Skip to main content
Acta Crystallographica Section B: Structural Science, Crystal Engineering and Materials logoLink to Acta Crystallographica Section B: Structural Science, Crystal Engineering and Materials
. 2021 Jan 26;77(Pt 1):131–137. doi: 10.1107/S2052520620016650

Synthesis, crystal structure and structure–property relations of strontium orthocarbonate, Sr2CO4

Dominique Laniel a,*, Jannes Binck b, Björn Winkler b, Sebastian Vogel c, Timofey Fedotenko a, Stella Chariton d, Vitali Prakapenka d, Victor Milman e, Wolfgang Schnick c, Leonid Dubrovinsky f, Natalia Dubrovinskaia a,g
PMCID: PMC7941283

A new orthocarbonate, Sr2CO4, was synthesized under extreme pressure and temperature conditions of 92 GPa and 2500 K, respectively. The crystal structure of the compound s fully characterized in situ by synchrotron single-crystal X-ray diffraction and DFT calculations were employed to provide insight into its equation of state, Raman and IR spectra, and bonding.

Keywords: orthocarbonates, crystal structure, single-crystal X-ray diffraction, high pressure, Sr2CO4

Abstract

Carbonates containing CO4 groups as building blocks have recently been discovered. A new orthocarbonate, Sr2CO4 is synthesized at 92 GPa and at a temperature of 2500 K. Its crystal structure was determined by in situ synchrotron single-crystal X-ray diffraction, selecting a grain from a polycrystalline sample. Strontium orthocarbonate crystallizes in the orthorhombic crystal system (space group Pnma) with CO4, SrO9 and SrO11 polyhedra as the main building blocks. It is isostructural to Ca2CO4. DFT calculations reproduce the experimental findings very well and have, therefore, been used to predict the equation of state, Raman and IR spectra, and to assist in the discussion of bonding in this compound.

1. Introduction  

Carbonates have been studied extensively, from the viewpoints of both geoscience and material science [see e.g. Orcutt et al. (2019) and references therein]. In nature, the most prominent representatives at ambient conditions are two polymorphs of CaCO3, namely calcite and aragonite. At ambient conditions, calcite, aragonite and dolomite account for more than 90% of the natural carbonates (Reeder, 1983). Additional geologically relevant phases are dolomite [CaMg(CO3)2], magnesite (MgCO3) and siderite (FeCO3). Numerous other carbonates have been found in nature, or have been synthesized for scientific or industrial purposes. Most carbonates are either isostructual to calcite (Inline graphic), to the related structure of dolomite (Inline graphic) or to orthorhombic aragonite (Pmcn). Carbonates with large cations (cation radius > 1 Å) tend to crystallize in the orthorhombic aragonite structure type [e.g. cerussite (PbCO3), witherite (BaCO3) and strontianite (SrCO3)], while most carbonates with smaller cations tend to crystallize in the calcite or dolomite structure type {e.g. magnesite (MgCO3), dolomite [CaMg(CO3)2], siderite (FeCO3), rhodochrosite (MnCO3), otavite (CdCO3) and smithsonite (ZnCO3) [Liu & Lin (1997)]}. However there are exceptions as, for example, alkali metals form monoclinic structures [e.g. Li2CO3 (C2/c), K2CO3 (C2/c) and Na2CO3 (C2/m)]. In the last few years, a plethora of new carbonate phases have been discovered in high-pressure studies and complex phase diagrams have been established [e.g. CaCO3 has at least 13 polymorphs from ambient conditions to 140 GPa and 2500 K (Ono et al., 2007; Ishizawa et al., 2013; Lobanov et al., 2017; Gavryushkin et al., 2017; Bayarjargal et al., 2018)]. However, until recently, it was thought that nearly planar CO3 groups [see Winkler et al. (2000) and references cited therein for a discussion on the planarity] were the defining feature of carbonates.

A remarkable discovery and a significant extension to our crystal chemical knowledge was, therefore, the synthesis and structural characterization of carbonates, in which sp 3 hybridization leads to the formation of COInline graphic tetrahedra instead of the usual triangular sp 2-hybridized Inline graphic groups. The first reports of the synthesis of such novel carbonates were based on synchrotron powder X-ray diffraction and in situ infrared spectroscopy using either magnesite (MgCO3) or ferromagnesite (Mg0.25Fe0.75CO3) as starting compositions (Boulard et al., 2011, 2015). The unequivocal experimental confirmation of carbonates with CO4 groups came with the utilization of single-crystal X-ray diffraction studies, where the structures of Mg2FeInline graphicC4O13-C2/c (Merlini et al., 2015), CaMg0.6Fe0.4C2O6-Pnma (Merlini et al., 2017), Mg2.53Fe0.47C3O9-C2/m (Chariton et al., 2020), FeInline graphicC3O12-R3c and FeInline graphicFeInline graphicC4O13-C2/c (Cerantola et al., 2017) were solved. More recently, Chariton (2020) has solved the crystal structures of MnC2O5-Inline graphic and Mn4C4O13-C2/c. A combination of theoretical structure predictions and Raman spectroscopy data was used to demonstrate the formation of sp 3-hybridized CaCO3 (Lobanov et al., 2017) and MgCO3 (Binck et al., 2020). In analogy to silicates, the CO4 tetrahedra may be isolated or connected to other tetrahedra by corner-sharing one or more oxygen atoms, thus forming rings, chains or pyramid-like clusters. Irrespective of the chemical composition, synthesis conditions for carbonates containing CO4 groups were at extreme conditions with P > 70 GPa and T > 2000 K. More recently, however, DFT calculations predicted that calcium orthocarbonate, Ca2CO4, may be formed at moderate pressures (Sagatova et al., 2020). Subsequently, this prediction was verified experimentally (Laniel, 2020; Binck et al., 2021) and it was found that Ca2CO4 can be formed at pressures ranging from ∼20–90 GPa.

It now seems plausible that carbonates containing CO4 groups can be formed with all elements for which conventional carbonates have been obtained. This would open a whole new field of crystal chemical studies, especially if it could be understood how to influence the polymerization of the tetrahedra. The present investigation supports the hypothesis of the chemical variability of carbonates with sp 3-hybridized carbon by demonstrating the formation of strontium orthocarbonate, Sr2CO4.

2. Experimental  

2.1. Synthesis and X-ray diffraction in the laser-heated diamond anvil cell  

High-pressure single-crystal X-ray diffraction experiments in a laser-heated diamond anvil cell (LH-DAC) were conducted at the P02.2 beamline at PETRA III (DESY, Hamburg, Germany). Strontium azide [Sr(N3)2] and strontium carbonate (SrCO3) were loaded in a BX90 diamond anvil cell (DAC) equipped with diamond anvils with 120 µm culets. The chemical precursors were prepared according to Vogel & Schnick (2018). Molecular nitrogen (N2) was employed as the pressure-transmitting medium. The in situ sample pressure was determined using the known equation of state of gold, also loaded in the sample cavity in the form of micrograins (Dewaele et al., 2008). The sample was compressed to 92 GPa and laser heated to a temperature of 2500 K. Measuring the thermal radiation produced by the sample enabled the accurate determination of its temperature (Fedotenko et al., 2019). Under these conditions, strontium carbonate reacted to produce strontium orthocarbonate (Sr2CO4). The produced compound was allowed to cool down to 293 K, temperature at which it was probed by X-ray diffraction. The formation of SrxNy compounds was also observed and will be described in an upcoming publication.

The diamond anvil cell, necessary to generate high pressures, imposes additional constraints in order to obtain high-quality single-crystal data. The high energy (λ = 0.29521 Å), small beam size (2 µm × 2 µm) and high flux of the employed P02.2 beamline of PETRAIII allow the tiny single-crystals (< 1 µm3) to be measured despite the intensity loss due to the scattering of the two 4 mm-thick diamond anvils. Also, the BX90 DAC used here (Kantor et al., 2012) was specifically designed to maximize the angular range at which data could be collected while having sufficient mechanical stability to allow even multi-megabar pressures to be reached. It has an effective X-ray opening of −38° to +38° much larger than most DAC designs. For the vast majority of crystal structures, including that of Sr2CO4, this opening angle in combination with the high-energy X-ray wavelength allows a sufficient coverage of reciprocal space that permits an unambiguous structural solution. Still, it must be noted that the metallic body of the BX90 blocks more than 60% of all reflections, which explains the lower reflection count and 2θ range compared to ambient conditions single-crystal X-ray diffraction datasets.

In the experiments performed here, still images were recorded on a 7 × 7 grid at the center of the sample after laser heating. With this strategy, the position of the Sr2CO4 single crystal was found. A single-crystal X-ray diffraction data collection was achieved by rotating the DAC in step scans of 0.5° from −38° to +38° around the vertical axis. At each angular step, a diffraction pattern was collected with an acquisition time of 1 s.

For the data analysis, the CrysAlis Pro software (Rigaku, 2014) was utilized. The analysis procedure includes the peak search, the removal of the diamond anvil’s parasitic reflections and saturated pixels of the detector, finding reflections belonging to a unique single crystal, the unit-cell determination and the data integration. The crystal structures were then solved with the SHELXT (Sheldrick, 2008) structure solution program using intrinsic phasing and refined within the JANA2006 software (Petříček et al., 2014). The procedure for DAC single-crystal X-ray diffraction data acquisition and analysis was previously demonstrated and successfully employed (Bykova, 2015; Laniel et al., 2019; Laniel, Winkler, Bykova et al., 2020; Laniel, Winkler, Fedotenko et al., 2020).

2.2. Refinement  

Crystal data, data collection details and structure refinement details are summarized in Table 1. As these measurements were performed in a DAC, the angular range over which single-crystal data is available is limited. For this reason, the data resolution was insufficient to anisotropically refine the atomic displacement parameters (ADP) of all atoms. Hence, anisotropic displacement parameters were refined only for the strontium atoms, while for the oxygen and carbon atoms the refinement was restricted to isotropic ADP. Due to the synthesis method of Sr2CO4, nitrogen may have been incorporated into the crystal structure. However, as no significant residual electronic density at chemically relevant distances remains in the crystal, the incorporation of nitrogen is implausible. Moreover, we tested for an unlikely substitution of either carbon or oxygen with nitrogen. An increase in R-factors was observed when performing the substitution of CInline graphicN (ΔR1 = 0.034) or OInline graphicN (ΔR1 = 0.013 to 0.033, depending on the substituted O atom). Therefore is no indication of the presence of nitrogen in the crystal structure.

Table 1. Crystal data on the Sr2CO4 compound for single-crystal X-ray diffraction measurements performed at 92 GPa.

Crystal data
Chemical formula Sr2CO4
M r 251.2
Crystal system, space group Orthorhombic, Pnma
Temperature (K) 293
a exp, b exp, c exp (Å) 6.214 (12), 4.6353 (14), 8.083 (2)
a DFT, b DFT, c DFT (Å) 6.2223, 4.6497, 8.687
V exp3) 232.8 (5)
V DFT3) 233.4
Z 4
Radiation type, wavelength (Å) Synchrotron, 0.29521
μ (mm−1) 4.31
Crystal size (mm) 0.001 × 0.001 × 0.001
 
Data collection
Diffractometer Esperanto-CrysAlis PRO-abstract goniometer imported esperanto images on P02.2 at PETRA III
Absorption correction Multi-scan (CrysAlis PRO). Empirical absorption correction using spherical harmonics, implemented in SCALE3 ABSPACK scaling algorithm.
T min, T max 0.339, 1
No. of measured, independent and observed [I > 3σ(I)] reflections 676, 230, 170
R int 0.054
(sin θ/λ)max−1) 0.887
 
Refinement
R[F 2 > 2σ(F 2)], wR(F 2), S 0.045, 0.051, 2.48
No. of reflections 230
No. of parameters 26
Δρmax, Δρmin (e Å−3) 2.23, −1.55

Computer programs: CrysAlis PRO 1.171.40.55a (Rigaku Oxford Diffraction, 2019).

2.3. Density functional theory-based calculations  

Density functional theory (DFT) calculations have been performed using the CASTEP code (Clark et al., 2005). The code is an implementation of Kohn–Sham DFT based on a plane wave basis set in conjunction with pseudopotentials. The plane wave basis set allows numerically converged results in a straightforward manner to be achieved, as the convergence is controlled by a single adjustable parameter, the plane wave cut-off, which was set to 1020 eV. The norm-conserving pseudopotentials were generated on the fly from the information provided in the CASTEP data base. These pseudopotentials have been tested extensively for accuracy and transferability (Lejaeghere et al., 2016). All calculations employed the GGA-PBE exchange-correlation functional (Perdew et al., 1996). The Brillouin zone integrals were performed using Monkhorst–Pack grids (Monkhorst & Pack, 1976) with spacings between grid points of less than 0.037 Å−1. Geometry optimizations were defined as being converged when the energy change between iterations was < 0.5 × 10−6 eV per atom, the maximal residual force was < 0.01 eV Å−1, and the maximal residual stress was <0.02 GPa. Phonon frequencies were obtained from density functional perturbation theory (DFPT) calculations. Raman intensities were computed using DFPT in the 2n + 1 theorem approach (Miwa, 2011).

3. Results and discussion  

3.1. Experimental crystal structure of Sr2CO4 at 92 GPa  

Strontium orthocarbonate, Sr2CO4 crystallizes in the orthorhombic crystal system with space-group symmetry Pnma. At 92 GPa, the unit-cell parameters were determined to be a = 6.214 (12), b = 4.6353 (14) and c = 8.083 (2) Å [V = 232.8 (5) Å3]. The crystal structure is shown in Fig. 1 and Table 1 contains selected crystal data. Eight distinct atoms compose the structure with all, except one oxygen atom (O1), occupying the 4c special Wyckoff position which lies on the a c mirror plane with b = Inline graphic and Inline graphic. The O1 oxygen atom rests on the 8d general position. The atomic arrangement gives rise to three types of coordination polyhedra: CO4, SrO9 and SrO11. At 92 GPa, the CO4 tetrahedra share corners, edges and faces with the SrO11 polyhedra, but only share corners and edges with the SrO9 polyhedra. The SrO9 and SrO11 polyhedra are connected to each other via their faces. While the SrO9 polyhedra are of irregular shape, the SrO11 polyhedra form pentacapped trigonal prisms. The COInline graphic group has four C—O bonds with lengths of 1.31 (5), 1.37 (2), 1.37 (2) and 1.38 (3) Å, and bond angles that vary between 103.2 (18) and 120 (3)°. These values are consistent with those previously reported for carbonates with sp 0-hybridized carbon (Chariton et al., 2020; Binck et al., 2021). The SrO9 and SrO11 polyhedra have an average Sr—O distance of 2.42 (2) and 2.27 (1) Å, respectively, with a minimum and maximum contact length of 2.203 (13) and 2.495 (11) Å, respectively.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

(a) Crystal structure of the Sr2CO4 orthocarbonate at 92 GPa. (b) Viewed along the a axis, when the atoms lying on the a c mirror plane (b = Inline graphic and Inline graphic) are clearly visible. (c) Polyhedral representation of Sr2CO4. (d) The three building blocks of Sr2CO4, namely: CO4, SrO11 and SrO9 (top to bottom).

3.2. DFT calculations  

At 92 GPa, the pressure at which Sr2CO4 was synthesized here, the experimentally derived structural model is well reproduced by DFT calculations (Table 1). The satisfactory reproduction of the experimentally determined structural parameters by DFT model calculations allows us to confidently predict properties and to investigate structure–property relations.

3.2.1. Bonding in orthocarbonates  

A Mulliken population analysis shows that the three symmetrically independent C—O bonds are very similar: at 1 bar (1 bar = 105 Pa) the bond population decreases slightly from 0.7 e Å−3 for the shortest bond to 0.6 e Å−3 for the longest bond. A plot of the electron density difference confirms this. In such a plot (Fig. 2), the difference between the self-consistent electron density and the density obtained by overlapping the electron density of non-interacting atoms is shown.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Isosurface of the electron density difference. The isosurface is plotted for a value of 0.2 e Å−3 and shows those regions in which the electron density, after reaching self-consistency, is larger than the electron density obtained by overlapping electron densities of non-interacting atoms. Clearly, there is charge accumulation halfway along each of the four C—O vectors, which is indicative of the formation of covalent bonds.

Clearly, in the CO4 group there are four very similar covalent C—O bonds. It is instructive to compare the CO4 groups to those of SiO4 groups in an isostructural Sr2SiO4 silicate. The C—O bonds are, as expected, shorter (≃1.4 Å compared to 1.63 Å for the Si—O bond in the silicate) but the bond populations are very similar (≃0.65 e Å−3) in both compounds. Another notable difference is the Mulliken charge of Si4+ to C4+, where the former is 1.6 e and the latter is only 0.55 e. The Mulliken charge of Sr2+ is, in both compounds, ≃1.5 e, and consequently the Mulliken charge of the O2− is notably less in Sr2CO4 (−0.9 e) than in isostructural Sr2SiO4, where it is −1.16 e. So, while there are some crystal chemical similarities, the formation of solid solutions in which SiO4 groups are substituted by CO4 groups is unlikely, especially as the volume of the former is about twice that of the latter (Milman et al., 2001).

3.2.2. Compression of orthocarbonates  

Fig. 3 shows the fit of a third-order Birch–Murnaghan equation of state (Birch, 1947) to the Sr2CO4 PV data. From this, a bulk modulus of K 0 = 99.7 (7) GPa was obtained, with a pressure derivative of K 0′ = 4.39 (2) and an ambient-pressure volume of V 0 = 344.4 (2) Å3. In a similar fashion, the change of volume with pressure for the three building blocks of Sr2CO4, namely CO4, SrO9 and SrO11, were calculated and are shown in Fig. 4. As expected from its four rigid C—O single bonds, the CO4 tetrahedron is found to be very incompressible [K 0 = 355 (5) GPa], while the SrO9 and SrO11 display a much lower value of K 0 = 92 (1) GPa and K 0 = 99 (1) GPa, respectively.

Figure 3.

Figure 3

(a) Pressure–volume data of Sr2CO4 (this study) and Ca2CO4 (Binck et al., 2021) between 1 bar and 100 GPa. The data is fitted with a third-order Birch–Murnaghan equation of state yielding K 0 = 99.7 (7) GPa, K 0′ = 4.39 (2) and V 0 = 344.4 (2) Å3. (b) Evolution of the unit-cell parameters of Sr2CO4. The red, green and blue symbols refer to the a, b and c unit-cell parameters, respectively.

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Pressure–volume evolution of the three building blocks of Sr2CO4: CO4 (a), SrO9 (b) and SrO11 (c). As expected from its short and rigid C—O single bonds the CO4 tetrahedron is found to be very incompressible.

Strontium orthocarbonate, Sr2CO4 is isostructural to calcium orthocarbonate, Ca2CO4 (Sagatova et al., 2020; Laniel, 2020; Binck et al., 2021). The comparison of the unit-cell parameters of Ca2CO4 and Sr2CO4 shows the expected influence of the cation substitution as the unit-cell volume increases by about 14% when Ca2+ is substituted by Sr2+ at ambient pressure. At 100 GPa, the difference between the unit-cell volume is similar (12%).

The isothermal bulk modulus of Ca2CO4 [K 0 = 108 (1) GPa] is 8% larger than that of Sr2CO4 [K 0 = 99.7 (7) GPa] (Fig. 3). This is similar to the relation of the compressibility of aragonite [K 0 = 69 (1) GPa] and strontianite [K 0 = 62 (1) GPa]. The CO4 tetrahedra in both Sr2CO4 and Ca2CO4 are very incompressible [for Sr2CO4: K 0 (CO4) = 355 (5) GPa, for Ca2CO4: K 0 (CO4) = 360 (38) GPa], even compared to SiO4 tetrahedra [K 0 (SiO4) = ∼300 GPa] (Binck et al., 2020).

3.2.3. Lattice dynamics of orthocarbonates  

It is very well established that DFPT calculations can reliably predict Raman spectra once the underlying structural model is established. For CaCO3 and MgCO3 polymorphs this has been demonstrated by Bayarjargal et al. (2018) and Binck et al. (2020), respectively. Raman spectra for SrCO3 polymorphs have been published by Biedermann et al. (2017). No Raman spectra of Sr2CO4 have been obtained yet, but high-quality data are available for isostructural Ca2CO4 (Binck et al., 2021).

The group theoretical analysis for Sr2CO4 is the same as for Ca2CO4. Both crystallize in the centrosymmetric space group Pnma, so the Raman active modes cannot be IR active and vice versa. The unit cells of these compounds contain n = 28 atoms each. Of the 3n = 84 modes, 42 are Raman active. Three of the 34 IR-active modes are acoustic phonons and cannot be measured. A group theoretical analysis gives ΓRaman = 13Ag + 8B1g + 13B2g + 8B3g and ΓIR = 12B1u + 7B2u + 12B3u (acoustic modes not included). In Fig. 5(a), we compare the predicted Raman spectrum of Sr2CO4 to experimental and DFT data for Ca2CO4 at 20 GPa.

Figure 5.

Figure 5

(a) Comparison of a DFT-calculated Raman spectrum of Sr2CO4 (purple, this study), to DFT-calculated (green) and experimental (red) Raman spectra of Ca2CO4 at ∼20 GPa as obtained by Binck et al. (2021). (b) DFT-calculated Raman spectra of Sr2CO4 at different pressures. The shift of Raman modes towards higher frequencies implies positive Grüneisen parameters for all modes. All DFT-calculated Raman spectra have their x axis (Raman shift) multiplied by a scaling factor of 4%.

As expected, the Raman spectra of Sr2CO4 and Ca2CO4 [Figs. 5(a) and 5(b)] are very similar. We use the DFT data to identify the dominant atomic displacements in the characteristic vibrations. Typical displacement patterns are shown in Fig. 6.

Figure 6.

Figure 6

Displacement patterns in typical Raman modes of Sr2CO4 at 20 GPa. Arrows indicate the displacement of the atoms during the specific vibration. Low-frequency modes [e.g. (a)] are dominated by relative motions of the CO4 groups against the Sr ions. Intermediate frequencies [e.g. (b)] are mainly due to displacements/rotations of the CO4 groups, while the Sr ions are at rest. Raman shifts > 500 cm−1 [(c), (d) and (e)] are due to various bending and stretching vibrations in the CO4 groups, while the Sr ions are at rest.

As the phonons with wavenumbers > 500 cm−1 are dominated by modes in which only the CO4 groups are deformed, the Raman shifts of Sr2CO4 and Ca2CO4 are very similar in that region. Only at lower frequencies are the Raman shifts in Sr2CO4 red-shifted with respect to those in Ca2CO4 due to higher mass of Sr2+ with respect to Ca2+. The predicted pressure dependence of the Raman spectra is shown in Fig. 5, which can now be used to identify Sr2CO4 and carbonates containing CO4 groups in high-pressure experiments.

4. Conclusion  

The present study has expanded our knowledge of carbonates containing CO4 groups by adding Sr2CO4 to this family of compounds. The crystal structure of strontium orthocarbonate, Sr2CO4, was unambiguously determined using single-crystal X-ray powder diffraction measurements. It was found to be isostructural to another orthocarbonate, Ca2CO4. The present study has shown yet another way on how to synthesize carbonates with sp 3-hybridized carbon by a more complex chemical reaction than has been employed in earlier studies. We have used the example of Sr2CO4 to discuss the bonding in this fascinating class of compounds and have identified characteristic features in the lattice dynamics, thus, facilitating the identification of sp 3-carbon in carbonates by Raman spectroscopy. The pressure stability range of Sr2CO4 and the conditions under which it can be formed have not been explored yet. Such experiments are currently underway.

Supplementary Material

CCDC reference: 2052128

Acknowledgments

The authors acknowledge the Deutsches Elektronen-Synchrotron (DESY, PETRA III) and the Advance Photon Source (APS) for provision of beamtime at the P02.2 and 13-IDD beamlines, respectively. Open access funding enabled and organized by Projekt DEAL.

Funding Statement

This work was funded by Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung grant 05K19WC1 to Natalia Dubrovinskaia and Leonid Dubrovinsky. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft grants DU 954-11/1, DU 393-9/2, DU 393-13/1, FOR2125, and WI1232. Swedish Government Strategic Research Area in Materials Science on Functional Materials at Link oping University grant 2009 00971 to Natalia Dubrovinskaia.

References

  1. Bayarjargal, L., Fruhner, C.-J., Schrodt, N. & Winkler, B. (2018). Phys. Earth Planet. Interiors, 281, 31–45.
  2. Biedermann, N., Speziale, S., Winkler, B., Reichmann, H. J., Koch-Müller, M. & Heide, G. (2017). Phys. Chem. Min. 44, 335–343.
  3. Binck, J., Bayarjargal, L., Lobanov, S. S., Morgenroth, W., Luchitskaia, R., Pickard, C. J., Milman, V., Refson, K., Jochym, D. B., Byrne, P. & Winkler, B. (2020). Phys. Rev. Mater. 4, 055001.
  4. Binck, J., Laniel, D., Bayarjargal, L., Khandarkhaeva, S., Fedotenko, T., Aslandukov, A., Glazyrin, K., Milman, V., Chariton, S., Prakapenka, V. B., Dubrovinskaia, N., Dubrovinsky, L. & Winkler, B. (2021). Am. Mineral. Submitted.
  5. Birch, F. (1947). Phys. Rev. 71, 809.
  6. Boulard, E., Gloter, A., Corgne, A., Antonangeli, D., Auzende, A.-L., Perrillat, J.-P., Guyot, F. & Fiquet, G. (2011). Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. 108, 5184–5187. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  7. Boulard, E., Pan, D., Galli, G., Liu, Z. & Mao, W. L. (2015). Nature Commun. 6, 6311. [DOI] [PubMed]
  8. Bykova, E. (2015). PhD thesis, University of Bayreuth, Germany.
  9. Cerantola, V., Bykova, E., Kupenko, I., Merlini, M., Ismailova, L., McCammon, C., Bykov, M., Chumakov, A. I., Petitgirard, S., Kantor, I., Svitlyk, V., Jacobs, J., Hanfland, M., Mezouar, M., Prescher, C., Rüffer, R., Prakapenka, V. B. & Dubrovinsky, L. (2017). Nature Commun. 8, 15960. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  10. Chariton, S. (2020). PhD thesis, University of Bayreuth, Germany.
  11. Chariton, S., Bykov, M., Bykova, E., Koemets, E., Fedotenko, T., Winkler, B., Hanfland, M., Prakapenka, V. B., Greenberg, E., McCammon, C. & Dubrovinsky, L. (2020). Acta Cryst. E76, 715–719. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  12. Clark, S. J., Segall, M. D., Pickard, C. J., Hasnip, P. J., Probert, M. I. J., Refson, K. & Payne, M. C. (2005). Z. Kristallogr. Cryst. Mater. 220, 567–570.
  13. Dewaele, A., Torrent, M., Loubeyre, P. & Mezouar, M. (2008). Phys. Rev. B, 78, 104102.
  14. Fedotenko, T., Dubrovinsky, L., Aprilis, G., Koemets, E., Snigirev, A., Snigireva, I., Barannikov, A., Ershov, P., Cova, F., Hanfland, M. & Dubrovinskaia, N. (2019). Rev. Sci. Instrum. 90, 104501.
  15. Gavryushkin, P. N., Martirosyan, N. S., Inerbaev, T. M., Popov, Z. I., Rashchenko, S. V., Likhacheva, A. Y., Lobanov, S. S., Goncharov, A. F., Prakapenka, V. B. & Litasov, K. D. (2017). Cryst. Growth Des. 17, 6291–6296.
  16. Ishizawa, N., Setoguchi, H. & Yanagisawa, K. (2013). Sci. Rep. 3, 2832. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  17. Kantor, I., Prakapenka, V., Kantor, A., Dera, P., Kurnosov, A., Sinogeikin, S., Dubrovinskaia, N. & Dubrovinsky, L. (2012). Rev. Sci. Instrum. 83, 125102. [DOI] [PubMed]
  18. Laniel, D. (2020). CCDC/Fiz Karlsruhe Communication. doi: 10.5517/ccdc.csd.cc2617bv.
  19. Laniel, D., Bykov, M., Fedotenko, T., Ponomareva, A. V., Abrikosov, I. A., Glazyrin, K., Svitlyk, V., Dubrovinsky, L. & Dubrovinskaia, N. (2019). Inorg. Chem. 58, 9195–9204. [DOI] [PubMed]
  20. Laniel, D., Winkler, B., Bykova, E., Fedotenko, T., Chariton, S., Milman, V., Bykov, M., Prakapenka, V., Dubrovinsky, L. & Dubrovinskaia, N. (2020). Phys. Rev. B, 102, 134109. [DOI] [PubMed]
  21. Laniel, D., Winkler, B., Fedotenko, T., Pakhomova, A., Chariton, S., Milman, V., Prakapenka, V., Dubrovinsky, L. & Dubrovinskaia, N. (2020). Phys. Rev. Lett. 124, 216001. [DOI] [PubMed]
  22. Lejaeghere, K. et al. (2016). Science, 351, aad3000. [DOI] [PubMed]
  23. Liu, L.-G. & Lin, C.-C. (1997). Am. Mineral. 82, 643–646.
  24. Lobanov, S. S., Dong, X., Martirosyan, N. S., Samtsevich, A. I., Stevanovic, V., Gavryushkin, P. N., Litasov, K. D., Greenberg, E., Prakapenka, V. B., Oganov, A. R. & Goncharov, A. F. (2017). Phys. Rev. B, 96, 104101.
  25. Merlini, M., Cerantola, V., Gatta, G. D., Gemmi, M., Hanfland, M., Kupenko, I., Lotti, P., Müller, H. & Zhang, L. (2017). Am. Mineral. 102, 1763–1766.
  26. Merlini, M., Hanfland, M., Salamat, A., Petitgirard, S. & Müller, H. (2015). Am. Mineral. 100, 2001–2004.
  27. Milman, V., Akhmatskaya, E. V., Nobes, R. H., Winkler, B., Pickard, C. J. & White, J. A. (2001). Acta Cryst. B57, 163–177. [DOI] [PubMed]
  28. Miwa, K. (2011). Phys. Rev. B, 84, 094304.
  29. Monkhorst, H. J. & Pack, J. D. (1976). Phys. Rev. B, 13, 5188.
  30. Ono, S., Kikegawa, T. & Ohishi, Y. (2007). Am. Mineral. 92, 1246–1249.
  31. Orcutt, B. N., Daniel, I. & Dasgupta, R. (2019). Deep Carbon: Past to Present. Cambridge University Press.
  32. Perdew, J. P., Burke, K. & Ernzerhof, M. (1996). Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 3865. [DOI] [PubMed]
  33. Petříček, V., Dušek, M. & Palatinus, L. (2014). Z. Kristallogr. Cryst. Mater. 229, 345–352.
  34. Reeder, R. J. (1983). Editor. Carbonates: Mineralogy and Chemistry. Berlin, Boston: De Gruyter.
  35. Rigaku (2015). CrysAlisPRO. Rigaku Oxford Diffraction, Yarnton, England.
  36. Sagatova, D., Shatskiy, A., Sagatov, N., Gavryushkin, P. N. & Litasov, K. D. (2020). Lithos, 370, 105637.
  37. Sheldrick, G. M. (2008). Acta Cryst, A64, 112–122. [DOI] [PubMed]
  38. Vogel, S. & Schnick, W. (2018). Chem. Eur. J. 24, 14275–14281. [DOI] [PubMed]
  39. Winkler, B., Zemann, J. & Milman, V. (2000). Acta Cryst. B56, 648–653. [DOI] [PubMed]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

CCDC reference: 2052128


Articles from Acta Crystallographica Section B, Structural Science, Crystal Engineering and Materials are provided here courtesy of International Union of Crystallography

RESOURCES