barriers for formal treatment-seeking in adolescents and young adults with depressive symptoms, focusing on all three Process aspects of help-seeking behaviour (Orientation, Intention and Behaviour) in a broad time frame (i.e. lifetime) (22).”

Strengths and Limitations

7. Limitations associated with the sample being more representative of people with parents from the Netherlands, females, seeking help from psychiatric outpatient centres, and not taking medications should be included.

Response: We thank the reviewer for this important remark. We used purposive sampling to include a diverse sample, resulting in a large number of non-Western participants from various backgrounds (37.5%) and a proportion of males (34.4%) representative of the population (adolescents with depressive symptoms). Participants from outpatient centres and to a lesser extent drug-naïve participants are relatively overrepresented.

We have altered the text in the Strengths and Limitations section: on page 26 accordingly:

“A limitation of this study is the relatively small number of low-educated adolescents compared to high-educated participants. In addition, the number of untreated participants was relatively small, despite efforts to include more participants without a treatment history in the study. This could have resulted in an underrepresentation of barriers and facilitators that are specific to these subgroups. The findings of this study are most representative for females, adolescents from Dutch descent, drug-naïve adolescents and adolescents (eventually) seeking help from psychiatric outpatient centres. Future research could specifically focus on adolescents that did not receive professional help and low-educated adolescents to explore whether other processes play a role within the help-seeking process of these specific subgroups.”

Practical Implications

8. The findings are interesting and there have been some new studies coming out that have similar findings re: gatekeepers that could be referenced to complement the paper.

Response: In accordance to your suggestions we have added recent literature to both the introduction and the discussion. To the introduction we added 7 recent studies in the part where we discuss previous research on barriers and facilitators in help-seeking behavior for mental health problem (page 4). Most importantly, we added the recent systematic review on facilitators and barriers in help-seeking behaviour of adolescents with mental health problems and suggested interventions, as suggested by reviewer 2 (Aguirre Velasco et al., 2020) (page 4).The text now reads as follows:

“A recent systematic review including 54 studies on barriers and facilitators in help seeking behaviours for common mental health problems in adolescents found that the two most cited barriers were stigma and negative beliefs towards mental health services and professionals (23). Research also shows that the desire to handle problems on one’s own (24,25), low perceived need for help (20,25,26),difficulty in identifying symptoms of mental illness (26,27), perceived fear of psychotherapy, the belief that a psychotherapist would not be able to be found and financial concerns were also barriers to seeking help in adolescents (28). While research into barriers to treatment for adolescents is readily available, few studies have addressed the role of facilitating factors. The little research that has been done shows that mental health literacy (29,30), positive past experiences with help-seeking (31–35), social support or encouragement from others (36,37) and confidentiality and trust in the provider (25,38) might facilitate help-seeking for adolescents with mental health issues. However, research on facilitating factors is scarce (23).”

Throughout the discussion, we included 2 studies (Aguirre Velasco et al., 2020; Martínez-Hernáez et al., 2014) in the sections on comparison with the literature (page 23, lines 456;464;469).

We highlighted newly added references in the revised manuscript.

Responses to reviewer #2:

9. Major: The abstract and introduction suggest a focus on youth who struggle to access care. However, the sample consists primarily of youth who did manage to access treatment. To set the readers’ expectations from the start, it would be helpful to emphasise that this study explored perceived facilitators and barriers, and that it did so from the perspective of youth who successfully navigated access. Given that only three out of 32 participants had never accessed mental health support, clarity and focus may be enhanced by removing these three cases from the sample.

Response: The reviewer addresses an important point, and we acknowledge that our sample primarily consists of participants who (eventually) accessed formal care. To set the readers’ expectations from the beginning we added a description of the sample to the abstract and we rephrased a sentence in the introduction to clarify that we focused on the search for professional help. The text now reads as follows:

Abstract:

“Our sample consisted mainly of adolescents who eventually found their way to professional help.” (page 2)

Introduction:

“The aim of the current qualitative study is to investigate which facilitating factors and barriers play a role in the search for professional help of depressed adolescents and young adults aged 16 to 24 years, using in-depth semi-structured individual interviews.” (page 5)

In the Methods section we now refer to the help-seeking framework of Rickwood and Thomas (2012) which clarifies the focus of our study (see Reviewer 1, point 6). The underrepresentation of adolescents who did not receive help is a limitation in our study and we now elaborate on this in greater detail in the discussion (see Reviewer 1, point 7). Although we do understand the reviewer’s suggestion, after discussion in our research group we decided not to remove the 3 participants who did not receive help from our sample, because a) we think they are a valuable addition to our findings because they bring a different, valuable, perspective, b) the inclusion criteria for our study and research question was focused on adolescents with all degrees of depressive symptomatology, who received help or who did not (yet) receive help. Unfortunately our sample was not as diverse on this point as we would have hoped, on which we reflect in the discussion. Further research on this specific subgroup is important, and we added a recommendation on this subject to the discussion (see Reviewer 1, point 7).

10. Major: Barriers and facilitators to youth mental health treatment access are a relatively well-researched area, as demonstrated by a recently published systematic review on the topic that the authors may want to reference (Aguirre Velasco et al., 2020). The authors helpfully explain how they seek to add to existing research. It would be helpful to comment specifically on how this work adds to a study by Martínez-Hernáez et al (2014), which involved 105 in-depth interviews with depressed youth about barriers to professional help-seeking.

Response: We would like to thank the reviewer for these valuable suggestions. We added the recent systematic review of Aguirre Velasco et al. (2020) to the literature in our introduction. We also added the article of Martínez-Hernáez et al. (2014) to the introduction to complete the overview of previous research on this topic. For specifications on how the text has been changed, see point 8 of reviewer #1.

Our study adds to the article of Martínez-Hernáez et al. by not only focusing on barriers but also (specifically) on facilitators of the help-seeking process. Insight into facilitators provides additional information on what can be improved in adolescents’ and young adults’ access to mental health care. As suggested, we added a comparison to the article of Martínez-Hernáez et al. (2014) in our Discussion:

Discussion (page 22):

“This study adds to the literature because contrary to previous studies focusing primarily on barriers (24–26,42,43) there was specific attention for facilitating factors, yielding valuable additional information on adolescents’ and young adults’ pathways to professional mental health care.”

Strengths & Limitations (page 25):

“Furthermore, in addition to previous qualitative studies focussing on barriers (24–26,42,43), our study paid specific attention to facilitators of the help-seeking process as well.”

11. Major: In the discussion, the authors provide some thoughtful suggestions for how access may be facilitated, but it would be helpful to contextualise these ideas with reference to current debates and initiatives in the field, (e.g., see Aguirre Velasco et al., for a review of interventions). It appears that an implicit assumption is made that the supply of treatment resources is sufficient to meet the demand from youth who do not currently seek help. This may, however, not be the case in all contexts. Even in countries with well-developed mental health systems, waiting times are high and a major barrier to access (see Edbrooke-Childs and colleagues 2020). This could be acknowledged and discussed. Similarly, the authors could expand on what systems of care are most likely to mitigate the identified access barriers (e.g., integrated care pathways, stepped care models, needs-based care delivery).

Response: We appreciate this recommendation. Part of the section on ‘Practical implications’ has been rewritten according to the reviewers’ suggestions: (page 26-27):

“Previous research has found promising effects from education and awareness programmes on mental health literacy, help-seeking behaviour or intention to seek help and stigma reduction (59–63), using different methods including psycho-education and (video) presentations with former patients.” (page 26)

“Peer leading interventions have been developed previously and shown a positive effect (61) on referring suicidal peers for adult support.” (page 27)

“Furthermore, in our sample waiting time appeared to be a problem. This is in accordance with previous research (62,63) and indicates that the number of young adults in need of treatment exceeds the available treatment resources. This problem needs particular attention from policy makers and governments, and suggests that rearrangement of treatment resources for youngsters might be necessary. One of the most promising approaches to facilitate access to care seems to be the provision of basic mental health care in schools (58,64). This could be considered a form of stepped care, where school counselors and psychologists function as primary support for distressed adolescents.” (page 27)

Specific suggestions

Introduction:

12. *Line 52-53: (minor): “Furthermore, in this age group, depression and other mental disorders are by far the most important causes of disability (2)” – Consider providing an updated reference – e.g., the 2019 WHO fact sheet on adolescent mental health: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/adolescent-mental-health).

Response: We thank the reviewer for this suggestion. We updated this reference in our manuscript (page 3, line 55).

13. *Line 81-83 (minor): The authors state that quantitative research does not capture the “specific personal information, required to be able to fully understand the specific pathways of facilitating factors in help-seeking”. – Arguably, quantitative analysis can assess whether specific personal factors (e.g., demographic and clinical characteristics) predict service use. It cannot, however, provide thick narrative descriptions of how different factors or barriers influence service use. McLeod 2011 provides a thorough rationale for using qualitative research methods that may be helpful to reference.

Response: We agree and have rephrased this sentence. We also strengthened our rationale for qualitative research with the reference of McLeod, 2011.The new text is as follows (page 4):

“A downside to these research designs might be that narrative descriptions, required to be able to fully understand the specific pathways of facilitating factors in help-seeking, might be missed. Qualitative research is specifically intended to promote the growth of understanding, rather than to collect factual knowledge and causal explanations (McLeod, 2011). No previous research uses in-depth individual interviewing to study barriers and specifically facilitators within the help-seeking process of adolescents with depressive symptomatology.”

Methods:

14. *(major): Line 99-100: Some additional information on the educational and mental health care institutions from which participants were recruited would be helpful. Were these high schools? Universities? Were mental health care institutions public or private? Were they outpatient or inpatient services?

Response: We agree with the reviewer and understand that the Dutch school system may be confusing for readers from other countries, and hence, that a clear description of educational attainment is required. However, direct comparison of the Dutch educational system to other (e.g. British or American) systems is challenging. In our sample, multiple MBO’s were approached for inclusion, which is vocational education at various levels (varying from 1 to 4 years duration). Higher education in The Netherlands can be categorized into two types of institutions, so-called ‘hogescholen’ and universities. The former include education in a particular field with a practical focus, whereas universities are academic institutions. More information can also be found on https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Education_in_the_Netherlands.

The affiliated mental health care institutions were public, and patients were recruited from outpatient settings only.

More detailed information on both the educational and mental health care institutions from which participants were recruited is added to the Methods section in order to provide the necessary clarification, on page 5 :

“Educational institutions included secondary vocational schools and three institutions for higher education of which one university. Participating mental health care institutions were public, outpatient mental health care centres.”

15. *Line 122-123 (minor): “Interviews were guided by a topic list, which was developed based on both literature and expert opinion” – please elaborate what is meant by ‘expert opinion’ and what process was used to obtain this.

Response: We appreciate this remark from the reviewer and would like to clarify the process. After a draft version of the topic list was created using relevant literature, this draft version was discussed with experts from the field (including mental health care professionals and an educational counsellor, the research group and a client panel of two patients) for further fine-tuning and was adjusted in accordance with their remarks. The topic list was further updated during the process of data collection.

An clarification of the process has been added to the Methods section, on page 6:

“Interviews were guided by a topic list, which was developed based on both literature and expert opinion. After a draft version of the topic list was created using relevant literature, it was discussed with experts from the field (including mental health care professionals, an educational counsellor, the research group and a client panel of two patients) for further fine-tuning and was adjusted accordingly.”

16. *Line 143 (major): “Data analysis was conducted using thematic content analysis”. Thematic analysis and content analysis may be considered to form two separate analytic approaches (see e.g. Joffe 2011). The authors reference a seminal guide to thematic analysis by Braun and Clark, and it is not clear why they call their approach thematic content analysis, rather than just thematic analysis. Clarification would be helpful. In Lines 151-156, the explanation of the coding process would benefit from review and refinement to clarify the sequence by which the authors identified overarching themes as well as more specific codes nested within each theme.

Response: We understand the confusion of the reviewer regarding this point, and realize the text is not clear. The reviewer is correct that we reference Braun and Clarke (2006) who use the term thematic analysis, and this has been altered in the text on page (7). Different authors use different terminology (e.g. ’thematic content analysis’ is used by Green & Thorogood) which might have caused confusion.

Furthermore, more detailed information on the coding process has been added to the Methods section. The first interviews were carefully read and then manually coded by two independent interviewers. Differences were discussed until consensus was reached. Then, a preliminary thematic map was developed based on these first interviews and discussed in a small research team (RW, MvM, AM). The thematic map was further updated and adapted after every two or three new interviews in an iterative process by four of the researchers. The main themes from the initial thematic map were then discussed amongst the coders and the research team and further reviewed and adjusted in subsequent meetings resulting in a final thematic map with the main themes. We added the following text to the Methods section on page 8:

“A preliminary thematic map was developed by two interviewers (RW, MvM) based on the first independently coded interviews and discussed in a small research team (RW, MvM, AM). The thematic map was further updated and adapted after every two or three new interviews in an iterative process by four of the interviewers (RW, EE, MvM, AIM). The main themes from the initial thematic map, differences and similarities between cases and possible explanations were then discussed amongst the coders and the research team (consisting of two psychiatrists (AvB, NB), one qualitative researcher (MW), one psychologist (AM) plus the aforementioned interviewers), and further reviewed and adjusted in subsequent meetings resulting in a final thematic map including the main themes..”

17. *Table 1 (minor): To protect confidentiality, the authors may want to consider grouping participants’ countries of origin. See also lines 342-346 where identification of specific countries may not be necessary (regions could be stated instead).

Response: We thank the reviewer for this thoughtful suggestion.To protect confidentiality we regrouped participants by geographical subregion (in line with the United Nations geoscheme). In Table 1 and in paragraph 4.3 (Stigma and cultural influences, page 18) all countries have been removed and replaced by geographical subregion.

Results:

18. *Table 2 (minor): The authors state here “Not noticing problems in academic performance hindered help-seeking (b)”. The narrative discussion however suggests that some youth did not have academic performance issues, and therefore did not notice their mental health difficulties (rather than not noticing academic issues).

Response: We thank the reviewer for noticing this and we now see this is not clear from our text. To be complete we changed the text in Table 2 (page 10) to “Not noticing or not experiencing problems in academic performance hindered help-seeking (b)”.

Discussion

19. *Line 408 (minor): “Individual malfunctioning – such as poor academic performance, physical symptoms, and mental distress – was often a prompt for help-seeking” – Malfunctioning may be perceived as a stigmatising term – functioning may be more neutral. Note that physical symptoms and mental distress can be distinguished conceptually from daily functioning, which refers to a young person’s ability to meet age appropriate role demands, and may be impaired by symptoms (see e.g., Rapee et al. 2012).

Response: We agree with the reviewer and changed ‘individual malfunctioning’ in ‘individual functioning’. Furthermore, we replaced the name of the main theme ‘individual functioning’ by ‘individual functioning and well-being’ throughout the manuscript to more adequately reflect the content of this theme.

20. *Line 490 (minor): “Furthermore, a focus on adolescents and young adults aged 16-24 years is relatively uncommon” – the recent review by Aguirre Velasco, et al 2020 suggests that this broad age range has been covered by a number of studies. Consider rephrasing.

Response: Taking into account the reviewer’s remark and the recent review by Aguirre Velasco et al., we removed this sentence from the ‘Strengths & Limitations’ section (page 25).

21. *Line 491 (minor): Typo in the reference.

Response: Since this sentence was removed from the text (see point 20), the typo was removed as well.

22. *Line 492 (minor): The authors describe their qualitative sample as “extensive”. This may be misleading, as the sample is small compared with quantitative research, although sizeable for a qualitative study. Consider rephrasing.

Response: We agree with the reviewer and rephrased this sentence (page 25):

“Another strength of the study is the, for qualitative research standards, sizeable sample consisting of 32 participants who were recruited in various contexts”

Conclusion:

23. (minor) Ensure consistent wording is used to refer to the five key themes in the Abstract, Results, Discussion, and Conclusions.

Response: We made sure that the words we used for the main themes were consistent throughout the manuscript. This resulted in consistently referring to the five key themes in the same way and order as in this part of the abstract (page 2):

“Five main themes in help-seeking by adolescents and young adults were identified: (I) Individual functioning and well-being, (II) Health literacy, (III) Attitudinal aspects, (IV) Surroundings, and (V) Accessibility.”

References

Aguirre Velasco, A., Cruz, I. S. S., Billings, J., Jimenez, M., & Rowe, S. (2020). What are the barriers, facilitators and interventions targeting help-seeking behaviours for common mental health problems in adolescents? A systematic review. BMC Psychiatry, 20(1), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12888-020-02659-0

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa

King K, Strunk C, S. M. (2011). Preliminary effectiveness of surviving the teens® suicide prevention and depression awareness program on adolescents’ Suicidality and self-efficacy in performing help-seeking behaviors. J School Health Am School Health Assoc., 81, 581–590.

Martínez-Hernáez, A., DiGiacomo, S. M., Carceller-Maicas, N., Correa-Urquiza, M., & Martorell-Poveda, M. A. (2014). Non-professional-help-seeking among young people with depression: A qualitative study. BMC Psychiatry, 14, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-244X-14-124

McLeod, J. (2011). Qualitative research in counselling and psychotherapy. SAGE Publications Ltd. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781849209663

Rickwood D, Cavanagh S, Curtis L, S. R. (2004). Educating young people about mental health and mental illness: evaluating a school-based programme. Int J Ment Health Promot, 6(4), 23–32.

Rickwood, D., & Thomas, K. (2012). Conceptual measurement framework for help-seeking for mental health problems. Psychology Research and Behavior Management, 5, 173–183. https://doi.org/10.2147/PRBM.S38707

Robinson J, Gook S, Yuen HP, Hughes A, Dodd S, Bapat S, Y. A. (2010). Depression education and identification in schools: an Australian-based study. Sch Ment Heal, 2, 13–22.

Saporito, J. M. (2009). Reducing stigma toward seeking mental health treatment. Dissertation Abstracts International: Section B: The Sciences and Engineering, 70(6-B), 3794.

Strunk CM, Sorter MT, Ossege J, K. K. (2014). Emotionally troubled teens’ help- seeking behaviors: an evaluation of surviving the teens (R) suicide prevention and depression awareness program. J Sch Nurs, 30(5), 366–375. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/1059840513511494

Wyman P, Hendricks Brown C, LoMurray M, Schmeelk-Cone K, Petrova M, Yu Q, Walsh E, Tu X, W. W. (2010). An outcome evaluation of the sources of strength suicide prevention program delivered by adolescent peer leaders in high schools. American Journal of Public Health, 100(9), 1653–1661.

Attachment

Submitted filename: Response to Reviewers.docx

Decision Letter 1

Therese van Amelsvoort

14 Jan 2021

PONE-D-20-29462R1

Facilitating factors and barriers in help-seeking behaviour in adolescents and young adults with depressive symptoms: a qualitative study

PLOS ONE

Dear Dr. Eigenhuis,

Thank you for submitting your manuscript to PLOS ONE. After careful consideration, we feel that it has merit but does not fully meet PLOS ONE’s publication criteria as it currently stands. Therefore, we invite you to submit a revised version of the manuscript that addresses the points raised during the review process. One of the reviewers still has some outstanding questions that need to be answered.

Please submit your revised manuscript by Feb 28 2021 11:59PM. If you will need more time than this to complete your revisions, please reply to this message or contact the journal office at plosone@plos.org. When you're ready to submit your revision, log on to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/ and select the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder to locate your manuscript file.

Please include the following items when submitting your revised manuscript:

  • A rebuttal letter that responds to each point raised by the academic editor and reviewer(s). You should upload this letter as a separate file labeled 'Response to Reviewers'.

  • A marked-up copy of your manuscript that highlights changes made to the original version. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Revised Manuscript with Track Changes'.

  • An unmarked version of your revised paper without tracked changes. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Manuscript'.

If you would like to make changes to your financial disclosure, please include your updated statement in your cover letter. Guidelines for resubmitting your figure files are available below the reviewer comments at the end of this letter.

If applicable, we recommend that you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io to enhance the reproducibility of your results. Protocols.io assigns your protocol its own identifier (DOI) so that it can be cited independently in the future. For instructions see: http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submission-guidelines#loc-laboratory-protocols

We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript.

Kind regards,

Therese van Amelsvoort

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

[Note: HTML markup is below. Please do not edit.]

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. If the authors have adequately addressed your comments raised in a previous round of review and you feel that this manuscript is now acceptable for publication, you may indicate that here to bypass the “Comments to the Author” section, enter your conflict of interest statement in the “Confidential to Editor” section, and submit your "Accept" recommendation.

Reviewer #2: (No Response)

**********

2. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented.

Reviewer #2: Partly

**********

3. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #2: N/A

**********

4. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

5. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

6. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #2: I thank the authors for their thorough and helpful response letter. The discussion of additional research in the introduction is helpful, and the additions to the limitations and implications sections strengthen the paper. However, I have some concerns about the conceptual integrity and clarity of the paper as currently presented, and believe further clarifications are needed.

Reviewer #1 suggested that “The [five help-seeking] themes could be strengthened by using (and adding to) a conceptual help-seeking framework (eg, Rickwood et al 2012) so that the terminology and findings can be compared across studies.”

In response to this suggestion, the authors now state that the study was informed by the help-seeking framework by Rickwood and Thomas (2012):

“In terms of the conceptual measurement framework from Rickwood and Thomas (22), this study focused on all three Process aspects (Orientation, Intention and Behaviour), in a broad time frame (Ever), from Formal help sources (Source), in participants with a specific syndrome type, i.e. depressive symptoms (Concern). Information on all types of help (Type) was gathered, with a specific focus on information and treatment.”

However, it remains unclear how exactly the framework did inform the paper. The authors state that the study focused “on all three Process aspects of help-seeking behaviour (Orientation, Intention and Behaviour)” (p. 22, line 442), but there is no explicit discussion of these three process aspects either in the findings or discussion section, and they also do not appear in the coding frame (Table 2). More generally, it does not seem that the authors used the framework to structure the discussion of findings, or their contextualisation within existing literature, as suggested by reviewer #1. As such, the Rickwood framework appears to be an afterthought, rather than a conceptual backbone. I might suggest that the authors engage with the framework more thoroughly and meaningfully, in line with the suggestions made by Reviewer #1. Alternatively, the authors could consider removing reference to the framework altogether. I might avoid a middle ground that may appear tokenistic and could undermine the paper’s credibility. If the authors decide to maintain reference to the conceptual framework, it would be helpful to (a) introduce its key constructs and dimensions in the introduction, (b) clarify that it did not inform the study design (e.g., design of the topic guide; design of the coding frame), (c) state more explicitly how it informed the paper.

In the Methods, the authors have helpfully expanded on the coding process. In addition, it would be helpful to state explicitly whether the coding process and creation of the thematic map was inductive, or informed by an existing coding frame (such as the framework by Rickwood and Thomas for example).

At the start of the findings section, it might be helpful to introduce the five key help-seeking themes identified by the authors, rather than focusing just on the distinction between processes centred within the individual and externally focused processes. It is not entirely clear what value this additional taxonomic layer adds, in addition to the five help-seeking themes, and how this layer relates to the process aspects described by the Rickwood and Thomas framework (i.e., Orientation, Intention and Behaviour). Clarification would be helpful.

Table 3 contains reference to Moroccan parents. The authors may want to adjust to “North Africa” for consistency with the remainder of the paper.

In several parts of the discussion (twice on page 23), the authors now state that “individual functioning and wellbeing – such as poor academic performance, physical symptoms, and mental distress – was often a prompt for help-seeking". The authors may want to clarify that it was impairment or a deterioration in functioning and wellbeing that prompted help-seeking.

**********

7. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #2: No

[NOTE: If reviewer comments were submitted as an attachment file, they will be attached to this email and accessible via the submission site. Please log into your account, locate the manuscript record, and check for the action link "View Attachments". If this link does not appear, there are no attachment files.]

While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com/. PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Registration is free. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email PLOS at figures@plos.org. Please note that Supporting Information files do not need this step.

PLoS One. 2021 Mar 8;16(3):e0247516. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0247516.r004

Author response to Decision Letter 1


5 Feb 2021

Prof. dr. T. van Amelsvoort

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

February 5, 2021

Subject: Revision “Facilitating factors and barriers in help-seeking behaviour in adolescents and young adults with depressive symptoms: a qualitative study” (PONE-D-20-29462R1).

Dear prof. dr. van Amelsvoort,

Thank you for reviewing our manuscript and for the opportunity to submit a revision. We appreciate the feedback from Reviewer #2 and have taken it into consideration.

Although we intend to comply with the requests of Reviewer #1 and Reviewer #2, we feel that the remarks about the integration of the conceptual framework are difficult to address in such a way that does justice to the suggestions and concerns of both reviewers.

After deliberation in our research group, we have chosen to integrate the framework as described in the Response to reviewers below. Hopefully, you will appreciate our proposed revision.

We believe that the manuscript has improved by incorporating the reviewers’ suggestions and hope you will consider it for publication in PLOS ONE.

Please feel free to contact us in case further clarifications are needed.

On behalf of all co-authors,

Yours sincerely,

Eline Eigenhuis and Ruth C. Waumans

Amsterdam UMC, location VUmc, Department of Psychiatry

GGZ inGeest

Oldenaller 1, 1081 HJ Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

E-mail: e.eigenhuis@ggzingeest.nl

Response to Reviewer #2:

Reviewer #2: I thank the authors for their thorough and helpful response letter. The discussion of additional research in the introduction is helpful, and the additions to the limitations and implications sections strengthen the paper. However, I have some concerns about the conceptual integrity and clarity of the paper as currently presented, and believe further clarifications are needed.

Reviewer #1 suggested that “The [five help-seeking] themes could be strengthened by using (and adding to) a conceptual help-seeking framework (eg, Rickwood et al 2012) so that the terminology and findings can be compared across studies.”

In response to this suggestion, the authors now state that the study was informed by the help-seeking framework by Rickwood and Thomas (2012):

“In terms of the conceptual measurement framework from Rickwood and Thomas (22), this study focused on all three Process aspects (Orientation, Intention and Behaviour), in a broad time frame (Ever), from Formal help sources (Source), in participants with a specific syndrome type, i.e. depressive symptoms (Concern). Information on all types of help (Type) was gathered, with a specific focus on information and treatment.”

However, it remains unclear how exactly the framework did inform the paper. The authors state that the study focused “on all three Process aspects of help-seeking behaviour (Orientation, Intention and Behaviour)” (p. 22, line 442), but there is no explicit discussion of these three process aspects either in the findings or discussion section, and they also do not appear in the coding frame (Table 2). More generally, it does not seem that the authors used the framework to structure the discussion of findings, or their contextualisation within existing literature, as suggested by reviewer #1. As such, the Rickwood framework appears to be an afterthought, rather than a conceptual backbone. I might suggest that the authors engage with the framework more thoroughly and meaningfully, in line with the suggestions made by Reviewer #1. Alternatively, the authors could consider removing reference to the framework altogether. I might avoid a middle ground that may appear tokenistic and could undermine the paper’s credibility. If the authors decide to maintain reference to the conceptual framework, it would be helpful to (a) introduce its key constructs and dimensions in the introduction, (b) clarify that it did not inform the study design (e.g., design of the topic guide; design of the coding frame), (c) state more explicitly how it informed the paper.

Response: We thank the reviewer for this important feedback. We endorse the remark from the reviewer that the framework has not been used to structure our findings or to form the coding tree, and as such was not part of the design of our study. We do however value the suggestion of Reviewer #1 to use a conceptual framework to structure findings in studies on help-seeking. After thorough discussion within our research group on how to follow up on the suggestions of both reviewers, we came to the conclusion that integrating the framework in this phase of the study does not match with the inductive design of our study. Therefore, we decided to remove the text about the framework from the Methods section.

However, we acknowledge the importance of conceptual consistency in order to enable comparison of findings across studies using a conceptual framework such as proposed by Rickwood and Thomas. The following text has therefore been added to the Discussion section (page 26):

“Previous research has shown that the literature on help-seeking behaviour comprises a variety of studies with different methodology, focus and outcomes, hampering direct comparison (22). In order to improve conceptual consistency, Rickwood and Thomas (22) presented a framework consisting of five aspects of help-seeking behaviour: Process (comprising the aspects of Orientation, Intention, Behaviour), Timeframe (i.e. past/next 4 weeks, past/next 12 months, Ever), Source (Formal help, Semi-formal help, Informal help, Self-Help), Type of help (Instrumental, Information, Affiliative, Emotional, Treatment) and Concern (General distress, Specific symptom types). Although we did not include this framework in the design of our study, our study can be categorised as focusing on all three Process aspects (Orientation, Intention and Behaviour) of help-seeking, in a broad time frame (Ever), from Formal help sources (Source), in participants with a specific syndrome type, i.e. depressive symptoms (Concern). Information on all types of help (Type) was gathered, with a specific focus on information and treatment. Future studies on help-seeking may use a conceptual framework such as described by Rickwood and Thomas (22) to increase homogeneity in study designs and comparability of the results.”

In the Methods, the authors have helpfully expanded on the coding process. In addition, it would be helpful to state explicitly whether the coding process and creation of the thematic map was inductive, or informed by an existing coding frame (such as the framework by Rickwood and Thomas for example).

Response: In order to clarify the process of data analysis, the text in the Methods section has been altered (page 7):

“Data analysis was conducted in an inductive manner using thematic analysis (41), focusing on participants’ perceived barriers and facilitators in treatment-seeking.”

At the start of the findings section, it might be helpful to introduce the five key help-seeking themes identified by the authors, rather than focusing just on the distinction between processes centred within the individual and externally focused processes. It is not entirely clear what value this additional taxonomic layer adds, in addition to the five help-seeking themes, and how this layer relates to the process aspects described by the Rickwood and Thomas framework (i.e., Orientation, Intention and Behaviour). Clarification would be helpful.

Response: We agree with the reviewer that the focus of the start of the results section should be on the five main themes and their introduction. The distinction between internal and external processes was therefore removed from our text and from Table 2. The text now reads (page 10):

“Analysis of the interviews generated five main themes with different barriers and facilitators for help-seeking. These main themes were (I) Individual functioning and well-being, (II) Health literacy, (III) Attitudinal aspects, (IV) Surroundings, and (V) Accessibility. A complete overview of the findings can be found in Table 2. The most important themes are explained below.”

Table 3 contains reference to Moroccan parents. The authors may want to adjust to “North Africa” for consistency with the remainder of the paper.

Response: We thank the reviewer for noticing this inconsistency. We changed the text in Table 3 to ‘parents originating from Northern Africa’.

In several parts of the discussion (twice on page 23), the authors now state that “individual functioning and wellbeing – such as poor academic performance, physical symptoms, and mental distress – was often a prompt for help-seeking". The authors may want to clarify that it was impairment or a deterioration in functioning and wellbeing that prompted help-seeking.

Response: We agree that the text could be clarified at this point. We added ‘impairment or a deterioration’ in two sentences of the discussion. The text now reads as follows (pages 22 & 23):

“Impairment or deterioration in individual functioning and well-being– such as poor academic performance, physical symptoms, and mental distress – was often a prompt for help-seeking, whereas good academic performance despite depressive symptoms could be a hindrance.”

And:

“Our finding that impairment or deterioration in individual functioning and well-being prompt treatment-seeking is in accordance with previous research in adolescents (24,32,44)”

Attachment

Submitted filename: Response to Reviewers.docx

Decision Letter 2

Therese van Amelsvoort

9 Feb 2021

Facilitating factors and barriers in help-seeking behaviour in adolescents and young adults with depressive symptoms: a qualitative study

PONE-D-20-29462R2

Dear Dr. Eigenhuis,

We’re pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been judged scientifically suitable for publication and will be formally accepted for publication once it meets all outstanding technical requirements.

Within one week, you’ll receive an e-mail detailing the required amendments. When these have been addressed, you’ll receive a formal acceptance letter and your manuscript will be scheduled for publication.

An invoice for payment will follow shortly after the formal acceptance. To ensure an efficient process, please log into Editorial Manager at http://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/, click the 'Update My Information' link at the top of the page, and double check that your user information is up-to-date. If you have any billing related questions, please contact our Author Billing department directly at authorbilling@plos.org.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please notify them about your upcoming paper to help maximize its impact. If they’ll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team as soon as possible -- no later than 48 hours after receiving the formal acceptance. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information, please contact onepress@plos.org.

Kind regards,

Therese van Amelsvoort

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Additional Editor Comments (optional):

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. If the authors have adequately addressed your comments raised in a previous round of review and you feel that this manuscript is now acceptable for publication, you may indicate that here to bypass the “Comments to the Author” section, enter your conflict of interest statement in the “Confidential to Editor” section, and submit your "Accept" recommendation.

Reviewer #2: All comments have been addressed

**********

2. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented.

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

3. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #2: N/A

**********

4. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

5. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

6. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #2: Thank you for the chance to review this manuscript one more time. The authors' decision to discuss the Rickwood and Thomas framework in the discussion section works well in my opinion, and strengthens the paper. I have no further comments and wish the authors well for disseminating their work.

**********

7. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #2: No

Acceptance letter

Therese van Amelsvoort

12 Feb 2021

PONE-D-20-29462R2

Facilitating factors and barriers in help-seeking behaviour in adolescents and young adults with depressive symptoms: a qualitative study

Dear Dr. Eigenhuis:

I'm pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been deemed suitable for publication in PLOS ONE. Congratulations! Your manuscript is now with our production department.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please let them know about your upcoming paper now to help maximize its impact. If they'll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team within the next 48 hours. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information please contact onepress@plos.org.

If we can help with anything else, please email us at plosone@plos.org.

Thank you for submitting your work to PLOS ONE and supporting open access.

Kind regards,

PLOS ONE Editorial Office Staff

on behalf of

Prof. Therese van Amelsvoort

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Associated Data

    This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

    Supplementary Materials

    Attachment

    Submitted filename: Response to Reviewers.docx

    Attachment

    Submitted filename: Response to Reviewers.docx

    Data Availability Statement

    Data cannot be shared publicly because according to European law (AVG) data containing potentially identifying or sensitive patient information are restricted. The data are available from the Institutional Data Access Committee of GGZ inGeest with reference to project AFBA 14-196 (contact: datamanagement@ggzingeest.nl) for researchers who meet the criteria for access to confidential data.


    Articles from PLoS ONE are provided here courtesy of PLOS

    RESOURCES