Skip to main content
PLOS One logoLink to PLOS One
. 2021 Feb 25;16(2):e0247723. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0247723

Degradation of benzo[a]pyrene by halophilic bacterial strain Staphylococcus haemoliticus strain 10SBZ1A

Alexis Nzila 1,*, Musa M Musa 2, Saravanan Sankara 1, Marwan Al-Momani 3, Lei Xiang 4, Qing X Li 5
Editor: Pankaj Kumar Arora6
PMCID: PMC7939701  PMID: 33630955

Abstract

The exploitation of petroleum oil generates a considerable amount of “produced water or petroleum waste effluent (PWE)” that is contaminated with polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs), including Benzo[a]pyrene (BaP). PWE is characterised by its high salinity, which can be as high as 30% NaCl, thus the exploitation of biodegradation to remove PAHs necessitates the use of active halophilic microbes. The strain 10SBZ1A was isolated from oil contaminated soils, by enrichment experiment in medium containing 10% NaCl (w/v). Homology analyses of 16S rRNA sequences identified 10SBZ1A as a Staphylococcus haemoliticus species, based on 99.99% homology (NCBI, accession number GI: MN388897). The strain could grow in the presence of 4–200 μmol l-1 of BaP as the sole source of carbon, with a doubling time of 17–42 h. This strain optimum conditions for growth were 37 oC, 10% NaCl (w/v) and pH 7, and under these conditions, it degraded BaP at a rate of 0.8 μmol l-1 per day. The strain 10SBZ1A actively degraded PAHs of lower molecular weights than that of BaP, including pyrene, phenanthrene, anthracene. This strain was also capable of removing 80% of BaP in the context of soil spiked with BaP (10 μmol l-1 in 100 g of soil) within 30 days. Finally, a metabolic pathway of BaP was proposed, based on the identified metabolites using liquid chromatography-high resolution tandem mass spectrometry. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first report of a halophilic BaP degrading bacterial strain at salinity > 5% NaCl.

Introduction

The exploitation of oil is associated with the generation of wastewater, also called produced water or petroleum waste effluent (PWE) or reservoir water, at a ratio of three barrels of PWE for one barrel of exploited oil. Based on an estimate of 90 million barrels of oil extracted daily, a staggering volume of more than 250 million barrels of PWE are daily generated worldwide [1]. PWE is hypersaline, up to 30% (w/v) NaCl, and is heavily contaminated with petroleum products [1, 2]. Other hypersaline environments contaminated with petroleum products can be industrial effluents and salt marshes [35].

These pollutants can be removed by bioremediation, a process that employs microorganisms to degrade toxic pollutants to harmless products, and when this process is complete, CO2 is generated as the end product. This strategy is environmentally safe and cost-effective. Thus, the exploitation of bioremediation in removing pollutants from PWE and salt marshes requires the use of halophiles, microbes that can actively thrive in media containing high salt concentrations.

Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) are classified as low molecular weight PAHs, containing three or less fused benzene rings such as naphthalene, anthracene and phenanthrene, and high molecular weight PAHs (HMW-PAHs), consisting of four or more fused benzene rings, such as pyrene and benzo[a]pyrene (BaP) [6]. The biodegradation of HMW-PAHs is challenging, the higher the number of rings, the more difficult it is to degrade [7]. Because of its high ring number, BaP is one of the most recalcitrant PAHs to degradation, thus, it persists longer in the environment, with its attendant toxicity. BaP is ranked as number 8 out of 275 chemicals on the priority list of hazardous environmental substances [8]. This compound is toxic to both marine flora and human, moreover, it is carcinogenic and can lead to developmental, neurological, reproductive and immunological toxicities [9, 10]. Thus, removal of this pollutant from the environment remains a priority.

Several studies have been dedicated on the degradation of PAHs by active non-halophilic microorganisms [1113]. Although most of this work has been devoted to PAHs containing up to four fused benzene rings, nevertheless, few microbes have been reported to degrade BaP in non-halophilic conditions, they include Sphingomonas yanoikuyae JA, Mycobacterium sp., Mycobacterium vanbaalenii, Stenotrophomonas maltophilia, Novosphingobium pentaromativorans, Mesoflavibacter zeaxanthinifaciens, Ochrobactrum sp., Bacillus licheniformis and Bacillus subtilis [1422].

The degradation of PAHs containing up to four fused benzene rings has also been reported in salinity conditions by various halophilic microbes [3, 23, 24]. However, reports are scanty on BaP degradation by halophilic microbes. Aruzahgan et al. reported a stain of Ochrobactrum sp. VP1 capable of using BaP as the sole source of carbon, in moderate salinity conditions of NaCl (3%, w/v) [25]. A consortium of bacteria (Achromobacter sp. AYS3, Marinobacter sp. AYS4 and Rhodanobacter sp. AYS5) has also been reported to degrade BaP in the presence of phenanthrene using the same salinity conditions (NaCl, 3%, w/v) [26]. To the best of our knowledge, so far, only one BaP-degrading strain, Ochrobactrum sp.VP1, has been reported to utilise BaP as a single strain, but in relatively low salinity of 3% (w/v).

As part of the current work, a halophilic bacterium capable of degrading BaP in the presence of 10% (w/v) NaCl has been isolated and characterised. The potential of this strain in removing BaP in contaminated soil samples has also been evaluated. BaP metabolites were investigated using high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC), coupled with high-resolution tandem mass spectrometry.

Materials and methods

Chemicals

Chemicals for the Luria-Bertani Broth (LB) culture medium were obtained from Difco (Lawrence, Kansas, USA). (NH4)2SO4, KH2PO4, CaCl2•7H2O, MgSO4•7H2O, Na2HPO4 and FeSO4•7H2O, BaP, pyrene, anthracene, phenanthrene, naphthalene, phthalic acid, salicylic acid, catechol; palmitic, oleic and stearic acids, were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA). Luria-Bertani Broth (LB) was purchased from Difco (Lawrence, Kansas, USA). All the chemicals were of analytical grades.

Microbial isolation

The isolation of bacteria that degrade BaP was carried out using soil contaminated from a filling petrol station, located at the King Fahd University of Petroleum & Minerals, Dhahra (Saudi Arabia). The enrichment culture was carried out in 50 ml Bushnell-Hass medium containing BaP (BH-BaP), which consists of (NH4)2SO4 (2.38 g), KH2PO4 (1.36 g), CaCl2•7H2O (10.69 g), MgSO4•7H2O (0.25 g), Na2HPO4 (1.42 g), FeSO4•7H2O (0.28 mg) per liter, and supplemented with 0.05% (w/v) [2 mmol l-1] of BaP as a sole carbon source and 1 g of contaminated soil. This Enrichment was carried out in 3 different salinity conditions, by adding 10, 15 and 20% NaCl (w/v) in the culture. The cultures were carried out at 37 oC, at 120 rpm for 3–4 weeks, and then transferred in a fresh culture medium (1/10, v/v) for 2–3 weeks. This step was replicated 4–5 times, until the growth of bacteria was observed. Bacterial colonies were separated using solid agar culture, prepared in BH-BaP medium (1%, w/v), and then incubated at 37 oC for 15–21 days. The purity of the isolated individual colonies was confirmed by another solid agar culture (in the same conditions), and thereafter, these colonies were cryopreserved in 15% (v/v) glycerol.

Bacterial count

Bacterial count was carried out in solid agar culture plate, prepared in rich LB medium (1%, w/v), containing NaCl at the optimum concentration of each tested strains. A series dilution of bacterial culture was prepared by a dilution of factor of 10, 100 and 1000, in BH medium. Therefore, one ml of each bacterial culture was spread separately in agar solid plates, and incubated at 37 oC. After 24H, plates that had clear colonies were counted, and the results were represented as colony forming units per ml (CFU ml-1).

Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) analysis

Bacteria were observed under the electron microscope JSM-T300 (JEOL, Japan), following by their fixation in formaldehyde (5%, v/v) for 12 h, a serial dehydration in 30%, 50%, 70%, 80%, 90% and 95% of ethanol, (v/v), and gold coating, according to a protocol described elsewhere [27].

Species identification

Species identification was carried out using 100ml of bacterial culture grown in LB rich medium. After 24H, the culture was centrifuged at 5000 g for 5 min at 4°C, and the corresponding pellet, which consisted of bacteria, was isolated. Thereafter, bacteria DNA was extracted and purified using Qiagen Powerfecal Kit (Hilden, Germany), following the user’s manual. The resulting purified DNA was subjected 16S rRNA gene amplification by PCR and sequencing, as described previously [28]. Around 1400 base pairs of 16S rRNA gene was amplified using Primers 27F AGAGTTTGATCMTGGCTCAG and 1492R CGGTTACCTTGTTACGACTT, and then sequenced using the primers 518F: CCAGCAGCCGCGGTAATACG and 518R: GTATTACCGCGGCTGCTGG, a Big Dye terminator cycle sequencing kit (Applied BioSystems, USA), and an automated DNA sequencer (Applied BioSystems model 3730XL, USA). The use of Basic Local Alignment Search Tool (BLAST), available at the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) database, permitted species identification.

Bacterial growth in the presence of PAHs and various hydrocarbon molecules, and effect of pH and salinity

To carry out these experiments, around 5×105 colony forming units (CFUs) of bacteria, which were pre-cultured in an LB medium, were then cultured in 50 ml BH medium containing BaP or other substrates. The polar substrates salicylic acid and catechol, and the aliphatic compounds were directly added to the medium, while non-polar substrates (BaP, pyrene, phenanthrene, naphthalene and anthracene) were dissolved first in dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO), prior to their addition in BH culture medium. Bacterial growth in the presence of BaP was also assessed at 30, 35, 40 and 45 oC; salinity of 0, 5, 10, 15 and 20% of NaCl (w/v), and pH 5, 6, 7, 8 and 9. CFU ml-1, which reflects bacterial counts, was employed as a measure of growth.

These counts were then fitted in the growth curves Qt = Qoe-kt equation, so as to compute the doubling time (dt). Qt and Qo represent the bacterial count at time t, and time 0 respectively, and k is the growth rate. The growth rate (k) was then used to compute dt values (in hours) according to the equation: dt = ln(2)/k. All experiments were carried out in duplicate.

Quantification of BaP

The quantification of the remaining BaP was carried over a period of 20 days, in a 100 ml containing 20 μmol l-1 BaP, as reported previously (Budiyanto et al. 2017). Around 100 ml culture samples were collected every 5 days, and the remaining BaP extracted using ethyl acetate (50 ml × 2), after sonication for 30 min. After dehydration with calcium chloride, the resulting organic layers were dried under vacuum, and then dissolved in 500 μl of chloroform, followed by gas chromatography mass spectrometry (GC-MS) analysis (GC, Agilent 6890N, MS, Agilent 5975B). A 5-point standard curve of BaP (4, 20, 100, 200, 400 μmol l-1) were used to assess the concentration of the remaining BaP, which were then fitted in the exponential decay equation Qt = Qoe-kt (Lu et al. 2014), for the computation of (k), representing the biodegradation rate.

Quantification of BaP utilisation in soil samples

Around 100 g of soil sample was spiked with 20 μmol of BaP, and placed in a 5 cm x 5 cm Petri dish. This soil was kept wet following an addition of around 5 ml of BH medium, at pH 7 and salinity 5%, and an approximate amount of 107 CFU was added, and then incubated at 37 oC. Control experiments were prepared in the same conditions, but without adding bacteria. At day 0, 15 and 30, each sample (from 5 cm x 5 cm Petri dish) was sonicated and extracted as explained in the previous section, and then subjected to GC (Agilent 7890A) equipped with a flame ionization detector (FID) for quantification.

Identification of metabolites by HPLC-MS/MS

Metabolites were identified following a 15-day bacterial culture in the presence of 4 mmol l-1 BaP. The medium was then extracted with ethyl acetate (300 ml × 2), and the organic layers was concentrated to around 200 ml, and extracted with 1.0 M sodium hydroxide (200 ml × 2). The resulting aqueous layer was neutralised with concentrated hydrochloric acid, then extracted with ethyl acetate (150 ml × 2). The organic layer was dried with sodium sulfate, and then evaporated under vacuum. The sample was dissolved in 2 ml of 30% (v/v) methanol in water before analysis using a Shimadzu Nexera Prominence LC, interfaced with an AB SCIEX X500 QTOF mass spectrometer. LC separation was conducted using an Agilent HC-C18 column (4.6×250 mm, Agilent, USA). Methanol and water were set as the mobile phase A and B, respectively. In the gradient program, the potential metabolites were eluted by a linear gradient of mobile phase B, with a flow rate of 1.0 ml/min. The mobile phase B started at 50%, increase to 95% at 60 min, and then back to 50% at 60.1 min (held for 4.9 min), with a total run time of 65 min. The ion source parameters were set as 300°C, 30, 60 psi, and 60s for ion source temperature, curtain gas, ion source gas 1, and ion source gas 2, respectively. To improve the chances of observing potential metabolites, both negative and positive TOFMS/MS scan modes were applied. In the negative scan mode, the typical TOFMS/MS parameters were as follows: ion spray voltage (IS), -4500 V; CAD gas, 7; TOF start mass, 50 Da; TOF start mass, 1000 Da; accumulation time, 0.15 s; declustering potential, -60 V; declustering potential spread, 0 V; collision energy, -10 V; collision energy spread, 0 V. Except ion spray voltage (IS, 5500 V), declustering potential (60 V), and collision energy (10 V), the other typical TOFMS/MS parameters in the positive scan mode were same with those in the negative scan mode.

Statistical analyses

One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA), t-test and a linear regression fitting model were employed to analyse the data, using MINITAB (Version 16, Coventry, UK). Pearson correlation coefficient was used to establish the data strength of linearity, and the p<0.05 was the level of significance in all tests.

Results

Enrichment, strain isolation and species identification

No bacterial growth was observed in the enrichment protocol with 15 and 20% NaCl salinity, in the presence of BaP as a sole carbon source. In the same condition, one single colony (10SBZ1A) grew at 10% NaCl. Under light microscope (40x-1000X), 10SBZ1A colony was white/cream, with circular form and flat with entire margins. These bacteria are Gram-positive, and electron microscopy shows that they have a coccus-shape, with about 1.2 μm diameter (S1 Fig).

Bacterial DNA was isolated and purified, and subjected to 16S rRNA gene sequencing for species identification. Using BLAST program for homology analysis of available 16S rRNA gene sequences in the NCBI database, this strain 10SBZ1A was identified as Staphylococcus haemoliticus, based on the threshold of 99% homology (NCBI accession number GI: MN388897.

Effect of BaP concentration on bacterial growth and BaP degradation

The effect of various concentrations of BaP (4, 20, 40, 100, 200, 400 μmol l-1) was assessed on the bacterial growth at pH 7, temperature 37 oC and salinity 10% NaCl. At BaP concentrations of 4–200 μmol l-1, the strain showed a rapid growth, reaching the maximum growth within 6–8 days, with the maximum count ranging between 107 and 108 CFU ml-1 (Fig 1). However, at 400 μmol.l-1, the bacterial growth rate decreases, as shown by the time delay at which the maximum growth was achieved, which was at day 15. This BaP inhibitory effect was also confirmed by the increase in the culture doubling time (dt) as the BaP concentration increases (Fig 2). At 4–40 μmol l-1, dt values were in the range of 17–24 h, and these values almost doubled at 100–400 μmol l-1. The single regression ANOVA showed the correlation between dt values and BaP concentrations is statistically significant (p<0.05), and it follows a linear equation dt = 20.83+0.0705×C (R2 = 0.78, where C is BaP concentration). All subsequent experiments were carried out at 40 μmol l-1 of BaP, unless otherwise stated.

Fig 1. Growth profile of Staphylococcus haemoliticus 1OSBZ1A strain in the presence of various concentrations of benzo(a)pyrene (BaP).

Fig 1

CFU represents colony forming unit.

Fig 2. Doubling time (dt, in hours) of culture of Staphylococcus heamolysis strain 10SBZ1A in the presence of various concentrations of Benzo(a)pyrene (BaP).

Fig 2

Effect pH on bacterial growth and BaP degradation

The ability of 10SBZ1A to degrade BaP was tested at pHs 5, 6, 7, 8, and 9, while the temperature was fixed at 37 oC, and salinity at 10% NaCl (Table 1). At pH 7, dt value was 21.49 ± 0.98, however, at other pH values, the rates of growth were so slow that dt could not be computed. Thus, this strain could actively degrade BaP in neutral medium (i.e., pH 7).

Table 1. Doubling time (dt, in hours) of the degradation of benzo(a)pyrene (BaP) by Staphylococcus haemoliticus strain 10SBZ1A, as a function of pH, temperature and salinity).

Conditions Doubling time (dt, h)
pH 5 NDa
6 ND
7 21.5 ± 1.0
8 ND
9 ND
Temperature 35 oC 28.5 ± 2.4b
37 oC 21.5 ± 1.0 b
40 oC 24.5 ± 1.0
45 oC ND
Salinity (% NaCl) 0 ND
5% 46.8 ± 7.4
10% 21.5 ± 1.0
15% 156 ± 74
20% ND

a Not determined due to slow growth rates.

b The difference of dt values were statistically significant (p < 0.05).

Effect of temperature on bacterial growth and BaP degradation

The effect of temperature on BaP degradation was evaluated at 35, 37, 40 and 45 oC (pH 7, salinity 10% NaCl) [Table 1]. Overall, dt fell in the range 21–29 h, and the temperature 37 oC corresponded to the smallest dt (21±1 h). Thus, 37 oC was considered the optimum for the degradation of BaP using the strain 10SBZ1A (Table 1), although these dt differences were statistically significant between 35 and 37 oC only (p<0.05).

Effect of salinity on bacterial growth and BaP degradation

The strain 10SBZ1A was isolated from a medium containing 10% NaCl (wt/v). To establish its salinity tolerance, its growth was assessed at 0, 5, 15 and 20% NaCl (while keeping the temperature at 37 oC and pH 7), and the results were compared with that obtained at 10% NaCl. No growth was observed at 0 and 20% NaCl. The highest growth rate, as measured by dt values (21±1 h), was observed at 10% NaCl, followed by a dt of 47±7 h at 5% NaCl and 156±74 h at 15% NaCl. Thus, these data show that the optimum salinity of S. haemolyticus is 10% NaCl, although these difference were not statistically significant (p>0.05).

Utilisation of others PAHs

The ability of the strain 10SBZ1A to degrade PAHs that are smaller than BaP, such as pyrene, phenanthrene, anthracene and naphthalene, was assessed, at pH 7, temperature 37 oC and salinity 10% NaCl. Monocyclic aromatic compounds salicylic acid and catechol were also included, along with the aliphatic and long chain palmitic, stearic, and oleic acids. All these substrates were assessed at 40 μmol l-1. As shown in Fig 3, overall, the ability of 10SBZ1A to degrade PAHs increases as the PAH ring number decreases. The dt of this strain in the presence of BaP was around 42 h, and although it is slightly similar to that with pyrene (a four-ring-containing PAH), however, this value decreases to 25–30 h for phenanthrene, anthracene, and naphthalene. The lowest dt value was associated with catechol (around 24 h) (Fig 3). A Significant linear correlation between dt values and the substrate’s number of aromatic rings was observed, and this correlation follows the linear equation: dt = 18.77+4.636×N (p <0.001, R2 = 66%) [N represents the number of rings].

Fig 3. Doubling time (dt, in hours) of a culture of Staphylococcus haemoliticus strain 10SBZ1A in the presence of benzo(a)pyrene (BaP), along with various aromatic substrates.

Fig 3

All substrates were used at 40 μmole.l-1.

The data also showed the higher efficiency of this strain to degrade long chain aliphatic acids compared to aromatic compounds. Indeed the dt for palmitic, oleic and stearic acids were 19±0.7, 17±0.9 and 15±0.8 h, respectively.

Degradation rate

The degradation profile shows that this strain degrades 50% of 20 μmol.l-1 BaP at day 12.5, and at day 25, almost 80% of BaP was degraded, leading to a BaP degradation rate of 0.8 μmol l-1.day-1 (Fig 4). Around 20% of abiotic degradation was observed (as indicated by the control). This degradation rate was more pronounced during the exponential phase of the bacterial growth.

Fig 4. Quantification of the remaining benzo[a]pyrene (BaP) in a culture of Staphylococcus haemoliticus strain 10SBZ1A.

Fig 4

Open circles represent the bacterial growth, and closed squares and closed triangles represent the control and the BaP degradation profiles, respectively.

In relation with soil samples spiked with BaP (20 μmol in 100g of soil), the use of this strain 10SBZ1A led to the degradation of 23% of BaP at day 15, and at day 30, 72% of BaP was removed, while in the control samples (soil without bacterial strains), the removal was around 18% only, after day 30.

BaP Metabolite identification

In an effort to identify the BaP metabolic pathway using the strain 10SBZ1A, we used reversed-phase HPLC to separate metabolites along with TOFMS/MS to analyse BaP metabolites. One of the identified metabolites, at retention time of 22.92 min, had [M+1]+ at m/z of 285.0909 with an elemental analysis of C20H12O2, which corresponds to a dihydroxybenzo[a]pyrene (dihydroxy-BaP) [Table 2, S2 Fig], as reported elsewhere [29]. Dihydrodiol-BaP and BaP-quinone were also detected. A metabolite was observed at a retention time of 24.8 min with [M+1]+ at m/z of 317.0811 that corresponds to C20H12O4; it showed a base peak at m/z of 299.0717 with elemental analysis of C20H11O3 (M+.– 17, loss of OH), and a fragment at m/z of 271.0763 with elemental analysis of C19H11O2 (M+.– 45, loss of CO2H). These fragmentations are consistent with 4,5-chrysene-dicarboxylic acid and 4-(8-hydroxypyren-7-yl)-2-oxobut-3-enoic acid or its isomer 4-(7-hydroxypyren-8-yl)-2-oxobut-3-enoic acid (Table 2, S2 Fig).

Table 2. High-resolution mass spectral data for BaP metabolites formed by Staphylococcus haemoliticus strain 10SBZ1A.

Metabolite Observed molecular ion mass (calculated) Retention time (min) Relative intensity Molecular formula Characteristics of major fragments (calculated)
Dihydroxy-BaP 285.0909 [M+1] (285.0916) 22.92 41 C20H12O2 C20H11O 267.0802 (267.0810) 73, C19H13O; 257.0954 (257.0966) 100
BaP-quinone 283.0756 [M+1] (283.0759) 26.55 93 C20H10O2 C19H11O 255.0814 (255.0810) 100; C18H10, 226.0783 (226.0782)
4,5-Chrysene-dicarboxylic acid or 4-(8-Hydroxypyren-7-yl)-2-oxobut-3-enoic acid or 4-(7-Hydroxypyren-8-yl)-2-oxobut-3-enoic acid 317.0811 [M+1] (317.0814) 24.89 9 C20H12O4 C20H11O3 299.0717 (299.0708) 100; C19H11O2 271.0763 (271.0759) 75.
10-Oxabenzo[def]chrysene-9-one or 7-Oxabenzo[def]chrysene-8-one 269.0607 [M-1] (269.0603) 24.87 71 C19H10O2 C19H10O, 254.0773 (254.0732) 43
4-Formylchrysene-5-carboxylic acid 299.0716 [M-1] (299.0708) 26.84 C20H12O3 C19H11O 255.0820 (255.0810) 100; C18H11 227.0871 (227.0861) 9

A metabolite was detected at retention time of 24.87 min with [M-1]- at m/z 269.0607 with an elemental analysis of C19H10O2, which corresponds to either 10-oxabenzo[def]chrysene-9-one or its isomer 7-oxabenzo[def]chrysene-8-one. This suggests that the detected dihydroxy-BaP could be 9,10-dihydroxy-BaP, which results in a ring opening at C9-C10, or 7,8-dihydroxy-BaP, which results in a ring opening at C7-C8; in both cases, a substituted pyrene is produced. A metabolite was observed at retention time of 26.84 min with [M-1]- at m/z 299.0716 with an elemental analysis of C20H12O3, a base peak at m/z of 255.0820 that corresponds to C19H11O2 (M+.– 45, loss of CO2H), and a fragment at m/z of 227.0861 [C18H11, M+.– 73, loss of CO2H and CO]. This fragmentation pattern is consistent with 4-formylchrysene-5-carboxylic acid, which indicates that the observed dihydroxy-BaP could be 4,5-dihydroxy-BaP.

Discussion

This study has led to the isolation of a S. heamoliticus, strain 10BZ1A strain, and bacteria belonging to Staphylococcus genera are known to degrade PAHs. For instance, the degradation of naphthalene and phenanthrene have been reported using Staphylococcus sp. [30, 31], and that of fluorene using Staphylococcus auricularis [32]. Likewise, a strain of Staphylococcus aureus was shown to grow in the presence of crude oil [33]. The current data show the ability of a bacterial species of this genus to degrade the HMW-PAH BaP. This study also showed that the increase in BaP concentration is associated with a decrease in 10BZ1A growth, which is consistent with previously reported studies. This includes anthracene using Bacillus licheniformis [34], and a co-culture of Ralstonia pickettii and Thermomonas haemolytica [28]; phenanthrene on a co-culture of Pseudomonas citronellolis and S. maltophilia [28]; anthracene and pyrene on Ochrobactrum sp. [25]; pyrene on Achromobacter xylosoxidans, and on the halophilic strains of Halomonas shengliensis and Halomonas smyrnensis [27, 35].

The results of this work also indicate that S. haemoliticus strain has an optimum pH of 7 in degrading BaP. Several reports indicate that the optimum pH range for the degradation of PAHs fall between 6 and 8, and the neutral pH being the most common [23, 36]. Nevertheless, efficient degradation of PAHs in acidic and alkaline conditions have also been reported [23]. So far, reports on active microorganisms degrading BaP has been centered at pH 7. In relation with temperature, several species of thermophilic bacteria have been reported to degrade PAHs at temperatures between 50 and 70 oC [37], however, limited work has been reported on BaP. A consortium of Geobacillus spp. and Thermus sp. could degrade BaP at 60–70 oC, but only if hexane was added as a growth substrate, a classical approach of cometabolism [6, 38]. So far, only one bacterial strain, the thermophilic Bacillus licheniformis M2-7, has been reported to degrade BaP as a sole substrate at 50 oC [22]. In the current work, the investigation on the temperature effect has shown the optimum range of 35–40 oC.

Bacteria of Staphyloccocus genus are known to be halotolerant, with an optimum range of 7.5–10% NaCl [39, 40]. Moreover, the strain 10SBZ1A grows at a similar salinity level, when cultured in the presence of BaP as a sole source of carbon. As stated earlier, several species of halophilic bacteria and archaea can degrade petroleum products, including PAHs such as naphthalene, phenanthrene, fluorene and pyrene [3, 23, 24, 41]. The degradation of BaP in saline conditions has been reported in the context of cometabolism (in the presence of phenanthrene), with the use of a consortium of bacteria (Achromobacter sp. AYS3, Marinobacter sp. AYS4 and Rhodanobacter sp. AYS5), in a medium containing 3–9% NaCl [26]. Recently, another consortium consisting of Ochrobactrum anthropi, Stenotrophomonas acidaminiphila, and Aeromonas salmonicida was shown to degrade BaP in seawater, which has a salinity level of about 3–5% NaCl [42]. So far, the use of a single strain for BaP degradation in halophilc conditions has only been reported once, using Ochrobactrum sp. VA1 strain [25]. However, careful analysis of these data showed that the tested NaCl concentrations were relatively low, 3% NaCl only [25]. The current work reports the isolation and characterisation of a single bacterial strain that can actively degrade BaP at high salinity of 10% NaCl.

In general, bacteria degrade PAHs in a stepwise ring-opening process, and the last aromatic intermediate being a mono-aromatic compound. As discussed earlier, the less complex the PAH is, the easier the degradation is. Thus, a bacterium that degrades a given PAH can also utilise a PAH of lower molecular weight [13]. The reported results confirmed that the lower the molecular weight of PAHs, the faster the degradation, and the aliphatic ones are more degradable that the aromatic ones. Thus, this strain could be used for the removal of both aliphatic and aromatic pollutants. The results of this investigation are also in agreement with reports indicating the ability of BaP-degrading bacteria to utilise PAHs of lower molecular weights, as it has been shown in Ochrobactrum sp. BAP5 [43], Ochrobactrum sp. VA1 [25], Hydrogenophaga PYR1 [44], Cellulosimicrobium cellulans CWS2 [45], Rhizobium tropici CIAT 899 [46], Klebsiella pneumonia PL1 [47] and Pseudomonas sp. JP1 [48].

The rate of BaP degradation using 10SBZ1A was compared to those reported in similar studies (which were all carried out using non-halophilic microbes), and these results are summarised in Fig 5. Of particular importance are studies 1–7 (Fig 5) that involved single bacterial strains, cultured in minimum mineral medium containing BaP as the sole source of carbon, as in the current study. In these studies, BaP degradation rates fell between 0.04–0.3 μmol l-1 day-1, and the rate reported in the current work falls within this range [17, 25, 43, 45, 4749]. Higher rates were reported, however, they were associated with the use of either a consortium of bacterial strains or rich culture medium (Studies 8–11, Fig 5) [21, 42, 46, 50]. Thus, in similar experimental conditions, the halophilic strain 10SBZ1A had a BaP degradation rate in the range of those of non-halophilic bacteria.

Fig 5. Values of degradation rates of benzo[a]pyrene (BaP) reported in various studies.

Fig 5

Studies A were cultures of single strains, in minimum mineral media (MM); studies B consisted of consortia of bacteria in MM or rich medium, or single bacterial strain but in rich media. References are listed in the text, in the Results/Discussions section.

Liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry analysis led to the identification of several metabolites, including dihydroxy-BaP and dihydrodiol-BaP. In aerobic condition, the first and the most important step in the degradation of aromatic compounds is the generation of dihydroxy-aromatic intermediates from the action of dioxygenase enzymes [1113]. For instance, this enzyme, owing to its central role in PAH degradation, has been used as genetic probe to track and identify pyrene-degrading bacteria in various environments [51, 52]. The metabolite, dihydroxy-BaP, reported in the current study, has also been identified in two bacterial strains, Beijerinckia B-836 as 9,10-dihydroxy-dihydroBaP [53], and Mycobacterium RJGII-135s as 7,8-dihydroxyBaP [54]. Following BaP dihydroxylation, ring opening will occur, generating derivatives of pyrene if dihydroxylation occurs at positions C7-C8 or C9-C10, or chrysene derivatives if it occurs at positions C4-C5. In the current study, the exact position of the dihydroxylation could not be resolved because of lack of reference metabolites, however, the identification of 4,5-chrysene-dicarboxylic acid, and that of 4-formylchrysene-5-carboxylic acid indicates that the dihydroxylation of BaP occurred at C4-C5. Chrysene analog 4,5-chrysene-dicarboxylic acid has been previously reported in Mycobacterium RJGII-135s [54]. Interestingly, in addition to chrysene derivatives, the pyrene intermediate 4-(8-hydroxypyren-7-yl)-2-oxobut-3-enoic acid (or its isomer 4-(7-hydroxypyren-8-yl)-2-oxobut-3-enoic acid) is a possible metabolite for BaP using the strain 10SBZ1A, indicating the ring opening option at C7-C8, thus BaP dihydroxylation of C7-C8 is not eliminated. It is worth mentioning that these two isomers and 4,5-chrysene-dicarboxylic acid have the same exact mass and have been reported to exhibit similar mass fragmentation pattern [54], which hamper their distinction from each other specially with lack of standards. BaP dihydroxylation can occur at more than one position, a feature that has already been reported [54, 55]. Based on the above analysis, we propose the BaP degradation pathways shown in Fig 6. Future investigations of metabolites that include the synthesis of specific metabolites is crucial to unravel more details about the metabolic pathway of BaP by the strain 10SBZ1A.

Fig 6. Propose pathways for the degradation of BaP by Staphylococcus haemoliticus strain 10SBZ1A.

Fig 6

*Compounds with identical exact molar mass. ** Compounds with identical exact molar mass.

Conclusion

Several investigations have been dedicated on the biodegradation of HMW-PAHs, including BaP, however most of that work has, so far, focused on the mesophilic bacteria. The current work reports, for the first, the isolation and characterisation of a bacterial strain that is capable to degrade BaP at saline concentration as high as 10% NaCl, in mineral culture medium and in soil samples. The strain can also degrade PAHs of lower molecular weight, along with aliphatic compounds, and was active at 37 oC and neutral pH. In addition, the report shows that this halophilic bacterium metabolises BaP through the typical aromatic-ring-hydroxylation dioxygenation, followed by ring opening, as it has been shown in many other PAH degrading bacteria. As discussed earlier, the degradation of PAH has been reported in several bacterial strains belonging to Staphylococcus genus, including the species S. aureus and S. auriculans, and in the current study, S. heamoliticus. Although these strains cannot be used in bioremediation of contaminated environments because of their medical importance, however they can be of use in deciphering the mechanisms of PAH degradation.

Supporting information

S1 Fig. Staphylococcus haemoliticus strain 10SBZ1A colony forms.

(A), from light microscope and [B], from scanning electron microscopy (SEM).

(TIF)

S2 Fig. Spectra of several Benzo(a)pyrene metabolites from Staphylococcus haemoliticus strain 10SBZ1A, using liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-Mass Spec).

(ZIP)

S1 Data

(XLSX)

Data Availability

All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting Information files.

Funding Statement

Alexis Nzila (King Fahd University of Petroleum and Minerals, KFUPM) would like to acknowledge the support of the Deanship of Scientific Research (DSR) at KFUPM, under grant IN171022. Qing Li (University of Hawaii, USA) acknowledges the support of the US Department of Agriculture, under USDA grant HAW5032-R, for high resolution liquid chromatography mass spectrometry analysis.

References

  • 1.Fakhru’l-Razi A, Pendashteh A, Abdullah LC, Biak DRA, Madaeni SS, Abidin ZZ. Review of technologies for oil and gas produced water treatment. Journal of Hazardous Materials. 2009. pp. 530–551. 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2009.05.044 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Igunnu ET, Chen GZ. Produced water treatment technologies. Int J Low-Carbon Technol. 2014;9: 157–177. 10.1093/ijlct/cts049 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Fathepure BZ. Recent studies in microbial degradation of petroleum hydrocarbons in hypersaline environments. Frontiers in Microbiology. 2014. 10.3389/fmicb.2014.00173 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Michel J, Rutherford N. Impacts, recovery rates, and treatment options for spilled oil in marshes. Mar Pollut Bull. 2014;82: 19–25. 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2014.03.030 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Lin Q, Mendelssohn IA, Graham SA, Hou A, Fleeger JW, Deis DR. Response of salt marshes to oiling from the Deepwater Horizon spill: Implications for plant growth, soil surface-erosion, and shoreline stability. Sci Total Environ. 2016;557–558: 369–377. 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.03.049 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Nzila A. Update on the cometabolism of organic pollutants by bacteria. Environ Pollut. 2013;178: 474–482. 10.1016/j.envpol.2013.03.042 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Arora PK. Bacilli-Mediated Degradation of Xenobiotic Compounds and Heavy Metals. Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology. 2020. p. 1100. Available: https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fbioe.2020.570307 10.3389/fbioe.2020.570307 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Atsdr. http://www.atsdr.cdc.gov/SPL/index.html. The priority list of hazardous substances that will be the subject of toxicological profiles. Access on 15 Oct 2019. 2011. Available: http://www.atsdr.cdc.gov/SPL/index.html
  • 9.Ramesh A, Archibong AE. Chapter 43—Reproductive toxicity of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons: occupational relevance. In: Gupta RC, editor. Reproductive and Developmental Toxicology. San Diego: Academic Press; 2011. pp. 577–591. 10.1016/B978-0-12-382032-7.10043-8 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Bostrom CE, Gerde P, Hanberg A, Jernstrom B, Johansson C, Kyrklund T, et al. Cancer risk assessment, indicators, and guidelines for polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in the ambient air. Env Heal Perspect. 2002/06/13. 2002;110 Suppl: 451–488. sc271_5_1835 [pii] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Kanaly RA, Harayama S. Advances in the field of high-molecular-weight polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon biodegradation by bacteriambt-130 136..164. Microbial Biotechnology. 2010. pp. 136–164. 10.1111/j.1751-7915.2009.00130.x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Seo J, Keum Y, Li QX. Bacterial Degradation of Aromatic Compounds. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2009;6: 278–309. 10.3390/ijerph6010278 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Ghosal D, Ghosh S, Dutta TK, Ahn Y. Current State of Knowledge in Microbial Degradation of Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAHs): A Review. Front Microbiol. 2016;7: 1369. 10.3389/fmicb.2016.01369 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Sohn JH, Kwon KK, Kang JH, Jung HB, Kim SJ. Novosphingobium pentaromativorans sp. nov., a high-molecular-mass polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon-degrading bacterium isolated from estuarine sediment. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2004/09/25. 2004;54: 1483–1487. 10.1099/ijs.0.02945-0 [pii] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Moody JD, Freeman JP, Cerniglia CE. Degradation of benz[a]anthracene by Mycobacterium vanbaalenii strain PYR-1. Biodegradation. 2005/05/04. 2005;16: 513–526. Available: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15865344 10.1007/s10532-004-7217-1 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Husain S. Literature Overview: Microbial Metabolism of High Molecular Weight Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons. Remediat J. 2008;18: 131–161. [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Rentz JA, Alvarez PJ, Schnoor JL. Benzo[a]pyrene degradation by Sphingomonas yanoikuyae JAR02. Env Pollut. 2007/05/08. 2008;151: 669–677. S0269-7491(07)00156-X [pii] 10.1016/j.envpol.2007.02.018 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Lily MK, Bahuguna A, Dangwal K, Garg V. Degradation of Benzo [a] Pyrene by a novel strain Bacillus subtilis BMT4i (MTCC 9447). Braz J Microbiol. 2009/10/01. 2009;40: 884–892. 10.1590/S1517-838220090004000020 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Wu Y, He T, Zhong M, Zhang Y, Li E, Huang T, et al. Isolation of marine benzo[a]pyrene-degrading Ochrobactrum sp. BAP5 and proteins characterization. J Env Sci. 2009/12/17. 2009;21: 1446–1451. Available: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20000001 10.1016/s1001-0742(08)62438-9 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Chen S, Yin H, Ye J, Peng H, Zhang N, He B. Effect of copper(II) on biodegradation of benzo[a]pyrene by Stenotrophomonas maltophilia. Chemosphere. 2012/11/13. 2013;90: 1811–1820. 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2012.09.009 [pii] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Okai M, Kihara I, Yokoyama Y, Ishida M, Urano N. Isolation and characterization of benzo[a]pyrene-degrading bacteria from the Tokyo Bay area and Tama River in Japan. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 2015/09/01. 2015;362: fnv143. 10.1093/femsle/fnv143 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Guevara-Luna J, Alvarez-Fitz P, Rios-Leal E, Acevedo-Quiroz M, Encarnacion-Guevara S, Moreno-Godinez ME, et al. Biotransformation of benzo[a]pyrene by the thermophilic bacterium Bacillus licheniformis M2-7. World J Microbiol Biotechnol. 2018/06/11. 2018;34: 88. 10.1007/s11274-018-2469-9 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Margesin R, Schinner F. Biodegradation and bioremediation of hydrocarbons in extreme environments. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology. 2001. pp. 650–663. 10.1007/s002530100701 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Martins LF, Peixoto RS. Biodegradation of petroleum hydrocarbons in hypersaline environments. Brazilian Journal of Microbiology. 2012. pp. 865–872. 10.1590/S1517-83822012000300003 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Arulazhagan P, Vasudevan N. Biodegradation of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons by a halotolerant bacterial strain Ochrobactrum sp. VA1. Mar Pollut Bull. 2011;62: 388–394. 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2010.09.020 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Arulazhagan P, Sivaraman C, Adish Kumar S, Aslam M, Rajesh Banu J. Co-metabolic degradation of benzo(e)pyrene by halophilic bacterial consortium at different saline conditions. J Environ Biol. 2014;35: 445–452. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Budiyanto F, Thukair A, Al-Momani M, Musa MM, Nzila A. Characterization of Halophilic Bacteria Capable of Efficiently Biodegrading the High-Molecular-Weight Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbon Pyrene. Environ Eng Sci. 2018;35. 10.1089/ees.2017.0244 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Nzila A, Sankara S, Al-Momani M, Musa Musa M, Musa MM. Isolation and characterisation of bacteria degrading polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons: phenanthrene and anthracene. Arch Env Prot. 2017;In press. 10.1515/aep-2016-0028 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.de Llasera MP, Olmos-Espejel J de J, Díaz-Flores G, Montaño-Montiel A. Biodegradation of benzo(a)pyrene by two freshwater microalgae Selenastrum capricornutum and Scenedesmus acutus: a comparative study useful for bioremediation. Environ Sci Pollut Res. 2016;23: 3365–3375. 10.1007/s11356-015-5576-2 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Zhuang WQ, Tay JH, Maszenan AM, Tay ST. Isolation of naphthalene-degrading bacteria from tropical marine sediments. Water Sci Technol. 2003/02/13. 2003;47: 303–308. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Mallick S, Chatterjee S, Dutta TK. A novel degradation pathway in the assimilation of phenanthrene by Staphylococcus sp. strain PN/Y via meta-cleavage of 2-hydroxy-1-naphthoic acid: formation of trans-2,3-dioxo-5-(2’-hydroxyphenyl)-pent-4-enoic acid. Microbiology. 2007/06/30. 2007;153: 2104–2115. 153/7/2104 [pii] 10.1099/mic.0.2006/004218-0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Monna L, Omori T, Kodama T. Microbial degradation of dibenzofuran, fluorene, and dibenzo-p-dioxin by Staphylococcus auriculans DBF63. Appl Env Microbiol. 1993/01/01. 1993;59: 285–289. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Ibrahim MM, Al-Turki A, Al-Sewedi D, Arif IA, El-Gaaly GA. Molecular application for identification of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons degrading bacteria (PAHD) species isolated from oil polluted soil in Dammam, Saud Arabia. Saudi J Biol Sci. 2015/08/20. 2015;22: 651–655. 10.1016/j.sjbs.2015.04.018 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Swaathy S, Kavitha V, Pravin AS, Mandal AB, Gnanamani A. Microbial surfactant mediated degradation of anthracene in aqueous phase by marine Bacillus licheniformis MTCC 5514. Biotechnol Reports. 2014;4: 161–170. 10.1016/j.btre.2014.10.004 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Nzila A, Ramirez CO, Musa MM, Sankara S, Basheer C, Li QX. Pyrene biodegradation and proteomic analysis in Achromobacter xylosoxidans, PY4 strain. Int Biodeterior Biodegrad. 2018;130. 10.1016/j.ibiod.2018.03.014 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Leahy JG, Colwell RR. Microbial degradation of hydrocarbons in the environment. Microbiol Rev. 1990;54: 305–315. Available: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC372779/ [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Nzila A. Biodegradation of high-molecular-weight polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons under anaerobic conditions: Overview of studies, proposed pathways and future perspectives. Env Pollut. 2018;239: 788–802. 10.1016/j.envpol.2018.04.074 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Feitkenhauer H, Märkl H. Biodegradation of aliphatic and aromatic hydrocarbons at high temperatures. Water Sci Technol. 2003;47: 123–130. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Ventosa A, Nieto JJ, Oren A. Biology of moderately halophilic aerobic bacteria. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev. 1998/06/10. 1998;62: 504–544. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Kim H-J, Oh S-W. Performance comparison of 5 selective media used to detect Staphylococcus aureus in foods. Food Sci Biotechnol. 2010;19: 1097–1101. 10.1007/s10068-010-0155-2 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Le Borgne S, Paniagua D, Vazquez-Duhalt R. Biodegradation of organic pollutants by halophilic bacteria and archaea. Journal of Molecular Microbiology and Biotechnology. 2008. pp. 74–92. 10.1159/000121323 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Aziz A, Agamuthu P, Alaribe FO, Fauziah SH. Biodegradation of benzo[a]pyrene by bacterial consortium isolated from mangrove sediment. Environ Technol. 2018;39: 527–535. 10.1080/09593330.2017.1305455 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Wu Y, He T, Zhong M, Zhang Y, Li E, Huang T, et al. Isolation of marine benzo[a]pyrene-degrading Ochrobactrum sp. BAP5 and proteins characterization. J Environ Sci. 2009/12/17. 2009;21: 1446–1451. 10.1016/s1001-0742(08)62438-9 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Yan Z, Zhang Y, Wu H, Yang M, Zhang H, Hao Z, et al. Isolation and characterization of a bacterial strain Hydrogenophaga sp. PYR1 for anaerobic pyrene and benzo[a]pyrene biodegradation. RSC Adv. 2017;7: 46690–46698. 10.1039/c7ra09274a [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Qin W, Fan F, Zhu Y, Huang X, Ding A, Liu X, et al. Anaerobic biodegradation of benzo(a)pyrene by a novel Cellulosimicrobium cellulans CWS2 isolated from polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon-contaminated soil. Braz J Microbiol. 2017/11/06. 2018;49: 258–268. 10.1016/j.bjm.2017.04.014 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Yessica G-P, Alejandro A, Ronald F-C, José AJ, Esperanza M-R, Samuel C-SJ, et al. Tolerance, growth and degradation of phenanthrene and benzo[a]pyrene by Rhizobium tropici CIAT 899 in liquid culture medium. Appl Soil Ecol. 2013;63: 105–111. 10.1016/j.apsoil.2012.09.010 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Ping L, Zhang C, Zhang C, Zhu Y, He H, Wu M, et al. Isolation and characterization of pyrene and benzo[a]pyrene-degrading Klebsiella pneumonia PL1 and its potential use in bioremediation. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2014;98: 3819–3828. 10.1007/s00253-013-5469-6 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Liang L, Song X, Kong J, Shen C, Huang T, Hu Z. Anaerobic biodegradation of high-molecular-weight polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons by a facultative anaerobe Pseudomonas sp. JP1. Biodegradation. 2014/08/06. 2014;25: 825–833. 10.1007/s10532-014-9702-5 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Hunter RD, Ekunwe SI, Dodor DE, Hwang HM, Ekunwe L. Bacillus subtilis is a potential degrader of pyrene and benzo[a]pyrene. Int J Env Res Public Heal. 2006/05/19. 2005;2: 267–271. Available: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16705827 10.3390/ijerph2005020010 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Guntupalli S, Thunuguntla VBSC, Santha Reddy M, IN K., Rao C V, Bondili JS. Enhanced Degradation of Carcinogenic PAHs Benzo (a) Pyrene and Benzo (k) Fluoranthene by a Microbial Consortia. Indian J Sci Technol. 2016;9: 35. 10.17485/ijst/2016/v9i35/93590 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Debruyn JM, Sayler GS. Microbial community structure and biodegradation activity of particle-associated bacteria in a coal tar contaminated creek. Env Sci Technol. 2009/06/19. 2009;43: 3047–3053. Available: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19534112 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.DeBruyn JM, Mead TJ, Sayler GS. Horizontal transfer of PAH catabolism genes in Mycobacterium: evidence from comparative genomics and isolated pyrene-degrading bacteria. Env Sci Technol. 2011/09/09. 2012;46: 99–106. 10.1021/es201607y [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Gibson DT, Mahadevan V, Jerina DM, Yogi H, Yeh HJ. Oxidation of the carcinogens benzo [a] pyrene and benzo [a] anthracene to dihydrodiols by a bacterium. Science (80-). 1975/07/25. 1975;189: 295–297. Available: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1145203 10.1126/science.1145203 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Schneider J, Grosser R, Jayasimhulu K, Xue W, Warshawsky D. Degradation of pyrene, benz[a]anthracene, and benzo[a]pyrene by Mycobacterium sp. strain RJGII-135, isolated from a former coal gasification site. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1996/01/01. 1996;62: 13–19. Available: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8572690 10.1128/AEM.62.1.13-19.1996 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Moody JD, Freeman JP, Fu PP, Cerniglia CE. Degradation of benzo[a]pyrene by Mycobacterium vanbaalenii PYR-1. Appl Env Microbiol. 2004/01/09. 2004;70: 340–345. Available: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/14711661 10.1128/aem.70.1.340-345.2004 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Decision Letter 0

Pankaj Kumar Arora

20 Jan 2021

PONE-D-20-38549

Degradation of benzo[a]pyrene by the halophilic bacterium strain Staphylococcus haemoliticus, 10SBZ1A

PLOS ONE

Dear Dr. Nzila,

Thank you for submitting your manuscript to PLOS ONE. After careful consideration, we feel that it has merit but does not fully meet PLOS ONE’s publication criteria as it currently stands. Therefore, we invite you to submit a revised version of the manuscript that addresses the points raised during the review process.

Please submit your revised manuscript by Feb 28 2021 11:59PM. If you will need more time than this to complete your revisions, please reply to this message or contact the journal office at plosone@plos.org. When you're ready to submit your revision, log on to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/ and select the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder to locate your manuscript file.

Please include the following items when submitting your revised manuscript:

  • A rebuttal letter that responds to each point raised by the academic editor and reviewer(s). You should upload this letter as a separate file labeled 'Response to Reviewers'.

  • A marked-up copy of your manuscript that highlights changes made to the original version. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Revised Manuscript with Track Changes'.

  • An unmarked version of your revised paper without tracked changes. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Manuscript'.

If you would like to make changes to your financial disclosure, please include your updated statement in your cover letter. Guidelines for resubmitting your figure files are available below the reviewer comments at the end of this letter.

If applicable, we recommend that you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io to enhance the reproducibility of your results. Protocols.io assigns your protocol its own identifier (DOI) so that it can be cited independently in the future. For instructions see: http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submission-guidelines#loc-laboratory-protocols

We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript.

Kind regards,

Pankaj Kumar Arora

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Journal Requirements:

When submitting your revision, we need you to address these additional requirements.

1. Please ensure that your manuscript meets PLOS ONE's style requirements, including those for file naming. The PLOS ONE style templates can be found at

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=wjVg/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_main_body.pdf and

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=ba62/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_title_authors_affiliations.pdf

2. We note that you have indicated that data from this study are available upon request. PLOS only allows data to be available upon request if there are legal or ethical restrictions on sharing data publicly. For more information on unacceptable data access restrictions, please see http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/data-availability#loc-unacceptable-data-access-restrictions.

In your revised cover letter, please address the following prompts:

a) If there are ethical or legal restrictions on sharing a de-identified data set, please explain them in detail (e.g., data contain potentially sensitive information, data are owned by a third-party organization, etc.) and who has imposed them (e.g., an ethics committee). Please also provide contact information for a data access committee, ethics committee, or other institutional body to which data requests may be sent.

b) If there are no restrictions, please upload the minimal anonymized data set necessary to replicate your study findings as either Supporting Information files or to a stable, public repository and provide us with the relevant URLs, DOIs, or accession numbers. For a list of acceptable repositories, please see http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/data-availability#loc-recommended-repositories.

We will update your Data Availability statement on your behalf to reflect the information you provide.

3. Please include a copy of Table 1 which you refer to in your text on page 10.

[Note: HTML markup is below. Please do not edit.]

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

2. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

3. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: No

**********

4. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

5. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #1: A halophilic BaP degradation strain was isolated, and its characteristics and a metabolic pathway of BaP was investigated and proposed. As the first report of a halophilic BaP degrading bacterial strain at salinity > 5% NaCl, this paper has some innovation. However, some details are still need to be addressed. Please follow the comments:

1. Abstract Line 42-43, Please carefully check the results of doubling time ‘2-10h’ and degradation rate ‘0.2 μmol/l’. It is inconsistent with the text.

2. Abstract Line 42-44, “The strain 10SBZ1A degraded BaP at a rate of 0.2 μmol/l per day” “The optimum conditions of growth were 37 ºC, 10% NaCl (w/v) and pH 7.” It’s better to change the order of the two sentences. It should be the degradation rate under optimum conditions.

3. Materials and methods Line 202-208, What’s the salinity of the soil sample? Please add the operation conditions of this experiment, including temperature, salinity, and pH.

4. Introduction Line 60-66, this part introduced the background of this study. I advise the authors to supply some references of benzo[a]pyrene as the main PAHs components existed in the produced water. In addition, some references are also needed to support the high salinity of PW, even up to 30% NaCl.

Reviewer #2: Comments:

1. Delete the word "the" from the title and there should be "bacterial" in place of "bacterium".

2. The end of the sentence is incomplete "and among them, Benzo[a]pyrene (BaP)" at Line No. 34-35. Rewrite.

3. Cite the following reference at the end of the sentenece "The biodegradation of HMW-PAHs is challenging........difficult it is to degrade": Arora (2020), doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2020.570307

4. Delete "also" from the sentence at Line no. 35.

5. Rephrase the sentence " that can reach up to 30% NaCl" at Lie No. 35-36.

6. There should be "organic contaminants" in place of "PAHs" at Line no. 75.

7. Mention the purity status of the followings: pyrene, anthracene, phenanthrene, naphthalene, phthalic

120 acid, salicylic acid, catechol; palmitic, oleic and stearic acids.

8. Write the model, make and country of origin for GC at Line No. 208.

9. Why the chromatograms of liquid chromatography-high resolution tandem mass spectrometry, gas chromatography-mass spectrometry and HPLC is not included in the main text. Include all these chromatogram and supporting information in the main text of the manuscript.

**********

6. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: No

[NOTE: If reviewer comments were submitted as an attachment file, they will be attached to this email and accessible via the submission site. Please log into your account, locate the manuscript record, and check for the action link "View Attachments". If this link does not appear, there are no attachment files.]

While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com/. PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Registration is free. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email PLOS at figures@plos.org. Please note that Supporting Information files do not need this step.

PLoS One. 2021 Feb 25;16(2):e0247723. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0247723.r002

Author response to Decision Letter 0


4 Feb 2021

A file has been uploaded.. in addition, below the same information

PONE-D-20-38549

Degradation of benzo[a]pyrene by the halophilic bacterium strain Staphylococcus haemoliticus, 10SBZ1A

PLOS ONE

POINT BY POINT RESPONSE TO THE REVIEWERS’ COMMENTS

1. Please ensure that your manuscript meets PLOS ONE's style requirements, including those for file naming. The PLOS ONE style templates can be found at

OUR RESPONSE: Our response: we have rechecked our manuscript about the style requirement

b) If there are no restrictions, please upload the minimal anonymized data set necessary to replicate your study findings as either Supporting Information files or to a stable, public repository and provide us with the relevant URLs, DOIs, or accession numbers. For a list of acceptable repositories, please see http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/data-availability#loc-recommended-repositories.

OUR RESPONSE: We have uploaded an excel file containing the necessary set of data to replicate our findings.

2. Please include a copy of Table 1 which you refer to in your text on page 10.

OUR RESPONSE: This has been an oversight, the Table has been added.

4. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available?

OUR RESPONSE: As mentioned earlier, we have uploaded an excel file containing the necessary set of data to replicate our findings.

Reviewer 1

1. Abstract Line 42-43, Please carefully check the results of doubling time ‘2-10h’ and degradation rate ‘0.2 μmol/l’. It is inconsistent with the text.

OUR RESPONSE: We thank the reviewer for this remark. Yes, there was inconsistency with the text and the figures. This has been changed accordingly.

2. Abstract Line 42-44, “The strain 10SBZ1A degraded BaP at a rate of 0.2 μmol/l per day” “The optimum conditions of growth were 37 ºC, 10% NaCl (w/v) and pH 7.” It’s better to change the order of the two sentences. It should be the degradation rate under optimum conditions.

OUR RESPONSE: We agree with the suggestion. Therefore we have changed the order of these 2 sentences.

3. Materials and methods Line 202-208, What’s the salinity of the soil sample? Please add the operation conditions of this experiment, including temperature, salinity, and pH.

Our response: The soil was not used dried. It was kept in the medium solution (BH), pH 7, salinity 5%. We have clarified this in the text.

4. Introduction Line 60-66, this part introduced the background of this study. I advise the authors to supply some references of benzo[a]pyrene as the main PAHs components existed in the produced water. In addition, some references are also needed to support the high salinity of PW, even up to 30% NaCl.

OUR RESPONSE: We quoted reference (Ref.1), that is relevant in relation with produced water (PW). In light of the reviewer comment, we have added an additional reference (Ref.2), and this reference provides information that PAHs are part of important pollutants found in PW.

Reviewer #2:

1. Delete the word "the" from the title and there should be "bacterial" in place of "bacterium".

OUR RESPONSE: Done

2. The end of the sentence is incomplete "and among them, Benzo[a]pyrene (BaP)" at Line No. 34-35. Rewrite.

OUR RESPONSE: We have removed “among them” and replace it with “including”. The sentence is not clearer.

3. Cite the following reference at the end of the sentence "The biodegradation of HMW-PAHs is challenging........difficult it is to degrade": Arora (2020), doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2020.570307

OUR RESPONSE: Done

4. Delete "also" from the sentence at Line no. 35.

OUR RESPONSE: Done

5. Rephrase the sentence " that can reach up to 30% NaCl" at Lie No. 35-36.

OUR RESPONSE: This has been done, by replacing" that can reach up to 30% NaCl" by “which can be as high as 30% NaCl”

6. There should be "organic contaminants" in place of "PAHs" at Line no. 75.

OUR RESPONSE: In this sentence, we are referring to a specific type of the organic pollutants, which are PAHs. Thus, replacing PAHs will make the sentence not clear.. So we suggest to keep it.

7. Mention the purity status of the followings: pyrene, anthracene, phenanthrene, naphthalene, phthalic

120 acid, salicylic acid, catechol; palmitic, oleic and stearic acids.

OUR RESPONSE: All chemicals were of HPLC, analytical grades. We have added this information in the text.

8. Write the model, make and country of origin for GC at Line No. 208.

OUR RESPONSE: We have provided the necessary additional information of the GC equipment we have used

9. Why the chromatograms of liquid chromatography-high resolution tandem mass spectrometry, gas chromatography-mass spectrometry and HPLC is not included in the main text. Include all these chromatogram and supporting information in the main text of the manuscript.

Our response: This information has been added as Supplementary material. Adding this information in the text is going to make it unnecessary long. Such information is appropriate to be added as Supplementary material.. Thus, for the conciseness of the manuscript, we suggest to keep it as Supplementary material.

END DOCUMENT

Attachment

Submitted filename: Response to Reviewer_PONE-D-20-38549_.docx

Decision Letter 1

Pankaj Kumar Arora

8 Feb 2021

PONE-D-20-38549R1

Degradation of benzo[a]pyrene by halophilic bacterial strain Staphylococcus haemoliticus, 10SBZ1A

PLOS ONE

Dear Dr. Nzila,

Thank you for submitting your manuscript to PLOS ONE. After careful consideration, we feel that it has merit but does not fully meet PLOS ONE’s publication criteria as it currently stands. Therefore, we invite you to submit a revised version of the manuscript that addresses the points raised during the review process.

Please submit your revised manuscript by Mar 25 2021 11:59PM. If you will need more time than this to complete your revisions, please reply to this message or contact the journal office at plosone@plos.org. When you're ready to submit your revision, log on to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/ and select the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder to locate your manuscript file.

Please include the following items when submitting your revised manuscript:

  • A rebuttal letter that responds to each point raised by the academic editor and reviewer(s). You should upload this letter as a separate file labeled 'Response to Reviewers'.

  • A marked-up copy of your manuscript that highlights changes made to the original version. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Revised Manuscript with Track Changes'.

  • An unmarked version of your revised paper without tracked changes. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Manuscript'.

If you would like to make changes to your financial disclosure, please include your updated statement in your cover letter. Guidelines for resubmitting your figure files are available below the reviewer comments at the end of this letter.

If applicable, we recommend that you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io to enhance the reproducibility of your results. Protocols.io assigns your protocol its own identifier (DOI) so that it can be cited independently in the future. For instructions see: http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submission-guidelines#loc-laboratory-protocols

We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript.

Kind regards,

Pankaj Kumar Arora

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Additional Editor Comments (if provided):

Whole manuscript should be edited for grammatical and English languages. Some examples are:

1. There are two full-stop line number 44.

2. Line 33, produced water is not scientific term. Use petroleum waste effluent or something else in whole manuscript.

3. use word " Strain before 10SBZ1A in whole manuscript.

4. Line 258- Bacterial DNA was isolated and purified.

5. Check other errors.

[Note: HTML markup is below. Please do not edit.]

[NOTE: If reviewer comments were submitted as an attachment file, they will be attached to this email and accessible via the submission site. Please log into your account, locate the manuscript record, and check for the action link "View Attachments". If this link does not appear, there are no attachment files.]

While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com/. PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Registration is free. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email PLOS at figures@plos.org. Please note that Supporting Information files do not need this step.

PLoS One. 2021 Feb 25;16(2):e0247723. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0247723.r004

Author response to Decision Letter 1


10 Feb 2021

Point by point response to the editor comments

1. There are two full-stop line number 44.

Our response: This has been removed

2. Line 33, produced water is not scientific term. Use petroleum waste effluent or something else in whole manuscript.

Our response: The term produced water is used in many publications, for instance, in Ref1 &2, the term “produced water” is even mentioned in the titles.. However, in light of the editor comments, we have mentioned that produced water is same as petroleum waste effluent (line 34 and 61), that we have replaced “produced water” by “petroleum waste effluent (PWE)” throughout the text.

3. use word " Strain before 10SBZ1A in whole manuscript.

Our response: This has been changed throughout the text, the tables and the figures

4. Line 258- Bacterial DNA was isolated and purified.

Our response: This has been done

5. Check other errors.

Our response: We have cross-checked the all text for mistakes.

END DOCUMENT

Attachment

Submitted filename: Reviewer Response.docx

Decision Letter 2

Pankaj Kumar Arora

12 Feb 2021

Degradation of benzo[a]pyrene by halophilic bacterial strain Staphylococcus haemoliticus strain 10SBZ1A

PONE-D-20-38549R2

Dear Dr. Nzila,

We’re pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been judged scientifically suitable for publication and will be formally accepted for publication once it meets all outstanding technical requirements.

Within one week, you’ll receive an e-mail detailing the required amendments. When these have been addressed, you’ll receive a formal acceptance letter and your manuscript will be scheduled for publication.

An invoice for payment will follow shortly after the formal acceptance. To ensure an efficient process, please log into Editorial Manager at http://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/, click the 'Update My Information' link at the top of the page, and double check that your user information is up-to-date. If you have any billing related questions, please contact our Author Billing department directly at authorbilling@plos.org.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please notify them about your upcoming paper to help maximize its impact. If they’ll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team as soon as possible -- no later than 48 hours after receiving the formal acceptance. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information, please contact onepress@plos.org.

Kind regards,

Pankaj Kumar Arora

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Additional Editor Comments (optional):

Reviewers' comments:

Acceptance letter

Pankaj Kumar Arora

17 Feb 2021

PONE-D-20-38549R2

Degradation of benzo[a]pyrene by halophilic bacterial strain Staphylococcus haemoliticus strain 10SBZ1A

Dear Dr. Nzila:

I'm pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been deemed suitable for publication in PLOS ONE. Congratulations! Your manuscript is now with our production department.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please let them know about your upcoming paper now to help maximize its impact. If they'll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team within the next 48 hours. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information please contact onepress@plos.org.

If we can help with anything else, please email us at plosone@plos.org.

Thank you for submitting your work to PLOS ONE and supporting open access.

Kind regards,

PLOS ONE Editorial Office Staff

on behalf of

Dr. Pankaj Kumar Arora

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Associated Data

    This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

    Supplementary Materials

    S1 Fig. Staphylococcus haemoliticus strain 10SBZ1A colony forms.

    (A), from light microscope and [B], from scanning electron microscopy (SEM).

    (TIF)

    S2 Fig. Spectra of several Benzo(a)pyrene metabolites from Staphylococcus haemoliticus strain 10SBZ1A, using liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-Mass Spec).

    (ZIP)

    S1 Data

    (XLSX)

    Attachment

    Submitted filename: Response to Reviewer_PONE-D-20-38549_.docx

    Attachment

    Submitted filename: Reviewer Response.docx

    Data Availability Statement

    All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting Information files.


    Articles from PLoS ONE are provided here courtesy of PLOS

    RESOURCES